1
|
Kesch C, Calleris G, Ploussard G. The relative impact of lymph-node metastasis and seminal vesical invasion on oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:589-590. [PMID: 38030887 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Kesch
- Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Urology Department, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Öğülmüş FE, Almalıoğlu Y, Tamam MÖ, Yıldırım B, Uysal E, Numanoğlu Ç, Özçevik H, Tekin AF, Turan M. Integrating PET/CT, radiomics and clinical data: An advanced multi-modal approach for lymph node metastasis prediction in prostate cancer. Comput Biol Med 2024; 184:109339. [PMID: 39522134 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 10/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
The involvement of lymph nodes critically affects patient outcomes in prostate cancer. While traditional risk models use factors like stage and PSA levels, the detection of lymph node involvement through modalities like PET targeting PSMA with 68Ga radiotracer plays a pivotal role in guiding treatments ranging from prostatectomy to pelvic radiotherapy. This study aims to create a deep learning model to predict lymph node involvement in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer patients using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imagery, radiomics features, and various clinical parameters. For this study, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans and corresponding clinical data from 229 prostate cancer patients were retrospectively collected. An artificial intelligence model, integrating PET/CT fusion images, clinical data, and radiomics features, was developed using a slice-wise feature extractor and MNASNet for spatial feature extraction. The model was trained on 181 cases and tested on 48 cases. To assess the model's performance, a reader study was conducted on a balanced subset of the test data with five radiation oncologists. Among the 229 intermediate to high-risk patients with localized prostate cancer evaluated, 67 (30%) had lymph node metastasis, while 162 were non-metastatic. The proposed AI model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.85±0.03 and an F1 score of 0.73±0.03. In the reader study, radiation oncologists' mean evaluations showed lower metrics (accuracy 0.71±0.08, F1 score 0.70±0.07), compared to the AI model's mean accuracy of 0.79±0.02 and F1 score of 0.76±0.02. Our findings demonstrate the potential benefits of the proposed model in the clinical setting, particularly in enhancing decision-making by doctors in scenarios with high variability between readers, such as lymph node metastasis prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Ezgi Öğülmüş
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Yasin Almalıoğlu
- Computer Science Department, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Müge Öner Tamam
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Berna Yıldırım
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Emre Uysal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Çakır Numanoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Halim Özçevik
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Sağlık Bilimleri University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Fuat Tekin
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey; Department of Radiology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Turan
- Department of Computer Engineering, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baas DJH, Israël B, de Baaij JMS, Vrijhof HJEJ, Hoekstra RJ, Kusters-Vandevelde H, Mulders PFA, Michiel Sedelaar JP, Somford DM, van Basten JPA. Evaluation of complications and biochemical recurrence rates after (super) extended lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2024; 42:605. [PMID: 39476127 PMCID: PMC11525387 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05321-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of extended (e-PLND) and super-extended pelvic lymph node dissection (se-PLND) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by examining lymph node (LN) yield, complications, LN metastasis, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) incidence. METHODS Between January 2016 and January 2020, 354 consecutive patients with > 5% risk of lymph node involvement (LNI), as predicted by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, underwent RARP with (s)e-PLND at a high-volume center. The e-PLND involved removing fibrofatty lymphatic tissue around the obturator fossa, internal iliac region, and external iliac vessels. The se-PLND, performed at the discretion of the surgeons, also included lymph nodes from the pre-sacral and common iliac regions. Outcomes included histopathological findings by anatomical region; complications; and BCR incidence during follow-up. RESULTS The median LNI risk was 18% (IQR 9-31%). A median of 22 LN (IQR 16-28) were removed, with se-PLND yielding a higher number: 25 (IQR 20-32) compared to e-PLND: 17 (IQR 13-24) (p < 0.001). pN1 disease was detected in 22% of patients overall, higher in se-PLND (29%) than e-PLND (14%) (p < 0.001). Of metastatic LNs, 14% were situated outside the e-PLND template. Operation time was longer for se-PLND, but perioperative complications were similar between both groups. After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 7-33), BCR incidence was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION Compared to standard extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), super extended PLND increases lymph node yield and removal of metastatic deposits but does not contribute to progression free survival at mid-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J H Baas
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, The Netherlands.
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Bas Israël
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M S de Baaij
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J E J Vrijhof
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter F A Mulders
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen, 6532 SZ, The Netherlands
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gillessen S, Turco F, Davis ID, Efstathiou JA, Fizazi K, James ND, Shore N, Small E, Smith M, Sweeney CJ, Tombal B, Zilli T, Agarwal N, Antonarakis ES, Aparicio A, Armstrong AJ, Bastos DA, Attard G, Axcrona K, Ayadi M, Beltran H, Bjartell A, Blanchard P, Bourlon MT, Briganti A, Bulbul M, Buttigliero C, Caffo O, Castellano D, Castro E, Cheng HH, Chi KN, Clarke CS, Clarke N, de Bono JS, De Santis M, Duran I, Efstathiou E, Ekeke ON, El Nahas TIH, Emmett L, Fanti S, Fatiregun OA, Feng FY, Fong PCC, Fonteyne V, Fossati N, George DJ, Gleave ME, Gravis G, Halabi S, Heinrich D, Herrmann K, Hofman MS, Hope TA, Horvath LG, Hussain MHA, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones RJ, Joshua AM, Kanesvaran R, Keizman D, Khauli RB, Kramer G, Loeb S, Mahal BA, Maluf FC, Mateo J, Matheson D, Matikainen MP, McDermott R, McKay RR, Mehra N, Merseburger AS, Morgans AK, Morris MJ, Mrabti H, Mukherji D, Murphy DG, Murthy V, Mutambirwa SBA, Nguyen PL, Oh WK, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Parker C, Poon DMC, Pritchard CC, Rabah DM, Rathkopf D, Reiter RE, Renard-Penna R, Ryan CJ, Saad F, Sade JP, Sandhu S, Sartor OA, Schaeffer E, Scher HI, Sharifi N, Skoneczna IA, Soule HR, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Sternberg CN, Suzuki H, Taplin ME, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Tilki D, Türkeri LN, Uemura H, Ürün Y, Vale CL, Vapiwala N, Walz J, Yamoah K, Ye D, Yu EY, Zapatero A, Omlin A. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC). Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)02610-1. [PMID: 39394013 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024. METHODS Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members ("panellists"). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biosciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Fabio Turco
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ian D Davis
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center and GenesisCare, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
| | - Eric Small
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Division of Urology, Clinique Universitaire St. Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biosciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Karol Axcrona
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Mouna Ayadi
- Salah Azaiz Institute, Medical School of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncostat U1018 INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Maria T Bourlon
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Muhammad Bulbul
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Medical Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Kim N Chi
- BC Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Caroline S Clarke
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Johann S de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Onyeanunam N Ekeke
- Urology Division, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
| | | | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS AOU Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter C C Fong
- Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Daniel J George
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin E Gleave
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gwenaelle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Heinrich
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lisa G Horvath
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maha H A Hussain
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert J Jones
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anthony M Joshua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Daniel Keizman
- Genitourinary Unit, Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Raja B Khauli
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Division of Urology, Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Gero Kramer
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fernando C Maluf
- Beneficiência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Departamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Joaquin Mateo
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Matheson
- Faculty of Education Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK
| | - Mika P Matikainen
- Department of Urology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ray McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rana R McKay
- University of California-San Diego, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hind Mrabti
- Institut National d'Oncologie, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Clemenceau Medical Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vedang Murthy
- Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shingai B A Mutambirwa
- Department of Urology, Sefako Makgatho Health Science University, Dr. George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Medunsa, South Africa
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William K Oh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Darren M C Poon
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Danny M Rabah
- Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dana Rathkopf
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raphaele Renard-Penna
- Department of Imagery, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Centre Hospitalier de Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Oliver A Sartor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Edward Schaeffer
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Howard I Scher
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nima Sharifi
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Iwona A Skoneczna
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sandy Srinivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Meyer Cancer Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Levent N Türkeri
- Department of Urology, M.A. Aydınlar Acıbadem University, Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yüksel Ürün
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Claire L Vale
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- University Hospital La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aurelius Omlin
- Onkozentrum Zurich, University of Zurich and Tumorzentrum Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Turco F, Buttigliero C, Delcuratolo MD, Gillessen S, Vogl UM, Zilli T, Fossati N, Gallina A, Farinea G, Di Stefano RF, Calabrese M, Saporita I, Crespi V, Poletto S, Palesandro E, Di Maio M, Scagliotti GV, Tucci M. Hormonal Agents in Localized and Advanced Prostate Cancer: Current Use and Future Perspectives. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102138. [PMID: 38996529 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is generally a hormone-dependent tumor. Androgen deprivation therapy ( has been the standard of care in metastatic disease for more than 80 years. Subsequent studies have highlighted the efficacy of ADT even in earlier disease settings such as in localized disease or in the case of biochemical recurrence (BCR). Improved knowledge of PC biology and ADT resistance mechanisms have led to the development of novel generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Initially used only in patients who became resistant to ADT, ARPI have subsequently shown to be effective when used in patients with metastatic hormone-naive disease and in recent years their effectiveness has also been evaluated in localized disease and in case of BCR. The objective of this review is to describe the current role of agents interfering with the androgen receptor in different stages of PC and to point out future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Turco
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Consuelo Buttigliero
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Marco Donatello Delcuratolo
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- Department of Oncology, IOSI (Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Oncology, Universita della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Canton Ticino, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico USI - Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Farinea
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Rosario Francesco Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Mariangela Calabrese
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Isabella Saporita
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Veronica Crespi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Stefano Poletto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Erica Palesandro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, at Division of Medical Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
