1
|
Viart NM, Renault AL, Eon-Marchais S, Jiao Y, Fuhrmann L, El Houdigui SM, Le Gal D, Cavaciuti E, Dondon MG, Beauvallet J, Raynal V, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Vincent-Salomon A, Andrieu N, Southey MC, Lesueur F. Breast tumors from ATM pathogenic variant carriers display a specific genome-wide DNA methylation profile. Breast Cancer Res 2025; 27:36. [PMID: 40069712 PMCID: PMC11899765 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-025-01988-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 03/14/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase phosphorylates and activates several downstream targets that are essential for DNA damage repair, cell cycle inhibition and apoptosis. Germline biallelic inactivation of the ATM gene causes ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), and heterozygous pathogenic variant (PV) carriers are at increased risk of cancer, notably breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate whether DNA methylation profiling can be useful as a biomarker to identify tumors arising in ATM PV carriers, which may help for the management and optimal tailoring of therapies of these patients. METHODS Breast tumor enriched DNA was prepared from 2 A-T patients, 27 patients carrying an ATM PV, 6 patients carrying a variant of uncertain clinical significance and 484 noncarriers enrolled in epidemiological studies conducted in France and Australia to investigate genetic and nongenetic factors involved in breast cancer susceptibility. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation EPIC and 450K BeadChips. Correlation between promoter methylation and gene expression was assessed for 10 tumors for which transcriptomic data were available. RESULTS We found that the ATM promoter was hypermethylated in 62% of tumors of heterozygous PV carriers compared to the mean methylation level of ATM promoter in tumors of noncarriers. Gene set enrichment analyses identified 47 biological pathways enriched in hypermethylated genes involved in neoplastic, neurodegenerative and metabolic-related pathways in tumor of PV carriers. Among the 327 differentially methylated promoters, promoters of ARHGAP40, SCGB3A1 (HIN-1), and CYBRD1 (DCYTB) were hypermethylated and associated with a lower gene expression in these tumors. Moreover, using three different deep learning algorithms (logistic regression, random forest and XGBoost), we identified a set of 27 additional biomarkers predictive of ATM status, which could be used in the future to provide evidence for or against pathogenicity in ATM variant classification strategies. CONCLUSIONS We showed that breast tumors that arise in women who carry an ATM PV display a specific genome-wide DNA methylation profile. Specifically, the methylation pattern of 27 key gene promoters was predictive of ATM PV status of the women. These genes may also represent new medical prevention and therapeutic targets for these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas M Viart
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Laure Renault
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
- Monash University, Clayton, VIC; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Yue Jiao
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Dorothée Le Gal
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Eve Cavaciuti
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | | | - Juana Beauvallet
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Virginie Raynal
- ICGex Next-Generation Sequencing Platform, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Nadine Andrieu
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Monash University, Clayton, VIC; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Inserm, U1331, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan S, Imam M. Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:110. [PMID: 37351713 PMCID: PMC10290022 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00732-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease that is the most common cancer in women worldwide. However, precise subtyping and corresponding treatments have improved patient outcomes. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2m) is a unique BC subset with dual drivers: homologous recombination deficiency and hormone receptor signaling. Wild-type BRCA1/2 suppresses estrogen receptor-mediated signaling. Loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1/2 release estrogen receptor suppression, leading to reduced sensitivity to endocrine therapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) exert antitumor effects against this subtype and can be used in combination with endocrine therapy. Although PARPis have been evaluated in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, their efficacy against HR+/HER2- BC has not been clearly established. The present review summarizes recent advances and prospects in the progress of the HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m subgroup. As such, this article provides theoretical guidance for future research and promotes the use of PARPis for the treatment of HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunchao Yan
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China.
| | - Murshid Imam
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allman R, Mu Y, Dite GS, Spaeth E, Hopper JL, Rosner BA. Validation of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the key risk factors: family history, mammographic density and polygenic risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:335-347. [PMID: 36749458 PMCID: PMC10020257 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06834-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared a simple breast cancer risk prediction model, BRISK (which includes mammographic density, polygenic risk and clinical factors), against a similar model with more risk factors (simplified Rosner) and against two commonly used clinical models (Gail and IBIS). METHODS Using nested case-control data from the Nurses' Health Study, we compared the models' association, discrimination and calibration. Classification performance was compared between Gail and BRISK for 5-year risks and between IBIS and BRISK for remaining lifetime risk. RESULTS The odds ratio per standard deviation was 1.43 (95% CI 1.32, 1.55) for BRISK 5-year risk, 1.07 (95% CI 0.99, 1.14) for Gail 5-year risk, 1.72 (95% CI 1.59, 1.87) for simplified Rosner 10-year risk, 1.51 (95% CI 1.41, 1.62) for BRISK remaining lifetime risk and 1.26 (95% CI 1.16, 1.36) for IBIS remaining lifetime risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was improved for BRISK over Gail for 5-year risk (AUC = 0.636 versus 0.511, P < 0.0001) and for BRISK over IBIS for remaining lifetime risk (AUC = 0.647 versus 0.571, P < 0.0001). BRISK was well calibrated for the estimation of both 5-year risk (expected/observed [E/O] = 1.03; 95% CI 0.73, 1.46) and remaining lifetime risk (E/O = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86, 1.17). The Gail 5-year risk (E/O = 0.85; 95% CI 0.58, 1.24) and IBIS remaining lifetime risk (E/O = 0.73; 95% CI 0.60, 0.87) were not well calibrated, with both under-estimating risk. BRISK improves classification of risk compared to Gail 5-year risk (NRI = 0.31; standard error [SE] = 0.031) and IBIS remaining lifetime risk (NRI = 0.287; SE = 0.035). CONCLUSION BRISK performs better than two commonly used clinical risk models and no worse compared to a similar model with more risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Allman
- Genetic Technologies Limited, 60-66 Hanover St, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
| | - Yi Mu
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Genetic Technologies Limited, 60-66 Hanover St, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | | | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Bernard A Rosner
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jung AY, Ahearn TU, Behrens S, Middha P, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Augustinsson A, Beane Freeman LE, Becher H, Brenner H, Canzian F, Carey LA, Czene K, Eliassen AH, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Figueroa JD, Fritschi L, Gabrielson M, Giles GG, Guénel P, Hadjisavvas A, Haiman CA, Håkansson N, Hall P, Hamann U, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Howell A, Hunter DJ, Hüsing A, Kaaks R, Kosma VM, Koutros S, Kraft P, Lacey JV, Le Marchand L, Lissowska J, Loizidou MA, Mannermaa A, Maurer T, Murphy RA, Olshan AF, Olsson H, Patel AV, Perou CM, Rennert G, Shibli R, Shu XO, Southey MC, Stone J, Tamimi RM, Teras LR, Troester MA, Truong T, Vachon CM, Wang SS, Wolk A, Wu AH, Yang XR, Zheng W, Dunning AM, Pharoah PDP, Easton DF, Milne RL, Chatterjee N, Schmidt MK, García-Closas M, Chang-Claude J. Distinct Reproductive Risk Profiles for Intrinsic-Like Breast Cancer Subtypes: Pooled Analysis of Population-Based Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1706-1719. [PMID: 35723569 PMCID: PMC9949579 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reproductive factors have been shown to be differentially associated with risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer. However, their associations with intrinsic-like subtypes are less clear. METHODS Analyses included up to 23 353 cases and 71 072 controls pooled from 31 population-based case-control or cohort studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium across 16 countries on 4 continents. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the association between reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by intrinsic-like subtypes (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, HER2-enriched-like, and triple-negative breast cancer) and by invasiveness. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Compared with nulliparous women, parous women had a lower risk of luminal A-like, luminal B-like, luminal B-HER2-like, and HER2-enriched-like disease. This association was apparent only after approximately 10 years since last birth and became stronger with increasing time (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.71; and OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.28 to 0.46 for multiparous women with luminal A-like tumors 20 to less than 25 years after last birth and 45 to less than 50 years after last birth, respectively). In contrast, parous women had a higher risk of triple-negative breast cancer right after their last birth (for multiparous women: OR = 3.12, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.83) that was attenuated with time but persisted for decades (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.34, for multiparous women 25 to less than 30 years after last birth). Older age at first birth (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) and breastfeeding (Pheterogeneity < .001 for triple-negative compared with luminal A-like breast cancer) were associated with lower risk of triple-negative breast cancer but not with other disease subtypes. Younger age at menarche was associated with higher risk of all subtypes; older age at menopause was associated with higher risk of luminal A-like but not triple-negative breast cancer. Associations for in situ tumors were similar to luminal A-like. CONCLUSIONS This large and comprehensive study demonstrates a distinct reproductive risk factor profile for triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes, with implications for the understanding of disease etiology and risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pooja Middha
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristan J Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura E Beane Freeman
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heiko Becher
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - CTS Consortium
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Heather Eliassen
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lin Fritschi
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marike Gabrielson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Andreas Hadjisavvas
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
- The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Niclas Håkansson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David J Hunter
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anika Hüsing
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Veli-Matti Kosma
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Stella Koutros
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James V Lacey
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M. Sklodowska-Curie National Research Oncology Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maria A Loizidou
- Department of Electron Microscopy/Molecular Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
- The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tabea Maurer
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel A Murphy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- BC Cancer Agency, Cancer Control Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alpa V Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Department of Genetics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Gad Rennert
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rana Shibli
- Carmel Medical Center and Technion Faculty of Medicine, Clalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren R Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), University Paris-Saclay, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sophia S Wang
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiaohong R Yang
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nilanjan Chatterjee
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wei Y, Wei C, Chen L, Liu N, Ou Q, Yin JC, Pang J, Fang Z, Wu X, Wang X, Mu D, Shao Y, Yu J, Yuan S. Genomic Correlates of Unfavorable Outcome in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation. Cancer Res Treat 2022; 54:1209-1218. [PMID: 35038823 PMCID: PMC9582489 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant therapy modality can increase the operability rate and mitigate pathological risks in locally advanced cervical cancer, but treatment response varies widely. It remains unclear whether genetic alterations correlate with the response to neoadjuvant therapy and disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 62 locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB-IIA) patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus radical hysterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients' tumor biopsy samples were comprehensively profiled using targeted next generation sequencing. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment and DFS were evaluated against the association with genomic traits. RESULTS Genetic alterations of PIK3CA were most frequent (37%), comparable to that of Caucasian populations from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The mutation frequency of genes including TERT, POLD1, NOS2, and FGFR3 was significantly higher in Chinese patients whereas RPTOR, EGFR, and TP53 were underrepresented in comparison to Caucasians. Germline mutations were identified in 21% (13/62) of the cohort and more than half (57%) had mutations in DNA damage repair genes, including BRCA1/2, TP53 and PALB2. Importantly, high tumor mutation burden, TP53 polymorphism (rs1042522), and KEAP1 mutations were found to be associated with poor pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment. KEAP1 mutations, PIK3CA-SOX2 co-amplification, TERC copy number gain, and TYMS polymorphism correlated with an increased risk of disease relapse. CONCLUSION We report the genomic profile of locally advanced cervical cancer patients and the distinction between Asian and Caucasian cohorts. Our findings highlight genomic traits associated with unfavorable neoadjuvant chemoradiation response and a higher risk of early disease recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchun Wei
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan,
China
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Chuqing Wei
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Ning Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Qiuxiang Ou
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Jiani C. Yin
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Jiaohui Pang
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Zhenhao Fang
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Xue Wu
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Xiaonan Wang
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
| | - Dianbin Mu
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Yang Shao
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing,
China
- School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing,
China
| | - Jinming Yu
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan,
China
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| | - Shuanghu Yuan
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan,
China
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan,
China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:153. [PMID: 34887416 PMCID: PMC8660783 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00360-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Population-based estimates of breast cancer risk for carriers of pathogenic variants identified by gene-panel testing are urgently required. Most prior research has been based on women selected for high-risk features and more data is needed to make inference about breast cancer risk for women unselected for family history, an important consideration of population screening. We tested 1464 women diagnosed with breast cancer and 862 age-matched controls participating in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS), and 6549 healthy, older Australian women enroled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study for rare germline variants using a 24-gene-panel. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age and other potential confounders. We identified pathogenic variants in 11.1% of the ABCFS cases, 3.7% of the ABCFS controls and 2.2% of the ASPREE (control) participants. The estimated breast cancer OR [95% confidence interval] was 5.3 [2.1–16.2] for BRCA1, 4.0 [1.9–9.1] for BRCA2, 3.4 [1.4–8.4] for ATM and 4.3 [1.0–17.0] for PALB2. Our findings provide a population-based perspective to gene-panel testing for breast cancer predisposition and opportunities to improve predictors for identifying women who carry pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abdel-Razeq H, Tamimi F, Abujamous L, Edaily S, Abunasser M, Bater R, Salama O. Patterns and Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutations Among Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Regional Perspectives. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:4597-4604. [PMID: 34135636 PMCID: PMC8200144 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s316470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Among all subtypes, patients with triple-negative (TN) breast cancer is known for their poor outcome and their higher risk of harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic mutations. Identification of such mutations has clinical impact on breast and ovarian cancer prevention and treatment decisions. We here report on patterns and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Arab patients diagnosed with TN subtype. Patients and Methods Patients with TN-breast cancer (n=197) were enrolled regardless of their age or family history. Following a detailed genetic counseling, BRCA1/2 testing was performed at reference labs. BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were classified as negative, pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) and variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Results Median age of enrolled patients was 42 (range, 19–74) years and 27 (13.7%) were non-Jordanian Arabs. Among the study group, 50 (25.4%) were tested positive for BRCA1 (n=36, 18.3%) or BRCA2 (n=14, 7.1%), while 14 (7.1%) others had VUS. Compared to older ones, mutation rates were higher among patients <40 years (32.9%, P= 0.034), those with close relatives with breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancer (37.8%, P=0.002) and those with two or more breast cancers (41.4%, P=0.032). Among eligible patients, 23 (63.9%) patients underwent prophylactic mastectomy, while 19 (52.8%) patients had risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. None of the patients with VUS underwent any prophylactic surgery. Conclusion Arab patients with TN-breast cancer have relatively high BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation rates. Young age at diagnosis and personal and family history of breast cancer further increase this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikmat Abdel-Razeq
