Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies

Greater risk of type 2 diabetes progression in multifetal gestations with gestational diabetes: the impact of obesity

BACKGROUND

The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes in multifetal pregnancies is complex and controversial. Moreover, limited research has focused on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus specifically in multifetal pregnancies, resulting in conflicting results from existing studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus between singleton and multifetal pregnancies in a large cohort of parturients with a 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted on a prospective cohort of pregnant individuals with pregnancies between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, followed up to 5 years after delivery. Glucose levels during pregnancy were obtained from the Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization laboratory system and cross-linked with the Israeli National Diabetes Registry. The cohort was divided into 4 groups: singleton pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus, multifetal pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, and multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gestational diabetes mellitus was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria using the 2-step strategy. Univariate analyses, followed by survival analysis that included Kaplan-Meier hazard curves and Cox proportional-hazards models, were used to assess differences between groups and calculate the adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 88,611 parturients, 61,891 cases met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 6.5% in the singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group and 9.4% in the multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group. Parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus, regardless of plurality, were older and had higher fasting plasma glucose levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rates of increased body mass index, hypertension, and earlier gestational age at delivery were significantly higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus group among patients with singleton pregnancies but not among patients with multifetal pregnancies. Survival analysis demonstrated that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with adjusted hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes mellitus of 4.62 (95% confidence interval, 3.69-5.78) in singleton pregnancies and 9.26 (95% confidence interval, 2.67-32.01) in multifetal pregnancies (P<.001 for both). Stratified analysis based on obesity status revealed that, in parturients without obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies increased the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 10.24 (95% confidence interval, 6.79-15.44; P<.001) compared with a nonsignificant risk in multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-90.22; P=.059). Among parturients with obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus for both singleton and multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.66; [95% confidence interval, 2.81-4.67; P<.001] and 9.31 [95% confidence interval, 2.12-40.76; P=.003], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal pregnancies doubles the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. This effect is primarily observed in patients with obesity. Our findings underscore the importance of providing special attention and postpartum follow-up for patients with multifetal pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus, especially those with obesity, to enable early diagnosis and intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies-a pathology requiring treatment or a benign physiological adaptation?

There is level-1 evidence that screening for and treating gestational diabetes in singleton pregnancies reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity. However, similar data for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies are currently lacking. Consequently, the current approach for the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is based on the same diagnostic criteria and glycemic targets used in singleton pregnancies. However, twin pregnancies have unique physiological characteristics, and many of the typical gestational diabetes-related complications are less relevant for twin pregnancies. These differences raise the question of whether the greater increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies (which is often diagnosed as diet-treated gestational diabetes) should be considered physiological and potentially beneficial in which case alternative criteria should be used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. In this review, we summarize the most up-to-date evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies and review the available data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. Although twin pregnancies are associated with a higher incidence of diet-treated gestational diabetes, diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is less likely to be associated with adverse outcomes and accelerated fetal growth than in singleton pregnancies and may reduce the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. In addition, there is currently no evidence that treatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies improves outcomes, whereas preliminary data suggest that strict glycemic control in such cases might increase the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. Overall, these findings provide support to the hypothesis that the greater transient increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies is merely a physiological exaggeration of the normal increase in insulin resistance observed in singleton pregnancies (that is meant to support 2 fetuses) rather than a pathology that requires treatment. These data illustrate the need to develop twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes to avoid overdiagnosis of gestational diabetes and to reduce the risks associated with overtreatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. Although data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria are presently scarce, preliminary data suggest that the optimal screening and diagnostic criteria in twin pregnancies are higher than those currently used in singleton pregnancies.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes, but its effects on maternal and perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies remain conflicting.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all primipara who delivered twin pregnancies at a single tertiary perinatal center between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2022. Excluded were those who had a single pregnancy, twin pregnancies with pre-existing diabetes, missing information on GDM screening, a delivery before gestational 28 weeks, complications related to monochorionic placentation, multifetal reduction, fetal anomalies, and monochorionic monoamniotic twins. Maternal outcomes included preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, hypothyroidism, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PROM), placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and oligohydramnios. Neonatal outcomes included small-for-gestational-age (SGA), large-for-gestational-age (LGA), birthweight, Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR), and neonatal hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

A total of 3269 twins were delivered, with 897 women (27.4%) diagnosed with GDM during pregnancies; moreover, 72 (8.0%) of these women received insulin treatment. The GDM group showed a significantly higher maternal age at delivery (≥35 years), as well as incidences of overweight and obesity. These factors also elevated the odds of insulin treatment in GDM women with twin pregnancies (OR = 1.881, 95% CI = 1.073-3.295, P = 0.027; OR = 2.450, 95% CI = 1.422-4.223, P < 0.001; OR = 4.056, 95% CI = 1.728-9.522, P < 0.001, respectively). Chronic hypertension prior to pregnancy was identified as a risk factor for GDM during twin pregnancies (OR = 1.896, 95% CI = 1.290-2.785, P < 0.001), although it did not increase the proportion of women requiring insulin treatment (P = 0.808). Aside from a higher incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks in insulin-treated GDM twins (OR = 2.096, 95% CI = 1.017-4.321, P = 0.045), there were no significant difference in other maternal outcomes (preterm birth before 34 weeks, pre-eclampsia, hypothyroidism, PROM, placental abruption, placenta previa, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and oligohydramnios) between the GDM group and non-GDM group, and between insulin-treated GDM and non-insulin-treated GDM. The rate of newborns with birthweight <1500 g was significantly lower among twins born to GDM women, but the prevalence of EUGR was notably higher. Additionally, the risk of EUGR was elevated in insulin-treated GDM twins (OR = 3.170, 95% CI = 1.639,6.131, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the GDM group and non-GDM group, or between insulin-treated GDM and non-insulin-treated GDM group in terms of mean birthweight, newborn sex ratio, and incidences of other adverse neonatal outcomes, including gestational age at delivery, LGA, birth weight <2500 g, and 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age ≥35 years, overweight or obesity, and chronic hypertension are significant risk factors for GDM during twin pregnancies. Women with GDM during twin pregnancies may achieve similar outcomes compared to those without GDM. However, the women with GDM during twin pregnancies receiving insulin therapy may have a higher risk of preterm birth and EUGR.

Maternal and foetal complications of pregestational and gestational diabetes: a descriptive, retrospective cohort study

Gestational diabetes is characterized by hyperglycaemia diagnosed during pregnancy. Gestational and pregestational diabetes can have deleterious effects during pregnancy and perinatally. The baby's weight is frequently above average and might reach macrosomia (≥ 4 kg), which can reduce pregnancy time causing preterm births, and increase foetal-pelvic disproportion which often requires delivery by caesarean section. Foetal-pelvic disproportion due to the baby's weight can also cause foetal distress resulting in lower Apgar scores. To analyse the association between pregestational and gestational diabetes with maternal and foetal risk. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in women pregnant between 2012 and 2018 in the region of Lleida. Regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. The multivariate analysis showed statistically significant associations between pregestational diabetes and: prematurity (OR 2.4); caesarean section (OR 1.4); moderate (OR 1.3), high (OR 3.3) and very high (OR 1.7) risk pregnancies; and birth weight ≥ 4000 g (macrosomia) (OR 1.7). In getational diabetes the multivariate analysis show significant association with: caesarean section (OR 1.5); moderate (OR 1.7), high (OR 1.7) and very high (OR 1.8) risk pregnancies and lower 1-minuto Apgar score (OR 1.5). Pregestational and gestational diabetes increase: pregnancy risk, caesarean sections, prematurity, low Apgar scores, and macrosomia.

Maternal vitamin D status and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies: a longitudinal twin pregnancies birth cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication of pregnancy, with significant short-term and long-term implications for both mothers and their offspring. Previous studies have indicated the potential benefits of vitamin D in reducing the risk of GDM, yet little is known about this association in twin pregnancies. This study aimed to investigate maternal vitamin D status in the second trimester and examine its association with the risk of GDM in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study based on data from the Chongqing Longitudinal Twin Study (LoTiS). Peripheral blood serum was collected from the mothers in the second trimester to measure 25(OH)D concentrations. GDM was diagnosed at 23-26 weeks of gestation using a 75-g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the correlations between vitamin D status and the risk of GDM.

RESULTS

Of the total participants, 93 (29.9%) women were diagnosed with GDM. The mean serum 25(OH)D concentration in the second trimester was 31.1 ± 11.2 ng/mL, and the rate of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency were 23.5% and 18.7%, respectively. Compared to women with a 25(OH)D concentration < 30 ng/mL, those with a 25(OH)D concentration ≥ 30 ng/mL had a significantly lower risk of GDM (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.86), especially those who were overweight before pregnancy (RR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.64). The restricted cubic splines model showed an inverted J-shaped relationship between vitamin D concentrations and GDM risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of GDM was significantly reduced in twin pregnant women with vitamin D concentrations ≥ 30 ng/mL in the second trimester.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-OOC-16,008,203. Retrospectively registered on 1 April 2016.

Twin Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Context

The risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies is more than double that of singleton pregnancies. Although twin pregnancies present unique challenges for fetal growth and prenatal management, the approach to GDM diagnosis and treatment is the same regardless of plurality. Data on pregnancy outcomes for individuals with GDM and a twin pregnancy are limited and conflicting.

Objective

To describe the maternal characteristics associated with GDM in twin pregnancies and to assess the associated pregnancy outcomes compared to twin pregnancies unaffected by GDM.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, and included predominantly Causasian women aged 18 to 45 years who received prenatal care for a twin pregnancy from 2017-2022. Maternal characteristics and a broad spectrum of pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Universal GDM screening involved a 50 g oral glucose challenge test +/- a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test.

