Definition and assessment of high risk in patients considered for lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert panel consensus document

Development and validation of the systemic nutrition/inflammation index for improving perioperative management of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Systemic nutrition and inflammation status is recognized for its influence on cancer survival, yet its role in perioperative outcomes remains poorly defined. This study aimed to refine the assessment of systemic nutrition and inflammation status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to elucidate its impact on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

All patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, with their nutrition and inflammation status assessed based on preoperative blood tests. The development cohort, comprising 1497 NSCLC patients from two centers, evaluated the predictive value of systemic nutrition/inflammation indicators for perioperative endpoints and formulated the systemic nutrition-inflammation index (SNII). The tertiles of SNII were used to classify the nutrition/inflammation risk as high (< 15.6), moderate (15.6-23.1), and low (> 23.1). An external validation cohort of 505 NSCLC patients was utilized to confirm the effectiveness of SNII in guiding perioperative management.

RESULTS

In the development cohort, the SNII tool, calculated as the product of total cholesterol and total lymphocytes divided by total monocytes, demonstrated a stronger correlation with perioperative outcomes compared to 11 existing nutrition/inflammation indicators. A low SNII score, indicative of high nutrition/inflammation risk, was independently predictive of increased complication incidence and severity, as well as prolonged chest tube duration and hospital stay. These findings were corroborated in the validation cohort. Upon combining the development and validation cohorts, the superiority of the SNII in predicting perioperative outcomes was further confirmed over the existing nutrition/inflammation indicators. Additionally, comprehensive subgroup analyses revealed the moderately variable efficacy of SNII across different patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study developed and validated the SNII as a tool for identifying systemic nutrition and inflammation risk, which can enhance perioperative managements in NSCLC patients. Patients identified with high risk may benefit from prehabilitation and intensive treatments, highlighting the need for further research.

Comparing survival outcomes of localized tumor destruction, sublobar resection, and pulmonary lobectomy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a study from the SEER database

PURPOSE

A large-scale comparative analysis was performed with the aim of comparing local tumor destruction (LTD), sublobar resection (SR), and pulmonary lobectomy (PL) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000-2021), we included patients with pathologically confirmed stage IA non-small cell lung cancer who were treated with LTD, SR, or PL. Comparison between groups was performed separately after 1:1 proportional propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper value of 0.1. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

In the total cohort of 4437 LTD patients, 2425 SR patients, and 6386 PL patients, 84.18% of LTD-treated patients were older than 65 years, whereas 68.95% of SR-treated patients and 62.82% of PL-treated patients were older than 65 years. The CSS (HR = 0.756, 95% CI 0.398 ~ 1.436, P = 0.393) and OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.553 ~ 1.295, P = 0.442) of LTD were consistent with SR. Whereas LTD demonstrated lower CSS (HR = 0.603, 95% CI 0.378 ~ 0.940, P = 0.024) and OS (HR = 0.590, 95% CI 0.432 ~ 0.805, P < 0.001) than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm. The CSS (HR = 1.215, 95% CI 0.872 ~ 1.693, P = 0.249) of SR was consistent with PL, but OS (HR = 1.347, 95% CI 1.079 ~ 1.681, P = 0.008) was higher than PL, but were consistent when the tumor size was 1.1-3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of SR. Compared with PL, the CSS and OS of LTD were lower, but when the tumor size was ≤ 1 cm, the CSS and OS of LTD were no worse than those of PL.

Comparison of Wedge Resection and Anatomical Lung Resection in Elderly Patients With Early-Stage Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

As the global population ages, the prevalence of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among octogenarians is rising. This demographic frequently presents with comorbid conditions, diminished cardiopulmonary function, and increased frailty, which elevate the risks associated with standard treatments. While lobectomy combined with lymph node dissection is still considered the gold standard for managing NSCLC, octogenarians are at significantly higher risk of perioperative mortality. Although wedge resection has been suggested as a less invasive option, previous research has insufficiently explored the influence of visceral pleural invasion (VPI) on postoperative outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate whether wedge resection can provide survival outcomes equivalent to those of anatomical resection in this high-risk population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using SEER data from 2010 to 2019, focusing on octogenarians diagnosed with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox multivariate regression were employed to evaluate and compare the outcomes associated with two different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

We identified 523 octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI, from a cohort of 1587 patients. In this study cohort, 372 (71.1%) patients received anatomical resection, while 151 (28.9%) patients underwent wedge resection. Following multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in lung cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.57-1.73) or overall survival (OS; HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.68-1.53) observed between the two surgical groups. Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the choice of surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for either CSS (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.62-2.69) or OS (HR 1.50, 95% CI: 0.68-1.62).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that wedge resection is a viable surgical option for octogenarians with stage I NSCLC and VPI. Notably, the addition of lymph node dissection to wedge resection significantly enhances survival outcomes compared to wedge resection performed without lymph node dissection.

The Association of Modified 5-Item Frailty Index on Perioperative Cochlear Implant Speech Perception

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the potential association of perioperative hearing outcomes with frailty by Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5).

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Single-institutional study conducted at a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and January 2022.

PATIENTS

All adult patients older than 50 years who underwent cochlear implantation (CI).

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Hearing outcomes were measured using pre-CI and longitudinal post-CI quiet AzBio scores. Frailty was determined by mFI-5 scores (0 = not frail, 1 = prefrail, and 2+ = frail). Univariable and multivariable linear regressions, ordinal logistic regressions, and time-to-event curves were used to determine perioperative speech perception and likelihood of high-performance hearing (defined as ≥70% on AzBio).

