Plasma immunoreactive beta-endorphin in bulimics

Central and peripheral peptides regulating eating behaviour and energy homeostasis in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a literature review

A large body of literature suggests the occurrence of a dysregulation in both central and peripheral modulators of appetite in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), but at the moment, the state or trait-dependent nature of those changes is far from being clear. It has been proposed, although not definitively proved, that peptide alterations, even when secondary to malnutrition and/or to aberrant eating behaviours, might contribute to the genesis and the maintenance of some symptomatic aspects of AN and BN, thus affecting the course and the prognosis of these disorders. This review focuses on the most significant literature studies that explored the physiology of those central and peripheral peptides, which have prominent effects on eating behaviour, body weight and energy homeostasis in patients with AN and BN. The relevance of peptide dysfunctions for the pathophysiology of eating disorders is critically discussed.

Dysfunctions of leptin, ghrelin, BDNF and endocannabinoids in eating disorders: beyond the homeostatic control of food intake

A large body of literature documents the occurrence of alterations in the physiology of both central and peripheral modulators of appetite in acute patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). Until more recently the role of most of the appetite modulators in the control of eating behavior was conceptualized solely in terms of their influence on homeostatic control of energy balance. However, it is becoming more and more evident that appetite modulators also affect the non-homeostatic cognitive, emotional and rewarding component of food intake as well as non food-related reward, and, recently, AN and BN have been pathophysiologically linked to dysfunctions of reward mechanisms. Therefore, the possibility exists that observed changes in appetite modulators in acute AN and BN may represent not only homeostatic adaptations to malnutrition, but also contribute to the development and/or the maintenance of aberrant non-homeostatic behaviors, such as self-starvation and binge eating. In the present review, the evidences supporting a role of leptin, ghrelin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and endocannabinoids in the homeostatic and non-homeostatic dysregulations of patients with AN and BN will be presented. The reviewed literature is highly suggestive that changes in the physiology of these modulators may play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of eating disorders by providing a possible link between motivated behaviors, reward processes, cognitive functions and energy balance.

New frontiers in endocrinology of eating disorders

Alterations of both central and peripheral feeding regulatory substances occur in the acute phases of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) and, generally, reverse after recovery. Some of these alterations are believed not only to sustain the altered eating behavior but also to contribute to certain psychopathological aspects and/or etiopathogenetic processes of eating disorders (EDs). It has been suggested that EDs are clinical conditions linked to reward-related mechanisms leading to a kind of addiction to self-starvation and/or overeating. Most of the feeding regulatory substances, which are dysregulated in EDs, are also implicated in the modulation of reward, emotional, and cognitive functions, thus representing possible links between altered nutritional regulation, motivated behaviors and reward processes. In this chapter, the ED literature dealing with ghrelin, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, opioid peptides, and endocannabinoids, which have prominent effects on eating behavior, body weight, reward, emotional, and cognitive functions, is reviewed in view of the above suggested links. Moreover, the potential therapeutics of new medications developed on the basis of neuroendocrine aberrations found in EDs is also presented.

Emotion-processing deficits in eating disorders

OBJECTIVE

First, we measured both emotional awareness and alexithymia to understand better emotion-processing deficits in eating disorder patients (EDs). Second, we increased the reliability of the measures by limiting the influence of confounding factors (negative affects).

METHOD

Seventy females with eating disorders were compared with 70 female controls. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; depression), the Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS; anxiety), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS; alexithymia), and the Level of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS).

RESULTS

EDs exhibited higher alexithymia scores and lower LEAS scores, with an inability to identify and describe their own emotions, as well as an impairment in mentalizing others' emotional experience. Whereas alexithymia scores were related to depression scores, LEAS scores were not. After controlling for depression, alexithymia scores were similar in EDs and controls.

DISCUSSION

The marked impairment in emotion processing found in EDs is independent of affective disorders. Thus, the joint use of TAS and LEAS suggests a global emotion-processing deficit in EDs.

Opioid peptides and the control of human ingestive behaviour

A variety of evidence suggests that endogenous opioid peptides play a role in the short-term control of eating. More recently, opioid receptor antagonists like naltrexone have been approved as a treatment for alcohol dependence. Here we review the evidence for a role of opioid peptides in both normal and abnormal eating and drinking behaviours and in particular try to identify the nature of the role of opioids in these behaviours. Particular attention is paid to the idea that opioid reward processes may be involved both in the short-term control of eating and hedonic aspects of alcohol consumption, and parallels are drawn between the effects of opiate antagonists on food pleasantness and the experience of drinking alcohol. The review also explores the extent to which data from studies using opiate antagonists and agonists provide evidence for a direct role of endogenous opioids in the control of ingestive behaviour, or alternatively whether these data may be better explained through non-specific effects such as the nausea commonly reported following administration of opiate antagonists. The review concludes that the present data suggests a single opioid mechanism is unlikely to explain all aspects of ingestive behaviour, but also concludes that opioid-mediated reward mechanisms play an important control in hedonic aspects of ingestion. The review also highlights the need for further empirical work in order to elucidate further the role of opioid peptides in human ingestive behaviour.

Aetiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of bulimia nervosa: biological bases and implications for treatment

Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of binge eating and associated efforts to purge the ingested calories through self-induced vomiting, laxative or diuretic abuse, fasting or intensive exercise. The aetiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of the disorder are currently unclear. Biological bases have been proposed repeatedly, based on several lines of evidence: hunger, satiety and food choice are regulated by neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, and impairment of eating habits may be related to alterations in the secretion of these chemicals; genetic studies suggest that these neurotransmitter systems are dysfunctional in individuals with bulimia nervosa; and the frequent comorbidity of bulimia nervosa with major depressive and obsessive-compulsive disorders, conditions in which multiple alterations of brain biochemical functions have been demonstrated. Data in the literature suggest that levels of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) are lower in individuals with bulimia nervosa than in healthy controls. Levels of dopamine are similar to, or lower than, those in controls. After remission of the disorder, noradrenergic function returns to that seen in controls, whereas dopaminergic and serotonergic function rebound to levels higher than in controls. Among the neuropeptides, alterations in the levels of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, beta-endorphin, corticotrophin-releasing hormone, somatostatin, cholecystokinin and vasopressin have been found in the symptomatic phase of bulimia nervosa, with a return to levels seen in controls after remission. Pharmacological treatment of bulimia nervosa that is directed at correction of the neurochemical alterations observed is difficult because of the complexity of the impairments. However, such treatment is necessary and should be continued long after symptomatic remission to ensure reinstitution of cerebral biochemical homeostasis.

Plasma concentrations of interleukin-1-beta, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and of their soluble receptors and receptor antagonist in anorexia nervosa

Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) induce anorexia, and multiple behavioral and biochemical alterations that mimic those of anorexia nervosa. Reports in the literature, however, contain contrasting data on the pattern of secretion of the three cytokines and on the downstream activities of their receptors and receptor antagonists in anorexia nervosa. We measured plasma concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6-R), soluble TNF-alpha receptors I and II (s-TNF-alpha-R-I and II), and soluble IL-1beta receptor antagonist (s-IL-1beta-R-A) in 14 female patients with anorexia nervosa (nine restricters, five binge/purgers) and in 13 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects to see whether the circulating cytokine concentrations and the downstream steps of cytokine activity were impaired, and if these alterations were correlated with some aspects of the disease. Concentrations of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, s-TNF-alpha-R-I and -II and sIL-1beta-RA in plasma did not differ significantly in patients with anorexia nervosa compared with control subjects. Concentrations of sIL-6-R were significantly lower in the patients than in the control subjects, but there were no differences between the two sub-types of anorexia nervosa. The etiopathogenetic significance of the sIL-6-R alteration is not clear, but together with recent data in the literature on cytokine function, the finding suggests that an impairment of the pro-inflammatory cytokine pathway might be involved in the development of anorexia nervosa.

Blood pressure-related hypoalgesia in bulimia nervosa

OBJECTIVE

This study examined pain sensitivity and its relationship to arterial blood pressure in bulimia nervosa (BN).

METHODS

Fourteen women who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, criteria for BN, purging subtype, and 14 controls were tested for ischemic pain sensitivity after an extended baseline period. Blood pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, and total peripheral resistance were assessed during baseline, during ischemic pain testing, and at the point of voluntary tolerance.

RESULTS

Women with BN had significantly greater ischemic pain tolerance than controls. Additionally, only for BN women was blood pressure related to pain sensitivity. Systolic blood pressure during the pain procedure and at the point of tolerance was positively related to pain threshold and tolerance times and negatively related to rated unpleasantness of pain in BN, whereas no relationships involving blood pressure and pain sensitivity were observed in controls.

CONCLUSIONS

These results may have implications for maladaptive changes in central pain-cardiovascular regulatory systems for women with BN.

Food cravings, endogenous opioid peptides, and food intake: a review

Extensive research indicates a strong relationship between endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs) and food intake. In the present paper, we propose that food cravings act as an intervening variable in this opioid-ingestion link. Specifically, we argue that altered EOP activity may elicit food cravings which in turn may influence food consumption. Correlational support for this opioidergic theory of food cravings is provided by examining various clinical conditions (e.g. pregnancy, menstruation, bulimia, stress, depression) which are associated with altered EOP levels, intensified food cravings, and increased food intake.

