Functional microdomains in G-protein-coupled receptors. The conserved arginine-cage motif in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor

Charged residues of the conserved DRY triplet of the vasopressin V1a receptor provide molecular determinants for cell surface delivery and internalization

The highly conserved "Asp-Arg-Tyr" triplet in the distal region of the third transmembrane region of most G-protein-coupled receptors is implicated in their activation process and mediation of G-protein signaling. The aim of this study was to determine whether specific features at this locus are important for the vasopressin V(1a) receptor (V(1a)R) by performing site-directed mutagenesis. In transfected HEK 293T cells, mutation of Asp (D148A) resulted in a misfolded receptor that was nonfunctional, localized intracellularly, and not constitutively active. Nonconservative (D148R) substitution was not expressed, whereas asparagine (D148N) partially restored cell surface expression, although no specific ligand-binding or inositol phosphate signaling was detected. In contrast, conservative (D148E) substitution was expressed moderately higher, bound ligands, and signaled similarly to a hemagglutinin epitope-tagged wild-type receptor. However, D148E showed a greater tendency to be internalized once it was delivered to the membrane. Individual replacements of the conserved arginine and tyrosine (R149A, Y150A) led to decreased signal transduction without affecting surface expression, agonist affinity, or internalization or increasing basal signaling activity. Incorporation of aspartate (R149D) or reversal of charges (D148R/R149D) were nonfunctional, localized intracellularly, and indicated the absence of an ionic interaction between Asp-148 and Arg-149. It is noteworthy that an important role of arginine was identified for regulating agonist-mediated internalization when a histidine (R149H) was present. This mutant was expressed on the cell surface but was rapidly internalized after agonist treatment. This study highlights the importance of specific charged residues within this motif that provide important determinants for cell surface delivery, internalization and for normal V(1a)R function.

A transmembrane phospholipase D in Phytophthora; a novel PLD subfamily

Phospholipase D (PLD) is a ubiquitous enzyme in eukaryotes that participates in various cellular processes. Its catalytic domain is characterized by two HKD motifs in the C-terminal part. Until now, two subfamilies were recognized based on their N-terminal domain structure. The first has a PX domain in combination with a PH domain and is designated as PXPH-PLD. Members of the second subfamily, named C2-PLD, have a C2 domain and have, so far, only been found in plants. Here we describe a novel PLD subfamily that we identified in Phytophthora, a genus belonging to the class oomycetes and comprising many important plant pathogens. We cloned Pipld1 from Phytophthora infestans and retrieved full-length sequences of its homologues from Phytophthora sojae and Phytophthora ramorum genome databases. Their promoters contain two putative regulatory elements, one of which is highly conserved in all three genes. The three Phytophthora pld1 genes encode nearly identical proteins of around 1807 amino acids, with the two characteristic HKD motifs in the C-terminal part. Homology of the predicted proteins with known PLDs however is restricted to the two catalytic HKD motifs and adjacent domains. In the N-terminal part Phytophthora PLD1 has a PX-like domain, but it lacks a PH domain. Instead the N-terminal region contains five putative membrane spanning domains suggesting that Phytophthora PLD1 is a transmembrane protein. Since Phytophthora PLD1 cannot be categorized in one of the two existing subfamilies we propose to create a novel subfamily named PXTM-PLD.

A GPCR that is not "DRY"

The conserved "DRY" motif (Asp-Arg-Tyr) at the cytosolic surface of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors has been the subject of much work attempting to understand the mechanisms of receptor activation and interaction with G proteins. Both the acidic (Asp) and basic (Arg) residues of this motif are important for isomerization of receptors between inactive and activated conformations. In this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Rosenkilde et al. (pp. 11-19) show that a novel wild-type receptor, ORF74-EHV2, which lacks the Arg residue, is fully functional, showing both constitutive and ligand-induced activation of G protein signaling. Reintroducing the DRY motif by mutagenesis decreased constitutive activity while retaining ligand-inducible function. This work shows that the conserved Arg side chain is not required for receptor function, but it is important for stabilizing receptors in the inactive conformation.

Mutation of the DRY motif reveals different structural requirements for the CC chemokine receptor 5-mediated signaling and receptor endocytosis

CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is a G protein-coupled receptor that governs migration of leukocytes and serves as a coreceptor for the R5 tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). CCR5-mediated signaling in response to CC chemokines relies on G protein activation. Desensitization, which rapidly turns off G protein-dependent signaling, involves phosphorylation of CCR5 that promotes interaction of the receptor with beta-arrestins for endocytosis. Whether coupling to G proteins, desensitization, and endocytosis of CCR5 require the same structural determinants remains a matter of investigation. Here, we show that CCR5 displayed agonist-independent coupling to G proteins. This constitutive activity of the receptor was abrogated by TAK779 (N,N-dimethyl-N-[4-[[[2-(4-methylphenyl)-6,7-dihydro-5H-benzocyclohepten-8-yl]carbonyl]amino]benzyl]tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-aminium chloride), a nonpeptidic CCR5 ligand that inhibits HIV infection and was found to depend on the integrity of the Asp-Arg-Tyr (DRY) motif. Changing Arg-126 by the neutral residue Asn (R126N-CCR5 mutant) abolished CCR5-mediated activation of G proteins, either constitutively or in response to agonists. In contrast, R126N-CCR5 not only retained agonist-promoted phosphorylation and beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis but also displayed a higher basal phosphorylation than wild-type CCR5. Expression of beta-arrestin in R126N-CCR5-expressing cells resulted in receptor down-regulation, thereby suggesting that R126N-CCR5 spontaneously interacts with beta-arrestins. However, although expression of beta-arrestin favored wild-type CCR5-mediated chemotaxis, it failed to promote migration of cells expressing R126N-CCR5. Overall, these data indicate that structural requirements for CCR5-mediated activation of G proteins, albeit not involved in receptor desensitization and internalization, are needed for beta-arrestin-mediated chemotaxis. These results have implications for how distinct biological responses of CCR5 might rely on a different set of receptor conformations.

Dopamine receptor microdomains involved in molecular recognition and the regulation of drug affinity and function

A cationic protonatable amine moiety on dopaminergic ligands forms a high affinity reinforced ionic bond with an anionic aspartic acid at position 3.32 of dopamine receptors. When present, catechol hydroxyls of the ligands form hydrogen bonds with serines at position 5.42, 5.43, and 5.46, and this network of hydrogen bonds serves to orient ligands in the binding-site crevice and increase their binding affinity. A steric clash between aromatic moieties of the ligands and aromatic amino acids of the receptor (e.g., H6.55, F6.52 or F6.51 and W6.48) is likely to be propagated in domino-like fashion along the length of TM6, which is believed to trigger activation of the receptor. Specifically, it is the change in the conformation of W6.48 from an orientation perpendicular to the plane of the lipid membrane to one that is parallel that is believed to result in activation. Molecular determinants that mediate the D4/D2-selectivity of many extremely D4-selective 1,4-DAP ligands, include a nonconserved cluster of bulky amino acids at the TM2/TM3 interface (positions 2.61, 3.28 and 3.29).

An activation switch in the rhodopsin family of G protein-coupled receptors: the thyrotropin receptor

We aimed at understanding molecular events involved in the activation of a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, the thyrotropin receptor. We have focused on the transmembrane region and in particular on a network of polar interactions between highly conserved residues. Using molecular dynamics simulations and site-directed mutagenesis techniques we have identified residue Asn-7.49, of the NPxxY motif of TM 7, as a molecular switch in the mechanism of thyrotropin receptor (TSHr) activation. Asn-7.49 appears to adopt two different conformations in the inactive and active states. These two states are characterized by specific interactions between this Asn and polar residues in the transmembrane domain. The inactive gauche+ conformation is maintained by interactions with residues Thr-6.43 and Asp-6.44. Mutation of these residues into Ala increases the constitutive activity of the receptor by factors of approximately 14 and approximately 10 relative to wild type TSHr, respectively. Upon receptor activation Asn-7.49 adopts the trans conformation to interact with Asp-2.50 and a putatively charged residue that remains to be identified. In addition, the conserved Leu-2.46 of the (N/S)LxxxD motif also plays a significant role in restraining the receptor in the inactive state because the L2.46A mutation increases constitutive activity by a factor of approximately 13 relative to wild type TSHr. As residues Leu-2.46, Asp-2.50, and Asn-7.49 are strongly conserved, this molecular mechanism of TSHr activation can be extended to other members of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors.

