Diabetes and pregnancy: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline

Guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Italy from 2010 to 2019: critical issues and the potential for improvement

AIMS

In 2010, Italian health professionals rapidly implemented the one-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) based on a 75 g OGTT, to comply with the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). The change was promoted by the two main Italian scientific societies of diabetology, Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD) and Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID), and it took just a few months for the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, together with several scientific societies, to revise the criteria and include them in the National Guidelines System. Over the last 9 years, the implementation of these guidelines has shown some benefits and some drawbacks.

METHODS

In order to evaluate the critical issues arisen from the implementation of the current Italian guidelines for the diagnosis of GDM, the studies published on this topic have been reviewed. The search was performed using the following keywords: "gestational diabetes" AND "diagnostic criteria" OR screening AND Ital*. The study is an expert opinion paper, based on the relevant scientific literature published between 2010 and 2019. The databases screened for the literature review included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus.

RESULTS

The implementation of the Guidelines for Screening and Diagnosis of GDM in Italy present some strengths and some weaknesses. One of the positive aspects is that high-risk women are required to perform an OGTT early in pregnancy. By contrast, there are several aspects in need of improvement: (1) In spite of the current indications, only a minority of high-risk women perform OGTT early in pregnancy; (2) several low-risk women are screened for GDM; (3) in some low-risk women affected by GDM, the diagnosis might be missed with the application of the current guidelines; (4) there is a lack of homogeneity in the risk assessment data from different regions.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to improve the current Italian GDM guidelines, some practical solutions have been suggested.

Metformin in overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes: a propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

Obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an independent negative impact in pregnancy outcomes. Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) represents an additional high-risk condition for adverse outcomes. The aims of this study were to evaluate the potential effect of metformin in GWG in overweight or obese women with GDM, to report our experience and to assess metformin's safety in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study involving pregnant women with GDM and pregestational overweight or obesity. Demographic, anthropometric, glycemic control data, obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. The sample was divided into two groups according to metformin treatment. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed using age, initial body mass index (BMI), trimester at GDM diagnosis and previous history of GDM or macrosomia as covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 457 enrolled in the study, 177 (38.7%) were treated with metformin. Two groups of 130 well matched patients were balanced regarding baseline characteristics. Women in metformin group had significantly less excessive GWG (29.23% vs. 42.31%, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.028) and more adequate GWG (36.92% vs. 23.08%, OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.14-3.35, p = 0.015). No significant differences were found between both groups regarding glycemic control, rate of insulinization, and obstetric, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights metformin as an important and safe tool to prevent excessive GWG and promote adequate GWG in overweight or obese women with GDM, regardless of age, BMI, timing of GDM diagnosis, previous history of GDM or macrosomia.

Prospective associations between maternal stress during pregnancy and fasting glucose with obstetric and neonatal outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study investigated associations between maternal stress exposure and maternal psychological stress measures during pregnancy with obstetric and neonatal outcomes. We also tested whether any observed associations would be moderated by increasing glucose levels, as increased glycaemia is also associated with adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

203 women between 24 and 30 weeks gestation completed validated questionnaires assessing pregnancy-related major events and major life events, maternal perceived stress, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Glucose was measured using fasting morning blood samples. Instrumental delivery represented an obstetric outcome. Neonatal outcomes included Apgar score, large and small for gestational age weight, cord blood pH, NICU hospitalization, and neonatal hypoglycaemia.

RESULTS

Regarding the obstetric outcome, pregnancy-related major life events OR = 1.346 (1.016-1.783; p = .016) were related to more incidences of instrumental delivery. Regarding neonatal outcomes, exposure to major life events in the last 12 months was associated with lower cord blood pH values B = -0.155 (-0.059 to -0.002; p = .036) and with more incidences of hypoglycaemia OR = 0.165 (0.012-0.169; p = .04). Maternal psychological stress measures were related to more incidences of instrumental delivery OR = 1.018 (1.003-1.032; p = .013). Maternal stress perception was associated with higher cord blood pH values B = 0.155 (0-0.003; p = .046) and fewer NICU hospitalisations OR = -0.170 (-0.009 to -0.001; p = .019). Some of these associations between life events and stress perceptions with neonatal outcomes were moderated by fasting glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Maternal pregnancy events as well as stress, depression and anxiety symptoms have a negative impact on obstetric outcomes and maternal life events are associated with negative neonatal outcomes. Higher fasting glucose levels moderate some of the relationships between stress and neonatal outcomes.

ARE THE FACTORS AFFECTING ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES DIFFERENT IN OBESE GESTATIONAL DIABETES PREGNANT WOMEN RECEIVING DIET OR INSULIN TREATMENT?

CONTEXT

We aimed to examine the factors affecting adverse gestational outcome in gestational diabetes (GDM) patients, who were grouped as obese and normal- weight, having only-diet, or insulin treatments.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study included 373 patients, treated with diet or insulin. These patients were sub-grouped as obese and non-obese, and examined retrospectively. The variables affecting adverse gestational outcome in obese GDM patients having dietary and/ or insulin treatments were detected with multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

The weight gained during pregnancy in the GDM group having insulin treatment was more than the one in only-diet treated GDM group (p=0.004). Pre-pregnancy body mass index, the weight gained during pregnancy, hemoglobin A1C levels in the second and third trimesters, caesarian rates were higher in the insulin-treated obese patients than in the other groups (p<0.001). The odds ratio for fasting blood glucose level in insulin-treated obese GDM group was 1.081 (95% CI =1.004 - 1.163) (p=0.039); and it was 0.982 (95% CI =0.924 - 1.002) (p=0.048) for the weight gained during pregnancy, in only-diet treated obese GDM patients.

CONCLUSION

The control of weight gained during pregnancy, and of fasting blood glucose levels in obese patients having GDM, is important to decrease adverse gestational outcome.

Intensive glycemic control in gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled clinical feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes, and they are also more likely to have suboptimal glycemic control. However, there is a paucity of data evaluating whether lower glycemic targets could improve outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of intensive glycemic control in overweight and obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We randomized 60 overweight or obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus, diagnosed between 12 and 32 weeks' gestation to either intensive (fasting <90 mg/dL, 1 hour postprandial <120 mg/dL) or standard (fasting <95 mg/dL, 1 ho postprandial <140 mg/dL) glycemic targets. Maternal glucose was assessed in 2 ways: blinded continuous glucose monitors, worn for 5 days at 2 time points (at 12-32 weeks and again at 32-36 weeks), and self-monitored glucose measurement 4 times per day. All women underwent standardized dietary counseling, and medical therapy was prescribed as needed to achieve glycemic control.

RESULTS

Between December 2015 and December 2017, we randomized 60 women to either intensive (n = 30) or standard (n = 30) glycemic control. Baseline characteristics including maternal age, body mass index, and gestational age at diagnosis were similar between the intensive and standard groups. Medical therapy was more common in women in the intensive group than those in the standard group (83 vs 57%, P = .02). Women in the intensive glycemic control group had lower glucose values as assessed by continuous glucose monitors at including 24-hour mean (-8.1; 95% confidence interval, -12.0 to -4.3 mg/dL; P < .0001) and 1-h postprandial (-11.8; 95% confidence interval, -19.7 to -3.9 mg/dL, P = .004) values. Hypoglycemia <60 mg/dL was uncommon and did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Intensive glycemic targets can be used in overweight and obese women with minimal hypoglycemia, and this approach results in improved glycemic control when compared to standard glycemic targets. Further studies are needed to determine whether intensive glycemic targets can improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in high-risk women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

NCT02530866; clinicaltrials.gov.

Are serum levels of ADAMTS5, TAS and TOS at 24-28 gestational weeks associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetic women?

