In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment

Assessment of the stabilization effect of ferrous sulfate for arsenic-contaminated soils based on chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods: Methodological differences and linkages

Stabilization of arsenic-contaminated soils with ferrous sulfate has been reported in many studies, but there are few stabilization effects assessments simultaneously combined chemical extraction methods and in vitro methods, and further explored the corresponding alternative relationships. In this study, ferrous sulfate was added at FeAs molar ratio of 0, 5, 10 and 20 to stabilize As in 10 As spiked soils. Stabilization effects were assessed by 6 chemical extraction methods (toxicity characteristic leaching procedures (TCLP), HCl, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), CaCl2, CH3COONH4, (NH4)2SO4), and 4 in vitro methods (physiologically based extraction test (PBET), in vitro gastrointestinal method (IVG), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium (SBRC) method, and the Unified Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe method (UBM)). The results showed that the HCl method provides the most conservative assessment results in non-calcareous soils, and in alkaline calcareous soils, (NH4)2SO4 method provides a more conservative assessment. In vitro methods provided significantly higher As concentrations than chemical extraction methods. The components of the simulated digestion solution as well as the parameters may have contributed to this result. The small intestinal phase of PBET and SBRC method produced the highest and lowest ranges of As concentrations, and in the range of 127-462 mg/kg and 68-222 mg/kg when the FeAs molar ratio was 5. So the small intestinal phase of PBET method may provide the most conservative assessment results, while the same phase of SBRC may underestimate the human health risks of As in stabilized soil by 51 %(at a FeAs molar ratio of 5). Spearman correlation analysis indicated that the small intestinal phase of PBET method correlated best with HCl method (correlation coefficient: 0.71). This study provides ideas for the assessment of stabilization efforts to ensure that stabilization meets ecological needs while also being less harmful to humans.

Immobilisation remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils with promising CaAl-layered double hydroxide and bioavailability, bioaccessibility, and speciation-based health risk assessment

Arsenic (As)-contaminated soil poses great health risk to human mostly through inadvertent oral exposure. We investigated CaAl-layered double hydroxide (CaAl-LDH), a promising immobilising agent, for the remediation of As-contaminated Chinese soils. The effects on specific soil properties and As fractionation were analyzed, and changes in the health risk of soil As were accurately assessed by means of advanced in vivo mice model and in vitro PBET-SHIME model. Results showed that the application of CaAl-LDH significantly increased soil pH and concentration of Fe and Al oxides, and effectively converted active As fractions into the most stable residual fraction, guaranteeing long-term remediation stability. Based on in vivo test, As relative bioavailability was significantly reduced by 37.75%. Based on in vitro test, As bioaccessibility in small intestinal and colon phases was significantly reduced by 25.65% and 28.57%, respectively. Furthermore, As metabolism (reduction and methylation) by the gut microbiota inhabiting colon was clearly observed. After immobilisation with CaAl-LDH, the concentration of bioaccessible As(Ⅴ) in the colon fluid was significantly reduced by 61.91%, and organic As (least toxic MMA(V) and DMA(V)) became the main species, which further reduced the health risk of soil As. In summary, CaAl-LDH proved to be a feasible option for immobilisation remediation of As-contaminated soils, and considerable progress was made in relevant health risk assessment.

Dermal and oral exposure risks to heavy metals from 3D printing metal-fill thermoplastics

Manufacturing advancements in polymer printing now allow for the addition of metal additives to thermoplastic feedstock up to 80-90 % by weight and subsequent printing on low-cost desktop 3D printers. Particles associated with metal additives are not chemically bound to the plastic polymer, meaning these particles can potentially migrate and become bioavailable. This study investigated the degree to which two human exposure pathways, oral (ingestion) and dermal (skin contact), are important exposure pathways for metals (copper, chromium, and tin) from metal-fill thermoplastics used in consumer fused filament fabrication (FFF). We found that dermal exposure to copper and bronze filaments presents the highest exposure risk due to chloride (Cl-) in synthetic sweat driving copper (Cu2+) release and dissolution. Chromium and tin were released as micron-sized particles < 24 μm in diameter with low bioaccessibility during simulated oral and dermal exposure scenarios, with potential to undergo dissolution in the gastrointestinal tract based on testing using synthetic stomach fluids. The rate of metal particle release increased by one to two orders of magnitude when thermoplastics were degraded under 1 year of simulated UV weathering. This calls into question the long-term suitability of biodegradable polymers such as PLA for use in metal-fill thermoplastics if they are designed not to be sintered. The greatest exposure risk appears to be from the raw filaments rather than the printed forms, with the former having higher metal release rates in water and synthetic body fluids for all but one filament type. For brittle feedstock that requires greater handling, as metal-fill thermoplastics can be, practices common in metal powder 3D printing such as wearing gloves and washing hands may adequately reduce metal exposure risks.

Importance of arsenic bioaccessibility in health risk assessment based on iron "Minette" rocks and related soils

Total element concentrations by themselves are not always good predictors of toxicity and are therefore not suitable for eco- and/or human toxicological risk determination. In addition, despite the growing call for harmonization, countries show significant variation in risk assessment tools, screening/background values, protocols and legal management of soils. By incorporating mobility and bioaccessibility/availability into soil risk assessments, location-specific physico-chemical and geological conditions can be considered in routinely applied general risk assessment methodologies. Minette soils and rocks are a great case in point since they often are associated with high geogenic As concentrations and consequently potential risks. Minette iron ores form the world largest Fe ore deposits since the "great oxidation". For the first time, oral bioaccessibility during direct ingestion was assessed on Minettes from Luxembourg by applying the in vitro Solubility/Bioavailability Research Consortium (SBRC) method. Out of > 180 samples, 25 representative samples were selected providing a unique dataset which showed an average gastric bioaccessibility of ∼10% (7.8 ± 4.0 mg/kg) of the total As-concentration, with a maximum of 45% (17.9 mg/kg). Of importance is that bioaccessibility of As in Minette rocks and soils are controlled by, and can be estimated from, lithology, mineralogy and total Ca content. Soils and ooid grainstones with an iron oxide or clayey matrix, are characterized by average gastric bioaccessible As concentrations < 6 mg/kg. Gastric As bioaccessibility is highest in Fe-bearing calcite-cemented bioclastic grainstones (∼12 mg/kg). Importantly, for all samples the maximal bioaccessible As concentrations remain below the threshold from which significant adverse non-carcinogenic and/or carcinogenic health effects are expected. These new results are in strong contrast with what total As concentrations might suggest. Considering bioaccessibilities, consequently, can help to avoid disproportionate, costly and environmentally impacting risk management strategies. Furthermore, this study illustrates the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration between geo- and health scientists.

