Multivitamins in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease: the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial

Potato Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in a Harmonized Analysis of Seven Prospective Cohorts

Background/Objectives: While previous study results have suggested an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes with potato consumption, limited and inconsistent results are available on the association of potato consumption with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hypertension (HTN). We assessed the associations of (i) total potato consumption with the risk of CVD and HTN as the primary aim and (ii) fried potatoes and combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes with the risk of CVD and HTN as the secondary aim. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis using data from seven cohorts for CVD (n = 110,063) and five cohorts for HTN (n = 67,146). Cox regression was used to estimate multivariable adjusted hazard ratios separately in each cohort and the cohort-specific results were meta-analyzed using an inverse-variance weighted method. Results: The mean age ranged from 25 to 72 years, 65% of the respondents were women, and the mean consumption of total potatoes ranged from 1.9 to 4.3 times per week. In the primary analysis, total potato intake was not associated with the risk of either CVD or HTN: multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) comparing 5+ servings/week to no potato intake: 0.96 (0.89-1.04) for CVD and 1.04 (0.99-1.08) for HTN. In secondary analyses, the consumption of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes was not associated with CVD or HTN; while fried potato consumption was not associated with CVD risk, there was a 10% higher risk of HTN (95% CI: 4% to 17%) comparing 1+ servings/week to no fried potato intake. Conclusions: While the consumption of total potato was not associated with the risk of CVD or HTN risk, a modest elevated risk of HTN but not CVD was observed only with fried potato consumption.

Bioavailability of mango (poly)phenols: An evaluation of the impact of the colon, and phenylalanine and tyrosine on the production of phenolic catabolites

A mango pulp purée was ingested by ileostomists, whose colon had been removed surgically, and subjects with a full gastrointestinal (GI) tract, after which ileal fluid, urine and feces were collected over a 24 h period and analysed by UHPLC-HR-MS. The main (poly)phenols in the purée were gallotannins (356 μmol) and two hydroxy-methoxy-cinnamoyl glucose esters (43 μmol) together with the aromatic amino acids phenylalanine (22 μmol) and tyrosine (209 μmol). Analysis of ileal fluid revealed almost all the ingested gallotannins appeared to have broken down in the upper GI tract with the released benzoic acids being rapidly absorbed into the circulatory system prior to urinary excretion mainly as phase-2 metabolites. Likewise, the glucose moiety of the cinnamic acid conjugates was cleaved and the released cinnamic acids absorbed efficiently from the proximal GI tract and subjected to phase II metabolism prior to excretion. Among the main phenolics excreted after mango intake were phenylacetic and benzoic acids and hydroxybenzene catabolites which were present in lower, but none-the-less, substantial amounts, in the urine of ileostomists. This indicates that a portion of these phenolics, including the hydroxybenzene derivatives, originate from substrates absorbed in the upper GI tract and are principally products of endogenous metabolism rather than being derived from colonic microbiota-mediated catabolism. 1,2,3-Trihydroxybenzene (aka pyrogallol) was the dominant urinary catabolite in both groups. Hippuric acid excretion exceeded (poly)phenol intake indicating a significant contribution from phenylalanine and tyrosine. The aromatic amino acids, while present in the ingested pulp, can also originate from several sources including breakdown of dietary proteins in the GI tract, and endogenous breakdown of surplus mammalian proteins independent of the GI tract. The trial was registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT06182540.

Nutraceuticals in osteoporosis prevention

Nutraceuticals are gaining popularity as they can contribute to bone health by delaying the onset or slowing down the progression of pathological bone loss. Osteoporosis's bone loss is a concern for older adults and a crucial aspect of aging. Maintaining healthy bones is the key to living a full and active life. Our review explores the current knowledge on the role of nutraceuticals in preventing osteoporosis by focusing on three main aspects. First, we provide an overview of osteoporosis. Second, we discuss the latest findings on natural nutraceuticals and their efficacy in reducing bone loss, emphasizing clinical trials. Third, we conduct a structured analysis to evaluate nutraceuticals' pros and cons and identify translational gaps. In conclusion, we must address several challenges to consolidate our knowledge, better support clinicians in their prescriptions, and provide people with more reliable nutritional recommendations to help them lead healthier lives.

Potato Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Harmonized Analysis of 7 Prospective Cohorts

BACKGROUND

Data on the relation of potato consumption with risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) are limited and inconsistent. It is unclear whether the plant-based diet index (PDI), which is a novel and comprehensive tool to assess overall dietary pattern, modifies the association of potato intake with T2D.

OBJECTIVES

We examined the association of total, combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes and fried potatoes with risk of T2D and test the interaction between PDI score and potato consumption on T2D risk.