Results

GDM was diagnosed in 23% pregnancies (n = 104/452). Compared to those without, women with GDM had known risk factors including a higher prepregnancy body mass index (31.1vs 26.3 kg/m2; P < .01) and a prior history of GDM (21.7 vs 5.9%; P < .01). There were no differences in maternal pregnancy complications or neonatal outcomes between groups. Attendance at postpartum glucose testing among women with GDM was poor at 27.9% (29/104).

Conclusion

These data suggest that women with twin pregnancies share a similar GDM risk profile to those with singleton pregnancies and provide reassuring evidence that current management for GDM twin pregnancies produces similar outcomes to twin pregnancies without GDM.

Perinatal Outcomes of Twin Gestations with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

Existing data suggest that obstetric outcomes for individuals with twin gestations, who have gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), may be comparable to those who do not have GDM, yet studies are limited by small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to examine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes of individuals with twin gestations based on presence of GDM.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of individuals giving birth to twins in the United States between 2012 and 2014. Inclusion criteria were live births (≥24 weeks) and available information on GDM status; individuals with pregestational diabetes were excluded. Participants were categorized as either having had or not had GDM. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the independent association of GDM with adverse maternal outcomes, whereas generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate associations with neonatal outcomes to account for clustering.

RESULTS

Of 173,196 individuals meeting inclusion criteria, 13,194 (7.6%) had GDM. Individuals with GDM were more likely to be older, identify as Hispanic or Asian race and ethnicity, married, college educated, privately insured, and obese than those without GDM. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, those with GDM were more likely to have hypertensive disorders (18.0 vs. 10.2%) and undergo cesarean delivery (51.2 vs. 47.3%). Neonates born to individuals with GDM were more likely to require mechanical ventilation for greater than 6 hours (6.5 vs. 5.6%) and experience neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (41.1 vs. 36.2%), but were less likely to be low birth weight or have small for gestational age status (16.2 vs. 19.5%). Findings were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis of neonates born at 32 weeks of gestation or greater.

CONCLUSION

Odds of poor obstetric and neonatal outcomes are increased for individuals with twin gestations complicated by GDM.

KEY POINTS

· Individuals with GDM and twin gestation have higher odds of developing hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and of undergoing cesarean delivery.. · Neonates of such pregnancies are less likely to be low birth weight or small for gestational age.. · Neonates of pregnancies complicated by GDM and twin gestation are more likely to require mechanical ventilation and experience NICU admission..

Maternal diabetes following gestational diabetes: Does multiple gestation multiply the risk?

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the risk for future diabetes is higher among women diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GD) during twin versus singleton gestations.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all women who delivered at a tertiary medical center between the years 1991 and 2021 and had at least one GD diagnosis. The first GD diagnosis per women was defined as the index pregnancy. Women diagnosed with GD during multiple gestations were compared with women diagnosed with GD during singleton gestations. The outcomes included first hemoglobin A1C (Hba1C) level > 6.4 mg/dL post partum, and the highest level measured during the follow-up period of up to 30 years. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional analysis were used to compare the risk between the two groups while adjusting for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The current study included 13 770 mothers, with 458 patients (3.3%) diagnosed with GD during twin gestations and 13 312 (96.7%) during singleton gestations. The mean follow-up was 12.25 ± 9.3 years. Mothers of both groups did not differ in age at index pregnancy; however, mothers of twins were more likely to conceive following fertility treatments. Incidence of diabetes and prediabetes (defined as Hba1C > 6.4 and >5.7, respectively) were lower among the twin-gestation group, both during the 6-month postpartum period (for diabetes: 15.5% vs 22.1%; odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.91]) and during the long-term follow-up (for diabetes: 31.8% vs 40.7%; OR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52-0.88]). These results remained significant in the multivariable analysis, while accounting for age, ethnicity, and fertility treatments.

CONCLUSION

GD diagnosis during multiple versus singleton gestations is associated with a lower risk for future diabetes.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal complications between twin and singleton pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes mellitus and the respective group without gestational diabetes mellitus (controls).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane from January 1980 to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies reporting maternal and perinatal outcomes in singleton and/or twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus vs controls were included.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated to determine the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes between twin and singleton pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated in the model and expressed using the I2 statistic. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. The meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan Web). Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. Meta-regression was used to compare relative risks between singleton and twin pregnancies. The addition of multiple covariates into the models was used to address the lack of adjustments.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 studies in singleton pregnancies and 27 in twin pregnancies were included. In singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.01), induction of labor (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.77), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.38), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-1.77), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.46), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-1.49). In twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus, compared with controls, there were increased risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (relative risk, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.90), cesarean delivery (relative risk, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.13), large-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.60), preterm birth (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.32), and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32) and reduced risks of small-for-gestational-age neonate (relative risk, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.97) and neonatal death (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.65). When comparing relative risks in singleton vs twin pregnancies, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that twin pregnancies have a lower relative risk of cesarean delivery (P=.003), have sufficient adjustment for confounders, and have lower relative risks of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (P=.005), stillbirths (P=.002), and neonatal death (P=.001) than singleton pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

In both singleton and twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. In twin pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus may have a milder effect on some adverse perinatal outcomes and may be associated with a lower risk of neonatal death.

Various screening and diagnosis approaches for gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a secondary analysis of a randomized non-inferiority field trial

INTRODUCTION

We evaluate which screening and diagnostic approach resulted in the greatest reduction in adverse pregnancy outcomes due to increased treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study presents a secondary analysis of a randomized community non-inferiority trial conducted among pregnant women participating in the GULF Study in Iran. A total of 35 430 pregnant women were randomly assigned to one of the five prespecified gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening protocols. The screening methods included fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the first trimester and either a one-step or a two-step screening method in the second trimester of pregnancy. According to the results, participants were classified into 6 groups (1) First-trimester FPG: 100-126 mg/dL, GDM diagnosed at first trimester; (2) First trimester FPG: 92-99.9 mg/dL, GDM diagnosed at first trimester; (3) First trimester FPG: 92-99.9 mg/dL, GDM diagnosed at second trimester; (4) First trimester FPG: 92-99.9 mg/dL, healthy at second trimester; (5) First trimester FPG<92 mg/dL, GDM diagnosed at second trimester; (6) First trimester FPG<92 mg/dL, healthy at second trimester. For our analysis, we initially used group 6, as the reference and repeated the analysis using group 2, as the reference group. The main outcome of the study was major adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Macrosomia and primary caesarean section occurred in 9.8% and 21.0% in group 1, 7.8% and 19.8% in group 2, 5.4% and 18.6% in group 3, 6.6% and 21.5% in group 4, 8.3% and 24.0% in group 5, and 5.4% and 20.0% in group 6, respectively. Compared with group 6 as the reference, there was a significant increase in the adjusted risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission in groups 1, 3, and 5 and an increased risk of macrosomia in groups 1, 2, and 5. Compared with group 2 as the reference, there was a significant decrease in the adjusted risk of macrosomia in group 3, a decreased risk of NICU admission in group 6, and an increased risk of hyperglycemia in group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that screening approaches for GDM reduced the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes to the same or near the same risk level of healthy pregnant women, except for the risk of NICU admission that increased significantly in groups diagnosed with GDM compared with healthy pregnant women. Individuals with slight increase in FPG (92-100 mg/dL) at first trimester, who were diagnosed as GDM, had an even increased risk of macrosomia in comparison to those group of women with FPG 92-100 mg/dL in the first trimester, who were not diagnosed with GDM, and developed GDM in second trimester TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT138707081281N1 (registered: February 15, 2017).

Risk factors for adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Globally, the incidence of twin pregnancies is rising owing to the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), emigration and deferment of pregnancy until advanced maternal age (AMA). While twin pregnancies have higher absolute risks of adverse outcomes, including miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death and preterm delivery, the impact of specific exposures and risk factors related to these outcomes may differ between twin pregnancies and singleton pregnancies. Regarding modifiable factors, data are sometimes based on evidence extrapolated from singleton or whole obstetric populations. Therefore, targeted evidence is required to provide care tailored to twin pregnancies to prevent adverse outcomes. We aimed to comprehensively review the association between different risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies, including data on chorionicity, and to compare these to singletons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review examines the risks associated with chorionicity, AMA, body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities, maternal smoking, use of ART, maternal perception of fetal movement, and maternal comorbidities, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Adverse outcomes reported were preterm birth, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), stillbirth and neonatal mortality. As such, fetal mortality and morbidity will be under-represented, as pregnancy loss before 22-24 weeks is omitted.

RESULTS

Monochorionicity increases the risk of stillbirth, NICU admission, and preterm delivery in twin pregnancy. AMA predisposes twin pregnancies to higher risks of mortality, admission to the NICU, and preterm birth than singleton pregnancies do. Conversely, the impact of BMI, socioeconomic inequalities, smoking, ART, and HDP on adverse outcomes appears to be lower in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. This attenuation might be explained by the higher baseline risk of adverse outcomes such as preterm birth in twin pregnancies. Some exposures, such as ART use and GDM, appear to be "protective" against perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies, despite being established risk factors for adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies, potentially related to access to specialist care. There is a paucity of evidence available to counsel mothers of twin pregnancies regarding reduced fetal movement.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes differ between twin and singleton pregnancies. This highlights the need for further studies to examine the association between risk factors and adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies. The resulting data would facilitate tailored guidance for twin pregnancies, contribute to improved antenatal care, and inform wider public health strategies.

The adverse effect of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on maternal-perinatal outcomes among singleton and twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study (2011-2019)

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the predominant pregnancy complications among singleton and twin pregnancies worldwide. Our primary objective was to explore the adverse effect of GDM and HDP on maternal-perinatal outcomes compared with non-GDM and non-HDP in singleton and twin pregnancies. The secondary objective was to find the risk of adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP in Hubei, China.

