JSCO-ESMO-ASCO-JSMO-TOS: international expert consensus recommendations for tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours with microsatellite instability or NTRK fusions

First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors: 1-Year Follow-Up of the FIRST-Dx Study

The FIRST-Dx study prospectively evaluated the clinical utility of the comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test (FoundationOne CDx) in the first-line setting for patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (gastrointestinal, biliary, pancreatic, lung, breast, gynecologic, melanoma) in six hospitals in Japan. Here, we report the results of the 1-year interim analysis of the follow-up study about the clinical benefits provided by the upfront CGP test. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients who actually received molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT) determined by the molecular tumor board, best overall response rate (ORR) in each line of therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) ratio (PFS on MBRT/PFS on the first-line therapy). Data from 172 patients with a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range: 0.1-21.5 months) were available. The median OS was not reached. Thirty-nine patients (22.7%) received MBRT during this follow-up period. ORR in first-line therapy was 56.3% in the MBRT group (n = 16) vs. 42.3% in the non-MBRT group (n = 137), and in the second-line was 26.3% in the MBRT group (n = 19) vs. 17.1% in the non-MBRT group (n = 82). Regarding the PFS ratio of second-line MBRT (n = 12), the median PFS ratio was 1.1, and four patients (33.3%) had a ratio ≥ 1.3, indicating that MBRT might be effective in changing the clinical outcome. The findings of this study imply that CGP testing before the standard of care for patients with advanced solid tumors could prove to be a clinically beneficial strategy for guiding subsequent precision anticancer treatments. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) ID: jRCT1050220041.

Analytical performance of OncoPrism-HNSCC, an RNA-based assay to inform immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decisions for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

While immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies can significantly improve outcomes for patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC), only about 15-20% benefit from such treatments. Clinical tests that guide the use of ICIs are therefore critically needed. OncoPrism-HNSCC was developed to address this need. The assay combines next generation RNA sequencing-based immunomodulatory gene expression signatures with machine learning algorithms to generate an OncoPrism score that classifies patients as having low, medium, or high likelihood of disease control in response to ICI treatment. Also, OncoPrism-HNSCC leverages the same FFPE patient tumor RNA used for ICI response prediction to identify rare cases where oncogenic rearrangements in NTRK1/2/3 or ALK genes may occur, and which may indicate the use of potentially highly effective targeted therapies. The clinical performance of OncoPrism-HNSCC has been validated. Here, we report its analytical performance in the presence of potentially confounding sources of variation.

METHODS

The assay's analytical sensitivity was assessed by varying RNA input quantity and quality, observing the effect on ICI response prediction scores. Analytical specificity was tested by spiking increasing percentages of genomic DNA into input RNA. Intra-assay and inter-assay precision were evaluated, and the analytical sensitivity, specificity, and precision of gene fusion detection were assessed. Concordance with orthogonal methods of gene fusion detection was tested on 67 FFPE clinical samples.

RESULTS

Varying RNA inputs as low as four-fold below the nominal input amount had little effect on ICI response prediction scores. RNA quality levels below the test threshold had no significant effect. Genomic DNA spike-ins up to 30% had only a small effect on scores. The pooled standard deviation for multiple operators, reagent lots, batches, and sequencers yielded an overall variance represented by just 0.87% of the score range of the test (0-100). NTRK and ALK gene fusion detection was 100% concordant with orthogonal methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Robust and reliable analytical performance of the OncoPrism-HNSCC assay supports its clinical use, even in the presence of variation typically encountered in the laboratory setting.

Consensus Statement: Recommendations on Actionable Biomarker Testing for Thyroid Cancer Management

Thyroid cancer management is rapidly changing. The identification of actionable biomarkers through both germline and somatic testing are now an integral part of directing patient management. However, deficiencies and disparities within existing thyroid cancer biomarker test approaches are resulting in inconsistent application for patient care. An expert panel was convened to create consensus biomarker testing algorithms and recommendations on actionable biomarker testing for patients diagnosed with medullary thyroid cancer, non-anaplastic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer, or anaplastic follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer who may benefit from targeted therapies. A review of international guidelines was performed to determine the current state, and a literature review was carried out to further evaluate the evidence supporting the use of actionable biomarkers in patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Thyroid biomarker-related gaps impacting patient care were also discussed, with an emphasis on the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach for optimal patient care. The recommendations are presented with the aim to help physicians navigate the current thyroid cancer biomarker testing landscape with its many challenges, balancing aspirational care with what is practical and feasible in terms of economic realities and jurisdictional constraints. By remaining therapy-agnostic, these algorithms and recommendations are broadly applicable.

Rediscovering immunohistochemistry in lung cancer

Several observations indicate that protein expression analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains relevant in individuals with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when considering targeted therapy, as an early step in diagnosis and for therapy selection. Since the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the role of IHC in testing for NSCLC biomarkers has been forgotten or ignored. We discuss how protein-level investigations maintain a critical role in defining sensitivity to lung cancer therapies in oncogene- and non-oncogene-addicted cases and in patients eligible for immunotherapy, suggesting that IHC testing should be reconsidered in clinical practice. We also argue how a panel of IHC tests should be considered complementary to NGS and other genomic assays. This is relevant to current clinical diagnostic practice but with potential future roles to optimize the selection of patients for innovative therapies. At the same time, strict validation of antibodies, assays, scoring systems, and intra- and interobserver reproducibility is needed.

Prognostic value of structural variants in early breast cancer patients

Genomic analysis of structural variants(SVs) in breast cancer (BC) patients has been conducted, but the relationship between genomic alterations and BC prognosis remains unclear. We performed RNA sequencing of 297 early BC fresh-frozen tissues. We identified SVs using three tools (STAR.Arriba, STAR.fusion, and STAR.SEQR) with the COSMIC and Mitelman databases as guide references. We found a median of five to eight fusions per sample. In BC intrinsic subtypes, normal subtype had the fewest fusions (median: 1, interquartile range [IQR]: 0, 3) followed by luminal A (median: 5.5, IQR: 2.75, 10.25), luminal B (median: 9, IQR: 6, 16.5), HER2-enriched (median: 9, IQR: 6, 16.5) and basal (median 10, IQR: 6, 15.5) subtypes (p < 0.05). Intrachromosomal fusion was more frequent observed rather than interchromosomal fusion. In location, chromosome 17 had the most fusions followed by chromosome 1 and 11. When samples were divided into high and low fusion groups based on a cut-off value of 11 fusions, five-year event-free survival (5Y-EFS) was 68.1% in the high fusion group (n = 72) and 80.1% in the low fusion group (n = 125) (p = 0.024) while 75.6% among all patients (95% confidence interval: 0.699, 0.819). Among BC subtype, TNBCs with more fusions had shorter EFS compared to those with fewer fusions (5Y-EFS rate: 65.1% vs. 85.7%; p = 0.013) but no EFS differences were observed in other BC subtypes. ESTIMATE ImmuneScore was also associated with the number of fusions in TNBC (p < 0.005) and TNBCs with high ImmuneScore had better 5Y-EFS compared to those with low ImmuneScore (p = 0.041). In conclusion, diverse fusions were observed by BC subtype, and the number of fusions was associated with BC survival outcome and immune status in TNBC.

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase gene fusions in adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors: a clinicogenomic biobank and record linkage study of expression frequency and patient characteristics from Finland

BACKGROUND

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are oncogenic drivers. Using the Auria Biobank in Finland, we aimed to identify and characterize patients with these gene fusions, and describe their clinical and tumor characteristics, treatments received, and outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated pediatrics with any solid tumor type and adults with colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sarcoma, or salivary gland cancer. We determined tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) protein expression by pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of tumor samples from the Auria Biobank, scored by a certified pathologist. NTRK gene fusion was confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). All 2,059 patients were followed-up starting 1 year before their cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Frequency of NTRK gene fusion tumors was 3.1% (4/127) in pediatrics, 0.7% (8/1,151) for CRC, 0.3% (1/288) for NSCLC, 0.9% (1/114) for salivary gland cancer, and 0% (0/379) for sarcoma. Among pediatrics there was one case each of fibrosarcoma (TPM3::NTRK1), Ewing's sarcoma (LPPR1::NTRK2), primitive neuroectodermal tumor (DAB2IP::NTRK2), and papillary thyroid carcinoma (RAD51B::NTRK3). Among CRC patients, six harbored tumors with NTRK1 fusions (three fused with TPM3), one harbored a NTRK3::GABRG1 fusion, and the other a NTRK2::FXN/LPPR1 fusion. Microsatellite instability was higher in CRC patients with NTRK gene fusion tumors versus wild-type tumors (50.0% vs. 4.4%). Other detected fusions were SGCZ::NTRK3 (NSCLC) and ETV6::NTRK3 (salivary gland cancer). Four patients (three CRC, one NSCLC) received chemotherapy; one patient (with CRC) received radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

NTRK gene fusions are rare in adult CRC, NSCLC, salivary tumors, sarcoma, and pediatric solid tumors.