Modeled structure of a G-protein-coupled receptor: the cholecystokinin-1 receptor

The Cholecystokinin-1 receptor (CCK1R) mediates actions of CCK in areas of the central nervous system and of the gut. It is a potential target to treat a number of diseases. As for all G-protein-coupled receptors, docking of ligands into modeled CCK1R binding site should greatly help to understand intrinsic mechanisms of activation. Here, we describe the procedure we used to progressively build a structural model for the CCK1R, to integrated, and on the basis of site-directed mutagenesis data on its binding site. Reliability of the CCK1R model was confirmed by interaction networks that involved conserved and functionally crucial motifs in G-protein-coupled receptors, such as Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr and Asn-Pro-Xaa-Xaa-Tyr motifs. In addition, the 3-D structure of CCK1R-bound CCK resembled that determined by NMR in a lipid environment. The derived computational model was also used for revealing binding modes of several nonpeptide ligands and for rationalizing ligand structure-activity relationships known from experiments. Our findings indeed support that our "validated CCK1R model" could be used to study the intrinsic mechanism of CCK1R activation and design new ligands.

Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function

The superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) could be subclassified into 7 families (A, B, large N-terminal family B-7 transmembrane helix, C, Frizzled/Smoothened, taste 2, and vomeronasal 1 receptors) among mammalian species. Cloning and functional studies of GPCRs have revealed that the superfamily of GPCRs comprises receptors for chemically diverse native ligands including (1) endogenous compounds like amines, peptides, and Wnt proteins (i.e., secreted proteins activating Frizzled receptors); (2) endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules; and (3) photons and exogenous compounds like odorants. The combined use of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling approaches have provided detailed insight into molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, receptor folding, receptor activation, G-protein coupling, and regulation of GPCRs. The vast majority of family A, B, C, vomeronasal 1, and taste 2 receptors are able to transduce signals into cells through G-protein coupling. However, G-protein-independent signaling mechanisms have also been reported for many GPCRs. Specific interaction motifs in the intracellular parts of these receptors allow them to interact with scaffold proteins. Protein engineering techniques have provided information on molecular mechanisms of GPCR-accessory protein, GPCR-GPCR, and GPCR-scaffold protein interactions. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations have revealed that the inactive state conformations are stabilized by specific interhelical and intrahelical salt bridge interactions and hydrophobic-type interactions. Constitutively activating mutations or agonist binding disrupts such constraining interactions leading to receptor conformations that associates with and activate G-proteins.

Large-scale analysis of gene structure in rhodopsin-like GPCRs: evidence for widespread loss of an ancient intron

The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large superfamily of seven transmembrane domain-spanning proteins that mediate signal transduction by activation of G-proteins. Mammalian GPCR genes are reputed to be largely intron-deficient, but there have been no reports of using genome-wide analyses of gene structure to investigate this. Using complete genome sequences, we analysed the intron content of over 850 members of the rhodopsin-like GPCR subfamily (family A G-protein-coupled receptor or GPCR-A) in four species. We find that mouse and human GPCR-As have a large and significant reduction in intron number compared to the rest of their genome. In contrast, invertebrate GPCR-As have an intron repertoire similar to, or slightly greater than, the rest of their genome, suggesting that the reduced intron content in mammals is due to widespread intron loss. Furthermore, we provide a specific example of intron loss through analysis of an intron that is conserved in position and phase within a phylogenetically diverse range of GPCR-As within six vertebrate and invertebrate species. Together, these two lines of evidence provide compelling evidence for the widespread loss of introns during the evolution of the mammalian GPCR-A family.

Certain 1,4-Disubstituted Aromatic Piperidines and Piperazines with Extreme Selectivity for the Dopamine D4 Receptor Interact with a Common Receptor Microdomain

We previously demonstrated that, in the D4 dopamine receptor, the aromatic microdomain that spans the interface of the second and third transmembrane segments influences the high-affinity interactions with the D4-selective ligand L750,667 [3-[[4-(4-iodophenyl) piperazin-1-yl]methyl]-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridine] and the D2-selective ligands methylspiperone, aripiprazole, and its congener OPC4392 [7-[3-(4-(2,3-dimethylphenyl) piperazinyl) propoxy] 2-(1H)-quinolinone] (Schetz et al., 2000). Here we tested a variety of 1,4-disubstituted aromatic piperidines/piperazines (1,4-DAPs) with different subtype selectivities and functional properties against a panel of D4 receptor mutations in the aromatic microdomain to ascertain whether these ligands recognize this common site. Mutant D4 receptors were constructed by substituting the nonconserved amino acid(s) from the corresponding locations in the D2 receptor. The D4-L2.60W, D4-F2.61V, and D4-LM3.28-3.29FV substitutions result in alterations of the relative position of members of the aromatic microdomain. From these results and molecular models of the ligand-receptor complexes, we conclude that 9 of the 11 D4-selective 1,4-DAPs, including L750,667, have a common pattern of ligand-receptor recognition that depends upon favorable interactions with the phenylalanine at position 2.61 (D4-F2.61V, 20-96-fold decrease). Like methylspiperone, aripiprazole, and OPC4392, the two D4-selective 1,4-DAPs that are insensitive to the D4-F2.61V mutation are sensitive to aromatics at position 2.60 (D4-L2.60W, 7-20-fold increase), and they all have longer spacer arms that permit their tethered aromatics to adopt alternative orientations in the binding-site crevice. All 11 of the D4-selective 1,4-DAPs were sensitive to the D4-LM3.28-3.29FV mutation (13-494-fold decrease) but not the moderately D2-selective methylspiperone. The inferences suggest that subtype selectivity involves two different modes of interaction with the microdomain for the D4-selective 1,4-DAPs and a third mode for D2-selective 1,4-DAPs.

Acid-base equilibria in rhodopsin: dependence of the protonation state of glu134 on its environment

Glutamic acid E134 in rhodopsin is part of a highly conserved triad, D(E)RY, located near the cytoplasmic lipid/water interface in transmembrane helix 3 of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A large body of experimental evidence suggests that the protonation of E134 plays a role in the mechanism of activation of rhodopsin and other GPCRs as well. For E134 to change its protonation state, its pK(a) value must shift from values below physiological pH to higher values. Because of the proximity of the triad to the lipid/water interface, it was hypothesized that a change in solvent around E134 from water to lipid could induce such a shift in pK(a). To test this hypothesis, the pK(a) values of the titratable amino acid residues in rhodopsin have been calculated and the change in solvent around E134 was modeled by shifting the position of the lipid/water interface. The approach used to carry out the pK(a) calculations takes into account the partial immersion of transmembrane proteins in lipid. Qualitative experimental evidence is available for several residues regarding their likely protonation state in rhodopsin at or near physiological pH. Comparison of the calculated pK(a) values with these experimental findings shows good agreement between the two. Notably, glutamic acids E122 and E181 were found to be protonated. The pK(a) values were then calculated for a range of lipid/water interface positions. Although the surrounding solvent of several titratable residues changed from water to lipid in this range, leading to pK(a) shifts in most cases, only for E134 would the shift lead to a change in protonation state at physiological pH. Thus, our results show that the protonation state of E134 is particularly sensitive to its environment. This sensitivity together with the location of E134 near the actual position of the lipid/water interface could be a strategic element in the mechanism of activation of rhodopsin.

