Muraglitazar, a dual (α/γ) PPAR activator: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week monotherapy trial in adult patients with type 2 diabetes

Efficacy and safety of chiglitazar, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pan-agonist, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (CMAP)

Chiglitazar (Carfloglitazar) is a novel non-thiazolidinedione (TZD) structured peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pan-agonist that has shown promising effects on glycemic control and lipid regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes in previous clinical studies. This randomized phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes with insufficient glycemic control by strict diet and exercise alone. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n = 167), chiglitazar 48 mg (n = 166), or placebo (n = 202) once daily. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) at week 24 with superiority of chiglitazar over placebo. The results showed that both chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in HbA_1c, and placebo-adjusted estimated treatment differences at week 24 for chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg were -0.87% (95% confidential interval (CI): -1.10 to -0.65; P < 0.0001) and -1.05% (95% CI: -1.29 to -0.81; P < 0.0001), respectively. Secondary efficacy parameters including glycemic control, insulin sensitivity and triglyceride reduction were also significantly improved in the chiglitazar groups. The overall frequency of adverse events and study discontinuation attributable to adverse events were similar among the groups. Low incidences of mild edema and body weight gain were reported in the chiglitazar dose groups. The results from this phase 3 trial demonstrated that the PPAR pan-agonist chiglitazar possesses an overall good efficacy and safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions, thereby providing adequate supporting evidence for using this PPAR pan-agonist as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes.

Chiglitazar monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (CMAS)

Chiglitazar (Carfloglitazar) is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pan-agonist that has shown promising effects on glycemic control and lipid regulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this randomized phase 3 trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of chiglitazar with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes who had insufficient glycemic control despite a strict diet and exercise regimen. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive chiglitazar 32 mg (n = 245), chiglitazar 48 mg (n = 246), or sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 248) once daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin A_1C (HbA_1c) from baseline at week 24 with the non-inferiority of chiglitazar over sitagliptin. Both chiglitazar and sitagliptin significantly reduced HbA_1c at week 24 with values of -1.40%, -1.47%, and -1.39% for chiglitazar 32 mg, chiglitazar 48 mg, and sitagliptin 100 mg, respectively. Chiglitazar 32 and 48 mg were both non-inferior to sitagliptin 100 mg, with mean differences of -0.04% (95% confidential interval (CI) -0.22 to 0.15) and -0.08% (95% CI -0.27 to 0.10), respectively. Compared with sitagliptin, greater reduction in fasting and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose and fasting insulin was observed with chiglitazar. Overall adverse event rates were similar between the groups. A small increase in mild edema in the chiglitazar 48 mg group and slight weight gain in both chiglitazar groups were reported. The overall results demonstrated that chiglitazar possesses good efficacy and safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with lifestyle interventions, thereby providing adequate supporting evidence for using this PPAR pan-agonist as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes.

To Probe Full and Partial Activation of Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors by Pan-Agonist Chiglitazar Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Chiglitazar is a promising new-generation insulin sensitizer with low reverse effects for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and has shown activity as a nonselective pan-agonist to the human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (i.e., full activation of PPARγ and a partial activation of PPARα and PPARβ/δ). Yet, it has no high-resolution complex structure with PPARs and its detailed interactions and activation mechanism remain unclear. In this study, we docked chiglitazar into three experimentally resolved crystal structures of hPPAR subtypes, PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ, followed by 3 μs molecular dynamics simulations for each system. Our MM-GBSA binding energy calculation revealed that chiglitazar most favorably bound to hPPARγ (-144.6 kcal/mol), followed by hPPARα (-138.0 kcal/mol) and hPPARβ (-135.9 kcal/mol), and the order is consistent with the experimental data. Through the decomposition of the MM-GBSA binding energy by residue and the use of two-dimensional interaction diagrams, key residues involved in the binding of chiglitazar were identified and characterized for each complex system. Additionally, our detailed dynamics analyses support that the conformation and dynamics of helix 12 play a critical role in determining the activities of the different types of ligands (e.g., full agonist vs. partial agonist). Rather than being bent fully in the direction of the agonist versus antagonist conformation, a partial agonist can adopt a more linear conformation and have a lower degree of flexibility. Our finding may aid in further development of this new generation of medication.

A Contemporary Overview of PPARα/γ Dual Agonists for the Management of Diabetic Dyslipidemia

Background:

Diabetes mellitus and concomitant dyslipidemia, being referred to as ‘diabetic dyslipidemia’, are the foremost detrimental factors documented to play a pivotal role in cardiovascular illness. Diabetic dyslipidemia is associated with insulin resistance, high plasma triglyceride levels, low HDL-cholesterol concentration and elevated small dense LDL-cholesterol particles. Maintaining an optimal glucose and lipid levels in patients afflicted with diabetic dyslipidemia could be a major task that might require a well-planned diet-management system and regular physical activity, or otherwise an intake of combined antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic medications. Synchronized treatment which efficiently controls insulin resistance-associated diabetes mellitus and co-existing dyslipidemia could indeed be a fascinating therapeutic option in the management of diabetic dyslipidemia. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α/γ (PPARα/γ) dual agonists are such kind of drugs which possess therapeutic potentials to treat diabetic dyslipidemia. Nevertheless, PPARα/γ dual agonists like muraglitazar, naveglitazar, tesaglitazar, ragaglitazar and aleglitazar have been reported to have undesirable adverse effects, and their developments have been halted at various stages. On the other hand, a recently introduced PPARα/γ dual agonist, saroglitazar is an emerging therapeutic agent of glitazar class approved in India for the management of diabetic dyslipidemia, and its treatment has been reported to be generally safe and well tolerated.