| | - Marcello Tucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti, Piedmont, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marra G, Lesma F, Montefusco G, Filippini C, Olivier J, Affentranger A, Grogg JB, Hermanns T, Afferi L, Fankhauser CD, Mattei A, Malkiewicz B, Scuderi S, Barletta F, Gallina S, Antonelli A, Zattoni F, Dal Moro F, Lieke W, Soeterik T, van den Bergh RCN, Rajwa P, Shariat SF, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Nicoletti R, Campi R, Ahmed M, Jeffrey Karnes R, Ladurner M, Heidegger I, Briganti A, Gontero P, Gandaglia G. Observation With or Without Subsequent Salvage Therapy for Pathologically Node-positive Prostate Cancer With Negative Conventional Imaging: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 68:32-39. [PMID: 39263349 PMCID: PMC11387258 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective More than 10% of patients with negative clinical metastatic status (cN0M0) on conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph node involvement (pN+) at final pathology following radical prostatectomy (RP) and lymphadenectomy. Our aim was to assess outcomes of initial observation for cN0M0 pN+ PCa and identify prognostic factors that may help in clinical decision-making. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients with cN0M0 PCa on conventional imaging (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and a bone scan) who were found to have pN+ disease at RP between 2000 and 2021. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) and systemic progression/recurrence were the primary outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival and multivariate analysis. Key findings and limitations A total of 469 men were included in this retrospective multicenter trial. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 10.1 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6-18.0). Among these patients, 56% had grade group ≥4, 53.7% had stage ≥pT3b, 42.6% had positive margins, and 19.6% had PSA persistence. The median number of positive nodes and of nodes removed were 1 (IQR 1-3) and 20 (14-28), respectively. At median follow-up of 41 mo, 48.5% experienced BCR. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was 31.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.33-37.1%). Salvage treatments were needed in 211 patients and included radiotherapy (RT; n = 53), RT + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; n = 88), ADT alone (n = 68), and salvage lymphadenectomy (n = 2). The 5-yr estimated survival rates were 66.3% (95% CI 60.4-72.1) for metastasis-free survival, 97.7% (95% CI 95.5-99.8%) for cancer-specific survival, and 95.3% (95% CI 92.4-98.1%) for overall survival. On multivariable analysis, PSA persistence was an independent predictor of BCR (odds ratio [OR] 51.8, 95% CI 12.2-219.2), exit from observation (OR 8.5, 95% CI 4.4-16.5), and systemic progression (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.771-4.971). Conclusions Initial observation in the management of pN+ cN0M0 PCa is feasible and has excellent survival rates in the intermediate term. Patients with worse disease features, especially PSA persistence, have a higher likelihood of recurrence and progression and may be candidates for more aggressive upfront management. Patient summary We investigated the value of initial observation for men with prostate cancer with negative scan findings for metastasis who were then found to have positive lymph nodes after surgery to remove the prostate. Our results show that initial observation is a good option for patients with less aggressive prostate cancer features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Lesma
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Bartosz Malkiewicz
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Wever Lieke
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherland
| | - Timo Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherland
| | | | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mohamed Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Michael Ladurner
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Triner D, Daignault-Newton S, Singhal U, Sessine M, Dess RT, Caram MEV, Borza T, Ginsburg KB, Lane BR, Morgan TM. Variation in management of lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy within a statewide quality improvement consortium. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:220.e1-220.e8. [PMID: 38570271 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with lymph node positive (pN+) disease found at the time of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) are at high risk of disease persistence and progression. Contemporary management trends of pN+ CaP are not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients in the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2012 and 2023 with cN0/pN+ disease were identified. The primary outcome was to evaluate patient and practice-level factors associated with time to secondary post-RP treatment. Secondary outcomes included practice-level variation in management of pN+ CaP and rates of secondary treatment modality. To assess factors associated with secondary treatment, a Cox proportional hazards model of a 60-day landmark analysis was performed. RESULTS We identified 666 patients with pN+ disease. Overall, 66% underwent secondary treatment within 12 months post-RP. About 19% of patients with detectable post-RP PSA did not receive treatment. Of patients receiving secondary treatment after 60-days post-RP, 34% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, 27% received radiation (RT) alone, 36% received combination, and 4% received other systemic therapies. In the multivariable model, pathologic grade group (GG)3 (HR 1.5; 95%CI: 1.05-2.14), GG4-5 (HR 1.65; 95%CI: 1.16-2.34), positive margins (HR 1.46; 95%CI: 1.13-1.88), and detectable postoperative PSA ≥0.1 ng/ml (HR 3.46; 95%CI: 2.61-4.59) were significantly associated with secondary post-RP treatment. There was wide variation in adjusted practice-level 12-month secondary treatment utilization (28%-79%). CONCLUSIONS The majority pN+ patients receive treatment within 12 months post-RP which was associated with high-risk pathological features and post-RP PSA. Variation in management of pN+ disease highlights the uncertainty regarding the optimal management. Understanding which patients will benefit from secondary treatment, and which type, will be critical to minimize variation in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Triner
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Udit Singhal
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael Sessine
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Megan E V Caram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tudor Borza
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kevin B Ginsburg
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Corewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dong L, Hu C, Ma Z, Huang Y, Shelley G, Kuczler MD, Kim CJ, Witwer KW, Keller ET, Amend SR, Xue W, Pienta KJ. Urinary extracellular vesicle-derived miR-126-3p predicts lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Med Oncol 2024; 41:169. [PMID: 38839666 PMCID: PMC11153291 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02400-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
To investigate extracellular vesicles (EVs), biomarkers for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa), plasma, and/or urine samples were prospectively collected from 45 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and five with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Small RNA sequencing was performed to identify miRNAs in the EVs. All patients with PCa underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in patients with and without pathologically-verified LNI. The candidate miRNAs were validated in low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) and BPH. Four miRNA species (e.g., miR-126-3p) and three miRNA species (e.g., miR-27a-3p) were more abundant in urinary and plasma EVs, respectively, of patients with PCa. None of these miRNA species were shared between urinary and plasma EVs. miR-126-3p was significantly more abundant in patients with HR PCa with LNI than in those without (P = 0.018). miR-126-3p was significantly more abundant in the urinary EVs of patients with HRPCa than in those with LRPCa (P = 0.017) and BPH (P = 0.011). In conclusion, urinary EVs-derived miR-126-3p may serve as a good biomarker for predicting LNI in patients with HRPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Dong
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Cong Hu
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Zehua Ma
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China
- Department of Urology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, 550001, China
| | - Yiyao Huang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Guangdong Engineering and Technology Research Center for Rapid Diagnostic Biosensors, Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
- Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Greg Shelley
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Morgan D Kuczler
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Chi-Ju Kim
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Kenneth W Witwer
- Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Evan T Keller
- Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sarah R Amend
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200127, China.
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schilham MGM, Somford DM, Veltien A, Zamecnik P, Barentsz JO, Sedelaar MJPM, Kusters-Vandevelde HVN, Gotthardt M, Rijpkema M, Scheenen TWJ. Subnodal Correspondence of PSMA Expression and USPIO-MRI in Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Prostate Cancer. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:458-464. [PMID: 37975702 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Two advanced imaging modalities used to detect lymph node (LN) metastases in prostate cancer patients are prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As these modalities use different targets, a subnodal comparison is needed to interpret both their correspondence and their differences. The aim of this explorative study was to compare ex vivo 111 In-PSMA μSPECT images with high-resolution 7 T USPIO μMR images and histopathology of resected LN specimens from prostate cancer patients to assess the degree of correspondence at subnodal level. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty primary prostate cancer patients who underwent pelvic LN dissection were included and received USPIO contrast and 111 In-PSMA. A total of 41 LNs of interest (LNOIs) were selected for ex vivo imaging based on γ-probe detection or palpation. μSPECT and μMRI acquisition were performed immediately after resection. Overlay of μSPECT images on MR images was performed, and the level of correspondence (LoC) between μSPECT and μMR findings was assessed according to a 4-point Likert classification scheme. RESULTS Forty-one LNOIs could be matched to an LN on ex vivo μMRI. Coregistration of μSPECT and USPIO-enhanced water-selective multigradient echo MR images was successful for all 41 LNOIs. Ninety percent of the lesions showed excellent correspondence regarding the presence of metastatic tissue and affected subnodal site (LoC 4; 37/41). In only 1 of 41 LNOIs, a small metastasis was misclassified by both techniques. Three LNOIs were classified as LoC 3 (7%) and 1 LNOI as LoC 2. All LoC 2 and LoC 3 lesions had PSMA-expressing metastases on final histopathology. CONCLUSIONS Coregistration of μSPECT and USPIO-μMRI showed excellent subnodal correspondence in the majority (90%) of LNs. Ex vivo imaging may thus help localize small cancer deposits within resected LNs and could contribute to improved interpretation of in vivo imaging of LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melline Gabrielle Maria Schilham
- From the Department of Medical Imaging-Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.G.M.S., A.V., P.Z., J.O.B., M.G., M.R., T.W.J.S.); Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, the Netherlands (D.M.S., J.P.M.S.); Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (D.M.S.); Andros Clinics, Medical Imaging, Arnhem, the Netherlands (J.O.B.); Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J.P.M.S.); and Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (H.V.N.K.-V.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shiota M, Takamatsu D, Matsui Y, Yokomizo A, Morizane S, Saito R, Miyake M, Tsutsumi M, Yamamoto Y, Tashiro K, Tomida R, Narita S, Edamura K, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto K, Kato M, Kasahara T, Yoshino T, Akamatsu S, Kaneko T, Matsukawa A, Matsumoto R, Joraku A, Saito T, Kato T, Kato M, Enokida H, Sakamoto S, Terada N, Kanno H, Nishiyama N, Kimura T, Kitamura H, Eto M. Prognostication in Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer with No PSA Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3872-3879. [PMID: 38353798 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14999-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to create a prognostic model to predict disease recurrence among patients with lymph node involvement but no prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence and to explore its clinical utility. METHODS The study analyzed patients with lymph node involvement after pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy in whom no PSA persistence was observed between 2006 and 2019 at 33 institutions. Prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Among 231 patients, 127 experienced disease recurrence. The factors prognostic for RFS were PSA level at diagnosis (≥ 20 vs. < 20 ng/mL: hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.52; P = 0.017), International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen (group ≥ 4 vs. ≤ 3: HR, 1.63; 95% CI 1.12-2.37; P = 0.010), pathologic T-stage (pT3b/4 vs. pT2/3a: HR, 1.70; 95% CI 1.20-2.42; P = 0.0031), and surgical margin status (positive vs. negative: HR, 1.60; 95% CI 1.13-2.28; P = 0.0086). The prognostic model using four parameters were associated with RFS and metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSION The prognostic model in combination with postoperative PSA value and number of lymph nodes is clinically useful for discussing treatment choice with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
| | - Dai Takamatsu
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Yokomizo
- Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | | | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Tomida
- Department of Urology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Edamura
- Department of Urology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- Department of Urology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Kasahara
- Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | | | | | - Tomoyuki Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Kashiwa Hospital, The Jikei University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Akira Joraku
- Department of Urology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki Cancer Center, Kasama, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Saito
- Department of Urology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuma Kato
- Department of Urology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Manabu Kato
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University, Tsu, Japan
| | - Hideki Enokida
- Department of Urology, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Terada
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Hidenori Kanno