We aimed to determine the role of placental A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS5), and maternal serum ADAMTS5, total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS) and oxidative stress index (OSI) levels at 24-28th gestational weeks in GDM. This study included 57 patients, who had been diagnosed as having GDM at their 24-28th gestational week, and 29 controls. The maternal blood samples were collected at the 24-28th gestational week and ADAMTS5 was studied with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method, whereas an automated colorimetric method was used to study TAS, TOS, and OSI. The level of ADAMTS5 in maternal serum of patients with GDM were significantly lower than the controls (p = .017); whereas TOS and OSI levels were significantly higher (p = .003 and p = .008). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed ADAMTS5 and TOS levels were independently associated with adverse perinatal outcomes (p = .004 and p = .018). We found that serum ADAMTS5 levels decreased and TOS level increased in GDM pregnant at 24-28th gestational weeks. In addition, we found that increased levels of serum ADAMTS5 and decreased TOS levels at 24-28th weeks were associated with adverse perinatal outcomes independent of the mode of treatment in GDM.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. The insulin resistance, which starts at the 24-28th gestational weeks, increases during gestation. GDM increases maternal complications like preeclampsia, cesarean rate, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes after pregnancy; and neonatal complications like macrosomia, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, delivery trauma, shoulder dystocia, and adult-onset obesity, and diabetes.What the results of this study add? A significant relationship between ADAMTS5, TOS levels and adverse perinatal outcome. insulin resistance and was observed.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on this finding, we concluded that increased levels of oxidative stress and decreased ADAMTS5 levels are associated with GDM and predictive for adverse perinatal outcomes. The results of the present study were consistent with the previous reports and indicated that increased oxidative stress in GDM patients are related to adverse perinatal outcomes.

Non-pharmacological management of gestational diabetes: The role of myo-inositol

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disorder occurring in pregnancy. GDM plays an important role in the current diabetes epidemic: exposure to a high glycemic environment during the early stages of development increases the risk of the fetus to develop type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in adult life. Various cardiometabolic risk factors are linked to GDM. A thorough knowledge of the risk factors and genes involved in the development of GDM, along with an understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are crucial to properly identify patients at risk of developing this condition. There is growing evidence showing that myo-inositol, combined with an appropriate therapeutic regimen for GDM, can provide additional benefits to the patient. The aim of this review is to analyze the role of inositol isomers - especially myo-inositol (MYO-INS) - in the treatment of patients with GDM.

[Clinical practice recommendations for diabetes in pregnancy (Update 2019)]

In 1989 the St. Vincent Declaration aimed to achieve comparable pregnancy outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic women. However, currently women with pre-gestational diabetes still feature a higher risk of perinatal morbidity and even increased mortality. This fact is mostly ascribed to a persistently low rate of pregnancy planning and pre-pregnancy care with optimization of metabolic control prior to conception. All women should be experienced in the management of their therapy and on stable glycemic control prior to the conception. In addition, thyroid dysfunction, hypertension as well as the presence of diabetic complications should be excluded before pregnancy or treated adequately in order to decrease the risk for a progression of complications during pregnancy as well as maternal and fetal morbidity. Especially in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy the risk of hypoglycemia is highest and decreases with the progression of pregnancy due to hormonal changes causing steady increase of insulin resistance. In addition, obesity increases worldwide and contributes to increasing numbers of women at childbearing age with type 2 diabetes mellitus and further deterioration of pregnancy outcomes in diabetic women. Maternal glycemic control should aim to achieve normoglycemia and normal HbA_1c levels, possibly without hypoglycemia, but is associated with the development of diabetic embryopathy and fetopathy if dysglycemia occurs. Intensified insulin therapy with multiple daily insulin injections and pump treatment are effective in reaching good metabolic control during pregnancy. Oral glucose lowering drugs (Metformin) may be considered in obese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus to increase insulin sensitivity but should be also prescribed cautiously due to crossing the placenta and lack of long-time follow up data of the offspring.

[Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2019)]

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as a glucose tolerance disorder with onset during pregnancy and is associated with increased feto-maternal morbidity as well as long-term complications in mother and child. Women who fulfil the criteria of a manifest diabetes in early pregnancy (fasting plasma glucose >126 mg/dl, spontaneous glucose level >200 mg/dl or HbA1c > 6.5% before 20 weeks of gestation) should be classified as having manifest diabetes in pregnancy and treated as such. Screening for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes at the first prenatal visit (evidence level B) is particularly recommended in women at increased risk (history of GDM or prediabetes, malformation, stillbirth, successive abortions or birth weight >4500 g in previous pregnancies, obesity, metabolic syndrome, age >35 years, vascular disease, clinical symptoms of diabetes, e. g. glucosuria, or ethnic groups with increased risk for GDM/T2DM, e.g. Arabian countries, south and southeast Asia and Latin America). A GDM is diagnosed by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or a fasting glucose concentration ≥92 mg/dl. Performance of the OGTT (120 min, 75 g glucose) may already be indicated in the first trimester in high risk women but is mandatory between 24-28 gestational weeks in all pregnant women with previous non-pathological glucose metabolism (evidence level B). Based on the results of the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study and following the recent WHO recommendations, GDM is present if the fasting plasma glucose level exceeds 92 mg/dl, the 1 h level exceeds 180 mg/dl or the 2 h level exceeds 153 mg/dl after glucose loading (OGTT international consensus criteria). A single increased value is sufficient for the diagnosis and a strict metabolic control is mandatory. After bariatric surgery an OGTT is not recommended due to the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia. All women with GDM should receive nutritional counselling, be instructed in self-monitoring of blood glucose and to increase physical activity to moderate intensity levels, if not contraindicated. If blood glucose levels cannot be maintained in the therapeutic range (fasting <95 mg/dl and 1 h postprandial <140 mg/dl) insulin therapy should be initiated as first choice. Maternal and fetal monitoring is required in order to minimize maternal and fetal/neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality. After delivery all women with GDM have to be re-evaluated by a 75 g OGTT (WHO criteria) 4-12 weeks postpartum to reclassify the glucose tolerance and every 2 years in cases of normal glucose tolerance (evidence level B). All women have to be informed about their (sevenfold increased relative) risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at follow-up and possible preventive measures, in particular weight management, healthy diet and maintenance/increase of physical activity. Monitoring of the development of children and recommendations for a healthy lifestyle are necessary for the whole family. Regular obstetric examinations including ultrasound examinations are recommended. Within the framework of neonatal care, neonates of GDM mothers should undergo blood glucose measurements and if necessary appropriate measures should be initiated.

Detection, treatment and prevention programs for gestational diabetes mellitus: The St Carlos experience

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of adverse events in pregnancy and jeopardizes long-term health of the mother and offspring. There is currently no consensus as to what screening strategies improve the efficiency of GDM diagnosis. Which criteria should be used? Is the one-step or two-step procedure better? There is no agreement as to what the best dietary approach in the treatment of GDM is. In addition, different nutritional interventions have been studied in the prevention of GDM. The Mediterranean diet seems to be effective in preventing GDM and other maternofoetal outcomes. We review herein our experience using the one-step criteria for GDM screening; the treatment and prevention strategies used; and the overall impact of nutrition on maternofoetal health.

Comparative effects of glibenclamide, metformin and insulin on fetal pancreatic histology and maternal blood glucose in pregnant streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

BACKGROUND

Oral hypoglycemic agents use during pregnancy was assumed to cause fetal macrosomia and skeletal deformities, and maternal complications due to significant transfer across placenta or ineffective control of blood glucose.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated effects of insulin, metformin and glibenclamide on maternal blood glucose; and fetal crown-rump length, gross malformation and pancreatic histology in pregnant streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

METHODS

Twenty-five pregnant rats of groups 1 to 5 as normal and diabetic controls; and diabetic treated with insulin, metformin and glibenclamide were used. Experimental GDM was induced using 45 and 35mg/Kgbw of intraperitoneal streptozotocin.

RESULTS

Metformin, Insulin and Glibenclamide significantly reduced maternal glucose by 140.6mg/dL, 103.2mg/dL and 98.54mg/dl; respectively and showed islets with regular interlobular ducts, islets with some irregular interlobular ducts, and islets with many irregular interlobular ducts in histological fetal pancreatic photomicrographs respectively. This depicts metformin having highest ameliorative effect. There were no significant differences in maternal and fetal body weights, maternal blood glucose between diabetic groups, and fetal gross examination.

CONCLUSION

At the doses used in this research, metformin and glibenclamide showed no adverse effects on maternal and fetal features in the treatment of GDM. Thus, they can be used as safe and inexpensive alternatives to insulin.

Evidenced-Based Nutrition for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the latest evidence for dietary interventions for treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM).

