Pretreatment Frailty Is Independently Associated With Increased Risk of Infections After Immunosuppression in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF in Elderly Crohn's Disease Patients

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies are associated with increased infection risk among elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are few data on the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in the elderly.

METHODS

The study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in elderly Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Patients ≥60 years of age who commenced ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for CD were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort. The primary outcome was incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization. Effectiveness was assessed by clinical remission, clinical response, and treatment persistence rates at 6 months. We adjusted for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and performed a logistic regression analysis to assess factors associated with serious infections, clinical remission, and treatment persistence.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients commencing ustekinumab and 124 commencing anti-TNF therapy were included. There was no difference in serious infection rates between anti-TNF agents (2.8%) and ustekinumab (3.1%) (P = .924) after propensity adjustment. Clinical remission rates were comparable at 6 months for ustekinumab (55.9%) and anti-TNF agents (52.4%) (P = .762). There was a significant reduction in HBI at 6 months in both groups. Treatment persistence was comparable between ustekinumab (90.6%) and anti-TNF agents (90.0%) at 6 months. Cox regression analysis did not show differences in treatment persistence (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.61; P = .594) and serious infection incidence (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-7.57; P = .709) by 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed comparable safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in treating elderly CD patients.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with steroid-sparing medications is age-dependent - Results from a Danish nationwide cohort study, 2000-2018

BACKGROUND

Paediatric-onset and elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present unique treatment challenges.

AIMS

We investigated treatment patterns following a first and second course of systemic steroids in paediatric- and elderly-onset IBD and compared them to adult-onset IBD.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) between 2000 and 2018 were identified through the Danish healthcare registries. Patients were divided into groups based on their age at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier plots were prepared for medications and surgeries after diagnosis and after the first and second courses of systemic steroids. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate Cox regression analysis for steroid-sparing medications.

RESULTS

1851 CD (13%) and 1687 (6%) UC patients were paediatric-onset, while 2952 (20%) CD and 5812 (23%) UC patients were elderly-onset. Paediatric-onset more frequently received immunomodulators [CD: HR: 1.64, CI: 1.52-1.77, UC: HR: 2.29, CI: 2.02-2.61] and biologics [CD: HR: 1.43, CI: 1.25-1.65, UC: HR: 1.27, CI: 0.99-1.64], while elderly-onset less frequently received immunomodulators [CD: HR: 0.39, CI: 0.35-0.44, UC: HR: 0.58, CI: 0.50-0.67] and biologics [CD: HR: 0.19, CI: 0.14-0.25, UC: HR: 0.36, CI: 0.27-0.48] compared to adult-onset age groups. After two courses of systemic steroids, elderly-onset still received less steroid-sparing medications. High frailty was associated with lower usage of medications for elderly-onset.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the use of steroid-sparing medication between age of onset, even after two courses with systemic steroids. High frailty could account for some of these differences in elderly-onset IBD.

Inflammatory bowel disease and risk for hemorrhoids: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Observational studies have reported an association between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and hemorrhoids (HEM). However, the presence of a causal relationship within this observed association remains to be confirmed. Consequently, we utilized the Mendelian randomization (MR) method to assess the causal effects of IBD on hemorrhoids. We validated the association between IBD and hemorrhoids in humans based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. To investigate the causal relationship between IBD and hemorrhoids, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization study using training and validation sets. The genetic variation data for IBD, CD, UC, and hemorrhoids were derived from published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals of European. Two-sample Mendelian randomization and Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) were employed to determine the causal relationship between IBD (CD or UC) and hemorrhoids. Genetically predicted overall IBD was positively associated with hemorrhoids risk, with ORs of 1.02 (95% CIs 1.01-1.03, P = 4.39 × 10-4) and 1.02 (95% CIs 1.01-1.03, P = 4.99 × 10-5) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Furthermore, we found that CD was positively associated with hemorrhoids risk, with ORs of 1.02 (95% CIs 1.01-1.03, P = 4.12 × 10-6) and 1.02 (95% CIs 1.01-1.02, P = 3.78 × 10-5) for CD in the training and validation sets, respectively. In addition, we found that UC in the training set was positively associated with hemorrhoids risk (ORs 1.02, 95% CIs 1.01-1.03, P = 4.65 × 10-3), while no significant causal relationship between UC and hemorrhoids was shown in the validation set (P > 0.05). However, after MVMR adjustment, UC in the training set was not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhoids. Our study showed that there is a causal relationship between CD and hemorrhoids, which may suggest that clinicians need to prevent the occurrence of hemorrhoids in CD patients.

Frailty Screening is Associated with Hospitalization and Decline in Quality of Life and Functional Status in Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Our goals were to study frailty screening in association with hospitalization and decline in quality of life [QoL] and functional status in older patients with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD].

METHODS

This was a prospective multicentre cohort study in IBD patients ≥65 years old using frailty screening [G8 Questionnaire]. Outcomes were all-cause, acute, and IBD-related hospitalization, any infection, any malignancy, QoL [EQ5D-3L], and functional decline (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living [IADL]) during 18 months of follow-up. Confounders were age, IBD type, biochemical disease activity [C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L and/or faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g], and comorbidity [Charlson Comorbidity Index].

RESULTS

Of 405 patients, with a median age of 70 years, 196 [48%] were screened as being at risk for frailty. All-cause hospitalizations occurred 136 times in 96 patients [23.7%], and acute hospitalizations 103 times in 74 patients [18.3%]. Risk of frailty was not associated with all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-2.4), but was associated with acute hospitalizations [aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8]. Infections occurred in 86 patients [21.2%] and these were not associated with frailty. A decline in QoL was experienced by 108 [30.6%] patients, and a decline in functional status by 46 patients [13.3%]. Frailty screening was associated with a decline in QoL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6) and functional status [aOR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7-8.1].

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty screening is associated with worse health outcomes in older patients with IBD. Further studies are needed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of its implementation in routine care.

Ustekinumab or Vedolizumab after Failure of Anti-TNF Agents in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Comparative Effectiveness Studies

Background: Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are effective in Crohn's disease (CD), but some patients lose responsiveness and require alternative biologic therapy. Until recently, ustekinumab and vedolizumab were the only other biological agents approved for use in CD. There are no randomised trials which compare the efficacy of these two agents in patients with anti-TNF refractory disease, but several retrospective cohort studies have compared their effectiveness in this setting. Aim: To review the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in anti-TNF refractory patients with CD. Methods: We included studies that compared the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in treating patients with anti-TNF refractory CD. We recorded the sample size, primary and secondary outcome measures and whether the studies employed adjustments for appropriate confounders. Results: Fourteen studies were included with a total sample size of 5651, of whom 2181 (38.6%) were treated with vedolizumab and the rest were treated with ustekinumab (61.4%). Of the fourteen studies included, eight found ustekinumab to be more effective in achieving clinical remission/steroid-free remission in the induction phase or during maintenance therapy (at least 1-year post-treatment) or that treatment persistence rates with ustekinumab were higher than with vedolizumab. Only one study reported vedolizumab to be superior during the maintenance phase in terms of clinical remission or treatment persistence rates. Biochemical outcomes were reported in five studies, two of which showed superiority for ustekinumab at 14 weeks and the other at 52 weeks. Only two studies reported endoscopic and/or radiologic outcomes; of these, one study showed ustekinumab to be significantly better at achieving endoscopic and radiologic responses. Adverse outcomes were broadly comparable, barring a single study which reported a lower hospitalisation rate for severe infection with ustekinumab. Conclusions: Most studies found ustekinumab to be more effective or non-inferior to vedolizumab in treating patients with anti-TNF refractory CD. Although many studies adjusted appropriately for confounders, the possibility of residual confounding remains and further data from prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Further studies are required to compare these two therapies to other emerging therapies, such as Janus-kinase inhibitors.