METHODS

We conducted a de novo, harmonized, individual-level data from 7 United States cohorts (N = 105,531). Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) separately in each cohort adjusting for anthropometric, demographic, and lifestyle factors and cohort-specific results were pooled using an inverse-variance weighted method.

RESULTS

Mean age ranged from 25 to 72 y, 65% women, and mean consumption of total potatoes ranged from 1.9 to 4.3 times per week. In the primary analysis, total potato intake was not associated with T2D risk: multivariable adjusted HR of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 1.08) for consumption of 1-2 servings/wk; 1.01 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.10) for >2-3 servings/wk; 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.12) for >3 to <5 servings/wk; and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.16) for 5+ servings/wk compared with no potato intake. In secondary analyses, consumption of combined baked, boiled, and mashed potatoes was not associated with T2D risk, whereas fried potato consumption was positively associated with T2D risk: HR were 1 (ref), 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.12), and 1.12 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.22) for intake frequency of 0/wk, >0 to 1/wk, and >1/wk, respectively (P-trend = 0.04). There was no significant interaction between PDI score and potato consumption on T2D risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Although consumption of total potato is not associated with T2D risk, a modest elevated risk of T2D is observed with fried potato consumption.

Comprehensive assessment on the association of dietary vitamins with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals with prediabetes: evidence from NHANES 1999-2018

Background: Prediabetes has become a global health issue, and currently, the relationship between vitamin levels and mortality in prediabetes remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between the levels of eleven vitamins and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in prediabetes patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 14 634 prediabetes patients from 10 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 1999 and 2018. Mortality and underlying causes of death were determined by linking records from the National Death Index until December 31, 2019. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were established to assess hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for all-cause, CVD, cancer, and other mortalities. Restricted cubic splines were used to visualize non-linear associations between various vitamins and mortality risk. Results: During the follow-up period, 2316/14 634 prediabetes patients died (12.55%), with 722 deaths (3.68%) attributed to CVD. After multivariable adjustment, vitamin B1, niacin, folate, vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin K levels exhibited non-linear associations with all-cause mortality (all p < 0.05). Vitamin B1, niacin, and vitamin E levels showed non-linear associations with CVD mortality (p < 0.05). Vitamin B6 exhibited a linear negative association with all-cause, CVD, and other mortalities (p > 0.05). However, vitamins A and B2 levels were not significantly associated with mortality rates (all p > 0.05). Consistent results were observed in the subgroup analyses after complete adjustment for variables. Conclusions: Higher levels of dietary vitamins B1, B6, niacin, folate, vitamin C, vitamin E, and vitamin K were significantly associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality in patients with prediabetes. There was no association between vitamin A and B2 levels and all-cause and CVD mortality among individuals with prediabetes. These findings suggest the importance of correcting vitamin deficiencies to prevent mortality in prediabetes patients.

Folic acid for the primary prevention of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Results from studies were inconsistent with regard to the effect of folic acid on the primary prevention of stroke. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between folic acid and the primary prevention of stroke using the data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Eligible publications published until June 2024 were searched in the database of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. This study included all observational studies and RCTs of folic acid with first stroke as the reporting endpoints. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled in the random-effects model to assess the effect of folic acid on the primary prevention of stroke.

Results

Results from 12 observational publications with 16 research, including 312,320 participants, were combined to explore the association between dietary folic acid intake and the primary prevention of stroke. The results showed that high dietary folic acid intake was associated with a 17% reduction in stroke incidence (RR:0.83; 95% CI: 0.73-0.94), and the effect of dietary folic acid was greater in areas without grain fortification (RR:0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.95). The pooled results from 12 RCTs, totaling 75,042 participants, indicated that folic acid supplementation was not associated with the stroke primary prevention (RR:0.92; 95% CI: 0.80-1.05), but folic acid supplementation was effective in areas without grain fortification (RR:0.78; 95% CI: 0.68-0.89).

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that dietary folic acid is effective in stroke primary prevention, and folic acid supplementation is effective in stroke primary prevention only in areas without grain fortification.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero, identifier CRD42024516991.

