Preeclampsia and COVID-19: results from the INTERCOVID prospective longitudinal study

Maternal and neonatal outcomes with different screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of an expanded gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening strategy on perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included gravidas screened for GDM at a single academic center. The "before" cohort (estimated due dates (EDD) March 2018-April 2019) was screened using the standard 2-step method. The "after" cohort (EDD November 2019-July 2023) was screened using an expanded strategy that included the potential for GDM diagnosis based on 1-2 weeks of home glucose monitoring following isolated fasting hyperglycemia on the 3-hour glucose tolerance test (GTT). The primary outcomes were primary cesarean delivery (PCD) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Binomial regression and Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare perinatal outcomes between the two cohorts in the general population and in a subgroup of those with isolated fasting hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

Outcomes for the "before" cohort (n = 1,733) were compared with those in the "after" cohort (n = 6,280). In the general population, A2GDM incidence increased after expansion of the screening protocol (4.8% vs. 6.4%, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.69), but PCD and NICU admission rates were unchanged. In the subgroup of patients with isolated fasting hyperglycemia (n = 233), there was a significant increase in the incidence of any GDM (12.5 vs. 46.0%, RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.95-6.93) and A2GDM (8.3% vs. 37.3%, RR 4.47, 95% CI 2.03-9.87). There was no difference in PCD between cohorts, but NICU admission increased significantly in the "after" cohort (8.3% vs 22.4%, RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.18-6.08) in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

An expanded approach to GDM diagnosis using home blood glucose monitoring following isolated fasting hyperglycemia on 3-hour GTT was associated with increased A2GDM incidence but no improvements in primary maternal or neonatal outcomes. In the absence of clinical benefit, we do not recommend widespread implementation of this expanded strategy.

Extracellular Vesicles Alter Trophoblast Function in Pregnancies Complicated by COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and resulting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cause placental dysfunction, which increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. While abnormal placental pathology resulting from COVID-19 is common, direct infection of the placenta is rare. This suggests that pathophysiology associated with maternal COVID-19, rather than direct placental infection, is responsible for placental dysfunction. We hypothesized that maternal circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs), altered by COVID-19 during pregnancy, contribute to placental dysfunction. To examine this hypothesis, we characterized circulating EVs from pregnancies complicated by COVID-19 and tested their effects on trophoblast cell physiology in vitro. Trophoblast exposure to EVs isolated from patients with an active infection (AI), but not controls, altered key trophoblast functions including hormone production and invasion. Thus, circulating EVs from participants with an AI, both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases, can disrupt vital trophoblast functions. EV cargo differed between participants with COVID-19, depending on the gestational timing of infection, and Controls, which may contribute to the disruption of the placental transcriptome and morphology. Our findings show that COVID-19 can have effects throughout pregnancy on circulating EVs, and circulating EVs are likely to participate in placental dysfunction induced by COVID-19.

Comparing the maternal and neonatal outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated pregnant women against COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Following the emergence of COVID-19 disease, and considering the limited number of studies regarding vaccination among pregnant women, as well as the differences between the vaccine administered in Iran and those used in other countries, this study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated women against COVID-19 disease.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the comprehensive healthcare centers of Rafsanjan city. Initially, the contact information of expectant mothers who were pregnant between June 22, 2021, and December 22, 2021, was obtained through Iran's integrated healthcare system (Sib). Subsequently, the required information was collected via a checklist during phone interviews. Out of 969 pregnant women, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 610 subjects were included in the study. Among these, 330 were unvaccinated, while the remaining participants had received the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine prior to or during pregnancy. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, employing one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's multiple comparison test, Fisher's exact test, Chi-square test, and multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnant women significantly increased the risk of neonatal jaundice (P < 0.05). Conversely, the miscarriage rate among these women was significantly lower (P < 0.05). No adverse outcomes were observed including hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, maternal hospitalization, maternal COVID-19 infection, preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, perinatal mortality, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, and low birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 Vaccination is recommended for pregnant women to mitigate adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes.

The pregnancy outcomes of women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester ---a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been prevalent worldwide. Pregnant women belong to a special group, and it is very important for clinicians to pay attention to the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes. However, there are limited studies on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes during the first trimester.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester on pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical information of pregnant women whose last menstrual period was between October 1, 2022, and April 1, 2023, and who were registered in the Obstetrics and Gynecology department of Peking University International Hospital, was analyzed. Among them, 498 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester were included in the study group; while a total of 654 pregnant women with no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester were included in the control group. Mann Whitney U test, χ2 test, Fisher's exact probability method, and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy outcomes during the first trimester.

RESULTS

A total of 30 cases in the study group experienced pregnancy loss before 28 weeks of gestation, and 468 cases delivered. In the control group, 41 cases experienced pregnancy loss before 28 weeks of gestation, and 613 cases delivered. The rates of pregnancy loss in the two groups were 6.02% and 6.27%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in the baseline data (delivery age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational age, and parity) between the two groups. The rates of neonatal malformation, premature birth, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section, small for gestational age infants, low birth weight infants, macrosomia, and neonatal asphyxia were compared, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of gestational hypertension in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center study, we found that SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester may increase the risk of gestational hypertension, while the incidences of other adverse pregnant outcomes such as premature birth, premature rupture of membranes, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, small for gestational age infants, low birth weight infants, and neonatal asphyxia did not significantly increase compared with women without SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester.

Trends in adverse pregnancy outcomes in Louisiana, 2017 to 2022

Natural disasters can lead to more adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO). It is unclear if the extended COVID-19 pandemic has impacted APOs and pre-existing conditions among perinatal populations with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality.A retrospective chart review was conducted of hospital records and birth certificates in the largest birth hospital in Louisiana from 2017 to 2022. Amongst 27,877 births (50.9% White, 38.3% Black, 28.9 ± 5.6 years), gestational diabetes (GDM) was lowest in pre-pandemic conceptions (11.0%, June 2017-May 2019) and rose to 16.4% early pandemic (October 2019-February 2020) but leveled off at 12.2% in peak (March 2020-February 2021) and late pandemic (March 2021-September 2021). Individuals who conceived in early and peak pandemic were 47% (95% CI 33, 63) and 11% (95% CI 2, 20) more likely to develop GDM respectively, compared to pre-pandemic conceptions. Individuals who delivered during early (aRR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.33-1.78), peak (aRR: 1.48, 95% CI 1.32-1.65), and late (aRR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.41, 1.85) pandemic were more likely to develop preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome compared to pre-pandemic conceptions. Individuals were also 17% (95% CI 5, 32) more likely to enter pregnancy with chronic hypertension in peak pandemic compared to pre-pandemic. In paired analysis (n = 3390), individuals with a pandemic conception that occurred early pandemic had a higher risk of developing GDM compared to their pre-pandemic pregnancy (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.52, 6.97). Supporting birthing individuals amongst significant stressful events, especially in early gestation, is critical for preventing APOs and severe maternal morbidity and mortality.

Does COVID-19 Cause Non-Dıpper Hypertension?

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains a health problem worldwide. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of blood pressure (BP) on the circadian pattern and prevalence of new-onset non-dipper hypertension in the post-COVID period in patients with known hypertension. This prospective single-center study included 722 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. Ambulatory BP (ABP) data were collected during their initial hospitalization. The ABP data were reassessed 1 month after the patients were discharged. The results were compared with a healthy control group with known hypertension but without COVID-19 infection. After exclusion criteria were applied, the study included 187 patients with COVID-19 and 136 healthy hypertensive controls. Post-COVID ABP showed that patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher mean 24-h systolic and diastolic BP, mean nighttime systolic and diastolic BP, and mean daytime diastolic BP than the control group. In addition, new-onset non-dipper hypertension was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19. This study demonstrated for the first time that the circadian pattern is disturbed and a non-dipper pattern develops in individuals with known hypertension during the post-COVID period.

