1
|
Hong Y, Lee N, Kirkpatrick CE, Hu S, Lee S, Hinnant A. "Trust Me, I'm a Doctor." How TikTok Videos from Different Sources Influence Clinical Trial Participation. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38699819 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2346680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
This study experiments with TikTok videos to promote clinical trial participation. More specifically, it examines how short-form video sources (doctors vs. prior volunteers for clinical trials) influence perceived source credibility, self-efficacy, and behavioral intention to participate in clinical trials. Findings from this online experiment (N = 396) showed that doctor sources led to greater behavioral intention through enhancing source credibility compared to prior volunteer sources. Alternatively, prior volunteer sources increased behavioral intention via enhanced self-efficacy for participants with low trust in doctors. These findings contribute to the understanding of how short-form video sources act as heuristic cues, leading to persuasion outcomes. Overall, we recommend featuring doctors when using video-based messages to promote clinical trial participation. Also, this study emphasizes the need for health communication practitioners to consider prior volunteers as spokespersons when targeting populations with low baseline trust in doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoorim Hong
- Strategic Communication, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| | - Namyeon Lee
- Department of Mass Communication, University of North Carolina at Pembroke
| | - Ciera E Kirkpatrick
- Advertising & Public Relations, College of Journalism & Mass Communications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
| | - Sisi Hu
- Advertising, School of Journalism and Strategic Media, University of Arkansas
| | - Sungkyoung Lee
- Strategic Communication, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| | - Amanda Hinnant
- Journalism Studies, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Krastev S, Krajden O, Vang ZM, Pérez-Gay Juárez F, Solomonova E, Goldenberg M, Weinstock D, Smith MJ, Turk L, Lin X, Gold I. Navigating the uncertainty: A novel taxonomy of vaccine hesitancy in the context of COVID-19. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295912. [PMID: 38127862 PMCID: PMC10734916 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy remains a significant and evolving public health challenge. The COVID-19 pandemic has created a unique decision context with significant uncertainty caused by the novelty of the disease being targeted, unfamiliarity with the vaccines being offered, misinformation, and strong handed government measures. In an effort to extend our understanding of vaccine hesitancy to the high uncertainty decision environment presented by COVID-19, we present a novel taxonomy of the determinants of vaccine hesitancy, based on an inductive analysis of qualitative data gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on focus group data from a purposive sample of 18 Canadians with varying sociodemographic characteristics and COVID-19 vaccination attitudes. An inductive thematic analysis of this data reveals eight core themes related to vaccine hesitancy: values, trust, social environment, personal anecdotes, environmental fluctuation, prior knowledge, perceived risk & systems of care. We explore these core themes as well as 25 sub-themes, contrasting them with previous models of vaccine hesitancy and suggesting potential strategies for public health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sekoul Krastev
- Integrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Oren Krajden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Zoua M. Vang
- Civil Society and Community Studies, School of Human Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
| | | | - Elizaveta Solomonova
- Neurophilosophy Lab, Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Maya Goldenberg
- Department of Philosophy, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Maxwell J. Smith
- School of Health Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsey Turk
- Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America
| | - Xingyan Lin
- Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, States of America
| | - Ian Gold
- Neurophilosophy Lab, Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Department of Philosophy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kohler RE, Wagner RB, Careaga K, Btoush R, Greene K, Kantor L. Mothers' perceptions and attitudes about HPV vaccination initiation among 9- and 10-year-olds. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2270842. [PMID: 37955127 PMCID: PMC10653617 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2270842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
HPV vaccination has potential to prevent 90% of HPV-associated cancers. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends HPV vaccination for 11- and 12-year-olds, but vaccine initiation can start at age 9. The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions about starting HPV vaccination at a younger age to inform future interventions that promote initiation at ages 9 and 10 years. This was part of a larger study about vaccine hesitancy among racially/ethnically diverse parents of adolescents in the Greater Newark Area of New Jersey. We thematically analyzed transcripts from 16 interviews with English- and Spanish-speaking mothers who had at least one child ≤ 10 years. Analyses focused on perceptions of HPV-related disease risk, attitudes toward HPV vaccination need, and vaccine confidence specifically for 9- and 10-year-olds. Few parents with young adolescents reported receiving vaccination recommendations, and only one reported series initiation before age 11. Mothers' hesitation about younger HPV vaccination initiation revolved around: 1) low perceived necessity among English-speaking mothers due to young adolescents not being sexually active, 2) concerns about potential side effects associated with vaccinating prepubescent adolescents, and 3) a desire for adolescents to be old enough to provide assent. Participants were not opposed to younger initiation but wanted and relied on pediatricians to inform them about vaccination for younger adolescents. These findings suggest mothers are willing to vaccinate at younger ages after clear provider recommendations. Equipping providers with evidence about vaccine safety and cancer prevention communication strategies may promote initiation and timely completion at younger ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Racquel E. Kohler
