A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment

Intensive Chemotherapy Versus Venetoclax-Based Regimens in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Is the Chemotherapy Era Ending?

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) primarily affects older adults and is associated with poor prognosis, particularly in patients aged ≥ 60 years with comorbidities and adverse disease characteristics. Standard intensive chemotherapy, such as the "7 + 3" regimen, has shown limited efficacy and substantial toxicity in this population, underscoring the need for alternative treatment strategies. In recent years, venetoclax-based regimens have emerged as an important option, demonstrating promising outcomes in elderly patients traditionally considered unfit for intensive therapy and, more recently, even in selected fit patients. Methods: This narrative review provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of intensive chemotherapy and venetoclax-based regimens in elderly AML patients. This review synthesizes evidence from prospective and retrospective clinical trials, with focuses on treatment efficacy, safety, and the ability to bridge patients to curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Results: Intensive chemotherapy has achieved complete remission (CR) rates of 40-60% in elderly AML patients, though the median overall survival (OS) rarely exceeds 12 months. Conversely, venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents has recently demonstrated CR rates of up to 74%, with 83% of responders proceeding to allo-HSCT in selected studies. Venetoclax-based regimens have also been associated with improved tolerability and reduced treatment-related mortality. Discussion: This review highlights a paradigm shift in the management of AML in the elderly. While intensive chemotherapy remains a standard option for selected patients, the increasing use of venetoclax-based regimens represents a novel and effective strategy with the potential to overcome traditional limitations, especially in patients previously deemed ineligible for curative approaches. The high remission and transplantation rates observed with non-intensive therapies support their role not only as a palliative alternative but as a bridge to cure. Conclusions: Venetoclax-based regimens are reshaping the treatment landscape of AML in the elderly, offering high response rates and facilitating access to allo-HSCT. Further research is needed to optimize treatment sequencing, explore novel combinations, and reduce relapse rates after transplants, ultimately improving the long-term outcomes in this high-risk population.

Glasdegib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by clonal expansion of myeloid precursors, often accompanied by poor prognostic outcomes in older populations due to molecular heterogeneity and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Glasdegib, a potent inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, has emerged as a targeted agent that enhances chemosensitivity and demonstrates favorable pharmacodynamic profiles in combination regimens. This systematic review evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of Glasdegib-based therapies in the management of AML.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify eligible studies reported up to August 2024. Using R version R.4.4.1, we reported outcomes as pooled proportions and confidence intervals (CIs). The survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves and reconstructed.

RESULTS

The pooled two-year overall survival for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy was 30% (95% CI [27-34%], I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis showed rates of 36% (95% CI [30-42%], Cytarabine and Daunorubicin), 27% (95% CI [20-36%], Low-Dose Cytarabine), and 25% (95% CI [20-31%], Azacitidine. Median survival times were highest for Glasdegib plus Cytarabine and Daunorubicin at 17.6 months (95% CI [15.6-21.9]), followed by 10.4 months (95% CI [8.22-12.3]) for Glasdegib plus Azacitidine, and 7.89 months (95% CI [5.47-11.5]) for Glasdegib plus Low-Dose Cytarabine. Safety analysis revealed varied adverse event rates for Glasdegib plus chemotherapy, with febrile neutropenia (37%), nausea (47%), vomiting (32%), and QT prolongation (44%) being the most commonly reported.

CONCLUSION

Glasdegib combined with chemotherapy demonstrates promising efficacy in improving survival outcomes for AML patients, particularly in combination with Cytarabine and Daunorubicin. While adverse events were common, they were generally manageable, supporting Glasdegib as a viable therapeutic option. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment regimens and evaluate long-term safety and quality-of-life outcomes.

Bemcentinib as monotherapy and in combination with low-dose cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 1b/2a trial

Beyond first line, the prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is poor with limited treatment options. Bemcentinib is an orally bioavailable, potent, highly selective inhibitor of AXL, a receptor tyrosine kinase associated with poor prognosis, chemotherapy resistance and decreased antitumor immune response. We report bemcentinib monotherapy and bemcentinib+low-dose cytarabine combination therapy arms from the completed BerGenBio-funded open-label Phase 1/2b trial NCT02488408 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ), in patients unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective in the monotherapy arm was identification of maximum tolerated dose with secondary objectives to identify dose-limiting toxicities, safety and efficacy, and bemcentinib pharmacokinetic profile. In the combination arm, the primary objective was safety and tolerability, with efficacy and pharmacokinetics as secondary objectives. Safety and tolerability were based on standard clinical laboratory safety tests and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Bemcentinib monotherapy (32 R/R, 2 treatment-naïve AML and 2 myelodysplasia patients) was well-tolerated and a loading/maintenance dose of 400/200 mg was selected for combination treatment, comprising 30 R/R and 6 treatment-naïve AML patients. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were cytopenia, febrile neutropenia and asymptomatic QTcF prolongation, with no grade 5 events reported. In conclusion, bemcentinib+low-dose cytarabine was safe and well tolerated.

A niche driven mechanism determines response and a mutation-independent therapeutic approach for myeloid malignancies

Myeloid cancers such as myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain resistant to standard of care (SOC) and targeted therapies. In this study, we demonstrate that responsiveness to therapy is associated with activation of β-catenin-JAG1 in osteoblastic cells of patients treated with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). ATRA suppresses β-catenin activity in patients and leukemic mice. Consequently, it inhibits the growth and survival of MDS/AML cells from patients with active β-catenin-JAG1 signaling and promotes their differentiation. This occurs independently of cytogenetics and mutational profile. ATRA also improves disease outcome in mice with no evidence of relapse and a superior safety profile to SOC. A human anti-JAG1 antibody improves efficacy in leukemic mice and patient-derived MDS/AML cells. β-catenin activation provides an explanation for the differential response to ATRA and a mechanistic biomarker for ATRA repurposing in myeloid malignancies, potentially evading relapse and extending across a broad range of cancers.

All-trans retinoic acid beyond acute promyelocytic leukemia

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), a known regulator of hematopoiesis, is a key component of the established therapeutic regimen for treating acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). In this issue of Cancer Cell, Mosialou et al. present a niche-based mechanism of ATRA targeting osteoblasts, repurposing ATRA treatment beyond APL.

Acute myeloid leukemia management and research in 2025

The first 5 decades of research in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were dominated by the cytarabine plus anthracyclines backbone, with advances in strategies including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, high-dose cytarabine, supportive care measures, and targeted therapies for the subset of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Since 2017, a turning point in AML research, 12 agents have received regulatory approval for AML in the United States: venetoclax (BCL2 inhibitor); gemtuzumab ozogamicin (CD33 antibody-drug conjugate); midostaurin, gilteritinib, and quizartinib (fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors); ivosidenib, olutasidenib, and enasidenib (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 inhibitors); oral azacitidine (a partially absorbable formulation); CPX351 (liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine:daunorubicin at a molar ratio of 5:1); glasdegib (hedgehog inhibitor); and recently revumenib (menin inhibitor; approved November 2024). Oral decitabine-cedazuridine, which is approved as a bioequivalent alternative to parenteral hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome, can be used for the same purpose in AML. Menin inhibitors, CD123 antibody-drug conjugates, and other antibodies targeting CD123, CD33, and other surface markers are showing promising results. Herein, the authors review the frontline and later line therapies in AML and discuss important research directions.