Role of microbial iron reduction in arsenic metabolism from soil particle size fractions in simulated human gastrointestinal tract

Gut microbiota provides protection against arsenic (As) induced toxicity, and As metabolism is considered an important part of risk assessment associated with soil As exposures. However, little is known about microbial iron(III) reduction and its role in metabolism of soil-bound As in the human gut. Here, we determined the dissolution and transformation of As and Fe from incidental ingestion of contaminated soils as a function of particle size (<250 μm, 100-250 μm, 50-100 μm and < 50 μm). Colon incubation with human gut microbiota yielded a high degree of As reduction and methylation of up to 53.4 and 0.074 μg/(log CFU/mL)/hr, respectively; methylation percentage increased with increasing soil organic matter and decreasing soil pore size. We also found significant microbial Fe(III) reduction and high levels of Fe(II) (48 %-100 % of total soluble Fe) may promote the capacity of As methylation. Although no statistical change in Fe phases was observed with low Fe dissolution and high molar Fe/As ratios, higher As bioaccessibility of colon phase (avg. 29.4 %) was mainly contributed from reductive dissolution of As(V)-bearing Fe(III) (oxy)hydroxides. Our results suggest that As mobility and biotransformation by human gut microbiota (carrying arrA and arsC genes) are strongly controlled by microbial Fe(III) reduction coupled with soil particle size. This will expand our knowledge on oral bioavailability of soil As and health risks from exposure to contaminated soils.

Coupling phytotoxicity and human health risk assessment to refine the soil quality standard for As in farmlands

In the present study, a field experiment was conducted to investigate arsenic (As) concentrations in soils and in grains of 15 rice varieties in a contaminated site in Taiwan. The studied site was divided into two experimental units, namely plot A and plot B. The results showed that mean total As concentrations were 70.94 and 61.80 mg kg^-1 in plot A and plot B, respectively, and thus greater than or approximate to the soil quality standard for total As in Taiwan (60 mg kg^-1). The As levels in rhizosphere soil in plot A (19.71-32.33 mg kg^-1) were much higher than in plot B (6.41-8.60 mg kg^-1); however, As accumulation in brown rice did not significantly differ between the plots. These results implied that a significant variation in the bioconcentration factor (BCF) value of As existed among different rice genotypes, and a negative correlation was observed between BCF value and rhizosphere As level in the soil. In phytotoxicity, the median values of the ecological risk indicator were 104.85 and 103.89 in plot A and plot B, respectively, indicating considerable risk. In human health risk assessment, the median and 97.5%-tile values for cancer risk for both male and female residents were markedly higher than the acceptable risk (1 × 10^-4). Furthermore, non-cancer and cancer risks were higher for males than females, mainly due to the greater rice ingestion rate of males. Sensitivity analysis showed that total As concentration in soil was the main factor affecting health risks, suggesting that priority should be given to the reduction of soil As levels. To better manage the phytotoxicity of As on rice, as well as the health risk to residents resulting from exposure to As-contaminated soils, the soil quality standard for As in farmland soils should be set between 5 and 10 mg kg^-1. The methodology developed in this study could also be applied to provide the basis for refining and revising the soil quality standard for heavy metals in farmland in other regions and countries.

Environmental and health impacts assessment of long-term naturally-weathered municipal solid waste incineration ashes deposited in soil-old burden in Bratislava city, Slovakia

Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) is an effective method for reducing the volume/mass of waste. However, MSWI ashes contain high concentrations of many substances, including trace metal (loid)s, that could be released into the environment and contaminate soils and groundwater. In this study, attention was focused on the site near the municipal solid waste incinerator where MSWI ashes are deposited on the surface without any control. Here, combined results (chemical and mineralogical analyses, leaching tests, speciation modelling, groundwater chemistry and human health risk assessment) are presented to assess the impact of MSWI ash on the surrounding environment. The mineralogy of ∼forty years old MSWI ash was diverse, and quartz, calcite, mullite, apatite, hematite, goethite, amorphous glasses and several Cu-bearing minerals (e.g. malachite, brochantite) were commonly detected. In general, the total concentrations of metal (loid)s in MSWI ashes were high, following the order: Zn (6731 mg/kg) > Ba (1969 mg/kg) ≈ Mn (1824 mg/kg) > Cu (1697 mg/kg) > Pb (1453 mg/kg) > Cr (247 mg/kg) > Ni (132 mg/kg) > Sb (59.4 mg/kg) > As (22.9 mg/kg) ≈ Cd (20.6 mg/kg). Cadmium, Cr, Cu, Pb, Sb and Zn exceeded the indication or even intervention criteria for industrial soils defined by the Slovak legislation. Batch leaching experiments with diluted citric and oxalic acids that simulate the leaching of chemical elements under rhizosphere conditions documented low dissolved fractions of metals (0.00-2.48%) in MSWI ash samples, showing their high geochemical stability. Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks were below the threshold values of 1.0 and 1 × 10^-6, respectively, with soil ingestion being the most important exposure route for workers. The groundwater chemistry was unaffected by deposited MSWI ashes. This study may be useful in determining the environmental risks of trace metal (loid)s in weathered MSWI ashes that are loosely deposited on the soil surface.

