Effects of fentanyl on cellular immune functions in man

Immunosuppression by opioids: Mechanisms of action on innate and adaptive immunity

Opioids are excellent analgesics for the clinical treatment of various types of acute and chronic pain, particularly cancer-related pain. Nevertheless, it is well known that opioids have some nasty side effects, including immunosuppression, which is commonly overlooked. As a result, the incidence of opportunistic bacterial and viral infections increases in patients with long-term opioid use. Nowadays, there are no effective medications to alleviate opioid-induced immunosuppression. Understanding the underlying molecular mechanism of opioids in immunosuppression can enable researchers to devise effective therapeutic interventions. This review comprehensively summarized the exogenous opioids-induced immunosuppressive effects and their underlying mechanisms, the regulatory roles of endogenous opioids on the immune system, the potential link between opioid immunosuppressive effect and the function of the central nervous system (CNS), and the future perspectives in this field.

A retrospective investigation of the relationship between neuroblastoma response to anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies and exposure to opioids for pain management

OBJECTIVE

Recent increased awareness and research studies reflect possible associations between opioid exposure and cancer outcomes. Children with neuroblastoma (NB) often require opioid treatment for pain. However, associations between tumor response to chemotherapy and opioid exposure have not been investigated in clinical settings.

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients with NB treated between 2013 and 2016. We evaluated opioid consumption quantified in morphine equivalent doses (mg/kg) based on nurse- or patient-controlled analgesia during antibody infusions. We also analyzed their associations with change in primary tumor volume and total tumor burden.

RESULTS

Of 42 patients given opioids for pain related to anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibodies (anti-GD2 mAb), data completion was achieved for 36, and details of statistical analyses were entered. Median total weight-based morphine equivalent (over 8 days) was 4.71 mg/kg (interquartile range 3.49-7.96). We found a statistically insignificant weak negative relationship between total weight-based morphine equivalents and tumor volume ratio (correlation coefficient -.0103, p-value .9525) and a statistically insignificant weak positive relationship between total weight-based morphine equivalent and Curie score ratio (correlation coefficient .1096, p-value .5247).

CONCLUSION

Our study found no statistically significant correlation between opioid consumption and natural killer (NK) cell-mediated killing of NB cells as measured by effects on tumor volume/tumor load.

Less Well-Known Consequences of the Long-Term Use of Opioid Analgesics: A Comprehensive Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of short-term opioid analgesics are well known and acknowledged; however, the spectrum of the sequelae of long-term use seems less clear. Some effects may remain undetected but still have the potential to cause harm and reduce patients' quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy.

METHODS

We performed a quasi-systematic search, analyzing articles published in the MEDLINE database between January 2000 and March 2021 that identified adverse effects of opioids used for chronic pain treatment.

RESULTS

Growing evidence indicates that there are multiple serious adverse effects of opioid treatment. Long-term opioid use may have significant effects on the endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neural systems. Studies show that long-term opioid treatment increases the risk of fractures, infections, cardiovascular complications, sleep-disordered breathing, bowel dysfunction, overdose, and mortality. Opioids may potentially affect cancer development. Most consequences of the long-term use of opioids have been identified in studies of patients with non-malignant pain.

CONCLUSION

Studies indicate that long-term use of opioids increases the risk of drug-related events in a significant number of patients. Clinicians should be aware of these complications associated with prescribing opioids, discuss them with patients, prevent complications, if possible, and diagnose them early and manage adequately. More human studies are needed to assess the risk, including trials with individual opioids, because they have different adverse effect profiles.

A Critical Appraisal of the Effects of Anesthetics on Immune-system Modulation in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

Purpose

The aim of the present article was to briefly summarize current knowledge about the immunomodulatory effects of general anesthetics and the possible clinical effects of this immunomodulation in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

The PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies.

Findings

The novel coronavirus causes a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, with a large absolute number of patients experiencing severe pneumonia and rapid progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. In these patients, the equilibrium of the inflammatory response is a major determinant of survival. The impact of anesthetics on immune-system modulation may vary and includes both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects.

Implications

Inhibition of the development of severe inflammation and/or the enhancement of inflammation resolution by anesthetics may limit organ damage and improve outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Which idea is better with regard to immune response? Opioid anesthesia or opioid free anesthesia

The stress of surgery is characterized by an inflammatory response with immune suppression resulting from many factors, including the type of surgery and the kind of anesthesia, linked with the drugs that are used and the underlying disease of the patient. The trauma of surgery triggers a cascade of reactions involving the immune response and nociception. As strong analgesics, opioids provide the analgesic component of general anesthesia with bi-directional effect on the immune system. Opioids influence almost all aspects of the immune response in regards to leukocytes, macrophages, mast cells, lymphocytes, and NK cells. The suppressive effect of opioids on the immune system is limiting their use, especially in patients with impaired immune response, so the possibility of using multimodal anesthesia without opioids, known as opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), is gaining more and more sympathizers. The idea of OFA is to eliminate opioid analgesia in the treatment of acute pain and to replace it with drugs from other groups that are assumed to have a comparable analgesic effect without affecting the immune system. Here, we present a review on the impact of anesthesia, with and without the use of opioids, on the immune response to surgical stress.