Current status and research directions in acute myeloid leukemia

The understanding of the molecular pathobiology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has spurred the identification of therapeutic targets and the development of corresponding novel targeted therapies. Since 2017, twelve agents have been approved for the treatment of AML subsets: the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax; the CD33 antibody drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin; three FLT3 inhibitors (midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib); three IDH inhibitors (ivosidenib and olutasidenib targeting IDH1 mutations; enasidenib targeting IDH2 mutations); two oral hypomethylating agents (oral poorly absorbable azacitidine; fully absorbable decitabine-cedazuridine [latter approved as an alternative to parenteral hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia but commonly used in AML]); and CPX-351 (encapsulated liposomal 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin), and glasdegib (hedgehog inhibitor). Other targeted therapies (menin inhibitors, CD123 antibody-drug conjugates) are showing promising results. To achieve optimal results in such a rare and heterogeneous entity as AML requires expertise, familiarity with this rare cancer, and the access to, and delivery of disparate therapies under rigorous supportive care conditions. In this review, we update the standard-of-care and investigational therapies and outline promising current and future research directions.

Frontline therapy of acute myeloid leukemia with lower intensity regimens: Where are we now and where can we go?

The advent of molecularly targeted therapeutics has transformed the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Particularly for individuals unfit for intensive chemotherapy, lower intensity therapies (LIT) incorporating small molecules have significantly improved patient outcomes. With BCL2, IDH1, IDH2, and FLT3 inhibitors widely used for relapsed AML, combination regimens are now utilized in the frontline. Expansion of these targeted LIT combinations, along with development of novel agents including menin inhibitors, exemplifies the promise of precision medicine. Further understanding of molecular drivers of leukemic transformation and mechanisms of relapse will continue to advance frontline treatment options for patients with AML.

All-trans retinoic acid in hematologic disorders: not just acute promyelocytic leukemia

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) plays a role in tissue development, neural function, reproduction, vision, cell growth and differentiation, tumor immunity, and apoptosis. ATRA can act by inducing autophagic signaling, angiogenesis, cell differentiation, apoptosis, and immune function. In the blood system ATRA was first used with great success in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), where ATRA differentiated leukemia cells into mature granulocytes. ATRA can play a role not only in APL, but may also play a role in other hematologic diseases such as immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), non-APL acute myeloid leukemia (AML), aplastic anemia (AA), multiple myeloma (MM), etc., especially by regulating mesenchymal stem cells and regulatory T cells for the treatment of ITP. ATRA can also increase the expression of CD38 expressed by tumor cells, thus improving the efficacy of daratumumab and CD38-CART. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of action of ATRA, its role in various hematologic diseases, drug combinations, and ongoing clinical trials.

Metronomic chemotherapy in hematology: Lessons from preclinical and clinical studies to build a solid rationale for future schedules

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHEMO), based on frequent, regular administration of low, but pharmacologically active drug doses, optimizes antitumor efficacy by targeting multiple targets and reducing toxicity of antineoplastic drugs. This minireview will summarize preclinical and clinical studies on cytotoxic drugs given at weekly, daily, or at continuous metronomic schedules alone or in combination with novel targeted agents for hematological malignancies, including lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and leukemia. Most of the preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies have reported a significant benefit of both mCHEMO monotherapy and combinatorial regimens compared with chemotherapy at the maximum tolerated dose. However, the combination of mCHEMO with targeted drugs is still little explored in the hematologic clinical setting. Data obtained from preclinical studies on low dose metronomic chemotherapy in hematological malignancies clearly suggested the possibility to clinically investigate more tolerable and effective strategies for the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies, or at least for those frail and elderly patients, who are not eligible or resistant to standard treatments.

Comparison of venetoclax and ivosidenib/enasidenib for unfit newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia and IDH1/2 mutation: a network meta-analysis

Because of lacking of head-to-head comparison between venetoclax and IDH1/IDH2 inhibitors (ivosidenib/enasidenib) for newly diagnosed unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the optimal option for these patients still remains undefined. We searched relevant published reports. Three RCTs with 180 IDH1 mutant and 165 IDH2 mutant patients were identified. Indirect comparison of OS using fixed effects network meta-analysis (NMA) models indicated venetoclax plus azacitidine (Ven-Aza) significantly improved survival than enasidenib plus azacitidine (Ena-Aza) (HR:0.30, p = 0.005) for those newly diagnosed patients with AML and IDH2 Mutation. And, for those IDH2 mutation patients, Ven-Aza also had the highest probability of 98.3% (OS analysis) and 84.0% (CR/CRi analysis) to be the best intervention among these first-line treatment regimens (Ven-Aza, Ena-Aza and Aza). And, there was a favorable trend towards Ven-Aza in survival analysis (HR:0.69, p = 0.42), when compared to ivosidenib plus azacitidine (Ivo-Aza) for those newly diagnosed patients with AML and IDH1 Mutation. For those IDH1 Mutation, venetoclax plus azacitidine (Ven-Aza) had the highest probability of 65.8% (OS analysis) and 73.0% (CR/CRi analysis) to be the best intervention among these first-line treatment regimens (Ven-Aza, ivosidenib plus azacitidine (Ivo-Aza) and azacitidine (Aza)). In conclusion, venetoclax plus azacitidine could be a good option for unfit newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia and IDH1/2 mutation. Considering our limits (only trial data-based network meta-analysis et al.), future trials directly comparing these regimens are warranted.

Glasdegib with intensive/nonintensive chemotherapy in Japanese patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Glasdegib is a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of the hedgehog signaling pathway. In this phase I study, previously untreated Japanese patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes were treated with glasdegib (100 mg once daily) combinations: low-dose cytarabine (20 mg twice daily; cohort 1, n = 6; expansion cohort, n = 15); daunorubicin and cytarabine (60 mg/m2 i.v.; cohort 2, n = 6); or azacitidine (100 mg/m2 i.v.; cohort 3, n = 6). Patients, except cohort 2, were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The primary end-point was dose-limiting toxicity in cohorts 1-3 and disease-modifying response in the expansion cohort. Disease-modifying response rate was tested with the null hypothesis of 6.8%, which was set based on the results from the phase II BRIGHT AML 1003 study (NCT01546038). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in cohorts 1 or 3; one patient in cohort 2 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 erythroderma. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (66.7% each) in cohort 1 and thrombocytopenia (60.0%) in the expansion cohort. In the expansion cohort, the disease-modifying response rate was 46.7% (90% confidence interval, 24.4-70.0; p < 0.0001), with all patients achieving either a complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery. Median overall survival was 13.9 months. In this study, the primary disease-modifying response end-point with glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine was met. The study confirms the safety and efficacy of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine in Japanese patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Evaluating the Economic Burden of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Canada

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a significant burden for patients and their families, and to the healthcare system. This study estimated the total cost of illness associated with newly diagnosed AML patients in Canada.