Conclusion:

Some additional and new compounds, at initial and preclinical stages, have been recently reported to possess PPARα/γ dual agonistic potentials with considerable therapeutic efficacy and reduced adverse profile. This review sheds light on the current status of various PPARα/γ dual agonists for the management of diabetic dyslipidemia.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and the Heart: Lessons from the Past and Future Directions

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) belong to the nuclear family of ligand activated transcriptional factors and comprise three different isoforms, PPAR-α, PPAR-β/δ, and PPAR-γ. The main role of PPARs is to regulate the expression of genes involved in lipid and glucose metabolism. Several studies have demonstrated that PPAR agonists improve dyslipidemia and glucose control in animals, supporting their potential as a promising therapeutic option to treat diabetes and dyslipidemia. However, substantial differences exist in the therapeutic or adverse effects of specific drug candidates, and clinical studies have yielded inconsistent data on their cardioprotective effects. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the molecular function of PPARs and the mechanisms of the PPAR regulation by posttranslational modification in the heart. We also describe the results and lessons learned from important clinical trials on PPAR agonists and discuss the potential future directions for this class of drugs.

Pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics of thiazolidinediones: role in diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors

The most important goal in the treatment of patients with diabetes is to prevent the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the first cause of mortality in these subjects. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), a class of antidiabetic drugs, act as insulin sensitizers increasing insulin-dependent glucose disposal and reducing hepatic glucose output. TZDs including pioglitazone, rosiglitazone and troglitazone, by activating PPAR-γ have shown pleiotropic effects in reducing vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis. However, troglitazone was removed from the market due to its hepatoxicity, and rosiglitazone and pioglitazone both have particular warnings due to being associated with heart diseases. Specific genetic variations in genes involved in the pathways regulated by TDZs have demonstrated to modify the variability in treatment with these drugs, especially in their side effects. Therefore, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics are an important tool in further understand intersubject variability per se but also to assess the therapeutic potential of such variability in drug individualization and therapeutic optimization.

Novel therapeutics for type 2 diabetes: insulin resistance

Insulin resistance (IR) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. Hence improving IR is a major target of treatment in patients with T2D. Obesity and lack of exercise are major causes of IR. However, recent evidence implicates sleep disorders and disorders of the circadian rhythm in the pathogenesis of IR. Weight loss and lifestyle changes are the cornerstone and most effective treatments of IR, but adherence and patient's acceptability are poor. Bariatric surgery results in significant and sustainable long-term weight loss associated with beneficial impact on IR and glucose metabolism, making this an attractive treatment option for patients with T2D. Currently available pharmacological options targeting IR (such as metformin and thiazolidinediones) do not maintain glycaemic measures within targets long term and can be associated with significant side effects. Over the last two decades, many pharmacological agents targeting different aspects of the insulin signalling pathway were developed to improve IR, but only a minority reached clinical trials. Such treatments need to be specific and reversible as many of the components of the insulin signalling pathway are involved in other cellular functions such as apoptosis. Recent evidence highlighted the role of circadian rhythm and sleep-related disorders in the pathogenesis of IR. In this article, we review the latest developments in the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions targeting IR including bariatric surgery. We will also review the role of circadian rhythm and sleep-related disorders in the development and treatment of IR.

Anti-inflammatory properties of a dual PPARgamma/alpha agonist muraglitazar in in vitro and in vivo models

Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists are widely used drugs in the treatment of diabetes and dyslipidemia. In addition to their metabolic effects, PPAR isoforms PPARα and PPARγ are also involved in the regulation of immune responses and inflammation. In the present study, we investigated the effects of a dual PPARγ/α agonist muraglitazar on inflammatory gene expression in activated macrophages and on carrageenan-induced inflammation in the mouse.

Methods

J774 murine macrophages were activated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and treated with dual PPARγ/α agonist muraglitazar, PPARγ agonist GW1929 or PPARα agonist fenofibrate. The effects of PPAR agonists on cytokine production and the activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) pathway were investigated by ELISA, Griess method, Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR. Nuclear translocation, DNA-binding activity and reporter gene assays were used to assess the activity of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) transcription factor. Carrageenan-induced paw oedema was used as an in vivo model of acute inflammation.

Results

Muraglitazar as well as PPARγ agonist GW1929 and PPARα agonist fenofibrate inhibited LPS-induced iNOS expression and NO production in activated macrophages in a dose-dependent manner. Inhibition of iNOS expression by muraglitazar included both transcriptional and post-transcriptional components; the former being shared by GW1929 and the latter by fenofibrate. All tested PPAR agonists also inhibited IL-6 production, while TNFα production was reduced by muraglitazar and GW1929, but not by fenofibrate. Interestingly, the anti-inflammatory properties of muraglitazar were also translated in vivo. This was evidenced by the finding that muraglitazar inhibited carrageenan-induced paw inflammation in a dose-dependent manner in mice as did iNOS inhibitor L-NIL and anti-inflammatory steroid dexamethasone.

Conclusions

These results show that muraglitazar has anti-inflammatory properties both in vitro and in vivo and these effects reflect the agonistic action through both PPARα and PPARγ.

PPAR agonists for the treatment of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes

Diabetes is a complex disease defined by hyperglycaemia; however, strong associations with abdominal obesity, hypertension and dyslipidaemia contribute to the high risk of cardiovascular disease. Although aggressive glycaemic control reduces microvascular complications, the evidence for macrovascular complications is less certain. The theoretical benefits of the mode of action of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists are clear. In clinical practice, PPAR-α agonists such as fibrates improve dyslipidaemia, while PPAR-γ agonists such as thiazolidinediones improve insulin resistance and diabetes control. However, although these agents are traditionally classed according to their target, they have different and sometimes conflicting clinical benefit and adverse event profiles. It is speculated that this is because of differing properties and specificities for the PPAR receptors (each of which targets specific genes). This is most obvious in the impact on cardiovascular outcomes--in clinical trials pioglitazone appeared to reduce cardiovascular events, whereas rosiglitazone potentially increased the risk of myocardial infarction. The development of a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist may prove beneficial in effectively managing glycaemic control and improving dyslipidaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Yet, development of agents such as muraglitazar and tesaglitazar has been hindered by various serious adverse events. Aleglitazar, a balanced dual PPAR-α/γ agonist, is currently the most advanced in clinical development and has shown promising results in phase II clinical trials with beneficial effects on glucose and lipid variables. A phase III study, ALECARDIO, is ongoing and will establish whether improvements in laboratory test profiles translate into an improvement in cardiovascular outcomes.