- Center for Cancer Health Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rachel B. Wagner
- Center for Cancer Health Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Katherine Careaga
- Center for Cancer Health Equity, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Rula Btoush
- School of Nursing, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Kathryn Greene
- School of Communication & Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Leslie Kantor
- School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ou L, Chen ACC, Amresh A. The Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions Targeting Parents and Youth in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Systematic Review. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2023; 6:e47334. [PMID: 37988155 PMCID: PMC10698656 DOI: 10.2196/47334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and its related cancers is a major global concern. In the United States, routine HPV vaccination is recommended for youth aged 11 or 12 years. Despite HPV being the most common sexually transmitted infection and the vaccine's proven efficacy, the vaccination rate among US youth remains below the recommended 80% completion rate. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have demonstrated promise in improving health. Examining and synthesizing the current evidence about the impact of mHealth interventions on vaccination coverage in youth and intervention characteristics could guide future mHealth interventions aimed at mitigating the vaccination gap and disease burden. OBJECTIVE This study aims to conduct a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of mHealth interventions on parental intent to vaccinate youth against HPV and youth's vaccine uptake. METHODS We searched empirical papers through databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria were the following: (1) published between January 2011 and December 2022; (2) using mHealth aimed to improve HPV vaccination rate; (3) targeted unvaccinated youth or their parents; and (4) measured HPV-related knowledge, vaccination intention, or vaccine uptake. Overall, 3 researchers screened and appraised the quality of the eligible papers using the Melnyk Levels of Evidence and the Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Disagreements in search results and result interpretation were resolved through consensus. RESULTS Overall, 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final review. Most studies were conducted in the United States (14/17, 82%), used a randomized controlled trial design (12/17, 71%), and adopted behavior change theories or a culture-centric approach (10/17, 59%). mHealth interventions included SMS text message reminders, motivational SMS text messages, computer-tailored or tablet-tailored interventions, smartphone apps, web-based tailored interventions, social media (Facebook) campaigns, digital videos, and digital storytelling interventions. Approximately 88% (15/17) of the mHealth interventions demonstrated positive effects on knowledge, intention, or behaviors related to HPV vaccination. Overall, 12% (2/17) reported limited or no intervention impact on vaccine uptake or vaccine series completion. Effective vaccine uptake was commonly seen in interventions based on behavior change theories and those that provided culturally relevant information. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review identified the impact of mHealth interventions among unvaccinated youth and their parents, which showed improvement in HPV-related knowledge, vaccination intention, or vaccine initiation. The interventions that incorporated theories and culture-centric approaches revealed the most promising results. Although these outcomes are encouraging, future studies are needed to investigate factors associated with the success of interventions using SMS text messaging or social media. More studies are also needed for a better understanding of the intervention elements that boost the responses of age-specific and ethnicity-specific populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihong Ou
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | | | - Ashish Amresh
