The use of real-world evidence for evaluating anti–vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Therapeutic blood-brain barrier modulation and stroke treatment by a bioengineered FZD4-selective WNT surrogate in mice

Derangements of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or blood-retinal barrier (BRB) occur in disorders ranging from stroke, cancer, diabetic retinopathy, and Alzheimer's disease. The Norrin/FZD4/TSPAN12 pathway activates WNT/β-catenin signaling, which is essential for BBB and BRB function. However, systemic pharmacologic FZD4 stimulation is hindered by obligate palmitoylation and insolubility of native WNTs and suboptimal properties of the FZD4-selective ligand Norrin. Here, we develop L6-F4-2, a non-lipidated, FZD4-specific surrogate which significantly improves subpicomolar affinity versus native Norrin. In Norrin knockout (NdpKO) mice, L6-F4-2 not only potently reverses neonatal retinal angiogenesis deficits, but also restores BRB and BBB function. In adult C57Bl/6J mice, post-stroke systemic delivery of L6-F4-2 strongly reduces BBB permeability, infarction, and edema, while improving neurologic score and capillary pericyte coverage. Our findings reveal systemic efficacy of a bioengineered FZD4-selective WNT surrogate during ischemic BBB dysfunction, with potential applicability to adult CNS disorders characterized by an aberrant blood-brain barrier.

Short-Term Outcomes of Intravitreal Faricimab Injection for Diabetic Macular Edema

Background and Objectives: Faricimab is a novel bispecific antibody with Fab regions inhibiting both vascular endothelial growth factor-A and angiopoietin-2. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain short-term outcomes of intravitreal injection of faricimab (IVF) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in daily clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was carried out on consecutive patients with DME who had been treated with IVF and were followed up for at least 1 month. Outcome measures included changes in logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), number of IVF administrations, and safety. Clinical outcomes were also compared between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. Results: A total of 21 consecutive DME eyes from 19 patients were identified. The mean number of IVFs was 1.6 ± 0.8 during the mean follow-up time of 5.5 months. The overall mean logMAR BCVA following IVF was 0.236, 0.204, 0.190, and 0.224 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, without a significant change from baseline to 1 month (p = 0.176) or for 6 months (p = 0.923). The overall mean CRT (μm) following IVF was 400.6, 346.6, 342.1, and 327.5 at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively. CRT significantly decreased from baseline to 1 month (p = 0.001) but did not reach a significant level over 6 months following IVF (p = 0.070). No significant difference in BCVA or CRT was observed between the treatment-naïve and switch groups. No serious safety concerns were noted. Conclusions: IVF for the treatment of DME may preserve visual acuity and improve macular thickness without serious safety concerns in the short term in a real-world clinical setting.

The management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcomes, patient mental health and caregiver burden

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic literature review was to describe patient-reported outcomes, mental health and caregiver burden in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted in Embase and MEDLINE according to pre-defined criteria.

RESULTS

Of 856 records identified, 63 met inclusion criteria. Depression or depressive symptoms were reported in up to 42% of patients with nAMD. Of 25/63 (40%) studies evaluating quality of life (QoL) and using various tools, eight studies reported composite National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire scores following anti-VEGF treatment. Of these, seven reported a statistically significant improvement at the earliest time point measured (Month 3-12) and approximately 50% reported sustained QoL benefits at 12 months. In studies comparing the attributed or different regimens, the most important factor from the patient's perspective was the likelihood that a particular regimen would maintain vision. There was a preference towards treat and extend, which was associated with a perceived reduction in patient and caregiver burden, compared to fixed dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

A coordinated holistic approach to patient care is key to optimizing patient well-being as well as visual outcomes. Further research regarding the patient-reported impact of nAMD management outside the trial setting (particularly international longitudinal studies) is warranted. Standardization of QoL studies would assist in establishing whether sustained QoL improvement, rather than prevention of QoL decline, should be a realistic expectation of treatment of nAMD in the longer term.