Effects of Acute Subdural Hematoma-Induced Brain Injury On Energy Metabolism in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

ABSTRACT

In activated immune cells, differentiation and function are determined by cell type-specific modifications of metabolic patterns. After traumatic brain injury both immune cell activation and suppression were reported. Therefore, we sought to explore immune cell energy metabolism in a long-term, resuscitated porcine model of acute subdural hematoma (ASDH)-induced acute brain injury devoid of impaired systemic hemodynamics and oxygen transport.Before and up to 50 h after induction of ASDH, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated by density gradient centrifugation, and cell metabolism was analyzed using high-resolution respirometry for mitochondrial respiration and electron spin resonance for reactive oxygen species production. After incubation with stable isotope-labeled 1,2-13C2-glucose or 13C5-glutamine, distinct labeling patterns of intermediates of glycolysis or tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and 13CO2 production were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Principal component analysis was followed by a varimax rotation on the covariance across all measured variables and all measured time points.After ASDH induction, average PBMC metabolic activity remained unaffected, possibly because strict adherence to intensive care unit guidelines limited trauma to ASDH induction without any change in parameters of systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and whole-body metabolism. Despite decreased glycolytic activity fueling the TCA cycle, the principal component analysis indicated a cell type-specific activation pattern with biosynthetic and proliferative characteristics.

General Anesthetics on Immune System Cytokines: A Narrative Review Article

Context

According to the previous studies, general anesthesia influences the immune system. Evaluating such impacts on the immune system helps to improve the management of anesthesia.

Evidence Acquisition

The current review aimed to summarize the literature related to the effects of general anesthesia agents on the cytokines. Google Scholar, PubMed, and ISI/Web of Sciences databases were searched using the following keywords: cytokine, general anesthesia, immune response, intravenous anesthetics, volatile anesthetics, opioids, benzodiazepines, and controlled ventilation.

Results

Long-term administration of general anesthesia drugs, due to their effects on cytokines, can lead to disease progression in patients with immune deficiency. Due to the conflicting results of various studies and the increasing number of patients with immune deficiency, the choice of the appropriate general anesthesia agents facilitates achieving the more favorable function of the cytokines.

Conclusions

It seems that the effect of general anesthesia on the immune system in healthy patients and short-term surgeries is not considerable and changes in the immune system are related to surgical trauma, particularly in major surgery.

Fentanyl self-administration impacts brain immune responses in male Sprague-Dawley rats

Opioid use disorder (OUD) affects over two million in the United States and is an increasing public health crisis. The abuse of fentanyl and the emergence of potent fentanyl derivatives increases the risk for the user to succumb to overdose, but also to develop OUD. While intense attention is currently focused on understanding the complexity of behaviors and neural functions that contribute to OUD, much remains to be discovered concerning the interactions of opioid intake with the immune response in the central nervous system (CNS). In the present studies, we tested the hypothesis that short-term abstinence from fentanyl self-administration associates with altered expression of innate immune markers. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to self-administer fentanyl (0.0032 mg/kg/infusion) to stability followed by 24 h of abstinence. Several innate immune markers, as well as opioid receptors (ORs) and intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), were interrogated within nodes of the neurocircuitry involved in OUD processes, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), caudate putamen (CPu), hippocampus (HIP) and midbrain (MB). In the present study, few immune targets were impacted in the PFC and MB during short-term abstinence from fentanyl (relative to saline) self-administration. However, increased expression of cytokines [e.g., interleukin (IL)1β, IL5], chemokines [e.g., C-C motif chemokine 20 (MIP3α)], tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interferon (IFN) proteins (e.g., IFNβ and IFNγ)] was seen in the NAc, while decreased expression of cytokines (e.g., several ILs), chemokines [e.g., granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP) MCP1, MIP3α], the chemokine ligand 5 (RANTES) and interferons (e.g., IFNβ and IFNγ) in the HIP. Positive correlations were observed between cumulative fentanyl intake and expression of IL1β and IL6 in the NAc, and significant negative correlations with fentanyl intake and IFN β, IL2, IL5, IL12p70 and IL17 in the HIP. Few changes in OR expression was observed during early abstinence from fentanyl self-administration. Excitingly, the expression of the PRR, stimulator of interferon genes (STING) negatively correlated with cumulative fentanyl intake and significantly correlated to specific cytokines, chemokines and interferon proteins in the HIP. Although the CPu appears relatively invulnerable to changes in innate immune markers, the highest correlations between cumulative fentanyl intake with MAVS and/or STING was measured in the CPu. Our findings provide the first evidence of CNS innate immune responses and implicate STING as novel mechanistic targets of immunomodulation during short-term abstinence from fentanyl self-administration.

Do All Opioid Drugs Share the Same Immunomodulatory Properties? A Review From Animal and Human Studies

Suppression of the immune system has been constantly reported in the last years as a classical side effect of opioid drugs. Most of the studies on the immunological properties of opioids refer to morphine. Although morphine remains the "reference molecule," other semisynthetic and synthetic opioids are frequently used in the clinical practice. The primary objective of this review is to analyze the available literature on the immunomodulating properties of opioid drugs different from morphine in preclinical models and in the human. A search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases using the terms "immunosuppression," "immune system," "opioids," "Natural killer cells," "cytokines," and "lymphocytes." The results achieved concerning the effects of fentanyl, methadone, oxycodone, buprenorphine, remifentanil, tramadol, and tapentadol on immune responses in animal studies, in healthy volunteers and in patients are reported. With some limitations due to the different methods used to measure immune system parameters, the large range of opioid doses and the relatively scarce number of participants in the available studies, we conclude that it is not correct to generalize immunosuppression as a common side effect of all opioid molecules.

Members of the same pharmacological family are not alike: Different opioids, different consequences, hope for the opioid crisis?

