Agonist-selective endocytosis of mu opioid receptor by neurons in vivo

Estrogen-induced alteration of mu-opioid receptor immunoreactivity in the medial preoptic nucleus and medial amygdala

The mu-opioid receptor (mu-OR), like most G-protein-coupled receptors, is rapidly internalized after agonist binding. Although opioid peptides induce internalization in vivo, there are no studies that demonstrate mu-OR internalization in response to natural stimuli. In this study, we used laser-scanning microscopy to demonstrate that estrogen treatment induces the translocation of mu-OR immunoreactivity (mu-ORi) from the membrane to an internal location in steroid-sensitive cell groups of the limbic system and hypothalamus. Estrogen-induced internalization was prevented by the opioid antagonist naltrexone, suggesting that translocation was largely dependent on release of endogenous agonists. Estrogen treatment also altered the pattern of mu-ORi at the bright-field light microscopic level. In the absence of stimulation, the majority of immunoreactivity is diffuse, with few definable mu-OR+ cell bodies or processes. After stimulation, the density of distinct processes filled with mu-ORi was significantly increased. We interpreted the increase in the number of mu-OR+ processes as indicating increased levels of internalization. Using this increase in the density of mu-OR+ fibers, we showed that treatment of ovariectomized rats with estradiol benzoate induced a rapid and reversible increase in the number of fibers. Significant internalization was noted within 30 min and lasted for >24 hr after estrogen treatment in the medial preoptic nucleus, the principal part of the bed nucleus, and the posterodorsal medial amygdala. Naltrexone prevented the increase of mu-OR+ processes. These data imply that estrogen treatment stimulates the release of endogenous opioids that activate mu-OR in the limbic system and hypothalamus providing a "neurochemical signature" of steroid activation of these circuits.

G protein-coupled receptors in gastrointestinal physiology. II. Regulation of neuropeptide receptors in enteric neurons

Neuropeptides exert their diverse biological effects by interacting with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this review we address the question, What regulates the ability of a target cell, in particular a neuron, to respond to a neuropeptide? Available evidence from studies of many GPCRs in reconstituted systems and transfected cell lines indicates that much of this regulation occurs at the level of the receptor and serves to alter the capacity of the receptor to bind ligands with high affinity and to couple to heterotrimeric G proteins. Although some of the knowledge gained from these studies is applicable to the regulation of neuropeptide receptors on neurons, at present there are far more questions than answers.

Multiple signaling pathways regulate cell surface expression and activity of the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 subtype of Glu transporter in C6 glioma

Neuronal and glial sodium-dependent transporters are crucial for the control of extracellular glutamate levels in the CNS. The regulation of these transporters is relatively unexplored, but the activity of other transporters is regulated by protein kinase C (PKC)- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-mediated trafficking to and from the cell surface. In the present study the C6 glioma cell line was used as a model system that endogenously expresses the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1) subtype of neuronal glutamate transporter. As previously observed, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) caused an 80% increase in transporter activity within minutes that cannot be attributed to the synthesis of new transporters. This increase in activity correlated with an increase in cell surface expression of EAAC1 as measured by using a membrane-impermeant biotinylation reagent. Both effects of PMA were blocked by the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide II (Bis II). The putative PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin, decreased L-[3H]-glutamate uptake activity by >50% within minutes. Wortmannin decreased the Vmax of L-[3H]-glutamate and D-[3H]-aspartate transport, but it did not affect Na+-dependent [3H]-glycine transport. Wortmannin also decreased cell surface expression of EAAC1. Although wortmannin did not block the effects of PMA on activity, it prevented the PMA-induced increase in cell surface expression. This trafficking of EAAC1 also was examined with immunofluorescent confocal microscopy, which supported the biotinylation studies and also revealed a clustering of EAAC1 at cell surface after treatment with PMA. These studies suggest that the trafficking of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 is regulated by two independent signaling pathways and also may suggest a novel endogenous protective mechanism to limit glutamate-induced excitotoxicity.