Identification of CC chemokine receptor 7 residues important for receptor activation

The binding pocket of family A GPCRs that bind small biogenic amines is well characterized. In this study we identify residues on CC chemokine receptor 7 (CCR-7) that are involved in agonist-mediated receptor activation but not in high affinity ligand binding. The mutations also affect the ability of the ligands to induce chemotaxis. Two of the residues, Lys3.33(137) and Gln5.42(227), are consistent with the binding pocket described for biogenic amines, while Lys3.26(130) and Asn7.32(305), are found at, or close to, the cell surface. Our observations are in agreement with findings from other peptide and chemokine receptors, which indicate that receptors that bind larger ligands contain contact sites closer to the cell surface in addition to the conventional transmembrane binding pocket. These findings also support the theory that chemokine receptors require different sets of interactions for high affinity ligand binding and receptor activation.

Modeling and simulation of the human delta opioid receptor

A model for the human delta opioid receptor has been generated via sequence alignment, structure building using the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template, and refinement by molecular dynamics simulation. The model building suggested that, in addition to the previously postulated interaction between D128 and Y308, an internal salt bridge also exists between residues D128 and R192, both of which are conserved in all the opioid receptors. The model and salt bridge were then shown to be stable during a 20-nsec simulation in a lipid bilayer. It is therefore proposed that both of these interactions play a role in stabilizing the inactive state of the receptor. The model is also used in an effort to rationalize many of the mutational studies performed on delta opioid receptors, and to suggest a plausible explanation for the differences between known delta opioid agonists and antagonists.

Receptors for hypothalamic releasing hormones TRH and GnRH: oligomerization and interactions with intracellular proteins

Studies of TRH and GnRH receptors have revealed much information about the roles of G-proteins and beta-arrestins, as well as receptor residues important for signaling, desensitization and internalization. However, the proteins involved are only just beginning to be identified and characterized. Additional complexity now exists with the observation that these receptors form oligomers in live cells. Indeed, hetero-oligomerization of TRH receptor subtypes 1 and 2 potentially alters interactions with intracellular regulatory proteins. Knowledge of proteins that interact with TRH or GnRH receptors will increase our understanding of receptor function and provide potential drug targets for a range of receptor-associated conditions.

Sheep exhibit novel variations in the organization of the mammalian type II gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene

Species-specific differences in genes encoding type II GnRH receptor indicate that a functional hepta-helical receptor is produced in monkeys but not in rodents, cows, chimpanzees, or humans. To further investigate the extent of evolutionary differences, we sequenced the type II GnRH receptor gene from wild-type Soay sheep. The gene was isolated by long-distance PCR using primers to PEX11beta and RBM8A genes known to flank type II GnRH receptor gene homologues. The gene spans 5.7-kb DNA and was sequenced after shot-gun subcloning. Its novel features include absence of a Pit-1 transcription factor binding site, a premature stop codon (TAG) in exon 1, an in-frame deletion of 51 bp (17 codons) in exon 2, and several nonconservative codon changes. Sheep breed variation in the gene was assessed using genomic DNA in PCR-restriction digest assays for the premature stop codon and in a PCR assay for the deletion. Both characteristics were present in all 15 breeds tested. Receptor gene expression was investigated using poly-A(+) RNA Northern analysis, RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization. An oligonucleotide probe to exon 1 revealed an alternative transcript in testis but not in pituitary gland. No transcripts in testis or pituitary were detectable using an exon 2-3 probe. All tissues examined including multiple brain areas and gonadotrope-enriched cell cultures were negative for type II GnRH receptor in RT-PCR. Testis and pituitary sections were negative with exon 1 riboprobes and exon 1 or 2-3 oligonucleotide probes in in situ hybridization. A hepta-helical type II GnRH receptor is therefore not expressed from this sheep gene.

Pro7.33(303) of the human GnRH receptor regulates selective binding of mammalian GnRH

Mammalian gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors have a conserved acidic residue (Glu7.32(301) or Asp7.32(302)) in extracellular loop (ECL) three that confers selectivity for mammalian GnRH, which has Arg8. Comparison of mammalian and non-mammalian GnRH receptors suggested that the acidic residue is not the only determinant of ligand selectivity in mammalian receptors. The acidic residue is followed by a conserved Pro7.33 in mammalian GnRH receptors, but not non-mammalian receptors. Unique structural constraints imposed by Pro residues suggested that Pro7.33 determines selective binding of Arg8-containing GnRH, by stabilising the conformation of the third extracellular loop of the receptor. Substituting Pro7.33(303) or introducing Pro to position 7.31 decreased affinity for GnRH, but not analogs lacking Arg8. Substituting Pro7.33(303) changed the predicted alpha-helix content of the loop-helix interface. These results show that Pro7.33(303) of the human GnRH receptor is required for selective high affinity binding of mammalian GnRH and supports the hypothesis that Pro7.33(303) stabilises a loop conformation that is necessary for selective ligand binding.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors

GnRH and its analogs are used extensively for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases and assisted reproductive techniques. They also have potential as novel contraceptives in men and women. A thorough delineation of the molecular mechanisms involved in ligand binding, receptor activation, and intracellular signal transduction is kernel to understanding disease processes and the development of specific interventions. Twenty-three structural variants of GnRH have been identified in protochordates and vertebrates. In many vertebrates, three GnRHs and three cognate receptors have been identified with distinct distributions and functions. In man, the hypothalamic GnRH regulates gonadotropin secretion through the pituitary GnRH type I receptor via activation of G(q). In-depth studies have identified amino acid residues in both the ligand and receptor involved in binding, receptor activation, and translation into intracellular signal transduction. Although the predominant coupling of the type I GnRH receptor in the gonadotrope is through productive G(q) stimulation, signal transduction can occur via other G proteins and potentially by G protein-independent means. The eventual selection of intracellular signaling may be specifically directed by variations in ligand structure. A second form of GnRH, GnRH II, conserved in all higher vertebrates, including man, is present in extrahypothalamic brain and many reproductive tissues. Its cognate receptor has been cloned from various vertebrate species, including New and Old World primates. The human gene homolog of this receptor, however, has a frame-shift and stop codon, and it appears that GnRH II signaling occurs through the type I GnRH receptor. There has been considerable plasticity in the use of different GnRHs, receptors, and signaling pathways for diverse functions. Delineation of the structural elements in GnRH and the receptor, which facilitate differential signaling, will contribute to the development of novel interventive GnRH analogs.

Molecular cloning and characterization of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor in the guinea pig, Cavia porcellus

Guinea pig gonadotropin-releasing hormone (gpGnRH) is predicted to have a unique structure among all known forms of GnRH molecule [Endocrinology 138 (1997) 4123] and it is of great interest to determine whether the unique structure of gpGnRH is manifested in the characteristics of the guinea pig GnRH receptor. In the present study, we isolated a full-length cDNA for a GnRH receptor from the pituitary gland of the guinea pig. The putative guinea pig GnRH receptor protein has an amino acid identity of 79-87% with mammalian type I GnRH receptors. The amino acid residues which have been demonstrated to be important for ligand binding and signal transduction were conserved in the guinea pig GnRH receptor. However, there are several specific amino acid substitutions among mammalian type I GnRH receptors. Moreover, though the guinea pig has generally been classified as a rodent, the putative GnRH receptor protein did not have some rodent-specific characteristics. Total IP assays demonstrated that the cloned guinea pig GnRH receptor is a functional GnRH receptor and that it shows different preference of ligand sensitivities from the rat GnRH receptor.

Differential dynamics in the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin revealed by solution NMR

G protein-coupled receptors are cell-surface seven-helical membrane proteins that undergo conformational changes on activation. The mammalian photoreceptor, rhodopsin, is the best-studied member of this superfamily. Here, we provide the first evidence that activation in rhodopsin may involve differential dynamic properties of side-chain versus backbone atoms. High-resolution NMR studies of alpha-(15)N-labeled receptor revealed large backbone motions in the inactive dark state. In contrast, indole side-chain (15)N groups of tryptophans showed well resolved, equally intense NMR signals, suggesting restriction to a single specific conformation.