Pain management is the specialized medical practice of modulating pain perception and thus easing the suffering and improving the life quality of individuals suffering from painful conditions. Since this requires the modulation of the activity of endogenous systems involved in pain perception, and given the large role that the opioidergic system plays in pain perception, opioids are currently the most effective pain treatment available and are likely to remain relevant for the foreseeable future. This contributes to the rise in opioid use, misuse, and overdose death, which is currently characterized by public health officials in the United States as an epidemic. Historically, the majority of preclinical rodent studies were focused on morphine. This has resulted in our understanding of opioids in general being highly biased by our knowledge of morphine specifically. However, recent in vitro studies suggest that direct extrapolation of research findings from morphine to other opioids is likely to be flawed. Notably, these studies suggest that different opioid analgesics (opioid agonists) engage different downstream signaling effects within the cell, despite binding to and activating the same receptors. This recognition implies that, in contrast to the historical status quo, different opioids cannot be made equivalent by merely dose adjustment. Notably, even at equianalgesic doses, different opioids could result in different beneficial and risk outcomes. In order to foster further translational research regarding drug-specific differences among opioids, here we review basic research elucidating differences among opioids in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, their capacity for second messenger pathway activation, and their interactions with the immune system and the dopamine D2 receptors.

Opioids in the immune system: from experimental studies to clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Opioids interact with both innate and adaptive immune systems and have direct effects on opioid receptors located on immune cells. Research on this topic has provided evidence of the opioid influence on the immune response associated with surgical stress. The immunological effects of opioids are currently being investigated, particularly whether they influence the outcome of surgery or the underlying disease regarding important aspects like infection or cancer progression. This review addresses background research related to the influence of the opioid receptor on the immune system, the immunosuppressive effect associated with major opioids during the perioperative period, and their clinical relevance. The objective of the study was to review the effects of opioids on the immune system.

The Effect of Anesthesia on the Immune System in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the key leading cause of high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Surgical excision is the most effective treatment for CRC. However, stress caused by surgery response can destroy the body's immunity and increase the likelihood of cancer dissemination and metastasis. Anesthesia is an effective way to control the stress response, and recent basic and clinical research has shown that anesthesia and related drugs can directly or indirectly affect the immune system of colorectal cancer patients during the perioperative period. Thus, these drugs may affect the prognosis of CRC surgery patients. This review is intended to summarize currently available data regarding the effects of anesthetics and related drugs on perioperative immune function and postoperative recurrence and metastasis in CRC patients. Determining the most suitable anesthesia for patients with CRC is of utmost importance.

Influence of opioids on immune function in patients with cancer pain: from bench to bedside

In patients with cancer, opioids are principally used for the management of acute surgical and chronic cancer-related pain. However, opioids have many non-analgesic effects, including direct and indirect effects on cancer cells and on anti-tumour immunity (NK cells, macrophages and T-cells). Direct effects on immune cells are manifested via opioid and non-opioid toll-like receptors, whereas indirect effects are manifested via the sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Opioids can also decrease/alter immune cell infiltration into the tumour micro-environment. Animal models have shown that this is not a class effect, in that morphine and fentanyl suppress NK cell cytotoxicity; buprenorphine does not affect NK cell cytotoxicity, whereas tramadol increases NK cell cytotoxicity, reducing metastasis. In healthy individuals, morphine suppresses and fentanyl enhances NK cell cytotoxicity. In patients undergoing surgery, fentanyl decreased and tramadol increased NK cell cytotoxicity; clinical outcomes were not determined. Meta-analyses of opioid-sparing surgical studies report an association between improved recurrence-free and/or overall survival with regional/neuraxial anaesthesia compared with systemic opioids. In patients receiving opioids for non-surgical cancer-related pain, morphine has variable effects on immunity; clinical outcomes were not assessed. Although there is a potential association between systemic opioid administration and shorter survival in cancer patients with a prognosis of months to years, studies have not been designed to primarily assess survival, as a consequence of which causality cannot be apportioned. Pain is immunosuppressive, so analgesia is important. Opioids for cancer-related pain will continue to be recommended until definitive data on the effects of opioids on clinical outcomes in specific patient groups becomes available.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Areas of Opioid Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.14/issuetoc.

Anti-inflammatory properties of anesthetic agents

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Effects of opioids on immunologic parameters that are relevant to anti-tumour immune potential in patients with cancer: a systematic literature review

Background:

The immune system has a central role in controlling cancer, and factors that influence protective antitumour immunity could therefore have a significant impact on the course of malignant disease. Opioids are essential for the management of cancer pain, and preclinical studies indicate that opioids have the potential to influence these tumour immune surveillance mechanisms. The aim of this systematic literature review is to evaluate the clinical effects of opioids on the immune system of patients with cancer.

Methods:

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase, Cochrane database and Web of Knowledge for clinical studies, which evaluated the effects of opioids on the immune system in patients with cancer, was performed.

Results:

Five human studies, which have assessed the effects of opioids on the immune system in patients with cancer, were identified. Although all of these evaluated the effect of morphine on immunologic end points in patients with cancer, none measured the clinical effects.

Conclusions:

Evidence from preclinical, healthy volunteer and surgical models suggests that different opioids variably influence protective anti-tumour immunity; however, actual data derived from cancer populations are inconclusive and definitive recommendations cannot be made. Appropriately designed and powered studies assessing clinical outcomes of opioid use in people with cancer are therefore required to inform oncologists and others involved in cancer care about the rational use of opioids in this patient group.

Comparison of effects of low-flow sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia on neutrophil and T-cell populations

BACKGROUND

Numerous transient effects of anesthesia on postoperative immune status have been documented in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to test the hypothesis that the effects on neutrophil and T-cell populations differ with use of low-flow sevoflurane- and desflurane-induced anesthesia during abdominal surgery.

METHODS

Fifty adult patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II) aged 20 to 60 years were recruited for the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. Anesthesia was induced using fentanyl, propofol, and vecuronium. After intubation, patients in group 1 received sevoflurane, oxygen, and nitrous oxide at a flow rate of 6 L/min, and those in group 2 received desflurane, oxygen, and nitrous oxide at a flow rate of 6 L/min. Ten minutes after induction of anesthesia, the flow rate was decreased to 1 L/min in both groups. Total leukocyte, lymphocyte, and neutrophil counts, percentage of T helper lymphocytes (CD4), cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8), natural killer lymphocytes, and active T lymphocyte, CD4/CD8 ratio, and plasma cortisol values were assessed before and at 2 and 24 hours after induction of anesthesia.