Impact of antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection on development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a large, diverse, cohort

OBJECTIVES

Various studies have noted an association between antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and increased risk for development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). Both disease processes have been shown to involve endothelial dysfunction systemically and in the placenta, suggesting common pathogenesis. We aim to further investigate this association in a diverse urban population.

STUDY DESIGN

Generation C is a prospective pregnancy cohort study at a large academic institution in NYC established between April 2020 and February 2022. SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was ascertained using a combination of spike and nucleocapsid IgG antibodies, RT-PCR testing, and electronic medical record (EMR) diagnoses. Maternal demographic and medical data were ascertained from the EMR and/or self-report survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was HDP defined using the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology diagnostic criteria. Covariates included maternal age ≥ 35 years, BMI ≥ 30, high social vulnerability index based on patient zip code, maternal chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and nulliparity. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection and HDP.

RESULTS

Among the 2402 participants, 15.4 % (369) were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and 18.2 % (67/369) of those exposed developed an HDP. In participants without evidence of antenatal SARS-COV-2 infection, 18.0 % (365/2033) developed an HDP. In an adjusted multivariable model, antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was not associated with HDP (aOR 0.89; 95 % CI, 0.65-1.22).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an increased risk of HDP associated with antenatal SARS-CoV-2 infection in a diverse prospective cohort.

2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2025 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2024 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. This year's edition includes a continued focus on health equity across several key domains and enhanced global data that reflect improved methods and incorporation of ≈3000 new data sources since last year's Statistical Update.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Calcitriol prevents SARS-CoV spike-induced inflammation in human trophoblasts through downregulating ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression

SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus of COVID-19, increases the risk of pregnancy complications including hypertensive disorders and placental inflammation. The spike glycoprotein mediates viral cell entry by interacting with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2 in conjunction with the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2). ACE1, ACE2 and renin are components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which regulates blood pressure. As the placenta expresses all these proteins, it is a target for SARS-CoV-2 and a source of blood pressure modulators. Noteworthy, an ACE1/ACE2 ratio imbalance can lead to RAS dysregulation and a bad prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Calcitriol, the most active vitamin D metabolite, negatively regulates RAS, reduces inflammation, and enhances antiviral immunity, thereby protecting against COVID-19 severity. However, contrasting information exists on the regulatory role of calcitriol upon RAS components and SARS-CoV-2 receptors; while the impact of calcitriol on spike-induced inflammation in placental cells has not been explored. Thus, we studied the effects of calcitriol on these parameters using the trophoblast cell line HTR-8/SVneo and primary syncytiotrophoblasts. By RT-qPCR, ELISA, and immunocytochemistry, we found that the spike enhanced proinflammatory cytokines expression and secretion, while calcitriol significantly downregulated this effect. Calcitriol also diminished ACE1, ACE2, TMPRSS2, and renin gene expression, as well as ACE1/ACE2 mRNA ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In the human placenta, calcitriol reduced the gene expression of main RAS components and TMPRSS2, resulting in the inhibition of spike-induced inflammation. This outcome suggest that vitamin D participates in restricting SARS-CoV-2 placental infection by rendering trophoblasts less permissive to infection while helping to regulate maternal blood pressure and decreasing inflammation.

Placental SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Its Implications for Increased Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

 Pregnant women are at increased risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This could be explained through the prism of physiologic and immunologic changes in pregnancy. In addition, certain immunological reactions originate in the placenta in response to viral infections.This study aimed to investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) can infect the human placenta and discuss its implications in the pathogenesis of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

 We conducted a retrospective cohort study in which we collected placental specimens from pregnant women who had a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed RNA in situ hybridization assay on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues to establish the in vivo evidence for placental infectivity by this corona virus. In addition, we infected trophoblast isolated from uninfected term human placenta with SARS-CoV-2 variants to further provide in vitro evidence for such an infectivity.

RESULTS

 There was a total of 21 cases enrolled, which included 5 cases of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) and 2 intrauterine fetal demises (IUFDs). Positive staining of positive-sense strand of SARS-CoV-2 virions was detected in 15 placentas including 4 SPTB and both IUFDs. In vitro infection assay demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 virions were highly capable of infecting both cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast.

CONCLUSION

 This study implies that placental SARS-CoV-2 infection may be associated with an increased risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· SARS-CoV-2 can effectively infect human placenta.. · Such infectivity is confirmed by in vitro experiments.. · Placental SARS-CoV-2 corelates with adverse obstetrical outcomes..

COVID-19 and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Descriptive Study From a Tertiary Hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE

Background: Over 768 million cases of COVID-19 infection have been reported worldwide, with pregnant women being the most vulnerable members of society during such an infectious disease outbreak. In the United Arab Emirates, there are limited studies explaining the effects of COVID-19 on pregnant women and their fetuses. In this study, the maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 in a tertiary maternal hospital, United Arab Emirates, were examined. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted in a tertiary hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. The study included all pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 infection from April 2020 to September 2021. Results: The study revealed that a higher number of COVID-19-infected pregnant patients presented in their third trimester (69.1%). The comorbidity of body mass index (BMI) had the most effect on the severity/hospitalization status of the patients (p=0.018). In the nonhospitalized group, fever was the most common symptom (26%), whereas in the hospitalized group, cough was the most common symptom (94%). Emergency cesarean delivery was found to be significant (p=0.0007) in hospitalized patients. COVID-19 pneumonia was the prevailing adverse maternal outcome. NICU admission and prematurity were the most frequent neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: In conclusion, our findings show that adverse maternal outcomes, obesity, and mode of delivery were related to COVID-19 severity in pregnant patients. However, there was no effect generally on the adverse fetal outcomes except for jaundice and birth weight.

Trimester and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy has been linked with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The aim of this study was to examine how both trimester and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection impact HDP.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals during pregnancy (n = 205) and examined the association between trimester and severity of infection with incidence of HDP using modified Poisson regression models to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We stratified the analysis of trimester by severity to understand the role of timing of infection among those with similar symptomatology and also examined timing of infection as a continuous variable.

RESULTS

Compared to a reference cohort from 2018, SARS-CoV-2 infection did not largely increase the risk of HDP (RR: 1.17; CI:0.90, 1.51), but a non-statistically significant higher risk of preeclampsia was observed (RR: 1.33; CI:0.89, 1.98), in our small sample. Among the SARS-CoV-2 cohort, severity was linked with risk of HDP, with infections requiring hospitalization increasing the risk of HDP compared to asymptomatic/mild infections. Trimester of infection was not associated with risk of HDP, but a slight decline in the risk of HDP was observed with later gestational week of infection. Among patients with asymptomatic or mild symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 in the first trimester conferred a higher risk of HDP compared to the third trimester (RR: 1.70; CI:0.77, 3.77), although estimates were imprecise.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy may increase the risk of HDP compared to infection later in pregnancy.