Molecular speciation controls arsenic and lead bioaccessibility in fugitive dusts from sulfidic mine tailings

Communities nearby mine wastes in arid and semi-arid regions are potentially exposed to high concentrations of toxic metal(loid)s from fugitive dusts deriving from impoundments. To assess the relation between potentially lofted particles and human health risk, we studied the relationship between pharmacokinetic bioaccessibility and metal(loid) molecular speciation for mine tailings dust particulate matter (PM), with elevated levels of arsenic and lead (up to 59 and 34 mmol kg-1, respectively), by coupling in vitro bioassay (IVBA) with X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). Mine tailing efflorescent salts (PMES) and PM from the surface crust (0-1 cm, PMSC) and near surface (0-25 cm) were isolated to <10 μm and <150 μm effective spherical diameter (PM10 and PM150) and reacted with synthetic gastric and lung fluid for 30 s to 100 h to investigate toxic metal(loid) release kinetics. Bioaccessible (BAc) fractions of arsenic and lead were about 10 and 100 times greater in gastric than in lung fluid simulant, respectively, and 10-100% of the maximum gastric BAc from PM10 and PM150 occurred within 30 s, with parabolic dissolution of fine, highly-reactive particles followed by slower release from less soluble sources. Evaporite salts were almost completely solubilized in gastric-fluid simulants. Arsenate within jarosite and sorbed to ferrihydrite, and lead from anglesite, were identified by XAS as the principal contaminant sources in the near surface tailings. In the synthetic lung fluid, arsenic was released continuously to 100 h, suggesting that residence time in vivo must be considered for risk determination. Analysis of pre- and post-IVBA PM indicated the release of arsenic in lung fluid was principally from arsenic-substituted jarosite, whereas in synthetic gastric fluid arsenic complexed on ferrihydrite surfaces was preferentially released and subsequently repartitioned to jarosite-like coordination at extended exposures. Lead dissolved at 30 s was subsequently repartitioned back to the solid phase as pyromorphite in phosphate rich lung fluid. The bioaccessibility of lead in surface tailings PM was limited due to robust sequestration in plumbojarosite. Kinetic release of toxic elements in both synthetic biofluids indicated that a single IVBA interval may not adequately describe release dynamics.

Risks of applying mobilising agents for remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils: Effects of dithionite-EDTA and citric acid on arsenic fractionation, leachability, oral bioavailability/bioaccessibility and speciation

Arsenic (As) mobilisation assists in remediating As-contaminated soils but might increase ecological and health risks. In this study, risks of applying two mobilising agents were assessed, i.e. an emerging reducing-chelating composite agent [dithionite (Na₂S₂O₄)-EDTA] and a classical low-molecular-weight organic acid (LMWOA) [citric acid (C₆H₈O₇)]. Results showed that both agents induced sharp increase in leachability-based ecological risk of As. Interestingly, the two agents had opposite performances regarding health risks. Na₂S₂O₄-EDTA significantly increased As relative bioavailability (RBA) to 1.83 times that in controls based on in vivo mouse model, and As bioaccessibility to 1.96, 1.65 and 1.20 times in gastric, small intestinal and colon phases based on in vitro PBET-SHIME model. Besides, it caused significant increase of highly toxic As(Ⅲ) in colon fluid. In contrast, C₆H₈O₇ significantly reduced RBA and bioaccessibility of soil As in colon by 44.44% and 14.65%, respectively. Importantly, C₆H₈O₇ restrained bioaccessible As(V) reduction and promoted bioaccessible As(Ⅲ) methylation, further reducing health risk. The phenomena could mainly be attributed to excessive metal components release from soil by C₆H₈O₇ and gut microbiota metabolism of C₆H₈O₇. In summary, C₆H₈O₇ and similar LMWOAs are recommended. The study contributes to mobilising agent selection and development and provides a reference for managing remediation sites.

Decreased in vitro bioaccessibility of Cd and Pb in an acidic Ultisol through incorporation of crop straw-derived biochar

Studies analyzing the in vitro bioaccessibility (BAc) of heavy metals in biochar-amended soils are currently lacking. The present study aimed to assess the metal BAc in Cd- and Pb-spiked acidic Ultisol samples treated individually with 2% (w/w) maize, rice, wheat, soybean, and pea straw-derived biochar. The results indicate that the Cd-BAc simulated in gastric phase (GP) decreased from 78.4% to 66.5-72.3% and the Pb-BAC decreased from 74.3% to 67.2-69.2%; however, the Cd-BAc in the intestinal phase (IP) decreased from 35.6% to 27.9-33.5% and the Pb-BAc decreased from 34.7% to 29.7-32.9% after 120 d of incubation with biochar application compared to the un-amended Ultisol. The Cd- and Pb-BAc in both GP and IP were significantly negatively correlated with soil pH, CEC, and organic carbon (P < 0.05), which increased after biochar application. The soybean straw-derived biochar amendment has the greatest potential to decrease the BAc of Cd and Pb in the GP and IP, owing to the highest level of CEC, SOC, TC and TN among all soil samples. Moreover, the BAc was positively correlated with the exchangeable, and exchangeable + carbonate-bound Cd and Pb fractions (P < 0.05), indicating these fractions had a dominant influence on the BAc of cationic heavy metals. Therefore, crop straw-derived biochar amendment can decrease the BAc of Cd and Pb in acidic Ultisol, and thus mitigate the health risks posed by these metals from incidental ingestion.

Evaluating the mouse model for estimation of arsenic bioavailability: Comparison of estimates of absolute bioavailability of inorganic arsenic in mouse, humans, and other species

Accurate assessment of adverse health effects attributable to ingestion of inorganic arsenic (As) present in contaminated soils requires determination of the internal dose of metal provided by ingested soil. This calculation requires estimation of the oral bioavailability of soil-borne (As). Animal models to assess the bioavailability of soil (As) are frequently used as surrogates for determination of this variable in humans. A mouse assay has been widely applied to estimate the bioavailability of As in soils at sites impacted by mining, smelting, and pesticides. In the mouse assay, the relative bioavailability (RBA) of soil (As) is determined as the ratio of the fraction of the ingested arsenic dose excreted in urine after consumption of diets containing a test soil or the soluble reference compound, sodium arsenate. The aim of the current study was to compare (As) bioavailability measured in the mouse assay with reported estimates in humans. Here, a pharmacokinetic model based on excretion of arsenic in urine and feces was used to estimate the absolute bioavailability (ABA) of As in mice that received an oral dose of sodium arsenate. Based upon this analysis, in mice that consumed diet amended with sodium arsenate, the ABA was 85%. This estimate of arsenic ABA for the mouse is comparable to estimates in humans who consumed (As) in drinking water and diet, and to estimates of ABA in monkeys and swine exposed to sodium arsenate. The concordance of estimates for ABA in mice and humans provides further support for use of the mouse model in human health risk assessment. Sodium arsenate ABA also provides a basis for estimating soil arsenic ABA from RBA estimates obtained in the mouse model.