NTRK gene fusion testing and management in lung cancer

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers found in a variety of solid tumours, including lung cancer. Several tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been developed to treat tumours with NTRK gene fusions. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are first-generation TRK inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in patients with TRK fusion lung cancers. Genomic testing is recommended for all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer for optimal drug therapy selection. Multiple testing methods can be employed to identify NTRK gene fusions in the clinic and each has its own advantages and limitations. Among these assays, RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be considered a gold standard for detecting NTRK gene fusions; however, several alternatives with minimally acceptable sensitivity and specificity are also available in areas where widespread access to NGS is unfeasible. This review highlights the importance of testing for NTRK gene fusions in lung cancer, ideally using the gold-standard method of RNA-based NGS, the various assays that are available, and treatment algorithms for patients.

State-of-the-Art Management of Colorectal Cancer: Treatment Advances and Innovation

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recent advancements in molecular characterization have revolutionized our understanding of the heterogeneity within colorectal tumors, particularly in the context of tumor sidedness. Tumor sidedness, referring to the location of the primary tumor in either the right or left colon, has emerged as a critical factor influencing prognosis and treatment responses in metastatic CRC. Molecular underpinnings of CRC, the impact of tumor sidedness, and how this knowledge guides therapeutic decisions in the era of precision medicine have led to improved outcomes and better quality of life in patients. The emergence of circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic and predictive tool in CRC heralds promising advancements in the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease. This innovation facilitates better patient selection for exploration of additional treatment options. As the field progresses, with investigational agents demonstrating potential as future treatments for refractory metastatic CRC, new avenues for enhancing outcomes in this challenging disease are emerging.

Efficient Identification of Patients With NTRK Fusions Using a Supervised Tumor-Agnostic Approach

CONTEXT.—

The neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) family gene rearrangements have been recently incorporated as predictive biomarkers in a "tumor-agnostic" manner. However, the identification of these patients is extremely challenging because the overall frequency of NTRK fusions is below 1%. Academic groups and professional organizations have released recommendations on the algorithms to detect NTRK fusions. The European Society for Medical Oncology proposal encourages the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) if available, or alternatively immunohistochemistry (IHC) could be used for screening with NGS confirmation of all positive IHC results. Other academic groups have included histologic and genomic information in the testing algorithm.

OBJECTIVE.—

To apply some of these triaging strategies for a more efficient identification of NTRK fusions within a single institution, so pathologists can gain practical insight on how to start looking for NTRK fusions.

DESIGN.—

A multiparametric strategy combining histologic (secretory carcinomas of the breast and salivary gland; papillary thyroid carcinomas; infantile fibrosarcoma) and genomic (driver-negative non-small cell lung carcinomas, microsatellite instability-high colorectal adenocarcinomas, and wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors) triaging was put forward.

RESULTS.—

Samples from 323 tumors were stained with the VENTANA pan-TRK EPR17341 Assay as a screening method. All positive IHC cases were simultaneously studied by 2 NGS tests, Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 and FoundationOne CDx. With this approach, the detection rate of NTRK fusions was 20 times higher (5.57%) by only screening 323 patients than the largest cohort in the literature (0.30%) comprising several hundred thousand patients.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Based on our findings, we propose a multiparametric strategy (ie, "supervised tumor-agnostic approach") when pathologists start searching for NTRK fusions.

Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series

BACKGROUND

The tumor-agnostic indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) increased the demand for such tests beyond Lynch syndrome. International guideline recommendations accept immunohistochemistry (IHC) for dMMR or molecular techniques (PCR or NGS) for MSI status determinations considering the two tests are equal, although there are scattered reports contradicting to this presumption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Here we have directly compared four protein MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) to MSI Pentaplex PCR test in a large cancer patient cohort (n = 1306) of our diagnostic center where the two tests have been run parallel in 703 cases.

RESULTS

In this study we have found a high discrepancy rate (19.3%) of the two tests which was independent of the tumor types. The MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was found to be very low resulting in a relatively low positive and negative predicting values. As a consequence, the correlation of the two tests was low (kappa < 0.7). During analysis of the possible contributing factors of this poor performance, we have excluded low tumor percentage of the samples, but identified dMMR phenotypes (classic versus non-classic or unusual) as possible contributors.

CONCLUSION

Although our cohort did not include samples with identified technical errors, our data strongly support previous reports that unidentified preanalytical factors might have the major influence on the poor performance of the MSI PCR and MMR IHC. Furthermore, the case is open whether the two test types are equally powerful predictive markers of immunotherapies.

Canadian Multicentric Pan-TRK (CANTRK) Immunohistochemistry Harmonization Study

Tumor-agnostic testing for NTRK1-3 gene rearrangements is required to identify patients who may benefit from TRK inhibitor therapies. The overarching objective of this study was to establish a high-quality pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening assay among 18 large regional pathology laboratories across Canada using pan-TRK monoclonal antibody clone EPR17341 in a ring study design. TRK-fusion positive and negative tumor samples were collected from participating sites, with fusion status confirmed by panel next-generation sequencing assays. Each laboratory received: (1) unstained sections from 30 cases of TRK-fusion-positive or -negative tumors, (2) 2 types of reference standards: TRK calibrator slides and IHC critical assay performance controls (iCAPCs), (3) EPR17341 antibody, and (4) suggestions for developing IHC protocols. Participants were asked to optimize the IHC protocol for their instruments and detection systems by using iCAPCs, to stain the 30 study cases, and to report the percentage scores for membranous, cytoplasmic, and nuclear staining. TRK calibrators were used to assess the analytical sensitivity of IHC protocols developed by using the 2 reference standards. Fifteen of 18 laboratories achieved diagnostic sensitivity of 100% against next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic specificity ranged from 40% to 90%. The results did not differ significantly between positive scores based on the presence of any type of staining vs the presence of overall staining in ≥1% of cells. The median limit of detection measured by TRK calibrators was 76,000 molecules/cell (range 38,000 to >200,000 molecules/cell). Three different patterns of staining were observed in 19 TRK-positive cases, cytoplasmic-only in 7 samples, nuclear and cytoplasmic in 9 samples, and cytoplasmic and membranous in 3 samples. The Canadian multicentric pan-TRK study illustrates a successful strategy to accelerate the multicenter harmonization and implementation of pan-TRK immunohistochemical screening that achieves high diagnostic sensitivity by using laboratory-developed tests where laboratories used centrally developed reference materials. The measurement of analytical sensitivity by using TRK calibrators provided additional insights into IHC protocol performance.

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor markers, 2nd edition review part 1

With advances in gene and protein analysis technologies, many target molecules that may be useful in cancer diagnosis have been reported. Therefore, the "Tumor Marker Study Group" was established in 1981 with the aim of "discovering clinically" useful molecules. Later, the name was changed to "Japanese Society for Molecular Tumor Marker Research" in 2000 in response to the remarkable progress in gene-related research. Currently, the world of cancer treatment is shifting from the era of representative tumor markers of each cancer type used for tumor diagnosis and treatment evaluation to the study of companion markers for molecular-targeted therapeutics that target cancer cells. Therefore, the first edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, which summarizes tumor markers and companion markers in each cancer type, was published in 2016. After publication of the first edition, the gene panel testing using next-generation sequencing became available in Japan in June 2019 for insured patients. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been indicated for a wide range of cancer types. Therefore, the 2nd edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines was published in September 2021 to address the need to revise the guidelines. Here, we present an English version of the review (Part 1) of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, Second Edition.