RESULTS

In the desflurane group, at 2 hours after induction of anesthesia, a significant decrease was observed in the lymphocyte count, percentage of CD4 cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio, and a significant increase was noted in the neutrophil count and percentage of CD8 cells (P < 0.05). At 24 hours after induction of anesthesia, a significant increase was observed in the leukocyte and neutrophil counts, percentage of CD4 cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio (P < 0.05). There was no change in the other parameters studied. In the sevoflurane group, a significant decrease was observed in the lymphocyte count and percentage of natural killer cells. In addition, a significant increase was noted in the leukocyte and neutrophil counts at 24 hours after induction of anesthesia (P < 0.01). The increase in the neutrophil count in the desflurane group compared with that in the sevoflurane group was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With use of the low-flow anesthesia technique, compared with desflurane, sevoflurane exerts minimal effects on neutrophil and T-cell populations, which supports our hypothesis.

Opioids and immune modulation: more questions than answers

Opioid addicts are more likely to present with infections suggesting opioids are immune modulators. The potential sites/mechanism(s) for this modulation are controversial and on close inspection not well supported by the current literature. It has long been assumed that opioid-induced immune modulation occurs via a combination of direct actions on the immune cell itself, via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, or both. Opioid receptors are classified as MOP (μ, mu), DOP (δ, delta), and KOP (κ, kappa)--classical naloxone sensitive receptors--or NOP (the receptor for nociceptin/orphanin FQ), which is naloxone insensitive. Opioids currently used in clinical practice predominantly target the MOP receptor. There do not appear to be classical opioid receptors present on immune cells. The evidence for HPA activation is also poor and shows some species dependence. Most opioids used clinically or as drugs of abuse do not target the NOP receptor. Other possible target sites for immune modulation include the sympathetic nervous system and central sites. We are currently unable to accurately define the cellular target for immune modulation and suggest further investigation is required. Based on the differences observed when comparing studies in laboratory animals and those performed in humans we suggest that further studies in the clinical setting are needed.

Comparative effects of flurbiprofen and fentanyl on natural killer cell cytotoxicity, lymphocyte subsets and cytokine concentrations in post-surgical intensive care unit patients: prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the long-term administration of flurbiprofen and fentanyl in the intensive care unit on natural killer cell cytotoxicity (NKCC), lymphocyte subsets and cytokine levels.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients scheduled for at least 48 h sedation after neck surgery were randomly assigned to two groups called group N and group F. Group N patients were sedated with propofol and flurbiprofen after surgery (n = 12), while group F patients were sedated with propofol and fentanyl (n = 13). The NKCC, lymphocyte subsets, and plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 were measured before and at the end of surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD2.

RESULTS

The NKCC was significantly higher on POD1 in group N than in group F (14.5 ± 11.2 versus 6.3 ± 4.1%, p < 0.05), the difference between the groups disappearing on POD2. Lymphocyte subsets and plasma levels of cytokines were not significantly different between the two groups during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Transient suppressive effects on NKCC were observed in the fentanyl group as compared to the flurbiprofen group. This suggests that when choosing postoperative analgesics, physicians should bear in mind the potential immunosuppressive effects of these agents in patients requiring prolonged sedation in the intensive care unit.

Opioids for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in older people

Chronic pain occurs in 45-85% of the geriatric population and the need to treat chronic pain is growing substantially. Unfortunately, treatment for chronic pain is not always correctly targeted, which leads to a reduced quality of life, with decreased socialization, depression, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairment, disability and malnutrition. Considering these consequences, healthcare professionals should aim at improving the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain in older persons. One of the most important limitations in achieving successful pain management is that older people are not aware that pain management options exist or medications for pain, such as opioids, have associated benefits and adverse effects. Importantly, opioids do not induce any organ failure and if adequately used at the right dosage may only present some predictable and preventable adverse effects. Treating and controlling chronic pain is essential in elderly patients in order to maintain a good quality of life and an active role in both the family and society. To date there are only a few randomized clinical trials testing opioid therapy in elderly patients, and the aim of the present review is to highlight the efficacy and tolerability of opioid use through a literature search strategy in elderly people with chronic non-cancer pain.

[Could anaesthesia, analgesia and sympathetic modulation affect neoplasic recurrence after surgery? A systematic review centred over the modulation of natural killer cells activity]

OBJECTIVE

The Natural Killer cells (NK) are an important part of non-specific cellular-mediated and antitumoral immunity. The goal of this review is to recapitulate data published over NK activity during the perioperative period and the influence of anaesthesia, analgesia and modulation of sympathetic system.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed/Medline database.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Keywords-based selection, without limit of date: fundamental studies, randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In human as in animal studies, an important correlation exists between NK activity and prognosis linked to the development of metastasis. The great depression of this cytotoxicity during the perioperative period could be able to compromise host defenses. The influence of anaesthetics and analgesics is important. The effects of the opioids, the agonists and the antagonists of the sympathetic nervous system, the prostaglandins, the NSAIDs, the ketamine, the hypnotics and the locoregional anaesthesia are systematically reviewed. The limits of experimental model presented are covered.

CONCLUSION

The effects of anaesthetic/analgesic drugs and techniques, the consequences of sympathomodulation on NK activity are numerous and sometimes opposite. It is important for the anaesthesiologist to keep in mind that the long term consequences of his techniques on the patients' outcome must be clarified.