METHODS

The economic burden of AML was estimated using an incidence-based model, analyzing different types of AML cases in Canada. Direct and indirect costs were calculated using scientific literature and Canadian clinical experts' inputs. Patients were categorized depending on their eligibility for intensive chemotherapy (fit and unfit patients) as well as according to age and cytogenetic markers.

RESULTS

The total average cost of AML per patient is estimated to be CAD 178,073 with a cost of CAD 210,983 and CAD 145,163 for fit and unfit patients, respectively. The costs related to treatment represent half of the total average cost (52%), followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplant (23%), best supportive care (16%), productivity loss (6%), and wastage (4%).

CONCLUSION

For patients with AML, the costs associated with fit patients are higher than unfit patients. Hospitalization and best supportive care costs are key cost drivers for the total costs of fit and unfit patients, respectively. This study highlights that AML is associated with a significant economic burden in Canada.

Spectrum of infections in different regimens of post-induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (de-novo): A comparative retrospective study

Background

Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face a heightened susceptibility to infections, which significantly elevates their risk of mortality and disability. The intensity of the chemotherapy treatment and its specific focus on inhibiting myeloid cell divisions render patients especially vulnerable, particularly during the early stages of chemotherapy. This vulnerability is compounded by the occurrence of repeated episodes of prolonged neutropenia, leaving patients highly susceptible to infections. The compromised immune systems of these individuals make them more susceptible to infections, which adversely affect their physical health and overall well-being. Consequently, our study aimed to investigate the range of infections experienced by patients with newly diagnosed AML undergoing different induction chemotherapy.

Methods

This was a comparative retrospective study, conducted at a tertiary hospital providing comprehensive cancer care in North India. All newly diagnosed patients with AML, who received induction chemotherapy from January 1, 2012 to November 1, 2022, were identified from the hospital database and included in this study.

Results

Four hundred and twenty AML patients treated with either high-intensity or low-intensity induction chemotherapy was observed in this study. It was found that patients who received high-intensity treatment had a higher rate of clinically and microbiologically documented infections, fever without a known cause, and more cases of febrile neutropenia than those who got low-intensity treatment. These differences between the two groups were particularly evident on day 14 (p = 0.0002) and persisted through day 28 (p = 0.005).

Conclusions

These findings underscore the effectiveness and downside of high-intensity induction chemotherapy regimens, as evidenced by the higher incidence of infections observed. Further investigation through prospective clinical studies is warranted to better evaluate and validate the efficacy of this approach.

Measurable residual disease monitoring in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy: Roadmap from an ELN-DAVID expert panel

With the availability of effective targeted agents, significant changes have occurred in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the past several years, particularly for those considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. While testing for measurable residual disease (MRD) is now routinely performed in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy to refine prognosis and, possibly, inform treatment decision-making, its value in the context of lower-intensity regimens is unclear. As such regimens have gained in popularity and can be associated with higher response rates, the need to better define the role of MRD assessment and the appropriate time points and assays used for this purpose has increased. This report outlines a roadmap for MRD testing in patients with AML treated with lower-intensity regimens. Experts from the European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-DAVID AML MRD working group reviewed all available data to propose a framework for MRD testing in future trials and clinical practice. A Delphi poll served to optimize consensus. Establishment of uniform standards for MRD assessments in lower-intensity regimens used in treating patients with AML is clinically relevant and important for optimizing testing and, ultimately, improving treatment outcomes of these patients.

The efficacy and adverse events of arsenic trioxide for the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) might be effective for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) by apoptosis induction and demethylation. But ATO has not been widely recommended for small sample and conflicting conclusion of existing trials. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of regimens containing ATO for the MDS and explore optimal combination.

METHOD

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about ATO regimens were retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Embase and PubMed. With odds ratio (OR) as the effect size, network meta-analysis (NMA) and component network meta-analysis (CNMA) were conducted by R and 'netmeta' package, after study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.

RESULT

Thirty-night RCTs were included with a total of 2125 patients, including 1235 treated by ATO containing regimen. With support therapy alone as reference, no inconsistency and heterogeneity were observed. Although NMA did not demonstrate better efficacy of ATO alone, the result of CNMA indicated that ATO was effective in the improvement of overall remission (ORR) [OR = 2.09(1.61, 2.71)] and complete remission (CR) [OR  = 1.66(1.25, 2.21)]. Five ATO-containing regimens reported could effectively improve ORR, some of them benefit in CR or hematological improvement (HI) as well. ATO + Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), ATO + Thalidomide (T)+TCM, ATO + Chemotherapy (Chem)+T + TCM were regarded as the optimal combination, which improved both ORR, CR and HI in theory. ATO did not increase the risk of common adverse events compared to supportive therapy [(OR = 0.90(0.67, 1.21)].

CONCLUSION

ATO may be an effective and well-tolerant option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Comparative Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Combination Therapies and Other Therapies in Treatment-Naive Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the efficacy of venetoclax (VEN) + azacitidine (AZA) and VEN + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) compared with AZA, LDAC, and decitabine monotherapies and best supportive care (BSC) in adults with untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and feasibility assessment was conducted to select phase III randomized controlled trials for inclusion in the NMA. Complete remission + complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery and overall survival (OS) were compared using a Bayesian fixed-effects NMA. Treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) with higher values indicating a higher likelihood of being effective.

RESULTS

A total of 1140 patients across 5 trials were included. VEN + LDAC (SUCRA 91.4%) and VEN + AZA (87.5%) were the highest ranked treatments for complete remission + complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery. VEN + LDAC was associated significantly higher response rates versus AZA (odds ratio 5.64), LDAC (6.39), and BSC (23.28). VEN + AZA was also associated significantly higher response rates than AZA (5.06), LDAC (5.74), and BSC (20.68). In terms of OS, VEN + AZA (SUCRA: 95.2%) and VEN + LDAC (75.9%) were the highest ranked treatments. VEN + AZA was associated with significant improvements in OS compared with AZA (hazard ratio 0.66), LDAC (0.57), and BSC (0.37), and VEN + LDAC was associated with significant improvements in OS compared with LDAC (0.70) and BSC (0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

VEN + AZA and VEN + LDAC demonstrated improved efficacy compared with alternative therapies among treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Homoharringtonine-Based Induction Regimen Improved the Remission Rate and Survival Rate in Chinese Childhood AML: A Report From the CCLG-AML 2015 Protocol Study