Use of Artificial Tears in Patients Undergoing Treatment with Anti-VEGF Intravitreal Injections

Purpose

To analyze the use of artificial tears in patients undergoing treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections.

Methods

Thirty-four eyes undergoing anti-VEGF treatment were analyzed. Each patient underwent a subjective and objective evaluation of the ocular surface, using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ)-5, tear meniscus height (TMH), first and average non-invasive Keratograph Break-Up Time (NIKBUT), bulbar conjunctival redness, meibography and the Vision Break-Up Time (VBUT). Patients attended 5 visits (days 0, 7, 30, 37, and 60). All patients continued with their intravitreal injection treatment during the study (days 0, 30, and 60). Patients did not receive any artificial tear treatment during the first month of the study, and at the baseline visit they were randomly assigned to one of two study groups to receive either the Systane Hydration or the Viscofresh 10mg/mL formulation. Patients were instructed to instill one drop of the assigned study treatment 3 times a day for 30 days during the second month of the study.

Results

According to the Mixed Models for Repeated Measures analysis, there is not enough statistical evidence for any of the parameters examined to determine significant differences between being treated with artificial tears and not being treated (p > 0.05). There is, however, a tendency toward improved outcomes in some parameters when artificial tears were used. OSDI, DEQ-5, TMH, and meibography were not affected by either the type of artificial tear used or by the time (from day 30 to day 60; p > 0.05), but the NIKBUT and VBUT values increased over time during this period regardless of which treatment the patient was receiving.

Conclusion

The use of artificial tears may help to keep the tear film stable Future studies with larger samples should be conducted to elucidate whether the tendency reported in our study becomes significant.

Ethnic differences on long term outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy after predominantly bevacizumab monotherapy

Background

A 3-year single-centre, retrospective, comparative, non-randomized cohort study to describe the long-term outcomes of treatment-naïve, Caucasian and non-Caucasian eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) after treatment with predominantly Bevacizumab monotherapy or in combination with rescue photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Methods

Demographics, visual outcomes, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and treatment data were collected up to 3 years after the first visit. Stratified analysis according to ethnicity and baseline vision was performed to identify factors predictive of long-term visual improvement and maintenance.

Results

A total of 89 eyes with PCV were identified, of which 14 received rescue verteporfin PDT. There was an equal distribution between Caucasian and non-Caucasian individuals. Non-Caucasians present at a younger age (67.3 vs. 76.0 years, p = 0.002), have a higher proportion of foveal involvement (80.9%, vs.54.2% p = 0.007), choroidal hyperpermeability (50% vs 25.8%, p = 0.013) and lower baseline visual acuity (53.1 vs. 63.3 letters, p = 0.008). Mean visual acuity (VA) gain was + 8.9 letters and + 5.0 letters at 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. Non-Caucasian individuals had a lower mean final visual acuity (VA) (54.7 vs. 70.5, respectively; P < 0.001) and net gain in VA (+ 2.0 vs. + 7.6 letters, p = 0.581) compared to Caucasian individuals. The mean total number of injections given over 3 years was 14.

Conclusions

Most patients treated with predominantly Bevacizumab anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy achieved sustained visual acuity gains out to 3 years. Due to ethnic-specific differences in presenting PCV phenotypes, non-Caucasians presented with lower baseline VA and had poorer long-term visual outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02551-3.

Real-world outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration diagnosed on OCT angiography: the REVEAL study

PURPOSE

To compare the 12 months visual and anatomical outcomes of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients diagnosed by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) compared with fluorescein angiography (FA)/indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), after anti-VEGF treatment in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Monocentric, observational, parallel-group study of nAMD patients diagnosed with either FA/ICGA or non-invasive OCT-A methods. Patients were treated with a fixed dosing regimen of intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept and followed up for 12 months. Primary outcomes were the 12 months functional (BCVA) and anatomical (CST reduction) gains between the two groups. The stratification of BCVA and CST gains by type of neovascular lesion and by anti-VEGF treatment was also assessed.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients received FA/ICGA for the initial diagnosis of nAMD, while 73 received OCT-A. Overall, the mean BCVA gain at 12 months was 11.5 ± 9.6 letters. There were no statistically significant differences between the invasive and non-invasive imaging groups in BCVA gain (p = 0.87) or CST reduction (p = 0.76). No statistically significant outcome differences between different lesion types and the two drugs were observed.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, nAMD patients diagnosed with OCT-A showed meaningful improvements in visual and anatomical parameters during 12 months of treatment, without significant differences with those diagnosed by invasive modalities.