Scaffold-based pan-agonist design for the PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ receptors

As important members of nuclear receptor superfamily, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) play essential roles in regulating cellular differentiation, development, metabolism, and tumorigenesis of higher organisms. The PPAR receptors have 3 identified subtypes: PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ, all of which have been treated as attractive targets for developing drugs to treat type 2 diabetes. Due to the undesirable side-effects, many PPAR agonists including PPARα/γ and PPARβ/γ dual agonists are stopped by US FDA in the clinical trials. An alternative strategy is to design novel pan-agonist that can simultaneously activate PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ. Under such an idea, in the current study we adopted the core hopping algorithm and glide docking procedure to generate 7 novel compounds based on a typical PPAR pan-agonist LY465608. It was observed by the docking procedures and molecular dynamics simulations that the compounds generated by the core hopping and glide docking not only possessed the similar functions as the original LY465608 compound to activate PPARα, PPARβ and PPARγ receptors, but also had more favorable conformation for binding to the PPAR receptors. The additional absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) predictions showed that the 7 compounds (especially Cpd#1) hold high potential to be novel lead compounds for the PPAR pan-agonist. Our findings can provide a new strategy or useful insights for designing the effective pan-agonists against the type 2 diabetes.

The prevention and regression of atherosclerotic plaques: emerging treatments

Occlusive vascular diseases, such as sudden coronary syndromes, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, are a huge burden on the health care systems of developed and developing countries. Tremendous advances have been made over the last few decades in the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerotic diseases. Intravascular ultrasound has been able to provide detailed information of plaque anatomy and has been used in several studies to assess outcomes. The presence of atherosclerosis disrupts the normal protective mechanism provided by the endothelium and this mechanism has been implicated in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and stroke. Efforts are being put into the prevention of atherosclerosis, which has been shown to begin in childhood. This paper reviews the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and discusses the current options available for the prevention and reversal of plaque formation.

Coronary atherosclerosis, low-density lipoproteins and markers of thrombosis, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction

Available information regarding the relation among atherosclerosis, low-density lipoproteins, markers of thrombosis, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction has accumulated, but is still very limited, making only minimal contributions to clinical decision-making. Many more clinical trials are needed, but unless there is a relationship between atherosclerosis prevention, specific markers and a pharmaceutical product, financial support for such trials will be difficult to obtain. The anti-inflammatory effect of statins is well established. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are generally not thought of as having anti-inflammatory effects, but the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA) study observed extensive RR reduction with perindopril. It was explained not simply by control of hypertension, but by reduced activity of multiple factors, supported by specific substudies. The 'cardiovascular continuum' is an excellent unifying term to explain atherosclerosis mechanisms, relate mechanisms to clinical understanding, and assist the clinician in selecting the appropriate prevention and control therapies. This so-called continuum actually describes a relationship among different biochemical, enzymatic and hormonal factors that affect the cardiovascular system. It can be seen in the downregulation of the angiotensin II receptor type 1 by statins, which contributes to hypertension control while lowering low-density lipoproteins. Peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma also demonstrates the cardiovascular continuum with activation of the receptor by glitazones. The glitazones increase insulin sensitivity for diabetes control. Activation of the peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma inhibits inflammation, which is possibly related to atherosclerosis, normalization of endothelial function, suppression of metalloproteinases and a decrease in smooth muscle cell migration. All of these effects may decrease atherosclerosis production while improving control of diabetes mellitus, a key disease in the cardiovascular continuum for development of atherosclerosis. Consideration of such interrelationships is just scratching the surface. Nevertheless, it can be seen that the complicated process of atherosclerosis development has a multifaceted explanation that has been minimally defined, but holds the key to prevention and control of this major medical problem faced in modern society.

Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

There is a rising worldwide prevalence of diabetes, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is one of the most challenging health problems in the 21st century. The associated complications of diabetes, such as cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, stroke, diabetic neuropathy, amputations, renal failure, and blindness result in increasing disability, reduced life expectancy, and enormous health costs. T2DM is a polygenic disease characterized by multiple defects in insulin action in tissues and defects in pancreatic insulin secretion, which eventually leads to loss of pancreatic insulin-secreting cells. The treatment goals for T2DM patients are effective control of blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids (if elevated) and, ultimately, to avert the serious complications associated with sustained tissue exposure to excessively high glucose concentrations. Prevention and control of diabetes with diet, weight control, and physical activity has been difficult. Treatment of T2DM has centered on increasing insulin levels, either by direct insulin administration or oral agents that promote insulin secretion, improving sensitivity to insulin in tissues, or reducing the rate of carbohydrate absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. This review presents comprehensive and up-to-date information on the mechanism(s) of action, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pleiotropic effects, drug interactions, and adverse effects of the newer antidiabetic drugs, including (1) peroxisome proliferator-activated-receptor-γ agonists (thiazolidinediones, pioglitazone, and rosiglitazone); (2) the incretin, glucagon-like peptide-) receptor agonists (incretin-mimetics, exenatide. and liraglutide), (3) inhibitors of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (incretin enhancers, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin), (4) short-acting, nonsulfonylurea secretagogue, meglitinides (repaglinide and nateglinide), (5) amylin anlog-pramlintide, (6) α-glucosidase inhibitors (miglitol and voglibose), and (7) colesevelam (a bile acid sequestrant). In addition, information is presented on drug candidates in clinical trials, experimental compounds, and some plants used in the traditional treatment of diabetes based on experimental evidence. In the opinion of this reviewer, therapy based on orally active incretins and incretin mimetics with long duration of action that will be efficacious, preserve the β-cell number/function, and block the progression of diabetes will be highly desirable. However, major changes in lifestyle factors such as diet and, especially, exercise will also be needed if the growing burden of diabetes is to be contained.

