Impact of estrogen type on cardiovascular safety of combined oral contraceptives

[Women-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism]

Women have a higher lifetime risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than men. Hormone-associated risk factors such as pregnancy, contraception and hormone replacement therapy contribute significantly to this. Contraception with combined hormonal contraception increases the risk of VTE in young women, with the extent of the increase in risk being determined by the level of the estrogen dose and the progestin component. After hormone associated VTE, temporary anticoagulation is sufficient in many cases, provided there are no additional persistent risk factors. Affected women should be informed that the risk of VTE recurrence is increased in a subsequent pregnancy and usually requires VTE prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin during pregnancy. If the suspicion of recurrent VTE arises during pregnancy, diagnostics must be carried out promptly so that deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism can be reliably confirmed or ruled out.

Are natural estrogens used in contraception at lower risk of venous thromboembolism than synthetic ones? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant global health challenge, notably exacerbated by the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Evidence mainly focuses on the type of progestogen used in COCs to establish the increased risk of VTE with less data assessed on the type of estrogen used. This meta-analysis aims to assess the risk of VTE associated with COCs containing synthetic estrogens like ethinylestradiol (EE) versus natural estrogens like estradiol (E2).

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searches were performed in December 2023 in MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify clinical studies comparing the VTE risk between COCs containing synthetic versus natural estrogens. Studies were selected through rigorous screening, and data extraction followed standardized protocols, with statistical analyses employing a random effects model.

Results

The search yielded five relevant studies, involving over 560,000 women/time, demonstrating a significant 33% reduction in VTE risk among users of natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic estrogen-based COCs (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87). Stratification analyses using adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of the main observationnal studies showed a 49% reduced VTE risk of E2-based pills compared to EE in association with levonorgestrel.

Discussion and conclusion

Despite the longstanding use of EE-based COCs, emerging evidence supports a lower thrombotic risk associated with natural estrogens. This meta-analysis substantiates the lower VTE risk associated with natural estrogen-based COCs compared to synthetic alternatives, advocating for a re-evaluation of contraceptive guidelines to prioritize patient safety and reduce thrombotic risks.

Blackcurrant extract promotes differentiation of MC3T3‑E1 pre‑osteoblasts

Osteoporosis risk increases in menopausal individuals owing to the decrease in estrogen secretion. Blackcurrant extract (BCE) ameliorates osteoporosis; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Furthermore, although BCE has phytoestrogenic activity, its effects on osteoblasts are unknown. In the present study, we investigated BCE-mediated attenuation of osteoporosis using mouse MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts, with a focus on osteogenesis. After treating MC3T3-E1 cells with BCE for 48 h, cell proliferation was assessed using Cell Counting Kit-8. Levels of osteoblast differentiation markers, namely alkaline phosphatase activity and total collagen content in the cells, were evaluated after 3 and 14 days of BCE treatment, respectively. The expression of genes encoding osteoblast differentiation markers, including collagen type I (Col-I), alkaline phosphatase (Alp), bone γ-carboxyglutamate protein (Bglap), and runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), was evaluated using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Mineralization of the cells was evaluated using Alizarin Red staining. Femoral tissues of ovariectomized (OVX) rats with or without 3% BCE were stained using ALP to evaluate osteogenic differentiation in femoral tissue. After treating MC3T3-E1 cells with BCE, cell proliferation had increased. BCE treatment increased Alp activity and total collagen content. Moreover, the expression of Col-I, Alp, Bglap, and Runx2 increased in BCE-treated cells. Furthermore, when MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with BCE for 21 days, the levels of calcified nodules increased. Alp staining intensity was stronger in the epiphyses on femoral tissue of OVX rats treated with 3% BCE than in those of untreated OVX rats. The results suggest that BCE may promote osteogenesis by inducing osteoblast differentiation.

Hormonal contraceptive use after a first venous thrombotic event and the risk of recurrence in premenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Extensive evidence is available on hormonal contraceptive (HC) use and the risk of a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. Despite recommendations to discontinue combined HC (CHC) use, some women continue or start its use after a first VTE.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the VTE recurrence risk associated with HC use in premenopausal women.

METHODS

Premenopausal women with a first VTE included in the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Venous Thrombosis study between 1999 and 2004 were followed for a recurrence until 2010. Data on HC use were available through linkage to the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics. The risk of recurrence was assessed 1) during anticoagulant therapy and 2) after cessation of anticoagulant therapy. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs adjusted for age and body mass index at baseline and thromboprophylaxis use during follow-up.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty women were uniquely linked and followed for a total of 3538 person-years (median, 6.1 years), during which 57 VTE recurrences occurred. Five occurred (8.8%) during anticoagulation treatment, with no clear risk difference for CHC use vs nonuse (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1-8.2). After anticoagulation cessation, CHC use was associated with a 2.4-fold higher risk of recurrence (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.0) compared with nonuse. Recurrence risk for levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use was similar to that for nonuse (HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-3.1).

CONCLUSION

CHC use after a first VTE is safe during anticoagulant use but substantially increases the risk of a recurrent VTE event in absence of anticoagulant use. This study adds to the evidence regarding the use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device as a safe alternative.

Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women's needs

BACKGROUND

The oestrogenic component of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) has changed over years with the aim of reducing oestrogen-related side effects and risks, whilst maintaining oestrogen beneficial effects, particularly on cycle control.

PURPOSE

To describe the pharmacological profiles of different oestrogens commonly used in COCs to provide insights on contraceptive prescription tailored to women's needs.

RESULTS

All COCs ensure a high contraceptive efficacy. COCs containing the natural oestrogens oestradiol (E2), oestradiol valerate (E2V) and estetrol (E4) have limited impact on liver metabolism, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, haemostasis and sex hormone binding globulin levels, compared with ethinylestradiol (EE). COCs with E2 and E2V appear also to entail a lower elevation of the risk of venous thromboembolism vs. EE-containing pills. No epidemiological data are available for E4-COC. E2- and E2V-containing COCs seem to exert a less stabilising oestrogenic effect on the endometrium compared with EE-COCs. The E4-COC results in a predictable bleeding pattern with a high rate of scheduled bleeding and minimal unscheduled bleeding per cycle. Based on in vitro and in vivo animal data, E4 seems to be associated with a lower effect on cell breast proliferation.

CONCLUSION

Today various COCs contain different oestrogens. Prescribers must be familiar with the different properties of each oestrogen for a tailored contraceptive recommendation, considering their safety and contraceptive efficacy, as well as women's needs and preferences.

Association between the use of oral contraceptives and the occurrence of systemic hypertension: A systematic review with statistical comparison between randomized clinical trial interventions

Introduction

In the WHO eligibility criteria, there is agreement that hypertensive women taking Oral Contraceptive Hormonal Combined (OCHC) may be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The risk-to-benefit ratio hinges on the severity of the condition. While a mild increase in blood pressure is a common occurrence in consumers of OCHC, the potential for developing high blood pressure exists during oral contraceptive use. Consequently, there is a possibility of increased cardiovascular risk, with limited available data on this issue.

Objective

To evaluate the potential effects of OCHC on blood pressure through a systematic review with statistical analysis of existing randomized controlled trials.

Method

This systematic review with statistical comparison adheres to the recommendations outlined in the PRISMA (Principal Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The analysis strategy involves comparing the mean difference in blood pressure change according to the type of treatment, in addition to the calculation of clinically relevant outcomes (CRO).