Identification and characterization of a reptilian GnRH receptor from the leopard gecko

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of reproductive functions through interactions with its specific receptor. We describe the first molecular cloning and characterization of a full-length GnRH receptor (GnRHR) from the leopard gecko Eublepharis macularius. It has a distinct genomic structure consisting of five exons and four introns, compared with all the other reported GnRHR genes. A native GnRH form, cGnRH-II, stimulated inositol phosphate (IP) production in COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the GnRHR, in a dose dependent manner. The mRNA was expressed in all the tissues and organs examined. Molecular phylogenetic analysis revealed that the cloned GnRHR belongs to the type 2/nonmammalian I GnRHR. Low-expression levels were observed from the pituitary glands of reproductively active leopard geckos, indicating the possibility that there is at least one more type of GnRHR highly expressed in the pituitary gland for the gonadotropin secretion in this reptile.

RNA Editing of the Human Serotonin 5-HT2CReceptor Disrupts Transactivation of the Small G-Protein RhoA

The human serotonin 5-HT2C receptor undergoes adenosineto-inosine RNA editing at five positions, generating multiple receptor isoforms with altered G-protein coupling properties. In the current study, we demonstrate that RNA editing regulates the pattern of intracellular signaling. The non-edited human 5-HT2C receptor isoform INI activates phospholipase D via the G13 heterotrimer G-protein. We present evidence that transactivation of the small G-protein RhoA is required for phospholipase D activation. In contrast, neither transactivation of RhoA nor phospholipase D activation was detected in cells expressing the fully edited VGV isoform. The ability to activate phospholipase C is also reduced in VGV-expressing cells, but not to the extent found for the phospholipase D signal. We conclude that RNA editing represents a novel mechanism for regulating 5-HT2C receptor signaling to pathways linked to actin cytoskeletal organization and regulated exocytosis.

Rice Phospholipase D Isoforms Show Differential Cellular Location and Gene Induction

Phospholipase D (PLD) has emerged as an important enzyme involved in signal transduction, stress responses, protein trafficking, and membrane metabolism. This report describes the cloning and characterization of three novel PLD genes from rice, designated RPLD3, RPLD4 and RPLD5. The rice PLDs, including the previously isolated RPLD1 and RPLD2, are similar to PLD subfamilies of Arabidopsis: Based on sequence homology and domain conservation, RPLD1 is most similar to the PLDalpha subfamily of PLDs while RPLD5 most closely resembles the PLDdelta type. RPLD2, 3 and 4 represent a unique subfamily, although they are most similar to PLDalpha. RPLD1 is located on chromosome 1, RPLD5 on chromosome 3, and RPLD2, RPLD3, and RPLD4 are tandemly arrayed on chromosome 5. Transcriptional analysis reveals that RPLD1, present in healthy rice vegetative tissues, is induced rapidly but transiently in wounded leaf tissues. RPLD2, also induced by wounding, is present at lower levels but for a more prolonged duration than RPLD1. Immunolocalization with peptide specific antibodies to each of the five PLDs was used to demonstrate that the isoforms have overlapping but distinct patterns of distribution in healthy rice cells. RPLD1 was detected in mesophyll cell wall, membranes, and chloroplasts, whereas RPLD3 and RPLD4 were located predominantly in the chloroplasts. Labeling of RPLD2 and RPLD5 was sparse, and was most concentrated in the secondary walls of xylem (RPLD2) and guard cells (RPLD2 and RPLD5). This combined information on structural features, expression profiles, and cellular localization will assist the basis for dissection of PLD isoform function in rice.

Conformational Changes of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors During Their Activation by Agonist Binding

The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest and most diverse group of transmembrane proteins involved in signal transduction. Many of the over 1000 human GPCRs represent important pharmaceutical targets. However, despite high interest in this receptor family, no high-resolution structure of a human GPCR has been resolved yet. This is mainly due to difficulties in obtaining large quantities of pure and active protein. Until now, only a high-resolution x-ray structure of an inactive state of bovine rhodopsin is available. Since no structure of an active state has been solved, information of the GPCR activation process can be gained only by biophysical techniques. In this review, we first describe what is known about the ground state of GPCRs to then address questions about the nature of the conformational changes taking place during receptor activation and the mechanism controlling the transition from the resting to the active state. Finally, we will also address the question to what extent information about the three-dimensional GPCR structure can be included into pharmaceutical drug design programs.

The role of a conserved region of the second intracellular loop in AT1 angiotensin receptor activation and signaling

The pleiotropic actions of angiotensin II are mediated by the primarily G(q) protein-coupled type 1 angiotensin (AT(1)) receptor. In this study a mutational analysis of the function of the conserved DRYXXV/IXXPL domain in the second intracellular loop of the rat AT(1A) receptor was performed in COS7 cells. Alanine substitution studies showed that single replacement of the highly conserved Asp(125) and Arg(126), but not Tyr(127), moderately impaired angiotensin II-induced inositol phosphate signaling. However, concomitant substitution of both Asp(125) and Arg(126) caused marked reduction of both inositol phosphate signaling and receptor internalization. Alanine scanning of the adjacent residues showed that substitution of Ile(130), His(132), and Pro(133) reduced agonist-induced inositol phosphate signal generation, whereas mutations of Met(134) also impaired receptor internalization. Expression of the D125A mutant AT(1A) receptor in COS7 cells endowed the receptor with moderate constitutive activity, as indicated by its enhanced basal Elk1 promoter activity and inositol phosphate response to partial agonists. Angiotensin II-induced stimulation of the Elk1 promoter showed parallel impairment with inositol phosphate signal generation in receptors containing mutations in this region of the AT(1A) receptor. These data confirm that Ca(2+) signal generation is required for the nuclear effects of angiotensin II-induced ERK activation. They are also consistent with the role of the conserved DRY sequence of the AT(1A) receptor in receptor activation, and of Asp(125) in constraining the receptor in its inactive conformation. Furthermore, in the cytoplasmic helical extension of the third helix, an apolar surface that includes Ile(130) and Met(134) appears to have a direct role in G protein coupling.

Molecular basis of partial agonism: orientation of indoleamine ligands in the binding pocket of the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor determines relative efficacy

Based on experiment and computational simulation, we present a structural explanation for the differing efficacies of indole agonists at the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor (5HT2AR). We find that serotonin [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)] forms hydrogen-bonds with Ser3.36 in helix 3 and Ser5.46 in helix 5. Disruption of these hydrogen bonds by methyl-substitution of the cationic primary amine or of the backbone N1-amine, respectively, leads to a reduction in agonist efficacy. Computational simulation predicts that mutation of Ser3.36 to Ala should allow a similar interaction with helix 3 both for agonists that have unmodified cationic amine side chains and for those with substituted amines. Experimentally, this mutation was found to largely eliminate the differences in efficacy caused by cationic amine substitution for a series of indole congeners. Similarly, substitution of the N1-amine, which interacts with Ser5.46, reduced efficacy more markedly at the wild-type (WT) than at the Ser5.46Ala mutant receptor. Computational modeling of binding pocket interactions of ligands with WT and mutant receptor constructs demonstrate how the Ser3.36 and Ser5.46 interactions serve to modify the agonist's favored position in the binding pocket. A striking correlation was found between differences in the position assumed by the indole ring and differences in agonist activity. These data support the hypothesis that the position of the agonist interacting with the receptor is influenced by specific interactions in helices 3 and 5 and determines the degree of receptor activation by agonist through a mechanism that is likely to be shared by other G-protein coupled receptors in this class.