PURPOSE

Homoharringtonine (HHT) is commonly used for the treatment of Chinese adult AML, and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has been verified in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, the efficacy and safety of HHT-based induction therapy have not been confirmed for childhood AML, and ATRA-based treatment has not been evaluated among patients with non-APL AML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This open-label, multicenter, randomized Chinese Children's Leukemia Group-AML 2015 study was performed across 35 centers in China. Patients with newly diagnosed childhood AML were first randomly assigned to receive an HHT-based (H arm) or etoposide-based (E arm) induction regimen and then randomly allocated to receive cytarabine-based (AC arm) or ATRA-based (AT arm) maintenance therapy. The primary end points were the complete remission (CR) rate after induction therapy, and the secondary end points were the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1,258 patients, of whom 1,253 were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. The overall CR rate was significantly higher in the H arm than in the E arm (79.9% v 73.9%, P = .014). According to the intention-to-treat analysis, the 3-year OS was 69.2% (95% CI, 65.1 to 72.9) in the H arm and 62.8% (95% CI, 58.7 to 66.6) in the E arm (P = .025); the 3-year EFS was 61.1% (95% CI, 56.8 to 65.0) in the H arm and 53.4% (95% CI, 49.2 to 57.3) in the E arm (P = .022). Among the per-protocol population, who received maintenance therapy, the 3-year EFS did not differ significantly across the four arms (H + AT arm: 70.7%, 95% CI, 61.1 to 78.3; H + AC arm: 74.8%, 95% CI, 67.0 to 81.0, P = .933; E + AC arm: 72.9%, 95% CI, 65.1 to 79.2, P = .789; E + AT arm: 66.2%, 95% CI, 56.8 to 74.0, P = .336).

CONCLUSION

HHT is an alternative combination regimen for childhood AML. The effects of ATRA-based maintenance are comparable with those of cytarabine-based maintenance therapy.

Glasdegib plus intensive or non-intensive chemotherapy for untreated acute myeloid leukemia: results from the randomized, phase 3 BRIGHT AML 1019 trial

This is the primary report of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 BRIGHT AML 1019 clinical trial of glasdegib in combination with intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine and daunorubicin) or non-intensive chemotherapy (azacitidine) in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Overall survival (primary endpoint) was similar between the glasdegib and placebo arms in the intensive (n = 404; hazard ratio [HR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.782-1.408; two-sided p = 0.749) and non-intensive (n = 325; HR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.768-1.289; two-sided p = 0.969) studies. The proportion of patients who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for glasdegib versus placebo (intensive: 99.0% vs. 98.5%; non-intensive: 99.4% vs. 98.8%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, febrile neutropenia, and anemia in the intensive study and anemia, constipation, and nausea in the non-intensive study. The addition of glasdegib to either cytarabine and daunorubicin or azacitidine did not significantly improve overall survival and the primary efficacy endpoint for the BRIGHT AML 1019 phase 3 trial was not met. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03416179.

Randomized phase-III study of low-dose cytarabine and etoposide + /- all-trans retinoic acid in older unfit patients with NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the impact of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in combination with non-intensive chemotherapy in older unfit patients (> 60 years) with newly diagnosed NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Patients were randomized (1:1) to low-dose chemotherapy with or without open-label ATRA 45 mg/m2, days 8-28; the dose of ATRA was reduced to 45 mg/m2, days 8-10 and 15 mg/m2, days 11-28 after 75 patients due to toxicity. Up to 6 cycles of cytarabine 20 mg/day s.c., bid, days 1-7 and etoposide 100 mg/day, p.o. or i.v., days 1-3 with (ATRA) or without ATRA (CONTROL) were intended. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Between May 2011 and September 2016, 144 patients (median age, 77 years; range, 64-92 years) were randomized (72, CONTROL; 72, ATRA). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two study arms. The median number of treatment cycles was 2 in ATRA and 2.5 in CONTROL. OS was significantly shorter in the ATRA compared to the CONTROL arm (p = 0.023; median OS: 5 months versus 9.2 months, 2-years OS rate: 7% versus 10%, respectively). Rates of CR/CRi were not different between treatment arms; infections were more common in ATRA beyond treatment cycle one. The addition of ATRA to low-dose cytarabine plus etoposide in an older, unfit patient population was not beneficial, but rather led to an inferior outcome.The clinical trial is registered at clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT Number: 2010-023409-37, first posted 14/12/2010).

Evolving trends and outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia including allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically been poor. Given advances in low-intensity therapy (LIT) and stem cell transplantation (SCT), we performed a retrospective single-center study to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of this population. We reviewed all patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML between 2012 and 2021 and analyzed treatment and SCT-related trends and outcomes. We identified 1073 patients with a median age of 71 years. Adverse clinical and cytomolecular findings were frequent within this cohort. In total, 16% of patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy, 51% with LIT alone, and 32% with LIT plus venetoclax. The composite complete remission rate with LIT plus venetoclax was 72%, which was higher than with LIT alone (48%, p < .0001) and comparable to intensive chemotherapy (74%, p = .6). The median overall survival (OS) with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax was 20.1, 8.9, and 12.1 months, respectively. 18% of patients received SCT. SCT rates were 37%, 10%, and 22% in patients treated with intensive chemotherapy, LIT, and LIT plus venetoclax, respectively. The 2-year OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse, and CI of treatment-related mortality with frontline SCT (n = 139) were 59%, 52%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. By landmark analysis, patients undergoing frontline SCT had superior OS (median 39.6 vs. 21.4 months, p < .0001) and RFS (30.9 vs. 12.1 months, p < .0001) compared with responding patients who did not. Outcomes in older patients with AML are improving with more effective LIT. Measures should be pursued to increase access to SCT in older patients.

Impact of Geographical Distance from Quaternary Treatment Center on Clinical Trial Participation, Intensive Induction Chemotherapy, and Outcomes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is centralized in the Ontario single-payer public healthcare system, with intensive induction chemotherapy and clinical trials only offered at specialized cancer centers with large catchment areas.

METHODS

We therefore conducted a retrospective single-center review of all AML patients assessed at a large specialized cancer center in Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2017, 1,310 patients were assessed by our center for upfront AML therapy. The median distance was 33.1 km, with 29% of patients living more than 50 km away from the center. There was no significant difference in probability of intensive induction chemotherapy or clinical trial by distance from center, both in univariate and multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, cytogenetics and molecular testing, and performance status. There was no significant difference in overall survival by distance from center on univariate and multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, geographic distance from treatment center does not appear to impact choice of upfront therapy, participation in clinical trials, or clinical outcomes in this study of newly diagnosed patients with AML treated in a single-payer environment.

BCL2 Inhibition: A New Paradigm for the Treatment of AML and Beyond

Altering the natural history of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in unfit and older patients has proved a highly challenging hurdle, despite several decades of concerted clinical trial effort. The arrival of venetoclax (VEN) to the clinical stage represents the most important therapeutic advance to date for older patients with AML. In this review, we will explain how and why VEN works, summarize its remarkable pathway to regulatory approval, and highlight the key milestones that have been important for its successful development in AML. We also provide perspectives on some of the challenges associated with using VEN in the clinic, emerging knowledge regarding mechanisms of treatment failure, and current clinical research directions likely to shape how this drug and others in this new class of anticancer agents are used in the future.

