Effects of a range of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on ethanol intake in the rat

Cannabidiol as a Modulator of the Development of Alcohol Tolerance in Rats

The study aimed to explore in vivo the influence of cannabidiol (CBD) on the development of alcohol tolerance in rats. Rats were treated with ethanol (3.0 g/kg, i.p.) and CBD (20 mg/kg, p.o.) for nine successive days, and rectal body temperature, sedation (sleeping time), and blood alcohol concentration (BAC) were measured. In the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum, the cannabinoid (CB1R and CB2R) and dopaminergic (DRD1, DRD2, DRD4, DRD5) receptors’ mRNA level changes were analyzed using the quantitative RT-PCR method. CBD inhibited the development of tolerance to the hypothermic and sedative action of alcohol, coupled with BAC elevation. On a molecular level, the most pronounced effects of the CBD + ethanol interaction in the striatum were observed, where CBD reversed the downregulation of CB2R gene transcription caused by ethanol. For CB1R, DRD1, and DRD2 mRNAs, the CBD + ethanol interaction produced opposite effects than for CB2R ones. In turn, for the transcription of genes encoding dopaminergic receptors, the most potent effect of alcohol as CBD occurred in the hippocampus. However, the combined CBD and alcohol administration showed the same effect for each substance administered separately. Since tolerance is considered a prelude to drug addiction, obtained results allow us to emphasize the thesis that CBD can inhibit the development of alcohol dependence in rats.

UFR2709, an Antagonist of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors, Delays the Acquisition and Reduces Long-Term Ethanol Intake in Alcohol-Preferring UChB Bibulous Rats

Alcoholism is a worldwide public health problem with high economic cost and which affects health and social behavior. It is estimated that alcoholism kills 3 million people globally, while in Chile it is responsible for around 9 thousand deaths per year. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are ligand-gated ion channels expressed in the central nervous system, and they were suggested to modulate the ethanol mechanism involved in abuse and dependence. Previous work demonstrated a short-term treatment with UFR2709, a nAChRs antagonist, which reduced ethanol intake using a two-bottle free-choice paradigm in University of Chile bibulous (UChB) rats. Here, we present evidence of the UFR2709 efficacy in reducing the acquisition and long-term ethanol consumption. Our results show that UFR2709 (2.5 mg/kg i.p.) reduces the seek behavior and ethanol intake, even when the drug administration was stopped, and induced a reduction in the overall ethanol intake by around 55%. Using naïve UChB bibulous rats, we demonstrate that UFR2709 could delay and reduce the genetically adaptive impulse to seek and drink ethanol and prevent its excessive intake.

Rodent models and mechanisms of voluntary binge-like ethanol consumption: Examples, opportunities, and strategies for preclinical research

Binge ethanol consumption has widespread negative consequences for global public health. Rodent models offer exceptional power to explore the neurobiology underlying and affected by binge-like drinking as well as target potential prevention, intervention, and treatment strategies. An important characteristic of these models is their ability to consistently produce pharmacologically-relevant blood ethanol concentration. This review examines the current available rodent models of voluntary, pre-dependent binge-like ethanol consumption and their utility in various research strategies. Studies have demonstrated that a diverse array of neurotransmitters regulate binge-like drinking, resembling some findings from other drinking models. Furthermore, repeated binge-like drinking recruits neuroadaptive mechanisms in mesolimbocortical reward circuitry. New opportunities that these models offer in the current context of mechanistic research are also discussed.

Dopamine receptor agonists modulate voluntary alcohol intake independently of individual levels of alcohol intake in rats

RATIONALE

Individual susceptibility to alcohol use disorder has been related to functional changes in dopaminergic neurotransmission.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current work was to assess the effects of selective dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists on alcohol consumption in rats that differ in individual levels of alcohol intake.

METHODS

The effects of the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 82958, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390, the dopamine D2 receptor agonist sumanirole and the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist L741,626 on alcohol consumption and preference were assessed at different time points after treatment in subgroups of low and high alcohol drinking rats (LD and HD) using an intermittent alcohol access paradigm.

RESULTS

SKF 82958 decreased alcohol intake and alcohol preference throughout the 24-h session. Sumanirole decreased alcohol intake during the first 2 h, but increased alcohol intake during the remainder of the session. The effects of SKF 82958 and sumanirole on alcohol intake and alcohol preference were comparable in LD and HD. By contrast, the dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and L741,626 did not alter alcohol consumption in either group at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors reduces alcohol intake, but that endogenous dopamine does not play a primary role in alcohol consumption. Moreover, the difference in alcohol consumption between LD and HD does not involve altered dopamine signaling.

Lack of effect of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptor blockade on consumption during the first two days of operant self-administration of sweetened ethanol in adult Long-Evans rats

The mechanisms underlying ethanol self-administration are not fully understood; however, it is clear that ethanol self-administration stimulates nucleus accumbens dopamine release in well-trained animals. During operant sweetened ethanol self-administration behavior, an adaptation in the nucleus accumbens dopamine system occurs between the first and second exposure, paralleling a dramatic increase in sweetened ethanol intake, which suggests a single exposure to sweetened ethanol may be sufficient to learn the association between sweetened ethanol cues and its reinforcing properties. In the present experiment, we test the effects of blockade of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptors on operant sweetened ethanol self-administration behavior during the first 2 days of exposure. Adult male Long-Evans rats were first trained to self-administer 10% sucrose (10S) across 6 days in an appetitive and consummatory operant model (appetitive interval: 10-min pre-drinking wait period and a lever response requirement of 4; consummatory interval: 20-min access to the drinking solution). After training on 10S, the drinking solution was switched to 10% sucrose plus 10% ethanol (10S10E); control rats continued drinking 10S throughout the experiment. Bilateral nucleus accumbens microinjections of the dopamine D1 antagonist, SCH-23390 (0, 1.0, or 3.0 μg/side), immediately preceded the first two sessions of drinking 10S10E. Results show that blocking nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptors has little or no influence on consumption during the first 2 days of exposure to the sweetened ethanol solution or maintenance of sucrose-only drinking. Furthermore, the high dose of SCH-23390, 3.0 μg/side, reduced open-field locomotor activity. In conclusion, we found no evidence to suggest that nucleus accumbens D1 receptor activation is involved in consumption of a sweetened ethanol solution during the first 2 days of exposure or maintenance of sucrose drinking, but rather D1 receptors seem necessary for general locomotor activity that contributes to initiation of appetitive behavior.