Aflibercept in clinical practice; visual acuity, injection numbers and adherence to treatment, for diabetic macular oedema in 21 UK hospitals over 3 years

INTRODUCTION

Randomised controlled trials provide evidence that a treatment works. Real world evidence is required to assess if proven treatments are effective in practice.

METHOD

Retrospective data collection on patients given aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema over 3 years from 21 UK hospitals: visual acuity (VA); Index of multiple deprivation score (IMD); injection numbers; protocols used, compared as a cohort and between sites.

RESULTS

Complete data: 1742 patients (from 2196 eligible) at 1 year, 860 (from 1270) at 2, 305 (from 506) at 3 years. The median VA improved from 65 to 71, 70, 70 (ETDRS letters) at 1, 2 and 3 years with 6, 9 and 12 injections, respectively. Loss to follow-up: 10% 1 year, 28.8% at 3. Centres varied: baseline: mean age 61-71 years (p < 0.0001); mean IMD score 15-37 (p < 0.0001); mean VA 49-68 (p < 0.0001). Only four centres provided a loading course of five injections at monthly intervals and one 6. This did not alter VA outcome at 1 year. Higher IMD was associated with younger age (p = 0.0023) and worse VA at baseline (p < 0.0001) not total number of injections or change in VA. Lower starting VA, higher IMD and older age were associated with lower adherence (p = 0.0010).

CONCLUSIONS

The data showed significant variation between treatment centres for starting age, VA and IMD which influenced adherence and chances of good VA. Once treatment was started IMD did not alter likelihood of improvement. Loading dose intensity did not alter outcome at one year.

OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS RESUMING INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY FOLLOWING TREATMENT DELAY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS-19 PANDEMIC

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of delay in care secondary to the coronavirus pandemic in patients requiring intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed, and subjects were divided into two groups: 1) a study group of patients who experienced a treatment delay of ≥6 weeks from the intended follow-up during the coronavirus pandemic and resumed treatment with ≥2 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections over 6 months following treatment delay, and 2) a control group of patients who received regular care throughout the coronavirus pandemic.

RESULTS

Totally, 234 subjects were analyzed. The mean treatment delay from the intended follow-up in the study group was 11.8 (±4.0) weeks. Visual acuity and central macular thickness worsened from baseline to 6 months after resuming anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in the study group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Visual acuity and central macular thickness were better in the control group compared with the study group at the end of the 6-month study period (P < 0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSION

Treatment delay in subjects undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for retina disease during the coronavirus pandemic had worse visual and anatomical outcomes despite reinitiating treatment over 6 months compared with a control group, suggesting irreversibility and permanence of outcomes.

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A review of findings from the real-world Fight Retinal Blindness! registry

The use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) since the pivotal Phase III studies demonstrated their efficacy more than 10 years ago. The Fight Retinal Blindness! project was developed to track the treatment outcomes of patients with nAMD in real-world practice. Data from this registry have been used to answer several clinically relevant questions related to the treatment of nAMD including the effect of under-treatment, the comparative effectiveness of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, long-term treatment outcomes, identifying optimal treatment regimens and the rate and outcomes of rare adverse events. Observational studies are a valuable complement to the shortcomings of clinical trials and a combination of data from real-world settings and clinical trials are necessary to provide evidence on how to achieve the best outcomes for individual patients with nAMD.

