1
|
Kosowska A, Zemelka-Wiącek M, Smolińska S, Wyrodek E, Adamczak B, Jutel M. Clinical validation of grass pollen exposure chamber in patients with allergic rhinitis triggered by timothy grass. Clin Exp Allergy 2024; 54:489-499. [PMID: 38616622 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fluctuation in concentrations of airborne allergens frequently presents a challenge to assessing the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in 'field' studies. Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) are specialized medical installations developed to expose individuals to allergens at defined and consistent concentrations under a controlled environment. The aim of the study was to validate the provocation test with timothy grass pollen as well as to assess its safety in the AEC in patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS In the ALLEC® AEC, varying concentrations of timothy grass pollen were dispersed. Allergic symptoms were measured by total nasal symptom score (TNSS), acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and nasal discharge volume. Lung function, assessed through peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), was used to evaluate safety. RESULTS The consistency of the test was proved by the stability of environmental conditions, including temperature, humidity and CO2 levels, as well as constant concentrations of grass pollen at predetermined levels ranging from 1000 to 10,000 particles per cubic meter (p/m3). Allergic individuals developed symptoms at concentrations of 3000 p/m3 and above, across all measured endpoints. Lung function was not affected throughout all the challenges. The reproducibility of symptoms was confirmed throughout the tests. The concentration of 8000 p/m3 together with a challenge duration of 120 min was found to be optimal. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that the ALLEC® grass pollen exposure chamber provides a reliable and safe method for inducing repeatable symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis. This approach can be effectively applied for allergy diagnostics and clinical endpoint determination during AIT.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Phleum/immunology
- Male
- Female
- Pollen/immunology
- Adult
- Allergens/immunology
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/physiopathology
- Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis
- Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy
- Rhinitis, Allergic/immunology
- Middle Aged
- Atmosphere Exposure Chambers
- Young Adult
- Reproducibility of Results
- Nasal Provocation Tests
- Respiratory Function Tests
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kosowska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Sylwia Smolińska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Wyrodek
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Adamczak
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zemelka-Wiacek M, Agache I, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Casale TB, Dramburg S, Jahnz-Różyk K, Kosowska A, Matricardi PM, Pfaar O, Shamji MH, Jutel M. Hot topics in allergen immunotherapy, 2023: Current status and future perspective. Allergy 2024; 79:823-842. [PMID: 37984449 DOI: 10.1111/all.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
The importance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is multifaceted, encompassing both clinical and quality-of-life improvements and cost-effectiveness in the long term. Key mechanisms of allergen tolerance induced by AIT include changes in memory type allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses towards a regulatory phenotype with decreased Type 2 responses, suppression of allergen-specific IgE and increased IgG1 and IgG4, decreased mast cell and eosinophil numbers in allergic tissues and increased activation thresholds. The potential of novel patient enrolment strategies for AIT is taking into account recent advances in biomarkers discoveries, molecular allergy diagnostics and mobile health applications contributing to a personalized approach enhancement that can increase AIT efficacy and compliance. Artificial intelligence can help manage and interpret complex and heterogeneous data, including big data from omics and non-omics research, potentially predict disease subtypes, identify biomarkers and monitor patient responses to AIT. Novel AIT preparations, such as synthetic compounds, innovative carrier systems and adjuvants, are also of great promise. Advances in clinical trial models, including adaptive, complex and hybrid designs as well as real-world evidence, allow more flexibility and cost reduction. The analyses of AIT cost-effectiveness show a clear long-term advantage compared to pharmacotherapy. Important research questions, such as defining clinical endpoints, biomarkers of patient selection and efficacy, mechanisms and the modulation of the placebo effect and alternatives to conventional field trials, including allergen exposure chamber studies are still to be elucidated. This review demonstrates that AIT is still in its growth phase and shows immense development prospects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mübeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Division of Allergy and Immunology, Joy McCann Culverhouse Clinical Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karina Jahnz-Różyk
- Department of Internal Diseases, Pneumonology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Kosowska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Care, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kappen J, Diamant Z, Agache I, Bonini M, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Durham SR, Guibas GV, Hamelmann E, Jutel M, Papadopoulos NG, Roberts G, Shamji MH, Zieglmayer P, Gerth van Wijk R, Pfaar O. Standardization of clinical outcomes used in allergen immunotherapy in allergic asthma: An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2023; 78:2835-2850. [PMID: 37449468 DOI: 10.1111/all.15817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In allergic asthma patients, one of the more common phenotypes might benefit from allergen immunotherapy (AIT) as add-on intervention to pharmacological treatment. AIT is a treatment with disease-modifying modalities, the evidence for efficacy is based on controlled clinical trials following standardized endpoint measures. However, so far there is a lack of a consensus for asthma endpoints in AIT trials. The aim of a task force (TF) of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) is evaluating several outcome measures for AIT in allergic asthma. METHODS The following domains of outcome measures in asthmatic patients have been evaluated for this position paper (PP): (i) exacerbation rate, (ii) lung function, (iii) ICS withdrawal, (iv) symptoms and rescue medication use, (v) questionnaires (PROMS), (vi) bronchial/nasal provocation, (vii) allergen exposure chambers (AEC) and (viii) biomarkers. RESULTS Exacerbation rate can be used as a reliable objective primary outcome; however, there is limited evidence due to different definitions of exacerbation. The time after ICS withdrawal to first exacerbation is considered a primary outcome measure. Besides, the advantages and disadvantages and clinical implications of further domains of asthma endpoints in AIT trials are elaborated in this PP. CONCLUSION This EAACI-PP aims to highlight important aspects of current asthma measures by critically evaluating their applicability for controlled trials of AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Kappen
- Department of Pulmonology, STZ Centre of Excellence for Asthma, COPD and Respiratory Allergy, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Diamant
- Departmentt of Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation, KU Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Matteo Bonini
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin Campus Berlin Buch, MASK-air, Montpellier, France
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy Clinic Humanitas University & Research Hospital-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - George V Guibas
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
- School of Biological Sciences, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children's Center Bethel, University Hospital Bielefeld, University Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Graham Roberts
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine (MP803), Clinical & Experimental Sciences & Human Development in Health Academic Units University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London, London, UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Petra Zieglmayer
- Karl Landsteiner University, Competence Center for Allergology and Immunology, Krems, Austria
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gherasim A, Bielory L. The use of environmental exposure chambers in studies related to ocular surface effects. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 23:409-414. [PMID: 37459277 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The potential of allergen challenges using environmental exposure facilities in allergic conjunctivitis drug development and more recently its implication on the diagnosis of the united airways concept have been emphasized in the recent literature. This study aims to present an overview of new and important data in this field. RECENT FINDINGS Standardized methodologies for ocular surface assessment during allergen challenges were described. The Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) is the main validated questionnaire used for the assessment of ocular surface during allergen challenges. It combines patient and investigator assessments for more accurate conjunctival response and was extensively used in clinical research and daily practice. Environmental Exposure Chambers (EECs) studies aim to conduct tight-controlled challenges to a stable and well defined allergen airborne concentration, closer to natural exposure to evaluate the efficacy of nonpharmaceutical and antiallergic treatments. Recent studies showed a good correlation between ocular symptoms elicited by EEC and those assessed during natural exposure. These validated methods allow to investigate the efficacy of novel pharmacotherapies for allergic conjunctivitis and allergen immunotherapy (AIT) in a real-world model of allergen exposure. SUMMARY This study aims to summarize novel data regarding the impact of EECs in studying pathophysiology and drug efficacy in the context of existing clinical protocols related to ocular surface effects. In this regard, studies comparing conjunctival response during natural and EEC exposures in patients with pollen-induced conjunctivitis aimed to demonstrate better outcomes in tight-controlled exposures mimicking natural exposure. Because allergen challenges are widely implemented in allergy treatment, this article will focus on the most important outcomes and the evolution of treatments for allergic conjunctivitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Gherasim
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 Place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Leonard Bielory
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Department of Medicine and Ophthalmology, Division of Allergy and Immunology
- Kean University, Center for Aerobiological Research, Union
- Rutgers University, Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gherasim A, Dietsch F, Beck M, Domis N, de Blay F. Birch-induced allergic rhinitis: Results of exposure during nasal allergen challenge, environmental chamber, and pollen season. World Allergy Organ J 2023; 16:100801. [PMID: 37520615 PMCID: PMC10384658 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pollen variation can affect field study data quality. Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is considered the gold standard for evaluating allergic rhinitis, while environmental exposure chambers (EECs) are mainly used in phase 2 drug development studies. We aimed to study birch-induced allergic rhinitis under 3 different conditions. Methods This study included 30 participants allergic to birch pollen, based on birch skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and positive NAC. Participants were exposed to placebo twice, followed by 2 consecutive 4-h birch airborne exposures, repeated on 2 occasions to evaluate reproducibility and priming effect. Nasal response was defined as total corrected nasal symptom score (ΔTNSS) ≥ 5 during NAC and EEC. The primary end-point was to measure TNSS during the last 2 h of first allergen exposure. TNSS was also analyzed during natural exposure. Results The dose most commonly yielding positive TNSS during NAC was 175.2 ng/200 μL. Eighteen participants experienced ΔTNSS ≥5 during the last 2 h of the first exposure, whereas 21 had positive responses at all 4 exposures. Mean ΔTNSS was 1 with placebo versus 6 with birch. Exposures were reproducible, with no observed priming effect. Airborne Bet v 1 was 25 ng/m3, while the pollen measurement was 279/m3 during pollen season. TNSS reached 5 in 67.9% of participants during peak pollen season. Conclusion EEC outcomes were similar to those obtained with NAC and natural exposure, suggesting the usefulness of EEC in allergic rhinitis studies. The primary end-point was reached, as 60% of participants experienced nasal responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Gherasim
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 place de l’Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frank Dietsch
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 place de l’Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marine Beck
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 place de l’Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nathalie Domis
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 place de l’Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Frederic de Blay
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber, 1 place de l’Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
- Chest Diseases Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- Federation of Translational Medicine EA 3070, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sahiner UM, Giovannini M, Escribese MM, Paoletti G, Heffler E, Alvaro Lozano M, Barber D, Canonica GW, Pfaar O. Mechanisms of Allergen Immunotherapy and Potential Biomarkers for Clinical Evaluation. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050845. [PMID: 37241015 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergen-immunotherapy (AIT) is an efficacious and disease-modifying treatment option for IgE-mediated diseases. Among these allergic rhinitis, insect venom allergy, food allergy, and allergic asthma are the most common candidates for AIT. AIT gives rise to clinical immunotolerance which may last for years after the treatment cessation. Mechanisms of AIT include suppression of allergic inflammation in target tissues and stimulation of the production of blocking antibodies, especially IgG4 and IgA. These mechanisms are followed by a reduction of underlying allergen-specific Th2 cell-driven responses to the allergens. Tolerance induction takes place through the desensitization of effector cells and stimulation of regulatory T cells that show their effects by mechanisms involving cell-cell cross-talk, but also other mechanisms, e.g., by the production of immunomodulatory cytokines such as, e.g., IL-10 and TGF-beta. From a personalized medical perspective, there is a need for clinical biomarkers of value in selecting responders and optimizing patient care during AIT. Also, a deeper understanding of underlying mechanistic processes will improve AIT's future outcomes. In this paper, the current knowledge of mechanisms in AIT is reviewed with a special focus on biomarkers of this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umit M Sahiner
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Hacettepe University Childrens Hospital, 06230 Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria M Escribese
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas, Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA) Nemesio Díez, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San PabloCEU, CEU Universities, 28668 Madrid, Spain
