Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis

Effect of roxadustat on lowering blood lipids in peritoneal dialysis patients with anemia

OBJECTIVES

To observe the effect of roxadustat on lowering blood lipids in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients beyond treating anemia.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter clinical study, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) 100 PD patients who had received erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy for at least 4 weeks to receive either roxadustat or erythropoietin (EPO) for 48 weeks. The blood lipids, hemoglobin, blood pressure, blood glucose, iron metabolism and inflammatory factors were compared between the two groups at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively.

RESULTS

At start of switching to roxadustat, hemoglobin seemed to rise a little faster (102.8 ± 15.4 vs. 97.1 ± 17.3 g/L at 2 weeks, p > 0.05), but there was no significant difference in hemoglobin change between the two groups over the course of observation (p = 0.185). At the early stage of the study (12 weeks), the transferrin saturation (TSAT) of roxadustat group decreased significantly from the baseline (32.7 (20.6) vs. 22.1 (18.7)%, p = 0.001). At the end of the study period (48 weeks), total cholesterol (3.89 ± 0.92 vs. 4.52 ± 1.14 mmol/L, p = 0.012), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (2.24 ± 0.74 vs. 2.63 ± 0.82 mmol/L, p = 0.045) and triglyceride (1.35 (0.86) vs. 1.89 (1.27) mmol/l, p = 0.013) in roxadustat group were significantly lower than those in EPO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Roxadustat not only can improve anemia and iron metabolism, but also can reduce serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels in PD patients after switching from the EPO.

Renal Safety Assessment of Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Between Old Certainties and New Questions

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Quantitative and qualitative changes in plasma lipoprotein profiles are frequently associated with CKD and represent a significant risk factor for CVD in patients with CKD. Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society classify CKD as a condition with high or very high cardiovascular risk and set specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets. Conventional lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs), such as statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, can control CKD-associated dyslipidemia and, to some extent, prevent major atherosclerotic events in patients with CKD, but their use in clinical practice presents challenges because of the potential renal safety concerns. In recent years, novel therapies with the ability to lower both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides have been introduced to the market (e.g., proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid, lomitapide, volanesorsen) to improve our ability to control lipid abnormalities. However, their impact on kidney functionality has not been fully elucidated. The aim of this review was to examine the renal safety profiles of various LLTs, with special reference to novel medications, and to highlight important considerations and guidance for the use of these medications in overt CKD or in patients with some degree of renal function impairment. We underscore the lack of a comprehensive understanding of kidney safety, particularly for novel LLT therapies, and strongly emphasize the importance of future dedicated research to fully assess the safety and efficacy of these agents in patients with kidney abnormalities.

Long-Term Benefits and Safety of Statins in Patients with Kidney Failure: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Key Points

Patients with kidney failure are at a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, but the evidence for statin therapy remains inconclusive. The long-term benefits and risks of statin therapy in patients with kidney failure were analyzed using public electronic health records in Hong Kong. Statin therapy was associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality without a higher risk of major adverse events.

Background

Patients with kidney failure are at elevated risk of cardiovascular diseases. Although statins are commonly used to mitigate cardiovascular risk among the population with high risk, the evidence for initiating statin therapy among patients with kidney failure remains inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the long-term benefits and risks associated with statin therapy in patients with kidney failure.

Methods

Using territory-wide public electronic health records in Hong Kong, 3019 statin-eligible individuals with kidney failure and elevated LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dl from January 2008 to December 2015 were included for analysis. The framework of target trial emulation was adopted to investigate the risk of the major cardiovascular diseases (i.e ., a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke), all-cause mortality, and major adverse events (i.e ., myopathies and liver dysfunction) between statin initiators and statin noninitiators. The pooled logistic model was used to obtain the hazard ratio for the outcomes of interest in both intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and per-protocol (PP) analysis.

Results

Significant risk reduction associated with statin therapy (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) was observed for major cardiovascular diseases (ITT: 0.78 [0.62 to 0.98]; PP: 0.66 [0.50 to 0.87]) and all-cause mortality (ITT: 0.80 [0.68 to 0.95]; PP: 0.60 [0.48 to 0.76]). The standardized 5- and 10-year absolute risk reduction in PP analysis was 7% (3% to 11%) and 11% (4% to 18%), respectively. No significant risks for the major adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Statin therapy was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in patients with kidney failure without a higher risk of major adverse events.

Statin Use in Special Populations for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Outcome benefits for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) use in the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are well established and yet, statins remain underutilized with only half of eligible individuals receiving them among certain vulnerable populations. This review critically examines available data to provide a summary of the current evidence for statin use in select populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipid management can be more complex in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), organ transplants, metabolic dysfunction associated with steatotic liver disease (MASLD), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Statins are generally safe and effective to reduce the burden of ASCVD among these highly heterogeneous groups of patients and should be considered with careful attention to their concomitant disease state. Herein, we focus on appropriate statin use in these challenging to treat conditions, their relationship with increased ASCVD risk, and approaches to statin use for ASCVD risk reduction. Although further research is needed to define optimal therapy in select high risk groups for ASCVD prevention, statins are proven to be clinically efficacious, safe, and cost-effective for ASCVD prevention, warranting greater efforts to increase their use.

Sensing ceramides by CYSLTR2 and P2RY6 to aggravate atherosclerosis

Recent evidence has shown that increased levels of circulating long-chain ceramides predict atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease independently of cholesterol1,2. Although targeting ceramide signalling may provide therapeutic benefits beyond the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia, the underlying mechanism by which circulating ceramides aggravate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains elusive. Here we examine whether circulating long-chain ceramides activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors to exacerbate atherosclerosis. We perform a systematic screen that combines G-protein-signalling quantification, bioinformatic analysis of G-protein-coupled receptor expression and functional examination of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. The results suggest that CYSLTR2 and P2RY6 are potential endogenous receptors of C16:0 ceramide-induced inflammasome activation in both endothelial cells and macrophages. Inhibition of CYSLTR2 and P2RY6 genetically or pharmacologically alleviates ceramide-induced atherosclerosis aggravation. Moreover, increased ceramide levels correlate with the severity of coronary artery disease in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. Notably, CYSLTR2 and P2RY6 deficiency mitigates chronic-kidney-disease-aggravated atherosclerosis in mice without affecting cholesterol or ceramide levels. Structural analyses of ceramide-CYSLTR2-Gq complexes reveal that both C16:0 and C20:0 ceramides bind in an inclined channel-like ligand-binding pocket on CYSLTR2. We further reveal an unconventional mechanism underlying ceramide-induced CYSLTR2 activation and the CYSLTR2-Gq interface. Overall, our study provides structural and molecular mechanisms of how long-chain ceramides initiate transmembrane Gq and inflammasome signalling through direct binding to CYSLTR2 and P2RY6 receptors. Therefore, blocking these signals may provide a new therapeutic potential to treat atherosclerosis-related diseases.

Statin Use and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Chinese Population: A Target Trial Emulation Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Statins have been shown to prevent major vascular events in a wide range of individuals. However, their potential mechanisms-such as impairing fibrinogen cleavage and reducing thrombin generation-raise concerns on increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Given the inconsistent findings of previous trials and observational studies, this study aims to assess the effect of statins on ICH risk in Chinese population.

METHODS

Within the framework of target trial emulation, we used data from the Yinzhou Regional Health Care Database covering the years 2011-2020. The study included patients aged 50 years or older with no history of ICH and statin use. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients were categorized as statin initiators or noninitiators based on their initial treatment regimen during the 1-month enrollment period. Using the sequential trial approach, 60 target trials were emulated each month from 2011 to 2015. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied to balance characteristics between statin initiators and noninitiators within each emulated trial, and these trials were then stacked together into a single data set. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effects of statin on ICH risk, ICH-related mortality, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 53,413 statin initiators and 35,033,455 noninitiators from 60 emulated trials were included in the analysis. Statin initiators were generally older (mean age 65 vs 63 years), less likely to be male (45.5% vs 50.5%), and more likely to have a history of hypertension (69.0% vs 14.1%). After PS matching, all characteristics between the 2 groups were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 6.7 (interquartile range 5.6-8.1) years, the hazard ratio (HR) of ICH for statin initiators compared with noninitiators was 1.18 (95% CI 1.03-1.35). The HRs of ICH-related mortality and all-cause mortality were 1.16 (95% CI 0.91-1.46) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.97), respectively. Results remained consistent across various subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION

Statin use may increase the risk of ICH in Chinese patients without history of ICH. However, the findings of this study may be limited by residual confounding, particularly the lack of cholesterol-related measurements.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that in Chinese populations, initiation of statins may increase the risk of ICH.