A novel tool to assess the quality of RWE to guide the management of retinal disease

Despite the growing importance of real-world evidence (RWE) for guiding clinical decisions in retinal disease, there is currently no widely used guidance available for assessing the quality and relevance of RWE studies in ophthalmology. This paper summarizes the development of a user-friendly tool that facilitates assessment of the quality of available RWE for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). A literature search was conducted to identify tools developed to assess the quality of RWE, in order to identify the most appropriate framework on which to base this tool. The Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness (GRACE) guidelines was chosen for this purpose as it is designed to assess the quality of observational studies and has been extensively validated, including demonstration of strong sensitivity and specificity. The GRACE guidelines were adapted to develop a straightforward tabular tool that allows simple assessment and comparison of the quality of published evidence in retinal disease for researchers and physicians alike, and includes guidance on treatment details, outcome measures, study population, and controlling for bias. The newly developed tool provides a simple method to support assessment of the strength of evidence and certainty of conclusions drawn from RWE in retinal disease, to ensure clinical decision-making is influenced by the highest quality evidence.

Ten-Year Real-World Outcomes of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Background

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has been treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy since 2006 with initial efficacy evidence of 2 years. In many, long-term therapy is required, and evidence for benefit is required from real-world data collection.

Methods

Retrospective review of electronic medical records of a consecutive series of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD over a 10-year period. Age, lens status and loss to follow-up was recorded. Primary outcome was change in VA at 10 years; secondary outcomes included proportion of eyes losing <15 letters at 3, 5, 7 and 10 years, number of injections and anatomic outcome.

Results

Of 196 patients (197 eyes), 90 patients had 10 years of follow-up data. Visual acuity (VA) declined by -11.2 letters (p=0.001), but 63.3% of eyes lost ≤15 letters. The proportion of eyes maintaining ≥70 letters was 17.7%, and the mean number of injections (±SD) was 47 ± 16. Retinal fluid was still present in 72.2% of eyes at 10 years. Forty-six percent of patients continued to receive anti-VEGF injections 10 years after treatment was commenced.

Conclusion

Anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD over a ten-year period showed 63.3% of eyes lost ≤15 letters. Eyes with better baseline vision were more likely to continue receiving anti-VEGF treatment, but the frequency of injection treatment decreased.

Non-invasive multimodal imaging of Diabetic Retinopathy: A survey on treatment methods and Nanotheranostics

Diabetes Retinopathy (DR) is one of the most prominent microvascular complications of diabetes. It is one of the pre-eminent causes for vision impairment followed by blindness among the working-age population worldwide. The de facto cause for DR remains challenging, despite several efforts made to unveil the mechanism underlying the pathology of DR. There is quite less availability of the low cost pre-emptive theranostic imaging tools in terms of in-depth resolution, due to the multiple factors involved in the etiology of DR. This review work comprehensively explores the various reports and research works on all perspectives of diabetic retinopathy (DR), and its mechanism. It also discusses various advanced non-destructive imaging modalities, current, and future treatment approaches. Further, the application of various nanoparticle-based drug delivery strategies used for the treatment of DR are also discussed. In a nutshell, the present review work bolsters the pursuit of the development of an advanced non-invasive optical imaging modal with a nano-theranostic approach for the future diagnosis and treatment of DR and its associated ocular complications.

Difference in treatment burden of neovascular age-related macular degeneration among different types of neovascularization

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the treatment burden among different types of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 431 patients who were diagnosed with neovascular AMD. Patients were divided into three groups: type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (n = 167), type 3 neovascularization group (n = 50), and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) group (n = 214). The number of hospital visits per year and the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections per year were compared among these groups. Furthermore, the incidence of bilateral involvement during the follow-up period was compared among the groups.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 50.6 ± 11.3 months. The number of hospital visits per year was significantly higher in the type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (mean: 6.1 ± 1.5) and type 3 neovascularization (6.6 ± 1.6) than in the PCV group (6.0 ± 1.5) (P < 0.001). The number of anti-VEGF injections per year was significantly higher in type 3 neovascularization group (3.1 ± 1.7) than in the type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (2.3 ± 1.5) or the PCV group (2.3 ± 1.2) (P = 0.042). There was a significant difference in the incidence of bilateral involvement among patients in type 1 or 2 neovascularization group (20.4%), type 3 neovascularization group (46.0%), and the PCV group (15.4%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high frequency of hospital visits and that of anti-VEGF injections in patients with type 3 neovascularization suggests high treatment burden in these patients. The high incidence of bilateral involvement could be one of the primary reasons for high treatment burden in patients with type 3 neovascularization.

