1
|
Hsu EJ, Lin TA, Dabush DR, McCaw Z, Koong A, Lin C, Abi Jaoude J, Patel R, Kouzy R, El Alam MB, Noticewala S, Yang Y, Sherry AD, Fuller CD, Thomas CR, Tang C, Msaouel P, Das P, Huang B, Tian L, Sun R, Lee JJ, Meirson T, Ludmir EB. Association of differential censoring with survival and suboptimal control arms among oncology clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:990-994. [PMID: 38331394 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Differential censoring, which refers to censoring imbalance between treatment arms, may bias the interpretation of survival outcomes in clinical trials. In 146 phase III oncology trials with statistically significant time-to-event surrogate primary endpoints, we evaluated the association between differential censoring in the surrogate primary endpoints, control arm adequacy, and the subsequent statistical significance of overall survival results. Twenty-four (16%) trials exhibited differential censoring that favored the control arm, whereas 15 (10%) exhibited differential censoring that favored the experimental arm. Positive overall survival was more common in control arm differential censoring trials (63%) than in trials without differential censoring (37%) or with experimental arm differential censoring (47%; odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.10 to 7.20; P = .04). Control arm differential censoring trials more frequently used suboptimal control arms at 46% compared with 20% without differential censoring and 13% with experimental arm differential censoring (odds ratio = 3.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.29 to 10.0; P = .007). The presence of control arm differential censoring in trials with surrogate primary endpoints, especially in those with overall survival conversion, may indicate an inadequate control arm and should be examined and explained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J Hsu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Lin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dor R Dabush
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
| | - Zachary McCaw
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alex Koong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine Lin
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roshal Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Molly B El Alam
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonal Noticewala
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yumeng Yang
- School of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander D Sherry
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lu Tian
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tomer Meirson
- Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gefen R, Emile SH, Garoufalia Z, Horesh N, Dourado J, Wexner SD. Local versus radical resection of stage I-III rectal cancer in very elderly patients: an exact matched analysis of the national cancer database. J Gastrointest Surg 2024:S1091-255X(24)00478-5. [PMID: 38815802 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of elderly cancer patients is challenging as they can be over-treated with respect to frailty or under-treated due to advanced age. Maintaining a good quality of life is essential for this population. This study aimed to assess the difference in overall survival and short-term outcomes according to extent of rectal cancer resection in patients aged ≥80 years. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, very elderly patients with stage I-III rectal cancer aged ≥80 years were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2019). Patients were divided into two groups: radical resection and local excision. The groups were matched using exact matched analysis for clinical T and N stage, tumor size, and neoadjuvant treatment. Main outcome measures were overall survival, hospital stay, 30-day unplanned readmissions, and short-term mortality. RESULTS 9634 patients were included (local excision = 2710; radical resection = 6924). After matching, 1106 patients were included in each group with a median follow-up of 49.9 and 51.7 months, respectively. The radical resection group had statistically significantly longer overall survival than did local excision (60 vs. 57.2 months, p=0.026). Local excision was associated with shorter length of stay (1 vs. 7 days. p<0.001), lower 30-day mortality (Odds ratio: 0.43; 95%CI: 0.25- 0.75, p=0.003), lower 90-day mortality (Odds ratio: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.32- 0.68, p<0.001), and lower 30-day readmission (Odds ratio: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.33- 0.74, p<0.001). A subgroup analysis of matched patients with cTis-T2, N0 tumors who underwent curative surgery, revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS Radical resection of rectal cancer in very elderly patients had a modest survival benefit whereas local excision had lower odds of readmission and short-term mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA; Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sameh Hany Emile
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA; Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Nir Horesh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA; Department of surgery and transplantations, Sheba Medical center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Justin Dourado
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daly GR, Dowling GP, Hamza E, AlRawashdeh M, Hegarty A, Naz T, McGrath J, Naidoo S, Downey E, Butt A, Power C, Hill ADK. Does Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Influence Subsequent Management Decisions in Women With Breast Cancer ≥ 70 Years Old? Clin Breast Cancer 2024:S1526-8209(24)00115-0. [PMID: 38821743 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There have been ongoing attempts to de-escalate surgical intervention in older breast cancer patients in recent years. However, there remains ongoing hesitancy amongst surgeons to de-implement axillary staging in this cohort. The supporting argument for performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is that it may guide subsequent management. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of 356 SLNBs, in 342 women ≥ 70 years of age with invasive breast cancer, between 2014 and 2022 in a single institution. Data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics and subsequent management for all patients and for patients with ER+/HER2-, early-stage disease. RESULTS Positive SLNB significantly increased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CTh) in patients aged 70-75 in all clinical subtypes (OR 4.0, 95% CI, 1.6-10; P = .0035). Positive SLNB did not significantly increase likelihood of receiving adjuvant CTh in patients aged 75-80, however, an Oncotype Dx score of ≥ 26 did (OR 34.50, 95% CI, 3.00-455.2; P = .0103). Positive SLNB was significantly associated with receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (RTh) in all patients aged 70-75 (OR 4.5, 95% CI, 2.0-11; P = .0004) and 75-80 (OR 9.7, 95% CI, 2.7-46; P = .0015). In patients aged ≥ 80 years, positive SLNB did not have a significant influence on subsequent treatments. CONCLUSION In this study, SLNB did not significantly influence subsequent management decisions in patients over 80 and should rarely be performed in this cohort. However, SLNB still had a role in patients aged 70-80 and should be used selectively in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon R Daly
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Gavin P Dowling
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eman Hamza
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ma'en AlRawashdeh
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Hegarty
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tarnum Naz
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jason McGrath
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sindhuja Naidoo
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eithne Downey
- Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abeeda Butt
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Colm Power
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arnold D K Hill
- Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Imai H, Fujita Y, Hiruta E, Masuno T, Yamazaki S, Tanaka H, Kamiya T, Sandoh M, Takei S, Arai K, Nishiba H, Mogi J, Koizuka S, Saito T, Obayashi K, Kaira K, Minato K. Efficacy and safety of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in older patients with cancer: a retrospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 36:571-577. [PMID: 38477855 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are pain relievers that are often associated with opioid-induced constipation (OIC) that worsens with age. We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis on the efficacy and safety of naldemedine, an opioid receptor antagonist, in treating OIC in patients with cancer (age >75 years). METHODS The electronic medical records of cancer patients who received naldemedine at 10 Japanese institutions between 7 June 2017 and August 31, 2019, were retrieved. Patients aged ≥75 years who were treated with naldemedine for the first time and hospitalized for at least 7 days before and after initiating naldemedine therapy were included in this analysis. RESULTS Sixty patients were observed for at least 7 days before and after starting naldemedine. The response rate was 68.3%, and the frequency of bowel movements increased significantly after naldemedine administration in the overall population ( P < 0.0001) and among those who defecated <3 times/week before naldemedine administration ( P < 0.0001). Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event in all grades, observed in 45% of patients, of which 92.6% were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 4 or higher adverse events, including death, were not observed. CONCLUSION Naldemedine exhibits significant efficacy and safety in OIC treatment in older patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisao Imai
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Saitama
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
| | | | - Eriko Hiruta
- Division of Pharmacy, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota
| | | | | | - Hajime Tanaka
- Division of Pharmacy, Haramachi Red Cross Hospital, Agatsuma-gun
| | - Teruhiko Kamiya
- Department of Pharmacy, Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Tatebayashi
| | | | | | - Kazuya Arai
- Division of Pharmacy, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi
| | - Hiromi Nishiba
- Division of Pharmacy, Japan Community Health Care Organization (JCHO) Gunma Chuo Hospital, Maebashi
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare
| | - Junnosuke Mogi
- Division of Pharmacy, Hidaka Hospital. 886 Nakao, Takasaki
| | - Shiro Koizuka
- Division of Palliative Care, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota, Gunma, Japan
| | - Taeko Saito
- Division of Pharmacy, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota
| | - Kyoko Obayashi
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare
| | - Kyoichi Kaira
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Hidaka, Saitama
| | - Koichi Minato
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shapiro GK, Santiago AT, Pittman T, Iwano K, Rodin G, Cole H, Zeman K, Sellmann S, Oza AM, Jones J, Rosenthal M, Conti RM, Rodin D. Disparities in clinical trial enrollment at a Canadian comprehensive cancer center: A 15-year retrospective study. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38662430 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disparities in clinical trials (CTs) enrollment perpetuate inequities in treatment access and outcomes, but there is a paucity of Canadian data. The objective of this study was to examine disparities in cancer CT enrollment at a large Canadian comprehensive cancer center. METHODS Retrospective study of CT enrollment among new patient consultations from 2006 to 2019, with follow-up to 2021 (N = 154,880), with the primary outcome of enrollment as a binary variable. Factors associated with CT enrollment were evaluated using multivariable Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression with random effects for most responsible physician (MRP) and geography, adjusted for patient characteristics (sex, age, language, geography, and primary care provider [PCP]), area-level marginalization (residential instability, material deprivation, dependency, and ethnic concentration), disease (cancer site and stage), and MRP (department, sex, language, and training). A sensitivity analysis of the cumulative incidence of enrollment was conducted to account for differences in disease type and follow-up length. RESULTS CT enrollment was 11.2% overall, with a 15-year cumulative incidence of 18%. Lower odds of enrollment were observed in patients who were female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.86), ≥65 years (AOR vs. <40, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.66), non-English speakers (0.72; 95% CI, 0.67-0.77), living ≥250 km away (AOR vs. <15 km, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.80), and without a PCP. Disease characteristics accounted for the largest proportion of observed variation (20.8%), with significantly greater odds of enrollment in patients with genitourinary cancers and late-stage disease. CONCLUSION Significant sociodemographic disparities were observed, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to increase diversity in access to cancer CTs in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilla K Shapiro
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna T Santiago
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tyler Pittman
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kai Iwano
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Cole
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Zeman
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susanna Sellmann
- Cancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meredith Rosenthal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University Questrom School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Danielle Rodin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gu N, Elsisi Z, Suk R, Li M. Geographic disparity in the distribution of cancer clinical trials in the United States and the associated factors. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2024; 30:376-385. [PMID: 38555628 PMCID: PMC10982574 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known regarding the geographic disparity in the distribution of phase 1-3 clinical trials of new cancer treatments in the US and the associated factors. OBJECTIVE To examine county-level variation in the number of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials and the associations between county characteristics and having phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. METHODS We identified phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials started in the US between January 2008 and December 2022 from the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. We analyzed the distribution of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials at the county level. Using a mixed-effects regression with states as random intercepts, we estimated the associations between a county's median age, median household income, percentage of population from racial and ethnic minority groups, proportion of population aged 25 years or older with an educational attainment of bachelor's degree or higher, rurality, cancer incidence rate, and number of medical oncologists per population with having any phase 1-3 cancer clinical trial in a county. RESULTS After excluding trials that were suspended, terminated, and withdrawn, a total of 14,977 phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials started in the United States between January 2008 and December 2022 were included in the primary analysis. Only 1,333 out of 3,143 counties (42.4%) had 1 or more trial during this period. Counties that were rural, with lower median household income, a less educated population, fewer medical oncologists per population, and lower cancer incidence rates demonstrated a significantly lower likelihood of having phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed substantial geographic disparities in the distribution of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. Limited trial availability in low-income, low-education, low-oncologist, and rural areas can be a significant barrier to patient participation, potentially hindering adoption and worsening outcomes in disadvantaged populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningzhou Gu
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (IEOR), Columbia University, New York City, NY
- Gu and Elsisi served as co-first authors and contributed equally to the work
| | - Zizi Elsisi
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
- Gu and Elsisi served as co-first authors and contributed equally to the work
| | - Ryan Suk
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Meng Li
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Beaulieu-Jones BK, Frau F, Bozzi S, Chandross KJ, Peterschmitt MJ, Cohen C, Coulovrat C, Kumar D, Kruger MJ, Lipnick SL, Fitzsimmons L, Kohane IS, Scherzer CR. Disease progression strikingly differs in research and real-world Parkinson's populations. NPJ Parkinsons Dis 2024; 10:58. [PMID: 38480700 PMCID: PMC10937726 DOI: 10.1038/s41531-024-00667-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Characterization of Parkinson's disease (PD) progression using real-world evidence could guide clinical trial design and identify subpopulations. Efforts to curate research populations, the increasing availability of real-world data, and advances in natural language processing, particularly large language models, allow for a more granular comparison of populations than previously possible. This study includes two research populations and two real-world data-derived (RWD) populations. The research populations are the Harvard Biomarkers Study (HBS, N = 935), a longitudinal biomarkers cohort study with in-person structured study visits; and Fox Insights (N = 36,660), an online self-survey-based research study of the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Real-world cohorts are the Optum Integrated Claims-electronic health records (N = 157,475), representing wide-scale linked medical and claims data and de-identified data from Mass General Brigham (MGB, N = 22,949), an academic hospital system. Structured, de-identified electronic health records data at MGB are supplemented using a manually validated natural language processing with a large language model to extract measurements of PD progression. Motor and cognitive progression scores change more rapidly in MGB than HBS (median survival until H&Y 3: 5.6 years vs. >10, p < 0.001; mini-mental state exam median decline 0.28 vs. 0.11, p < 0.001; and clinically recognized cognitive decline, p = 0.001). In real-world populations, patients are diagnosed more than eleven years later (RWD mean of 72.2 vs. research mean of 60.4, p < 0.001). After diagnosis, in real-world cohorts, treatment with PD medications has initiated an average of 2.3 years later (95% CI: [2.1-2.4]; p < 0.001). This study provides a detailed characterization of Parkinson's progression in diverse populations. It delineates systemic divergences in the patient populations enrolled in research settings vs. patients in the real-world. These divergences are likely due to a combination of selection bias and real population differences, but exact attribution of the causes is challenging. This study emphasizes a need to utilize multiple data sources and to diligently consider potential biases when planning, choosing data sources, and performing downstream tasks and analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett K Beaulieu-Jones
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- APDA Center for Advanced Parkinson Research of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Precision Neurology Program of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60615, USA.
- Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Collaborative Research Network, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815, USA.
| | | | - Sylvie Bozzi
- Sanofi Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Dinesh Kumar
- Sanofi Translational Sciences, Framingham, MA, 01701, USA
| | - Mark J Kruger
- Sanofi Genzyme, Clinical Development Neurology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Scott L Lipnick
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Lane Fitzsimmons
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Isaac S Kohane
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Clemens R Scherzer
- APDA Center for Advanced Parkinson Research of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Precision Neurology Program of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Collaborative Research Network, Chevy Chase, MD, 20815, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mac Eochagain C, Barrell A, Slavova-Boneva V, Murphy J, Pattwell M, Cumming J, Edmondson A, McGinn M, Kipps E, Milton M, Jethwa J, Ring A, Battisti NML. Implementation of a geriatric oncology service at the Royal Marsden Hospital. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101698. [PMID: 38219333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite significant evidence supporting the benefits of comprehensive oncogeriatric assessment in the management of older patients with cancer, the adoption of specialised geriatric oncology programs in the United Kingdom remains limited. Descriptions of clinic structure and models, patient demographics and baseline characteristics, resource utilisation, and predictors of resource utilisation are lacking in this population, which may complicate or impede the planning, resourcing, and development of further services in this subspecialty on a national and regional basis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between November 2021 and April 2023, 244 patients commencing systemic anticancer treatment at the Royal Marsden Hospital, London underwent geriatric screening using the Senior Adult Oncology Programme-3 (SAOP3) screening tool. Baseline clinical factors (sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric [CIRS-G] score, Katz Index score, Barthel Index score, treatment intent, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status [ECOG-PS]) were assessed as predictors of geriatric impairments and need for multidisciplinary referral and intervention using a negative binomial regression analysis. Referral rates to multidisciplinary teams were assessed against ECOG-PS score using point-biserial correlation, as well as against a historical control using descriptive statistics. RESULTS The median age of participants was 77; 75.8% were female. Breast cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (61.9%). Most patients (67.6%) were undergoing treatment in the palliative setting. Two hundred eleven (86.5%) patients were identified as having at least one geriatric impairment. Six hundred forty-nine multidisciplinary referrals were made, of which 583 (86.7%) were accepted by the referred patient. Higher ECOG PS was positively associated with geriatric impairments in physiotherapy, occupational therapy, dietetics, pharmacy, and welfare rights domains, as well as with the overall number of geriatric impairments. DISCUSSION The Royal Marsden Senior Adult Oncology Programme represents the first geriatric oncology service in a tertiary cancer centre in the United Kingdom. Following implementation of SAOP3 screening, we observed a substantial increase in referrals to all multidisciplinary teams, suggestive of previously underrecognized needs among this population. The need for multidisciplinary intervention was strongly correlated with baseline ECOG-PS score, but not with other measured clinical variables, including comorbidity or functional indices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colm Mac Eochagain
- Trinity St James' Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | - Jane Murphy
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Emma Kipps
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jo Jethwa
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Habib MH, Alibhai SMH, Puts M. How representative are participants in geriatric oncology clinical trials? The case of the 5C RCT in geriatric oncology: A cross-sectional comparison to a geriatric oncology clinic. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101703. [PMID: 38228054 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frail older adults make up a substantial portion of the older adult population. However, frail patients are often excluded from randomized controlled trials. This underrepresentation restricts the extent to which trial findings can be generalized to this population. We compared a sample from the Canadian 5C Randomized Controlled Trial investigating comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the geriatric oncology setting in terms of frailty to patients referred to the Older Adults with Cancer Clinic (OACC) to determine if the trial sample was representative of the normal geriatric oncology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Baseline CGA data of 5C Trial participants seen at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM), were compared to data from OACC patients that were seen during the duration of the 5C trial (between April 2018 and April 2020) and that satisfied the 5C inclusion criteria. To assess the frailty of samples, sex, age, disease site, comorbidity level, medical optimization, social supports, functional status, falls risk, nutrition, cognition, and mood were compared between 5C participants and OACC patients using Fisher's exact and independent samples t-test. RESULTS A sample of 115 5C participants and 205 OACC patients were included. The mean age of 5C participants and OACC patients was 75.4 and 81.6 years, respectively (p < 0.001). The distribution of disease sites was significantly different between the samples (p < 0.001) and OACC patients were also significantly more impaired compared to 5C participants in comorbidity (23.4% versus 10.4% high comorbidity) (p = 0.001), IADL dependence (55.1% versus 42.6%) (p = 0.036), impaired physical function (70.6% versus 31.3%) (p < 0.001), falls risk (67.8% versus 27%) (p < 0.001), impaired nutrition (55.6% versus 40.9%) (p = 0.014), and cognition (47.2% versus 10%) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in sex, medication optimization, poor social supports, and impaired mood between the samples. DISCUSSION The 5C sample was less frail and younger than patients seen in the geriatric oncology clinic. Finding strategies to address barriers to the inclusion of frailer older adults is important to increase their representation in future trials to allow findings to be generalized to this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03154671.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed H Habib
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Department of Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beaulieu-Jones BK, Frau F, Bozzi S, Chandross KJ, Peterschmitt MJ, Cohen C, Coulovrat C, Kumar D, Kruger MJ, Lipnick SL, Fitzsimmons L, Kohane IS, Scherzer CR. Disease progression strikingly differs in research and real-world Parkinson's populations. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.17.24302981. [PMID: 38405736 PMCID: PMC10889035 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.17.24302981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Characterization of Parkinson's disease (PD) progression using real-world evidence could guide clinical trial design and identify subpopulations. Efforts to curate research populations, the increasing availability of real-world data and recent advances in natural language processing, particularly large language models, allow for a more granular comparison of populations and the methods of data collection describing these populations than previously possible. This study includes two research populations and two real-world data derived (RWD) populations. The research populations are the Harvard Biomarkers Study (HBS, N = 935), a longitudinal biomarkers cohort study with in-person structured study visits; and Fox Insights (N = 36,660), an online self-survey-based research study of the Michael J. Fox Foundation. Real-world cohorts are the Optum Integrated Claims-electronic health records (N = 157,475), representing wide-scale linked medical and claims data and de-identified data from Mass General Brigham (MGB, N = 22,949), an academic hospital system. Structured, de-identified electronic health records data at MGB are supplemented using natural language processing with a large language model to extract measurements of PD progression. This extraction process is manually validated for accuracy. Motor and cognitive progression scores change more rapidly in MGB than HBS (median survival until H&Y 3: 5.6 years vs. >10, p<0.001; mini-mental state exam median decline 0.28 vs. 0.11, p<0.001; and clinically recognized cognitive decline, p=0.001). In the real-world populations, patients are diagnosed more than eleven years later (RWD mean of 72.2 vs. research mean of 60.4, p<0.001). After diagnosis, in real-world cohorts, treatment with PD medications is initiated 2.3 years later on average (95% CI: [2.1-2.4]; p<0.001). This study provides a detailed characterization of Parkinson's progression in diverse populations. It delineates systemic divergences in the patient populations enrolled in research settings vs. patients in the real world. These divergences are likely due to a combination of selection bias and real population differences, but exact attribution of the causes is challenging using existing data. This study emphasizes a need to utilize multiple data sources and to diligently consider potential biases when planning, choosing data sources, and performing downstream tasks and analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett K Beaulieu-Jones
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- APDA Center for Advanced Parkinson Research of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Precision Neurology Program of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615 USA
- Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Collaborative Research Network, Chevy Chase MD, 20815
| | | | - Sylvie Bozzi
- Sanofi Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Dinesh Kumar
- Sanofi Translational Sciences, Framingham, 01701 USA
| | - Mark J Kruger
- Sanofi Genzyme, Clinical Development Neurology, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Scott L Lipnick
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Lane Fitzsimmons
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Isaac S Kohane
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Clemens R Scherzer
- APDA Center for Advanced Parkinson Research of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Precision Neurology Program of Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Aligning Science Across Parkinson's (ASAP) Collaborative Research Network, Chevy Chase MD, 20815
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hagège M, Bringuier M, Martinez-Tapia C, Chouaïd C, Helissey C, Brain E, Lempdes GR, Dubot C, Bello-Roufai D, Geiss R, Kempf E, Gourden A, Elgharbi H, Garrigou S, Gregoire L, Derbez B, Canouï-Poitrine F. Disentangling the reasons why older adults do not readily participate in cancer trials: a socio-epidemiological mixed methods approach. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae007. [PMID: 38346934 PMCID: PMC10861365 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies of the under-representation of older adults in cancer clinical trials (CTs) have encompassed the entire pathway from a trial being available in a cancer centre to the patient's invitation to participate and then agreement or refusal to participate. OBJECTIVES The study's primary objective was to evaluate CT non-invitation and refusal rates. The secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with non-invitation and refusal and to assess experiences of CT participation from the patients' and professionals' perspectives. METHODS Here, we used mixed methods and a socio-epidemiological approach to analyse reasons for the non-participation of eligible older patients with a solid cancer in cancer CTs in France. RESULTS We found that non-invitation and low CT participation are mainly related to the patients' sociodemographic characteristics and living conditions (such as social isolation, being single, divorced or widowed, not having children and the absence of close family members) and the healthcare professionals' perceptions of insufficient informal support or a high homecare requirement. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that efforts to increase fair inclusion and the participation of older adults in CTs should target the physician-patient relationship, the medical profession and hospital funding, rather than the patient alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meoïn Hagège
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Claudia Martinez-Tapia
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Christos Chouaïd
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil, 40 Av. de Verdun, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Carole Helissey
- Departement of Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, 69 Av. de Paris, F-94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Coraline Dubot
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | | | - Romain Geiss
- Institut Curie, 35 Rue Dailly, F-92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Audrey Gourden
- Departement of Oncology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Bégin, 69 Av. de Paris, F-94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Hanane Elgharbi
- Department of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil, 40 Av. de Verdun, F-94000 Créteil, France
| | - Sonia Garrigou
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Laetitia Gregoire
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Benjamin Derbez
- Department of Sociology, Université Paris 8, Cresspa CSU, 2 Rue de la Liberté, F-93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Department of Health, French institute for health research, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, InsermU955, Eq. CEpiA & University Paris Est Créteil, 8 rue du general Sarrail, F-94010 Créteil, France
- Department of Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 54 avenue du maréchal lattre de tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Donovan A, O'Hanlon S. Breaking bad barriers: engaging older adults in cancer research. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae019. [PMID: 38369627 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anita O'Donovan
- Trinity College Dublin-Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT) & Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Endo Y, Tsilimigras DI, Munir MM, Resende V, Kim A, Beane J, Pelc Z, Sędłak K, Pawlik TM. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Improves Oncological Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Among Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:753-761. [PMID: 37985525 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14569-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the USA, approximately half of newly diagnosed patients with GC are 75 years or older. The objective of the current population-based study was to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the outcomes of elderly patients with locally advanced GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged > 75 years were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included lymph node (LN) harvest, surgical margin status, and 30-day mortality. To minimize the effect of selection bias on the assessed outcome between the two study groups (NAC versus no NAC), propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. RESULTS After PSM, a total of 1958 patients were included in both groups. NAC utilization increased from 2013 to 2019 (21% versus 42.7%, ptrend < 0.001). On pathologic analysis, patients who received NAC were more likely to have ≥ 16 LNs evaluated (NAC 60.1% versus no NAC 55.5%, p = 0.044) and negative resection margins (NAC 88.6% versus no NAC 83%, p = 0.001). Patients who received NAC were also less likely to experience 30-day mortality following resection (NAC 4.1% versus no NAC 7.1%). Receipt of NAC was associated with improved 1-year (73.9% versus 68.3%), 3-year (48.2% versus 43.5%), and 5-year OS (36.9% versus 30.5%) compared with patients who underwent upfront surgery (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Receipt of NAC was associated with improved oncological outcomes among elderly patients undergoing resection for locally advanced GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vivian Resende
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Alex Kim
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Joal Beane