Common biological pathways in eating disorders and obesity

The purpose of this article is to summarize briefly potential biological pathways that are common among anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and obesity. We conclude that data on serotonergic and beta-endorphin regulatory systems provide the most promising leads for potential trait-based etiological theories. We then discuss the contribution of current data to a better understanding of the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders. Finally, we comment on how the exploration for common biological mechanisms highlights problems in nosological diagnosis (i.e., the lack of symptom specificity among disorders) and obscures the etiological significance of social stressors and cultural factors.

T-lymphocyte concentrations of cholecystokinin-8 and beta-endorphin in eating disorders: II. Bulimia nervosa

Concentrations of cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8) and beta-endorphin (beta-EP) in T-lymphocytes of 26 women with bulimia nervosa (BN) and in 26 age- and sex-matched healthy comparison subjects were measured. Ten patients were then treated with 300 mg/day of fluvoxamine, p.o., and five patients were treated with 300 mg/day of amineptine, p.o., for 4 months. Concentrations of the two peptides were measured again after 1, 2, and 4 months of therapy. Basal CCK-8 values were significantly lower in patients than in healthy subjects. During fluvoxamine therapy, CCK-8 values increased, reaching normal levels by month 4 of treatment. No such increase occurred during amineptine therapy. Baseline beta-EP values were normal in the bulimic patients but had declined by month 4 of fluvoxamine therapy.

Lack of plasmic beta-endorphin response to a gastronomic meal in healthy humans

In order to study the relationship between the endogenous opiate system and food intake in man, plasma concentrations of beta-endorphin were measured in ten healthy subjects. Time course of beta-endorphinemia was compared under the following conditions: basal (fasting), after an injection of pentagastrin (6 micrograms/kg), or after a gastronomic meal. No changes in plasma beta-endorphin or ACTH concentrations were observed with pentagastrin nor after the meal, despite the combination of very high sensory pleasure with intake of a very large amount of food. It is concluded that blood beta-endorphin concentration is not a sensitive index of the effects of food intake on the endogenous opioid system in man.

Pain sensitivity in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

Pain threshold was measured with short heat stimuli using a contact thermode in 19 patients with anorexia nervosa, 20 patients with bulimia nervosa, and 21 control subjects. Both patient groups had significantly elevated pain thresholds compared with the control subjects. In the total sample, no substantial covariation could be demonstrated among pain threshold and clinical, physiological, metabolic, or psychological data. However, in separate regression analyses pain threshold correlated significantly (negatively) with local skin temperature in the anorectic patients and almost significantly (positively) with body weight in the bulimic patients. This finding suggests that the reduced pain sensitivity in the two kinds of eating disorders might have different causes.

Measurement of CSF dynorphin A 1-8 immunoreactivity in anorexia nervosa and normal-weight bulimia

Twenty-one patients with anorexia nervosa and 35 normal-weight patients with bulimia underwent a series of CSF studies involving measurement of CSF dynorphin A 1-8 immunoreactivity during hospitalization in an eating-disorder treatment and research program. The control group consisted of 17 healthy volunteers. There were no statistically significant differences in CSF dynorphin A 1-8 measurements among groups or within a group at various stages of treatment. These results regarding dynorphin A 1-8 immunoreactivity are discussed in light of other evidence for altered opiate function in some eating-disorder patients.

Stereoselective effect of morphine on antinociception and endogenous opioid peptide levels in plasma but not cerebrospinal fluid of dogs

Morphine releases endogenous opioids into the circulation of dogs. To test the stereospecificity of this effect, as well as to determine whether morphine also releases endogenous opioids centrally, which might be involved in its antinociceptive action, the effects of (-)-morphine sulfate (10 mg/kg, sc) or (+)-morphine hydrobromide on antinociception in a dog tail-flick test, on semi-quantified morphine-induced signs of salivation, emesis, defecation and ataxia, and on the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of endogenous opioid peptides were studied. Plasma and CSF levels of immunoreactive beta-endorphin (i-BE), met-enkephalin (i-ME), leu-enkephalin (i-LE), and dynorphin (i-DY) were quantified by radioimmunoassay in octadecylsilyl-silica cartridge extracts. Immunoreactive morphine (i-M) levels were measured in unextracted samples. (-)-Morphine treatment significantly increased antinociception, morphine-induced signs, i-M levels in plasma and CSF, and i-BE, i-ME, and i-LE levels in plasma, but not CSF. Levels of i-DY remained constant in plasma and CSF. (+)-Morphine treatment did not alter any of these parameters, indicating that the effects of morphine on nociception, behavioral signs, and plasma endogenous opioids in dogs were stereoselective. It is concluded that morphine does not cause an increase in immunoreactive endogenous opioid peptides in the CSF at the time of its peak antinociceptive effect.