Dual-acting therapeutic proteins for intraocular use

Intravitreally injected antibody-based medicines have revolutionised the treatment of retinal disease. Bispecific and dual-functional antibodies and therapeutic proteins have the potential to further increase the efficacy of intraocular medicines.

Macula service evaluation and assessing priorities for anti-VEGF treatment in the light of COVID-19

Purpose

To assess the treatment position of all patients who have had an anti-VEGF injection in 2020, prior to the UK lockdown on 23 March. To assess methods of service quality evaluation in setting benchmarks for comparison after the situation stabilized. To consider what proportion could be delayed based on national guidelines and varying vision parameters. Finally, to measure how many patients actually attended.

Method

A retrospective analysis of data collected from our electronic medical record was performed. Age, sex, reason for injection, visual acuity (VA) for both treated and untreated eyes and number of injections were recorded. The proportion of patients and eyes with ≥ 70 letters were calculated as an assessment of quality of service provision. The proportion of patients that could be delayed was estimated based on published guidelines and varying the parameters of difference between treated and untreated eyes. Finally, the number of patients who actually attended was recorded.

Results

About 3364 eyes (2229 neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), 427 diabetic macular oedema (DMO), 599 retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and 109 other) from 2924 patients were analysed. At the last appointment with injection, 64.4% of patients achieved ≥ 70 letters in their better-seeing eye. Mean VA of the treated eye was 61.5 letters, and 36.9% achieved ≥ 70. The mean number of injections was 16, 90% with aflibercept. Of the patients receiving treatment to one eye, 57.6% was receiving treatment to their worse seeing eye. In 18.2% this eye was > 20 letters worse and in 5.07% > 40 letters worse than the untreated eye. Using Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) guidelines, (treat nAMD 8 weekly, delay majority of RVO and DMO) 24.8% would be delayed. From 2738 appointments during the first 4 weeks of lockdown (booked prior to lockdown), doctors rescheduled 1025 and patients did not attend 820, leaving 893 who were seen (33%).

Conclusions

Assessing the treatment position of patients prior to COVID-19 lockdown enables objective stratification for prioritization for continued treatment. If RCOphth guidelines were followed 24.8% could be delayed and if treating the worse seeing eye up to 57.6%. Many scheduled patients elected not to attend, with 67% not seen in the first 4 weeks. The impact of non-attendance and delays may be evaluated later.

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term visual outcomes and intravitreal injection burden of patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with exudative AMD treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections with annual office visits for at least 7 years.

METHODS

Snellen visual acuity was measured at baseline and then annually until the last year of follow-up. The number of injections was recorded on an annual basis during each year of follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The change in the frequency of injections over time along with the change in visual acuity each year from the baseline visit through 7 years.

RESULTS

During this period, 533 eyes of 429 patients were treated for exudative AMD. Of these, 391 eyes (73%) met the inclusion criteria of annual office visits and received a mean of 5.8 ± 2.5 intravitreal injections per year. The baseline mean visual acuity was 0.6 ± 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; Snellen equivalent, 20/80), and the 7-year visual acuity was 0.8 ± 0.6 logMAR (Snellen equivalent, 20/126; P < 0.0001). When compared with the 142 eyes that did not undergo an office visit for a continuous 12-month period, eyes with annual office visits showed similar baseline mean visual acuity (0.7 logMAR vs. 0.6 logMAR; P = 0.2102), but more injections per year (P < 0.0001). Of the 533 total eyes, 124 eyes (23%) maintained better than 20/40 visual acuity at 7 years. These eyes received more injections overall per year (6.5 vs. 5.5 injections per year; P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, eyes that maintained consistent, long-term follow-up received significantly more intravitreal injections per year than eyes with inconsistent follow-up. Eyes with 20/40 or better vision at study conclusion received more injections per year than eyes with worse than 20/40 vision.

