Antipsychotic metabolic effects: weight gain, diabetes mellitus, and lipid abnormalities

Differential trends in prevalence of diabetes and unrelated general medical illness for schizophrenia patients before and after the atypical antipsychotic era

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the net growth in the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in the population of patients with schizophrenia that may be attributable to the increased use of the class of atypical antipsychotics (A-APDs), adjusting for community trends in DM risk.

METHODS

Using data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, we perform trend analyses for prevalence of DM and general illness unrelated to insulin resistance in patients with schizophrenia, as well as in individuals without known mental illness, during three time periods: 1) prior to any A-APDs introduction (1979-1989); 2) short-term after their introduction (1990-1995), and long-term following their introduction (1996-2001).

RESULTS

Trends in DM and general illness risks were comparable among inpatients with schizophrenia and those without mental illness during the pre-A-APD era and the short-term post-A-APDs era. During 1996-2001, the net difference in DM prevalence grew at an increasing rate (0.7% per year, p<0.001). By 2001, over a base DM prevalence of 10% in patients with schizophrenia, 3.1 percentage points (p=0.016) could be attributed to the use of A-APDs. There was no significant net growth in the prevalence of general illness during this period for these patients. This growth was most pronounced among African-American females and middle aged (35-49 years old) patients. This increased risk of DM translates into additional direct medical costs of $800 million per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of A-APDs, after a lag period, is associated with increased risk of DM. This needs to be considered in light of the advantages of these drugs in efficacy and tolerability. Long-term studies are necessary to identify the effect of individual A-APDs on DM risk.

Chronic administration of olanzapine induces metabolic and food intake alterations: a mouse model of the atypical antipsychotic-associated adverse effects

RATIONALE

Most of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are highly related to a major risk of metabolic drawbacks leading to dyslipidemia and obesity.

OBJECTIVE

To set up a mouse model of the AAP-associated weight gain in mice under the influence of chronic olanzapine regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female mice were housed in pairs and habituated to spontaneous feeding with a high-palatable diet (10% sucrose wet mash). Firstly, we orally administered olanzapine (0.75, 1.5 and 3 mg/kg), evaluating body weight and periuterine fat mass, as well as insulin, non-esterified fatty acids, triglycerides, and glucose levels. In a second experiment, we assessed the effect of olanzapine on energy expenditure through indirect calorimetry (IC). A third experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of olanzapine on a high fat-high sweet palatable diet (10% sucrose + 30% fat, HF-HS) in mice implanted with subcutaneous osmotic mini-pumps. Locomotor activity was also assessed.

RESULTS

In experiment 1, the highest dose of chronically administered olanzapine (3 mg/kg) induced significant weight gain accompanied by augmentation of periuterine fat depots, with no changes in locomotor activity. In experiment 2, chronic administration did not alter energy expenditure, whereas, decreased respiratory quotient (RQ). In experiment 3, subcutaneously infused olanzapine evidenced a dose and time-dependent increase of body weight and HF-HS diet consumed. Notably, serum analyses revealed a hyperinsulinemia together with increased levels of triglycerides and glucose.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we describe in female mice metabolic alterations matching the metabolic syndrome, thus resembling the clinical situation of schizophrenic patients taking AAPs.

Atypical antipsychotic usage-related higher serum leptin levels and disabled lipid profiles in euthymic bipolar patients

Atypical antipsychotics (AA)-induced weight gain is associated with increased leptin levels. AA have been increasingly used in the treatment of bipolar disorders. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the association between serum leptin and lipid profiles considering the drug treatments in euthymic bipolar outpatients. Leptin and lipid profiles were compared, and no differences were noted in leptin, cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein levels among the patients and controls. Glucose, very-low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels in patients were higher than in controls, while high-density lipoprotein levels were low. Patients were divided into three groups according to their type of drug usage: AA users, AA + mood stabilizer users, and mood stabilizer users. Each group of patients was compared with a healthy control group for mentioned biochemical parameters. Lipid profiles were disordered by using both AA and mood stabilizers, but higher leptin levels are associated with AA usage. However, leptin does not seem to be responsible for dyslipidemia caused by AA or mood stabilizers in euthymic bipolar patients.

Women are not the same as men: specific clinical issues for female patients with bipolar disorder

Women are not the same as men. While this observation can be considered to subjectively manifest in many different ways, objectively a greater tendency for bipolar II disorder, depressive symptoms, a rapid cycling course, and the consequences of being of child-rearing age can all represent additional challenges for female patients. Despite much recent interest in improving the management of patients with bipolar disorder, relatively little guidance exists relating to female-biased gender-specific issues. This review article will explore how female gender can influence bipolar disorder and its treatment and will focus on epidemiologic differences, the relevance to clinical presentation of events unique to women (particularly contraception, pregnancy, and lactation), and the importance of considering gender when making decisions about the pharmacological management of mood. All female patients should receive counseling regarding family planning and sexually transmitted diseases, as well as the risks of and treatment options during pregnancy and postpartum. Wherever possible, treatment choices should be made in a partnership between patient and clinician.

Early effects of olanzapine on serum levels of ghrelin, adiponectin and leptin in patients with schizophrenia

Although treatment with antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine and clozapine, has been implicated in weight gain and higher incidence of diabetes, the mechanism of these adverse reactions remains unclear. The purposes of this study were to explore the early effects of olanzapine on serum levels of ghrelin, adiponectin and leptin, three recently identified hormones that play crucial roles in the regulation of energy balance and glucose metabolism. Thirteen patients with schizophrenia who had not received any medication in the 4 weeks prior to this study were included. The patients received olanzapine at an average dose of 14.5mg/day. Serum levels of ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin and insulin, as well as weight and fasting glucose, were investigated at the baseline and at 4 weeks. Serum ghrelin levels had decreased (p 0.03) and leptin had increased (p 0.02), while adiponectin and insulin levels had not significantly changed at Week 4 (p 0.29 and p 0.25, respectively). Weight had increased (p 0.01), while fasting glucose had not significantly changed (p 0.46). These findings suggest that ghrelin levels decrease and leptin levels increase after initiation of olanzapine therapy. Weight gain is also considered to be an early change, while change in insulin sensitivity is not an early change of treatment with olanzapine. Further large-scale and longitudinal studies are warranted to elucidate metabolic changes involving ghrelin, adiponectin, leptin and insulin and their impact on weight and glucose metabolism during treatment with olanzapine and other antipsychotics.

Olanzapine overdose in children and adolescents: two case reports and a review of the literature

Although the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine is increasingly being used in child and adolescent psychiatry, reports of olanzapine overdose in this young population are scarce. We report on two cases of adolescents who attempted suicide with an overdose of olanzapine: (1) A 14-year-old female ingested 275 mg olanzapine, which produced the highest reported nonlethal serum level (1503 ng/mL) and caused somnolence, agitation (acutely), and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS; after 54 hours) but no major clinical complications. The serum olanzapine level dropped to 129 ng/mL within 48 hours; and (2) a 17-year-old male ingested 400 mg olanzapine, the highest reported nonlethal dose of olanzapine in adolescents, which produced respiratory suppression requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation; he recovered after 3 days. Based on clinical monitoring and postmortem data, the 2 patients survived the ingestion of high doses of olanzapine. We also provide a review of the literature, encompassing all reported cases of olanzapine overdose in children and adolescents and discuss symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options, based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

A crossover study on lipid and weight changes associated with olanzapine and risperidone

RATIONALE

The results from case-control and retrospective studies revealed that olanzapine might be associated with more increased risks of metabolic dysfunction than risperidone. The crossover design can minimize the influence of individual variation in metabolic profiles and demographic variables, such as age, sex, concomitant medication use and personal life styles.