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zuzanna Pelc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sędłak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery,The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center , Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhao S, Miao M, Wang Q, Zhao H, Yang H, Wang X. The current status of clinical trials on cancer and age disparities among the most common cancer trial participants. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:30. [PMID: 38166779 PMCID: PMC10763089 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11690-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To illustrate the status of all cancer clinical trials and characterize clinical trial enrollment disparities in the most common cancer. METHODS Clinical trial data were extracted from ClinicalTrials.gov website. All searched clinical trials were included in the current status analysis of clinical trials on cancer. Among all the clinical trials, only trials addressing single disease sites of breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung (BPCRL) cancer were included in the age disparities analysis. The difference in median age (DMA) between the trial participant median age and the population-based disease-site-specific median age was calculated for each trial. RESULTS A total of 7747 clinical trials were included in the current status analysis of clinical trials on cancer. The number of registered trials had been increasing from 2008 to 2021 (AAPC = 50.60, 95% CI 36.60, 66.00, P < 0.05). Of the 7747 trials, 1.50% (116) of the studies were clinical trials for the elderly aged 60 years or older. 322 trials were included in the age disparities analysis. For all trials, the median DMA was - 8.15 years (P25, P75, - 10.83 to - 2.98 years, P < 0.001). The median DMA were - 9.55 years (P25, P75, - 11.63 to - 7.11 years), - 7.10 years (P25, P75, - 9.80 to - 5.70 years), - 9.75 years (P25, P75, - 11.93 to - 7.35 years), 3.50 years (P25, P75, 0.60 to 4.55 years), respectively, for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer and prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The numbers of registered clinical trials show an upward trend. Age disparities between trial participants and diagnosed disease population are present in BPCRL cancer trials and appear to be increasing over time. Equitable participation in clinical trials on the basis of age is crucial for advancing medical knowledge and evaluating the safety and efficacy of new treatments that are generalizable to aging populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Zhao
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Miao Miao
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Qingqing Wang
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Haijuan Zhao
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Han Yang
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xin Wang
- Clinical Trial Research Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yavropoulou MP, Kasdagli MI, Makras P, Diomatari KM, Anastasilakis AD, Mitsikostas DD, Kassi E, Sfikakis PP, Kravvariti E. Nocebo-associated treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in randomized-controlled trials. Maturitas 2024; 179:107874. [PMID: 37976923 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nocebo is a concept of therapeutics referring to unpleasant symptoms attributed by a patient to a drug, due to negative anticipation. Patients receiving oral anti-osteoporotic drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCT) can experience adverse events leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment discontinuation for these drugs. In this study we aim to investigate the nocebo effect of subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs with a higher compliance rate than orally administered drugs. STUDY DESIGN We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for double-blind trials investigating subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs for osteoporosis (namely, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab) published up to May 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms ("nocebo dropouts"). RESULTS Data from 17 trials were extracted. Among 10,529 placebo-treated patients the pooled nocebo-dropout percentage was 3 % for denosumab (average: 0.03; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.05), 1 % for romosozumab (average: 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.00-0.03) and 6 % for teriparatide and abaloparatide (average: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.07). Nocebo-dropouts were significantly higher in men than women (6 % vs. 3 %, respectively, p = 0.012), in older (mean age >68 years) than in younger patients (5 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.017) and in those with more severe osteoporosis (based on the percentage of participants with prior fragility-related fractures in the study cohort) compared with patients with no prior fracture history (4 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Nocebo responses may contribute to treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Higher nocebo-related dropout rates in the higher-risk RCT population (older patients, males, those with prior fractures) show that nocebo mechanisms have the potential to hinder therapeutic efforts to specific populations who would benefit most. Prospero registration number CRD42020212843.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Yavropoulou
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.
| | - Maria-Iosifina Kasdagli
- Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Polyzois Makras
- Department of Medical Research, 251 Hellenic Air Force & VA General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantina-Maria Diomatari
- Postgraduate Medical Studies in the Physiology of Aging and Geriatric Syndromes, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- 1st Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Eva Kassi
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Evrydiki Kravvariti
- Endocrinology Unit, 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; 1st Department of Propaedeutic and Internal Medicine, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon University Hospital of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Markham SC, McNab J, O'Loughlin K, Clemson L. International responses addressing the under-representation of older people in clinical research. Australas J Ageing 2023; 42:762-768. [PMID: 37724905 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.13234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Older people (aged 65 years +) are under-represented in clinical research across many disease areas. Such exclusions limit the generalisability of trial results and can lead to a gap in critical knowledge regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions in older age groups. International bodies and regulators have addressed this issue to varying degrees. The USA's Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has produced regular non-binding guidance about the inclusion of older trial participants, while the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) binding regulations mean that those seeking research funding must include participants of all ages unless there are scientific or ethical reasons to exclude them. European regulations governing clinical trials of new medications require that participants represent the population groups that are likely to use the product being tested, while Britain highlights the need to improve trial participation of under-served groups, which include older people. Australian clinical trial guidelines point to the potential problem of excluding some groups from research but do not specifically address older participants. While current international approaches may provide some improvements in trial representation, additional strategies are required to promote clinical research that better reflects populations seen in clinical practice. Australia could benefit from clinical trial guidance that highlights the specific issue of the under-representation of older participants and outlines strategies to facilitate greater inclusion. This article provides an overview and critique of the current approaches to the inclusion of older people in clinical research and highlights policy gaps and limitations of current strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan C Markham
- ARC-Funded Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin McNab
- Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate O'Loughlin
- ARC-Funded Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lindy Clemson
- ARC-Funded Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), Sydney School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rached L, Frelaut M, Baldini C. Bridging the gap: addressing disparities of access to oncology clinical trials in the geriatric population. ESMO Open 2023; 8:102029. [PMID: 37866030 PMCID: PMC10598687 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.102029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- L Rached
- Gustave Roussy, Drug Development Department DITEP, Villejuif
| | - M Frelaut
- Gustave Roussy, Department of Geriatric Oncology, Villejuif, France
| | - C Baldini
- Gustave Roussy, Drug Development Department DITEP, Villejuif.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Denkinger M, Knol W, Cherubini A, Simonds A, Lionis C, Lacombe D, Petelos E, McCarthy M, Ouvrard P, Van Kerrebroeck P, Szymański P, Cupelli A, Laslop A, Koch A, Sepodes B, Torre C, Rönnemaa E, Bałkowiec-Iskra E, Herdeiro MT, Rosa MM, Trauffler M, Mirošević Skvrce N, Mayrhofer S, Berntgen M, Silva I, Cerreta F. Inclusion of functional measures and frailty in the development and evaluation of medicines for older adults. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2023; 4:e724-e729. [PMID: 37977177 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00208-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) E7, the guidance for the conduct of clinical trials in people older than age 65 years, dates from 1994. Since then, the inclusion of older people in clinical trials has hardly improved, particularly for the oldest old age group (individuals older than age 75 years), which is the fastest growing demographic bracket in the EU. Even though most medications are taken by this group, relevant endpoints and safety outcomes for this cohort are rarely included and reported, both in clinical trials and regulatory approval documents. To improve the critical appraisal and the regulatory review of medicines taken by frail older adults, eight recommendations are presented and discussed in this Health Policy. These recommendations are brought together from different perspectives and experience of the treatment of older patients. On one side, the perspective of medical practitioners from various clinical disciplines, with their direct experience of clinical decision making; on the other, the perspective of regulators assessing the data submitted in medicine registration dossiers, their relevance to the risk-benefit balance for older patients, and the communication of the findings in the product information. Efforts to improve the participation of older people in clinical trials have been in place for more than a decade, with little success. The recommendations presented here are relevant for stakeholders, authorities, pharmaceutical companies, and researchers alike, as the implementation of these measures is not under the capacity of a single entity. Improving the inclusion of frail older adults requires awareness, focus, and action on the part of those who can effect a much needed change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Denkinger
- European Geriatric Medicine Society, Genoa, Italy; Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center at Agaplesion Bethesda Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Wilma Knol
- European Geriatric Medicine Society, Genoa, Italy; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Antonio Cherubini
- European Geriatric Medicine Society, Genoa, Italy; Geriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy
| | - Anita Simonds
- European Respiratory Society, Lausanne, Switzerland; NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christos Lionis
- European Forum for Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands; Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Denis Lacombe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elena Petelos
- European Forum for Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands; Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece; European Public Health Association, Utrecht, Netherlands; Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mary McCarthy
- European Union of General Practitioners/Family Physicians, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick Ouvrard
- European Union of General Practitioners/Family Physicians, Brussels, Belgium; Société de Formation Thérapeutique du Généraliste, Paris, France
| | - Philip Van Kerrebroeck
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; European Association of Urology, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Piotr Szymański
- European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France; Center for Clinical Cardiology, Structural and Rare Cardiovascular Diseases, National Institute of Medicine MSWiA, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Amelia Cupelli
- Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Pharmacovigilance Office, Italian Medicines Agency, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Laslop
- Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Scientific Office, Austrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, Federal Office for Safety in Health Care, Vienna, Austria
| | - Armin Koch
- Institut für Biometrie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Bruno Sepodes
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Departamento de Farmácia, Farmacologia e Tecnologias em Saúde, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Torre
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Departamento de Farmácia, Farmacologia e Tecnologias em Saúde, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Elina Rönnemaa
- Scientific Advice Working Party, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ewa Bałkowiec-Iskra
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Scientific Advice Working Party, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Central Nervous System Working Party, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; The Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria Teresa Herdeiro
- Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Health Sciences Department Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Mário Miguel Rosa
- Scientific Advice Working Party, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Martine Trauffler
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Division of Pharmacy and Medicines, Directorate of Health, Ministry of Health, Luxembourg
| | - Nikica Mirošević Skvrce
- Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Pharmacovigilance Department, Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Sabine Mayrhofer
- Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Berntgen
- Scientific Evidence Generation Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ivana Silva
- Public and Stakeholders Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Francesca Cerreta
- Scientific Evidence Generation Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cromer SJ, Thaweethai T, Wexler DJ. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in achievement of treatment goals within a clinical trial: a secondary analysis of the ACCORD trial. Diabetologia 2023; 66:2261-2274. [PMID: 37715820 PMCID: PMC10942722 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-023-05997-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Clinical trial participation should theoretically reduce barriers to care by ensuring medication and healthcare access. We aimed to evaluate disparities in achieving diabetes treatment targets by race/ethnicity and educational attainment within the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00000620). METHODS The ACCORD trial included three interventions of varying participant burden: glycaemic (high burden), blood pressure (medium burden) and triglyceride-lowering (low burden). We examined adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for achievement of glycaemic targets, blood pressure targets and a ≥25% reduction in triglyceride levels (a proxy for adherence to fenofibrate therapy) in the first year, and for hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance at any time, by treatment arm, race/ethnicity and educational attainment using multivariable models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics. We explored whether disparities in glycaemic goal achievement were mediated by hypoglycaemia, medication use, change in BMI or number of study visits attended. RESULTS Compared with White participants, participants who identified as Black, Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity were less likely to achieve glycaemic targets (aOR [95% CI]) 0.63 [0.55,0.71], 0.73 [0.61, 0.88], 0.82 [0.71, 0.96], respectively); Black participants but not Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity participants were less likely to achieve blood pressure targets (aOR [95% CI] 0.77 [0.65, 0.90], 1.01 [0.78, 1.32], 1.01 [0.81, 1.26], respectively); and Black, Hispanic and Other race/ethnicity participants were equally or more likely to achieve triglyceride reduction (aOR [95% CI] 1.77 [1.38, 2.28], 1.34 [0.98, 1.84], 1.43 [1.10, 1.85], respectively). Differences in goal achievement by educational attainment were generally not significant after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Rates of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance were highest among Black individuals and those with lower educational attainment. Associations between race/ethnicity and glycaemic control were partially mediated by differences in insulin dosing and oral medication use. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Racially/ethnically minoritised participants in the ACCORD trial were less likely to achieve high-burden (glycaemic) treatment goals but were generally similarly likely to achieve goals of less intensive interventions. Differences in glycaemic treatment goal achievement were partially mediated by differences in medication use but not mediated by hypoglycaemia, change in BMI or study visit attendance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J Cromer