| | - Giovanni Paoletti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Montserrat Alvaro Lozano
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Service, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, 08950 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Domingo Barber
- Departamento de Ciencias Médicas Básicas, Instituto de Medicina Molecular Aplicada (IMMA) Nemesio Díez, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San PabloCEU, CEU Universities, 28668 Madrid, Spain
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, Philipps-Universität Marburg, University Hospital Marburg, 35039 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zemelka-Wiacek M, Kosowska A, Winiarska E, Sobanska E, Jutel M. Validated allergen exposure chamber is plausible tool for the assessment of house dust mite-triggered allergic rhinitis. Allergy 2023; 78:168-177. [PMID: 35980665 PMCID: PMC10087469 DOI: 10.1111/all.15485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen exposure chamber (AEC) is a clinical facility that allows exposure to allergenic airborne particles in controlled environment. Although AECs offer stable levels of airborne allergens, the validation of symptoms and other endpoints induced by allergen challenge is key for their recommendation as a plausible tool for the assessment of patients, especially in clinical research. This study aimed to demonstrate the reproducibility of defined clinical endpoints after AEC house dust mite (HDM) challenge under optimal conditions in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). METHOD HDM was distributed at different concentrations. The assessment was subjective by the patients: total nasal symptom score (TNSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and objective by the investigator: acoustic rhinometry, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and nasal secretion weight. Safety was assessed clinically and by peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1 ). RESULTS Constant environment: temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) concentration were maintained during all challenges. The concentration of HDM on average remained stable within the targeted values: 1000, 3000, 5000, 7000 particles (p)/m3 . Most symptoms were observed at concentrations 3000 p/m3 or higher. The symptoms severity and other endpoints results were reproducible. 5000 p/m3 , and challenge duration of 120 min were found optimal. The procedure was safe with no lung function abnormalities due to challenge. CONCLUSION HDM challenge in ALL-MED AEC offers a safe and reliable method for inducing symptoms in AR patients for the use in controlled clinical studies including allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Kosowska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.,ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Winiarska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Ewa Sobanska
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.,ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zieglmayer PU, Pfaar O. Update on the use of allergen challenge chambers in immunotherapy: clinical implications. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:132-136. [PMID: 35067579 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to reflect on and discuss recent evidence of applicability of allergen exposure chambers (AEC) for allergen immunotherapy studies, especially focussing on validation of AECs, technical documentation and future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Publications covered by this review summarize the historical background, current status of research use and validation of AEC systems. It describes identified unmet needs regarding comparability of AEC systems, reproducibility of clinical assessments and correlation of AEC-induced symptoms with scores under natural environmental exposure. Furthermore, new information on technical specifications, for example, dimensions, allergen dispersal and validation procedures is highlighted and future activities of the EAACI AEC task force group regarding harmonization of clinical endpoints are delineated. SUMMARY AECs are in use for evaluation of allergic patients for over three decades now. As different systems largely vary regarding technical set up and standard assessments, detailed technical documentation must be available. To gain acceptance of regulatory authorities for pivotal immunotherapy trials conducted with the use of AEC system, harmonization of clinical assessments as well as documentation of correlation of clinical AEC outcomes with environmental exposure clinical scores is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra U Zieglmayer
- Karl Landsteiner University, Krems
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Blay F, Gherasim A, Domis N, Choual I, Bourcier T. Efficacy of N-acetyl aspartyl glutamic acid versus fluorometholone for treating allergic conjunctivitis in an environmental exposure chamber. Clin Exp Allergy 2022; 52:1091-1100. [PMID: 35302688 PMCID: PMC9544405 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Topical mast cell stabilizers were previously shown to treat the signs and symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis safely and effectively in active and placebo‐controlled trials. However, mast cell stabilizers have not been compared to topical corticosteroids for efficacy. We tested the non‐inferiority of a topical mast cell stabilizer, N‐acetyl aspartyl glutamic acid (4.9%, NAAGA), compared to fluorometholone (0.1%, FM) during controlled exposures to the airborne birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC). Methods This randomized, cross‐over, investigator‐blinded study included 24 patients with a history of birch pollen allergic conjunctivitis. Patients were randomized to 5 days of treatment with NAAGA, then FM (n = 12) or FM, then NAAGA (n = 12). After each treatment, patients were exposed to a fixed airborne concentration of Bet v 1 in ALYATEC EEC. The primary endpoint was the amount of allergen required to trigger a conjunctival response (Abelson score ≥5). Groups were compared with a linear model for cross‐over studies. Non‐inferiority was assumed, when the lower bound of the risk ratio confidence interval (CI) was >0.5. Results At screening, the mean time‐to‐conjunctival response was 72.5 ± 35.9 min. NAAGA and FM extended the response time to 114.8 ± 55.0 and 116.6 ± 51.5 min respectively. The mean amounts of allergen required to trigger a conjunctival response were 1.165 ng after NAAGA and 1.193 ng after FM treatment. The risk ratio for the conjunctival response was 0.977 (95% CI: 0.812; 1.174), which indicated non‐inferiority. Adverse events occurred less frequently with NAAGA (29.2%) than with FM (58.3%). Conclusion In patients with allergic conjunctivitis to birch pollen, NAAGA was non‐inferior to FM in exposures to airborne Bet v 1. The EEC was a good model for simulating real‐life airborne allergen exposure and for demonstrating the efficacy and safety of eye drops for treating allergic conjunctivitis. Trial registration Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric de Blay
- ALYATEC, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Chest Diseases, Strasbourg University Hospital, FMTS, EA 3070, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| | - Alina Gherasim
- ALYATEC, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nathalie Domis
- ALYATEC, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ibrahim Choual
- ALYATEC, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1 place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Tristan Bourcier
- Department of Ophthalmology, Strasbourg University Hospital, FMTS, Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bonertz A, Tripathi A, Zimmer J, Reeb C, Kaul S, Bridgewater J, Rabin RL, Slater JE, Vieths S. A regulator’s view on AIT clinical trials in the United States and Europe: Why successful studies fail to support licensure. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:812-818. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Yang WH, Kelly S, Haya L, Mehri R, Ramesh D, DeVeaux M, Wang CQ, Meier P, Narula S, Shawki F, Pennington R, Perlee L, O'Brien MP. Cat allergen exposure in a naturalistic exposure chamber: a prospective observational study in cat-allergic subjects. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 52:265-275. [PMID: 34962661 PMCID: PMC9303194 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background To determine the proportion and reproducibility of cat‐allergic mild asthmatics with early asthmatic response (EAR) during cat allergen exposure in a naturalistic exposure chamber (NEC). Methods This was a prospective, observational study in 30 cat‐allergic mild asthmatics who received two 180‐min cat‐allergen (Felis domesticus allergen 1 [Fel d 1]) challenges 27 days apart in an NEC. Results An EAR (≥20% reduction from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1]) was observed in 67% and 52% of subjects at first and second NEC exposure, respectively, with similar median time to EAR; 44% of subjects had an EAR on days 1 and 28. Late asthmatic response (≥15% reduction in FEV1 within 24 h of NEC exit) was observed in 33% of subjects following either exposure. Average FEV1 and total nasal symptom score during NEC exposure were highly correlated within subjects between NEC exposures (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001; r = 0.73, p < 0.001), but total ocular symptom score was not. Time to EAR, but not average FEV1, was significantly associated with NEC Fel d 1 concentration, which was variable. There were no serious adverse events; 12/30 subjects experienced 20 adverse events (including asthma, 10%; headache, 10%). Conclusions The NEC model demonstrates that average FEV1 change is highly reproducible and has a low correlation with cat allergen levels. However, time to EAR and incidence of EAR are less reproducible and are highly correlated with NEC allergen levels. Average FEV1, rather than incidence of EAR or time to EAR, could be considered as an endpoint for interventional trials testing cat‐specific anti‐allergy therapies using an NEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura Haya
- Red Maple Trials, Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rym Mehri
- Red Maple Trials, Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pfaar O, Bergmann K, Bonini S, Compalati E, Domis N, Blay F, Kam P, Devillier P, Durham SR, Ellis AK, Gherasim A, Haya L, Hohlfeld JM, Horak F, Iinuma T, Jacobs RL, Jacobi HH, Jutel M, Kaul S, Kelly S, Klimek L, Larché M, Lemell P, Mahler V, Nolte H, Okamoto Y, Patel P, Rabin RL, Rather C, Sager A, Salapatek AM, Sigsgaard T, Togias A, Willers C, Yang WH, Zieglmayer R, Zuberbier T, Zieglmayer P. Technical standards in allergen exposure chambers worldwide - an EAACI Task Force Report. Allergy 2021; 76:3589-3612. [PMID: 34028057 DOI: 10.1111/all.14957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) can be used for controlled exposure to allergenic and non-allergenic airborne particles in an enclosed environment, in order to (i) characterize the pathological features of respiratory diseases and (ii) contribute to and accelerate the clinical development of pharmacological treatments and allergen immunotherapy for allergic disease of the respiratory tract (such as allergic rhinitis, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and allergic asthma). In the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency for the clinical development of products for allergen immunotherapy (AIT), the role of AECs in determining primary endpoints in dose-finding Phase II trials is emphasized. Although methodologically insulated from the variability of natural pollen exposure, chamber models remain confined to supporting secondary, rather than primary, endpoints in Phase III registration trials. The need for further validation in comparison with field exposure is clearly mandated. On this basis, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) initiated a Task Force in 2015 charged to gain a better understanding of how AECs can generate knowledge about respiratory allergies and can contribute to the clinical development of treatments. Researchers working with AECs worldwide were asked to provide technical information in eight sections: (i) dimensions and structure of the AEC, (ii) AEC staff, (iii) airflow, air processing, and operating conditions, (iv) particle dispersal, (v) pollen/particle counting, (vi) safety and non-contamination measures, (vii) procedures for symptom assessments, (viii) tested allergens/substances and validation procedures. On this basis, a minimal set of technical requirements for AECs applied to the field of allergology is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Department of Dermatology and Allergy Allergy Centre Charité Berlin Germany
| | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Medicine Italian National Research Council Rome Italy
| | | | - Nathalie Domis
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber Strasbourg France
| | - Frédéric Blay
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber Strasbourg France
- Chest Diseases Department Strasbourg University Hospital Strasbourg France
| | | | - Philippe Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases Pharmacology Research Laboratory‐VIM Suresnes, Exhalomics Platform, Hôpital Foch University Paris‐Saclay Suresnes France
| | | | - Anne K. Ellis
- Departments of Medicine and Biomedical & Molecular Sciences Queen's University Kingston ON Canada
- Allergy Research Unit Kingston General Health Research Institute Kingston ON Canada
| | - Alina Gherasim
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure Chamber Strasbourg France
| | | | - Jens M. Hohlfeld
- Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine and Department of Respiratory Medicine Hannover Medical School Member of the German Center for Lung Research Hannover Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐MED Medical Research Institute Wrocław Poland
| | | | | | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
- Allergy Center Rhineland‐Palatinate Mainz University Medical Center Mainz Germany
| | - Mark Larché
- Divisions of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, and Respirology Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Piyush Patel
- Cliantha Research Limited Mississauga ON Canada
- Providence Therapeutics Toronto ON Canada
| | - Ronald L. Rabin
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD USA
| | | | | | | | - Torben Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment Occupation and Health Danish Ramazzini Centre Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT) National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIH Bethesda MD USA
| | | | | | | | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health Department of Dermatology and Allergy Allergy Centre Charité Berlin Germany
| | - Petra Zieglmayer
- Vienna Challenge Chamber Vienna Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University Krems Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gherasim A, Fauquert J, Domis N, Siomboing X, de Blay F. Birch allergen challenges in allergic conjunctivitis using standard conjunctival allergen challenge and environmental exposure chamber. Clin Transl Allergy 2021; 11:e12053. [PMID: 34429874 PMCID: PMC8369317 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Environmental exposure chambers (EECs) have been used extensively to study allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Few studies have been published using EECs in conjunctivitis only, and none have used conjunctival allergen challenge as a selection criterion. The present study validated ALYATEC EEC in allergic conjunctivitis to birch pollen. METHODS Sixteen patients with a positive conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) were exposed to 60 ng/m3 of Bet v 1 in an EEC on two consecutive days for a maximum of 4 h to validate EEC exposure to birch. Reproducibility was tested among seven of the patients. A conjunctival positive scoring during the CAC and the EEC exposure was defined as a Total Ocular Symptom Score (TOSS) ≥ 5. RESULTS Fifty percent of patients had a conjunctival positive scoring during first exposure and 75% during second exposure. The mean time to a conjunctival response was 81.2 ± 33.9 min and 101.6 ± 57 (P > 0.05) during first and second exposure, respectively. No difference in TOSS occurred between the two exposures. The time necessary to obtain a positive response during the CAC was significantly shorter than with the EEC. The estimated quantity of Bet v 1 inducing a positive response was 0.07 ± 0.03 ng (exposure 1), 0.07 ± 0.07 ng (exposure 2), 980 ± 784 ng (CAC). Conjunctival positive scoring and quantity of Bet v 1 was reproducible in all six EEC exposures. CONCLUSIONS Early conjunctival responses induced by birch allergen exposures in EEC were different than from those identified with direct instillation during CAC. EEC appears to be closer to natural exposure than CAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Frederic de Blay