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marra G, Rajwa P, Filippini C, Ploussard G, Montefusco G, Puche-Sanz I, Olivier J, Zattoni F, Moro FD, Magli A, Dariane C, Affentranger A, Grogg JB, Hermanns T, Chiu PK, Malkiewicz B, Kowalczyk K, Van den Bergh RCN, Shariat SF, Bianchi A, Antonelli A, Gallina S, Berchiche W, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Afferi L, Fankhauser CD, Mattei A, Karnes RJ, Scuderi S, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Deandreis D, Gontero P, Gandaglia G. The Prognostic Role of Preoperative PSMA PET/CT in cN0M0 pN+ Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:244-251. [PMID: 38155081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite negative preoperative conventional imaging, up to 10% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph-node involvement (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP). The advent of more accurate imaging modalities such as PET/CT improved the detection of LNI. However, their clinical impact and prognostic value are still unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative PET/CT in patients node positive (pN+) at RP. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrospectively identified cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI, and bone scan) who had pN+ PCa at RP at 17 referral centers. Patients with cN+ at PSMA/Choline PET/CT but cN0M0 at conventional imaging were also included. Systemic progression/recurrence was the primary outcome; Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We included 1163 pN+ men out of whom 95 and 100 had preoperative PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT, respectively. ISUP grade ≥4 was detected in 66.6%. Overall, 42% of patients had postoperative PSA persistence (≥0.1 ng/mL). Postoperative management included initial observation (34%), ADT (22.7%) and adjuvant RT+/-ADT (42.8%). Median follow-up was 42 months. Patients with cN+ on PSMA PET/CT had an increased risk of systemic progression (52.9% vs. 13.6% cN0 PSMA PET/CT vs. 21.5% cN0 at conventional imaging; P < .01). This held true at multivariable analysis: (HR 6.184, 95% CI: 3.386-11-295; P < .001) whilst no significant results were highlighted for Choline PET/CT. No significant associations for both PET types were found for local progression, BCR, and overall mortality (all P > .05). Observation as an initial management strategy instead of adjuvant treatments was related with an increased risk of metastases (HR 1.808; 95% CI: 1.069-3.058; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT cN+ patients with negative conventional imaging have an increased risk of systemic progression after RP compared to their counterparts with cN0M0 disease both at conventional and/or molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria della misericordia, Udine, Italia
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bartosz Malkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - William Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huebner NA, Wasinger G, Rajwa P, Resch I, Korn S, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Prüger L, Rauschmeier A, Seitz C, Comperat E, Shariat SF, Grubmüller B. Clinical parameters for the prediction of occult lymph node metastasis in patients with negative PSMA-PET. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:115.e9-115.e16. [PMID: 38246806 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depending on the risk of LN metastasis ePLND at RP is recommended. As ePLND has potential side effects, and diagnostics have improved substantially, our objective was to evaluate the performance of the Briganti 2019 nomogram in a contemporary cohort with preoperative negative PSMA-PET. METHODS Patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP), undergoing RP and ePND at our center with preoperative negative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET were included. The Accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using ROC analysis. The association of clinical parameters with the presence of LN metastasis was assessed using logistic regression. Specimen of prostate and LNs in patients with false negative PSMA-PET were additionally stained for AR and PSMA expression and assessed by IHC. RESULTS The study included 108 patients, 28% intermediate- and 72% high-risk. Twelve patients harbored occult LN metastasis. Accuracy of the nomogram was 0.62. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed a NPV of 89%. IHC showed expression of PSMA and AR in the primary and LN metastasis in all patients. On logistic regression analysis only DRE (OR 2.72; 95%CI 1.01-7.35; P = 0.05) and percentage of cores with significant CaP (OR 1.29; 95%CI 1.05-1.60; P = 0.02) showed a significant association with LN metastasis. CONCLUSION The currently used nomogram is suboptimal in detecting patients with occult LNM. While the cut-off value to perform ePLND can be increased slightly following a negative PSMA-PET scan, more accurate methods of identifying these patients are needed. Whether ePLND can have a therapeutic benefit, as opposed to a diagnostic only, needs to be re-evaluated in the PSMA-PET era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian Association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria.
| | - Gabriel Wasinger
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascal Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image guided Therapy, Division of General and Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Larissa Prüger
- Department of Urology, Hospital Weinviertel Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria
| | | | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Working Group for Diagnostic imaging in Urology (ABDU), Austrian Association of Urology (ÖGU), Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology and Division of Medical Oncology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Bernhard Grubmüller
- Department of Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dong L, Hu C, Ma Z, Huang Y, Shelley G, Kuczler MD, Kim CJ, Witwer KW, Keller ET, Amend SR, Xue W, Pienta KJ. Urinary extracellular vesicle-derived miR-126-3p predicts lymph node invasion in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. RESEARCH SQUARE 2024:rs.3.rs-4164213. [PMID: 38585988 PMCID: PMC10996795 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4164213/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
To investigate extracellular vesicles (EVs) biomarkers for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa), plasma and/or urine samples were prospectively collected from 45 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and five with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Small RNA sequencing was performed to identify miRNAs in the EVs. All patients with PCa underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Differentially-expressed miRNAs were identified in patients with and without pathologically-verified LNI. The candidate miRNAs were validated in low-risk prostate cancer (LRPCa) and BPH. Four miRNA species (e.g. miR-126-3p) and three miRNA species (e.g. miR-27a-3p) were more abundant in urinary and plasma EVs, respectively, of patients with PCa. None of these miRNA species were shared between urinary and plasma EVs. miR-126-3p was significantly more abundant in patients with HR PCa with LNI than in those without (P = 0.018). miR-126-3p was significantly more abundant in the urinary EVs of patients with HRPCa than in those with LRPCa (P = 0.017) and BPH (P = 0.011). In conclusion, urinary EVs-derived miR-126-3p may serve as a good biomarker for predicting LNI in patients with HRPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Dong
- Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Cong Hu
- Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Zehua Ma
- Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Yiyao Huang
- Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University
| | | | - Morgan D Kuczler
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Chi-Ju Kim
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Sarah R Amend
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Wei Xue
- Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- The Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fink CA, Wegener D, Sauer LD, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Liermann J, Müller AC, Zips D, Debus J, Herfarth K, Koerber SA. Pelvic Irradiation for Node-Positive Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy: Long-Term Results of the Prospective PLATIN-4 and PLATIN-5 Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1011-1017. [PMID: 37863242 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE After radical prostatectomy (RP), adjuvant or salvage radiation treatment in node-positive prostate cancer is offered to prevent systemic disease. Prospective long-term survival and toxicity data on patients with radiation for nodal disease are still scarce. This study evaluates safety and feasibility of salvage radiation therapy to the pelvic lymph nodes in node-positive prostate cancer after RP. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 2009 and 2018, 78 patients with lymph node recurrence after RP (PLATIN-4 trial) or after RP and prostate bed radiation therapy (PLATIN-5 trial) were treated with salvage pelvic lymph node radiation therapy with boost to the involved nodes as field abutment (PLATIN-5) and boost to the prostate bed (PLATIN-4). Androgen deprivation therapy was started 2 months before radiation and recommended for 24 months. The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility of the intensity modulated radiation therapy-image guided radiation therapy technique based on the rate of treatment discontinuations and incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3+ toxicity. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS No treatment discontinuations were reported in either trial. Median overall survival was not reached in PLATIN-4 and was 117 months in PLATIN-5. Median progression-free survival was 66 months in PLATIN-4 and 39 months in PLATIN-5. Late grade 3+ genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed in 4% of patients at 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Salvage radiation therapy to the prostate bed and pelvic lymphatic drainage combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy is a curative treatment option for patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP, with excellent in-field disease control. Pelvic lymph node radiation therapy as field abutment after prostate bed radiation therapy is feasible with long-term survival and no high-grade toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas D Sauer
- University of Heidelberg, Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wei Y, Zhu M, Chen Y, Ji Q, Wang J, Shen L, Yang X, Hu H, Zhou X, Zhu Q. Network pharmacology and experimental evaluation strategies to decipher the underlying pharmacological mechanism of Traditional Chinese Medicine CFF-1 against prostate cancer. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:5387-5411. [PMID: 38484140 PMCID: PMC11006490 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in elderly men. We have applied Traditional Chinese Medicine CFF-1 in clinical treatments for PCa for several years. Here, we aimed to identify the underlying mechanism of CFF-1 on PCa using network pharmacology and experimental validation. Active ingredients, potential targets of CFF-1 were acquired from the public databases. Subsequently, protein-protein interaction (PPI) and the herbs-active ingredients-target network was constructed. A prognostic model for PCa was also constructed based on key targets. In vitro experiments using PCa cell lines CWR22Rv1 and PC-3 were carried out to validate the potential mechanism of CFF-1 on PCa. A total of 112 bioactive compounds and 359 key targets were screened from public databases. PPI and herbs-active ingredients-target network analysis determined 12 genes as the main targets of CFF-1 on PCa. Molecular docking studies indicated that the primary active ingredients of CFF-1 possess strong binding affinity to the top five hub targets. DNMT3B, RXRB and HPRT1 were found to be involved in immune regulation of PCa. In vitro, CFF-1 was found to inhibit PCa cell proliferation, migration, invasion and induce apoptosis via PI3K-Akt, HIF-1, TNF, EGFR-TKI resistance and PD-1 checkpoint signaling pathways. This study comprehensively elucidates the underlying molecular mechanism of CFF-1 against PCa, offering a strong rationale for clinical application of CFF-1 in PCa treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Mingxia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Ye Chen
- The First Medicine College, Taizhou Campus of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taizhou 225300, China
| | - Qianying Ji
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Luming Shen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Xin Yang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Haibin Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| | - Xin Zhou
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Suqian First People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suqian 223812, China
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Qingyi Zhu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210000, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schilham MGM, Somford DM, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Hermsen R, van Basten JPA, Hoekstra RJ, Scheenen TWJ, Gotthardt M, Sedelaar JPM, Rijpkema M. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioguided Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients with a Suspicion of Locoregional Lymph Node Metastases: The DETECT Trial. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:423-429. [PMID: 38176721 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) aims to optimize the peroperative detection and removal of PSMA-avid lymph node (LN) metastases (LNMs) and has been described in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). In newly diagnosed PCa patients undergoing pelvic LN dissections, PSMA RGS could guide the urologist toward PSMA-expressing LNMs as identified on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS in primary PCa patients with one or more suggestive LNs on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. Methods: This prospective, phase I/II study included 20 newly diagnosed PCa patients with at least 1 suggestive LN on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. PSMA RGS was performed 24 h after 111In-PSMA-I&T administration, and postoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT was performed to verify successful removal of the suggestive lesions. The primary endpoint was determination of the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Feasibility was described as the possibility to peroperatively detect suggestive LNs as identified on preoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes included the accuracy of 111In-PSMA RGS compared with histopathology, tumor- and lesion-to-background ratios, and biochemical recurrence. Results: No tracer-related adverse events were reported. In 20 patients, 43 of 49 (88%) 18F-PSMA PET-suggestive lesions were successfully removed. 111In-PSMA RGS facilitated peroperative identification and resection of 29 of 49 (59%) RGS-target lesions, of which 28 (97%) contained LNMs. Another 14 of 49 (29%) resected LNs were not detected with 111In-PSMA RGS, of which 2 contained metastases. Conclusion: 111In-PSMA RGS is a safe and feasible procedure that allows peroperative detection of 18F-PSMA PET/CT-suggestive lesions in newly diagnosed PCa patients. The use of a radioactive PSMA tracer and a detection device (γ-probe) during surgery helps in identifying LNs that were suggestive of PCa metastases on the 18F-PSMA PET/CT before surgery and thus may improve the peroperative identification and removal of these LNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melline G M Schilham
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik M Somford
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick Hermsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean Paul A van Basten
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Hoekstra
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; and
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P Michiel Sedelaar
- Prosper Prostate Cancer Clinics, Nijmegen/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Rijpkema