Frailty risk and treatment strategy in elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease. A Norwegian nationwide population-based registry study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine real-world medical and surgical treatment patterns in elderly-onset inflammatory bowel disease in a nationwide cohort, and to investigate associations between frailty and treatment choices.

METHODS

Norwegian health registries were used to identify adult-onset (born 1950-1989) and elderly-onset (born 1910-1949) patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) diagnosed 2010-2017 (n = 13,006). Patients were classified as no, low and intermediate/high frailty risk after the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. Outcomes included use of medical and surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Within five years, elderly-onset patients received less biologics (13% [CD], 7% [UC]) and immunomodulators (24% [CD], 11% [UC]), and major surgery was more frequent (22% [CD], 9% [UC]) than in adult-onset. Respective log rank tests were significant (p < 0.01). Compared to no frailty risk groups, elderly-onset UC with intermediate/high frailty risk had lower probability of starting biologics (4% versus 9%), immunomodulators (7% versus 13%) and 5-aminosalisylic acids (66% versus 84%), and elderly-onset CD with intermediate/high frailty risk had higher probability of starting prednisolone (67% versus 49%). Respective log rank tests were significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly-onset patients received less biologics and immunomodulators and a larger proportion underwent major surgery. Frailty risk in elderly-onset patients was associated with increased use of prednisolone, and less use of 5-aminosalisylic acids, immunomodulators and biologics.

Fatigue, sarcopenia, and frailty in older adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are characterized by a multifactorial clinical picture, in which age-related physical, functional and psychological symptoms may coexist. The accurate evaluation and identification of such symptomatology acquires considerable importance in the context of older adults, since those core factors typical of IBD may also expose older patients to an increased risk for age-related negative outcomes, such as frailty and disability. The purpose of the present review was to provide an updated overview on the evaluation and management of IBD in the elderly population, with regard to fatigue, sarcopenia, and frailty. The assessment of fatigue might contribute to the identification of early symptoms of IBD, such as pain and mood disorders, which should be treated timely to offer elderly patient a better quality of life. Similarly, an accurate evaluation of sarcopenia might represent a useful Prognostic Index to identify those patients at risk of developing physical frailty. Frailty in IBD should be evaluated not only in relation to the occurrence of negative outcomes, but also should be considered itself as an outcome itself in IBD. A recommendation for future research on this topic might be the implementation of randomized trials, which include older adults and evaluate fatigue, sarcopenia, and frailty. Similarly, the development of tailored intervention programs, based on both physical and psychological outcomes, with the purpose of improving patients' adaptation to the disease, and monitoring the evolution of symptoms and the response to therapies over time, should be encouraged.

Understanding the role of frailty in local and systemic complications and healthcare resource utilization in acute pancreatitis: Findings from a national cohort

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a significant gastrointestinal cause of hospitalization with increasing incidence. Risk stratification is crucial for determining AP outcomes, but the association between frailty and AP outcomes is poorly understood. Moreover, age disparities in severity indices for AP complicate risk assessment. This study investigates frailty's impact on local and systemic complications in AP, readmission rates, and healthcare resource utilization.

METHODS

Using the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2019, we identified adult AP patients and assessed frailty using the Frailty Risk Score. Our analysis included local and systemic complications, resource utilization, readmission rates, procedures performed, and hospitalization outcomes. Multivariate regression was employed, and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 using Stata version 14.2.

RESULTS

Among 1,134,738 AP patients, 6.94 % (78,750) were classified as frail, with a mean age of 63.42 years and 49.71 % being female. Frail patients experienced higher rates of local complications (e.g., pseudocyst, acute pancreatic necrosis, walled-off necrosis) and systemic complications (e.g., pleural effusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, abdominal compartment syndrome) compared to non-frail patients. Frailty was associated with increased readmission rates and served as an independent predictor of readmission. Frail patients had higher inpatient mortality (7.11 % vs. 1.60 %), longer hospital stays, and greater hospitalization costs.

CONCLUSION

Frailty in AP patients is linked to elevated rates of local and systemic complications, increased mortality, and higher healthcare costs. Assessing frailty is crucial in AP management as it provides a valuable tool for risk stratification and identifying high-risk patients, thereby improving overall outcomes.

Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

OBJECTIVE

To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

METHODS

Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

RESULTS

Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

CONCLUSION

This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.

Sarcopenia and frailty in inflammatory bowel disease: Emerging concepts and evidence

Sarcopenia is a condition marked by progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and function while frailty is a multidimensional concept characterized by diminished physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Both of these were previously considered as related to aging and shown to impact the quality of life and carry prognostic significance. Emerging data show that both sarcopenia and frailty carry similar relevance in chronic illness. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and malnourishment, both of which contribute to the development of sarcopenia by increasing protein breakdown and reducing protein synthesis. The coexistence of frailty further compounds the clinical complexity of IBD patients. Published evidence suggests a bidirectional association with IBD contributing to muscle wasting, while the resultant sarcopenia and frailty could further exacerbate the disease course. Sarcopenia and frailty are independently associated with adverse outcomes, including hospitalizations, increased surgical interventions, and surgical complications. As therapeutic strategies for IBD evolve, understanding the nuanced relationship between inflammatory bowel disease, sarcopenia, and frailty is crucial for devising holistic management. Comprehensive care should encompass not only disease-modifying therapies but also interventions targeting frailty and sarcopenia, as they have been shown to have a significant impact not only on the disease course but also on the quality of life. Future research could focus on further elucidating underlying mechanisms, simple screening strategies, and developing targeted interventions to improve the overall quality of life for individuals grappling with the complex interplay of IBD, sarcopenia, and frailty.

Lack of Benefit for Early Escalation to Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence

Although ulcerative colitis [UC] shares many common pathways and therapeutic options with Crohn's disease [CD], CD patients are four times more likely to undergo surgery 10 years into their disease in the biological era and are more likely to have extraintestinal manifestations than UC patients. Early treatment in CD has been demonstrated to modify the natural history of the disease and potentially delay surgery. Previous reviews on this topic have borrowed their evidence from CD to make UC-specific recommendations. This review highlights the emergence of UC-specific data from larger cohort studies and a comprehensive individual patient data systemic review and meta-analysis to critically appraise evidence on the utility of early escalation to advanced therapies with respect to short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes. In UC, the utility of the early escalation concept for the purposes of changing the natural history, including reducing colectomy and hospitalizations, is not supported by the available data. Data on targeting clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes are needed to demonstrate that they are meaningful with regard to achieving reductions in hospitalization and surgery, improving quality of life, and minimizing disability. Analyses of different populations of UC patients, such as those with 'relapsing & remitting' disease or with severe or complicated disease course, are urgently needed. The costs and risk/benefit profile of some of the newer advanced therapies should be carefully considered. In this clinical landscape, it appears premature to advocate an indiscriminate 'one size fits all' approach to escalating to advanced therapies early during the course of UC.

Prevalence and risk factors for early medical and surgical complications following an admission for acute severe ulcerative colitis

Background

Risk factors for colectomy following an episode of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) have been well studied, but data examining the early complications following an episode is limited.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for medical and surgical complications within 90 days of an ASUC admission and determine if a high-intensity induction infliximab dose is associated with these complications.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of ASUC admissions between January 2015 and July 2021 at a tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was the prevalence of total, medical and surgical complications within 90 days following an ASUC admission. Multivariate linear regression analysis assessed for factors associated with the prevalence of complications.