OBJECTIVES

We design a crossover study to evaluate the metabolic effect of olanzapine and risperidone.

METHODS

Fifteen schizophrenic patients were shifted from olanzapine and risperidone or from risperidone and olanzapine due to poor treatment response. The body weights, lipid profiles and fasting glucose levels were assessed before medication switch and 3 months after crossover.

RESULTS

In the seven patients taking risperidone at the time of inclusion (risperidone-first group), after shifting to olanzapine, there was a significant increase in triglyceride level (p=0.048) and body weight (p=0.008). In the other eight patients (olanzapine-first group), after shift to risperidone, there was a decrease in triglyceride level (p=0.009), body weight (p=0.049) and body mass index (BMI; p=0.04). When comparing the metabolic profiles in all patients after olanzapine and after risperidone (irrespective of the order of treatment), the mean triglyceride level (p=0.001), body weight (p=0.001) and BMI (p=0.015) were significantly higher in patients receiving olanzapine than in those receiving risperidone. Furthermore, there was a small increase in total cholesterol level (p=0.091) and a small decrease in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level (p=0.061) in olanzapine group, but the differences did not reach a significant level. There was no significant difference between olanzapine and risperidone in fasting glucose and low-density lipoprotein (LDL).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that elevated levels of triglyceride and body weight could be associated with the use of olanzapine as compared with risperidone. The changes in body weights and lipid profiles should be closely monitored in patients during treatment with atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Cardiovascular disease in relation to weight in deceased persons with schizophrenia

This study evaluated body mass index, body surface area, subcutaneous fat tissue, and coronary atherosclerosis by autopsy reports for people with schizophrenia who were deceased to evaluate the presence of cardiac atherosclerosis and its association with body weight. Included in the study were autopsy reports for 134 people with schizophrenia and 134 matched normal subjects who had died between January 1990 and December 2000 and whose family had donated brain tissue to Maryland Brain Collection. Cause of death due to cardiovascular disease was observed for 45.7% of people with schizophrenia and 42.3% of the control group (P = NS). Body weight, body mass index, body surface area, and subcutaneous fat were not significantly different between the 2 groups; however, a larger proportion of the schizophrenia group had high (33.3%) and low (20.9%) percentile body weight compared with controls (27.7% vs 10.0%). People with schizophrenia who were underweight had higher rates of cardiac death than the controls (37.7% vs 13%) (chi(2) = 5.79, P = .01); however, no difference was noted in the number of coronary arteries occluded. Twenty-three (48.9%) of 47 of the controls with abnormally high subcutaneous fat showed cardiac atherosclerosis, whereas only 15 (33.3%) of 45 of the schizophrenia group with abnormally high subcutaneous fat had atherosclerosis (P = NS). Overall, the percentage of deaths due to cardiovascular disease was not higher in people with schizophrenia; however, in normal controls, cardiovascular disease appears to be related more to weight than in people with schizophrenia. This may be related to intrinsic metabolic differences associated with schizophrenia, lifestyle differences, or effects of antipsychotic medications. Nonetheless, our study suggests that efforts for the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis in schizophrenia patients should go beyond weight control to target multiple risk factors such as smoking, dyslipidemia, and cardiac side effect of antipsychotic medications.

Atypical antipsychotic drugs, diabetes and ethnicity

There are 17 million people affected by diabetes in the US. It is a syndrome consisting of metabolic abnormalities, microvascular and macrovascular disease leading to cardiac, renal and neurological abnormalities. Obesity is the most common public health problem in developed nations. Diabetes and obesity-related illnesses are common in ethnic minorities such as African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians related to both genetics and lifestyle patterns. In all ethnic minorities in the US, an increase in Type 2 diabetes has been observed. However, the Asian group experienced the highest rate of increase in prevalence between the years 1990 and 1998. The changing ethnic composition of the US population may contribute significantly to the worsening of the diabetes epidemic in this country. Atypical antipsychotic drugs can induce diabetes, as well as obesity. All atypical antipsychotic drugs can produce diabetes, but drugs such as olanzapine and clozapine have been known to produce diabetes more often than other drugs. As ethnic minority patients including Asians, Hispanics and African-Americans are predisposed to develop diabetes, antipsychotics become a burden by precipitating diabetes. Such a situation poses a problem in treating ethnic minority psychiatric patients. In clinical situations, close monitoring is necessary to prevent metabolic side effects of these drugs.

Metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics in children: a literature review

The objective of this review is to summarize the data about metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics in children. Original research articles about side effects of atypical antipsychotics used in children were reviewed. The data was obtained mainly through Medline searches, identifying articles focusing on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children. Forty studies that addressed the issue of metabolic side effects were selected. The use of atypical antipsychotics in children has been consistently associated with weight gain and moderate prolactin elevation, while only a few case reports address the issue of glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia. The risk of weight gain and hyperprolactinaemia might be higher in younger children. Other risk factors have also been associated with antipsychotic-induced metabolic disturbances. These changes seem to be reversible, at least in some cases. Metabolic side effects of atypical antipsychotics could lead to serious complications in children who are prescribed these medications. Serious considerations should be given before initiating treatment and consistent clinical monitoring is essential. More research is needed, especially regarding glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia.

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain

Novel 'atypical' antipsychotic drugs represent a substantial improvement on older 'typical' drugs. However, clinical experience has shown that some, but not all, of these drugs can induce substantial weight gain. This interferes with compliance with drug taking and has expected effects on morbidity and mortality. In this review, we summarize current thinking on: (i) the extent to which different 'atypical' drugs induce weight gain; (ii) the possible roles of various neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in this adverse drug reaction; and (iii) the state of development of animal models in this area. We also outline major areas for future research.

Atypical antipsychotics in psychiatric practice: practical implications for clinical monitoring

OBJECTIVES

To provide practical recommendations for monitoring patients both before and during treatment with atypical antipsychotics, to assist clinicians in implementing preventative measures against diabetes, and to establish baselines according to which clinicians should initiate diabetes treatment.

METHOD

A working group of Canadian specialists in psychiatry and endocrinology reviewed peer-reviewed clinical studies published in this area and other relevant papers and abstracts.

RESULTS

The reviewed studies further confirm that atypical antipsychotic medications are the most effective components in the medical management of many psychotic conditions; they also further emphasize the need to more stringently monitor and recognize diabetes risk factors inherent in these patients. Recommendations are based on a review of the available data, on expert opinion and consensus, and on current Canadian guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and management of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psychiatric disorders, most particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders, have an increased risk for type 2 diabetes and should be screened frequently, especially when other risk factors are present. The resulting recommendations offer practical steps for effectively screening patients prior to and during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. They include (1) how to conduct an initial baseline assessment, (2) when and how to monitor blood glucose and lipid levels, and (3) how to educate patients regarding such lifestyle issues as nutrition, exercise, and diet.