Lentiviral vector-mediated dopamine d3 receptor modulation in the rat brain impairs alcohol intake and ethanol-induced conditioned place preference

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) knockout mice display similar ethanol (EtOH) consumption compared to wild types. In addition, studies with D3R pharmacological targeting were inconclusive.

METHODS

In the current study, we used both gain- and loss-of-function approaches to test the effects of central D3R manipulation on voluntary alcohol intake and EtOH-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats. To this aim, we developed a lentiviral-mediated gene transfer approach to examine whether D3R knockdown (LV-siD3R) or overexpression (LV-D3R) in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is sufficient to modulate voluntary alcohol consumption and EtOH-CPP.

RESULTS

Using the standard 2-bottle choice drinking paradigm and an unbiased CPP procedure, our results indicated that, like the D3R selective antagonist SB-277011-A, LV-siD3R attenuated voluntary alcohol consumption. In contrast, LV-D3R increased EtOH intake with no effect on total fluid intake. Similarly, the D3R agonist 7-OH-DPAT also exacerbated EtOH intake. Interestingly, neither pharmacological nor genetic manipulation of D3R activity affected saccharin and quinine consumption and preference. More importantly, we report that LV-siD3R blocked, whereas LV-D3R exacerbated, EtOH-CPP.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the notion that the D3R plays an important role in alcohol reward in rats and suggest that a key threshold range of D3R levels is associated with impaired alcohol consumption. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the D3R is an essential component of the molecular pathways underlying the reinforcing properties of alcohol. Thus, medications targeting the D3Rs may be beneficial to tackle EtOH abuse and alcoholism in humans.

Adenosinergic regulation of binge-like ethanol drinking and associated locomotor effects in male C57BL/6J mice

We recently observed that the addition of caffeine (a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist) to a 20% ethanol solution significantly altered the intoxication profile of male C57BL/6J (B6) mice induced by voluntary binge-like consumption in the 'Drinking-in-the-Dark' (DID) paradigm. In the current study, the roles of A1 and A2A adenosine receptor subtypes, specifically, in binge-like ethanol consumption and associated locomotor effects were explored. Adult male B6 mice (PND 60-70) were allowed to consume 20% ethanol (v/v) or 2% sucrose (w/v) for 6days via DID. On day 7, mice received a systemic administration (i.p.) of the A1 antagonist DPCPX (1, 3, 6mg/kg), the A2A antagonist MSX-3 (1, 2, 4mg/kg), or vehicle immediately prior to fluid access in DID. Antagonism of the A1 receptor via DPCPX was found to dose-dependently decrease binge-like ethanol intake and associated blood ethanol concentrations (p's<0.05), although no effect was observed on sucrose intake. Antagonism of A2A had no effect on ethanol or sucrose consumption, however, MSX-3 elicited robust locomotor stimulation in mice consuming either solution (p's<0.05). Together, these findings suggest unique roles for the A1 and A2A adenosine receptor subtypes in binge-like ethanol intake and its associated locomotor effects.

Desipramine enhances the ability of risperidone to decrease alcohol intake in the Syrian golden hamster

The atypical antipsychotic clozapine reduces alcohol drinking in patients with schizophrenia. We have proposed that clozapine׳s ability to decrease alcohol drinking relates to its weak blockade of the dopamine D2 receptor and potent blockade of the norepinephrine α-2 receptor, as well as its ability to elevate plasma and brain norepinephrine. Another atypical antipsychotic, risperidone, which is a potent blocker of both the dopamine D2 receptor and norepinephrine α-2 receptor, does not decrease alcohol drinking. In this study, we used the Syrian golden hamster to test whether the ability of risperidone to reduce alcohol drinking would be enhanced if it was used in combination with the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desipramine. Hamsters were given free access to water and alcohol (15% v/v) until they reached a steady drinking baseline. They were then treated daily with each drug or drug combination for 20 days. Risperidone (0.2mg/kg) only transiently decreased alcohol drinking. However, 5.0mg/kg, and possibly 1.0mg/kg, desipramine added to 0.2mg/kg risperidone appeared to produce a more substantial and relatively sustained effect than risperidone alone. Data from this study provide leads toward the development of new treatments for patients with schizophrenia and alcoholism, and also for those with alcoholism alone.

Dopamine D3 receptor is necessary for ethanol consumption: an approach with buspirone

Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) controls drug- and alcohol-seeking behavior, but the role of specific DA receptor subtypes is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that D3R gene deletion or the D3R pharmacological blockade inhibits ethanol preference in mice. D3R-deficient mice (D3R(-/-)) and their wild-type (WT) littermates, treated or not with the D3R antagonists SB277011A and U99194A, were tested in a long-term free choice ethanol-drinking (two-bottle choice) and in a binge-like ethanol-drinking paradigm (drinking in the dark, DID). The selectivity of the D3R antagonists was further assessed by molecular modeling. Ethanol intake was negligible in D3R(-/-) and robust in WT both in the two-bottle choice and DID paradigms. Treatment with D3R antagonists inhibited ethanol intake in WT but was ineffective in D3R(-/-) mice. Ethanol intake increased the expression of RACK1 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in both WT and D3R(-/-); in WT there was also a robust overexpression of D3R. Thus, increased expression of D3R associated with activation of RACK1/BDNF seems to operate as a reinforcing mechanism in voluntary ethanol intake. Indeed, blockade of the BDNF pathway by the TrkB selective antagonist ANA-12 reversed chronic stable ethanol intake and strongly decreased the striatal expression of D3R. Finally, we evaluated buspirone, an approved drug for anxiety disorders endowed with D3R antagonist activity (confirmed by molecular modeling analysis), that resulted effective in inhibiting ethanol intake. Thus, DA signaling via D3R is essential for ethanol-related reward and consumption and may represent a novel therapeutic target for weaning.

Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

RATIONALE

Studies support differential roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the rewarding and reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, the roles these receptor subfamilies play in ethanol reward are not fully delineated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), we pretreated animals systemically with antagonist drugs selective for dopamine D1-like (SCH-23390) and D2-like (raclopride) receptors prior to ethanol conditioning trials.