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Faris Tamimi
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Lama Abujamous
- Department of Cell Therapy & Applied Genomic, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Sara Edaily
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Mahmoud Abunasser
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Rayan Bater
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Osama Salama
- Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Population-Based Estimates of the Age-Specific Cumulative Risk of Breast Cancer for Pathogenic Variants in CHEK2: Findings from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061378. [PMID: 33803639 PMCID: PMC8003064 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary It is well established that women who carry pathogenic CHEK2 variants have about a 3-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. CHEK2 is now commonly included in genetic tests for breast cancer predisposition and increasingly used to inform the clinical management of women who are identified to carry pathogenic variants. Important information for counselling these women includes knowing how breast cancer risk, due to having a pathogenic variant in CHEK2, changes over a woman’s lifetime. This information is currently not well established. By conducting a population-based case-control-family study of pathogenic CHEK2 variants we aimed to provide this information and estimated the penetrance (age-specific cumulative risk) of breast cancer to be 18% (95% CI 11–30%) to age 60 years and 33% (95% CI 21–48%) to age 80 years. These findings provide new and important information for the clinical management of breast cancer risk for women carrying pathogenic variants in CHEK2. Abstract Case-control studies of breast cancer have consistently shown that pathogenic variants in CHEK2 are associated with about a 3-fold increased risk of breast cancer. Information about the recurrent protein-truncating variant CHEK2 c.1100delC dominates this estimate. There have been no formal estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for all CHEK2 pathogenic (including likely pathogenic) variants combined. We conducted a population-based case-control-family study of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (26 families, 1071 relatives) and estimated the age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer using segregation analysis. The estimated hazard ratio for carriers of pathogenic CHEK2 variants (combined) was 4.9 (95% CI 2.5–9.5) relative to non-carriers. The HR for carriers of the CHEK2 c.1100delC variant was estimated to be 3.5 (95% CI 1.02–11.6) and the HR for carriers of all other CHEK2 variants combined was estimated to be 5.7 (95% CI 2.5–12.9). The age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer was estimated to be 18% (95% CI 11–30%) and 33% (95% CI 21–48%) to age 60 and 80 years, respectively. These findings provide important information for the clinical management of breast cancer risk for women carrying pathogenic variants in CHEK2.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang J, Zhang Y, Yuan L, Ren L, Zhang Y, Qi X. Comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of single-agent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic or advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY) 2020; 13:450-459. [PMID: 33257598 PMCID: PMC7834995 DOI: 10.18632/aging.202152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Both talazoparib and olaparib are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating BRCA (breast cancer 1, early onset)-mutated HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative metastatic or advanced breast cancer. However, the optimal choice of first-line treatment has not been determined. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of single-agent poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for patients with BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic or advanced breast cancer. RESULTS We included two trials comprising 733 participants. Compared with talazoparib, olaparib was not associated with improved PFS (HR = 1.08, 95% CrI = 0.34-3.45) or OS (HR = 1.18, 95% CrI = 0.61-2.31). Compared with talazoparib, olaparib was associated with non-significantly improved ORR (OR = 0.83, 95% CrI = 0.05-12.64). Regarding safety, olaparib had reduced risk for both grade 3-4 anemia (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI = 0.003-34.94) and any-grade anemia (OR = 0.37, 95% CrI = 0.02-6.81) compared with talazoparib. Olaparib also showed a low risk for grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR = 0.57, 95% CrI = 0.06-5.75) compared with talazoparib. Both talazoparib and olaparib were not associated with high risk of treatment discontinuation (OR = 0.95, 95% CrI = 0.21-4.47). Regarding time to QoL deterioration, olaparib was associated with short time to clinically meaningful QoL deterioration (HR = 1.16, 95% CrI = 0.19-7.17) compared to talazoparib. CONCLUSION Both talazoparib and olaparib have similar efficacy, safety, and acceptability in patients with BRCA-mutated HER2-negative metastatic or advanced breast cancer. Well-designed head-to-head randomized controlled trials with large samples are suggested to determine the optimal treatment choice. METHODS We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis. We performed a systematic search of Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and international registers for published and unpublished double-blind randomized controlled trials from database inception to July 20, 2019. The pooled estimates of hazard ratios (HR) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated for PFS, OS, and the time to deterioration of quality of life (QoL). The pooled estimates of odds ratio (OR) with 95% CrIs were calculated for ORR, AEs, and treatment discontinuation. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019138939).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Wang
- Chongqing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chongqing, P.R. China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, P.R. China
| | - Long Yuan
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, P.R. China
| | - Lin Ren
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, P.R. China
| | - Yi Zhang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaowei Qi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Midha MK, Huang YF, Yang HH, Fan TC, Chang NC, Chen TH, Wang YT, Kuo WH, Chang KJ, Shen CY, Yu AL, Chiu KP, Chen CJ. Comprehensive Cohort Analysis of Mutational Spectrum in Early Onset Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2089. [PMID: 32731431 PMCID: PMC7464007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Early onset breast cancer (EOBC), diagnosed at age ~40 or younger, is associated with a poorer prognosis and higher mortality rate compared to breast cancer diagnosed at age 50 or older. EOBC poses a serious threat to public health and requires in-depth investigation. We studied a cohort comprising 90 Taiwanese female patients, aiming to unravel the underlying mechanisms of EOBC etiopathogenesis. Sequence data generated by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) from white blood cell (WBC)-tumor pairs were analyzed to identify somatic missense mutations, copy number variations (CNVs) and germline missense mutations. Similar to regular breast cancer, the key somatic mutation-susceptibility genes of EOBC include TP53 (40% prevalence), PIK3CA (37%), GATA3 (17%) and KMT2C (17%), which are frequently reported in breast cancer; however, the structural protein-coding genes MUC17 (19%), FLG (16%) and NEBL (11%) show a significantly higher prevalence in EOBC. Furthermore, the top 2 genes harboring EOBC germline mutations, MUC16 (19%) and KRT18 (19%), encode structural proteins. Compared to conventional breast cancer, an unexpectedly higher number of EOBC susceptibility genes encode structural proteins. We suspect that mutations in structural proteins may increase physical permeability to environmental hormones and carcinogens and cause breast cancer to occur at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohit K. Midha
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; (M.K.M.); (Y.-F.H.); (T.-H.C.); (C.-J.C.)
- Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Feng Huang
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; (M.K.M.); (Y.-F.H.); (T.-H.C.); (C.-J.C.)
| | - Hsiao-Hsiang Yang
- Department of Medical Research, Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
| | - Tan-Chi Fan
- Institute of Stem Cell and Translational Cancer Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fu-Shin St., Kuei Shang, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (T.-C.F.); (N.-C.C.); (A.L.Y.)
| | - Nai-Chuan Chang
- Institute of Stem Cell and Translational Cancer Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fu-Shin St., Kuei Shang, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (T.-C.F.); (N.-C.C.); (A.L.Y.)
| | - Tzu-Han Chen
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; (M.K.M.); (Y.-F.H.); (T.-H.C.); (C.-J.C.)
| | - Yu-Tai Wang
- National Center for High-Performance Computing, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
| | - Wen-Hung Kuo
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (W.-H.K.); (K.-J.C.)
| | - King-Jen Chang
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (W.-H.K.); (K.-J.C.)
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan;
| | - Alice L. Yu
- Institute of Stem Cell and Translational Cancer Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, No. 5, Fu-Shin St., Kuei Shang, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; (T.-C.F.); (N.-C.C.); (A.L.Y.)
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California in San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| | - Kuo-Ping Chiu
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; (M.K.M.); (Y.-F.H.); (T.-H.C.); (C.-J.C.)
- Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Department of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Jen Chen
- Genomics Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan; (M.K.M.); (Y.-F.H.); (T.-H.C.); (C.-J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen-Dumont T, Steen JA, Winship I, Park DJ, Pope BJ, Hammet F, Mahmoodi M, Tsimiklis H, Theys D, Clendenning M, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Mismatch repair gene pathogenic germline variants in a population-based cohort of breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2020; 19:197-202. [PMID: 32060697 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00164-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The advent of gene panel testing is challenging the previous practice of using clinically defined cancer family syndromes to inform single-gene genetic screening. Individual and family cancer histories that would have previously indicated testing of a single gene or a small number of related genes are now, increasingly, leading to screening across gene panels that contain larger numbers of genes. We have applied a gene panel test that included four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) to an Australian population-based case-control-family study of breast cancer. Altogether, eight pathogenic variants in MMR genes were identified: six in 1421 case-families (0.4%, 4 MSH6 and 2 PMS2) and two in 833 control-families (0.2%, one each of MLH1 and MSH2). This testing highlights the current and future challenges for clinical genetics in the context of anticipated gene panel-based population-based screening that includes the MMR genes. This testing is likely to provide additional opportunities for cancer prevention via cascade testing for Lynch syndrome and precision medicine for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Jason A Steen
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | | | - Daniel J Park
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Bernard J Pope
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Fleur Hammet
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Maryam Mahmoodi
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Helen Tsimiklis
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Derrick Theys
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Science at Monash Health, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong EM, Southey MC, Terry MB. Integrating DNA methylation measures to improve clinical risk assessment: are we there yet? The case of BRCA1 methylation marks to improve clinical risk assessment of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1133-1140. [PMID: 32066913 PMCID: PMC7156506 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0720-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Current risk prediction models estimate the probability of developing breast cancer over a defined period based on information such as family history, non-genetic breast cancer risk factors, genetic information from high and moderate risk breast cancer susceptibility genes and, over the past several years, polygenic risk scores (PRS) from more than 300 common variants. The inclusion of additional data such as PRS improves risk stratification, but it is anticipated that the inclusion of epigenetic marks could further improve model performance accuracy. Here, we present the case for including information on DNA methylation marks to improve the accuracy of these risk prediction models, and consider how this approach contrasts genetic information, as identifying DNA methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk differs inherently according to the source of DNA, approaches to the measurement of DNA methylation, and the timing of measurement. We highlight several DNA-methylation-specific challenges that should be considered when incorporating information on DNA methylation marks into risk prediction models, using BRCA1, a highly penetrant breast cancer susceptibility gene, as an example. Only after careful consideration of study design and DNA methylation measurement will prospective performance of the incorporation of information regarding DNA methylation marks into risk prediction models be valid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ee Ming Wong
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. .,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dai X, Zhang X, Lu P. Toward a holistic view of multiscale breast cancer molecular biomarkers. Biomark Med 2019; 13:1509-1533. [PMID: 31668082 DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2019-0143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Powered by rapid technology developments, biomarkers become increasingly diverse, including those detected at genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and cellular levels. While diverse sets of biomarkers have been utilized in breast cancer predisposition, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and management, recent additions derived from lincRNA, circular RNA, circulating DNA together with its methylated and hydroxymethylated forms and immune signatures are likely to further transform clinical practice. Here, we take breast cancer as an example of heterogeneous diseases that require many informed decisions from treatment to care to review the huge variety of biomarkers. By assessing the advantages and limitations of modern biomarkers in diverse use scenarios, this article outlines the prospects and challenges of releasing complimentary advantages by augmentation of multiscale molecular biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Dai
- Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Xuanhao Zhang
- School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Peihua Lu
- Wuxi People's Hospital, Nan Chang Qu, Wuxi, Jiangsu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jayasekara H, MacInnis RJ, Chamberlain JA, Dite GS, Leoce NM, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe A, Win AK, Milne RL, Giles GG, Terry MB, Eccles DM, Southey MC, Hopper JL. Mortality after breast cancer as a function of time since diagnosis by estrogen receptor status and age at diagnosis. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:3207-3217. [PMID: 30771221 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Our aim was to estimate how long-term mortality following breast cancer diagnosis depends on age at diagnosis, tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status, and the time already survived. We used the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Study which followed-up 1,196 women enrolled during 1992-1999 when aged <60 years at diagnosis with a first primary invasive breast cancer, over-sampled for younger ages at diagnosis, for whom tumor pathology features and ER status were measured. There were 375 deaths (median follow-up = 15.7; range = 0.8-21.4, years). We estimated the mortality hazard as a function of time since diagnosis using a flexible parametric survival analysis with ER status a time-dependent covariate. For women with ER-negative tumors compared with those with ER-positive tumors, 5-year mortality was initially higher (p < 0.001), similar if they survived to 5 years (p = 0.4), and lower if they survived to 10 years (p = 0.02). The estimated mortality hazard for ER-negative disease peaked at ~3 years post-diagnosis, thereafter declined with time, and at 7 years post-diagnosis became lower than that for ER-positive disease. This pattern was more pronounced for women diagnosed at younger ages. Mortality was also associated with lymph node count (hazard ratio (HR) per 10 nodes = 2.52 [95% CI:2.11-3.01]) and tumor grade (HR per grade = 1.62 [95% CI:1.34-1.96]). The risk of death following a breast cancer diagnosis differs substantially and qualitatively with diagnosis age, ER status and time survived. For women who survive >7 years, those with ER-negative disease will on average live longer, and more so if younger at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harindra Jayasekara