Results

A total of 150 patients had 186 hospital admissions for ASUC. In total, 101/186 (54.3%) admissions required rescue medical therapy. Standard infliximab induction occurred in 65/100 admissions, accelerated infliximab induction in 35/100 and cyclosporine in 1/100 of admissions. In total, 117 complications, including 74/117 (63.2%) medical and 43/117 (36.8%) surgical complications, arose. Low serum albumin was independently associated with a higher incidence of total [β = -0.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.15, -0.01), p = 0.03] and surgical complications [β = -0.1 (95% CI: -0.18, -0.001), p = 0.047], while an increased age was associated with increased incidence of surgical complications [β = 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.12), p = 0.02]. A higher Charlson score was associated with increased medical complications [β = 0.12 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.24), p = 0.03]. Infliximab induction dose intensity was not associated with an increased incidence of any complications.

Conclusion

Early complications following an ASUC admission is prevalent although the majority are not serious. Risk factors associated with complications include low serum albumin, older age and a higher comorbidity score. Induction infliximab dose intensity, however, is not a risk factor.

Emerging oral drug options for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Despite the availability of a variety of therapeutic compounds and improved management strategies, one-third of UC patients with moderate-to-severe disease do not benefit from the existing treatments or experience drug-related side effects. This has boosted intensive research focusing on the development of new drugs for UC therapy. This article aims to summarize the available evidence on oral drugs, which are now being explored in clinical trials or are ready to enter the clinics.

AREAS COVERED

From May 15 to June 11, we searched on PubMed using the keywords 'oral drugs ulcerative colitis,' 'ulcerative colitis clinical trials,' 'UC phase 2 and 3 trials' excluding case reports, case series, phase 1 and 4 studies, and studies about approved therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

The findings discussed in this article suggest that the future treatment of UC patients will be probably characterized by the possibility of using various small-molecule drugs. All these new compounds, even those belonging to the same class, differ in terms of efficacy and safety. Identification of predictors of response could help optimize the efficacy and safety of these treatments, thus improving resource allocation through a pretreatment stratification of patients.

Frail Phenotype in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Recent retrospective studies have shown that frailty is common in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and enhances the risk of drug-related infections, postsurgery complications, hospital readmissions, and mortality, independently of age and comorbidities. We carried out a descriptive cohort study to evaluate the frequency of frail phenotype in IBD and analyzed the risk factors associated with this condition.

METHODS

Frail phenotype was assessed in IBD patients by using the Fried frailty phenotype. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the risk factors for frail phenotype. Serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6 were quantified in patients with a frail or a fit phenotype by ELISA.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-six IBD outpatients (198 Crohn's disease and 188 ulcerative colitis) were prospectively enrolled from December 2021 to April 2022. Frail phenotype was diagnosed in 64 of 386 (17%) IBD patients and was significantly associated with female gender, active disease, and current use of steroids. Multivariate analysis showed that active disease was a risk factor for frail phenotype (odds ratio, 11.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-33.9). No difference in IL-6 serum levels was seen between patients with a frail phenotype and those who were fit.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first prospective study showing that frail phenotype occurs in nearly one-fifth of IBD patients. Data indicate that active IBD is an independent risk factor for frail phenotype in IBD.

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Special Populations-IBD in Seniors

Approximately one out of every 88 seniors has inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and this is expected to increase in the future. They are more likely to have left-sided disease in ulcerative colitis, and isolated colonic disease in Crohn's disease; perianal disease is less common. Other common diagnoses in the elderly must also be considered when they initially present to a healthcare provider. Treatment of the elderly is similar to younger persons with IBD, though considerations of the increased risk of infections and malignancy must be considered when using immune modulating drugs. Whether anti-TNF therapies increase the risk of infections is not definitive, though newer biologics, including vedolizumab and ustekinumab, are thought to be safer with lower risk of adverse events. Polypharmacy and frailty are other considerations in the elderly when choosing a treatment, as frailty is associated with worse outcomes. Costs for IBD-related hospitalizations are higher in the elderly compared with younger persons. When elderly persons with IBD are cared for by a gastroenterologist, their outcomes tend to be better. However, as elderly persons with IBD continue to age, they may not have access to the same care as younger people with IBD due to deficiencies in their ability to use or access technology.

Accumulating awareness on the clinical significance and relevance of frailty in cirrhosis: Time to dig deeper into mechanistic basis!

Frailty corresponds to an emerging construct in the hepatology which is originally introduced as a validated geriatric syndrome regarding increased vulnerability to pathophysiological stressors. As for patients with cirrhosis, the presence of frailty is indicative of debilitating conditions that subjects are prone to deleterious acute insults and have difficulties to restore even if the underlying liver function partially returned to normal levels. Since this conceptual development, a variety of tools assessing frailty have been proposed and evaluated in the context of cirrhosis. A recent performance-based metric for frailty, designated as Liver Frailty Index, has broadly been applied in patients with cirrhosis and exhibited acceptable predictive ability in relation to disease progression, mortality and hospitalization. However, those functional tests measuring frailty may be impossible to perform in circumstance that patients are critically ill or undergoing detrimental events. An interesting modality indicates the use of alternative tests to evaluate frailty, which may be more adaptable and of choice for specific subgroups. The interrelation between frailty and various cirrhosis-associated pathological entities is of clinical importance and implication. Noticeably, it is imperative to clarify these complex linkages to highlight novel therapeutic targets or interventional endpoints. The efficient and effective management of frailty is still challenging, but many attempts have been made to overcome barriers of affordability and availability. Some clinical trials on small scale revealed that home-based exercise and individualized nutrition therapy show benefits in patients with cirrhosis, and high adherence to the treatment regimen may direct better efficacy and performance.

Management of inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly: A review

The burden of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is increasing worldwide, with a particular increase in the prevalence in the elderly population, due to the ageing of young-onset IBD as well as to the increasing incidence in elderly patients. Elderly IBD patients present specific challenges to the treating physician, as they have comorbidities, lower functional reserves, and higher risk of treatment-related complications. The diagnosis of IBD in the elderly may be difficult due to a more subtle disease presentation and to a wide range of differential diagnosis. Moreover, as these patients are often excluded from clinical trials, there is a lack of high-quality evidence to inform on the most appropriate management. Despite an increasing prevalence, the management of IBD in the elderly is still hindered by frequent misconceptions by physicians treating these patients. Due to a erroneous notion of a milder disease course and fear of adverse events, elderly IBD-patients are managed with frequent and continuous use of steroids and undertreated with effective medical therapies. In this review, we describe the principles of management of IBD in the elderly, which is a topic of increasing importance to IBD clinics, that will have to progressively adapt to care for an ageing population.

Conventional Frailty Index Does Not Predict Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients With IBD: A Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been associated with adverse outcomes in patients with IBD.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between health deficit-defined frailty (using the 5-factor modified frailty index) and postoperative outcomes in patients with IBD.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Module.

PATIENTS

The included patients had IBD and underwent major abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2019. Patients were classified as frail (modified frailty index ≥2), prefrail (modified frailty index = 1), or normal (modified frailty index = 0) based on a validated, 5-factor modified frailty index.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The association was evaluated between frailty and risk of 30-day severe postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and risk of readmission using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 3172 patients with IBD who underwent major abdominal surgery (42.7 ± 16.4 y, 49.3% female, 57.7% with Crohn's disease, 43.9% on biologics), 116 (3.7%) were classified as frail and 477 as prefrail (15%). After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking, BMI, type of surgery, corticosteroid use, and biologic and immunomodulator use, frailty was not associated with increased risk for severe postoperative complications (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.81-1.90), mortality (adjusted OR, 1.38 [0.44-3.6]), or 30-day readmission (adjusted OR, 1.35 [0.77-2.30]). Nonelective surgery, significant weight loss, corticosteroid use, and need for ileostomy were associated with increased risk of severe postoperative complications.