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schaufler C, Kaul S, Fleishman A, Korets R, Chang P, Wagner A, Kim S, Bellmunt J, Kaplan I, Olumi AF, Gershman B. Immediate radiotherapy versus observation in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:81-88. [PMID: 36434164 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00619-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of node-positive (pN1) prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP) remains uncertain. Despite randomized evidence, utilization of immediate, life-long androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains poor, and recent trials of early salvage radiotherapy included only a minority of pN1 patients. We therefore emulated a hypothetical pragmatic trial of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation in men with pN1 prostate cancer. METHODS Using the RADICALS-RT trial to inform the design of a hypothetical trial, we identified men aged 50-69 years with pT2-3 Rany pN1 M0, pre-treatment PSA < 50 ng/mL prostate cancer in the NCDB from 2006 to 2015 treated with 60-72 Gy of adjuvant RT (aRT) ± ADT within 26 weeks of RP or observation. After estimating a propensity score for receipt of aRT, we estimated absolute and relative treatment effects using stabilized inverse probability of treatment (sIPW) re-weighting. RESULTS In total, 3510 patients were included in the study, of whom 587 (17%) received aRT (73% with concurrent ADT). Median follow-up was 40.0 -months, during which 333 deaths occurred. After sIPW re-weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Adjusted overall survival (OS) was 93% versus 89% at 5-years and 82% versus 79% at 7-years for aRT versus observation (p = 0.11). In IPW-reweighted Cox regression, aRT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) than observation, but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.70 p = 0.06). In analyses examining heterogeneity of treatment effects, aRT was associated with improved ACM only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease (HR 0.59, p = 0.01), ≥2 positive LNs (HR 0.49, p = 0.04 for 2 positive LNs; HR 0.42, p = 0.01 for ≥3 positive LNs), or negative surgical margins (HR 0.50, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In observational analyses designed to emulate a hypothetical target trial of aRT versus observation in pN1 prostate cancer, aRT was associated with improved OS only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease, ≥2 positive LNs, or negative surgical margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Schaufler
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sumedh Kaul
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron Fleishman
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruslan Korets
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Chang
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Wagner
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simon Kim
- Division of Urology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irving Kaplan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aria F Olumi
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Boris Gershman
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guo J, Gu L, Johnson H, Gu D, Lu Z, Luo B, Yuan Q, Zhang X, Xia T, Zeng Q, Wu AHB, Johnson A, Dizeyi N, Abrahamsson PA, Zhang H, Chen L, Xiao K, Zou C, Persson JL. A non-invasive 25-Gene PLNM-Score urine test for detection of prostate cancer pelvic lymph node metastasis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-023-00758-z. [PMID: 38308042 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) have poor prognosis. Based on EAU guidelines, patients with >5% risk of PLNM by nomograms often receive pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during prostatectomy. However, nomograms have limited accuracy, so large numbers of false positive patients receive unnecessary surgery with potentially serious side effects. It is important to accurately identify PLNM, yet current tests, including imaging tools are inaccurate. Therefore, we intended to develop a gene expression-based algorithm for detecting PLNM. METHODS An advanced random forest machine learning algorithm screening was conducted to develop a classifier for identifying PLNM using urine samples collected from a multi-center retrospective cohort (n = 413) as training set and validated in an independent multi-center prospective cohort (n = 243). Univariate and multivariate discriminant analyses were performed to measure the ability of the algorithm classifier to detect PLNM and compare it with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram score. RESULTS An algorithm named 25 G PLNM-Score was developed and found to accurately distinguish PLNM and non-PLNM with AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.85-1.01) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99) in the retrospective and prospective urine cohorts respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots showed large and significant difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival in the patients stratified by the 25 G PLNM-Score (log rank P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). It spared 96% and 80% of unnecessary PLND with only 0.51% and 1% of PLNM missing in the retrospective and prospective cohorts respectively. In contrast, the MSKCC score only spared 15% of PLND with 0% of PLNM missing. CONCLUSIONS The novel 25 G PLNM-Score is the first highly accurate and non-invasive machine learning algorithm-based urine test to identify PLNM before PLND, with potential clinical benefits of avoiding unnecessary PLND and improving treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinan Guo
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Clinical Research Centre for Geriatrics, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Urology Minimally Invasive Engineering Center, Shenzhen, China
- Shenzhen Public Service Platform on Tumor Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis, Clinical Medicine Research Centre, Shenzhen, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Liangyou Gu
- Department of Urology, The Third Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Di Gu
- Department of Urology, The First affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenquan Lu
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Binfeng Luo
- The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Qian Yuan
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xuhui Zhang
- Department of Bio-diagnosis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Taolin Xia
- Department of Urology, Foshan First People's Hospital, Foshan, China
| | - Qingsong Zeng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Alan H B Wu
- Clinical Laboratories, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Nishtman Dizeyi
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Per-Anders Abrahamsson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Heqiu Zhang
- Department of Bio-diagnosis, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lingwu Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kefeng Xiao
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chang Zou
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University), Shenzhen, China.
- Shenzhen Urology Minimally Invasive Engineering Center, Shenzhen, China.
- Shenzhen Public Service Platform on Tumor Precision Medicine and Molecular Diagnosis, Clinical Medicine Research Centre, Shenzhen, China.
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
- Key Laboratory of Medical Electrophysiology of Education Ministry, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Jenny L Persson
- Department of Molecular Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Xu B, Zhao X, Feng Z, Li J, Liang Y, Zhang W, Chen L, Shen X, Qu M, Gao X, Zhang H. Protocol for Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy for Prostate and Oligometastatic Lesions in Patients With Low-Burden Sensitive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: An Open, Exploratory Pilot Clinical Trial. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241274595. [PMID: 39180187 PMCID: PMC11344251 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241274595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The existing large prospective study demonstrates the benefits of primary radiotherapy in patients with low-volume oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), and there is additional evidence of the benefits of local metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for metastatic lesions. However, there are no results from a prospective study to demonstrate the efficacy of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastases. Therefore, the aim of the protocol is to illustrate the efficacy of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients with low-volume de novo hormone-sensitive OMPC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study involves a prospective, single-center, limited-sample, single-arm exploration of radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients diagnosed with low-volume hormone-sensitive OMPC. Eligible participants undergo thorough assessments and treatment involving endocrine therapy alongside radiation targeting metastatic lesions and the pelvic region. The primary site is treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), while metastatic sites are treated with either VMAT or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) depending on their location. All patients received radiation therapy for both the primary and metastatic lesions combined with endocrine therapy. Endocrine therapy with an antiandrogen (bicalutamide, for 4 weeks) androgen deprivation therapy combined with novel hormonal agents (acetate abiraterone) will be continued for 2 years. The primary objective is to evaluate progression-free survival-2 (PFS-2), while secondary endpoints include androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival, quality of life (QoL), overall survival, time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), radiation-related complications, and endocrine therapy-related adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (CHEC2023-220). This is a single-arm exploration pilot trial evaluating radiotherapy for prostate and oligometastatic lesions in patients with OMPC. It aims to disseminate its findings through peer-reviewed journals and relevant medical conferences, with the intention of publication and presentation at these events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06198387.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bichun Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianzhi Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhiru Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jialun Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiyin Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianqi Shen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Qu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huojun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rajwa P, Heidenreich J, Drzezga A, Schmidt M, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. The diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in primary staging of patients with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: A single-center cohort analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:74-78. [PMID: 37750292 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a recommended imaging modality for patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Its routine implementation before radical prostatectomy (RP) may allow avoiding undertreatment. We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT for pelvic lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for high-risk PCa. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of an institutional database of patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT before RP and ePLND for high-risk PCa. The diagnostic estimates of 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lymph node involvement were calculated. RESULTS We included 165 high-risk PCa patients. The median PSA value was 24.5 ng/mL (range: 6.7-185) and all the patients had biopsy Grade Group 4-5. In total, 46 (28%) of patients had clinical lymph node involvement at 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. A mean number of resected lymph nodes per patient was 22 (range: 15-45) and 149 (4.2%) of all resected nodes were positive for lymph node metastasis at final pathology. The diagnostic estimates for the detection of pN+ disease at RP were as follows: sensitivity 63% (95% CI: 51-75), specificity 97% (95% CI: 91-99), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI: 82-99), and negative predictive value 79% (95% CI: 70-86). The total accuracy of PSMA-PET was 83% (95% CI: 76-88). CONCLUSION Our analyses support high specificity and positive predictive value of pretreatment 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients treated with RP for high-risk PCa. While a positive finding should be considered as robust indicator for clinical decision-making, a negative result cannot reliably rule out the presence of lymph node involvement in high-risk PCa; there is a need for advanced risk stratification in those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Julian Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Schmidt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Perez-Ardavin J, Mir MC. Is solo indocyanine green-guided lymphadenectomy a feasible alternative to standard pelvic lymph node dissection? BJU Int 2024; 133:44-45. [PMID: 37731159 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Perez-Ardavin
- Doctoral School, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain
- Urology, La Fe Universitary and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang H, Xiao L, Xie H, Li L. Hotspots and frontiers in PSMA research for prostate cancer: a bibliometric and visualization analysis over the past 20 years. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:610. [PMID: 38115121 PMCID: PMC10731714 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01590-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted imaging and therapy have significantly changed the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) at different disease stages. This advancement has attracted the attention of scholars, leading to a prolific output of scholarly publications. This study comprehensively outlines the knowledge framework associated with PSMA-based diagnosis and treatment of PCa through the application of bibliometric analysis, and discusses the potential research trends and foci. METHODS Articles and reviews related to PSMA for prostate cancer from 2003 to 2022 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer, Citespace, and R-bibliometrix were primarily employed to execute and visually represent co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis of countries, institutions, authors, references and keywords in this field. RESULTS A total of 3830 papers were included. The papers on the field of PSMA-based PCa therapy and imaging had been continuously increased since 2003, but the rate has slowed from 2020. The United States made the largest contribution in this field, in terms of publications 997 (26.03%), H-index (110) and total citations (53,167 times). We identified the most productive institution were Technical University of Munich, and Australian institutions had become very active in recent years. Journal of Nuclear Medicine was the most prominent journal in this field. Professors Matthias Eiber and Martin G Pomper made great achievements, while Ali Afshar-Oromieh was the most co-cited author. According to the result of keywords and topics analysis, "ga-68 labeled psma ligand", "radiation dosimetry" and "HBED-CC" were major research areas in the near future, while "Extended pelvic lymph node dissection" was considered to be the future research foci. CONCLUSIONS The field of psma-based PCa therapy and imaging is in the stage of vigorous development and has a bright prospect. The United States and Germany have achieved outstanding results in this area, while Australia has recently developed rapidly. It is foreseeable that more research foci will be lied in the early detection of pelvic lymph nodes and the multimodal imaging-guided surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanfei Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Liu Xiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Hangyu Xie