Results

Our findings suggest a clinically relevant outcome related to the increase in blood pressure in users of ethinyl estradiol combined with gestodene in a cyclic regimen over 6 months. Conversely, a decrease in blood pressure was observed among users of ethinyl estradiol combined with chlormadinone over 24 months of usage.

Conclusion

While our study found minor variations in blood pressure across varying forms of oral contraceptives, these differences are not significant enough to warrant specific clinical recommendations. However, the results suggest that individuals with hypertension should exercise caution with ethinyl estradiol, particularly when administered cyclically alongside gestodene, due to the potential risk of increased blood pressure. Additionally, the use of oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol paired with chlormadinone acetate or ethinyl estradiol combined with drospirenone may be more suitable for individuals at a high risk of developing hypertension.

Venous Thromboembolic Risk of Estradiol Valerate-Dienogest Compared with Ethinyl Estradiol-Levonorgestrel Combined Oral Contraceptives

This pooled analysis compared the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing estradiol (E2) valerate-dienogest with those containing ethinyl E2-levonorgestrel. Data were retrieved from two large, prospective, observational cohort studies. Propensity score subclassification was applied to balance baseline parameters between the COC user cohorts. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated based on the extended Cox model. The pooled data set included 11,616 E2 valerate-dienogest users and 18,681 ethinyl E2-levonorgestrel users, contributing 17,932 and 29,140 women-years of observation, respectively. A significantly decreased VTE risk in E2 valerate-dienogest COCs compared with ethinyl E2-levonorgestrel COCs was observed (propensity score-stratified HR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.22-0.98). This pooled analysis expands data from a previous postauthorization safety study and provides valuable real-world safety information on the relative safety of current COCs.

Is the multinational, surveillance PRO-E2 study informative for all countries? The Italian data on VTE and contraceptive effectiveness

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the thromboembolic risk and contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 observed in the PRO-E2 study can be extended to each participating country, as lifestyle, cardiovascular risk factors and prescribing habits may differ geographically. This analysis was performed on the PRO-E2 Italian subpopulation, where smoking habit and women over 35 years were more prevalent compared with the overall study population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from NOMAC-E2 or levonorgestrel-containing COCs (COCLNG) new users were descriptively analysed. Incidence rates of thrombosis (events/10,000 women-years [WY]) and the Pearl Index (pregnancies/100 WY) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 11,179 NOMAC-E2 and 8,504 COCLNG users were followed up to 2 years (34,869 WY). The NOMAC-E2 cohort included more women over 35 vs. COCLNG (37.7% vs. 31.8%; p = 0.001). A comparable low risk of combined deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was observed in NOMAC-E2 (1.7/10,000 WY; 95% CI: 0.21-6.2) and COCLNG users (6.6/10,000 WY; 95% CI: 2.4-14.4). Similar results were obtained by considering all thromboembolic events (VTE). Unintended pregnancies did not differ between NOMAC-E2 (0.12/100 WY; 95% CI: 0.06-0.21) and COCLNG (0.15/100 WY; 95% CI: 0.08-0.26) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Despite the higher age and tobacco use, findings from the Italian subpopulation were broadly consistent with overall PRO-E2 results, confirming a similar low thromboembolic risk and high contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 and COCLNG.

SHORT CONDENSATION

This subgroup analysis of the PRO-E2 study provides comprehensive epidemiological data on the use of combined oral contraceptives in a large Italian cohort, with a higher prevalence of women over 35 years and smokers. The study confirms the low thromboembolic risk and high contraceptive effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 pill.

Contraceptives and Thrombosis: An Intertwined Revolutionary Road

The development of oral contraceptives (OCs) began in 1921 and continued in the following years until the first regulatory approval from the Food and Drug Administration was granted in 1960. However, it took several years to realize that OCs presented an important but not frequent risk of venous thrombosis. Several reports ignored this dangerous effect and only in 1967 the Medical Research Council clearly stated this as an important risk. Later, research led to the formulation of second-generation OCs containing progestins, which nevertheless presented an increased thrombotic risk. In early 1980s, OCs containing third-generation progestins were introduced into the market. Only in 1995, it became clear that these new compounds induced a higher thrombotic risk than that related to the second-generation progestins. It appeared clear that the modulating action of progestins was against the procoagulant activity of estrogens. Lastly, at the end of the 2000s, OCs containing natural estrogens and a fourth-generation progestin (dienogest) became available. The prothrombotic effect of those natural products was not different from that of preparations containing second-generation progestins. Moreover, research over the years has produced much data on risk factors associated with OCs use such as age, obesity, cigarette smoking, and thrombophilia. These findings allowed us to better assess the individual thrombotic risk (both arterial and thrombotic) of each woman before offering an OC. Furthermore, research has shown that in high-risk people the use of single progestin is not dangerous as far as thrombosis is concerned. In conclusion, the OCs road has been long and difficult but has led to a great and unthinkable scientific and social enrichment since the 1960s.

Postpartum contraception: A matter of guidelines

The postpartum period is the perfect time to access family planning services. WHO guidelines contraindicate combined hormonal contraceptives postpartum in breastfeeding patients between 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery (Medical Eligibility Criteria category 3). On the contrary, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines do not contraindicate their use in women who breastfeed from 6 weeks to 6 months postpartum. New combined hormonal contraceptives with natural estrogens have never been studied in this setting. Guidelines agree on the prescription of the progestin-only pill postpartum in non-breastfeeding women (category 1). Differences are found in women who breastfeed. In non-breastfeeding women, an implant is considered safe (category 1) by all guidelines, without any distinction in time. Regarding postpartum breastfeeding women, the guidelines for implants give quite different indications but are still permissive. Intrauterine devices are viable options for postpartum contraception but guidelines give different indications about the timing of insertion. Postplacental intrauterine device placement can reduce the subsequent unintended pregnancy rate, particularly in settings at greatest risk of not having recommended postpartum controls. However, it has yet to be understood whether this approach can really have an advantage in high-income countries. Postpartum contraception is not a 'matter of guidelines': it is the best customization for each woman, as early as possible but at the ideal timing.

Sexual health and contraception in the menopause journey

Women may experience changes in sexuality across menopause, because at this step in life hormone deficiency interacts with several determinants in a bio-psycho-social perspective. Healthcare providers should inform women about menopause impact on sexuality and be proactive during consultation in disclosing sexual concerns that would require a targeted assessment. Sexual symptoms become more frequent as women age, but they do not always translate into sexual dysfunction diagnosis, for which distress is required. It is important to recognize conditions that may increase the risk of dysfunctional response to menopause challenges in order to promote sexual longevity through counselling and specific management. In this review, we report key elements for a comprehensive assessment of sexual health around menopause, with a focus on genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) and hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), representing well identified clinical conditions affecting sexuality at midlife and beyond. We also address the issue of contraception across the menopausal transition, highlighting risks and benefits, and possible implications on sexual function.