COVID-19 is associated with early emergence of preeclampsia: results from a large regional collaborative

Objective: To investigate the relationship between preeclampsia and SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women between March and October 2020. Pregnant patients admitted to 14 obstetrical centers in Michigan, USA formed the study population. Of the N = 1458 participants, 369 had SARS-CoV-2 infection (cases). Controls were uninfected pregnancies that were delivered in the same obstetric unit within 30 days of the index case. Robust Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk (RR) of preterm and term preeclampsia and preeclampsia involving placental lesions. The analysis included adjustment for relevant clinical and demographic risk factors.Results: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy increased the risk of preeclampsia [adjusted aRR = 1.69 (1.26-2.26)], preeclampsia involving placental lesions [aRR = 1.97(1.14-3.4)] and preterm preeclampsia 2.48(1.48-4.17). Although the highest rate of preeclampsia was observed in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 who were symptomatic (18.4%), there was increased risk even in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (14.2%) relative to non-infected controls (8.7%) (p < 0.05). This association with symptomatology was also noted with preterm preeclampsia for which the rate doubled from 2.7% in controls to 5.2% in asymptomatic cases and reached 11.8% among symptomatic cases (p < 0.05). The rate of preterm preeclampsia among cases of pregnant people self-identified as Black reached 10.1% and was almost double the rate of the reminder of the group of infected pregnancies (5.3%), although the rate among uninfected was almost the same (2.7%) for both Black and non-Black groups (interaction p = 0.05).Conclusions: Infection with SARS-CoV-2 increases the risk of preeclampsia even in the absence of symptoms, although symptomatic persons are at even higher risk. Racial disparities in the development of preterm preeclampsia after SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain discrepancies in prematurity between different populations.

Physical development of infants born to patients with COVID-19 during pregnancy: 2 years of age

Background

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and pandemic circumstances could negatively impact infant development. This study aimed to investigate the physical development, common pediatric illness incidence, and healthcare utilization over the first 2 years of life of infants born to COVID+ and COVID- patients. Comparisons were also made with infants born pre-pandemic.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study at a major academic health system in New York City. Participants include all infants born to birthing persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (N = 758) and without (N = 9,345) from 03/01/2020 to 08/17/2022, infants born pre-pandemic (N = 3,221) from 03/01/2017 to 08/17/2019, and birthing persons of all infants.

Results

There were no differences in weight, length, or head circumference curves between pandemic infants born to COVID+ and COVID- patients over the first 2 years of life (p > 0.05, repeated ANOVA). Annualized incidence of illness occurrence and healthcare utilization were similar between groups. Compared to pre-pandemic infants, the length of pandemic (COVID-) infants was lower from birth to 9 months (p < 0.0001). Pandemic infants additionally had more adverse perinatal outcomes including increased stillbirth (0.75% vs. 0.12%, p = 0.0001) and decreased gestational age (38.41 ± 2.71 vs. 38.68 ± 2.55 weeks, Cohen's d = -0.10, p < 0.0001), birthweight (2,597 ± 335 vs. 3,142 ± 643 g, Cohen's d = -1.06, p < 0.0001), and birth length (48.08 ± 4.61 vs. 49.09 ± 3.93 cm, Cohen's d = -0.24, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Birthing persons' SARS-CoV-2 infection status, birthing persons' profiles, and pandemic circumstances negatively affected perinatal outcomes, newborn physical development, and healthcare utilization. These findings draw clinical attention to the need to follow infants closely and implement enrichment to ensure optimal developmental outcomes.

COVID-19 and Its Potential Impact on Children Born to Mothers Infected During Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review

Pregnancy is a vulnerable period of time during which pregnant people are prone to infections like COVID-19, which can increase risks for both the mother and fetus. These infections may lead to complications such as preterm birth, developmental delays, and congenital abnormalities. While COVID-19 poses additional risks like placental dysfunction and neonatal infections, studies on long-term effects remain limited. Ongoing research and monitoring are essential to understand and mitigate potential cognitive and developmental challenges in children born to mothers infected with COVID-19. This review aims to guide clinicians in managing these risks throughout childhood. Maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy can have significant implications for fetal development, even if the newborn is not infected at birth. The release of inflammatory cytokines may cross the placental barrier, potentially disrupting fetal brain development and increasing the risk of long-term cognitive and behavioral issues, such as ADHD or autism. Placental dysfunction, caused by inflammation or thrombosis, can lead to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm birth, or hypoxia, affecting both neurological and respiratory health in newborns. Furthermore, a compromised fetal immune system can increase susceptibility to autoimmune conditions and infections. The early diagnosis and management of infections during pregnancy are crucial in mitigating risks to both the mother and fetus. Swift intervention can prevent complications like preterm birth and long-term developmental challenges, ensuring better health outcomes for both the mother and child. Long-term monitoring of children born to mothers infected with COVID-19 is necessary to understand the full extent of the virus's impact. This review evaluates the long-term systemic effects of maternal COVID-19 infection during pregnancy on fetuses, newborns, and children, focusing beyond vertical transmission. It highlights the broader impacts on fetal development, offering insights to help clinicians manage potential issues that may arise later in life.

Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women

OBJECTIVES

Due to the association between COVID-19 and adverse pregnancy outcomes, pregnant women are considered to be a vulnerable patient group. Studies have shown that low socioeconomic status (SES) is a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 and low SES are likely to have a synergistic adverse effect. This study aimed to evaluate the socioeconomic background, indicated by self-reported SES, educational level, and financial situation, in pregnant women who were positive for SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted, including all pregnant women with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests at Kepler University Hospital Linz between May 2020 and August 2021 (n=150) and a control group matched 1:1 relative to gestational age at birth (n=150). Data were collected using written questionnaires and medical records from the hospital information system.

RESULTS

Lower self-reported socioeconomic status (p=0.029) and lower education level (p=0.003) were detected in the COVID group. Mothers in the COVID group were significantly younger (p=0.024). However, after adjustment for educational attainment, younger age was not confirmed as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (p=0.326). The social gradient was not explained by the assumed mediators and confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings confirm an association between lower socioeconomic status and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Since both socioeconomic factors and COVID-19 impose negative effects on pregnancy outcomes, health inequalities should be taken into consideration when implementing SARS-CoV-2 prevention measures and when providing health care for pregnant women from disadvantaged communities.

Time series analysis of comprehensive maternal deaths in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on comprehensive maternal deaths in Brazil have not been fully explored. Using publicly available data from the Brazilian Mortality Information (SIM) and Information System on Live Births (SINASC) databases, we used two complementary forecasting models to predict estimates of maternal mortality ratios using maternal deaths (MMR) and comprehensive maternal deaths (MMRc) in the years 2020 and 2021 based on data from 2008 to 2019. We calculated national and regional standardized mortality ratio estimates for maternal deaths (SMR) and comprehensive maternal deaths (SMRc) for 2020 and 2021. The observed MMRc in 2021 was more than double the predicted MMRc based on the Holt-Winters and autoregressive integrated moving average models (127.12 versus 60.89 and 59.12 per 100,000 live births, respectively). We found persisting sub-national variation in comprehensive maternal mortality: SMRc ranged from 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64, 1.86) in the Northeast to 2.70 (95% CI 2.45, 2.96) in the South in 2021. The observed national estimates for comprehensive maternal deaths in 2021 were the highest in Brazil in the past three decades. Increased resources for prenatal care, maternal health, and postpartum care may be needed to reverse the national trend in comprehensive maternal deaths.

Placental Drug Delivery to Treat Pre-Eclampsia and Fetal Growth Restriction

Pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction (FGR) continue to cause unacceptably high levels of morbidity and mortality, despite significant pharmaceutical and technological advances in other disease areas. The recent pandemic has also impacted obstetric care, as COVID-19 infection increases the risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. This review explores the reasons why it lacks effective drug treatments for the placental dysfunction that underlies many common obstetric conditions and describes how nanomedicines and targeted drug delivery approaches may provide the solution to the current drug drought. The ever-increasing range of biocompatible nanoparticle formulations available is now making it possible to selectively deliver drugs to uterine and placental tissues and dramatically limit fetal drug transfer. Formulations that are refractory to placental uptake offer the possibility of retaining drugs within the maternal circulation, allowing pregnant individuals to take medicines previously considered too harmful to the developing baby. Liposomes, ionizable lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and adenoviral vectors have all been used to create efficacious drug delivery systems for use in pregnancy, although each approach offers distinct advantages and limitations. It is imperative that recent advances continue to be built upon and that there is an overdue investment of intellectual and financial capital in this field.

Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 and neonatal outcomes during Omicron: INTERCOVID-2022 study

BACKGROUND

In early 2023, when Omicron was the variant of concern, we showed that vaccinating pregnant women decreased the risk for severe COVID-19-related complications and maternal morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on newborns and the effects of maternal COVID-19 vaccination on neonatal outcomes when Omicron was the variant of concern.

STUDY DESIGN

INTERCOVID-2022 was a large, prospective, observational study, conducted in 40 hospitals across 18 countries, from November 27, 2021 (the day after the World Health Organization declared Omicron the variant of concern) to June 30, 2022, to assess the effect of COVID-19 in pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes and to assess vaccine effectiveness. Women diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 during pregnancy were compared with 2 nondiagnosed, unmatched women recruited concomitantly and consecutively during pregnancy or at delivery. Mother-newborn dyads were followed until hospital discharge. The primary outcomes were a neonatal positive test for COVID-19, severe neonatal morbidity index, severe perinatal morbidity and mortality index, preterm birth, neonatal death, referral to neonatal intensive care unit, and diseases during the neonatal period. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated with adjustment for maternal risk profile.

RESULTS

We enrolled 4707 neonates born to 1577 (33.5%) mothers diagnosed with COVID-19 and 3130 (66.5%) nondiagnosed mothers. Among the diagnosed mothers, 642 (40.7%) were not vaccinated, 147 (9.3%) were partially vaccinated, 551 (34.9%) were completely vaccinated, and 237 (15.0%) also had a booster vaccine. Neonates of booster-vaccinated mothers had less than half (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.91) the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 when compared with those of unvaccinated mothers; they also had the lowest rates of preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, respiratory distress syndrome, and number of days in the neonatal intensive care unit. Newborns of unvaccinated mothers had double the risk for neonatal death (relative risk, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.00) when compared with those of nondiagnosed mothers. Vaccination was not associated with any congenital malformations. Although all vaccines provided protection against neonatal test positivity, newborns of booster-vaccinated mothers had the highest vaccine effectiveness (64%; 95% confidence interval, 10%-86%). Vaccine effectiveness was not as high for messenger RNA vaccines only. Vaccine effectiveness against moderate or severe neonatal outcomes was much lower, namely 13% in the booster-vaccinated group (all vaccines) and 25% and 28% in the completely and booster-vaccinated groups, respectively (messenger RNA vaccines only). Vaccines were fairly effective in protecting neonates when given to pregnant women ≤100 days (14 weeks) before birth; thereafter, the risk increased and was much higher after 200 days (29 weeks). Finally, none of the neonatal practices studied, including skin-to-skin contact and direct breastfeeding, increased the risk for infecting newborns.

CONCLUSION

When Omicron was the variant of concern, newborns of unvaccinated mothers had an increased risk for neonatal death. Neonates of vaccinated mothers had a decreased risk for preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes. Because the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination decreases with time, to ensure that newborns are maximally protected against COVID-19, mothers should receive a vaccine or booster dose no more than 14 weeks before the expected date of delivery.

COVID-19 diagnosis, vaccination during pregnancy, and adverse pregnancy outcomes of 865,654 women in England and Wales: a population-based cohort study

Background

The extent to which COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy are associated with risks of common and rare adverse pregnancy outcomes remains uncertain. We compared the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with and without COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination during pregnancy.

Methods

We studied population-scale linked electronic health records for women with singleton pregnancies in England and Wales from 1 August 2019 to 31 December 2021. This time period was divided at 8th December 2020 into pre-vaccination and vaccination roll-out eras. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for common and rare pregnancy outcomes according to the time since COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination and by pregnancy trimester and COVID-19 variant.

Findings

Amongst 865,654 pregnant women, we recorded 60,134 (7%) COVID-19 diagnoses and 182,120 (21%) adverse pregnancy outcomes. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.18-1.26), gestational hypertension (1.16, 1.10-1.22), pre-eclampsia (1.20, 1.12-1.28), preterm birth (1.63, 1.57-1.69, and 1.68, 1.61-1.75 for spontaneous preterm), very preterm birth (2.04, 1.86-2.23), small for gestational age (1.12, 1.07-1.18), thrombotic venous events (1.85, 1.56-2.20) and stillbirth (only within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, 3.39, 2.23-5.15). HRs were more pronounced in the pre-vaccination era, within 14-days since COVID-19 diagnosis, when COVID-19 diagnosis occurred in the 3rd trimester, and in the original variant era. There was no evidence to suggest COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Instead, dose 1 of COVID-19 vaccine was associated with lower risks of preterm birth (0.90, 0.86-0.95), very preterm birth (0.84, 0.76-0.94), small for gestational age (0.93, 0.88-0.99), and stillbirth (0.67, 0.49-0.92).

Interpretation

Pregnant women with a COVID-19 diagnosis have higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support recommendations towards high-priority vaccination against COVID-19 in pregnant women.

Funding

BHF, ESRC, Forte, HDR-UK, MRC, NIHR and VR.

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and preeclampsia markers in Mozambican pregnant women with perinatal loss

BACKGROUND

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is known to be associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, including pre-eclampsia (PE), prematurity, perinatal and maternal mortality. Data on the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women and their offspring in Sub-Saharan Africa is limited. We aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and determine PE biomarkers in Mozambican pregnant women with perinatal loss.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among women who had a fetal or an early neonatal death at the Maputo Central Hospital (MCH), Mozambique. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM were determined in maternal and umbilical cord blood and PE biomarkers (sFlt-1 and PIGF) in maternal blood. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR was performed in placenta and fetal lung biopsies from participants found to be SARS-CoV-2 seropositive.

RESULTS

A total of 100 COVID-19 unvaccinated women were included in the study from March 2021 to April 2022. Total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 68 [68%; 95CI (58 - 76)] maternal and 55 [55%; 95CI (54 - 74)] cord blood samples. SARS-CoV-2 IgM was detected in 18 cord blood samples and a positive placental RT-PCR in three of these participants. The proportion of women with moderate to high sFlt-1/PIGF ratio was higher in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive women than in those seronegative (71.2% vs 28.8%, p = 0.339), although the difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among Mozambican women with perinatal loss was high during the second pandemic year, and there was evidence of vertical transmission in stillbirths. Findings also suggest that maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection may increase the risk of developing PE.

Impact of COVID-19 on Maternal Health Service Uptake and Perinatal Outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a major global public health threat that has impeded health infrastructures in low- and middle-income countries. This systematic review examines the impact of COVID-19 on maternal health service uptake and perinatal outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa. We searched four databases in August 2020 and updated the search on 22 December 2023: PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, and EMBASE. Data extraction was performed using a standardised Joana Briggs Institute data extraction format for the eligibility of articles, and any discrepancies were solved through discussion and consensus. This systematic review includes 36 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Antenatal care attendance and institutional childbirth significantly decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and home births increased. Fear of contracting the virus, a lack of transport, a shortage of logistic supplies, a lack of personal protective equipment, lockdown policies, economic and food security, stigmatisation of sick persons, long waiting times in the hospital, and health system weakness were barriers to accessing maternity care. The findings of this review showed a significant decrease in antenatal care attendance and institutional birth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on our findings, we recommend that stakeholders ensure the availability of essential medical supplies in the hospital.

COVID-19 in Pregnancy: An Update for Clinicians

In this review, we will discuss the risks of COVID-19 on maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes. We will also review the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, as well as review the management of COVID-19 in pregnancy.