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Lin Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gandaglia G, Barletta F, Robesti D, Scuderi S, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J, Ibanez L, Soeterik TFW, Bianchi L, Afferi L, Kesch C, Darr C, Guo H, Zhuang J, Zattoni F, Fendler W, Marra G, Stabile A, Amparore D, Huebner NA, Giesen A, Joniau S, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E, Mattei A, Dal Moro F, Sierra JM, Porpiglia F, Picchio M, van den Bergh R, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:543-552. [PMID: 37270378 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the therapeutic role of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is still under debate, this procedure is recommended for staging purposes in selected cases. Nomograms for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) do not account for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, which is characterized by a high negative predictive value for nodal metastases. OBJECTIVE To externally validate models predicting LNI in patients with miN0M0 PCa at PSMA PET and to develop a novel tool in this setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Overall, 458 patients with miN0M0 disease undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) and ePLND at 12 centers between 2017 and 2022 were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Available tools were externally validated using calibration plots, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and decision curve analyses to assess calibration, discrimination, and the net benefit. A novel coefficient-based model was developed, internally validated, and compared with available tools. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 53 patients (12%) had LNI. The AUC was 69% for the Briganti 2012, 64% for the Briganti 2017, 73% for the Briganti 2019, and 66% for the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging stage, biopsy grade group 5, the diameter of the index lesion, and the percentage of positive cores at systematic biopsy were independent predictors of LNI (all p ≤ 0.04). Internal cross-validation confirmed a coefficient-based model with AUC of 78%, better calibration, and a higher net benefit in comparison to the other nomograms assessed. Use of a 5% cutoff would have spared 47% ePLND procedures (vs 13% for the Briganti 2019 nomogram) at the cost of missing only 2.1% LNI cases . The lack of central review of imaging and pathology represents the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS Tools for predicting LNI are associated with suboptimal performance for men with miN0M0 PCa. We propose a novel model for predicting LNI that outperforms available tools in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY Tools currently used to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer are not optimal for men with negative node findings on PET (positron emission tomography) scans, leading to a high number of unnecessary extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) procedures. A novel tool should be used in clinical practice to identify candidates for ePLND to reduce the risk of unnecessary procedures without missing LNI cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Ibanez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Timo F W Soeterik
- Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Junlong Zhuang
- Department of Urology, Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicolai A Huebner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chung DH, Han JH, Jeong SH, Yuk HD, Jeong CW, Ku JH, Kwak C. Role of lymphatic invasion in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1226366. [PMID: 37752996 PMCID: PMC10518614 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1226366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Lymphatic invasion in prostate cancer is associated with poor prognosis. However, there is no consensus regarding the clinical and prognostic value of lymphatic invasion. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of lymphatic invasion in biochemical recurrence (BCR) and compare the recurrence rates between patients with lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 2,207 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and 742 patients who underwent RP with PLND for clinically localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, between 1993 and 2020, at Seoul National University Hospital. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate BCR-free survival (BCRFS) using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the significant factors for BCR. Propensity score matching was performed with a 1:2 ratio to match age, initial PSA level, pathological T stage, and Gleason score to exclude confounding effects. Results Of the 2,207 patients who underwent RP without PLND, lymphatic invasion (L1Nx) was observed in 79 (3.5%) individuals. Among the 742 patients who underwent RP with PLND, lymph node metastases were found in 105 patients (14.2%). In patients with lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion was observed in 50 patients (47.6%), whereas lymphatic invasion was observed in 53 patients (8.3%) among those without lymph node metastasis. In patients who underwent RP without PLND, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly poorer BCR-free survival in the L1Nx group than in the L0Nx group (p < 0.001). In patients who underwent RP with PLND, the L1N0, L0N1, and L1N1 groups showed significantly worse prognoses than the L0N0 group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BCRFS between the L1N0 and lymph node metastasis groups, including the L0N1 and L1N1 groups. After propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio, the L1Nx group showed significantly poorer outcomes in terms of BCRFS than the L0Nx group (p = 0.05). In addition, the L1N0 group showed a significantly worse prognosis than the L0N0 group after propensity score matching. Conclusion Lymphatic invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent prognostic factor, which can complement lymph node status for predicting biochemical recurrence. Considering lymphatic invasion as an adverse pathological finding, similar to lymph node metastasis, adjuvant therapy could be considered in patients with lymphatic invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Hyuk Chung
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang Hee Han
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Hwan Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeong Dong Yuk
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gottlieb J, Chang SC, Choe J, Grunkemeier GL, Hanes DA, Krasne D, Hoon DSB, Wilson TG. Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor Burden in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3707. [PMID: 37509368 PMCID: PMC10378308 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) nodal staging does not account for lymph node (LN) tumor burden. The LN anatomical compartment involved with the tumor or the quantified extent of extranodal extension (ENE) have not yet been studied in relation to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). METHODS Histopathological slides of 66 pN1 PCa patients who underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. We recorded metrics to quantify LN tumor burden. We also characterized the LN anatomical compartments involved and quantified the extent of ENE. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 38 months. The median number of total LNs obtained per patient was 30 (IQR 23-37). In the risk-adjusted cox regression model, the following variables were associated with BRFS: mean size of the largest LN deposit per patient (log2: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.91, p < 0.001), the mean total span of all LN deposits per patient (2.07, p < 0.001), and the mean percent surface area of the LN involved with the tumor (1.58, p < 0.001). There was no significant BRFS association for the LN anatomical compartment or the quantified extent of ENE. CONCLUSION LN tumor burden is associated with BRFS. The LN anatomical compartments and the quantified extent of ENE did not show significant association with BRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Gottlieb
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Shu-Ching Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Jane Choe
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Gary L Grunkemeier
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Douglas A Hanes
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - David Krasne
- Department of Pathology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Timothy G Wilson
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hayden C, Rahman S, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Kim IY. Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:729-734. [PMID: 37071296 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01420-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Approximately 15% of prostate cancer patients have lymph node metastases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no universally accepted standard of care for these men. The options for treatment in this subset of patients range from observation to a combination of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT) and radiation therapy (RT). RECENT FINDINGS A recent systematic review showed that there was no clear choice out of the options above to treat these patients. Studies have shown that patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy have lower all-cause mortality when compared to patients treated with salvage radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize treatment options for pathologic node-positive (pN1) patients and discuss the urgent need for robust clinical trials that includes observation as the control group to help establish a standard of care for treating patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Hayden
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Syed Rahman
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Soum Lokeshwar
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Ankur Choksi
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Isaac Y Kim
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Berchiche W, Long Depaquit T, Baboudjian M, Barret É, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Bastide C. Mid-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in lymph node metastatic prostate cancer patients. Prog Urol 2023:S1166-7087(23)00090-8. [PMID: 37248105 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lymph node invasion (LNI) has been reported in 10-15% of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy (RP). The objective of this study was to describe the mid-term oncological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with metastatic lymph node. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study at two French referral centers including consecutive cN0 PCa patients who underwent RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection and had lymph node metastases on final pathological analysis (pN1) between January 2000 and May 2020. Follow-up was per institution, which generally included a PSA level measurement every 3 to 12 months for 5 years and annually thereafter. RESULTS A total of 123 patients were included: two (1.6%) low-risk, 64 (52%) intermediate-risk and 57 (46.4%) high-risk PCa according to the D'Amico risk classification. The median number of nodes removed and metastatic nodes per patient was 15 (IQR 11-22) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Adverse pathological features, i.e., ≥pT3a stage, ISUP grade ≥3, and positive surgical margins were reported in 113 (91.9%), 103 (83.7%), and 73 (59%) of cases, respectively. Postoperative treatment was administered in 104 patients, including radiotherapy alone (n=6), androgen deprivation therapy alone (n=27) or combination with androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy (n=71). The mean follow-up was 42.7 months. The estimated 3-year biochemical-free survival, clinical recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival was 66% and 85% and 98.8%, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, the number of metastatic nodes was associated with clinical recurrence (P=0.04) and a persistently elevated PSA with biochemical recurrence (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The management of lymph node metastatic PCa patients is challenging. Risk stratification of node-positive patients, based on postoperative PSA levels and pathologic features being identified, should help physicians determine which patient would best benefit from multimodal treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
| | - T Long Depaquit
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - É Barret
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - F Rozet
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - X Cathelineau
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C Bastide
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhu X, Liu Z, He J, Li Z, He W, Lu J. MRI-derived tumor volume as a predictor of biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology in patients after radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matching study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023:10.1007/s00432-023-04825-9. [PMID: 37148292 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04825-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the predictive value of MRI-derived tumor volume (TV) of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and adverse pathology (AP) in patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS The data of 565 patients receiving RP in a single institution between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All suspicious tumor foci were delineated manually using ITK-SNAP software as the regions of interest (ROIs). The sum of the TV of all lesions was calculated automatically based on the voxel in the ROIs to acquire the final TV parameter. TV was categorized as low-volume (≤ 6.5 cm3) and high-volume (> 6.5 cm3) based on the cut-off value. Univariate and multivariate Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of BCR and AP. The Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test was conducted to compare the BCR-free survival (BFS) between the low and high-volume groups. RESULTS All the included patients were divided into the low-volume group (n = 337) and the high-volume group (n = 228). The TV was an independent predictor of BFS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% CI]: 1.550 [1.066-2.256], P = 0.022). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that low volume was associated with a better BFS than high volume before propensity score matching (PSM) (P < 0.001). One hundred and fifty-eight pairs were obtained by 1:1 PSM to balance the baseline parameters between the two groups. After the PSM, low-volume remained to be associated with a better BFS than high-volume (P = 0.006). TV as a categorical variable was an independent factor of AP in multivariate logistic regression analysis (Odd ratio (OR) [95% CI]: 1.821 [1.064-3.115], P = 0.029). After balancing the potential factors influencing AP by 1:1 PSM, 162 new pairs were identified. The high-volume group had a higher AP rate than the low-volume group after PSM (75.9 vs. 64.8%, P = 0.029). CONCLUSION We adopted a novel approach to acquiring the TV on preoperative MRI. TV was significantly associated with BFS and AP of patients undergoing RP, which was further illustrated by PSM analysis. MRI-derived TV may serve as a predictive marker for assessing BFS and AP in further studies, which will facilitate clinical decision-making and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehua Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zenan Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jide He