RESULTS

Of the 126 patients, the median age was 70 (63-77) years, 50% (63) were female, and 39% (49) identified as non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, or other. By mFI-5 scoring, 38% (48) had no frailty, with 34% (43) and 28% (35) scoring 1 and 2+, respectively. When adjusting for age, sex, race, and BMI, scoring 1 point on mFI-5 was associated with significantly lower pre-implantation and post-implantation AzBio scores (pre: = -15 [-26, -3.4], p < 0.05; post: = -14 [-25, -3.0], p < 0.05). When controlling for all covariates, prefrailty and frailty were associated with significantly decreased likelihood of high-performance hearing (prefrailty OR: 0.22 [0.07, 0.63], p < 0.01; frailty OR: 0.31 [0.10, 0.92], p < 0.05). Time-to-event curves demonstrate significantly reduced likelihood of reaching high-performance hearing within 7 months after CI in patients with mFI-5 scores >0 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that prefrailty is associated with worse pre-CI and post-CI hearing and lower likelihood of high-performance hearing within 7 months post-CI. Preoperative frailty screening in adult CI candidates may better inform providers of patients' long-term risk-to-benefit.

Systematic Review of the Comparative Studies of Image-Guided Thermal Ablation, Stereotactic Radiosurgery, and Sublobar Resection for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Document

The Clinical Practice Standards Committee of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery assembled an expert panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature detailing studies directly comparing treatment options for high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A systematic search was performed to identify publications comparing outcomes following image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA), stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR; also called stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT] and stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS]), and sublobar resection-the main treatment options applicable to high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. There were no publications detailing completed randomized controlled trials comparing these treatment options. Several retrospective studies with comparisons were identified, some of which used large, population-based registries. The findings of several of these studies are summarized in this Expert Review article. Registry studies comparing IGTA with SABR in propensity-score matched patients with stage I NSCLC found no difference in overall survival. The use of thermal ablation was less frequent and had wider variation depending on geographic region as compared with SABR, however. Studies yielding high-quality data comparing SABR with sublobar resection have been limited. When comparing sublobar resection with IGTA, sublobar resection was associated with superior primary tumor control and overall survival in the retrospective cohort studies. Retrospective comparative studies are difficult to assess due to the inherent biases or treatment selection and the definitions of loco-regional control. Prospective randomized trials are needed to fully evaluate the outcomes of treatment options applicable to high-risk patients with early-stage lung cancer.

Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Document

OBJECTIVES

A significant proportion of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered at high risk for complications or mortality after lobectomy. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) previously published important considerations in determining which patients are considered high risk. The current objective was to evaluate treatment options and important factors to consider during treatment selection for these high-risk patients.

METHODS

The AATS Clinical Practice Standards Committee assembled an expert panel to review treatment options for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. After a systematic search of the literature identification of lung-nodule-related factors to consider in treatment selection, the panel developed expert consensus statements and vignettes using a modified Delphi method. A 75% consensus was required for approval.

RESULTS

The expert panel identified sublobar resection, image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA), and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), which is also known as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as modalities applicable in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. Fourteen statements and 5 vignettes illustrating clinical scenarios were formulated, revised, and ultimately approved.

CONCLUSION

The choice of which modality (sublobar resection, SABR, or IGTA) is optimal in high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is complex, but a surgical approach is generally favored when deemed safe. SABR and IGTA are reasonable options in select patients, with SABR being the likely next choice in nonsurgical patients. If possible, obtaining a biopsy is very important prior non-surgical treatment. A multi-disciplinary review of patient and tumor characteristics is essential for achieving an optimal decision. The clinical treatment decision should also take patient perspectives, preferences, and quality of life into consideration.

Treatment Selection for the High-Risk Patient with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Sublobar Resection, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy or Image-Guided Thermal Ablation? The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus Document

A significant proportion of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are considered at high risk for complications or mortality after lobectomy. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) previously published an expert consensus document detailing important considerations in determining who is at high risk. The current objective was to evaluate treatment options and important factors to consider during treatment selection for these high-risk patients. After systematic review of the literature, treatment options for high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC were reviewed by an AATS expert panel. Expert consensus statements and vignettes pertaining to treatment selection were then developed using discussion and a modified Delphi method. The expert panel identified sublobar resection, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), and image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) as modalities applicable in the treatment of high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. The panel also identified lung-nodule-related factors that are important to consider in treatment selection. Using this information, the panel formulated 14 consensus statements and 5 vignettes illustrating clinical scenarios. This article summarizes important factors to consider in treatment selection using these modalities, which are applicable in high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC. The choice of which modality (sublobar resection, SABR, or IGTA) is optimal in high-risk patients with stage I NSCLC is complex, but a surgical approach is generally favored when deemed safe. SABR and IGTA are reasonable options in select patients. SABR is more commonly used than IGTA and is likely the next-best choice. A multi-disciplinary review of patient and tumor characteristics is essential for achieving an optimal decision. The clinical treatment decision should also take patient perspectives, preferences, and quality of life into consideration.

A New Functional Threshold for Minimally Invasive Lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the performance of a lower predicted postoperative (ppo) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ) or diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO) threshold to predict cardiopulmonary complications after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) lobectomy.

BACKGROUND

Although MIS is associated with better postoperative outcomes than open surgery, MIS uses risk-assessment algorithms developed for open surgery. Moreover, several different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications are used for assessment.

METHODS

All patients who underwent MIS lobectomy for clinical stage I to II lung cancer from 2018 to 2022 at our institution were considered. The performance of a ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was compared against that of the current guideline threshold of <60%. Three different definitions of cardiopulmonary complications were compared: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS), and Berry and colleagues' study.