Multiple signaling pathways regulate cell surface expression and activity of the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 subtype of Glu transporter in C6 glioma

Neuronal and glial sodium-dependent transporters are crucial for the control of extracellular glutamate levels in the CNS. The regulation of these transporters is relatively unexplored, but the activity of other transporters is regulated by protein kinase C (PKC)- and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-mediated trafficking to and from the cell surface. In the present study the C6 glioma cell line was used as a model system that endogenously expresses the excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1) subtype of neuronal glutamate transporter. As previously observed, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) caused an 80% increase in transporter activity within minutes that cannot be attributed to the synthesis of new transporters. This increase in activity correlated with an increase in cell surface expression of EAAC1 as measured by using a membrane-impermeant biotinylation reagent. Both effects of PMA were blocked by the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide II (Bis II). The putative PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin, decreased L-[3H]-glutamate uptake activity by >50% within minutes. Wortmannin decreased the Vmax of L-[3H]-glutamate and D-[3H]-aspartate transport, but it did not affect Na+-dependent [3H]-glycine transport. Wortmannin also decreased cell surface expression of EAAC1. Although wortmannin did not block the effects of PMA on activity, it prevented the PMA-induced increase in cell surface expression. This trafficking of EAAC1 also was examined with immunofluorescent confocal microscopy, which supported the biotinylation studies and also revealed a clustering of EAAC1 at cell surface after treatment with PMA. These studies suggest that the trafficking of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 is regulated by two independent signaling pathways and also may suggest a novel endogenous protective mechanism to limit glutamate-induced excitotoxicity.

The relationship between agonist intrinsic activity and the rate of endocytosis of muscarinic receptors in a human neuroblastoma cell line

The molecular mechanisms underlying the internalization of G protein-coupled receptors are still poorly understood. Normally agonists but not antagonists cause internalization (defined here as a reduction in the number of receptors at the cell surface), suggesting a functional relationship between agonist activity and internalization. In this study we investigated the effects of eight muscarinic ligands on the rate constants for endocytosis and recycling of m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. We found that there was a linear correlation between the intrinsic activity of the ligand and its ability to increase the rate constant for endocytosis, suggesting that the same active conformation of the receptor is responsible for stimulating both second messenger generation and receptor endocytosis. In contrast, the rate constant for recycling did not depend on which agonist had triggered receptor endocytosis, suggesting that recycling is a purely constitutive process. Because receptor internalization depends on the rate constants for both endocytosis and recycling, the relationship between internalization and intrinsic activity is nonlinear. In particular, mathematical modeling of receptor trafficking revealed that under certain conditions very small (3% or less) increases in the rate constant for endocytosis are sufficient to cause substantial receptor internalization. An important implication of this analysis is that extremely weak partial agonists (which may in practice be indistinguishable from antagonists) may produce significant receptor internalization.

Internalization of D1 dopamine receptor in striatal neurons in vivo as evidence of activation by dopamine agonists

To investigate how dopamine influences the subcellular localization of the dopamine receptors in the striatal dopaminoceptive neurons, we have used immunohistochemistry to detect D1 dopamine receptors (D1R) after modifications of the dopamine environment. In normal rats, D1R are located mostly extrasynaptically at the plasma membrane of the cell bodies, dendrites, and spines. The intrastriatal injection of the full D1R agonist SKF-82958 and the intraperitoneal injection of the same molecule or of amphetamine (which induces a massive release of dopamine in the striatum) induce modifications of the pattern of D1R immunoreactivity in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Whereas normal rats display homogenous staining of the neuropile with staining of the plasma membrane of the cell bodies, either treatment provokes the appearance of an intense immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm and the proximal dendrites. The labeling pattern is heterogeneous and more intense in the striosomes than in the matrix. Analysis of semithin sections and electron microscopy studies demonstrates a translocation of the labeling from the plasma membrane to endocytic vesicles and endosomes bearing D1R immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of cell bodies and dendrites. Injection of D1R antagonist (SCH-23390) alone or injection of D1R antagonist, together with amphetamine or SKF-82958, do not provoke modification of the immunoreactivity, as compared with normal rat. Our results demonstrate that, in vivo, the acute activation of dopamine receptors by direct agonists or endogenously released dopamine provokes dramatic modifications of their subcellular distribution in neurons, including internalization in the endosomal compartment in the cytoplasm. This suggests that modifications of the localization of neurotransmitter receptors, including extrasynaptic ones, may be a critical event that contributes to the postsynaptic response in vivo.