Perioperative pain, psychological distress, and immune function in men undergoing prostatectomy for cancer of the prostate

Prostate cancer is a leading malignancy in men, and prostatectomy is widely used for its treatment. Psychological distress and pain are commonly experienced in the perioperative period, and both can contribute to suppression of the immune response to cancer. This study evaluated perioperative pain, psychological distress, and immune function in men undergoing prostatectomy. Men were evaluated prior to surgery, 1 and 2 days postoperatively and 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Compared to cancer-free men, the prostatectomy group reported increased perceived stress, depression, confusion, and anxiety prior to surgery. During the 2 postoperative days, mood disturbance and anxiety persisted and were accompanied by mild elevations in pain and reduced vigor. At 4-6 weeks postoperative, mood, pain, and immune function were similar to those of the cancer-free group; however, the prostatectomy group continued to report significant elevations in anxiety. Natural killer cell activity (NKCA) was significantly reduced on Day 1 after prostatectomy, but by postoperative Day 2, NKCA returned to a level similar to that of the cancer-free group. The reduction in NKCA was not accompanied by changes in circulating immune cells, demonstrating that this reduction represented a functional change in NKCA. No correlations between immune variables and pain or psychological variables were found, suggesting that the postoperative reduction in NKCA was likely the result of the physical stress of the surgical experience. Suppression of immune defenses during the critical postoperative period can place cancer patients at risk for nascent tumor seeding. Additional interventions are needed to reduce this risk.

Opioid-induced immunosuppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of the immunological effects of commonly used analgesic opioid drugs with particular emphasis on human studies, with the final aim to highlight their potential clinical relevance.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immunomodulatory effects of morphine have been characterized in animal and human studies. Morphine decreases the effectiveness of several functions of both natural and acquired immunity, interfering with important intracellular pathways involved in immune regulation. Mainly from animal studies, however, it has emerged that not all opioids induce the same immunosuppressive effects and evaluating each opioid's profile is important for appropriate analgesic selection. The potent opioid fentanyl also exerts a relevant immunosuppression, while the partial agonist buprenorphine appears to have a more favourable immune profile. The impact of the opioid-mediated immune effects could be particularly dangerous in selective vulnerable populations, such as the elderly or immunocompromised patients.

SUMMARY

The impact of opioid drug treatment on immunity may be a new safety concern for the physician. Although many advances have been made in understanding the effects of opioid drugs on immune responses, their relevance is not completely clear. The scientific community must be aware that it is about time to perform well designed clinical studies in order to assess the importance of opioid-induced immune suppression.

Anesthetics, immune cells, and immune responses

General anesthesia accompanied by surgical stress is considered to suppress immunity, presumably by directly affecting the immune system or activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system. Along with stress such as surgery, blood transfusion, hypothermia, hyperglycemia, and postoperative pain, anesthetics per se are associated with suppressed immunity during perioperative periods because every anesthetic has direct suppressive effects on cellular and neurohumoral immunity through influencing the functions of immunocompetent cells and inflammatory mediator gene expression and secretion. Particularly in cancer patients, immunosuppression attributable to anesthetics, such as the dysfunction of natural killer cells and lymphocytes, may accelerate the growth and metastases of residual malignant cells, thereby worsening prognoses. Alternatively, the anti-inflammatory effects of anesthetics may be beneficial in distinct situations involving ischemia and reperfusion injury or the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Clinical anesthesiologists should select anesthetics and choose anesthetic methods with careful consideration of the clinical situation and the immune status of critically ill patients, in regard to long-term mortality, morbidity, and the optimal prognosis.

Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone)