Methods

A tertiary hospital-based retrospective study was conducted at Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Hubei Province, China, from 2011 to 2019. A chi-square test was used to determine the difference in adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes between singleton and twin pregnancies. A multiple binary logistic regression model and a joinpoint regression model were used to determine the association of GDM and HDP with adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes and GDM and HDP temporal trend among singleton and twin pregnancies.

Results

The trend of HDP [average annual percentage change (AAPC) 15.1% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 5.3, 25.7)] among singleton pregnancies and GDM [AAPC 50.4% (95%CI: 19.9, 88.7)] among twin pregnancies significantly increased from 2011 to 2019. After adjusting for confounding factors, GDM is associated with an increased risk of C-section (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.5; 95%CI: 1.3, 1.6) and macrosomia (aOR, 1.3; 95%CI: 1.1, 1.6) in singleton and preterm birth (PTB) (aOR, 2.1; 95%CI: 1.2, 3.3) in twin pregnancies compared with non-GDM. HDP was associated with a higher risk of C-section, PTB, perinatal mortality, and low birth weight (LBW) in both singleton and twin pregnancies compared with the non-HDP. Compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP, twin pregnancies showed higher odds of C-section [(aOR, 1.7; 95%CI: 1.1, 2.7), (aOR, 4.6; 95%CI: 2.5, 8.7), respectively], PTB [(aOR, 22.9; 95%CI: 14.1, 37.3), (aOR, 8.1; 95%CI: 5.3, 12.3), respectively], LBW [(aOR, 12.1; 95%CI: 8.2, 18.1), (aOR, 5.1; 95%CI: 3.6, 7.4), respectively], and low Apgar score [(aOR, 8.2; 95%CI: 4.4, 15.1), (aOR, 3.8; 95%CI: 2.4, 5.8), respectively] complicated with GDM and HDP.

Conclusion

In conclusion, GDM showed an increased risk of a few adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes and HDP is associated with a higher risk of several adverse maternal-perinatal outcomes in singleton and twin pregnancies compared to non-GDM and non-HDP. Moreover, twin pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP showed higher odds of adverse maternal-neonatal outcomes compared with singleton pregnancies complicated with GDM and HDP.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Association with Maternal and Neonatal Complications

Background and objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known to be associated with pregnancy complications but there is limited evidence about the strength of these associations in recent clinical practice, especially after the introduction of strict guidelines for the management of pregnancies with GDM in a multidisciplinary team setting. The objectives of our study were to first compare the rates of complications in pregnancies with GDM with those that had pre-existing diabetes mellitus and those without diabetes; and second, to derive measures of effect size expressed as odds ratios after adjustment for confounding factors to assess the independent association of GDM in prediction of these pregnancy complications. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study undertaken at a large maternity unit in the United Kingdom between January 2010 and June 2022. We included singleton pregnancies that were booked at our unit at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Multivariate regression analysis was carried out to determine the risks of complications in pregnancies with GDM after adjusting for pregnancy characteristics. Risks were expressed as odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence intervals [CI]) and expressed graphically in forest plots. Results: The study population included 53,649 singleton pregnancies including 509 (1%) with pre-existing DM, 2089 (4%) with GDM and 49,122 (95%) pregnancies without diabetes. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that there was a significant independent contribution from GDM in the prediction of adverse outcomes, including maternal complications such as preterm delivery, polyhydramnios, preeclampsia and delivery of large for gestational age neonates and elective caesarean section (CS); and neonatal complications including admission to neonatal intensive care unit, hypoglycaemia, jaundice and respiratory distress syndrome. Conclusions: GDM is associated with an increased rate of pregnancy complications compared to those without diabetes, even after adjustment for maternal and pregnancy characteristics. GDM does not increase the risk of stillbirth, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy or neonatal death.

Long-term outcomes of offspring from multiple gestations: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study on multi-system diseases using UK Biobank and FinnGen databases

BACKGROUND

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have increased the incidence of multiple births, which can have a negative impact on maternal and offspring health. The study aimed to investigate the association between genetically predicted multiple birth and the risk of 42 common diseases of the nervous, psychiatric, cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, and endocrine systems.

METHODS

The study utilized two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the potential causal relationship between genetically predicted multiple birth and the genetically predicted risk of diseases. The study used the FinnGen and UK Biobank datasets for analysis.

RESULTS

The study found no significant causal relationship between multiple birth and psychiatric disorders. However, the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals for bipolar affective disorder and anxiety disorders were not robust, indicating a need for further investigation. The study found that multiple birth may be a strong risk factor for infantile cerebral palsy, and caution is necessary in both natural and ART multiple births. The study revealed a potential causal relationship between multiple birth and coronary heart disease, ischemic heart disease, and deep vein thrombosis, which may be related to abnormal intrauterine environments in multiple pregnancies. Surprisingly, multiple birth appears to have a protective effect against some respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the need for caution regarding the risk of infantile cerebral palsy, cardiovascular diseases, and psychiatric disorders in multiple birth. Our study can lead to the development of preventive strategies and improved clinical management for affected infants.

Characteristics of the oral glucose tolerance test in women with different pre-pregnancy body mass index and the effect of gestational diabetes mellitus on twin pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the mid-pregnancy blood glucose levels of women with singleton or twin pregnancies.

METHOD

The relationship between blood glucose levels and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) was studied in women with different pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI), and the effect of GDM on twin pregnancy outcomes was analyzed. Women with twin (n = 1,985) and singleton (n = 1,985) pregnancies were categorized into underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2, n = 597), normal weight (BMI: 18.5-23.9 kg/m2, n = 2,575), and overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m2, n = 798) groups.

RESULTS

The incidence of GDM was 21.01% in women with twin pregnancies. Among the women with GDM in twin pregnancies, 38.37% had at least two abnormal blood glucose levels. The incidence of these parameters increased with preconception BMI, and the incidence of twin pregnancies was higher than that of singleton pregnancies (p < 0.001). In the normal weight and overweight/obese group, the oral glucose tolerance test glucose level and incidence of GDM were higher in women with twin than singleton pregnancies (p < 0.05). For twin pregnancies, the prevalence of selective fetal growth restriction was higher and anemia was lower in the GDM group than in the non-GDM group (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Therefore, a greater emphasis should be placed on BMI before conception, and well-controlled GDM does not increase adverse pregnancy outcomes for twin pregnancies.

Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes

BACKGROUND

Antenatal detection of accelerated fetal growth and macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus is important for patient counseling and management. Sonographic fetal weight estimation is the most commonly used tool to predict birthweight and macrosomia. However, the predictive accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation for these outcomes is limited. In addition, an up-to-date sonographic fetal weight estimation is often unavailable before birth. This may result in a failure to identify macrosomia, especially in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus where care providers might underestimate fetal growth rate. Therefore, there is a need for better tools to detect and alert care providers to the potential risk of accelerated fetal growth and macrosomia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models for birthweight and macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a completed retrospective cohort study of all patients with a singleton live birth at ≥36 weeks of gestation complicated by preexisting or gestational diabetes mellitus observed at a single tertiary center between January 2011 and May 2022. Candidate predictors included maternal age, parity, type of diabetes mellitus, information from the most recent sonographic fetal weight estimation (including estimated fetal weight, abdominal circumference z score, head circumference-to-abdomen circumference z score ratio, and amniotic fluid), fetal sex, and the interval between ultrasound examination and birth. The study outcomes were macrosomia (defined as birthweights >4000 and >4500 g), large for gestational age (defined as a birthweight >90th percentile for gestational age), and birthweight (in grams). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the probability of dichotomous outcomes, and multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate birthweight. Model discrimination and predictive accuracy were calculated. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap resampling technique.

RESULTS

A total of 2465 patients met the study criteria. Most patients had gestational diabetes mellitus (90%), 6% of patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 4% of patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus. The overall proportions of infants with birthweights >4000 g, >4500 g, and >90th percentile for gestational age were 8%, 1%, and 12%, respectively. The most contributory predictor variables were estimated fetal weight, abdominal circumference z score, ultrasound examination to birth interval, and type of diabetes mellitus. The models for the 3 dichotomous outcomes had high discriminative accuracy (area under the curve receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.929-0.979), which was higher than that achieved with estimated fetal weight alone (area under the curve receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.880-0.931). The predictive accuracy of the models had high sensitivity (87%-100%), specificity (84%-92%), and negative predictive values (84%-92%). The predictive accuracy of the model for birthweight had low systematic and random errors (0.6% and 7.5%, respectively), which were considerably smaller than the corresponding errors achieved with estimated fetal weight alone (-5.9% and 10.8%, respectively). The proportions of estimates within 5%, 10%, and 15% of the actual birthweight were high (52.3%, 82.9%, and 94.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The prediction models developed in the current study were associated with greater predictive accuracy for macrosomia, large for gestational age, and birthweight than the current standard of care that includes estimated fetal weight alone. These models may assist care providers in counseling patients regarding the optimal timing and mode of delivery.

Association between One Abnormal Value on 3-Hour Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Twin Gestation

AIM

To investigate whether women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the diagnostic 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are at an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study of women with twin gestation, comparing four groups: (1) normal 50-g screening, (2) normal 100-g 3-hour OGTT, (3) one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT, and (4) GDM. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for maternal age, gravidity, parity, previous CDs, fertility treatments, smoking, obesity and chorionicity were used.

RESULTS

The study included 2,597 women with twin gestations, of which 79.7% had a normal screen, and 6.2% had one abnormal value on the OGTT. In adjusted analyses, women with one abnormal value were found to have higher rates of preterm delivery <32 weeks, large for gestational age neonates, and composite neonatal morbidity of at least one fetus, however, similar maternal outcomes as those with a normal screen.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT are at an increased risk of unfavorable neonatal outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariable logistic regressions. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions such as nutritional counseling, blood glucose monitoring, and treatment with diet and medication would improve perinatal outcomes in this population.