Therapeutic potential of aleglitazar, a new dual PPAR-α/γ agonist: implications for cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus

Preventing morbidity and mortality from diabetes mellitus is of paramount importance as the incidence of this disease is increasing across the world. While microvascular complications of diabetes such as nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy are reduced with intensive glycemic control, treatment of hyperglycemia has not been consistently shown to have effects on the macrovascular complications of diabetes such as coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease. Preventive efforts have accordingly shifted toward the modification of other cardiovascular risk factors in diabetic patients. Agonism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) has long been an attractive target for antidiabetic therapy due to the role of PPARs in glycemic control and lipid metabolism. PPAR-α agonists such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone are used in clinical practice for the treatment of diabetes, and there is some evidence that pioglitazone may have positive effects on cardiovascular complications by virtue of its favorable effects on lipid profiles. However, they have not been shown to reduce macrovascular events. PPAR-α agonism is the mechanism of action in the fibrate class of medications; these agents have been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, reduce triglyceride levels, and improve cardiovascular outcomes. Given the prevalence of lipid abnormalities in patients with diabetes, dual PPAR-α/γ agonists (glitazars) could potentially benefit patients with diabetes. A phase II trial examining a novel dual PPAR agonist, aleglitazar, showed that therapy with this agent reduced hyperglycemia and favorably modified levels of HDL-C and triglycerides with an acceptable safety profile. Aleglitazar is currently being studied in large-scale clinical trials to assess whether it will reduce the risk of major cardiovascular endpoints (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) among patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease. If ongoing studies confirm the theoretical benefit and safety of dual PPAR-α/γ agonism, aleglitazar may become the first therapy demonstrated to reduce macrovascular complications in patients with diabetes.

Strategies for the development of new PPAR agonists in diabetes

Diabetes is associated with a range of metabolic abnormalities including insulin resistance, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension, and inflammation. These factors are likely to underlie the adverse cardiovascular outcome typically observed in diabetic cohorts. The family of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been implicated in the regulation of a number of physiologic and metabolic pathways. Pharmacologic agonists directed against various PPARs have been shown to have a beneficial impact on these metabolic risk factors. The potential impact on cardiovascular risk with the use of PPAR agonists will be reviewed.

Orphan nuclear receptors as targets for drug development

Orphan nuclear receptors regulate diverse biological processes. These important molecules are ligand-activated transcription factors that act as natural sensors for a wide range of steroid hormones and xenobiotic ligands. Because of their importance in regulating various novel signaling pathways, recent research has focused on identifying xenobiotics targeting these receptors for the treatment of multiple human diseases. In this review, we will highlight these receptors in several physiologic and pathophysiologic actions and demonstrate how their functions can be exploited for the successful development of newer drugs.

Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Correction of hyperglycaemia and prevention of glucotoxicity are important objectives in the management of type 2 diabetes. Dapagliflozin, a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, reduces renal glucose reabsorption in an insulin-independent manner. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, 546 adults with type 2 diabetes who were receiving daily metformin (>/=1500 mg per day) and had inadequate glycaemic control were randomly assigned to receive one of three doses of dapagliflozin (2.5 mg, n=137; 5 mg, n=137; or 10 mg, n=135) or placebo (n=137) orally once daily. Randomisation was computer generated and stratified by site, implemented with a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system. Patients continued to receive their pre-study metformin dosing. The primary outcome was change from baseline in haemoglobin A(1c)(HbA(1c)) at 24 weeks. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of double-blind study medication and who had both a baseline and at least one post-baseline measurement (last observation carried forward) were included in the analysis. Data were analysed by use of ANCOVA models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00528879.

FINDINGS

534 patients were included in analysis of the primary endpoint (dapagliflozin 2.5 mg, n=135; dapagliflozin 5 mg, n=133; dapagliflozin 10 mg, n=132; placebo, n=134). At week 24, mean HbA(1c) had decreased by -0.30% (95% CI -0.44 to -0.16) in the placebo group, compared with -0.67% (-0.81 to -0.53, p=0.0002) in the dapagliflozin 2.5 mg group, -0.70% (-0.85 to -0.56, p<0.0001) in the dapagliflozin 5 mg group, and -0.84% (-0.98 to -0.70, p<0.0001) in the dapagliflozin 10 mg group. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia occurred in similar proportions of patients in the dapagliflozin (2-4%) and placebo groups (3%). Signs, symptoms, and other reports suggestive of genital infections were more frequent in the dapagliflozin groups (2.5 mg, 11 patients [8%]; 5 mg, 18 [13%]; 10 mg, 12 [9%]) than in the placebo group (seven [5%]). 17 patients had serious adverse events (four in each of the dapagliflozin groups and five in the placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

Addition of dapagliflozin to metformin provides a new therapeutic option for treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin alone.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca.