Nickel oral bioavailability in contaminated soils using a mouse urinary excretion bioassay: Variation with bioaccessibility

To assess the health risk of nickel (Ni) in contaminated soils, studies rarely evaluated Ni bioavailability in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, limiting the accurate regulation of contaminated sites. Here, for 15 soil samples contaminated by Ni-electroplating, Ni oral relative bioavailability (RBA, relative to NiSO₄) was measured using a mouse urinary excretion bioassay. Nickel-RBA varied from 7.89% to 33.8% at an average of 19.1 ± 18.6%. The variation was not explained well by variation in soil properties including Ni speciation and co-contamination of other metals, which showed weak correlation with Ni-BRA (R² < 0.36). In comparison, the Ni-RBA variation was explained well by the variation of soil-Ni solubility in simulated human gastric or gastrointestinal fluids, i.e., Ni bioaccessibility. Determined using the gastric (GP) and intestinal phases (IP) of solubility bioaccessibility research consortium (SBRC), physiologically based extraction test methods (PBET), and unified BARGE method (UBM), Ni bioaccessibility explained 54-71% variation of the Ni-RBA, suggesting that Ni oral bioavailability was predominantly controlled by Ni solubility in the GI tract. The results highlight the suitability of using simple, fast, and cost-effective bioaccessbility assays to predict site-specific Ni oral bioavailability.

Bioaccessibility of arsenic from contaminated soils and alteration of the gut microbiome in an in vitro gastrointestinal model

Arsenic exposure has been reported to alter the gut microbiome in mice. Activity of the gut microbiome derived from fecal microbiota has been found to affect arsenic bioaccessibility in an in vitro gastrointestinal (GI) model. Only a few studies have explored the relation between arsenic exposure and changes in the composition of the gut microbiome and in arsenic bioaccessibility. Here, we used simulated GI model system (GIMS) containing a stomach, small intestine, colon phases and microorganisms obtained from mouse feces (GIMS-F) and cecal contents (GIMS-C) to assess whether exposure to arsenic-contaminated soils affect the gut microbiome and whether composition of the gut microbiome affects arsenic bioaccessibility. Soils contaminated with arsenic did not alter gut microbiome composition in GIMS-F colon phase. In contrast, arsenic exposure resulted in the decline of bacteria in GIMS-C, including members of Clostridiaceae, Rikenellaceae, and Parabacteroides due to greater diversity and variability in microbial sensitivity to arsenic exposure. Arsenic bioaccessibility was greatest in the acidic stomach phase of GIMS (pH 1.5-1.7); except for GIMS-C colon phase exposed to mining-impacted soil in which greater levels of arsenic solubilized likely due to microbiome effects. Physicochemical properties of different test soils likely influenced variability in arsenic bioaccessibility (GIMS-F bioaccessibility range: 8-37%, GIMS-C bioaccessibility range: 2-18%) observed in this study.

Effect of soil particle size and extraction method on the oral bioaccessibility of arsenic

Recent findings indicate that incidental ingestion of soil by humans primarily involves soil particles <150 µm, rather than <250 µm-sized fraction previously used for most oral bioaccessibility and bioavailability studies. It was postulated that a greater soil surface area in the finer fraction (<150 versus <250 µm) might increase oral bioaccessibility of arsenic (As) in soil. Bioaccessibility and concentrations of As were compared in <150 and <250 µm fractions of 18 soil samples from a variety of arsenic-contaminated sites. The two methods used to measure bioaccessibility were compared - EPA Method 1340 and the California Arsenic Bioaccessibility (CAB) method. Arsenic concentrations were nearly the same or higher in the <150 fraction compared with <250 µm. EPA Method 1340 and the CAB method presented significantly different bioaccessibility results, as well as estimated relative oral bioavailability (RBA) based upon algorithms specific to the methods, but there was no marked difference for <150 and <250 µm soil fractions within either method. When compared with RBA determined previously for these soil samples in vivo in non-human primates, EPA Method 1340 was generally more predictive than the CAB method. Data suggest that soil- or site-specific factors control bioaccessibility under either method and that the test method selected is more important than the particle size fraction (<150 or <250) in using these in vitro methods to predict As RBA for use in risk assessment.

Predictive capabilities of in vitro colon bioaccessibility for estimating in vivo relative bioavailability of arsenic from contaminated soils: Arsenic speciation and gut microbiota considerations

Arsenic (As) transformation by human gut microbiota has been evidenced to impact As toxicity and human health. However, little is known about the influence of gut microbiota on As bioavailability from incidental ingestion of soil. In this study, we assessed As relative bioavailability (RBA) using an in vivo mouse model and As bioaccessibility in the colon phase of in vitro assays. Strong in vivo-in vitro correlations (R² = 0.70-0.92, P < 0.05) were observed between soil As RBA (10.2%-57.7%) and colon bioaccessibility (4.8%-49.0%) in 13 As-contaminated soils. Upon in vitro incubation of human colon microbiota, we found a high degree of As transformation and 65.9% of generated As(III) was observed in soil residues. For in vivo mouse assay, DMA(V) accounted for 79.0% of cumulative urinary As excretion. Except for As(V), dominant As species including As(III), DMA(V) and As sulfides were also detected in mouse feces. Gut bacteria (families Rikenellaceae and Marinifilaceae) could be significantly correlated with As intake and excretion in mice (P < 0.05). Our findings provide evidence that gut microbiota can affect transformation, bioavailability, and fate of the orally ingested soil As in human gastrointestinal tract.

Bioaccessible arsenic in soil of thermal areas of Viterbo, Central Italy: implications for human health risk

Thermal waters near the city of Viterbo (Central Italy) are known to show high As contents (up to 600 µg/l). Travertine is precipitated by these waters, forming extended plateau. In this study, we determine the As content, speciation and bioaccessibility in soil and travertine samples collected near a recreational area highly frequented by local inhabitants and tourists to investigate the risk of As exposure through accidental ingestion of soil particles. (Pseudo)total contents in the studied soils range from 17 to 528 mg/kg, being higher in soil developed on a travertine substrate (197 ± 127 mg/kg) than on volcanic rocks (37 ± 13 mg/kg). In travertines, most As is bound to the carbonatic fraction, whereas in soil the semimetal is mostly associated with the oxide and residual fractions. Accordingly, bioaccessibility (defined here by the simplified bioaccessibility extraction test, SBET; Oomen et al., 2002.) is maximum (up to 139 mg/kg) for soil developed on a travertine substrate, indicating a control of calcite dissolution on As bioaccessibility. On the other hand, risk analysis suggests a moderate carcinogenic risk associated with accidental soil ingestion, while dermal contact is negligible. By contrast, ingestion of thermal water implies a higher carcinogenic and systemic health risk.