[Assessment of metabolic impairments inducted by atypical antipsychotics among schizophrenic patients]

Conventional and atypical antipsychotics are known to induce weight gain, cause glucose and lipid impairments among schizophrenic patients. These impairments contribute to the intrinsic risk factors linked to the psychiatric pathology (sedentary state, nicotin addiction, diabetes) increasing numbers of cardiovascular complications. We propose to study ponderal modifications and presence of metabolic abnormalities in a population of schizophrenic patients treated by conventional or atypical antipsychotics, depending on the received treatment; 32 patients, whose schizophrenia diagnosis had been previously made, were consecutively included over a 4 months period. They were divided into three groups: patients treated by conventional antipsychotics (n = 6), by atypical antipsychotics (n = 16) or by a combination of both (n = 10); 6 patients (18%) display overweight problems, 4 patients (12.5%) got hypertriglyceridemia and 4 other patients (12.5%) have hypercholesterolemia. No particular drug could be directly targeted, partly because of the restricted size of our sample, but the patients presenting metabolism impairment were treated by atypical antipsychotic. The observance of these abnormalities is reflected in publications and lead to some antipsychotic treatments monitoring rules.

Pharmacotherapy to limit weight gain caused by antipsychotic use

Obesity is a major health problem, especially in patients with severe mental illnesses. Newer atypical antipsychotics are better tolerated and have fewer extrapyramidal side effects, however, they can cause significant weight gain. This poses a considerable added burden and increases the likelihood of developing medical illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Obesity in patients taking antipsychotic medication can usually be avoided, if behavioural modification and pharmacological measures are implemented from the outset. Greater awareness and a willingness to address the problem are needed along with more research into the development of weight gain and its prevention. This review examines these issues with a pharmacotherapy focus.

Wie viel allgemeinmedizinische Kompetenz ben�tigen Psychiater?

Due to manifold interactions between physical and mental health, there exist close interactions between psychiatric care and that from other medical fields. In this regard, points of general medical practice are discussed as they relate to psychiatric care. The frequency of somatic comorbidities in patients with mental disorders and a rising proportion of elderly patients are strong arguments for inclusion of general medical elements in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic training.

Association between antipsychotic treatment and hyperlipidemia among California Medicaid patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the risk of hyperlipidemia among people with schizophrenia exposed to new antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone) compared with those exposed to older generation antipsychotics.

METHODS

A case-control study of Medi-Cal claims. Cases developed hyperlipidemia after being diagnosed with schizophrenia (ICD-9: 295) and were exposed to only one antipsychotic drug at some point within 12 weeks prior to the hyperlipidemia diagnosis. Hyperlipidemia was defined by diagnostic claim (ICD-9: 272.1-272.4) or prescription claim for antilipemic agents. Cases were matched on gender and age +/- 3 years to patients with schizophrenia who did not develop hyperlipidemia. Conditional logistic regression assessed the risk of antipsychotic exposure, controlling for age, ethnicity, prior type 2 diabetes or hypothyroidism, and exposure to other medications that may cause hyperlipidemia. Analyses were repeated using a 24- and 52-week retrospective exposure windows.

RESULTS

For the 12-week exposure window, olanzapine (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33) was associated with increased risk of developing hyperlipidemia compared with older antipsychotic medications. Exposure to clozapine (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.99-1.37), risperidone (OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.90-1.12), and quetiapine (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.78-1.32) was not. Hypothesis tests comparing the 4 atypicals to one another revealed that the odds ratio for olanzapine was greater than that for risperidone (P = 0.002). Other than clozapine's odds ratio being significant at 24 weeks (OR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45), increasing the exposure window to 24 or 52 weeks did not substantially alter the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with older generation antipsychotics, exposure to olanzapine and, somewhat less consistently, to clozapine is associated with an increased risk of hyperlipidemia among people with schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic exposure and type 2 diabetes among patients with schizophrenia: a matched case-control study of California Medicaid claims

PURPOSE

To examine the risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus among people with schizophrenia exposed to atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone) compared to those exposed to conventional antipsychotics.

METHODS

A matched case-control design was used to examine California Medicaid beneficiaries. Cases developed diabetes subsequent to being diagnosed with schizophrenia (ICD-9295), were 18 years or older, and were exposed to at least one antipsychotic medication at some point during the 12 weeks preceding diabetes diagnosis. Diabetes was defined by diagnostic claim (ICD-9250) or prescription for antidiabetic agents. A total of 3663 cases were matched to 14 523 non-diabetic controls (people with schizophrenia matched on gender and age +/-5 years). All had to be continuously eligible for benefits during the 12-week period preceding diabetes onset in the case. Conditional logistic regression modeled the risk of exposure, controlling for age, ethnicity, and exposure to selected concomitant medications. Analyses were repeated with 24- and 52-week exposure windows.

RESULTS

Using a 12-week exposure window, olanzapine (OR = 1.36, 95%CI 1.20-1.53), clozapine (OR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.16-1.55), and combination atypical therapy (OR = 1.58, 95%CI 1.33-1.88), but not risperidone or quetiapine, were associated with increased odds of developing diabetes compared to conventional antipsychotics. Changing to a 24-week exposure window, the risks were: olanzapine (OR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.22-1.56), clozapine (OR = 1.32, 95%CI 1.14-1.53), or combinations (OR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.29-1.84). With a 52-week exposure window, the risks were: olanzapine (OR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.24-1.60), clozapine (OR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.21-1.65), combinations (OR = 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.90). Risk for olanzapine increased with dose. Hispanic, African American, and unknown ethnicity were significant risks for development of type 2 diabetes as was exposure to selected concomitant medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to olanzapine or clozapine is associated with a 34-41% increase in the developing of type 2 diabetes among California Medicaid recipients with schizophrenia. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these retrospective, observational findings.

Exploring the risk of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia among ambulatory users of atypical antipsychotics: a population-based comparison of risperidone and olanzapine

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence rates of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia in ambulatory first-time users of risperidone and olanzapine.

METHODS

The database for the Prescription Drug Insurance Plan in the province of Quebec was used as the data source for a population-based cohort study. Denominalized data were extracted for all ambulatory patients who first received an atypical antipsychotic between 1 January 1997 and 31 August 1999. Eligible patients were categorized as taking: no antidiabetic medication; no lipid reducing medication; neither type of medication. Those who started to use an outcome drug (an antidiabetic or lipid-lowering medication) before the end of the follow-up period (31 August 2000) were considered to have developed the corresponding outcome disease. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) (and 95% confidence intervals) for initiating antihyperglycemic or lipid-lowering drug treatment, or both were calculated. Outcomes on risperidone were compared to those on olanzapine.

RESULTS

A total of 19 582 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Relative to risperidone, olanzapine was associated with a higher risk of initiating a pharmacologic treatment for diabetes [IRR: 1.33 (1.03-1.74)], dyslipidemia [IRR: 1.49 (1.22-1.83)], or either condition [1.47 (1.23-1.76)].

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine seems to be associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes and/or dyslipidemia than risperidone. Further prospective studies are needed to rigorously assess the safety of olanzapine.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting risperidone in stable patients with schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND

The treatment of schizoaffective disorder is often complicated by the variety of symptoms that contribute to its pathology. Data from a large study (n=725), which included schizoaffective patients to assess the effect of long-acting risperidone, are presented.

