Valganciclovir results in improved oral absorption of ganciclovir in liver transplant recipients

Oral valganciclovir is noninferior to intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

Intravenous ganciclovir is the standard treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Oral valganciclovir is a more convenient alternative. In a randomized, international trial, recipients with cytomegalovirus disease were treated with either 900 mg oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg i.v. ganciclovir twice daily for 21 days, followed by 900 mg daily valganciclovir for 28 days. A total of 321 patients were evaluated (valganciclovir [n = 164]; i.v. ganciclovir [n = 157]). The success rate of viremia eradication at Day 21 was 45.1% for valganciclovir and 48.4% for ganciclovir (95% CI -14.0% to +8.0%), and at Day 49; 67.1% and 70.1%, respectively (p = NS). Treatment success, as assessed by investigators, was 77.4% versus 80.3% at Day 21 and 85.4% versus 84.1% at Day 49 (p = NS). Baseline viral loads were not different between groups and decreased exponentially with similar half-lives and median time to eradication (21 vs. 19 days, p = 0.076). Side-effects and discontinuations of assigned treatment (18 of 321 patients) were comparable. Oral valganciclovir shows comparable safety and is not inferior to i.v. ganciclovir for treatment of cytomegalovirus disease in organ transplant recipients and provides a simpler treatment strategy, but care should be taken in extrapolating to organ transplant recipients not properly represented in the present study.

Cost of prophylaxis in the management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Limited economic data exist on the use of valganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We compared the economics of sequential i.v. and oral ganciclovir prophylaxis vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis alone in high-risk (D+/R-) SOT patients.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System comparing the cost of sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis (induction with i.v. ganciclovir 10 mg/kg daily for 14 d followed by oral ganciclovir 1 g t.i.d. for 3 months) vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily for 100 d). Resource utilization data for both regimens were obtained from the literature and from clinical records of 83 patients in nine Spanish hospitals. Results were expressed as average cost per patient treated.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient treated with sequential ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis was euro3715.51 and euro3295.90, respectively. The higher cost of ganciclovir therapy was due to concomitant administration of anti-CMV immunoglobulin (euro313.73), drug administration costs (euro401.45), catheter culture tests (euro13.64) and adverse events associated with catheter use (euro3.30). Following a sensitivity analysis, taking into account dose and duration of drug, concomitant medications and adverse events, costs for valganciclovir and sequential therapy were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Valganciclovir prophylaxis is as economical as sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk D+/R- SOT patients. In addition, the once-daily dosing regimen of valganciclovir is more convenient, and avoids the complications associated with catheter use.

Oral valganciclovir as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection post allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Antiviral compounds including ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir are routinely used in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease; however, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and have the inconvenience and expense of intravenous administration.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral valganciclovir (VGCV) for preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated 15 patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from related (n=9) or unrelated (n=6) donors. In all patients, either the donor, host, or both were CMV Ig G positive pretransplant. Indication for therapy was preemptive treatment of CMV infection defined as one or two consecutive positive tests of pp65 antigenemia assay or CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). VGCV was administered orally in a dosage of 900 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks, followed by 450 mg b.i.d. for 2 additional weeks.

RESULTS

Patients developed a positive CMV-PCR after a median of 52 days (range 37-427) post HSCT and a positive pp65 antigenemia after a median time of 74 days (range 37-427) post HSCT. Preemptive treatment with VGCV was started a median time of 56 days (range 37-429) after transplant. In all, 11 patients (73%) completed the 28 days of therapy with VGCV. All patients showed a complete clearance of the virus. The median time to achieve a negative CMV-PCR was 6 days (range 4-18). A relapse of CMV infection after VGCV preemptive therapy occurred in 6 patients (40%). No patient developed early or late CMV disease. Six patients (40%) presented hematological toxicity including neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia that required drug discontinuation in 4 cases.

CONCLUSION

VGCV administered as preemptive therapy for CMV infection in patients receiving an allogeneic HSCT showed promise for treating this frequent complication. Prospective randomized studies in this setting are mandatory to yield more definitive results.

Determination of aciclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma by liquid chromatography–spectrofluorimetric detection and stability studies in blood samples

A sensitive HPLC method has been developed for the assay of aciclovir and ganciclovir in human plasma, by HPLC coupled with spectrofluorimetric detection. Plasma (1000 microl), with 9-ethyl-guanine added as internal standard, is submitted to protein precipitation with trichloroacetic acid solution 20%. The supernatant, evaporated to dryness at 37 degrees C, is reconstituted in 100 microl of a solution of sodium heptanosulfonate 0.4% adjusted with acetic acid to pH 2.60 and a 30 microl volume is then injected onto a Nucleosil 100-5 microm C18 column. Aciclovir and ganciclovir are analysed by spectrofluorimetric detection set at 260 nm (excitation) and 380 nm (emission) using a gradient elution program with solvents constituted of acetonitrile and a solution of sodium heptanosulfonate 0.4% adjusted to pH 2.60. The calibration curves are linear between 0.1 and 10 microg/ml. The mean absolute recovery of aciclovir and ganciclovir are 99.2+/-2.5 and 100.3+/-2.5%, respectively. The method is precise (with mean inter-day C.V.s within 1.0-1.6% for aciclovir and 1.2-3.5% for ganciclovir), and accurate (range of inter-day deviations -1.6 to +1.6% for aciclovir and -0.4 to -1.4% for ganciclovir). The method has been applied in stability studies of ganciclovir in patients' blood samples, demonstrating its good stability in plasma at -20 degrees C and at room temperature. The distribution of ganciclovir and aciclovir in plasma and red blood cells was also investigated in vitro in spiking experiments with whole blood, which showed an initial drop of ganciclovir and aciclovir levels in plasma (about -25%) due to the cellular uptake of aciclovir and ganciclovir by red blood cells. The method has been validated and is currently applied in a clinical study assessing the ganciclovir plasma concentration variability after administration of valganciclovir in a population of solid organ transplant patients.

Oral Valgancyclovir Versus Intravenous Gancyclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a regular practice in organ transplantation. Oral valgancyclovir appears to be an interesting alternative to the usual intravenous form.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively compared the response of intravenous gancyclovir for 2 weeks (GAN; n=41) to oral valgancyclovir for 2 weeks (VAL2w; n=23) or 3 months (VAL3m; n=46) in kidney transplant recipients receiving induction immunosuppression. CMV antigenemia assay and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used for viral detection. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months posttransplantation. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis using a cutoff of significance as P<.05.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the demographic features among the study groups. However, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match was better in the VAL3m group and the patients of this group received less ATG induction immunosuppression (41.3%) compared with the GAN group (100%). The incidence of acute rejection was not different among the study groups. There was a higher incidence of fever with positive CMV tests in the VAL2w group (P=.035) compared with the other groups, while leukopenia with a negative CMV test was significantly higher in the VAL3m group (P=.04). The incidence of CMV disease was higher in the VAL2w group (30.4%) compared with the GAN group (14.6%) or the VAL3m group (8.7%). Renal function was significantly worse in the VAL2w group at 3 and 6 months (P=.011 and .02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months oral valgancyclovir prophylaxis for CMV was a more effective regimen compared with intravenous gancyclovir for 2 weeks. Shorter courses were associated with a higher incidence of CMV infection and poorer graft function. Leukopenia observed in patients receiving valgancyclovir may be a drug-related side effect.