Interconnected soil iron and arsenic speciation effects on arsenic bioaccessibility and bioavailability: a scoping review

Extensive research has examined arsenic (As) bioavailability in contaminated soils and is routinely assessed using in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) assays. Analysis of differences in bioaccessibility measurements across IVBA assays and phases is expected to provide valuable insights into geochemical mechanisms controlling soil As bioaccessibility and bioavailability. Soil iron (Fe) content and As speciation are expected to significantly influence IVBA gastric and intestinal phases due to fluctuations in precipitation-dissolution chemistry and sorption reactivity as pH and assay chemical complexity changes. The aim of this review was to examine these relationships by 1) conducting a meta-analysis (n = 47 soils) determining the influence of total Fe on As bioaccessibility measurements and 5 IVBA assays and 2) investigating the effect of As speciation on gastric/intestinal phase IVBA and in vitro-in vivo correlations. Our findings indicate that soil Fe content and As speciation heterogeneity are important in elucidating variability of bioaccessibility measurements across IVBA assays and gastrointestinal phases. Greater focus on coupled As speciation and Fe precipitation chemistry may (1) improve our understanding of soil geochemical factors and assay constituents that influence As in vitro-in vivo correlations and (2) resolve variability in the precision of oral relative bioavailability (RBA) estimated using IVBA assays for soils possessing heterogenous As speciation and Fe composition.

In vitro bio-accessibility and distribution characteristic of each arsenic species in different fishes and shellfishes/shrimps collected from Fujian of China

It is very important to consider the bio-accessibilities and concentrations of each arsenic species, not total arsenic, in seafood in order to accurately assess internal exposure level and health risk of arsenic from seafood. Herein, the concentrations and in vitro bio-accessibilities of each arsenic species in various fishes and shellfishes/shrimps were extensively investigated. Experimental results showed that arsenic species and contents in shellfishes/fishes remarkably varied with the difference of fish/shellfish species or individuals and sampling area, and arsenobetaine (AsB) is dominant arsenic species for fishes and shellfishes/shrimps. Different arsenic species in the same fish/shellfish have quite different bio-accessibilities, and the bio-accessibilities of each arsenic species also varied with fish/shellfish species or individuals. As³⁺ in fishes/shellfishes was partly oxidized to form As⁵⁺ during gastrointestinal digestion, and thus it is more reasonable and practicable to evaluate the bio-accessibilities of inorganic arsenic (iAs, total As³⁺ and As⁵⁺), not individual As³⁺ and As⁵⁺. Fishes and shellfishes/shrimps have similar bio-accessibilities of iAs, AsB and total arsenic, whereas have different bio-accessibilities of MMA (monomethylarsonic acid), DMA (dimethylarsinic acid), and two un-identified arsenic (Ui-As1 and Ui-As2). The results of this study provided a valuable knowledge for accurately assessing the health risk of arsenic in seafood.

Improving the predictive value of bioaccessibility assays and their use to provide mechanistic insights into bioavailability for toxic metals/metalloids - A research prospectus

Widespread contamination of soil, dust, and food with toxic metal(loid)s pose a significant public health concern. Only a portion of orally ingested metal(loid) contaminants are bioavailable, which is defined as the fraction of ingested metal(loid)s absorbed across the gastrointestinal barrier and into systemic circulation. Bioaccessibility tools are a class of in vitro assays used as a surrogate to estimate risk of oral exposure and bioavailability. Although development and use of bioaccessibility tools have contributed to our understanding of the factors influencing oral bioavailability of metal(loid)s, some of these assays may lack data that support their use in decisions concerning adverse health risks and soil remediation. This review discusses the factors known to influence bioaccessibility of metal(loid) contaminants and evaluates experimental approaches and key findings of SW-846 Test Method 1340, Unified BARGE Method, Simulated Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem, Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium assay, In Vitro Gastrointestinal model, TNO-Gastrointestinal Model, and Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment bioaccessibility models which are used to assess oral absolute bioavailability and relative bioavailability in solid matrices. The aim of this review was to identify emerging knowledge gaps and research needs with an emphasis on research required to evaluate these models on (1) standardization of assay techniques and methodology, and (2) use of common criteria for assessing the performance of bioaccessibility models.

Human health risk assessment in aluminium smelting site: Soil fluoride bioaccessibility and relevant mechanism in simulated gastrointestinal tract

Incidental oral ingestion is considered to be an important exposure route for humans to soil contaminants, such as fluoride (F). For 25 soil samples containing 4000 mg F/kg from aluminium smelting site in southwestern China, this study investigated F bioaccessibility in the human gastrointestinal tract in vitro. Fluoride bioaccessibility (2.4-48.8%) in the gastric phase was primarily caused by the dissolution of F-Ca and F-Al compounds (assigned to residual phase), identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and sequential extraction. Following modification to the small intestinal phase, the variation in F bioaccessibility (2.5-38.8%) should be the result of concurrent processes, including the formation of F complexes and competitive adsorption, and inversely the precipitation of fluorite and surface adsorption of formed F-Al complexes. The colon incubation with human gut microbiota yielded a 1.3-fold increase in F bioaccessibility (3.9-45.7%), probably due to the dissolution of F bound to Fe (hydr)oxides. Bioaccessibility adjustment can reduce hazard quotient of fluoride, and non-carcinogenic risk for children should be noted that soil F intake contributed 21.7% on average, up to 76.6% of oral reference dose. This will result in better understanding of human health risk assessment associated with F exposures.