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ziang Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei He
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Lu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Marra G, van Leenders GJLH, Zattoni F, Kesch C, Rajwa P, Cornford P, van der Kwast T, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Eberli D, Farolfi A, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet JP, Henry AM, Lardas M, Lieuw M, Linares Espinós E, Mason MD, O'Hanlon S, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Stranne J, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Mottet N, Gandaglia G. Impact of Epithelial Histological Types, Subtypes, and Growth Patterns on Oncological Outcomes for Patients with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2023:S0302-2838(23)02654-4. [PMID: 37117107 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The optimal management for men with prostate cancer (PCa) with unconventional histology (UH) is unknown. The outcome for these cancers might be worse than for conventional PCa and so different approaches may be needed. OBJECTIVE To compare oncological outcomes for conventional and UH PCa in men with localized disease treated with curative intent. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review adhering to the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022296013) was performed in July 2021. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We screened 3651 manuscripts and identified 46 eligible studies (reporting on 1 871 814 men with conventional PCa and 6929 men with 10 different PCa UHs). Extraprostatic extension and lymph node metastases, but not positive margin rates, were more common with UH PCa than with conventional tumors. PCa cases with cribriform pattern, intraductal carcinoma, or ductal adenocarcinoma had higher rates of biochemical recurrence and metastases after radical prostatectomy than for conventional PCa cases. Lower cancer-specific survival rates were observed for mixed cribriform/intraductal and cribriform PCa. By contrast, pathological findings and oncological outcomes for mucinous and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like PCa were similar to those for conventional PCa. Limitations of this review include low-quality studies, a risk of reporting bias, and a scarcity of studies that included radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Intraductal, cribriform, and ductal UHs may have worse oncological outcomes than for conventional and mucinous or PIN-like PCa. Alternative treatment approaches need to be evaluated in men with these cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to explore whether prostate cancers with unconventional growth patterns behave differently to conventional prostate cancers. We found that some unconventional growth patterns have worse outcomes, so we need to investigate if they need different treatments. Urologists should be aware of these growth patterns and their clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urologic Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany; Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Caulfield North, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matt Lieuw
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | | | - Malcolm D Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Toulouse, Onocopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenborg, Sweden
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Adiyat KT, Pooleri GK, Cherian DT, Santhamma SGN, Ravichandran K, Sundaram S. Negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1453-1457. [PMID: 37086333 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03595-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan for lymph node staging in patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection and had a preoperative negative PSMA PET scan for metastasis was performed. The documented pre-operative variables studied included age, BMI, PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, and biopsy ISUP grades. Patients were categorised as low, intermediate and high risk according to the D Amico classification. The post-op variables included were number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive nodes, positivity rate, size of the node metastasis, T staging and ISUP grading. RESULTS The overall negative predictive value of PSMA PET scan was 71.6%. Further sub-classification according to risk stratification demonstrated a NPV of 58.02%, 92.7% and 90% for high, intermediate and low risk, respectively. CONCLUSION Pelvic lymph node dissection cannot be excluded based on a negative preop PSMA PET/CT scan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kishore Thekke Adiyat
- Aster Medcity, Kochi, India.
- Department of Urology, Aster Medcity, Kuttisahib Road, Cheranelloor, Ernakulam, Kerala, 682027, India.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zhu XL, Tung TH, Li H, Wu S, Wang X, Wang L, Zhang M, Chen Z, Liu D, Li F. Using "Age and Total-PSA" as the Main Indicators: The Results of Taizhou Integrated Prostate Screening (No 2). Am J Mens Health 2023; 17:15579883231161292. [PMID: 36998194 PMCID: PMC10068996 DOI: 10.1177/15579883231161292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to analyze population-based prostate cancer (PCa) screening and the incidence of PCa among males ≥50 years of age residing in the Luqiao district of Taizhou, China. From October to December 2020, male residents ≥50 years of age were screened for serum total prostate-specific antigen (total-PSA). If t-PSA re-test levels persisted above 4 μg/L, subjects underwent further noninvasive examinations, including digital rectal examination or multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. Subjects underwent prostate biopsy of pathological tissue based on t-PSA and mpMRI results. A total of 3524 (49.1%) residents participated in this PCa screening study. In total, 285 (8.1%) subjects exhibited t-PSA levels ≥4.0 μg/L and 112 (3.2%) underwent noninvasive examinations. Forty-two (1.2%) residents underwent prostate biopsy, of which 16 (0.45%) were diagnosed with PCa. Of those diagnosed with PCa, three (19%) had localized PCa (cT1-cT2N0M0), six (37%) had locally advanced PCa (cT3a- cT4N0-1M0), and seven (44%) had advanced metastatic PCa (M1). Unfortunately, 3477 (48.5%) residents did not participate in the study, mainly due to lack of awareness of PCa based on feedback from local health centers. Age and t-PSA were used as primary screening indicators and, when further combined with mpMRI and prostate biopsy, confirmed the diagnosis of PCa among participating residents. Although this was a relatively economical and convenient screening method, education and knowledge should be further enhanced to increase the participation rate in PCa screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Liang Zhu
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Tao-Hsin Tung
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Haipin Li
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Songjiang Wu
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Xianyou Wang
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Lijun Wang
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Meixian Zhang
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Zhixia Chen
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Dingyi Liu
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Feipin Li
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Barros HA, van Beurden I, Droghetti M, Wilthagen EA, Özman O, Bergman AM, Aluwini S, van Moorselaar RJA, Donswijk ML, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. Role of Local and/or Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Hormone-sensitive M1a Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:16-27. [PMID: 36372736 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT It remains unclear whether men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa) metastasized to nonregional lymph nodes (M1a) benefit from prostate-directed therapy (PDT) and/or metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize the literature regarding oncological outcomes of de novo and recurrent M1a PCa patients treated with PDT and/or MDT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Scopus according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines for reports on oncological outcomes of de novo or recurrent hormone-sensitive M1a PCa patients treated with PDT (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) and/or MDT (nodal radiotherapy or salvage lymph node dissection) with or without androgen deprivation therapy. A descriptive data synthesis and a methodological quality assessment were performed to evaluate the impact of PDT and/or MDT on survival in M1a PCa patients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 6136 articles were screened and 24 studies were included in this systematic review. In de novo M1a PCa patients, PDT was associated with improved oncological outcomes compared with no PDT. In recurrent M1a PCa, MDT could delay the need for systemic treatment in a selection of patients, but high-level evidence from prospective phase III randomized controlled trials is still awaited. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review summarized the limited literature data on the management of M1a PCa. Subgroup analyses suggest a role for PDT plus systemic therapy in de novo M1a PCa. MDT to distant nodal metastases delayed the need for systemic therapy in recurrent disease, but robust data are lacking. The predominantly retrospective nature of the included studies and significant heterogeneity in study designs limit the strength of evidence. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the treatment of patients with prostate cancer that has spread to lymph nodes outside the pelvis without metastases in other organ systems. There is evidence that treatment of the primary prostate tumor improves outcomes in well-selected patients and that treatment targeting distant lymph node metastases can delay the start of systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilda A de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Isabeau van Beurden
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Erica A Wilthagen
- Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oktay Özman
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Jeroen A van Moorselaar
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kirisawa T, Shiota M, Kimura T, Edamura K, Miyake M, Morizane S, Yoshino T, Matsukawa A, Matsumoto R, Kasahara T, Nishiyama N, Eto M, Kitamura H, Nakamura E, Matsui Y, Shiota M, Kimura T, Edamura K, Miyake M, Morizane S, Yoshino T, Matsukawa A, Matsumoto R, Kasahara T, Nishiyama N, Eto M, Kitamura H, Nakamura E, Matsui Y. Comparison of therapeutic features and oncologic outcome in patients with pN1 prostate cancer among robot-assisted, laparoscopic, or open radical prostatectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:306-313. [PMID: 36527579 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02278-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the therapeutic features and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with those of open radical prostatectomy (ORP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in lymph node (LN) positive prostate cancer patients in a retrospective observational multi-institutional study. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated the clinical results of 561 patients across 33 institutions who underwent RARP, LRP, or ORP and who were diagnosed with LN-positive prostate cancer during RP with pelvic LN dissection (PLND). We determined the following survival outcomes: metastasis-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and biochemical recurrence-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the effect of treatment on oncological outcomes. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS There was no significant difference for any of the survival outcomes between the three surgical groups. However, RARP achieved a greater LN yield compared to that of ORP or LRP. When the extent of PLND was limited to the obturator LNs, the number of removed LNs (RLNs) was comparable between the three surgical groups. However, higher numbers of RLNs were achieved with RARP compared to the number of RLNs with ORP (P < 0.001) when PLND was extended to the external and/or internal iliac LNs. CONCLUSION RARP, LRP, and ORP provided equal surgical outcomes for pN1 prostate cancer, and the prognosis was relatively good for all procedures. Increased numbers of RLNs may not necessarily affect the oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kirisawa
- Department of Urology and Retroperitoneal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Kohei Edamura
- Department of Urology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | | | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Kashiwa Hospital, The Jikei University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryuji Matsumoto
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Eijiro Nakamura
- Department of Urology and Retroperitoneal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology and Retroperitoneal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts nodal involvement in unfavourable, clinically nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients and overall survival in pN1 patients. Sci Rep 2023; 13:392. [PMID: 36624246 PMCID: PMC9829873 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27542-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of our study was to determine the clinical utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting presence and prognosis of nodal involvement in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) due to prostate cancer. This single-centre retrospective study included 205 patients treated with RP and lymphadenectomy between 2012 and 2018. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative NLR in terms of nodal spread and survival. Patients staged pN1 presented lower mean NLR (2.53 vs 3.86; p = 0.0025) compared to pN0 patients. On multivariable analysis of different haematological markers, only NLR exceeding the median (≥ 2.7) predicted pN1 (OR = 0.38; p = 0.0367) independently of biopsy grading and PSA. In internal validation (n = 31 pN1, n = 174 pN0) on the bootstrapped dataset using a spare cutoff of NLR ≥ 4.1 would allow sparing lymphadenectomy in 22.09% pN0 patients, missing 6.45% pN1 (NPV 92.66%; 95% CI 84.91-100%). Noticeably, in pN1 patients NLR ≥ 2.7 correlated with shorter overall survival (p = 0.0196), despite its association with reduced risk of pN1. High pre-prostatectomy NLR was negatively associated with pN1, yielding high NPV in internal validation. Simultaneously, high NLR in pN1 patients was associated with shorter survival.