Internalization of D1 dopamine receptor in striatal neurons in vivo as evidence of activation by dopamine agonists

To investigate how dopamine influences the subcellular localization of the dopamine receptors in the striatal dopaminoceptive neurons, we have used immunohistochemistry to detect D1 dopamine receptors (D1R) after modifications of the dopamine environment. In normal rats, D1R are located mostly extrasynaptically at the plasma membrane of the cell bodies, dendrites, and spines. The intrastriatal injection of the full D1R agonist SKF-82958 and the intraperitoneal injection of the same molecule or of amphetamine (which induces a massive release of dopamine in the striatum) induce modifications of the pattern of D1R immunoreactivity in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Whereas normal rats display homogenous staining of the neuropile with staining of the plasma membrane of the cell bodies, either treatment provokes the appearance of an intense immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm and the proximal dendrites. The labeling pattern is heterogeneous and more intense in the striosomes than in the matrix. Analysis of semithin sections and electron microscopy studies demonstrates a translocation of the labeling from the plasma membrane to endocytic vesicles and endosomes bearing D1R immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of cell bodies and dendrites. Injection of D1R antagonist (SCH-23390) alone or injection of D1R antagonist, together with amphetamine or SKF-82958, do not provoke modification of the immunoreactivity, as compared with normal rat. Our results demonstrate that, in vivo, the acute activation of dopamine receptors by direct agonists or endogenously released dopamine provokes dramatic modifications of their subcellular distribution in neurons, including internalization in the endosomal compartment in the cytoplasm. This suggests that modifications of the localization of neurotransmitter receptors, including extrasynaptic ones, may be a critical event that contributes to the postsynaptic response in vivo.

Interrelationships between somatostatin sst2A receptors and somatostatin-containing axons in rat brain: evidence for regulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin

Using an antipeptide antibody, we reported previously on the distribution of the somatostatin sst2A receptor subtype in rat brain. Depending on the region, immunolabeled receptors were either confined to neuronal perikarya and dendrites or distributed diffusely in tissue. To investigate the functional significance of these distribution patterns, we examined the regional and cellular relationships between somatostatin axons and sst2A receptors in the rat CNS, using double-labeling immunocytochemistry. Light and confocal microscopy revealed a significant correlation (p < 0.02) between the distribution of somatodendritic sst2A receptor immunoreactivity and that of somatostatin terminal fields, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Furthermore, in regions of somatodendritic labeling, a subpopulation of sst2A-immunoreactive cells was also immunopositive for somatostatin, suggesting that a subset of sst2A receptors consists of autoreceptors. By contrast, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A labeling only moderate to low densities of somatostatin terminals were observed, and no significant relationship was found between terminal density and receptor immunoreactivity. At the electron microscopic level, areas expressing somatodendritic sst2A labeling were found by immunogold cytochemistry to display low proportions of membrane-associated, as compared with intracellular, receptors. Conversely, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A receptor labeling, receptors were predominantly associated with neuronal plasma membranes, a finding consistent with the high density of sst2 binding sites previously visualized in these areas by autoradiography. Double-labeling studies demonstrated that in the former but not in the latter regions, sst2A-immunoreactive somata and dendrites were heavily contacted by somatostatin axon terminals. Taken together, these results suggest that the low incidence of membrane-associated receptors observed in regions of somatodendritic sst2A labeling may be caused by downregulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin, possibly through ligand-induced receptor internalization.

Interrelationships between somatostatin sst2A receptors and somatostatin-containing axons in rat brain: evidence for regulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin

Using an antipeptide antibody, we reported previously on the distribution of the somatostatin sst2A receptor subtype in rat brain. Depending on the region, immunolabeled receptors were either confined to neuronal perikarya and dendrites or distributed diffusely in tissue. To investigate the functional significance of these distribution patterns, we examined the regional and cellular relationships between somatostatin axons and sst2A receptors in the rat CNS, using double-labeling immunocytochemistry. Light and confocal microscopy revealed a significant correlation (p < 0.02) between the distribution of somatodendritic sst2A receptor immunoreactivity and that of somatostatin terminal fields, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Furthermore, in regions of somatodendritic labeling, a subpopulation of sst2A-immunoreactive cells was also immunopositive for somatostatin, suggesting that a subset of sst2A receptors consists of autoreceptors. By contrast, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A labeling only moderate to low densities of somatostatin terminals were observed, and no significant relationship was found between terminal density and receptor immunoreactivity. At the electron microscopic level, areas expressing somatodendritic sst2A labeling were found by immunogold cytochemistry to display low proportions of membrane-associated, as compared with intracellular, receptors. Conversely, in regions displaying diffuse sst2A receptor labeling, receptors were predominantly associated with neuronal plasma membranes, a finding consistent with the high density of sst2 binding sites previously visualized in these areas by autoradiography. Double-labeling studies demonstrated that in the former but not in the latter regions, sst2A-immunoreactive somata and dendrites were heavily contacted by somatostatin axon terminals. Taken together, these results suggest that the low incidence of membrane-associated receptors observed in regions of somatodendritic sst2A labeling may be caused by downregulation of cell surface receptors by endogenous somatostatin, possibly through ligand-induced receptor internalization.

New aspects of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling and regulation

Research on the structure, regulation and signalling properties of the family of seven-transmembrane-helix, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) continues at a frantic pace. This reflects their central role in transmission of hormone- and neurotransmitter-encoded information across the plasma membrane of cells. The location of the ligand-binding sites on the extracellular face of the membrane has made them obvious targets for therapeutic intervention in a wide range of conditions resulting from endocrine imbalance. Furthermore, based on the identification of many novel GPCR sequences emerging from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and other DNA sequencing programmes, it has become clear that the GPCR family is likely to be considerably larger than appreciated in even the recent past. Although neither the natural ligands nor synthetic pharmaceuticals have yet been identified for these so-called ;orphan' GPCRs, they offer the potential for a plethora of new therapeutic targets. Within a short review, it is impossible to cover all the current developments in this field and the topics selected represent a personal view of recent highlights of areas that provide both novel and general insights into the function and regulation of GPCRs.

CB1 cannabinoid receptor: cellular regulation and distribution in N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells

In order to characterize cellular regulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors, synthesis and turnover studies were performed. Metabolic labeling of N18TG2 cells with 35S-labeled amino acids was followed by immunoprecipitation from cell lysates using an affinity-purified antibody generated to the N-terminal 14-amino-acid segment of the CB1 receptor. During a 2 h labeling period, CB1 receptors were rapidly and constitutively synthesized (rate: 0.86%/min). The majority of newly synthesized CB1 cannabinoid receptors (70%) was degraded rapidly by a first-order process (t1/2=4.8 h). The remaining nascent receptors, which were degraded slowly (t1/2>24 h), may represent the pool of potentially functional receptors. Trypsin treatment of intact confluent cells, designed to cleave the extracellular antibody recognition site, did not alter the recovery of metabolically labeled immunoprecipitated CB1 receptors. This suggests that a large percentage of newly synthesized receptors was inaccessible to the protease and is probably intracellular. Immunocytochemistry revealed CB1 cannabinoid immunoreactivity both intracellularly and on the cell surface. Subcellular membrane fractions exhibited receptor binding activity on plasma membranes and nuclear-associated membranes. Only low-affinity binding was seen in the chromatin fraction. An hypothesis has been developed to explain these results and form the basis for future studies.

Histamine-induced internalization of substance P receptors in myoepithelial cells of the guinea pig nasal glands

Numerous substance P (SP) immunoreactive nerve fibers were located around submucosal glands in the guinea pig nasal mucosa. Since these SP positive nerve fibers were also positive for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, and to a lessor extent for neuropeptide Y, they were presumed to be parasympathetic fibers. SP receptor positive structures were observed exclusively on the membrane of myoepithelial cells in normal nasal mucosa, suggesting that myoepithelial cells are targets of SP positive fibers. SP receptor-like immunoreactivity was observed associated with intracellular organella of myoepithelial cells 5 min after intranasal histamine challenge, which may indicate the molecular basis for histamine-induced nasal discharge.