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James A Chamberlain
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole M Leoce
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, New York
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adrian Bickerstaffe
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Aung Ko Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, NY, New York.,Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, New York
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Scott CM, Wong EM, Joo JE, Dugué PA, Jung CH, O'Callaghan N, Dowty J, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Genome-wide DNA methylation assessment of 'BRCA1-like' early-onset breast cancer: Data from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Exp Mol Pathol 2018; 105:404-410. [PMID: 30423315 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2018.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancers arising in women carrying a germline mutation in BRCA1 are typically high-grade, early-onset and have distinct morphological features (BRCA1-like). However, the majority of early-onset breast cancers of this morphological type are not associated with germline BRCA1 mutations or constitutional BRCA1 promoter methylation. We aimed to assess DNA methylation across the genome for associations with the "BRCA1-like" morphology. Genome-wide methylation in blood-derived DNA was measured using the Infinium HumanMethylation450K BeadChip assay for women under the age of 40 years participating in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) diagnosed with: i) BRCA1-like breast cancer (n = 30); and ii) breast cancer without BRCA1-like morphological features (non BRCA1-like; n = 30), and age-matched unaffected women (controls; n = 30). Corresponding tumour-derived DNA from 43 of the affected women was also assessed. Methylation of blood-derived DNA was found to be elevated across 17 consecutive marks in the BRCA1 promoter region and decreased at several other genomic regions (including TWIST2 and CTBP1) for 7 women (23%) diagnosed with BRCA1-like breast cancer compared with women in the other groups. Corresponding tumour-derived DNA available from 5 of these 7 women had elevated methylation within the BRCA1 and SPHK2 promoter region and decreased methylation within the ADAP1, IGF2BP3 and SPATA13 promoter region when compared with the other breast tumours. These methylation marks could be biomarkers of risk for BRCA1-like breast cancer, and could be responsible in part for their distinctive morphological features and biology. As such, they may assist with prevention and targeted therapies for this cancer subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron M Scott
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia.
| | - Ee Ming Wong
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia.
| | - JiHoon Eric Joo
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Pierre-Antoine Dugué
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC 3004, Australia.
| | - Chol-Hee Jung
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Neil O'Callaghan
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - James Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC 3004, Australia.
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Australia; Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC 3004, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pastorino S, Yoshikawa Y, Pass HI, Emi M, Nasu M, Pagano I, Takinishi Y, Yamamoto R, Minaai M, Hashimoto-Tamaoki T, Ohmuraya M, Goto K, Goparaju C, Sarin KY, Tanji M, Bononi A, Napolitano A, Gaudino G, Hesdorffer M, Yang H, Carbone M. A Subset of Mesotheliomas With Improved Survival Occurring in Carriers of BAP1 and Other Germline Mutations. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:JCO2018790352. [PMID: 30376426 PMCID: PMC7162737 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.79.0352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that four criteria could help identify malignant mesotheliomas (MMs) most likely linked to germline mutations of BAP1 or of other genes: family history of MM, BAP1-associated cancers, or multiple malignancies; or age younger than 50 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Over the course of 7 years, 79 patients with MM met the four criteria; 22 of the 79 (28%) reported possible asbestos exposure. They were screened for germline BAP1 mutations by Sanger sequencing and by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for germline mutations in 55 additional cancer-linked genes. Deleterious mutations detected by tNGS were validated by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS Of the 79 patients, 43 (16 probands and 27 relatives) had deleterious germline BAP1 mutations. The median age at diagnosis was 54 years and median survival was 5 years. Among the remaining 36 patients with no BAP1 mutation, median age at diagnosis was 45 years, median survival was 9 years, and 12 had deleterious mutations of additional genes linked to cancer. When compared with patients with MMs in the SEER cohort, median age at diagnosis (72 years), median survival for all MM stages (8 months), and stage I (11 months) were significantly different from the 79 patients with MM in the current study ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION We provide criteria that help identify a subset of patients with MM who had significantly improved survival. Most of these patients were not aware of asbestos exposure and carried either pathogenic germline mutations of BAP1 or of additional genes linked to cancer, some of which may have targeted-therapy options. These patients and their relatives are susceptible to development of additional cancers; therefore, genetic counseling and cancer screening should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Pastorino
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Yoshie Yoshikawa
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Harvey I. Pass
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mitsuru Emi
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Masaki Nasu
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Ian Pagano
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Yasutaka Takinishi
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Ryuji Yamamoto
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Minaai
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Masaki Ohmuraya
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Keisuke Goto
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Chandra Goparaju
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Kavita Y. Sarin
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mika Tanji
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Angela Bononi
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Andrea Napolitano
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Giovanni Gaudino
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Mary Hesdorffer
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Haining Yang
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Michele Carbone
- Sandra Pastorino, Mitsuru Emi, Masaki Nasu, Ian Pagano, Yasutaka Takinishi, Ryuji Yamamoto, Michael Minaai, Keisuke Goto, Mika Tanji, Angela Bononi, Andrea Napolitano, Giovanni Gaudino, Haining Yang, and Michele Carbone, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI; Yoshie Yoshikawa, Mitsuru Emi, Tomoko Hashimoto-Tamaoki, and Masaki Ohmuraya, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan; Mary Hesdorffer, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, Washington DC; Harvey I. Pass and Chandra Goparaju, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; Andrea Neopolitano, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy; and Kavita Y. Sarin, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Starlard-Davenport A, Allman R, Dite GS, Hopper JL, Spaeth Tuff E, Macleod S, Kadlubar S, Preston M, Henry-Tillman R. Validation of a genetic risk score for Arkansas women of color. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204834. [PMID: 30281645 PMCID: PMC6169938 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