METHOD

A multicenter, open-label study enrolled non-acute, clinically stable patients with schizoaffective disorder (n=110). Patients on a stable dose of antipsychotic for at least 4 weeks at study entry were switched to long-acting risperidone every 2 weeks for 50 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores (+/-S.E.) improved significantly (p<0.001) at each measured time point, including endpoint (-9.0+/-1.6), compared with baseline. Significant reductions were observed on mean PANSS cluster scores for both anxiety/depression (-1.3+/-0.4, p<0.001) and uncontrolled hostility/excitement (-0.7+/-0.3, p<0.05). In addition, scores improved significantly for positive symptoms (-2.2+/-0.5, p<0.001), negative symptoms (-3.1+/-0.5, p<0.001), and disorganized thoughts (-1.7+/-0.4, p<0.001). The overall subjective score of movement disorders was low at baseline (3.6+/-4.1) and had significantly decreased at endpoint (2.75; p<0.05). Patients were previously treated with antipsychotics for 398+/-790 days before being switched to long-acting risperidone.

LIMITATIONS

Although this was a 50-week study, which included over 100 patients with schizoaffective disorder, limitations include the open-label design and that it was not designed specifically to assess patients with this disorder. PANSS symptom domains previously defined by factor analytic methods were used for mood symptom measures. No specific mood symptom scales were administered in this study.

CONCLUSION

Patients with schizoaffective disorder, considered stable on their antipsychotic medication at study entry, experienced additional significant clinical improvements and minimal side effects with injections of long-acting risperidone over a 50-week study period.

Frequency of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and Use of Antipsychotic Drugs Among Central Texas Veterans

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the frequency of new-onset diabetes mellitus differs between patients taking atypical antipsychotic agents and those taking typical agents, whether the frequency of new-onset diabetes differs among those taking the atypical antipsychotic agents, and what clinical and demographic factors influence the occurrence of new-onset diabetes.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Central Texas Veterans Health Care System.

PATIENTS

Continuously enrolled adult (> or = 18 yrs) patients with no previous (6 mo) antipsychotic use and no history (previous 1 yr) of diabetes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from the Central Texas Veterans Health Care System were extracted from September 1995-November 2002. Clinical and demographic factors used in the analysis were antipsychotic agent taken, body mass index, diabetes-related risk factors, type of mental health comorbidity, age, sex, and race. Among those who met the inclusion criteria (3469 patients), chi2 analyses revealed no significant difference in the frequency of diabetes between the typical and atypical groups (p=0.5553) or among those taking atypical agents (p=0.6520). Multivariate logistic regression (1587 patients) revealed that increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 1.213, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.016-1.447, p=0.0324), nonwhite race (OR 1.761, 95% CI 1.174-2.640, p=0.0062), and hyperlipidemia (OR 1.606, 95% CI 1.064-2.425, p=0.0242) were significantly related to new-onset diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among veterans taking antipsychotic agents, no difference was noted in the frequency of diabetes between patients who took typical agents and those who took atypical agents. After controlling for demographic and clinical variables, still no significant difference was noted among the agents. The main factors (increasing age, nonwhite race, and hyperlipidemia) related to new-onset diabetes were those that are typically associated with the disease.

Oral glucose tolerance test in children and adolescents: positives and pitfalls

OBJECTIVES

To describe the glycaemic status (assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)) and associated comorbidities in a cohort of Australian children and adolescents at risk of insulin resistance and impaired glucose homeostasis (IGH).

METHODS

Twenty-one children and adolescents (three male, 18 female) (18 Caucasian, one Indigenous, two Asian) (20 obese, one lipodystrophy) referred to the Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Clinic underwent a 2-h OGTT with plasma glucose and insulin measured at baseline, + 60 and + 120 min. If abnormal, the OGTT was repeated.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age was 14.2 (1.6) years, BMI 38.8 (7.0) kg/m2 and BMI-SDS 3.6 (0.6). Fourteen patients had fasting insulin levels >21 mU/L. Type 2 diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in one patient, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in four patients and impaired fasting glycaemia (IFG) in one patient. Despite no weight loss, only one patient had a persistently abnormal OGTT on repeat testing. Three patients with IGH were medicated with risperidone at the time of the initial OGTT. One patient who had persistent IGT had continued risperidone. The other two patients had initial OGTT results of IGT and diabetes mellitus type 2. They both ceased risperidone between tests and repeat OGTT showed normal glycaemic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of fasting glucose alone may miss cases of IGH. Diagnosis of IGT should not be made on one test alone. Interpretation of glucose and insulin responses in young people is limited by lack of normative data. Larger studies are needed to generate Australian screening recommendations. Further assessment of the potential adverse effects of atypical antipsychotic medication on glucose homeostasis in this at-risk group is important.

Atypical antipsychotics and metabolic dysregulation: evaluating the risk/benefit equation and improving the standard of care

Atypical antipsychotics are a major advance in the management of schizophrenia. The reevaluation of widely held risk/benefit assessments of the various atypical antipsychotics provides an opportunity to improve treatment patterns. The best available clinical trial evidence indicates that efficacy among the atypical antipsychotics (at equivalent doses) is very similar, but safety and tolerability profiles differ significantly. Atypical antipsychotics differ markedly in their potential to cause metabolic disturbances, including obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and the metabolic syndrome; clozapine and olanzapine carry the greatest risks, atypical antipsychotics like risperidone and quetiapine have lower risks, and newer agents like ziprasidone and aripiprazole are associated with minimal metabolic risks. Results from the Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy and Metabolic Issues (AtAMI) survey define important opportunities for improving medical and psychiatric outcomes during atypical antipsychotic therapy. (See accompanying article by Newcomer et al) Additional educational and research efforts are required to increase understanding of common conditions such as the metabolic syndrome, increase awareness of uncommon but serious events like diabetic ketoacidosis, and pancreatitis, and identify appropriate strategies for monitoring the risks/benefits of atypical antipsychotic therapy. As clinicians refine practice patterns regarding the atypical antipsychotics, they may require additional knowledge and resources to fully incorporate risk/benefit considerations and optimize long-term psychiatric and medical outcomes.

The Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy and Metabolic Issues National Survey: practice patterns and knowledge of psychiatrists

A nationwide survey in 2003 of 300 randomly selected psychiatrists who routinely treat schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotic therapy was conducted to ascertain practice patterns and attitudes regarding metabolic disturbances during atypical antipsychotic therapy with an emphasis on how these perceptions impact therapeutic decision making. Psychiatrists generally believe that some atypical antipsychotic drugs are associated with metabolic disturbances and that atypical antipsychotics differ in their risk for metabolic disturbances. A majority of respondents (82%) believed that patients with schizophrenia-even those not receiving atypical antipsychotic therapy-are at greater risk for metabolic abnormalities than the general population. A majority of respondents recognized weight gain and diabetes mellitus (59% and 51%, respectively) as potential metabolic complications of atypical antipsychotic therapy, while only some recognized dyslipidemia and certain acute metabolic decompensations like diabetic ketoacidosis (22% and 2%, respectively). Large minorities of respondents (48% and 43%) indicated a willingness to risk weight gain and/or diabetes for the benefits of atypical antipsychotics, possibly because metabolic issues were regarded as long-term issues. However, large majorities also stated that they considered metabolic issues when selecting atypical antipsychotic therapy for some or all of their patients (90%), and that emergence of metabolic dysfunction prompted them to change atypical antipsychotic treatment regimens (85%). Additional efforts at continuing education and communication regarding metabolic outcomes associated with atypical antipsychotic therapy, as well as critical reviews in this area, may help clarify atypical antipsychotic treatment risks and benefits. The results from the survey indicate that psychiatrists are aware of and concerned about metabolic risks and how they differ across the atypical antipsychotic class. The impact of additional data and educational efforts in this area, such as a recently published consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and other organizations, remains to be assessed.