LIMITATIONS

Limited information regarding IBD-specific characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD undergoing major abdominal surgery, frailty measured by a conventional abbreviated health deficits index is not predictive of adverse postoperative outcomes. Biologic and functional measures of frailty may better risk-stratify surgical candidacy in patients with IBDs. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108 .

EL NDICE DE FRAGILIDAD CONVENCIONAL NO PREDICE EL RIESGO DE COMPLICACIONES POSOPERATORIAS EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDADES INFLAMATORIAS DEL INTESTINO UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE MULTICNTRICO

ANTECEDENTES:La fragilidad se ha asociado con resultados adversos en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.OBJETIVO:Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad definida por déficit de salud (utilizando el índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores) y los resultados postoperatorios en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte prospective.ESCENARIO:Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos, Módulo de Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino.PACIENTES:Pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales inscritos en la cohorte que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor entre 2016-19.EXPOSICIÓN:Los pacientes se clasificaron como frágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado ≥2), prefrágiles (índice de fragilidad modificado = 1) o normales (índice de fragilidad modificado = 0) según un índice de fragilidad modificado de 5 factores validado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Examinamos la asociación entre la fragilidad y el riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves a los 30 días, la estancia hospitalaria prolongada y el riesgo de reingreso, mediante regresión logística multivariable.RESULTADOS:De 3172 pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales que se sometieron a cirugía abdominal mayor (42,7 ± 16,4 años, 49,3% mujeres, 57,7% con enfermedad de Crohn, 43,9% con biológicos), 116 (3,7%) fueron clasificados como frágiles y 477 como pre- frágil (15%). Después de ajustar por edad, sexo, raza/origen étnico, tabaquismo, índice de masa corporal, tipo de cirugía, uso de corticosteroides, uso de biológicos e inmunomoduladores, la fragilidad no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves (odds ratio ajustado, 1,24; 95 % de confianza intervalos, 0,81-1,90), mortalidad (odds ratio ajustado, 1,38 [0,44-3,6]) o reingreso a los 30 días (odds ratio ajustado, 1,35 [0,77-2,30]). La cirugía no electiva, la pérdida de peso significativa, el uso de corticosteroides y la necesidad de ileostomía se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de complicaciones posoperatorias graves.LIMITACIONES:Información limitada sobre las características específicas de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino sometidos a cirugía abdominal mayor, la fragilidad medida por un índice de déficit de salud abreviado convencional no es predictivo de resultados postoperatorios adversos. Las medidas biológicas y funcionales de fragilidad pueden estratificar mejor la candidatura quirúrgica en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias del intestino. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C108 . (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Managing the older adult with inflammatory bowel disease: is age just a number?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the most recent literature on older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Additionally, we review geriatric syndromes that may be pertinent to the management of older adults with IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditionally chronological age has been used to risk stratify older adults with IBD, however physiologic status, including comorbidities, frailty, and sarcopenia, are more closely associated with clinical outcomes for older adults. Delaying care for and undertreating older adults with IBD based upon advanced chronologic age alone is associated with worse outcomes, including increased mortality. Treatment decisions should be made considering physiologic status, with an understanding of the differential risks associated with both ongoing disease and treatment. As such, there is an increasing recognition of the impact geriatric syndromes have on older adults with IBD, which need to be further explored.

SUMMARY

Older adults with IBD are less likely to receive advanced therapies and timely surgery. They are also more likely to have adverse outcomes despite having similar disease courses to younger adults with IBD. Focusing on biological age as opposed to chronological age can shift this trajectory and improve quality of care for this growing population of patients with IBD.

Efficacy and Safety of Biological Therapies and JAK Inhibitors in Older Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

With the introduction of more and more monoclonal antibodies selectively targeting various mediators of the immune system, together with Janus-Kinase (JAK)-inhibitors with variable affinities towards different JAK subtypes, the available therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have undergone an acceleration in the last five years. On the other hand, the prevalence of IBD patients over 65-years-old is steadily increasing, and, with this, there is a large population of patients that presents more comorbidities, polypharmacy, and, more frequently, frailty compared to younger patients, exposing them to potentially major risks for adverse events deriving from newer therapies, e.g., infections, cardiovascular risks, and malignancies. Unfortunately, pivotal trials for the commercialization of new therapies rarely include older IBD patients, and those with serious comorbidities are virtually excluded. In the present review, we focus on existing literature from pivotal trials and real-world studies, analyzing data on efficacy/effectiveness and safety of newer therapies in older IBD patients with special emphasis on comorbidities and frailty, two distinct but intercorrelated aspects of the older population since age by itself seems to be of minor importance.

Management of inflammatory bowel diseases in older adults

The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in older adults (ie, aged over 60 years old) is increasing due to a combination of an ageing population with compounding prevalence of IBD and increasing incidence of elderly-onset (ie, onset over the age of 60 years) IBD. Despite the increasing prevalence of IBD, there is a paucity of evidence on which to base management of older adults with IBD, leading to substantial variability in care. This population is under-represented in clinical trials and has a high burden of chronic corticosteroid use, low uptake of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, and high rates of unplanned health-care use and disability. Management of IBD in older adults requires carefully weighing an individual patient's risk of IBD-related complications, IBD-directed immunosuppressive therapy, and non-IBD comorbidities. A deeper understanding of biological and functional age, dynamic risk stratification strategies (including frailty-based risk assessment tools), comparative effectiveness and safety of current therapies and treatment strategies, and shared decision making to inform treatment goals and targets is needed to improve outcomes in older adults with IBD. In this Review, we discuss the epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, and medical and surgical management of older individuals living with IBD and identify key research gaps and approaches to address them.

Causal Link between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Fistula: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies have found that fistulas are common in Crohn's disease (CD) and less common in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, some patients have a fistula before diagnosis. Based on retrospective analysis, it was not possible to determine whether there was a bi-directional causal relationship between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and fistulas.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the open GWAS database; 25,042 cases and 34,915 controls were included for IBD, and 6926 cases and 30,228 controls were included for fistula. Two-sample Mendelian randomization and multivariable Mendelian randomization were used in combination to determine the causal relationship between IBD and fistula.

RESULTS

Forward MR showed that IBD increased the risk of colonic or urogenital fistula (FISTULA) (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.13, p = 1.22 × 10^-6), mainly associated with fissure and fistula of the anal and rectal regions (FISSANAL) (OR:1.10, 95% CI:1.06 to 1.14, p = 6.12 × 10^-8), but not with fistulas involving the female genital tract (FEMGENFISTUL) (OR:0.97, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.11, p = 0.669). Furthermore, both UC and CD increased the risk of FISTULA. However, after adjusting by MVMR, only CD increased the risk of FISTULA (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.11, p = 0.004), and UC did not increase the risk of FISTULA (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.06, p = 0.838). Reverse MR showed that fistulas did not increase the risk of IBD.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms it is CD, rather than UC, that casually leads to an increased risk of fistula, but fistulas do not increase the risk of IBD.

Frailty and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence

Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important concept in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the current literature on frailty in IBD. We will discuss the definition of frailty, frailty assessment methods, the prevalence of frailty, risk factors for frailty and the prognostic value of frailty in IBD. A scoping literature search was performed using the PubMed database. Frailty prevalence varied from 6% to 53.9%, depending on the population and frailty assessment method. Frailty was associated with a range of adverse outcomes, including an increased risk for all-cause hospitalization and readmission, mortality in non-surgical setting, IBD-related hospitalization and readmission. Therefore, frailty assessment should become integrated as part of routine clinical care for older patients with IBD.