RESULTS

In 946 patients, the ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% was associated with a higher proportion correctly classified [79% (95% CI, 76%-81%) vs 65% (95% CI, 62%-68%); P <0.001]. The complication with the biggest difference in incidence between ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO of 45% to 60% and >60% was prolonged air leak [33 (13%) vs 34 (6%); P <0.001]. The predicted probability curves for cardiopulmonary complications were higher for the STS definition than for the ESTS or Berry definitions across ppoFEV 1 and ppoDLCO values.

CONCLUSIONS

The ppoFEV 1 /ppoDLCO threshold of <45% more accurately classified patients for cardiopulmonary complications after MIS lobectomy, emphasizing the need for updated risk-assessment guidelines for MIS lobectomy to optimize additional cardiopulmonary function evaluation.

Leveraging State-of-the-Art AI Algorithms in Personalized Oncology: From Transcriptomics to Treatment

BACKGROUND

Continuous breakthroughs in computational algorithms have positioned AI-based models as some of the most sophisticated technologies in the healthcare system. AI shows dynamic contributions in advancing various medical fields involving data interpretation and monitoring, imaging screening and diagnosis, and treatment response and survival prediction. Despite advances in clinical oncology, more effort must be employed to tailor therapeutic plans based on each patient's unique transcriptomic profile within the precision/personalized oncology frame. Furthermore, the standard analysis method is not compatible with the comprehensive deciphering of significant data streams, thus precluding the prediction of accurate treatment options.

METHODOLOGY

We proposed a novel approach that includes obtaining different tumour tissues and preparing RNA samples for comprehensive transcriptomic interpretation using specifically trained, programmed, and optimized AI-based models for extracting large data volumes, refining, and analyzing them. Next, the transcriptomic results will be scanned against an expansive drug library to predict the response of each target to the tested drugs. The obtained target-drug combination/s will be then validated using in vitro and in vivo experimental models. Finally, the best treatment combination option/s will be introduced to the patient. We also provided a comprehensive review discussing AI models' recent innovations and implementations to aid in molecular diagnosis and treatment planning.

RESULTS

The expected transcriptomic analysis generated by the AI-based algorithms will provide an inclusive genomic profile for each patient, containing statistical and bioinformatics analyses, identification of the dysregulated pathways, detection of the targeted genes, and recognition of molecular biomarkers. Subjecting these results to the prediction and pairing AI-based processes will result in statistical graphs presenting each target's likely response rate to various treatment options. Different in vitro and in vivo investigations will further validate the selection of the target drug/s pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Leveraging AI models will provide more rigorous manipulation of large-scale datasets on specific cancer care paths. Such a strategy would shape treatment according to each patient's demand, thus fortifying the avenue of personalized/precision medicine. Undoubtedly, this will assist in improving the oncology domain and alleviate the burden of clinicians in the coming decade.

Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey

Background

Frailty is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. How thoracic surgeons recognize, measure, and mitigate frailty in their daily clinical practice is unknown. We administered a national survey to determine the current practices of thoracic surgeons managing frail patients.

Methods

A 144-question survey developed in collaboration with the University of Chicago Survey Lab was sent to CTSnet.org members who identified as general thoracic surgeons, practiced in the United States, and had publicly available emails. Responses were collected from August 12 to September 11, 2022. Both fully and partially (at least 20%) completed surveys were included in a descriptive statistical analysis.

Results

After 2796 surveys were administered, 342 surgeons responded. Surgeons were in practice a median of 23 years (range, 1-50 years) at academic (63.4% [187/295]) or community (36.6% [108/295]) centers. Most surgeons believed it important to assess frailty preoperatively (83.9% [287/342]), but only 28% (97/342) of surgeons performed routine frailty assessment. Barriers to routine frailty assessment included lack of tools (80.0% [32/40]), training (59.0% [23/39]), and staffing (56.4% [22/39]). Whereas most surgeons believed that frailty could be mitigated (72.2% [247/342]), only 49.5% (156/315) prescribed prehabilitation. Up to 78.7% (203/263) of surgeons would delay or cancel surgery for patient frailty, depending on disease cause.

Conclusions

Thoracic surgeons recognize that frailty is an established risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality; however, there is high variability in diagnosis and management of frailty. Guidelines are needed to establish best practices for screening and mitigation to optimally treat frail patients.

Factors Associated With Radiological Lung Growth Rate After Lobectomy in Patients With Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study is a retrospective study. This study aims to explore the association between lobectomy in lung cancer patients and subsequent compensatory lung growth (CLG), and to identify factors that may be associated with variations in CLG.

METHODS

207 lung cancer patients who underwent lobectomy at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and December 2020. All patients had stage IA primary lung cancer and were performed by the same surgical team. And computed tomography examinations were performed before and 1 y postoperatively. Based on computed tomography images, the volume of each lung lobe was measured using computer software and manual, the radiological lung weight was calculated. And multiple linear regressions were used to analyze the factors related to the increase in postoperative lung weight.

RESULTS

One year after lobectomy, the radiological lung weight increased by an average of 112.4 ± 20.8%. Smoking history, number of resected lung segments, preoperative low attenuation volume, intraoperative arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio and postoperative visual analog scale scores at 48 h were significantly associated with postoperative radiological lung weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CLG have occurred after lobectomy in adults. In addition, anesthetists should maintain high arterial oxygen partial pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio during one-lung ventilation and improve acute postoperative pain to benefit CLG.