Folic acid supplementation for stroke prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized clinical trials worldwide

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The AHA/ASA guidelines for primary stroke prevention are almost a decade old. The current recommendation regarding folic acid supplementation is based on only 8 clinical trials, and an additional 13 folate trials have been published since then. This meta-analysis aims to fill in critical evidence gaps by comprehensively evaluating 21 published trials with particular attention given to identifying the true influences through stratification.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched from inception to April 4, 2023. This study included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of folic acid with stroke as one of the reporting endpoints. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the association between folic acid supplementation and the risk of stroke in a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Results from the 21 pooled RCTs totaling 115,559 participants showed that folic acid supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 10% (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analyses showed that folic acid efficacy was greater in areas without fortified grain or with partially-fortified grain (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.93; RR = 1.04 in areas with grain fortification, P-interaction = 0.003). In this group, folic acid supplementation was most efficacious in those without a history of stroke or myocardial infarction (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86; RR = 0.94 for participants with a history of stroke or myocardial infarction, P-interaction = 0.008). The efficacy of folic acid remained consistent regardless of baseline folate levels, folic acid dosage, baseline vitamin B12 levels, vitamin B12 dosage, homocysteine reduction, intervention duration, and whether folic acid was taken alone or in combination (all P-interaction>0.05). All 21 trials were free of attrition bias and reporting bias, and there was no significant publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This is by far the largest meta-analysis of RCTs regarding folic acid supplementation and stroke, demonstrating the overall benefit of folic acid for stroke prevention. Grain fortification and history of stroke or myocardial infarction may be the most important influences on the efficacy of folic acid for stroke prevention.

Exploring and disentangling the production of potentially bioactive phenolic catabolites from dietary (poly)phenols, phenylalanine, tyrosine and catecholamines

Following ingestion of fruits, vegetables and derived products, (poly)phenols that are not absorbed in the upper gastrointestinal tract pass to the colon, where they undergo microbiota-mediated ring fission resulting in the production of a diversity of low molecular weight phenolic catabolites, which appear in the circulatory system and are excreted in urine along with their phase II metabolites. There is increasing interest in these catabolites because of their potential bioactivity and their use as biomarkers of (poly)phenol intake. Investigating the fate of dietary (poly)phenolics in the colon has become confounded as a result of the recent realisation that many of the phenolics appearing in biofluids can also be derived from the aromatic amino acids, l-phenylalanine and l-tyrosine, and to a lesser extent catecholamines, in reactions that can be catalysed by both colonic microbiota and endogenous mammalian enzymes. The available evidence, albeit currently rather limited, indicates that substantial amounts of phenolic catabolites originate from phenylalanine and tyrosine, while somewhat smaller quantities are produced from dietary (poly)phenols. This review outlines information on this topic and assesses procedures that can be used to help distinguish between phenolics originating from dietary (poly)phenols, the two aromatic amino acids and catecholamines.

Dosage exploration of combined B-vitamin supplementation in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The optimal dosage range for B-vitamin supplementation for stroke prevention has not received sufficient attention.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine the optimal dosage range of a combination of folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 supplementation in stroke prevention.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase database for randomized controlled trials published between January 1966 and April 2023, whose participants received B-vitamin supplementation and that reported the number of stroke cases. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure the effect of combined supplementation on risk of stroke using a fixed-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias algorithm.

RESULTS

The search identified 14 randomized controlled trials of folic acid combined with vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 supplementation for stroke prevention that included 76,664 participants with 2720 stroke cases. In areas without and with partial folic acid fortification, combined B-vitamin supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 34% [RR: 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.86] and 11% (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.00), respectively. Further analysis showed that a dosage of folic acid ≤0.8 mg/d and vitamin B12 ≤0.4 mg/d was best for stroke prevention (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.86) in these areas. In contrast, no benefit of combined supplementation was found in fortified areas (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis found that the folic acid combined with vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 supplementation strategy significantly reduced the risk of stroke in areas without and with partial folic acid fortification. Combined dosages not exceeding 0.8 mg/d for folic acid and 0.4 mg/d for vitamin B12 supplementation may be more effective for populations within these areas. This trial was registered at PROSPERO asCRD42022355077.

Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: results from the clinic subcohort of the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of 3 cognitive studies within COSMOS

BACKGROUND

Longer effects of multivitamin-mineral (MVM) supplementation on late-life cognitive function remain untested using in-person, detailed neuropsychological assessments. Furthermore, insufficient evidence exists for healthcare providers to recommend daily MVM supplements to prevent cognitive decline.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to test MVM effects on cognitive change using in-person, detailed neuropsychological assessments and conduct a meta-analysis within COSMOS (COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study) cognitive substudies for a robust evaluation of MVM effects on cognition.

METHODS

COSMOS is a 2 × 2 factorial trial of cocoa extract (500 mg flavanols/d) and/or a daily MVM supplement for cardiovascular disease and cancer prevention among 21,442 United States adults aged ≥60 y. There were 573 participants in the clinic subcohort of COSMOS (that is, COSMOS-Clinic) who completed all cognitive tests administered at baseline. For the meta-analysis, we included nonoverlapping participants across 3 COSMOS cognitive substudies: COSMOS-Clinic (n = 573); COSMOS-Mind (n = 2158); COSMOS-Web (n = 2472).