Association between serum lipid profile during the first and second trimester of pregnancy as well as their dynamic changes and gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Abnormal lipid metabolism is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in singleton pregnancies. Data were lacking on twin pregnancies with GDM. We explored the association between serum lipid profiles in the first and second trimesters as well as their dynamic changes and GDM in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 2739 twin pregnancies that underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and were selected from the Beijing Birth Cohort Study from June 2013 to May 2021. Cholesterol (CHO), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were measured at mean 9 and 25 weeks of gestation. We described maternal lipid levels in different tertiles that were associated with the risk of GDM stratified for age, pre-BMI, and fertilization type. GDM patients were divided into two groups according to OGTT: elevated fasting plasma glucose only (FPG group) and the rest of the GDM (non-FPG group). We estimated the relative risk of GDM with multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that 599 (21.9%, 599/2739) twin pregnancies developed GDM. They had increased CHO, TG, LDL, and LDL/HDL, decreased HDL levels in the first trimester, and increased TG as well as decreased HDL in the second trimester in univariate analyses, each P < 0.05. In multivariate analysis, when TG > 1.67 mmol/l (upper tertile) in elderly individuals, nonoverweight and ART groups increased the risk of GDM by 2.7-fold, 2.3-fold and 2.2-fold, respectively, compared with TG < 0.96 mmol/l (lower tertile). This effect remained in the abovementioned groups in the second trimester. Moreover, high TGs increased the risk of GDM in the FPG group (OR = 2.076, 95% CI 1.130-3.815) and non-FPG group (OR = 2.526, 95% CI 1.739-3.67) in the first trimester when TG > 1.67 mmol/l, and the rising risk in the non-FPG group as the TG tertile increased remained in the second trimester. HDL predominantly showed a negative association with elevated FPG in the second trimester (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Twin pregnancies with GDM have higher lipid levels. Increased TGs in the first and second trimesters are strongly associated with GDM, especially in elderly individuals, nonoverweight and ART groups. Lipid profiles varied among different GDM subtypes.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Worsen Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy

The specific effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on twin pregnancy outcomes, which are at high risk per se, are unclear. The present study analyzes outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by GDM (n = 227) by comparing them with GDM singleton pregnancies (n = 1060) and with twin pregnancies without GDM (n = 1008), all followed up at Sant'Anna Hospital, Turin (Italy), between January 2010 and March 2020. The prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies (n = 1235) was 18.4%. Compared to GDM singletons, GDM twins had higher rates of preeclampsia (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.8), cesarean section (aOR 7.5; 95% CI 5.2-10.8), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.3). They had a higher incidence of abnormal 2 h OGTT values (aOR 7.1; 95% CI: 3.2-15.7) and were less likely to require insulin therapy (aOR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7). In comparison with twin pregnancies without GDM, women with GDM twins were significantly older (35.0 vs. 33.0 years; p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (23.0 versus 22.0 kg/m²; p < 0.001); they had a higher incidence of LGA newborns (aOR 5.3; 95% CI 1.7-14.8), and lower incidence of low APGAR scores (0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Overall, GDM does not worsen outcomes of twin pregnancy, which is per se at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Twins versus singletons-Long-term health outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Multiple gestations are a risk factor for most pregnancy complications. The current study aimed to study whether offspring born after twin pregnancies are at increased risk for long-term health complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a large medical center, including all offspring born between the years 1991-2021, which were followed-up until 18 years of age. Hospital-based diagnoses of the offspring were categorized into main groups of morbidities: cardiac, respiratory, infectious, neurological, malignancy, and metabolic. Incidence of hospitalization with diagnoses from each main group was compared between twins and singletons, as well as time to first hospitalization. Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the association between twins versus singletons and hospitalizations by grouped morbidities, while adjusting for maternal age, ethnicity and gender, besides maternal recurrence in the cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 369 478 offspring were included in the analysis; of these 11 986 (3.2%) were twins and 357 492 (96.8%) were singletons. Twins were more likely to be delivered preterm (odds ratio = 17.65, 95% CI: 16.74-18.60), by cesarean delivery and following infertility treatments. Incidence of hospitalizations with all morbidity groups was slightly, some significantly, higher among twins, including cardiac: 1.9% versus 1.5%, respiratory; 8.4% versus 7.1%, neurological: 7.7% versus 7.4%, infectious: 26.0% versus 24.1%, and malignancies: 0.7% versus 0.4%. The risk remained higher in the multivariable analyses (adjusted hazard ratios ranging between 1.09-1.75). When stratifying by gestational age at delivery, the risk for most morbidities was lower among twins versus singletons born in similar gestational ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Twins as compared to singletons are at increased risk for most morbidities due to their risk of being born earlier.

Impact of Gestational Diabetes and Hypertension Disorders of Pregnancy on Neonatal Outcomes in Twin Pregnancies Based on Chorionicity

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the co-existence of gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertension disorders of pregnancy (HDP) on neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies based on chorionicity.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1398 women with twin pregnancies was performed between January 2016 and December 2021. The effects of GDM and HDP on neonatal outcomes were assessed by logistic regression models. An additional stratified analysis was conducted to estimate the effects based on chorionicity (monochorionic (MC) and dichorionic (DC)).

RESULTS

The incidence of the co-existence of GDM and HDP was 3.8%. The presence of GDM increased the likelihood of HDP only in women with MC twin pregnancies (OR, 2.13; 95% CI 1.08-4.19). After adjustments, co-existence of GDM and HDP was positively associated with gestational age (β, 1.06; 95% CI 0.43-1.69) and birthweight (β, 174.90; 95% CI 8.91-340.89) in MC twin pregnancies, while no associations were found between co-existence of GDM and HDP and neonatal outcomes in DC twin pregnancies. However, HDP was negatively associated with birthweight (β, -156.97; 95% CI (-257.92, -56.02)) and positively associated with small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (OR, 2.03; 95% CI 1.02-4.03) and discordant twins (OR, 2.83; 95% CI 1.78-4.48) in DC twin pregnant women without GDM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that GDM leads to an increased risk of HDP only in MC twin pregnancies, but GDM seemed to attenuate the adverse effects of HDP on perinatal outcomes in both MC and DC twin pregnancies. Further investigation is needed to explain these intriguing findings.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of singleton versus twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence exploring the maternal and neonatal complications of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) following singleton or twin pregnancies. Further, there have been no reviews completed examining the possible risk factors associated with GDM in singleton compared to twin pregnancies. This study assesses the impact of GDM in singleton and twin pregnancies on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

METHODS

From 1954 to December 2021, a thorough literature search was conducted in the EMBASE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases and search engines. The risk of bias was calculated using the Newcastle Ottawa (NO) scale. A random-effects model was applied and interpreted as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, with the quality of most studies being good to satisfactory. The risk of caesarean section (pooled OR = 0.32; 95%CI: 0.22 to 0.46), small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates (pooled OR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.19 to 0.84), preterm delivery (pooled OR = 0.07; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.09), respiratory morbidity (pooled OR = 0.26; 95%CI: 0.19 to 0.37), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (pooled OR = 0.19; 95%CI: 0.10 to 0.40), and NICU admission (pooled OR = 0.18; 95%CI: 0.14 to 0.25) was significantly lower in singleton pregnancies with GDM than in twin pregnancies with GDM.

CONCLUSION

Maternal outcomes like caesarean section and neonatal outcomes like SGA neonates, preterm delivery, respiratory morbidity, hyperbilirubinemia, and NICU admission were significantly greater in twin pregnancies with GDM. It is important for clinicians and policymakers to focus intervention strategies on twin pregnancies with GDM.

Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse obstetric outcomes among women with advanced maternal age: A retrospective cohort study

To explore the association of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes among women with advanced maternal age. This retrospective cohort study included 1551,140 eligible pregnant women from the National Vital Statistics System database in 2017 to 2019, and all participants were divided into two groups: GDM group (n = 154,646) and non-GDM group (n = 1396,494). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association of GDM and maternal and neonatal outcomes; additionally, we also adopted subgroup analysis to analyze the association in detail based on gestational weight gain (GWG) levels. The risk of each adverse outcome was presented by using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). After adjusted some covariables, GDM increased the risk of neonatal assisted ventilation (OR = 1.380, 95% CI: 1.345-1.417), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU, OR = 1.436, 95% CI: 1.410-1.463) admission, neonatal low Apgar score at the fifth minutes (OR = 1.034, 95% CI: 1.018-1.051), neonatal high birth weight (OR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.111-1.153), neonatal premature birth (OR = 1.244, 95% CI: 1.223-1.266), mothers entered intensive care unit (ICU, OR = 1.247, 95% CI: 1.107-1.406), and mothers took cesarean section (OR = 1.193, 95% CI: 1.180-1.207) among women with advanced maternal age. The study findings indicated that GDM was the risk factor for obstetric outcomes among women with advanced maternal age, which will have important implications for the management of GDM in women with advanced maternal age.

The effect of maternal gestational diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetes and twin pregnancies are known risk factors for poor perinatal and neonatal outcomes. However, the effects of these two entities occurring together are still unclear. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases were searched in a systematic manner to identify observational studies among twin pregnancies, which documented the association of gestational diabetes with maternal and neonatal outcomes. All the analysis was done using STATA software. The meta-analysis included 21 studies, of which majority were retrospective data based. Mothers with gestational diabetes had higher risks of hypertensive disorder in pregnancy, caesarean section, large for gestational age baby, NICU admission and neonatal hypoglycaemia compared to mothers without gestational diabetes. Diabetic mothers were at reduced risk of small for gestational age baby and low APGAR score. No statistically significant differences in the risk of low birth weight, mean birth weight, prematurity and neonatal death were noted. This meta-analysis observed increased risks of detrimental maternal, neonatal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes, underscoring the need for the early detection and management of gestational diabetes.