Schizophrénie, diabète et antipsychotiques

During the last years, a contribution of antipsychotic drugs in the increase of diabetes prevalence in schizophrenic population has been repetitively suggested. The debate focused mainly on the second-generation antipsychotics. The analysis of the scientific literature indicates however that this discussion is not recent and an increase of diabetes prevalence in schizophrenic populations was already described before the introduction of neuroleptics. Then, after the introduction of the first neuroleptics in the 1950s, an increase of diabetes prevalence was reported among treated patients and the same alarms occurred in the 1990s after the introduction of second-generation antipsychotics. These treatments were related to an increase of glucose tolerance impairment, type II diabetes and diabetic acidoketosis. Recent epidemiological studies have confirmed the increase prevalence of diabetes in schizophrenic patients, particularly in schizophrenic patients before any antipsychotic treatment. Among the suggested mechanisms, there are sedentary life (due to hospitalisation and sedative effects of neuroleptics), food imbalance, shared genetic factors for diabetes and schizophrenia. Moreover, the frequency of the metabolic syndrome is increased in schizophrenic populations. This syndrome associates blood glucose increase, lipid metabolism disorders and android obesity. This could explain--via an increase of the cortisol production--the increase of mortality due to cardiovascular diseases observed in schizoprhenic patients. Thus, it seems well established that schizophrenia is associated with an increased risk for diabetes. It is however more difficult to evaluate the role of antipsychotic treatment as a causative factor of diabetes. Indeed, there are many published case reports or diabetes or diabetic acidoketosis after an antipsychotic treatment, but the level of evidence in controlled trials is low. Many studies were performed on large databases, but were retrospective and subjected to many flaws: concomitant diseases not taken into account, diabetes status evaluated by drug consumption, unknown diabetes status before antipsychotic treatment, etc. In the few prospective studies performed, no significant differences between the atypical versus typical antipsychotics were evidenced for new cases of diabetes. Moreover, in general population, the glucose tolerance impairment is underdiagnosed and it is estimated that people with a glucose tolerance impairment have a 5-10% annual risk of type II diabetes. Thus, this concern has to be replaced among the world epidemic increase of diabetes and in a population of patients whose the disease itself and life style are risk factors for diabetes. Some studies have explored the pathophysiological mechanisms that could support a diabetogenic effect of antipsychotics. Although it does not seem to be a direct effect of antipsychotics on insulin secretion by pancreatic cells, body weight increase has been evidence for both typical and atypical antipsychotics. However, it remains unclear whether this weight increase is responsible for a visceral adiposity, which is a risk factor better fitted to the cardiovascular mortality tha the body weight itself. Other hypotheses involving an effect on the leptin, which regulates the appetite, have been proposed. In waiting of new prospective controlled studies, and without denying the impact of antipsychotics on the glucose and lipid metabolisms (on the weight increase, for example), it should be recognized that the benefit/risk ratio remains largely in favour of the treatment, particularly for the atypical antipsychotics, more effective and better tolerated at the neurological level than the conventional antipsychotics. One of the benefits of the mainly articles in professional media about this concern is to draw attention on the metabolism disorders in schizophrenic patients, which are important risk factor of their frequent cardiovascular surmortality whatever the causes. Consequently, it is advised to monitor glucose and lipid metabolisms of schizophrenic patients before and during their treatment (body weight, fast blood glucose, blood cholesterol and triglycerides). In conclusion, schizophrenic patients are a population with an increased metabolic risk, which is a cause of their increased mortality. Although these data are known since a long time ago, this population does not benefit from the same metabolic follow-up than the non-schizophrenic population. The debate on the possible relationship between diabetes and antipsychotics should be also taken as a helpful recall of the necessity to follow simple rules of prevention and monitoring in this at-risk population. This should make it possible to preserve the benefit of the antipsychotics, the contribution of which in the treatment of schizophrenia is not any more to demonstrate.

The effects of antipsychotic therapy on serum lipids: a comprehensive review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this paper is to review the literature since 1970 documenting the effects of antipsychotic agents on serum lipids, including a discussion of possible mechanisms for the observed phenomena, the clinical significance and recommendations for monitoring hyperlipidemia during antipsychotic therapy.

RESULTS

High-potency conventional antipsychotics (e.g., haloperidol) and the atypical antipsychotics, ziprasidone, risperidone and aripiprazole, appear to be associated with lower risk of hyperlipidemia. Low-potency conventional antipsychotics (e.g., chlorpormazine, thioridazine) and the atypical antipsychotics, quetiapine, olanzapine and clozapine, are associated with higher risk of hyperlipidemia. Possible hypotheses for lipid dysregulation include weight gain, dietary changes and the development of glucose intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the multiple cardiovascular risk factors seen in patients with schizophrenia, great care must be exercised in the choice of antipsychotic therapy to minimize the medical burden of additional risk imposed by hyperlipidemia. It is recommended that a lipid panel be obtained at baseline in all patients with schizophrenia, annually thereafter for patients on agents associated with lower risk of hyperlipidemia and quarterly in patients on agents associated with higher risk for hyperlipidemia. All patients with persistent dyslipidemia should be referred for lipid-lowering therapy or switched to a less lipid-offending antipsychotic agent.

Rhabdomyolysis and compartment syndrome with coadministration of risperidone and simvastatin

We report a case of rhabdomyolysis and acute compartment syndrome of the lower extremity in a schizophrenic patient taking risperidone following the addition of simvastatin to treat hyperlipidemia. We suspect that disrupted drug metabolism, resulting from interactions with cytochrome P450 enzymes, rapidly elevated drug plasma levels, which then led to muscle toxicity. Clinicians who pharmacologically treat medical comorbidities in patients receiving atypical antipsychotics must be proactive in anticipating potential drug-drug interactions.