- ALYATEC Environmental Exposure ChamberStrasbourgFrance
- Chest Diseases DepartmentStrasbourg University HospitalStrasbourgFrance
- University of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ellis AK, DeVeaux M, Steacy L, Ramesh D, Suprun M, Langdon S, Wang CQ, Adams D, Thiele J, Walker T, Perlee LT, O'Brien MP. Environmental exposure unit simulates natural seasonal birch pollen exposures while maximizing change in allergic symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:488-495.e5. [PMID: 34186172 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Birch pollen is a prevalent aeroallergen during the springtime allergy season. In field studies, variable allergen exposure and environmental factors can affect data quality while environmental exposure units (EEUs) deliver controlled, standardized, and reproducible allergen exposures. OBJECTIVE To inform study design for EEU trials evaluating antiallergic therapies. METHODS In this prospective study, 76 participants with birch allergy experienced 3 exposures to birch pollen: (1) an out-of-season EEU challenge (two 3-hour sessions on consecutive days); (2) a natural seasonal exposure; and (3) an in-season EEU challenge (3-hour exposure for 2 weeks after birch pollen season initiation). RESULTS The total nasal symptom score, total ocular symptom score, and total symptom score (TSS = total nasal symptom score plus total ocular symptom score) were assessed every 30 minutes and daily during EEU and natural exposures. A high association between TSSs and day 2 of the out-of-season and in-season EEU challenges was noted, with a good association between the maximum TSS during the natural and in-season EEU challenges, and natural season and day 2 of the out-of-season EEU challenge (P < .001 for all). Participants had higher maximum change from the baseline TSS during day 2 of the out-of-season EEU challenge (12.4) vs the following: (1) first day (9.8); (2) in-season EEU challenge (8.4); and (3) natural seasonal exposure (7.6) (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION A strong association was seen between the presence of allergy symptoms and exposure to birch pollen in the EEU (maximum change in symptom scores during day 2) and in the field. A hybrid trial design may be useful to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of novel antiallergic therapies requiring fewer participants and shorter timelines and expediting treatment availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K Ellis
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Lisa Steacy
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Divya Ramesh
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Maria Suprun
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy, and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Shaun Langdon
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Claire Q Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Daniel Adams
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Thiele
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terry Walker
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pfaar O, Agache I, Bergmann K, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Bousquet J, Creticos PS, Devillier P, Durham SR, Hellings P, Kaul S, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Klimek L, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Muraro A, Papadopoulos NG, Rief W, Scadding GK, Schedlowski M, Shamji MH, Sturm G, Ree R, Vidal C, Vieths S, Wedi B, Gerth van Wijk R, Frew AJ. Placebo effects in allergen immunotherapy-An EAACI Task Force Position Paper. Allergy 2021; 76:629-647. [PMID: 32324902 DOI: 10.1111/all.14331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The placebo (Latin "I will please") effect commonly occurs in clinical trials. The psychological and physiological factors associated with patients' expectations about a treatment's positive and negative effects have yet to be well characterized, although a functional prefrontal cortex and intense bidirectional communication between the central nervous system and the immune system appear to be prerequisites for a placebo effect. The use of placebo raises certain ethical issues, especially if patients in a placebo group are denied an effective treatment for a long period of time. The placebo effect appears to be relatively large (up to 77%, relative to pretreatment scores) in controlled clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), such as the pivotal, double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) randomized clinical trials currently required by regulatory authorities worldwide. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) therefore initiated a Task Force, in order to better understand the placebo effect in AIT and its specific role in comorbidities, blinding issues, adherence, measurement time points, variability and the natural course of the disease. In this Position Paper, the EAACI Task Force highlights several important topics regarding the placebo effect in AIT such as a) regulatory aspects, b) neuroimmunological and psychological mechanisms, c) placebo effect sizes in AIT trials, d) methodological limitations in AIT trial design and e) potential solutions in future AIT trial design. In conclusion, this Position Paper aims to examine the methodological problem of placebo in AIT from different aspects and also to highlight unmet needs and possible solutions for future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health Allergy‐Centre‐Charité Berlin Germany
| | - Carsten Bindslev‐Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense Denmark
| | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
- University Hospital Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Peter S. Creticos
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
- Creticos Research Group Crownsville MD USA
| | - Philippe Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases, Exhalomics, Hôpital Foch Université Paris‐Saclay Suresnes France
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - Peter Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
| | - Susanne Kaul
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Lars Jacobsen
- ALC, Allergy Learning and Consulting Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐Med Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre Padua University Hospital Padua Padua Italy
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection Immunity & Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department 2nd Pediatric Clinic University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Philipps‐University of Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Manfred Schedlowski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology University Clinic Essen Essen Germany
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Imperial College London London UK
| | - Gunter Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Department of Allergy and Faculty of Medicine University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago Spain
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Comprehensive Allergy Center Hannover Germany
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Anthony J. Frew
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Royal Sussex County Hospital University of Sussex and University of Brighton Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pfaar O, Zieglmayer P. Allergen exposure chambers: implementation in clinical trials in allergen immunotherapy. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:33. [PMID: 32742636 PMCID: PMC7388504 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00336-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) have been developed for controlled allergen challenges of allergic patients mimicking natural exposure. As such, these facilities have been utilized e.g., for proof of concept, dose finding or the demonstration of onset of action and treatment effect sizes of antiallergic medication. Moreover, clinical effects of and immunological mechanisms in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) have been investigated in AECs. In Europe AIT products have to fulfill regulatory requirements for obtaining market authorization through Phase I to III clinical trials. Multiple Phase II (dose-range-finding or proof-of-concept) trials on AIT products have been performed in AECs. However, they are not accepted by regulatory bodies for pivotal (Phase III) trials and a more thorough technical and clinical validation is requested. Recently, a Position Paper of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) has outlined unmet needs in further development of AECs. The following review aims to address some of these needs on the basis of recently published data in the first part, whereas the second part overviews published examples of most relevant Phase II trials in AIT performed in AEC facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Calderon MA, Waserman S, Bernstein DI, Demoly P, Douglass J, Gagnon R, Katelaris CH, Kim H, Nelson HS, Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Virchow JC, DuBuske L, Casale TB, Canonica GW, Nolte H. Clinical Practice of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis and Asthma: An Expert Panel Report. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:2920-2936.e1. [PMID: 32422372 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) reduces symptoms and medication use associated with allergic rhinitis with or without conjunctivitis and allergic asthma. Although several AIT guidelines exist, there remain unanswered questions about AIT that are relevant to everyday practice. Our objective was to prepare an evidence-based overview addressing the practical aspects of AIT in clinical practice based on published evidence and the experience of international experts in the field. Topics covered include interpretation and translation of clinical trial data into everyday clinical practice (eg, allergen doses and treatment duration), assessment of risk and treatment of local and systemic allergic reactions, recommendations for improvement of AIT guidelines, and identification of appropriate data for seeking regulatory approval, to name a few. Many informational gaps in AIT practice need further evaluation as products and practices evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moisés A Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Imperial College London-NHLI, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Susan Waserman
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - David I Bernstein
- Division of Allergy, Rheumatology and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, & IPLESP, Sorbonne Université - Inserm, Paris, France
| | - Jo Douglass
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital & The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Remi Gagnon
- Clinique Spécialisée en Allergie de la Capitale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Constance H Katelaris
- Campbelltown Hospital and the School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Harold Kim
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Harold S Nelson
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Okubo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Nippon, Japan
| | - J Christian Virchow
- Department of Pneumology/Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Lawrence DuBuske
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine Clinic Asthma & Allergy, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sugita K, Akdis CA. Recent developments and advances in atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Allergol Int 2020; 69:204-214. [PMID: 31648922 DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2019.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This review highlights recent advances in atopic dermatitis (AD) and food allergy (FA), particularly on molecular mechanisms and disease endotypes, recent developments in global strategies for the management of patients, pipeline for future treatments, primary and secondary prevention and psychosocial aspects. During the recent years, there has been major advances in personalized/precision medicine linked to better understanding of disease pathophysiology and precision treatment options of AD. A greater understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of AD through substantial progress in epidemiology, genetics, skin immunology and psychological aspects resulted in advancements in the precision management of AD. However, the implementation of precision medicine in the management of AD still requires the validation of reliable biomarkers, which will provide more tailored management, starting from prevention strategies towards targeted therapies for more severe diseases. Cutaneous exposure to food via defective barriers is an important route of sensitization to food allergens. Studies on the role of the skin barrier genes demonstrated their association with the development of IgE-mediated FA, and suggest novel prevention and treatment strategies for type 2 diseases in general because of their link to barrier defects not only in AD and FA, but also in asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis and inflammatory bowel disease. The development of more accurate diagnostic tools, biomarkers for early prediction, and innovative solutions require a better understanding of molecular mechanisms and the pathophysiology of FA. Based on these developments, this review provides an overview of novel developments and advances in AD and FA, which are reported particularly during the last two years.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Villa E, Ebisawa M, Passalacqua G, Savi E, Ebo D, Gómez RM, Luengo Sánchez O, Oppenheimer JJ, Jensen-Jarolim E, Fischer DA, Haahtela T, Antila M, Bousquet JJ, Cardona V, Chiang WC, Demoly PM, DuBuske LM, Ferrer Puga M, Gerth van Wijk R, González Díaz SN, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Jares E, Kalpaklioğlu AF, Kase Tanno L, Kowalski ML, Ledford DK, Monge Ortega OP, Morais Almeida M, Pfaar O, Poulsen LK, Pawankar R, Renz HE, Romano AG, Rosário Filho NA, Rosenwasser L, Sánchez Borges MA, Scala E, Senna GE, Sisul JC, Tang ML, Thong BYH, Valenta R, Wood RA, Zuberbier T. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100080. [PMID: 32128023 PMCID: PMC7044795 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, testing for immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization is the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation in suspected allergic conditions. This review provides a thorough and updated critical appraisal of the most frequently used diagnostic tests, both in vivo and in vitro. It discusses skin tests, challenges, and serological and cellular in vitro tests, and provides an overview of indications, advantages and disadvantages of each in conditions such as respiratory, food, venom, drug, and occupational allergy. Skin prick testing remains the first line approach in most instances; the added value of serum specific IgE to whole allergen extracts or components, as well as the role of basophil activation tests, is evaluated. Unproven, non-validated, diagnostic tests are also discussed. Throughout the review, the reader must bear in mind the relevance of differentiating between sensitization and allergy; the latter entails not only allergic sensitization, but also clinically relevant symptoms triggered by the culprit allergen.