RESULTS

In COSMOS-Clinic, we observed a modest benefit of MVM compared with placebo on global cognition over 2 y {mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.06 SD units (SU) (-0.003, 0.13)}, with a significantly more favorable change in episodic memory [mean difference (95% CI) = 0.12 SU (0.002, 0.23)] but not in executive function or attention [mean difference (95% CI) = 0.04 SU (-0.04, 0.11)]. The meta-analysis of COSMOS substudies showed clear evidence of MVM benefits on global cognition [mean difference (95% CI) = 0.07 SU (0.03, 0.11); P = 0.0009] and episodic memory [mean difference (95% CI) = 0.06 SU (0.03, 0.10); P = 0.0007]; the magnitude of effect on global cognition was equivalent to reducing cognitive aging by 2 y.

CONCLUSIONS

In COSMOS-Clinic, daily MVM supplementation leads to a significantly more favorable 2-y change in episodic memory. The meta-analysis within COSMOS cognitive substudies indicates that daily MVM significantly benefits both global cognition and episodic memory. These findings within the COSMOS trial support the benefits of a daily MVM in preventing cognitive decline among older adults. This trial was registered at COSMOS-clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02422745, at COSMOS-Mind-clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03035201, and at COSMOS-Web-clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04582617.

Effect of a multinutrient supplement as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of periodontitis: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a multinutrient supplement as an add-on therapy to scaling and root planing for patients with periodontitis.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with stage III or IV periodontitis were randomly allocated to a 2-month treatment of either a multinutrient supplement containing vitamin C, vitamin E, zinc, selenium, alpha-lipoic-acid, cranberry extract, grapeseed extract, and coenzyme Q10 or placebo capsules as an adjunct to conservative periodontal therapy. Periodontal parameters, including probing pocket depth, gingival recession, bleeding on probing, approximal plaque index, and papillary bleeding index, were assessed. Clinical attachment loss, periodontal inflamed surface area, periodontal epithelial surface area, and percentages of pocket sites with ≤3, ≤4, ≥5, ≥6, ≥7, and ≥4 mm with bleeding on probing were calculated.

RESULTS

All clinical parameters significantly improved from baseline to reevaluation within each group (p < 0.05). Multinutrient intake resulted in a significantly higher reduction of probing-pocket-depth (-0.75 ± 0.42 mm) and bleeding-on-probing (-21.9 ± 16.1%) from baseline to reevaluation compared with placebo (-0.51 ± 0.30 mm, p = 0.040 and -12.5 ± 9.8%, p = 0.046, respectively). All periodontal parameters showed insignificantly higher improvements in patients receiving the supplement compared with those receiving the placebo (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Multinutrient supplementation as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of periodontitis showed some additional benefit regarding probing-pocket-depth and bleeding-on-probing. However, the clinical relevance needs to be further explored.

Personalization matters: the effect of sex in multivitamin-multimineral-based cancer prevention

The prevention of non-communicable diseases like cancer contributes to healthy aging. Dietary supplements might support such prevention; their effect likely depends on the personal characteristics of the individuals receiving them. To evaluate the influence of sex on reducing cancer incidence with multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) supplementation, sex-specific results of the efficacy of MVM supplementation for cancer prevention were collected and meta-analyzed (using fixed effect (FE) and random effect (RE) models). Three trials included in the "US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Report regarding Vitamin, Mineral, and Multivitamin Supplementation to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer" were used, namely, COSMOS, SU.VI.MAX, and PHS2. A total of 28,558 men and 20,542 women were included. Multivitamin-multimineral supplementation significantly reduced cancer incidence in the entire population (HR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.99], FE and RE); sex-specific meta-analysis showed beneficial effects of supplementation in men (HR 0.91 [95% CI, 0.85-0.97] (FE)/0.88 [95% CI, 0.77-1.01] (RE)); however, there was no effect in women (HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.88-1.14], FR and RE); (Pdifference = 0.17). Sex could influence the effect of MVM supplementation in reducing cancer incidence, with supplementation being effective only in male individuals. These results might be informative for future research and public health policy makers.

Association between dietary vitamin intake and mortality in US adults with diabetes: A prospective cohort study

AIMS

To explore the association of dietary vitamin intake from food and/or supplement with mortality in US adults with diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted on 5418 US adults with diabetes from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018. Vitamin intake from food and supplements was estimated via dietary recall. Sufficient intake from food or food + supplement was defined as ≥ estimated average requirement (EAR) and ≤ tolerable upper intake level (UL), insufficient intake, < EAR; and excess intake, > UL. Medium supplementary intake was classified as > median level and ≤75th percentile; low intake, ≤ median level; and high intake, >75th percentile, as reported by supplement users.