Structural basis for activation of G-protein-coupled receptors

Our understanding of how G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) operate at the molecular level has been considerably improved over the last few years. The application of advanced biophysical techniques as well as the availability of high-resolution structural information has allowed insight both into conformational changes accompanying GPCR activation and the underlying molecular mechanism governing transition of the receptor between its active and inactive states. Using the beta2-adrenergic receptor as a model system we have obtained evidence for an evolutionary conserved activation mechanism where disruption of intramolecular interactions between TM3 and TM6 leads to a major conformational change of TM6 relative to the rest of the receptor. This conclusion was based on experiments in which environmentally sensitive, sulfhydryl-reactive fluorophores were site-selectively incorporated into wild-type and mutant beta2-adrenergic receptors purified from Sf-9 insect cells. Our studies have also raised important questions regarding kinetics of receptors activation. These questions should be addressed in the future by application of techniques that will allow for simultaneous measurement of conformational changes and receptor activation. At the current stage we are exploring the possibility of reaching this goal by direct in situ labeling of the beta2-adrenergic receptor in Xenopus laevis oocytes with conformationally sensitive fluorescent probes and parallel detection of receptor activation by co-expression with the cAMP sensitive Cl- channel CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) and electrophysiological measurements.

Structure modeling of the chemokine receptor CCR5: implications for ligand binding and selectivity

The G-protein coupled receptor CCR5 is the main co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains. I have built a structural model of the chemokine receptor CCR5 and used it to explain the binding and selectivity of the antagonist TAK779. Models of the extracellular (EC) domains of CCR5 have been constructed and used to rationalize current biological data on the binding of HIV-1 and chemokines. Residues spanning the transmembrane region of CCR5 have been modeled after rhodopsin, and their functional significance examined using the evolutionary trace method. The receptor cavity shares six residues with CC-chemokine receptors CCR1 through CCR4, while seven residues are unique to CCR5. The contribution of these residues to ligand binding and selectivity is tested by molecular docking simulations of TAK779 to CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5. TAK779 binds to CCR5 in the cavity formed by helices 1, 2, 3, and 7 with additional interactions with helices 5 and 6. TAK779 did not dock to either CCR1 or CCR2. The results are consistent with current site-directed mutagenesis data and with the observed selectivity of TAK779 for CCR5 over CCR1 and CCR2. The specific residues responsible for the observed selectivity are identified. The four EC regions of CCR5 have been modeled using constrained simulated annealing simulations. Applied dihedral angle constraints are representative of the secondary structure propensities of these regions. Tertiary interactions, in the form of distance constraints, are generated from available epitope mapping data. Analysis of the 250 simulated structures provides new insights to the design of experiments aimed at determining residue-residue contacts across the EC domains and for mapping CC-chemokines on the surface of the EC domains.

The local environment at the cytoplasmic end of TM6 of the mu opioid receptor differs from those of rhodopsin and monoamine receptors: introduction of an ionic lock between the cytoplasmic ends of helices 3 and 6 by a L6.30(275)E mutation inactivates the mu opioid receptor and reduces the constitutive activity of its T6.34(279)K mutant

Activation of rhodopsin and monoamine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been proposed to involve in part the disruption of a conserved E6.30-R3.50 ionic interaction between transmembrane segments (TMs) 3 and 6. However, this interaction does not occur in the opioid receptors, which have L275 at 6.30. On the basis of our findings that mutations of T6.34(279) to K and D produced, respectively, a constitutively active and an inactive form of the mu opioid receptor, we previously suggested that the functional role of the 6.30(275) residue could be assumed by T6.34(279), but the interplay between residues at positions 6.30 and 6.34 remained unresolved. In this study, we examined the effects of introducing an E in position 6.30(275) of the wild type (WT) and of the T6.34(279) mutants of the mu opioid receptor to compare the participation of the 6.30 locus in molecular events during activation in this receptor with its role in other GPCRs. The L6.30(275)E and the L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)D mutants displayed no constitutive activity and could not be activated by the agonist DAMGO or morphine. The L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)K mutant had some constitutive activity, but much less than the T6.34(279)K mutant, and could be activated by both agonists. The rank order of affinity for the agonist DAMGO is as follows: T6.34(279)K > WT congruent with L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)K > L6.30(275)E congruent with T6.34(279)D > L6.30(275)E/T6.34(279)D; however, all constructs have a similar affinity for the antagonist [(3)H]diprenorphine. These data are interpreted in the context of interactions with the conserved R3.50(165) in TM3. When L6.30(275) is mutated to E, the favorable E6.30(275)-R3.50(165) interaction stabilizes an inactive state, as in rhodopsin, and hence reduces the activities of T6.34(279) mutants. Thus, the mu opioid receptor is shown to be different from rhodopsin and monoamine GPCRs, of which the WTs with native E6.30 can be activated, and the 6.34D or 6.34K mutants display enhanced constitutive activities. Our molecular modeling results suggest that some specific differences in local geometry at the cytoplasmic ends of TM5 and TM6 may account in part for the observed differences in the molecular mechanisms of receptor activation.

Lessons from constitutively active mutants of G protein-coupled receptors

In the past decade, the concept of constitutive activity has profoundly modified our understanding of G protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs). Here, we review the contribution of constitutively active mutants (CAMs) to our understanding of three aspects of GPCR physiopathology: (1) GPCR activation is a complex mechanism involving both the release of inactive state conformational constraints, mimicked by most CAMs, and the creation of new interactions that stabilize the active state and are mimicked by a restricted set of CAMs; (2) GPCR phosphorylation, internalization and desensitization processes are activated by receptor conformations, which partly overlap those activating G protein; (3) natural CAMs, mostly affecting GPCRs of the endocrine system, are found in several hereditary and acquired diseases, including cancers. One major remaining question is how CAMs recapitulate the different structural modifications of the agonist-induced active conformation(s) of the wild-type receptor. This characterization is a prerequisite for further use of CAMs as ligand-free models of active GPCRs in structural, cellular and physiological studies.

Conserved helix 7 tyrosine acts as a multistate conformational switch in the 5HT2C receptor. Identification of a novel "locked-on" phenotype and double revertant mutations

Studies in many rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors are providing a general scheme of the structural processes underlying receptor activation. Microdomains in several receptors have been identified that appear to function as activation switches. However, evidence is emerging that these receptor proteins exist in multiple conformational states. To study the molecular control of this switching process, we investigated the function of a microdomain involving the conserved helix 7 tyrosine in the serotonin 5HT2C receptor. This tyrosine of the NPXXY motif was substituted for all naturally occurring amino acids. Three distinct constitutively active receptor phenotypes were found: moderate, high, and "locked-on" constitutive activity. In contrast to the activity of the other receptor mutants, the high basal signaling of the locked-on Y7.53N mutant was neither increased by agonists nor decreased by inverse agonists. The Y7.53F mutant was uncoupled. Computational modeling based on the rhodopsin crystal structure suggested that Y7.53 interacts with the conserved aromatic ring at position 7.60 in the recently identified helix 8 domain. This provided a basis for seeking revertant mutations to correct the defective function of the Y7.53F receptor. When the Y7.53F receptor was mutated at position 7.60, the wild-type phenotype was restored. These results suggest that Y7.53 and Y7.60 contribute to a common functional microdomain connecting helices 7 and 8 that influences the switching of the 5HT2C receptor among multiple active and inactive conformations.