Pharmacokinetics of muraglitazar (BMS-298585), a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) α and γ activator, in mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys

The pharmacokinetic parameters of muraglitazar, a novel dual-activator of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) alpha and gamma, were determined in mice, rats, dogs, and monkeys after intravenous and oral administration. In the mouse, rat, and monkey the absolute oral bioavailability of muraglitazar ranged from 64 to 88%, and in the dog oral bioavailability was approximately 18%. The systemic clearance values of muraglitazar in the mouse, rat, dog, and cynomolgus monkey were 1.2, 3.0, 12.3 and 1.2 ml min-1 kg-1, respectively. The terminal elimination half-life was 2.4 h in dogs and 7.3 h in rats. The terminal elimination half-life could not be determined in the mouse and monkey because the sampling interval did not adequately cover the terminal elimination phase. Muraglitazar appears to be distributed outside of the vasculature, with the steady-state volume of distribution being approximately twofold that of the vascular volume in rats and dogs, and approximately twofold that of the total body water in mice. The systemic plasma clearance of muraglitazar in humans was predicted to be approximately 12-14 ml min-1 kg-1 based on allometry or by scaling of in vitro clearance parameters. Overall, the pharmacokinetic parameters of muraglitazar in preclinical species were acceptable for the advancement of the compound as a clinical candidate.

Efficacy and safety of muraglitazar: a double-blind, 24-week, dose-ranging study in patients with type 2 diabetes

Muraglitazar is a dual (alpha/gamma) PPAR activator. Dual receptor activation may improve glycaemic and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.This randomised double-blind trial in 1,477 drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes compared the efficacy and safety of muraglitazar (0.5, 1.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg) with pioglitazone (15 mg). Endpoints included changes in HbA(1C) and plasma lipids, last observation carried forward over 24 weeks. At week 24, mean changes from baseline in HbA(1C) ranged from -0.25% to -1.76% with muraglitazar (p<or=0.0008, 0.5 mg versus each higher muraglitazar dose), compared with -0.57% with pioglitazone. At week 12, tri-glycerides decreased 4-41% with muraglitazar and 9% with pioglitazone. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased 6-23% with muraglitazar and 10% with pioglitazone. Oedema-related events occurred with muraglitazar in a dose-dependent incidence (range 9-40%), and at 14% with pioglitazone. Overall, muraglitazar produced simultaneous dose-dependent improvements in glycaemic and lipid parameters in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Coadministration of muraglitazar plus glyburide: improvement of glycaemic and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes

In this trial we evaluated the efficacy and safety of muraglitazar, a dual (alpha/gamma) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activator, plus glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes not controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy. After 2 weeks of open-label glyburide (15 mg/day), 583 patients were randomised to additionally receive muraglitazar 2.5 mg, 5 mg, or placebo. End points included changes in HbA(1C) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at weeks 24 and 102, and changes in lipid parameters at weeks 11/12 and 102.At week 24, mean changes from baseline in HbA(1C) and FPG were significantly greater with glyburide plus muraglitazar 2.5 mg or 5 mg than with glyburide plus placebo (p<0.0001). At week 11/12, triglyceride levels were significantly reduced with muraglitazar (p<0.0001). During the extension phase, muraglitazar demonstrated long-term glycaemic and lipid effects through week 102. Although generally well tolerated, muraglitazar was associated with higher rates of congestive heart failure, cardiovascular events, weight gain and oedema.

Direct antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR agonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that mediate a range of important metabolic functions by transactivation, transrepression or corepression of various gene targets. PPAR agonists also have direct antiatherosclerotic effects, independent of their metabolic effects on glucose and lipid homeostasis. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the currently available evidence for a direct vasculoprotective effect of PPAR agonists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current studies have emphasized PPAR-mediated effects on inflammatory and immune responses, oxidative stress, the renin-angiotensin system and modulation of plaque composition. Furthermore, it has become evident that the relative activation of the different PPAR isoforms and the contribution of transactivation of target genes against transrepression of transcription factors need to be considered when assessing the vasculoprotective effects of PPAR agonists.

SUMMARY

It is anticipated that the antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR agonists observed in experimental studies will translate into reduced cardiovascular events. This promise is yet to be realized in short-to-medium term studies. Given the central role of the PPAR in gene regulation, particularly in metabolic states, it is possible that more targeted modulation of PPAR signalling may hold many rewards for the prevention of atherosclerosis.

Improvement of glycaemic and lipid profiles with muraglitazar plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: an active-control trial with glimepiride

The efficacy and safety of muraglitazar versus glimepiride were evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes. After open-label metformin monotherapy, 1,805 patients received randomised therapy with muraglitazar 2.5 mg or 5 mg or with glimepiride 1 mg in a double-blind 52-week study. The primary end point was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1C); secondary end points were changes in fasting lipid levels and glycaemic indices. At week 52, the reduction in HbA1C with muraglitazar 5 mg plus metformin was superior (p<0.0001) and with muraglitazar 2.5 mg it was non-inferior in comparison with glimepiride. At week 12, muraglitazar significantly decreased triglyceride levels (p<0.0001) and increased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (p<0.0001). Oedema, weight gain and heart failure were more evident with muraglitazar. Muraglitazar 5 mg plus metformin significantly improved HbA1C, triglyceride and HDL-C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovascular events were similar among groups (~2%), but there was an imbalance of total mortality in favour of glimepiride.

Is raising HDL a futile strategy for atheroprotection?

The dramatic failure of clinical trials evaluating the cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor torcetrapib has led to considerable doubt about the value of raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as a treatment for cardiovascular disease. These results have underscored the intricacy of HDL metabolism, with functional quality perhaps being a more important consideration than the circulating quantity of HDL. As a result, HDL-based therapeutics that maintain or enhance HDL functionality warrant closer investigation. In this article, we review the complexity of HDL metabolism, discuss clinical-trial data for HDL-raising agents, including possible reasons for the failure of torcetrapib, and consider the potential for future HDL-based therapies.