RECENT FINDINGS

High-quality systematic reviews demonstrate no major advantages between the low-carbohydrate or calorie-restricted diets. However, the low glycemic index (GI) diet, characterized by intake of high-quality, complex carbohydrates, demonstrated lower insulin use and reduced risk of macrosomia in multiple reviews. Recent evidence suggests the Mediterranean diet is safe in pregnancy, though trials are needed to determine its efficacy over conventional dietary advice. Currently, there are insufficient data to support the safety of the ketogenic diet for the treatment of GDM. The low GI diet may improve maternal and neonatal outcomes in GDM. The liberalized carbohydrate intake is less restrictive, culturally adaptable, and may improve long-term maternal adherence. Further research is needed to establish the optimal, most sustainable, and most acceptable medical nutrition therapy for management of women with GDM.

Low-Carbohydrate Diets for Gestational Diabetes

Nutrition therapy provides the foundation for treatment of gestational diabetes (GDM), and has historically been based on restricting carbohydrate (CHO) intake. In this paper, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are reviewed to assess the effects of both low- and higher CHO nutrition approaches in GDM. The prevailing pattern across the evidence underscores that although CHO restriction improves glycemia at least in the short-term, similar outcomes could be achievable using less restrictive approaches that may not exacerbate IR. The quality of existing studies is limited, in part due to dietary non-adherence and confounding effects of treatment with insulin or oral medication. Recent evidence suggests that modified nutritional manipulation in GDM from usual intake, including but not limited to CHO restriction, improves maternal glucose and lowers infant birthweight. This creates a platform for future studies to further clarify the impact of multiple nutritional patterns in GDM on both maternal and infant outcomes.

Clinical importance of the 75-g glucose tolerance test (GTT) in the prediction of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses in non-diabetic pregnancies

Objective To demonstrate clinical importance of the 75-g glucose tolerance test (GTT) in the prediction of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses in non-diabetic pregnancies. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 75-g GTT screening results of 356 pregnancies without prompt diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) between January 2013 and December 2017. Newborns with a birthweight greater than the 90th percentile were evaluated as LGA. Pregnancies with LGA and non-LGA fetuses were compared by demographic and historical factors - maternal age, gravidity, parity, birthweight, birthweek, GTT results and birthweight percentiles - via Student's t-test. Multiple linear regression using the backward elimination method was performed to define the correlation between parameters and LGA (P-value of <0.20 was identified as the threshold). Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed for further analysis. Results The cohort was consisted of 45 (12.6%) and 311 (87.4%) pregnancies with LGA and non-LGA fetuses, respectively. Maternal age and 2nd-h GTT results were found to be significantly higher in patients with LGA newborns (P<0.001 and P=0.016, respectively). Fasting glucose levels and GTT 1st-h results were also higher (P=0.112, P=0.065). The coefficient of multiple determination (R2) was 0.055 by multiple linear regression analysis. Accordingly, GTT 2nd-h result and maternal age were statistically significant and contributed to the explanation of LGA, although the R2 value was not that much higher (P=0.016; P=0.001). Maternal age and GTT 2nd-h results were found to be associated with LGA fetuses with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.662 and 0.608 according to ROC curve analysis. Conclusion Maternal age and 75-g GTT 2nd-h results were significantly higher in gestations with LGA newborns without GDM.

Fighting Type-2 Diabetes: Present and Future Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Type-2 diabetes mellitus accounts for 80-90% of diabetic patients. So far, the treatment of diabetes mainly aims at elevating insulin level and lowering glucose level in the peripheral blood and mitigating insulin resistance. Physiologically, insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells is delicately regulated. Thus, how insulin-related therapies could titrate blood glucose appropriately and avoid the occurrence of hypoglycemia remains an important issue for decades. Similar question is addressed on how to attenuate vascular complication in diabetic subjects.

METHODS

We overviewed the evolution of each class of anti-diabetic drugs that have been used in clinical practice, focusing on their mechanisms, clinical results and cautions.

RESULTS

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists stimulate β cells for insulin secretion in response to diet but not in fasting stage, which make them superior than conventional insulinsecretion stimulators. DPP-4 inhibitors suppress glucagon-like peptide-1 degradation. Sodium/ glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors enhance glucose clearance through urine excretion. The appearance of these new drugs provides new information about glycemic control. We update the clinical findings of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors and Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in glycemic control and the risk or progression of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. Stem cell therapy might be an alternative tool for diabetic patients to improve β cell regeneration and peripheral ischemia. We summarize the clinical results of mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into patients with diabetic limb and foot.

CONCLUSION

A stepwise intensification of dual and triple therapy for individual diabetic patient is required to achieve therapeutic target.

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Hyperglycaemia that develops during pregnancy and resolves after birth has been recognized for over 50 years, but uniform worldwide consensus is lacking about threshold hyperglycaemic levels that merit a diagnosis of 'gestational diabetes mellitus' (GDM) and thus treatment during pregnancy. GDM is currently the most common medical complication of pregnancy, and prevalence of undiagnosed hyperglycaemia and even overt diabetes in young women is increasing. Maternal overweight and obesity, later age at childbearing, previous history of GDM, family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and ethnicity are major GDM risk factors. Diagnosis is usually performed using an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), although a non-fasting, glucose challenge test (GCT) is used in some parts of the world to screen women for those requiring a full OGTT. Dietary modification and increased physical activity are the primary treatments for GDM, but pharmacotherapy, usually insulin, is used when normoglycaemia is not achieved. Oral hypoglycaemic agents, principally metformin and glibenclamide (glyburide), are also used in some countries. Treatment improves immediate pregnancy outcomes, reducing excess fetal growth and adiposity and pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders. GDM increases the risk of long-term complications, including obesity, impaired glucose metabolism and cardiovascular disease, in both the mother and infant. Optimal management of mother and infant during long-term follow-up remains challenging, with very limited implementation of preventive strategies in most parts of the world.

Dietary and exercise interventions and glycemic control and maternal and newborn outcomes in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes: Systematic review

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complication of pregnancy and can lead to significant perinatal mortalities as well as long term risk of comorbidities for both mother and her offspring. This systematic review aimed to explore whether combined diet and exercise interventions are associated with improved glycemic control and/or improved maternal and newborn outcomes in women with GDM when compared to dietary interventions. A search on combined diet and exercise interventions during pregnancy in women with GDM was performed in 3 electronic databases: PubMed (NCBI), ScienceDierct, and the Cochrane Library. Evaluated outcomes were fasting blood glucose levels, postprandial blood glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin percentages, total weight gain during pregnancy, proportion of caesarean delivery, proportion of patients needing insulin, neonatal birth weight, proportion of macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and preterm birth. This systematic review identified eight randomized, controlled trials involving 592 pregnant women and 350 infants. The risk of bias of the included trials ranged from high to low. The combined diet and exercise interventions reduced fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels when compared to dietary interventions. No significant differences were reported in the selected trials regarding total weight gain during pregnancy, cesarean section, neonatal birth weight, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and preterm birth between diet plus exercise and diet groups. The combination of diet and exercise interventions help to control postprandial blood glucose concentration in women diagnosed with GDM, but did not change either maternal or newborn outcomes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018109896.

Exploration of the shared pathophysiological mechanisms of gestational diabetes and large for gestational age offspring

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and large for gestational age (LGA) offspring are two common pregnancy complications. Connections also exist between the two conditions, including mutual maternal risk factors for the conditions and an increased prevalence of LGA offspring amongst pregnancies affected by GDM. Thus, it is important to elucidate potential shared underlying mechanisms of both LGA and GDM. One potential mechanistic link relates to macronutrient metabolism. Indeed, derangement of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism is present in GDM, and maternal biomarkers of glucose and lipid control are associated with LGA neonates in such pregnancies. The aim of this paper is therefore to reflect on the existing nutritional guidelines for GDM in light of our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of GDM and LGA offspring. Lifestyle modification is first line treatment for GDM, and while there is some promise that nutritional interventions may favourably impact outcomes, there is a lack of definitive evidence that changing the macronutrient composition of the diet reduces the incidence of either GDM or LGA offspring. The quality of the available evidence is a major issue, and rigorous trials are needed to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Current guidelines on the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a content analysis and appraisal

BACKGROUND

Despite many guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes available internationally, little work has been done to summarize and assess the content of existing guidelines. A paucity of analysis guidelines within in a unified system may be one explanatory factor. So this study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents of all available guidelines for the management of gestational diabetes.