RESULTS

A total of 1601 deaths occurred among the participants over a median follow-up of 11.0 years. Cox regression analysis of the single-vitamin model demonstrated that sufficient vitamin A and folate intake from food and food + supplement and medium vitamin A and folate intake from supplement; sufficient riboflavin, niacin, and vitamin B6 intake from food and food + supplement; and sufficient thiamin and vitamin E intake from food + supplement were significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (all p < 0.05). In the multivitamin model, sufficient vitamin A and folate intake from food and food + supplement, medium vitamin A and folate intake from the supplement, and sufficient niacin intake from food and food + supplement were inversely associated with mortality (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin A and folate intake from food or supplement and niacin intake from food were significantly associated with reduced mortality in US adults with diabetes.

Effect of cocoa extract supplementation on cognitive function: results from the clinic subcohort of the COSMOS trial

BACKGROUND

Some prior randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that tested the effects of cocoa extract (CE), a source of flavanols, on late-life cognition have yielded promising findings. A long-term RCT using in-person neuropsychological tests covering multiple cognitive domains may clarify the cognitive effects of CE.

OBJECTIVES

To test whether daily supplementation with CE, compared with placebo, produces better cognitive change over 2 y.

METHODS

The COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) is a 2 × 2 factorial RCT of CE [500 mg flavanols/d, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechin] and/or a daily multivitamin-mineral supplement for cardiovascular disease and cancer prevention among 21,442 United States adults aged ≥60 y. There were 573 participants in the clinic subcohort of COSMOS (that is, COSMOS-Clinic) who completed all cognitive tests at baseline; of these, 492 completed 2-y follow-up assessments. The primary outcome was global cognition (averaging z-scores across 11 tests). Secondary outcomes were episodic memory and executive function/attention. Repeated measures models were used to compare randomized groups.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age (standard deviation) was 69.6 (5.3); 49.2% were females. Daily supplementation with CE, compared with placebo, had no significant effect on 2-y change in global cognition {mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -0.01 (-0.08, 0.05) standard deviation units (SU)}. CE, compared with placebo, had no significant effects on 2-y change in episodic memory [mean difference (95% CI): -0.01 (-0.13, 0.10) SU] or executive function/attention [mean difference (95% CI): 0.003 (-0.07, 0.08) SU]. Subgroup analyses uncorrected for multiple-testing suggested cognitive benefits of CE supplementation, compared with placebo among those with poorer baseline diet quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 573 older adults who underwent repeat in-person, detailed neuropsychological assessments over 2 y, daily CE supplementation, compared with placebo, showed no overall benefits for global or domain-specific cognitive function. Possible cognitive benefits of CE among those with poorer diet quality warrant further study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov with identifier - NCT02422745.

Cocoa Extract Supplementation and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: The Cocoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

Observational studies have indicated that cocoa flavanol supplementation may be a promising strategy for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention. We aimed to directly evaluate its clinical efficacy in a large randomized clinical trial (RCT).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD

The Cocoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COMSOS) was a 2 × 2 factorial RCT performed from June 2015 to December 2020 that tested cocoa extract and a multivitamin for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer. A total of 21,442 U.S. adults free of CVD and recent cancer, including 12,666 women aged ≥65 years and 8,776 men aged ≥60 years, were randomly assigned to receive cocoa extract [500 mg/day cocoa flavanols, including 80 mg (-)-epicatechin] or placebo. In this study, we included 18,381 participants without diabetes at enrollment and examined the effect of cocoa extract supplementation on incident self-reported T2D in intention-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 801 incident T2D cases were reported. Compared with placebo, taking a cocoa extract supplement did not reduce T2D (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.91-1.20, P = 0.58). Stratification analyses showed that the effect of cocoa extract supplementation was not significantly modified by sex, race, BMI, smoking, physical activity, dietary quality, flavanol status at baseline, or randomized multivitamin assignment.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-aged and older adults taking a cocoa extract supplement for a median of 3.5 years did not reduce their risk of incident T2D. Further studies of cocoa extract supplementation beginning earlier in adulthood and in populations with different background diets are warranted.

Impact of multivitamin-mineral and cocoa extract on incidence of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Results from the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study for the Mind (COSMOS-Mind)

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the effects of multivitamin-mineral and cocoa extract supplementation on incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and all-cause probable dementia.