The experience of pregnant women and their families who were infected with covid-19 before vaccination: A qualitative approach within a multicenter study in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Pregnant and postpartum women infected by COVID-19 are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including negative effects on their mental health. Brazilian maternal mortality rate due to COVID-19 is 2.5 times higher than overall mortality rates. This study aimed to understand how pregnant/postpartum women experienced the COVID-19 suspicion/investigation or confirmed infection in different Brazilian cities, the pandemic's consequences to women and their families, and their needs to improve maternal health services during public health emergencies.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study with 27 women with COVID-19 and 6 of their family members, as part of a multicenter study among 15 maternity hospitals in Brazil. We applied in-depth interviews through telephone calls when women received the diagnostic or had a suspect infection and after 60 days. Another semi-structured interview was applied to their close family members. The interviews were considered through thematic analysis.

RESULTS

From the thematic content analysis three major themes emerged from the first and second interviews: (Cucinotta and Vanelli, 2020) assistance received by the woman and newborn in the medical services; (World Health Organization (WHO) 2021) stigma/fear of contamination from health workers and from family and friends reported by the women; (Allotey et al., 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic impact.

CONCLUSION

Before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, pregnant women experienced fear of death, hospitalization, quarantine, loss of family members, and financial repercussions, resulting in physical, psychological, and socioeconomic impacts on these women's lives.

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy on the placenta and fetus

Pregnant people and their fetuses are vulnerable to adverse health outcomes from coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) due to infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 has been associated with higher rates of maternal mortality, preterm birth, and stillbirth. While SARS-CoV-2 infection of the placenta and vertical transmission is rare, this may be due to the typically longer time interval between maternal infection and testing of the placenta and neonate. Placental injury is evident in cases of SARS-CoV-2-associated stillbirth with massive perivillous fibrin deposition, chronic histiocytic intervillositis, and trophoblast necrosis. Maternal COVID-19 can also polarize fetal immunity, which may have long-term effects on neurodevelopment. Although the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, the impact of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants on placental and perinatal injury/mortality remains concerning for maternal and perinatal health. Here, we highlight the impact of COVID-19 on the placenta and fetus and remaining knowledge gaps.

[Pregnant women with COVID-19 ARDS on the intensive care unit]

BACKGROUND

Pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk of severe disease progression. Comorbidities, such as chronic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, advanced maternal age and high body mass index, may predispose to severe disease. The management of pregnant COVID-19 patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging and requires careful consideration of maternal, fetal and ethical issues.

OBJECTIVE

Description and discussion of intensive care treatment strategies and perinatal anesthesiological management in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed the demographic data, maternal medical history, clinical intensive care management, complications, indications and management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and infant survival of all pregnant patients treated for severe CARDS in the anesthesiological ICU of a German university hospital between March and November 2021.

RESULTS

The cohort included 9 patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range 26-40 years). The gestational age ranged from 21 + 3 weeks to 37 + 2 weeks. None of the patients had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2. Of the nine patients seven were immigrants and communication was hampered by inadequate Central European language skills. Of the patients five had a PaO2/FiO2 index < 150 mm Hg despite escalated invasive ventilation (FiO2 > 0.9 and a positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] of 14 mbar) and were therefore treated with repeated prolonged prone positioning maneuvers (5-14 prone positions for 16 h each, a total of 47 prone positioning treatments) and 2 required treatment with inhaled nitric oxide and venovenous ECMO. The most common complications were bacterial superinfection of the lungs, urinary tract infection and delirium. All the women and five neonates survived. All newborns were delivered by cesarean section, two patients were discharged home with an intact pregnancy and two intrauterine fetal deaths were observed. None of the newborns tested positive for SARS-CoV‑2 at birth.

CONCLUSION

High survival rates are possible in pregnant patients with CARDS. The peripartum management of pregnant women with CARDS requires close interdisciplinary collaboration and should prioritize maternal survival in early pregnancy. In our experience, prolonged prone positioning, an essential evidence-based cornerstone in the treatment of ARDS, can also be safely used in advanced stages of pregnancy. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) and ECMO should be considered as life-saving treatment options for carefully selected patients. For cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia can be safely performed in patients with mild CARDS if well planned but the therapeutic anticoagulation recommended for COVID-19 may increase the risk of bleeding complications, making general anesthesia a more viable alternative, especially in severe disease.

Neonatal-perinatal collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic required perinatal clinicians to address the individual medical needs of the pregnant person and the fetus as well as the interdependent considerations of the maternal/newborn dyad. Regional, national and international collaborative groups utilized existing structures and in some cases, formed new partnerships to rapidly collect perinatal information. The urgent need to care for at-risk and infected pregnant persons required these groups to develop practical approaches to collect the data needed to safely inform practice. Here we will summarize the findings of five collaborative studies that leveraged differing methods to inform perinatal pandemic care.

Etiologically Based Functional Taxonomy of the Preterm Birth Syndrome

Preterm birth (PTB) is a complex syndrome traditionally defined by a single parameter, namely, gestational age at birth (ie, ˂37 weeks). This approach has limitations for clinical usefulness and may explain the lack of progress in identifying cause-specific effective interventions. The authors offer a framework for a functional taxonomy of PTB based on (1) conceptual principles established a priori; (2) known etiologic factors; (3) specific, prospectively identified obstetric and neonatal clinical phenotypes; and (4) postnatal follow-up of growth and development up to 2 years of age. This taxonomy includes maternal, placental, and fetal conditions routinely recorded in data collection systems.

The Impact of COVID-19 during Pregnancy on Maternal Hemodynamic Function, Angiogenic Markers and Neonatal Outcome

Infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) in pregnancy are associated with the development of preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction (FGR). Recently, preeclampsia was linked to impaired maternal hemodynamic function. This retrospective study evaluated singleton pregnancies with COVID-19 during pregnancy and healthy pregnant controls matched for gestational age from November 2020 to March 2022. Non-invasive assessment of maternal hemodynamics by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound measurements (USCOM-1A® Monitor) and oscillometric arterial stiffness (Arteriograph) was performed. Overall, 69 pregnant women were included-23 women after COVID-19 during pregnancy and 46 healthy controls. While two women (8.7%) were admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19-related symptoms, none required intensive care unit admission or non-invasive/invasive ventilation. There were no statistically significant differences in the majority of hemodynamic parameters between the two cohorts. The prevalence of FGR was significantly higher in the COVID-19 during pregnancy group (9.5% vs. healthy controls: 0.0%; p = 0.036), especially in nulliparous women. No difference in angiogenic markers and neonatal outcomes were observed between pregnant women after COVID-19 and healthy controls. In conclusion, no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters or neonatal outcome were observed in women with COVID-19 during pregnancy. However, an increased prevalence of FGR could be described.

Extracellular vesicles alter trophoblast function in pregnancies complicated by COVID-19

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and resulting coronavirus disease (COVID-19) causes placental dysfunction, which increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. While abnormal placental pathology resulting from COVID-19 is common, direct infection of the placenta is rare. This suggests that pathophysiology associated with maternal COVID-19, rather than direct placental infection, is responsible for placental dysfunction and alteration of the placental transcriptome. We hypothesized that maternal circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs), altered by COVID-19 during pregnancy, contribute to placental dysfunction. To examine this hypothesis, we characterized maternal circulating EVs from pregnancies complicated by COVID-19 and tested their effects on trophoblast cell physiology in vitro . We found that the gestational timing of COVID-19 is a major determinant of circulating EV function and cargo. In vitro trophoblast exposure to EVs isolated from patients with an active infection at the time of delivery, but not EVs isolated from Controls, altered key trophoblast functions including hormone production and invasion. Thus, circulating EVs from participants with an active infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases, can disrupt vital trophoblast functions. EV cargo differed between participants with COVID-19 and Controls, which may contribute to the disruption of the placental transcriptome and morphology. Our findings show that COVID-19 can have effects throughout pregnancy on circulating EVs and circulating EVs are likely to participate in placental dysfunction induced by COVID-19.

Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes during delivery admissions: a nationwide analysis with clinical implications

Background

The available literature indicates a link between SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and a heightened probability of experiencing negative outcomes for both the pregnant patient and the developing fetus. We compared clinical outcomes of pregnant patients with or without COVID-19 hospitalized during delivery.

Methods

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes and was adjusted for patient-related, hospital-related, and illness severity indicators.

Results

We identified a total of 3,447,771 pregnant patients admitted between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020; 1.3% (n = 46,050) had COVID-19. COVID-19-positive patients had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (0.15% vs 0.05%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-14.25, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (0.9% vs 0.05%, aOR 14.2, 95% CI 10.7-18.76, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (0.26% vs 0.14%, aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.07-2.02, P = 0.01), and perinatal maternal complications like preeclampsia (9.66% vs 7.04%, aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.2-1.39, P < 0.001) and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome (0.53% vs 0.26%, aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.43-2.61, P < 0.001) than COVID-19-negative patients.

Discussion

Clinicians should be aware of the heightened risk of complications in pregnant patients with COVID-19 and consider strategies to mitigate them.

Impact of COVID-19 and Vaccination During Pregnancy on Placenta-Mediated Complications (COVIGRO Study)

OBJECTIVES

COVID-19 has been associated with preterm birth (PTB) and placental-mediated complications, including fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia (PE). This study aimed to estimate the impact of COVID-19 and vaccination on adverse pregnancy outcomes and markers of placental function.

METHODS

We performed a study on a prospective cohort of women recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (December 2020 to December 2021). At each trimester of pregnancy, the assessment included a questionnaire on COVID-19 and vaccination status; serological tests for COVID-19 (for asymptomatic infection); measurement of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) in maternal blood; measurement of mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI); and pregnancy outcomes (PTB, PE, birth weight below the fifth and the tenth percentile).

RESULTS

Among 788 patients with complete data, we observed 101 (13%) cases of symptomatic infection and 74 (9%) cases of asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2. Most cases (73%) of infection were among women with previous vaccination or COVID-19 infection before pregnancy. COVID-19 infection was not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, abnormal fetal growth, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio, or mean UtA-PI. Vaccination during pregnancy did not influence these outcomes either. We observed no case of severe COVID-19 infection requiring respiratory support.

CONCLUSION

Mild symptomatic or asymptomatic COVID-19 during pregnancy did not influence the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and the markers of placental function in predominantly vaccinated women. Fetal growth monitoring is unlikely to be mandatory in women with mild symptoms of COVID-19.

Implication of viruses in the etiology of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is one of the most common disorders that poses threat to both mothers and neonates and a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Viral infection during pregnancy is not typically considered to cause preeclampsia; however, syndromic nature of preeclampsia etiology and the immunomodulatory effects of viral infections suggest that microbes could trigger a subset of preeclampsia. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Herein, we review the potential role of viral infections in this great obstetrical syndrome. According to in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, viral infections can cause preeclampsia by introducing poor placentation, syncytiotrophoblast stress, and/or maternal systemic inflammation, which are all known to play a critical role in the development of preeclampsia. Moreover, clinical and experimental investigations have suggested a link between several viruses and the onset of preeclampsia via multiple pathways. However, the results of experimental and clinical research are not always consistent. Therefore, future studies should investigate the causal link between viral infections and preeclampsia to elucidate the mechanism behind this relationship and the etiology of preeclampsia itself.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease- 2019 Among Pregnant Women in Saudi Arabia; a Retrospective Study

Background

Pregnancy-related coronavirus disease 2019 infection ranges from asymptomatic to very serious illness. This study aimed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 infection on pregnant women in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of women who had COVID-19 positive test in pregnancy admitted in King Fahd Hospital, Abu Arish General Hospital, and Sabya General Hospital, Jazan, Saudi Arabia during the period between March 2020 and March 2022. Data were extracted from the patient's records. Frequency and percentage distributions were calculated for categorical variables. Descriptive studies and regression analysis were conducted to evaluate the association between selected variables and pregnancy outcomes.

Results

Of the 33 pregnant women with confirmed infection, the majority were in their second and third trimester, with approximately 42.4% requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission and oxygen therapy. The most prevalent symptoms were high respiratory rate and low blood pressure, often accompanied by fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Live births resulted in 54.5% of the cases, while two maternal deaths were reported. Significant associations were found between the need for non-invasive ventilation and timing of infection (p = 0.026), the mode of delivery and timing of infection (p = 0.036), and the mode of delivery and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

COVID-19 poses significant risks to pregnant women, particularly in the third trimester, and emphasized the importance of early identification of high-risk pregnancies, strategic planning, and enhanced monitoring during antenatal care.

Mendelian randomization supports genetic liability to hospitalization for COVID-19 as a risk factor of pre-eclampsia

Background

Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are among the major threats to pregnant women and fetuses, but they can be mitigated by prevention and early screening. Existing observational research presents conflicting evidence regarding the causal effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on pre-eclampsia risk. Through Mendelian randomization (MR), this study aims to investigate the causal effect of three COVID-19 severity phenotypes on the risk of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia to provide more rigorous evidence.

Methods

Two-sample MR was utilized to examine causal effects. Summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals of European ancestry were acquired from the GWAS catalog and FinnGen databases. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with COVID-19 traits at p < 5 × -8 were obtained and pruned for linkage disequilibrium to generate instrumental variables for COVID-19. Inverse variance weighted estimates were used as the primary MR results, with weighted median and MR-Egger as auxiliary analyses. The robustness of the MR findings was also evaluated through sensitivity analyses. Bonferroni correction was applied to primary results, with a p < 0.0083 considered significant evidence and a p within 0.083-0.05 considered suggestive evidence.

Results

Critical ill COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19 with either a death outcome or respiratory support, OR (95% CI): 1.17 (1.03-1.33), p = 0.020] and hospitalized COVID-19 [defined as hospitalization for COVID-19, OR (95% CI): 1.10 (1.01-1.19), p = 0.026] demonstrated suggestive causal effects on pre-eclampsia, while general severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection did not exhibit a significant causal effect on pre-eclampsia. None of the three COVID-19 severity phenotypes exhibited a significant causal effect on eclampsia.

Conclusions

Our investigation demonstrates a suggestive causal effect of genetic susceptibility to critical ill COVID-19 and hospitalized COVID-19 on pre-eclampsia. The COVID-19 severity exhibited a suggestive positive dose-response relationship with the risk of pre-eclampsia. Augmented attention should be paid to pregnant women hospitalized for COVID-19, especially those needing respiratory support.

Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and prevention of COVID-19 severity in pregnant and postpartum women: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant women have an increased risk of severe COVID-19. Evaluation of drugs with a safety reproductive toxicity profile is a priority. At the beginning of the pandemic, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was recommended for COVID-19 treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in eight teaching hospitals in Spain to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCQ in reducing viral shedding and preventing COVID-19 progression. Pregnant and postpartum women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (with or without mild COVID-19 signs/symptoms) and a normal electrocardiogram were randomized to receive either HCQ orally (400 mg/day for 3 days and 200 mg/day for 11 days) or placebo. PCR and electrocardiogram were repeated at day 21 after treatment start. Enrollment was stopped before reaching the target sample due to low recruitment rate. Trial registration EudraCT #: 2020-001587-29, on April 2, 2020.

CLINICAL TRIALS

gov # NCT04410562, registered on June 1, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 116 women (75 pregnant and 41 post-partum) were enrolled from May 2020 to June 2021. The proportion of women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR at day 21 was lower in the HCQ group (21.8%, 12/55) than in the placebo group (31.6%, 18/57), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.499). No differences were observed in COVID-19 progression, adverse events, median change in QTc, hospital admissions, preeclampsia or poor pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HCQ was found to be safe in pregnant and postpartum women with asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although the prevalence of infection was decreased in the HCQ group, the statistical power was insufficient to confirm the potential beneficial effect of HCQ for COVID-19 treatment.