Independent and combined associations of urinary heavy metals exposure and serum sex hormones among adults in NHANES 2013-2016

Accumulating evidences indicated that heavy metals may disrupt human sex hormones. However, the combined effects of heavy metals on sex hormones remain to be clarified. To explore the independent and combined associations between heavy metal exposure and serum sex hormones among adults, data of 2728 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was applied. We examined independent and combined associations of fourteen urinary heavy metals and three serum sex steroid hormones (total testosterone (TT), estradiol (E2) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)). Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the independent associations between metal exposure and sex hormone alterations. Principle component analysis -weighted quantile sum regression (PCA-WQSR) model was performed to estimate the combined associations in our individuals. In the co-exposure model, we determined that weighted quantile sum (WQS) index of industrial pollutants was negatively associated with E2 in females (WQS Percent change_8-metal = -20.6%; 95% CI: -30.1%, -9.96%), while in males WQS index of water pollutants was negatively related to SHBG (WQS Percent change_8-metal = -5.35%; 95% CI: -9.88%, -0.598%). Cadmium (Cd), tin (Sn) and lead (Pb) were the dominating metals of female E2-negative association while Ba was the leading contributor related to male SHBG reduction, which was consistent with the results of multivariate linear regression. Additionally, in postmenopausal women, the associations of E2 decrease with heavy metal co-exposure remained significant while Cd and monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) were identified as hazardous metals in the mixture. We concluded that the exposure to heavy metals was associated with human sex hormone alterations in independent or combined manners. Considering the design of NHANES study, further studies from other national-representative surveys are necessary.

Health risks from groundwater arsenic on residents in northern China coal-rich region

Shanxi Province of northern China is a typical mining concentration and arsenism area. Years of mining activities have resulted in serious regional groundwater problems in Shanxi. Therefore, it is of great significance to know the health risk of groundwater arsenic on residents under the background of mining activities. Kriging interpolation was used to illustrate the spatio-temporal dynamics of the health risks on groundwater arsenic based on a ten-year investigation. The groundwater arsenic concentrations decreased over time and the distribution of high arsenic concentrations shrank. High arsenic concentrations were mainly distributed in the northern and middle basin areas. The forecasted area of high risks in coal mining areas was 5623 km², which was larger than that in non-coal mining areas. The residents living around mining areas were more vulnerable to exposure to groundwater arsenic. Further, the output map outlines the high-risk zones in order to protect the safety of drinking water for residents. This study may be helpful for the policy-makers to adopt a lower limit for groundwater arsenic to the worst affected regions and groups.

Comparative study of As (V) uptake in aqueous medium by a polymer inclusion membrane-based passive sampling device and two filamentous fungi (Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus sp.)

In this work a polymer inclusion membrane (PIM) is proposed as passive sampler material and compared with two filamentous fungi for As (V) uptake to evaluate its ability as chemical surrogate material for the monitoring of this metalloid in aquatic environments. Results show excellent passive sampling characteristics of the device since a linear uptake profile as a function of time was observed. The correlation coefficients between the PIM passive sampler with Aspergillus niger (r = 0.83) and Rhizopus sp. (r = 0.13) uptake, show that the first species is the best modeled by the PIM, suggesting its potential as a chemical substitute in bioavailability studies.

Bioavailability Evaluation of Perchlorate in Different Foods In Vivo: Comparison with In Vitro Assays and Implications for Human Health Risk Assessment

Perchlorate in various foods continuously arouses public health concern. Bioavailability is a critical parameter to better estimate perchlorate exposure from diets. In this study, perchlorate bioavailability in five foods was determined in an in vivo mouse model and compared with in vitro bioaccessibility/bioavailability. The estimated in vivo perchlorate bioavailability for different foods ranged from 18.01 ± 4.53% to 45.60 ± 7.11%, with the order lettuce > pork > rice > milk powder > soybean. Moisture, fiber, and fat in foods were identified as critical factors affecting perchlorate bioavailability (correlation r = 0.71, 0.52, and -0.67, respectively). Linear regression analysis revealed that the in vitro perchlorate bioavailability determined using the Caco-2 cell model has the potential to estimate the in vivo perchlorate bioavailability in foods (R² = 0.67, slope = 1.33, and y intercept = 4.99). These findings provide insights into the effects of the food matrices on perchlorate bioavailability and could contribute to decrease the uncertainty regarding perchlorate dietary exposure risk assessment.

Development of a whole-cell biosensor based on an ArsR-P ars regulatory circuit from Geobacter sulfurreducens

In this study, an Escherichia coli (E. coli) whole-cell biosensor for the specific detection of bioavailable arsenic was developed by placing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene under the control of the ArsR1 (GSU2952) regulatory circuit from Geobacter sulfurreducens. E. coli cells only emitted green fluorescence in the presence of arsenite and were more sensitive to arsenite when they were grown in M9 supplemented medium compared to LB medium. Under optimal test conditions, the Geobacter arsR1 promoter had a detection limit of 0.01 μM arsenite and the GFP expression was linear within a range of 0.03-0.1 μM (2.25-7.5 μg/l). These values were well below World Health Organization's drinking water quality standard, which is 10 μg/l. The feasibility of using this whole-cell biosensor to detect arsenic in water samples, such as arsenic polluted tap water and landfill leachate was verified. The biosensor was determined to be just as sensitive as atomic fluorescence spectrometry. This study examines the potential applications of biosensors constructed with Geobacter ArsR-P _ars regulatory circuits and provides a rapid and cost-effective tool that can be used for arsenic detection in water samples.

The role of soil arsenic fractionation in the bioaccessibility, transformation, and fate of arsenic in the presence of human gut microbiota

Soil arsenic (As) fractionation and its bioaccessibility are two important factors in human health risk assessment. However, data related to the impact of As minerals on the bioaccessibility with human gut microbiota involvement are scarce. In this study, speciation analysis was determined using HPLC-ICP-MS and XANES after incubation with colon microbiota from human origin, in combination with sequential extraction. Significant increase of colon As bioaccessibility was contributed primarily from As associated with amorphous and crystalline Fe/Al (hydr)oxides. We found a high degree of transformation at higher bioaccessibility (ave. 40 % of total As), which was predominantly present as liquid-phase As. In contrast, As transformation occurred mainly in the solid phase at lower bioaccessibility (< 5%), especially for soils containing As-S species. XANES spectroscopy revealed that As(III) increased by about 20 % in soil residues. Finally, the excreted As may be predominantly in association with (alumino)silicate minerals by SEM-EDX. It inferred that the priority sequence in As transformation by human gut microbiota was dissolved As(V), As(V) sorbed to mineral surfaces, crystalline As(V)-bearing minerals and As sulfides. This study will shed new light on the role of As-bearing minerals in evaluating health risks from soil As exposure.