Lipid and immunophenotypic profiles in hemodialysis patients with citrate vs. acetate dialysates

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, with dialysis-dependent CKD (DD-CKD) patients facing high mortality rates. Hypercholesterolemia is another crucial CV risk factor, typically managed with lipid-lowering therapy, though its efficacy in DD-CKD remains uncertain. Evidence shows mixed results regarding the benefits of statins in these patients. Citrate-based dialysates are known to reduce inflammatory biomarkers compared to acetate-based ones, potentially impacting lipid profiles and immune responses. This study aimed to determine the effects of citrate vs. acetate dialysate on lipid profiles and immunophenotypes in DD-CKD patients.

Methods

This unicentric, cross-over, prospective study included 21 hemodialysis patients (10 males, 11 females, average age 62.25 years). Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions (12 with each dialysate) and acted as their own control. Lipid profiles, immunological parameters, and nutritional and inflammatory markers were measured before the last session with each dialysate.

Results

After twelve dialysis sessions with citrate dialysate (CD), compared to acetate dialysate (AD), there was a statistically significant decline in TG and remnant cholesterol, with a decrease in HDL and an increase in LDL. Regarding immunology, C3 complement levels were higher, while CD3+ CD8+ and CD16+ 56+ lymphocytes were lower. Finally, total lymphocytes were lower with AD than with CD. We found no difference in predialysis nutritional nor inflammatory parameters except for ESR, which was higher when subjects used CD than AD.

Conclusion

There are significant differences in lipid and immunophenotypic profiles with CD in comparison to AD. Interestingly, there could be an advantageous profile given the reduced amount of remnant cholesterol and TG. However, further studies are needed to understand if the observed changes lead to beneficial hard clinical outcomes in DD-CKD patients.

Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease

Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibit an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with its manifestations coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. The presence of both, CVD and CKD has a major impact on the prognosis of patients. This association likely reflects the involvement of several pathophysiological mechanisms, including shared risk factors (e.g. diabetes and hypertension), as well as other factors such as inflammation, anaemia, volume overload, and the presence of uraemic toxins. Identifying and characterizing CKD is crucial for appropriate CVD risk prediction. Mitigating CVD risk in patients with CKD mandates a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, nephrologists, and other health care professionals. The present State-of-the-Art Review addresses the current understanding on the pathophysiological link between CVD and CKD, clinical implications and challenges in the treatment of these patients.

New Therapies for the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease

A major public health concern gripping the nation is chronic kidney disease (CKD), and for individuals concomitantly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the coexistence significantly increases the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by two to three times higher than patients diagnosed without CKD. CKD management encompasses both non-pharmacological approaches, such as dietary sodium restriction and lifestyle modification for blood pressure control, and pharmacological approaches. Current pharmacological management focuses on four key pillars: renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), all of which have shown renoprotective and cardiovascular benefits. An incomplete block of aldosterone activity remains a challenge and is one of the factors contributing to the progression of kidney damage. Aldosterone synthase inhibitors (ASIs), such as vicadrostat, may represent a new horizon in selectively inhibiting aldosterone synthesis while preserving cortisol production. Early-phase trials have shown reductions in albuminuria and a potential for renal protection. The question is, could ASIs emerge as a fifth pillar in CKD management and help curb the progression?

Cardiac evaluation in patients awaiting kidney transplant-position statement of the Cardiological Society of India and Indian Society of Nephrology

Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of death after kidney transplantation. This statement addresses preoperative cardiac decision-making and management with the aim of assessing and reducing the risk of the kidney transplant surgery. Important issues from a clinician's perspective include the basic cardiovascular workup of these patients, coronary evaluation and management of coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Recovery left ventricular function after kidney transplant is discussed. In addition, the use of cardiovascular drugs in patients with special emphasis on antiplatelets and anticoagulants in patients planned for kidney transplant is also discussed.

[Practical approach to the patient with hypercholesterolemia in Spain. SEMERGEN position statement]

Hypercholesterolemia, specifically the increase in the set of lipoproteins containing apolipoproteinB and, in particular, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), together with the decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) constitute the etiopathogenic basis of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Multiple clinical trials have shown that lowering LDL-C by lipid-lowering therapy is associated with a significant decrease in the risk of vascular complications. Thus, LDL-C is the main therapeutic target in patients with dyslipidemia. Unfortunately, current LDL-C control figures are still very low, partly due to insufficient intensification of lipid-lowering therapy, but also due to the need for new tools to achieve these goals. This paper reviews the different lipid-lowering treatment options, including the latest available therapies, and provides a practical approach to achieving LDL-C control goals in patients with hypercholesterolemia, as well as in different patient subgroups.

Phytosterol-Enriched Dietary Supplements for Lowering Plasma LDL-Cholesterol: Yes or No?

Elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is associated with an increased risk for atherosclerosis and development of cardiovascular disease. An elevated plasma LDL-C concentration is the result of enhanced C synthesis, C absorption, and/or altered C homeostasis. Plasma LDL-C lowering can be achieved using pharmaceutical means. Statin therapy inhibits endogenous C synthesis and leads to a mean 40% LDL-C reduction. Ezetimibe inhibits C absorption and achieves an average 20% LDL-C reduction with a 10 mg daily intake. Phytosterol therapy is established by dietary supplements enriched in phytosterols and/or phytostanols. A dosage of 2 to 3 g a day reduces C absorption and leads to an average 10% LDL-C reduction. This dosage expresses a 10-fold increased daily intake for phytosterols or a 100-fold increased intake of phytostanols. Phytosterol- and -stanol-enriched dietary supplements are freely available in the supermarket. The majority of consumers may be healthy subjects with a plasma LDL-C in the normal range. Scientific evidence reveals that increased phytosterol intake may be associated with the development of atherosclerosis. The degree of increased risk is dependent on the patient's genetic polymorphisms in NPC1L1 and ABCG5/G8 transport proteins as well as on the established risk reduction due to LDL-C lowering. Subjects with a normal or only slightly elevated LDL-C have only minimal LDL-C lowering and lack the compensation for the potential increased risk for atherosclerosis by phytosterols.

Dose-response relationship between lipids and all-cause mortality in the dialysis population: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of lipid-lowering drugs in the dialysis population has been controversial and there is no target for the dialysis population.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the dose-response relationship between lipids and all-cause mortality in the dialysis population.

METHODS

Computer searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang. Data were conducted to collect published cohort studies on lipids and all-cause mortality in the dialysis population from home and abroad up to February 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the combined effect size (Hazard ratio) and its 95% confidence interval and dose-response relationship by applying Stata17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 11 publications with a cumulative total of 106,808 individuals were included. All-cause mortality was statistically different between the highest dose total cholesterol (TC) group and the low TC group (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.75-0.90, P < 0.05). The TC range for lower all-cause mortality is > 140.5 mg/dL, and on this basis, TC in the range of 180-220 mg/dL may have a better prognosis for dialysis population. There was a nonlinear relationship between Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (NHDL-C) cholesterol and all-cause mortality, with no statistical difference between the high and low dose group. In contrast, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) masked its association with all-cause mortality due to changes in death spectrum, differences in relative time risks, and other factors. In the 50-450 mg/dL range, all-cause mortality in the dialysis population was positively associated with triglycerides (TG), with a 2.5% increase in all-cause mortality per 50 mg/dL increase in TG (HR = 1.025, 95% CI = 1.003-1.048, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

TC is a target for monitoring the dialysis population, which has the lowest all-cause mortality in the range of 180-220 mg/dL. However, NHDL-C and LDL-C monitoring is not clinically meaningful. Increased TG can contribute to the risk of higher all-cause mortality in dialysis patients.