SOMATIC DEFICIENT MISMATCH REPAIR ASSESSED BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL FEATURES IN BRAZILIAN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant CNS tumor. Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) is associated with better prognosis and is a biomarker for immunotherapy. Evaluation of MMR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is accessible, cost effective, sensitive, and specific.

AIM

Our objective was to investigate MMR proteins in adult GBM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 68 GBM samples to evaluate the proficiency of MMR genes expression assessed by IHC. Clinicopathologic and molecular features were compared in proficient (pMMR) or dMMR.

RESULTS

10 (14.7%) samples showed dMMR, and the most frequent was MSH6 (100%) followed by MSH2, PMS2, and MLH1. We observed heterogeneous expression of dMMR in 5 GBMs. The median overall survival did not differ between pMMR (19.8 months; 0.2-30) and dMMR (16.9 months; 6.4-27.5) (p = 0.31). We observed a significantly higher overall survival associated with gross total resection compared to subtotal resection or biopsy (30.7 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.02) and MGMT methylated status (29.6 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.049). At the analysis time, 10 patients were still alive, all in the pMMR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated dMMR phenotype assessed by IHC in an expressive portion of GBM patients, however without significant impact on overall survival.

Detection of NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors: recommendations from a Latin American group of oncologists and pathologists

NTRK gene fusions have been detected in more than 25 types of tumors and their prevalence is approximately 0.3% in solid tumors. This low prevalence makes identifying patients who could benefit from TRK inhibitors a considerable challenge. Furthermore, while numerous papers on the evaluation of NTRK fusion genes are available, not all countries have guidelines that are suitable for their setting, as is the case with Latin America. Therefore, a group of oncologists and pathologists from several countries in Latin America (Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay) met to discuss and reach consensus on how to identify patients with NTRK gene fusions in solid tumors. To do so, they developed a practical algorithm, considering their specific situation and limitations.

Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

Antitumor Activity and Safety of Dostarlimab Monotherapy in Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient Solid Tumors: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) occurs in various cancers, and these tumors are attractive candidates for anti-programmed cell death 1 therapies, such as dostarlimab, a recently approved immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Objective

To assess the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR solid tumors.

Design, Setting, And Participants

The GARNET trial was a phase 1, open-label, single-group, multicenter study that began enrolling May 8, 2017. Participants had advanced or recurrent dMMR and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or polymerase epsilon (POLE)-altered solid tumors. The data cut for this interim analysis was from November 1, 2021, with median follow-up of 27.7 months.

Interventions

Patients received 500 mg of dostarlimab intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression, discontinuation, or withdrawal.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate and duration of response in patients with dMMR solid tumors by blinded independent central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

The efficacy population included 327 patients (median [range] age, 63 [24-85] years; 235 [71.9%] female; 7 [2.1%] Asian, 6 [1.8%] Black, and 206 [63.0%] White patients), with 141 patients (43.1%) with dMMR endometrial cancer, 105 patients (32.1%) with dMMR colorectal cancer, and 81 patients (24.8%) with other dMMR tumor types. All patients had at least 1 previous line of therapy. Objective response rate assessed per blinded independent central review for dMMR solid tumors was 44.0% (95% CI, 38.6% to 49.6%). Median duration of response was not reached (range, ≥1.18 to ≥47.21 months); 72.2% of responders (104 of 144) had a response lasting 12 or more months. Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months); probability of progression-free survival at 24 months was 40.6% (95% CI, 35.0% to 46.1%). Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months to not reached). The most frequent immune-related adverse events were hypothyroidism (25 [6.9%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (21 [5.8%]), and arthralgia (17 [4.7%]). No new safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions And Relevance

In this nonrandomized controlled trial, dostarlimab was a well-tolerated treatment option with rapid, robust, and durable antitumor activity in patients with diverse dMMR solid tumors. These findings suggest that dostarlimab provides meaningful long-term benefit in a population with high unmet need.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02715284.

Integrated analysis reveals SMARCD1 is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in skin cutaneous melanoma

OBJECTIVE

SMARCD1 is a part of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex family, which consists of transcription factors that are implicated in various types of cancer. Examining SMARCD1 expression in human cancers can provide valuable insights into the development and progression of skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM).

METHODS

Our study comprehensively examined the association between SMARCD1 expression and numerous factors, including prognosis, tumor microenvironment (TME), immune infiltration, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in SKCM. Then we utilized immunohistochemical staining to measure the SMARCD1 expression in both SKCM tissues and normal skin tissues. Furthermore, we conducted in vitro experimentation to evaluate the effects of SMARCD1 knockdown on SKCM cells.

RESULTS

We found that aberrant expression of SMARCD1 across 16 cancers was strongly correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, our research revealed that SMARCD1 expression is associated with multiple factors in different types of cancer, including immune infiltration, TME, immune-related genes, MSI, TMB, and sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. SMARCD1 is likely involved in various SKCM signaling pathways and biological processes. Additionally, our research revealed that an SMARCD1-based risk factor model accurately predicted OS in SKCM patients. Furthermore, the downregulation of SMARCD1 expression demonstrated a significant inhibition of SKCM cell proliferation and migration, as well as an increase in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that SMARCD1 is a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarker for SKCM, and its expression has significant clinical implications for the development of novel treatment strategies.

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Signet-Ring/Poorly Cohesive Cells

Signet-ring cell (SRC)/poorly cohesive cell carcinoma is an aggressive variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to clarify its clinicopathologic and molecular profiles based on a multi-institutional cohort of 20 cases. The molecular profiles were investigated using DNA and RNA sequencing. The clinicopathologic parameters and molecular alterations were analyzed based on survival indices and using a validation/comparative cohort of 480 conventional PDAC patients. The primary findings were as follows: (1) clinicopathologic features: SRC carcinomas are highly aggressive neoplasms with poor prognosis, and the lungs are elective metastatic sites; (2) survival analysis: a higher SRC component was indicative of poorer prognosis. In particular, the most clinically significant threshold of SRC was 80%, showing statistically significant differences in both disease-specific and disease-free survival; (3) genomic profiles: SRC carcinomas are similar to conventional PDAC with the most common alterations affecting the classic PDAC drivers KRAS (70% of cases), TP53 (55%), SMAD4 (25%), and CDKN2A (20%). EGFR alterations, RET::CCDC6 fusion gene, and microsatellite instability (3 different cases, 1 alteration per case) represent novel targets for precision oncology. The occurrence of SMAD4 mutations was associated with poorer prognosis; (4) pancreatic SRC carcinomas are genetically different from gastric SRC carcinomas: CDH1, the classic driver gene of gastric SRC carcinoma, is not altered in pancreatic SRC carcinoma; (5) transcriptome analysis: the cases clustered into 2 groups, one classical/exocrine-like, and the other squamous-like; and (6) SRC carcinoma-derived organoids can be successfully generated, and their cultures preserve the histologic and molecular features of parental SRC carcinoma. Although pancreatic SRC carcinoma shares similarities with conventional PDAC regarding the most important genetic drivers, it also exhibits important differences. A personalized approach for patients with this tumor type should consider the clinical relevance of histologic determination of the SRC component and the presence of potentially actionable molecular targets.

[Testing deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update. German version]

Testing to detect mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) has become an integral part of the routine diagnostic workup for colorectal cancer (CRC). While MSI was initially considered to be a possible indicator of a hereditary disposition to cancer (Lynch syndrome, LS), today the prediction of the therapy response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is in the foreground. Corresponding recommendations and testing algorithms are available for use in primary diagnosis (reviewed in: Rüschoff et al. 2021).Given the increasing importance for routine use and the expanding indication spectrum of ICI therapies for non-CRCs, such as endometrial, small intestinal, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing is presented. The focus is on the challenges in the assessment of immunohistochemical stains and the value of PCR-based procedures, considering the expanded ICI indication spectrum. A practice-oriented flowchart for everyday diagnostic decision-making is provided that considers new data on the frequency and type of discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings, and the possible role of Next Generation Sequencing in clarifying them. Reference is made to the significance of systematic quality assurance measures (e.g., QuIP MSI portal and multicenter proficiency testing), including regular continued training and education.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of immunotherapy in patients with high tumor mutational burden tumors

The development of novel antitumor agents and accompanying biomarkers has improved survival across several tumor types. Previously, we developed recommendations for tumor-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficient or neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusions. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown efficacy in patient with tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors and have been established as a third tumor-agnostic agent, making it necessary to develop the guideline prioritized for these patients. Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO), Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), and Japanese society of pediatric hematology/oncology (JSPHO) voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done. The current guideline describes three clinical questions and seven recommendations for whom, when, and how TMB should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with TMB-H advanced solid tumors. In this guideline, the committee proposed seven recommendations for performing TMB testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from immunotherapy.