Gastric bioaccessibility is a conservative measure of nickel bioavailability after oral exposure: Evidence from Ni-contaminated soil, pure Ni substances and Ni alloys

Oral bioaccessibility (BAc) is a surrogate for the bioavailability (BAv) of a broad range of substances, reflecting the value that the approach offers for assessing oral exposure and risk. BAc is generally considered to have been validated as a proxy for oral BAv for the important soil contaminants Pb, Cd, and As. Here, using literature data for Ni BAc and BAv, we confirmed that Ni BAc (gastric only, with HCl mimicking stomach conditions) is a conservative measure of BAv for the oral exposure pathway. Measured oral BAv of Ni in soil was shown to be 50-100 times less than the simplest oral BAc estimates (%BAv = 0.012(%BAc) - 0.023 (r = 0.701, 95%CI [0.456, 0.847], n = 30)) in rats, demonstrating a significant conservatism for exposure assessment. The relationship between the oral BAv and BAc of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NSHH) was comparable to that of soil, with measured oral BAv of NSHH (1.94%) being a small fraction of NSHH gastric BAc (91.1%). BAc and BAv reflect the underlying Ni speciation of the sample, with the bioaccessible leaching limits being represented by the highly soluble Ni salts and the poorly soluble Ni monoxide, and the environmental (e.g. soil properties) or gastric (e.g. food present) conditions. BAc has potential utility for chemical classification purposes because pure Ni substances can be grouped by %BAc values(using standardized methodologies for the relevant exposure routes), these groupings reflecting the underlying chemistry and speciation of the samples of substances tested here, with 0.008% %BAc for alloys (SS304, SS316, Inconel, Monel), <1% in green NiO and Ni metal massives, 0.9-23.6% for Ni powders, 9.8-22.7% for Ni sulfides, 26.3-29.6% for black oxidic Ni, and 82-91% for the soluble Ni salts. Oral BAc provides realistic yet conservative estimates of BAv for the hazard classification and risk assessment of Ni substances.

Binding and Activity of Tetrabromobisphenol A Mono-Ether Structural Analogs to Thyroid Hormone Transport Proteins and Receptors

BACKGROUND

Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) mono-ether structural analogs, identified as the by-products or transformation products of commercial TBBPA bis-ether derivatives, have been identified as emerging widespread pollutants. However, there is very little information regarding their toxicological effects.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the potential thyroid hormone (TH) system-disrupting effect of TBBPA mono-ether structural analogs.

METHODS

The binding potencies of chemicals toward human TH transport proteins [transthyretin (TTR) and thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG)] and receptors [TRα ligand-binding domain (LBD) and TRβ-LBD] were determined by fluorescence competitive binding assays. Molecular docking was used to simulate the binding modes of the chemicals with the proteins. The cellular TR-disrupting potencies of chemicals were assessed by a GH3 cell proliferation assay. The intracellular concentrations of the chemicals were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

TBBPA mono-ether structural analogs bound to TTR with half maximal inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.1μM to 1.0μM but did not bind to TBG. They also bound to both subtypes of TR-LBDs with 20% maximal inhibitory concentrations ranging from 4.0μM to 50.0μM. The docking results showed that the analogs fit into the ligand-binding pockets of TTR and TR-LBDs with binding modes similar to that of TBBPA. These compounds likely induced GH3 cell proliferation via TR [with the lowest effective concentrations (LOECs) ranging from 0.3μM to 2.5μM] and further enhanced TH-induced GH3 cell proliferation (with LOECs ranging from 0.3μM to 1.2μM). Compared with TBBPA, TBBPA-mono(2,3-dibromopropyl ether) showed a 4.18-fold higher GH3 cell proliferation effect and 105-fold higher cell membrane transportation ability.

CONCLUSION

This study provided a possible mechanism underlying the difference in TTR or TR binding by novel TBBPA structural analogs. These compounds might exert TH system-disrupting effects by disrupting TH transport in circulation and TR activity in TH-responsive cells. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6498.

Arsenic Accumulation of Realgar Altered by Disruption of Gut Microbiota in Mice

Objective

To investigate the influence of gut microbiota on arsenic accumulation of realgar in mice.

Methods

Mice were treated with antibiotics to form a mouse model of gut microbial disruption. Antibiotic-treated and normally raised mice were given 15 mg/kg, 150 mg/kg, and 750 mg/kg realgar by gavage and 0.2 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg arsenic solution by subcutaneous injection for 7 days. The concentration of arsenic in mice whole blood was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Arsenic accumulation in antibiotic-treated mice and normally raised mice was compared.

Results

After exposure to low dose (15 mg/kg) and middle dose (150 mg/kg) of realgar, significantly, more arsenic was accumulated in the whole blood of antibiotic-treated mice compared to normally raised counterparts, which indicated that the disruption of gut microbiota could lead to higher arsenic load of realgar in mice. The homeostasis of gut microbiota was supposed to be disrupted by high dose (750 mg/kg) of realgar because after exposure to high dose of realgar, there was no significant difference in arsenic accumulation between antibiotic-treated and normally raised mice. Furthermore, arsenic solution was administered by subcutaneous injection to mice to investigate the influence of gut microbial differences on arsenic accumulation in addition to the absorption process, and there was no significant difference in arsenic accumulation between mice with these two different statuses of gut microbiota.

Conclusions

Gut microbiota disruption could increase arsenic accumulation of realgar in mice.

In Vitro Assessment of Arsenic Release and Transformation from As(V)-Sorbed Goethite and Jarosite: The Influence of Human Gut Microbiota

The importance of arsenic metabolism by gut microbiota has been evidenced in risk characterization from As exposures. In this study, we evaluated the metabolic potency of human gut microbiota toward As(V)-sorbed goethite and jarosite, presenting different behaviors of As release, and the solid-liquid transformation and partitioning. The release of As occurred mainly in the small intestinal phase for jarosite and in the colon phase for goethite, respectively. We found higher degree of As(V) and Fe(III) reduction by human gut microbiota in the colon digests of goethite than jarosite. Speciation analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy, revealed that 43.2% and 8.5% of total As was present as As(III) in the liquid and solid phase, respectively, after goethite incubation, whereas almost all generated As(III) was in the colon digests of jarosite. Therefore, As bioaccessibility in human gastrointestinal tract was predominantly contributed to Fe(III) dissolution in jarosite, and to microbial reduction of Fe(III) and As(V) in goethite. It expanded our knowledge on the role of Fe minerals in human health risk assessment associated with soil As exposures.