Atherosclerotic Diseases in Chronic Kidney Disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high incidence of atherosclerotic diseases, such as ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. To prevent the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD, the pathology of arteriosclerosis should be determined. Vascular calcification is a characteristic of arteriosclerosis in patients with CKD. Recent studies have reported that coronary artery calcification is associated with acute coronary syndromes. CKD is frequently associated with heart failure. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that coronary artery calcification affects asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. Hyperphosphatemia and calciprotein particles may be involved in the pathology of vascular calcification. Controlling the progression of vascular calcification and classical atherosclerotic risk factors is important to prevent the occurrence of atherosclerotic diseases in CKD.

KDOQI US Commentary on the KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a work group to review the 2024 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The KDOQI Work Group reviewed the KDIGO guideline statements and practice points and provided perspective for implementation within the context of clinical practice in the United States. In general, the KDOQI Work Group concurs with several recommendations and practice points proposed by the KDIGO guidelines regarding CKD evaluation, risk assessment, and management options (both lifestyle and medications) for slowing CKD progression, addressing CKD-related complications, and improving cardiovascular outcomes. The KDOQI Work Group acknowledges the growing evidence base to support the use of several novel agents such as sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for several CKD etiologies, and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for type 2 CKD in setting of diabetes. Further, KDIGO guidelines emphasize the importance of team-based care which was also recognized by the work group as a key factor to address the growing CKD burden. In this commentary, the Work Group has also assessed and discussed various barriers and potential opportunities for implementing the recommendations put forth in the 2024 KDIGO guidelines while the scientific community continues to focus on enhancing early identification of CKD and discovering newer therapies for managing kidney disease.

Advances in the pharmacological management of hyperlipidemia through the use of combination therapies

INTRODUCTION

Lipid-lowering therapies are well established for the treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Historically monotherapy studies have been performed, but the introduction of statins has led to these drugs being recognized as baseline therapies and to the investigation of combination therapy of both older and newer medications with them.

AREAS COVERED

Surrogate marker studies have shown additive effects on LDL-C, triglycerides and HDL-C of combination therapies with statins and these have extended to lipoprotein (a). Imaging studies have often shown benefits paralleling lipid studies. However, outcome studies have failed to show added benefits with niacin or fibrates while confirming the benefits of ezetimibe, bempedoic acid and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors and icosapent ethyl.

EXPERT OPINION

Combination therapy for LDL-C in dual combinations is well validated. Data for intervention on triglycerides is limited to icosapent ethyl, but this may exert effects independent of lipids. New drugs targeting triglycerides through apolipoprotein C3 and angiopoietin-like peptides are in development. Studies on combination therapy raising HDL-C have generally disappointed, though cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibition remains a target. Lipoprotein (a) is recognized as a CVD risk factor and effective therapies are in development but results on CVD events are lacking.

Comprehensive Review of Lipid Management in Chronic Kidney Disease and Hemodialysis Patients: Conventional Approaches, and Challenges for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction

Background/Objectives: Lipid disorders are very prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), leading to heightened cardiovascular risk. This review examines the effectiveness of lipid-lowering agents in these populations and explores gaps in the current research. The goal of this review is to assess the efficacy of lipid-lowering therapies in CKD and ESRD patients and identify future research needs. It aims to provide a clearer understanding of how these treatments impact cardiovascular risk in high-risk populations. Methods: We conducted a literature search in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases using keywords including but not limited to: chronic kidney diseases, dialysis, hemodialysis, dyslipidemia, statins, ezetimibe, and lipid-lowering drugs. Findings from included studies were synthetized to provide an overview of the current management of dyslipidemia in ESRD and HD. Results: Statins show mixed results in CKD and ESRD, with limited benefits in reducing cardiovascular events in dialysis patients. Agents like PCSK9 inhibitors show promising results but require further research, while non-statin therapies like fibrates and omega-3 fatty acids have limited evidence for use in this population. Conclusions: The review underscores the need for further research into lipid-lowering agents in CKD and ESRD patients, highlighting the need for tailored lipid management strategies in vulnerable patients with unique risk factors. More studies are needed to refine treatment strategies and assess the role of exercise and accurate risk calculators in managing cardiovascular outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting for Carotid Artery Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Most previous large studies of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in maintenance hemodialysis patients are old-era, do not describe the types of stents and method of protection, and their effectiveness is unknown. CAS has progressed remarkably, and tailor-made CAS is now possible in hemodialysis patients according to the lesion. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients treated in our institution.We retrospectively investigated the data of patients who underwent elective CAS in our institution between January 2012 and April 2023. Firstly, we verified the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Secondly, the outcomes of CAS in maintenance hemodialysis patients were compared with CAS in nondialysis patients during the same period.During the study period, 212 patients with carotid stenosis underwent CAS. Among these, 18 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were identified for analysis. All 18 patients underwent lesion-specific tailor-made CAS. All 18 patients were technically successfully stented with good vasodilation and improvement in stenosis. No symptomatic cerebral infarction occurred within 30 days after CAS. There was no difference between dialysis and nondialysis patients in the risk of symptomatic complications and death occurring within 30 days after surgery. There was a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications not associated with prognosis in the dialysis group (23.1% vs 1.0%, P = 0.0047). No in-stent restenosis (>50% stenosis) and ipsilateral cerebral infarction at 1 year occurred during follow-up.CAS in hemodialysis patients may be safe and effective.

Statin Therapy and C-reactive Protein in Patients with Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Increased levels of inflammation markers in patients with kidney disease, particularly chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important risk factor. This study explored whether the effect of more potent statins on inflammation in CKD patients is dose-dependent, whether there is any difference between the hydrophilic and lipophilic statins concerning their effects on inflammation markers in patients with CKD, and whether the duration of treatment with statins has any effect on markers of inflammation in these patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Scopus, PubMed, and ISI Web of Science databases from inception to August 2022 was performed. Eligible studies were stratified based on a target population, intervention duration, dosage and type of statins (high intensity statin and moderate/ low intensity), and solubility of statins. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's regression asymmetry test for visual inspection of funnel plots. Non-linear effects of dosage of statins and treatment duration were also examined by fractional polynomial modeling.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (12 studies) on 264 patients with kidney disease and 254 controls showed a significant hs-CRP lowering effect of the dose of statin. Both hydrophilic and lipophilic statins had significant hs-CRP lowering effects. Meta-analysis of 6 publications (7 studies) evaluating the impact of statins on CRP in 235 patients and 197 control subjects showed a significant negative association between treatment with statins group and CRP levels.

CONCLUSION

Statin treatment decreases significantly the levels of CRP and hs-CRP in patients with kidney disease.

Uric Acid and Atherosclerosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Recent Progress, Mechanisms, and Prospect

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent global health concern, significantly linked to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Among various risk factors, uric acid (UA) has emerged as a potentially modifiable contributor to cardiovascular complications in CKD patients.

Summary

Elevated serum uric acid levels frequently occur in individuals with CKD and are associated with the development of atherosclerosis (AS). Uric acid has been demonstrated to exacerbate inflammatory processes, promote oxidative stress, and cause endothelial dysfunction, which are critical factors that drive the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Furthermore, high uric acid levels can worsen renal function, establishing a detrimental cycle that amplifies cardiovascular risk.

Key Messages

This review investigates the complex interconnection between UA and AS in patients with CKD, highlighting the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic considerations. A more profound comprehension of this relationship is essential for enhancing cardiovascular health and outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Understanding Vascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

Vascular calcification (VC) is a biological phenomenon characterized by an accumulation of calcium and phosphate deposits within the walls of blood vessels causing the loss of elasticity of the arterial walls. VC plays a crucial role in the incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), leading to a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality in these patients. Different conditions such as age, sex, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension are the main risk factors in patients affected by chronic kidney disease. However, VC may occur earlier and faster in these patients if it is associated with new or non-traditional risk factors such as oxidative stress, anemia, and inflammation. In chronic kidney disease, several pathophysiological processes contribute to vascular calcifications, including osteochondrogenic differentiation of vascular cells, hyperphosphatemia and hypercalcemia, and the loss of specific vascular calcification inhibitors including pyrophosphate, fetuin-A, osteoprotegerin, and matrix GLA protein. In this review we discuss the main traditional and non-traditional risk factors that can promote VC in patients with kidney disease. In addition, we provide an overview of the main pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for VC that may be crucial to identify new prevention strategies and possible new therapeutic approaches to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with kidney disease.