N-Glycomic Profiling of Microsatellite Unstable Colorectal Cancer

Aberrant glycosylation affects cancer progression and immune evasion. Approximately 15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) demonstrate microsatellite instability (MSI) and display major differences in outcomes and therapeutic responses, as compared to corresponding microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. We compared the N-glycan profiles of stage II and IV MSI CRC tumors, further subdivided into BRAF^V600E wild-type and mutated subgroups (n = 10 in each subgroup), with each other and with those of paired non-neoplastic mucosal samples using mass spectrometry. Further, the N-glycans of BRAF^V600E wild-type stage II MSI tumors were compared to corresponding MSS tumors (n = 9). Multiple differences in N-glycan profiles were identified between the MSI CRCs and control tissues, as well as between the stage II MSI and MSS samples. The MSI CRC tumors showed a lower relative abundance of high-mannose N-glycans than did the control tissues or the MSS CRCs. Among MSI CRC subgroups, acidic N-glycans showed tumor stage and BRAF mutation status-dependent variation. Specifically, the large, sulfated/phosphorylated, and putative terminal N-acetylhexosamine-containing acidic N-glycans differed between the MSI CRC subgroups, showing opposite changes in stages II and IV, when comparing BRAF mutated and wild-type tumors. Our results show that molecular subgroups of CRC exhibit characteristic glycan profiles that may explain certain carcinogenic properties of MSI tumors.

First-Line Genomic Profiling in Previously Untreated Advanced Solid Tumors for Identification of Targeted Therapy Opportunities

IMPORTANCE

Precision oncology using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) by next-generation sequencing is aimed at companion diagnosis and genomic profiling. The clinical utility of CGP before the standard of care (SOC) is still not resolved, and more evidence is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical utility of next-generation CGP (FoundationOne CDx [F1CDx]) in patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent solid tumors.

DESIGN, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study enrolled patients with previously untreated advanced solid tumors between May 18, 2021, and February 16, 2022, with follow-up through August 16, 2022. The study was conducted at 6 hospitals in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent cancers in the gastrointestinal or biliary tract; pancreas, lung, breast, uterus, or ovary; and malignant melanoma.

EXPOSURE

Comprehensive genomic profiling testing before SOC for advanced solid tumors.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportion of patients with actionable or druggable genomic alterations and molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT).

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria and 180 patients (92 men [51.1%]) with a median age of 64 years (range, 23-88 years) subsequently underwent CGP (lung [n = 28], colon/small intestine [n = 27], pancreas [n = 27], breast [n = 25], biliary tract [n = 20], gastric [n = 19], uterus [n = 12], esophagus [n = 10], ovary [n = 6], and skin melanoma [n = 6]). Data from 172 patients were available for end point analyses. Actionable alterations were found in 172 patients (100.0%; 95% CI, 97.9%-100.0%) and druggable alternations were identified in 109 patients (63.4%; 95% CI, 55.7%-70.6%). The molecular tumor board identified MBRT for 105 patients (61.0%; 95% CI, 53.3%-68.4%). Genomic alterations included in the companion diagnostics list of the CGP test were found in 49 patients (28.5%; 95% CI, 21.9%-35.9%) in a tumor-agnostic setting. After a median follow-up of 7.9 months (range, 0.5-13.2 months), 34 patients (19.8%; 95% CI, 14.1%-26.5%) received MBRT.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that CGP testing before SOC for patients with advanced solid tumors may be clinically beneficial to guide the subsequent anticancer therapies, including molecularly matched treatments.

Safety of current treatment options for NTRK fusion-positive cancers

INTRODUCTION

Oncogenic NTRK fusions have been found in multiple cancer types affecting adults and/or children, including rare tumors with pathognomonic fusions and common cancers in which fusions are rare. The tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors (TRKi) larotrectinib and entrectinib are among the first agents with tissue agnostic FDA approvals for cancer treatment, and additional TRKi are undergoing development. As experience with TRKi grow, novel mechanisms of resistance and on/off target side effects have become increasingly important considerations.

AREAS COVERED

Authors reviewed literature published through July 2023 on platforms such as PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and manufacturer/FDA drug labels, focusing on the development of TRKi, native functions of TRK, phenotype of congenital TRK aberrancies, efficacy, and safety profile of TRKi in clinical trials and investigator reports, and on/off target adverse effects associated with TRKi (Appendix A).

EXPERT OPINION

TRKi have histology-agnostic activity against tumors with NTRK gene fusions. TRKi are generally well tolerated with a side effect profile that compares favorably to cytotoxic chemotherapy. There are numerous ongoing studies investigating TRKi as frontline, adjuvant, and salvage therapy. It will be critical to continue to gather long-term safety data on the use of these agents, particularly in children.

Comparison of NTRK fusion detection methods in microsatellite-instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been approved for metastatic solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions, but the detection of NTRK fusions is challenging. International guidelines recommend pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) in tumor types with low prevalence of NTRK fusions, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). RNA-based NGS is preferred, but is expensive, time-consuming, and extracting good-quality RNA from FFPE tissue is challenging. Alternatives in daily clinical practice are warranted. We assessed the diagnostic performance of RNA-NGS, FFPE-targeted locus capture (FFPE-TLC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the 5'/3' imbalance quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) after IHC screening in 268 patients with microsatellite-instability-high mCRC, the subgroup in which NTRK fusions are most prevalent (1-5%). A consensus result was determined after review of all assay results. In 16 IHC positive tumors, 10 NTRK fusions were detected. In 33 IHC negative samples, no additional transcribed NTRK fusions were found, underscoring the high sensitivity of IHC. Sensitivity of RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, FISH, and qRT-PCR was 90%, 90%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for all assays. Robustness, defined as the percentage of samples that provided an interpretable result in the first run, was 100% for FFPE-TLC, yet more limited for RNA-NGS (85%), FISH (70%), and qRT-PCR (70%). Overall, we do not recommend FISH for the detection of NTRK fusions in mCRC due to its low sensitivity and limited robustness. We conclude that RNA-NGS, FFPE-TLC, and qRT-PCR are appropriate assays for NTRK fusion detection, after enrichment with pan-TRK IHC, in routine clinical practice.

Immunohistochemistry in the pathologic diagnosis and management of thyroid neoplasms

The use of immunohistochemistry cannot be underestimated in the everyday practice of thyroid pathology. It has evolved over the years beyond the traditional confirmation of thyroid origin to molecular profiling and the prediction of clinical behavior. In addition, immunohistochemistry has served to implement changes in the current thyroid tumor classification scheme. It is prudent to perform a panel of immunostains, and the immunoprofile should be interpreted in light of the cytologic and architectural features. Immunohistochemistry can also be easily performed in the limited cellularity specimen preparation generated from thyroid fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy; however, it will require laboratory validation of immunostains specific to these preparations to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. This review discusses the application of immunohistochemistry in thyroid pathology with a focus on limited cellularity preparations.

Japanese Society of Medical Oncology/Japan Society of Clinical Oncology/Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have reported the efficacy of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors against neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion gene-positive advanced solid tumors. The accumulated evidence of tumor-agnostic agent has made since TRK inhibitors were approved and used in clinical practice. Therefore, we have revised the 'Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)/Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO)-led clinical recommendations on the diagnosis and use of tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in adult and pediatric patients with neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase fusion-positive advanced solid tumors, cooperated by the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO)'.

METHODS

Clinical questions regarding medical care were formulated for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors. Relevant publications were searched by PubMed and Cochrane Database. Critical publications and conference reports were added manually. Systematic reviews were performed for each clinical question for the purpose of developing clinical recommendations. The committee members identified by JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO voted to determine the level of each recommendation considering the strength of evidence, expected risks and benefits to patients, and other related factors. Thereafter, a peer review by experts nominated from JSCO, JSMO, and JSPHO, and the public comments among all societies' members was done.