METHODS

Effects of raclopride (0-1.2 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (0-0.3 mg/kg) on the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP were examined in DBA/2J mice (experiments 1 and 2). Based on significant effects of SCH-23390, we then determined if SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) produced a place preference on its own (experiment 3). To evaluate whether SCH-23390 impaired learning, we used a conditioned place aversion (CPA) paradigm and pretreated animals with SCH-23390 (0-0.3 mg/kg) before conditioning sessions with LiCl (experiment 4).

RESULTS

Whereas raclopride (0-1.2 mg/kg) did not affect acquisition, SCH-23390 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) impaired the development of ethanol-induced CPP. SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) did not produce place preference when tested alone and SCH-23390 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) did not perturb the acquisition of LiCl-induced CPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a role for dopamine D1-like but not D2-like receptors in ethanol's unconditioned rewarding effect as indexed by CPP. Blockade of D1-like receptors did not affect aversive learning in this procedure.

Involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine D1 receptors in ethanol drinking, ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, and ethanol-induced psychomotor sensitization in mice

RATIONALE

Dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) signaling has been associated to ethanol consumption and reward in laboratory animals.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we hypothesize that this receptor, which is located within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) neurons, modulates alcohol reward mechanisms.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we measured alcohol consumption and ethanol-induced psychomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference (CPP) in mice that received bilateral microinjections of small interference RNA (siRNA)-expressing lentiviral vectors (LV-siD1R) producing D1R knock-down. The other group received control (LV-Mock) viral vectors into the NAc.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the total fluid consumed and also no differences in the amount of ethanol consumed between groups prior to surgery. However, after surgery, the LV-siD1R group consumed less ethanol than the control group. This difference was not associated to taste neophobia. In addition, results have shown that down-regulation of endogenous D1R using viral-mediated siRNA in the NAc significantly decreased ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization as well as acquisition, but not expression, of ethanol-induced place preference.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that decreased D1R expression into the NAc led to reduced ethanol rewarding properties, thereby leading to lower voluntary ethanol consumption. Together, these findings demonstrate that the D1 receptor pathway within the NAc controls ethanol reward and intake.

Mice lacking adenylyl cyclase type 5 (AC5) show increased ethanol consumption and reduced ethanol sensitivity

RATIONALE

The adenylyl cyclase (AC)/cAMP system is believed to be a key component in regulating alcohol-drinking behavior. It was reported that adenylyl cyclase-5 (AC5) is expressed widely in the brain, with a preferential concentration in the dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens, brain regions which are important for addiction and emotion. AC5 has been shown to be an essential mediator of morphine addiction and dopamine receptor function; however, it remains unknown whether or not AC5 plays a role in ethanol preference and sensitivity in animals.

OBJECTIVE

This work was carried out to determine the role of AC5 in alcohol consumption and the hypnotic response to alcohol using AC5 knockout (KO) mice.

RESULTS

In the test for ethanol preference employing a two-bottle free-choice paradigm, AC5 KO mice showed increased ethanol consumption and preference compared with the wild-type mice. Ethanol-induced hypothermia was weakly reduced in AC5 KO mice. AC5 KO mice exhibited sedation/behavioral sleep to high-dose ethanol, but their responses were greatly suppressed compared with the wild-type mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that AC5 is an important signaling molecule regulating alcohol sensitivity and preference in animals. These data provide critical information for AC5 activation as a candidate target for the treatment of alcoholism.

Genetics of dopamine receptors and drug addiction: a comprehensive review

Drug dependence is a chronic, relapsing disorder in which compulsive drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviours persist despite serious negative consequences. Addictive substances, such as opioids, ethanol, psychostimulants and nicotine, induce pleasant states or relieve distress, effects that contribute to their recreational use. Dopamine is critically involved in drug addiction processes. However, the role of the various dopaminergic receptor subtypes has been difficult to delineate. Here, we will review the information collected implicating the receptors of the D1 family (DRD1 and DRD5) and of the D2 family (DRD2, DRD3 and DRD4) in drug addiction. We will summarize the distribution of these receptors in the brain, the preclinical experiments carried out with pharmacological and transgenic approaches and the genetic studies carried out linking genetic variants of these receptors to drug addiction phenotypes. A meta-analysis of the studies carried out evaluating DRD2 and alcohol dependence is also provided, which indicates a significant association. Overall, this review indicates that different aspects of the addiction phenotype are critically influenced by dopaminergic receptors and that variants of those genes seem to influence some addiction phenotypes in humans.

Injection of the neuropeptide CNP into dopaminergic rat brain areas decreases alcohol intake

Alcohol administration is known to alter several brain functions and behaviors in humans and in laboratory animals. One of the targets of ethanol is the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic reward pathway. We used the "alcohol deprivation effect" test as a rat model of alcohol craving and relapse. The effect is characterized by increased alcohol intake and preference after several weeks of voluntary alcohol consumption followed by a withdrawal phase. The alcohol deprivation effect was found to be considerably reduced by the injection in dopaminergic brain structures of the neuropeptide CNP. This peptide is the most abundant natriuretic peptide in the brain, and signals via an intracellular rise in cyclic GMP. The effect of CNP was observed whether the peptide was injected in situ into the ventral tegmental area or into the prefrontal cortex. It was partially reversed by the injection in the same structures of KT5823, a selective inhibitor of the cGMP-dependent protein kinase. The results indicate that changes of cyclic GMP levels in dopaminergic rat brain areas participate in the neurobiological mechanisms underlying alcohol craving after withdrawal and/or alcohol dependence.

Cortical dopamine D(1) receptors in type 1 and type 2 alcoholics measured with human whole hemisphere autoradiography

A large body of evidence indicates the importance of dopamine (DA) activation for ethanol reinforcement, and animal models of alcoholism have implied the involvement of DA D(1) receptors in this context. We studied cortical DA D(1) receptors in nine type 1 alcoholics (late-onset, binge-drinker), eight type 2 alcoholics (early-onset, antisocial) and 10 controls by using [(3)H]SCH23390 as a radioligand in postmortem human whole hemisphere autoradiography. We also evaluated correlations of DA D(1) receptors between the cortical and subcortical areas and between cortical DA transporters and DA D(2) and D(3) receptors by comparing the present results to our earlier studies. On the average, type 2 alcoholics were younger and had more violent causes of death than type 1 alcoholics and controls. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups, suggesting that cortical DA D(1) receptors do not play a major role in alcoholism. However, among type 2 alcoholics, the binding was consistently lower (8.6%-22.3%) than among controls, and the effect sizes showed a large effect in the anterior cingulate (0.90) and frontal (0.87) cortices. Interestingly, among type 2 alcoholics, the correlation of DA D(1) receptors between two ventral midbrain structures (substantia nigra and amygdala) and anterior cingulate cortex was significantly negative, whereas in the type 1 alcoholics and controls, the correlations were significantly positive.