Multimodality Management of Thoracic Tumors: Initial Experience With a Multidisciplinary Thoracic Ablation Conference

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to describe lesion-specific management of thoracic tumors referred for consideration of image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) at a newly established multidisciplinary ablation conference.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center cohort study included consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or thoracic metastases evaluated from June 2020 to January 2022 in a multidisciplinary conference. Outcomes included the management recommendation, treatments received (IGTA, surgical resection, stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT], multimodality management), and number of tumors treated per patient. Pearson's chi-square test was used to assess for a change in management, and Poisson regression was used to compare the number of tumors by treatment received.

RESULTS

The study included 172 patients (58 % female; median age, 69 years; 56 % thoracic metastases; 27 % multifocal primary lung cancer; 59 % ECOG 0 [range, 0-3]) assessed in 206 evaluations. For the patients with NSCLC, IGTA was considered the most appropriate local therapy in 12 %, equal to SBRT in 22 %, and equal to lung resection in 3 % of evaluations. For the patients with thoracic metastases, IGTA was considered the most appropriate local therapy in 22 %, equal to SBRT in 12 %, and equal to lung resection in 3 % of evaluations. Although all patients were referred for consideration of IGTA, less than one third of patients with NSCLC or thoracic metastases underwent IGTA (p < 0.001). Multimodality management allowed for treatment of more tumors per patient than single-modality management (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with thoracic tumors referred for consideration of IGTA significantly changed patient management and facilitated lesion-specific multimodality management.

The association between neighborhood disadvantage and frailty: A retrospective case series

Background

Frailty predicts poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Recent studies have found socioeconomic status to be an important characteristic for surgical outcomes. We evaluated the association of Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), two geospatial atlases that provide a multidimensional evaluation of neighborhood deprivation, with frailty in a surgery population.

Design & methods

A retrospective study of patients undergoing routine frailty screening was conducted 12/2020-8/2022. Frailty was measured using Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and the five-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5). ADI and SVI quartiles were determined using patient residence. Logistic regression models were used to evaluated associations of FFP (frail only vs not frail) and mFI-5 (≥2 vs 0-1) with ADI and SVI (α = 0.05).

Results

Of 372 screened patients, 41% (154) were women, median age was 68% (63-74), and 46% (170) identified as non-White. Across ADI and SVI quartiles, higher number of comorbidities, decreasing median income, and frailty were associated with increasing deprivation (p < 0.01). When controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and BMI category, frailty by FFP was associated with the most deprived two quartiles of ADI (OR 2.61, CI: [1.35-5.03], p < 0.01) and the most deprived quartile of SVI (OR 2.33, [1.10-4.95], p < 0.05). These trends were also seen with mFI-5 scores ≥2 (ADI: OR 1.64, [1.02-2.63], p < 0.05; SVI: OR 1.71, [1.01-2.91], p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical patients living in socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods are more likely to be frail. Interventions may include screening of disadvantaged populations and resource allocation to vulnerable neighborhoods.

Barriers and facilitators to smartwatch-based prehabilitation participation among frail surgery patients: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

For older, frail adults, exercise before surgery through prehabilitation (prehab) may hasten return recovery and reduce postoperative complications. We developed a smartwatch-based prehab program (BeFitMe) for older adults that encourages and tracks at-home exercise. The objective of this study was to assess patient perceptions about facilitators and barriers to prehab generally and to using a smartwatch prehab program among older adult thoracic surgery patients to optimize future program implementation.

METHODS

We recruited patients, aged ≥50 years who had or were having surgery and were screened for frailty (Fried's Frailty Phenotype) at a thoracic surgery clinic at a single academic institution. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone after obtaining informed consent. Participants were given a description of the BeFitMe program. The interview questions were informed by The Five "Rights" of Clinical Decision-Making framework (Information, Person, Time, Channel, and Format) and sought to identify the factors perceived to influence smartwatch prehab program participation. Interview transcripts were transcribed and independently coded to identify themes in for each of the Five "Rights" domains.

RESULTS

A total of 29 interviews were conducted. Participants were 52% men (n = 15), 48% Black (n = 14), and 59% pre-frail (n = 11) or frail (n = 6) with a mean age of 68 ± 9 years. Eleven total themes emerged. Facilitator themes included the importance of providers (right person) clearly explaining the significance of prehab (right information) during the preoperative visit (right time); providing written instructions and exercise prescriptions; and providing a preprogrammed and set-up (right format) Apple Watch (right channel). Barrier themes included pre-existing conditions and disinterest in exercise and/or technology. Participants provided suggestions to overcome the technology barrier, which included individualized training and support on usage and responsibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the perceived facilitators and barriers to a smartwatch-based prehab program for pre-frail and frail thoracic surgery patients. The future BeFitMe implementation protocol must ensure surgical providers emphasize the beneficial impact of participating in prehab before surgery and provide a written prehab prescription; must include a thorough guide on smartwatch use along with the preprogrammed device to be successful. The findings are relevant to other smartwatch-based interventions for older adults.

Resectable non-stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: the surgical perspective

Surgery remains an essential element of the multimodality radical treatment of patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. In addition, thoracic surgery is one of the key specialties involved in the lung cancer tumour board. The importance of the surgeon in the setting of a multidisciplinary panel is ever-increasing in light of the crucial concept of resectability, which is at the base of patient selection for neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments within trials and in real-world practice. This review covers some of the topics which are relevant in the daily practice of a thoracic oncological surgeon and should also be known by the nonsurgical members of the tumour board. It covers the following topics: the pre-operative selection of the surgical candidate in terms of fitness in light of the ever-improving nonsurgical treatment alternatives unfit patients may benefit from; the definition of resectability, which is so important to include patients into trials and to select the most appropriate radical treatment; the impact of surgical access and surgical extension with the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery, sublobar resections and parenchymal-sparing sleeve resections to avoid pneumonectomy.