PPAR Agonists and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes

Peroxisome proliferators activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors that play important roles in lipid and glucose homeostasis. To the extent that PPAR agonists improve diabetic dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance, these agents have been considered to reduce cardiovascular risk. However, data from murine models suggests that PPAR agonists also have independent anti-atherosclerotic actions, including the suppression of vascular inflammation, oxidative stress, and activation of the renin angiotensin system. Many of these potentially anti-atherosclerotic effects are thought to be mediated by transrepression of nuclear factor-kB, STAT, and activator protein-1 dependent pathways. In recent clinical trials, PPARalpha agonists have been shown to be effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events, while their cardiovascular benefit in patients with established cardiovascular disease remains equivocal. However, the use of PPARgamma agonists, and more recently dual PPARalpha/gamma coagonists, has been associated with an excess in cardiovascular events, possibly reflecting unrecognised fluid retention with potent agonists of the PPARgamma receptor. Newer pan agonists, which retain their anti-atherosclerotic activity without weight gain, may provide one solution to this problem. However, the complex biologic effects of the PPARs may mean that only vascular targeted agents or pure transrepressors will realise the goal of preventing atherosclerotic vascular disease.

PPAR agonists: multimodal drugs for the treatment of type-2 diabetes

Patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are considered to be at particularly high risk for cardiovascular disease. Over the last decade, the members of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subfamily of nuclear receptors have emerged as valuable pharmacological targets whose activation can normalize metabolic dysfunctions and reduce some cardiovascular risk factors associated with T2DM. PPARalpha agonists, such as the fibrates, can correct dyslipidemia. PPARgamma agonists, such as the thiazolidinediones, act as insulin sensitizers and improve insulin resistance in patients with T2DM. Because of restricted potency and certain side-effects of PPAR agonists, as well as the increasingly epidemic incidence of T2DM, there is a real need for the development of selective PPAR agonists with improved clinical efficacy. This chapter focuses on the PPAR agonists currently used in the clinic, as well as on the discovery and development of the next generation of PPAR agonists.

Pharmacogenetics of the PPAR genes and cardiovascular disease

The goal of pharmacogenetics is to define the genetic determinants of individual drug responsiveness, and thereby provide personalized treatment to each individual. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are polypeptide products of a set of related genes functioning to regulate several cellular processes that are central to cardiovascular health and disease. Given their pleiotropic roles in lipid and glucose homeostasis, cardiac energy balance and regulation of adipocyte release of circulating inflammatory factors, it is not surprising that PPARs represent an attractive target for clinical investigation and intervention in disease states, such as diabetes, obesity, atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy, cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Research into the manipulation of PPAR function by pharmacologic agents has already resulted in important advances in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. It follows that PPAR pharmacogenetics promises important advances in the personalized treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Metabolic syndrome: from global epidemiology to individualized medicine

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) encompasses a constellation of metabolic abnormalities that are thought to place patients at higher risk for the development of diabetes and cardiovascular (CV) disease. The underlying pathophysiology is still a point of contention among various professional organizations leading to inconsistencies in the manner in which MetS is defined. Each definition has its advantages and disadvantages. Nonetheless, there is an agreement that insulin resistance and obesity are likely the central contributing factors. Because the prevalence of obesity has been increasing at a frightening rate in the past few decades, MetS represents a major public health problem that should be identified clinically in individual patients. This review describes the changing epidemiology of obesity and of MetS and discusses its importance in CV disease. We outline the existing controversies that surround MetS and discuss the role of lifestyle, pharmacological, surgical, and novel approaches in its management.

Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Muraglitazar, a Novel PPARα/γ Agonist

The toxicity of muraglitazar, an oxybenzylglycine, nonthiazolidinedione peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist, was evaluated in a comprehensive nonclinical toxicology program that included single-dose oral toxicity studies in mice, rats, and monkeys; repeat-dose toxicity studies in rats, dogs, and monkeys; a battery of in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicity studies; carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats; reproductive and developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits; and studies to investigate species-specific findings. Pharmacologically mediated changes, similar to those observed with other PPARgamma agonists, were observed following chronic administration and included subcutaneous edema, hematologic/hematopoietic and serum chemistry alterations, and morphologic findings in the heart and adipose tissue in rats and monkeys. In dogs, a species highly sensitive to PPARgamma agonists, muraglitazar caused pronounced species-specific clinical toxicity and degenerative changes in the brain, spinal cord, and testes at high doses and exposures. Muraglitazar was nongenotoxic in the standard battery of genotoxicity studies. Gallbladder adenomas in male mice and adipocyte neoplasms in male and female rats were seen at suprapharmacologic exposures, whereas urinary bladder tumors occurred in male rats at lower exposures. Subsequent investigative studies established that the urinary bladder carcinogenic effect was mediated by urolithiasis rather than a direct pharmacologic effect on urothelium. Muraglitazar had no effects on reproductive function in male and female rats at high systemic exposures, was not teratogenic in rats or rabbits, and demonstrated no selective developmental toxicity. Overall, there were no nonclinical findings that precluded the safe administration of muraglitazar to humans.

Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and PPAR-gamma agonists on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of pioglitazone (PIO), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonist, and fenofibrate (FENO), a PPAR-alpha agonist, as monotherapy and in combination on glucose and lipid metabolism.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Fifteen type 2 diabetic patients received FENO (n = 8) or PIO (n = 7) for 3 months, followed by the addition of the other agent for 3 months in an open-label study. Subjects received a 4 h hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and a hepatic fat content measurement at 0, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Following PIO, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.05) and HbA(1c) (p < 0.01) decreased, while plasma adiponectin (AD) (5.5 +/- 0.9 to 13.8 +/- 3.5 microg/ml [SEM], p < 0.03) and the rate of insulin-stimulated total-body glucose disposal (R (d)) (23.8 +/- 3.8 to 40.5 +/- 4.4 micromol kg(-1) min(-1), p < 0.005) increased. After FENO, FPG, HbA(1c), AD and R (d) did not change. PIO reduced fasting NEFA (784 +/- 53 to 546 +/- 43 micromol/l, p < 0.05), triacylglycerol (2.12 +/- 0.28 to 1.61 +/- 0.22 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and hepatic fat content (20.4 +/- 4.8 to 10.2 +/- 2.5%, p < 0.02). Following FENO, fasting NEFA and hepatic fat content did not change, while triacylglycerol decreased (2.20 +/- 0.14 to 1.59 +/- 0.13 mmol/l, p < 0.01). Addition of FENO to PIO had no effect on R (d), FPG, HbA(1c), NEFA, hepatic fat content or AD, but triacylglycerol decreased (1.61 +/- 0.22 to 1.00 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, p < 0.05). Addition of PIO to FENO increased R (d) (24.9 +/- 4.4 to 36.1 +/- 2.2 micromol kg(-1) min(-1), p < 0.005) and AD (4.1 +/- 0.8 to 13.1 +/- 2.5 microg/ml, p < 0.005) and reduced FPG (p < 0.05), HbA(1c) (p < 0.05), NEFA (p < 0.01), hepatic fat content (18.3 +/- 3.1 to 13.5 +/- 2.1%, p < 0.03) and triacylglycerol (1.59 +/- 0.13 to 0.96 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, p < 0.01). Muscle adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity did not change following FENO; following the addition of PIO, muscle AMPK activity increased significantly (phosphorylated AMPK:total AMPK ratio 1.2 +/- 0.2 to 2.2 +/- 0.3, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

We conclude that PPAR-alpha therapy has no effect on NEFA or glucose metabolism and that addition of a PPAR-alpha agonist to a PPAR-gamma agent causes a further decrease in plasma triacylglycerol, but has no effect on NEFA or glucose metabolism.

Discovery of tertiary aminoacids as dual PPARα/γ agonists-I

A novel series of potent dual agonists of PPARalpha and PPARgamma, the alkoxybenzylglycines, was identified and explored using a solution-phase library approach. The synthesis and structure-activity relationships of this series of dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists are described.

Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors on lipoprotein metabolism and glucose control in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are central regulators of lipoprotein metabolism and glucose homeostasis that are considered particularly useful for improving glycemic control and comorbidities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials of PPAR-alpha agonists have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events; however, these benefits have been confined to subgroups of patients with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides. While activators of PPAR-gamma reduce early atherosclerotic lesions and reduce cardiovascular events, these agents have the effect of increasing fluid retention in patients, which results in more hospitalizations for congestive heart failure. Future studies of PPAR-gamma agonists or dual PPAR-alpha/gamma agonists will require further delineation of the risk profile to avoid adverse outcomes in susceptible patients.

A rapid, homogeneous, fluorescence polarization binding assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma using a fluorescein-tagged dual PPARalpha/gamma activator

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family are important drug targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases. PPARalpha and PPARgamma play crucial roles in lipid and glucose metabolism, respectively. Therefore, screening methods that help to rapidly identify activators of these receptors should be of considerable value. A homogeneous fluorescence polarization (FP) ligand binding assay capable of rapidly identifying ligands that bind to both PPARalpha and PPARgamma has been developed using purified PPARalpha or PPARgamma ligand binding domains and a fluorescein-labeled analog (FLA) of a potent dual PPARalpha/gamma activator. FLA activator showed good binding affinity toward both PPARalpha (K(i)=0.7microM) and PPARgamma (K(i)=0.4microM). The binding of FLA activator was rapid and reached a plateau within 10 min. The resulting FP signal was stable for at least 18h. The FP binding assay performed robustly in a 384-well format, and the average Z' value was 0.77. There was a good correlation between the binding potency (IC(50) values) and rank order of binding potency for a panel of standard PPAR ligands obtained in FP binding assay and scintillation proximity assay or gel filtration binding assays using (3)H-labeled PPARalpha (r(2)=0.99) and PPARgamma (r(2)=0.99) ligands. There was also a good correlation of IC(50) values obtained by FP binding assay and scintillation proximity assay for the clinically used PPAR activators. Thus, the FP binding assay with a single fluorescein-labeled PPARalpha/gamma dual activator offers a homogeneous nonradioactive, sensitive, robust, and less expensive high-throughput assay for detecting compounds that bind to both PPARgamma and PPARalpha. Using this FP binding assay, we have identified a large number of PPARalpha/gamma dual activators. A similar assay platform may be easily adapted to other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family.

Tesaglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist, reduces atherosclerosis in female low density lipoprotein receptor deficient mice

OBJECTIVE

The transcription factors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) alpha (alpha) and gamma (gamma), which are involved in lipid and glucose homeostasis, also exert modulatory actions on vascular cells where they exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative properties. Hence, PPAR agonists potentially can affect atherogenesis both via metabolic effects and direct effects on the vessel wall. We tested whether the dual PPAR-alpha/gamma agonist, tesaglitazar (TZ), would reduce atherosclerosis in a non-diabetic, atherosclerosis-prone mouse model, independent of effects on plasma lipids.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Low-density lipoprotein receptor deficient (LDLr-/-) mice were fed a Western type diet consisting of 21% butterfat and 0.15% cholesterol, with or without TZ 0.5 micromol/kg of diet, for 12 weeks. TZ reduced atherosclerosis in the female, but not male, LDLr-/- mice without affecting cholesterol and triglyceride levels, HDL binding to biglycan, or the inflammatory markers serum amyloid A (SAA) and serum amyloid P (SAP). TZ also decreased adiposity in both genders.