Collapse
Key Words
- AAAAI, American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology
- ABA, Allergen Bead Array
- ACAAI, American College of Allergy Asthma and Immunology
- AEC, Allergen Exposure Chambers
- AIT, allergen immunotherapy
- AP, Alkaline Phosphatase
- AU/mL, Allergenic Units milliLiter
- Allergy
- Anti-IgE, Antibody against IgE
- BAT, Basophil Activation Test
- BAU/mL, Biologic Allergenic Units milliLiter
- CBA, Cytometric Bead Array
- CCD, Cross-reactive Carbohydrate Determinants
- CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (USA)
- CL, Chemiluminescence
- CaFE, Calibrated Fluorescence Enhancement
- DBPCFC, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge
- Diagnostic strategies
- EAACI, European Academy of Allergy and Immunology
- EIA, Enzyme Immune Assay
- ELISA, Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Analysis
- EMEA, European MEdicine Agencies
- ENPP-3, EctoNucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase 3
- FACS, Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
- FEIA, Fluorescent Enzyme Immunoassays
- FcεRI, High affinity IgE receptor
- H1, Histamine 1 receptor
- H2, Histamine 2 receptor
- HPO, Horseradish Peroxidase
- IDT, Intradermal Test
- ISAC, Immuno-Solid phase Allergen Chip
- IUIS, International Union of Immunological Societies
- IVD, in vitro diagnostic tool
- IgE
- IgE, immunoglobulin E
- In vitro tests
- LAMP-3, Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein
- MBAD, Molecule Based Allergy Diagnostics
- MRGPRX2, Mas-related G protein receptor 2
- NIH, National Institutes of Health (USA)
- NMBAs, NeuroMuscular Blocking Agents
- NPA, Negative Percent Agreement
- NSAIDs, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- PPA, Positive Percent Agreement
- PPT, Prick-Prick Test
- RAST, Radio Allergo Sorbent Test
- SCAR, severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions
- SPT, Skin prick test
- Skin tests
- kUA/L, kilo Units of Allergen/Liter for allergen-specific IgE antibody assays
- mAb, Monoclonal Antibody
- pNPP, p-Nitrophenylphosphate
- sIgE, specific IgE
- w/v, weight /volume
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni Melioli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Elisa Villa
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Vercelli, S.C. Pneumologia, Vercelli, Italia
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Didier Ebo
- Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp University, Department Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Olga Luengo Sánchez
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Erika Jensen-Jarolim
- Institute for Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David A. Fischer
- Fischer Medicine Professional Corporation, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Jean J. Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Montpellier, France
- INSERM, Villejuif, France
- Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
- Euforea, Brussels, Belgium
- CHU Montpellier, France
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Sección de Alergología, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wen Chin Chiang
- Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Chiang Children's Allergy & Asthma Clinic, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pascal M. Demoly
- University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Marta Ferrer Puga
- The Unidad de Educación Médica, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Clinica Universitad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marek L. Kowalski
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars K. Poulsen
- Gentofte University Hospital, Lab for Allergology, Allergy Clinic, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Nippon Medical School, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Harald E. Renz
- University Hospital GI & MR GmbH, Institute of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lanny Rosenwasser
- University of Missouri at Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Enrico Scala
- Experimental Allergy Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Mimi L.K. Tang
- Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Allergy & Immunology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bernard Yu-Hor Thong
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Deptartment of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Robert A. Wood
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Campus Charite Mitte, Klinik fur Dermatologie & Allergologie, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pfaar O, Agache I, Blay F, Bonini S, Chaker AM, Durham SR, Gawlik R, Hellings PW, Jutel M, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Klimek L, Kopp MV, Nandy A, Rabin RL, Ree R, Renz H, Roberts G, Salapatek A, Schmidt‐Weber CB, Shamji MH, Sturm GJ, Virchow JC, Wahn U, Willers C, Zieglmayer P, Akdis CA. Perspectives in allergen immunotherapy: 2019 and beyond. Allergy 2019; 74 Suppl 108:3-25. [PMID: 31872476 DOI: 10.1111/all.14077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The seventh "Future of the Allergists and Specific Immunotherapy (FASIT)" workshop held in 2019 provided a platform for global experts from academia, allergy clinics, regulatory authorities and industry to review current developments in the field of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Key domains of the meeting included the following: (a) Biomarkers for AIT and allergic asthma; (b) visions for the future of AIT; (c) progress and data for AIT in asthma and the updates of GINA and EAACI Asthma Guidelines (separated for house dust mite SCIT, SLIT tablets and SLIT drops; patient populations) including a review of clinically relevant endpoints in AIT studies in asthma; (d) regulatory prerequisites such as the "Therapy Allergen Ordinance" in Germany; (e) optimization of trial design in AIT clinical research; (f) challenges planning and conducting phase III (field) studies and the future role of Allergen Exposure Chambers (AEC) in AIT product development from the regulatory point of view. We report a summary of panel discussions of all six domains and highlight unmet needs and possible solutions for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Romania
| | - Frédéric Blay
- Pneumology Department New Civil Hospital Strasbourg‐Cedex France
| | - Sergio Bonini
- Institute of Translational Medicine Italian National Research Council Rome Italy
| | - Adam M. Chaker
- Department of Otolaryngology and Center of Allergy and Environment TUM School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Radoslaw Gawlik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology and Clinical Immunology Silesian University of Medicine Katowice Poland
| | - Peter W. Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐Med Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Matthias V. Kopp
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany
- Member of the Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung (DZL) Airway Research Center North (ARCN) Luebeck Germany
| | - Andreas Nandy
- Research & Development Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG Reinbek Germany
| | - Ronald L. Rabin
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD USA
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Harald Renz
- Department Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry Molecular Diagnostics University Giessen and Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Graham Roberts
- Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- David Hide Asthma and Allergy Centre St Mary’s Hospital Isle of Wight UK
| | | | - Carsten B. Schmidt‐Weber
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM) Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich Munich Germany
- Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) Lübeck Germany
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Gunter J. Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - J. Christian Virchow
- Department Pulmonology & Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine Rostock University Medical Center Rostock Germany
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department for Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology Charité Medical University Berlin Germany
| | | | | | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF) University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland
- Christine‐Kühne‐Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐CARE) Davos Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Upadhyay E, Mohammad AlMass AA, Dasgupta N, Rahman S, Kim J, Datta M. Assessment of Occupational Health Hazards Due to Particulate Matter Originated from Spices. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16091519. [PMID: 31035724 PMCID: PMC6538991 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16091519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Spices have been known for their various health activities; however, they also possess the allergic potential for the respiratory system and the skin as they are fine particulate matter. Persons involved in spice agriculture and food industries are at greater risk since they are exposed to a considerable amount of combustible dust, which may be the cause of fire and explosion and adversely affect the health. These workers may experience allergy, long-term and short-term respiratory issues including occupational asthma, dermatitis, etc. Some spices induce T cell-based inflammatory reaction upon contact recognition of the antigen. Antigen Presenting Cells (APC) on binding to the causative metabolite results in activation of macrophages by allergen cytokine interleukin (IL)-12 and tumor necrosis factor-beta (TNF). Cross-reactivity for protein allergens is another factor which seems to be a significant trigger for the stimulation of allergic reactions. Thus, it was imperative to perform a systematic review along with bioinformatics based representation of some evident allergens has been done to identify the overall conservation of epitopes. In the present manuscript, we have covered a multifold approach, i.e., to categorize the spice particles based on a clear understanding about nature, origin, mechanisms; to assess metabolic reactions of the particles after exposure as well as knowledge on the conditions of exposure along with associated potential health effects. Another aim of this study is to provide some suggestions to prevent and to control the exposure up to some extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Era Upadhyay
- Amity institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302 002, India.
| | - Afnan Ahmad Mohammad AlMass
- Emergency Medicine Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh 11321, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Nandita Dasgupta
- Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226031, India.
| | - Safikur Rahman
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 712-749, Korea.
| | - Jihoe Kim
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 712-749, Korea.