Unexpectedly high inter- and intrapatient variability of ganciclovir levels in children

Few studies report Ganciclovir or Valganciclovir levels in children. Single-center, retrospective study of all available Ganciclovir levels in transplanted children. Ganciclovir monitoring was performed as previously described [G. Filler (1998); Pediatric Nephrology, 12, 6]. For the normalization of dosing to GFR and target trough levels, we assumed first-order kinetics. We analyzed 57 Ganciclovir levels in 20 children (mean age 8.6 +/- 5.5 yr) treated with intravenous or oral Ganciclovir or oral Valganciclovir. Ganciclovir levels were drawn after IV therapy (n = 9), during oral Ganciclovir (n = 5), or during oral Valganciclovir (n = 15). Oral bioavailability of Valganciclovir was 42.0 +/- 21.8%. The dose-normalized intrapatient Valganciclovir variability was 83%. Mean GFR was 92 +/- 22 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Mean Ganciclovir concentration at last available measurement was 0.60 +/- 0.09 mg/L. While target trough Ganciclovir levels have not been established, possibly subtherapeutic Ganciclovir levels <0.5 mg/L on recommended IV doses were found in eight patients. This subset of patients was significantly younger (4.5 +/- 3.1 vs. 11.4 +/- 5.0 yr). Levels <0.5 mg/L were found in 24/57 instances and 10 patients subsequently had their dose increased. The last Valganciclovir dose adjusted to a GFR of 100 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 842 +/- 323 mg/m(2)/day. A high proportion of patients had low Ganciclovir levels both on intravenous and oral therapy. The oral bioavailability of Valganciclovir was 42%. Our data suggest substantial inter- and intrapatient variability of Ganciclovir levels after pediatric renal transplantation and may support the need for pharmacokinetic monitoring of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir therapy for the prevention and treatment of CMV disease after pediatric transplantation. It is currently unclear what target trough level would be most suitable.

Leukopenia Complicates Cytomegalovirus Prevention After Renal Transplantation With Alemtuzumab Induction

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity after transplantation. Valganciclovir (VGCV) is commonly utilized for CMV prophylaxis but can cause leukopenia, with risk compounded by the use of myelosuppressive immunosuppression. By utilizing a preemptive therapeutic strategy with VGCV targeted only toward patients at risk for developing CMV disease, the rate and extent of leukopenia may be reduced.

METHODS

VGCV prophylactic and preemptive strategies were compared in renal transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab induction and prednisone-free maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were risk-stratified by CMV serologic status. All donor seropositive/recipient seronegative (D+/R-) patients, February 2002-January 2004 (n=32), received prophylaxis with VGCV 450 mg daily for 3 months. Outcomes of D+/-/R+ patients were compared. Patients in the first cohort, February 2002-October 2002 (n=61), received prophylaxis as described. In the second cohort, October 2002-January 2004 (n=110), patients were monitored by quantitative CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) every 2 weeks for 3 months. If the CMV load was above laboratory threshold, VGCV 450 mg daily was initiated for 1 month or until viremia cleared.

RESULTS

Comparing preemptive therapy versus prophylaxis in D+/-/R+ patients, there was a lower incidence of leukopenia (67% vs. 82%, P=0.039) and trend toward less granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) use (24% vs. 33%, P=0.196), but higher CMV disease rate (15% vs. 3%, P=0.02). One limitation was strategy compliance: 41% (7 of 17) of preemptive patients who developed CMV missed at least 1 CMV-PCR before diagnosis. One-year patient (98.2% vs. 98.4%) and death-censored graft (100% vs. 98.4%) survival was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiviral toxicity may be decreased with preemptive therapy, but effectiveness for CMV prevention seems dependent upon monitoring compliance.

A sensitive assay for simultaneous determination of plasma concentrations of valganciclovir and its active metabolite ganciclovir by LC/MS/MS

A protein precipitation, liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of valganciclovir and its active metabolite ganciclovir in human plasma. The solvent system also served as a protein precipitation reagent. The chromatographic separation was achieved on an Aquasil C18 column (50 mm x 2.1mm, 5 microm). A linear gradient mobile phase between 0.02% formic acid and methanol was used. Detection was by positive ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry on a Sciex API3000. The standard curves, which ranged from 4 to 512 ng/mL for valganciclovir and from 0.1 to 12.8 microg/mL for ganciclovir, were fitted to a 1/x weighted quadratic regression model. The method was proved to be accurate, specific and sensitive enough and was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study.

Cytomegalovirus in transplantation ? challenging the status quo

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients causes both ''direct'' and ''indirect'' effects including allograft rejection, decreased graft and patient survival, and predisposition to opportunistic infections and malignancies. Options for CMV prevention include pre-emptive therapy, whereby anti-CMV agents are administered based on sensitive viral assays, or universal prophylaxis of all at-risk patients. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy, costs, and side effects. Standards of care for prophylaxis have not been established.

METHODS

A committee of international experts was convened to review the available data regarding CMV prophylaxis and to compare preventative strategies for CMV after transplantation from seropositive donors or in seropositive recipients.

RESULTS

Pre-emptive therapy requires frequent monitoring with subsequent treatment of disease and associated costs, while universal prophylaxis results in greater exposure to potential toxicities and costs of drugs. The advantages of prophylaxis include suppressing asymptomatic viremia and prevention of both direct and indirect effects of CMV infection. Meta analyses reveal decreased in mortality for patients receiving CMV prophylaxis. Costs associated with prophylaxis are less than for routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains undefined. Extended prophylaxis may improve clinical outcomes in the highest-risk patient populations including donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative renal transplants and in CMV-infected lung and heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in transplant recipients, affecting both allograft and patient survival. More studies are necessary to define optimal prophylaxis regimens.

Oral Ganciclovir Versus Low-Dose Valganciclovir for Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Recipients of Kidney and Pancreas Transplants

BACKGROUND

The optimal regimen for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation remains unclear. We compared the effectiveness of three months of oral ganciclovir (3 g/day) versus low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) for CMV prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients at our center who received kidney and/or pancreas transplants between January 2000 and April 2003. We used a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relationship between baseline covariates, including type of CMV prophylaxis, and time to development of CMV disease.