RESULTS

The current guideline describes 3 clinical questions and 14 recommendations for whom, when, and how NTRK fusion should be tested, and what is recommended for patients with NTRK fusion-positive advanced solid tumors.

CONCLUSION

The committee proposed 14 recommendations for performing NTRK testing properly to select patients who are likely to benefit from TRK inhibitors.

Diagnostic performance of Idylla MSI test in colorectal cancer biopsies

Universal testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) is recommended in colorectal cancer (CRC) to screen for Lynch syndrome and to guide optimal treatment and follow-up of the patients. Especially in neoadjuvant setting, where immuno-oncological treatments have recently shown excellent responses, identification of MSI status at biopsy is a prerequisite. Idylla MSI test offers a rapid and automated test to assess MSI-status from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections. In this study, we compared the performance of the Idylla MSI test to mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 117 CRC biopsies with previously known deficient MMR status. The concordance between Idylla and IHC was 99.0% (95/96) for biopsies with the recommended ≥ 20% tumor cell content. Further, 85.7% (18/21) of suboptimal CRC biopsy specimens (tumor cell content 5-15%) were diagnosed as MSI. Overall, we identified four discrepant cases of which three had tumor cell content less than 20%, explaining the discordant result. Our study shows that the Idylla MSI test offers a competent tool for MSI screening in CRC biopsy specimens.

Systematic review of NTRK 1/2/3 fusion prevalence pan-cancer and across solid tumours

NTRK gene fusions are rare somatic mutations found across cancer types with promising targeted therapies emerging. Healthcare systems face significant challenges in integrating these treatments, with uncertainty in prevalence and optimal testing methods to identify eligible patients. We performed a systematic review of NTRK fusion prevalence to inform efficient diagnostic screening and scale of therapeutic uptake. We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases on 31/03/2021. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting fusion rates in solid tumours, English language, post-2010 publication and minimum sample size. Critical appraisal was performed using a custom 11-item checklist. Rates were collated by cancer type and pooled if additional synthesis criteria were met. 160 studies were included, with estimates for 15 pan-cancer and 429 specific cancer types (63 paediatric). Adult pan-cancer estimates ranged 0.03-0.70%, with higher rates found in RNA-based assays. In common cancers, rates were consistently below 0.5%. Rare morphological subtypes, colorectal microsatellite instability, and driver mutation exclusion cancers had higher rates. Only 35.6% of extracted estimates used appropriate methods and sample size to identify NTRK fusions. NTRK fusion-positive cancers are rare and widely distributed across solid tumours. Small-scale, heterogeneous data confound prevalence prediction. Further large-scale, standardised genomic data are needed to characterise NTRK fusion epidemiology.

TRK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and NTRK fusions identified via cell-free DNA analysis

Tissue-agnostic indications for targeted therapies have expanded options for patients with advanced solid tumors. The Food and Drug Administration approvals of the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib provide rationale for next-generation sequencing (NGS) in effectively all advanced solid tumor patients given potential for clinical responses even in otherwise refractory disease. As proof of concept, this case report describes a 64-year-old woman with triple-negative breast cancer refractory to multiple lines of therapy, found to have a rare mutation on NGS which led to targeted therapy with meaningful response. She initially presented with metastatic recurrence 5 years after treatment for a localized breast cancer, with rapid progression through four lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugate-based therapy, and chemotherapy. Germline genetic testing was normal. Ultimately, NGS evaluation of cell-free DNA via an 83-gene assay (Guardant Health, Inc.) identified two NTRK3 fusions: an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion associated with the rare secretory breast carcinoma, and CRTC3-NTRK3, a novel fusion partner not previously described in breast cancer. Liver biopsy was sent for whole exome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis of tissue (BostonGene, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), which provided orthogonal confirmation of both the ETV6-NTRK3 and CRTC3-NTRK3 fusions. She was started on the TRK inhibitor larotrectinib with a marked clinical and radiographic response after only 2 months of therapy. The patient granted verbal consent to share her clinical story, images, and data in this case report. This case demonstrates the significant potential benefits of NGS testing in advanced cancer and the lessons we may learn from individual patient experiences.

Development and external validation of a non-invasive imaging biomarker to estimate the microsatellite instability status of gastric cancer and its prognostic value: The combination of clinical and quantitative CT-imaging features

PURPOSE

Molecular testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) status plays a vital role in the clinical management of gastric cancer (GC). Nevertheless, challenges of routinely applied technology for MSI determination exist. This study aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive imaging biomarker for MSI assessment in GC and explore its prognostic value.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 396 GC patients with pretreatment CT images from a single center and a public database and divided them into an original cohort (n = 356) and an external validation cohort (n = 40). The SMOTE algorithm was used to generate a balanced training cohort (n = 192) and the independent radiomics model, clinical model, and radiomics-clinic combined model were constructed for determining MSI status. The models' discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, and prognosis significance were evaluated by AUC, calibration, decision curve analyses, and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The radiomics-clinic combined model derived from clinical and quantitative CT-based "Radscore" exhibited the best discriminatory abilities of MSI status in all cohorts, with AUCs of 0.836 (95% CI, 0.780-0.893) in the training cohort, 0.834 (95% CI, 0.688-0.981) in the external validation cohort, and 0.750 (95% CI, 0.682-0.819) in the original cohort, respectively. Meanwhile, the combined model demonstrated goodness of fitness, higher clinical net benefits, and significant positive integrated discrimination improvement compared with any independent model. While it showed no significant overall survival- or progression-free survival-based risk stratification ability (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics-clinic combined model could be a potential non-invasive biomarker for MSI status in GC, which help clinical decision-making, nevertheless, provided limited prognostic ability.

The clinical impact of testing for biomarkers in gastric cancer patients: a real-world cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In gastric cancer (GC), HER2 was the first biomarker for guided therapy registered for clinical use. Considering the recent approvals of immune check-point blockade (ICB) in gastro-oesophageal cancers, testing for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) is becoming increasingly important. Here we describe a real-world cohort on biomarker assessment in GC patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GC between 2017 and 2021 were included. Biomarker results were retrieved from electronic patient files. PD-L1 CPS was determined retrospectively on dMMR and EBV-positive (EBV+) tumours. Data on genomic sequencing were analysed separately.

RESULTS

Of 363 patients identified, 45% had metastatic disease. In 335 patients (92%) at least one biomarker was tested. The prevalence of HER2+, dMMR and EBV+ tumours was 10% (32 of 319), 7% (20 of 294) and 1% (three of 235), respectively. Of the dMMR and EBV+ tumours, 95% had a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5. Therapeutic strategy was adjusted in 31 of 55 patients and consisted of anti-HER2 therapies as well as ICB in clinical trials. Genomic alterations were found in 44 of 60 tested patients. TP53 (73%) and PIK3CA (20%) mutations were most common, followed by KRAS mutations (11%) and amplifications (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world cohort, testing for HER2, dMMR and EBV status affected treatment decisions in 56% of the patients. Although most dMMR and EBV+ tumours had a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, not all patients with a high probability of treatment response are identified. Based on these results, a stepwise diagnostic strategy is proposed.

Survival Outcomes of Patients With Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Fusion-Positive Cancer Receiving Larotrectinib Versus Standard of Care: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Using Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Larotrectinib, a highly specific tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor, previously demonstrated high response rates in single-arm trials of patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer, but there are limited data on comparative effectiveness against standard-of-care (SoC) regimens used in routine health care practice, before widespread adoption of TRK inhibitors as SoC for TRK fusion-positive cancers. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison, a validated methodology that balances population characteristics to facilitate cross-trial comparisons, was used to compare the overall survival (OS) of larotrectinib versus non-TRK-inhibitor SoC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individual patient data from three larotrectinib trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02122913, NCT02637687, and NCT02576431) were compared with published aggregate real-world data from patients with locally advanced/metastatic TRK fusion-positive cancer identified in the Flatiron Health/Foundation Medicine database. OS was defined as the time from advanced/metastatic disease diagnosis to death. After matching population characteristics, the analyses included (1) a log-rank test of equality to test whether the two groups were similar before larotrectinib initiation; and (2) estimation of treatment effect of larotrectinib versus non-TRK-inhibitor SoC. These analyses are limited to prognostic variables available in real-world data.