Report of the ISTH registry on pregnancy and COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (COV-PREG-COAG)

Background

Concerns about COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) in pregnant individuals were raised in early pandemic.

Methods

An ISTH-sponsored COVID-19 coagulopathy in pregnancy (COV-PREG-COAG) international registry was developed to describe incidence of coagulopathy, VTE, and anticoagulation in this group.

Results

All pregnant patients with COVID-19 from participating centers were entered, providing 430 pregnancies for the first pandemic wave. Isolated abnormal coagulation parameters were seen in 20%; more often with moderate/severe disease than asymptomatic/mild disease (49% vs 15%; p < 0.0001). No one met the ISTH criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), though 5/21 (24%) met the pregnancy DIC score. There was no difference in antepartum hemorrhage (APH) with asymptomatic/mild disease versus moderate/severe disease (3.4% vs 7.7%; p = 0.135). More individuals with moderate/severe disease experienced postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (22.4% vs 9.3%; p = 0.006). There were no arterial thrombotic events. Only one COVID-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) was reported.

Conclusions

Low rates of coagulopathy, bleeding, and thrombosis were observed among pregnant people in the first pandemic wave.

2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Analysis of the transplacental transmission of SARS CoV-2 virus and antibody transfer according to the gestational age at maternal infection

To quantify transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibody transfer in pregnant women and their newborns according to the gestational age at maternal infection. A prospective observational multicenter study including pregnant women with a positive RT-PCR or a positive serology for SARS-CoV-2 and compatible symptoms, from April to December 2020, in 11 French maternities. The study was designed to obtain a systematic collection of mother-infant dyad's samples at birth. SARS-CoV-2 viral load was measured by RT-PCR. IgG and IgM antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibody concentrations and transplacental transfer ratios were analyzed according to the gestational age at maternal infection. The primary outcome was the rate of SARS CoV-2 materno-fetal transmission at birth. The secondary outcome was the quantification of materno-fetal antibody transfer. Maternal and neonatal outcomes at birth were additionally assessed. Among 165 dyads enrolled, one congenital infection was confirmed {n = 1 (0.63%) IC95% [0.02%; 3.48%]}. The average placental IgG antibody transfer ratio was 1.27 (IC 95% [0.69-2.89]). The transfer ratio increased with increasing time between the onset of maternal infection and delivery (P Value = 0.0001). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were reassuring. We confirmed the very low rate of SARS-CoV-2 transplacental transmission (< 1%). Maternal antibody transfer to the fetus was more efficient when the infection occurred during the first and second trimester of pregnancy.

An Update on COVID-19-Associated Placental Pathologies

COVID-19 pregnancies are associated with increased rates of premature delivery and stillbirths. It is still a matter of debate whether there is a COVID-19-associated pattern of placenta pathology. We updated our previously published results on a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 pregnancies. In total, 38 reports on 3677 placentas were evaluated regarding histopathological changes. Maternal vascular malperfusion (32%), fetal vascular malperfusion (19%), acute and chronic inflammation (20% and 22%) were frequent pathologies. In non-COVID-19 pregnancies, placentas show similar histologic patterns and mainly similar frequencies of manifestation. It has to be taken into account that there might be an observation bias, because some findings are diagnosed as a "pathology" that might have been classified as minor or unspecific findings in non-COVID-19 placentas. COVID-19 placentitis occurs in 1-2% of cases at the most. In conclusion, this updated meta-analysis indicates that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy does not result in an increased rate of a specific placenta pathology and COVID-19 placentitis is rare.

sFlT-1/PlGF ratio as a predictor of preeclampsia in COVID-19 pregnant patients

The association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and preeclampsia is widely debated in numerous studies. The aim of our study was to investigate whether an increased sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is a good marker of preeclampsia in pregnant patients with COVID-19 infection. This single centre prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, at the Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration in Warsaw. The study group consisted of 68 COVID-19 pregnant patients and 57 SARS-CoV-2 negative pregnant controls. Serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was assessed. The two groups did not differ in terms of the frequency of IVF, nulliparity, history of hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia was diagnosed in 10 patients in both groups. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio higher than 38, considered highly suggestive of developing preeclampsia, was found in 20 patients in the COVID-19 group and 15 patients in the control group. The odds of developing preeclampsia in patients with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 was approximately 4-fold higher in COVID-19 group and 11-fold higher in controls. Sflt-1/PlGF ratio does not differ significantly between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-COV-2-negative pregnant patients. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio > 38 is associated with higher odds of the diagnosis of preeclampsia in both of these groups, and therefore may serve as its marker regardless of COVID-19 infection status.

Respiratory distress in SARS-CoV-2 exposed uninfected neonates followed in the COVID Outcomes in Mother-Infant Pairs (COMP) Study

Respiratory distress (RD) has been reported in SARS-CoV-2 exposed uninfected (SEU) term neonates. Prior studies suggest that prenatal exposure to Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) may activate an inflammatory cascade in the newborn airway. In this study, we examine the relationship between maternal COVID-19 vaccination and neonatal RD using a longitudinal cohort of mother-infant pairs in Los Angeles, CA. Two-hundred and twenty-one mothers with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and 227 exposed fetuses are enrolled in our study. Maternal disease severity and neonatal RD variables were defined based on current accepted clinical criteria. To explore the multifactorial associations between maternal COVID-19 parameters and infant RD, we utilize a multivariable logistic regression model and a proteomic sub-analysis to propose a pathway for the development of RD following in utero exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Unusually high rates of RD are observed in SEU infants (17%). The odds ratio of RD is 3.06 (95% CI:1.08-10.21) in term neonates born to unvaccinated individuals versus those born to individuals vaccinated prior to maternal infection. Proteomic analysis reveals a robust inflammatory response associated with ciliary dysregulation and enhanced IgE production among SEU neonates with RD. Maternal vaccination against COVID-19 reduces the frequency of neonatal RD.

Gene crosstalk between COVID-19 and preeclampsia revealed by blood transcriptome analysis

Background

The extensive spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a rapid increase in global mortality. Preeclampsia is a commonly observed pregnancy ailment characterized by high maternal morbidity and mortality rates, in addition to the restriction of fetal growth within the uterine environment. Pregnant individuals afflicted with vascular disorders, including preeclampsia, exhibit an increased susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection via mechanisms that have not been fully delineated. Additionally, the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying preeclampsia and COVID-19 have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to discern commonalities in gene expression, regulators, and pathways shared between COVID-19 and preeclampsia. The objective was to uncover potential insights that could contribute to novel treatment strategies for both COVID-19 and preeclampsia.

Method

Transcriptomic datasets for COVID-19 peripheral blood (GSE152418) and preeclampsia blood (GSE48424) were initially sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Subsequent to that, we conducted a subanalysis by selecting females from the GSE152418 dataset and employed the "Deseq2" package to identify genes that exhibited differential expression. Simultaneously, the "limma" package was applied to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the preeclampsia dataset (GSE48424). Following that, an intersection analysis was conducted to identify the common DEGs obtained from both the COVID-19 and preeclampsia datasets. The identified shared DEGs were subsequently utilized for functional enrichment analysis, transcription factor (TF) and microRNAs (miRNA) prediction, pathway analysis, and identification of potential candidate drugs. Finally, to validate the bioinformatics findings, we collected peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples from healthy individuals, COVID-19 patients, and Preeclampsia patients. The abundance of the top 10 Hub genes in both diseases was assessed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

Result

A total of 355 overlapping DEGs were identified in both preeclampsia and COVID-19 datasets. Subsequent ontological analysis, encompassing Gene Ontology (GO) functional assessment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, revealed a significant association between the two conditions. Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) were constructed using the STRING database. Additionally, the top 10 hub genes (MRPL11, MRPS12, UQCRH, ATP5I, UQCRQ, ATP5D, COX6B1, ATP5O, ATP5H, NDUFA6) were selected based on their ranking scores using the degree algorithm, which considered the shared DEGs. Moreover, transcription factor-gene interactions, protein-drug interactions, co-regulatory networks of DEGs and miRNAs, and protein-drug interactions involving the shared DEGs were also identified in the datasets. Finally, RT-PCR results confirmed that 10 hub genes do exhibit distinct expression profiles in the two diseases.