Management of Hypercholesterolemia in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Glimpse into the Future

Cardio-cerebral vascular diseases due to atherosclerosis are still the leading cause of death worldwide. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein B have been identified as the primary factors responsible for the atherosclerotic process, with a causal effect. Many drugs aimed at reducing LDL-C levels are already on the market, acting in different ways in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety. Moreover, new lipid-lowering agents and new technologies in the fields of gene editing and immunotherapy are currently under investigation. A more recent biomarker associated with an increased risk of plaque generation, progression, and subsequent ASCVD is the lipoprotein (a) and, in the next few years, it will be the new target of pharmacological therapy. The aim of this review is to present the landscape of therapies already approved to reduce LDL-C levels, evaluating their efficacy, tolerability, and indications. Moreover, we take a glimpse into the future to evaluate experimental novel therapies to lower LDL-C levels that will be approved in the next few years or are under clinical evaluation.

Combinatorial lipidomics and proteomics underscore erythrocyte lipid membrane aberrations in the development of adverse cardio-cerebrovascular complications in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Patients on maintenance hemodialysis exhibit a notably higher risk of cardio-cerebrovascular complications that constitute the major cause of death. Preceding studies have reported conflicting associations between traditional lipid measures and clinical outcome in dialysis patients. In this prospective longitudinal study, we utilized quantitative lipidomics to elucidate, at molecular resolution, changes in lipidome profiles of erythrocyte and plasma samples collected from maintenance hemodialysis patients followed up for 86 months (≈7 years). Primary outcome was defined as cardiovascular-related deaths or new-onset cardio-cerebrovascular events. Cox regression model uncovered plasma/erythrocyte lipids associated with incident cardio-cerebrovascular events in the erythrocyte cohort (n = 117 patients, 37 events) and plasma cohort (n = 45 patients, 11 events), respectively. Both the erythrocyte lipid panel [PA 40:5, PI 34:2, PC 42:6, AUC = 0.83] and plasma lipid panel [PC O-34:1, GM3 18:1; O2/25:0, TG 44:1(16:1_28:0), AUC = 0.94] significantly improved the prediction of cardio-cerebrovascular-related outcome compared to the base model comprising age, sex and dialysis vintage alone. Our findings underscore the pathophysiological significance of anionic phospholipid accretion in erythrocytes in the development of cardio-cerebrovascular complications in dialysis patients. In particular, distorted membrane lipid asymmetry leads to compromised membrane deformability, aberrant cell-cell interactions and altered glutathione metabolism in the erythrocytes of high-risk individuals even at relatively early stage of hemodialysis. Our findings thus underscore the importance of maintaining the RBC pool to lower the risk of cardio-cerebrovascular complications in dialysis patients.

The effects of hemodialysis on the cardiovascular system

Chronic kidney disease and dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease are increasing in prevalence in the United States. The costs associated with end-stage renal disease management comprise approximately 1% of the federal government's annual budget. Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease cause significant derangements of the cardiac and vascular system. Pathophysiologic hallmarks include alterations of the renin-angiotensin system, chronically increased sympathetic tone, calcium and phosphate imbalance, pro-inflammatory cytokine release, and uremic toxin accumulation. This results in several pathologies specific to the cardiac and vascular systems, which will each be reviewed separately herein.

Association between Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Inflammation plays a key role in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) is a novel inflammatory marker. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between MLR and inflammation in CKD patients.

METHODS

In total, 1,809 subjects were recruited from Wanzhai Town, Zhuhai City, between December 2017 and March 2018 for a cross-sectional survey. Patients were categorized based on the absence (hypersensitive C-reactive protein [hsCRP] level ≦3 mg/L) or presence (hsCRP level >3 mg/L) of inflammation. Logistic regression models and MLR quartiles were used to explore the relationship between MLR and inflammation in CKD patients.

RESULTS

Among 1,809 subjects, 403 (22.2%) had CKD. Significant differences in systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, monocyte, MLR, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were observed between noninflammatory group and inflammatory group. The highest MLR quartile had higher Scr, WBC, neutrophil, monocyte, IL-6, and hsCRP values and lower eGFR and lymphocyte values. Comparing the lowest quartile of MLR, the OR (95% CI) of inflammation risk in the highest quartile was 2.30 (1.24-4.27) after adjustment for confounding factors. The area under the curve of MLR for predicting inflammation was 0.631. The cutoff point for the MLR was 0.153.

CONCLUSION

A high MLR was significantly and independently associated with inflammation in patients with CKD, making MLR a potential marker for inflammation in this demographic. MLR may also predict the severity of CKD.

Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Failure: A Review

Importance

More than 3.5 million people worldwide and 540 000 individuals in the US receive maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for the treatment of chronic kidney failure. The 5-year survival rate is approximately 40% after initiation of maintenance dialysis.

Observations

Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis remove metabolic waste and excess body water and rebalance electrolytes to sustain life. There is no recommended estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) threshold for initiating dialysis, and patient-clinician shared decision-making should help determine when to initiate dialysis. Persistent signs and symptoms of uremia (eg, nausea, fatigue) and volume overload (eg, dyspnea, peripheral edema), worsening eGFR, metabolic acidosis, and hyperkalemia inform the timing of therapy initiation. A randomized clinical trial reported no mortality benefit to starting dialysis at higher eGFR (10-14 mL/min/1.73 m2) vs lower eGFR (5-7 mL/min/1.73 m2) levels. Observational data suggested no differences in 5-year mortality with use of hemodialysis vs peritoneal dialysis. Cardiovascular (eg, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest) and infection-related complications of maintenance dialysis are common. In the US, hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections occur at a rate of 1.1 to 5.5 episodes per 1000 catheter-days and affect approximately 50% of patients within 6 months of catheter placement. Peritonitis occurs at a rate of 0.26 episodes per patient-year and affects about 30% of individuals in the first year of peritoneal dialysis therapy. Chronic kidney failure-related systemic complications, such as anemia, hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia, and hypertension, often require pharmacologic treatment. Hypotension during dialysis, refractory symptoms (eg, muscle cramps, itching), and malfunction of dialysis access can interfere with delivery of dialysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

In 2021, more than 540 000 patients in the US received maintenance hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis for treatment of chronic kidney failure. Five-year survival rate after initiation of maintenance dialysis is approximately 40%, and the mortality rate is similar with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Decisions about dialysis initiation timing and modality are influenced by patient symptoms, laboratory trajectories, patient preferences, and therapy cost and availability and should include shared decision-making.

Recurrent Hospitalizations for Fluid Overload in Diabetes with Kidney Failure Treated with Dialysis

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in Singapore. ESKD patients have high disease burden and are at increased risk of recurrent hospitalizations, including fluid overload. This study aimed to characterize the risk factors associated with readmissions for fluid overload that will identify high-risk hospitalizations for interventions to reduce readmissions.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all hospitalizations for fluid overload in adults with diabetes and ESKD on dialysis in SingHealth hospitals between 2018 and 2021. Fluid overload was defined by discharge codes for fluid overload, heart failure, pulmonary edema, and generalized edema. Multivariable Cox regression analysis using the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total Time model was performed for the outcomes of readmissions for fluid overload within 30 days and 90 days of discharge.

RESULTS

Among 3,234 hospitalizations for fluid overload, readmission for fluid overload within 30 days and 90 days occurred in 585 (18.1%) and 967 (29.9%) hospitalizations, respectively. Ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and lower hemoglobin level were independently associated with readmissions for fluid overload within 30 and 90 days. Additionally, heart failure, hemodialysis (compared to peritoneal dialysis), and lack of statin at discharge were associated with increased 90-day readmission risk.

CONCLUSION

Modifiable (hemoglobin level, statin use) and non-modifiable factors (ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and heart failure) influenced the risk of readmission for fluid overload. These results may guide risk stratification and inform targeted interventions to reduce avoidable, unplanned readmissions for recurrent fluid overload among individuals with diabetes and ESKD.

Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves the formation of a blood clot in a vein, and includes deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). The annual incidence for VTE varies from 0.75 to 2.69 per 1000 individuals, with about 40 million people worldwide impacted by VTE. Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-coenzyme A (CoA) reductase inhibitors, inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis and display several vascular-protective effects, including antithrombotic properties. However, the potential role of statins in the primary prevention of VTE is still not clear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and risks of statins in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals with no prior history of VTE.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard Cochrane search methods. The search was last updated on 13 March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statins with any control intervention (including placebo and usual care) in healthy individuals or participants with conditions other than VTE. There were no restrictions on the dose, duration, route, or timing of statins.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were VTE, DVT, and PE. Our secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, adverse events, and mortality. We used the trial sequential analysis (TSA) method to judge whether the evidence was sufficient, and we used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 RCTs involving 122,601 adults (aged 18 years and above) who were healthy, had various medical conditions (e.g. hypercholesterolemia), or were at risk for cardiovascular disease. Both males and females were included in all studies. Two studies focused solely on participants over 60 years of age. We deemed four studies to have a low risk of bias overall, while 19 were at high risk of bias, and four were unclear. The 27 studies compared use of statins versus placebo or usual care in individuals who had never experienced VTE. The statins used in the studies were atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin, and simvastatin. Twenty-three studies followed up participants for over a year, with six of those extending follow-ups for over five years. Twenty-five studies were based in hospitals, and 24 studies were funded by industry. Only one study used VTE as a primary endpoint. The median incidence of VTE in the statins group was 0.72% (ranging from 0% to 10.53%), and in the control group it was 0.89% (ranging from 0% to 6.83%). Our pooled analysis of the 27 studies showed that, relative to control groups, statins may slightly reduce the overall incidence of VTE (odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.76 to 0.98; 27 studies, 122,601 participants; low-certainty evidence). Of the statins we evaluated, only rosuvastatin seemed to be associated with a reduced incidence of VTE, albeit the reduction in incidence was very small. The evidence did not clearly indicate a difference between groups in the incidence of DVT (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.18; six studies, 40,305 participants; low-certainty evidence), PE (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.52; five studies, 28,427 participants; low-certainty evidence), or myopathy (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.45; 10 studies, 75,551 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nonetheless, statin use might slightly decrease the incidence of any serious adverse event (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99; 13 studies, 67,020 participants; low-certainty evidence) and any death (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.95; 24 studies, 116,761 participants; low-certainty evidence), compared to control.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Using statins for the primary prevention of VTE may slightly reduce the incidence of VTE and all-cause mortality. However, this effect is likely too weak to be considered significant. Statin use may not decrease the occurrence of DVT and PE. The current evidence is insufficient to draw strong conclusions because of the risk of bias in the studies, imprecision in the effect estimates, and potential publication bias. More evidence from well conducted and fully reported RCTs is needed to assess the preventive effects of different types of statins, as well as the effects of different dosages and treatment durations in various populations.

Cardiovascular and non-renal complications of chronic kidney disease: Managing risk

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) currently affects approximately 850 million people globally and is continuing to increase in prevalence as well as in importance as a cause of death. The excess mortality related to CKD is mostly caused by an increase in cardiovascular disease. This includes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease as many promoters of atherosclerosis, such as blood pressure, lipid levels and hypercoagulation, are increased in people with CKD. Diabetes is a leading cause of CKD contributing to the risk of CVD, and obesity is also increasingly prevalent. Management of these risk factors is therefore very important in CKD, and to reduce risk of CKD progression. Heart failure is also more prevalent in CKD and, again, many risk factors are shared. The concept of foundational pillars in the management of heart failure has been adapted to the treatment of CKD, with many organ-protective interventions, such renin-angiotensin system blockade, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism, reducing the risk for mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but also for progression of CKD. Atrial fibrillation is also more common with CKD and affects the management of the former. In this review these non-renal complications of CKD are discussed, along with how the risk of these complications should be managed. Many new opportunities have demonstrated heart and kidney organ protection, but implementation is a challenge.

Novel Insights into Diabetic Kidney Disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), affecting over one-third of type 1 and nearly half of type 2 diabetes patients. As the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally, DKD develops through a complex interplay of chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Early detection is crucial, with diagnosis based on persistent albuminuria and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Treatment strategies emphasize comprehensive management, including glycemic control, blood pressure regulation, and the use of nephroprotective agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Ongoing research explores novel therapies targeting molecular pathways and non-coding RNAs. Preventive measures focus on rigorous control of hyperglycemia and hypertension, aiming to mitigate disease progression. Despite therapeutic advances, DKD remains a leading cause of ESRD, highlighting the need for continued research to identify new biomarkers and innovative treatments.

Research hotspots and future trends in lipid metabolism in chronic kidney disease: a bibliometric and visualization analysis from 2004 to 2023

Background

Disorders of lipid metabolism play a key role in the initiation and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, research on lipid metabolism in CKD has rapidly increased worldwide. However, comprehensive bibliometric analyses in this field are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate publications in the field of lipid metabolism in CKD over the past 20 years based on bibliometric analysis methods to understand the important achievements, popular research topics, and emerging thematic trends.

Methods

Literature on lipid metabolism in CKD, published between 2004 and 2023, was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. The VOSviewer (v.1.6.19), CiteSpace (v.6.3 R1), R language (v.4.3.2), and Bibliometrix (v.4.1.4) packages (https://www.bibliometrix.org) were used for the bibliometric analysis and visualization. Annual output, author, country, institution, journal, cited literature, co-cited literature, and keywords were also included. The citation frequency and H-index were used to evaluate quality and influence.

Results

In total, 1,285 publications in the field of lipid metabolism in CKD were identified in this study. A total of 7,615 authors from 1,885 institutions in 69 countries and regions published articles in 466 journals. Among them, China was the most productive (368 articles), and the United States had the most citations (17,880 times) and the highest H-index (75). Vaziri Nosratola D, Levi Moshe, Fornoni Alessia, Zhao Yingyong, and Merscher Sandra emerged as core authors. Levi Moshe (2,247 times) and Vaziri Nosratola D (1,969 times) were also authors of the top two most cited publications. The International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Kidney International are the most published and cited journals in this field, respectively. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) have attracted significant attention in the field of lipid metabolism. Oxidative stress, inflammation, insulin resistance, autophagy, and cell death are the key research topics in this field.

Conclusion

Through bibliometric analysis, the current status and global trends in lipid metabolism in CKD were demonstrated. CVD and DKD are closely associated with the lipid metabolism of patients with CKD. Future studies should focus on effective CKD treatments using lipid-lowering targets.

Chinese expert consensus on blood lipid management in patients with diabetes (2024 edition)

Diabetes is a significant independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with dyslipidemia playing a critical role in the initiation and progression of ASCVD in diabetic patients. In China, the current prevalence of dyslipidemia in diabetes is high, but the control rate remains low. Therefore, to enhance lipid management in patients with diabetes, the Endocrinology and Metabolism Physician Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, in collaboration with the Experts' Committee of the National Society of Cardiometabolic Medicine, has convened experts to develop a consensus on the management of dyslipidemia in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. The development of this consensus is informed by existing practices in lipid management among Chinese diabetic patients, incorporating contemporary evidence-based findings and guidelines from national and international sources. The consensus encompasses lipid profile characteristics, the current epidemiological status of dyslipidemia, ASCVD risk stratification, and lipid management procedures in diabetic patients. For the first time, both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol have been recommended as primary targets for lipid intervention in diabetic patients. The consensus also includes a summary and recommendations for lipid management strategies in special diabetic populations, including children and adolescents, individuals aged 75 years and older, patients with chronic kidney disease, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, and those who are pregnant. This comprehensive consensus aims to improve cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients by contributing to the dissemination of key clinical advancements and guiding clinical practice.