| | - Manali Datta
- Amity institute of Biotechnology, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302 002, India.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ellis AK, Jacobs RL, Tenn MW, Steacy LM, Adams DE, Walker TJ, Togias A, Ramirez DA, Andrews CP, Visness CM, James RL, Rather CG. Clinical standardization of two controlled allergen challenge facilities: The Environmental Exposure Unit and the Biogenics Research Chamber. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2019; 122:639-646.e2. [PMID: 30878629 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controlled allergen challenge facilities (CACF), in disparate geographic regions with dissimilar engineering and base populations, have historically functioned as single, independent sites in clinical allergy trials. We aimed to demonstrate "between-unit reproducibility" to allow controlled challenge trials of participants using 2 CACFs. OBJECTIVE To compare and standardize 2 CACFs located in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and San Antonio, Texas, by examining participant-reported symptom severity during qualifying and treatment visits and evaluating response to treatment, while using the same allergen. METHODS At 2 different CACFs, participants were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention trial with cetirizine 10 mg. Different distribution devices delivered common short ragweed pollen via laminar air flow and maintained an airborne concentration of 3500 ± 700 grains/m3 in both facilities. A 1-hour "sham" run with no pollen release preceded a priming exposure of 3 hours and was followed 3 days later by a qualifying/treatment 5-hour exposure. At least 14 days later, another priming exposure was followed by the crossover exposure and treatment. RESULTS Forty-eight and 43 subjects completed the study at Kingston and San Antonio, respectively. Demographics were similar. Fewer than 10% exhibited symptoms with sham exposure. No significant differences were found between the 2 facilities in maximal total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score, total nasal symptom score, and total ocular symptom score, nor in areas under the curve. In both facilities, no significant effects of cetirizine 10 mg over placebo were detected. CONCLUSION The results were equivalent, demonstrating that the 2 CACFs can be used together in dual-center clinical trials and show the possibility of multicenter trials involving multiple CACFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K Ellis
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Mark W Tenn
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa M Steacy
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel E Adams
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terry J Walker
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alkis Togias
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Couroux P, Ipsen H, Stage BS, Damkjaer JT, Steffensen MA, Salapatek AM, Lund K, Würtzen PA. A birch sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet reduces rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms when exposed to birch and oak and induces IgG 4 to allergens from all trees in the birch homologous group. Allergy 2019; 74:361-369. [PMID: 30229939 PMCID: PMC6588091 DOI: 10.1111/all.13606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to determine the optimal dose for clinical efficacy of the SQ tree SLIT-tablet. An environmental exposure chamber (EEC) was used to reduce variability of allergen exposure and allow investigation of symptom reduction towards different species from the birch homologous group in separate EEC sessions. METHODS Eligible subjects (N = 219) were randomized to receive treatment with placebo or the SQ tree SLIT-tablet (2, 7, or 12 DU) for 24 weeks. EEC pollen challenges were conducted outside the birch pollen season and included four birch and two oak EEC sessions. The primary efficacy endpoint was the average allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) total symptom score (TSS) after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS There was a statistically significantly lower TSS during the 24-week birch EEC session for 7 DU and 12 DU compared to placebo with relative differences of 24% (P = 0.03) and 25% (P = 0.02). For the 24-week oak EEC session, there was a statistically significant difference for 12 DU (24%, P = 0.03). IgE and IgG4 measurements supported these findings and demonstrated cross-reactivity to all other species within the birch homologous group. Treatment was well-tolerated with the most frequently reported adverse reactions being the local reactions in the oral cavity of mild-to-moderate severity. CONCLUSION This trial demonstrates that the SQ tree SLIT-tablet reduce ARC symptoms triggered by birch or oak pollen. The optimal dose for further development was 12 DU. Clinical and immunological findings suggest that the tablet may be used to treat allergies to all species within the birch homologous group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Couroux
- Inflamax Research Limited; Mississauga Ontario Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Khayath N, Radu C, Choual I, Jilani S, Vecellio L, Domis N, De Blay F. [Environmental exposure chambers (EEC): A novel tool for pathophysiological and pharmaceutical research]. Rev Mal Respir 2018; 35:390-402. [PMID: 29731373 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Airborne allergic diseases (allergic asthma, rhinitis and conjunctivitis) have reached epidemic proportions and are a great burden for both society and individuals. Therefore we need to better understand the physiopathological mechanisms and to increase clinical research in these diseases. However, traditional outpatient studies are difficult and have number of limitations, in particular the variability of allergen exposure. Yet allergen provocation tests, especially bronchial challenges in asthma, are excellent tools to measure the efficiency of anti-allergic therapies. Environmental exposure chambers (EEC) allow the performance of controlled allergen provocation tests on a large scale with remarkable sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility. Moreover, they allow a precise collection of allergic symptoms, making them interesting tools for patho-physiological and clinical studies. During the last thirty years, they have assisted the study of anti-allergic therapies and provided data on their pharmacodynamic characteristics, particularly in allergic rhinitis. However, there are still no EEC tests centered on asthma. The EEC of Strasbourg (ALYATEC®) was developed to fulfill two objectives: to allow standardized allergenic and non-allergenic exposures with better control of the parameters than in other EEC and to offer a place to study asthma and anti-asthmatic therapies safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Khayath
- Service de pneumologie, pôle de pathologie thoracique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Fédération de médecine translationnelle, université de Strasbourg, BP426, 67091 Strasbourg, France
| | - C Radu
- Service de pneumologie, pôle de pathologie thoracique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Alyatec, Biocluster-des-Haras, 23, rue des Glacières, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - I Choual
- Alyatec, Biocluster-des-Haras, 23, rue des Glacières, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - S Jilani
- Alyatec, Biocluster-des-Haras, 23, rue des Glacières, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - L Vecellio
- Université François-Rabelais, 37020 Tours cedex, France
| | - N Domis
- Alyatec, Biocluster-des-Haras, 23, rue des Glacières, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - F De Blay
- Service de pneumologie, pôle de pathologie thoracique, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Fédération de médecine translationnelle, université de Strasbourg, BP426, 67091 Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pepper AN, Ledford DK. Nasal and ocular challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 141:1570-1577. [PMID: 29501480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Nasal and ocular challenges facilitate the evaluation of subjective and objective responses to defined allergen or irritant exposure. Nasal and ocular allergen challenges are the gold standard to diagnose allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis, respectively, and aid in the evaluation of novel therapies in clinical trials. Additionally, nasal and ocular allergen challenges might help identify medically relevant allergens in clinical practice. Nonspecific or irritant challenges evaluate mucosal hyperreactivity. Direct mucosal challenges, which can be performed in an office or research setting, expose the participant to higher allergen doses than common in the natural environment. Park studies and environmental chambers, which are most practical in clinical trials, more closely simulate natural allergen exposure. International consensus guidelines for nasal and ocular challenges do not exist. Therefore the positivity criteria, methodologies, and extract or allergen preparations used in challenges vary in the literature. Regardless of these limitations, nasal and ocular challenges are helpful clinical and research tools for nasal and ocular diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber N Pepper
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and James A. Haley Veterans' Affairs Hospital, Tampa, Fla
| | - Dennis K Ledford
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and James A. Haley Veterans' Affairs Hospital, Tampa, Fla.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Werchan M, Sehlinger T, Goergen F, Bergmann KC. The Pollator: a personal pollen sampling device. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-018-1525-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
27
|
Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, Azar A, Baroody FM, Bachert C, Canonica GW, Chacko T, Cingi C, Ciprandi G, Corey J, Cox LS, Creticos PS, Custovic A, Damask C, DeConde A, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, Eloy JA, Flanagan CE, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Gosepath J, Halderman A, Hamilton RG, Hoffman HJ, Hohlfeld JM, Houser SM, Hwang PH, Incorvaia C, Jarvis D, Khalid AN, Kilpeläinen M, Kingdom TT, Krouse H, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lee SE, Levy JM, Luong AU, Marple BF, McCoul ED, McMains KC, Melén E, Mims JW, Moscato G, Mullol J, Nelson HS, Patadia M, Pawankar R, Pfaar O, Platt MP, Reisacher W, Rondón C, Rudmik L, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Settipane RA, Sharma HP, Sheikh A, Smith TL, Tantilipikorn P, Tversky JR, Veling MC, Wang DY, Westman M, Wickman M, Zacharek M. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8:108-352. [PMID: 29438602 PMCID: PMC7286723 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). METHODS Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. CONCLUSION This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Cezmi A. Akdis
- Allergy/Asthma, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Switzerland
| | | | - Antoine Azar
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Cemal Cingi
- Otolaryngology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam DeConde
- Otolaryngology, University of California San Diego, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Gosepath
- Otorhinolaryngology, Helios Kliniken Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jens M. Hohlfeld
- Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Airway Research Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, German Center for Lung Research, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber U. Luong
- Otolaryngology, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | - Erik Melén
- Pediatric Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | | | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- Otolaryngology, Universitat de Barcelona, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Rhinology/Allergy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | - Carmen Rondón
- Allergy, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Spain
| | - Luke Rudmik
- Otolaryngology, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern, USA
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergology, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jiminez Diaz, Spain
| | | | | | - Hemant P. Sharma
- Allergy/Immunology, Children's National Health System, George Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - De Yun Wang
- Otolaryngology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pfaar O, Bonini S, Cardona V, Demoly P, Jakob T, Jutel M, Kleine-Tebbe J, Klimek L, Klysner S, Kopp MV, Kuna P, Larché M, Muraro A, Schmidt-Weber CB, Shamji MH, Simonsen K, Somoza C, Valovirta E, Zieglmayer P, Zuberbier T, Wahn U. Perspectives in allergen immunotherapy: 2017 and beyond. Allergy 2018; 73 Suppl 104:5-23. [PMID: 29171712 DOI: 10.1111/all.13355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The Future of the Allergists and Specific Immunotherapy (FASIT) workshop provides a regular platform for global experts from academia, allergy clinics, regulatory authorities and industry to review developments in the field of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The most recent meeting, held in February 2017, had two main themes: advances in AIT and hot topics in AIT from the regulatory point of view. The first theme covered opportunities for personalized AIT, advances in adjuvants and delivery systems, and the development of new molecules and future vaccines for AIT. Key topics in the second part of the meeting were the effects of the enactment of European Directive 2001/83 on the availability of allergens for therapy and diagnosis across the EU, the challenges of conducting Phase 3 studies in the field, the future role of allergen exposure chambers in AIT studies and specific considerations in performing AIT studies in the paediatric population. Finally, the group highlighted the forthcoming EAACI guidelines and their particular importance for the standardization of practice in the treatment of allergies. This review presents a comprehensive insight into those panel discussions and highlights unmet needs and also possible solutions to them for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - S. Bonini
- Italian National Research Council; Institute of Translational Pharmacology; Rome, and University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’; Naples Italy
- Expert-on Secondment at the European Medicines Agency; London UK
| | - V. Cardona
- Hospital Vall D'Hebron, S. Allergologia, S. Medicina Interna; Barcelona Spain
| | - P. Demoly
- Departement de Pneumologie et Addictologie; Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
| | - T. Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; University Medical Center Giessen (UKGM); Justus-Liebig-University Giessen; Giessen Germany
- Allergy Research Group; Department of Dermatology; Medical Center - University Freiburg; Freiburg Germany
| | - M. Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology; Wroclaw Medical University; Wroclaw Poland
- All-Med Medical Research Institute; Wroclaw Poland
| | - J. Kleine-Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend; Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center; Berlin Germany