Long-Term Treatment Outcomes in Type 3 Neovascularization: Focus on the Difference in Outcomes between Geographic Atrophy and Fibrotic Scarring

Background: To evaluate the difference in the long-term treatment outcomes of type 3 neovascularization between eyes with geographic atrophy and those with fibrotic scars. Methods: This retrospective study included 195 eyes diagnosed with type 3 neovascularization and treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. The included eyes were divided into three groups according to the fundus findings at the final visit: patients with fovea-involving geographic atrophy (GA group), patients with fovea-involving fibrotic scars (scar group), and patients with no fovea-involving geographic atrophy or fibrotic scars (non-GA/scar group). The best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA) of the three groups at the final visits were compared. Results: The mean follow-up period was 47.5 ± 20.7 months. The mean logMAR BCVA at the final visit was 1.18 ± 0.58 in the GA group (n = 58), 1.67 ± 0.58 in the scar group (n = 62), and 0.69 ± 0.64 in the non-GA/scar group (n = 75). The BCVA was significantly worse in the scar group than in the GA (p < 0.001) and the non-GA/scar groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Eyes with fibrotic scars showed the poorest visual outcomes in type 3 neovascularization among the studied groups. Preventing the development of fibrotic scars should be considered an important treatment goal.

Real-world management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema: 2-year visual outcome focusing on the starting year of intervention from STREAT-DMO study

Background/aims

To investigate the yearly change of real-world outcomes for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 2-year clinical intervention for treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

Methods

Retrospective analysis of aggregated, longitudinal medical records obtained from 27 retina specialised institutions in Japan from Survey of Treatment for DMO database. A total of 2049 treatment-naïve centre involving DMO eyes of which the initial intervention started between 2010 and 2015, and had been followed for 2 years, were eligible. As interventions, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, local corticosteroids, macular photocoagulation and vitrectomy were defined. In each eye, baseline and final BCVA, the number of each intervention for 2 years was extracted. Each eye was classified by starting year of interventional treatment.

Results

Although baseline BCVA did not change by year, 2-year improvement of BCVA had been increased, and reached to +6.5 letters in the latest term. There is little difference among starting year about proportions of eyes which BCVA gained >15 letters, in contrast to those which lost >15 letters were decreased by year. The proportion of eyes receiving anti-VEGF therapy was dramatically increased, while those receiving the other therapies were gradually decreased. The proportion of eyes which maintained socially good vision of BCVA>20/40 has been increased and reached to 59.0% in the latest term.

Conclusion

For recent years, treatment patterns for DMO have been gradually but certainly changed; as a result, better visual gain, suppression of worsened eyes and better final BCVA have been obtained. Anti-VEGF therapy has become the first-line therapy and its injection frequency has been increasing.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of ranibizumab for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: Results from the LUMINOUS study

Purpose

To assess the 1-year effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) enrolled in the LUMINOUS study.

Methods

This 5-year, prospective, multicenter, observational, study enrolled 30,138 patients across all approved ranibizumab indications from outpatient ophthalmology clinics. 297 consenting patients (≥18 years) with mCNV who were treatment-naïve or prior-treated with ranibizumab or other ocular treatments were enrolled, and treated with ranibizumab according to the local product label. The main outcomes are visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters or equivalent), adverse events during the study, and treatment exposure over 1 year. Results are presented by prior treatment status of the study eye and injection frequency.