Exploring the nexus: The place of kidney diseases within the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome spectrum

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are two significant comorbidities affecting a large proportion of the general population with considerable crosstalk. In addition to substantial co-incidence of CKD and CKM syndrome in epidemiological studies, clinical and pre-clinical studies have identified similar pathophysiological pathways leading to both entities. Patients with CKM syndrome are more prone to develop acute kidney injury and CKD, while therapeutic alternatives and their success rates are considerably lower in such patient groups. Nevertheless, the association between CKM syndrome and CKD or ESKD is bidirectional rather than being a cause-effect relationship as patients with CKD are also prone to develop peripheral insulin resistance, high blood pressure, and dyslipidemia. Furthermore, such patients are less likely to receive kidney transplantation in addition to the higher allograft dysfunction risk. We hereby aim to evaluate the association in-between kidney diseases and CKM syndrome, including epidemiological data, pre-clinical studies with pathophysiological pathways, and potential therapeutic perspectives.

[Rationale for Increasing Doses of Statins in Everyday Clinical Practice]

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) were discovered in the early 1970s in Japan and were originally used to treat patients with hereditary hyperlipidemia. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, clinical trials using statins for primary and secondary prevention showed the possibility of reducing cardiovascular (CV) and, in some cases, all-cause mortality. Intensive statin therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg/day and rosuvastatin 40 mg/day) compared to initial doses provides an additional 16% reduction in CV complications. Regression studies with the original rosuvastatin using intracoronary ultrasound and other modern methods have shown the possibility of stabilization and regression of atherosclerosis in the carotid and coronary arteries. High-dose statin therapy is generally well tolerated; the incidence of clinically significant adverse liver reactions does not exceed 2-3 per 100,000 people, and the incidence of myopathies with increased creatine kinase over 10 upper limits of normal is not higher than 1 per 10,000 people per year. Long-term statin treatment does not increase the risk of dementia and, in some studies, reduced the risk of Alzheimer's disease. Achieving target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in routine practice does not exceed 5-11%; one of the main reasons for that is the rare (2-3%) prescription of high doses of statins. Increasing statin doses in routine clinical practice will optimize the treatment of patients with high CV risk and will contribute to further reduction of mortality in our country.

IL-6 inhibition with clazakizumab in patients receiving maintenance dialysis: a randomized phase 2b trial

Inflammation mediated by interleukin-6 (IL-6) is strongly associated with cardiovascular risk. Here we evaluated clazakizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-6 ligand, in a phase 2b dose-finding study. Adults with cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes receiving maintenance dialysis with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥ 2 mg l-1 at baseline were randomized to receive clazakizumab (2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg, n = 32 per dose group) or placebo (n = 31) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in hs-CRP to week 12, expressed as the geometric mean ratio. Clazakizumab treatment signficantly reduced serum hs-CRP concentrations at week 12 by 86%, 90% and 92% relative to placebo in patients randomized to 2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg clazakizumab, respectively (all P < 0.0001), meeting the primary outcome. With regard to secondary endpoints, clazakizumab treatment reduced serum fibrinogen, amyloid A, secretory phospholipase A2, and lipoprotein(a) concentrations, as well as increased mean serum albumin concentrations at 12 weeks, relative to placebo. The proportion of patients who achieved hs-CRP < 2.0 mg l-1 was 79%, 82% and 79% in the 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg clazakizumab groups, respectively, compared with 0% of placebo-treated patients. With regard to safety, no cases of sustained grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia were observed. Serious infections were seen with similar frequency in the placebo, clazakizumab 2.5 mg and clazakizumab 5 mg groups, but were numerically more frequent in the clazakizumab 10 mg group. The results of this trial indicate that in patients receiving maintenance dialysis, clazakizumab reduced inflammatory biomarkers associated with cardiovascular events. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05485961 .

Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia: A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK trial

INTRODUCTION

The clinical benefits of aspirin in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear.

METHODS

The secondary analysis of the LANDMARK trial investigated whether aspirin use was associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality was performed. A total of 2135 patients at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The risk of CVEs was comparable between participants with aspirin use at baseline and those without at baseline, between participants with aspirin use during the study period and those without during the study period, and between participants with new aspirin prescription and those without aspirin use during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CVEs in participants undergoing hemodialysis patients at risk of vascular calcification.

Benefits and Risks of Antihyperlipidemic Medication in Adults with Different Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Based on the Number Needed to Treat

PURPOSE

The objective of this investigation is to examine the benefits and potential risks of these drugs in individuals by varying baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values, utilizing the concept of the number needed to treat (NNT).

METHODS

We extensively searched electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science, up to 6 August 2023. Baseline LDL-C values were stratified into four categories: < 100, 100-129, 130-159, and ≥ 160 mg/dL. Risk ratios (RRs) and NNT values were computed.

RESULTS

This analysis incorporated data from 46 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing a total of 237,870 participants. The meta-regression analysis demonstrated an incremental diminishing risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with increasing baseline LDL-C values. Statins exhibited a significant reduction in MACE [number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25-37], but this effect was observed only in individuals with baseline LDL-C values of 100 mg/dL or higher. Ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors also were effective in reducing MACE (NNTB 18, 95% CI 11-41, and NNTB 18, 95% CI 16-24). Notably, the safety outcomes of statins and ezetimibe did not reach statistical significance, while the incidence of injection-site reactions with PCSK9 inhibitors was statistically significant [number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 41, 95% CI 80-26].

CONCLUSION

Statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors demonstrated a substantial capacity to reduce MACE, particularly among individuals whose baseline LDL-C values were relatively higher. The NNT visually demonstrates the gradient between baseline LDL-C and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Registration: PROSPERO identifier number: CRD42023458630.

Re-Analyses of 8 Historical Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine Assessing Multimorbidity Burden and Its Association with Treatment Response

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the multimorbidity burden of clinical trial participants and assess its association with treatment response.

METHODS

We conducted a reanalysis of patient level data. There were 29,954 participants from 8 clinical trials containing 11 comparisons between an intervention and control condition. Patients were classified by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. The primary outcomes were the primary study endpoints as originally specified for each trial. A Cox model that included the CCI score groups, the randomized group, and their interaction, was used to compare the primary outcome between randomized groups. The interaction term between randomized group and comorbidity index allowed the treatment effect to differ by level of comorbidity index and comprised the primary effect of interest. Hazard ratios and risk differences were reported for all comparisons.

RESULTS

The mean CCI scores of trial populations ranged from 2.1 to 3.9 points, and the percentage of patients with scores ≥5 from 3% to 39%. Tests of interaction terms in models yielded P values ≤ .10 for 4/11 comparisons and ≤ .05 for 2/11 comparisons. In 3 additional comparisons, potentially important treatment variation on an absolute scale was observed despite interaction tests with P values > .10 on the relative scale.

CONCLUSIONS

These trials were mainly composed of patient populations with CCI scores ≤4. Despite this, biologically plausible treatment interactions were commonly suggested. These results are hypothesis generating; confirmation of results would require larger studies or studies targeted specifically toward patients with higher levels of multimorbidity.

The Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Geriatric Syndromes in Older Patients Undergoing Chronic Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the complexity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and geriatric syndromes in older patients with end-stage renal disease. Our aims were to (1) examine the prevalence of CVD in older patients on chronic hemodialysis, (2) compare the burden of geriatric syndromes in patients with and without CVD, and (3) examine the impact of CVD on hospitalization.

METHODS

This prospective, observational, multi-center study was conducted at two dialysis units of two major hospitals in Vietnam. Consecutive older adults receiving chronic hemodialysis were recruited from November 2020 to June 2021. CVD was defined as having one of these conditions: heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or stroke. Participants were assessed for geriatric conditions including frailty, malnutrition, impairment in instrumental activities/activities of daily living, depression, falls, and polypharmacy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the impact of CVD on 6-month hospitalization, adjusting for age, sex, duration of dialysis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and geriatric conditions. Results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

There were 175 participants (mean age 72.4 ± 8.5 and 58.9% female). CVD was present in 80% of the participants (ischemic heart disease: 49.7%, heart failure: 60.0%, and stroke: 25.7%). Participants with CVD had a higher burden of geriatric syndromes compared to those without CVD. During the 6-month follow-up, 48.6% of the participants were hospitalized (56.4% of those with CVD vs. 17.1% of those without CVD), p < 0.001). CVD independently increased the risk of hospitalization (adjusted OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.12-9.80).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, there was a very high prevalence of CVD in older patients undergoing chronic dialysis. Participants with CVD had a higher burden of geriatric syndromes and their risk of 6-month hospitalization increased by three times. There is a need for a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach to treatment planning for these patients.