Analysis of the incidence and influencing factors of abdominal distension in postoperative lung cancer patients in ICU based on real-world data: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Abdominal distension is a relatively common complication in postoperative lung cancer patients, which affects patients' early postoperative recovery to varying degrees. However, the current status of the incidence of abdominal distension in postoperative lung cancer patients and the affecting factors are not well understood. This study aims at exploring the incidence of abdominal distension in postoperative lung cancer patients in ICU based on real-world data and analyzing its influencing factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing patients who underwent lung cancer resections in the Lung Cancer Center of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from April 2020 to April 2021. Nevertheless, patients younger than 18 years and those whose information was limited in medical records were excluded. All data were obtained from the hospital HIS system. In this study, the influencing factors of abdominal distension were analyzed by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

A total of 1317 patients met eligibility criteria, and were divided into the abdominal distended group and the non-distended group according to whether abdominal distension occurred after surgery. Abdominal distension occurred in a total of 182 cases(13.8%). The results of the univariate analysis showed that, compared with the non-distended group, the abdominal distended group had these features as follows: more women (P = 0.021), older (P = 0.000), lower BMI (P = 0.000), longer operation duration (P = 0.031), more patients with open thoracotomy (P = 0.000), more patients with pneumonectomy (p = 0.002), more patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.000), more days of hospitalization on average (P = 0.000), and higher costs of hospitalization on average (P = 0.032). Multifactor logistic regression analysis showed that sex (OR = 0.526; 95% CI = 0.378 ~0.731), age (OR = 1.154; 95%CI = 1.022 ~1.304) and surgical approach (OR = 4.010; 95%CI = 2.781 ~5.781) were independent influencing factors for the occurrence of abdominal distension in patients after lung cancer surgery in ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of abdominal distension was high in postoperative lung cancer patients in ICU, and female, older and patients with open thoracotomy were more likely to experience abdominal distension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number was ChiCTR2200061370).

Association of Preoperative Lung Function with Complications after Lobectomy Using Race-Neutral and Race-Specific Normative Equations

Rationale: Pulmonary function testing (PFT) is performed to aid patient selection before surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The interpretation of PFT data relies on normative equations, which vary by race, but the relative strength of association of lung function using race-specific or race-neutral normative equations with postoperative pulmonary complications is unknown. Objectives: To compare the strength of association of lung function, using race-neutral or race-specific equations, with surgical complications after lobectomy for NSCLC. Methods: We studied 3,311 patients who underwent lobectomy for NSCLC and underwent preoperative PFT from 2001 to 2021. We used Global Lung Function Initiative equations to generate race-specific and race-neutral normative equations to calculate percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1%). The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications within 30 days of surgery. We used unadjusted and race-adjusted logistic regression models and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analyses adjusted for relevant comorbidities to measure the association of race-specific and race-neutral FEV1% with pulmonary complications. Results: Thirty-one percent of patients who underwent surgery experienced pulmonary complications. Higher FEV1, whether measured with race-neutral (odds ratio [OR], 0.98 per 1% change in FEV1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-0.99]; P < 0.001) or race-specific (OR, 0.98 per 1% change in FEV1% [95% CI, 0.98-0.98]; P < 0.001) normative equations, was associated with fewer postoperative pulmonary complications. The area under the receiver operator curve for pulmonary complications was similar for race-adjusted race-neutral (0.60) and race-specific (0.60) models. Using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, higher FEV1% was similarly associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications in race-neutral (OR, 0.99 per 1% [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]) and race-specific (OR, 0.99 per 1%; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) models. The marginal effect of race on pulmonary complications was attenuated in all race-specific models compared with all race-neutral models. Conclusions: The choice of race-specific or race-neutral normative PFT equations does not meaningfully affect the association of lung function with pulmonary complications after lobectomy for NSCLC, but the use of race-neutral equations unmasks additional effects of self-identified race on pulmonary complications.

Comparison of Robotic and Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Marginal Pulmonary Function Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with reduced respiratory function represents a challenge for thoracic surgeons. Minimally invasive surgery seems to be beneficial for these patients because it reduces tissue trauma and its impact on respiratory mechanics. Application of the robotic technique, the use of CO2 insufflation and longer surgical time are factors that could influence the outcomes of marginal pulmonary function patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the robotic technique on the postoperative outcomes of patients with poor lung function.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from consecutive marginal respiratory function patients who underwent robotic or open lobectomy for NSCLC. Data regarding clinical, operative and postoperative details were compared between the open and robotic approaches.

RESULTS

The outcomes of 100 patients with reduced respiratory function were evaluated, of whom 59 underwent open lobectomies and 41 underwent robotic lobectomies. Robotic lobectomy was characterized by a longer operative time, a reduced hospital stay and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (22% vs. 33.9%), when compared to the open approach.

CONCLUSION

Robotic lobectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with marginal pulmonary function.

Racial differences in phenotypic frailty assessment among general thoracic surgery patients

Objectives

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery recommends using frailty assessments to identify patients at higher risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. We evaluated what patient factors are associated with frailty in a thoracic surgery patient population.