Screening Accuracy of the 50 g-Glucose Challenge Test in Twin Compared With Singleton Pregnancies

CONTEXT

The optimal 50 g-glucose challenge test (GCT) cutoff for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to explore the screening accuracy of the 50 g-GCT and its correlation with the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn in twin compared to singleton pregnancies. A population-based retrospective cohort study (2007-2017) was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Participants included patients with a singleton (n = 546 892 [98.4%]) or twin (n = 8832 [1.6%]) birth who underwent screening for GDM using the 50 g-GCT.

METHODS

We compared the screening accuracy, risk of GDM, and risk of LGA between twin and singleton pregnancies using various 50 g-GCT cutoffs.

RESULTS

For any given 50 g-GCT result, the probability of GDM was higher (P = .0.007), whereas the probability of LGA was considerably lower in the twin compared with the singleton group, even when a twin-specific growth chart was used to diagnose LGA in the twin group (P < .001). The estimated false-positive rate (FPR) for GDM was higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies irrespective of the 50 g-GCT cutoff used. The cutoff of 8.2 mmol/L (148 mg/dL) in twin pregnancies was associated with an estimated FPR (10.7%-11.1%) that was similar to the FPR associated with the cutoff of 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) in singleton pregnancies (10.8%).

CONCLUSION

The screening performance of the 50 g-GCT for GDM and its correlation with LGA differ between twin and singleton pregnancies.

Relationship between age of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar score

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) refers to abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy, and it is often accompanied by obvious changes in glucose and lipid metabolism, and associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The incidence of fetal distress, polyhydramnios, puerperal infection, premature delivery, and macrosomia in pregnant women with GDM are higher than in those without GDM.

AIM

To analyze the relationship between age of pregnant women with GDM and mode of delivery and neonatal Apgar score.

METHODS

A total of 583 pregnant women with GDM who delivered in the Department of Obstetrics at our hospital between March 2019 and March 2022 were selected. Among them, 377 aged < 35 years were selected as the right age group and 206 aged > 35 years were selected as the older group. The clinical data of the two groups were collected, and the relationship between age of the pregnant women with GDM and mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and neonatal Apgar score were compared. In the older group, 159 women were classed as the adverse outcome group and 47 as the good outcome group according to whether they had adverse maternal and infant outcomes. The related factors of adverse maternal and infant outcomes were analyzed through logistic regression.

RESULTS

The number of women with assisted pregnancy, ≤ 37 wk gestation, ≥ 2 pregnancies, one or more deliveries, and no pre-pregnancy blood glucose screening in the older group were all higher than those in the right age group (P < 0.05). The natural delivery rate in the right age group was 40.85%, which was higher than 22.33% in the older group (P < 0.05). The cesarean section rate in the older group was 77.67%, which was higher than 59.15% in the right age group (P < 0.05). The older group had a higher incidence of polyhydramnios and postpartum hemorrhage, and lower incidence of fetal distress than the right age group had (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in neonatal weight between the two groups (P > 0.05). The right age group had higher Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min than the older group had (P < 0.05). Significant differences existed between the poor and good outcome groups in age, education level, pregnancy mode, ≤ 37 wk gestation, number of pregnancies, and premature rupture of membranes (P < 0.05). Logistic regression showed that age, education level and premature rupture of membranes were all risk factors affecting the adverse outcomes of mothers and infants (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Delivery mode and Apgar score of pregnant women with GDM are related to age. Older age increases the adverse outcome of mothers and infants.

Perinatal outcomes among twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus: A nine-year retrospective cohort study

Objective

To compare the outcomes between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) vs. non-GDM twin gestations.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 2,151 twin pregnancies was performed in a tertiary hospital in Foshan, China, 2012–2020. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with vs. without GDM using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic models. For neonatal outcomes, generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach was used to address the intertwin correlation.

Results

Of the 2,151 participants, 472 women (21.9%) were diagnosed with GDM. Women with GDM were older and more likely to be overweight or obese, and more likely have chronic hypertension, assisted pregnancies and dichorionic twins. In the PSM cohort of 942 pregnancies, there was no statistical difference when comparing GDM twin pregnancies and non-GDM in any of the perinatal outcomes, especially in terms of preterm birth (PTB) <37 weeks (P = 0.715), large for gestational age (LGA) (P = 0.521) and neonatal respiratory distress (NRDS) (P = 0.206). In the entire cohort, no significant adjusted ORs for these outcomes were obtained from logistic regression models adjusted for confounders (aOR for PTB < 37 weeks: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.98–1.58; aOR for LGA: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.88–1.82; and aOR for NRDS, 1.05, 95% CI: 0.68–1.64).

Conclusion

Twin pregnancies with GDM and adequate prenatal care have comparable perinatal outcomes to those without.

Perinatal Outcomes and Related Risk Factors of Single vs Twin Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-Analysis

Objective

Perinatal outcomes and related risk factors of single vs twin pregnancy complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were clarified, providing evidence for developing preventive measures.

Methods

The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM), CQVIP, Wanfang, and PubMed databases were searched for published research on the perinatal outcomes and risk factors of single and twin pregnancy complicated by GDM from 2000 to 2021. The quality of the included literature was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of the included literature was conducted using RevMan5.3 software.

Results

Relative to a single pregnancy group, infertility, gestational weight gain, and family history of diabetes presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05); gestational age at delivery, cesarean section, preterm birth < 37 weeks, and preeclampsia presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05); and neonatal birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal death presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Infertility, prenatal weight gain, and diabetes in the family are all risk factors for postpartum impaired glucose metabolism in pregnant women with GDM who are carrying twins. The gestational age at delivery, cesarean section, preterm birth < 37 weeks, and preeclampsia of twin pregnant women with diabetes will affect the perinatal status of twin pregnant women. Neonatal birth weight, SGA, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, NRDS, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal death, etc. should be paid special attention in the perinatal process.

Glycemic profile assessment during betamethasone administration in women with twin pregnancies after IVF with or without gestational diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Betamethasone's effect on glycemia in twin pregnancies, with or without gestational diabetes mellitus, has not been adequately investigated.

METHODS

We assessed the glycemic profile of 30 women with twin pregnancies after in-vitro-fertilization who were given betamethasone.

RESULTS

The majority of women were treated eventually with insulin to maintain glycemia. In insulin-treated women the increase in insulin dosage was of 61.1%. Insulin use/dosage was not associated with betamethasone dose, age, gestational age, weight gain in pregnancy, or duration of hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Post-betamethasone, twin pregnancies seem to follow the same glycemia pattern as singleton pregnancies.

Novel Biomolecules in the Pathogenesis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus 2.0

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has become a major public health problem and one of the most discussed issues in modern obstetrics. GDM is associated with serious adverse perinatal outcomes and long-term health consequences for both the mother and child. Currently, the importance and purposefulness of finding a biopredictor that will enable the identification of women with an increased risk of developing GDM as early as the beginning of pregnancy are highly emphasized. Both “older” molecules, such as adiponectin and leptin, and “newer” adipokines, including fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4), have proven to be of pathophysiological importance in GDM. Therefore, in our previous review, we presented 13 novel biomolecules, i.e., galectins, growth differentiation factor-15, chemerin, omentin-1, osteocalcin, resistin, visfatin, vaspin, irisin, apelin, FABP4, fibroblast growth factor 21, and lipocalin-2. The purpose of this review is to present the potential and importance of another nine lesser known molecules in the pathogenesis of GDM, i.e., 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF), angiopoietin-like protein-8 (ANGPTL-8), nesfatin-1, afamin, adropin, fetuin-A, zonulin, secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs), and amylin. It seems that two of them, fetuin-A and zonulin in high serum levels, may be applied as biopredictors of GDM.

Gestational Diabetes in Twin Versus Singleton Pregnancies With Normal Weight or Overweight Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index: The Mediating Role of Mid-Pregnancy Weight Gain

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes might be more common in twin versus singleton pregnancies, yet the reasons for this are unclear. We evaluated the extent to which this relationship is explained by higher mid-pregnancy weight gain within normal weight and overweight pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) strata.

METHODS

We analyzed serial weights and glucose screening and diagnostic data abstracted from medical charts for twin (n = 1397) and singleton (n = 3117) pregnancies with normal or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI delivered from 1998 to 2013 at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pennsylvania. We used causal mediation analyses to estimate the total effect of twin versus singleton pregnancy on gestational diabetes, as well as those mediated (natural indirect effect) and not mediated (natural and controlled direct effects) by pathways involving mid-pregnancy weight gain.

RESULTS

Odds of gestational diabetes were higher among twin pregnancies [odds ratios (ORs) for total effect = 2.83 (95% CI = 1.54, 5.19) for normal weight and 2.09 (95% CI = 1.16, 3.75) for overweight pre pregnancy BMI], yet there was limited evidence that this relationship was mediated by mid-pregnancy weight gain [ORs for natural indirect effect = 1.21 (95% CI = 0.90, 1.24) for normal weight and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.92, 1.21) for overweight pre-pregnancy BMI] and more evidence of mediation via other pathways [ORs for natural direct effect = 2.34 (95% CI = 1.24, 4.40) for normal weight and 1.97 (95% CI = 1.08, 3.60) for overweight pre-pregnancy BMI].