Effects of Soil Properties and Land Use Types on the Bioaccessibility of Cd, Pb, Cr, and Cu in Dongguan City, China

In order to determine the potential heavy metal contamination in soil across Dongguan City, 124 soil samples from seven land use types were collected, four heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Cr, and Cu) were analyzed. Total Cd, Cr, and Cu contents were significantly higher than the background values for Guangdong Province. Lead bioaccessibility in urban green land was lower than that in industrial and abandoned districts. The bioaccessibility of heavy metals was affected by total metal concentrations, soil properties, and land use types. The results showed that there was a negative correlation between the bioaccessibility of heavy metals (except for Cu) and their total concentrations. Soil pH and organic matter were the main factors affecting the bioaccessibility of Cd, Cr, Pb, and Cu in most land use types. Furthermore, sand, P, and clay also affected Pb, Cr, and Cu bioaccessibility. With the exception of the industrial zone periphery and urban green land, the bioaccessibility of heavy metals was mainly affected by clay.

Oral Bioavailability of As, Pb, and Cd in Contaminated Soils, Dust, and Foods based on Animal Bioassays: A Review

Metal contamination in soil, dust, and food matrices impacts the health of millions of people worldwide. During the past decades, various animal bioassays have been developed to determine the relative bioavailability (RBA) of As, Pb, and Cd in contaminated soils, dust, and foods, which vary in operational approaches. This review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of different animal models (swine and mice), dosing schemes (single gavage dose, repeated gavage dose, daily repeated feeding, and free access to diet), and end points (blood, urine, and tissue) in metal-RBA measurement; compares metal-RBA obtained using mouse and swine bioassays, different dosing schemes, and different end points; and summarizes key findings on As-, Pb-, and Cd-RBA values in contaminated soils, dust, and foods. Future directions related to metal-RBA research are highlighted, including (1) comparison of metal-RBA determinations between different bioassays and different laboratories to ensure robust bioavailability data, (2) enhancing the metal-RBA database for contaminated dust and foods, (3) identification of physiological and physicochemical mechanisms responsible for variability in metal-RBA values, (4) formulation of strategies to decrease metal-RBA values in contaminated soils, dust, and foods, and (5) assessing the impacts of cocontaminants on metal-RBA measurement.

As, Cd, and Pb relative bioavailability in contaminated soils: Coupling mouse bioassay with UBM assay

The robustness of in vitro bioaccessibility assays to predict oral relative bioavailability (RBA) of multiple metals in contaminated soils requires validation using additional soil samples. In this study, 11 contaminated soils from mining/smelting areas were analyzed for As-, Cd-, and Pb-RBA using a mouse bioassay and metal bioaccessibility via the UBM gastric phase assay. Metal-RBA varied considerably among soils, with As-RBA (2.5-23%, mean 12%) being generally lower than Cd-and Pb-RBA (3.4-88 and 3.3-59%, mean 42 and 28%), due to higher proportions of As in the residual fractions. Metal-RBA generally decreased with increasing metal concentrations probably due to reduced labile metal fractions. In addition, strong negative correlations were observed between total Fe with As-, Cd-, and Pb-RBA (R² = 0.46-0.77), suggesting the role of Fe in controlling metal-RBA in soils. Like RBA, metal bioaccessibility by the UBM assay also varied among samples. However, strong in vivo-in vitro correlations (IVIVCs) were observed between metal-RBA and bioaccessibility (R² = 0.52-0.81). Further, there were little differences when As-, Cd-, and Pb-IVIVCs established using soils from this study and soils pooled from literature were compared, suggesting the robustness of the UBM assay to predict metal-RBA in contaminated soils.

Collaborative response to arsenic-contaminated soil in an Appalachian Kentucky neighborhood

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with an increased exposure to arsenic-contaminated soil in a Kentucky neighborhood as part of collaborative public health response. An exposure assessment survey was administered to residents and toenail clippings and soil samples analyzed for arsenic concentration. The associations between exposure variables and arsenic concentrations were evaluated using a multivariate-generalized estimating equation. An ecological assessment of cancer incidence in the community was also conducted using standardized incidence ratio maps. Median toenail arsenic was 0.48 micrograms/gram (µg/g), twice the expected regional level of 0.2 µg/g. Mean residence surface soil arsenic level was 64.8 ppm. An increase of 1 ppm of residence concentration was significantly associated with a 0.003 µg/g rise in toenail levels. Concentrations for respondents who engaged in digging were 0.68 µg/g significantly higher compared to individuals who did not. No significantly elevated rates of lung or bladder cancer were observed in the affected ZIP codes. Living in areas with high soil arsenic contamination might lead to (1) increased exposure; (2) elevated residence soil arsenic concentrations and (3) the action of digging in the soil was associated with elevated toenail arsenic levels. Based upon elevated soil levels identified, residents were recommended to move from the contaminated environment until remediation was complete. Additional recommendations included regular health-care follow-up.

Accumulation of arsenic and lead in garden-grown vegetables: Factors and mitigation strategies

Pesticides containing lead and arsenic were widely used in the US through the 20th century. Legacy contamination from this use poses a health risk as interest in cultivation of abandoned agricultural lands has grown in recent years. We addressed these risks by quantifying Pb and As in soils and produce from a suburban farm in New Jersey, USA and examining the ability of phosphate-bearing amendments (bone meal, triple super phosphate, manure compost and raised bed soil) in combination with Fe and/or Mn amendments to stabilize these metals and prevent their movement into vegetables. Common produce (tomato, carrot, lettuce, and radish) was grown in soils with 133-307 mg Pb kg^-1 and 19-73 mg As kg^-1. Our results suggest that vegetables produced on these soils can have Pb and As at levels above health and safety standards, especially root and leafy green vegetables. Phosphate-bearing amendments can reduce extractable Pb but can increase extractable As in soils, and can have similar effects on vegetables. Iron amendment increased both extractable Pb and As, likely due to the presence of elemental sulfur in the Fe amendment, which lowered soil pH, while Mn amendment had the opposite effect. Most of the Pb and As in vegetables appear to be associated with soil particles adhered to the vegetables, and the contribution from uptake was relatively small except for plots treated with Fe-amendments and for carrots. Thus, proper crop selection, rigorous cleaning, and dust and dirt control are critical to reduce the risk of contaminant exposure through the consumption of garden produce.