Paradigm Shift in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Approved Options in 2023

The word Leukemia was coined nearly 200 years ago by Rudolf Virchow. Once a death sentence, Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is now a treatable condition. The introduction of "7 + 3" chemotherapy, originally reported from the Roswell Park Memorial institute in Buffalo, New York, in 1973, changed the treatment paradigm for AML. About twenty-seven years later, FDA approved the first targeted agent, gemtuzumab, to be added to this backbone. During the last seven years, we have had ten new drugs approved for the management of patients with AML. Work by many dedicated scientists led to AML achieving the elite status of being the first cancer to have the whole genome sequenced using next-generation sequencing. In the year 2022, we witnessed the introduction of new classification systems for AML by the international consensus classification and the world health organization, both emphasizing molecular classification of the disease. In addition, the introduction of agents such as venetoclax and targeted therapies have changed the treatment paradigm in older patients ineligible for intensive therapy. In this review, we cover the rationale and evidence behind these regimens and provide insights into the newer agents.

The Role of Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Past, Present, and Future Directions

Relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is hallmarked by dramatic prognosis. Treatment remains challenging, with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as the only curative option. The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) has proven to be a promising therapy for AML and is currently the standard of care in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) for newly diagnosed AML patients ineligible for induction chemotherapy. Given its satisfactory safety profile, VEN-based combinations are increasingly being investigated as a part of the therapeutic strategy for R/R AML. The current paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the main evidence regarding VEN in the setting of R/R AML, with a specific focus on combinational strategies, including HMAs and cytotoxic chemotherapy, as well as different clinical settings, especially in view of the crucial role of HSCT. A discussion of what is known about drug resistance mechanisms and future combinational strategies is also provided. Overall, VEN-based regimes (mainly VEN + HMA) have provided unprecedented salvage treatment opportunities in patients with R/R AML, with low extra-hematological toxicity. On the other hand, the issue of overcoming resistance is one of the most important fields to be addressed in upcoming clinical research.

Acute myeloid leukemia in the medically unfit elderly patients

Acute Myeloid Leukemia is a clonal proliferative disorder whose incidence increases with age. While studies have shown that the elderly medically unfit patients have poorer outcomes with intensive chemotherapy, a vast majority of them are deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Multiple studies have also shown that poor performance status prior to treatment initiation affects the prognosis. An accurate comprehensive assessment is hence vital to the selection of such patients. The chemotherapy agents that have been used for AML in the medically unfit patients have also changed significantly in the past few years. In this review we focus on the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to chemotherapy initiation among patients who are 75 years and older and the treatment approaches available for the medically unfit, Acute Myeloid Leukemia patients.

Venetoclax: A New Partner in the Novel Treatment Era for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) are two closely related blood cancers that are more frequent in older adults. AML is the most common type of adult acute leukemia, and MDS is characterized by ineffective blood cell production and abnormalities in the bone marrow and blood. Both can be resistant to treatment, often due to dysfunction in the process of apoptosis, the body's natural mechanism for cell death. Venetoclax, an orally-administered medication that selectively targets the BCL-2 protein, has shown promise in enhancing treatment sensitivity in some hematological malignancies by reducing the apoptotic threshold. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of venetoclax in treating AML and MDS, as well as potential mechanisms of resistance to the medication.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted utilizing PUBMED to capture all relevant research articles on the use of venetoclax as a therapy for both diseases. The MeSH terms "acute myeloid leukemia", "myelodysplastic syndrome" and "venetoclax" were searched. Furthermore, Clinicaltrials.gov was accessed to ensure the inclusion of all ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS

Although Venetoclax showed modest results as a single-agent therapy in AML, venetoclax-based combination therapies? mainly with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine? yielded significantly positive results. Preliminary results oN the use of venetoclax-based combination therapy with HMA, mainly azacitidine, in unfit high-risk MDS also yielded optimistic results. Identification of mutations for which various drugs have been approved has spurred active investigation of venetoclax in combination trials.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax-based combination therapies have been shown to induce rapid responses and increase overall survival in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. These therapies are also yielding positive preliminary results in high-risk MDS patients in phase I trials. Resistance to venetoclax and drug-related toxicity are two main obstacles that need to be overcome to reap the full benefits of this therapy.

Prediction of survival with lower intensity therapy among older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for survival in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The authors reviewed all older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML who received lower-intensity chemotherapy from 2000 until 2020 at their institution. A total of 1462 patients were included. They were divided (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 1088) and a validation group (n = 374).

RESULTS

In the training cohort of 1088 patients (median age, 72 years), the multivariate analysis identified 11 consistent independent adverse factors associated with survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, existence of previous myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms, poor performance status, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis, and therapy not containing venetoclax. The 3-year survival rates were 52%, 24%, 10%, and 1% in favorable, intermediate, poor, and very poor risk, respectively. This survival model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients in whom molecular mutation profiles were performed in more recent times, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified IDH2 (favorable), NPM1 (favorable), and TP53 (unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

The proposed survival model with lower-intensity chemotherapy in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML may help to advise patients on their expected outcome, to propose different strategies in first complete remission, and to compare the results of different existing or future investigational therapies.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Lower intensity therapy can be considered for older patients to avoid severe toxicities and adverse events. However, survival prediction in AML was commonly developed in patients who received intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we have proposed a survival model to guide therapeutic approach in older patients who received lower-intensity therapy.

Non-intensive acute myeloid leukemia therapies for older patients

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive disease predominantly affecting the elderly population. The elderly population represents a challenging group to treat and the prognosis is generally poor with significantly worse treatment outcomes compared to the younger population. While the goal of treatment for younger fit patients is cure and includes intensive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, these strategies are not always feasible for elderly unfit patients due to increased frailty, co-morbidities, and, subsequently, an increased risk of treatment-related toxicity and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss both patient- and disease-related factors, outline prognostication models and summarize current treatment options, including intensive and less intensive treatment strategies and novel agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Although recent years have seen major advances in the development of low-intensity therapies, there is still a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment for this patient group. Because of the heterogeneity of the disease, personalizing the treatment strategy is important and curative-oriented approaches should be selected wisely, rather than following a rigid hierarchical algorithm.

The Cup Runneth Over: Treatment Strategies for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Since 2017, the number of agents for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has rapidly expanded. Given the increased therapeutic options, better identification of high-risk subsets of AML and more refined approaches to patient fitness assessment, the decisions surrounding selection of intensive chemotherapy versus lower-intensity treatment have grown increasingly more nuanced. In this review, we present available data for both standard and investigational approaches in the initial treatment of AML using an intensive chemotherapy backbone or a lower-intensity approach. We summarize management strategies in newly diagnosed secondary AML, considerations around allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and the role of maintenance therapy. Finally, we highlight important areas of future investigation and novel agents that may hold promise in combination with standard therapies.