Combined oral contraceptives: update recommendations of the Latin American contraceptive association

Background: In recent years, new combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have become available, representing an advance in terms of individualization and compliance by users.Objective: To provide recommendations regarding COCs: formulations, use, efficacy, benefits and safety.Method: For these recommendations, we have used the modified Delphi methodology and carried out a systematic review of studies found in the literature and reviews performed in humans, published in English and Spanish in Pubmed, Medline and advanced medicine and computer networks until the year 2021, using the combination of terms: 'oral contraceptives', 'estroprogestins' and 'combined oral contraceptives'.Results: Regarding the estrogen component, initially switching from mestranol (the pro-drug of ethinylestradiol) to ethinylestradiol (EE) and then reducing the EE dose helped reduce side effects and associated adverse events. Natural estradiol and estradiol valerate are already available and represent a valid alternative to EE. The use of more potent 19-nortestosterone-derived progestins, in order to lower the dose and then the appearance of non-androgenic progestins with different endocrine and metabolic characteristics, has made it possible to individualize the prescription of COC according to the profile of each woman.Conclusion: Advances in the provision of new COCs have improved the risk/benefit ratio by increasing benefits and reducing risks. Currently, the challenge is to tailor contraceptives to individual needs in terms of safety, efficacy, and protection of female reproductive health.

Cardiovascular diseases in women - Consensus document of the Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia, Sociedade Portuguesa de Ginecologia, Sociedade Portuguesa de Obstetrícia e Medicina Materno-Fetal, Sociedade Portuguesa de Contraceção e Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

The main objective of this consensus statement from the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, the Portuguese Society of Gynecology, the Portuguese Society of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Portuguese Society of Contraception, Portuguese Association of General Practice and Family Medicine is to improve cardiovascular care for women. It includes a brief review of the state-of-the-art of cardiovascular diseases in women and of the links to other fields such as Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Endocrinology. It also provides final recommendations to help clinicians working in care of women's health.

Role of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in hormone-induced venous thromboembolism

ABSTRACT

Exposure to higher levels of steroid hormones, like that in pregnancy or during combined hormonal contraception, increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. Development of resistance to activated protein C (APC) thought to be the underlying pathomechanism of this prothrombotic state. This coagulation phenomena is largely to be explained by the hormone-induced impairment of the protein S/ tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) leading to a less efficient inactivation of factor Va and factor VIIIa by APC. APC resistance and decreased protein S/TFPI function were associated with the risk of first as well as recurrent venous thromboembolism. Preexisting disturbances in these pathways are likely to predispose to thrombosis during hormone exposure and can persist over years after the thrombosis event.Further studies are necessary to investigate the predictive value of forgoing APC resistance and decreased protein S/TFPI function or an excessive alteration in these parameters during hormone intake on the development of hormone-induced venous thromboembolism.

Hormonal therapies in females with blood disorders: thrombophilia, thrombosis, hemoglobinopathies, and anemias

There is widespread use of gonadal steroid hormone therapy for a variety of indications throughout the reproductive and postreproductive lifespan. These therapies may have particular benefits and specific risk among those with blood disorders, including inherited or acquired bleeding disorders, thrombophilia, thrombosis, or anemia. This clinical review is intended to provide a guidance for counseling and management of adolescent and adult biologic females with thrombophilic risk factors and/or thrombosis who require hormonal therapy. In general, synthetic estrogens present in contraceptive products should be avoided in those with a personal or strong family history of thrombosis or thrombophilias. In contrast, natural estrogens present in formulations for climacteric symptom management do not need to be avoided, and vaginal or transdermal formulations are preferred. Likewise, transdermal estradiol is preferred for gender-affirming hormone therapy and requires individualized assessment in those at high risk of thrombosis. Progestogens (either synthetic progestins or naturally occurring progesterone) can be used safely in nearly all patients. There is minimal safety evidence among anticoagulated patients at risk for thrombosis, which requires a patient-specific approach when discussing hormone therapies.

Regulation of human endothelial cell migration by oral contraceptive estrogen receptor ligands

Ethinylestradiol (EE) and estetrol (E4) are the two main estrogenic agents used in combined oral contraceptives. These compounds have different binding affinity to and efficacy on estrogen receptors (ER) subtypes. We previously reported that treatment with estrogenic agents enhances angiogenesis via nongenomic, G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER)-dependent mechanisms. However, the impact of EE and E4 on human endothelial function has been little investigated. EE and E4 (10^-9- 10^-7 M) significantly enhanced migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) using scratch and Boyden chamber assays. Mechanistically, both agents increased accumulation of phosphorylated protein tyrosine kinase 2 on tyrosine 397 (FAK Y397), a key player in endothelial cell motility, after 30-min treatment. Treatment with increasing concentrations of EE, but not E4, enhanced accumulation of the glycolysis activator PFKFB3. Of note, effects of EE and E4 on endothelial migration and signalling proteins were abolished by addition of the GPER antagonist G36 (10^-6 M). Thus, EE and E4 induced comparable endothelial responses in vitro, suggesting no apparent alterations of vascular remodelling and regeneration capacity by oral contraceptives containing these agents.

Evaluation of Activated Protein C Resistance Using Thrombin Generation Test

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) has been identified as a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A mutation at the level of factor (F) V has at first permitted the description of this phenotypic pattern and corresponded to a transition (guanine to adenine) at nucleotide 1691 in the gene coding for factor V, resulting in the replacement of arginine at position 506 by a glutamine. This confers to this mutated FV a resistance toward the proteolytic action of the complex formed by activated protein C with protein S. However, many other factors also lead to APCR, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy, and postpartum. All these conditions lead to the phenotypic expression of APCR and are associated with an increased risk of VTE. Considering the large population affected, the proper detection of this phenotype is a public health challenge. Currently, two types of tests are available: clotting time-based assays and their multiple variants and a thrombin generation-based assays and the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based APCR assay. As APCR was thought to be uniquely related to the FV Leiden mutation, clotting time-based assays were specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Nevertheless, other APCR conditions have been reported but were not captured by these clotting methods. Thus, the ETP-based APCR assay has been proposed as a global coagulation test able to these multiple APCR conditions, as it provides much more information, which makes it a potential candidate for screening coagulopathic conditions before therapeutic interventions. This chapter will describe the current method used for the realization of the ETP-based APC resistance assay.

[The Thromboembolism Risk with Combined Hormonal Contraceptives: Current Status and Prescribing Practice]

The Thromboembolism Risk with Combined Hormonal Contraceptives: Current Status and Prescribing Practice Abstract. The use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) increases not only the risk for venous thromboembolism, but also for arterial thromboembolism. The risk for thromboembolism is the same for non-oral CHC (patches, vaginal rings) as for oral CHC. Risk factors such as age >35, obesity, smoking and a positive family history need to be recognized and considered in contraceptive counselling. Elaborate information concerning risks and benefits is mandatory. This applies to first-time as well as long-term users. Careful investigation of the history is required, and the risk factors need to be re-evaluated at yearly prescription. It is also very important to inform the patients about the early symptoms of thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, so that therapy can be started immediately. Apart from these risks, CHC may have beneficial effects on organs such as the ovaries, the endometrium and the general well-being for many women. When prescribing a CHC for the first time or when changing to another preparation, one should always weigh up whether certain benefits justify prescribing a preparation with a slightly higher risk of thrombosis compared to the second-generation pill or preparations with Estradiol/Nomegestrolacetat. Women who are already using a third-generation pill or a pill with drospirenone or cyproterone acetate and feel comfortable with it do not need to switch to another preparation (provided no new risk factors have arisen). For women with increased risks, i.e. several relative contraindications or one absolute contraindication, safe alternatives to CHC include progestogen-only preparations, intrauterine devices containing copper or levonorgestrel or, after family planning has been completed, surgical methods (sterilisation/vasectomy).

Low Thrombin Generation in Users of a Contraceptive Containing Estetrol and Drospirenone

OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact on thrombin generation of the new combined oral contraceptive containing 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone with ethinylestradiol (30 or 20 mcg) associated either with 150 mcg levonorgestrel or with 3 mg drospirenone.