Methods

New patients aged more than 50 years who were evaluated in a thoracic surgery clinic underwent routine frailty screening with a modified Fried's Frailty Phenotype. Differences in demographics and comorbid conditions among frailty status groups were assessed with chi-square and Student t tests. Logistic regressions performed with binomial distribution assessed the association of demographic and clinical characteristics with nonfrail, frail, prefrail, and any frailty (prefrail/frail) status.

Results

The study population included 317 patients screened over 19 months. Of patients screened, 198 (62.5%) were frail or prefrail. Frail patients undergoing thoracic surgery were older, were more likely single or never married, had lower median income, and had lower percent predicted diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and forced expiratory volume during 1 second (all P < .05). More non-Hispanic Black patients were frail and prefrail compared with non-Hispanic White patients (P = .003) and were more likely to score at least 1 point on Fried's Frailty Phenotype (adjusted odds ratio, 3.77; P = .02) when controlling for age, sex, number of comorbidities, median income, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, and forced expiratory volume during 1 second. Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to score points for slow gait and low activity (both P < .05).

Conclusions

Non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing thoracic surgery are more likely to score as frail or prefrail than non-Hispanic White patients. This disparity stems from differences in activity and gait speed. Frailty tools should be examined for factors contributing to this disparity, including bias.

Perioperative considerations for patients undergoing surgical stabilization of rib fractures: A narrative review

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become an increasingly common management strategy for traumatic rib fractures. Although historically managed with supportive care, patients with multiple rib fractures and flail chest increasingly undergo SSRF, and so the anesthesiologist must be well-versed in the perioperative management and pain control for these patients, as controlling pain in this population is associated with decreased length of stay and improved outcomes. There are multiple modalities that can be used for both pain control and as part of the anesthetic plan in patients undergoing SSRF. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary of anesthetic considerations for surgical rib fracture patients, covering the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. We describe an approach to the assessment of high-risk patients, analgesic and anesthetic techniques including emerging techniques within locoregional anesthesia, ventilation strategies, and potential complications. This review also identifies areas where additional research is needed to ensure optimal anesthetic management for patients undergoing SSRF.

Clinical Implications of Removing Race-Corrected Pulmonary Function Tests for African American Patients Requiring Surgery for Lung Cancer

Importance

Removal of race correction in pulmonary function tests (PFTs) is a priority, given that race correction inappropriately conflates race, a social construct, with biological differences and falsely assumes worse lung function in African American than White individuals. However, the impact of decorrecting PFTs for African American patients with lung cancer is unknown.

Objectives

To identify how many hospitals providing lung cancer surgery use race correction, examine the association of race correction with predicted lung function, and test the effect of decorrection on surgeons' treatment recommendations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this quality improvement study, hospitals participating in a statewide quality collaborative were contacted to determine use of race correction in PFTs. For hospitals performing race correction, percent predicted preoperative and postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was calculated for African American patients who underwent lung cancer resection between January 1, 2015, and September 31, 2022, using race-corrected and race-neutral equations. US cardiothoracic surgeons were then randomized to receive 1 clinical vignette that differed by the use of Global Lung Function Initiative equations for (1) African American patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 49%), (2) other race or multiracial patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 45%), and (3) race-neutral patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 42%).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Number of hospitals using race correction in PFTs, change in preoperative and postoperative FEV1 estimates based on race-neutral or race-corrected equations, and surgeon treatment recommendations for clinical vignettes.

Results

A total of 515 African American patients (308 [59.8%] female; mean [SD] age, 66.2 [9.4] years) were included in the study. Fifteen of the 16 hospitals (93.8%) performing lung cancer resection for African American patients during the study period reported using race correction, which corresponds to 473 African American patients (91.8%) having race-corrected PFTs. Among these patients, the percent predicted preoperative FEV1 and postoperative FEV1 would have decreased by 9.2% (95% CI, -9.0% to -9.5%; P < .001) and 7.6% (95% CI, -7.3% to -7.9%; P < .001), respectively, if race-neutral equations had been used. A total of 225 surgeons (194 male [87.8%]; mean [SD] time in practice, 19.4 [11.3] years) were successfully randomized and completed the vignette items regarding risk perception and treatment outcomes (76% completion rate). Surgeons randomized to the vignette with African American race-corrected PFTs were more likely to recommend lobectomy (79.2%; 95% CI, 69.8%-88.5%) compared with surgeons randomized to the other race or multiracial-corrected (61.7%; 95% CI, 51.1%-72.3%; P = .02) or race-neutral PFTs (52.8%; 95% CI, 41.2%-64.3%; P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Given the findings of this quality improvement study, surgeons should be aware of changes in PFT testing because removal of race correction PFTs may change surgeons' treatment decisions and potentially worsen existing disparities in receipt of lung cancer surgery among African American patients.

The Role of Sublobar Resection for the Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer killer in the world. The standard of care for surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has been lobectomy. Recent studies have identified that sublobar resection has non-inferior survival rates compared to lobectomy, however. Sublobar resection may increase the number of patients who can tolerate surgery and reduce postoperative pulmonary decline. Sublobar resection appears to have equivalent results to surgery in patients with small, peripheral tumors and no lymph node disease. As the utilization of segmentectomy increases, there may be some centers that perform this operation more than other centers. Care must be taken to ensure that all patients have access to this modality. Future investigations should focus on examining the outcomes from segmentectomy as it is applied more widely. When employed on a broad scale, morbidity and survival rates should be monitored. As segmentectomy is performed more frequently, patients may experience improved postoperative quality of life while maintaining the same oncologic benefit.