Receptors induce chemotaxis by releasing the betagamma subunit of Gi, not by activating Gq or Gs

Many chemoattractants cause chemotaxis of leukocytes by stimulating a structurally distinct class of G protein-coupled receptors. To identify receptor functions required for chemotaxis, we studied chemotaxis in HEK293 cells transfected with receptors for nonchemokine ligands or for interleukin 8 (IL-8), a classical chemokine. In gradients of the appropriate agonist, three nonchemokine Gi-coupled receptors (the D2 dopamine receptor and opioid mu and delta receptors) mediated chemotaxis; the beta2-adrenoreceptor and the M3-muscarinic receptor, which couple respectively to Gs and Gq, did not mediate chemotaxis. A mutation deleting 31 C-terminal amino acids from the IL-8 receptor type B quantitatively impaired chemotaxis and agonist-induced receptor internalization, but not inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. To probe the possible relation between receptor internalization and chemotaxis, we used two agonists of the mu-opioid receptor. Morphine and etorphine elicited quantitatively similar chemotaxis, but only etorphine induced receptor internalization. Overexpression of two betagamma sequestering proteins (betaARK-ct and alphat) prevented IL-8 receptor type B-mediated chemotaxis but did not affect inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by IL-8. We conclude that: (i) Nonchemokine Gi-coupled receptors can mediate chemotaxis. (ii) Gi activation is necessary but probably not sufficient for chemotaxis. (iii) Chemotaxis does not require receptor internalization. (iv) Chemotaxis requires the release of free betagamma subunits.

Estrogen modulation of opioid and cholecystokinin systems in the limbic-hypothalamic circuit

The display of lordosis behavior has been correlated with the estrogen-induced expression of cholecystokinin (CCK) and enkephalin within the limbic-hypothalamic circuit. These neuropeptides have opposing effects on lordosis; for example, in the medial preoptic nucleus, CCK facilitates and opiates inhibit lordosis. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotide blockade of receptor expression indicated that CCK modulates lordosis in the medial preoptic nucleus through the CCK(A)-receptor. Sequence-specific antibodies directed against delta- and mu-opiate receptor proteins labeled fibers in the medial preoptic nucleus. Estrogen treatment of ovariectomized rats or etorphine (a nonselective opiate agonist) treatment altered the appearance of the immunoreactivity from a diffuse pattern to one of distinctly stained mu-opiate receptor immunoreactive cells and varicose fibers in the medial preoptic nucleus. Such a pattern of staining reflects an internalization of mu-opiate receptors following agonist stimulation. This type of internalization has been used as an indication of synaptic activity. The distribution of receptor internalization surrounds the distribution of CCK cells in the medial preoptic nucleus, suggesting that endogenous opioid peptides may modulate estrogen-induced CCK mRNA expression. Interestingly, nonselective and delta-opiate receptor selective antagonists potentiated the estrogen-induced CCK mRNA expression in the medial preoptic nucleus. Together, these results suggest that endogenous opioid peptides may modulate the estrogenic upregulation of CCK mRNA expression and demonstrate an important level of regulation of gene expression in which synaptic activity modifies hormonal input.

In vivo homologous regulation of mu-opioid receptor gene expression in the mouse

Regulation of the mu-opioid receptor gene by opioid analgesic drugs has not been observed in rats and mice following in vivo treatments that produce tolerance. Although in vivo heterologous regulation of mu-opioid receptor mRNA by non-opioid compounds has been reported, the failure to observe changes in mu-opioid receptor mRNA levels in vivo after treatment with opioid agonists raised the possibility that in vivo homologous regulation by agonists may not occur. Therefore, in the present study, the effect of a high intrinsic efficacy opioid receptor agonist on opioid receptor density, gene expression and tolerance was determined. Mice were infused with etorphine for 7 days using an osmotic minipump, then the pump was removed and studies conducted 16-168 h later. Etorphine (50-250 microg/kg/day) infusion produced significant dose-dependent tolerance to the analgesic (tailflick) effects of etorphine, as well as dose-dependent mu-opioid receptor downregulation in brain at 16 h following the end of the infusion. Mu-opioid receptor density returned to control levels over a 168 h period following the end of etorphine (250 microg/kg/day) infusion. Similarly, the magnitude of tolerance decreased over the same period. Evaluation of changes in brain mu-opioid receptor mRNA 16 h following etorphine infusion indicated that there was dose-dependent increase in steady-state levels, with no significant change in GAPDH mRNA. The increase in mu-opioid receptor mRNA was approximately 55-65% over control at the highest etorphine infusion dose. Mu-opioid receptor mRNA returned to control levels over a 168 h period following the end of etorphine (250 microg/kg/day) infusion. These data suggest that the increase in mu-opioid receptor mRNA following the termination of etorphine treatment may drive the recovery of mu-opioid receptors. These data are the first demonstration of in vivo homologous regulation of mu-opioid receptor gene expression in the mouse by an opioid receptor agonist that produces tolerance and receptor downregulation.