METHODS

COSMOS-Mind (N = 2262), a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized-controlled clinical trial administered a telephone-based cognitive battery at baseline and annually for 3 years. Incidence rates of MCI, and separately dementia, were compared among treatment arms with proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Over 3 years, 110 incident MCI and 14 incident dementia cases were adjudicated. Incidence rates did not vary by assignment to multivitamin-mineral or cocoa extract (all p's ≥ 0.05); however, statistical power was low. When participants assigned to multivitamin-mineral versus placebo converted to MCI, their scores for global cognition (p = 0.03) and executive function (p < 0.001) were higher and had declined less relative to the previous year (p = 0.03 for global cognition; p = 0.004 for executive function).

DISCUSSION

Multivitamin-mineral therapy may provide cognitive resilience, countering conversion to MCI, but not significantly reduce its incidence over 3 years.

HIGHLIGHTS

Multivitamin-mineral supplementation did not reduce risks for cognitive impairment. Cocoa extract supplementation did not reduce risks for cognitive impairment. Multivitamin-mineral supplementation slowed cognitive declines for incident mild cognitive impairment.

Multivitamin Supplementation Improves Memory in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Maintenance of cognitive abilities is of critical importance to older adults, yet few effective strategies to slow cognitive decline currently exist. Multivitamin supplementation is used to promote general health; it is unclear whether it favorably affects cognition in older age.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of daily multivitamin/multimineral supplementation on memory in older adults.

METHODS

The COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study Web (COSMOS-Web) ancillary study (NCT04582617) included 3562 older adults. Participants were randomly assigned to a daily multivitamin supplement (Centrum Silver) or placebo and evaluated annually with an Internet-based battery of neuropsychological tests for 3 y. The prespecified primary outcome measure was change in episodic memory, operationally defined as immediate recall performance on the ModRey test, after 1 y of intervention. Secondary outcome measures included changes in episodic memory over 3 y of follow-up and changes in performance on neuropsychological tasks of novel object recognition and executive function over 3 y.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, participants randomly assigned to multivitamin supplementation had significantly better ModRey immediate recall at 1 y, the primary endpoint (t(5889) = 2.25, P = 0.025), as well as across the 3 y of follow-up on average (t(5889) = 2.54, P = 0.011). Multivitamin supplementation had no significant effects on secondary outcomes. Based on cross-sectional analysis of the association between age and performance on the ModRey, we estimated that the effect of the multivitamin intervention improved memory performance above placebo by the equivalent of 3.1 y of age-related memory change.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily multivitamin supplementation, compared with placebo, improves memory in older adults. Multivitamin supplementation holds promise as a safe and accessible approach to maintaining cognitive health in older age. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04582617.

Effects of cocoa extract and a multivitamin on cognitive function: A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Dietary supplements are touted for cognitive protection, but supporting evidence is mixed. COSMOS-Mind tested whether daily administration of cocoa extract (containing 500 mg/day flavanols) versus placebo and a commercial multivitamin-mineral (MVM) versus placebo improved cognition in older women and men.

METHODS

COSMOS-Mind, a large randomized two-by-two factorial 3-year trial, assessed cognition by telephone at baseline and annually. The primary outcome was a global cognition composite formed from mean standardized (z) scores (relative to baseline) from individual tests, including the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status, Word List and Story Recall, Oral Trail-Making, Verbal Fluency, Number Span, and Digit Ordering. Using intention-to-treat, the primary endpoint was change in this composite with 3 years of cocoa extract use. The pre-specified secondary endpoint was change in the composite with 3 years of MVM supplementation. Treatment effects were also examined for executive function and memory composite scores, and in pre-specified subgroups at higher risk for cognitive decline.

RESULTS

A total of 2262 participants were enrolled (mean age = 73y; 60% women; 89% non-Hispanic White), and 92% completed the baseline and at least one annual assessment. Cocoa extract had no effect on global cognition (mean z-score = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.08; P = .28). Daily MVM supplementation, relative to placebo, resulted in a statistically significant benefit on global cognition (mean z = 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12; P = .007), and this effect was most pronounced in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease (no history: 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.11; history: 0.14, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.31; interaction, nominal P = .01). Multivitamin-mineral benefits were also observed for memory and executive function. The cocoa extract by MVM group interaction was not significant for any of the cognitive composites.

DISCUSSION

Cocoa extract did not benefit cognition. However, COSMOS-Mind provides the first evidence from a large, long-term, pragmatic trial to support the potential efficacy of a MVM to improve cognition in older adults. Additional work is needed to confirm these findings in a more diverse cohort and to identify mechanisms to account for MVM effects.