SUMMARY OF CONSENSUS: 1. The use of opioids in cancer pain: The criteria for selecting analgesics for pain treatment in the elderly include, but are not limited to, overall efficacy, overall side-effect profile, onset of action, drug interactions, abuse potential, and practical issues, such as cost and availability of the drug, as well as the severity and type of pain (nociceptive, acute/chronic, etc.). At any given time, the order of choice in the decision-making process can change. This consensus is based on evidence-based literature (extended data are not included and chronic, extended-release opioids are not covered). There are various driving factors relating to prescribing medication, including availability of the compound and cost, which may, at times, be the main driving factor. The transdermal formulation of buprenorphine is available in most European countries, particularly those with high opioid usage, with the exception of France; however, the availability of the sublingual formulation of buprenorphine in Europe is limited, as it is marketed in only a few countries, including Germany and Belgium. The opioid patch is experimental at present in U.S.A. and the sublingual formulation has dispensing restrictions, therefore, its use is limited. It is evident that the population pyramid is upturned. Globally, there is going to be an older population that needs to be cared for in the future. This older population has expectations in life, in that a retiree is no longer an individual who decreases their lifestyle activities. The "baby-boomers" in their 60s and 70s are "baby zoomers"; they want to have a functional active lifestyle. They are willing to make trade-offs regarding treatment choices and understand that they may experience pain, providing that can have increased quality of life and functionality. Therefore, comorbidities--including cancer and noncancer pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and postherpetic neuralgia--and patient functional status need to be taken carefully into account when addressing pain in the elderly. World Health Organization step III opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment for cancer patients and morphine has been the most commonly used for decades. In general, high level evidence data (Ib or IIb) exist, although many studies have included only few patients. Based on these studies, all opioids are considered effective in cancer pain management (although parts of cancer pain are not or only partially opioid sensitive), but no well-designed specific studies in the elderly cancer patient are available. Of the 2 opioids that are available in transdermal formulation--fentanyl and buprenorphine--fentanyl is the most investigated, but based on the published data both seem to be effective, with low toxicity and good tolerability profiles, especially at low doses. 2. The use of opioids in noncancer-related pain: Evidence is growing that opioids are efficacious in noncancer pain (treatment data mostly level Ib or IIb), but need individual dose titration and consideration of the respective tolerability profiles. Again no specific studies in the elderly have been performed, but it can be concluded that opioids have shown efficacy in noncancer pain, which is often due to diseases typical for an elderly population. When it is not clear which drugs and which regimes are superior in terms of maintaining analgesic efficacy, the appropriate drug should be chosen based on safety and tolerability considerations. Evidence-based medicine, which has been incorporated into best clinical practice guidelines, should serve as a foundation for the decision-making processes in patient care; however, in practice, the art of medicine is realized when we individualize care to the patient. This strikes a balance between the evidence-based medicine and anecdotal experience. Factual recommendations and expert opinion both have a value when applying guidelines in clinical practice. 3. The use of opioids in neuropathic pain: The role of opioids in neuropathic pain has been under debate in the past but is nowadays more and more accepted; however, higher opioid doses are often needed for neuropathic pain than for nociceptive pain. Most of the treatment data are level II or III, and suggest that incorporation of opioids earlier on might be beneficial. Buprenorphine shows a distinct benefit in improving neuropathic pain symptoms, which is considered a result of its specific pharmacological profile. 4. The use of opioids in elderly patients with impaired hepatic and renal function: Functional impairment of excretory organs is common in the elderly, especially with respect to renal function. For all opioids except buprenorphine, half-life of the active drug and metabolites is increased in the elderly and in patients with renal dysfunction. It is, therefore, recommended that--except for buprenorphine--doses be reduced, a longer time interval be used between doses, and creatinine clearance be monitored. Thus, buprenorphine appears to be the top-line choice for opioid treatment in the elderly. 5. Opioids and respiratory depression: Respiratory depression is a significant threat for opioid-treated patients with underlying pulmonary condition or receiving concomitant central nervous system (CNS) drugs associated with hypoventilation. Not all opioids show equal effects on respiratory depression: buprenorphine is the only opioid demonstrating a ceiling for respiratory depression when used without other CNS depressants. The different features of opioids regarding respiratory effects should be considered when treating patients at risk for respiratory problems, therefore careful dosing must be maintained. 6. Opioids and immunosuppression: Age is related to a gradual decline in the immune system: immunosenescence, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer, and decreased efficacy of immunotherapy, such as vaccination. The clinical relevance of the immunosuppressant effects of opioids in the elderly is not fully understood, and pain itself may also cause immunosuppression. Providing adequate analgesia can be achieved without significant adverse events, opioids with minimal immunosuppressive characteristics should be used in the elderly. The immunosuppressive effects of most opioids are poorly described and this is one of the problems in assessing true effect of the opioid spectrum, but there is some indication that higher doses of opioids correlate with increased immunosuppressant effects. Taking into consideration all the very limited available evidence from preclinical and clinical work, buprenorphine can be recommended, while morphine and fentanyl cannot. 7. Safety and tolerability profile of opioids: The adverse event profile varies greatly between opioids. As the consequences of adverse events in the elderly can be serious, agents should be used that have a good tolerability profile (especially regarding CNS and gastrointestinal effects) and that are as safe as possible in overdose especially regarding effects on respiration. Slow dose titration helps to reduce the incidence of typical initial adverse events such as nausea and vomiting. Sustained release preparations, including transdermal formulations, increase patient compliance.

Anaesthetics and immune function

Surgical trauma and anaesthetics may cause immune suppression, predisposing patients to postoperative infections. Furthermore, stress such as surgery and pain per se is associated with immune suppression which, in animal models, leads to an increased susceptibility to infection and tumour spread. Thus, by modulating the neurohumoral stress response, anaesthesia may indirectly affect the immune system of surgical patients. In particular, regional anaesthesia attenuates this stress response and the associated effects on cellular and humoral immunity. Additionally, anaesthetics may directly affect the functions of immune-competent cells. However, the reported effects of commercial preparations of, for example, propofol, etomidate and midazolam are highly dependent on the applied solvent. Immunosuppressive effects may be particularly relevant in the intensive care unit when anaesthetics are used as long-term sedatives. There is a striking body of evidence that long-term exposure to certain sedatives is paralleled by infectious complications. On the other hand, anti-inflammatory effects of anaesthetics may be therapeutically beneficial in distinct situations such as those involving ischaemia/reperfusion injury or the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Consequently, sedatives should be administered with careful regard to their respective potential immunomodulatory properties, the clinical situation, and the immunity status of the critically ill patient.

Anesthesia drugs, immunity, and long-term outcome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We provide an overview of the immunological effects of commonly used anesthetic drugs and highlight their potential impact on long-term outcome after surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials provide preliminary evidence that the perioperative process can influence long-term patient outcome. Immunology may begin to elucidate the biology of this safety concern and open new therapeutic opportunities. In this context, awareness of the immunological properties of drugs administered in the perioperative period may assist in their deliberate use to modulate this risk. Statins, beta-blockers, and clonidine can potentially improve long-term cardiac risk. Volatile anesthetics appear to suppress effector functions of both the innate and adaptive immunity, assist tumor growth in animal models, and facilitate aggregation of certain neurodegenerative disease proteins. Local anesthetics block neurons, but are also potent antiinflammatory drugs. Morphine has recognized immunosuppressive functions, which the newer, synthetic opioids don't seem to share. The cholinergic nervous system has antiinflammatory control functions that are largely unexploited.

SUMMARY

Long-term outcome after surgery is a new safety concern in perioperative care. We are faced with enormous challenges in healthcare and research. As providers, tailoring an anesthetic plan to patients' needs will become increasingly critical, and immunology should help in this pursuit.

Effect of 2 anesthetic techniques on the postoperative proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine response and cellular immune function to minor surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of 2 established anesthetic techniques: total intravenous anesthesia and balanced inhalation anesthesia (BAL) on the perioperative-induced changes of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), changes in lymphocyte subsets, and the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, clinical comparison study.