There and back again: a tale of norepinephrine and drug addiction

Fueled by anatomical, electrophysiological, and pharmacological analyses of endogenous brain reward systems, norepinephrine (NE) was identified as a key mediator of both natural and drug-induced reward in the late 1960s and early 1970s. However, reward experiments from the mid-1970s that could distinguish between the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems resulted in the prevailing view that dopamine (DA) was the primary 'reward transmitter' (a belief holding some sway still today), thereby pushing NE into the background. Most damaging to the NE hypothesis of reward were studies demonstrating that NE receptor antagonists and NE reuptake inhibitors failed to impact drug self-administration. In recent years new tools, such as genetically engineered mice, and new experimental paradigms, such as reinstatement of drug seeking following withdrawal, have propelled NE back into the awareness of addiction researchers. Of particular interest is disulfiram, an inhibitor of the NE biosynthetic enzyme dopamine beta-hydroxylase, which has demonstrated promising efficacy in the treatment of cocaine dependence in preliminary clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the new data linking NE to critical aspects of DA signaling and drug addiction, with a focus on psychostimulants (eg, cocaine), opiates (eg, morphine), and alcohol.

EFFECTS OF ARIPIPRAZOLE ON ALCOHOL INTAKE IN AN ANIMAL MODEL OF HIGH-ALCOHOL DRINKING

AIMS

This study examined the effects of aripiprazole, a novel atypical antipsychotic drug with partial agonist properties at dopamine D2 receptors, on the voluntary limited access alcohol drinking of alcohol-preferring AA (Alko, Alcohol) rats.

METHODS

AA rats were taught to drink 10% alcohol in a 4 h limited access paradigm. Effects of acute aripiprazole (0, 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg) on the limited access alcohol drinking were studied. In repeated treatment experiment, aripiprazole (0, 1.0, and 6.0 mg/kg) was administered once daily over five successive days. To reveal any effect by aripiprazole not selective for alcohol drinking, 0.025% saccharin solution was substituted for alcohol during the 4 h limited access, and acute treatments were repeated. The effects of aripiprazole on ambulatory locomotor activity were tested with doses that were used in the acute experiments.

RESULTS

Acute aripiprazole at the doses of 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg had no effect on alcohol drinking. Repeated treatment with the aripiprazole dose of 6.0 mg/kg significantly diminished alcohol drinking at the 1 h time point. This dose had no effect on saccharin drinking when given acutely. Acute aripiprazole at the doses of 1.0, 3.0, and 6.0 mg/kg significantly suppressed locomotor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Aripiprazole decreased limited access alcohol drinking in AA rats, but only at a high dose that also strongly suppressed locomotor activity.

The dopamine D3 receptor is part of a homeostatic pathway regulating ethanol consumption

We recently identified a homeostatic pathway that inhibits ethanol intake. This protective pathway consists of the scaffolding protein RACK1 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). RACK1 translocates to the nucleus after exposure of neurons to ethanol and increases expression of BDNF (McGough et al., 2004). We also found that increasing the levels of BDNF via systemic administration of RACK1 expressed as a Tat-fusion protein (Tat-RACK1) reduces ethanol consumption, whereas reduction of BDNF levels augments this behavior (McGough et al., 2004). Based on these results, we hypothesized that activation of the BDNF receptor TrkB is necessary for the effects of BDNF on ethanol intake and that gene products downstream of BDNF negatively regulate ethanol consumption. Here, we show that inhibition of the BDNF receptor TrkB increases voluntary ethanol consumption in wild-type mice but not in mice lacking one copy of the BDNF gene (BDNF(+/-)). We also find that increases in the levels of BDNF, mediated by ethanol or RACK1, lead to increased dorsal striatal levels of the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), a gene downstream of BDNF, via activation of the TrkB receptor. Finally, we show that the Tat-RACK1-mediated reduction of ethanol consumption is attenuated by coinjection with either the Trk inhibitor K252a or the dopamine D3R-prefering antagonist U-99194A [5, 6-dimethoxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)indan], suggesting that activation of the BDNF pathway via RACK1 leads to increased expression of the dopamine D3R, which in turn mediates the attenuation of ethanol consumption.

Alcohol drinking of alcohol-preferring AA rats is differentially affected by clozapine and olanzapine

Clinical evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotic drugs might reduce alcohol drinking and help to maintain abstinence. This study aimed to compare the effects of two widely used atypical antipsychotic drugs clozapine and olanzapine on alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring AA (Alko, Alcohol) rats that were taught to drink 10% alcohol in a 4 h limited access paradigm. Effects of acute clozapine (0, 0.3, 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) and olanzapine (0, 0.1, 0.5 and 1.25 mg/kg) treatments on the limited access alcohol drinking were studied. In repeated treatment experiment, clozapine (1.0 mg/kg) or olanzapine (0.5 mg/kg) was administered once daily, before limited access alcohol drinking session, over 5 successive days. To reveal any effect of the drugs selective for alcohol drinking, alcohol was exchanged with 0.1% saccharin solution for the 4 h limited access, and acute treatments were repeated. Effects of the drugs on ambulatory locomotor activity were tested with doses that were used in the acute experiments. Acute clozapine treatment had no effect on either alcohol or saccharin drinking, but olanzapine significantly reduced 4 h alcohol drinking. Repeated olanzapine treatment significantly reduced 4 h alcohol drinking when compared with vehicle or clozapine, but a tolerance developed to this effect. Repeated clozapine treatment produced no significant effect compared with vehicle. Both drugs significantly reduced locomotor activity. In conclusion, the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine non-selectively reduced alcohol drinking, while clozapine failed to do so, even if both were administered at pharmacologically effective doses.

The mesolimbic dopamine system: the final common pathway for the reinforcing effect of drugs of abuse?