The role of hydrophobic microenvironments in modulating pKa shifts in proteins

The screened Coulomb potential (SCP) method, combined with a quantitative description of the microenvironments around titratable groups, based on the Hydrophobic Fragmental Constants developed by Rekker, has been applied to calculate the pK(a) values of groups embedded in extremely hydrophobic microenvironments in proteins. This type of microenvironment is not common; but constitutes a small class, where the protein's architecture has evolved to lend special properties to the embedded residue. They are of significant interest because they are frequently important in catalysis and in proton and electron transfer reactions. In the SCP treatment these special cases are treated locally and therefore do not affect the accuracy of the pK(a) values calculated for other residues in less hydrophobic environments. Here the calibration of the algorithm is extended with the help of earlier results from lysozyme and of three mutants of staphylococcal nuclease (SNase) that were specially designed to measure the energetics of ionization of titratable groups buried in extremely hydrophobic microenvironments. The calibrated algorithm was subsequently applied to a fourth mutant of SNase and then to a very large dimeric amine oxidase of 1284 residues, where 334 are titratable. The observed pK(a) shifts of the buried residues are large (up to 4.7 pK units), and all cases are well reproduced by the calculations with a root mean square error of 0.22. These results support the hypothesis that protein electrostatics can only be described correctly and self-consistently if the inherent heterogeneity of these systems is properly accounted for.

A critical role for a tyrosine residue in the cannabinoid receptors for ligand recognition

Previous mutation and modeling studies have identified an aromatic cluster in the transmembrane helix (TMH) 3-4-5 region as important for ligand binding at the CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors. Through novel mixed mode Monte Carlo/Stochastic Dynamics (MC/SD) calculations, we tested the importance of aromaticity at position 5.39(275) in CB(1). MC/SD calculations were performed on wild-type (WT) CB(1) and two mutants, Y5.39(275)F and Y5.39(275)I. Results indicated that while the CB(1) Y5.39(275)F mutant is very similar to WT, the Y5.39(275)I mutant shows pronounced topology changes in the TMH 3-4-5 region. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of tyrosine 5.39 to phenylalanine (Y-->F) or isoleucine (Y-->I) in both CB(1) and CB(2) were performed to determine the functional role of this amino acid in each receptor subtype. HEK 293 cells transfected with mutant receptor cDNAs were evaluated in radioligand binding and cyclic AMP assays. The CB(1) mutant and WT receptors were also co-expressed with G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying channels (GIRK1 and GIRK4) in Xenopus oocytes to assess functional coupling. The Y-->F mutation resulted in cannnabinoid receptors with subtle differences in WT binding and signal transduction. In contrast, the Y-->I mutations produced receptors that could not produce signal transduction or bind to multiple cannabinoid compounds. However, immunofluorescence data indicate that the Y-->I mutation was compartmentalized and expressed at a level similar to that of the WT cannabinoid receptor. These results underscore the importance of aromaticity at position CB(1) 5.39(275) and CB(2) 5.39(191) for ligand recognition in the cannabinoid receptors.

The binding site of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors: the transmembrane segments and second extracellular loop

In the current chapter, we review approaches to the identification of the residues forming the binding sites for agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators in the family of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We then review the structural bases for ligand binding and pharmacological specificity based on the application of these methods to muscarinic cholinergic, adrenergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic, and histaminergic receptors, using the high resolution rhodopsin structure as a template. Furthermore, we propose a critical role of the second extracellular loop in forming the binding site for small molecular weight aminergic ligands, much as this loop dives down into the binding-site crevice and contacts retinal in rhodopsin.

Beta(1)-selective agonist (-)-1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenetylamino)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-2-propanol [(-)-RO363] differentially interacts with key amino acids responsible for beta(1)-selective binding in resting and active states

(-)-1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenetylamino)-3-(3,4-dihydroxy)-2-propanol [(-)-RO363] is a highly selective beta(1)-adrenergic receptor (beta(1)AR) agonist. To study the binding site of beta(1)-selective agonist, chimeric beta(1)/beta(2)ARs and Ala-substituted beta(1)ARs were constructed. Several key residues of beta(1)AR [Leu(110) and Thr(117) in transmembrane domain (TMD) 2], and Phe(359) in TMD 7] were found to be responsible for beta(1)-selective binding of (-)-RO363, as determined by competitive binding. Based on these results, we built a three-dimensional model of the binding domain for (-)-RO363. The model indicated that TMD 2 and TMD 7 of beta(1)AR form a binding pocket; the methoxyphenyl group of N-substituent of (-)-RO363 seems to locate within the cavity surrounded by Leu(110), Thr(117), and Phe(359). The amino acids Leu(110) and Phe(359) interact with the phenyl ring of (-)-RO363, whereas Thr(117) forms hydrogen bond with the methoxy group of (-)-RO363. To examine the interaction of these residues with beta(1)AR in an active state, each of the amino acids was changed to Ala in a constitutively active (CA)-beta(1)AR mutant. The degree of decrease in the affinity of CA-beta(1)AR for (-)-RO363 was essentially the same as that of wild-type beta(1)AR when mutated at Leu(110) and Thr(117). However, the affinity was decreased in Ala-substituted mutant of Phe(359) compared with that of wild-type beta(1)AR. These results indicated that Leu(110) and Thr(117) are necessary for the initial binding of (-)-RO363 with beta(1)-selectivity, and interaction of Phe(359) with the N-substituent of (-)-RO363 in an active state is stronger than in the resting state.

Evidence for a model of agonist-induced activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A serotonin receptors that involves the disruption of a strong ionic interaction between helices 3 and 6

5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) receptors are essential for the actions of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) on physiological processes as diverse as vascular smooth muscle contraction, platelet aggregation, perception, and emotion. In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism(s) by which 5-HT activates 5-HT2A receptors using a combination of approaches including site-directed mutagenesis, molecular modeling, and pharmacological analysis using the sensitive, cell-based functional assay R-SAT. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of residues close to the intracellular end of H6 of the 5-HT2A receptor implicated glutamate Glu-318(6.30) in receptor activation, as also predicted by a newly constructed molecular model of the 5-HT2A receptor, which was based on the x-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin. Close examination of the molecular model suggested that Glu-318(6.30) could form a strong ionic interaction with Arg-173(3.50) of the highly conserved "(D/E)RY motif" located at the interface between the third transmembrane segment and the second intracellular loop (i2). A direct prediction of this hypothesis, that disrupting this ionic interaction by an E318(6.30)R mutation would lead to a highly constitutively active receptor with enhanced affinity for agonist, was confirmed using R-SAT. Taken together, these results predict that the disruption of a strong ionic interaction between transmembrane helices 3 and 6 of 5-HT2A receptors is essential for agonist-induced receptor activation and, as recently predicted by ourselves (B. L. Roth and D. A. Shapiro (2001) Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 5, 685-695) and others, that this may represent a general mechanism of activation for many, but not all, G-protein-coupled receptors.

NMR structure of the second intracellular loop of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor: evidence for a novel cytoplasmic helix

A major, unresolved question in signal transduction by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is to understand how, at atomic resolution, a GPCR activates a G protein. A step toward answering this question was made with the determination of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin; we now know the intramolecular interactions that characterize the resting conformation of a GPCR. To what degree does this structure represent a structural paradigm for other GPCRs, especially at the cytoplasmic surface where GPCR-G protein interaction occurs and where the sequence homology is low among GPCRs? To address this question, we performed NMR studies on approximately 35-residue-long peptides including the critical second intracellular loop (i2) of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (AR) and of rhodopsin. To stabilize the secondary structure of the peptide termini, 4-12 residues from the adjacent transmembrane helices were included and structures determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. We also characterized the effects on an alpha 2A AR peptide of a D130I mutation in the conserved DRY motif. Our results show that in contrast to the L-shaped loop in the i2 of rhodopsin, the i2 of the alpha 2A AR is predominantly helical, supporting the hypothesis that there is structural diversity within GPCR intracellular loops. The D130I mutation subtly modulates the helical structure. The spacing of nonpolar residues in i2 with helical periodicity is a predictor of helical versus loop structure. These data should lead to more accurate models of the intracellular surface of GPCRs and of receptor-mediated G protein activation.