SETTINGS

This study was set at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

This study involved 50 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I who were scheduled for elective minimal invasive partial diskectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

There was no intervention involved in this study.

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in differential counts, lymphocyte subsets, and proliferation rates were determined before surgery and in the early postoperative period. Plasma concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, interferon gamma) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-1RA, transforming growth factor beta), and plasma concentrations of cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine were measured before, during, and after surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

Absolute number of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+, and expression of HLA-DR and activation marker CD25+, CD26+, and CD69+ decreased more in response to surgery after BAL. Changes in distribution of T-lymphocyte cells seem to be in part related to severe postoperative pain. Plasma concentration of IL-6 significantly increased during and after surgery with BAL without relation to pain.

CONCLUSION

Anesthetic management may have varying influences on the postoperative immune response. Surgery-induced inflammatory response and alteration in cell-mediated immunity seem to be more pronounced after BAL. These effects were attributed to the enhanced stress response after BAL.

Opioids and the immune system

Opioid compounds such as morphine produce powerful analgesia that is effective in treating various types of pain. In addition to their therapeutic efficacy, opioids can produce several well known adverse events, and, as has recently been recognized, can interfere with the immune response. The immunomodulatory activities of morphine have been characterized in animal and human studies. Morphine can decrease the effectiveness of several functions of both natural and adaptive immunity, and significantly reduces cellular immunity. Indeed, in animal studies morphine is consistently associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to infection and worsening of cancer. However, from several animal studies it emerges that not all opioids induce the same immunosuppressive effects, and evaluating each opioid's profile is important for appropriate analgesic selection. Buprenorphine is a potent opioid that is frequently prescribed for chronic pain. Acute intracerebroventricular administration of buprenorphine has been shown in rats not to affect cellular immune responses, while a statistically significant inhibition of the immune response was observed with morphine. In mouse studies, chronic administration of buprenorphine led to immune parameters important for antimicrobial responses or for anti-tumour surveillance (lymphoproliferation, natural killer (NK)-lymphocyte activity, cytokine production, lymphocyte number) being unaffected. In contrast, levels of these immune markers were significantly reduced when the potent micro-agonist fentanyl was administered, but recovered after longer periods as tolerance developed. Because the intrinsic immunosuppressive activity varies between individual opioids, predicting the outcome on immunity can be difficult. To study this, the effects of morphine, fentanyl and buprenorphine on NK-lymphocyte activity depressed by experimental surgery were examined in rats. Treating animals immediately after surgery with equianalgesic doses of morphine and buprenorphine significantly reduced surgery-induced immunosuppression. However, buprenorphine reverted NK-lymphocyte activity to preoperative levels, while in morphine-treated rats NK-lymphocyte activity was ameliorated, although not completely. In contrast, fentanyl did not prevent immunosuppression induced by surgery. Overall, from several animal studies it emerges that buprenorphine has the more favourable profile, being a potent analgesic devoid of intrinsic immunosuppressive activity.

Effects of different anaesthetic agents on immune cell function in vitro

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Anaesthesia may affect the regulatory balance of postoperative immune response. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different volatile and non-volatile anaesthetic agents and particularly of clinically used agent combinations on the proliferation capacity and cytokine production of immune cells.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were PHA-activated in the presence or absence of various concentrations of thiopental, propofol, fentanyl, sufentanil, sevoflurane, nitrous oxide and combinations of these anaesthetics. Cell proliferation was assessed by tritiated thymidine uptake. Interleukin-2 production and release of the soluble IL-2 receptor were determined by enzyme immunoassays and used as measures of lymphocyte activation.

RESULTS

Thiopental inhibited cell proliferation in a dose dependent manner (P < 0.001) and reduced sIL-2R release (2090-970 microg mL(-1); P < 0.05). Propofol reduced sIL-2R release at the high concentration of 10 microg mL(-1) (2220 pg mL(-1) 1780 microg mL(-1); p < 0.05). Fentanyl and sufentanil did not compensate for or enhance the inhibitory effects of thiopental. Nitrous oxide, but not sevoflurane, reduced the proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (P < 0.05). In combinations with thiopental or nitrous oxide, sevoflurane compensated the inhibitory effects of these two agents. Fentanyl, sufentanil, sevoflurane and nitrous oxide did not affect PHA-induced IL-2 and sIL-2 receptor release by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

CONCLUSION

Thiopental and nitrous oxide have immunosuppressive activity. In contrast, sevoflurane may have a beneficial effect by alleviating the immunosuppressive effects of both substances.

Mutual interference of HIV and natural killer cell-mediated immune response

Natural killer (NK) cells represent important early effector cells in innate immune defense as they exert their functions without prior sensitization. They participate in regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses and hematopoiesis by producing various cytokines and chemokines. In addition, NK cells lyse virally infected and malignant cells raising them to multifunctional members of the first line of defense. Unlike other lymphocytes they lack specific antigen receptors. They rather bind cells using ubiquitous molecules and communicate via a pattern of receptors specific for MHC-I molecules with their counterparts. In general, successful binding of the receptors delivers an inhibitory signal to NK cells thus sparing the target cell from lysis. In contrast, down-regulated or altered MHC-I expression as frequently observed during virus infection or on malignant cells prevents ligation of inhibitory receptors and MHC-I paralyzing inhibition and thus inducing lysis of the target cell. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection NK cells are of central importance since they can combat viral infection itself and opportunistic pathogens like fungi and protozoa that usually spread during the course of HIV infection. However, various studies have reported alterations in HIV patients affecting NK cell numbers and functions that might negatively influence course and severity of the disease. This review will focus on the mutual interference of NK cells and the HI virus.