Outcomes and costs of risperidone versus olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders: a Markov model

OBJECTIVE

To compare expected outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders who are treated with risperidone versus olanzapine.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to examine outcomes and costs of care in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders receiving risperidone or olanzapine. The time frame of interest was 1 year. The model focused particular attention on the likelihood of therapy switching and discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent side effects, as the efficacy of these two agents is similar. Measures of interest included the incidence of relapse and selected side effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), prolactin-related disorders and diabetes, expected change in body weight, and the percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year. Costs of antipsychotic therapy and psychiatric and nonpsychiatric services also were examined.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of EPS was estimated to be slightly higher for risperidone, as was the incidence of symptomatic prolactin-related disorders. The expected incidence of diabetes mellitus, while low, was slightly higher for olanzapine. Approximately 25% and 4% of olanzapine and risperidone patients, respectively, were projected to experience an increase in body weight > or = 7%. The estimated percentage of patients remaining on initial therapy at the end of 1 year was higher for risperidone than olanzapine (76.9% vs. 45.6%, respectively). Expected mean total costs of care per month of therapy were $2163 for risperidone and $2316 for olanzapine. Results from sensitivity analyses suggest that the probability of therapy discontinuation following weight gain >5 kg would have to be lower than 0.1 for the number of patients remaining on therapy at the end of 1 year to be the same for risperidone and olanzapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with risperidone, treatment with olanzapine may result in greater increases in body weight, higher rates of therapy discontinuation, and higher costs of medical-care services.

Weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic use in children and adolescents: prevalence, clinical relevance, and management

Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly prescribed to children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders. Although their profile of potent antagonism at specific serotonin and dopamine receptors offers certain advantages compared with typical antipsychotics, their use has been associated with various adverse effects, including significant weight gain. This adverse effect is of particular concern in children and adolescents, secondary to the immediate and long-term health risks associated with weight gain, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Indeed, from 1963 to 1991, the prevalence of obesity has approximately doubled in youth. Prior to selecting an atypical antipsychotic, a detailed review of the predictors of weight gain is necessary for every child and adolescent. Published data suggest that clozapine and olanzapine are associated with considerable weight gain, whereas risperidone and quetiapine have a moderate risk. Alternatively, ziprasidone and aripiprazole may exhibit a low risk for this adverse effect. Whereas behavioral and pharmacologic measures are available to manage weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics, research is needed to establish more effective and safe interventions for this adverse effect in children and adolescents.

Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic-induced weight gain

RATIONALE

Antipsychotic medications have been associated with considerable weight gain. The degree of inter-individual variability and known genetic contributions to obesity suggest a combination of genetic and environmental factors. In the absence of established mechanisms and valid predictors for this relevant adverse effect, pharmacogenetic studies may provide the basis for the development of individualized treatment and preventive interventions.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present review is to analyze the theoretical and empirical knowledge base for the selection of the most promising target genes that may contribute to antipsychotic-induced weight gain.

METHODS

Examination of the preclinical and clinical literature that can inform the rational choice of target genes that may play a role in the development of adverse changes in body composition associated with antipsychotic treatment.

RESULTS

Theoretically, candidate gene selection can be guided by knowledge about molecular pathways associated with obesity, receptors modulated by antipsychotic drugs, and enzymes implicated in their metabolism and bioavailability. While most available data relate to the general mechanisms of obesity and few studies have directly examined the genetic contributions to antipsychotic-induced weight gain, several genes warrant further investigation. These include the 5-HT(2C), pro-opiomelanocortin, leptin, ghrelin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, adiponectin, dopamine D(2) receptor, histamine-H(1) receptor, and alpha(1), beta(2) and beta(3) adrenergic receptor genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacogenetic studies can provide powerful tools for the pre-treatment identification of individuals at high risk for antipsychotic-induced weight gain, to uncover biological mechanisms that may even generalize to non-drug-induced weight gain, and to isolate novel targets for treatments of weight gain and obesity. To enhance power, future studies should pay close attention to population selection and avoidance/control of confounds, particularly past treatment exposure.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in patients with schizophrenia: a multicentre comparative study in East Asia

AIMS

Previous studies of the prescription patterns of psychotropic medications in patients with schizophrenia have highlighted a high rate of antipsychotic polypharmacy, but data in Asia are sparse. This study seeks to examine the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy in patients with schizophrenia and compare the differences between patients receiving one vs. those receiving more than one antipsychotic.

METHODS

Antipsychotic prescription for a sample of 2399 patients with schizophrenia from six countries and territories was evaluated. Daily doses of antipsychotic medications were converted to standard chlorpromazine equivalents (CPZ).

RESULTS

Antipsychotic polypharmacy was found in 45.7% (n = 1097) of the patients with wide intercountry variations. Polypharmacy was associated with male gender [odds ratio (OR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.46, P < 0.01], advanced age (t = -7.81, d.f. = 2396, P < 0.001), psychiatric hospital setting (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11, 1.62) as well as higher daily CPZeq doses (411.47 vs. 983.10 CPZeq day(-1), z = -25.94, P < 0.001), anticholinergic use (OR 3.17, 95% CI 2.65, 3.79, P < 0.001) and less use of an atypical antipsychotic drug (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71, 0.98, P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, country, age and duration of illness were significantly associated with antipsychotic polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the wide intercountry variations of antipsychotic polypharmacy which are likely to be influenced by a complex combination of clinical, setting, cultural and personal practice factors, requiring more research.

Clinical rating scales and instruments: how do they compare in assessing abnormal, involuntary movements?

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have shown that quantitative instrumental measurements are more sensitive than clinical rating scales to subclinical dyskinesia and parkinsonism. We therefore hypothesized that an instrumental assessment would be more sensitive to the presence of dyskinetic and parkinsonian movements than the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), the Dyskinesia Identification Scale, Condensed User Version (DISCUS), and the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS). We also hypothesized that the DISCUS, by virtue of its more detailed protocol, would be more sensitive than the AIMS.

METHOD

Using blinded raters, we compared the clinical rating scales with instrumental measurements in 100 patients referred to a movement disorders clinic. We collected demographic data, risk factors for tardive dyskinesia, current medication use, Axis I and III disorders, and an estimate of cognitive functioning using the Mini-Mental Status Examination.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the AIM and the DISCUS in the identification of dyskinesia. However, an instrumental assessment revealed a significantly greater prevalence of dyskinesia. The Mini-Mental Status Examination was the most prominent predictor of both instrumental and clinical measurements of parkinsonian and dyskinetic movements.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that even trained raters, utilizing standard rating scales, may underestimate the prevalence of some motor abnormalities. Instrumental ratings may be helpful to both the clinician and investigator, particularly when abnormal movements are not clinically obvious. The relationship between cognitive impairment and motor abnormalities remains an important area for further research.

The impact of weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic use in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotics offer clear advantages in the management of schizophrenia, compared with conventional neuroleptics, but weight gain is a significant adverse effect with some of these agents.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Relevant sources were identified from Medline searches to February 2003 using combinations of keywords including 'schizophrenia', 'antipsychotics', 'weight gain', 'adverse events', 'obesity', and 'diabetes'.

RESULTS

Most atypical antipsychotics induce some weight gain, but the magnitude of the effect varies markedly. The greatest increases are seen with clozapine and olanzapine: risperidone has a slight effect, comparable with that of conventional neuroleptics, while ziprasidone and aripiprazole appear from current data to have little effect. In addition, atypical antipsychotics have been associated with metabolic disturbances, particularly glucose dysregulation and dyslipidemia. These effects tend to be more marked with olanzapine and clozapine than with other agents. Weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics imposes substantial morbidity, in addition to that associated with schizophrenia itself. Furthermore, weight gain can significantly impair patients' quality of life, and leads to non-adherence with treatment. Effective weight management should include the selection of an appropriate atypical antipsychotic and for effective weight management, as well both diet and exercise, formal weight management programs tailored to the needs of schizophrenic patients may be useful, and some patients may benefit from weight-reducing drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics is a common problem that requires effective management. The selection of an agent with a low risk of weight gain, such as risperidone or ziprasidone, is central to such management.