Arrestin variants display differential binding characteristics for the phosphorylated N-formyl peptide receptor carboxyl terminus

The phosphorylation-dependent binding of arrestins to cytoplasmic domains of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to be a crucial step in receptor desensitization. In some GPCR systems, arrestins have also been demonstrated to be involved in receptor internalization, resensitization, and the activation of signaling cascades. The objective of the current study was to examine binding interactions of members of the arrestin family with the formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a member of the GPCR family of receptors. Peptides representing the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated carboxyl terminus of the FPR were synthesized and bound to polystyrene beads via a biotin/streptavidin interaction. Using fluorescein-conjugated arrestins, binding interactions between arrestins and the bead-bound FPR carboxyl terminus were analyzed by flow cytometry. Arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 bound to the FPR carboxyl-terminal peptide in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, with K(d) values in the micromolar range. Binding of visual arrestin, which binds rhodopsin with high selectivity, was not observed. Arrestin-2-(1--382) and arrestin-3-(1--393), truncated mutant forms of arrestin that display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact receptors, were also observed to bind the bead-bound FPR terminus in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, but with much greater affinity than the full-length arrestins, yielding K(d) values in the 5--50 nm range. Two additional arrestin mutants, which are full-length but display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact GPCRs, were evaluated for their binding affinity to the FPR carboxyl terminus. Whereas the single point mutant, arrestin-2 R169E, displayed an affinity similar to that of the full-length arrestins, the triple point mutant, arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A, displayed an affinity more similar to that of the truncated forms of arrestin. The results suggest that the carboxyl terminus of arrestin is a critical determinant in regulating the binding affinity of arrestin for the phosphorylated domains of GPCRs.

Seven-transmembrane receptors: crystals clarify

The X-ray structure of the photoreceptor rhodopsin has provided the first atomic-resolution structure of a seven-transmembrane (7-TM) G-protein-coupled receptor. This has provided an improved template for interpreting the huge body of structure--activity, mutagenesis and affinity labelling data available for related 7-TM receptors, such as muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Ligand contacts, and the intramolecular interactions that stabilize the ground state structure, can be identified with some degree of confidence. We now have a firm basis for attempts to predict the structure of the receptor--G-protein complex, and understand the mechanism by which the agonist--receptor complex activates the G protein.

The cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3 regulates the activity of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor

The binding of alpha-factor to its receptor (Ste2p) activates a G-protein-signaling pathway leading to conjugation of MATa cells of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. We conducted a genetic screen to identify constitutively activating mutations in the N-terminal region of the alpha-factor receptor that includes transmembrane domains 1-5. This approach identified 12 unique constitutively activating mutations, the strongest of which affected polar residues at the cytoplasmic ends of transmembrane domains 2 and 3 (Asn84 and Gln149, respectively) that are conserved in the alpha-factor receptors of divergent yeast species. Targeted mutagenesis, in combination with molecular modeling studies, suggested that Gln149 is oriented toward the core of the transmembrane helix bundle where it may be involved in mediating an interaction with Asn84. These residues appear to play specific roles in maintaining the inactive conformation of the protein since a variety of mutations at either position cause constitutive receptor signaling. Interestingly, the activity of many mammalian G-protein-coupled receptors is also regulated by conserved polar residues (the E/DRY motif) at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3. Altogether, the results of this study suggest a conserved role for the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane domain 3 in regulating the activity of divergent G-protein-coupled receptors.

Impact of aromatic residues within transmembrane helix 6 of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor upon agonist and antagonist binding

To investigate the impact of aromatic residues within transmembrane helix 6 (TMH6) of the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) on agonist and antagonist binding, residues Y(283), Y(284), W(289), Y(290), W(291), and F(292) were exchanged to alanine and analyzed comprehensively in functional reporter gene and ligand binding assays. Whereas receptor mutants Y(283)A, Y(284)A, and W(291)A were capable of neither ligand binding nor signal transduction, mutants W(289)A, Y(290)A, and F(292)A were functional: the F(292)A mutant behaved like wild-type receptor, while mutants W(289)A and Y(290)A differentiated between agonistic and antagonistic ligands. On the basis of the high-resolution X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin as well as available data on GnRH-R mutants, models for ligand-receptor interactions are proposed. The model for D-Trp(6)-GnRH (Triptorelin) binding, representing a superagonistic ligand, is in full accordance to available data. Furthermore, new interactions are proposed: pGlu(1) interacts with N(212) in transmembrane helix 5, Tyr(5) with Y(290), and D-Trp(6) with W(289). The binding behavior of mutants W(289)A and Y(290)A corresponds to the proposed binding model for the antagonist Cetrorelix. In summary, our data as presented indicate that Y(290) plays a key function in agonist but not antagonist binding.

RNA editing of the human serotonin 5-HT2C receptor alters receptor-mediated activation of G13 protein

The recent completion of the human genome predicted the presence of only 30,000 genes, stressing the importance of mechanisms that increase molecular diversity at the post-transcriptional level. One such post-transcriptional event is RNA editing, which generates multiple protein isoforms from a single gene, often with profound functional consequences. The human serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptor undergoes RNA editing that creates multiple receptor isoforms. One consequence of RNA editing of cell surface receptors may be to alter the pattern of activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins and thereby shift preferred intracellular signaling pathways. We examined the ability of the nonedited 5-HT(2C) receptor isoform (INI) and two extensively edited isoforms, VSV and VGV, to interact with various G-protein alpha subunits. Two functional assays were utilized: the cell-based functional assay, Receptor Selection/Amplification Technology(TM), in which the pharmacological consequences of co-expression of 5HT(2C) receptor isoforms with G-protein alpha subunits in fibroblasts were studied, and 5HT(2C) receptor-mediated rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton in stable cell lines. These studies revealed that the nonedited 5-HT(2C) receptor functionally couples to G(q) and G(13). In contrast, coupling to G(13) was not detected for the extensively edited 5-HT(2C) receptors. Thus, RNA editing represents a novel mechanism for regulating the pattern of activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins, molecular switches that control an enormous variety of biological processes.

Functional role of a conserved motif in TM6 of the rat mu opioid receptor: constitutively active and inactive receptors result from substitutions of Thr6.34(279) with Lys and Asp

Mutations within the "X1BBX2X3B" motif or its variants in the junction of the third intracellular (i3) loop and the sixth transmembrane domain (TM6) have been shown to lead to constitutive activation of several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this study, T6.34(279) at the X3 locus of the rat mu opioid receptor was mutated to Lys and Asp, and the mutants were examined for binding and signaling properties. The T6.34(279)K mutant was poorly expressed, and pretreatment with naloxone greatly enhanced its expression. This construct exhibited properties identified previously with constitutive activation: (1) compared with the wild type, it produced much higher agonist-independent [35S]GTPgammaS binding, which was abolished by pertussis toxin treatment; (2) it displayed an enhanced affinity for the agonist DAMGO similar to that of the high-affinity state of the wild type, which was not altered by GTPgammaS, while having unchanged affinity for the antagonist diprenorphine. The T6.34(279)K mutant displayed a higher intracellular receptor pool than the wild type. Naloxone inhibited the basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding of the T6.34(279)K mutant, demonstrating inverse agonist activity at this mutant receptor. In contrast, the T6.34(279)D substitution did not increase basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding, greatly reduced agonist-promoted [35S]GTPgammaS binding, and markedly decreased affinity for DAMGO. Thus, the T6.34(279)D mutant adopts conformations corresponding to inactive states of the receptor. The results were interpreted in the structural context of a model for the mu opioid receptor that incorporates the information from the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The interaction of T6.34(279) with R3.50(165) in the mu opioid receptor is considered to stabilize the inactive conformations. The T6.34(279)K substitution would then disrupt this interaction and support agonist-free activation, while T6.34(279)D mutation should strengthen this interaction which keeps the receptor in inactive states. T6.34(279) may, in addition, interact with the neighboring R6.35(280) to help constrain the receptor in inactive states, and T6.34(279)K and T6.34(279)D mutations would affect this interaction by disrupting or strengthening it, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the results presented here represent the first structurally rationalized demonstration that mutations of this locus can lead to dramatically different properties of a GPCR.