Down-regulation of mu-opioid receptor by full but not partial agonists is independent of G protein coupling

In C6 glial cells stably expressing rat mu-opioid receptor, opioid agonist activation is negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase through pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. In membranes, [D-Ala2, N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO) increases guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate (GTP[gamma-35S]) binding by 367% with an EC50 value of 28 nM. Prolonged exposure to agonists induced desensitization of the receptor as estimated by a reduction in the maximal stimulation of GTP[gamma-35S] binding by DAMGO and rightward shifts in the dose-response curves. In cells treated with 10 microM concentrations of etorphine, DAMGO, beta-endorphin, morphine, and butorphanol, DAMGO-stimulated GTP[gamma-35S] binding was 58%, 149%, 205%, 286%, and 325%, respectively. Guanine nucleotide regulation of agonist binding was correspondingly lower in membranes from tolerant cells. Furthermore, chronic opioid treatment increased forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity, and potency of DAMGO to inhibit cAMP accumulation was lower in morphine- and DAMGO-tolerant cells (EC50 = 55 and 170 nM versus 18 nM for control). Chronic treatment with agonists reduced [3H]DAMGO binding in membranes with the rank order of etorphine > DAMGO = beta-endorphin > morphine > butorphanol, and the affinity of DAMGO in alkaloid- but not peptide-treated membranes was significantly lower in comparison with control. Pertussis toxin treatment of the cells before agonist treatment did not prevent the down-regulation by full agonists; DAMGO and etorphine exhibited approximately 80% internalization, whereas the ability of partial agonists was greatly impaired. In addition to establishing this cell line as a good model for further studies on the mechanisms of opioid tolerance, these results indicate important differences in the inactivation pathways of receptor triggered by full and partial agonists.

Dimerization of the delta opioid receptor: implication for a role in receptor internalization

Dimerization of G-protein-coupled receptors has been increasingly noted in the regulation of their biological activity. However, its involvement in agonist-induced receptor internalization is not well understood. In this study, we examined the ability of mouse delta-opioid receptors to dimerize and the role of receptor dimerization in agonist-induced internalization. Using differentially (Flag and c-Myc) epitope-tagged receptors we show that delta-opioid receptors exist as dimers. The level of dimerization is agonist dependent. Increasing concentrations of agonists reduce the levels of dimer with a corresponding increase in the levels of monomer. Interestingly, morphine does not affect the levels of either form. It has been shown that morphine, unlike other opioid agonists, does not induce receptor internalization. This suggests a relationship between the ability of agonists to reduce the levels of dimer and to induce receptor internalization. The time course of the agonist-induced decrease of delta-opioid receptor dimers is shorter than the time course of internalization, suggesting that monomerization precedes the agonist-induced internalization of the receptor. Furthermore, we found that a mutant delta-opioid receptor, with a 15-residue C-terminal deletion, does not exhibit dimerization. This mutant receptor has been shown to lack the ability to undergo agonist-induced internalization. These results suggest that the interconversion between the dimeric and monomeric forms plays a role in opioid receptor internalization.

Delta and kappa opioid receptors are differentially regulated by dynamin-dependent endocytosis when activated by the same alkaloid agonist

Many alkaloid drugs used as analgesics activate multiple opioid receptors. Mechanisms that distinguish the actions of these drugs on the regulation of individual micro, delta, and kappa receptors are not understood. We have observed that individual cloned opioid receptors differ significantly in their regulation by rapid endocytosis in the presence of alkaloid drug etorphine, a potent agonist of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors. Internalization of epitope-tagged delta opioid receptors from the plasma membrane is detectable within 10 min in the presence of etorphine. In contrast, kappa receptors expressed in the same cells remain in the plasma membrane and are not internalized for >/=60 min, even when cells are exposed to saturating concentrations of etorphine. The rapid internalization of delta receptors is specifically inhibited in cells expressing K44E mutant dynamin I, suggesting that type-specific internalization of opioid receptors is mediated by clathrin-coated pits. Examination of a series of chimeric mutant kappa/delta receptors indicates that at least two receptor domains, including the highly divergent carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic tail, determine the type specificity of this endocytic mechanism. We conclude that structurally homologous opioid receptors are differentially sorted by clathrin-mediated endocytosis following activation by the same agonist ligand. These studies identify a fundamental mechanism of receptor regulation mediating type-specific effects of analgesic drugs that activate more than one type of opioid receptor.