Collapse
|
35
|
The Changing Face of cN0M0 Prostate Cancer Being Found With pN+ After Surgery in the Contemporary Era: Results of an International European Survey on Disease Management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:416.e1-416.e10. [PMID: 36609130 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The urological community's opinion over the management of men being found with pathologically positive nodes (pN+) following radical prostatectomy (RP) performed with curative intent after preoperative negative conventional staging (cN0M0) has never been assessed. This remains crucial, especially considering the advent of novel imaging modalities. Our aim was to investigate the current opinion on management of pN+ cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) in the European urological community. METHODS Following validation, a 31-item survey, complying with the Cherries checklist, was distributed using a web link from December 2021 to April 2022 to 10 urological societies mailing list. Social media (Twitter, Facebook) were also used. RESULTS We received 253 replies. The majority were Urologists (96.8%), younger than 60 (90.5%); 5.2% did not have access to PET-scans; 78.9% believed pN+ is a multifaceted category; 10-years CSS was marked as 71 to 95% by 17.5%. Gold standard management was stated not being ADT by 80.8% and being RT±ADT by 52.3%. Early sRT±ADT was considered an option vs. aRT±ADT by 72.4%. In case of BCR 71% would perform and decide management based on PSMA-PET whilst 3.7% would not perform PSMA-PET. pN+ management is still unclear for 77.1%. On multivariate analysis PSMA-PET availability related to a lower and higher likelihood of considering aRT±ADT as standard and of considering early salvage versus aRT respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The Urological community has an acceptable awareness of pN+ disease and management, although it may overestimate disease aggressiveness. The majority consider pN+ PCa as a multifaceted category and rely on a risk-adapted approach. Expectant compared to immediate upfront management and new imaging modalities are increasingly considered.
Collapse
|
36
|
Nagaya N, Chua KJ, Sterling J, Horie S, Kim IY. Extended versus Standard Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection yields no difference in 3-year biochemical recurrence rates. Prostate Int 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
37
|
Kurokawa R, Kato S, Koyama H, Ishida M, Kurokawa M, Kuroda R, Ushiku T, Kume H, Abe O. Osteolytic or mixed bone metastasis is not uncommon in patients with high-grade prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 2022; 157:110595. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
38
|
French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: prostate cancer - Diagnosis and management of localised disease. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1275-1372. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.07.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
39
|
Combes AD, Palma CA, Calopedos R, Wen L, Woo H, Fulham M, Leslie S. PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2594. [PMID: 36359439 PMCID: PMC9689635 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. The imaging assessment and treatment of prostate cancer has vastly improved over the past decade. The introduction of PSMA PET-CT has improved the detection of loco-regional and metastatic disease. PSMA PET-CT also has a role in the primary diagnosis and staging, in detecting biochemical recurrence after curative treatment and in metastasis-directed therapy. In this paper we review the role of PSMA PET-CT in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D. Combes
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Catalina A. Palma
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Ross Calopedos
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Lingfeng Wen
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Henry Woo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Fulham
- Department of Molecular Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Department of Urology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gandaglia G, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Cucchiara V, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Robesti D, Leni R, Samanes Gajate AM, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Brembilla G, De Cobelli F, van Oosterom MN, van Leeuwen FWB, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Prostate-specific membrane antigen Radioguided Surgery to Detect Nodal Metastases in Primary Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Results of a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol 2022; 82:411-418. [PMID: 35879127 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended pelvic nodal dissection (ePLND) represents the gold standard for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PCa). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (RGS) could identify lymph node invasion (LNI) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). OBJECTIVE To report the planned interim analyses of a phase 2 prospective study (NCT04832958) aimed at describing PSMA-RGS during RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A phase 2 trial aimed at enrolling 100 patients with intermediate- or high-risk cN0cM0 PCa at conventional imaging with a risk of LNI of >5% was conducted. Overall, 18 patients were enrolled between June 2021 and March 2022. Among them, 12 patients underwent PSMA-RGS and represented the study cohort. SURGICAL PROCEDURE All patients received 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging; 99mTc-PSMA-I&S was synthesised and administered intravenously the day before surgery, followed by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. A Drop-In gamma probe was used for in vivo measurements. All positive lesions (count rate ≥2 compared with background) were excised and ePLND was performed. MEASUREMENTS Side effects, perioperative outcomes, and performance characteristics of robot-assisted PSMA-RGS for LNI were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, four (33%), six (50%), and two (17%) patients had intermediate-risk, high-risk, and locally advanced PCa. Overall, two (17%) patients had pathologic nodal uptake at PSMA PET. The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 230 min, 100 ml, and 5 d, respectively. No adverse events and intraoperative complications were recorded. One patient experienced a 30-d complication (Clavien-Dindo 2; 8.3%). Overall, three (25%) patients had LNI at ePLND. At per-region analyses on 96 nodal areas, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PSMA-RGS were 63%, 99%, 83%, and 96%, respectively. On a per-patient level, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of PSMA-RGS were 67%, 100%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted PSMA-RGS in primary staging is a safe and feasible procedure characterised by acceptable specificity but suboptimal sensitivity, missing micrometastatic nodal disease. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided robot-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible procedure for the intraoperative identification of nodal metastases in cN0cM0 prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. However, this approach might still miss micrometastatic nodal dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Leni
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthias N van Oosterom
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fijs W B van Leeuwen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Małkiewicz B, Knura M, Łątkowska M, Kobylański M, Nagi K, Janczak D, Chorbińska J, Krajewski W, Karwacki J, Szydełko T. Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy-Do We Know the Proper Way of Management? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2326. [PMID: 35565455 PMCID: PMC9104304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Miłosz Knura
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Łątkowska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Maximilian Kobylański
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Krystian Nagi
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Dawid Janczak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Laine C, Gandaglia G, Valerio M, Heidegger I, Tsaur I, Olivier J, Ceci F, van den Bergh RCN, Kretschmer A, Thibault C, Chiu PK, Tilki D, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Zattoni F, Fankhauser C, Kesch C, Puche-Sanz I, Moschini M, Pradere B, Ploussard G, Marra G. Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:69-84. [PMID: 34812201 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To investigate the features and optimal management of pN+ cM0 prostate cancer (PCa) according to registry-based studies. RECENT FINDINGS Up to 15% of PCa patients harbor lymph node invasion (pN+) at radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection. Nonetheless, the optimal management strategy in this setting is not well characterized. SUMMARY We performed a systematic review including n = 13 studies. Management strategies comprised 13 536 men undergoing observation, 11 149 adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT), 7,075 adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) +aADT and 705 aRT. Baseline features showed aggressive PCa in the majority of men. At a median follow-up ranging 48-134months, Cancer-related death was 5% and overall-mortality 16.6%. aADT and aRT alone had no cancer-specific survival or overall survival advantages over observation only and over not performing aRT, respectively. aADT plus aRT yielded a survival benefit compared to observation and aADT, which in one study, were limited to certain intermediate-risk categories. Age, Gleason, Charlson score, positive surgical margins, pathological stage, and positive nodes number, but not prostate specific antigen, were most relevant prognostic factors. Our work further confirmed pN+ PCa is a multifaceted disease and will help future research in defining its optimal management based on different risk categories to maximize survival and patient's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Laine
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Kesch
- West German Cancer Center; Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Bio-Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada Granada, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France and Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Stabile A, Pellegrino A, Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, de Angelis M, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Cucchiara V, Gandaglia G, Raggi D, Necchi A, Karakiewicz P, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:1-17. [PMID: 34538770 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in the primary staging for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is still debated. OBJECTIVE To analyze published studies reporting the accuracy of PSMA PET/CT for detecting lymph node invasion (LNI) at pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library's Central, EMBASE and Scopus databases, from inception to May 2021, was conducted. The primary outcome was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of PSMA PET/CT in detecting LNI on a per-patient level. As a secondary outcome, NPV of PET PSMA was tested on a per-node-level analysis. Detection rates were pooled using random-effect models. Preplanned subgroup analyses tested the diagnostic accuracy after stratification for the preoperative risk group. PPV and NPV variation over LNI prevalence was evaluated. Only studies including extended PLND (ePLND) as the reference standard test were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-seven studies, with a total of 2832 participants, were included in quantitative synthesis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of PSMA PET/CT for LNI were, respectively, 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50-66%), 95% (95% CI 93-97%), 79% (95% CI 72-85%), and 87% (95% CI 84-89%), with overall moderate heterogeneity between studies. At bivariate analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT estimated through summary receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve was 84% (95% CI 81-87%). On a per-node level, NPV of PET PSMA was 97% (95% CI 96-99%). At subgroup analyses, according to preoperative risk groups, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 51%, 93%, 73%, and 81%, respectively, in high-risk patients. Over the LNI prevalence range of 5-40%, PPV increased from 59% to 91%, while NPV decreased from 99% to 84%. CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT scan provides promising accuracy in the field of primary nodal staging for PCa. The high NPV in men with a lower risk of LNI might be clinically useful to reduce the number of unnecessary PLND procedures performed. Conversely, in high-risk patients, negative PSMA PET/CT cannot replace staging ePLND. PATIENT SUMMARY In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we demonstrated that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan may optimize the primary nodal staging and surgical management of prostate cancer patients candidate to radical prostatectomy. The high negative predictive value in men with a lower risk of lymph node invasion might be clinically useful for reducing the number of useless pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) procedures performed. Conversely, in high-risk patients, negative PSMA PET/CT cannot allow avoiding of PLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario de Angelis