Effects of general anaesthesia on inflammation

General anaesthesia accompanied by surgical stress may influence the inflammatory responses that are essential for maintaining the homeostatic state during the postoperative course. Severe dysregulation of the inflammatory process may provoke or aggravate postoperative complications, e.g. increased susceptibility to infections, inadequate stress reactions and hypercatabolism. Anaesthetics have been suspected of impairing various functions of the immune system either directly, by disturbing the functions of immune-competent cells, or indirectly by modulating the stress response. In the past, conflicting data on the possible immunological side effects of anaesthetics have been published. Potential reasons for these controversial findings include heterogeneous patient study groups with diverse pre-existing diseases, lack of standardisation of surgical procedures, major differences in the length and severity of surgical tissue injury and a small number of randomised studies. Although the immunological effects are of minor consequence in subjects with normal immune functions, the suppression of cellular and humoral immunity following surgery and general anaesthesia may be relevant in patients with pre-existing immune disorders.

Chronic fentanyl or buprenorphine infusion in the mouse: similar analgesic profile but different effects on immune responses

It is known that morphine has a negative impact on the immune responses. The potent opioids fentanyl and buprenorphine have recently become available as transdermal preparation for the treatment of chronic pain. We analyze the effect of fentanyl and buprenorphine on splenic cellular immune responses in the mouse. The parameters evaluated were lymphoproliferation, natural killer cell activity and interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma production. Drugs were administered acutely at the equianalgesic doses of 0.25 mg/kg for fentanyl and 5 mg/kg for buprenorphine, or delivered continuously with osmotic pumps for 24 h, 3 and 7 days at the rate of 7.5 microg/h per mouse (fentanyl) and 12.5 microg/h per mouse (buprenorphine). After acute administration, a significant decrease of lymphoproliferation is observed in fentanyl-treated animals only. After 24 h of fentanyl administration all the parameters were significantly reduced. After 3 days of fentanyl infusion NK activity had returned to normal values, while all the other parameters were still significantly reduced. In 7 day fentanyl-treated animals immunological tolerance had developed, since no differences with controls were present. In contrast no immune alterations were ever present in buprenorphine-treated animals. No tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of drugs had yet developed. After 1 week of infusion with fentanyl and buprenorphine, new pumps were implanted releasing double amounts of drugs. Neither fentanyl nor buprenorphine-treated animals showed altered immune responses at any time considered. These results indicate that fentanyl and buprenorphine exert different immune effects. Opioid-induced immunosuppression is less relevant in chronic administration than in acute or short-time administration.

Low-dose remifentanil infusion does not impair natural killer cell function in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Mu opioid agonists suppress natural killer (NK) cell activity in animal models. Studies in human volunteers, however, have yielded conflicting results, with morphine suppressing and fentanyl increasing NK cell activity. This study evaluated the effect of a constant 8-h infusion of remifentanil on NK cell number and function in human volunteers.

METHODS

After IRB approval and informed consent was obtained, 10 healthy volunteers underwent an 11 pm to 7 am infusion of saline, and at least 1 week later an infusion of 0.02-0.04 microg x kg(-1) min(-1) remifentanil. Blood was collected at 7 am for measurement of NK cell cytotoxicity using a (51)Cr release assay and measurement of NK cell number using fluorescent flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Median and range of the total NK cell cytotoxicity (KU ml(-1)) was 745.0 (498.3-1483.6) on the control morning and 818.6 (238.5-1454.5) on the morning following the remifentanil infusion. Neither the number of NK cells ml(-1) (2.5 x 10(5) (1.4 x 10(5)-4.2 x 10(5)) vs 2.7 x 10(5) (1.1 x 10(5)-4.4 x 10(5))) nor the cytotoxicity per 1000 NK cells (KU 1000 NK cells(-1)) (3.0 (1.8-5.2) vs 2.9 (0.9-6.7)) changed between the control and remifentanil conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

An 8-h infusion of remifentanil did not affect NK cell activity in normal volunteers. This result differs from previous findings of morphine-induced NK cell activity suppression and fentanyl-induced NK cell activity enhancement in normal volunteers.

Intravenous fentanyl increases natural killer cell cytotoxicity and circulating CD16(+) lymphocytes in humans

Opioids, including fentanyl, are often administered to patients who may be at risk for the consequences of impaired immune function. We performed a clinical study to test the effects of the synthetic opioid fentanyl on human immune function. Participants received an IV fentanyl initial dose of 3 microg/kg followed by a 2-h IV infusion of 1.2 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Peripheral blood was drawn before and after fentanyl administration to test for neutrophil phagocytic function, neutrophil antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, natural killer cell cytotoxicity, percentage of lymphocyte populations, T-lymphocyte proliferative response, and in vivo antibody response to a pneumococcal vaccine inoculation given at the end of the fentanyl infusion. Fentanyl exposure under the conditions of this study caused a rapid and significant increase in natural killer cell cytotoxicity, which was coincident with an increase in the percentage of CD16(+) and CD8(+) cells in peripheral blood. Fentanyl did not significantly affect any of the other immune measurements.

IMPLICATIONS

Many previous studies have suggested that opioid drugs can impair immune resistance in patients who may be at risk for infection. This study suggests that the opioid fentanyl, when given to healthy humans without coexisting diseases, does not suppress immune resistance. On the basis of these results, the use of fentanyl should not be restricted because of concerns that it may suppress immune function.

Endogenous opiates: 1999

This paper is the twenty-second installment of the annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It summarizes papers published during 1999 that studied the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects, although stress-induced analgesia is included. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; learning, memory, and reward; eating and drinking; alcohol and other drugs of abuse; sexual activity, pregnancy, and development; mental illness and mood; seizures and other neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunologic responses.