- College of Engineering, Informatics, and Applied Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Skuras A, Iseler J. Increasing COVID-19 Immunization Awareness in Rural Communities Through a Multimedia Campaign. CLIN NURSE SPEC 2023; 37:291-298. [PMID: 37870515 DOI: 10.1097/nur.0000000000000781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES The purpose of this project was to implement a multimedia campaign to increase COVID-19 vaccine awareness and acceptance in rural communities. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This project was created and implemented in partnership with a public university in Michigan and targeted to rural Michigan communities. The campaign consisted of digital advertisements and video interviews with nurses from rural areas. Interview questions were developed using knowledge of the health belief model and allowed the nurses to share their COVID-19 stories. Video interviews were published to social media, and digital advertisements were targeted to rural areas via geofencing. A viewer response survey was provided to measure likelihood of behavior change after viewing. OUTCOME The campaign advertisements and videos reached 602 980 people during the implementation period, and 239 surveys were completed. Of the 53 unvaccinated respondents, 87% stated an increased likelihood to vaccinate. CONCLUSION This project supports the ability of the clinical nurse specialist to lead a multimedia campaign partnership that can reach thousands of people and increase the likelihood of vaccination. As the popularity of digital media continues to rise, clinical nurse specialists can embrace these channels to disseminate critical health information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Skuras
- Author Affiliations: Assistant Professor (Dr Skuras), University of Michigan-Flint; and Program Director and Clinical Nurse Specialist (Dr Iseler), Michigan State University, Grand Rapids
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chandra M, Osaghae I, Talluri R, Shete S. Barriers to human papillomavirus vaccine uptake: role of state religiosity and healthcare professionals' participation in a state vaccine program. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad068. [PMID: 37698997 PMCID: PMC10575682 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the known benefits of preventing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, HPV vaccine coverage is low in the United States. Grounded in Social Ecological theory, we assessed the macro-level (state) and meso-level (organization) factors associated with HPV vaccine initiation and up-to-date. METHODS Data from 2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen were used to study a sample of 20 163 US adolescents (aged 13-17 years). The data were collected from each teen's parents or guardians and health-care professionals. Weighted prevalence estimates were calculated, and multivariable regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS The prevalence of HPV vaccine initiation was 75.1% and of remaining up-to-date was 58.6%. At the macro level, teens living in states with high and moderate religiosity had lower odds of HPV vaccine initiation (high religiosity adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 0.78; moderate religiosity AOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.85) and up-to-date (high religiosity AOR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.85; moderate religiosity AOR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.91) than states with low religiosity. At the meso level, when none of their healthcare professionals ordered vaccine from the state, teens had lower odds of initiation (AOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.87) and up-to-date (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.95) than teens whose healthcare professionals ordered vaccine from the state. In addition, race and ethnicity, age, mother's education level, household income, well-child examination status, and doctor's recommendation were significantly associated with HPV vaccine uptake. CONCLUSION A multiprong approach is needed to address religious and systemic barriers to HPV vaccination and expand healthcare professionals' access and enrollment in state vaccine initiatives, such as the Vaccine for Children program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monalisa Chandra
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ikponmwosa Osaghae
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rajesh Talluri
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Panickar R, Aziz Z, Mohd Sani N, Kamarulzaman A. The use of technology in vaccine safety communication: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 112:107707. [PMID: 36989861 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify technologies used in vaccine safety communication and evaluate their impact on vaccination intention, uptake, knowledge, attitude, and perceptions of consumers. METHODS We searched 6 electronic databases to identify randomised controlled trials assessing the impact of using technology in vaccine safety communication. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to evaluate each study. RESULTS We included 22 studies involving 27,109 participants from 8 countries; 15 studies assessed the use of videos and 7 examined innovative technologies. Using videos significantly improved knowledge (n = 3) and participant engagement (n = 2) compared to printed material. Among the innovative technologies, the use of virtual reality, and smartphone applications incorporating social networking or gamification significantly increased vaccination knowledge, confidence, and engagement. The studies showed that narrative messaging increased perceived disease severity (n = 2) and vaccination intention (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS While the use of innovative technologies is increasing, videos currently remain the most popular technology for vaccine safety communication. Communication technology, particularly with narrative messaging, improves patient engagement and comprehension. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Health authorities should increase focus on using videos and smartphone applications for vaccine safety communication. Collaboration among stakeholders is essential to develop guidelines on effective message content to complement the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rema Panickar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Zoriah Aziz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Faculty of Pharmacy, MAHSA University, Bandar Saujana Putra, Malaysia.