In this review we will critically assess the hypothesis that the reinforcing effect of virtually all drugs of abuse is primarily dependent on activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. The focus is on five classes of abused drugs: psychostimulants, opiates, ethanol, cannabinoids and nicotine. For each of these drug classes, the pharmacological and physiological mechanisms underlying the direct or indirect influence on mesolimbic dopamine transmission will be reviewed. Next, we evaluate behavioral pharmacological experiments that specifically assess the influence of activation of the mesolimbic dopamine system on drug reinforcement, with particular emphasis on animal experiments using drug self-administration paradigms. There is overwhelming evidence that all five classes of abused drugs increase dopamine transmission in limbic regions of the brain through interactions with a variety of transporters, ionotropic receptors and metabotropic receptors. Behavioral pharmacological experiments indicate that increased dopamine transmission is clearly both necessary and sufficient to promote psychostimulant reinforcement. For the other four classes of abused substances, self-administration experiments suggest that although increasing mesolimbic dopamine transmission plays an important role in the reinforcing effects of opiates, ethanol, cannabinoids and nicotine, there are also dopamine-independent processes that contribute significantly to the reinforcing effects of these compounds.

Effect of operant self-administration of 10% ethanol plus 10% sucrose on dopamine and ethanol concentrations in the nucleus accumbens

Although operant ethanol self-administration can increase accumbal dopamine activity, the relationship between dopamine and ethanol levels during consumption remains unclear. We trained Long-Evans rats to self-administer escalating concentrations of ethanol (with 10% sucrose) over 7 days, during which two to four lever presses resulted in 20 min of access to the solution with no further response requirements. Accumbal microdialysis was performed in rats self-administering 10% ethanol (plus 10% sucrose) or 10% sucrose alone. Most ethanol (1.6 +/- 0.2 g/kg) and sucrose intake occurred during the first 10 min of access. Sucrose ingestion did not induce significant changes in dopamine concentrations. Dopamine levels increased within the first 5 min of ethanol availability followed by a return to baseline, whereas brain ethanol levels reached peak concentration more than 40 min later. We found significant correlations between intake and dopamine concentration during the initial 10 min of consumption. Furthermore, ethanol-conditioned rats consuming 10% sucrose showed no effect of ethanol expectation on dopamine activity. The transient rise in dopamine during ethanol ingestion suggests that the dopamine response was not solely due to the pharmacological properties of ethanol. The dopamine response may be related to the stimulus properties of ethanol presentation, which were strongest during consumption.

Striatal dopamine D1 receptors in type 1 and 2 alcoholics measured with human whole hemisphere autoradiography

A considerable number of human and animal studies have implied the importance of dopamine system and alterations in dopamine receptors in the context of alcoholism. However, it has remained unclear if the alcohol-abuse related dopaminergic deficit is specifically associated with certain receptor subtype. The aim of this study was to compare putative alterations of dopamine D(1) receptors in caudate and putamen of nine type 1 alcoholics, eight type 2 alcoholics and 10 healthy controls by using [(3)H]SCH 23390 as a radioligand in postmortem human whole hemisphere autoradiography. In addition, we compared the present results to our earlier studies on dopamine transporters and dopamine D(2) receptors in these same subjects and evaluated the putative correlations of dopamine D(1) receptor densities between the nucleus accumbens and the above-mentioned structures. Our results show that alcoholics do not have significantly different striatal dopamine D(1) receptor densities compared to controls. Neither were there any significant correlations between the dopamine D(1) receptors and the two other dopamine binding sites. However, the correlations of the dopamine D(1) receptors between nucleus accumbens and dorsal striatal structures were consistently and mostly statistically significantly positive in alcoholics, but not in controls, which may suggest some pathology related to addiction. In addition, considering the facts that dopamine D(1) receptors were more abundant in the mesolimbic nucleus accumbens than in the caudate or putamen and that there was a strong tendency towards lower binding among type 1 alcoholics may suggest the importance of dopamine D(1) receptors in reward and/or alcoholism.

Association studies of neurotransmitter gene polymorphisms in alcoholic Caucasians

Ethanol enhances mesolimbic/cortical dopamine activity in reward and reinforcement circuits. We investigated the hypothesis that risk for alcoholism may be mediated by genes for neurotransmitters associated with the dopamine reward system as well as genes for enzymes involved in ethanol metabolism. DNA was extracted from brain tissue collected at autopsy from pathologically characterized alcoholics and controls. PCR-based assays showed that alcoholism was associated with polymorphisms of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) TaqI B (P = .029) and the GABAA-beta2 subunit C1412T (P = .012) genes, but not with the glutamate receptor subunit gene NMDAR2B (366C/G), the serotonin transporter gene (5HTTL-PR), the dopamine transporter gene DAT1(SLC6A3), the dopamine D2 receptor gene DRD2 TaqI A, or the GABAA alpha1(A15G), alpha6(T1519C), and gamma2(G3145A) subunit genes. The glial glutamate transporter gene EAAT2 polymorphism G603A was associated with alcoholic cirrhosis (P = .048). The genotype for the most active alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme ADH1C was associated with a lower risk of alcoholism (P = .026) and was less prevalent in alcoholics with DRD2TaqIA2/A2 (P = .047), GABAA-beta2 1412C/C (P = .01), or EAAT2 603G/A (P = .022) genotypes. Combined DRD2TaqI A or B with GABAA-beta2 or EAAT2 G603A genotypes may have a concerted influence in the predisposition to alcoholism.

Cue reactivity in nicotine and tobacco dependence: a “multiple-action” model of nicotine as a primary reinforcement and as an enhancer of the effects of smoking-associated stimuli

The present paper proposes a model for the identification and the validation of brain processes and mechanisms underlying smokers' cue reactivity. Smoking behaviour is maintained by the reinforcing properties of nicotine, but it was also proposed that nicotine enhances the conditioned value of smoking and nicotine-associated stimuli. In fact, it is widely reported that the exposure of smokers to smoking/nicotine-associated stimuli induces cue reactivity, which is a vast array of physiological, psychological and behavioural responses. Imaging studies are revealing neuroanatomical correlates of cue reactivity in brain areas involved in motivational, emotional, cognitive processes and in their integration. Behavioural studies in laboratory animal models have shown analogies between the effects of nicotine-associated stimuli and cue reactivity effects in smokers. Lesion and mapping studies with nicotine reported brain activation patterns in cortico-limbic areas similarly to those obtained with imaging studies in humans. Although only limited studies have been done with nicotine-associated stimuli in animals, the identification of molecular mechanisms underlying other drugs of abuse-associated cue effect may help to propose potential common molecular mechanisms for nicotine cues. These findings suggest that smoking/nicotine-associated stimuli are processed at two levels: (i), bottom-up, automatic processing in a parallel fashion through ascendant pathways, to activate attentional functions; (ii), top-down, in a serial fashion from cortical areas, to modulate sensory inputs and motor control. It appears that nicotine increase information processing at both levels so as to establish and to amplify the conditioned value of smoking cues.