METHODS

Data were collected from the "E4/DRSP Endocrine Function, Metabolic Control and Hemostasis Study" (NCT02957630). Overall, the per-protocol set population included 24 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel arm, 28 subjects in the ethinylestradiol/drospirenone arm, and 34 subjects in the estetrol/drospirenone arm. Thrombograms and thrombin generation parameters (lag time, peak, time to peak, endogenous thrombin potential, and mean velocity rate index) were extracted for each subject at baseline and after 6 cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

After 6 cycles of treatment, ethinylestradiol-containing products arms show a mean thrombogram outside the upper limit of the reference range, that is the 97.5th percentile of all baseline thrombograms. On the other hand, the mean thrombogram of estetrol/drospirenone is within this reference interval. After 6 cycles of treatment, all thrombin generation parameters are statistically less affected by estetrol/drospirenone than ethinylestradiol-containing products.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, an association of 15 mg estetrol with 3 mg drospirenone does not have an impact on thrombin generation compared with ethinylestradiol-containing products that, either associated with levonorgestrel or drospirenone, are able to increase the production of procoagulant factors and decrease the production of anticoagulant ones, shifting the patient to a prothrombotic state. Ethinylestradiol-containing products thus generate prothrombotic environments contrary to estetrol which demonstrates a neutral profile on hemostasis.

Venous Thromboembolism Issues in Women

The lifetime risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is slightly higher in women than in men. There are several issues related to VTE that are unique to women. Combined hormonal contraceptives and pregnancy increase the risk of VTE in women of childbearing age, whereas hormone replacement therapy increases the VTE risk of postmenopausal women. Hereditary thrombophilia and risk factors such as older age, obesity, or smoking contribute to the risk increase. In women diagnosed with acute hormone-related VTE who are treated with oral anticoagulants, adequate contraception is mandatory to avoid unwanted pregnancies. According to current knowledge, hormonal contraception may be continued during anticoagulant therapy but must be switched to an estrogen-free contraception method at least 6 weeks before the termination of anticoagulation. VTE is also a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Currently, assisted reproduction technologies such as in vitro fertilization are widely used to treat couples affected by infertility. Complications of fertility treatment comprise VTE cases, especially in women with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. With this review, we intended to focus on VTE issues in women and summarize current evidence and guideline recommendations.

Obesity and contraceptive use: impact on cardiovascular risk

Obesity and oestrogen containing contraceptive products are well-known independent cardiovascular risk factors. However, a significant number of obese women continue to receive prescriptions of hormonal products that contain oestrogens for their contraception. We have conducted a narrative review to discuss the latest evidence, ongoing research, and controversial issues on the synergistic effect of obesity and contraceptive use, in terms of cardiovascular risk. There is compelling evidence of an interplay between obesity and contraception in increasing cardiovascular risk. Women who present both obesity and use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have a greater risk (between 12 and 24 times) to develop venous thromboembolism than non-obese non-COC users. Data here discussed offer new insights to increase clinicians' awareness on the cardiovascular risk in the clinical management of obese women. The synergistic effect of obesity and COCs on deep venous thrombosis risk must be considered when prescribing hormonal contraception. Progestin-only products are a safer alternative to COCs in patients with overweight or obesity. Obese women taking contraceptives should be viewed as an 'at risk' population, and as such, they should receive advice to change their lifestyle, avoiding other cardiovascular risk factors, as a form of primary prevention. This indication should be extended to young women, as data show that COCs should be avoided in obese women of any age.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

A novel estetrol-containing combined oral contraceptive: European expert panel review

PURPOSE

Despite considerable advances in recently developed combined oral contraceptives (COCs), resulting in lower rates of adverse events while maintaining contraceptive efficacy, there is interest in further innovation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Estetrol (E4), a native oestrogen, and progestin drospirenone (DRSP) were combined in a new COC. A European expert panel reviewed the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety and tolerability of this combination. Their findings are presented as a narrative review.

RESULTS

E4 15mg/DRSP 3 mg in a 24/4 regimen provided effective contraception with good cycle control, characterised by a predictable regular bleeding pattern and minimal unscheduled bleeding, together with a good safety profile. The combination was associated with high user satisfaction, wellbeing, and minimal changes in body weight. The effects on endocrine and metabolic parameters were limited, and the combination was found to have a limited impact on liver function and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Moreover, its effect on several haemostatic parameters was lower than that of comparators containing ethinyl oestradiol (EE) 20mg/DRSP 3 mg and EE 30mg/levonorgestrel 150mg.

CONCLUSION

E4 15 mg/DRSP 3 mg provides safe and effective contraception, with high user satisfaction and predictable bleeding. Further research will evaluate the long-term safety of the COC.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Laboratory Testing for the Evaluation of Phenotypic Activated Protein C Resistance

Activated protein C (APC) resistance (APCR) is considered a risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The most common genetic disorder conferring APCR is a factor (F) V Leiden mutation, but many other factors are also implicated, such as other F5 mutations (e.g., FV Hong-Kong and FV Cambridge), protein S deficiency, elevated factor VIII, exogenous hormone use, pregnancy and postpartum, depending on how APCR is defined. Considering the large population affected, the detection of this phenotype is crucial. Two types of tests are currently available: clotting time-based assays (with several versions) and thrombin generation-based assays with the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP)-based assay. The purpose of this review is therefore to discuss the performances of these tests and the cases in which it would be appropriate to use one over the other. Initially, as APCR was thought to be solely related to the FV Leiden mutation, the objective was to obtain a 100% specific assay. Clotting-time based assays were thus specifically designed to detect this inherited condition. Later on, an APCR condition without a FV Leiden mutation was identified and highlighted as an independent risk factor of VTE. Therefore, the development of a less specific assay was needed and a global coagulation test was proposed, known as the ETP-based APCR assay. In light of the above, these tests should not be used for the same purpose. Clotting time-based assays should only be recommended as a screening test for the detection of FV mutations prior to confirmation by genetic testing. On the other hand, the ETP-based APC resistance assay, in addition to being able to detect any type of APCR, could be proposed as a global screening test as it assesses the entire coagulation process.

Bleeding Patterns of Oral Contraceptives with a Cyclic Dosing Regimen: An Overview

Bleeding irregularities are one of the major reasons for discontinuation of oral contraceptives (OCs), and therefore clinicians need to set expectations during consultations. In this review we provide an overview of bleeding data of recently marketed cyclic combined OCs (COCs) and one progestin-only pill (POP). We evaluated data from phase 3 trials (≥12 months) used to gain regulatory approval. Overall, each type of OC has its own specific bleeding pattern. These patterns however were assessed by using different bleeding definitions, which hampers comparisons between products. In COCs, the estrogen balances the effects of the progestin on the endometrium, resulting in a regular bleeding pattern. However, this balance seems lost if a too low dose of ethinylestradiol (EE) (e.g., 10 µg in EE/norethindrone acetate 1 mg) is used in an attempt to lower the risk of venous thromboembolism. Replacement of EE by 17β-estradiol (E2) or E2 valerate could lead to suboptimal bleeding profile due to destabilization of the endometrium. Replacement of EE with estetrol (E4) 15 mg in the combination with drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg is associated with a predictable and regular scheduled bleeding profile, while the POP containing DRSP 4 mg in a 24/4 regimen is associated with a higher rate of unscheduled and absence of scheduled bleeding than combined products.