- Diabetes Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tanayott Thaweethai
- Diabetes Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah J Wexler
- Diabetes Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gefen R, Emile SH, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Wexner SD. Age-related variations in colon and rectal cancer: An analysis of the national cancer database. Surgery 2023; 174:1315-1322. [PMID: 37735035 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characteristics of colorectal diseases may vary according to the patient's age. By using a large national database, we assessed age-related differences in characteristics and treatments of colorectal cancer and to evaluate the influence of age on outcomes. METHOD Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer in the US National Cancer Database between 2005 and 2019. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: young age onset (<50 years), middle age group (50-79 years), and very old (≥80 years). Differences in tumor characteristics among groups were assessed. The main outcomes were clinical and treatment characteristics and short-term mortality. RESULTS In total, 662,102 patients with colon cancer and 114,460 with rectal cancer were included-36.1% of young patients with colon cancer presented with metastatic disease. Older patients underwent open surgery more often and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy less often than did the other 2 groups regarding disease stage. Very old patients, compared to middle-aged and young patients, had longer hospitalization and significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality after colon (7.6% vs 2.4% vs 0.7%; P < .001) and rectal (5.9% vs 1.3% vs 0.3%; P < .001) cancer surgery and higher 90-day mortality after colon (12.9% vs 4.6% vs 1.7% P < .001) and rectal (10.3% vs 2.6% vs 0.7%; P < .001) cancer surgery.Older patients had significantly shorter overall survival than the other 2 groups, regardless of pathologic stage, Charlson -Deyo comorbidity score, or tumor side. CONCLUSION Significant age-related disparities in characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of colorectal cancer were found in this study. Recognizing these differences can be the first step toward reducing age-related treatment differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gefen
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. https://twitter.com/RachellGefen
| | - Sameh Hany Emile
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura University, Egypt. https://twitter.com/dr_samehany81
| | - Nir Horesh
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL; Department of Surgery and Transplantations, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. https://twitter.com/nirhoresh
| | - Zoe Garoufalia
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL. https://twitter.com/ZGaroufalia
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eochagain CM, Battisti NML. Reporting of older subgroups in registration breast cancer trials 2012-2021. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:411-421. [PMID: 37665474 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07081-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adequate reporting of data specific to older populations enrolled to breast cancer trials is critical, given the high incidence of the disease among this demographic. This study aimed to examine the completeness of reporting of older subgroups among patients recruited to registration clinical trials investigating systemic treatments for breast cancer. METHODS Clinical trials leading to a US food and drug administration (FDA) approval in breast cancer between 2012 and 2021 were included. Primary study reports and and all available secondary publications were systematically and objectively assessed with regard to the availability of data regarding efficacy, baseline characteristics, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among older subgroups. RESULTS 27 trials and 216 publications were assessed. 20.3% of patients were aged ≥65. 70.0% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0. Although complete reporting of primary endpoints was adequate (72.7%), most protocol-defined primary endpoints were surrogate endpoints (84.8%). Overall survival data among older populations was unavailable in 50.0% of studies. Reporting was poor for secondary efficacy endpoints (81.8% unreported), baseline characteristics (70.4% unreported), toxicity (55.6% unreported), and health-related quality of life outcomes (87.5% unreported). CONCLUSION The findings underline significant deficits in the reporting of age-specific data in breast cancer registration trials. The underreporting of key efficacy, safety, and HRQOL outcomes highlights the need for mandatory reporting standards and a dedicated emphasis on older populations' priorities and needs in the reporting of registration clinical trials.
Collapse
|
22
|
Khadraoui W, Meade CE, Backes FJ, Felix AS. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Women With Gynecologic Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2346494. [PMID: 38060227 PMCID: PMC10704282 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Racial and ethnic disparities in clinical trial enrollment are unjust and hinder development of new cancer treatments. Objective To examine the association of race and ethnicity with clinical trial enrollment among women with endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based cancer registry, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), a population-based cancer registry. Population-based race and ethnicity-specific proportions for each cancer site were derived from SEER. Participants included women with an endometrial, ovarian, or cervical cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2019. Analyses were performed from February 2 to June 14, 2023. Exposure Race and ethnicity were categorized as American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Hispanic (any race), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, White, and other (not defined in the National Cancer Database). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the odds of clinical trial enrollment and representation in clinical trials compared with the US population. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for associations of race and ethnicity with clinical trial enrollment within the National Cancer Database sample. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) according to diagnosis period (2004-2011 vs 2012-2019) were calculated by dividing the race and ethnicity-specific percentage of clinical trial participants in the study sample by the percentage of racial and ethnic groups in SEER. Results Among 562 592 patients with gynecologic cancer (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 62.9 [11.3] years), 1903 were American Indian/Alaska Native, 18 680 were Asian, 56 421 were Black, 38 145 were Hispanic, 1453 were Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 442 869 were White, and 3121 were other race and ethnicity. Only 548 (<1%) were enrolled in clinical trials. Compared with White women, clinical trial enrollment was lower for Asian (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.78), Black (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99), and Hispanic (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) women. Compared with the US population, White women were adequately or overrepresented for all cancer types (PPRs ≥1.1), Black women were adequately or overrepresented for endometrial and cervical cancers (PPRs ≥1.1) but underrepresented for ovarian cancer (PPR ≤0.6), and Asian and Hispanic women were underrepresented among all 3 cancer types (PPRs ≤0.6). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort of patients with gynecologic cancer, clinical trial enrollment was lower among certain minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Continued efforts are needed to address disparate clinical trial enrollment among underrepresented groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wafa Khadraoui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus
| | - Caitlin E. Meade
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Floor J. Backes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus
| | - Ashley S. Felix
- Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sherry AD, Corrigan KL, Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Yang Y, Patel RR, Totten DJ, Newman NB, Das P, Taniguchi C, Minsky B, Snyder RA, Fuller CD, Ludmir E. Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research. Cancer 2023; 129:3430-3438. [PMID: 37382235 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although most patients with cancer are treated with local therapy (LT), the proportion of late-phase clinical trials investigating local therapeutic interventions is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion, characteristics, and trends of phase 3 cancer clinical trials assessing the therapeutic value of LT over time. METHODS This was a cross-sectional analysis of interventional randomized controlled trials in oncology published from 2002 through 2020 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends and characteristics of LT trials were compared to all other trials. RESULTS Of 1877 trials screened, 794 trials enrolling 584,347 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 trials (3%) included a primary randomization assessing LT compared with 767 trials (97%) investigating systemic therapy or supportive care. Annual increase in the number of LT trials (slope [m] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.39; p < .001) was outpaced by the increase of trials testing systemic therapy or supportive care (m = 7.57; 95% CI, 6.03-9.11; p < .001). LT trials were more often sponsored by cooperative groups (22 of 27 [81%] vs. 211 of 767 [28%]; p < .001) and less often sponsored by industry (5 of 27 [19%] vs. 609 of 767 [79%]; p < .001). LT trials were more likely to use overall survival as primary end point compared to other trials (13 of 27 [48%] vs. 199 of 767 [26%]; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS In contemporary late-phase oncology research, LT trials are increasingly under-represented, under-funded, and evaluate more challenging end points compared to other modalities. These findings strongly argue for greater resource allocation and funding mechanisms for LT clinical trials. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Most people who have cancer receive treatments directed at the site of their cancer, such as surgery or radiation. We do not know, however, how many trials test surgery or radiation compared to drug treatments (that go all over the body). We reviewed trials testing the most researched strategies (phase 3) completed between 2002 and 2020. Only 27 trials tested local treatments like surgery or radiation compared to 767 trials testing other treatments. Our study has important implications for funding research and understanding cancer research priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D Sherry
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelsey L Corrigan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yumeng Yang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roshal R Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas J Totten
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Neil B Newman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bruce Minsky
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C David Fuller
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ethan Ludmir
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
DuMontier C, La J, Bihn J, Corrigan J, Yildirim C, Dharne M, Hassan H, Yellapragada S, Abel GA, Gaziano JM, Do NV, Brophy M, Kim DH, Munshi NC, Fillmore NR, Driver JA. More intensive therapy as more effective treatment for frail patients with multiple myeloma [corrected]. Blood Adv 2023; 7:6275-6284. [PMID: 37582048 PMCID: PMC10589796 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Although randomized controlled trial data suggest that the more intensive triplet bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRd) is superior to the less intensive doublet lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM), guidelines have historically recommended Rd over VRd for patients who are frail and may not tolerate a triplet. We identified 2573 patients (median age, 69.7 years) newly diagnosed with MM who were initiated on VRd (990) or Rd (1583) in the national US Veterans Affairs health care System from 2004 to 2020. We measured frailty using the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index. To reduce imbalance in confounding, we matched patients for MM stage and 1:1 based on a propensity score. Patients who were moderate-severely frail had a higher prevalence of stage III MM and myeloma-related frailty deficits than patients who were not frail. VRd vs Rd was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.94) in the overall matched population. Patients who were moderate-severely frail demonstrated the strongest association (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97), whereas the association weakened in those who were mildly frail (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-1.05) and nonfrail (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.10). VRd vs Rd was associated with a modestly higher incidence of hospitalizations in the overall population, but this association weakened in patients who were moderate-severely frail. Our findings confirm the benefit of VRd over Rd in US veterans and further suggest that this benefit is strongest in patients with the highest levels of frailty, arguing that more intensive treatment of myeloma may be more effective treatment of frailty itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark DuMontier
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer La
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - John Bihn
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - June Corrigan
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Cenk Yildirim
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Mayuri Dharne
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Hamza Hassan
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Sarvari Yellapragada
- Debakey VA Medical Center and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Gregory A. Abel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - J Michael Gaziano
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Nhan V. Do
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Brophy
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Dae H. Kim
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Hebrew SeniorLife and Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil C. Munshi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Veterans Affairs, Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Nathanael R. Fillmore
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Jane A. Driver
- New England Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Corrigan KL, Rooney MK, Kouzy R, Manzar G, Thomas CR, Ludmir EB. Selection and Prejudice: Addressing Clinical Trial Disparities With a Review of Current Shortcomings and Future Directions. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:367-373. [PMID: 37684066 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Growing evidence has demonstrated significant, persistent, and widespread disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment across myriad disease sites and target populations. Although mechanisms underlying such disparities are complex and multifactorial, clinical trial eligibility criteria may serve as a key structural barrier to equitable and diverse trial enrollment. In this review, we provide an overview of the data describing historical and current disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment and subsequently describe several patient-, institution-, and trial-related factors which appear to be key drivers of enrollment inequity, with specific discussion regarding the impact of eligibility criteria. We further describe the landscape of ongoing professional efforts aimed at eliminating clinical trial disparities through various medical, professional, and advocacy groups. The review concludes with a practical discussion of how modernization of eligibility criteria in clinical trials may decrease or eliminate trial disparities, including specific actionable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of future eligibility criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael K Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ramez Kouzy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gohar Manzar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Norris Cotton Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX..