The role of mesolimbic dopamine in the development and maintenance of ethanol reinforcement

The neurobiological processes by which ethanol seeking and consumption are established and maintained are thought to involve areas of the brain that mediate motivated behavior, such as the mesolimbic dopamine system. The mesolimbic dopamine system is comprised of cells that originate in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and project to several forebrain regions, including a prominent terminal area, the nucleus accumbens (NAcc). The NAcc has been subdivided into core and shell subregions. Both areas receive converging excitatory input from the cortex and amygdala and dopamine input from the VTA, with the accumbal medium spiny neuron situated to integrate the signals. Although forced ethanol administration enhances dopamine activity in the NAcc, conclusions regarding the role of mesolimbic dopamine in ethanol reinforcement cannot be made from these experiments. Behavioral experiments consistently show that pharmacological manipulations of the dopamine transmission in the NAcc alter responding for ethanol, although ethanol reinforcement is maintained after lesions of the accumbal dopamine system. Additionally, extracellular dopamine increases in the NAcc during operant self-administration of ethanol, which is consistent with a role of dopamine in ethanol reinforcement. Behavioral studies that distinguish appetitive responding from ethanol consumption show that dopamine is important in ethanol-seeking behavior, whereas neurochemical studies suggest that accumbal dopamine is also important during ethanol consumption before pharmacological effects occur. Cellular studies suggest that ethanol alters synaptic plasticity in the mesolimbic system, possibly through dopaminergic mechanisms, and this may underlie the development of ethanol reinforcement. Thus, anatomical, pharmacological, neurochemical, cellular, and behavioral studies are more clearly defining the role of mesolimbic dopamine in ethanol reinforcement.

Dopamine and alcoholism: neurobiological basis of ethanol abuse

The role of the dopamine (DA) system in brain reward mechanisms and the development of substance abuse has been well established. We review earlier animal and human studies on DA and alcoholism with some relevant issues relating to those studies. The present animal and human data suggest several alterations in the DA system in the context of alcoholism. Receptor studies imply that DA D(2) receptor density and function are lower at least among type 1 alcoholics, which suggests that they could benefit from drugs that enhance DAergic activity, such as partial DA agonists. These drugs could help to restore suboptimal levels of DAergic activity by reducing both the craving for alcohol in abstinence and the euphoria subsequent to alcohol's release of DA in the nucleus accumbens (NAC), thus providing negative reinforcement for relapse.

The Dopamine D1 Antagonist Reduces Ethanol Reward for C57BL/6 Mice

BACKGROUND

Dopamine D1 antagonist effects on behaviors related to obtaining and consuming ethanol remain unclear. The highly selective D1 antagonist ecopipam (SCH 39166), which has no effect on the serotonin system, was used to evaluate the role of D1 receptors in ethanol reward and its potential for treating alcohol abuse by determining its effect on several measures of ethanol reward in C57BL/6 (B6) mice.

METHODS

Ecopipam (0.025-0.2 mg/kg) effects on instrumental and contingent consummatory responses and on noncontingent consummatory responses for ethanol and water reward were determined in food-restricted male mice trained to lever-respond for 12% ethanol delivered on a fixed ratio-4 reinforcement schedule. The mice were tested for 15-min sessions under preprandial (high-hunger and low-thirst) and postprandial (low-hunger and high-thirst) test conditions.

RESULTS

Ecopipam dose-dependently reduced instrumental and consummatory responses for ethanol and ethanol intake when tested under hunger- or thirst-motivated conditions with free access to water. Under thirst motivation with no access to an alternate fluid source, lever responses for ethanol and water were similar; however, ecopipam reduced responding for ethanol more than responding for water reward. When given concurrent free access to the same fluid delivered for lever pressing, animals made more contacts for ethanol than for water; ecopipam reduced free ethanol but not water contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Ecopipam attenuated ethanol reward at doses that did not affect water reward, indicating an effect independent of reductions in motor system function or general motivation and arousal. Ecopipam also reduced ethanol reward to the same degree under hunger, thirst, or sated conditions, again indicating that it affected ethanol reward at doses that did not grossly affect general motivational states. These data suggest that ecopipam may reduce ethanol reward with few side effects and that it warrants further investigation as a pharmacological tool for treating alcohol abuse.

Clozapine reduces alcohol drinking in Syrian golden hamsters

Alcohol abuse contributes substantially to the overall morbidity of schizophrenia. While typical antipsychotic medications do not limit alcohol use in patients with schizophrenia, emerging data suggest that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine does. To further elucidate the effects of these antipsychotics on alcohol use, we initiated a study in alcohol-preferring rodents. Syrian golden hamsters were given free-choice, unlimited access to alcohol. Nine days of treatment (s.c. injection) with clozapine (2-4 mg/kg/day), but not haloperidol (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day), reduced alcohol drinking. Clozapine reduced alcohol drinking by 88% (from 11.3+/-1.7 to 1.4+/-0.2 g/kg/day) while increasing both water and food intake. Alcohol drinking gradually (during 24 days) returned toward baseline in the clozapine-treated animals when vehicle was substituted for clozapine. Further increasing the doses of haloperidol (0.6-1.0 mg/kg/day) had no effect on alcohol drinking; moreover, very low doses of haloperidol (0.025-0.1 mg/kg/day) tested in separate groups of hamsters also had no effect on alcohol drinking. This study demonstrates that clozapine, but not haloperidol, can effectively and reversibly decrease alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring hamsters. The results are compatible with the observations that clozapine, but not haloperidol, limits alcohol use in patients with schizophrenia. These data further suggest that clozapine may serve as a prototype for developing novel treatments for alcohol abuse.