Mood-stabilizer-maintained, remitted bipolar patients: taper and discontinuation of adjunctive antipsychotic medication

The aim of this study was to determine whether bipolar patients who had been stabilized on combined antipsychotic and mood-stabilizer medications and were currently in remission benefited from continuation of the antipsychotic medication. Remitted bipolar patients were randomly assigned to either remain on adjunctive antipsychotic medication or to taper to placebo. Antipsychotic/placebo medication assignment was double-blind. Subjects were outpatients at a university-affiliated community mental health center. Fifteen subjects consented and proceeded with eligibility assessments. Five subjects were never randomized. One of these was excluded when the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV interview revealed schizoaffective disorder. The remaining four subjects were not randomized for other reasons. Three randomized subjects never received study medications, or were withdrawn by the investigator within 1 week after beginning study medications. The seven remaining subjects received study medication for more than 1 week. Five subjects were randomized to taper to placebo and two to antipsychotic continuation. Of the five randomized to taper to placebo, three successfully tapered and completed the year of follow-up in continuous remission. One subject became manic 4 months after taper was completed, and one subject became psychotic, in the absence of a mood episode, during taper. Of the two subjects randomized to double-blind antipsychotic continuation, both completed the year of follow-up in continuous remission. When adjunctive antipsychotic medications are discontinued, bipolar patients' clinical symptoms can remain unchanged. Others are, however, at risk for manic relapse.

Use of psychopharmacologic agents in the elderly

Most psychiatric disorders in elderly patients are amenable to treatment, provided that intervention is thorough and intensive. Appropriate and judicious use of psychopharmacologic agents has a potential for dramatically improving the quality of life and functional status of many elderly patients with psychiatric disorders. The decision to prescribe a psychopharmacologic agent in elderly patients is a serious and complex issue. Several basic principles need to be followed (Table 6). Although some strides have been made in the last decade regarding safety and efficacy of many psychopharmacologic agents in elderly [table: see text] patients, for many psychopharmacologic agents, large randomized controlled studies to evaluate efficacy and safety in elderly patients are lacking. Sparse data are available regarding the long-term effects of psychopharmacologic agents in elderly patients. Important gaps remain in our knowledge concerning the optimal duration of treatment for most psychiatric disorders in elderly patients. The treatment data deficiency is most striking among the oldest old (patients aged 85 and older), frail medically ill elderly patients (such as nursing home residents), and ethnic minority groups. Future research should focus on these and other relevant issues related to the use of psychopharmacologic agents in elderly patients.

Management of diabetes mellitus occurring during treatment with olanzapine: report of six cases and clinical implications

In spite of conflicting reports, there is emerging evidence that at least two of the atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and olanzapine, are associated with an increased risk of developing glucose dysregulation or new onset diabetes mellitus. We report on the management of six patients who developed diabetes mellitus following treatment with olanzapine, five of whom had independent risk factors for diabetes. Olanzapine was changed to quetiapine in all patients with improvement in glycaemic control in two patients. In view of the uncertainty of the size and mechanism of the link between olanzapine and diabetes, we discuss issues surrounding routine clinical management and monitoring of patients on antipsychotics and the clinical implications.

Risperidone in acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenia--a clinical profile

Data from a range of well-controlled clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical use support the efficacy of risperidone for both acute and long-term therapy of schizophrenic psychoses. With regard to positive symptoms, the efficacy of risperidone was shown to be at least comparable with that of haloperidol. However, risperidone differs from conventional antipsychotics because it is more effective against the negative symptoms, has beneficial effects on affective and cognitive symptoms, and carries less risk of extrapyramidal side effects (EPS). To date, risperidone is the only atypical antipsychotic to have shown a significantly lower relapse rate compared with haloperidol in a long-term double-blind trial. This review describes comprehensive trial data and therapeutic observations gained with risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia since its approval.

Adverse Metabolic Effects Associated with Atypical Antipsychotics

Adverse metabolic effects, such as diabetes mellitus, lipid abnormalities and weight gain, have increasingly been recognised with the use of the newer, so-called atypical antipsychotic drugs. This article reviews the current literature in the field and attempts to answer the question of whether the atypical antipsychotics differ in their effects on glucose-insulin homeostasis and lipid metabolism. It also addresses how then to manage the use of the atypical antipsychotics that do interfere with these metabolic systems. Differences in effects of atypical antipsychotics on leptin levels are also summarised and put into context; bodyweight gain associated with atypical antipsychotics is reviewed elsewhere. In summary, there are no large controlled trials published quantifying the prevalence of adverse effects on glucose-insulin homeostasis and lipid metabolism in patients receiving atypical antipsychotics. Nevertheless, the published articles and case reports reviewed in this article give a fairly good view of those adverse effects occurring with clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone, whereas little data are available regarding quetiapine, ziprasidone and zotepine, and no data exist for amisulpride and aripiprazole. Estimated rankings of the atypical agents, based on the available literature, show that the relative risk of glucose intolerance/diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and hyperleptinaemia is highest for clozapine and olanzapine, moderately high for quetiapine, rather low for risperidone and lowest for ziprasidone. Since adverse metabolic effects of atypical antipsychotics may have a negative influence on both the antipsychotic treatment outcome as well as the physical health of the patient, these effects have to be recognised and adequately managed. In this review, recommendations for prevention and treatment of the adverse metabolic effects are outlined.

Treatment of acute mania

Mood stabilizers have evolved considerably over the past decade. Lithium, divalproex, and olanzapine are currently Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of acute mania. A number of new and traditional medications have also been tested and are commonly used in clinical practice. Several strategies for managing treatment-resistant mania have been suggested, but few have been rigorously tested. Emphases on rapid stabilization and fewer side effects have raised the bar for what is expected from mood stabilizers and the successful treatment of mania involves a delicate balance between swiftness, short-term tolerability, and long-term safety.

Eicosapentaenoic acid in the treatment of schizophrenia and depression: rationale and preliminary double-blind clinical trial results

It has been hypothesised that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) play an important role in the aetiology of schizophrenia and depression. Evidence supporting this hypothesis for schizophrenia includes abnormal brain phospholipid turnover shown by 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, increased levels of phospholipase A2, reduced niacin skin flush response, abnormal electroretinogram, and reduced cell membrane levels of n-3 and n-6 PUFA. In depression, there is strong epidemiological evidence that fish consumption reduces risk of becoming depressed and evidence that cell membrane levels of n-3 PUFA are reduced. Four out of five placebo-controlled double- blind trials of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in the treatment of schizophrenia have given positive findings. In depression, two placebo-controlled trials have shown a strong therapeutic effect of ethyl-EPA added to existing medication. The mode of action of EPA is currently not known, but recent evidence suggests that arachidonic acid (AA) if of particular importance in schizophrenia and that clinical improvement in schizophrenic patients using EPA treatment correlates with changes in AA.