HIGHLIGHTS

COSMOS-Mind was a large simple pragmatic randomized clinical trial in older adults conducted by mail and telephone. The trial used a two-by-two factorial design to assess treatment effects of two different interventions within a single large study. We found no cognitive benefit of daily cocoa extract administration (containing 500 mg flavanols) for 3 years. Daily multivitamin-mineral (MVM) supplementation for 3 years improved global cognition, episodic memory, and executive function in older adults. The MVM benefit appeared to be greater for adults with cardiovascular disease.

Role of Vitamins in Cardiovascular Health: Know Your Facts - Part 1

Cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide, thus it is important to adopt preventive interventions. Observational data demonstrating CV benefits of vitamin supplements, advanced by self-proclaimed experts have resulted in ~50% of Americans reporting the use of multivitamins for health promotion; this practice has led to a multi-billion-dollar business of the multivitamin-industry. However, the data on the extensive use of multivitamins show no consistent benefit for CVD prevention or all-cause mortality, while the use of certain vitamins might prove harmful. Thus, the focus of this two-part review is on the attributes or concerns about specific vitamins on CVD. In Part 1, the CV effects of specific vitamins are discussed, indicating the need for further supportive evidence of potential benefits. Vitamin A preserves CV homeostasis as it participates in many biologic functions, including atherosclerosis. However, supplementation could potentially be harmful. Betacarotene, a pro-vitamin A, conveys pro-oxidant actions that may mitigate any other benefits. Folic acid alone and certain B-vitamins (e.g., B1/B2/B6/B12) may reduce CVD, heart failure, and/or stroke, while niacin might increase mortality. Vitamin C has antioxidant and cardioprotective effects. Vitamin D may confer CV protection, but all the data are not in agreement. Combined vitamin E and C have antiatherogenic effects but clinical evidence is inconsistent. Vitamin K seems neutral. Thus, there are individual vitamin actions with favorable CV impact (certain B-vitamins and vitamins C and D), but other vitamins (β-carotene, niacin) may potentially have deleterious effects, which also holds true for high doses of fat-soluble vitamins (A/D/E/K).

Role of Vitamins in Cardiovascular Health: Know Your Facts-Part 2

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity/mortality world-wide, hence preventive interventions are crucial. Observational data showing beneficial CV effects of vitamin supplements, promoted by self-proclaimed experts, have led to ~50% of Americans using multivitamins; this practice has culminated into a multi-billion-dollar business. However, robust evidence is lacking, and certain vitamins might incur harm. This two-part review focuses on the attributes or concerns about specific vitamin consumption on CVD. The evidence for indiscriminate use of multivitamins indicates no consistent CVD benefit. Specific vitamins and/or combinations are suggested, but further supportive evidence is needed. Data presented in Part 1 indicated that folic acid and certain B-vitamins may decrease stroke, whereas niacin might raise mortality; beta-carotene mediates pro-oxidant effects, which may abate the benefits from other vitamins. In Part 2, data favor the anti-oxidant effects of vitamin C and the anti-atherogenic effects of vitamins C and E, but clinical evidence is inconsistent. Vitamin D may provide CV protection, but data are conflicting. Vitamin K appears neutral. Thus, there are favorable CV effects of individual vitamins (C/D), but randomized/controlled data are lacking. An important caveat regards the potential toxicity of increased doses of fat-soluble vitamins (A/D/E/K). As emphasized in Part 1, vitamins might benefit subjects who are antioxidant-deficient or exposed to high levels of oxidative-stress (e.g., diabetics, smokers, and elderly), stressing the importance of targeting certain subgroups for optimal results. Finally, by promoting CV-healthy balanced-diets, we could acquire essential vitamins and nutrients and use supplements only for specific indications.

Micronutrient Supplementation to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk

BACKGROUND

Healthy dietary patterns are rich in micronutrients, but their influence on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks has not been systematically quantified.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive and most up-to-date evidence-based map that systematically quantifies the impact of micronutrients on CVD outcomes.

METHODS

This study comprised a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled intervention trials of micronutrients on CVD risk factors and clinical events.