Presynaptic versus postsynaptic localization of mu and delta opioid receptors in dorsal and ventral striatopallidal pathways

Parallel studies have demonstrated that enkephalin release from nerve terminals in the pallidum (globus pallidus and ventral pallidum) can be modulated by locally applied opioid drugs. To investigate further the mechanisms underlying these opioid effects, the present study examined the presynaptic and postsynaptic localization of delta (DOR1) and mu (MOR1) opioid receptors in the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal enkephalinergic system using fluorescence immunohistochemistry combined with anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracing techniques. DOR1 immunostaining patterns revealed primarily a postsynaptic localization of the receptor in pallidal cell bodies adjacent to enkephalin- or synaptophysin-positive fiber terminals. MOR1 immunostaining in the pallidum revealed both a presynaptic localization, as evidenced by punctate staining that co-localized with enkephalin and synaptophysin, and a postsynaptic localization, as evidenced by cytoplasmic staining of cells that were adjacent to enkephalin and synaptophysin immunoreactivities. Injections of the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) or the retrograde tracer Texas Red-conjugated dextran amine (TRD) into the dorsal and ventral striatum resulted in labeling of striatopallidal fibers and pallidostriatal cell bodies, respectively. DOR1 immunostaining in the pallidum co-localized only with TRD and not PHA-L, whereas pallidal MOR1 immunostaining co-localized with PHA-L and not TRD. These results suggest that pallidal enkephalin release may be modulated by mu opioid receptors located presynaptically on striatopallidal enkephalinergic neurons and by delta opioid receptors located postsynaptically on pallidostriatal feedback neurons.

Molecular and cellular basis of addiction

Drug addiction results from adaptations in specific brain neurons caused by repeated exposure to a drug of abuse. These adaptations combine to produce the complex behaviors that define an addicted state. Progress is being made in identifying such time-dependent, drug-induced adaptations and relating them to specific behavioral features of addiction. Current research needs to understand the types of adaptations that underlie the particularly long-lived aspects of addiction, such as drug craving and relapse, and to identify specific genes that contribute to individual differences in vulnerability to addiction. Understanding the molecular and cellular basis of addictive states will lead to major changes in how addiction is viewed and ultimately treated.

Presynaptic versus postsynaptic localization of mu and delta opioid receptors in dorsal and ventral striatopallidal pathways

Parallel studies have demonstrated that enkephalin release from nerve terminals in the pallidum (globus pallidus and ventral pallidum) can be modulated by locally applied opioid drugs. To investigate further the mechanisms underlying these opioid effects, the present study examined the presynaptic and postsynaptic localization of delta (DOR1) and mu (MOR1) opioid receptors in the dorsal and ventral striatopallidal enkephalinergic system using fluorescence immunohistochemistry combined with anterograde and retrograde neuronal tracing techniques. DOR1 immunostaining patterns revealed primarily a postsynaptic localization of the receptor in pallidal cell bodies adjacent to enkephalin- or synaptophysin-positive fiber terminals. MOR1 immunostaining in the pallidum revealed both a presynaptic localization, as evidenced by punctate staining that co-localized with enkephalin and synaptophysin, and a postsynaptic localization, as evidenced by cytoplasmic staining of cells that were adjacent to enkephalin and synaptophysin immunoreactivities. Injections of the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) or the retrograde tracer Texas Red-conjugated dextran amine (TRD) into the dorsal and ventral striatum resulted in labeling of striatopallidal fibers and pallidostriatal cell bodies, respectively. DOR1 immunostaining in the pallidum co-localized only with TRD and not PHA-L, whereas pallidal MOR1 immunostaining co-localized with PHA-L and not TRD. These results suggest that pallidal enkephalin release may be modulated by mu opioid receptors located presynaptically on striatopallidal enkephalinergic neurons and by delta opioid receptors located postsynaptically on pallidostriatal feedback neurons.