Indoxyl Sulfate-Induced Macrophage Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies in Uremic Atherosclerosis

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) frequently occurs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly those undergoing dialysis. The mechanisms behind this may be related to traditional risk factors and CKD-specific factors that accelerate atherosclerosis and vascular calcification in CKD patients. The accumulation of uremic toxins is a significant factor in CKD-related systemic disorders. Basic research suggests that indoxyl sulfate (IS), a small protein-bound uremic toxin, is associated with macrophage dysfunctions, including increased oxidative stress, exacerbation of chronic inflammation, and abnormalities in lipid metabolism. Strategies to mitigate the toxicity of IS include optimizing gut microbiota, intervening against the abnormality of intracellular signal transduction, and using blood purification therapy with higher efficiency. Further research is needed to examine whether lowering protein-bound uremic toxins through intervention leads to a reduction in CVD in patients with CKD.

Dynamic natural components and morphological changes in nonculprit subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome and mild chronic kidney disease at the 1-year follow-up and clinical significance at the 5-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The natural outcome of coronary plaque in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unique, which can be analyzed quantitatively by optical flow ratio (OFR) software.

METHODS

A total of 184 ACS patients with at least one nonculprit subclinical atherosclerosis (NSA) detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 1-year follow-up were divided into non-CKD group (n = 106, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)> 90 mL/(min×1.73 m2)) and mild CKD group (n = 78, 60≤eGFR<90 mL/(min×1.73 m2)). Changes of normalized total atheroma volume (TAVn) of NSA was the primary endpoint at the 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients with mild CKD showed more TAVn progression of NSA than non-CKD (p = 0.019) from baseline to the 1-year follow-up, which was mainly due to an increase in calcium TAVn (p<0.001). The morphological change in the maximal calcification thickness (p = 0.026) was higher and the change in the distance from the calcified surface to the contralateral coronary media membrane (ΔC-to-M) at the maximal cross-sectional calcium area was lower (p<0.001) in mild CKD group than in non-CKD group. Mild CKD had more NSA related MACEs at the 5-year follow-up than non-CKD (30.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild CKD patients had more plaque progression of NSA which showed the increase of calcium component with more protrusion into the lumen morphologically at the 1-year follow-up and a higher corresponding incidence of NSA-related MACEs at the 5-year follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02140801. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02140801.

Identification of endophenotypes supporting outcome prediction in hemodialysis patients based on mechanistic markers of statin treatment

Background

Statins are widely used to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis have significantly increased risk of developing CVD. Statin treatment in these patients however did not show a statistically significant benefit in large trials on a patient cohort level.

Methods

We generated gene expression profiles for statins to investigate the impact on cellular programs in human renal proximal tubular cells and mesangial cells in-vitro. We subsequently selected biomarkers from key statin-affected molecular pathways and assessed these biomarkers in plasma samples from the AURORA cohort, a double-blind, randomized, multi-center study of patients on hemodialysis or hemofiltration that have been treated with rosuvastatin. Patient clusters (phenotypes) were created based on the identified biomarkers using Latent Class Model clustering and the associations with outcome for the generated phenotypes were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The multivariable models were adjusted for clinical and biological covariates based on previously published data in AURORA.

Results

The impact of statin treatment on mesangial cells was larger as compared with tubular cells with a large overlap of differentially expressed genes identified for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin indicating a predominant drug class effect. Affected molecular pathways included TGFB-, TNF-, and MAPK-signaling and focal adhesion among others. Four patient clusters were identified based on the baseline plasma concentrations of the eight biomarkers. Phenotype 1 was characterized by low to medium levels of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and high levels of interleukin 6 (IL6) or matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and it was significantly associated with outcome showing increased risk of developing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or cardiovascular death. Phenotype 2 had high HGF but low Fas cell surface death receptor (FAS) levels and it was associated with significantly better outcome at 1 year.

Conclusions

In this translational study, we identified patient subgroups based on mechanistic markers of statin therapy that are associated with disease outcome in patients on hemodialysis.

Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Electronic address: ctt@ndph.ox.ac.uk, Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses of summary data from randomised controlled trials have shown that statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes, but less is known about the size or timing of this effect, or who is at greatest risk. We aimed to address these gaps in knowledge through analysis of individual participant data from large, long-term, randomised, double-blind trials of statin therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of statin therapy that participated in the CTT Collaboration. All double-blind randomised controlled trials of statin therapy of at least 2 years' scheduled duration and with at least 1000 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. All recorded diabetes-related adverse events, treatments, and measures of glycaemia were sought from eligible trials. Meta-analyses assessed the effects of allocation to statin therapy on new-onset diabetes (defined by diabetes-related adverse events, use of new glucose-lowering medications, glucose concentrations, or HbA1c values) and on worsening glycaemia in people with diabetes (defined by complications of glucose control, increased use of glucose-lowering medication, or HbA1c increase of ≥0·5%). Standard inverse-variance-weighted meta-analyses of the effects on these outcomes were conducted according to a prespecified protocol.

FINDINGS

Of the trials participating in the CTT Collaboration, 19 trials compared statin versus placebo (123 940 participants, 25 701 [21%] with diabetes; median follow-up of 4·3 years), and four trials compared more versus less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 5340 [17%] with diabetes, median follow-up of 4·9 years). Compared with placebo, allocation to low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 10% proportional increase in new-onset diabetes (2420 of 39 179 participants assigned to receive a statin [1·3% per year] vs 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to receive placebo [1·2% per year]; rate ratio [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 1·04-1·16), and allocation to high-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 36% proportional increase (1221 of 9935 participants assigned to receive a statin [4·8% per year] vs 905 of 9859 participants assigned to receive placebo [3·5% per year]; 1·36, 1·25-1·48). For each trial, the rate of new-onset diabetes among participants allocated to receive placebo depended mostly on the proportion of participants who had at least one follow-up HbA1c measurement; this proportion was much higher in the high-intensity than the low-intensity or moderate-intensity trials. Consequently, the main determinant of the magnitude of the absolute excesses in the two types of trial was the extent of HbA1c measurement rather than the proportional increase in risk associated with statin therapy. In participants without baseline diabetes, mean glucose increased by 0·04 mmol/L with both low-intensity or moderate-intensity (95% CI 0·03-0·05) and high-intensity statins (0·02-0·06), and mean HbA1c increased by 0·06% (0·00-0·12) with low-intensity or moderate-intensity statins and 0·08% (0·07-0·09) with high-intensity statins. Among those with a baseline measure of glycaemia, approximately 62% of new-onset diabetes cases were among participants who were already in the top quarter of the baseline distribution. The relative effects of statin therapy on new-onset diabetes were similar among different types of participants and over time. Among participants with baseline diabetes, the RRs for worsening glycaemia were 1·10 (1·06-1·14) for low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 1·24 (1·06-1·44) for high-intensity statin therapy compared with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Statins cause a moderate dose-dependent increase in new diagnoses of diabetes that is consistent with a small upwards shift in glycaemia, with the majority of new diagnoses of diabetes occurring in people with baseline glycaemic markers that are close to the diagnostic threshold for diabetes. Importantly, however, any theoretical adverse effects of statins on cardiovascular risk that might arise from these small increases in glycaemia (or, indeed, from any other mechanism) are already accounted for in the overall reduction in cardiovascular risk that is seen with statin therapy in these trials. These findings should further inform clinical guidelines regarding clinical management of people taking statin therapy.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Outcomes of peripheral artery disease and polyvascular disease in patients with end-stage kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and end-stage kidney disease are a high-risk population, and concomitant atherosclerosis in coronary arteries (CAD) or cerebral arteries (CVD) is common. The aim of the study was to assess long-term outcomes of PAD and the impact of coexistent CAD and CVD on outcomes.

METHODS

The United States Renal Data System was used to identify patients with PAD within 6 months of incident dialysis. Four groups were formed: PAD alone, PAD with CAD, PAD with CVD, and PAD with CAD and CVD. PAD-specific outcomes (chronic limb-threatening ischemia, major amputation, percutaneous/surgical revascularization, and their composite, defined as major adverse limb events [MALE]) as well as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke were studied.