Very low doses of ethanol induce behavioral changes involving dopamine D2 receptors

In male rats, pretreatment for 20 days with very low (0.5, 1%, v/v) but not with high (5, 10%, v/v) oral doses of ethanol delayed the initiation and reduced the duration of narcosis induced by an acute high intraperitoneal (i.p.) dose of the drug (3 g/kg in 25% saline solution). Furthermore, the treatment improved the acquisition of shuttle-box active avoidance response but did not affect the emission of ultrasonic calls, an index of emotional state of animals. These effects were inhibited by peripheral administration of the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (1 mg/kg). A higher dose of sulpiride (10 mg/kg) prolonged the duration of narcosis in rats pretreated with high-dose ethanol and reduced the number of conditioned avoidance responses in the shuttle-box paradigm. The pretreatment with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist, (+/-)-2-(N-phenethyl-N-propylamino)-5-hydroxytetralin (PPHT, 0.1 mg/kg), enhanced the effects of ethanol very low doses in delaying the initiation and reducing the duration of narcosis induced by an acute i.p. dose of the drug. A pharmacokinetic study in ethanol-pretreated animals revealed that administration of 0.5% or 1% ethanol for 20 days did not modify significantly the bioavailability of acute ethanol administered i.p. in a dose of 3 g/kg in 25% saline solution. Thus, repeated administration of ethanol very low doses may have affected the sensitivity of presynaptic dopamine D2 receptors. The influence on dopamine release through an action on presynaptic receptors may be involved in these effects of small doses of ethanol.

Risperidone reduces limited access alcohol drinking in alcohol-preferring rats

An atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone reduced ethanol drinking of ethanol-preferring Alko, Alcohol (AA) rats in a limited access paradigm. Its effect was transient at a dose known to preferentially antagonize the 5-HT(2) receptors (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), but long-lasting when the dose was increased to 1.0 mg/kg that also blocks dopamine D(2) receptors. Risperidone also reduced dose-dependently locomotor activity and limited access saccharin intake of the AA rats, indicating that its effect on ethanol drinking was not selective. Risperidone at 0.1 mg/kg given before four successive daily ethanol-drinking sessions significantly reduced the ethanol intake. These data from an animal model of high ethanol intake suggest that risperidone should be tested in various populations of alcoholics for reducing ethanol consumption.

Dopamine receptors and transporters in the brain reward circuits of type 1 and 2 alcoholics measured with human whole hemisphere autoradiography

The role of the dopamine system in brain reward mechanisms and development of substance abuse is well-established with nucleus accumbens as a key structure in mediating these effects. Several studies on alcoholism have indicated defects in dopaminergic neurotransmission and alterations in dopamine receptor densities. However, it has remained unclear if the substance abuse-related dopaminergic defect is specifically associated with a certain receptor subtype. The aim of this study was to compare putative alterations of dopamine D(1,) D(2), and D(3) receptors in nucleus accumbens, amygdala, and substantia nigra among alcoholics and controls. We studied the densities of dopamine D(1) and D(3) receptors in brains of 9 type 1 alcoholics, 8 type 2 alcoholics, and 10 healthy controls by using postmortem human whole hemisphere autoradiography. The mean densities of dopamine D(1) and D(3) receptors were at the same level in all study groups. Combining these with our previous results, our data suggest that among type 1 alcoholics dopamine transporters are lower in nucleus accumbens and dopamine D(2), but not D(1) or D(3) receptors in nucleus accumbens and amygdala. Further, the densities of all these dopamine-binding sites among type 2 alcoholics are at the level of healthy controls. The results suggest that lower dopamine receptor density is specific for D(2) receptor and for type 1 alcoholism, which supports Cloninger's neurogenetic model of two alcoholic subtypes, and indicates the importance of classifying these subgroups separately when issues related to dopaminergic activity are studied.

Ethanol, endocannabinoids, and the cannabinoidergic signaling system

This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2001 annual meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Montreal, Canada. The chairpersons were Appa Hungund and George Koob. The presentations were (1) Role of endocannabinoids in ethanol tolerance, by Appa Hungund; (2) Modulation of cannabinoid receptor and its signal transduction in chronic alcoholism, by B. S. Basavarajappa; (3) Endocannabinoid involvement in the control of appetitive behavior, by George Kunos; (4) Regulation of voluntary ethanol intake by cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists in alcohol-preferring sP rats, by Giancarlo Colombo; (5) Role of endogenous cannabinoid system in alcoholism, by Fernado Rodriguez de Fonseca; and (6) Endocannabinoids and dopamine interactions in vivo, by Loren Parsons and George Koob.

Dopamine D3 receptor antagonist effects on the motivational effects of ethanol

Dopaminergic systems are thought to play important roles in the motivational effects of ethanol. In the present experiments, we examined the effects of U99194A, a putative dopamine D(3) receptor antagonist, on ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, locomotor stimulation, taste aversion, and self-administration. In two separate studies with the use of a place conditioning procedure, adult male Swiss-Webster mice received six pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (1 or 3 g/kg, i.p.), U99194A (20 mg/kg, i.p.), or ethanol + U99194A. For determination of ethanol-stimulated activity, subjects received U99194A at a dose of 0, 10, 20, or 30 mg/kg 15 min before ethanol at 0, 1, or 2 g/kg immediately before a 30-min locomotor activity test. In a taste conditioning procedure, subjects received five 1-h access periods to 0.2 M NaCl. After the first four access periods, subjects received ethanol at 0, 2, or 4 g/kg and U99194A at 0, 10, or 20 mg/kg. In an oral self-administration procedure, male C57BL/6J mice received U99194A at 0, 10, or 20 mg/kg, followed by 30-min access to 10% (wt./vol.) sucrose or 10% (vol./vol.) ethanol in 10% sucrose. The acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference was enhanced by U99194A. However, U99194A did not produce significant preference alone. U99194A did not alter locomotor stimulation produced by an injection of ethanol at 2 g/kg. U99194A also did not alter the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion and did not change oral ethanol self-administration. These results support the suggestion that dopamine D(3) receptors have specific involvement in ethanol reward, as measured by place conditioning, but are not important for ethanol-stimulated activity, ethanol taste aversion, or ethanol intake.