Evaluation of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopic biopsy of lung lesions performed by a thoracic surgical service

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of computed tomography scans for lung cancer screening and surveillance of other cancers, thoracic surgeons are being referred patients with lung lesions for biopsies. Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy-guided lung biopsy is a relatively new technique for bronchoscopic biopsy. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic yields and safety of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy-guided lung biopsy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent an electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy biopsy, performed by a thoracic surgical service, and evaluated its safety and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients (men 46, women 64) underwent electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy sampling of pulmonary lesions (n = 121; median size 27 mm; interquartile range 17-37 mm). There was no procedure-related mortality. Pneumothorax requiring pigtail drainage occurred in 4 patients (3.5%). Ninety-three (76.9%) of the lesions were malignant. Eighty-seven (71.9%) of the 121 lesions had an accurate diagnosis. Accuracy increased with increased lesion size (P = .0578) with a yield of 50% for lesions <2 cm, increasing to 81% for lesions ≥2 cm. The lesions that demonstrated a positive "bronchus sign" had a yield of 87% (45/52) compared with 61% (42/69) in lesions with a negative "bronchus sign" (P = .0359).

CONCLUSION

Thoracic surgeons can perform electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy safely, with minimal morbidity and with good diagnostic yields. Accuracy increases with the presence of a bronchus sign and increasing lesion size. Patients with larger tumors and the bronchus sign may be candidates for this approach to biopsy. Further work is required to define the role of electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary lesions.

Systemic inflammation influences the prognosis of patients with radically resected non-small cell lung cancer and correlates with the immunosuppressive microenvironment

The impact of host condition on prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the interaction between host and NSCLC remain unclear. This study investigated the association between systemic inflammation and prognosis and characteristics of radically resected NSCLC. This study consisted of a cohort study and an exploratory study of institutional prospective databases. All participants underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy as the primary treatment. Systemic inflammation was assessed before surgery using the advanced lung cancer inflammation index and the systemic inflammation response index. Next-generation sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence analysis were conducted to delineate tumor characteristics. In the cohort study including 1507 participants, high inflammation was associated with poor disease-free survival and overall survival before and after propensity score matching and in multivariable analysis. Systemic inflammation showed good prognostic value for stage IA-IB NSCLC, and the prognostic value diminished with upstaging of NSCLC. In the exploratory study including 217 adenocarcinomas, tumor microenvironment of high inflammation group showed a greater abundance of PDL1+ tumor cells and immune cells, which were independent from driver gene mutations and clinicopathological characteristics. Spatial analysis demonstrated a higher frequency of immune-suppressed cellular neighborhood, increased avoidance between immune cells and PDL1- tumor cells and compromised immune killing and presentation in tumor microenvironment of high inflammation group. Systemic inflammation showed limited association with genomic mutations. Systemic inflammation may influence the prognosis of NSCLC at both the systematic level and the local immune response. The correlation between high inflammation and immunosuppressive microenvironment indicates a novel thread for anticancer treatment.

The effect of ambient PM2.5 exposure on survival of lung cancer patients after lobectomy

Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) is linked to lung cancer incidence and mortality. However, the impact of PM_2.5 exposure on lung cancer patients after lobectomy, which remains the primary treatment for early-stage lung cancer, is unknown. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between PM_2.5 exposure and the survival of lung cancer patients after lobectomy. This study included 3,327 patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy procedures. We converted residential addresses into coordinates and estimated individual patients' daily PM_2.5 and O₃ exposure levels. A Cox multivariate regression model was used to analyze the specific monthly association between PM_2.5 exposure and lung cancer survival. Every 10 μg/m³ increase in monthly PM_2.5 concentration in the first and second months after lobectomy increased the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.043, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.019-1.067 and HR: 1.036, 95% CI: 1.013-1.060, respectively). Non-smokers, younger patients, and patients with longer hospitalization durations had worse survival rates when exposed to greater concentrations of PM_2.5. High postoperative PM_2.5 exposure immediately after lobectomy reduced the survival of patients with lung cancer. Patients living in areas with high PM_2.5 should be offered the opportunity to transfer to areas with better air quality after undergoing lobectomies, to prolong their survival times.

Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Recent COVID-19 Infection

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 outbreak had a massive impact on lung cancer patients with the rise in the incidence and mortality of lung cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated whether a recent COVID-19 infection affected the outcome of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer using a retrospective observational mono-centric study conducted between January 2020 and August 2022. Postoperative complications and 90-day mortality were reported. We compared lung cancer patients with a recent history of COVID-19 infection prior to thoracoscopic lobectomy to those without recent COVID-19 infection. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-three consecutive lung cancer patients were enrolled. Of these 30 (19%), had a history of recent COVID-19 infection prior to surgery. COVID-19 was not associated with a higher complication rate or 90-day mortality. Patients with recent COVID-19 infection had more frequent pleural adhesions (p = 0.006). There were no differences between groups regarding postoperative complications, conversion, drain removal time, total drainage output, and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 infection did not affect the outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. The treatment of these patients should not be delayed in case of recent COVID-19 infection and should not differ from that of the general population.

Understanding Racial Differences in Lung Cancer Surgery Through a Statewide Quality Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Persistent racial disparities in lung cancer incidence, treatment, and survival are well documented. Given the importance of surgical resection for lung cancer treatment, racial disparities in surgical quality were investigated using a statewide quality collaborative.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from the Michigan Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons General Thoracic database, which includes data gathered for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database at 17 institutions in Michigan. Adult patients undergoing resection for lung cancer between 2015 and 2021 were included. Propensity score-weighting methodology was used to assess differences in surgical quality, including extent of resection, adequate lymph node evaluation, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rate between white and black patients.