Position of the American Dietetic Association: Integration of medical nutrition therapy and pharmacotherapy

It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that the application of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and lifestyle counseling as a part of the Nutrition Care Process is an integral component of the medical treatment for management of specific disease states and conditions and should be the initial step in the management of these situations. If optimal control cannot be achieved with MNT alone and concurrent pharmacotherapy is required, then The Association promotes a team approach to care for clients receiving concurrent MNT and pharmacotherapy and encourages active collaboration among dietetics professionals and other members of the health care team. There are a number of medical conditions, many of them chronic, that will respond to MNT and, therefore, MNT should be the first intervention for these conditions. In addition to being a vital element of the optimal management and control of these conditions, MNT is also a cost-effective method of management. However, because of the long-term nature of these conditions, concurrent pharmacotherapy may become necessary to achieve or maintain optimal control. In cases where this is necessary, MNT should continue to be an integral component of the therapy because it may complement or enhance the therapeutic effectiveness of pharmacotherapy, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for multiple medications. The utilization of a coordinated multidisciplinary team approach is critical to the success of the concurrent use of MNT and pharmacotherapy because of the long-term duration of the treatments, the necessity of monitoring compliance and effectiveness, and the likelihood of multiple medication-nutrient interactions.

Weight Change after an Atypical Antipsychotic Switch

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotics successfully treat schizophrenia and other conditions, with a lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects than other agents used in treatment of these disorders. However, some atypical antipsychotics are associated with weight gain.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact on weight and identify atypical antipsychotics causing the least amount of weight gain among patients switched from risperidone to olanzapine and olanzapine to risperidone.

METHODS

Patients included in the study (n = 86) were > or =18 years and had received > or =2 prescriptions for risperidone or olanzapine for > or =60 days, switched to the other atypical antipsychotic, and were dispensed > or =2 prescriptions for at least 60 days after the index date. Age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were retrospectively abstracted from automated databases containing patient-specific prescription and vital sign information.

RESULTS

At the time of their switch, the average patient age was 53.2 years (range 25-83). The average weight change in patients switched to olanzapine (n = 47) was +2.3 kg (p = 0.01) and the BMI change was +0.8 kg/m(2) (p = 0.02). The average percent body weight change was +2.8% and the BMI change was +3.0%. The average weight change after patients switched to risperidone (n = 39) was -0.45 kg (p = 0.69) and BMI change was -0.2 kg/m2 (p = 0.64). The average percentage weight change was -0.4% and BMI change was -0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners' concern regarding weight changes after switching atypical antipsychotics seems warranted and patients should be provided consistent, ongoing weight monitoring. Further investigations should examine whether weight changes associated with atypical antipsychotic treatment further jeopardize this already at-risk population for severe comorbid conditions such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, and type 2 diabetes.

Behavioural management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a review

OBJECTIVE

Although psychiatrists are aware of weight gain induced by atypical antipsychotics, only few studies on behavioural interventions in this patient group are published. This review aims to summarize the evidence on effectiveness of behavioural interventions for weight gain in the general population and in-patients treated with atypical antipsychotics.

METHOD

Medline and Cochrane databases search for evidence on effectiveness of behavioural interventions.

RESULTS

In general, behavioural approaches including, diet, exercise and drug treatments may be effective. There were only 13 studies of behavioural interventions for patients taking antipsychotic medication. No study met the criteria for a RCT. Calorie restriction in a controlled ward environment, structured counselling combined with cognitive behavioural therapy and counselling on life style and provision of rewards may potentially lead to weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Currently only limited, methodologically flawed, evidence is available that behavioural interventions in overweight patients treated with antipsychotics, although intuitively appealing, actually work.

The implications of weight changes with antipsychotic treatment

Patients receiving treatment with atypical antipsychotics commonly experience weight gain, which can cause considerable distress and can have deleterious effects on cardiovascular health. Because of the associated weight gain and potential direct effects on glucose metabolism, atypical antipsychotics have also been linked to the development of type II diabetes mellitus. Data on long-term treatment with these agents show that clozapine and olanzapine, followed by risperidone, were associated with the greatest degree of weight gain. A large body of data suggests that during long-term treatment, patients receiving the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine experience minimal weight gain. Data also suggest that quetiapine treatment does not increase the risk of developing type II diabetes. The use of atypical antipsychotics is increasing, as these agents are being prescribed for schizophrenia in lieu of conventional antipsychotics. Furthermore, these drugs have efficacy for treating other conditions such as bipolar disorder. Physicians prescribing atypical antipsychotics must be aware of the risk of weight gain and its associated comorbidities.

Effect of acute psychotic stress in nondiabetic subjects on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of acute psychotic stress on glucose homeostasis in nondiabetic subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity were determined by the homeostasis model assessment in 39 nondiabetic patients with acute psychotic stress reaction admitted to a psychiatric ward. The clinical global impression (CGI) score was used to evaluate the level of psychological stress. Patients were assessed on admission, after 2 weeks, before discharge, and 6 months after discharge.

RESULTS

The mean CGI score decreased significantly with time: 5.3 +/- 0.8 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 on admission and predischarge, respectively (P < 0.001). This was associated with a significant reciprocal increase of mean beta-cell function from 96.8 +/- 33.2 to 134.4 +/- 60% at admission and postdischarge, respectively (P < 0.003), and a decrease of mean insulin sensitivity from 101.7 +/- 36 to 77.1 +/- 34.8% (P < 0.001). In contrast, mean glucose and HbA(1c) levels did not change significantly. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with the highest stress score on admission (> or =6) had significantly higher glucose (P = 0.01) and insulin levels (P = 0.04) than patients with lower score (<6). Furthermore, insulin sensitivity and CGI score on admission were inversely correlated (r = -0.38, P < 0.02). In these patients, no correlation was found between beta-cell function or insulin sensitivity and BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity are inversely correlated with acute psychotic stress.

Sweet blood and social suffering: rethinking cause-effect relationships in diabetes, distress, and duress

I draw upon anthropological engagements with bioscience and embodiment in order to unpack current approaches to defining and preventing diabetes mellitus. The analysis stems from the conviction that carefully considering the symbolic frames through which we conceive of diseases, their origins, their distribution, and their consequences will assist us in planning and implementing interventions to improve population health. I argue that research and interventions focused on the sweetness of blood would benefit from rethinking intersections between diabetes, distress, and duress. In many instances, the lived experience of diabetes is consonant with an understanding of distress (i.e., "social suffering") that expands conventional understandings of population health problems. Diabetes incidence is rising worldwide, but it is rising especially rapidly in Aboriginal and other disadvantaged populations. Notably, diabetes is now three to five times more common in Canada's First Nations population than it is in its non-Aboriginal population. Yet as recently as 50 years ago, diabetes and associated health problems were rare in these groups. To come to grips with such transformations and disparities is to advance the population health research agenda.

Understanding the new and evolving profile of adverse drug effects in schizophrenia

This article has reviewed the emerging side-effect profiles of second-generation antipsychotic medications. Although these medications have favorable extrapyramidal side-effect profiles, clinicians must be aware of their propensity to cause weight gain, glucose and lipid abnormalities, and cardiac and sexual side effects. If clinicians are proactive about warning patients about these side effects and appropriately monitoring them, further morbidity and mortality may be prevented in this patient population. Initial choices of medication should be made based on the relative side-effect profiles in light of a particular patient's medical status. In the future, new treatments may be developed, with even fewer side effects.