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lin TA, Sherry AD, Ludmir EB. Challenges, Complexities, and Considerations in the Design and Interpretation of Late-Phase Oncology Trials. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:429-437. [PMID: 37684072 PMCID: PMC10917127 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Optimal management of cancer patients relies heavily on late-phase oncology randomized controlled trials. A comprehensive understanding of the key considerations in designing and interpreting late-phase trials is crucial for improving subsequent trial design, execution, and clinical decision-making. In this review, we explore important aspects of late-phase oncology trial design. We begin by examining the selection of primary endpoints, including the advantages and disadvantages of using surrogate endpoints. We address the challenges involved in assessing tumor progression and discuss strategies to mitigate bias. We define informative censoring bias and its impact on trial results, including illustrative examples of scenarios that may lead to informative censoring. We highlight the traditional roles of the log-rank test and hazard ratio in survival analyses, along with their limitations in the presence of nonproportional hazards as well as an introduction to alternative survival estimands, such as restricted mean survival time or MaxCombo. We emphasize the distinctions between the design and interpretation of superiority and noninferiority trials, and compare Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches. Finally, we discuss appropriate utilization of phase II and phase III trial results in shaping clinical management recommendations and evaluate the inherent risks and benefits associated with relying on phase II data for treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy A Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alexander D Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.; Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX..
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Brufsky A, Liu X, Li B, McRoy L, Chen C, Layman RM, Rugo HS. Real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness of palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer aged 75 years or older. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1237751. [PMID: 37841423 PMCID: PMC10569486 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1237751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Elderly patients are generally underrepresented in oncology clinical trials; therefore, real-world data are needed to inform clinical management of elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This subanalysis of the P-REALITY X study (NCT05361655) evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness of palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) versus an AI alone among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC aged ≥ 75 years treated in routine clinical practice in the United States. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study used electronic health records from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database. Palbociclib treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and time to chemotherapy (TTC) were evaluated. Three methods were used for comparative analyses: (1) an unadjusted analysis, (2) stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW; primary analysis), and (3) propensity score matching (PSM; sensitivity analysis). Results A total of 961 patients aged ≥ 75 years with HR+/HER2- mBC were identified who started palbociclib plus an AI (n = 313) or an AI alone (n = 648) as first-line (1L) therapy between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cut-off: September 30, 2020). Among patients in the palbociclib plus an AI group with a documented palbociclib starting dose (n = 306), approximately 75% started palbociclib at 125 mg/day, and approximately 40% experienced dose adjustment. After sIPTW, patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI versus an AI alone had significantly improved OS (median of 43.0 vs. 32.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.84]; P = 0.0007), rwPFS (median of 20.0 vs. 15.0 months; HR, 0.72 (0.59-0.89); P = 0.0021), and TTC (median of 40.2 vs. 27.4 months; HR, 0.69 [0.55-0.87]; P = 0.0014). These significant improvements in OS, rwPFS, and TTC remained consistent in the unadjusted analysis and after PSM. Conclusion This real-world comparative analysis demonstrated that 1L palbociclib plus an AI is associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone among patients with HR+/HER2- mBC aged ≥ 75 years. These findings support palbociclib plus an AI as a standard-of-care 1L treatment for elderly patients with HR+/HER2- mBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Brufsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Xianchen Liu
- Department of Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Benjamin Li
- Department of Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Lynn McRoy
- Department of Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Connie Chen
- Department of Oncology Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, United States
| | - Rachel M. Layman
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Laface C, Giuliani F, Melaccio A, Pappagallo MN, Santoro AN, Perrone M, De Santis P, Guarini C, Carrozzo D, Fedele P. The Treatment Landscape of Elderly Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Her2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6012. [PMID: 37762952 PMCID: PMC10532156 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) in elderly women is an increasing health issue due to demographic changes. BC tends to present later and may receive less than standard treatment options. More often, BC in elderly patients is endocrine-positive (HR+). The treatment of elderly patients with metastatic BC (mBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. In recent years, the treatment landscape of patients that are HR+/Her2-negative has changed due to the introduction in clinical practice of new targeted drugs, which have improved patient outcomes. Elderly patients are a small percentage of all patients enrolled in clinical trials and, to date, there are no standardized guidelines that define the best treatment option for this patient population. This can lead to undertreatment or overtreatment, impacting patient morbidity and mortality. Geriatric Assessment tools to tailor the treatment in elderly patients are underused because they are long and difficult to apply in a busy routine clinical practice. For all these reasons, there is an urgent need to produce data about the best treatment for elderly patients with HR+ mBC. Herein, we report data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence on the therapeutic options for HR+ Her2-negative mBC elderly patients and explore future treatment directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Laface
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Francesco Giuliani
- Medical Oncology, San Paolo Hospital, ASL Bari, 70123 Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.M.); (M.N.P.)
| | - Assunta Melaccio
- Medical Oncology, San Paolo Hospital, ASL Bari, 70123 Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.M.); (M.N.P.)
| | - Maria Nicla Pappagallo
- Medical Oncology, San Paolo Hospital, ASL Bari, 70123 Bari, Italy; (F.G.); (A.M.); (M.N.P.)
| | - Anna Natalizia Santoro
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Martina Perrone
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Pierluigi De Santis
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Chiara Guarini
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Daniela Carrozzo
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| | - Palma Fedele
- Medical Oncology, Dario Camberlingo Hospital, 72021 Francavilla Fontana, Italy (A.N.S.); (M.P.); (P.D.S.); (C.G.); (D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kilic S, Zhao J, Okut H, Jani CT, Radwan A, Dudipala H, Burns L, Tapan U. Disparities in US Lung Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01776-2. [PMID: 37651069 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities within clinical trial enrollment are well-documented, reducing the generalizability of results. Although nearly 30 years have passed since Congress passed the NIH Revitalization Act to encourage the participation of minoritized populations in clinical trials, these patients continue to be underrepresented. This study aimed to investigate lung cancer clinical trial enrollment disparities for race/ethnicity, sex, and age. METHODS We queried the National Institutes of Health: US National Library of Medicine database of clinical trials for all US-based lung cancer clinical trials completed between 2004 and 2021 and collected data on race and ethnicity, gender, and age breakdown. This data was compared to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database data. Independent sample t-tests and Kruskal-Wallis's approach were used to analyze the data. RESULTS Of 311 eligible trials with exclusive US enrollment, 136 (44%) reported race and ethnicity breakdown for the patient cohort representing 9869 patients. Hispanic, Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, Non-Hispanic Black, and Non-Hispanic Unreported participants were underrepresented (p = 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.014, p = 0.002, respectively). Non-Hispanic White participants were overrepresented (p = 0.018). Disparities worsened from 2017 to 2021 for Hispanic patients (p = 0.03). No significant differences were found for sex or age. CONCLUSIONS Disparities for clinical lung cancer trial enrollment have not shown statistically significant improvement since 2004, and representation remains unequal, especially for racial and ethnic minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyda Kilic
- School of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Zhao
- Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hayrettin Okut
- Kansas University School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Chinmay T Jani
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Amr Radwan
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Harshitha Dudipala
- Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura Burns
- Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Umit Tapan
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yildirim H, Widdershoven CV, Aarts MJ, Bex A, Bloemendal HJ, Bochove-Overgaauw DM, Hamberg P, Herbschleb KH, van der Hulle T, Lagerveld BW, van Oijen MG, Oosting SF, van Thienen JV, van der Veldt AA, Westgeest HM, Zeijdner EE, Aben KK, van den Hurk C, Zondervan PJ, Bins AD. The PRO-RCC study: a long-term PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort in the Netherlands, providing an infrastructure for 'Trial within Cohorts' study designs. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:648. [PMID: 37434119 PMCID: PMC10337109 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11094-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ongoing research in the field of both localized, locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma has resulted in the availability of multiple treatment options. Hence, many questions are still unanswered and await further research. A nationwide collaborative registry allows to collect corresponding data. For this purpose, the Dutch PROspective Renal Cell Carcinoma cohort (PRO-RCC) has been founded, for the prospective collection of long-term clinical data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient reported experience measures (PREMs). METHODS PRO-RCC is designed as a multicenter cohort for all Dutch patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Recruitment will start in the Netherlands in 2023. Importantly, participants may also consent to participation in a 'Trial within cohorts' studies (TwiCs). The TwiCs design provides a method to perform (randomized) interventional studies within the registry. The clinical data collection is embedded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Next to the standardly available data on RCC, additional clinical data will be collected. PROMS entail Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), symptom monitoring with optional ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of pain and fatigue, and optional return to work- and/or nutrition questionnaires. PREMS entail satisfaction with care. Both PROMS and PREMS are collected through the PROFILES registry and are accessible for the patient and the treating physician. TRIAL REGISTRATION Ethical board approval has been obtained (2021_218) and the study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05326620). DISCUSSION PRO-RCC is a nationwide long-term cohort for the collection of real-world clinical data, PROMS and PREMS. By facilitating an infrastructure for the collection of prospective data on RCC, PRO-RCC will contribute to observational research in a real-world study population and prove effectiveness in daily clinical practice. The infrastructure of this cohort also enables that interventional studies can be conducted with the TwiCs design, without the disadvantages of classic RCTs such as slow patient accrual and risk of dropping out after randomization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilin Yildirim
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Maureen Jb Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK
| | - Haiko J Bloemendal
- Department of Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Hamberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam/Schiedam, the Netherlands
| | - Karin H Herbschleb
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn Gh van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes V van Thienen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Am van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans M Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Katja Kh Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Corina van den Hurk
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia J Zondervan
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D Bins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, 4F De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Szturz P, Vermorken JB. Editorial: Head and neck cancer in the elderly. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1218274. [PMID: 37427107 PMCID: PMC10325853 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1218274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Szturz
- Department of Oncology, University of Lausanne (UNIL) and Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jan B. Vermorken
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brain EGC. Systemic Therapy in Older Patients With High-Risk Disease. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390456. [PMID: 37437232 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant systemic treatments for older patients with breast cancer require constant dose or schedule adjustments of standards established for younger ones. This is mainly due to frailty that increases according to age (40%-50% of signals in all comers after age 70 years) and remains difficult to spot or diagnose accurately and therefore is often overlooked. Older patients are at higher risk to develop side effects whether under chemotherapy, optimized endocrine treatment, or targeted therapies. Pharmacokinetic reflects poorly functional reserves that reduce with aging and is therefore misleading. The demonstration of significant long-term benefits provided by adjuvant treatments is challenged by life expectancy, driven by multimorbidity status that increases with age, competing with cancer outcome. When geriatric assessment is incorporated into the multidisciplinary team, treatment decision process shows 30%-50% changes, de-escalating initial age-agnostic treatment choices in two of three cases. Finally, expectations from treatment vary over the years: In older ones, although not being exclusive, there is a general shift of preference for protecting functionality, cognitive functions, and independence, as summarized in quality of life that many systemic adjuvant treatment may jeopardize. These provocative considerations show importance to pay more attention to expectations expressed by older patients to limit gaps between what is thought by health care professionals as right, often on the basis of dose intensity models strongly engrained in oncology and that older patients may assess counterintuitively differently. The most achieved molecular testing to identify high-risk luminal tumors should be combined with determinant geriatric factors to bring relevant global information in the adjuvant setting for older patients.