African American women in the state of Arkansas have high breast cancer mortality rates. Breast cancer risk assessment tools developed for African American underestimate breast cancer risk. Combining African American breast cancer associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) into breast cancer risk algorithms may improve individualized estimates of a woman's risk of developing breast cancer and enable improved recommendation of screening and chemoprevention for women at high risk. The goal of this study was to confirm with an independent dataset consisting of Arkansas women of color, whether a genetic risk score derived from common breast cancer susceptibility SNPs can be combined with a clinical risk estimate provided by the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) to produce a more accurate individualized breast cancer risk estimate. A population-based cohort of African American women representative of Arkansas consisted of 319 cases and 559 controls for this study. Five-year and lifetime risks from the BCRAT were measured and combined with a risk score based on 75 independent susceptibility SNPs in African American women. We used the odds ratio (OR) per adjusted standard deviation to evaluate the improvement in risk estimates produced by combining the polygenic risk score (PRS) with 5-year and lifetime risk scores estimated using BCRAT. For 5-year risk OR per standard deviation increased from 1.84 to 2.08 with the addition of the polygenic risk score and from 1.79 to 2.07 for the lifetime risk score. Reclassification analysis indicated that 13% of cases had their 5-year risk increased above the 1.66% guideline threshold (NRI = 0.020 (95% CI -0.040, 0.080)) and 6.3% of cases had their lifetime risk increased above the 20% guideline threshold by the addition of the polygenic risk score (NRI = 0.034 (95% CI 0.000, 0.070)). Our data confirmed that discriminatory accuracy of BCRAT is improved for African American women in Arkansas with the inclusion of specific SNP breast cancer risk alleles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Starlard-Davenport
- Department of Genetics, Genomics & Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
| | | | - Gillian S. Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erika Spaeth Tuff
- Phenogen Sciences Inc, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Stewart Macleod
- Genomics Core, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
| | - Susan Kadlubar
- Division of Medical Genetics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
| | - Michael Preston
- Center for Diversity Affairs and Inclusion, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
| | - Ronda Henry-Tillman
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cortellini A, Bersanelli M, Buti S, Gambale E, Atzori F, Zoratto F, Parisi A, Brocco D, Pireddu A, Cannita K, Iacono D, Migliorino MR, Gamucci T, De Tursi M, Sidoni T, Tiseo M, Michiara M, Papa A, Angius G, Tomao S, Fargnoli MC, Natoli C, Ficorella C. Family history of cancer as surrogate predictor for immunotherapy with anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents: preliminary report of the FAMI-L1 study. Immunotherapy 2018; 10:643-655. [DOI: 10.2217/imt-2017-0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Tumors related to hereditary susceptibility seem to have an immunosensitive phenotype. Materials & methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study, to investigate if family history of cancer, multiple neoplasms and early onset of cancer could be related to clinical outcomes of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Activity and efficacy data of 211 advanced cancer patients (kidney, non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, urothelium, colorectal and HeN), treated at seven Italian centers with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, were analyzed. Results: In this preliminary report at multivariate analyses, positive family history of cancer showed a statistically significant relationship with a better objective response rate (p = 0.0024), disease control rate (p = 0.0161), median time to treatment failure (p = 0.0203) and median overall survival (p = 0.0221). Diagnosis of multiple neoplasms significantly correlates only to a better disease control rate, while interestingly non-early onset of cancer and sex (in favor of female patients) showed significant correlation with a better median overall survival (p = 0.0268 and p = 0.0272, respectively). Conclusion: This pilot study seems to individuate easily available patient's features as possible predictive surrogates of clinical benefit for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments. These preliminary results need to be confirmed with a greater sample size, in prospective trials with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Cortellini
- Medical Oncology Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
- Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Gambale
- Medical Oncology Unit, SS Annunziata Hospita, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medical, Oral & Biotechnological Sciences University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Francesco Atzori
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Parisi
- Medical Oncology Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
- Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Davide Brocco
- Medical Oncology Unit, SS Annunziata Hospita, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medical, Oral & Biotechnological Sciences University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | | | - Katia Cannita
- Medical Oncology Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Daniela Iacono
- Pulmonary Oncology Unit, St. Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Teresa Gamucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, F. Spaziani Hospital, Frosinone, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Medical Oncology Unit, SS Annunziata Hospita, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medical, Oral & Biotechnological Sciences University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy
| | - Tina Sidoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Marcello Tiseo
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Maria Michiara
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Anselmo Papa
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences & Biotechnologies, University of Rome ‘Sapienza’, Latina, Italy
| | - Gesuino Angius
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences & Biotechnologies, University of Rome ‘Sapienza’, Latina, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Oncology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology & Pathology, University of Rome ‘Sapienza’, Latina, Italy
| | - Maria C Fargnoli
- Oncological Dermatology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Clara Natoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, SS Annunziata Hospita, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Medical, Oral & Biotechnological Sciences & CeSI-MeT, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti and Pescara, Italy
| | - Corrado Ficorella
- Medical Oncology Unit, St Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
- Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schuster B, Ellmann A, Mayo T, Auer J, Haas M, Hecht M, Fietkau R, Distel LV. Rate of individuals with clearly increased radiosensitivity rise with age both in healthy individuals and in cancer patients. BMC Geriatr 2018; 18:105. [PMID: 29728069 PMCID: PMC5935967 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-018-0799-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The question of an age dependence of individual radiosensitivity has only marginally been studied so far. Therefore, we analyzed blood samples of healthy individuals and cancer patients of different ages to determine individual radiosensitivity. METHODS Ex vivo irradiated blood samples of 595 individuals were tested. Chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 were stained by 3-color fluorescence in situ hybridization and aberrations were analyzed. Radiosensitivity was determined by the mean breaks per metaphase (B/M). RESULTS Healthy individuals (mean age 50.7 years) had an average B/M value of 0.42 ± 0.104 and an increase of 0.0014B/M per year. The patients (mean age 60.4 years) had an average B/M value of 0.44 ± 0.150 and radiosensitivity did not change with age. In previous studies we found that from a value of 0.6B/M on an individual is considered to be distinctly radiosensitive. The portion of radiosensitive individuals (B/M > 0.6) increased in both cohorts with age. CONCLUSION Individual radiosensitivity rises continuously with age, yet with strong interindividual variation. No age related increase of radiosensitivity can be demonstrated in patients due to the strong interindividual variation. However among old cancer patients there is a higher probability to have patients with clearly increased radiosensitivity than at younger age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Schuster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Ellmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theresa Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Judith Auer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias Haas
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Hecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Luitpold V Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF, Dite GS, Stone J, MacInnis RJ, Dowty JG, Bickerstaffe A, Aujard K, Rommens JM, Song YM, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Southey MC, Giles GG, Apicella C, Hopper JL. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 46:652-661. [PMID: 28338721 PMCID: PMC5837222 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Mammographic density defined by the conventional pixel brightness threshold, and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI), is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. We asked if higher thresholds better separate women with and without breast cancer. Methods: We studied Australian women, 354 with breast cancer over-sampled for early-onset and family history, and 944 unaffected controls frequency-matched for age at mammogram. We measured mammographic dense area and percent density using the CUMULUS software at the conventional threshold, which we call Cumulus, and at two increasingly higher thresholds, which we call Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, respectively. All measures were Box–Cox transformed and adjusted for age and BMI. We estimated the odds per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) using logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results:Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus were correlated with Cumulus (r ∼ 0.8 and 0.6, respectively). For dense area, the OPERA was 1.62, 1.74 and 1.73 for Cumulus, Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, respectively (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, Cumulus was not significant (P > 0.6). The OPERAs for percent density were less but gave similar findings. The mean of the standardized adjusted Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus dense area measures was the best predictor; OPERA = 1.87 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64–2.14] and AUC = 0.68 (0.65–0.71). Conclusions: The areas of higher mammographically dense regions are associated with almost 30% stronger breast cancer risk gradient, explain the risk association of the conventional measure and might be more aetiologically important. This has substantial implications for clinical translation and molecular, genetic and epidemiological research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Ye K Aung
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher F Evans
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Curtin UWA Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, Curtin University and The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Adrian Bickerstaffe
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Kelly Aujard
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Johanna M Rommens
- Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yun-Mi Song
- Department of Family Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea and
| | - Joohon Sung
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carmel Apicella
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.,Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Walker LC, Pearson JF, Wiggins GAR, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Increased genomic burden of germline copy number variants is associated with early onset breast cancer: Australian breast cancer family registry. Breast Cancer Res 2017; 19:30. [PMID: 28302160 PMCID: PMC5356248 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0825-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with breast cancer who have multiple affected relatives are more likely to have inherited genetic risk factors for the disease. All the currently known genetic risk factors for breast cancer account for less than half of the average familial risk. Furthermore, the genetic factor(s) underlying an increased cancer risk for many women from multiple-case families remain unknown. Rare genomic duplications and deletions, known as copy number variants (CNVs), cover more than 10% of a human genome, are often not assessed in studies of genetic predisposition, and could account for some of the so-called "missing heritability". METHODS We carried out a hypothesis-generating case-control study of breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 years (200 cases, 293 controls) using population-based cases from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study. Genome-wide scanning for CNVs was performed using the Human610-Quad BeadChip and fine-mapping was conducted using PennCNV. RESULTS We identified deletions overlapping two known cancer susceptibility genes, (BRCA1 and BLM), and a duplication overlapping SMARCB1, associated with risk. The number of deletions across the genome was 1.5-fold higher for cases than controls (P = 10-16), and 2-fold higher when only rare deletions overlapping genes (frequency <1%) were assessed (P = 5 × 10-4). Association tests of CNVs, followed by experimental validation of CNV calls, found deletions overlapping the OR4C11 and OR4P4 genes were associated with breast cancer (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION These results suggest rare CNVs might have a role in breast cancer susceptibility, at least for disease at a young age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan C Walker
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - John F Pearson
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - George A R Wiggins
- Mackenzie Cancer Research Group, Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, Milne RL, Antoniou AC, Weideman P, Apicella C, Giles GG, Southey MC, Jenkins MA, Phillips KA, Win AK, Terry MB, Hopper JL. Testing for Gene-Environment Interactions Using a Prospective Family Cohort Design: Body Mass Index in Early and Later Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 185:487-500. [PMID: 28399571 PMCID: PMC6158796 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to classify people according to their underlying genetic susceptibility to a disease is increasing with new knowledge, better family data, and more sophisticated risk prediction models, allowing for more effective prevention and screening. To do so, however, we need to know whether risk associations are the same for people with different genetic susceptibilities. To illustrate one way to estimate such gene-environment interactions, we used prospective data from 3 Australian family cancer cohort studies, 2 enriched for familial risk of breast cancer. There were 288 incident breast cancers in 9,126 participants from 3,222 families. We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate whether associations of breast cancer with body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) at age 18-21 years, BMI at baseline, and change in BMI differed according to genetic risk based on lifetime breast cancer risk from birth, as estimated by BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) software, adjusted for age at baseline data collection. Although no interactions were statistically significant, we have demonstrated the power with which gene-environment interactions can be investigated using a cohort enriched for persons with increased genetic risk and a continuous measure of genetic risk based on family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John L. Hopper