METHOD

Relevant clinical guidelines were collected through a search of relevant guideline websites and databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, etc.). Fourteen guidelines were identified, and each guideline was assessed for quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Two independent reviewers extracted guideline recommendations using a "recommendation matrix" through which basic guideline information and consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen documents were analyzed, and a total of 361 original recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management were assessed. In all guidelines included, the recommendations were developed in five domains, namely, diagnosis of GDM, prenatal care, intrapartum care, neonatal care and postpartum care. Different guidelines appeared to have significant discrepancy in consistency of guideline content, but overall, there was consistency between search strategy and selection of evidence, between selected evidence and interpretation, and between interpretation and resulting recommendations (scilicet 49.31, 57.20 and 58.17%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although commonality in most recommendations existed, there were still some discrepancies between guidelines. Consistency of guidelines on the management of GDM in pregnancy is highly variable and needs to be improved.

Guidelines for Medical Nutrition Therapy in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

Medical nutrition therapy is the cornerstone of gestational diabetes mellitus treatment. However, guidelines often present contradictory guidance to health care practitioners.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and critically appraise medical nutrition therapy guidelines for treating patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN

We searched Medline, the Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, and Google Scholar to retrieve clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for medical nutrition therapy in gestational diabetes mellitus from professional or governmental organizations, published in English, between January 1, 2007, and November 24, 2018. CPGs were reviewed and appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II instrument.

RESULTS

Of 1,286 retrieved articles, 21 CPGs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. CPGs of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Diabetes Canada, and Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section received the greatest overall scores and the highest scores concerning rigor of recommendations development. Many CPGs failed to involve multidisciplinary teams in their development, including patients, and often, dietitians. Applicability of the recommendations was low, lacking facilitators and tools to enhance implementation. Many CPGs demonstrated low editorial independence by failing to disclose funding and competing interests. More medical nutrition therapy recommendations were incorporated in the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section CPGs. The Malaysia Health Technology Assessment Section, Diabetes Canada, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, and Endocrine Society guidelines were recommended by the review panel herein without modifications. Overall, the CPGs suggested the consumption of adequate protein and the selection of foods with low glycemic index, divided into three main meals and two to four snacks. Weight gain recommendations were mostly based on the Institute of Medicine body mass index thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

With few exceptions, the main developmental limitations of the appraised CPGs involved low rigor of recommendations development, lack of multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement, low applicability, and inadequate editorial independence. This indicates a need for developing more clear, unbiased, practical, and evidence-based CPGs.

Effectiveness of Following Mediterranean Diet Recommendations in the Real World in the Incidence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Adverse Maternal-Foetal Outcomes: A Prospective, Universal, Interventional Study with a Single Group. The St Carlos Study

We reported that a Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet), supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO) and pistachios, reduces GDM incidence and several other adverse outcomes. In order to assess its translational effects in the real world we evaluated the effect of MedDiet from 1st gestational visit in GDM rate compared with control (CG) and intervention (IG) groups from the previously referred trial. As secondary objective we also compared adverse perinatal outcomes between normoglycemic and diabetic women. This trial is a prospective, clinic-based, interventional study with a single group. 1066 eligible normoglycaemic women before 12 gestational weeks were assessed. 932 women (32.4 ± 5.2 years old, pre-gestational BMI 22.5 ± 3.5 kg/m2) received a motivational lifestyle interview with emphasis on daily consumption of EVOO and nuts, were followed-up and analysed. Binary regression analyses were used to examine the risk for each pregnancy outcome, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational weight gain (GWG), caesarean-section, perineal trauma, preterm delivery, small (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA), and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions. GDM was diagnosed in 13.9%. This rate was significantly lower than the CG: RR 0.81 (0.73-0.93), p < 0.001 and no different from the IG: RR 0.96 (0.85-1.07), p = 0.468. GWG was lower in diabetic women (10.88 ± 6.46 vs. 12.30 ± 5.42 Kg; p = 0.013). Excessive weight gain (EWG) was also lower in GDM [RR 0.91 (0.86-0.96); p < 0.001] without a significant increase of insufficient weight gain. LGA were also lower (1 (0.8%) vs. 31 (3.9%); p < 0.05)), and SGA were similar (5 (3.8%) vs. 30 (3.7%)). LGA were associated to EWG (RR 1.61 (1.35-1.91), p < 0.001). Differences in other maternal-foetal outcomes were not found. In conclusions an early MedDiet nutritional intervention reduces GDM incidence and maternal-foetal adverse outcomes and should be universally applied as 1st line therapy. GDM might not be consider as a high risk pregnancy any longer.

Maternal Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes and the Risk for Preterm Birth: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Maternal type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been linked to preterm birth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. How these risks vary with glycated hemoglobin (or hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]) levels is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To examine preterm birth risk according to periconceptional HbA1c levels in women with T1D.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Sweden, 2003 to 2014.

PATIENTS

2474 singletons born to women with T1D and 1 165 216 reference infants born to women without diabetes.

MEASUREMENTS

Risk for preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal death, large for gestational age, macrosomia, infant birth injury, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, 5-minute Apgar score less than 7, and stillbirth.

RESULTS

Preterm birth occurred in 552 (22.3%) of 2474 infants born to mothers with T1D versus 54 287 (4.7%) in 1 165 216 infants born to mothers without diabetes. The incidence of preterm birth was 13.2% in women with a periconceptional HbA1c level below 6.5% (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] vs. women without T1D, 2.83 [95% CI, 2.28 to 3.52]), 20.6% in those with a level from 6.5% to less than 7.8% (aRR, 4.22 [CI, 3.74 to 4.75]), 28.3% in those with a level from 7.8% to less than 9.1% (aRR, 5.56 [CI, 4.84 to 6.38]), and 37.5% in those with a level of 9.1% or higher (aRR, 6.91 [CI, 5.85 to 8.17]). The corresponding aRRs for medically indicated preterm birth (n = 320) were 5.26 (CI, 3.83 to 7.22), 7.42 (CI, 6.21 to 8.86), 11.75 (CI, 9.72 to 14.20), and 17.51 (CI, 14.14 to 21.69), respectively. The corresponding aRRs for spontaneous preterm birth (n = 223) were 1.81 (CI, 1.31 to 2.52), 2.86 (CI, 2.38 to 3.44), 2.88 (CI, 2.23 to 3.71), and 2.80 (CI, 1.94 to 4.03), respectively. Increasing HbA1c levels were associated with the study's secondary outcomes: large for gestational age, hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, low Apgar score, neonatal death, and stillbirth.

LIMITATION

Because HbA1c levels were registered annually at routine visits, they were not available for all pregnant women with T1D.

CONCLUSION

The risk for preterm birth was strongly linked to periconceptional HbA1c levels. Women with HbA1c levels consistent with recommended target levels also were at increased risk.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Swedish Diabetes Foundation.

Updates in Gestational Diabetes Prevalence, Treatment, and Health Policy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes and increased maternal risk for subsequent type 2 diabetes. The best diagnostic strategy for GDM is debated and the role of oral antidiabetic medications (OAD) for treatment is unclear. In this paper, we review methods of GDM diagnosis, updates in GDM therapy, and interventions to reduce future type 2 diabetes in women with a history of GDM.

RECENT FINDINGS

A "one-step" screening protocol for GDM using 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance testing at 24-28 weeks gestation is recommended by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups, the American Diabetes Association, and the Endocrine Society. This strategy identifies a milder degree of hyperglycemia and thus increases GDM prevalence. Studies indicate that in these cases of mild hyperglycemia, treatment decreases pregnancy and neonatal complications. Insulin analogues including detemir, aspart, and lispro have been shown to be safe in pregnancy with a pregnancy category B classification. Growing literature suggests that sulfonylureas cross the placenta and are associated with increased incidence of macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycemia. Telephone or online diabetes prevention program (DPP)-based interventions for women with GDM have shown encouraging results in pilot studies. Insurance coverage remains a barrier. Additional studies are needed to determine the safety of OAD in pregnancy. Public policy supporting DPP could help improve patient access to these proven interventions.