Collapse
|
33
|
van Eijk E, van der Spek YM, van Deudekom FJA, van den Bos F, Mooijaart SP, Trompet S. Temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:324. [PMID: 37226093 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04018-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older individuals are often underrepresented in clinical trials. In 2012 only 7% of RCT's specifically studied older people and their geriatric characteristics were poorly reported. The aim of this review was to investigate temporal changes in characteristics and external validity of randomized controlled trials in older people from 2012 to 2019. METHODS PubMed was searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in 2019. Firstly, the proportion of RCTs specially designed for older people were determined by the following criteria: a reported mean age of ≥ 70 years or a lower age cutoff of ≥ 55. Secondly, the trials with a majority of older people, defined by a reported mean age of ≥ 60 years, were screened for reporting of geriatric assessments. Both parts were compared with identical reviews performed in 2012. RESULTS From a 10% random sample, 1446 RCTs were included in this systematic review. First, 8% of trials were specifically designed for older people in 2019 compared to 7% in 2012. Secondly, 25% of the trials included a majority of older people in 2019, compared to 22% in 2012. Thirdly, in 52% of these trials in 2019 one or more of the geriatric assessments were reported compared to 34% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS Although in 2019 the proportion of published RCTs specifically designed for older people remains low, more characteristics on geriatric assessments were reported compared to 2012. Continued efforts should be paid to increase both the number and the validity of trials for older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estelle van Eijk
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Yanna M van der Spek
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cao JA, Patel SB, Wong CW, Garcia D, Munoz J, Cone C, Zamora D, Reagan M, Nguyen TV, Pearce W, Fish RH, Brown DM, Chaudhary V, Wykoff CC, Fan KC. Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors in Prospective Retina-Focused Clinical Trial Screening and Enrollment. J Pers Med 2023; 13:880. [PMID: 37373869 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically marginalized populations are disproportionately affected by many diseases that commonly affect the retina, yet they have been traditionally underrepresented in prospective clinical trials. This study explores whether this disparity affects the clinical trial enrollment process in the retina field and aims to inform future trial recruitment and enrollment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, preferred language, insurance status, social security number (SSN) status, and median household income (estimated using street address and zip code) for patients referred to at least one prospective, retina-focused clinical trial at a large, urban, retina-based practice were retrospectively extracted using electronic medical records. Data were collected for the 12-month period from 1 January 2022, through 31 December 2022. Recruitment status was categorized as Enrolled, Declined, Communication (defined as patients who were not contacted, were contacted with no response, were waiting for a follow-up, or were scheduled for screening following a clinical trial referral.), and Did Not Qualify (DNQ). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine significant relationships between the Enrolled and Declined groups. Among the 1477 patients, the mean age was 68.5 years old, 647 (43.9%) were male, 900 (61.7%) were White, 139 (9.5%) were Black, and 275 (18.7%) were Hispanic. The distribution of recruitment status was: 635 (43.0%) Enrolled, 232 (15.7%) Declined, 290 (19.6%) Communication, and 320 (21.7%) DNQ. In comparing socioeconomic factors between the Enrolled and Declined groups, significant odds ratios were observed for age (p < 0.02, odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.97, 1.00]), and between patients who preferred English versus Spanish (p = 0.004, OR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.17, 0.72]. Significant differences between the Enrolled and Declined groups were also observed for age (p < 0.05), ethnicity (p = 0.01), preferred language (p < 0.05), insurance status (p = 0.001), and SSN status (p < 0.001). These factors may contribute to patient participation in retina-focused clinical trials. An awareness of these demographic and socioeconomic disparities may be valuable to consider when attempting to make clinical trial enrollment an equitable process for all patients, and strategies may be useful to help address these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sagar B Patel
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Calvin W Wong
- McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Garcia
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
| | - Jose Munoz
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
| | | | | | - Mary Reagan
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
| | - Tieu V Nguyen
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Will Pearce
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Richard H Fish
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David M Brown
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Varun Chaudhary
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Charles C Wykoff
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kenneth C Fan
- Retina Consultants of Texas, Houston, TX 77401, USA
- Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital & Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chew G, Menounos S, Sheldrick K, Das A, Diwan AD. Age-based exclusion is common and multifactorial in spinal RCTs: a systematic review and quantitative analysis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:1537-1545. [PMID: 36881142 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07618-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Most diseases of the spine disproportionately impact older persons, with the modal (i.e., commonest) patient a female in their 8th decade of life. We examined the corpus of spinal RCTs to determine how many included "average" spine patients. We searched PubMed for randomized clinical trials published in the top 7 spine journals over a period of 5 years from 2016 to 2020 and extracted nominal upper age cut-offs and the distribution of ages actually recruited. We identified 186 trials of 26,238 patients. We found that only 4.8% of trials could be applied to an "average" 75-year-old patient. This age-based exclusion was not dependent on funding source. Age-based exclusion was exacerbated by explicit upper age cut-offs, however, the age-based exclusion went beyond explicit age cut-offs. Only few trials were applicable to older patients even amongst trials with no age cut-off specified. Age-based exclusion from clinical trials starts at late middle age. The mismatch between spinal patient's age seen in clinical practice and spinal patient's age in trials was so severe that over the 5 years (2016-2020) almost no RCT evidence was produced applicable to the "average" aged-patient across the body of literature available. In conclusion, age-based exclusion is ubiquitous, multifactorial, and happens on a supratrial level. Eliminating age-based exclusion involves more than an arbitrary lifting of explicitly stated upper age cut-offs. Instead, recommendations include increasing input from geriatricians and ethics committees, establishing updated or new models of cares, and creating new protocols to facilitate further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gem Chew
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building (C27), Cnr High St and Botany St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Spine Labs, 10 South St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Spiro Menounos
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building (C27), Cnr High St and Botany St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Spine Labs, 10 South St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Kyle Sheldrick
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building (C27), Cnr High St and Botany St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Spine Labs, 10 South St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Abhirup Das
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building (C27), Cnr High St and Botany St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
- Spine Labs, 10 South St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia
| | - Ashish D Diwan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building (C27), Cnr High St and Botany St, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
- Spine Labs, 10 South St, Kogarah, NSW, 2217, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gheybi K, Buckley E, Vitry A, Roder D. Variations in colorectal cancer pattern of care by age and comorbidity in South Australia. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37084009 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced age is associated with decreased likelihood of colorectal cancer treatment. Here, we investigated the extent to which comorbidities are accountable for this lesser treatment. METHODS Using population-based datasets, the pattern of care among CRC cases in South Australia during 2004-2013 was investigated. Models were used to investigate associations of age with each treatment type, and differences in these associations were explored by comorbidity and cancer site. RESULTS The presence of comorbidity was associated with a significantly weaker relationship of age with surgery and chemotherapy. The association of age with surgery also varied for colon and rectal primary cancer sites. Individual comorbidity types varied in their associations with each treatment category. For example, dementia was associated with less chemotherapy provision, however, it was not significantly related to the likelihood of surgery. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the association of age with surgical treatment differed significantly by the CRC subsite. Comorbidity moderated the negative association of age with chemotherapy, and less so, with extent of surgery. Results were novel in indicating associations of multiple individual comorbidity types with CRC treatment modalities. The data suggest that different individual comorbidity types may have different effects on treatment and should be studied separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazzem Gheybi
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Buckley
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Agnes Vitry
- University of South Australia Clinical and Health Sciences, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mokhnatkin JV, Bae M, Dale W, Tiwari A, Patanapirom J, Sedrak MS. Facilitators and Barriers to Older Adult Participation in Cancer Trials: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient-Caregiver Dyad Congruence. JCO Oncol Pract 2023:OP2200843. [PMID: 37079865 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Family caregivers play an integral role in caring for older adults with cancer. Few studies have examined older adults with cancer and their family caregivers as a unit in a relationship or a dyad. Dyad congruence, or consistency in perspective, is relevant to numerous aspects of living with cancer, including the decision to enroll in a cancer clinical trial. METHODS Semistructured interviews of 32 older women (age ≥ 70 years) with breast cancer and their family caregivers (16 dyads) were conducted at both academic and community settings from December 2019 to March 2021 to explore perceived facilitators and barriers to cancer trials. Dyad congruence was defined as aligned (matching) perspectives, and incongruence was defined as misaligned (nonmatching) perspectives. RESULTS Five (31%) of 16 patients were age ≥80 years, 11 (69%) had nonmetastatic breast cancer, and 14 (88%) were treated in an academic setting. Six (38%) of 16 caregivers were in the 50-59 age group, 10 (63%) were female, and seven (44%) were daughters. Dyad congruence centered on the clinical benefit of trials and physician recommendation. However, compared with caregivers, patients were more motivated to contribute to science. Patients and caregivers also differed on the perceived extent to which the caregiver influenced enrollment. CONCLUSION Older patients with cancer and their caregivers generally agree about the facilitators and barriers to cancer trial enrollment, but some perceptions are misaligned. Further research is needed to understand whether misaligned perspectives between patients and caregivers influence clinical trial participation of older adults with cancer.