RESULTS

Of the 500 patients (295 ganciclovir, 205 valganciclovir), 22 patients (4.4%) developed CMV disease (mean time to CMV disease, 163+/-85 days). Sixteen of the ganciclovir patients (5.4%) and six of the valganciclovir patients (2.9%) developed CMV disease (P=0.18). By CMV serostatus, the incidence of CMV disease during the first posttransplant year was 8.5% among donor-seropositive, recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) patients, 8.6% among D+/R+ patients, 2.9% among D-/R+ patients, 1.0% among D-/R- patients, and 0.9% among patients for whom documentation of CMV serostatus was incomplete. In the unadjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis, race/ethnicity, type of transplant, type of antiviral prophylaxis, CMV serostatus, and use of mycophenolate mofetil were each associated with risk of developing CMV disease. In the adjusted, multivariable model, only CMV serostatus was associated with development of CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Three months of low-dose valganciclovir (450 mg/day) was as effective as ganciclovir (3 g/day) for prophylaxis of CMV disease after kidney and/or pancreas transplantation.

Efficacy and safety of preemptive anti-CMV therapy with valganciclovir after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

CMV infections still pose a potentially serious threat to kidney transplant recipients and have a significant impact on graft as well as patient survival. The antiviral agent valganciclovir (VGCV) has a greater bioavailability after oral administration than oral ganciclovir (GCV) and can be considered a substitute for GCV. The substance is approved in North America and Europe for anti-CMV prophylaxis after organ transplantation. In this pilot study, we examined if VGCV could also be administered in preemptive treatment of CMV infections.

METHODS

Twenty-eight renal transplant recipients suffering from 32 asymptomatic episodes of CMV infection were treated with VGCV and followed up. CMV infection was diagnosed by routine controls of pp65-antigenemia in pre-defined intervals. All patients received sequential quadruple immunosuppression. VGCV was given for up to 12 wk in a dosage adapted to renal graft function. Efficacy and safety parameters were monitored for 16 wk.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven episodes of CMV antigenemia, two patients progressing to CMV syndrome and three patients progressing to CMV disease were treated. Primary efficiency was 79%, Four patients relapsed and were treated with a second course resulting in serological recovery. Two patients did not respond to oral VCGV and were switched to another antiviral agent. Graft function remained stable during and after treatment. Serious side effects were seen in seven patients, four patients complained of diarrhea and gastrointestinal pain, three patients suffered from leucopenia, in one of these treatment had to be temporary paused. Fifty-nine percent of all episodes were treated in a completely ambulatory setting.

CONCLUSIONS

VGCV can be considered as an option also for preemptive treatment of CMV infections after renal transplantation. The antiviral potency seems to be adequate, potential side effects are comparable with IV GCV. Because of the improved pharmacokinetics of VGCV the substance can be used to abbreviate or even completely avoid in-hospital care of CMV infections.

Correlation Between Body Mass Index and Leucopenia After Administration of Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Chinese Cardiac Recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir (VGC) has recently been proved efficacious for the prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients. Leucopenia is a troublesome complication of VGC but the possible risk factors are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Once a cardiac recipient's quantitative real-time CMV-polymerase chain reaction result showed positive, VGC was administered for 3 months. The 61 cardiac recipients enrolled in this study were divided into 2 groups: non-leucopenia group (n=29) and leucopenia group (n=32). The white blood cell (WBC) counts in the leucopenia group dropped approximately 55.6% in the first month after VGC therapy (pre-VGC WBC count: 5,544 cells/mm(3) vs post-VGC WBC count: 2,460 cells/mm(3), p<0.0001). The most significant difference between the 2 groups was body mass index (BMI, 23.04 vs 25.84, p=0.008), which was the impact factor of VGC-induced leucopenia.

CONCLUSION

Severe leucopenia may develop after VGC therapy in Chinese cardiac recipients, especially those with lower BMI.

Efficacy of Valganciclovir in the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is relatively common following solid organ transplant, particularly if a serologically negative recipient receives an organ from a serologically positive donor (D+/R-). Although valganciclovir is approved for the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients and is used for the prophylaxis against CMV infection in solid organ transplant patients, the current standard treatment for CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients remains intravenous ganciclovir. We retrospectively reviewed our experience using valganciclovir as treatment for CMV disease in CMV D+/R- kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients from March 2002 to June 2005. A total of 37 cases with primary CMV disease were diagnosed and treated with either intravenous ganciclovir as induction followed with valganciclovir or valganciclovir from the beginning. We compared clinical outcomes and viremia between the two groups. Our data suggest that valganciclovir is an effective treatment modality for primary CMV disease in kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients. It led to the resolution of disease and undetectable viremia. Valganciclovir allowed for early initiation of treatment and for treatment to be given as an outpatient. These advantages of valganciclovir have both health and economic impact for patients with CMV disease.

Determination of ganciclovir in different matrices from solid organ transplanted patients treated with a wide range of concomitant drugs

The aim of the present study was to develop a time-efficient chromatographic method for the analysis of therapeutic concentrations of ganciclovir (GCV) in plasma, urine as well as dialysate (from continuous renal replacement therapy) from solid organ transplant recipient treated with either GCV or its prodrug valganciclovir (VGCV) in combination with a wide variety of other concomitant drugs. Sample preparation was performed by reversed phase solid phase extraction and was followed by separation of the analytes on a reversed phase column using isocratic elution with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile-a counter ion (50 mM 1-heptanesulfonic acid) in an aqueous sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH 2.1; 10 mM) (10:90 v/v) and a fluorescence detector. Validation of the method showed linearity within the concentration range of 0.1-40 microg/mL for plasma and 0.1-120 microg/mL for urine and dialysate (R(2)>0.99, n> or =5). Accuracy and precision (evaluated at 0.1, 5 and 40 microg/mL) were both satisfactory. The LLOQ was determined to be 0.1 microg/mL. The method was successfully applied on clinical samples from renal transplant recipients treated with VGCV in combination with a variety of usually used concomitant drugs for solid organ transplant recipients.

Synthesis and Pharmacokinetics of Valopicitabine (NM283), an Efficient Prodrug of the Potent Anti-HCV Agent 2‘-C-Methylcytidine

In our search for new therapeutic agents against chronic hepatitis C, a ribonucleoside analogue, 2'-C-methylcytidine, was discovered to be a potent and selective inhibitor in cell culture of a number of RNA viruses, including the pestivirus bovine viral diarrhea virus, a surrogate model for hepatitis C virus (HCV), and three flaviviruses, namely, yellow fever virus, West Nile virus, and dengue-2 virus. However, pharmacokinetic studies revealed that 2'-C-methylcytidine suffers from a low oral bioavailability. To overcome this limitation, we have synthesized the 3'-O-l-valinyl ester derivative (dihydrochloride form, valopicitabine, NM283) of 2'-C-methylcytidine. We detail herein for the first time the chemical synthesis and physicochemical characteristics of this anti-HCV prodrug candidate, as well as a comparative study of its pharmacokinetic parameters with those of its parent nucleoside analogue, 2'-C-methylcytidine.

Pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients with graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract

The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir after oral valganciclovir versus intravenous ganciclovir were compared in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with stable graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Twenty-two evaluable adult patients were randomized to receive a single dose of open-label study drug (900 mg of oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg of intravenous ganciclovir). After a washout period of 2 to 7 days, patients were crossed over to receive the alternate study drug. Ganciclovir and valganciclovir concentrations in plasma were measured over 24 hours after dosing. Noninferiority of 900 mg of valganciclovir relative to intravenous ganciclovir was concluded if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least-square means of the ganciclovir area under the curve (AUC) for the 2 study drugs was >80%. Valganciclovir was found to be rapidly absorbed and converted into ganciclovir. The ganciclovir exposure after 900 mg of valganciclovir noninferior to that of intravenous ganciclovir (AUC0-infinity, 52.1 and 53.8 microg.h/mL, respectively; 95% confidence interval of the ratio of least square means of AUC0-infinity, 82.48%-118.02%). Oral valganciclovir could be a useful alternative to intravenous ganciclovir in certain stable stem cell transplant patients who require prophylaxis or preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection.

Antivirals in the transplant setting

Over the past quarter of a century, antiviral drugs have moved from an experimental adventure in transplant patients to a situation where they are used routinely to prevent diseases caused by several viruses. Furthermore, they have significantly reduced several medical complications of transplantation, such as graft rejection, thereby implicating viruses as components of their pathogenesis. By controlling these major complication, the development of these antiviral drugs and their prodrugs, has therefore greatly facilitated the clinical expansion of transplantation, allowing life saving procedures to be offered to more patients who could potentially benefit. This article will briefly summaries which viruses are important following transplantation and outline the evidence-base from randomized controlled clinical trails for the deployment of antiviral drugs to prevent viral diseases.

Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis with oral valganciclovir in an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patient unresponsive to combination antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis was a much-feared visual complication of late-stage acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the past. Its incidence has waned significantly owing to the benefits of potent antiretroviral combination therapy, which for many individuals has provided some degree of immune reconstitution and avoidance of opportunistic infections, particularly this blinding disease.

CASE REPORT

A 45-year-old white man with long-standing, multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and severe immunodeficiency despite multiple antiretroviral drug regimens, presented to the eye clinic reporting decreased vision and spider web patterns in his left eye for the past week. Best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in the right (O.D.) and 20/25 in the left eye (O.S.). Dilated funduscopic examination of the left eye found vasculitis of the midperipheral inferonasal arcade in the midperiphery, with surrounding intraretinal hemorrhage and granular retinal necrosis. Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus retinitis was made, and the patient began induction therapy with oral valganciclovir 900 mg twice a day for 3 weeks. Maintenance therapy after retinitis stabilization was 900 mg every day until any observed recurrence of infection. Three months after complete resolution of the active retinitis, the patient returned to the clinic reporting new floaters of recent onset. A reactivation of the CMV retinitis warranted a reinduction with valganciclovir 900 mg orally twice a day for 3 weeks.

CONCLUSION

This case is illustrative of the efficacy and relative ease of administration of valganciclovir, the newest medication approved for treatment and maintenance of CMV retinitis. Despite his severe immunodeficiency, our patient tolerated the induction and maintenance therapy of oral valganciclovir well, and the CMV retinitis was stabilized and resolved with full recovery of visual acuity.

Valganciclovir: what is the status in solid organ transplantation?

Prophylactic drug therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients is effective and simple to implement, but it is associated with patient nonadherence and viral resistance. Recent data show that the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir are similar. However, three large daily doses of oral ganciclovir are required, which is inconvenient, and viral resistance can develop to the drug. The single daily dose and lack of viral resistance are advantages of valganciclovir. This has become the primary agent for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease. Current trials are underway to determine its effectiveness for treatment of cytomegalovirus disease, the optimal length of prophylaxis, and the safety and efficacy of a syrup formulation in children.

Oral valganciclovir as pre-emptive therapy has similar efficacy on cytomegalovirus DNA load reduction as intravenous ganciclovir in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients

The efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir was compared to ganciclovir i.v. in pre-emptive treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) recipients. A therapeutic guideline was developed to allow the safe application of valganciclovir in allo-SCT recipients requiring CMV therapy. In total, 107 consecutive transplant recipients were evaluated. Cytomegalovirus DNA load in plasma was monitored longitudinally; details on antiviral therapy and treatment responses were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-seven CMV treatment episodes were recorded in 34 patients: 20 with valganciclovir (900 mg twice-daily) and 37 with ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice-daily). Median CMV DNA load reduction was 0.079 and 0.069 log10 copies/ml/day in the ganciclovir and valganciclovir group, respectively. Good response on CMV DNA load (reduction below 3.0 log10 copies/ml) was observed in 75.7% of ganciclovir and 80.0% of valganciclovir treatment episodes. Severe adverse effects were not observed and CMV-related disease did not occur. However, the percentage of patients receiving erythrocyte transfusion was higher in the group of patients receiving ganciclovir as compared to valganciclovir (41 versus 20%, P=0.116). In conclusion, pre-emptive treatment with valganciclovir and ganciclovir, led to similar reduction of CMV DNA load. Oral valganciclovir is an attractive and safe alternative for pre-emptive CMV treatment in T-cell-depleted allo-SCT recipients.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose valganciclovir in the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients

The efficacy and safety of valganciclovir (VGCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients has not been established. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral VGCV (450 mg once daily for 90 days) and standard oral ganciclovir (1 g three times a day for 90 days, GCV) in preventing CMV disease in 109 adult liver transplant recipients who survived at least 1 month between January 2001 and April 2003 (49 GCV and 60 VGCV). The incidence of CMV disease at 1 year post-transplant was similar among patients treated with VGCV and GCV (3% and 4%, respectively). Three of the four CMV disease cases occurred in high-risk recipients with CMV serotype of donor+/recipient- (D+/R-) and all cases presented after completion of CMV prophylaxis, ranging 114-152 days post-transplant. Severe neutropenia was rare, and thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred at similar frequencies with both prophylaxis regimens. In conclusion, a 90-day regimen of low-dose oral VGCV has a similar efficacy and safety profile to high-dose oral GCV in adult liver transplant recipients. D+/R- liver transplant recipients remain at risk of developing CMV disease after completion of antiviral prophylaxis. Additional prospective studies with close monitoring for CMV viremia and drug resistance are needed to further establish the optimal dose and duration of VGCV in liver transplant recipients.