Hormonal therapies and venous thrombosis: Considerations for prevention and management

Background

Venous thromboses are well-established complications of hormonal therapy. Thrombosis risk is seen with both hormonal contraceptive agents and with hormone replacement therapy for menopause and gender transition. Over the past several decades, large epidemiological studies have helped better define these risks.

Objectives

To review and discuss the differences in thrombosis risk of the many of hormonal preparations available as well as their interaction with patient-specific factors.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the available literature regarding venous thrombosis and hormonal therapies including for contraception, menopausal symptoms, and gender transition.

Results

Thrombosis risk with estrogen-containing compounds increases with increasing systemic dose of estrogen. While progesterone-only-containing products are not associated with thrombosis, when paired with estrogen in combined oral contraceptives, the formulation of progesterone does impact the risk. These components, along with patient-specific factors, may influence the choice of hormonal preparation. For patients who develop thrombosis on hormonal treatment, anticoagulation is protective against future thrombosis. Duration of anticoagulation is dependent on ongoing and future hormone therapy choice. Finally, the optimal management of hormone therapy for individuals diagnosed with prothrombotic illnesses such as COVID-19 remains unclear.

Conclusions

When contemplating hormonal contraception or hormone replacement therapy, clinicians must consider a variety of factors including hormone type, dose, route, personal and family history of thrombosis, and other prothrombotic risk factors to make informed, personalized decisions regarding the risk of venous thrombosis.

Combined oral contraceptives containing estradiol valerate vs ethinylestradiol on coagulation: A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol (EE) induce changes in the coagulation system and are associated with a risk of venous thromboembolism. However, studies comparing the effects of combined oral contraceptives containing EE and low-potency estrogens (ie, estradiol [E₂ ] and estradiol valerate [EV]) on coagulation biomarkers are limited. This study represents secondary outcomes of a randomized trial comparing combined oral contraceptives containing EV + dienogest (DNG), EE + DNG, and DNG alone on selected coagulation biomarkers. We could compare the specific effects of the different estrogen components owing to the inclusion of preparations containing the same progestin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 59 healthy, 18- to 35-year-old, non-smoking women, of whom three discontinued. The participants were randomly allocated to 9 weeks of continuous treatment with EV 2 mg + DNG 2-3 mg (n = 20), EE 0.03 mg + DNG 2 mg (n = 20), or DNG 2 mg (n = 19). Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 9 weeks. We assessed coagulation in vitro by thrombin generation using the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram. Thrombin generation was evaluated by lag time, time to thrombin peak, thrombin peak, and endogenous thrombin potential in response to tissue factor (1 pm). In vivo coagulation assessment was based on levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) (thrombin generation) and D-dimer (fibrin turnover).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02352090.

RESULTS

Lag time and time to thrombin peak remained unaltered after exposure to EV + DNG, whereas EE + DNG shortened both lag time (mean percentage change -24%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -32% to -15%; p < 0.01) and time to thrombin peak (-26%, 95% CI -37% to -16%; p < 0.01). EV + DNG induced lower thrombin peak and endogenous thrombin potential than EE + DNG (peak; +45%, 95% CI 22%-67% vs +147%,95% CI 96%-198%; p < 0.01, and endogenous thrombin potential; +26%, 95% CI 15%-38% vs +64%, 95% CI 51%-76%; p < 0.01). Median F1 + 2 levels remained unchanged with EV + DNG (p = 0.22) but increased within normal ranges with EE + DNG (from 152 pmol/L, 95% CI 127-206] pmol/L to 194 pmol/L, 95% CI 149-250 pmol/L, p = 0.04). The within-group change in D-dimer levels was not significant in any of the groups. DNG alone did not affect these biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Both in vitro and in vivo thrombin generation was lower after exposure to EV + DNG compared with EE + DNG. The lower thrombin generation measures after treatment with EV + DNG indicate less enhancement of coagulation potential and suggest that EV may be favorable to EE as a component of combined oral contraceptives.

Estradiol Valerate vs Ethinylestradiol in Combined Oral Contraceptives: Effects on the Pituitary-Ovarian Axis

CONTEXT

Limited studies have compared the effects of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) containing natural estrogens and synthetic ethinylestradiol (EE) on reproductive hormones.

OBJECTIVE

To compare estradiol valerate (EV) + dienogest (DNG), EE + DNG, and DNG alone (active control) on levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), ovarian steroids, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and the free androgen index (FAI).

METHODS

This spin-off study from a randomized trial enrolled 59 healthy, 18 to 35-year-old ovulatory women, outpatients at Helsinki and Oulu University Hospitals, Finland, who were randomized to EV 2 mg + DNG 2-3 mg (n = 20); EE 0.03 mg + DNG 2 mg (n = 20); and DNG 2 mg (n = 19) for 9 weeks. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, and at 5 and 9 weeks. Age and BMI were comparable between groups; 3 women discontinued.

RESULTS

EV + DNG suppressed FSH by -27% (-51% to -3%) (median [95% CI]) vs EE + DNG, -64% (-78 to -51), P = 0.04, but AMH levels decreased similarly by -9% (-18 to -0.1) vs -13% (-28 to 0.2), P = 0.38, respectively. EV + DNG increased SHBG levels by 56% (30% to 82%) and EE + DNG by 385% (313% to 423%), P < 0.001. Total testosterone decreased by 16% (-27% to -5%) in the EV + DNG group but it did not decrease in the EE + DNG group, whereas the FAI decreased by -39% (-54% to -25%) vs -72% (-78% to -67%), P < 0.001. DNG alone did not induce changes in any of these parameters.

CONCLUSION

Compared with EE + DNG, treatment with EV + DNG resulted in milder pituitary downregulation and reduced induction of hepatic SHBG synthesis-potentially carrying more beneficial health effects.

Systemic hormonal contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

The increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of hormonal contraception is well recognized, but evidence regarding hormonal contraception containing natural estradiol is limited. This study aimed to assess the associations between the patterns of use of different systemic hormonal contraceptives and the risk of venous thromboembolism during 2017-2019.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All fertile-aged women (15-49 years) living in Finland in 2017 and using hormonal contraception in 2017 and their 1:1 age- and residence-matched controls not using hormonal contraception in 2017 (altogether 587 559 women) were selected from the Prescription Centre. All incident venous thromboembolism cases during 2018-2019 and their 4:1 age-matched controls were further analyzed in a prospective nested case-control design to assess the associations between the use (starting, stopping, continuous vs no use) of different hormonal contraception types and venous thromboembolism.

RESULTS

Altogether, 1334 venous thromboembolism cases occurred during the follow-up period (incidence rate 1.14 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.20), with an incidence rate ratio of hormonal contraception vs no hormonal contraception use of 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.58). Compared with non-use, starting the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.85; 95% CI 1.62-5.03), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 0.98-2.44), desogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.97; 95% CI 0.99-3.92), and transdermal patch releasing norelgestromin and ethinylestradiol (aOR 5.10; 95% CI 1.12-23.16), as well as continuing the use of gestodene and ethinylestradiol (aOR 2.60; 95% CI 1.61-4.21), drospirenone and ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.55; 95% CI 1.02-2.37), cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.66; 95% CI 1.06-2.61), and vaginal ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 1.95-5.48) were associated with venous thromboembolism risk. Regarding the type of estrogen, the highest risk was associated with current use (vs non use in the previous 180 days) of ethinylestradiol-containing preparations (aOR 2.20; 95% CI 1.82-2.65), followed by estradiol-containing preparations (aOR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87) with no risk for progestin-only hormonal contraception. Current use of estradiol-containing preparations was not associated with venous thromboembolism risk after exclusion of cyproterone-acetate and estrogen/ethinylestradiol (aOR 1.05; 95% CI 0.66-1.66).