| | - Noraisyah Mohd Sani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Srivastava T, Head KJ, O'Dell SM, Feemster KA, Panozzo CA, Zimet GD, Kornides ML. Characterizing U.S. mothers with high human papillomavirus vaccine intent yet unvaccinated adolescents. Prev Med 2023; 169:107472. [PMID: 36854366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal in the United States. While the current literature focuses on expressly hesitant parents, few studies have examined parents with "high intent", or those indicating they definitely will vaccinate and have had the opportunity but not yet vaccinated their adolescents. Our objective was to differentiate characteristics of mothers with high intent from those who already vaccinated their adolescents using various socioeconomic, previous vaccine decision-making, and healthcare provider relationship-related variables. English-speaking mothers or female guardians of adolescents ages 11-14 years living in low HPV vaccine uptake states within the U.S. in September 2018 were recruited from a national survey panel as part of a larger study. We assessed HPV vaccine status of their adolescents and categorized respondents into two categories: Already Vaccinated and High Intent. We assessed differences using a multivariable logistic regression model. Among 2406 mothers, 18% reported high intent vs. 82% already having vaccinated. Mothers with high intent were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic White (p = 0.01), to have a younger adolescent (p < 0.001), and to report not receiving a provider HPV vaccination recommendation (p < 0.001). Mothers who estimated that half/more (vs. less) of their child's friends have received/will receive the vaccine had higher odds of already vaccinating (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest that clinicians may be able to improve HPV vaccination uptake within their practices by giving repeated, high-quality recommendations to parents of children who are not yet vaccinated. Additionally, these findings indicate perceived social norms may play a large role in on-time vaccine uptake. Reassuring hesitant parents that most parents accept the vaccine may also improve uptake in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuhina Srivastava
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Cavanaugh Hall 307C, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Kristen A Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | | | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10(th) Street, HS 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Melanie L Kornides
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Leonard David Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Choi J, Tamí-Maury I, Cuccaro P, Kim S, Markham C. Digital Health Interventions to Improve Adolescent HPV Vaccination: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020249. [PMID: 36851127 PMCID: PMC9963303 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital technologies are being increasingly utilized in healthcare to provide pertinent and timely information for primary prevention, such as vaccination. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to describe and assess current digital health interventions to promote HPV vaccination among adolescents and parents of adolescents, and to recommend directions for future interventions of this kind. Using appropriate medical subject headings and keywords, we searched multiple databases to identify relevant studies published in English between 1 January 2017 and 31 July 2022. We screened and selected eligible studies for inclusion in the final analysis. We reviewed a total of 24 studies, which included interventions using text messages (4), mobile apps (4), social media and websites (8), digital games (4), and videos (4). The interventions generally improved determinants of HPV vaccination, such as HPV-related knowledge, vaccine-related conversations, and vaccination intentions. In particular, text message and social media interventions targeted improved vaccine uptake behaviors, but little meaningful change was observed. In conclusion, digital health interventions can cost-effectively provide education about HPV vaccination, offer interactive environments to alleviate parental vaccine hesitancy, and ultimately help adolescents engage in HPV vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Choi
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Irene Tamí-Maury
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Paula Cuccaro
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sooyoun Kim
- Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Christine Markham
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Staras SAS, Bylund CL, Mullis MD, Thompson LA, Hall JM, Hansen MD, Fisher CL. Messaging preferences among Florida caregivers participating in focus groups who had not yet accepted the HPV vaccine for their 11- to 12-year-old child. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2413. [PMID: 36550434 PMCID: PMC9779937 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14852-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates remain low. The President's Cancer Panel suggests that effective messaging about the HPV vaccination focus on the vaccine's safety, efficacy, ability to prevent cancer, and recommendation at ages 11- to 12-years. We aimed to develop messages about HPV vaccine that include the President Cancer Panel's suggestions and were acceptable to caregivers of adolescents. METHODS From August to October 2020, we conducted one-hour, Zoom videoconference focus groups with caregivers who lived in Florida, had an 11- to 12-year-old child, and had not had any of their children receive the HPV vaccine. Focus group moderators asked caregivers to react to three videos of clinician (i.e., MD, DO, APRN, PA) recommendations and three text message