A randomized phase 2 trial of nintedanib and low-dose cytarabine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

We investigated the safety and efficacy of nintedanib added to low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in a phase 1/2 study in patients 60 years or older with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The results of the dose-finding phase 1 part have been previously published. Patients were randomized 1:1 to LDAC plus nintedanib or LDAC plus placebo stratified by AML status (newly diagnosed vs r/r). LDAC was applied subcutaneously at 20 mg twice daily on days 1 to 10. Nintedanib/placebo was orally administered twice daily on days 1 to 28 in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Between 05/2017 and 09/2019, 31 patients were randomized and 30 were treated, before the study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment. Median (range) age of patients was 76 (60-84) years. Twenty-two patients (73%) had r/r AML. Median OS in patients treated with LDAC and nintedanib was 3.4 months, compared with 3.6 months in those treated in the placebo arm, with a HR adjusted for AML status of 1.19 (corresponding confirmatory adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-2.56; univariate log-rank P = 0.96). In the 22 patients with r/r AML, median OS was 3.0 months in the nintedanib and 3.6 months in the placebo arm (P = 0.36). One patient in the nintedanib and two patients in the placebo arm achieved a CR and entered maintenance treatment. Nintedanib showed no superior therapeutic activity over placebo when added to LDAC in elderly AML patients considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01488344.

Hypomethylating agents for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia: Past discoveries and future directions

Azacitidine and decitabine are hypomethylating agents that have dose-dependent epigenetic and cytotoxic effects and are widely used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this review, we discuss the path to regulatory approval of azacitidine and decitabine, highlighting the substantial efforts that have been made to optimize the dosing schedule and administration of these drugs, including the development of new, oral formulations of both agents. We also review novel combination strategies that are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials for patients with MDS and AML, as well as efforts to expand the current indications of these agents.

Oral Antineoplastics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review

AML is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease that is associated with poor overall long-term survival. The expanding knowledge of genomic landscape in AML as well as advancements in molecular and chemical biology over the pathway in AML. After 40 years of stagnancy, the recent approval of numerous novel oral anti-leukemic agents for the treatment of AML has changed both the armamentarium of medications and treatment paradigms. These agents have unique clinical considerations in terms of administration, adverse effects, and monitoring parameters which may differ from clinician's historical expectations. Understanding the data, indication and clinical considerations for such novel oral anti-leukemic agents is paramount for clinicians caring patients with AML.

Efficacy of the combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in the treatment of patients with primary, relapsed and/or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Relevance and goals. Treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia has traditionally been highly intensive and includes induction therapy using cytarabine and anathracyclines. In addition to new opportunities in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, the problem of toxicity of high-intensity therapy in elderly and young somatically burdened patients is quite acute. International clinical trials of phases I-III demonstrated a combination of high efficacy and acceptable hematological toxicity of combinations of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax in the first line of therapy, as well as in the treatment of resistant forms and relapses of acute myeloid leukemia in the older age group, which contributed to the study of the effectiveness of combinations of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax in the treatment of similar groups of young comorbid patients. In this work, we evaluated the efficiency of a combination of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax and overall and disease-free survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in routine practice.

Methods. In the period from October 2017 to December 2021 on the basis of the Department of Hematology No. 11 and the Department of Bone Marrow and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation No. 56 of the Botkin Hospital (Moscow, Russia) 33 patients with acute myeloid leukemia received venetoclax therapy in combination with decitabine or azacitidine: 14 (42%) men and 19 (58%) women, median age was 60 years (23–83 years). In 42% (14 of 33) of cases, the regimen was prescribed for resistant course or relapse of acute myeloid leukemia and in 61% (20 of 33) as induction therapy. Three patients (15%) out of 19 from the group of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia received this treatment regimen in the first line, taking into account the ECOG status 3-4. By August 2022, 13 (39%) patients are alive, 20 (61%) people have died. Overall survival, the rate of complete remission and complete remission with incomplete recovery, the rate of achieving negativity of minimal residual disease, the frequency of hematological toxicity and infectious complications were assessed. Statistical data processing used: frequency analysis using contingency tables (Fisher's exact test), survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results. Complete remission and complete remission with incomplete recovery were achieved in 72.72% (24 of 33) of patients. In the group of primary acute myeloid leukemia, remissions were observed in 80% (16 out of 20) of cases, in the group with resistant course or recurrence of acute myeloid leukemia in 67% (8 out of 12) (p = 0.3). Determination of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry after the 1st course was performed for 54.54% (18 of 33) patients, while negativity was stated in 84.2% (14 of 18 patients) cases. In both groups, the incidence of hematological toxicity and infectious complications are comparable to those according to the literature data. The median follow-up was 9.5 months (1–47). Median overall survival was 39 months, 2-year overall survival was 63%, and overall 4-year survival was 39%. The disease-free survival rate was 33%.

Conclusion. The combination of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax showed good efficacy and fairly high overall survival in patients of all age groups, both for primary acute myeloid leukemia and for relapses and resistant forms, regardless of previous therapy. Given the moderate hematological toxicity, as well as the relatively low rates of infectious complications during therapy, including the rather low mortality rates in case of COVID-19 infection in comparison with those on the background of high-intensity courses of therapy for acute myeloid leukemia, this scheme can be widely used not only in patients of the older age group, but also in young comorbid patients.

Retinoids in cancer chemoprevention and therapy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Retinoids, natural and synthetic derivatives of vitamin A, have many regulatory functions in human body, including regulating cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis. Moreover, retinoids have been used successfully for the treatment of certain malignancies, especially acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in adults and neuroblastoma in children. However, retinoids have not yet been translated into effective systemic treatments for most solid cancers. Some recent studies have shown that retinoids promote tumorigenesis. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy of retinoids in the chemoprevention and treatment of cancers. We performed literature search of several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from 2000 January to 2021 November. Various outcomes were applied to investigate the potential of retinoids for prevention and treatment of cancers. The primary outcomes in this study were disease recurrence and clinical response. The secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer development, disease progression and event-free survival. We identified 39 randomized controlled trials with 15,627 patients in this study. Our results showed that lower recurrence rate and better clinical response were obtained in retinoids treated patients with cancer or premalignancy as compared with control. The differences were statistically significant (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.74-0.96, p = 0.01; RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.03-1.49, p = 0.02, respectively). Retinoids treatment was not associated with improvement in overall survival, cancer development, disease progression or event-free survival. Subgroup analysis conducted based on cancer type showed that patients benefited from retinoids treatment in APL, renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, lung cancer, Kaposi sarcoma, and complete hydatidiform mole. No significant therapeutic effect was noted in head and neck cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), melanoma, breast cancer, bladder cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical carcinoma. Subgroup analysis based on tumor classification demonstrated that retinoids group obtained a lower recurrence rate and better clinical response than control group in solid cancers. In conclusion, clinical application of retinoids was associated with reduction in disease recurrence and improvement in clinical response, illustrating that retinoids play a key role in cancer prevention and therapy. Further research is needed to broaden the utility of retinoids in other types of cancers. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022296706.