CONCLUSIONS

An increased risk of venous thromboembolism is associated with ethinylestradiol-containing combined preparations. The use of estradiol-containing combined preparations confers only a slightly increased risk, possibly driven by cyproterone-containing combined oral contraceptives, whereas the use of progestin-only contraception is not associated with venous thromboembolism.

Role of Estrogens in Menstrual Migraine

Migraine is a major neurological disorder affecting one in nine adults worldwide with a significant impact on health care and socioeconomic systems. Migraine is more prevalent in women than in men, with 17% of all women meeting the diagnostic criteria for migraine. In women, the frequency of migraine attacks shows variations over the menstrual cycle and pregnancy, and the use of combined hormonal contraception (CHC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) can unveil or modify migraine disease. In the general population, 18–25% of female migraineurs display a menstrual association of their headache. Here we present an overview on the evidence supporting the role of reproductive hormones, in particular estrogens, in the pathophysiology of migraine. We also analyze the efficacy and safety of prescribing exogenous estrogens as a potential treatment for menstrual-related migraine. Finally, we point to controversial issues and future research areas in the field of reproductive hormones and migraine.

Hormonelle Kontrazeption und Thrombose

Hormonelle Kontrazeption und Thromboembolie-Risiko Kombinierte hormonelle Kontrazeptiva (KK) erhöhen das VTE-Risiko signifikant. Gestagen-Monopräparate sind mit Ausnahme der 3-Monatsspritze nicht mit einem erhöhten VTE-Risiko assoziiert und können bei Frauen mit vorausgegangener VTE oder thrombophilen Risikofaktoren mit Wunsch nach hormoneller Verhütung angewandt werden.

Individuelle Risikofaktoren und hormonelle Kontrazeption Vor der Verschreibung einer hormonellen Kontrazeption soll eine sorgfältige Erhebung des VTE-Risikos erfolgen. Eine entsprechende Checkliste findet sich auf der Internetseite des BfArM. Eine routinemäßige Testung auf hereditäre Thrombophilie wird nicht empfohlen.

Kontrazeption unter Antikoagulation Orale Antikoagulanzien sind plazentagängig und prinzipiell embryotoxisch und erfordern somit die Anwendung einer sicheren Empfängnisverhütung. Eine häufige Nebenwirkung unter oraler Antikoagulanzientherapie ist das Auftreten einer Hypermenorrhö. Die hormonelle Kontrazeption kann bei bestehender Antikoagulation auch mit einem Kombinationspräparat fortgeführt werden, sofern spätestens 6 Wochen vor Beendigung der Antikoagulation die Umstellung auf eine östrogenfreie Form der Kontrazeption erfolgt.

Hormonassoziierte VTE und Rezidivrisiko VTE, die bei Frauen unter Verwendung von hormonellen Kontrazeptiva aufgetreten sind, gelten als provozierte Ereignisse. Das Rezidivrisiko einer hormonassoziierten VTE ist nach Absetzen der Antikoagulation und Umstellung auf eine östrogenfreie Form der Kontrazeption gering, sodass eine Antikoagulationsdauer von 3–6 Monaten in der Regel ausreichend ist. Nach hormonassoziierter VTE wird während einer künftigen Schwangerschaft und im Wochenbett eine medikamentöse VTE-Prophylaxe empfohlen.

Contraception and diabetes: Which modalities should we consider in 2021?

Diabetes affects many women of reproductive age. Choice of contraceptive method is essential in order to combine efficacy and the patient's wishes, while taking into account the potential side effects. In this review, we will discuss the different methods available for women with diabetes, focusing the discussion on their metabolic and general effects. We will not discuss the side effects and contraindications common to all women, whether they have diabetes or not. The objective is to try to identify an algorithm to help in the decision to choose the most suitable contraceptive method for women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Thromboembolic safety of norethisterone vs levonorgestrel in combined oral contraceptive users: a pooled analysis of 4 large prospective cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Norethisterone (acetate) and levonorgestrel are marketed globally as components of combined oral contraceptives. Although guidelines recommend both as first-line combined oral contraceptives, no direct, comparative safety studies are available.

OBJECTIVE

We directly compared the thromboembolic event risk associated with the use of norethisterone acetate-containing and levonorgestrel-containing combined oral contraceptives.

STUDY DESIGN

Data regarding the cohorts of interest, norethisterone/norethisterone acetate (ethinylestradiol ≤30 µg) and levonorgestrel (ethinylestradiol ≤30 µg), were retrieved from a pooled dataset comprising 4 prospective, noninterventional, active-surveillance cohort studies in 14 European countries, the United States, and Canada, with similar study design but differing medication cohorts. Baseline characteristics and parameters of reproductive, contraceptive, and medical history were summarized using descriptive statistics. Propensity score subclassification was applied to balance baseline parameters between cohorts. Time-to-event analysis of venous thromboembolic events was performed on the basis of the extended Cox model to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios, including 95% confidence intervals. The time of venous thromboembolic events was censored at the end of the observation period for women who did not have an event. Women who dropped out or were lost to follow-up without reported venous thromboembolic events were censored at the time they last confirmed that they did not have an event.

RESULTS

The pooled dataset included 235,437 combined oral contraceptive users who were followed up for a total of 571,163 women years. Among these, 40,142 women were users of norethisterone/norethisterone acetate (ethinylestradiol ≤30 µg), and 39,098 women were users of levonorgestrel (ethinylestradiol ≤30 µg), contributing 61,976 and 84,816 women years of observation, respectively. The observed prevalence of prognostic factors at baseline showed typical features of US and European combined oral contraceptive users. Both cohorts showed a similar, low rate of thromboembolic events, and we could exclude a 1.5-fold increased venous thromboembolism risk for norethisterone/norethisterone acetate relative to levonorgestrel (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.11).

CONCLUSION

These data confirm the similar risk profiles of norethisterone/norethisterone acetate and levonorgestrel regarding thromboembolic events in routine combined oral contraceptive use of around 80,000 women from Europe and the United States/Canada. The analysis provides reassurance for both combined oral contraceptive users and clinicians regarding the safety of oral contraceptives and potentially opens discussion on norethisterone acetate as a potential gold standard therapy in clinical and postmarket research alongside levonorgestrel-combined oral contraceptives.

Epidemiological Survey on the Perception of Adverse Effects in Women Using Contraceptive Methods in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

 The present study aimed to understand patient perception of the adverse effects of contraceptives to improve health care and adherence to treatment.

METHODS

 An online questionnaire was available for women in Brazil to respond to assess their perception of adverse effects and their relationship with contraceptive methods.

RESULTS

 Of all 536 women who responded, 346 (64.6%) reported current contraceptive use. One hundred and twenty-two (122-34.8%) women reported having already stopped using contraception because of the adverse effects. As for the contraceptive method used, the most frequent was the combined oral contraceptive (212-39.6%). When we calculated the relative risk for headache, there was a relative risk of 2.1282 (1.3425-3.3739; 95% CI), suggesting that the use of pills increases the risk of headache, as well as edema, in which a relative risk of 1.4435 (1.0177-2.0474; 95% CI) was observed. For low libido, the use of oral hormonal contraceptives was also shown to be a risk factor since its relative risk was 1.8805 (1.3527-2.6142; 95% CI). As for acne, the use of hormonal contraceptives proved to be a protective factor, with a relative risk of 0.3015 (0.1789-0.5082; 95% CI).