Potentiation of ethanol-induced loss of the righting reflex by ascorbic acid in mice: interaction with dopamine antagonists

The present investigation was carried out to determine the effect of ascorbic acid on ethanol-induced loss of the righting reflex (LORR) and the interactions between ascorbic acid and dopamine receptor antagonists in affecting this action of ethanol in mice. To test the effect of each drug on ethanol-induced LORR, ascorbic acid (31.25, 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 mg/kg intraperitoneally [IP]) and dopamine receptor antagonists (haloperidol 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg; L-sulpiride 20, 40, 80 mg/kg; clozapine 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 mg/kg; SCH 23390 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg subcutaneously [SC]) were administered, respectively, 30 min before ethanol (4.0 g/kg IP) administration. Ascorbic acid, at the dose of 1000 mg/kg, significantly potentiated ethanol-induced LORR in mice. Dopamine D(2) antagonists haloperidol (0.5, 1.0 mg/kg SC), and L-sulpiride (80 mg/kg SC) also significantly prolonged the duration of LORR induced by ethanol. Clozapine and SCH 23390, at the doses used, did not affect ethanol-induced LORR. In the interaction study, the synergistic effect of ascorbic acid (1000 mg/kg IP) on ethanol-induced LORR was significantly enhanced by dopamine D(2) antagonists haloperidol, L-sulpiride, and clozapine, and the highest dose of dopamine D(1) antagonist SCH 23390. These results suggest that ascorbic acid may potentiate ethanol-induced LORR partially via a mechanism mainly linked to blockade of dopamine D(2) receptors.

Haloperidol administered subchronically reduces the alcohol-deprivation effect in mice

During the pre-experimental phase, hybrid (CBA x C57BL) male mice having had 16 weeks free access to food, water and flavored 30% alcohol were deprived of alcohol for 3 days. The next day they were given free choice between similarly flavored water and 30% alcohol. The mice were divided into two subgroups having (HD) or lacking (LD) the deprivation-induced elevation in alcohol intake during the first 1.5 h of renewed access compared with their intake during the last 22.5 h of first postdeprivation day. In Experiment 1, alcohol naive, LD, and HD mice received daily injections of haloperidol (Haldol; 1 mg/kg) or vehicle during 14 days of abstinence. The behavior of the mice was evaluated in an exploratory cross-maze and inescapable slip funnel test a day after the 13th injection (before the 14th injection). On the first postinjection day, the mice were again given a free choice between flavored water and alcohol. In Experiment 2, all the mice were administered with vehicle during the first 13 days of abstinence. On 14th day, they received an injection of haloperidol (1 mg/kg) or vehicle and a day later were given choice between flavored water and alcohol. Unlike a single injection, the subchronic administration of haloperidol lowered the alcohol intake by HD mice with a more prominent decrease seen during the first 1.5 h than during the last 22.5 h of first postdeprivation day. The alcohol-deprivation effect in HD mice decreased by 79% after subchronic haloperidol. No significant change in alcohol intake was found in alcohol-naive and LD mice. Water intake did not vary systematically. Among the groups, the effect of subchronic haloperidol on the alcohol-deprivation effect did not parallel changes in most of the measures of exploratory or avoidance behavior. It is proposed that haloperidol administered subchronically may attenuate motivation for alcohol.

Effects of haloperidol or SCH-23390 on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

Dopaminergic systems are thought to play an important role in the motivational effects of ethanol. The present experiments examined the effects of haloperidol (a D2 antagonist) and SCH-23390 (a D1 antagonist) on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion. In four separate experiments, adult male Swiss-Webster mice were acclimated to a 2-h/day water restriction regimen. Subsequently they received four conditioning trials consisting of 1-h access to either 0.2 M NaCl (experiments 1-3) or 0.15 % w/v saccharin (experiment 4). After flavor access on trials 1-3, subjects received either haloperidol (0.1, 0.15, or 0.3 mg/kg), SCH-23390 (0.05 mg/kg), or saline followed 30 min later by 0, 2, or 4 g/kg ethanol. Ethanol-flavor pairings reduced subsequent flavor intakes, indicating the development of conditioned taste aversion. Neither haloperidol of SCH-23390 reduced flavor intakes in the absence of ethanol. However, both haloperidol and SCH-23390 reduced ethanol-conditioned aversion depending on ethanol dose and conditioned flavor. These results are consistent with the notion that dopaminergic processes are important for the development of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion, and the notion that dopaminergic receptor systems influence both positive and negative motivational effects of ethanol.

Left and right 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex differentially affect voluntary ethanol consumption

Dopaminergic projections to the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were unilaterally lesioned with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) to examine how dopamine (DA) asymmetry in the mPFC influences voluntary ethanol consumption. Differences in nucleus accumbens (NAS) DA neurotransmission have been related to individual differences in locomotor activity and in the rewarding efficacy of ethanol. Therefore, differences in locomotor activity were used to further characterize the effects of unilateral mPFC 6-OHDA lesions on ethanol consumption. Male Long Evans rats were assessed for high versus low levels of spontaneous locomotor activity. DA terminals in the left or right mPFC were unilaterally lesioned with 6-OHDA, resulting in an average DA depletion of 54% and 50%, respectively. After a minimum seven-day recovery period, preference for a 10% ethanol solution vs. water was determined in a 24-h 2-bottle home-cage free-choice paradigm. Left mPFC 6-OHDA lesions increased and right lesions decreased ethanol consumption. These differential effects of left and right lesions were primarily attributable to rats exhibiting low locomotor activity prior to surgery. The present data suggest that right greater than left cortical DA asymmetry in combination with low endogenous NAS DA (predicted by low locomotor activity levels) may increase the vulnerability to abuse ethanol.

Comparison of effects of a range of 5-HT receptor modulators on consumption and preference for a sweetened ethanol solution in rats

This study assessed the effects of a range of serotonergic agents on preference for a slightly sweetened ethanol solution (10% ethanol, 3% glucose) in rats. A two-bottle, free-choice paradigm was used following induction of ethanol consumption. The model used provides a robust and reliable level of ethanol self-administration in normal laboratory rats. Ethanol consumption was significantly and selectively reduced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) full agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) and the 5-HT3 antagonist granisetron (0.1-1.0 mg/kg). Non-specific reductions in fluid consumption were induced by the 5-HT1B agonist RU 24969 (0.1-1.0mg/kg) and the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin (1.0-6.0 mg/kg). These studies thus confirm the potential for decreasing ethanol consumption and ethanol preference of 5-HT1A agonists and 5-HT3 antagonists, but failed to find any selective effects for agents acting at 5-HT1B or 5-HT2 receptors.