RESULTS

The study included 106,567 patients (mean age, 71.2 years; 40.8% female) with a median follow-up of 546 days (interquartile range, 214-1096 days). Most patients had PAD and CAD (49.8%), 25.8% had PAD alone, and 19.2% had all three territories involved. MALE rate in patients with PAD was 22.3% and 35.0% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. In comparison to PAD alone, the coexistence of both CAD and CVD (ie, polyvascular disease) was associated with a higher adjusted rates of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.31), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.69-1.88), stroke (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.52,1.80), and MALE (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high burden of PAD with poor long-term outcomes, which worsen, in an incremental fashion, with the involvement of each additional diseased arterial bed.

Association between Myocardial Oxygen Supply and Demand and Myocardial Injury in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease

AIM

In patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), it is unclear whether an imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand leads to myocardial injury (MI). This study clarifies the association between the balance of the rate pressure product (RPP), consisting of the systolic blood pressure multiplied by the pulse rate (PR), a marker for myocardial oxygen demand, and hemoglobin (Hb), a marker for oxygen supply, with MI.

METHODS

A total of 283 consecutive unselected patients for hemodialysis were enrolled in this retrospective, cross-sectional study, and were divided into four groups according to Hb levels (high or low) and RPP. Potential imbalances between myocardial oxygen supply and demand were defined as patients with simultaneous high RPP and low Hb levels. The odds ratio (OR) for MI, defined as cardiac troponin T (cTnT) of ≥ 0.15 ng/mL was investigated using logistic regression analysis between the four patient groups.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.7 years, 71.3% were men, and 52.6% had diabetes. The mean Hb level was 9.0 g/dL, and 20.5% of patients were latently diagnosed with MI. The median RPP and cTnT level was 12,144 and 0.083 ng/mL, respectively. When exposed to simultaneous high RPP with low Hb, OR significantly increased compared with that of the well-balanced group (RPP ＜12,500 and Hb ≥ 9.0 g/dL; OR 3.63, p＜0.05). Similar results were obtained in multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounding variables. These associations were enhanced or weakened when the Hb cut-off level became lower (Hb=8 g/dL) or higher (Hb=10 g/dL).

CONCLUSIONS

As the myocardial oxygen supply and demand balance in patients with ESKD is potentially associated with MI, appropriate management for blood pressure, PR, and anemia may prevent MI.

Individual versus integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness in predicting cardiovascular mortality in end-stage renal diseases

Aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), is a predictor of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Aortic stiffness increases aortic systolic and pulse pressures (cSBP, cPP) and augmentation index adjusted for a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75). In this study, we examined if the integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness (ICPS) into risk score categories could improve CV mortality prediction in ESRD. In a prospective cohort of 311 patients with ESRD on dialysis who underwent vascular assessment at baseline, 118 CV deaths occurred after a median follow-up of 3.1 years. The relationship between hemodynamic parameters and CV mortality was analyzed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analysis. ICPS risk score from 0 to 5 points were calculated from points given to tertiles, and were regrouped into three risk categories (Average, High, Very-High). A strong association was found between the ICPS risk categories and CV mortality (High risk HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.05-4.62, P = 0.036); Very-High risk (HR = 4.44, 95% CI: 2.21-8.92, P < 0.001) as compared to the Average risk group. The Very-High risk category remained associated with CV mortality (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.37-9.21, P = 0.009) after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors as compared to the Average risk group. While higher C-statistics value of ICPS categories (C: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.578-0.676, P = 0.001) was not statistically superior to PWV, cPP or AIx@75, the use of ICPS categories resulted in a continuous net reclassification index of 0.56 (95% CI: 0.07-0.99). In conclusion, integration of multiple components of central blood pressure and aortic stiffness may potentially be useful for better prediction of CV mortality in this cohort.

Association of Use and Dose of Lipid-Lowering Therapy Post Acute Myocardial Infarction With 5-Year Survival in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Older people are underrepresented in randomized trials. The association between lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and its intensity after acute myocardial infarction and long-term mortality in this population deserves to be assessed.

METHODS

The FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) program consists of nationwide French surveys including all patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction ≤48 hours from onset over a 1- to 2-month period in 2005, 2010, and 2015, with long-term follow-up. Numerous data were collected and a centralized 10-year follow-up was organized. The present analysis focused on the association between prescription of LLT (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or equivalent, or any combination of statin and ezetimibe) and 5-year mortality in patients aged ≥80 years discharged alive. Cox multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were used to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Among the 2258 patients aged ≥80 years (mean age, 85±4 years; 51% women; 39% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; 58% with percutaneous coronary intervention), 415 were discharged without LLT (18%), 866 with conventional doses (38%), and 977 with high-dose LLT (43%). Five-year survival was 36%, 47.5%, and 58%, respectively. Compared with patients without LLT, high-dose LLT was significantly associated with lower 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]), whereas conventional-intensity LLT was not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.80-1.09]). In propensity score-matched cohorts (n=278 receiving high-intensity LLT and n=278 receiving no statins), 5-year survival was 52% with high-intensity LLT at discharge and 42% without statins (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

In these observational cohorts, high-intensity LLT at discharge after acute myocardial infarction was associated with reduced all-cause mortality at 5 years in an older adult population. These results suggest that high-intensity LLT should not be denied to patients on the basis of old age.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00673036, NCT01237418, and NCT02566200.

Effects of Administration and Intensity of Statins on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

(1) Background: Few studies have investigated the association between the intensity of statins and patient survival rates in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) as primary outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate patient survival rates according to the intensity of statins using a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD. (2) Methods: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this study (n = 53,345). We divided the patients into four groups based on the administration and intensity of statins: Group 1, patients without a prescription of statins (n = 37,944); Group 2, patients with a prescription of a low intensity of statins (n = 700); Group 3, patients with a prescription of a moderate intensity of statins (n = 14,160); Group 4, patients with a prescription of a high intensity of statins (n = 541). (3) Results: Significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the four groups. Group 1 had the best patient survival among the four groups in the univariate Cox regression analyses. However, multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the patient survival rate was higher for Group 3 than for Group 1. Cox regression analyses using data of a balanced cohort showed that, on univariate analyses, the HRs were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95, p < 0.001) in Group 2 and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96, p < 0.001) in Group 3 compared to that in Group 1. Group 4 had a higher mortality rate than Groups 2 or 3. The results from the cohort after balancing showed a similar trend to those from the multivariable Cox regression analyses. Young age and less comorbidities in Group 1 were mainly associated with favorable survival in Group 1 in the univariate analysis using cohort before balancing. Among the subgroup analyses based on sex, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, and heart disease, most multivariable analyses showed significantly higher patient survival rates in Group 3 than for Group 1. (4) Conclusions: Our study exhibited significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, leading to limitations in establishing a robust association between statin intensity and clinical outcomes. However, we conducted various statistical analyses to mitigate these differences. Some results, including multivariable analyses controlling for baseline characteristics and analyses of a balanced cohort using propensity score weighting, indicated improved patient survival in the moderate-intensity statin group compared to non-users. These findings suggest that moderate statin use may be associated with favorable patient survival.

Association between the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and mortality in Chinese maintenance haemodialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio and all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality in Chinese haemodialysis (HD) patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Patients from June 2015 to September 2016 and followed through September 2021 were categorised into quartiles according to the follow-up averaged TG/HDL-C ratio. The association between TG/HDL-C and mortality was examined by univariate and multivariate time-varying Cox regression analyses. The C-index was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the Cox regression models.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 534 maintenance HD patients were enrolled.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcomes were all-cause death and CV mortality.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 61 months, 207 patients died, with 94 (45.4%) classified as CV death. After adjusting for confounders, multivariate time-varying Cox regression analysis showed that the quartile 4 group (TG/HDL-C ≥2.64) was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.77, p=0.001) and CV mortality (adjusted HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.62; p=0.001) in maintenance HD patients. Model 1 of all-cause mortality achieved a C-index of 0.72 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.75), and model 2 achieved a C-index of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82). The C-index for model 1 in CV mortality was 0.74 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.77), and the C-index for model 2 was 0.80 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

High TG/HDL-C was associated with decreased all-cause and CV mortality in HD patients.