RESULTS

The cohort included 5073 patients comprising 357 (7%) black and 4716 (93%) white patients. The black patients had significantly higher unadjusted rates of wedge resection than the white patients, but after propensity score-weighting for clinical factors, wedge resection did not differ from lobectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.49; P = 0.67). The black patients had fewer lymph nodes collected (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; P < 0.0001) and lymph node stations sampled (IRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P < 0.0001). The black patients did not differ from the white patients in terms of mortality (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.19-2.34; P = 0.55) or readmission (OR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.49-1.27; P = 0.32). The black patients had longer hospital stays (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In a statewide quality collaborative that included high-volume centers, black patients received a less extensive lymph node evaluation, with fewer non-anatomic wedge resections performed, and a more limited lymph node evaluation with lobectomy.

Ventilatory efficiency in combination with peak oxygen uptake improves risk stratification in patients undergoing lobectomy

Objective

We aimed to evaluate whether or not using the slope of the increase in minute ventilation in relation to carbon dioxide (VE/VCo₂-slope), with a cutoff value of 35, could improve risk stratification for major pulmonary complications or death following lobectomy in lung cancer patients at moderate risk (Vo_2peak = 10-20 mL/kg/min).

Methods

Single center, retrospective analysis of 146 patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy and preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 2008-2020. The main outcome was any major pulmonary complication or death within 30 days of surgery. Patients were categorized based on their preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing as: low-risk group, peak oxygen uptake >20 mL/kg/min; low-moderate risk, peak oxygen uptake 10 to 20 mL/kg/min and VE/VCo₂-slope <35; and moderate-high risk, peak oxygen uptake 10 to 20 mL/kg/min and VE/VCo₂-slope ≥35. The frequency of complications between groups was compared using χ² test. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio with 95% CI for the main outcome based on the cardiopulmonary exercise testing group.

Results

Overall, 25 patients (17%) experienced a major pulmonary complication or died (2 deaths). The frequency of complications differed between the cardiopulmonary exercise testing groups: 29%, 13%, and 8% in the moderate-high, low-moderate, and low-risk group, respectively (P = .023). Using the low-risk group as reference, the adjusted odds ratio for the low-moderate risk group was 3.44 (95% CI, 0.66-17.90), whereas the odds ratio for the moderate-high risk group was 8.87 (95% CI, 1.86-42.39).

Conclusions

Using the VE/VCo₂-slope with a cutoff value of 35 improved risk stratification for major pulmonary complications following lobectomy in lung cancer patients with moderate risk based on a peak oxygen uptake of 10 to 20 mL/kg/min. This suggests that the VE/VCo₂-slope can be used for preoperative risk evaluation in lung cancer lobectomy.

Artificial intelligence in clinical applications for lung cancer: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science that includes research in robotics, language recognition, image recognition, natural language processing, and expert systems. AI is poised to change medical practice, and oncology is not an exception to this trend. As the matter of fact, lung cancer has the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide. The leading cause is the complexity of associating early pulmonary nodules with neoplastic changes and numerous factors leading to strenuous treatment choice and poor prognosis. AI can effectively enhance the diagnostic efficiency of lung cancer while providing optimal treatment and evaluating prognosis, thereby reducing mortality. This review seeks to provide an overview of AI relevant to all the fields of lung cancer. We define the core concepts of AI and cover the basics of the functioning of natural language processing, image recognition, human-computer interaction and machine learning. We also discuss the most recent breakthroughs in AI technologies and their clinical application regarding diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in lung cancer. Finally, we highlight the future challenges of AI in lung cancer and its impact on medical practice.

Management of Patients With Resectable and Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

For patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as those with metastatic disease, there have been significant recent advances in therapies. In patients with resectable disease, new evidence supports use of neoadjuvant nivolumab + chemotherapy for eligible patients with resectable stage II–IIIA NSCLC. Separate data lead to the recommendation for adjuvant atezolizumab (after adjuvant chemotherapy) for eligible patients with completely resected stage II–IIIA NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥1%. Adjuvant osimertinib (± adjuvant chemotherapy) is an alternative for eligible patients with completely resected stage IB–IIIA NSCLC and EGFR mutations (exon 19 del or L858R). For patients with metastatic NSCLC, molecular testing is recommended for EGFR and BRAF mutations; MET exon skipping 14 alterations; ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 gene arrangements; and KRAS G12C mutations. First-line targeted therapies are available for many of these targets and, in the second-line setting, there are new targeted agents for KRAS G12C mutations and EGFR exon 20 insertions.

Complete Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery for Elderly Patients With NSCLC

Objective:

To observe the efficacy of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (CVATS) and traditional open surgery (TOS) in the treatment of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and their influence on cardiopulmonary function.

Methods

A total of 120 elderly patients with primary NSCLC who were treated surgically in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected and divided into the study group and the control group according to the different surgical procedures, 60 patients in each group. CVATS was used in the observation group and TOS in the control group. The surgical indexes and cardiopulmonary function indexes were observed and compared between the two groups. The serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level and visual analog scale's (VAS) score of the patients at different time points were detected. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared between the two groups.

Results

The perioperative indexes such as operation time were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05), but the number of lymph node dissection was not significantly different (p > 0.05). The serum CRP level and VAS score of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in cardiopulmonary function between the two groups on the 7th postoperative day (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

CVATS is effective in the treatment of NSCLC. Compared with TOS therapy, CVATS has less damage to cardiopulmonary function and fewer complications, which is conducive to the rehabilitation of elderly patients. It is a safe and reliable scheme for the treatment of elderly patients with NSCLC.