Collapse
|
38
|
Gannon MR, Park MH, Miller K, Dodwell D, Horgan K, Clements K, Medina J, Cromwell DA. Concordance of cancer drug therapy information derived from routinely collected hospital admissions data and the Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) dataset, for older women diagnosed with early invasive breast cancer in England. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 83:102337. [PMID: 36774694 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluating uptake of oncological treatments, and subsequent outcomes, depends on data sources containing accurate and complete information about cancer drug therapy (CDT). This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of CDT information in the Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES-APC) and Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy (SACT) datasets for early invasive breast cancer (EIBC). METHODS The study included women (50 + years) diagnosed with EIBC in England from 2014 to 2019 who had surgery within six months of diagnosis. Concordance of CDT recorded in HES-APC (identified using OPCS codes) and SACT was evaluated at both patient-level and cycle-level. Factors associated with CDT use captured only in HES-APC were assessed using statistical models. RESULTS The cohort contained 129,326 women with EIBC. Overall concordance between SACT and HES-APC on CDT use was 94 %. Concordance increased over the study period (91-96 %), and there was wide variation across NHS trusts (lowest decile of trusts had concordance≤77 %; highest decile≥99 %). Among women receiving CDT, 9 % (n = 2781/31693) of use was not captured in SACT; incompleteness was worst (18 %=47/259) among women aged 80 + and those diagnosed in 2014 (21%=1121/5401). OPCS codes in HES-APC were good at identifying patient-level and cycle-level use of trastuzumab or FEC chemotherapy (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), with 89 % and 93 % concordance with SACT respectively (patient-level agreement). Among cycles of solely oral CDT recorded in SACT, only 24 % were captured in HES-APC, compared to 71 % for intravenous/subcutaneous CDT. CONCLUSIONS Combining information in HES-APC and SACT provides a more complete picture of CDT treatment in women aged 50 + receiving surgery for EIBC than using either data source alone. HES-APC may have particular value in identifying CDT use among older women, those diagnosed less recently, and in NHS trusts with low SACT data returns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Ruth Gannon
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
| | - Min Hae Park
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - Katie Miller
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - David Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kieran Horgan
- Department of Breast Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Karen Clements
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, NHS Digital, 2nd Floor, 23 Stephenson Street, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jibby Medina
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| | - David Alan Cromwell
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
LoCastro M, Sanapala C, Wang Y, Jensen‐Battaglia M, Wittink M, Norton S, Klepin HD, Richardson DR, Mendler JH, Liesveld J, Huselton E, O'Dwyer K, Cortes A, Rodriguez C, Dale W, Loh KP. Patient-centered communication tool for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia, their caregivers, and oncologists: A single-arm pilot study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:8581-8593. [PMID: 36533397 PMCID: PMC10134384 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a single-arm pilot study, we assessed the feasibility and usefulness of an innovative patient-centered communication tool (UR-GOAL tool) that addresses aging-related vulnerabilities, patient values, and prognostic awareness for use in treatment decision making between older adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their caregivers, and oncologists. METHODS Primary feasibility metric was retention rate; >50% was considered feasible. We collected recruitment rate, usefulness, and outcomes including AML knowledge (range 0-14) and perceived efficacy in communicating with oncologists (range 5-25). Due to the pilot nature and small sample size, hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10. RESULTS We included 15 patients (mean age 76 years, range 64-88), 12 caregivers, and 5 oncologists; enrollment and retention rates for patients were 84% and 73%, respectively. Patients agreed that the UR-GOAL tool helped them understand their AML diagnosis and treatment options, communicate with their oncologist, and make more informed decisions. From baseline to post-intervention, patients and caregivers scored numerically higher on AML knowledge (patients: +0.6, p = 0.22; caregivers: +1.1, p = 0.05) and perceived greater efficacy in communicating with their oncologists (patients: +1.5, p = 0.22; caregivers: +1.2, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION We demonstrated that it is feasible to incorporate the UR-GOAL tool into treatment decision making for older patients with AML, their caregivers, and oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa LoCastro
- School of Medicine and DentistryUniversity of RochesterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- Burrell College of Osteopathic MedicineLas CrucesNew MexicoUnited States
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Public Health SciencesUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Marsha Wittink
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and DentistryRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Sally Norton
- School of NursingUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Heidi D. Klepin
- Section on Hematology and OncologyWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center BlvdWinston‐SalemNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Daniel R. Richardson
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jason H. Mendler
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Jane Liesveld
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Eric Huselton
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Kristen O'Dwyer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Chrystina Rodriguez
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive CareCity of Hope National Medical CenterDuarteCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of MedicineJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Basmadjian RB, Chow K, Kim D, Kenney M, Lukmanji A, O'Sullivan DE, Xu Y, Quan ML, Cheung WY, Lupichuk S, Brenner DR. The Association between Early-Onset Diagnosis and Clinical Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071923. [PMID: 37046584 PMCID: PMC10093252 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Early-onset diagnosis, defined by age <40 years, has historically been associated with inferior outcomes in breast cancer. Recent evidence suggests that this association is modified by molecular subtype. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to synthesize evidence on the association between early-onset diagnosis and clinical outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Studies comparing the risk of clinical outcomes in non-metastatic TNBC between early-onset patients and later-onset patients (≥40 years) were queried in Medline and EMBASE from inception to February 2023. Separate meta-analyses were performed for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and pathological complete response (pCR). In total, 7581 unique records were identified, and 36 studies satisfied inclusion criteria. The pooled risk of any recurrence was significantly greater in early-onset patients compared to later-onset patients. Better BCSS and OS were observed in early-onset patients relative to later-onset patients aged >60 years. The pooled odds of achieving pCR were significantly higher in early-onset patients. Future studies should evaluate the role of locoregional management of TNBC and the implementation of novel therapies such as PARP inhibitors in real-world settings, and whether they improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Basmadjian
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Kristian Chow
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Dayoung Kim
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Matthew Kenney
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Aysha Lukmanji
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Dylan E O'Sullivan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Research & Analytics, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Sasha Lupichuk
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Darren R Brenner
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bringuier M, Carton M, Debieuvre D, Pasquier D, Perol M, Filleron T, Léna H, Quantin X, Simon G, Baldini C. Enrolment of older adults with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in first-line clinical trials in the multicentre ESME cohort. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101423. [PMID: 36657245 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.101423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a great need for data based on clinical trials for the older population in order to improve treatment. Historically, the inclusion rate of older adults in clinical trials has been low, but the rate specific to lung cancer is unknown, as are the factors associated with enrolment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the national Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics Advanced or Metastatic Lung Cancer (AMLC) Data Platform, a multicentre real-life database. Inclusion criteria were patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (AMNSCLC) aged 70 years or older, with at least one line of systemic treatment from 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2018. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of older adults enrolled in clinical trials. Secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with enrolment in clinical trials for older patients and to compare the overall survival of older adults included in trials versus those not included. RESULTS There were 3488 patients aged ≥70 years (median age at AMNSCLC 75 years). Among older patients, 234 (6.7%) were enrolled in a clinical trial in the first-line setting. Significant factors associated with enrolment in the multivariable analysis in older patients were: good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS 0) (p < 0.001), de novo versus recurrent presentation at diagnosis (p < 0.001), and non-central nervous system (CNS) metastases versus advanced setting or CNS metastases (p < 0.001). Medical history was associated with fewer inclusions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.56; 0.99]). Among older patients, being enrolled in a trial in the first-line setting was not associated with better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; 95%CI 0.86-1.22) in the multivariable analysis. DISCUSSION In this large database, few older AMNSCLC patients were enrolled in a trial. Factors associated with enrolment were: good ECOG PS, absence of medical history, de novo AMNSCLC, and presentation with non-CNS metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bringuier
- Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Supportive Care, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - Matthieu Carton
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - Didier Debieuvre
- Pneumology Department, Groupe hospitalier de la région de Mulhouse Sud Alsace, Mulhouse, France.
| | - David Pasquier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Lille University, CRIStAL UMR, 9189 Lille, France.
| | - Maurice Perol
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
| | - Thomas Filleron
- Biostastistic and Health Data science Unit, Institut Claudius Régaud IUCT-O, Toulouse, France.
| | - Herve Léna
- Pneumology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Rennes, France.
| | - Xavier Quantin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, INSERM Unité, 1194 Montpellier, France.
| | - Gaëtane Simon
- Real-world Data Department, Unicancer, Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Examining participant representation by sex, race, ethnicity and age in United States blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials. Transfus Apher Sci 2023:103653. [PMID: 36781328 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Significant inequities based on sex, race, ethnicity, and age exist among participants in clinical trials dedicated to investigating medical disease states. While general demographic data regarding blood donors and blood transfusion recipients have been studied extensively, the demographics of participants involved in blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials are unknown. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of United States (U.S.) -based interventional blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials registered with Clinicaltrials.gov to ascertain the composition of participants' sex, race, ethnicity, and age, as well as diagnostic conditions and geographic trial locations.Eligible trials were undertaken between July 2003 and August 2020. Thirty-eight of the one hundred and fifty-two blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trials met inclusion criteria (seven blood donation and thirty-one blood transfusion trials). While the participant dataset from trial reports were incomplete, 100 % of blood donation trials reported sex and age, 71.4 % reported race, and 42.3 % reported ethnicity. 96.8 % of blood transfusion trials reported sex, 51.6 % reported race, 38.7 % reported ethnicity, and 100 % reported age. Among 2720 participants enrolled in the seven blood donation trials, females were underrepresented (28.5 %) compared to U.S. Census data. Conversely, female (50.8 %) and male participants (49.2 %) were equally represented in blood transfusion trials (9255 participants). White participants were overrepresented in blood donation trials (73.4 %), while Hispanic or Latinos were underrepresented in both blood donation (7.7 %) and blood transfusion (8.2 %) trials compared to 2019 U.S.Census data. Only 8.3 % of blood transfusion clinical trials open to adults reported including older adults (i.e., ≥ 65yo). Despite mandatory reporting requirements and an already established framework, researchers frequently failed to report complete demographics of blood donation and blood transfusion clinical trial participants. Furthermore, various demographic groups were underrepresented in blood donation and/or blood transfusion clinical trials, including females, Hispanic or Latino individuals, and older adults. These findings demonstrate the need for implementation of strategies to ensure equitable representation of individuals in blood donation and transfusion clinical trials.
Collapse
|
43
|
Huang H, Cui D, Leng Y, Zhang K, Yu A, Wang Y, Wu H, Tang Y, Yu F, Li N. Geriatric drug trials on solid tumor are scarce worldwide. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1063648. [PMID: 36814778 PMCID: PMC9939632 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1063648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Conducting geriatric trials is the most feasible way to address the vast underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials of cancer therapies. This study is a globally comprehensive examination of geriatric trials for solid tumor worldwide over the last decade. Methods Up-to-date information on cancer drug trials in older adults aged over 59 years from the beginning of 2012 to the end of 2021 was collected from Trialtrove and Pharmaprojects. The number of identified trials was the dependent variable and corresponding analysis was conducted from the perspective of time trend, status quo and comparisons by region and country, sponsor type and cancer type, study status and phase. Results A total of 292 geriatric cancer drug trials were identified, of which 287 were single-region studies, 219 were initiated by academic groups, and 55 (18.8%) were terminated. Decreasing trends in the annual number of all trials (-9.2% per year) and the annual number of trials by academic groups (-9.4%) were observed over time. Of the geriatric trials, 183 were conducted in Asia; this number was significantly higher than that in Europe (74), North America (37), Oceania (4), and South America (1). Similar difference was found in participation rate in trials by academic groups ranging from 71.7% in Asia to 0.5% in South America. Of the trials, 19 and 97 were initiated before drug and indication approval, respectively, and the remaining 176 were initiated after indication approval. Phase II trials accounted for the highest proportion of trials (213, 72.9%), while phase I trials accounted for the lowest proportion (14, 4.8%). Trials by academic groups had a higher termination rate (21.5% vs. 11.0%) and fewer were phase IV trials (8.2% vs. 21.9%). Treatment was explored for 16 different cancers, with lung, colorectal and breast cancers being the most common. Conclusion Geriatric trials of solid tumor drugs are scarce and partially prematurely terminated. Moreover, the number of geriatric trials has decreased and differs according to region. Global guidance and regulatory supervision are needed to facilitate the acquisition of adequate evidence on drug risk-benefit profiles in older adults, and thus to achieve high-quality care and safe medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiyao Huang
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dandan Cui
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Hebei Cancer Hospital, Langfang, China
| | - Ye Leng
- School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Kaiting Zhang
- Phase I Clinical Research Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Anqi Yu
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yanting Wang
- Department of Pharmacy National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hanli Wu
- Department of Kidney Internal Medicine, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Yu
- School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Clinical Trials Center, National Cancer Center, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Ning Li,