Prevalence of frailty among patients with inflammatory bowel disease and its association with clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported frailty as an independent risk factor of mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted to determine the relationship of frailty and IBD. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of frailty in patients with IBD and the impact of frailty on the clinical prognosis of these patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid (Medline), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from database inception until October 2022. This systematic review included observational studies describing IBD and frailty. We performed meta-analysis for the frailty prevalence in patients with IBD. We analyzed primary outcomes (mortality) and secondary outcomes (infections, hospitalizations, readmission, and IBD-related surgery).

RESULTS

Nine studies with a total of 1,495,695 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The prevalence of frailty was 18% in patients with IBD. The combined effect analysis showed that frail patients with IBD had a higher risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-4.55) than non-frail patients with IBD. The hazard ratio for infections (HR = 1.23, 0.94-1.60), hospitalizations (HR = 1.72, 0.88-3.36), readmission (HR = 1.21, 1.17-1.25) and IBD-related surgery (HR = 0.78, 0.66-0.91) in frail patients with IBD.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that frailty is a significant independent predictor of mortality in patients with IBD. Our work supports the importance of implementing frailty screening upon admission in patients with IBD. More prospective studies are needed to investigate the influence of frailty on patients with IBD and improve the poor prognosis of patients with frailty and IBD.

Comorbidity Influences the Comparative Safety of Biologic Therapy in Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on comparative risk of infections with various biologic agents in older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We aimed to assess the comparative safety of biologic agents in older IBD patients with varying comorbidity burden.

METHODS

We used data from a large, national commercial insurance plan in the United States to identify patients 60 years and older with IBD who newly initiated tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNF), vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. Comorbidity was defined using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Our primary outcome was infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare the risk of infections between the different therapeutic classes.

RESULTS

The anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab cohorts included 2,369, 972, and 352 patients, respectively, with a mean age of 67 years. The overall rate of infection-related hospitalizations was similar to that of anti-TNF agents for patients initiating vedolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04) and ustekinumab (0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.16). Among patients with a CCI of >1, both ustekinumab (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91, p-interaction <0.01) and vedolizumab (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p-interaction: 0.02) were associated with a significantly lower rate of infection-related hospitalizations compared with anti-TNFs. No difference was found among patients with a CCI of ≤1.

DISCUSSION

Among adults 60 years and older with IBD initiating biologic therapy, both vedolizumab and ustekinumab were associated with lower rates of infection-related hospitalizations than anti-TNF therapy for those with high comorbidity burden.

Safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab in elderly Crohn's disease patients

OBJECTIVE

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents are associated with increased infection risk among elderly IBD patients, but little is known about non anti-TNF biologics in this cohort. We examined the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab in elderly Crohn's patients.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-centre cohort study included Crohn's patients ≥60-years old who commenced ustekinumab. We recorded Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), concomitant steroid therapy, treatment persistence and new infections or malignancies. Primary outcome was serious infections requiring hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included, with median age of 68 years. 43 (61.4%) had prior anti-TNF exposure, and 15 (21.4%) vedolizumab. Median treatment duration was 12 months, totalling 84 patient-years. Nine serious infections were reported, incidence 106.7/1000 patient-years. Systemic steroids were associated with increased risk of serious infections [odds ratio (OR) 7.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44-44.32, P = 0.02]. There were 27 "non-serious" infections; 321.4/1000 patient-years. Charlson co-morbidity index (OR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.05-2.12, P = 0.03) and steroid exposure (OR 44.10, 95% CI: 1.75-1112.10, P = 0.02) increased non-serious infection risk (P &lt; 0.05). Mean HBI improved from 8.13 to 4.64 at 6 months and 4.10 at last follow up (P &lt; 0.0001). 12-month treatment persistence was 55.7% (N = 39); 34 (48.6%) were steroid-free.

CONCLUSION

Ustekinumab was safe and effective in a cohort of elderly Crohn's disease patients. Infections were mostly mild, not resulting in therapy discontinuation. Serious infection risk was comparable to previously reported rates with anti-TNF agents. Steroid exposure was associated with an increased serious infection risk.

Prevalence and Implications of Frailty in Older Adults With Incident Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to compare the risk of frailty in older adults with incident inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and matched non-IBD comparators and assess the association between frailty and future hospitalizations and mortality.

METHODS

In a cohort of patients with incident IBD ≥60 years of age from 2007 to 2016 in Sweden identified using nationwide registers, we defined frailty using Hospital Frailty Risk Score. We compared prevalence of frailty in patients with IBD with age, sex, place of residency- and calendar year-matched population comparators. In the IBD cohort, we used Cox proportional hazards modeling to examine the associations between frailty risk and hospitalizations or mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 10,590 patients with IBD, 52% female with a mean age of 71 years of age, matched to 103,398 population-based comparators. Among patients with IBD, 39% had no risk for frailty, 49% had low risk for frailty, and 12% had higher risk for frailty. Mean Hospital Frailty Risk Score was 1.9 in IBD and 0.9 in matched comparators (P < .01). Older adults with IBD at higher risk for frailty had a 20% greater risk for mortality at 3 years compared with those who were not frail. Compared with nonfrail older patients with IBD, patients at higher risk for frailty had increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-3.61), all-cause hospitalization (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.24-2.61), and IBD-related hospitalization (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.35-1.66). These associations were not attenuated after adjusting for comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is more prevalent in older adults with IBD than in matched comparators. Among older patients with IBD, frailty is associated with increased risk for hospitalizations and mortality.

Comparative Outcomes and Safety of Vedolizumab vs Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists for Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

IMPORTANCE

Observational comparative effectiveness studies can inform the positioning of biologic therapies for older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are underrepresented in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab vs tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for older patients with IBD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This active comparator, new-user design, comparative effectiveness study was conducted between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, among 754 older patients (aged ≥50 years) with IBD from the Danish National Patient Register. The mean follow-up after treatment initiation took place at 32 to 40 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to April 27, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with vedolizumab or TNF antagonists.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary effectiveness outcome was treatment failure, defined as the composite risk of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, or a new corticosteroid prescription more than 6 weeks after initiation of treatment with biologic therapy. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were time to each individual component of the composite effectiveness outcome. The primary safety outcome was the risk of serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospitalization. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was conducted, accounting for patient-, disease-, and treatment-associated factors.

RESULTS

The study compared 377 older patients with IBD with incident use of vedolizumab (202 women [53.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.2 [8.3] years; 177 [46.9%] with Crohn disease) vs 377 patients with incident use of TNF antagonists (206 women [54.6%]; mean [SD] age, 61.3 [8.1] years; 182 [48.3%] with Crohn disease). Overall, vedolizumab was associated with an increased risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists (1-year risk, 45.4% vs 34.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69), including higher risk of IBD-related hospitalization (1-year risk, 27.8% vs 16.3%; adjusted HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15) and IBD-related major abdominal surgery (1-year risk, 21.3% vs 8.0%; adjusted HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.45-3.94). In subgroup analysis by IBD phenotype, among patients with Crohn disease, vedolizumab was associated with a 77% higher risk of treatment failure (adjusted HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.21-2.58), while no difference in risk of treatment failure was seen among patients with ulcerative colitis (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.75-1.43; P = .03 for interaction). There was no significant difference in the risk of serious infections, overall (1-year risk, 8.2% vs 8.7%; adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.58-1.85) and by IBD phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this comparative effectiveness study of older patients with IBD, vedolizumab was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure compared with TNF antagonists, particularly among patients with Crohn disease, without offering a significant safety advantage.

Simplified Machine Learning Models Can Accurately Identify High-Need High-Cost Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Hospitalization is the primary driver of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related healthcare costs and morbidity. Traditional prediction models have poor performance at identifying patients at highest risk of unplanned healthcare utilization. Identification of patients who are high-need and high-cost (HNHC) could reduce unplanned healthcare utilization and healthcare costs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients hospitalized with IBD using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (model derivation in the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database and validation in the 2017 Nationwide Readmission Database). We built 2 tree-based algorithms (decision tree classifier and decision tree using gradient boosting framework [XGBoost]) and compared traditional logistic regression to identify patients at risk for becoming HNHC (patients in the highest decile of total days spent in hospital in a calendar year).