The case for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus prevention strategies have been debated for the past decade. This review argues in favour of the prophylaxis strategy. Clinical trials comparing prophylaxis to pre-emptive therapy have, thus far, had insufficient power to differentiate strategies, especially with regard to the indirect effects of CMV. From meta-analyses, prospective trials, observational studies, and case control studies, there is evidence that prophylaxis prevents cytomegalovirus infection and disease, reduces the indirect effects of cytomegalovirus, including organ rejection and transplant associated, all cause mortality as well as opportunistic infection, and even bacteremia as well as post transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Prophylaxis has also been shown to be cost effective. One must recognise that with the current prophylaxis regimens employed for 3 months post-transplantation, late onset cases of cytomegalovirus disease may occur. Cytomegalovirus replication monitoring may be necessary after cessation of prophylaxis, especially in the high risk cytomegalovirus seropositive donor to cytomegalovirus seronegative recipient. Future trials with longer periods of prophylaxis are being undertaken.

Neurotoxicity related to valganciclovir in a child with impaired renal function: usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of neurotoxicity related to antiviral drugs, discuss the involvement of concomitant medications, and document the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir (administered as valganciclovir) in a child with impaired renal function.

CASE SUMMARY

A 13-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia was treated for cytomegalovirus retinitis with valganciclovir 450 mg every 2 days in the course of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant medication included omeprazole, furosemide, and acetaminophen. During treatment, when creatinine clearance decreased to 20 mL/min, the child presented with acute neurotoxicity, consisting of mental confusion and hallucinations, which resolved when all medications were stopped. Valganciclovir therapeutic monitoring showed high ganciclovir concentrations in the plasma (3.85 microg/mL) and cerebrospinal fluid (2.6 microg/mL) 48 hours after the last valganciclovir dose. After recovery of neurologic function, valganciclovir was resumed at a lower dosage (225 mg twice a week) with therapeutic drug monitoring and was well tolerated. However, the cytomegalovirus infection was not resolved. The leukemia relapsed, and the patient had terminal renal failure and died. The Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between valganciclovir and neurotoxicity.

DISCUSSION

Drugs taken by this child (acyclovir, valganciclovir, omeprazole) have been reported to induce neurotoxicity, with the pharmacokinetics of the first 2 being altered by renal failure. At the time when acyclovir was first administered, symptoms of neurotoxicity were already apparent. Moreover, plasma concentrations of ganciclovir were very high during the course of the neurotoxicity. Thus, the adverse effects seemed related to an overdosage of valganciclovir and were worsened by the addition of acyclovir.

CONCLUSIONS

This case is informative because few clinical and pharmacokinetic data are available concerning the use of valganciclovir in children. A study should be performed to determine the proper pediatric dose of valganciclovir with and without renal impairment to prevent the occurrence of adverse effects.

Cytomegalovirus Pneumonia in Transplant Recipients

The incidence of cytomegalovirus CMV pneumonia has been reduced by routine antiviral prophylaxis in susceptible populations. Many of the complications of this infection are caused by indirect effects of the virus, including acute and chronic graft rejection, graft-versus-host disease, and superinfection by other viruses, bacteria and fungi. Distinction must be made between viral secretion and invasion. Invasive procedures are often required for the optimal management of such infections. The use of sensitive and quantitative assays have greatly improved the outcomes of CMV infection.

Preemptive Therapy With Intravenous Ganciclovir for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Lung Transplant Recipients

The most effective strategy for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in lung transplantation has not been conclusively established. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of preemptive ganciclovir therapy for this purpose. Twenty-five consecutive adult patients positive for CMV before transplantation and surviving more than 30 days after the procedure were studied. Mean follow-up was 732.2 days (range, 210-1125). All patients received intravenous (IV) ganciclovir prophylaxis for the first 21 days and subsequently underwent frequent CMV antigenemia monitoring: weekly for the first 3 months, every 15 days between 3 and 6 months, and monthly thereafter. IV ganciclovir was given when antigenemia results were greater than 10 infected cells per 100,000 polymorphonuclears. The study group was compared with a historical group of 30 consecutive patients who had received IV ganciclovir prophylaxis and continued on oral ganciclovir up to day 120 posttransplantation. Eighteen of the 25 patients (72.0%) presented episodes of CMV infection. Six of the 25 patients (24.0%) had CMV disease, including 3 viral syndromes and 3 cases of pneumonitis. Four patients debuted with CMV disease, 1 of them with pneumonitis. CMV resistance to ganciclovir was observed in 2 patients. The incidence of infection was higher than in the historical group (72.0% vs 46.7%; P < .05), but there were no significant differences in the incidence of CMV disease (24.0% vs 40.0%; P = not significant [NS]). Mean time before onset of the first episode of disease was lower in the preemptive therapy group than in the comparison patients (82.8 days; range, 42-240 vs 175 days; range, 90-243; P < .05). In conclusion, preemptive therapy for CMV disease is as effective a prevention strategy as oral ganciclovir prophylaxis. However, the early appearance of CMV disease with preemptive therapy can make this approach inadvisable.

Does Valganciclovir Hydrochloride (Valcyte) Provide Effective Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients?

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after solid organ transplantation is one of the most common viral infections, causing significant morbidity and mortality if not treated promptly. Ganciclovir has proven to be effective for the prophylaxis and treatment of CMV. However, oral absorption of ganciclovir is poor. Recently, oral administration of valganciclovir hydrochloride (Valcyte) has been observed to display 10-fold better absorption than oral ganciclovir. Valganciclovir has increasingly been used as prophylaxis against CMV after solid organ transplantation. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of valganciclovir prophylaxis therapy after primary liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2001 and May 2003, 203 consecutive liver transplant recipients, including 129 men and 74 women of overall mean age 53 +/- 11 years, received valganciclovir (900 mg/d or 450 mg every other day depending on renal function) for 3 to 6 months after primary liver transplantation. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Mean follow-up was 19 +/- 5.8 months. CMV DNA in peripheral blood was tested using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Symptomatic CMV was stratified according to the CMV immunoglobulin (Ig)G status of the donor and recipient at the time of liver transplantation. Donors and recipients were classified preoperatively into groups according to the presence or absence of CMV as follows: group 1 (n = 73; donor CMV+, recipient CMV+); group 2 (n = 41; donor CMV-, recipient CMV+); group 3 (n = 54; donor CMV+, recipient CMV-; high-risk group); and group 4 (n = 35; donor CMV-, recipient CMV-).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (14.3%) developed symptomatic CMV disease at 169 +/- 117 days after liver transplantation: group 1, 16.4% versus group 2, 7.3% versus group 3, 25.9% versus group 4, 0%. Of these patients, 5 also had invasive CMV on liver biopsy, which was performed owing to abnormal liver functions. All 29 patients were treated with intravenous ganciclovir. One patient died owing to disseminated CMV, whereas the remaining 28 patients responded to treatment. Interestingly, 8 patients, including 1 who had invasive CMV hepatitis, developed symptomatic CMV within 90 days of liver transplantation even while on prophylactic valganciclovir.

CONCLUSION

Valganciclovir failed to provide adequate prophylaxis following liver transplantation in our patients. The overall rate of CMV in seropositive donors and/or recipients was 17%, and in the high-risk group was 26%. Further prospective studies with measurement of ganciclovir concentrations are needed to elucidate the reasons for this unexpected failure.