reminders. Thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method and led by one author with qualitative analysis expertise. Two additional authors validated findings. RESULTS Caregivers (n = 25 in six groups) were primarily non-Hispanic white (84%) and educated (64% had at least an Associate's degree). Approximately a third of caregivers had delayed (44%) or decided against a vaccine for their child (36%). Caregivers described six preferred message approaches: recognize caregivers' autonomy, balanced benefits and risks, trustworthy sources, increased feasibility of appointment scheduling, information prior to decision point, and preferred personalized information. Caregivers expressed a desire to have the follow-up doses mentioned in the introduction. CONCLUSIONS HPV vaccine messages, whether delivered by a clinician or via text message, will be more acceptable to caregivers if they approach HPV vaccination as the caregivers' decision, and include information from trusted sources to help caregivers make an informed choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A. S. Staras
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA ,grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Carma L. Bylund
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Michaela D. Mullis
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2096 Weimer Hall 1885 Stadium Rd, PO BOX 118400, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| | - Lindsay A. Thompson
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA ,grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA ,grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Jaclyn M. Hall
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA ,grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Marta D. Hansen
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Road, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
| | - Carla L. Fisher
- grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, 2096 Weimer Hall 1885 Stadium Rd, PO BOX 118400, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Browne S, Feemster KA. Human papillomavirus: optimizing opportunities for prevention. Curr Opin Pediatr 2022; 34:132-139. [PMID: 35152231 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide and is a precursor to anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. Effective prevention is available through HPV vaccination and emerging evidence demonstrates the potential to significantly impact HPV-associated disease through reductions in the incidence of genital warts, precancerous cervical lesions, and cervical cancer. Indications have also recently expanded to include the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer, an outcome that has been increasing in incidence for men and women. Yet despite demonstrated effectiveness, the potential for broader impact and well-established routine recommendations for administration to adolescents, barriers to vaccine uptake persist. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on HPV prevention in the US, including trends in disease burden, HPV vaccine effectiveness, evolving vaccine recommendations and opportunities and barriers to their implementation. RECENT FINDINGS Several studies have demonstrated that HPV vaccination has the potential to prevent most HPV-attributable cancers. Ongoing research addresses questions related to duration of protection, effectiveness in vulnerable populations, vaccine schedules and strategies to improve access and optimize uptake. SUMMARY To ensure continued impact on the prevention of HPV-associated disease and subsequent cancer, it is crucial to address gaps in vaccine uptake. A strong recommendation for all persons for whom HPV vaccines are indicated, alongside initiatives to increase awareness of HPV vaccination and address specific concerns, can improve uptake among hesitant populations. Globally, efforts to bolster immunization programs are needed to broaden access to HPV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safa Browne
- Vaccine Education Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
| | - Kristen A Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Global Medical and Scientific Affairs, Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vanderpool RC, Gaysynsky A, Chou WYS, Tonorezos ES. Using Behavioral Science to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Cancer Survivors: Communication Strategies and Research Opportunities. J Behav Med 2022; 46:366-376. [PMID: 35305205 PMCID: PMC8933612 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-022-00304-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Due to cancer survivors’ increased vulnerability to complications from COVID-19, addressing vaccine hesitancy and improving vaccine uptake among this population is a public health priority. However, several factors may complicate efforts to increase vaccine confidence in this population, including the underrepresentation of cancer patients in COVID-19 vaccine trials and distinct recommendations for vaccine administration and timing for certain subgroups of survivors. Evidence suggests vaccine communication efforts targeting survivors could benefit from strategies that consider factors such as social norms, risk perceptions, and trust. However, additional behavioral research is needed to help the clinical and public health community better understand, and more effectively respond to, drivers of vaccine hesitancy among survivors and ensure optimal protection against COVID-19 for this at-risk population. Knowledge generated by this research could also have an impact beyond the current COVID-19 pandemic by informing future vaccination efforts and communication with cancer survivors more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin C Vanderpool
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 20850, Rockville, MD, USA.