RESULTS

Of 47,402 adult patients hospitalized with IBD, we identified 4,717 HNHC patients. The decision tree classifier model (length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index, procedure, Frailty Risk Score, and age) had a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78 ± 0.01 in the derivation data set and 0.78 ± 0.02 in the validation data set. XGBoost (length of stay, procedure, chronic pain, drug abuse, and diabetic complication) had a mean AUC of 0.79 ± 0.01 and 0.75 ± 0.02 in the derivation and validation data sets, respectively, compared with AUC 0.55 ± 0.01 and 0.56 ± 0.01 with traditional logistic regression (peptic ulcer disease, paresthesia, admission for osteomyelitis, renal failure, and lymphoma) in derivation and validation data sets, respectively.

DISCUSSION

In hospitalized patients with IBD, simplified tree-based machine learning algorithms using administrative claims data can accurately predict patients at risk of progressing to HNHC.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in a matched cohort of elderly and nonelderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: the IG-IBD LIVE study

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab registration trials were the first to include elderly patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), but few real-life data have been reported in this population.

AIMS

We investigated the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in matched cohorts of elderly and nonelderly UC and CD patients.

METHODS

The Long-term Italian Vedolizumab Effectiveness (LIVE) study is a retrospective-prospective study including UC and CD patients who started vedolizumab from April 2016 to June 2017. Elderly patients (≥65 years) were matched clinically 1:2 to nonelderly patients (18-64 years); the 2 groups were followed until drug discontinuation or June 2019.

RESULTS

The study included 198 elderly (108 UC, 90 CD) and 396 matched nonelderly patients (205 UC, 191 CD). Nonelderly UC patients had a significantly higher persistence on vedolizumab compared to elderly patients (67.6% vs. 51.4%, p = 0.02). No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between elderly and nonelderly CD patients (59.4% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.32). Age ≥65 years was associated with lower persistence in UC; for CD, previous exposure to anti-TNF-α agents, Charlson comorbidity index >2 and moderate-to-severe clinical activity at baseline were associated with lower persistence. There were recorded 130 adverse events, with comparable rates between the two groups. A Charlson comorbidity index >2 was associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab can be considered a safe option in elderly IBD patients. Its effectiveness in elderly UC patients may be reduced, while no age-dependent effect on effectiveness was observed in CD.

Crohn's Disease of the Elderly: Unique Biology and Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety

The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in the elderly population. Compared with patients with onset during younger years, patients with elderly-onset IBD have a distinct clinical presentation, disease phenotype, and natural history. Genetics contribute less to pathogenesis of disease, whereas aging-related biological changes, such as immunosenescence and dysbiosis, are associated with elderly-onset IBD. Frailty is an increasingly recognized predictor of adverse outcomes. As an increasingly wider array of biologic and small molecule therapeutic options becomes available, data regarding efficacy and safety of these agents in patients are paramount given the unique characteristics of this population.

Vedolizumab Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Serious Infections Than Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Older Adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite the increased numbers of older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), there are few studies regarding the safety and effectiveness of IBD treatments in older adults. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents and vedolizumab in older adults with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an active comparator, new-user design for adults age 65 years and older with IBD initiating anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab in the Medicare claims database from 2014 to 2017. The primary safety outcome was infection-related hospitalization (excluding intra-abdominal and perianal abscesses). Co-primary outcomes to estimate effectiveness were IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, and new corticosteroid use 60 days or more after biologic initiation. We performed propensity score weighting to control for confounding and estimated adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using standardized morbidity ratio-weighted variables.

RESULTS

We identified 1152 anti-TNF-α new users and 480 vedolizumab new users. The median age was 71 years in both cohorts and 11% were age 80 years or older. Crohn's disease patients comprised 54% of the anti-TNF-α cohort and 57% of the vedolizumab cohort. There was no significant difference in demographics, health care utilization, or frailty in both cohorts. More than half of both cohorts had a Charlson comorbidity index of 2 or higher. Vedolizumab users had a decreased risk of infection-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.86). There was no significant difference in the outcomes approximating effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Older IBD patients treated with vedolizumab had a lower risk of infection-related hospitalization compared with those initiating anti-TNFs. We observed no difference in effectiveness defined by hospitalizations, surgery, or new corticosteroid use.

Perspectives on Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Older Patients: Applying Gut-Feeling in an Evidence-Based Era?

Background: The older inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population is challenging to treat because of heterogeneity in characteristics related to frailty. The authors aimed to study factors contributing to the difference in treatment between older and younger patients with IBD and the relation between frailty and therapy goals, from the perspectives of both professionals and patients with IBD. Methods: Semi-structured interviews in 15 IBD professionals and 15 IBD patients aged ≥65 years. Results: Professionals had 1–20 years of experience, and three practiced in an academic hospital. Patients were aged 67–94 years and had a disease duration between 2 years and 62 years. The authors found that professionals aimed more often for clinical remission and less often for endoscopic remission in older compared with younger patients. Older patients also aimed for clinical remission, but valued objective confirmation of remission as a reassurance. Professionals sometimes opted for surgery earlier in the treatment course, while older patients aimed to prevent surgery. Professionals’ opinion on corticosteroids in older patients differed, while patients preferred to avoid corticosteroids. In professionals and patients, there was a shift towards goals related to frailty in patients with frailty. However, professionals did not assess frailty systematically, but judged frailty status by applying a clinical view. Conclusions: Many therapy goals differed between older and younger patients, in both professionals and patients. Professionals did not assess frailty systematically, yet aspects of frailty influenced therapy goals. This underlines the need for clinically applicable evidence on frailty in IBD, which could aid tailored treatment.

Is it time to include older adults in inflammatory bowel disease trials? A call for action

The therapeutic management of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging, particularly because of the absence of evidence-based guidelines for these patients, who seem to frequently be excluded from clinical trials. In this systematic review we investigated the exclusion of older patients with IBD from phase 3 studies registered on PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, by assessing the upper limit of age exclusion criteria and the percentage of patients older than 65 years included in the trials. Exclusion criteria other than age were also recorded, and comorbidities were analysed separately. Our review of 222 phase 3 studies shows that older patients are frequently excluded from IBD clinical trials because of their age, which was used as an exclusion criterion in 129 (58%) of the 222 assessed trials. Of the 32 trials that detailed the percentage of included patients who were 65 years or older, only 763 (5·4%) patients of the 14 124 patients included were older than 65 years. In addition to age, patients were also excluded because of comorbidities (mainly renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular, and used as an exclusion criterion in 76% of trials), a history of dysplasia (45% of trials), and previous treatment for IBD (19% of trials). We propose a three-step process that should enable the inclusion of all older patients in IBD clinical trials, regardless of their age, comorbidities, and frailty.

Deficits in Geriatric Assessment Associate With Disease Activity and Burden in Older Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We aimed to perform geriatric assessment in older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to evaluate which IBD characteristics associate with deficits in geriatric assessment and the impact of deficits on disease burden (health-related quality of life).

METHODS

A prospective multicenter cohort study including 405 consecutive outpatient patients with IBD aged ≥65 years. Somatic domain (comorbidity, polypharmacy, malnutrition), impairments in (instrumental) activities of daily living, physical capacity (handgrip strength, gait speed), and mental (depressive symptoms, cognitive impairment) and social domain (life-partner) were assessed. Deficits in geriatric assessment were defined as ≥2 abnormal domains; 2-3 moderate deficits and 4-5 severe deficits. Clinical (Harvey Bradshaw Index >4/partial Mayo Score >2) and biochemical (C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/L and/or fecal calprotectin ≥250 μg/g) disease activity and disease burden (short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire) were assessed.