| | - L. Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - S. Klysner
- Expres ion Biotechnologies Aps; Hørsholm Denmark
| | - M. V. Kopp
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology; University of Luebeck; Luebeck Germany
- Airway Research Center North (ARCN); Member of the Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung (DZL); Luebeck Germany
| | - P. Kuna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy; Barlicki University Hospital; Medical University of Lodz; Lodz Poland
| | - M. Larché
- Divisions of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, and Respirology; Department of Medicine and Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
| | - A. Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre; Padua University Hospital; Padua Italy
| | - C. B. Schmidt-Weber
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM); Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL); Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Center Munich; Munich Germany
| | - M. H. Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Inflammation Repair and Development; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
| | | | - C. Somoza
- Biological Products and Biotechnology Division; Medicines for Human Use Department; Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS); Madrid Spain
| | - E. Valovirta
- Department of Lung Disease and Clinical Allergology; University of Turku and Terveystalo Allergy Clinic; Turku Finland
| | - P. Zieglmayer
- Allergy Center Vienna West; Vienna Challenge Chamber; Vienna Austria
| | - T. Zuberbier
- Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité; Department of Dermatology and Allergy; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
- Member of Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA LEN); GA LEN coordinating Office; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Germany
| | - U. Wahn
- Department for Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Voegler T, Goergen F, Bergmann KC, Boelke G, Salame J, Gildemeister J, Zuberbier T. Technical specifications of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) chamber: a novel mobile allergen exposure chamber. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-017-1495-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
30
|
Technical specifications of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) chamber: a novel mobile allergen exposure chamber. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-017-0040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
31
|
Pfaar O, Hohlfeld JM, Al-Kadah B, Hauswald B, Homey B, Hunzelmann N, Schliemann S, Velling P, Worm M, Klimek L. Dose-response relationship of a new Timothy grass pollen allergoid in comparison with a 6-grass pollen allergoid. Clin Exp Allergy 2017; 47:1445-1455. [PMID: 28696503 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy with grass pollen allergoids has been proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Based on the extensive cross-reactivity among Pooideae species, it has been suggested that grass pollen extracts could be prepared from a single species, rather than from a multiple species mixture. OBJECTIVE To find the optimal dose of a Phleum pratense (P. pratense) allergoid preparation and compare its efficacy and safety to a 6-grass pollen allergoid preparation. METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EudraCT: 2011-000674-58), three doses of P. pratense allergoid (1800 therapeutic units (TU), standard-dose 6000 TU and 18 000 TU) were compared with placebo and the marketed 6-grass pollen allergoid (6000 TU). In a pre-seasonal dosing regimen, 102 patients were randomized to five treatment groups and received nine subcutaneous injections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in weal size (late-phase reaction [LPR]) in response to the intracutaneous testing (ICT) before and after treatment, comparing the active allergoids to placebo. Secondary outcomes were the change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) assessed in the allergen exposure chamber (AEC), the changes in P. pratense-serum-specific IgG4 and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS All three doses of the P. pratense and the 6-grass pollen allergoid preparations were significantly superior to placebo for the primary outcome, whereas there were no significant differences in the change in TNSS. Compared to the standard-dose, the high-dose of P. pratense did not produce any additional significant benefit, but showed a slight increase in AEs. Yet this increase in AEs was lower than for the 6-grass pollen preparation. CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE The standard-dose of the new P. pratense allergoid was comparable to the marketed 6-grass pollen preparation at equal dose for the parameters measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - J M Hohlfeld
- Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM; Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany.,Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - B Al-Kadah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - B Hauswald
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Homey
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - N Hunzelmann
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - S Schliemann
- Department of Dermatology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - P Velling
- Medical Care Centre of Evangelical Chest Clinic Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boelke G, Berger U, Bergmann KC, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bousquet J, Gildemeister J, Jutel M, Pfaar O, Sehlinger T, Zuberbier T. Peak nasal inspiratory flow as outcome for provocation studies in allergen exposure chambers: a GA 2LEN study. Clin Transl Allergy 2017; 7:33. [PMID: 28932387 PMCID: PMC5604509 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-017-0169-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The GA2LEN chamber has been developed as a novel mobile allergen exposure chamber (AEC) allowing standardized multicenter trials in allergy. Hitherto, subjective nasal symptom scores have been the most often used outcome parameter, but in standardized modern trials objective parameters are preferred. Despite its practicability, the objective parameter peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) has been rarely used for allergy trials in the setting of allergen exposure chambers. This study aims to evaluate PNIF as an outcome parameter for provocation studies in AECs. Methods In a randomized controlled blinded setting subjects suffering from allergic rhinitis were exposed to grass pollen, birch pollen, house dust mite and/or placebo in the GA2LEN chamber. Different allergen concentrations were used to evaluate symptom severities. Patients had to perform PNIF before and every 30 min during a challenge using a portable PNIF meter. Results 86 subjects participated in 203 challenges, altogether. House dust mite provocations caused the greatest reduction in PNIF values, followed by grass pollen and birch pollen. Provocations with every allergen or pollen concentration led to a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in PNIF compared to baseline. Furthermore, positive correlations were obtained between PNIF and peak expiratory flow, height and weight, and inverse correlations between PNIF and total nasal symptom score, nasal congestion score and visual analog scale of overall subjective symptoms. Conclusion PNIF is a helpful and feasible tool for conducting provocation trials with allergens, especially grass pollen and house dust mite, in an AEC. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13601-017-0169-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Boelke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy-Center-Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Berger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Aerobiology and Pollen Information Research Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karl-Christian Bergmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy-Center-Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jean Bousquet
- CHRU, Montpellier University Hospital Center, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Marek Jutel
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wrocław, Poland.,Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.,Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy-Center-Charité, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Werchan M, Sehlinger T, Goergen F, Bergmann KC. The pollator: a personal pollen sampling device. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40629-017-0034-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
34
|
Shamji MH, Kappen JH, Akdis M, Jensen-Jarolim E, Knol EF, Kleine-Tebbe J, Bohle B, Chaker AM, Till SJ, Valenta R, Poulsen LK, Calderon MA, Demoly P, Pfaar O, Jacobsen L, Durham SR, Schmidt-Weber CB. Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2017; 72:1156-1173. [PMID: 28152201 DOI: 10.1111/all.13138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) with or without asthma. It is important to note that due to the complex interaction between patient, allergy triggers, symptomatology and vaccines used for AIT, some patients do not respond optimally to the treatment. Furthermore, there are no validated or generally accepted candidate biomarkers that are predictive of the clinical response to AIT. Clinical management of patients receiving AIT and efficacy in randomised controlled trials for drug development could be enhanced by predictive biomarkers. METHOD The EAACI taskforce reviewed all candidate biomarkers used in clinical trials of AR patients with/without asthma in a literature review. Biomarkers were grouped into seven domains: (i) IgE (total IgE, specific IgE and sIgE/Total IgE ratio), (ii) IgG-subclasses (sIgG1, sIgG4 including SIgE/IgG4 ratio), (iii) Serum inhibitory activity for IgE (IgE-FAB and IgE-BF), (iv) Basophil activation, (v) Cytokines and Chemokines, (vi) Cellular markers (T regulatory cells, B regulatory cells and dendritic cells) and (vii) In vivo biomarkers (including provocation tests?). RESULTS All biomarkers were reviewed in the light of their potential advantages as well as their respective drawbacks. Unmet needs and specific recommendations on all seven domains were addressed. CONCLUSIONS It is recommended to explore the use of allergen-specific IgG4 as a biomarker for compliance. sIgE/tIgE and IgE-FAB are considered as potential surrogate candidate biomarkers. Cytokine/chemokines and cellular reponses provided insight into the mechanisms of AIT. More studies for confirmation and interpretation of the possible association with the clinical response to AIT are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - J. H. Kappen
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Imperial College London; London UK
- Department of Pulmonology; STZ Centre of Excellence for Asthma & COPD; Sint Franciscus Vlietland Group; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - M. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF); University of Zürich; Davos Switzerland
| | - E. Jensen-Jarolim
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University Vienna; Vienna Austria
- The interuniversity Messerli Research Institute; University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna; Medical University Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - E. F. Knol
- Departments Immunology and Dermatology/Allergology; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - J. Kleine-Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend; Outpatient Clinic and Research Center Hanf, Ackermann & Kleine-Tebbe; Berlin Germany
| | - B. Bohle
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - A. M. Chaker
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM); Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich; Munich Germany
- Department of Otolaryngology; Allergy Section; Klinikum rechts der Isar; Technische Universität; Munich Germany
| | - S. J. Till
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology; King's College London; London UK
- Department of Allergy; Guy's and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - R. Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - L. K. Poulsen
- Allergy Clinic; Copenhagen University Hospital at Gentofte; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - P. Demoly
- Division of Allergy; Department of Pulmonology; Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital; University Hospital of Montpellier and Sorbonne University; Paris France
| | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - L. Jacobsen
- Allergy Learning and Consulting; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - S. R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London UK
- MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma; London UK
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - C. B. Schmidt-Weber
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM); Technische Universität and Helmholtz Center Munich; Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bush RK. Advances in allergen immunotherapy in 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 138:1284-1291. [PMID: 27817799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The year 2015 saw a significant number of advances in allergen immunotherapy (AIT), and several of these are reviewed in this report. Although AIT has been used for more than 100 years, investigations into optimal treatment approaches and mechanisms are ongoing. Among the highlights was a report by an international group of experts who reviewed AIT guidelines from the major specialty societies and addressed potential unmet needs. Herein, advances in the effectiveness, safety, and mechanisms of sublingual and oral immunotherapy are reviewed. Development of hypoallergenic vaccines to enhance safety, newer routes and regimens to improve efficacy, and biomarkers to monitor immunotherapy are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K Bush
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Allergen Immunotherapy Clinical Trial Outcomes and Design: Working Toward Harmonization of Methods and Principles. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017; 17:18. [PMID: 28293909 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-017-0687-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Progress has been made in the harmonization of efficacy and safety outcome measures for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) trials, but unresolved issues still remain. Furthermore, there are discrepancies in recommendations from professional medical societies and regulatory agencies regarding requirements for AIT trials. In this article, we reviewed published recommendations and current data from recent clinical trials, as well as the criteria applied by regulatory authorities for approval of AIT products, to provide updated considerations for conducting phase 3 AIT trials. Topics discussed include analysis of outcomes and trial designs for pediatric and asthma indications, as well as trial designs for perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. In addition, the need for harmonization of safety reporting is emphasized. Considerations presented in this article may further effort to find common ground among professional medical societies and government agencies in developing future recommendations for AIT trial design.