CONCLUSION

 The choice of a contraceptive method must always be individualized, and the patients must be equal participants in the process knowing the expected benefits and harms of each method and hormone, when present.

Analysis of the Role of Female Hormones During Infection by COVID-19

Women have metabolic, immunological, and genetic variables that ensure more protection from coronavirus infection. However, the indication of treatment for several pathologies and contraception is determined by hormones that have adverse effects and raise doubts about their use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, the present study searches women specificities and the relation between female sexual hormones and COVID-19, and reports the main recommendations in this background. To this end, a review of the literature was conducted in the main databases, auxiliary data sources, and official websites. Therefore, considering the hypercoagulability status of COVID-19, the debate about the use of contraceptives due to the relative risk of thromboembolic effects that they impose arises. However, the current available evidence, as well as the recommendations of main health organs around the world, demonstrate that the use of hormonal contraceptives must be maintained during the pandemic.

Combined Oral Contraceptives and Venous Thromboembolism: Review and Perspective to Mitigate the Risk

Many factors must be considered and discussed with women when initiating a contraceptive method and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of them. In this review, we discuss the numerous strategies that have been implemented to reduce the thrombotic risk associated with combined oral contraceptives (COCs) from their arrival on the market until today. Evidences suggesting that COCs were associated with an increased risk of VTE appeared rapidly after their marketing. Identified as the main contributor of this risk, the dosage of the estrogen, i.e., ethinylestradiol (EE), was significantly reduced. New progestins were also synthetized (e.g., desogestrel or gestodene) but their weak androgenic activity did not permit to counterbalance the effect of EE as did the initial progestins such as levonorgestrel. Numerous studies assessed the impact of estroprogestative combinations on hemostasis and demonstrated that women under COC suffered from resistance towards activated protein C (APC). Subsequently, the European Medicines Agency updated its guidelines on clinical investigation of steroid contraceptives in which they recommended to assess this biological marker. In 2009, estradiol-containing COCs were marketed and the use of this natural form of estrogen was found to exert a weaker effect on the synthesis of hepatic proteins compared to EE. In this year 2021, a novel COC based on a native estrogen, i.e., estetrol, will be introduced on the market. Associated with drospirenone, this preparation demonstrated minor effects on coagulation proteins as compared with other drospirenone-containing COCs. At the present time, the standard of care when starting a contraception, consists of identifying the presence of hereditary thrombophilia solely on the basis of familial history of VTE. This strategy has however been reported as poorly predictive of hereditary thrombophilia. One rationale and affordable perspective which has already been considered in the past could be the implementation of a baseline screening of the prothrombotic state to provide health care professionals with objective data to support the prescription of the more appropriate contraceptive method. While this strategy was judged too expensive due to limited laboratory solutions, the endogenous thrombin potential-based APC resistance assay could now represent an interesting alternative.

Oestrogen component of COCs: have we finally found a replacement for ethinyl estradiol?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined oral contraceptive pills are among the most widely used contraceptive methods globally. Despite their popularity, the potential risks and side effects can lead to both high discontinuation rates and adverse outcomes including thromboembolic events. The quest for a safer alternative to the traditional ethinyl estradiol/progestin combination has led to the use of newer oestrogens. Ethinyl oestradiol alternatives will be reviewed including the newest option, estetrol, as it enters clinical use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oestradiol, when combined with a progestin with strong endometrial activity, is a viable alternative to ethinyl estradiol in the form of oestradiol valerate and estradiol, which have been available since 2008 and 2011, respectively. Estetrol is the newest oestrogen available and is found naturally in the foetal liver. Estetrol was approved for use in 2021. All three of these alternatives have high contraceptive efficacy, similar if not improved cycle control and decreased impact on haemostatic factors as compared to ethinyl estradiol.

SUMMARY

Alternatives to ethinyl oestradiol, including the newest option of estetrol, show promise in providing comparable contraceptive efficacy with potentially lower risk of side effects and thromboembolic events.

COVID-19, gender and estroprogestins, what do we know?

The new coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly spread all around the world, eliciting many questions and doubts about the pathogenesis of the disease and treatment. Mortality has been related to a prothrombotic state. Risk factors for the infection and for severe forms of COVID-19 have still to be defined. According to data collected, women appear to be less prone to severe forms of the disease and their mortality was lower than for men. The role of female hormones in the modulation of inflammation may be the reason behind this gender gap.Considering the prothrombotic state activated by the virus, hormone therapies have been placed under investigation as possible increasing risk factors for severe forms. Moreover, new vaccines and their rare thrombotic side effects have increased the concern about this issue.The goal of this review is to go over the mechanisms that lead up to thrombosis during COVID-19, trying to explain the possible reasons why women seem to be naturally protected. The expert opinions about whether to continue/discontinue hormonal therapies are reviewed. Moreover, available data about the so-called 'vaccine induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia' caused by vaccines against COVID-19 are discussed.

Current and future hormonal contraception in Italy: results from an Italian consensus expert meeting

BACKGROUND

Hormonal pills are among the most widely contraceptive methods used by women, despite the possible onset of different adverse events. To minimize the risk of thrombosis-related adverse events, different formulations and doses have been investigated. Micronized estradiol (E2)/nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) 24+4 is the first monophasic combined oral contraceptive pill containing natural E2, the same steroid produced by the granulosa cells of women ovaries. This combination presents an improved effect on hemostasis and metabolism compared to ethinyl-estradiol (EE)-based products and may be considered a good option to meet women's needs in a more physiological way. Despite the benefits of E2, its use is still not so common among combined oral contraceptives (COC).

METHODS

Seventy-seven Italian gynecologists were involved and asked to answer a survey to investigate some aspects related to contraception. The results of the survey were discussed within the same gynecologists and a panel of experts during eight macro-regional meetings.

RESULTS

The survey demonstrated that clinicians dedicate 40-60% of their time to contraception and confirmed the importance of the choice of the contraceptive pill, which is mostly prescribed for contraceptive purposes. Moreover, COC containing E2 is considered as the first choice in oral contraception and meets the features of an ideal pill.

CONCLUSIONS

Italian gynecologists reported that E2-based pill presents benefits related to safety, good tolerability, and low adverse events, in particular, related to a reduced thromboembolic risk. Research market data highlight that the use of these types of COC should expand with respect to traditional compounds containing EE.

Unintended pregnancy in users of nomegestrol acetate and 17β-oestradiol (NOMAC-E2) compared with levonorgestrel-containing combined oral contraceptives: final results from the PRO-E2 study

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the risk of unintended pregnancy in NOMAC-E2 users with levonorgestrel-containing COC (COC_LNG) users in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

In this observational study, new users¹ of NOMAC-E2 and COC_LNG were recruited in Europe, Australia, and Latin America and followed for up to 2 years. Unintended pregnancy was expressed by the Pearl Index (contraceptive failures per 100 women-years [WY]), crude hazard ratios (HR_crude) and adjusted hazard ratios (HR_adj).