RESULTS

Somatic domain (51.6%) and activities of daily living (43.0%) were most frequently impaired. A total of 160 (39.5%) patients had moderate deficits in their geriatric assessment; 32 (7.9%) severe. Clinical and biochemical disease activity associated with deficits (clinical: adjusted odds ratio, 2.191; 95% confidence interval, 1.284-3.743; P = .004; biochemical: adjusted odds ratio, 3.358; 95% confidence interval, 1.936-5.825; P < .001). Deficits in geriatric assessment independently associate with lower health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Deficits in geriatric assessment are highly prevalent in older patients with IBD. Patients with active disease are more prone to deficits, and deficits associate with lower health-related quality of life, indicating higher disease burden. Prospective data validating impact of frailty and geriatric assessment on outcomes are warranted to further improve treatment strategies.

Positioning biologics in the treatment of IBD: A practical guide – Which mechanism of action for whom?

The number of available biological therapies have doubled over the last 10 years and the arrival of novel molecules (interleukin 23p19 inhibitors) is ongoing alongside the development of small molecules. As a result of this vast landscape of treatment, positioning advanced therapies (according to clinical situation, efficacy and safety) is of paramount importance to providing personalized, appropriate IBD treatment.

In this publication the recent available literature is summarized for practical integration into clinical practice including comparative efficacy data, patient and disease demographics. We refer to recent publications and expert opinion in order to facilitate the decision making process of positioning biologicals IBD treatment.

Elderly onset age is associated with low efficacy of first anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

The outcomes of patients with elderly onset (EO) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) remains uncertain. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF treatment for bio-naïve EO-IBD. Elderly patients were defined as those 60 years and older, and further divided into those with EO (Elderly-EO) and those with non-elderly onset (Elderly-NEO). A total of 432 bio-naïve patients were enrolled in this multicenter observational study, comprising 55 with Elderly-EO (12.7%), 25 with Elderly-NEO (5.8%), and 352 under age 60 (Non-elderly, 81.5%). After 52 weeks of anti-TNF treatment, clinical and steroid-free remission rates were significantly lower in Elderly-EO than in Non-elderly (37.7% and 60.8%; P = 0.001, and 35.9% and 57.8%; P = 0.003, respectively), and comparable between Elderly-NEO and Non-elderly. Multivariate analysis revealed that elderly onset was a significant factor for both clinical remission (OR, 0.49, 95% CI 0.25–0.96) and steroid-free remission (OR, 0.51, 95% CI 0.26–0.99) after 52 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. The rate of cumulative severe adverse events was significantly higher in Elderly-EO than in Non-elderly (P = 0.007), and comparable between Elderly-NEO and Non-elderly. In conclusion, anti-TNF treatment for bio-naïve EO-IBD may be less effective and raise safety concerns.

Association Between Frailty or Sarcopenia and Adverse Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Background and Aims

Chronological age often guides the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Frailty and sarcopenia, which are related but distinct entities that become increasingly prevalent with age, better predict nonsurgical and surgical outcomes in various chronic illnesses. We conducted a systematic review to assess the association between frailty or sarcopenia and adverse nonsurgical outcomes in adult patients with IBD.

Methods

Through a systematic literature review of 4 online databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL Plus), we identified 16 studies that focused on frailty or sarcopenia and nonsurgical outcomes in IBD. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to determine the quality of included studies.

Results

We identified 16 studies: 8 frailty-based and 8 sarcopenia-based studies (14 high-quality and 2 low-quality studies). All results were presented in a summarized narrative format. Frailty predicted all hospitalization-related outcomes (hospitalization, readmission, and length of stay) and mortality-related outcomes. The outcomes of therapeutic efficacy, need for therapy escalation, and infections had mixed results in relation to their association with frailty or sarcopenia. The data regarding sarcopenia and hospitalizations were also equivocal.

Conclusion

This systematic review supports the use of frailty indices to predict hospitalization- and mortality-related outcomes in adult patients with IBD. Future research should focus on identifying and validating frailty and sarcopenia tools in IBD to better help predict adverse clinical outcomes and response to therapy.

Aging and IBD: A New Challenge for Clinicians and Researchers

Evidence from recent epidemiological data suggests that the patient population with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is chronologically aging. As these individuals become older, cellular senescence leads to a state of chronic inflammation. This process, known as inflammaging, is thought to be closely linked with biological aging and may be upregulated within IBD. As a consequence, we see an increased risk of aging-related disorders within IBD. In addition, we see that frailty, which results from physiologic decline, is increasing in prevalence and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in IBD. As such, in this review we explore the potential overlapping biology of IBD and aging, discuss the risk of aging-related disorders in IBD, and describe frailty and its relation to clinical outcomes within IBD. Finally, we discuss current considerations for clinical care and potential research avenues for further investigation.

Orphan patients with inflammatory bowel disease - when we treat beyond evidence

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition that requires continuous medical treatment. To date, the medical management of patients with moderately-to-severely active IBD who develop dependence or resistance to corticosteroids is based on immunomodulator drugs. Such therapies are licenced after passing through three phases of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and are subsequently adopted in clinical practice. However, the real-life population of IBD patients who require these therapies can significantly differ from those included in RCTs. As a matter of fact, there is a number of exclusion criteria – nearly ubiquitous in all RCTs – that prevent the enrolment of specific patients: Chronic refractory pouchitis or isolated proctitis in ulcerative colitis, short-bowel syndrome and stomas in Crohn’s disease, ileorectal anastomosis in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, and elderly age are some representative examples. In this frontier article, we aim to give an overview of current literature on this topic, in order to address the main knowledge gaps that need to be filled in the upcoming years.

Increasing Prevalence of Frailty and Its Association with Readmission and Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients with IBD

BACKGROUND

Although age is often used as a clinical risk stratification tool, recent data have suggested that adverse outcomes are driven by frailty rather than chronological age.

AIMS

In this nationwide cohort study, we assessed the prevalence of frailty, and factors associated with 30-day readmission and mortality among hospitalized IBD patients.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we examined all patients with IBD hospitalized from 2010 to 2014. Based on index admission, we defined IBD and frailty using previously validated ICD codes. We used univariable and multivariable regression to assess risk factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission and 30-day readmission mortality.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2014, 1,405,529 IBD index admissions were identified, with 152,974 (10.9%) categorized as frail. Over this time period, the prevalence of frailty increased each year from 10.20% (27,594) in 2010 to 11.45% (33,507) in 2014. On multivariable analysis, frailty was an independent predictor of readmission (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.14-1.17), as well as readmission mortality (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.23) after adjusting for relevant clinical factors. Frailty also remained associated with readmission after stratification by IBD subtype, admission characteristics (surgical vs. non-surgical), age (patients ≥ 60 years old), and when excluding malnutrition, weight loss, and fecal incontinence as frailty indicators. Conversely, we found older age to be associated with a lower risk of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty, independent of age, comorbidities, and severity of admission, is associated with a higher risk of readmission and mortality among IBD patients, and is increasing in prevalence. Given frailty is a potentially modifiable risk factor, future studies prospectively assessing frailty within the IBD patient population are needed.