CONCLUSIONS

TZ reduced atherosclerosis in the female LDLr-/- mice via lipid-independent mechanisms, probably at least in part by direct actions on the vessels. The body weight changes in these mice are different from the effects of dual PPAR agonists seen in humans.

Dual PPAR α/γ Agonists: Promises and Pitfalls in Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease of complex pathogenesis and pleiotropic clinical manifestations. The greatest clinical challenge in this disease is the prevention of the long-term complications, many of which involve cardiovascular outcomes. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma isoforms of the family of nuclear transcription factors are pharmaceutical targets for therapeutic intervention because they can potentially ameliorate not only the hyperglycemia of diabetes, but also the dyslipidemia that is characteristic of this disorder (low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high triglycerides, small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles). Novel drugs with dual PPAR alpha and gamma activity have been under clinical development for type 2 diabetes, and they have shown promise in early studies with regard to glucose lowering and improved lipid profile when compared with the PPAR-gamma-specific thiazolidinediones. Unfortunately, the dual PPARs available to date have some of the PPAR-gamma-associated side effect profile, including fluid retention and weight gain, which have limited the further clinical development of higher doses that show improved efficacy. This review will briefly summarize our understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, the role of the PPAR family of receptors, and the potential for clinical use of this novel emerging class of agents that serve as dual activators of both PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma.

Effect of tesaglitazar, a dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist, on glucose and lipid abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 12-week dose-ranging trial

OBJECTIVE

The Glucose and Lipid Assessment in Diabetes (GLAD) trial examined the dose-response relationship of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/gamma agonist tesaglitazar in type 2 diabetic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

GLAD was a 12-week, multicenter, international, randomized, parallel-group trial. Five-hundred men and women aged 30-80 years with type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] > or = 126 mg/dL [> or = 7.0 mmol/L]) received once-daily, double-blind placebo or tesaglitazar (0.1 mg, 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or open-label pioglitazone (45 mg), included as a therapeutic benchmark.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Placebo-corrected changes from baseline in FPG (primary end point), plasma lipids, and insulin-resistance measures.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean patient age was 56.1 years, 57.5 years, and 58.9 years for placebo, across tesaglitazar groups, and for pioglitazone, respectively. For the corresponding groups, mean body mass index was 30.6 kg/m2, 30.9 kg/m2, and 29.7 kg/m2, and mean HbA1c was 7.0%, 7.2%, and 7.0%, respectively. At 12 weeks, tesaglitazar 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 2.0 mg, and 3.0 mg produced statistically significant reductions in FPG (-30.3 mg/dL, -41.1 mg/dL, -55.0 mg/dL, -60.9 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), triglycerides (-17.2%, -32.9%, -41.0%, -40.9%; p < 0.01), and apolipoprotein B (-15.0%, -15.7%, -21.0%, -22.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Tesaglitazar at doses > or = 1.0 mg significantly increased high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (15.0%, 13.0%, 12.9%; p < 0.001), and reduced non-HDL-C (-13.2%, -22.2%, -25.0%; p < 0.0001), very-low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C) (-36.9%, -49.8%, -52.5%; p < 0.0001), and total cholesterol (-6.8%, -14.1%, -15.5%, respectively; p < 0.01). Tesaglitazar > or = 0.5 mg improved insulin-resistance measures. Although no formal statistical analyses were performed between active treatments, improvements in efficacy measures with tesaglitazar 1.0 mg were numerically similar to or greater than those with pioglitazone. Similar numbers of adverse events occurred in the tesaglitazar < or = 1.0 mg, placebo, and pioglitazone arms, but there was an increasing frequency of discontinuations due to pre-specified hematologic and clinical-chemistry criteria with tesaglitazar doses > or = 1.0 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In type 2 diabetic patients, tesaglitazar dose-dependently reduced FPG levels at doses > or = 0.5 mg. Other markers of glycemic control, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and measures associated with insulin resistance were improved at doses > or = 0.5 mg or > or = 1.0 mg. Study limitations included that the majority of patients were white, patients had good glycemic control at baseline, and the increased number of early withdrawals in the tesaglitazar 2.0 mg and 3.0 mg doses limits conclusions about the efficacy of these doses. The 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg tesaglitazar doses were identified for further investigation.

Dual PPARα/γ Agonist Tesaglitazar Reduces Atherosclerosis in Insulin-Resistant and Hypercholesterolemic ApoE*3Leiden Mice

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether the dual PPARalpha/gamma agonist tesaglitazar has anti-atherogenic effects in ApoE*3Leiden mice with reduced insulin sensitivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ApoE*3Leiden transgenic mice were fed a high-fat (HF) insulin-resistance-inducing diet. One group received a high-cholesterol (HC) supplement (1% wt/wt; HC group). A second group received the same HC supplement along with tesaglitazar (T) 0.5 micromol/kg diet (T group). A third (control) group received a low-cholesterol (LC) supplement (0.1% wt/wt; LC group). Tesaglitazar decreased plasma cholesterol by 20% compared with the HC group; cholesterol levels were similar in the T and LC groups. Compared with the HC group, tesaglitazar caused a 92% reduction in atherosclerosis, whereas a 56% reduction was seen in the cholesterol-matched LC group. Furthermore, tesaglitazar treatment significantly reduced lesion number beyond that expected from cholesterol lowering and induced a shift to less severe lesions. Concomitantly, tesaglitazar reduced macrophage-rich and collagen areas. In addition, tesaglitazar reduced inflammatory markers, including plasma SAA levels, the number of adhering monocytes, and nuclear factor kappaB-activity in the vessel wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Tesaglitazar has anti-atherosclerotic effects in the mouse model that go beyond plasma cholesterol lowering, possibly caused by a combination of altered lipoprotein profiles and anti-inflammatory vascular effects.