Molecular mechanisms of opiate and cocaine addiction

Chronic administration of opiates or cocaine has been shown to alter the activity or expression of diverse types of cellular proteins in specific target neurons within the central nervous system. Prominent examples include signaling proteins, such as receptors, G proteins, second-messenger synthetic enzymes, and protein kinases. It is now increasingly possible to relate particular molecular adaptations to specific behavioral actions of drugs of abuse in animal models of addiction. In addition, recent work has focused on a role for transcription factors, and the associated alterations in gene expression, in mediating part of this long-lasting, drug-induced molecular and behavioral plasticity.

Arrestin/clathrin interaction. Localization of the clathrin binding domain of nonvisual arrestins to the carboxy terminus

We have recently demonstrated that the nonvisual arrestins, beta-arrestin and arrestin3, interact with high affinity and stoichiometrically with clathrin, and we postulated that this interaction mediates internalization of G protein-coupled receptors (Goodman, O. B., Jr., Krupnick, J. G., Santini, F., Gurevich, V. V., Penn, R. B., Gagnon, A. W., Keen, J. H., and Benovic, J. L. (1996) Nature 383, 447-450). In this study, we localized the clathrin binding domain of arrestin3 using a variety of approaches. Truncation mutagenesis demonstrated that the COOH-terminal half of arrestin3 is required for clathrin interaction. Assessment of the clathrin binding properties of various glutathione S-transferase-arrestin3 fusion proteins indicated that the predominant clathrin binding domain is contained within residues 367-385. Alanine scanning mutagenesis further localized this domain to residues 371-379, and site-directed mutagenesis demonstrated the critical importance of both hydrophobic (Leu-373, Ile-374, and Phe-376) and acidic (Glu-375 and Glu-377) residues in the arrestin3/clathrin interaction. These results are complementary to the observation that hydrophobic and basic residues in clathrin are critical for its interaction with nonvisual arrestins (Goodman, O. B. , Jr., Krupnick, J. G., Gurevich, V. V., Benovic, J. L., and Keen, J. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15017-15022). Lastly, an arrestin3 mutant in which Leu-373, Ile-374, and Phe-376 were mutated to Ala was significantly defective in its ability to promote beta2-adrenergic receptor internalization in COS-1 cells when compared with wild-type arrestin3. Taken together, these results implicate a discrete region of arrestin3 in high affinity binding to clathrin, an interaction critical for agonist-promoted internalization of the beta2-adrenergic receptor.

Regulatory mechanisms that modulate signalling by G-protein-coupled receptors

The large and functionally diverse group of G-protein-coupled receptors includes receptors for many different signalling molecules, including peptide and non-peptide hormones and neuro-transmitters, chemokines, prostanoids and proteinases. Their principal function is to transmit information about the extracellular environment to the interior of the cell by interacting with the heterotrimeric G-proteins, and they thereby participate in many aspects of regulation. Cellular responses to agonists of these receptors are usually rapidly attenuated. Mechanisms of signal attenuation include removal of agonists from the extracellular fluid, receptor desensitization, endocytosis and down-regulation. Agonists are removed by dilution, uptake by transporters and enzymic degradation. Receptor desensitization is mediated by receptor phosphorylation by G-protein receptor kinases and second-messenger kinases, interaction of phosphorylated receptors with arrestins and receptor uncoupling from G-proteins. Agonist-induced receptor endocytosis also contributes to desensitization by depleting the cell surface of high-affinity receptors, and recycling of internalized receptors contributes to resensitization of cellular responses. Receptor down-regulation is a form of desensitization that occurs during continuous, long-term exposure of cells to receptor agonists. Down-regulation, which may occur during the development of drug tolerance, is characterized by depletion of the cellular receptor content, and is probably mediated by alterations in the rates of receptor degradation and synthesis. These regulatory mechanisms are important, as they govern the ability of cells to respond to agonists. A greater understanding of the mechanisms that modulate signalling may lead to the development of new therapies and may help to explain the mechanism of drug tolerance.