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Peterson JS, Plana D, Bitterman DS, Johnson SB, Aerts HJWL, Kann BH. Growth in eligibility criteria content and failure to accrue among National Cancer Institute (NCI)-affiliated clinical trials. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4715-4724. [PMID: 36398619 PMCID: PMC9972031 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer trial accrual is a national priority, yet up to 20% of trials fail to accrue. Trial eligibility criteria growth may be associated with accrual failure. We sought to quantify eligibility criteria growth within National Cancer Institute (NCI)-affiliated trials and determine impact on accrual. METHODS Utilizing the Aggregated Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov, we analyzed phase II/III interventional NCI-affiliated trials initiated between 2008 and 2018. Eligibility criteria growth was assessed via number of unique content words within combined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Association between unique word count and accrual failure was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for known predictors of failure. Medical terms associated with accrual failure were identified via natural language processing and categorized. RESULTS Of 1197 trials, 231 (19.3%) failed due to low accrual. Accrual failure rate increased with eligibility criteria growth, from 11.8% in the lowest decile (12-112 words) to 29.4% in the highest decile (445-750 words). Median eligibility criteria increased over time, from 214 (IQR [23, 282]) unique content words in 2008 to 417 (IQR [289, 514]) in 2018 (r2 = 0.73, P < 0.001). Eligibility criteria growth was independently associated with accrual failure (OR: 1.09 per decile, 95% CI [1.03-1.15], p = 0.004). Eighteen exclusion criteria categories were significantly associated with accrual failure, including renal, pulmonary, and diabetic, among others (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Eligibility criteria content growth is increasing dramatically among NCI-affiliated trials and is strongly associated with accrual failure. These findings support national initiatives to simplify eligibility criteria and suggest that further efforts are warranted to improve cancer trial accrual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Danielle S Bitterman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Skyler Bryce Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Benjamin Harris Kann
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Grant SJ, Jansen M, Kuo TM, Rubinstein SM, Wildes TM, Tuchman SA, Muss HB, Lichtman EI, Charlot M. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Clinical Trial Availability and North Carolina Neighborhood Social Vulnerability. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e248-e262. [PMID: 36473128 PMCID: PMC9970296 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Residents of communities facing social vulnerability (eg, poverty) have limited access to clinical trials, leaving them susceptible to experiencing poor health outcomes. We examined the association between North Carolina county-level social vulnerability and available multiple myeloma (MM) trials. METHODS Using a novel data linkage between ClinicalTrials.gov, the 2019 American Community Survey, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index, we investigated at the county level (1) availability of MM trial sites and (2) the relationship between Social Vulnerability Index and MM trial site availability using logistic regression. RESULTS Between 2002 and 2021, 229 trials were registered across 462 nonunique trial sites in 34 counties. Nearly 50% of trial sites were in academic medical centers, 80% (n = 372) of all trials were industry-sponsored, 60% (n = 274) were early-phase, and 50% (n = 232) were for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Counties with low as opposed to high poverty rates had six times greater odds of having ≥ 1 MM trial sites (odds ratio [OR], 5.60; 95% CI, 1.85 to 19.64; P = .004). Counties with the lowest percentage of Black Indigenous Persons of Color and non-native English speakers had 77% lower odds (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.69; P = .011) of having ≥ 1 trial sites. The effect remained significant after accounting for the presence of five academic medical centers (n = 95; OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.6; P = .008) and adjustment for metropolitan, suburban, or rural status (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.81; P = .025). CONCLUSION Counties with the lowest poverty rates had more MM trial sites, whereas those with the lowest percentage of Black Indigenous Persons of Color populations had fewer MM trial sites. Multilevel efforts are needed to improve the availability and access to trials for socially vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shakira J. Grant
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Matthew Jansen
- University Libraries, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Tzy-Mey Kuo
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Samuel M. Rubinstein
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Tanya M. Wildes
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Sascha A. Tuchman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hyman B. Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eben I. Lichtman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Marjory Charlot
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sedrak MS, Sun CL, Ji J, Cohen HJ, Gross CP, Tew WP, Klepin HD, Wildes TM, Dotan E, Freedman RA, O'Connor T, Chow S, Fenton MA, Moy B, Chapman AE, Dale W, Katheria V, Kuderer NM, Lyman GH, Magnuson A, Muss HB. Low-Intensity Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer in Older Women: Results From the Prospective Multicenter HOPE Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:316-326. [PMID: 36455189 PMCID: PMC9839299 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Older women with high-risk early breast cancer (EBC) benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, but their treatment is frequently complicated by toxic side effects, resulting in dose reductions and delays. This makes it challenging for oncologists to maintain a relative dose intensity (RDI) ≥ 85%, as recommended for optimal curative-intent treatment. Understanding which women are at risk of receiving suboptimal RDI may inform treatment discussions and guide early, targeted supportive care or geriatric comanagement interventions. METHODS This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the HOPE trial, which enrolled women age ≥ 65 years with EBC initiating neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. RDI was calculated as the ratio of delivered to planned chemotherapy dose intensity. The primary outcome was low RDI, defined as RDI < 85%. Multivariable logistic regression with stepwise selection was used to evaluate the association between baseline variables (demographic, clinical, and geriatric assessment) and low RDI. Survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare overall survival. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-two patients (median age at diagnosis, 70 years; range, 65-86 years) were included. The median follow-up was 4 years. Sixty-six patients (21%) had a low RDI. Age ≥ 76 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.57; 95% CI, 1.12 to 5.91; P = .03), lower performance status (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.98 to 9.42; P < .001), and use of anthracycline-based or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimens (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.71 to 7.05; P < .001) were associated with low RDI. The 5-year overall survival probability was 0.80 versus 0.91 in patients with RDI < 85 versus ≥ 85%, respectively (log-rank P = .02). CONCLUSION One in five older patients with EBC treated with standard chemotherapy received low RDI and had inferior survival outcomes. Older patients at risk for low RDI should be identified and targeted upfront before initiating chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina S. Sedrak
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Jingran Ji
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Harvey J. Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Cary P. Gross
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - William P. Tew
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heidi D. Klepin
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Tanya M. Wildes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Rachel A. Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Tracey O'Connor
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Selina Chow
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Beverly Moy
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew E. Chapman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center/Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Dale
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Vani Katheria
- Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Gary H. Lyman
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Hyman B. Muss
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lazarus HM, Pitts K, Wang T, Lee E, Buchbinder E, Dougan M, Armstrong DG, Paine R, Ragsdale CE, Boyd T, Rock EP, Gale RP. Recombinant GM-CSF for diseases of GM-CSF insufficiency: Correcting dysfunctional mononuclear phagocyte disorders. Front Immunol 2023; 13:1069444. [PMID: 36685591 PMCID: PMC9850113 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1069444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Endogenous granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), identified by its ability to support differentiation of hematopoietic cells into several types of myeloid cells, is now known to support maturation and maintain the metabolic capacity of mononuclear phagocytes including monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. These cells sense and attack potential pathogens, present antigens to adaptive immune cells, and recruit other immune cells. Recombinant human (rhu) GM-CSF (e.g., sargramostim [glycosylated, yeast-derived rhu GM-CSF]) has immune modulating properties and can restore the normal function of mononuclear phagocytes rendered dysfunctional by deficient or insufficient endogenous GM-CSF. Methods We reviewed the emerging biologic and cellular effects of GM-CSF. Experts in clinical disease areas caused by deficient or insufficient endogenous GM-CSF examined the role of GM-CSF in mononuclear phagocyte disorders including autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (aPAP), diverse infections (including COVID-19), wound healing, and anti-cancer immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Results We discuss emerging data for GM-CSF biology including the positive effects on mitochondrial function and cell metabolism, augmentation of phagocytosis and efferocytosis, and immune cell modulation. We further address how giving exogenous rhu GM-CSF may control or treat mononuclear phagocyte dysfunction disorders caused or exacerbated by GM-CSF deficiency or insufficiency. We discuss how rhu GM-CSF may augment the anti-cancer effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy as well as ameliorate immune-related adverse events. Discussion We identify research gaps, opportunities, and the concept that rhu GM-CSF, by supporting and restoring the metabolic capacity and function of mononuclear phagocytes, can have significant therapeutic effects. rhu GM-CSF (e.g., sargramostim) might ameliorate multiple diseases of GM-CSF deficiency or insufficiency and address a high unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillard M. Lazarus
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Katherine Pitts
- Medical Affairs, Partner Therapeutics, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States
| | - Tisha Wang
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elinor Lee
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Elizabeth Buchbinder
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael Dougan
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - David G. Armstrong
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Robert Paine
- Division of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Occupational Pulmonary Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Timothy Boyd
- Clinical Development, Partner Therapeutics, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States
| | - Edwin P. Rock
- Clinical Development, Partner Therapeutics, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States
| | - Robert Peter Gale
- Hematology Centre, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Varma T, Mello M, Ross JS, Gross C, Miller J. Metrics, baseline scores, and a tool to improve sponsor performance on clinical trial diversity: retrospective cross sectional study. BMJ MEDICINE 2023; 2:e000395. [PMID: 36936269 PMCID: PMC9951369 DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective To develop a measure for fair inclusion in pivotal trials by assessing transparency and representation of enrolled women, older adults (aged 65 years and older), and racially and ethnically minoritized patients. Design Retrospective cross sectional study. Population Sponsors of novel oncology therapeutics that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration over 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017. Data sources Trial data from Drugs@FDA, ClinicalTrials.gov, and corresponding publications; cancer incidence demographics from US Cancer Statistics and the American Cancer Society. Main outcome measures Transparency measures assess whether trials publicly report participant sex, age, and racial and ethnic identity. Representation measures assess whether trial participant demographics represent more than 80% of the US patient population for studied conditions, calculated by dividing the percentage of study participants in each demographic subgroup by the percentage of the US cancer population with the studied condition per group. Composite fair inclusion measures assess average transparency and representation scores, overall and for each demographic group. Results are reported at the trial, product, and sponsor levels. Results Between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017, the FDA approved 59 novel cancer therapeutics, submitted by 25 sponsors (all industry companies) on the basis of 64 pivotal trials. All 25 sponsors (100%) reported participant sex, 10 (40%) reported age, and six (24%) reported race and ethnicity. Although 14 (56%) sponsors had adequate representation of women in trials, only six (24%) adequately represented older adults, and four (16%) adequately represented racially and ethnically minoritized patients (black, Asian, Hispanic or Latinx). On overall fair inclusion, one sponsor scored 100% and the median sponsor score was 81% (interquartile range 75-87%). More than half of sponsors (13 (56%) of 25) fairly included women, 20% (n=5) fairly included older adults, and 4% (n=1) fairly included racially and ethnically minoritized patients in trials. 80% of product had pivotal trials that fairly included women, 24% fairly included older adults, and 5% fairly included racially and ethnically minoritized patients. Conclusions This novel approach evaluates trials, products, and sponsors on their fair inclusion of demographic groups in research. For oncology trials, substantial room was noted for improved inclusion of older adults and patients who identify as black or Latinx and transparency around the number of participants identifying as Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, and Alaska Native. These measures can be used by sponsors, ethics committees, among others, to set and evaluate trial diversity goals to help spur progress toward greater research equity in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Mello
- Stanford University Law School, Stanford, CA, USA
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph S Ross
- Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Cary Gross
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jennifer Miller
- Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Program for Biomedical Ethics; Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Bioethics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Bioethics International, New York, NY, USA
- Equity Research and Innovation Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Roeder F, Jensen AD, Lindel K, Mattke M, Wolf F, Gerum S. Geriatric Radiation Oncology: What We Know and What Can We Do Better? Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:689-711. [PMID: 37168037 PMCID: PMC10166100 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s365495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients represent a growing subgroup of cancer patients for whom the role of radiation therapy is poorly defined. Older patients are still clearly underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in very limited high-level evidence. Moreover, elderly patients are less likely to receive radiation therapy in similar clinical scenarios compared to younger patients. However, there is no clear evidence for a generally reduced radiation tolerance with increasing age. Modern radiation techniques have clearly reduced acute and late side effects, thus extending the boundaries of the possible regarding treatment intensity in elderly or frail patients. Hypofractionated regimens have further decreased the socioeconomic burden of radiation treatments by reducing the overall treatment time. The current review aims at summarizing the existing data for the use of radiation therapy or chemoradiation in elderly patients focusing on the main cancer types. It provides an overview of treatment tolerability and outcomes with current standard radiation therapy regimens, including possible predictive factors in the elderly population. Strategies for patient selection for standard or tailored radiation therapy approaches based on age, performance score or comorbidity, including the use of prediction tests or geriatric assessments, are discussed. Current and future possibilities for improvements of routine care and creation of high-level evidence in elderly patients receiving radiation therapy are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
- Correspondence: Falk Roeder, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria, Tel +43 57255 55569, Email
| | - Alexandra D Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Marburg-Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Katja Lindel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Naoum GE, Taghian AG. Endocrine Treatment for 5 Years or Radiation for 5 Days for Patients With Early Breast Cancer Older Than 65 Years: Can We Do It Right? J Clin Oncol 2022; 41:2331-2336. [PMID: 36538740 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- George E. Naoum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - Alphonse G. Taghian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|