CONCLUSIONS

While twin pregnancies with normal weight or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI experienced higher odds of gestational diabetes versus singletons, most of this effect was explained by pathways not involving mid-pregnancy weight gain.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia: Correlation and Influencing Factors

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE) are common pregnancy complications with similar risk factors and pathophysiological changes. Evidence from previous studies suggests that the incidence of PE is significantly increased in women with GDM, but whether GDM is independently related to the occurrence of PE has remained controversial. GDM complicated by PE further increases perinatal adverse events with greater impact on the future maternal and offspring health. Identify factors associated with PE in women with GDM women, specifically those that are controllable, is important for improving pregnancy outcomes. This paper provides the findings of a review on the correlation between GDM and PE, factors associated with PE in women with GDM, possible mechanisms, and predictive markers. Most studies concluded that GDM is independently associated with PE in singleton pregnancy, and optimizing the treatment and management of GDM can reduce the incidence of PE, which is very helpful to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Time Interval From Early-Term Antenatal Corticosteroids Administration to Delivery and the Impact on Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between the time interval from antenatal corticosteroids administration to delivery and neonatal complications in diabetic mothers undergoing early term (37+0 to 38+6 weeks) scheduled cesarean section (ETSCS).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of women with any form of diabetes in pregnancy undergoing ETSCS was included. Cases were stratified into the following groups based on the time interval from the first dose of corticosteroids administration to delivery: <2, 2-7, and >7 days. Women undergoing ETSCS, who did not receive corticosteroids were included as controls. We assessed the association between the time interval and neonatal outcomes in a multivariate regression model that controlled for potential confounders. Primary outcomes were the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)/transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN) and neonatal hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 1,165 neonates. Of those, 159 (13.6%) were delivered within 2 days of maternal corticosteroids administration, 131 (11.2%) were delivered within 2-7 days after maternal corticosteroids administration, and 137 (11.8%) delivered more than 7 days after maternal corticosteroids administration. The remaining 738 (63.3%) were not exposed to corticosteroids. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that delivery within any time of antenatal corticosteroids administration was not associated with decreased risks of RDS/TTN. The risk of neonatal hypoglycemia was highest in the delivery of <2 days group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.684, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.647-4.374 for control group; aOR: 2.827, 95% CI: 1.250-6.392 for delivery 2-7 days group; aOR:2.975, 95% CI: 1.265-6.996 for delivery >7 days group).

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids treatment for diabetic mothers undergoing ETSCS was not associated with beneficial neonatal respiratory outcomes. In addition, delivery, <2 days after antenatal corticosteroids administration was associated with an increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.

Analysis of Maternal and Neonatal Complications in a Group of Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Background and Objectives: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents one of the most common complications during pregnancy, being associated with numerous maternal and neonatal complications. The study aimed to analyze maternal and neonatal complications associated with GDM. The risk factors of GDM and of the maternal and neonatal complications were studied in order to prevent their occurrence. Materials and Methods: The study included 97 women in the study, who underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between weeks 24–28 of pregnancy, consequently being divided into two groups: pregnant women with and without GDM. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 26.0 software and MATLAB fitglm, the results being considered statistically significant if p < 0.05. Results: We observed statistically significant differences between the group of women with and without GDM, regarding gestational hypertension (17.6% vs. 0%), preeclampsia (13.72% vs. 0%), and cesarean delivery (96.1% vs. 78,3%). Data on the newborn and neonatal complications: statistically significant differences were recorded between the two groups (GDM vs. no GDM) regarding the average weight at birth (3339.41 ± 658.12 g vs. 3122.83 ± 173.67 g), presence of large for gestational age (21.6% vs. 0%), macrosomia (13.7% vs. 0%), excessive fetal growth (35.3% vs. 0%), respiratory distress (31.4% vs. 0%), hospitalization for at least 24 h in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (9.80% vs. 0%), and APGAR score <7 both 1 and 5 min following birth (7.8% vs. 0%). Additionally, the frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia was higher among newborns from mothers with GDM. Conclusions: The screening and diagnosis of GDM is vital, and appropriate management is required for the prevention of maternal and neonatal complications associated with GDM. It is also important to know the risk factors for GDM and attempt to prevent their appearance.

Special Considerations Regarding Antenatal Care and Pregnancy Complications in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies

Twin pregnancies account for about 3.3% of all deliveries in the United States with the majority of them being dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA). Maternal physiological adaption in twin pregnancies is exaggerated and the rate of almost every maternal and fetal complication is higher when compared to singleton pregnancies. Therefore, twin pregnancies necessitate closer antenatal surveillance by care providers who are familiar with the specific challenges unique to these pregnancies, and there is evidence that following women with twins in a specialized twin clinic can result in improved obstetrical outcomes. The importance of the first antenatal visit in twin pregnancies cannot be over emphasized and should preferably take place early in gestation as it is the optimal period to correctly identify the number of fetuses and the type of placentation (chorionicity and amnionicity). This will allow the patients, families, and caregivers to make the appropriate modifications and to tailor an optimal antenatal follow-up plan. This plan should focus on general recommendations such as weight gain and level of activity, education regarding complications specific to twin pregnancies along with the relevant symptoms and indications to seek care, as well as on close maternal and fetal monitoring. In this review, we summarize available evidence and current guidelines regarding antenatal care in DCDA twin pregnancies.

Gestational diabetes and fetal growth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with accelerated fetal growth in singleton pregnancies but may affect twin pregnancies differently because of the slower growth of twin fetuses during the third trimester of pregnancy and their greater predisposition to fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with longitudinal fetal growth in twin pregnancies and to compare this association with that observed in singleton pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton or twin pregnancy who were followed up at a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and April 2020. Data on estimated fetal weight and individual fetal biometric indices were extracted from ultrasound examinations of eligible women. Generalized linear models were used to model and compare the change in fetal weight and individual biometric indices as a function of gestational age between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies and between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies. The primary outcome was estimated fetal weight as a function of gestational age. The secondary outcomes were longitudinal growth of individual fetal biometric indices and the rate of small for gestational age and large for gestational age at birth.

RESULTS

A total of 26,651 women (94,437 ultrasound examinations) were included in the analysis: 1881 with a twin pregnancy and 24,770 with a singleton pregnancy. The rate of gestational diabetes mellitus in the twin and singleton groups was 9.6% (n=180) and 7.6% (n=1893), respectively. The estimated fetal weight in singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly higher than that in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001) starting at approximately 30 weeks of gestation. The differences remained similar after adjusting for maternal age, chronic hypertension, nulliparity, and neonatal sex (P<.001). In twin pregnancies, fetal growth was similar between pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (P=.105 and P=.483 for unadjusted and adjusted models, respectively). The findings were similar to the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with the risk of large for gestational fetuses and the growth of each biometric index. When stratified by type of gestational diabetes mellitus treatment, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with accelerated fetal growth only in the subgroup of women with medically treated gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001), which represented 12% (n=21) of the twin pregnancy group with gestational diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to singleton pregnancies, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus is less likely to be associated with accelerated fetal growth. This finding has raised the question of whether the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus and the blood glucose targets in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus should be individualized for twin pregnancies.

Association between pregravid liver enzyme levels and gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis of national cohort study

Multiple pregnancies are prone to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study investigated the association between pregravid liver enzyme levels and the development of GDM in a twin pregnancy. Women who had the National Health Screening Examination and delivered their twin babies within one year were enrolled. Pregravid liver enzyme levels were divided into high and low level. Risks for developing GDM by high levels of liver enzymes were analyzed, in subgroups by pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Among the 4348 twin pregnancies, 369 women (8.5%) developed GDM not requiring insulin treatment (GDM - IT), and 119 women (2.7%) developed GDM requiring insulin treatment(GDM + IT). High levels of pregravid GGT and ALT were related to risks of GDM + IT not only in women with obesity or metabolic syndrome (odds ratio[OR] 6.348, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.579-15.624 and OR 6.879, 95% CI 2.232-21.204, respectively), but also in women without obesity (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.565-5.946) or without metabolic syndrome (OR 3.338, 95% CI 1.86-5.992), compared to in women with low levels of those. However, there were no significant associations in the pregravid ALT and GGT levels and risks for development of GDM - IT, unrelated to pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Therefore, this study suggests that women with high levels of pregravid GGT and ALT need to recognize their increased risk of GDM + IT, regardless of pregravid obesity or MetS, when they get pregnant twin.

Outcomes Associated With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in Twin Compared With Singleton Gestations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether pregnancy outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin pregnancies differ relatively from those in singleton pregnancy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of all women with a liveborn singleton or twin hospital birth in Ontario, Canada, between 2012 and 2019. Data were obtained from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between women with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in twin gestations, and separately in singleton gestations. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% CIs were generated using modified Poisson regression and were compared between twins and singletons using relative risk ratios.

RESULTS

Overall, 932,218 women met the study criteria, of whom 917,542 (98.4%) and 14,676 (1.6%) had singleton and twin gestations, respectively. The incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was higher in women with twin compared with singleton gestations (14.4% vs 6.4%, aRR 1.85 [1.76-1.94]). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with certain adverse outcomes in singleton gestations only and with other adverse outcomes in both the singleton and twin gestations, but the aRR was lower in twins. For example, preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (singletons: 15.2% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 5.4% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 2.42; twins: 67.5% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 50.4% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.30) and neonatal respiratory morbidity (singletons: 16.3% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 8.7% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.50; twins: 39.8% [hypertensive disorders of pregnancy] vs 32.7% [no hypertensive disorders of pregnancy], aRR 1.13). These findings persisted in the subgroups of women with preeclampsia and early-onset preeclampsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the absolute risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes is higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies, the incremental risk of adverse outcomes associated with hypertensive disorders in twin pregnancies is lower than the incremental risk in singleton pregnancies. These findings may be attributed in part to the higher baseline risk of preterm birth and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin compared with singleton pregnancies.

Whey protein preloading can alleviate stress adaptation disorder and improve hyperglycemia in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To investigate the change of stress hormones, oxidative stress and insulin resistance (IR) in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) after supplement whey protein, in an attempt to gain insights into the prevention and treatment of GDM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

60 GDM women were recruited in this study, and 30 women received a preload drink containing 20 g whey protein as group GDM-W, and the other 30 women received control flavoring drink as group GDM, and the trial lasted for 14 days. Plasma epinephrine (E), noradrenaline (NE), and cortisol were detected; we also determined levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione (GSH). Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used to assess IR.