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim D, Kim DY, Kim JS, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE. Clinical outcomes of salvage treatment in lymph node-positive prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256778. [PMID: 34506516 PMCID: PMC8432826 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The optimal salvage treatment strategies for lymph node-positive (LNP) patients after radical surgery have not been clearly defined in prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence or persistence of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of two different salvage treatments, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone versus ADT with radiotherapy (RT). We also investigated prognostic factors that could support the use of ADT with RT in LNP prostate cancer. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed 94 LNP prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by salvage treatment between 2004 and 2018. Salvage treatments involved either ADT alone or ADT with RT according to the clinical judgment of the physician. We analyzed clinicopathological and treatment factors related to 2nd biochemical failure (2nd BCF), clinical progression (CP), and progression-free survival (PFS). The cumulative failure after salvage treatment was defined as including both 2nd BCF and CP. Results The median duration of follow-up was 55 months (interquartile range, 35–97 months). Thirty-seven (39.4%) patients were treated with ADT alone, and 57 patients (60.6%) were treated with a combination of ADT with RT. During follow-up period, the incidence of failure after salvage treatment in the ADT alone group and the combined treatment group was 89.2% and 45.6%, respectively (HR, 22.4; 95% CI 5.43–92.1; P < 0.001). The combination of ADT with RT was associated with better 2nd BCF and PFS than ADT alone (P = 0.007 and P = 0.015, respectively). In multivariate analyses, number of positive LN ≥ 2 and PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP were associated with poor 2nd BCF, CP, and PFS after salvage treatment. Salvage by combined ADT plus RT showed better 2nd BCF and PFS than ADT alone. Specifically, patients with number of positive LN ≥ 2 or PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP showed better 2nd BCF (P = 0.004) or PFS (P = 0.011) when treated with ADT plus RT rather than ADT alone. Conclusions In patients with LNP prostate cancer, salvage ADT plus RT improved 2nd BCF and PFS compared to ADT alone. In particular, when the patients had more than two positive lymph nodes or PSA nadir ≥ 0.005 ng/ml after RP, ADT with RT seems to be a more beneficial salvage treatment resulting in better 2nd BCF and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dowook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Yun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Eun Lee
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sterling J, Kim IY. EDITORIAL COMMENT. Urology 2021; 155:151. [PMID: 34488998 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Sterling
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Isaac Yi Kim
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, and Division of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Quhal F, Rajwa P, Mori K, Laukhtina E, Grossmann NC, Schuettfort VM, König F, Aydh A, Motlagh RS, Katayama S, Mostafai H, Pradere B, Marra G, Gontero P, Mathieu R, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Shariat SF, Heidenreich A. The role of lymph node dissection in salvage radical prostatectomy for patients with radiation recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate 2021; 81:765-771. [PMID: 34057227 PMCID: PMC8361975 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the effect of lymph node dissection on the outcomes of patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from radiation-recurrent patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent SRP from 2000-2016. None of the patients had clinical lymph node involvement before SRP. The effect of the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) and the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastases free survival, and overall survival (OS) was tested in multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS About 334 patients underwent SRP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Lymph node involvement was associated with increased risk of BCR (p < .001), metastasis (p < .001), and overall mortality (p = .006). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, an increased number of RLNs significantly lowered the risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.96, p = .01). In patients with positive lymph nodes, a higher number of RLNs and a lower number of PLNs were associated with improved freedom from BCR (HR 0.89, p = .001 and HR 1.34, p = .008, respectively). At a median follow-up of 23.9 months (interquartile range, 4.7-37.7), neither the number of RLNs nor the number of PLNs were associated with OS (p = .69 and p = .34, respectively). CONCLUSION Pathologic lymph node involvement increased the risk of BCR, metastasis and overall mortality in radiation-recurrent PCa patients undergoing SRP. The risk of BCR decreased steadily with a higher number of RLNs during SRP. Further research is needed to support this conclusion and develop a precise therapeutic adjuvant strategy based on the number of RLNs and PLNs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Quhal
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyKing Fahad Specialist HospitalDammamSaudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyMedical University of SilesiaZabrzePoland
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive HealthSechenov UniversityMoscowRussia
| | - Nico C. Grossmann
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Victor M. Schuettfort
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Frederik König
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg‐EppendorfHamburgGermany
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyKing Faisal Medical CityAbhaSaudi Arabia
| | - Reza S. Motlagh
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyOkayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayamaJapan
| | - Hadi Mostafai
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Research Center for Evidence Based MedicineTabriz University of Medical SciencesTabrizIran
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical SciencesSan Giovanni Battista HospitalUniversity of Studies of TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical SciencesSan Giovanni Battista HospitalUniversity of Studies of TorinoTurinItaly
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of UrologyRennes University HospitalRennesFrance
| | - Pierre I. Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes UnitUniversity of Montreal Health CentreMontrealCanada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of UrologyVita Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive HealthSechenov UniversityMoscowRussia
- Department of UrologyWeill Cornell Medical CollegeNew York CityNew YorkUSA
- Department of UrologyUniversity of Texas SouthwesternDallasTexasUSA
- Department of UrologySecond Faculty of MedicineCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special SurgeryJordan University HospitalThe University of JordanAmmanJordan
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of UrologyComprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
- Department of UrologyUniversity Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zattoni F, Heidegger I, Kasivisvanathan V, Kretschmer A, Marra G, Magli A, Preisser F, Tilki D, Tsaur I, Valerio M, van den Bergh R, Kesch C, Ceci F, Fankhauser C, Gandaglia G. Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: What Has Changed Over Time? Front Surg 2021; 8:691473. [PMID: 34307443 PMCID: PMC8298897 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.691473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role and timing of radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial. While recent trials support the oncological safety of early salvage RT (SRT) compared to adjuvant RT (ART) in selected patients, previous randomized studies demonstrated that ART might improve recurrence-free survival in patients at high risk for local recurrence based on adverse pathology. Although ART might improve survival, this approach is characterized by a risk of overtreatment in up to 40% of cases. SRT is defined as the administration of RT to the prostatic bed and to the surrounding tissues in the patient with PSA recurrence after surgery but no evidence of distant metastatic disease. The delivery of salvage therapies exclusively in men who experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) has the potential advantage of reducing the risk of side effects without theoretically compromising outcomes. However, how to select patients at risk of progression who are more likely to benefit from a more aggressive treatment after RP, the exact timing of RT after RP, and the use of hormone therapy and its duration at the time of RT are still open issues. Moreover, what the role of novel imaging techniques and genomic classifiers are in identifying the most optimal post-operative management of PCa patients treated with RP is yet to be clarified. This narrative review summarizes most relevant published data to guide a multidisciplinary team in selecting appropriate candidates for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Udine General Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Engels S, Brautmeier L, Reinhardt L, Wasylow C, Hasselmann F, Henke RP, Wawroschek F, Winter A. Evaluation of Fast Molecular Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA). Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1117. [PMID: 33807774 PMCID: PMC7961354 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In clinical routine, only fractions of lymph nodes (LNs) are examined histopathologically, often resulting in missed (micro-)metastases and incorrect staging of prostate cancer (PCa). One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) analyzes the entire LN by detecting cytokeratin 19 (CK19) mRNA as a surrogate for LN metastases requiring less effort than conventional biomolecular techniques. We aimed to evaluate performance of OSNA in detecting sentinel LN (SLN) metastases in PCa. Methods: SLNs (n = 534) of 64 intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with extended and sentinel-guided lymphadenectomy were cut into slices and alternatingly assigned to OSNA and histopathology (hematoxylin-eosin staining, CK19, and CK AE1/AE3 immunohistochemistry). Sensitivity and specificity of OSNA and concordance and measure of agreement (Cohen's kappa (κ)) between OSNA and histopathology were assessed. Results: Histopathology revealed metastases in 76 SLNs. Sensitivity and specificity of OSNA were 84.2% and 96.1%, respectively. Discordant results were recorded for 30 of 534 SLNs, revealing high concordance (94.4%). Twenty-four discordant cases were classified as micrometastases, indicating a possible allocation bias. In 18 cases, positive results were conferred only by OSNA resulting in seven LN-positive patients who were missed by histopathology. Overall, the level of agreement was high (κ = 0.78). Conclusions: OSNA provided a diagnosis that was as least as accurate as detailed histological examination and might improve LN staging in PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Engels
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Lutz Brautmeier
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Lena Reinhardt
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Clara Wasylow
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Friederike Hasselmann
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Rolf P. Henke
- Oldenburg Institute of Pathology, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany;
| | - Friedhelm Wawroschek
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| | - Alexander Winter
- University Hospital for Urology, Klinikum Oldenburg, Department of Human Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany; (S.E.); (L.B.); (L.R.); (C.W.); (F.H.); (F.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sun Y, Chen G, He J, Huang ZG, Li SH, Yang YP, Zhong LY, Ji SF, Huang Y, Chen XH, He ML, Wu H. Clinical significance and potential molecular mechanism of miRNA-222-3p in metastatic prostate cancer. Bioengineered 2021; 12:325-340. [PMID: 33356818 PMCID: PMC8806336 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1867405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical significance and underlying molecular mechanism of miRNA-222-3p in metastatic prostate cancer (MPCa) remain unclear. The present study used a large number of cases (n = 1,502) based on miRNA chip and miRNA sequencing datasets to evaluate the expression and diagnostic potential of miRNA-222-3p in MPCa. We applied a variety of meta-analytic methods, including forest maps, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and summary receiver operating characteristic curves, to prove the final results. MiRNA-222-3p was reduced in MPCa and had a moderate diagnostic potential in MPCa. We screened 118 miRNA-222-3p targets using three different methods including miRNA-222-3p transfected MPCa cell lines, online prediction databases and differently upregulated genes in MPCa. Moreover, functional enrichment analysis performed to explore the potential molecular mechanism of miRNA-222-3p showed that the potential target genes of miRNA-222-3p were significantly enriched in the p53 signal pathway. In the protein–protein interaction network analysis, SNAP91 was identified as a hub gene that may be closely related to MPCa. Gene chip and RNA sequencing datasets containing 1,237 samples were used to determine the expression level and diagnostic potential of SNAP91 in MPCa. SNAP91 was found to be overexpressed in MPCa and had a moderate diagnostic potential in MPCa. In addition, miRNA-222-3p expression was negatively correlated with SNAP91 expression in MPCa (r = −0.636, P = 0.006). These results demonstrated that miRNA-222-3p might play an important role in MPCa by negatively regulating SNAP91 expression. Thus, miRNA-222-3p might be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target of MPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Sun
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Juan He
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Guang Huang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Sheng-Hua Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Yuan-Ping Yang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Lu-Yang Zhong
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Shu-Fan Ji
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Ying Huang
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Hua Chen
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Mao-Lin He
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| | - Hao Wu
- Division of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University , Nanning, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|