Person-Centered Primary Care and Type 2 Diabetes: Beyond Blood Glucose Control

With an estimated 9% of persons in the United States diagnosed with diabetes, primary care providers such as midwives and nurse practitioners are increasingly working with persons who have diabetes and are seeking primary care services. This article reviews the current literature with regard to the initial evaluation of individuals who are diagnosed with diabetes, and what is entailed in comprehensive continuing management of care. A person-centered interprofessional approach to care of the person with diabetes is presented. Recommendations are given that address dietary habits, activities of daily living, medication regimens, and potential alternative therapies. Social constructs related to effective care of individuals with diabetes also are addressed. Knowledge of current research that has identified effective care practices for individuals with diabetes is imperative to ensuring their well-being, and promoting a person-centered and interprofessional approach is best for offering optimal care to those diagnosed with diabetes.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Postpartum Follow-Up Testing: Challenges and Solutions

One in every 4 pregnancies is affected by hyperglycemia, of which 90% is gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Women with GDM are at a high risk of developing both short- and long-term complications. Various studies have shown the heightened risk of type 2 diabetes among women with GDM. Despite clear evidence from published literature about the substantial risk that GDM imposes on women after delivery, rates of postpartum follow up have been low in most parts of the world. Several reasons, such as lack of awareness among health-care professionals and patient-related barriers, such as emotional stress and adjusting to motherhood, have been cited as reasons for poor follow-up rates. To address these issues and come up with solutions to improve postpartum follow-up rates, it is important to understand these barriers both from the patient and the health-care system points of view. In this review, we have summarized some of the key issues contributing to the low postpartum follow-up rates and have discussed possible strategies to tackle them. Use of proactive reminder systems, such as postal service, telephone call, short messaging service and e-mail, recall registries for GDM and utilization of mobile health technology are some of the key strategies that have been discussed in this review. A brief note on the Women in India with GDM Strategy project, which developed a model of care for GDM in resource-constrained settings and adopted several strategies that led to a 95.8% postpartum follow up, has also been presented.

Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been updated in the past several years, and various inconsistencies exist across these guidelines. Moreover, the quality of these updated guidelines has not been clarified. We thus conducted this systematic review to evaluate the relationship between the quality and detailed recommendations of these guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

The Guidelines International Network Library, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) database, the Medline database, the Embase and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse were searched for guidelines containing recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies for GDM between 2009 and November 2018.

METHODS

Guidelines included a target group of women with GDM, and contained recommendations for screening and diagnostic strategies for GDM were included in the present systematic review. Reviewers summarised recommendations on screening and diagnosis strategies from each guideline and rated the quality of guidelines by using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 459 citations were collected by the preliminary literature selection, and 16 guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were assessed. The inconsistencies of the guidelines mainly focus on the screening process (one step vs two step) and criteria of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups [IADPSG] vs CarpenterandCoustan). Guidelines with higher AGREE scores usually recommend a one-step OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, and the majority of these guidelines likely to select evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines of WHO-2013, NICE-2015, American Diabetes Association-2018, Endocrine Society-2013, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada-2016, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics-2015, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists-2018, United States Preventive Services Task Force-2014 and IADPSG-2015 are strongly recommended in the present evaluation, according to the AGREE II criteria. Guidelines with higher quality tend to recommend a one-step 75 g OGTT strategy with IADPSG criteria between 24 and 28 gestational weeks.

Association between glycated haemoglobin, glycated albumin and fructosamine with neonatal birthweight and large-for-date status infants in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study

This study aims to investigate associations between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), glycated albumin (GA) and fructosamine with neonatal birthweight in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The prospective cohort consisted of 82 women with GDM and their newborns, enrolled between November 2016 and September 2017. Considering neonatal birthweight and birthweights ≥90th percentile for gestational age as outcomes, linear and logistic regression models were used, respectively. Fructosamine (R²=0.62) and GA (R²=0.61) performed very similarly between them and best than HbA1c (R²=0.58). The added value of GA or fructosamine to HbA1c resulted in increase in models' performances. GA attained the best discriminative ability regarding large-for-date status babies (AUC = 0.80, OR-estimate 1.58, p=.001) followed by fructosamine (AUC = 0.78, OR-estimate 1.42, p=.001) and HbA1c (AUC = 0.69, OR-estimate 3.09, p=.070). GA and fructosamine, besides from providing additional information to HbA1c, when used separately perform better than the traditional biomarker in predicting neonatal birthweight and large-for-date babies in pregnant women with GDM. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? HbA1c is the standard glycaemic indicator used in GDM. Its association with birthweight and large-for-date status has been previously reported. However, it has become increasingly questionable whether it is a suitable glycaemic marker in pregnancy. There is a growing interest in other non-traditional shorter-term glycaemic indicators, such as GA and fructosamine. Nevertheless, few studies exist and almost all are retrospective and with ethnically homogeneous study populations composed by pregnant women not only with GDM but also type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. What do the results of this study add? Our prospective multi-ethnic cohort composed solely on pregnant women with GDM and their infants show that even though all of the aforementioned biomarkers are associated with birthweight and large-for-date status in GDM when used separately, GA and fructosamine seem to perform better than HbA1c. When used with HbA1c, they improve the predicting performance of the traditional marker. What are the implications of these findings for future clinical practice and/or further research? These findings suggest that GA and fructosamine can provide important additional or substitute information to HbA1c in GDM, namely in predicting birthweight and large-for-date status babies. Larger studies are needed to confirm if this non-traditional biomarkers can change clinical practice.

Impact of overt diabetes diagnosed in pregnancy in a multi-ethnic cohort in Spain

Overt diabetes (ODM) is defined as women without diabetes meeting the criteria for diabetes at the first antenatal visit. The risk of obstetric complications increases linearly with maternal glycemia and poorer maternal-fetal outcomes than in gestational diabetes (GDM) may be expected. Studies focusing on ODM pregnancy outcomes are lacking. We aimed to analyze maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in ODM women compared with those with GDM. A retrospective cohort study of women giving birth between January 2010 and April 2013 was conducted. Participants with pre-gestational diabetes were excluded. All women underwent screening for GDM at the 24th-28th weeks of gestation or at the first prenatal visit in those with risk factors. HbA1c and a fasting glucose were measured in GDM women to rule out ODM. Of the 5,633 women included, 572 (10%) were diagnosed with GDM and 50 (0.88%) with ODM. Almost 95% of ODM women were from ethnic minorities. After adjustment for confounding factors, ODM women showed increased rates of premature birth (23.1% vs. 6.7%, p < .001), emergent cesarean section (41.0% vs. 19.5%, p = .049), preeclampsia (22% vs. 3.7%, p < .001) and large-for-gestational-age babies (40.0% vs. 14.8%, p = .008) compared with GDM. In conclusion, ODM is associated with poorer obstetric outcomes than GDM and affects mainly women from ethnic minorities.

Advances in pharmacological treatment of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

In women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pregnancy is associated with a potential risk of maternal, foetal and neonatal outcomes. Stringent metabolic control is required to improve these outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors summarise the current evidence from studies on the pharmacological therapy and on monitoring of T1DM during pregnancy. The authors also discuss the use of new technologies to improve therapeutic management and patient compliance.

EXPERT OPINION

Pre-conception counselling is essential in T1DM to minimise pregnancy risks. Pregnancy in T1DM is always considered a high-risk pregnancy. During pregnancy, the target haemoglobin A1C (HbA_1c) is near-normal at <6%, without excessive hypoglycaemia. Strict control of pre- and post-prandial glucose is also required. Human soluble insulin, neutral protamine Hagedorn and the quick-acting insulin analogues aspart and lispro are widely used. Insulin is administered either as a basal-bolus regimen or by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Careful and strict glucose monitoring is also needed during labour and delivery, including caesarean section. Moreover, the control of retinopathy, hypertension, nephropathy, hyper- and hypothyroidism is required. Post-partum, insulin requirements decrease, and less stringent glycaemic control is pursued, to avoid hypoglycaemias. Finally, breastfeeding is recommended and should be encouraged.

Metabolic effects of breastfeed in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study was undertaken to provide comprehensive analyses of current research developments in the field of breastfeed (BF) and metabolic-related outcomes among women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Database PubMed, Embase, BIOSIS Previews, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through December 3, 2017. Odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled by random-effects model using Stata version 12.0. Twenty-three observational studies were included in quantitative synthesis. Reduced possibility of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92) and pre-DM (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.51-0.86) were found among women with longer BF of any intensity after GDM pregnancy. The positive effect of longer BF on progression to T2DM gradually became prominent with the extension of follow-up period. Compared with women with shorter BF, those with longer BF manifested more favourable metabolic parameters, including significant lower body mass index, fasting glucose, triglyceride, and higher insulin sensitivity index. The findings support that BF may play an important role in protection against the development of T2DM-related outcomes in midlife of women with prior GDM. However, further studies are needed to reveal the etiological mechanism.