| | - Anna Gaysynsky
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 20850, Rockville, MD, USA.,ICF Next, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
- Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 20850, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Emily S Tonorezos
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reñosa MDC, Landicho J, Wachinger J, Dalglish SL, Bärnighausen K, Bärnighausen T, McMahon SA. Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-006237. [PMID: 34593513 PMCID: PMC8487203 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccine hesitancy (VH) and the global decline of vaccine coverage are a major global health threat, and novel approaches for increasing vaccine confidence and uptake are urgently needed. ‘Nudging’, defined as altering the environmental context in which a decision is made or a certain behaviour is enacted, has shown promising results in several health promotion strategies. We present a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the value and impact of nudges to address VH. Methods We conducted a systematic review to determine if nudging can mitigate VH and improve vaccine uptake. Our search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH terms to identify articles related to nudging and vaccination in nine research databases. 15 177 titles were extracted and assessed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The final list of included articles was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Findings Identified interventions are presented according to a framework for behaviour change, MINDSPACE. Articles (n=48) from 10 primarily high-income countries were included in the review. Nudging-based interventions identified include using reminders and recall, changing the way information is framed and delivered to an intended audience, changing the messenger delivering information, invoking social norms and emotional affect (eg, through storytelling, dramatic narratives and graphical presentations), and offering incentives or changing defaults. The most promising evidence exists for nudges that offer incentives to parents and healthcare workers, that make information more salient or that use trusted messengers to deliver information. The effectiveness of nudging interventions and the direction of the effect varies substantially by context. Evidence for some approaches is mixed, highlighting a need for further research, including how successful interventions can be adapted across settings. Conclusion Nudging-based interventions show potential to increase vaccine confidence and uptake, but further evidence is needed for the development of clear recommendations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic increases the urgency of undertaking nudging-focused research. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020185817.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Donald C Reñosa
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines
| | - Jeniffer Landicho
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines
| | - Jonas Wachinger
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah L Dalglish
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
- International Health Department, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kate Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg-Braamfontein, South Africa
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shannon A McMahon
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- International Health Department, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yih WK, Kulldorff M, Dashevsky I, Maro JC. A Broad Safety Assessment of the 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190:1253-1259. [PMID: 33558897 PMCID: PMC8245868 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Parents indicate that safety is their top concern about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. A data-mining method not requiring prespecification of health outcome(s) or postexposure period(s) of potentially increased risk can be used to identify possible associations between an exposure and any of thousands of medically attended health outcomes; this method was applied to data on the 9-valent HPV vaccine (HPV9) to detect potential safety problems. Data on 9- to 26-year-olds who had received HPV9 vaccine between November 4, 2016, and August 5, 2018, inclusive, were extracted from the MarketScan database and analyzed for statistically significant clustering of incident diagnoses within the hierarchy of diagnoses coded using the International Classification of Diseases and temporally within the 1 year after vaccination, using the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic and TreeScan software. Only 56 days of postvaccination enrollment was required; subsequent follow-up was censored at disenrollment. Multiple testing was adjusted for. The analysis included 493,089 doses of HPV9. Almost all signals resulted from temporal confounding, not unexpected with a 1-year follow-up period. The only plausible signals were for nonspecific adverse events (e.g., injection-site reactions, headache) on days 1–2 after vaccination, with attributable risks as low as 1 per 100,000 vaccinees. Considering the broad scope of the evaluation and the high statistical power, the findings of no specific serious adverse events should provide reassurance about this vaccine’s safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Katherine Yih
- Correspondence to Dr. W. Katherine Yih, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walker KK, Head KJ, Owens H, Zimet GD. A qualitative study exploring the relationship between mothers' vaccine hesitancy and health beliefs with COVID-19 vaccination intention and prevention during the early pandemic months. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:3355-3364. [PMID: 34187310 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1942713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccine hesitancy is a top ten global health threat that can negatively impact COVID-19 vaccine uptake. It is assumed that vaccine refusers hold deep, negative beliefs, while acceptors hold strong, positive beliefs. However, vaccine hesitancy exists along a continuum and is multidimensional, varying by time, place, vaccine, subgroup, and person. Guided by the Health Belief Model and vaccine hesitancy frameworks, the study purpose was to qualitatively explore maternal COVID-19 threat perceptions and willingness to accept a COVID-19 vaccine in light of their expressed vaccine hesitancy toward past school required and routinely recommended vaccines and the HPV vaccine for their children. Researchers conducted twenty-five interviews with US Midwestern mothers during the early COVID-19 pandemic months. Mothers were grouped by vaccine hesitancy categories and thematic analysis was used to analyze the data within and across categories. Results showed that prior vaccine hesitancy attitudes and behavior did not fully capture maternal acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine or perception of COVID-19 threat. Perceptions of COVID-19 threat did influence mothers' decisions about COVID-19 protective behaviors (e.g., handwashing, mask wearing, and distancing). However, mothers were hesitant to accept the COVID-19 vaccine across vaccine hesitancy categories, primarily citing concerns about safety, efficacy, and confusion over conflicting information as barriers to immediate COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Findings indicate that mothers cannot be grouped together based on hesitancy about, or acceptance of, other vaccines for purposes of assuming COVID-19 preventive behavior adherence or anticipated COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K Walker
- Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Department of Communication Studies, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Heather Owens
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Feemster KA, Head KJ, Panozzo CA, O'Dell SM, Zimet GD, Kornides ML. Efficacy of tailored messages to improve behavioral intent to accept HPV vaccination among mothers may be moderated by sociodemographics. Prev Med Rep 2021; 23:101413. [PMID: 34150474 PMCID: PMC8192722 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of a tailored video intervention differed by sociodemographics. Further research should evaluate interventions tailored by sociodemographics. Tailoring interventions by child age and other factors may improve efficacy.