How Genetics Can Drive Initial Therapy Choices for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is challenging. Therapy decisions must be guided by multiple factors including aging-related conditions (e.g., comorbidities, functional impairment), therapy benefits and risks, patient preferences, and disease characteristics. Balancing these factors requires understanding the unique, and frequently higher-risk cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of AML in older adult populations, which should caution providers not to reduce therapy intensity on the basis of age alone. Instead, geriatric assessments should be employed to determine fitness for therapy. Treatment options in AML are increasingly targeted to specific mutations or recognized to have differential benefits on the basis of genomics, and representation of older adults and geriatric outcome reporting in clinical trials is improving. Additionally, newer studies have begun to explore personalized therapy strategies on the basis of initial genetic testing. Review and refinement of practice guidelines for older patients on the basis of these advances is needed and is anticipated to remain an important topic in ongoing hematology/oncology clinical education.

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-(4-aminophenyl)-6-methylisoxazolo[3,4-b] pyridin-3-amine covalent inhibitors as potential agents for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation has been strongly associated with increased risk of relapse, and the irreversible covalent FLT3 inhibitors had the potential to overcome the drug-resistance. In this study, a series of simplified 4-(4-aminophenyl)-6-methylisoxazolo[3,4-b] pyridin-3-amine derivatives containing two types of Michael acceptors (vinyl sulfonamide, acrylamide) were conveniently synthesized to target FLT3 and its internal tandem duplications (ITD) mutants irreversibly. The kinase inhibitory activities showed that compound C14 displayed potent inhibition activities against FLT3 (IC₅₀ = 256 nM) and FLT3-ITD by 73 % and 25.34 % respectively, at the concentration of 1 μM. The antitumor activities indicated that C14 had strong inhibitory activity against the human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines MOLM-13 (IC₅₀ = 507 nM) harboring FLT3-ITD mutant, as well as MV4-11 (IC₅₀ = 325 nM) bearing FLT3-ITD mutation. The biochemical analyses showed that these effects were related to the ability of C14 to inhibit FLT3 signal pathways, and C14 could induce apoptosis in MV4-11 cell as demonstrated by flow cytometry. Fortunately, C14 showed very weak potency against FLT3-independent human cervical cancer cell line HL-60 (IC₅₀ > 10 μM), indicating that it might have no off-target toxic effects. In light of these data, compound C14 represents a novel covalent FLT3 kinase inhibitor for targeted therapy of AML.

Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Venetoclax; Biomarkers for Sensitivity and Rationale for Venetoclax-Based Combination Therapies

Simple Summary

Venetoclax has proven to be a promising therapy for newly diagnosed, relapsed and refractory AML patients ineligible for induction chemotherapy. Current ongoing clinical trials are evaluating its effectivity as frontline therapy for all acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, response rates vary wildly, depending on patient characteristics and mutational profiles. This review elaborates on the efficacy and safety of venetoclax compared to conventional chemotherapy for treatment of AML patients, comparing the response rates, overall survival and adverse events. Moreover, it gives an overview of genetic and epigenetic AML cell characteristics that give enhanced or decreased response to venetoclax and offers insights into the pathogenesis of venetoclax sensitivity and resistance. Additionally, it suggests possible treatment combinations predicted to be successful based on identified mechanisms influencing venetoclax sensitivity of AML cells.

Abstract

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor that effectively improves clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed, relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, with complete response rates (with and without complete blood count recovery) ranging between 34–90% and 21–33%, respectively. Here, we aim to give an overview of the efficacy of venetoclax-based therapy for AML patients, as compared to standard chemotherapy, and on factors and mechanisms involved in venetoclax sensitivity and resistance in AML (stem) cells, with the aim to obtain a perspective of response biomarkers and combination therapies that could enhance the sensitivity of AML cells to venetoclax. The presence of molecular aberrancies can predict responses to venetoclax, with a higher response in NPM1-, IDH1/2-, TET2- and relapsed or refractory RUNX1-mutated AML. Decreased sensitivity to venetoclax was observed in patients harboring FLT3-ITD, TP53, K/NRAS or PTPN11 mutations. Moreover, resistance to venetoclax was observed in AML with a monocytic phenotype and patients pre-treated with hypomethylating agents. Resistance to venetoclax can arise due to mutations in BCL-2 or pro-apoptotic proteins, an increased dependency on MCL-1, and usage of additional/alternative sources for energy metabolism, such as glycolysis and fatty acid metabolism. Clinical studies are testing combination therapies that may circumvent resistance, including venetoclax combined with FLT3- and MCL-1 inhibitors, to enhance venetoclax-induced cell death. Other treatments that can potentially synergize with venetoclax, including MEK1/2 and mitochondrial complex inhibitors, need to be evaluated in a clinical setting.

Real-life experience of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in acute myeloid leukemia patients not candidates for intensive chemotherapy or who are refractory/relapsed: A single-centre experience

We report our experience with venetoclax/hypomethylating agents (Ven/HMA) in 8 AML patients not candidates for intensive CT or refractory/relapsed with limited treatment options. The response rate was 50%. Venetoclax was well-tolerated in 62.5% of the patients. Ven/HMA provides a benefit particularly when used in patients without prior HMA exposure.

Venetoclax combinations delay the time to deterioration of HRQoL in unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Phase 3 trials Viale-A and Viale-C evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy who received venetoclax (VEN) + (AZA) (Viale-A) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) (Viale-C) or placebo (PBO) + AZA or LDAC. Patient-reported outcomes included: EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS/QoL) and physical functioning (PF), PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form 7a (Fatigue), and EQ-5D-5L health status visual analog scale (HS-VAS). Time to deterioration (TTD), defined as worsening from baseline in meaningful change thresholds (MCT) of ≥10, 5, or 7 points for GHS/QoL or PF, fatigue, and HS-VAS, respectively, was assessed; differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and unadjusted log-rank analyses. VEN + AZA vs PBO + AZA patients had longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.066) and fatigue (P = 0.189), and significantly longer TTD in PF (P = 0.028) and HS-VAS (P < 0.001). VEN + LDAC vs PBO + LDAC patients had significantly longer TTD in GHS/QoL (P = 0.011), PF (P = 0.020), and fatigue (P = 0.004), and a trend in HS-VAS (P = 0.057). Approximately 43%, 35%, 32%, and 18% of patients treated with VEN + AZA, AZA + PBO, VEN + LDAC, or LDAC + PBO, respectively, saw improvements >MCT in GHS/QoL. Overall, VEN may positively impact HRQoL in patients with AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, leading to longer preservation of functioning and overall health status.

Use of Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The PETHEMA Registry Experience

Simple Summary

The use of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy was recently approved. However, the evidence in relapse or refractory patients is still scarce. The cohort of patients included in our study was heavily pretreated and had a poor performance status. It is still necessary to identify those patients at higher risk of early death who would not benefit from this type of treatment. For these ultra-high-risk patients, other treatment strategies should be followed.