Collapse
|
37
|
Hoffmann HJ, Valovirta E, Pfaar O, Moingeon P, Schmid JM, Skaarup SH, Cardell LO, Simonsen K, Larché M, Durham SR, Sørensen P. Novel approaches and perspectives in allergen immunotherapy. Allergy 2017; 72:1022-1034. [PMID: 28122129 DOI: 10.1111/all.13135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we report on relevant current topics in allergen immunotherapy (AIT) which were broadly discussed during the first Aarhus Immunotherapy Symposium (Aarhus, Denmark) in December 2015 by leading clinicians, scientists and industry representatives in the field. The aim of this symposium was to highlight AIT-related aspects of public health, clinical efficacy evaluation, mechanisms, development of new biomarkers and an overview of novel therapeutic approaches. Allergy is a public health issue of high socioeconomic relevance, and development of evidence-based action plans to address allergy as a public health issue ought to be on national and regional agendas. The underlying mechanisms are in the focus of current research that lays the ground for innovative therapies. Standardization and harmonization of clinical endpoints in AIT trials as well as current knowledge about potential biomarkers have substantiated proof of effectiveness of this disease-modifying therapeutic option. Novel treatments such as peptide immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy and use of recombinant allergens herald a new age in which AIT may address treatment of allergy as a public health issue by reaching a large fraction of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. J. Hoffmann
- Department of Clinical Medicine; HEALTH; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - E. Valovirta
- Department of Lung Diseases and Clinical Immunology; University of Turku; Turku Finland
- Filha; Finnish Lung Health Association; Helsinki Finland
- Terveystalo Allergy Clinic Turku; Finland
| | - O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - P. Moingeon
- Research and Development; StallergenesGreer; Antony Cedex France
| | - J. M. Schmid
- Department of Clinical Medicine; HEALTH; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - S. H. Skaarup
- Department of Clinical Medicine; HEALTH; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - L.-O. Cardell
- Division of ENT Diseases; Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of ENT Diseases; Karolinska University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - K. Simonsen
- Anergis SA; BioPole III; Epalinges Switzerland
| | - M. Larché
- Clinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology Divisions; Department of Medicine; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
- Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
| | - S. R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology; National Heart and Lung Institute; Imperial College London; London UK
| | - P. Sørensen
- Research and Development; StallergenesGreer; Antony Cedex France
- Department of Biomedicine; HEALTH; Aarhus University & Research; Aarhus Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pfaar O, Calderon MA, Andrews CP, Angjeli E, Bergmann KC, Bønløkke JH, de Blay F, Devillier P, Ellis AK, Gerth van Wijk R, Hohlfeld JM, Horak F, Jacobs RL, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Kaul S, Larché M, Larenas-Linnemann D, Mösges R, Nolte H, Patel P, Peoples L, Rabin RL, Rather C, Salapatek AM, Sigsgaard T, Thaarup S, Yang J, Zieglmayer P, Zuberbier T, Demoly P. Allergen exposure chambers: harmonizing current concepts and projecting the needs for the future - an EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2017; 72:1035-1042. [PMID: 28122133 DOI: 10.1111/all.13133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen exposure chambers (AECs) are clinical facilities allowing for controlled exposure of subjects to allergens in an enclosed environment. AECs have contributed towards characterizing the pathophysiology of respiratory allergic diseases and the pharmacological properties of new therapies. In addition, they are complementary to and offer some advantages over traditional multicentre field trials for evaluation of novel therapeutics. To date, AEC studies conducted have been monocentric and have followed protocols unique to each centre. Because there are technical differences among AECs, it may be necessary to define parameters to standardize the AECs so that studies may be extrapolated for driving basic immunological research and for marketing authorization purposes by regulatory authorities. METHODS For this task force initiative of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), experts from academia and regulatory agencies met with chamber operators to list technical, clinical and regulatory unmet needs as well as the prerequisites for clinical validation. RESULTS The latter covered the validation process, standardization of challenges and outcomes, intra- and interchamber variability and reproducibility, in addition to comparability with field trials and specifics of paediatric trials and regulatory issues. CONCLUSION This EAACI Position Paper aims to harmonize current concepts in AECs and to project unmet needs with the intent to enhance progress towards use of these facilities in determining safety and efficacy of new therapeutics in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - M. A. Calderon
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Imperial College London; London UK
- National Heart & Lung Institute; Royal Brompton Hospital; London UK
| | | | | | - K. C. Bergmann
- Allergy-Centre-Charité; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - J. H. Bønløkke
- Department of Public Health; Section for Environment, Occupation and Health; Danish Ramazzini Center; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
| | - F. de Blay
- ALYATEC; Strasbourg France
- Chest Disease Department; University Hospital of Strasbourg and Federation of Translational Medicine, EA3072; Strasbourg University; Strasbourg France
| | - P. Devillier
- UPRES EA 220; Airway Diseases Department; Hôpital Foch; Université Versailles Saint Quentin; University Paris Saclay; Suresnes France
| | - A. K. Ellis
- Department of Medicine; Queen's University; Kingston ON Canada
- Environmental Exposure Unit; Kingston General Hospital; Kingston ON Canada
| | - R. Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology; Department of Internal Medicine; Erasmus MC; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - J. M. Hohlfeld
- Department of Clinical Airway Research; Fraunhofer Institute of Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM); Hannover Germany, Member of the German Center for Lung Research
| | - F. Horak
- Vienna Challenge Chamber; Vienna Austria
| | - R. L. Jacobs
- Biogenics Research Chamber LLC; San Antonio TX USA
| | - L. Jacobsen
- Allergy Learning and Consulting (ALC); Copenhagen Denmark
| | - M. Jutel
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute; Wrocław Poland
- Wroclaw Medical University; Wrocław Poland
| | - S. Kaul
- Division of Allergology; Paul-Ehrlich-Institut; Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines; Langen Germany
| | - M. Larché
- Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health; Department of Medicine; St. Joseph's Hospital Healthcare; McMaster University; Hamilton ON Canada
| | - D. Larenas-Linnemann
- Department of Investigation; Hospital Médica Sur; Mexico City Mexico
- Center for Excellence in Asthma and Allergy; Mexico City Mexico
| | - R. Mösges
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMSIE); University Hospital of Cologne; University at Cologne; Cologne Germany
| | | | - P. Patel
- Inflamax Research Inc.; Mississauga ON Canada
| | | | - R. L. Rabin
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; United States Food and Drug Administration; Silver Spring MD USA
| | - C. Rather
- Biogenics Research Chamber LLC; San Antonio TX USA
| | | | - T. Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health; Section for Environment, Occupation and Health; Danish Ramazzini Center; Aarhus University; Aarhus Denmark
| | - S. Thaarup
- Mobile Chamber Experts GmbH (MCX); Berlin Germany
| | - J. Yang
- Red Maple Trials; Ottawa ON Canada
| | | | - T. Zuberbier
- Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA LEN); Department of Dermatology & Allergy; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; Berlin Germany
| | - P. Demoly
- Département de Pneumologie et Addictologie; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve; University Hospital of Montpellier; Montpellier France
- UPMC Paris 06; UMR-S 1136; IPLESP; Equipe EPAR; Sorbonne Universités; Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zieglmayer P, Lemell P, Chen KW, Schmutz R, Zieglmayer R, Pfaar O, Horak F, Vrtala S. Clinical validation of a house dust mite environmental challenge chamber model. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 140:266-268.e5. [PMID: 28238743 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2016] [Revised: 10/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Zieglmayer
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Allergy Center Vienna West, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Patrick Lemell
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Allergy Center Vienna West, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kuan Wei Chen
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - René Schmutz
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Allergy Center Vienna West, Vienna, Austria
| | - René Zieglmayer
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Allergy Center Vienna West, Vienna, Austria
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Friedrich Horak
- Vienna Challenge Chamber, Allergy Center Vienna West, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susanne Vrtala
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Angjeli E, Gomes P, Lane KJ, Stein L, Abelson MB. Technical and clinical validation of the Allergen BioCube ® for timothy grass. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2017; 5:78-84. [PMID: 28250927 PMCID: PMC5322160 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Field studies for allergic rhinitis (AR) commonly have inconsistent allergen concentrations and subject exposure patterns due to varying environmental conditions and subject behaviors. A technical and clinical validation study was conducted for the Allergen BioCube® using timothy grass to confirm uniform allergen concentration and clinically relevant subject symptom responses. METHODS Allergen concentrations were verified by laser particle counts. Subjects (N = 14) with positive skin test reactions and no symptoms at screening received four 3-h timothy grass exposures in the BioCube over consecutive days. Subjects evaluated nasal itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion while in the BioCube; Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) was computed. Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), sIgE blood tests, and Nasal Inflammation Score (NIS) were assessed. A correlation analysis was conducted for mean sIgE, skin test, and TNSS. RESULTS Uniform timothy grass concentrations were achieved in the BioCube, both spatially and temporally, at all subject positions. Mean TNSS increased substantially from pre-exposure levels (0.36 ± 0.74 to 1.86 ± 2.14) to maximums of 7.07 ± 2.76 at 1.5 h and 6.71 ± 2.70 at 3 h BioCube exposure. Twelve (86%) subjects had TNSS increases ≥6 units. PNIF decreased 12-24% from baseline at 3-h BioCube exposure. NIS increased (baseline = 0) to 3.7 (maximum score = 4). A low/moderate correlation (r = 0.485) occurred between mean sIgE blood levels and mean skin tests; neither sIgE or skin tests correlated with mean TNSS. However, subjects with high skin test scores or positive blood IgE tended to also have higher TNSS. CONCLUSIONS The Allergen BioCube achieved technical and clinical validation for uniform timothy grass concentration and clinically meaningful AR sign and symptom responses. The Allergen BioCube can be used to assess the efficacy of therapies for reduction of AR signs and symptoms resulting from grass exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mark B Abelson
- Ora, Inc.AndoverMassachusettsUSA; Department of OphthalmologyHarvard Medical SchoolCambridgeMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gomes PJ, Lane KJ, Angjeli E, Stein L, Abelson MB. Technical and clinical validation of an environmental exposure unit for ragweed. J Asthma Allergy 2016; 9:215-221. [PMID: 28008277 PMCID: PMC5167464 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s123547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Allergic rhinitis is a common condition, with ragweed pollen one of the more prevalent aeroallergens. Environmental exposure units such as the Allergen BioCube® are valuable models for clinical allergy studies. A study was conducted to validate the Allergen BioCube for uniform ragweed pollen concentrations and clinically relevant sign and symptom responses to ragweed exposure. Methods Ragweed pollen concentrations were measured on 3 consecutive days in the Allergen BioCube and verified by Rotorod collection and continuous laser particle count measurements. Subjects (N=10) were exposed to ragweed pollen in the BioCube for 3 hours per day for 3 consecutive days. Subjects assessed their nasal itching, sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion during each BioCube exposure; total nasal symptom score was computed. Peak nasal inspiratory flow was also assessed during BioCube exposure. Results Uniform ragweed pollen concentrations were obtained throughout each of the 3-hour testing periods in the Allergen BioCube, both spatially and temporally, at all subject positions, with a low mean standard deviation of 10%. Pronounced increases in mean total nasal symptom scores (6.7±0.94 to 7.6±0.86, last 90 minutes of exposure) occurred for all three BioCube ragweed pollen exposure visits. Mean peak nasal inspiratory flow decreased 24% at 3 hours of BioCube exposure on Day 3. No safety issues of concern occurred in this study. Conclusion The Allergen BioCube achieved technical and clinical validation for ragweed allergen. Ragweed pollen concentration was uniform both temporally and spatially. Allergic rhinitis signs and symptoms were induced in subjects during exposure to ragweed in the BioCube at clinically meaningful levels for allergy studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mark B Abelson
- Ora, Inc., Andover, MA, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Advances in rhinitis and rhinosinusitis in 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138:1277-1283. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Revised: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
43
|
Zuberbier T, Abelson MB, Akdis CA, Bachert C, Berger U, Bindslev-Jensen C, Boelke G, Bousquet J, Canonica GW, Casale TB, Jutel M, Kowalski ML, Madonini E, Papadopoulos NG, Pfaar O, Sehlinger T, Bergmann KC. Validation of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA 2LEN) chamber for trials in allergy: Innovation of a mobile allergen exposure chamber. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 139:1158-1166. [PMID: 27697498 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Field clinical trials of pollen allergy are affected by the impossibility of predicting and determining individual allergen exposure because of many factors (eg, pollen season, atmospheric variations, pollutants, and lifestyles). Environmental exposure chambers, delivering a fixed amount of allergen in a controlled environmental setting, can overcome these limitations. Environmental exposure chambers are currently already used in phase 2, 3, and even 4 trials. Unfortunately, few chambers exist in the world, and this makes it difficult to perform large, multicenter clinical trials. The new Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN) mobile exposure chamber is a step forward because the mobility of the chamber makes it convenient for patients to participate in clinical testing. OBJECTIVE This study was made to validate the reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of the results obtained in the new GA2LEN chamber. METHODS Seventy-two adult patients (19-61 years old) with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma caused by grass pollen were included in different clinical validation tests. Total symptom scores and total nasal symptom scores were recorded at time zero (0) and every 10 minutes during exposures, along with nasal and respiratory parameters. RESULTS Exposure tests confirmed the reproducibility between subsequent runs and the sensitivity (P < .00001 vs patients exposed to placebo) and specificity (very low score in nonallergic subjects) in the GA2LEN chamber. No adverse reactions were recorded during the tests. CONCLUSIONS The mobility of the GA2LEN chamber provides a new, potentially effective, and safe way of generating reliable data in allergy multicenter clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Zuberbier
- Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Member of Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Mark B Abelson
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard University, Andover, Mass
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airway Research Laboratory, Ghent University, and Division of ENT Diseases, Clintec, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
| | - Uwe Berger
- Aerobiology and Pollen Information Research Unit, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Georg Boelke
- Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Member of Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Allergy & Respiratory Diseases Clinic, DIMI University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| | - Marek Jutel
- ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw 2, Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Marek L Kowalski
- Department of Immunology, Rheumatology and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Allergy Department, National Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, and the Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, and the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Karl-Christian Bergmann
- Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Member of Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN), Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Patient selection for subcutaneous versus sublingual immunotherapy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 15:588-95. [PMID: 26485098 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With the Food and Drug Administration's approval of sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy (SL-AIT) tablets for grass and ragweed pollen, SL-AIT is progressively gathering importance not only in Europe, but also in the United States and other parts of the world. We reviewed issues related to the selection of patients for the sublingual or the subcutaneous route for allergic patients, based on what has been published since January 2014 on subcutaneous-versus-SL-AIT efficacy, safety and other issues. (Figure is included in full-text article.) RECENT FINDINGS As patient's adherence seems one of the major problems in real-life AIT, investigators have sought how to enhance AIT simplicity by changing the route to home-administrated SL-AIT, and by shortening the subcutaneous-allergen-specific immunotherapy (SC-AIT) build-up or maintenance phase. The latter was safe with several hypoallergenic extracts. As for SL-AIT, double blind placebo-controlled large trials in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma have shown the efficacy and safety of ragweed pollen and house dust mite SLIT tablets and highly concentrated liquid formulations, primarily in adults. A large trial with SLIT in 3-year-old children was effective. SUMMARY With the improvement of SL-AIT efficacy, the selection of SC-versus-SL-AIT will probably increasingly be based not on efficacy, but on practical aspects, without losing sight of which SL-AIT products have proven efficacy.