We assessed differences in response to a tailored recommendation intervention for HPV vaccine by participants’ sociodemographic characteristics in this exploratory sub-analysis of a larger web-based, randomized-controlled trial on tailored messaging among mothers with low intent to vaccinate their 11–14-year-old child against HPV. The intervention consisted of pre-recorded video messages tailored to 1–5 common concerns about HPV vaccine. In these exploratory analyses, we used generalized linear models to assess differences in post-intervention intent across intervention arms, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics among 496 trial participants. We found significantly higher post-intervention intent in the intervention participants versus the control group among mothers: 1) with younger children; 2) with white vs. black children; 3) with Non-Hispanic children; 4) who were younger; 5) with some college or vocational training; with household incomes of ≥$100,000; and 7) with 1–2 children. Our findings of effect modification by certain sociodemographic factors such as age, race/ethnicity, and household income should be considered when designing similar tailored messaging interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen A Feemster
- Vaccine Education Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katharine J Head
- Indiana University School of Liberal Arts, Department of Communication Studies, Cavanaugh Hall 307C, 425 University Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | | - Sean M O'Dell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, PA 17822, USA
| | - Gregory D Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 West 10 Street Suite 1001, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Melanie L Kornides
- Department of Family & Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, 418 Curie Boulevard, Office 401, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pires C. What Is the State-of-the-Art in Clinical Trials on Vaccine Hesitancy 2015-2020? Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:348. [PMID: 33916427 PMCID: PMC8065658 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9040348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy is related to a delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination. AIM to perform a systematic review of clinical trials on vaccine hesitancy (2015-2020). METHODS a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria (PRISMA). Five databases were screened-PubMed, Cochrane Library, DOAJ, SciELO and b-on-which comprise multiple resources. KEYWORDS "Vaccine hesitancy" and ("randomized controlled trial" or "clinical trial"). INCLUSION CRITERIA trials about "vaccine hesitancy" enrolling patients and/or health professionals (2015-2020). EXCLUSION CRITERIA studies about other topics, repeated and qualitative studies, reviews and papers written in languages other than English, Portuguese, French or Spanish. RESULTS a total of 35 trials out of 90 were selected (19 PubMed, 14 Cochrane Library, 0 DOAJ, 0 SciELO and 2 b-on). Selected trials were classified into five topics: children/pediatric (n = 5); online or electronic information (n = 5); vaccination against a specific disease (n = 15) (e.g., influenza or COVID-2019); miscellaneous (n = 4); and educational strategies (n = 6). CONCLUSION the provision of online or electronic information (e.g., through virtual reality, social websites of experts, or apps), communication-based interventions and training of health professionals, residents or subjects seemed to improve vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Pires
- Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias-Escola de Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, Campo Grande 376, 1740-024 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Walker KK, Owens H, Zimet G. "We fear the unknown": Emergence, route and transfer of hesitancy and misinformation among HPV vaccine accepting mothers. Prev Med Rep 2020; 20:101240. [PMID: 33294312 PMCID: PMC7689543 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Revised: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Although licensed since 2006, US HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal. Since mothers are decision-makers for young adults' vaccination, assessing ongoing knowledge deficits and misunderstanding among parents is important for determining the content and mode of interventions to reach parents. Guided by the social-ecological model and health belief model, 30 interviews with vaccine accepting mothers in the U.S. Midwest were conducted from January through June 2020. Researchers examined ecological determinants of acceptance, perceptions of vaccination barriers, and perceived cues to action for empowering other mothers to vaccinate their children. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results found vaccine accepting mothers exhibited ongoing misconceptions and negative attitudes toward HPV vaccine. Physicians, peers and the media were identified as primary pro-HPV vaccine sources, yet hesitancy and misinformation occurred with each source. Trust in provider recommendation was the primary source for decision-making, yet trust was still lacking. While mothers looked to the media for HPV information, the media were identified as the main source of confusion and distrust. Results show that parents who accept the HPV vaccine can still be hesitant. Thus, mothers who have vaccinated their children for HPV may still need attitudinal and educational training prior to establishing them as role models in interventions for empowering other parents to vaccinate their children. Results showing that the media sow confusion and hesitancy also call for more attention to social media policies to guard against misinformation about the HPV vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K Walker
- Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Heather Owens
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Gregory Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Walker KK, Owens H, Zimet G. The role of the media on maternal confidence in provider HPV recommendation. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1765. [PMID: 33228674 PMCID: PMC7684709 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09877-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite a growing understanding of the importance of provider HPV recommendation on parental acceptance, U.S. HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal. Given the prevalence and use of the media for health decisions, this study examined the relationship between the media and provider HPV recommendation on maternal HPV vaccine hesitancy. Methods Thirty individual interviews with HPV vaccine-accepting mothers in the Midwest U.S. were conducted to examine their feelings of hesitancy around the decision to accept HPV vaccination at the time of provider recommendation and their suggestions for improving the recommendation experience by addressing media concerns. Results Media exposure was an antecedent to hesitancy for three main vaccination concerns: safety, protection/efficacy and sexual stigma. Although mothers accepted vaccination, they continued to feel confused and hesitant about HPV vaccination. They had several recommendations for how providers could combat hesitancy to improve confidence in HPV vaccine acceptance. Conclusions Providers’ approach to HPV vaccination recommendation must consider concerns reported in the media with delivery techniques modified to adjust to maternal fears absorbed from adverse media information. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-020-09877-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly K Walker
- Zimmerman School of Advertising and Mass Communications, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Avenue, CIS1040, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
| | - Heather Owens
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Gregory Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Petrusek J, Thorpe E, Britt CJ. HPV vaccination practices and attitudes among primary care physicians since FDA approval to age 45. Am J Otolaryngol 2020; 41:102685. [PMID: 32866846 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine HPV vaccine administration practices since FDA approval to age 45 and assess knowledge regarding HPV and its association with oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS A survey was distributed to 86 primary care physicians at Loyola University Medical Center. The survey contained 11 questions designed to capture HPV vaccination practices, knowledge of FDA approval, and barriers to vaccination. RESULTS 46 (53%) physicians completed the survey and 45 responses were included. Among respondents who treat males ages 9-21 and females ages 9-26, the vaccination is widely recommended with >95% always or almost always recommending the vaccination. Among those treating males >21, and females >26, 52% and 35% of physicians recommend vaccination to these cohorts, respectively. Only 17% and 26% of respondents would recommend the vaccine to men and women respectively up to age 45. 100% of respondents recognize an association between HPV and cervical cancer, and 90% of respondents recognize HPV's association with oropharyngeal cancer. However, respondents also associate HPV with oral cavity and laryngeal cancer. 28% of respondents said parents are barriers to vaccination, while 7% said that insurance is a barrier. CONCLUSIONS HPV vaccination is widely recommended by physicians at our institution; however, for men older than 21 and women older than 26, vaccination recommendation rates decrease, and relatively few physicians would offer the vaccination up to age 45. Primary care physicians at our institution recognize HPV's close association to oropharyngeal cancer. Barriers to vaccination are primarily negative perception of the vaccine by patients and parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Petrusek
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, United States of America.
| | - Eric Thorpe
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, United States of America
| | - Christopher J Britt
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rauh LD, Lathan HS, Masiello MM, Ratzan SC, Parker RM. A Select Bibliography of Actions to Promote Vaccine Literacy: A Resource for Health Communication. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:843-858. [PMID: 33719890 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1878312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In this bibliography, the researchers provide an introduction to the available evidence base of actions to promote vaccine literacy. The research team organized interventions to create a tool that can inform health communicators and practitioners seeking a resource focused on strategy and implementation design for actions that support vaccine literacy. This scoping bibliography is honed specifically to respond to the urgency of the current pandemic, when supporting and increasing vaccine literacy offers promise for achieving the critically needed high levels of vaccination. Over the course of the coming months and year, this bibliography will be a dynamic and "living" document hosted and maintained on vaccineliteracy.com.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D Rauh
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah S Lathan
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Scott C Ratzan
- Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, City University of New York Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth M Parker
- Division of General Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|