Abstract

The effectiveness of venetoclax (VEN) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) has not been well established. This retrospective, multicenter, observational database studied the effectiveness of VEN in a cohort of 51 RR-AML patients and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). The median age was 68 years, most were at high risk, 61% received ≥2 therapies for AML, 49% had received hypomethylating agents, and ECOG was ≥2 in 52%. Complete remission (CR) rate, including CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), was 12.4%. Additionally, 10.4% experienced partial response (PR). The CR/CRi was higher in combination with azacitidine (AZA; 17.9%) than with decitabine (DEC; 6.7%) and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 0%). Mutated NPM1 was associated with increased CR/CRi. Median OS was 104 days (95% CI: 56–151). For the combination with AZA, DEC, and LDAC, median OS was 120 days, 104 days, and 69 days, respectively; p = 0.875. Treatment response and ECOG 0 influenced OS in a multivariate model. A total of 28% of patients required interruption of VEN because of toxicity. Our real-life series describes a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after VEN-based salvage. Patients included had very poor-risk features and were heavily pretreated. The small percentage of responders did not reach the median OS.

Treatment Pattern, Financial Burden and Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Although approximately 50% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are diagnosed over the age of 60 years, there is currently no established consensus on the treatment of elderly AML patients. Herein, we aimed to explore the incidence, medical expenditure, treatment, and outcomes of elderly AML patients in Korea by analyzing a nationwide cohort. We employed the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort, which represents 10% of a random selection from a total of 5.5 million subjects aged 60 years or older. AML patients were identified according to the main diagnostic criteria of acute leukemia. Treatment for AML was divided into high- (high-dose cytarabine ± idarubicin) and low- (low-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents) intensity chemo-therapy and classified according to the chemotherapeutics protocol. We analyzed the survival outcomes and medical expenditures. Among 558,147 elderly patients, 471 were diagnosed with AML, and 195 (41.4%) were treated with chemotherapy. The median age was 65 years, and the median overall survival (OS) was 4.93 months (95% confidence interval, 4.47–5.43). Median OS was longer in patients undergoing chemotherapy than those in the best supportive care group (6.28 vs. 3.45 months, p < 0.001), and the difference was prominent in patients aged < 70 years. Twenty-eight (5.9%) patients received high-intensity chemotherapy, while 146 (31.0%) received low-intensity chemotherapy. The difference in median OS according to dose intensity was 4.6 months, which was longer in the high-intensity chemotherapy group (9.8 vs. 5.2 months in low-intensity group); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Patients who received high-intensity chemotherapy recorded longer hospital stays and incurred greater expenses on initial hospitalization. Elderly AML patients in Korea exhibited clinical benefits from chemotherapy. Although patients should be carefully selected for intensive treatment, chemotherapy, including low-intensity treatment, can be considered in elderly patients. Moreover, prospective studies on new agents or new treatment strategies are needed.

The cure of leukemia through the optimist's prism

Progress is occurring at a dizzying rate across all leukemias. Since the authors' review of the topic in Cancer in 2018, numerous discoveries have been made that have improved the therapy and outcomes of several leukemia subsets. Hairy cell leukemia is potentially curable with a single course of cladribine followed by rituximab (10-year survival, ≥90%). Acute promyelocytic leukemia is curable at a rate of 80% to 90% with a nonchemotherapy regimen of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide. The cure rate for core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is ≥75% with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Survival for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is close to that for an age-matched normal population with BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, a previously incurable disease, may now be potentially curable with a finite duration of therapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venetoclax. The estimated 5-year survival rate for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) exceeds 70% with intensive chemotherapy and ponatinib, a third-generation BCR-ABL1 TKI, and more recent nonchemotherapy regimens using dasatinib or ponatinib with blinatumomab are producing outstanding results. Survival in both younger and older patients with ALL has improved with the addition of antibodies targeting CD20, CD19 (blinatumomab), and CD22 (inotuzumab) to chemotherapy. Several recent drug discoveries (venetoclax, FLT3 and IDH inhibitors, and oral hypomethylating agents) are also improving outcomes for younger and older patients with AML and for those with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Prediction of early (4-week) mortality in acute myeloid leukemia with intensive chemotherapy

The progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Given the recent development of effective low intensity therapies, an optimal decision on the therapy intensity may improve survival through the avoidance of early mortality. We reviewed the outcome of 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received intensive chemotherapy between August 1980 and May 2020. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as a cumulative cytarabine dose ≥ 700 mg/m2 during induction therapy. We divided the whole cohort into a training and validation group at a 3:1 ratio. The population was divided into a training (2790 patients) and a validation cohort (938 patients). The median age was 55 years (range, 15-99). Among them, 442 patients (12%) had core-binding factor AML. Binary logistic regression identified older age, worse performance status, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated creatinine, hyperuricemia, cytogenetic abnormalities other than CBF and -Y, and pneumonia as adverse prognostic factors for an early 4-week mortality. This risk classification for early mortality was verified in the validation cohort of patients. In the validation cohort of more recently treated patients from 2000 to 2017, the 4-week mortality rates with intensive chemotherapy were 2%, 14%, and 50% in the low-, high-, and very high-risk group, respectively. The mortality rates with low intensity therapies were 3%, 9%, and 20%, respectively. The risk classification guides treatment intensity by the assessment of age, frailty, organ dysfunction, cytogenetic abnormality, and infection to avoid early mortality.

How We Incorporate Venetoclax in Treatment Regimens for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax has transformed the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hypomethylating agents with venetoclax (HMA-VEN) have significantly improved outcomes and have become the standard therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML and are comparable to intensive chemotherapy in salvage setting. Venetoclax with intensive chemotherapy have shown high response rates in both frontline and salvage setting in younger patients, and triplet combinations with HMA-VEN and FLT3 inhibitors have shown encouraging results in FLT3mut AML. While patients with NPM1mut, IDH1/2mut experience favorable outcomes, those with TP53mut and secondary AML may experience minimal benefit from the addition of venetoclax. Despite improved outcomes, severe cytopenias and infectious complications are common with venetoclax-based regimens. Early response evaluation, dose reductions, venetoclax interruptions, use of growth factors, and prophylactic antimicrobials may minimize such myelosuppression and risk of infections. Outcomes after failure of frontline HMA-VEN are dismal, and novel approaches are needed to abrogate primary and acquired resistance.

Combination romidepsin and azacitidine therapy is well tolerated and clinically active in adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

Azacitidine (AZA) is important in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Romidepsin (ROM) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor which synergises with AZA in vitro. The ROMAZA trial established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combined ROM/AZA therapy in patients with AML, as ROM 12 mg/m2 on Days 8 and 15, with AZA 75 mg/m2 administered for 7/28 day cycle. Nine of the 38 (23·7%) patients treated at the MTD were classified as responders by Cycle 6 (best response: complete remission [CR]/incomplete CR n = 7, partial response n = 2). Correlative next-generation sequencing studies demonstrated important insights into therapy resistance.