RESULTS

Eighty-five larotrectinib patients and 28 non-TRK-inhibitor SoC patients were included in the analyses. After matching, log-rank testing showed no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P = .31). After matching, larotrectinib was associated with a 78% lower risk of death, compared with non-TRK-inhibitor SoC (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.52]; P = .001); median OS was 39.7 months (95% CI: 16.4, NE [not estimable]) for larotrectinib and 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.2, 14.1) for SoC.

CONCLUSION

Matching-adjusted indirect comparison analyses suggest longer OS with larotrectinib, compared with non-TRK-inhibitor SoC, in adult patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer.

Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer

In the era of targeted therapy based on genomic alterations, the treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been changing. Before systemic treatment initiation, determination of tumour genomic status for KRAS and NRAS, BRAF^V600E mutations, ERBB2, and microsatellite instability and/or mismatch repair (MMR) status is recommended. In patients with deficient MMR and BRAF^V600E mCRC, randomized phase III trials have established the efficacy of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy and the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab as second-line or third-line therapy. In addition, new agents have been actively developed in other rare molecular fractions such as ERBB2 alterations and KRAS^G12C mutations. In March 2022, the combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for ERBB2-positive mCRC was approved in Japan, thereby combining real-world evidence from the SCRUM-Japan Registry. As the populations are highly fragmented owing to rare genomic alterations, various strategies in clinical development are expected. Clinical development of a tumour-agnostic approach, such as NTRK fusion and tumour mutational burden, has successfully introduced corresponding drugs to clinical practice. Considering the difficulty of randomized trials owing to cost-benefit and rarity, a promising solution could be real-world evidence utilized as an external control from the molecular-based disease registry.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry as screening tool for NTRK fusions: A diagnostic workflow for the identification of positive patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Pan-TRK inhibitors Entrectinib and Larotrectinib have been recently approved as tumor-agnostic therapies in NTRK1-2-3 rearranged patients and there is therefore an urgent need to identify reliable and accessible biomarkers for capturing NTRK fusions in the real-world practice.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the analytical validity of the recently released pan-TRK assay (Ventana), running a head-to-head comparison between immunohistochemistry and Archer FusionPlex Lung Panel (ArcherDX) that is designed to detect key fusions in 13 genes, also including NTRK1-3.

METHODS

Pan-TRK IHC and NGS analysis were conducted on a retrospective/prospective cohort of 124 cancer patients (carcinomas, 93 cases; soft tissue sarcomas, 19; primary central nervous system tumours, 10; and neuroblastomas, 2). FISH data were available in most of the IHC/NGS discordant cases.

RESULTS

A comparison between IHC and NGS results was carried out in 117 cases: among 30 pan-TRK positive cases, NTRK rearrangement by NGS was found in 11 (37%), while one of the 87 (1.1%) pan-TRK negative cases (a case of NSCLC) showed a TPM3-NRTK1 rearrangement by NGS. Accordingly, sensitivity and specificity of IHC in predicting NTRK status were 91.7% and 81.9%, respectively, while negative (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were 98.8% and 36.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data lead to suggest that IHC with VENTANA pan-TRK antibody can be a reliable screening tool for the identification of patients potentially bearing NTRK rearranged tumours.

Brazilian Expert Consensus for NTRK Gene Fusion Testing in Solid Tumors

Oncogenic neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusions occur in less than 1% of common cancers. These mutations have emerged as new biomarkers in cancer genomic profiling with the approval of selective drugs against tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion proteins. Nevertheless, the optimal pathways and diagnostic platforms for this biomarker's screening and genomic profiling have not been defined and remain a subject of debate. A panel of national experts in molecular cancer diagnosis and treatment was convened by videoconference and suggested topics to be addressed in the literature review. The authors proposed a testing algorithm for oncogenic neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusion screening and diagnosis for the Brazilian health system. This review aims to discuss the latest literature evidence and international consensus on neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase gene fusion diagnosis to devise clinical guidelines for testing this biomarker. We propose an algorithm in which testing for this biomarker should be requested to diagnose advanced metastatic tumors without known driver mutations. In this strategy, Immunohistochemistry should be used as a screening test followed by confirmatory next-generation sequencing in immunohistochemistry-positive cases.

Prevalence of NTRK Fusions in Canadian Solid Tumour Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions occur in ~ 0.3% of all solid tumours but are enriched in some rare tumour types. Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib are approved as tumour-agnostic therapies for solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions.

METHODS

This study investigated the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Canadian patients and also aimed to help guide NTRK testing paradigms through analysis of data reported from a national clinical diagnostic testing program between September 2019 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Of 1,687 patients included in the final analysis, NTRK fusions were detected in 0.71% (n = 12) of patients representing salivary gland carcinoma (n = 3), soft tissue sarcoma (n = 3), CNS (n = 3), and one in each of melanoma, lung, and colorectal cancer. All three salivary gland carcinomas contained ETV6-NTRK3 fusions. Thirteen (0.77%) clinically actionable incidental findings were also detected. Two of the 13 samples containing incidental findings were NTRK fusion-positive (GFOD1-NTRK2, FGFR3-TACC3 in a glioblastoma and AFAP1-NTRK2, BRAF c.1799T>A in a glioma). The testing algorithm screened most patient samples via pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas samples from the central nervous system (CNS), pathognomonic cancers, and confirmed/ putative NTRK fusion-positive samples identified under research protocols were reflexed straight to next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the benefit and practicality of a diagnostic testing program to identify patients suitable for tumour-agnostic TRK inhibitor therapies, as well as other targeted therapies, due to clinically actionable incidental findings identified. Collectively, these findings may inform future guidance on selecting the appropriate testing approach per tumour type and on optimal NTRK testing algorithms.

Implementation of microsatellite instability testing for the assessment of solid tumors in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

In Japan, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing for solid tumors was introduced in clinical practice in December 2018. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are established standards of care for patients with MSI-high tumors, the status of implementing MSI testing in clinical practice remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with solid tumors who underwent MSI testing between January 2019 and December 2020 at our institution.

RESULTS

In total, 1,052 MSI tests were performed in 1,047 patients. Regardless of specimen volume and condition, the MSI status was successfully determined in 1,041 (99.0%) tests, encompassing 27 tumor types (microsatellite stable [MSS] or MSI-low: n = 991 [95.2%] and MSI-high: n = 50 [4.8%]). Patients whose specimens were fixed with 20% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) and who had specimens with prolonged storage (98.4% and 95.4%) showed lower success rates than those whose specimens were fixed with 10% NBF and who had specimens with nonprolonged storage (100.0% and 99.6%), respectively. The prolonged turnaround time (TAT) in MSI-high cases (median TAT: 24 days) was a critical issue that directly resulted in treatment delay. Of the 50 patients with MSI-high tumors, 24 (48.0%) received ICIs and 34 (68.0%) were referred to the Department of Clinical Genetic Oncology where 6 (12.0%) patients were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI testing was successfully performed for various types of tumors and specimens in clinical practice. Our study results identified certain issues associated with the clinical implementation of MSI testing, including optimal specimen selection, extended TAT in MSI-high cases, and awareness of hereditary tumors.

A scoping review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of pan-tumour biomarkers (dMMR, MSI, high TMB) in different solid tumours

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget impacts of future reimbursements depend on the size of the potential target population, we performed a scoping review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of these pan-tumour biomarkers in different cancers. We systematically searched Medline/Embase and included studies reporting the prevalence of dMMR/MSI/high TMB in solid tumours published 01/01/2018-31/01/2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for the pan-cancer prevalence of each biomarker, and by cancer type and stage where possible. The searches identified 3890 papers, with 433 prevalence estimates for 32 different cancer types from 201 studies included in meta-analyses. The pooled overall prevalence of dMMR, MSI and high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) in pan-cancer studies was 2.9%, 2.7% and 14.0%, respectively. The prevalence profiles of dMMR/MSI and high TMB differed across cancer types. For example, endometrial, colorectal, small bowel and gastric cancers showed high prevalence of both dMMR and MSI (range: 8.7-26.8% and 8.5-21.9%, respectively) and high TMB (range: 8.5-43.0%), while cervical, esophageal, bladder/urothelial, lung and skin cancers showed low prevalence of dMMR and MSI (< 5%), but high prevalence of high TMB (range: 23.7-52.6%). For other cancer types, prevalence of all three biomarkers was generally low (< 5%). This structured review of dMMR/MSI/high TMB prevalence across cancers and for specific cancer types and stages provide timely evidence to inform budget impact forecasts in health technology assessments for drug approvals based on these pan-tumour biomarkers.