Biomedical variables in the eating disorders

Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are complex psychosomatic illnesses for which there may be significant biomedical diatheses and sequelae. This paper reviews these biomedical variables, focusing on the medical and nutritional assessment and management of patients with eating disorders and the medical complications that arise in these patients. The paper then examines the relationship between medical illness and eating disorders, including the medical misdiagnoses often given to these patients and the way in which a chronic medical condition such as diabetes mellitus predisposes a patient to an eating disorder. The relationship between eating disorders and pregnancy is also discussed. Through an understanding of these biomedical issues, iatrogenesis can be prevented and treatment can be improved.

Negative allesthesia and decreased endogenous opiate system activity in anorexia nervosa

The combined effects of an intragastric load of glucose compared to water and of naltrexone compared to placebo were tested on preference for sucrose in six anorectic patients. While in normal subjects, glucose-induced negative allesthesia is known to disappear upon loss of weight, it persisted in anorexia nervosa (AN) despite a major weight loss; furthermore, in contrast with its effects in normoponderal subjects, naltrexone at the dose of 25 mg did not decrease the preference for sucrose nor did it enhance glucose-induced allesthesia. Basal plasma beta endorphin level determined by radioimmunoassay was higher in AN than in normal subjects (75 +/- 6.1 pmoles/l vs. 13 +/- 3.8 pmoles/l) (p less than 0.001). It is suggested that a decrease in endogenous system opiate activity might be associated with food refusal and body weight loss in anorexia nervosa.

Luteinizing hormone and cortisol responses to naloxone in normal weight women with bulimia

The present study was undertaken in order to establish whether alterations in the endogenous opioid control of luteinizing hormone (LH) and ACTH/cortisol secretion occur in bulimic women with normal body weight and normal menstrual cycles. For this purpose, the capability of the opioid antagonist naloxone (4 mg injected as an intravenous bolus at time 0, plus 10 mg infused over 2 hr) to increase the circulating levels of LH and cortisol was tested in nine bulimic women and in nine age- and weight-matched normal controls. All women were tested on the 22nd day of a normal menstrual cycle. Two days later, a control test with normal saline (NaCl 0.9%) instead of naloxone was performed. The basal levels of LH and cortisol were similar in the bulimic and normal subjects and were not modified by the administration of normal saline. In contrast, the administration of naloxone significantly increased plasma LH and cortisol levels in all subjects, with peak LH responses at 30 min and peak cortisol responses at 60 min. The naloxone-induced LH and cortisol increases were significantly higher in the bulimic women than in the normal controls. These data indicate the presence of an increased opioid inhibitory tone in the control of LH and ACTH/cortisol secretion in normal weight bulimic women with normal menstrual cycles.

Neuroendocrine profile in bulimia nervosa

The neuroendocrinology of bulimia nervosa has only recently been investigated, with initial research suggesting some biological overlap with both anorexia nervosa (AN) and depression. Similarities among AN, depression, and bulimia include a nonsuppressed Dexamethasone Suppression Test and an abnormal growth hormone (GH) response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). Bulimics and anorectics both tend to have a delayed thyrotropin (TSH) response to TRH and elevated basal GH levels. Bulimics, however, have a normal GH response to clonidine, a nonblunted TSH response to TRH, low basal prolactin (PRL) levels, and may have an exaggerated PRL response to TRH. Unpublished data suggest bulimics may have a gonadotropin profile distinct from either AN or depression, as well as a variety of other endocrinopathies. Although many of these abnormalities may reflect malnutrition despite normal weight, other factors that are as yet unidentified are likely to be contributing to the neuroendocrine abnormalities seen in bulimia.

The use of opiate antagonists in treating bulimia: a study of low-dose versus high-dose naltrexone

Sixteen individuals with bulimia consented to a 6-week trial of naltrexone, receiving either standard dosages of 50-100 mg each day or high dosages of 200-300 mg each day. At the end of 6 weeks, individuals in the low-dose group had no significant change in their frequency of binge eating or purging, while individuals in the high-dose group had significant reductions in both behaviors. Four individuals in the low-dose group who were crossed over to high-dose naltrexone at the end of the study went on to experience significant reductions in binge eating and purging. These findings support the potential utility of opiate blockade in treating bulimia, but suggest that dosages of naltrexone greater than those needed to block exogenous opiates may be required for therapeutic efficacy in reducing binge eating and purging.

Endogenous opiates: 1986

This is the ninth installment of our annual review of research involving the endogenous opiate peptides. It is restricted to the non-analgesic and behavioral studies of the opiate peptides published in 1986. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic processes; mental illness; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; activity; sex, pregnancy, and development; and some other behaviors.

Treatment of antidepressant-resistant bulimia with naltrexone

Ten individuals with antidepressant-resistant bulimia were treated with the long-acting opiate antagonist naltrexone. Seven of the ten experienced at least a 75 percent reduction of their bulimic symptoms, and have maintained their improvement on three to five month follow-up. These preliminary data suggest that naltrexone may be of use in bulimia unresponsive to standard antidepressant therapy, and may provide insight into the role of endogenous opioids in the etiology of eating disorders.