A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

An open, prospective, randomised study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Eighty-three renal transplant recipients were assigned randomly to receive valacyclovir (n=43) or oral ganciclovir (n=40) for the first 3 months after transplantation. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, primary renal disease, graft source, HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapy and donor-recipient CMV antibody status. CMV infection was diagnosed by detection of virus DNA in plasma with the Amplicor CMV Test. CMV disease was observed in only one patient belonging to the ganciclovir group, who developed enterocolitis 6 months post-transplantation. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups with respect to detection of CMV DNA, virus infections other than CMV, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months following transplantation. An increased number of bacterial infections was noted in the ganciclovir group (p 0.003). No adverse reactions with either treatment were reported. The estimated cost of valacyclovir treatment was 20% higher than that of ganciclovir treatment. Overall, both valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir were found to be effective and safe for CMV prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Decisions regarding prophylactic regimens should include additional criteria, such as cost or possible development of resistance.

Management of cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients: evidence-based recommendations

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients. This article presents recommendations based on available evidence for the optimal management of CMV in lung transplant recipients, which have been developed by an expert committee of transplant physicians-surgeons and infectious disease specialists.

Valganciclovir: a review of its use in the management of CMV infection and disease in immunocompromised patients

Valganciclovir (Valcyte) is an orally administered prodrug of the standard anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) drug ganciclovir. Valganciclovir is as effective as intravenous ganciclovir for the treatment of AIDS-related CMV retinitis, and oral ganciclovir for the prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients. The drug is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to that of oral or intravenous ganciclovir, but is devoid of adverse events related to intravenous or indwelling catheter access associated with the use of intravenous ganciclovir, cidofovir and foscarnet. The simple and convenient once-daily valganciclovir regimen offers potential for improved patient compliance. It provides greater systemic ganciclovir exposure than oral ganciclovir, thus reducing the risk of viral resistance when used for prophylaxis in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients. Furthermore, the use of valganciclovir instead of intravenous ganciclovir may provide significant cost savings, based on data comparing oral versus intravenous regimens for the treatment of AIDS-related CMV retinitis. Overall, valganciclovir appears to have some advantages over ganciclovir. Therefore, when used as prophylaxis against CMV infection and disease in high-risk solid organ transplant recipients or as induction and maintenance therapy of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS, oral valganciclovir is an attractive alternative to other available anti-CMV drugs.

Pharmacodynamics of oral ganciclovir and valganciclovir in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir following oral administration of ganciclovir or valganciclovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in solid organ transplant recipients (n = 240/372).

METHODS

The correlations between individual exposure to ganciclovir during prophylaxis, with CMV viremia incidence during and after treatment, CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant, and hematological toxicity were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean daily areas under the curve (AUCs) of ganciclovir from valganciclovir and oral ganciclovir were 46.3 +/- 15.2 and 28.0 +/- 10.9 microg.h/ml (mean +/- SD), respectively. Viremia was suppressed during prophylaxis when exposure to ganciclovir was 40-50 microg.h/ml, AUCs typical of those achieved in valganciclovir-treated patients. The development of viremia 1 month after ending prophylaxis was also reduced with higher ganciclovir AUC (median predicted incidence, 20% and 10% at AUCs of 33 and 50 microg h/ml, respectively). The development of CMV disease within 1 year of transplant was 17.6% and independent of prophylactic exposure to ganciclovir. There was only a weak tendency to increased neutropenia and leukopenia with higher ganciclovir exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater systemic exposure to ganciclovir delivered by valganciclovir was associated with delayed development of viremia. There was only a weak association between AUC and hematological toxicity.

Design and synthesis of a potent macrocyclic 1,6-naphthyridine anti-human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) inhibitors

A novel class of macrocyclic 1,6-napthyridines designed to adopt the presumed bioactive conformation of anti-HCMV acyclic 1,6-napthyridines are described. Both 14- and 15-membered macrocycles were shown to be highly potent against HCMV HSV-1 and HSV-2.

Pharmacokinetics of antiviral agents for the treatment of cytomegalovirus infection

PURPOSE

The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and other advantages and disadvantages of ganciclovir and valganciclovir are discussed.

SUMMARY

Shortcomings of oral ganciclovir include low bioavailability, large pill burden, patient nonadherence, and the emergence of resistance. Valganciclovir, an oral prodrug of ganciclovir, has a nearly tenfold greater absolute bioavailability than ganciclovir. Dosage adjustment is required for both drugs in patients with renal impairment.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic profile of valganciclovir offers significant advantages for its use in cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis.

A trial of valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus prevention in lung transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common after lung transplantation. We performed a prospective trial of valganciclovir prophylaxis in lung recipients with outcomes compared to matched historical controls. The valganciclovir group (n = 40) (including D+/R- and R+ patients) was prospectively enrolled, and received oral valganciclovir 900 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Historical controls (n = 40) received 12 weeks of daily intravenous ganciclovir if D+/R- or 12 weeks of oral ganciclovir if R+. CMV viral load testing was done at two-week intervals until 6 months posttransplant. Baseline demographics and immunosuppression were comparable in the two groups. The incidence of CMV viremia was 16/40 (40.0%) in the valganciclovir arm versus 18/40 (45%) in the ganciclovir arm (p = NS). The incidence of symptomatic CMV disease was 8/40 (20%) versus 7/40 (17.5%), respectively (p = NS). In both groups viremia, while on prophylaxis, was uncommon (valganciclovir: 0/40 and ganciclovir: 2/40). Peak viral load and time to viremia were similar in the two arms. High rates of viremia and symptomatic disease occurred in the D+/R- patients after discontinuation of prophylaxis. Genotypic CMV sequence analysis demonstrated low rates of ganciclovir resistance in both groups. Valganciclovir prophylaxis had similar efficacy to either intravenous ganciclovir (D+/R- patients), or oral ganciclovir (R+ patients) in lung recipients.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus

There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen. Eighty adult African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients transplanted from November 3, 2001 to May 28, 2003 and followed for 22 +/- 8 months received VGC once daily for 90 d post-transplant dosed according to donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus: high risk (D+/R-) received 900 mg (n = 12); moderate risk (D+/R+, D-/R+) received 450 mg (n = 60); and low risk (D-/R-) received no prophylaxis (n = 8). Thymoglobulin or basiliximab was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Only six patients (7.5%) developed symptomatic CMV infection diagnosed by pp65 antigenemia, three in the high-risk (25%) and three in the moderate-risk (5%) group (p = 0.02). All patients were on tacrolimus for at least 3 months prior to diagnosis. There were no cases of tissue-invasive disease, resistance to treatment, or recurrence. D+/R- serostatus was the only significant independent predictor for CMV infection using multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.5; p = 0.04). Thymoglobulin induction was not associated with CMV infection. None of 43 patients who were exposed to sirolimus for >30 d developed CMV infection, vs. six of 37 who were not (p = 0.006). We conclude that VGC dosed according to D/R serostatus provides safe and effective CMV prophylaxis in AA renal allograft recipients.