RESULTS

Overall, 44,559 and 46,754 users were recruited to the NOMAC-E2 and COC_LNG user cohorts, respectively. There were 64 unintended pregnancies in NOMAC-E2 users (0.15 per 100 WY; 95% CI, 0.11-0.19) and 200 in COC_LNG users (0.41 per 100 WY; 95% CI, 0.35-0.47). The unintended pregnancy risk was statistically significantly lower in the NOMAC-E2 cohort (p<.0001) compared to the COC_LNG user cohort. The HR_adj of NOMAC-E2 vs COC_LNG was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.34-0.60; adjusted for age, body mass index, gravidity, COC user status, education level).

CONCLUSIONS

NOMAC-E2 demonstrated superior contraceptive effectiveness compared to COC_LNG, likely due to the comparatively short hormone-free interval and possibly reinforced by the long half-life of NOMAC.

Real world data on symptomology and diagnostic approaches of 27,840 women living with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic disease that requires a suitable, lifelong treatment. To our knowledge, the Visanne Post-approval Observational Study (VIPOS) is to date the largest real-world, non-interventional study investigating hormonal management of endometriosis. We describe women’s experiences of endometriosis in the real world by considering their symptoms and the diagnostic process in their healthcare setting. Overall, 27,840 women were enrolled from six European countries via networks of gynecologists or specialized centers. Of these, 87.8% of women were diagnosed based on clinical symptoms; the greatest and lowest proportions of women were in Russia (94.1%) and Germany (61.9%), respectively. Most women (82.8%) experienced at least one of the triad of endometriosis-associated pain symptoms: pelvic pain, pain after/during sexual intercourse, and painful menstrual periods. The most frequently reported endometriosis-associated symptoms were painful periods (61.8%), heavy/irregular bleeding (50.8%), and pelvic pain (37.2%). Women reported that endometriosis impacted their mood; 55.6% reported feeling “down”, depressed, or hopeless, and 53.2% reported feeling like a failure or having let down family/friends. VIPOS broadens our understanding of endometriosis based on real-world data by exploring the heterogeneity of symptoms women with endometriosis experience and the differences in diagnostic approaches between European countries.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01266421; registered 24 December 2010. Registered in the European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorisation Studies as number 1613.

Metabolic and laboratory effects of a progestin-only pill containing drospirenone 4 mg in comparison to desogestrel 75 µg: a double-blind, double-dummy, prospective, randomised study

Purpose: Steroid hormones in hormonal contraceptives influence a variety of metabolic parameters. Mainly, ethinyloestradiol (EE) in combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) is a potent inducer of hepatic coagulation factors, has an impact on cholesterol and triglyceride levels and glucose tolerance. Progestins in CHC modify the oestrogen effects in different ways, depending on their pharmacologic properties. The metabolic impact of progestin-only contraceptives is generally considered low.Methods: The influence of novel drospirenone (DRSP)-only pill (4 mg DRSP in 24/4 intake) on a variety of lipid-, carbohydrate- and bone metabolic parameters and on haemostatic variables including clotting factors and D-Dimer level was evaluated in comparison to 0.075 mg desogestrel (DSG) during a multicentric, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial with 1190 participants over nine treatment cycles.Results: For both DRSP and DSG, there was a decrease in cholesterol (total, HDL, and LDL) and triglyceride levels. No relevant influence on glucose, insulin, and c-peptide levels or bone remodelling markers were detected in both treatment groups. Considering the coagulatory parameters, there was no impact on hemostasis.Conclusions: The results confirm the beneficial properties of the drospirenone-only pill.EudraCT Number: 2011-002396-42.

Patient-reported utilization patterns of endometriosis medications in Europe: Real-world results from the non-interventional VIPOS study

Introduction:

Women with endometriosis require individualized, long-term treatment. Analyzing prescription choices, medication switches, discontinuations, and breaks can describe real-world treatment patterns and optimize pathways for women. To our knowledge, the Visanne Post-approval Observational Study (VIPOS) is the largest real-world, non-interventional study examining the safety of hormonal treatments for the routine clinical management of endometriosis. We present data from VIPOS on endometriosis drug utilization patterns, including treatment discontinuation due to treatment failure.

Methods:

VIPOS was a prospective, long-term, controlled, non-interventional cohort study in six European countries (Germany, Switzerland, Russia, Poland, Ukraine, and Hungary) conducted between 2010 and 2018. Women self-reported medical and gynecological history and symptoms and treatment information via comprehensive questionnaires.

Results:

Overall, 27,840 women were enrolled via gynecologists or specialized centers. Inter-country variance in treatment prescription patterns suggests the influence of differential management strategies and guidelines on prescribing behavior and diagnostic methods. Most enrolled women were receiving combined hormonal contraceptives. Women receiving dienogest 2 mg or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists more often had a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis compared to other treatments, while most women receiving combined hormonal contraceptives, other progestins or danazol had a symptom-based diagnosis. Although treatment changes during follow-up were common, only 4733 discontinuations out of 42,342 treatment starts were reported due to side effects or treatment ineffectiveness.

Conclusion:

VIPOS provides valuable insights into the considerable inter-country variance in endometriosis treatment prescription and potential role of differing management guidelines and practices strategies. Findings presented here suggest the need greater alignment of clinical practice to optimize patient management.

[Hormonal contraception and venous thromboembolism]

The use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) is a well-established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The VTE risk depends on the specific combination of oestrogen and gestagen components. Progestin-only contraceptives with the exception of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate are not associated with a significant VTE risk and can therefore be offered to women with known thrombophilia or a prior VTE. The recent German S3 guideline "Contraception" advises to carefully assess individual VTE risk factors before prescribing CHC. According to recent data there is no evidence suggesting that VTE risk is increased during oral anticoagulation. To reduce the risk of vaginal bleeding complication and the risk of unplanned pregnancy, the use of CHC can be continued under anticoagulation treatment provided that the patient is switched to an oestrogen-free contraception no later than six weeks before the end of anticoagulation. The risk of recurrence is low in women with hormone-associated VTE. Anticoagulation is therefore in general discontinued after 3-6 months. Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular heparin is recommended for women with prior hormone-associated VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Thromboembolic safety profile of low-dose estradiol (valerate) in combined hormonal preparations: Implications for the development of new hormonal endometriosis and uterine fibroid therapies

Background:

Several promising new medications containing low-dose estradiol (E2) in combination with a progestin and an additional component, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, are currently being developed for use in pre-menopausal women.

Objective:

This pooled analysis was designed to estimate the thromboembolic safety profile of E2 and its ester, estradiol valerate (E2Val), when used in combined hormonal treatments in a pre-menopausal population.

Methods:

Data regarding users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and combined menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) containing either E2/E2Val or ethinylestradiol (EE) ⩽ 30 µg were retrieved from five large prospective, non-interventional, cohort studies in Europe, US, and Canada with similar study design but differing medication cohorts. Propensity score sub-classification was applied to balance baseline parameters between cohorts and time-to-event analysis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) was carried out based on the extended Cox model to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR).

Results:

(1) Crude incidence rates of VTE were higher in MHT users compared to pre-menopausal COC users, (2) the VTE risk in menopausal users of E2/E2Val-norethindrone acetate was not higher than that in menopausal users of E2/E2Val-progestin (adjusted HR 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.26) and (3) the VTE risk in pre-menopausal users of E2/E2Val-progestin was similar, or lower, than pre-menopausal users of EE⩽30µg-progestin (adjusted HR 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.28–0.84).

Conclusion:

Our data presents a solid safety assessment of combined hormonal preparations containing E2/E2Val. We conclude that the risk of E2/E2Val-norethindrone acetate in pre-menopausal users is unlikely to be higher than the known risk of COCs containing EE ⩽ 30 µg-progestin.