Control of conformational equilibria in the human B2 bradykinin receptor. Modeling of nonpeptidic ligand action and comparison to the rhodopsin structure

A prototypic study of the molecular mechanisms of activation or inactivation of peptide hormone G protein-coupled receptors was carried out on the human B2 bradykinin receptor. A detailed pharmacological analysis of receptor mutants possessing either increased constitutive activity or impaired activation or ligand recognition allowed us to propose key residues participating in intramolecular interaction networks stabilizing receptor inactive or active conformations: Asn(113) and Tyr(115) (TM III), Trp(256) and Phe(259) (TM VI), Tyr(295) (TM VII) which are homologous of the rhodopsin residues Gly(120), Glu(122), Trp(265), Tyr(268), and Lys(296), respectively. An essential experimental finding was the spatial proximity between Asn(113), which is the cornerstone of inactive conformations, and Trp(256) which plays a subtle role in controlling the balance between active and inactive conformations. Molecular modeling and mutagenesis data showed that Trp(256) and Tyr(295) constitute, together with Gln(288), receptor contact points with original nonpeptidic ligands. It provided an explanation for the ligand inverse agonist behavior on the WT receptor, with underlying restricted motions of TMs III, VI, and VII, and its agonist behavior on the Ala(113) and Phe(256) constitutively activated mutants. These data on the B2 receptor emphasize that conformational equilibria are controlled in a coordinated fashion by key residues which are located at strategic positions for several G protein-coupled receptors. They are discussed in comparison with the recently determined rhodopsin crystallographic structure.

Mutations at position 125 in transmembrane helix III of rhodopsin affect the structure and signalling of the receptor

Mutation of L125R in trasmembrane helix III of rhodopsin, associated with the retinal degenerative disease retinitis pigmentosa, was previously shown to cause structural misfolding of the mutant protein. Also, conservative mutations at this position were found to cause partial misfolding of the mutant receptors. We report here on a series of mutations at position 125 to further investigate the role of Leu125 in the correct folding and function of rhodopsin. In particular, the effect of the size of the substituted amino-acid side chain in the functionality of the receptor, measured as the ability of the mutant rhodopsins to activate the G protein transducin, has been analysed. The following mutations have been studied: L125G, L125N, L125I, L125H, L125P, L125T, L125D, L125E, L125Y and L125W. Most of the mutant proteins, expressed in COS-1 cells, showed reduced 11-cis-retinal binding, red-shifts in the wavelength of the visible absorbance maximum, and increased reactivity towards hydroxylamine in the dark. Thermal stability in the dark was reduced, particularly for L125P, L125Y and L125W mutants. The ability of the mutant rhodopsins to activate the G protein transducin was significantly reduced in a size dependent manner, especially in the case of the bulkier L125Y and L125W substitutions, suggesting a steric effect of the substituted amino acid. On the basis of the present and previous results, Leu125 in transmembrane helix III of rhodopsin, in the vicinity of the beta-ionone ring of 11-cis-retinal, is proposed to be an important residue in maintaining the correct structure of the chromophore binding pocket. Thus, bulky substitutions at this position may affect the structure and signallling of the receptor by altering the optimal conformation of the retinal binding pocket, rather than by direct interaction with the chromophore, as seen from the recent crystallographic structure of rhodopsin.

Constitutive activation of the mu opioid receptor by mutation of D3.49(164), but not D3.32(147): D3.49(164) is critical for stabilization of the inactive form of the receptor and for its expression

The roles of conserved aspartates in the third transmembrane domain of the rat mu opioid receptor (RMOR) were explored with mutations of D3.32(147) and D3.49(164). D3.49(164) in the highly conserved DRY motif was mutated to 13 amino acids. Except for the D3.49(164)E mutant, each mutant displayed little or no detectable [(3)H]diprenorphine binding, and pretreatment with naloxone greatly enhanced binding. D3.49(164)H, -Q, -Y, -M, and -E mutants were further studied. D3.32(147) was substituted with A or N. All seven mutants exhibited similar binding affinities for the antagonist [(3)H]diprenorphine as the wild-type. The D3.49(164)H, -Q, -Y, and -M mutants, but not the D3.49(164)E and D3.32(147) mutants, exhibited enhanced basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding which was comparable to the maximally activated level of the wild-type and was related to expression levels. Naloxone, naltrexone, and naloxone methiodide significantly inhibited the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding of the D3.49(164) mutants, indicating inverse agonist activities. Treatment of the D3.49(164)Y mutant with pertussis toxin greatly reduced the basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, demonstrating constitutive activation of Galpha(i)/Galpha(o). The D3.49(164)H, -Y, -M, and -Q mutants had higher affinities for DAMGO than the wild-type, which were not significantly lowered by GTPgammaS. Thus, mutation of D3.49(164) to H, Y, M, or Q in RMOR resulted in receptor assuming activated conformations. In contrast, the D3.49(164)E mutant displayed significantly lower basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and reduced affinity for DAMGO. Upon incubation of membranes at 37 degrees C, the constitutively active D3.49(164)Y mutant was structurally less stable, whereas the inactivated D3.49(164)E mutant was more stable, than the wild-type. Computational simulations showed that the E3.49 side chain interacted strongly with the conserved R3.50 in the DRY motif and stabilized the inactive form of the receptor. Taken together, these results indicate that D3.49 plays an important role in constraining the receptor in inactive conformations.

A conserved Asn in transmembrane helix 7 is an on/off switch in the activation of the thyrotropin receptor

The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor is an interesting model to study G protein-coupled receptor activation as many point mutations can significantly increase its basal activity. Here, we identified a molecular interaction between Asp(633) in transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) and Asn(674) in TM7 of the TSHr that is crucial to maintain the inactive state through conformational constraint of the Asn. We show that these residues are perfectly conserved in the glycohormone receptor family, except in one case, where they are exchanged, suggesting a direct interaction. Molecular modeling of the TSHr, based on the high resolution structure of rhodopsin, strongly favors this hypothesis. Our approach combining site-directed mutagenesis with molecular modeling shows that mutations disrupting this interaction, like the D633A mutation in TM6, lead to high constitutive activation. The strongly activating N674D (TM7) mutation, which in our modeling breaks the TM6-TM7 link, is reverted to wild type-like behavior by an additional D633N mutation (TM6), which would restore this link. Moreover, we show that the Asn of TM7 (conserved in most G protein-coupled receptors) is mandatory for ligand-induced cAMP accumulation, suggesting an active role of this residue in activation. In the TSHr, the conformation of this Asn residue of TM7 would be constrained, in the inactive state, by its Asp partner in TM6.

Differences in conformational properties of the second intracellular loop (IL2) in 5HT(2C) receptors modified by RNA editing can account for G protein coupling efficiency

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing events that have been demonstrated for 5HT (2C) receptors resulted in alterations of the amino acid sequence at positions 156, 158 and 160 in the intracellular loop 2 (IL2) region. The edited receptor isoforms were shown to have reduced basal activity, but similar maximum responses to agonist binding. To identify the molecular mechanism of these pharmacological effects of editing we explored the conformational properties of the edited IL2 in comparison with the wild type. The results from conformational studies of the IL2 isoforms, using biased Monte Carlo simulations with an implicit solvent model based on a screened Coulomb potential, show that the compared loops differ in their preferred spatial orientations as a result of differences in the conformational space that is accessible to them by energy criteria. For the IL2 of the unedited (5HT (2C-INI) ) receptor, the preference for structures oriented towards the 7TM bundle is larger than for the 5HT (2C-VGV) edited receptor. This difference in preferred orientation can affect the association of IL2 with other intracellular loop domains involved in G protein coupling and hence the coupling efficiency. The results illustrate the high sensitivity of the system to small changes in the interaction surface presented to other intracellular loops, and/or the G protein.