Results

Of the 297 mCNV patients recruited in the study, 108 were treatment-naïve and 175 were prior ranibizumab-treated. At baseline, the mean age of patients was 57.6 years, and 59.0 years and 80.6% and 65.7% were female in the treatment-naïve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Most were Caucasian (treatment-naïve, 88.9%; prior ranibizumab-treated, 86.9%). The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) VA letter changes to 1 year were +9.7 (±17.99) from 49.5 (±20.51) and +1.5 (±13.15) from 58.5 (±19.79) and these were achieved with a mean (SD) of 3.0 (±1.58) and 2.6 (±2.33) injections in the treatment-naïve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Presented by injection frequencies 1–2, 3–4 and ≥5 injections in Year 1, the mean (SD) VA changes were +15.0 (±14.70), +7.7 (±19.91) and −0.7 (±16.05) in treatment-naïve patients and +1.5 (±14.57), +3.1 (±11.53) and −3.6 (±11.97) in prior ranibizumab-treated patients, respectively. The safety profile was comparable with previous ranibizumab studies.

Conclusions

Ranibizumab treatment for mCNV showed robust VA gains in treatment-naïve patients and VA maintenance in prior ranibizumab-treated patients in a clinical practice setting, consisting mainly of Caucasians. No new safety signals were observed during the study.

Innate immune response in retinal homeostasis and inflammatory disorders

Innate immune cells such as neutrophils, monocyte-macrophages and microglial cells are pivotal for the health and disease of the retina. For the maintenance of retinal homeostasis, these cells and immunosuppressive molecules in the eye actively regulate the induction and the expression of inflammation in order to prevent excessive activation and subsequent tissue damage. In the disease context, these regulatory mechanisms are modulated genetically and/or by environmental stimuli such as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and a chronic innate immune response regulates or contributes to the formation of diverse retinal disorders such as uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal vascular diseases and retinal fibrosis. Here we summarize the recent knowledge regarding the innate immune response in both ocular immune regulation and inflammatory retinal diseases, and we describe the potential of the innate immune response as a biomarker and therapeutic target.

Anti-VEGF therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: from randomized trials to routine clinical practice

Antivasoproliferative therapy is a revolutionary trend in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), as it is aimed at blocking growth factors of the newly formed vessels. Currently, two anti-VEGF drugs are registered for ophthalmological use, and the search for new molecules is only gaining momentum. Studying new approaches to treatment and developing innovative drugs, modern medicine relies on the data from international randomized clinical trials (RCT). The fact that this direction attracts much scientific interest is explained by high reliability of the data obtained with RCTs. However, when analyzing the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with nAMD in routine clinical practice, many ophthalmologists are confronted with discrepancies between the expected morphological and functional results as predicted by RCTs and those obtained in reality. It is thus important to bear in mind that RCTs simply determine how the dynamics of morphofunctional parameters should look like, whilst the ideal result is only achievable through correct implementation of therapeutic strategy in real clinical practice. The results obtained in the practice of any specialist wholly depend on how carefully the prescribed treatment protocols are followed by doctors and patients, how burdensome the treatment is, as well as on the potential of the medication. This literary review offers a comparative analysis of the results achieved by using anti-VEGF drugs (ranibizumab and aflibercept) obtained in key RCTs and in routine clinical treatment of nAMD patients.

Recent advances in slow and sustained drug release for retina drug delivery

INTRODUCTION

Striking recent advance has occurred in the field of medical retina, greatly because intraocular drugs have been developed, enhancing their clinical efficacy while avoiding systemic side-effects. However, the burden of repeated intraocular administration makes limits the optimal efficacy of treatments, prompting the development of new drugs with prolonged half-life or of sustained drug delivery systems.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the various drugs and drug delivery systems that have reached the clinical stage and those that are in clinical development and we discuss the limitations to clinical translation.

EXPERT OPINION

Substantial fundamental work is still required to build guidelines on optimal animal models for ocular pharmacokinetics and safety studies depending on the target disease site and the on the type of therapeutic compounds. The effects of a drug administered as a bolus at high concentration in the vitreous might differ from those resulting from the sustained release of a lower concentration, and no delivery platform can be simply adapted to any drug. For the treatment of retinal diseases, development of therapeutic compounds should integrate from its early conception, the combination of an active drug with a specific drug delivery system, administered by a specific route.