Detecting mismatch repair deficiency in solid neoplasms: immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, or both?

In managing patients with solid tumors, the value of detecting the status of tumor DNA mismatch repair function is widely recognized. Mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and molecular microsatellite instability testing constitute the two major test modalities currently in use, yet each is associated with caveats and limitations that can be consequential. Most notably, the traditional approach of defining mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry abnormality by complete loss of staining in all tumor cells is evolving. Partial or clonal loss is becoming recognized as a manifestation of gene abnormality; in some cases, such clonal loss is associated with germline pathogenic variants. The current criteria and cutoff values for defining microsatellite instability-high are developed primarily according to colorectal tumors. Non-colorectal cases, and occasionally even colorectal tumors, that are mismatch repair-deficient by immunohistochemistry but not microsatellite instability-high by current standards are being recognized. Emerging data suggest that these immunohistochemistry abnormal / non-microsatellite instability-high cases warrant further genetic workup for Lynch syndrome detection. Whether these tumors respond to immunotherapy is a question still to be addressed. It is imperative that pathologists as well as clinicians and investigators be aware of such intricacies regarding routine immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing and the results they generate. This review summarizes our current understanding of the advantages and limitations of these tests and offer our view on what constitutes the most optimal strategy in test selection and how best to utilize case context to enhance the interpretation of the test results.

Tuft cell-like carcinomas: novel cancer subsets present in multiple organs sharing a unique gene expression signature

BACKGROUND

Tuft cells are chemosensory epithelial cells playing a role in innate immunity. Recent studies revealed cancers with a tuft cell-like gene expression signature in the thorax. We wondered whether this signature might also occur in extrathoracic cancers.

METHODS

We examined mRNA expression of tuft cell markers (POU2F3, GFI1B, TRPM5, SOX9, CHAT, and AVIL) in 19 different types of cancers in multiple extrathoracic organs with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (N = 6322). Four different extrathoracic cancers in our local archives (N = 909) were analysed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Twenty-two (0.35%) extrathoracic tumours with co-expression of POU2F3 and other tuft cell markers were identified in various TCGA datasets. Twelve of the 22 "tuft cell-like tumours" shared poor differentiation and a gene expression pattern, including KIT, anti-apoptotic BCL2, and ionocyte-associated genes. In our archival cases, eleven (1.21%) tumours co-expressing POU2F3, KIT, and BCL2 on immunohistochemistry, i.e., were presumable tuft cell-like cancers. In three among five TCGA cohorts, the tuft cell-like cancer subsets expressed SLFN11, a promising biomarker of PARP inhibitor susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Tuft cell-like carcinomas form distinct subsets in cancers of many organs. It appears warranted to investigate their shared gene expression signature as a predictive biomarker for novel therapeutic strategies.

The Prognostic and Therapeutic Potential of DNA Damage Repair Pathway Alterations and Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer remains the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The mapping of genomic alterations and their role in lung-cancer progression has been followed by the development of new therapeutic options. Several novel drugs, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have significantly improved outcomes. However, many patients with lung cancer do not benefit from existing therapies or develop progressive disease, leading to increased morbidity and mortality despite initial responses to treatment. Alterations in DNA-damage repair (DDR) genes represent a cancer hallmark that impairs a cell's ability to prevent deleterious mutation accumulation and repair. These alterations have recently emerged as a therapeutic target in breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. The role of DDR alterations remains largely unknown in lung cancer. Nevertheless, recent research efforts have highlighted a potential role of some DDR alterations as predictive biomarkers of response to treatment. Despite the failure of PARP inhibitors (main class of DDR targeting agents) to improve outcomes in lung cancer patients, there is some evidence suggesting a role of PARP inhibitors and other DDR targeting agents in benefiting a distinct subset of lung cancer patients. In this review, we will discuss the existing literature on DDR alterations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) state as predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets in both non-small cell lung and small cell lung cancer.

Current Clinical Practice of Precision Medicine Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Tests in Biliary Tract Cancer in Japan

With the recent advances of next generation sequencing technologies, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests, which are designed to measure more than hundreds of cancer-related genes at a time, have now been widely introduced into daily clinical practice. For the patients whose tumor samples are not fit for tissue-based CGP tests, a blood-based CGP test (liquid biopsy) is available as an alternative option. Three CGP tests, "OncoGuide NCC™Oncopanel System (124 genes)", "FoundationOne®CDx (324 genes)", and "Founda-tionOne®CDx Liquid (324 genes)", are now reimbursed by public insurance in 233 hospitals designated for cancer genomic medicine in Japan. In biliary tract cancer, the prevalence of druggable variants is relatively higher compared to other cancer types and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends routine use of CGP tests for advanced biliary tract cancer to guide treatment options. The latest National Cancer Center Network guideline lists eight druggable markers (NTRK fusion, MSI-H, TMB-H, BRAF V600E, FGFR2 fusions/rearrangement, IDH1 mutations, RET fusion, and HER2 overexpression) and matched therapies. In Japan, matched therapies for four markers (NTRK, MSI-H, TMB-H, and FGFR2) are reimbursed by public insurance (as of September 2022). The progress of genomic profiling technology will contribute to the improvement of the dismal clinical outcomes of this disease in the future.

Çocukluk Çağı Kanserlerinde NTRK Somatik Füzyonları ve Tümör Agnostik Tedavi

Nörotrofik tirozin reseptör kinaz (NTRK) geni yeniden düzenlemeleri yakın zamanda kanser tedavisi için yeni hedefler olarak ortaya konulan biyobelirteçlerden (biyomarker) bir tanesi olarak tanımlanmış ve geliştirilmiştir. NTRK gen füzyonları öngörücü (prediktif-tanısal) bir biyobelirteç olarak kullanılmasının yanı sıra tedavi hedefi olarak da kullanılarak bireyselleştirilmiş hedef tedavide yerini almıştır. NTRK füzyon proteinlerinin selektif inhibitörleri, NTRK füzyon pozitif solid tümörlerin tedavisinde güçlü etkinliğe sahiptir (tümör-agnostik tedavi). Tümörlerinde NTRK füzyonları saptanan hastaların tedavisinde etkili olan FDA (Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Gıda ve İlaç Yönetimi) onaylı yeni tedavilerle birlikte, bu füzyonların test edilmesi önemli hale gelmiştir. Yapılan klinik çalışmalar birinci nesil tirozin reseptör kinaz (TRK) inhibitörleri olan larotrectinib ve entrectinibin NTRK füzyonu pozitif kanserlerin tedavisinde yüksek oranda başarılı olduğu görülmüştür. İlerleyen zamanlarda bu ilaçlar üzerine geniş kapsamlı araştırmaların sayısının artması bu ilaçlar hakkında daha fazla bilgiyi mevcut kılacak ve faydalı olacaktır.

Recommended testing algorithms for NTRK gene fusions in pediatric and selected adult cancers: Consensus of a Singapore Task Force

The occurrence of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions in a wide range of tumor types presents an attractive opportunity for using a tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor as cancer therapy. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated highly efficacious outcomes associated with the use of TRK inhibitors, such as larotrectinib and entrectinib in NTRK fusion-bearing cancers, in both adult and pediatric populations. While NTRK gene fusions are commonly found in some uncommon adult and pediatric malignancies, they are also found, albeit rarely, in a wide range of more common malignancies. The potential value of testing for NTRK gene fusions in practically all advanced malignancies is underpinned by the remarkable therapeutic outcomes that TRK inhibitors offer. This requirement presents practical and financial challenges in real-world oncological practice. Furthermore, different testing platforms exist to detect NTRK gene fusions, each with its advantages and disadvantages. It is, therefore, imperative to develop strategies for NTRK gene fusion testing in an attempt to optimize the use of limited tissue specimen and financial resources, and to minimize the turnaround time. A multidisciplinary task force of Singapore medical experts in both public and private sectors was convened in late 2020 to propose testing algorithms for adult colorectal tumors, sarcomas, non-small cell lung cancer, and pediatric cancers, with particular adaptation to the Singapore oncological practice. The recommendations presented here highlight the heterogeneity of NTRK-fusion positive cancers, and emphasize the need to customize the testing methods to each tumor type to optimize the workflow.

Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Comprehensive genomic profiling is increasingly used to facilitate precision oncology based on molecular stratification. In addition to conventional tissue comprehensive genomic profiling, comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA has become widely utilized in cancer care owing on its advantages, including less invasiveness, rapid turnaround time, and capturing heterogeneity. However, circulating tumor DNA comprehensive genomic profiling has some limitations, mainly false negatives due to low levels of plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and false positives caused by clonal hematopoiesis. Nevertheless, no guidelines and recommendations fully address these issues. Here, an expert panel committee involving representatives from 12 Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan was organized to develop expert consensus recommendations for the use of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid‐based comprehensive genomic profiling. The aim was to generate guidelines for clinicians and allied healthcare professionals on the optimal use of the circulating tumor DNA assays in advanced solid tumors and to aid the design of future clinical trials that utilize and develop circulating tumor DNA assays to refine precision oncology. Fourteen clinical questions regarding circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid comprehensive genomic profiling including the timing of testing and considerations for interpreting results were established by searching and curating associated literatures, and corresponding recommendations were prepared based on the literature for each clinical question. Final consensus recommendations were developed by voting to determine the level of each recommendation by the Committee members.

American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section and International Thyroid Oncology Group consensus statement on mutational testing in thyroid cancer: Defining advanced thyroid cancer and its targeted treatment

BACKGROUND

The development of systemic treatment options leveraging the molecular landscape of advanced thyroid cancer is a burgeoning field. This is a multidisciplinary evidence-based statement on the definition of advanced thyroid cancer and its targeted systemic treatment.

METHODS

An expert panel was assembled, a literature review was conducted, and best practice statements were developed. The modified Delphi method was applied to assess the degree of consensus for the statements developed by the author panel.

RESULTS

A review of the current understanding of thyroid oncogenesis at a molecular level is presented and characteristics of advanced thyroid cancer are defined. Twenty statements in topics including the multidisciplinary management, molecular evaluation, and targeted systemic treatment of advanced thyroid cancer are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

With the growth in targeted treatment options for thyroid cancer, a consensus definition of advanced disease and statements regarding the utility of molecular testing and available targeted systemic therapy is warranted.

Correlation of mismatch repair deficiency with clinicopathological features and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes associated with thyroid carcinoma (TC) have rarely been reported, especially in East Asian populations.

METHODS

We examined tumor tissue from a cohort of 241 patients diagnosed with TC between 2008 and 2020. MMR proteins were detected using tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry in order to identify MMR-protein-deficient (MMR-D) and MMR-protein-intact (MMR-I) tumors. We retrospectively summarized the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with MMR-D TC, measured the expression of PD-L1, and recorded overall survival (OS) and other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In our cohort, there were 18 (7.5%) MMR-D (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) patients, including 12 with papillary TC (PTC) (6.7%), 2 with poorly differentiated TC (PDTC) (4.7%), and 4 with anaplastic TC (ATC) (22.2%). Half of them (9/18) showed a specific deletion in MSH6, and 6 of them also carried variants in the MSH6 and PMS2 gene. Survival was significantly better in patients with MMR-D ATC than in those with MMR-I tumors (p = 0.033). Four of the 18 MMR-D patients (22%) were found to be PD-L1 positive. Their OS was much shorter than that of PD-L1-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

MMR-D and PD-L1 positivity appear to be associated with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in TC. The results indicate that MMR status may have important prognostic significance in TC. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors that target the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway may be a treatment option for TCs.

Gene fusions and oncogenic mutations in MLH1 deficient and BRAFV600E wild-type colorectal cancers

Gene fusions can act as oncogenic drivers and offer targets for cancer therapy. Since fusions are rare in colorectal cancer (CRC), their universal screening seems impractical. Our aim was to investigate gene fusions in 62 CRC cases with deficient MLH1 (dMLH1) and BRAFV600E wild-type (wt) status from a consecutive real-life series of 2079 CRCs. First, gene fusions were analysed using a novel FusionPlex Lung v2 RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, and these results were compared to a novel Idylla GeneFusion assay and pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC). NGS detected seven (7/62, 11%) NTRK1 fusions (TPM3::NTRK1, PLEKHA6::NTRK1 and LMNA::NTRK1, each in two cases, and IRF2BP2::NTRK1 in one case). In addition, two ALK, four RET and seven BRAF fusions were identified. Idylla detected seven NTRK1 expression imbalances, in line with the NGS results (overall agreement 100%). Furthermore, Idylla detected the two NGS-identified ALK rearrangements as one specific ALK fusion and one ALK expression imbalance, whilst only two of the four RET fusions were discovered. However, Idylla detected several expression imbalances of ALK (n = 7) and RET (n = 1) that were found to be fusion negative with the NGS. Pan-TRK IHC showed clearly detectable, fusion partner-dependent staining patterns in the seven NTRK1 fusion cases. Overall agreement for pan-TRK antibody clone EPR17341 was 98% and for A7H6R 100% when compared to the NGS. Of the 62 CRCs, 43 were MLH1 promoter hypermethylated (MLH1ph) and 39 were RASwt. All fusion cases were both MLH1ph and RASwt. Our results show that kinase fusions (20/30, 67%) and most importantly targetable NTRK1 fusions (7/30, 23%) are frequent in CRCs with dMLH1/BRAFV600Ewt/MLH1ph/RASwt. NGS was the most comprehensive method in finding the fusions, of which a subset can be screened by Idylla or IHC, provided that the result is confirmed by NGS.

Assessment of a cancer genomic profile test for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Comprehensive cancer genomic profile (CGP) tests are being implemented under Japanese universal health insurance system. However, the clinical usefulness of CGP test for breast cancer patients has not been evaluated. Of the 310 patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between November 2019 and April 2021, 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer whose treatment strategy was discussed by our molecular tumor board within the study period were investigated after exclusion of 2 cases that could not be analyzed. The turn-around time, drug accessibility, and germline identification detection were evaluated. The subtype was luminal in 20 patients (57.1%), triple-negative in 12 patients (34.3%), and luminal-HER2 in 3 patients (8.6%). Actionable gene mutations were detected in 30 patients (85.7%), and 7 patients (20.0%) were recommended for clinical trial participation, with the drug administered to 2 patients (5.7%). Three patients (8.6%) died due to disease progression before the test results were disclosed. We report the results of an initial assessment of the utility of CGP testing for patients with metastatic breast cancer under Japanese universal health insurance system. Conducting CGP tests at a more appropriate time could provide patients with greater benefit from treatments based on their specific gene mutations.

Detection of NTRK Fusions and TRK Expression and Performance of pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry in Routine Diagnostics: Results from a Nationwide Community-Based Cohort

Gene fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 are rare drivers of cancer that can be targeted with histology-agnostic inhibitors. This study aimed to determine the nationwide landscape of NTRK/TRK testing in the Netherlands and the usage of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a preselection tool to detect NTRK fusions. All pathology reports in 2017–2020 containing the search term ‘TRK’ were retrieved from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Patient characteristics, tumor histology, NTRK/TRK testing methods, and reported results were extracted. NTRK/TRK testing was reported for 7457 tumors. Absolute testing rates increased from 815 (2017) to 3380 (2020). Tumors were tested with DNA/RNA-based molecular assay(s) (48%), IHC (47%), or in combination (5%). A total of 69 fusions involving NTRK1 (n = 22), NTRK2 (n = 6) and NTRK3 (n = 41) were identified in tumors from adult (n = 51) and pediatric (n = 18) patients. In patients tested with both IHC and a molecular assay (n = 327, of which 29 NTRK fusion-positive), pan-TRK IHC had a sensitivity of 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 56–91) and a specificity of 84% (95% CI, 78–88%). These results showed that pan-TRK IHC has a low sensitivity in current routine practice and warrants the introduction of quality guidelines regarding the implementation and interpretation of pan-TRK IHC.