Collapse
|
45
|
Pfaar O, Nell MJ, Boot JD, Versteeg SA, van Ree R, Roger A, Riechelmann H, Sperl A, Oude Elberink JNG, Diamant Z, Bachert C. A randomized, 5-arm dose finding study with a mite allergoid SCIT in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients. Allergy 2016; 71:967-76. [PMID: 26864207 DOI: 10.1111/all.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety and tolerability of a mite allergoid subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) product was previously established. The aim of this study (EudraCT number: 2011-000393-61) was to find the optimally safe and effective allergoid dose by evaluating several dosages in patients with house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) using a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT). METHODS In total, 290 adult ARC patients (148 females; 142 males) with established HDM allergy and with a positive TNPT were randomized to receive placebo or mite allergoid SCIT 6667, 20 000, 50 000 or 100 000 AUeq/ml for 12 months. Patients were updosed weekly, followed by monthly maintenance dosing. The primary study endpoint comprised the clinical response to TNPT after 12 months of treatment. Secondary endpoints included response to TNPT after 6 months, PNIF measurements, symptom and medication scores during the last 8 weeks of treatment, serum immunoglobulins and safety assessments. RESULTS After 12 months, a dose-response was observed showing statistically significant improvements in the TNPT with SCIT concentrations of ≥20 000 AUeq/ml, while no significantly different outcomes were reached after 6 months. Specific serum IgG and IgG4 levels were dose dependently increased. In the highest dose group, more treatment-emergent adverse events were observed compared with the lower dose groups. CONCLUSION In this mite allergoid SCIT dose finding study in HDM-induced ARC, concentrations of ≥20 000 AUeq/ml showed both immunological effects and clinical efficacy in the TNPT compared with placebo. The risk-benefit ratio favours 20 000 AUeq/ml and 50 000 AUeq/ml strengths for further clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Universitätsmedizin Mannheim; Medical Faculty Mannheim; Heidelberg University; Mannheim Germany
| | | | | | - S. A. Versteeg
- Experimental Immunology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - R. van Ree
- Experimental Immunology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhino-laryngology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - A. Roger
- Unitat d'Allèrgia; Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol; Badalona Spain
| | - H. Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery; Medical University of Innsbruck; Innsbruck Austria
| | - A. Sperl
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology; Wiesbaden Germany
| | - J. N. G. Oude Elberink
- Department of Allergology; University Medical Center Groningen; University of Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Z. Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology; Institute for Clinical Science; Skane University Hospital; Lund Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology and Department of Gen Practice; University Medical Center Groningen; University Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
| | - C. Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory; Ghent University; Ghent Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
International Consensus on Allergen Immunotherapy II: Mechanisms, standardization, and pharmacoeconomics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 137:358-68. [PMID: 26853128 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Revised: 11/30/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
This article continues the comprehensive international consensus (ICON) statement on allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The initial article also recently appeared in the Journal. The conclusions below focus on key mechanisms of AIT-triggered tolerance, requirements in allergen standardization, AIT cost-effectiveness, and regulatory guidance. Potential barriers to and facilitators of the use of AIT are described in addition to future directions. International allergy specialists representing the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; and the World Allergy Organization critically reviewed the existing literature and prepared this summary of recommendations for best AIT practice. The authors contributed equally and reached consensus on the statements presented herein.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kenney P, Bønløkke J, Hilberg O, Ravn P, Schlünssen V, Sigsgaard T. Method for a homogeneous distribution of pollens in an environmental exposure chamber. Clin Exp Allergy 2016; 46:1176-84. [PMID: 27144495 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2016] [Revised: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of different environmental exposure chambers (EECs) have been used to evaluate treatments for allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE To describe and test a system for a homogenous distribution of grass pollen, Phleum Pratense, in an EEC to be used for controlled pollen exposure studies in allergic participants. METHODS A chamber made of stainless steel with completely rounded corners, seating four individuals at a time, was used. Room pressure, temperature, humidity and the air change rate were kept constant throughout the study period. A rotating pipette dispensed a uniform supply of pollen into a turntable's v-shaped grooves. A stainless steel capillary tube sucked the pollens into a venturi throat at which time the pollens were mixed with a high-pressure airstream of compressed high-efficiency particulate arrestance filtered air and then transported to a spreading plate inside the EEC. To achieve uniform concentrations in the EEC, the turntable's rotating speed was continuously adjusted using information from video-coupled feedback and feed forward mechanisms. Pollen levels were detected using standard volumetric air samplers and laser particle counters. The target pollen exposure level was 1000 pollens/m(3) . Twenty-one participants were exposed to pollens in the EEC twice for 210 min. Participants evaluated their symptoms every 30 min using a total nasal symptom score (TNSS) consisting of blocked nose, runny nose, nasal itching and sneezing. RESULTS Across fifteen study days, the average pollen level was 982 pollens/m(3) (SD, 102 pollens/m(3) ). On average, participants experienced a 10% difference in overall pollen levels between their two visits to the EEC. The mean TNSSs rose throughout the exposure period, with a low at baseline of 0.43 (SD, 0.68) to a high of 4.71 (SD, 2.43) just before exiting the EEC. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE This EEC provides a reproducible, precise and homogenous distribution of pollens making it suitable for single-centre allergy clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Kenney
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Rhinix ApS, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - J Bønløkke
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - O Hilberg
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - P Ravn
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - V Schlünssen
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,National Research Center for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Sigsgaard
- Department of Public Health, Section for Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Shimizu K, Miyauchi H, Urakami T, Yamamura-Ichikawa K, Yonezawa S, Asai T, Oku N. Specific delivery of an immunosuppressive drug to splenic B cells by antigen-modified liposomes and its antiallergic effect. J Drug Target 2016; 24:890-895. [DOI: 10.3109/1061186x.2016.1172588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Shimizu
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Haruna Miyauchi
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takeo Urakami
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kanae Yamamura-Ichikawa
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Sei Yonezawa
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Asai
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Naoto Oku
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Efficacy and safety of sublingual tablets of house dust mite allergen extracts: Results of a dose-ranging study in an environmental exposure chamber. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2016; 138:451-458.e5. [PMID: 27289490 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Revised: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a natural field study, sublingual tablets of house dust mite (HDM) allergen extracts (STG320) were efficacious in treating HDM-associated allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVES We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of 3 doses of STG320 in an environmental exposure chamber. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind study, adults with HDM-associated allergic rhinitis were given a daily sublingual tablet containing placebo or STG320 at a dose of 500IR, 300IR, or 100IR (IR, index of reactivity) for 6 months. Participants recorded their rhinitis symptoms during 4-hour HDM EEC challenges at randomization and months 1, 2, 4, and 6. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to end of treatment in the area under the curve of the rhinitis total symptom score (ChBLAUCRTSS 0-4h). Differences from the placebo group were analyzed by analysis of covariance. Adverse events (AEs) and routine safety parameters were recorded. RESULTS A total of 355 subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 groups: 500IR (n = 93), 300IR (n = 86), 100IR (n = 89), or placebo (n = 87). The least squares mean differences from placebo in ChBLAUCRTSS 0-4h for the 500IR, 300IR, and 100IR groups indicated a dose-dependent effect, with reductions in symptom scores of 33%, 29%, and 20%, respectively. The most frequent AEs were throat irritation and oral pruritus. There were no reports of anaphylaxis or reports consistent with severe laryngopharyngeal disorders and no use of epinephrine. AEs leading to premature discontinuations were more common in the 500IR group. CONCLUSIONS A dose-dependent effect of sublingual HDM immunotherapy was demonstrated in this environmental exposure chamber study, supporting further development of this treatment.
Collapse
|
50
|
Pfaar O, Twuijver E, Boot JD, Opstelten DJE, Klimek L, Ree R, Diamant Z, Kuna P, Panzner P. A randomized DBPC trial to determine the optimal effective and safe dose of a SLIT-birch pollen extract for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: results of a phase II study. Allergy 2016; 71:99-107. [PMID: 26417901 PMCID: PMC5057302 DOI: 10.1111/all.12760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a potential efficacious and safe treatment option for patients with respiratory, IgE-mediated allergic diseases. A combined tolerability, dose-finding study with a sublingual liquid birch pollen preparation (SB) was conducted. METHODS Two hundred and sixty-nine adults with birch-pollen-induced AR were randomized to placebo, SB: 3333, 10,000, 20,000 or 40,000 AUN/ml. Differences in symptom scores following a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT) at baseline and after 5 months of treatment were determined. Safety, tolerability, birch-pollen-specific immunoglobulin levels and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were also measured (all measures determined outside the birch pollen season). RESULTS In all treatment groups, an improvement in symptom scores after treatment compared to baseline was observed, with an additional stepwise improvement in the active groups compared to placebo, which was significant in high-dose groups (P = 0.008 and P < 0.001, respectively). For this primary endpoint, a significant linear dose-response curve was observed: the higher the dose, the better the improvement observed. Likewise, active treatment resulted in an increase in PNIF and serum IgG levels compared to placebo. The highest improvements were found in the 40,000 AUN/ml group. All active dosages resulted in more adverse reactions than placebo, which were mainly mild and well-controlled. CONCLUSIONS A multicentre trial evaluated the dose-response and tolerability of SB. All active treatment groups showed better responses than placebo for both primary and secondary parameters. The results indicate that, within the studied dose range, SB 40,000 AUN/ml is the most optimal effective and safe dose (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01639768).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O. Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical Faculty Mannheim Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Heidelberg University Mannheim Germany
| | | | | | | | - L. Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - R. Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Z. Diamant
- Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology Institute for Clinical Science Skane University Hospital Lund Sweden
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacology and General Practice University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - P. Kuna
- Dept. of Internal Medicine Asthma and Allergy Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
| | - P. Panzner
- Department of Allergology and Immunology Medical Faculty in Plzen Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|