RESULTS

A total of 884 randomized controlled intervention trials evaluating 27 types of micronutrients among 883,627 participants (4,895,544 person-years) were identified. Supplementation with n-3 fatty acid, n-6 fatty acid, l-arginine, l-citrulline, folic acid, vitamin D, magnesium, zinc, α-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10, melatonin, catechin, curcumin, flavanol, genistein, and quercetin showed moderate- to high-quality evidence for reducing CVD risk factors. Specifically, n-3 fatty acid supplementation decreased CVD mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.92), and coronary heart disease events (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.93). Folic acid supplementation decreased stroke risk (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97), and coenzyme Q10 supplementation decreased all-cause mortality events (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.94). Vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, and selenium showed no effect on CVD or type 2 diabetes risk. β-carotene supplementation increased all-cause mortality (RR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), CVD mortality events (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18), and stroke risk (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation of some but not all micronutrients may benefit cardiometabolic health. This study highlights the importance of micronutrient diversity and the balance of benefits and risks to promote and maintain cardiovascular health in diverse populations. (Antioxidant Supplementation in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases; CRD42022315165).

Breaking new frontiers: Assessment and re-evaluation of clinical trial design for nutraceuticals

Despite sophisticated study designs and measurement tools, we have yet to create an innovative space for diet and dietary supplements in the health care system. The path is challenging due to current hierarchies of scientific evidence and regulatory affairs. The role of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT) as a research approach functions well to characterize the benefits and risks of drugs but lacks the sensitivity to capture the efficacy and safety of nutraceuticals. While some facets of RCTs can be relevant and useful when applied to nutraceuticals, other aspects are limiting and potentially misleading when taken in their entirety. A differentiation between guidelines for evidence-based medicine and the evidence required for nutrition spotlight the need to reconceptualize constituents of the RCT and their applicability with relevance to health promotion. This perspective identifies the limitations of the traditional RCT to capture the complexities of nutraceuticals and proposes the N-of-1 as Level 1 evidence better suited for the proof of efficacy of nutraceuticals.

Contributions of the Women's Health Initiative to Cardiovascular Research: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

The WHI (Women's Health Initiative) enrolled 161,808 racially and ethnically diverse postmenopausal women, ages 50-79 years, from 1993 to 1998 at 40 clinical centers across the United States. In its clinical trial component, WHI evaluated 3 randomized interventions (menopausal hormone therapy; diet modification; and calcium/vitamin D supplementation) for the primary prevention of major chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, in older women. In the WHI observational study, numerous clinical, behavioral, and social factors have been evaluated as predictors of incident chronic disease and mortality. Although the original interventions have been completed, the WHI data and biomarker resources continue to be leveraged and expanded through ancillary studies to yield novel insights regarding cardiovascular disease prevention and healthy aging in women.

Vitamin and Mineral Supplements for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 leading causes of death in the US, and vitamin and mineral supplementation has been proposed to help prevent these conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To review the benefits and harms of vitamin and mineral supplementation in healthy adults to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, PubMed (publisher-supplied records only), Cochrane Library, and Embase (January 2013 to February 1, 2022); prior reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of vitamin or mineral use among adults without cardiovascular disease or cancer and with no known vitamin or mineral deficiencies; observational cohort studies examining serious harms.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Single extraction, verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative pooling methods appropriate for rare events were used for most analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Mortality, cardiovascular disease events, cancer incidence, serious harms.

RESULTS

Eighty-four studies (N=739 803) were included. In pooled analyses, multivitamin use was significantly associated with a lower incidence of any cancer (odds ratio [OR], 0.93 [95% CI, 0.87-0.99]; 4 RCTs [n=48 859]; absolute risk difference [ARD] range among adequately powered trials, -0.2% to -1.2%) and lung cancer (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.95]; 2 RCTs [n=36 052]; ARD, 0.2%). However, the evidence for multivitamins had important limitations. Beta carotene (with or without vitamin A) was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.01-1.42]; 4 RCTs [n=94 830]; ARD range, -0.1% to 0.6%) and cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.02-1.19]; 5 RCTs [n=94 506] ARD range, -0.8% to 0.8%). Vitamin D use was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.91-1.02]; 27 RCTs [n=117 082]), cardiovascular disease (eg, composite cardiovascular disease event outcome: OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.05]; 7 RCTs [n=74 925]), or cancer outcomes (eg, any cancer incidence: OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.92-1.03]; 19 RCTs [n=86 899]). Vitamin E was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.97-1.07]; 9 RCTs [n=107 772]), cardiovascular disease events (OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.90-1.04]; 4 RCTs [n=62 136]), or cancer incidence (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98-1.08]; 5 RCTs [n=76 777]). Evidence for benefit of other supplements was equivocal, minimal, or absent. Limited evidence suggested some supplements may be associated with higher risk of serious harms (hip fracture [vitamin A], hemorrhagic stroke [vitamin E], and kidney stones [vitamin C, calcium]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Vitamin and mineral supplementation was associated with little or no benefit in preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and death, with the exception of a small benefit for cancer incidence with multivitamin use. Beta carotene was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer and other harmful outcomes in persons at high risk of lung cancer.