Insights on Medical Nutrition Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Indian Perspective

It is critical to integrate medical nutrition therapy (MNT) provided by a registered dietician (RD) into primary care of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is necessary to achieve the goals of improving overall metabolic measures beyond calorie restriction and weight loss. Misconceptions about nutrition in T2DM add to the challenges of executing MNT in a culturally sensitive population. The current review provides insights into MNT for the prevention and management of T2DM in India, based on both evidence and experience. It revisits historical Indian studies and provides information on appropriate dietary intake of carbohydrates (60-70%), proteins (~ 20%) and fats (10%) that will be acceptable and beneficial in an Indian T2DM population. It discusses nuances of types of carbohydrates and fats and explains associations of increased dietary fiber intake, balanced intake of low and high glycemic index foods and substitution of saturated fats with plant-based polyunsaturated fats in improving outcomes of T2DM and attenuating risk factors. The article also deliberates upon special patient populations with comorbid conditions and diseases and the necessary adjustments needed in their nutritional care. It outlines a step-wise approach to MNT involving a careful interplay of nutrition assessment, diagnosis, individualization and patient counseling. Overall, the success of MNT relies on providing accurate, acceptable and appropriate dietary choices for continued patient adherence. Collaborative efforts from diabetologists, endocrinologists, internists and RDs are required to prioritize and implement MNT in diabetes practice in India.Funding: Signutra Inc.

Pregnancy outcomes of early detected gestational diabetes: a retrospective comparison cohort study, Qatar

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes in patients with early versus usual gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The Women's Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar.

PARTICIPANTS

GDM women who attended and delivered in the Women's Hospital, between January and December 2016. GDM was diagnosed based on the 2013-WHO criteria. The study included 801 patients; of which, 273 E-GDM and 528 U-GDM. Early GDM (E-GDM) and usual GDM (U-GDM) were defined as GDM detected before and after 24 weeks' gestation, respectively.

OUTCOMES

Maternal and neonatal outcomes and the impact of timing of GDM-diagnosis on pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

At conception, E-GDM women were older (mean age 33.5±5.4 vs 32.0±5.4 years, p<0.001) and had higher body mass index (33.0±6.3 vs 31.7±6.1 kg/m2, p=0.0059) compared with U-GDM. The mean fasting, and 1-hour blood glucose levels were significantly higher in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively (5.3±0.7 vs 4.0±0.7 mmol/L, p<0.001 and 10.6±1.7 vs 10.3±1.6 mmol/L, p<0.001). More patients in the U-GDM were managed on diet alone compared with E-GDM (53.6% vs 27.5%, p<0.001). E-GDM subjects gained less weight per week compared with U-GDM (0.02±0.03 vs 0.12±0.03 kg/week, p=0.0274). Maternal outcomes were similar between the two groups apart from a higher incidence of preterm labour (25.5% vs 14.4%; p<0.001) and caesarean section (52.4% vs 42.8%; p=0.01) in E-GDM vs U-GDM, respectively. After correction for covariates; gestational age at which GDM was diagnosed was associated with increased risk of macrosomia (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05) and neonatal hypoglycaemia (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the concept of early screening and treatment of GDM in high-risk patients. More data are needed to examine the optimal time for screening.

How diet, physical activity and psychosocial well-being interact in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an integrative review

Background

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is associated with future cardio-metabolic risks for the mother and her child. In addition, one-third of women with recent GDM develop postpartum depression. Given these adverse impacts of GDM on the health of the mother and her offspring, it is important to intervene on modifiable factors, such as diet, physical activity, and psychosocial well-being. This integrative review therefore explored evidence on how these modifiable factors interact in women with GDM and their offspring, and how effective combined interventions are on reducing adverse impacts of GDM.

Methods

A comprehensive search strategy included carefully selected terms that corresponded to the domains of interest (diet, physical activity and psychosocial well-being). The databases searched for articles published between 1980 and February 2018 were: CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane. Studies that were included in this review were either observational or intervention studies that included at least two domains of interest. Articles had to at least report data on maternal outcomes of women with GDM.

Results

The search strategies identified 14′419 citations after excluding duplicates. After screening titles and then abstracts, 114 articles were selected for detailed evaluation of their full text, and 16 were included in this review: two observational and 14 intervention studies. Results from observational studies showed that psychosocial well-being (social support and self-efficacy) were positively associated with physical activity and dietary choice. Intervention studies always included diet and physical activity interventions, although none integrated psychosocial well-being in the intervention. These lifestyle interventions mostly led to increased physical activity, improved diet and lower stress perception. Many of these lifestyle interventions also reduced BMI and postpartum diabetes status, improved metabolic outcomes and reduced the risk of preterm deliveries and low birth weight.

Conclusion

This integrative review showed that psychosocial well-being interacted with diet as well as with physical activity in women with GDM. We recommend that future studies consider integrating psychosocial well-being in their intervention, as observational studies demonstrated that social support and self-efficacy helped with adopting a healthy lifestyle following GDM diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-019-2185-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prevalence and predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus: a nationwide multicentre prospective study

AIM

Prevalence rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) show considerable variation among different countries and regions of the world. The primary aim of this study was to determine the nationwide prevalence and predictors of GDM in Turkey.

METHODS

We conducted prospective nationwide screening among pregnant women. Between August 2016 and November 2017, a total of 2643 pregnant women from 51 centres in 12 different regions were enrolled. A two-step screening method and Carpenter and Coustan criteria were used in the diagnosis of GDM. Clinical and biochemical data were obtained using electronic database software.

RESULTS

The national prevalence of GDM was found to be 16.2% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 15.0% to 17.4%] without a significant difference between urban and rural regions. Women with GDM were older (mean age: 32 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 5 years, P < 0.001) and heavier (mean BMI: 27.2 ± 5.1 vs. 24.7 ± 4.7 kg/m² , P < 0.001) than their counterparts without GDM. The prevalence of GDM tended to increase with age (< 25 years, 6.9%; 26-35 years, 15.6%; and 36-45 years, 32.7%; P < 0.001). Maternal age, maternal BMI, history of previous GDM and family history of diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of developing GDM (P < 0.05 for all). Low-risk women (age < 25 years, BMI < 25 kg/m² , no family history of diabetes) comprised 10.7% of the total population and the prevalence of GDM in these women was 4.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 7.8%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this nationwide study indicate that GDM is very common, affecting one in seven pregnancies in Turkey. Implementation of international guidelines on screening and management of this public health problem is required.

Effectiveness of Insulin Analogs Compared with Human Insulins in Pregnant Women with Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Diabetes during pregnancy has been linked to unfavorable maternal-fetal outcomes. Human insulins are the first drug of choice because of the proven safety in their use. However, there are still questions about the use of insulin analogs during pregnancy. The objective of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of insulin analogs compared with human insulin in the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The search comprised the period since the inception of each database until July 2017, and the following databases were used: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, SIGLE and Google Scholar. We have selected 29 original articles: 11 were randomized clinical trials and 18 were observational studies. We have explored data from 6,382 participants. All of the articles were classified as having an intermediate to high risk of bias. The variable that showed favorable results for the use of insulin analogs was gestational age, with a mean difference of - 0.26 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.49; p = 0.02), but with significant heterogeneity (Higgins test [I2] = 38%; chi-squared test [χ2] = 16.24; degree of freedom [DF] = 10; p = 0.09). This result, in the clinical practice, does not compromise the fetal well-being, since all babies were born at term. There was publication bias in the gestational age and neonatal weight variables. To date, the evidence analyzed has a moderate-to-high risk of bias and does not allow the conclusion that insulin analogs are more effective when compared with human insulin to treat diabetic pregnant women.

Comparing outcomes of nutrition therapy, insulin and oral anti-diabetics in managing diabetes mellitus in Pregnancy: Retrospective study and review of current guidelines

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the glycemic profile and outcomes of Indonesian diabetic pregnant mothers based on their methods of therapy and review current international as well as national guidelines on management of diabetes in pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was obtained from medical records of Hermina-Podomoro Hospital. Subjects were grouped based on therapy - nutrition therapy only, insulin and oral anti-diabetics group.