RESULTS

In the GDM-W group, postprandial blood glucose was decreased significantly on 3, 5, 7, and 14 days (all p < .05), plasma 2 h insulin was increased by 7.2, 8.6, and 20.5% on days 5, 7, and 14 (p < .05, .05, .01). HOMA-IR was decreased significantly on day 14 (p < .05). MDA was decreased by 20.7% on day 14 (p < .01), and anti-oxidative enzymes' SOD was decreased by 13.4% on day 14 (p < .05) and GSH was decreased by 16.7 and 29.1% on days 7 and 14 (both p < .05). Stress hormones E and cortisol were decreased by 10.8 and 19.8%, respectively, on day 14 (p < .05). There was no significant difference in NE between the two groups within 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Whey protein supplementation may improve hyperglycemia by alleviating stress disorder and oxidative stress injury in GDM women. This trial was registered at chictr.org.cn/as ChiCTR1800020413.

Patterns of discordant growth and adverse neonatal outcomes in twins

BACKGROUND

Intertwin size discordance is an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. However, size discordance at a given point in gestation fails to take into consideration information, such as the timing of onset and the rate of progression of discordance, that may be of prognostic value.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to identify distinct patterns of discordant fetal growth in twin pregnancies and to determine whether these patterns are predictive of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of women with twin pregnancies in a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and April 2020, who had at least 3 ultrasound examinations during pregnancy that included assessment of fetal biometry. Size discordance was calculated at each ultrasound examination, and pregnancies were classified into 1 of 4 predetermined patterns based on the timing of onset and the progression of discordance: pattern 1, no significant discordance group (referent); pattern 2, early (<24 weeks' gestation) progressive discordance group; pattern 3, early discordance with plateau group; or pattern 4, late (≥24 weeks' gestation) discordance group. The associations of discordance pattern (using pattern 1 as referent) with preterm birth, preeclampsia, size discordance at birth, and birthweight<10th percentile were expressed as adjusted relative risk with 95% confidence intervals and were compared with those observed for a single measurement of size discordance at 32 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

Of 2075 women with a twin gestation who were identified during the study period, 1059 met the study criteria. Of the 1059 women, 599 (57%) were classified as no significant discordance (pattern 1), 23 (2%) as early progressive discordance (pattern 2), 160 (15%) as early discordance with plateau (pattern 3), and 277 (26%) as late discordance (pattern 4). The associations of discordance pattern with preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation and preeclampsia were strongest for pattern 2 (rates of 43% [adjusted relative risk, 3.43; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-5.62] and 17% [adjusted relative risk, 5.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-14.60], respectively), intermediate for pattern 3 (rates of 23% [adjusted relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.59] and 6% [adjusted relative risk, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.43], respectively), and weakest for pattern 4 (rates of 12% [adjusted relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.42] and 4% [adjusted relative risk, 1.41; 0.68-2.92], respectively). In contrast, a single measurement of size discordance at 32 weeks' gestation showed no association with preeclampsia and only a weak association with preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSION

We identified 4 distinct discordance growth patterns among twins that demonstrated a dose-response relationship with adverse outcomes and seemed to be more informative than a single measurement of size discordance.

The screening performance of glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The screening accuracy of the 50 g-glucose challenge test (50 g-GCT) for gestational diabetes (GDM) has been described in singleton pregnancies. Given the physiologic differences and greater increase in insulin resistance in twin compared with singleton pregnancies, the performance of the 50 g-GCT in twin pregnancies may differ.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on the screening performance of the 50 g-GCT for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

We included randomized controlled trials or cohort studies that evaluated the screening accuracy of the 50 g-GCT for GDM in twin pregnancies using the two-step approach. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value of the 50 g-GCT for GDM using the 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) threshold.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The positive predictive value (PPV) was pooled for studies that used similar test characteristics.

RESULTS

From 2044 citations, 7 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 55,597 participants were included (6.5% twins and 93.5% singletons). The majority of studies evaluated a 50-g GCT cutoff point of 140 mg/dL. The pooled PPV for a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) for twins was 22.58% (95% CI: 0.1912-0.2647, I²=34.1%). The 50-g GCT screen positive rate in twin pregnancies was higher than that in singleton pregnancies. None of the studies performed routine OGTT.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

The PPV of 50 g-GCT for GDM in twin pregnancies when using a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) is approximately 23%. There is currently no data on the sensitivity and specificity of the 50 g-GCT in twins.

The association between maternal complications and small for gestational age in twin pregnancies using singleton and twin birth weight references

INTRODUCTION

In singleton pregnancies, maternal complications, such as preeclampsia and thyroid dysfunction are associated with small for gestational age (SGA). However, data on the association between SGA and maternal complications in twin pregnancies are limited and conflicting. Small sample size and the application of singleton birth weight reference (SBWR) to define SGA in twins may be reasons for the inconsistent conclusions. Purpose of this study was to define SGA in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) and monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies using both SBWR and twin birth weight reference (TBWR) and to determine whether certain maternal complications are associated with SGA in twin pregnancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all twins delivered in a single tertiary center between 2013 and 2018. SGA was defined as a twin with birth weight <10th centile for gestational age using either SBWR or TBWR. The association between SGA and maternal complications was analyzed separately for DCDA and MCDA twin pregnancies, expressed as odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%-CI).

RESULTS

A total of 2005 DCDA and 467 MCDA twin pregnancies were enrolled. In DCDA pregnancies, SGA was significantly associated with PE according to TBWR (22.73 vs. 14.56%, aOR 1.823, 95%-CI 1.137-2.922). This association was even more pronounced between SGA and severe PE (9.09 vs. 4.54%, aOR 2.234, 95%-CI 1.115-4.479). In turn, PE was associated with higher risk of SGA defined according to TBWR (8.31 vs. 4.99%, aOR 1.825, 95%-CI 1.139-2.925). No association was detected between SGA and other maternal complications. Using SBWR, no association was found between preeclampsia and SGA. In MCDA pregnancies, according to TBWR, SGA was associated only with severe PE (12.5 vs. 4.06%, aOR 3.470, 95%-CI 1.256-9.587) and lower risk of PROM (aOR 0.067, 95%-CI 0.014-0.322).

CONCLUSION

PE was associated with SGA in DCDA pregnancies only when TBWR was used, suggesting that DCDA pregnancies complicated with PE should be closely monitored for signs of SGA and vice versa. In MCDA pregnancies, SGA defined according to TBWR was associated with only severe PE (but not with all PE) and lower risk of PROM. More basic experiments are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying PE and SGA in DCDA and MCDA twin pregnancies respectively.

Mild Gestational Diabetes and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Mild gestational diabetes (GDM) refers to the gestational hyperglycemia, which does not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for GDM. The results of studies on adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with mild GDM are controversial. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of mild GDM on the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature search was performed to retrieve articles that investigated adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with mild GDM in comparison with non-GDM counterparts. All populations were classified to three groups based on their diagnostic criteria for mild GDM. Heterogeneous and non-heterogeneous results were analyzed using the fixed/random effects models. Publication bias was assessed using the Harbord test. DerSimonian and Laird, and inverse variance methods were used to calculate the pooled relative risk of events. Subgroup analysis was performed based on mild GDM diagnostic criteria. Quality and risk of bias assessment were performed using standard questionnaires. Results: Seventeen studies involving 11,623 pregnant women with mild GDM and 53,057 non-GDM counterparts contributed to the meta-analysis. For adverse maternal outcomes, the results of meta-analysis showed that the women with mild GDM had a significantly higher risk of cesarean section (pooled RR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), pregnancy-induced hypertension (pooled RR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), preeclampsia (pooled RR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5) and shoulder dystocia (pooled RR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-5.1) in comparison with the non-GDM population. For adverse neonatal outcomes, the pooled relative risk of macrosomia (pooled RR = 0.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7), large for gestational age (pooled RR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3), hypoglycemia (pooled RR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.3), hyperbilirubinemia (pooled RR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1-1.3), 5 min Apgar <7 (pooled RR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (pooled RR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1), respiratory distress syndrome (pooled RR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8-5.5), and preterm birth (pooled RR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.7) was significantly increased in the mild GDM women as compared with the non-GDM population. However, the adverse events of small for gestational age and neonatal death were not significantly different between the groups. Analysis of composite maternal and neonatal outcomes revealed that the risk of those adverse outcomes in the women with mild GDM in all classifications were significantly higher than the non-GDM population. Also, the meta-regression showed that the magnitude of those increased risks in both composite maternal and neonatal outcomes was similar. Conclusion: The risks of sever adverse neonatal outcomes including small for gestational age and neonatal mortality are not increased with mild GDM. However, the increased risks of most adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes are observed. The risks have similar magnitudes for all mild GDM diagnostic classifications.

Risk factors and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with dichorionic twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cross-sectional study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies remains unclear. This study was undertaken to highlight risk factors for GDM in women with dichorionic (DC) twins, and to determine the association between GDM DC twins and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in a large homogeneous Taiwanese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 645 women with DC twins, excluding pregnancies complicated by one or both fetuses with demise (n = 22) or congenital anomalies (n = 9), who gave birth after 28 complete gestational weeks between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Maternal age >34 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.25-5.07) and pre-pregnancy body mass index >24.9 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.47-5.46) were independent risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Newborns from women with GDM DC twins were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.72) than newborns from women with non-GDM DC twins. Other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced maternal age and pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity are risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Except for a nearly twofold increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission of newborns, the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes for women with GDM DC twins are similar to those for women with non-GDM DC twins.

DEVELOPING twin-specific 75-g oral glucose tolerance test diagnostic thresholds for gestational diabetes based on the risk of future maternal diabetes: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To develop twin-specific outcome-based oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) diagnostic thresholds for GDM based on the risk of future maternal type-2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A population-based retrospective cohort study (2007-2017).