Viral prophylaxis in organ transplant patients

Viral pathogens have emerged as the most important microbial agents having deleterious effects on solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Antiviral chemoprophylaxis involves the administration of medications to abort transmission of, avoid reactivation of, or prevent progression to disease from, active viral infection. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the major microbial pathogen having a negative effect on SOT recipients. CMV causes infectious disease syndromes, augments iatrogenic immunosuppression and is commonly associated with opportunistic superinfection. CMV has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of rejection. Chemoprophylactic regimens for CMV have included oral aciclovir (acyclovir) at medium and high doses, intravenous and oral ganciclovir, and the prodrugs valaciclovir (valacyclovir) and valganciclovir. CMV prophylactic strategies should be stratified, with the highest-risk patients receiving the most 'potent' prophylactic regimens. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation in SOT recipients is more frequent, may become more invasive, takes longer to heal, and has greater potential for dissemination to visceral organs than it does in the immunocompetent host. Prophylactic regimens for CMV are also effective chemoprophylaxis against HSV; in the absence of CMV prophylaxis, aciclovir, valaciclovir or famciclovir should be used as HSV prophylaxis in seropositive recipients. Primary varicella-zoster virus (VZV) after SOT is rare and most commonly seen in the paediatric transplant population because of VZV epidemiology. Zoster occurs in 5-15% of patients, usually after the sixth post-transplant month. Prophylactic regimens for zoster are neither practical nor cost effective after SOT because of the late onset of disease and low proportion of affected individuals. All SOT recipients should receive VZV immune globulin after contact with either varicella or zoster. Epstein-Barr virus has its most significant effect in SOT as the precipitating factor in the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Antiviral agents that could be effective are the same as those used for CMV, but indications for and effectiveness of prophylaxis are poorly established. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are important pathogens in the SOT population as indications for transplantation. So-called 'prophylaxis' for recurrent HBV and HCV after liver transplantation is controversial, suppressive rather than preventive, and potentially lifelong. Influenza infection after SOT is acquired by person-to-person contact. During epidemic periods of influenza, transplant populations experience a relatively high frequency of infection, and influenza may affect immunosuppressed SOT recipients more adversely than immunocompetent individuals. Antiviral medications for prevention of influenza are administered as post-exposure prophylaxis to SOT recipients, in addition to yearly vaccine, in circumstances such as influenza epidemics and nosocomial outbreaks, and after exposure to a symptomatic individual during 'flu season'.

Efficacy of valganciclovir administered as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients: impact on viral load and late-onset cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of valganciclovir used as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in liver transplant recipients is not known.

METHODS

Between 1996 and 2004, surveillance testing using CMV antigenemia was performed at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 posttransplant. A total of 28.8% (17/59) of the patients from 2001 to 2004 with antigenemia who received valganciclovir as preemptive therapy were compared with 26.2% (21/80) of the patients from 1996 to 2000 who received oral ganciclovir as preemptive therapy.

RESULTS

The mean decline in the antigenemia level after initiation of valganciclovir and oral ganciclovir was 80.5% versus 50.7% at 1 week, 99.5% versus 89.4% at 2 weeks, and 100% versus 97.7% at 4 weeks, respectively. A higher proportion of patients who received valganciclovir (64.7%) belonged to the high-risk group (R-/D+) than patients who received oral ganciclovir (33.3%, P=0.10). Recurrent shedding was documented in 47.1% (8/17) of the patients in the valganciclovir group and 28.6% (6/21) of the patients in the oral ganciclovir group (P>0.20). Recurrent shedding correlated significantly with R-/D+ CMV serostatus and baseline CMV antigenemia level, regardless of the study group. No patient in either group developed CMV disease during or after the period of surveillance monitoring. The incidence of opportunistic infections and patient outcome did not differ for the valganciclovir group versus the oral ganciclovir group or patients without CMV infection (P>0.20).

CONCLUSION

Antigenemia-directed valganciclovir as preemptive therapy seems to be effective for the prevention of CMV disease in liver transplant recipients, including high-risk patients.

Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Valganciclovir

Valganciclovir (VGC) has proved efficacious and safe for the prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) in high-risk transplant recipients and for the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients. We used VGC for the treatment of CMV infection (viremia without symptoms) or disease (CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive disease) in kidney, heart, and lung transplant recipients. Fourteen transplant recipients were treated: five for asymptomatic CMV infection and nine for CMV disease. VGC was administered in doses adjusted to renal function for 4 to 12 weeks (induction and maintenance therapy). Clinically, all nine patients with CMV disease responded to treatment. Microbiologically, treatment with VGC turned blood culture negative for CMV within 2 weeks in all patients and was associated with a > or =2 log decrease in blood CMV DNA within 3 weeks in 8 of 8 tested patients. With a follow-up of 6 months (n = 12 patients), asymptomatic recurrent CMV viremia was noted in five cases, and CMV syndrome noted in one case (all cases in the first 2 months after the end of treatment). VGC was clinically well tolerated in all patients; however, laboratory abnormalities occurred in three cases (mild increase in transaminases, thrombocytopenia, and pancytopenia). This preliminary experience strongly suggests that therapy with VGC is effective against CMV in organ transplant recipients; however, the exact duration of therapy remains to be determined: a longer course may be necessary to prevent early recurrence.

Valganciclovir: oral prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host

Herpes virus infections, particularly those caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), lead to significant and, sometimes severe, clinical problems for the immunocompromised host. As effective agents have become available, several treatment and prevention strategies have evolved over the past decade, first in intra-venous form and more recently, as oral preparations. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, is an orally administered, potent, antiviral agent active against all herpes viruses. When taken orally, valganciclovir has much-improved bioavailability compared with oral ganciclovir and achieves ganciclovir exposures similar to intravenous ganciclovir. Clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for the treatment of new AIDS-associated CMV retinitis showed equivalency to intravenous ganciclovir and prevented progression of quiescent disease. In solid organ recipients, once-daily valganciclovir has been proven equivalent to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection. The high bioavailability and convenient dosing formulation make valganciclovir an attractive option for these indications.