RESULTS

Forty-five subjects were obtained with an average age of 31-years. Around thirty-five percent of patients were given nutrition therapy only, 55.6% were using insulin and 8.8% were using oral anti-diabetics. Oral anti-diabetics users showed worse glycemic profile among the three groups. Six-patients suffered from IUFD with the highest proportion found in oral anti-diabetics users.

CONCLUSION

The above results show the negative impacts of DM on pregnant mothers and the unborn. Caution is advised on the use of oral anti-diabetics as it may increase the risk of infant mortality. Increased monitoring and prenatal services for DM patients are essential in achieving blood glucose targets.

Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in South East Nigeria Using the Updated Diagnostic Guidelines

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Controversy still surrounds the choice of screening methods for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Updated guidelines on hyperglycemias in pregnancy, recognizes 2 categories; Diabetes in pregnancy or pre-gestational diabetes and GDM. Early screening and diagnosis of GDM prevents maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. <b><i>Study Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of GDM and associated risk factors in a population of pregnant women in Enugu, South East Nigeria. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> The study was cross sectional and descriptive. All pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic were eligible for the study. A risk factor assessment questionnaire was administered. The one step universal screening with 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was used. The results were tabulated and categorized according to the World Health Organization (2013) Diagnostic Criteria. Statistical analysis was by SPSS version 21. <b><i>Result:</i></b> A total of 205 women were initially screened. Risk factors for GDM were identified in up to third of the subjects. They were aged 15–41 years (28.6 ± 4.9 years). OGTT was performed in 142 of the subjects (who came fasting). Gestational age was 8–40 weeks (28.5 ± 7.3); gravidity, 1–9 (2.4 ± 1.5); parity, 0–4 (1.3 ± 1.4); miscarriages, 0–5; and live births, 0–5. Blood glucose levels were 60–145 mg/dL (85.5 ± 12.5) fasting; 77–229 mg/dL (131.8 ± 27.2) at 1 h and 72–223 mg/dL (123.1 ± 25.0) at 2 h post glucose load. The WHO (2013) criteria for GDM were met in 51 subjects (35.9%), WHO 1999 in 29 (20.4%); IAPDSG/American Diabetes Association in 54 (38%); NICE in 44 (31%) and DIPSI in 25 (17.6%). Three subjects had diabetes in pregnancy. Previous miscarriages and macrosomic babies, family history of diabetes mellitus, previous GDM, hypertension and recurrent urinary tract infection were found to be significant risk factors for the development of GDM. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The study highlights the high prevalence of GDM in our local population. At every level, screening and management of GDM should be incorporated as a routine antenatal service.

Compliance and barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study intends to understand the barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. In addition, it also aims to know the factors that influence the compliance with SMBG-testing among GDM patients.

METHODS

The study primarily comprised a search of various databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, PROQUEST, and CINAHL). Research papers published between March 2010 and June 2018 were searched for this review. Article types considered for this review were observational studies, experimental studies, and systemic reviews with or without meta-analysis. Using a set of eligibility criteria; initially, the papers were scrutinized by reviewing the abstracts, following which a full-text review of the selected papers was undertaken. Finally, a critical appraisal and an overall qualitative assessment of these studies were done.

RESULTS

Literature search identified 25 papers, excluding the duplicates. Six studies (two qualitative and four quasi-experimental) that matched the eligibility criteria of this study were reviewed. The barriers of SMBG in GDM patients were non-prescription of SMBG by the health-care providers, poor perception and fear of SMBG, and family history of Type 2 diabetes. Use of smartphone technology and SMBG-education improved the compliance to SMBG testing. However, most of the quasi-experimental studies did not have a pre- and post-intervention comparison of their results or comparison of their findings with any control group. Moreover, the way of determining compliance among three of these studies was not identical. Similarly, among the qualitative studies, one study does not have a clear mention of the language in which the interviews were conducted, whereas the other qualitative study does not state, if the English language translation of the verbatim transcripts was validated or not. Only one study mentioned the diagnostic criteria used to diagnose GDM.

CONCLUSION

The recent evidence to the barriers of SMBG and the factors that influence the compliance of SMBG is weak and not generalizable. Moreover, there is a scarcity of literature that addresses the context.

The impact of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on its prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The absence of universal gold standards for screening of gestational diabetes (GDM) has led to heterogeneity in the identification of GDM, thereby impacting the accurate estimation of the prevalence of GDM. We aimed to evaluate the effect of different diagnostic criteria for GDM on its prevalence among general populations of pregnant women worldwide, and also to investigate the prevalence of GDM based on various geographic regions.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus and Google-scholar databases for retrieving articles in English investigating the prevalence of GDM. All populations were classified to seven groups based-on their diagnostic criteria for GDM. Heterogeneous and non-heterogeneous results were analyzed using the fixed effect and random-effects inverse variance model for calculating the pooled effect. Publication bias was assessed by Begg's test. The Meta-prop method was used for the pooled estimation of the prevalence of GDM. Meta-regression was conducted to explore the association between prevalence of GDM and its diagnostic criteria. Modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for nonrandomized studies was used for quality assessment of the studies included; the ROBINS and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tools were used to evaluate the risk of bias.

RESULTS

We used data from 51 population-based studies, i.e. a study population of 5,349,476 pregnant women. Worldwide, the pooled overall-prevalence of GDM, regardless of type of screening threshold categories was 4.4%, (95% CI 4.3-4.4%). The pooled overall prevalence of GDM in the diagnostic threshold used in IADPSG criteria was 10.6% (95% CI 10.5-10.6%), which was the highest pooled prevalence of GDM among studies included. Meta-regression showed that the prevalence of GDM among studies that used the IADPSG criteria was significantly higher (6-11 fold) than other subgroups. The highest and lowest prevalence of GDM, regardless of screening criteria were reported in East-Asia and Australia (Pooled-P = 11.4%, 95% CI 11.1-11.7%) and (Pooled-P = 3.6%, 95% CI 3.6-3.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Over the past quarter century, the diagnosis of gestational diabetes has been changed several times; along with worldwide increasing trend of obesity and diabetes, reducing the threshold of GDM is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of GDM. The harm and benefit of reducing the threshold of diagnostic criteria on pregnancy outcomes, women's psychological aspects, and health costs should be evaluated precisely.

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and results of the screening tests at a tertiary referral center: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence of low risk pregnant population at a tertiary referral center by different approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study using retrospective data between 2007-2017 was conducted. During this period 77227 patients underwent either two step or one step glucose tolerance tests.

RESULTS

The median age of the study population was 27 (15-49). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) testing was evaluated in 144,113 women at the initial antenatal care visit which %21 of these were between 92-126 mg/dL. Of these women %1.25 had FPG>126 mg/dL which showed the prevalence of pregestational diabetes in our cohort. During the study period 74412 women underwent 50-g glucose challenge test where %18 were screen positive and % 2.9 was defined as gestational diabetic without need for further testing (>180 mg/dL). The screening positive patients were sent to 100-g oral glucose tolerance test and the prevalence of GDM with two-step screening was 5.5%. A total of 2815 patients were screened by 75-g glucose tolerance test and the prevalence of GDM with one-step screening was 21%. Overall 4684 patients have been diagnosed as gestational diabetes mellitus with the prevalence of 6.07%.

CONCLUSION

Fasting plasma glucose >92 mg/dL is challenging in our population due to improper fasting. The FPG dependent GDM prevalence is almost four times higher than two-step glucose screening test results (21.8% vs 5.5%). If FPG levels will be used for diagnosing GDM then the values must be checked in a second laboratory analysis.

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Diagnosed during Follow-up of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Early Postpartum Period

A 27-year-old woman with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) developed type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) in the early postpartum period. Women with a history of GDM are at an increased risk of developing T1D, which is rarer than type 2 diabetes mellitus. A postpartum follow-up 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and the measurement of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies aided in the early detection of T1D in this patient. Careful attention should be paid to women with a history of GDM who exhibit clinical features suggestive of future development of T1D.