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

Nulliparous women with a live singleton (n = 55 361) or twin (n = 1308) birth who underwent testing for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using a 75-g OGTT in Ontario, Canada (2007-2017). We identified the 75-g OGTT thresholds in twin pregnancies that were associated with similar incidence rates of future type-2 diabetes to those associated with the standard OGTT thresholds in singleton pregnancies.

RESULTS

For any given 75-g OGTT value, the incidence rate of future maternal type-2 diabetes was lower for women with a twin than women with a singleton pregnancy. Using women with a negative OGTT as reference, the risk of future maternal type-2 diabetes in twin pregnancies with a positive OGTT based on the standard OGTT thresholds (9.86 per 1000 person years, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.79, 95% CI 2.69-8.51) was lower than for singleton pregnancies with a positive OGTT (18.74 per 1000 person years, aHR 8.22, 95% CI 7.38-9.16). The twin-specific OGTT fasting, 1-hour and 2-hour thresholds identified in the current study based on correlation with future maternal type-2 diabetes were 5.8 mmol/l (104 mg/dl), 11.8 mmol/l (213 mg/dl) and 10.4 mmol/l (187 mg/dl), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified potential twin-specific OGTT thresholds for GDM that are associated with a similar risk of future type-2 diabetes to that observed in women diagnosed with GDM in singleton pregnancies based on standard OGTT thresholds.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Potential twin-specific OGTT thresholds for GDM were identified.

A Review of Research Progress of Pregnancy with Twins with Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia has a significant long-term effect on the health of both mothers and babies. Preeclampsia-related pregnancy complications increase the morbidity and mortality of pregnant women and their fetuses by 5-8%. The recent advancement of assisted reproductive technology, combined with a rise in the number of elderly pregnant women, has resulted in pregnancy incidence with twins. Twins pregnant women have a 2-3 times greater risk of developing preeclampsia than singleton pregnant women, and it happens sooner and progresses faster. It is more severe and may appear in an atypical way. End-organ damage, such as renal failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, pulmonary edema, placental abruption, and cesarean section, are related maternal complications. Fetal growth retardation, stillbirth, and premature delivery with obstetric signs are all fetal complications. According to studies, all multiple pregnancies can take low-dose aspirin (60-150 mg) to minimize the risk of preeclampsia. To improve pregnancy outcomes and reduce the inherent risk of pregnancy with twins, twins should be handled as a high-risk pregnancy and treated differently than singletons. The literature on twin pregnancy with preeclampsia is the subject of this review. It will examine the current state of research on preeclampsia in pregnancy with twins, including the occurrence, diagnosis, and pathophysiological process. Moreover, the effect of pregnancy with twins on the perinatal outcome and pregnancy management of pregnancy with twins, including blood pressure management and preeclampsia prevention and treatment, is examined in this literature review. The goal is to figure out what kind of diagnosis and care you may need.

Perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes in singleton pregnancies increases the risk for large for gestational age infants, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and neonatal morbidity. Compared with singleton gestations, twin gestations are at increased risk for fetal growth abnormalities, hypertensive disorders, and neonatal morbidity. Whether gestational diabetes further increases the risk for these outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the relationship between gestational diabetes and the risk for preeclampsia, fetal growth abnormalities, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions in a large cohort of women with twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a retrospective cohort of all twin gestations that were delivered at our institution from 1998 to 2013. We excluded pregnancies delivered before 24 weeks' gestation, monochorionic-monoamniotic twins, and patients with preexisting diabetes for a final cohort of 2573 twin deliveries. Gestational diabetes was defined as 2 abnormal values on a 100 g, 3-hour glucose challenge test as defined by the Carpenter-Coustan criteria or a 1-hour value of 200 mg/dL after a 50 g glucose test. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate the associations between gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, small for gestational age infants, large for gestational age infants, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit after adjusting for prepregnancy body mass index, maternal race, maternal age, parity, use of in vitro fertilization, prepregnancy smoking status, and chronic hypertension as confounders.

RESULTS

The unadjusted incidence of gestational diabetes was 6.5% (n=167). Women with gestational diabetes were more likely to be aged 35 years or older, living with obesity, and have conceived via in vitro fertilization than women without gestational diabetes. Preeclampsia was more common among women with twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes (31%) than among women with twin pregnancies without gestational diabetes (18%) (adjusted risk ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.1). A diagnosis of small for gestational age infant was less common among women with gestational diabetes (17%) than among women without gestational diabetes (24%), although the results were imprecise (adjusted risk ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.1). There was no association between gestational diabetes and the incidence of large for gestational age neonates or neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Among women with gestational diabetes who reached 35 weeks' gestation, 62% (n=60) required medical management.

CONCLUSION

Gestational diabetes is a risk factor for preeclampsia among women with twin pregnancies. Close blood pressure monitoring and patient education are critical for this high-risk group. The association between gestational diabetes and neonatal outcomes among women with twin pregnancies is less precise, although it may reduce the incidence of small for gestational age infants. Prospective studies to determine if glycemic control decreases the risk for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes are needed.

Trends in Prevalence of Diabetes among Twin Pregnancies and Perinatal Outcomes in Catalonia between 2006 and 2015: The DIAGESTCAT Study

The aims of our study were to evaluate the trends in the prevalence of diabetes among twin pregnancies in Catalonia, Spain between 2006 and 2015, to assess the influence of diabetes on perinatal outcomes of twin gestations and to ascertain the interaction between twin pregnancies and glycaemic status. A population-based study was conducted using the Spanish Minimum Basic Data Set. Cases of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pre-existing diabetes were identified using ICD-9-CM codes. Data from 743,762 singleton and 15,956 twin deliveries between 2006 and 2015 in Catalonia was analysed. Among twin pregnancies, 1088 (6.82%) were diagnosed with GDM and 83 (0.52%) had pre-existing diabetes. The prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies increased from 6.01% in 2006 to 8.48% in 2015 (p < 0.001) and the prevalence of pre-existing diabetes remained stable (from 0.46% to 0.27%, p = 0.416). The risk of pre-eclampsia was higher in pre-existing diabetes (15.66%, p = 0.015) and GDM (11.39%, p < 0.001) than in normoglycaemic twin pregnancies (7.55%). Pre-existing diabetes increased the risk of prematurity (69.62% vs. 51.84%, p = 0.002) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (20.9% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.001) in twin gestations. An attenuating effect on several adverse perinatal outcomes was found between twin pregnancies and the presence of GDM and pre-existing diabetes. As a result, unlike in singleton pregnancies, diabetes did not increase the risk of all perinatal outcomes in twins and the effect of pre-existing diabetes on pre-eclampsia and LGA appeared to be attenuated. In conclusion, prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies increased over the study period. Diabetes was associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia, prematurity and LGA in twin gestations. However, the impact of both, pre-existing diabetes and GDM, on twin pregnancy outcomes was attenuated when compared with its impact on singleton gestations.

Maternal Plasma Betaine in Middle Pregnancy Was Associated with Decreased Risk of GDM in Twin Pregnancy: A Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Although previous studies have shown that choline-related metabolites in one carbon metabolism (OCM) were related to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk in singleton pregnancy, their role in twin gestations remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the associations between choline, betaine, methionine, dimethylglycine (DMG), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and GDM risk among women with twin gestations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This hospital-based cohort study included 187 women with dichorionic twin gestations. Blood samples were collected during pregnancy at a median of 16.1 weeks of gestation (IQR: 13.9 -17.9). Concentrations of plasma metabolites were measured by HPLC-triple quadrupole MS. Log-binomial regression models were applied to estimate the associations between plasma metabolites and the risk of GDM.

RESULTS

A total of 57 (30.5%) GDM cases were diagnosed over the study follow-up. Eighty-seven percent of women conceived through ART. Plasma betaine had an inverse association with GDM risk, and the adjusted RR of GDM comparing the highest tertile with the lowest tertile was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.19-0.86, P _trend=0.015). Women with a high betaine/choline ratio or a low DMG/betaine ratio were at decreased GDM risk (P _trend=0.031 or 0.001, respectively). Plasma choline, methionine, DMG and TMAO were not associated with GDM risk.

CONCLUSION

Among women with dichorionic twin gestations, higher plasma level of betaine in the second trimester was associated with lower risk of GDM. This finding needs further confirmation.

Burden, associated risk factors and adverse outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies in Al Ain, UAE

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in singleton pregnancies represent a high-risk scenario. The incidence, associated factors and outcomes of GDM in twin pregnancies is not known in the UAE.

Methods

This was five years retrospective analysis of hospital records of twin pregnancies in the city of Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Relevant data with regards to the pregnancy, maternal and birth outcomes and incidence of GDM was extracted from two major hospitals in the city. Regression models assessed the relationship between socio-demographic and pregnancy-related variables and GDM, and the associations between GDM and maternal and fetal outcomes at birth.

Results

A total of 404 women and their neonates were part of this study. The study population had a mean age of 30.1 (SD: 5.3), overweight or obese (66.5%) and were majority multiparous (66.6%). High incidence of GDM in twin pregnancies (27.0%). While there were no statistical differences in outcomes of the neonates, GDM mothers were older (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06–1.4) and heavier (aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00 -1.04). They were also likely to have had GDM in their previous pregnancies (aOR: 7.37, 95% CI: 2.76–19.73). The prognosis of mothers with twin pregnancies and GDM lead to an independent and increased odds of cesarean section (aOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.03–5.30) and hospitalization during pregnancy (aOR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.16–2.20).

Conclusion

More than a quarter of women with twin pregnancies were diagnosed with GDM. GDM was associated with some adverse pregnancy outcomes but not fetal outcomes in this population. More studies are needed to further investigate these associations and the management of GDM in twin pregnancies.