Cytomegalovirus antiviral resistance associated with treatment induced UL97 (protein kinase) and UL54 (DNA polymerase) mutations

HCMV-related illness due to infections with antiviral resistant virus was verified by phenotypic and genotypic assays in 17% (8/47) of high-risk immunocompromised Australian patients. Selective PCR-sequencing of UL97 (protein kinase; PK) and UL54 (DNA polymerase; DNApol) regions important for antiviral sensitivity, identified the majority (6/8) of resistant strains through detection of mutations known to confer antiviral resistance. Additionally, eight UL54 (DNApol) mutations (N408K, T691S, A692V, S695T, L737M, A834P, V955I, and A972V) of unknown phenotype were identified in six specimens from patients with clinical evidence of antiviral resistant infections. One isolate was resistant to ganciclovir (GCV) and another resistant to PFA on phenotypic testing where mutations in UL97 (PK) or UL54 (DNApol) were not detected, suggesting a loss of correlation between phenotype and genotype. Selective PCR-sequencing of UL97 (PK) and UL54 (DNApol) provided rapid and comprehensive results, but missed some resistance detected by phenotypic assays. A combination of phenotypic and genotypic assays is recommended for complete analysis of CMV antiviral resistance, as well as further definition of the clinical relationship between novel UL54 (DNApol) mutations and antiviral resistance.

Valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients at high risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in antiviral therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading opportunistic infection in the transplant population. Valganciclovir (VGC), the L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), provides an excellent oral alternative to GCV for the prevention of CMV in transplant recipients. We investigated the use of VGC for CMV prevention in high-risk renal and pancreas transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients at high risk for development of CMV disease were defined as either those who had donor positive, recipient-negative serostatus (D+/R-), or those who received antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy for either rejection treatment or induction. A retrospective review was conducted of all kidney and pancreas transplants performed between August 2001 and December 2003. A total of 341 transplants were performed, of which 109 received VGC, and 88 were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of CMV disease was 5.7% (5/88). All of the CMV episodes were in patients who were D+/R- (17.2% [5/29] versus 0% [0/59], P<0.001). Of these patients, all the episodes of CMV were in patients who received VGC prophylaxis for<100 days post transplant (29% [5/17] versus 0% [0/12], P=0.06). The overall incidence of leukopenia was 11% and thrombocytopenia was 7%, with the incidence between the D+/R- group and the ALA group being similar.

CONCLUSION

VGC is an effective agent in preventing CMV disease in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients who are at high risk for developing the disease. The optimal length of prophylaxis in D+/R- patients is still undefined, while 3 months of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient in patients who received ALA therapy.

Similar Reduction of Cytomegalovirus DNA Load by Oral Valganciclovir and Intravenous Ganciclovir on Pre-Emptive Therapy after Renal and Renal–Pancreas Transplantation

Background

Pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients aims at prevention of clinical disease by early detection. However, current treatment requires the intravenous (iv) administration of ganciclovir for 2 weeks, which is a considerable burden for the patient. In this observational study, the efficacy of the new oral prodrug valganciclovir was compared with iv ganciclovir.

Methods

To facilitate the introduction of valganciclovir, a therapeutic guideline was developed to use this drug under controlled conditions with regard to safety in renal/renal–pancreas transplant recipients requiring CMV therapy. Subsequently, a group of 57 consecutive transplant recipients was evaluated. Onset and treatment of CMV infections were followed by frequent monitoring of CMV DNA in plasma by quantitative real-time PCR. Details of antiviral therapy were documented.

Results

In 15 out of 57 transplant recipients, a total of 27 anti-CMV treatment episodes were recorded: 18 with valganciclovir (900 mg twice daily) and nine with iv ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice daily) as initial treatment. Median CMV DNA load reduction during treatment was 0.12 log10/day in the valganciclovir group and 0.09 log10/day in the ganciclovir group. There were no haematological side effects in any group and no patient developed signs of clinical CMV disease.

Conclusion

Similar reduction of CMV DNA load was observed during pre-emptive treatment with oral valganciclovir and iv ganciclovir in transplant recipients. Oral valganciclovir would provide an attractive and safe alternative for pre-emptive CMV treatment in renal/renal–pancreas transplant patients, however, confirmation in larger randomized studies would be desirable.

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Ganciclovir After its Oral Administration and From its Prodrug, Valganciclovir, in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir (Valcyte) has recently been approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk (CMV donor positive [D+]/recipient negative [R-]) solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Large-scale studies describing the pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir in SOT recipients are lacking. A recent randomised, double-blind study of valganciclovir in 364 D+/R- (intent-to-treat population) SOT recipients provided valuable data on which a population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir from oral ganciclovir (Cymevene, 1000 mg three times daily) and from valganciclovir (900 mg once daily) were described with plasma levels from 240 patients (1181 datapoints describing 449 pharmacokinetic profiles) using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with separate absorption/metabolism and absorption parameters for valganciclovir and ganciclovir, respectively, was developed.

RESULTS

Exposure to ganciclovir from valganciclovir averaged 1.65-fold greater than that from oral ganciclovir (95% CI 1.58, 1.81); respective daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve values were 46.3 +/- 15.2 microg . h/mL and 28.0 +/- 10.9 microg . h/mL. The relative systemic exposure of ganciclovir was approximately 8-fold higher from valganciclovir than oral ganciclovir. Exposure to ganciclovir from valganciclovir was similar among liver, heart and kidney transplant recipients (46.0 +/- 16.1, 40.2 +/- 11.8 and 48.2 +/- 14.6 microg . h/ mL, respectively). Adherence to the prescribed dosing regimens, which were reduced for renal impairment, gave consistent exposure to ganciclovir.

CONCLUSION

Oral valganciclovir produces exposures of ganciclovir exceeding those attained with oral ganciclovir, but in line with those reported after standard intravenous administration of ganciclovir. This indicates that oral valganciclovir is suitable in circumstances requiring prophylactic use of ganciclovir and allows for more convenient management of patients at risk of CMV disease.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis using oral ganciclovir or valganciclovir in kidney and pancreas–kidney transplantation under antibody preconditioning

We investigated retrospectively the risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection under ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis (oral ganciclovir 1 g tid, valganciclovir 450 mg/d) in our kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant patients undergoing transplantation between July 1, 2001 and February 28, 2003. Two hundred eleven patients receiving prophylactic oral ganciclovir or valganciclovir were included in the study. All patients were given antibody preconditioning (thymoglobulin 178, alemtuzumab 33). Duration of prophylactic treatment was between 3 and 8 months. Fifteen (7.1%) patients developed a positive CMV antigenemia in the first 6 months after transplantation, and 18 of 176 (10.2%) patients developed a positive CMV antigenemia during the first year. No patient developed tissue invasive CMV disease. At 6 months after transplantation, valganciclovir was slightly more effective than ganciclovir prophylaxis (P=.052). Positive donor CMV serology significantly increased the risk of CMV infection compared to CMV-negative donors (P=.014 and P=.003 at 6 and 12 months, respectively). Duration of CMV prophylaxis for more than 3 months decreased the risk of CMV infection (P=.04 and P=.009 at 6 and 12 months, respectively). Either valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg/d) or high-dose oral ganciclovir (1 g tid) is effective in preventing tissue-invasive CMV disease, and results in a low incidence of CMV antigenemia in patients undergoing kidney and SPK transplantation.