Investigating the Reliability of HbA1c Monitoring for Blood Glucose Control During Late Pregnancy in Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) with and without β-Thalassemia Minor

INTRODUCTION

Patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) need strict blood glucose control to reduce the incidence of perinatal complications in the mother or infant. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values of GDM patients were affected by β-thalassemia minor and to subsequently discuss the limitations of HbA1c monitoring for blood glucose control.

METHODS

41 GDM patients with β-thalassemia minor were enrolled to serve as the study group. 93 GDM patients without thalassemia were randomly selected as a control group. Clinical data on the 134 mothers as well as their newborns were retrospectively analyzed. The blood glucose values of the participants at various times during the gestation period were compared between the groups, as were their HbA1c and ferritin levels and iron deficiency rates in late pregnancy (36-38 weeks of gestation). Pearson's coefficient was calculated to determine the correlations between HbA1c and ferritin in both the study and control groups.

RESULTS

The study and control groups did not show any significant differences in newborn birth weight, maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), gestational age, newborn sex, gravidity, and parity. The blood glucose values of the participants at different times during the gestation period also did not differ significantly between the study group and the control group. However, the late-pregnancy HbA1c level (5.23 ± 0.49%) and iron deficiency rate (12.19%) in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (5.42 ± 0.43% and 58.06%, respectively); P  < 0.05. Also, the late-pregnancy ferritin level in the study group (46.59 ± 18.03 ng/mL) was significantly higher than that in the control group (25.58 ± 11.42 ng/mL); P  < 0.05. In addition, a significant negative correlation was observed between HbA1c and ferritin in both the study group (R = - 0.459, P = 0.003) and the control group (R = - 0.358, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The HbA1c level is affected by many factors. Using serum HbA1c values to monitor blood glucose in GDM patients with β-thalassemia minor may lead to a mistaken assumption of low blood glucose levels, so HbA1c may not be a suitable indicator for monitoring blood glucose in pregnant women, particularly GDM patients with β-thalassemia minor.

Financial Conflicts of Interest Among Authors of Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines

CONTEXT

There has been a proliferation of clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology and a coincident increased interest in transparency regarding relationships between physicians and industry.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We collected self-reported disclosures and Open Payments data for 169 authors of 26 clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2017 by the Endocrine Society. Conflicts of interest in which pharmaceutical and device companies manufactured drugs or products pertinent to an author's specific clinical practice guideline(s) were deemed relevant. Open Payments data were grouped into research and nonresearch (consultancies, honoraria, travel, food) categories.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We compared the policies of the Endocrine Society regarding seven conflict of interest recommendations issued by the National Academy of Medicine in 2011.

CONCLUSION

Relevant nonresearch financial conflicts of interest were self-reported by 42% of authors of clinical practice guidelines. Open Payments were recorded for 74% (84 of 113) of US authors between 2013 and 2016. Payments to 84 US authors totaled $5.5 million for nonresearch activities and $30.9 million for research. The nonresearch payments were divided into consulting (46%), honoraria (26%), travel (25%), and food (3%). The Endocrine Society partially follows the National Academy of Medicine recommendations to limit conflicts of interest. Readers should be aware of how clinical practice guidelines are developed and the policies of the organizations and journals that publish them. Professional societies and journal editors should strive to ensure that their policies and practices promote objective and unbiased clinical practice guidelines.

Prevalence of glucose intolerance and metabolic syndrome within one year following delivery of a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes

Background

Women with a history of gestational diabetes (GDM) are at risk for development of both overt Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) at higher rates and at earlier ages than control women. Current guidelines recommend longitudinal testing of glucose tolerance for women with prior GDM, but no formal assessments of cardiovascular disease are suggested. This study estimated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women with GDM in recent pregnancy who were followed for at least 1 year postpartum to quantify their cardiovascular risks.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of women who were diagnosed with GDM in a public hospital and followed for at least 1 year after delivery and who had tests performed at a minimum 4–12 weeks postpartum and 6 and 12 months postpartum. Primary outcomes were prevalence of glucose tolerance abnormalities and metabolic syndrome (MetS) defined by two prevailing sets of diagnostic criteria.

Results

One hundred fifty-one indigent, primarily Latina women who had been diagnosed in their last pregnancy with GDM comprised the study population. At the first visit postpartum, 4.7% were found to have overt diabetes and between 24 and 31% met the criteria for MetS. By the end of 12 months, another 14.5% were diagnosed with overt diabetes, and 38.5% had prediabetes. An additional 12–25% of the woman who had not had MetS at baseline developed MetS by the end of the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Given the high prevalence of MetS among women with recent history of GDM immediately postpartum and its rapid development in the following year, further research is needed to enable the development of practice guidelines that will define appropriate short and long-term evaluations needed to assess risk for cardiovascular disease in these women.

Pharmacotherapy for hyperglycemia in pregnancy - The new insulins

Hyperglycemia in pregnancy may lead to adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Tight glycemic control is prudent in order to reduce pregnancy complications. For many years, the gold standard pharmacological therapy during pregnancy was human insulin. Recently, insulin analogues were also introduced to clinical use in pregnancy. This brief review aims to summarize the information on the efficacy and safety of insulin analogue therapy during gestation. The strengths and pitfalls of insulin analogue administration during gestation, compared with human insulin, are presented. According to studies in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, insulins lispro, aspart and detemir are efficacious and safe. Correspondingly, the FDA has reclassified them for the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes from category C to category B. Although large and prospective data on insulin glargine in gestation are still lacking, no major safety concerns were documented. No controlled trials with insulins glulisine and degludec were conducted in pregnancy. In sum, insulin analogues are practical therapeutic options for hyperglycemia in pregnancy, mainly due to their hypoglycemia risk reduction. More research for their use in pregnant women with gestational diabetes or type 2 diabetes should be conducted. Overall, their efficacy and safety is possibly comparable to human insulin.

Intervention to Reduce Unnecessary Glucose Tolerance Testing in Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can be diagnosed in pregnant women by increased fasting plasma glucose alone, which eliminates the need for performing a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). If whole blood glucose meters are used to triage fasting samples in order to decide whether to give the glucose drink, a cutpoint with appropriate sensitivity and specificity for elevated fasting plasma glucose is needed.

METHODS

The number of GDM diagnoses by increased fasting plasma glucose alone was determined from specimens collected and tested at core laboratories in urban hospitals, rural health centers, and from specimens collected at patient phlebotomy service centers (PSCs) for plasma testing at a central laboratory. The number of glucose drinks avoided was counted after implementing the diagnostic cutoff of ≥95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) at urban hospitals and rural health centers, which have on-site plasma testing, and after selecting a PSC meter fasting venous whole blood glucose cutpoint after calculating sensitivity and specificity for plasma glucose ≥95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 4850 OGTTs, there were 1315 GDM diagnoses annually, of which 409 were from increased fasting plasma glucose. Ninety-one percent of OGTTs were performed at PSCs. If a fasting plasma glucose cutpoint of ≥95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L) was implemented at urban hospitals and rural health centers and a meter fasting venous whole blood glucose cutpoint of ≥108 mg/dL (6.0 mmol/L) (25% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity) was implemented at PSCs, the drink would be appropriately avoided by 145 patients/year, and inappropriately avoided by 3 patients/year. After implementing these cutpoints, the drink was appropriately avoided in 91 patients during a 36-week period, with none inappropriately avoiding it.

CONCLUSION

Modifying fasting glucose cutpoints reduced unnecessary diagnostic OGTTs in pregnant women.

Pharmacotherapy for hyperglycemia in pregnancy - Do oral agents have a place?

Diabetes is a frequent condition in pregnancy and achieving adequate glycemic control is of paramount importance. Insulin treatment is the gold standard, oral agents are more attractive, but their safety and efficiency should be a prerequisite for their use. We have more information regarding treatment of women with gestational diabetes mellitus where glyburide can induce a picture of fetal hyperinsulinism (higher birthweight and more neonatal hypoglycemia) whereas metformin requires supplemental insulin in a larger proportion of women but achieves satisfactory perinatal outcomes with the exception of preterm birth. Information in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is much more limited but also favors metformin. Combinations provide additional possibilities. However, as to long-term outcomes, we have no information on the impact of exposure to glyburide and it is still unclear if in utero exposure to metformin will have any effect on the offspring and the direction of this effect. Women prefer oral agents, indicating the need of additional studies.