Applying Administrative Data-Based Coding Algorithms for Frailty in Patients With Cirrhosis

Frailty is a powerful prognostic tool in cirrhosis. Claims-based frailty scores estimate the presence of frailty without the need for in-person evaluation. These algorithms have not been validated in cirrhosis. Whether they measure true frailty or perform as well as frailty in outcome prediction is unknown. We evaluated 2 claims-based frailty scores-Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) and Claims-Based Frailty Index (CFI)-in 3 prospective cohorts comprising 1100 patients with cirrhosis. We assessed differences in neuromuscular/neurocognitive capabilities in those classified as frail or nonfrail based on each score. We assessed the ability of the indexes to discriminate frailty based on the Fried Frailty Index (FFI), chair stands, activities of daily living (ADL), and falls. Finally, we compared the performance of claims-based frailty measures and physical frailty measures to predict transplant-free survival using competing risk regression and patient-reported outcomes. The CFI identified neuromuscular deficits (balance, chair stands, hip strength), whereas the HFRS only identified poor chair-stand performance. The CFI had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) for identifying frailty as measured by the FFI, ADL, and falls of 0.57, 0.60, and 0.68, respectively; similarly, the AUROCs were 0.66, 0.63, and 0.67, respectively, for the HFRS. Claims-based frailty scores were associated with poor quality of life and sleep but were outperformed by the FFI and chair stands. The HFRS, per 10-point increase (but not the CFI) predicted survival of patients in the liver transplantation (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12) and non-liver transplantation cohorts (SHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22). Claims-based frailty scores do not adequately associate with physical frailty but are associated with important cirrhosis-related outcomes.

Frailty Is Independently Associated with Mortality and Readmission in Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Old age must be considered in weighing the risks of complications vs benefits of treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We conducted a nationally representative cohort study to estimate the independent effects of frailty on burden, costs, and causes for hospitalization in patients with IBD.

METHODS

We searched the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify 47,402 patients with IBD, hospitalized from January through June 2013 and followed for readmission through December 31, 2013. Based on a validated hospital frailty risk scoring system, 15,507 patients were considered frail and 31,895 were considered non-frail at index admission. We evaluated the independent effect of frailty on longitudinal burden and costs of hospitalization, inpatient mortality, risk of readmission and surgery, and reasons for readmission.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up time of 10 months, adjusting for age, sex, income, comorbidity index, depression, obesity, severity, and indication for index hospitalization, frailty was independently associated with 57% higher risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34-1.83), 21% higher risk of all-cause readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.17-1.25), and 22% higher risk of readmission for severe IBD (aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16-1.29). Frail patients with IBD spent more days in the hospital annually (median 9 days; interquartile range, 4-18 days vs median 5 days for non-frail patients; interquartile range, 3-10 days; P < .01) with higher costs of hospitalization ($17,791; interquartile range, $8368-$38,942 vs $10,924 for non-frail patients, interquartile range, $5571-$22,632; P < .01). Infections, rather than IBD, were the leading cause of hospitalization for frail patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is independently associated with higher mortality and burden of hospitalization in patients with IBD; infections are the leading cause of hospitalization. Frailty should be considered in treatment approach, especially in older patients with IBD.

Frailty in inflammatory bowel diseases: an emerging concept

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), consisting of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic remitting, relapsing inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. While traditionally a disease of younger ages, the number of older adults with IBD is rising rapidly. Patients with IBD often experience geriatric syndromes at earlier ages. Older adults with IBD have poorer disease and treatment-related outcomes compared with younger adults with IBD. Applying the principles of geriatrics to understanding a chronic disease in older adults may improve health span. Better tools are needed to stratify IBD patients who are at high risk for adverse events. Frailty is a geriatric construct that may approximate biologic age. Frailty is a complex, multi-dimensional syndrome that leads to increased vulnerability to stress and decline of reserve across multiple physiologic systems. In this review, we present the leading conceptual models of frailty and discuss the applications of frailty in immune-mediated diseases. We also review chronic conditions where frailty has been applied successfully as a tool for risk stratification. Finally, we discuss in the detail the growing body of literature highlighting the relationship between frailty and IBD, the epidemiology of frailty in IBD, and ramifications of frailty in IBD.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Sarcopenia: Its Mechanism and Clinical Importance

Malnutrition is a major contributor to muscle loss and muscle dysfunction, known as sarcopenia. Malnutrition is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). The number of patients with IBD has recently been increasing. More severe malnutrition is often seen in CD compared to UC, probably due to CD affecting the main site of nutrient absorption, extensive mucosal lesions, fistulas, short bowel syndrome after resection, or obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. A recent meta-analysis showed the high prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with IBD, and thus sarcopenia is a very important problem for IBD. Although IBD is more common in younger patients, sarcopenia can develop through a variety of mechanisms, including malnutrition, chronic inflammation, increased inflammatory status in adipose tissue, vitamin deficiency, and imbalance of the muscle–gut axis. In addition, sarcopenia has a negative impact on postoperative complications and hospital stay in patients with IBD. Appropriate intervention for sarcopenia may be important, in addition to clinical remission and endoscopic mucosal healing in patients with IBD. Much more attention will thus be paid to sarcopenia in patients with IBD. In this review, we outline IBD and sarcopenia, based on the current evidence.

Short-Term Outcomes for Restorative and Non-Restorative Proctocolectomy in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Curative surgery for ulcerative colitis can be subdivided into restorative (with pouch and anastomosis) and non-restorative operations. Restorative surgery in older adults is controversial, due to concerns about surgical risk and long-term functional outcome. The goal of this study is to compare 30-day outcomes for restorative and non-restorative surgery in older adults with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Initiative Program from 2012-2018. Patients were included if they were >65 years old and had ulcerative colitis. Restorative and non-restorative surgeries were defined with procedure codes. Patient characteristics and adverse surgical outcomes were compared between restorative and non-restorative surgeries utilizing chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the association of restorative versus non-restorative surgery with adverse surgical outcomes while adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 392 total patients, 95 had restorative and 297 had non-restorative surgery. Patients undergoing restorative surgery, compared to non-restorative surgery, were significantly younger (P<0.01), had lower incidences of steroid usage (P<0.001) and higher rates of readmission (P = 0.02). There were no differences in post-operative complications between the groups in both unadjusted analyses and covariate-adjusted regression analysis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected older patients with ulcerative colitis, restorative surgery is associated with increased readmission, but otherwise similar rates of morbidity or mortality compared to non-restorative surgery. Data regarding postoperative functional outcome and quality of life are also needed to help select the most appropriate curative option for older adults.

Evaluating the impact of frailty on periprocedural adverse events and mortality among patients with GI bleeding

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Frailty is a known predictor of mortality and adverse events in the inpatient setting; however, it has not been studied as a modality to assess risk among patients undergoing endoscopy for GI bleeding (GIB). We aimed to determine the association between frailty status and risk of adverse events in hospitalized patients with GIB who underwent endoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study using the 2016 and 2017 National Inpatient Sample database, using International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes to identify adult patients with GIB who underwent endoscopic procedures within 2 days of admission and the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to classify patients as frail or nonfrail. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the predictors of periprocedural adverse events, and marginal standardization analysis was performed to assess for possible interaction between age and frailty.

RESULTS

A total of 757,920 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 44.4% (336,895) were identified as frail and 55.6% (421,025) as nonfrail; 49.2% of frail patients had composite periprocedural adverse events compared with 25.5% of nonfrail patients (P < .001). Frail patients notably had more cardiovascular (32.1% vs 17.1%, P < .001), pulmonary (18.5% vs 4.3%, P < .001), GI (10.1% vs 6.1%, P < .001), and infectious (9.9% vs .7%, P < .001) adverse events compared with nonfrail patients. Frail patients also had higher all-cause inpatient mortality rates (4.8% vs .5%, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, positive frailty status was associated with a 2.13 times increased likelihood of having composite periprocedural adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopy for GIB, frailty status is associated with increased periprocedural adverse events including all-cause mortality. The use of frailty assessments can thus further guide clinical decision-making when considering endoscopy and risk of adverse events in adult patients with GI hemorrhage.