Conclusion

This study successfully identified overlapping DEGs, functional pathways, and regulatory elements between COVID-19 and preeclampsia. The findings provide valuable insights into the shared molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for both diseases. The validation through RT-qPCR further supports the distinct expression profiles of the identified hub genes in COVID-19 and preeclampsia, emphasizing their potential roles as biomarkers or therapeutic targets in these conditions.

Increased risk of early-onset preeclampsia in pregnant women with COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

To estimate incidence, risk of early and late-onset preeclampsia (PE) and understand their relationship with severity of COVID-19.

METHODS

Pregnant women with COVID-19 (n = 1929) were enrolled from 1 April 2020 to 24 February 2022. Primary outcome measure was incidence and risk of early onset PE in women with COVID-19.

RESULTS

The incidence of early and late-onset PE was 11.4% and 5.6%. Moderate to severe COVID-19 was associated with eight times higher risk of early onset PE [aOR = 8.13 (1.56-42.46), p = 0.0129] compared to asymptomatic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of early onset PE was higher in pregnant women with symptomatic COVID-19 as compared to asymptomatic women.

Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: Global Burden From 1990 to 2019, Current Research Hotspots and Emerging Trends

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) constitute a worldwide health problem for pregnant women and their infants. This study provided HDP burden over 1990 to 2019 by region and age distribution, and predicted changes in related values for the next 25 years. We then conducted an econometric analysis of the author distribution, collaborative networks, keyword burst clustering, and spatio-temporal analysis of HDP-related publications from 2012 to 2022 to access current scientific developments and hotspots. The number of pregnant women with HDP has been increasing over the past 30 years, with regional and age-stratified differences in the burden of disease. Additionally, projections suggest an increase of deaths due to maternal HDP among adolescents younger than 20 years. Current research is mostly centered on pre-eclampsia, with hot keywords including trophoblast, immune tolerance, frozen-thawed embryo transfer, aspirin, gestational diabetes association, and biomarkers. Researches on the pathological mechanism, classification, and subtypes of HDP need to be further advanced.

Hypertension after multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C)

BACKGROUND

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is associated with SARS-CoV-2. Long-term consequences of MIS-C remain unknown. The objective was to describe the prevalence and clinical predictors of hypertension (HTN) and elevated blood pressure (BP) following MIS-C.

METHODS

A retrospective study of children ≤ 18 years admitted to a tertiary center with MIS-C was performed. HTN and elevated BP were classified as per the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines and indexed to the 95th percentile. Data included demographics, inpatient clinical measures, and echocardiograms over 1-year follow-up. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 63 children hospitalized with MIS-C (mean age 9.7 ± 4.2 years, 58.7% male, body mass index (BMI) z-score 0.59 ± 1.9), 14% had HTN, and 4% had elevated BP > 30 days post-hospitalization. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that BMI z-score was significantly associated with higher mean systolic (β = 2.664, CI = 1.307-3.980, p < 0.001) and diastolic (β = 2.547, CI = 0.605-4.489, p = 0.012) BP index > 30 days post-hospitalization. Acute kidney injury (AKI) (23.8%) (OR = 2.977, CI = 1.778-4.987, p < 0.001), peak inpatient serum creatinine (OR = 2.524, CI = 1.344-4.740, p = 0.004), and maximum CRP (OR = 1.009, CI = 1.002-1.016, p = 0.014) were all associated with increased odds of post-hospitalization HTN. Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 46% while hospitalized, compared to 10% at last follow-up. All had return of normal systolic function.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-hospitalization HTN and elevated BP may be associated with MIS-C. Children with greater BMI or AKI may be at greater risk for developing HTN after MIS-C. MIS-C follow-up requires careful BP monitoring and antihypertensive medication consideration. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

COVID-19 and obstetric outcomes: a single-center retrospective experience in a predominantly Black population

Objective: This retrospective, single-center case series was designed to characterize the effects of perinatal COVID-19 diagnosis on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in a predominantly high-risk, urban Black population.Study Design: Data were collected via retrospective chart review on all COVID-19-positive obstetric patients and their neonates who presented to the University of Chicago Medical Center between March 2020 and November 2020, before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine. Patient demographics, delivery outcomes, COVID-19 symptoms, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed.Results: A total of 56 COVID-19-positive obstetric patients were included in the study, of which four were lost to follow-up before delivery. The median age of patients was 27 years (IQR 23, 32), with 73.2% publicly insured and 66.1% Black. Patients had a median body mass index (BMI) of 31.6 kg/m² (IQR 25.9, 35.5). 3.6% of patients had chronic hypertension, 12.5% had diabetes, and 16.1% had asthma. Perinatal complications were common. Twenty-six patients (50.0%) had a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP). 28.8% had gestational hypertension, and 21.2% had preeclampsia (with and without severe features). The rate of maternal ICU admission was 3.6%. Furthermore, 23.5% of patients delivered preterm (<37 weeks gestation), and 50.9% of infants were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).Conclusion: In our study of a predominantly Black, publicly-insured, unvaccinated group of COVID-19-positive pregnant patients, we found high rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, and NICU admission compared to rates reported in existing literature before widespread vaccine availability. Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, irrespective of maternal disease severity, may exacerbate existing obstetric health disparities by disproportionately impacting Black, publicly insured patients. Larger comparative studies are needed to better characterize possible racial and socioeconomic disparities in obstetric outcomes in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. These studies should examine the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, as well as potential associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and disparities in access to care, COVID-19 vaccination, and other social determinants of health amongst more vulnerable populations infected with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.

COVID-19 during pregnancy could potentially affect placental function

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 is an ongoing pandemic and has been extensively studied. However, the effects of COVID-19 during pregnancy, particularly on placental function, have not been verified. In this study, we used blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) to evaluate whether COVID-19 incidence during pregnancy has any lasting effects with respect to placental oxygenation.

METHODS

This is a case-control study, in which eight cases of singleton pregnancies before 30 weeks gestation with COVID-19 mothers were included. Placental oxygenation was evaluated using BOLD-MRI after 32 weeks of gestation. BOLD-MRI was consecutively performed under normoxia (21% O2), hyperoxia (100% O2), and normoxia for 4 min each. Individual placental time-activity curves were evaluated to calculate the peak score (peakΔR2*) and the time from the start of maternal oxygen administration to the time of peakΔR2* (time to peakΔR2*). Eighteen COVID-19-free normal pregnancies from a previous study were used as the control group.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding maternal background, number of days of delivery, birth weight, and placental weight. The parameter peakΔR2* was significantly decreased in the COVID-19 group (8 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 1, p < .001); however, there was no significant difference in time to peakΔR2* (458 ± 74 s vs. 471 ± 33 s, p = .644).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, BOLD-MRI was used to evaluate placental oxygenation during pregnancy in COVID-19-affected patients. COVID-19 during pregnancy decreased placental oxygenation even post-illness, but had no effect on fetal growth; further investigation of the possible effects of COVID-19 on the fetus and mother is warranted.