- Correspondence to Prof. John L. Hopper, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Katapodi MC, Duquette D, Yang JJ, Mendelsohn-Victor K, Anderson B, Nikolaidis C, Mancewicz E, Northouse LL, Duffy S, Ronis D, Milliron KJ, Probst-Herbst N, Merajver SD, Janz NK, Copeland G, Roberts S. Recruiting families at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer from a statewide cancer registry: a methodological study. Cancer Causes Control 2017; 28:191-201. [PMID: 28197806 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-017-0858-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer genetic services (counseling/testing) are recommended for women diagnosed with breast cancer younger than 45 years old (young breast cancer survivors-YBCS) and at-risk relatives. We present recruitment of YBCS, identification and recruitment of at-risk relatives, and YBCS willingness to contact their cancer-free, female relatives. METHODS A random sample of 3,000 YBCS, stratified by race (Black vs. White/Other), was identified through a population-based cancer registry and recruited in a randomized trial designed to increase use of cancer genetic services. Baseline demographic, clinical, and family characteristics, and variables associated with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) were assessed as predictors of YBCS' willingness to contact at-risk relatives. RESULTS The 883 YBCS (33.2% response rate; 40% Black) who returned a survey had 1,875 at-risk relatives and were willing to contact 1,360 (72.5%). From 853 invited at-risk relatives (up to two relatives per YBCS), 442 responded (51.6% response rate). YBCS with larger families, with a previous diagnosis of depression, and motivated to comply with recommendations from family members were likely to contact a greater number of relatives. Black YBCS were more likely to contact younger relatives and those living further than 50 miles compared to White/Other YBCS. CONCLUSION It is feasible to recruit diverse families at risk for hereditary cancer from a population-based cancer registry. This recruitment approach can be used as a paradigm for harmonizing processes and increasing internal and external validity of large-scale public health genomic initiatives in the era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Katapodi
- Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Deb Duquette
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, 333 S. Grand Ave., P.O. Box 30195, Lansing, MI, 48909, USA
| | - James J Yang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Kari Mendelsohn-Victor
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Beth Anderson
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, 333 S. Grand Ave., P.O. Box 30195, Lansing, MI, 48909, USA
| | - Christos Nikolaidis
- Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Emily Mancewicz
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Laurel L Northouse
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Sonia Duffy
- Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - David Ronis
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Kara J Milliron
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, CCGC 6-303, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0944, USA
| | - Nicole Probst-Herbst
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Socinstrasse 57, 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sofia D Merajver
- University of Michigan, School of Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Nancy K Janz
- University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Glenn Copeland
- Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program, 333 S. Grand Ave, P.O. Box 30195, Lansing, MI, 48909, USA
| | - Scott Roberts
- University of Michigan, School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk: Implications of the Breast Density Legislation for Health Care Practitioners. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 59:419-38. [PMID: 26992182 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Breast density has emerged as a critical phenotypic marker of increased breast cancer risk. The breast density legislation, passed in multiple states, requires patient notification of the implications of the breast density on breast cancer risk and screening. Supplemental screening may be suggested in the state regulation; however, there are limited data to guide conversations with patients. This article will review the current state of supplemental screening in women with dense breasts and discuss theories of the mechanism of action. Guidance is provided to assist in shared decision making and appropriate patient counseling.
Collapse
|
25
|
Scott CM, Joo JE, O’Callaghan N, Buchanan DD, Clendenning M, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Wong EM, Southey MC. Methylation of Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes in Early-Onset Breast Cancer: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165436. [PMID: 27902704 PMCID: PMC5130174 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 10/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA methylation can mimic the effects of both germline and somatic mutations for cancer predisposition genes such as BRCA1 and p16INK4a. Constitutional DNA methylation of the BRCA1 promoter has been well described and is associated with an increased risk of early-onset breast cancers that have BRCA1-mutation associated histological features. The role of methylation in the context of other breast cancer predisposition genes has been less well studied and often with conflicting or ambiguous outcomes. We examined the role of methylation in known breast cancer susceptibility genes in breast cancer predisposition and tumor development. We applied the Infinium HumanMethylation450 Beadchip (HM450K) array to blood and tumor-derived DNA from 43 women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 40 years and measured the methylation profiles across promoter regions of BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, CDH1, TP53, FANCM, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Prior genetic testing had demonstrated that these women did not carry a germline mutation in BRCA1, ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, TP53, BRCA2, CDH1 or FANCM. In addition to the BRCA1 promoter region, this work identified regions with variable methylation at multiple breast cancer susceptibility genes including PALB2 and MLH1. Methylation at the region of MLH1 in these breast cancers was not associated with microsatellite instability. This work informs future studies of the role of methylation in breast cancer susceptibility gene silencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron M. Scott
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - JiHoon Eric Joo
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Neil O’Callaghan
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ee Ming Wong
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
MDM2 promoter SNP55 (rs2870820) affects risk of colon cancer but not breast-, lung-, or prostate cancer. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33153. [PMID: 27624283 PMCID: PMC5022009 DOI: 10.1038/srep33153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Two functional SNPs (SNP285G > C; rs117039649 and SNP309T > G; rs2279744) have previously been reported to modulate Sp1 transcription factor binding to the promoter of the proto-oncogene MDM2, and to influence cancer risk. Recently, a third SNP (SNP55C > T; rs2870820) was also reported to affect Sp1 binding and MDM2 transcription. In this large population based case-control study, we genotyped MDM2 SNP55 in 10,779 Caucasian individuals, previously genotyped for SNP309 and SNP285, including cases of colon (n = 1,524), lung (n = 1,323), breast (n = 1,709) and prostate cancer (n = 2,488) and 3,735 non-cancer controls, as well as 299 healthy African-Americans. Applying the dominant model, we found an elevated risk of colon cancer among individuals harbouring SNP55TT/CT genotypes compared to the SNP55CC genotype (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.01-1.30). The risk was found to be highest for left-sided colon cancer (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.00-1.45) and among females (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.01-1.74). Assessing combined genotypes, we found the highest risk of colon cancer among individuals harbouring the SNP55TT or CT together with the SNP309TG genotype (OR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.00-1.46). Supporting the conclusions from the risk estimates, we found colon cancer cases carrying the SNP55TT/CT genotypes to be diagnosed at younger age as compared to SNP55CC (p = 0.053), in particular among patients carrying the SNP309TG/TT genotypes (p = 0.009).
Collapse
|
27
|
Ferrari D, Qian G, Hunter T. Parsimonious and Efficient Likelihood Composition by Gibbs Sampling. J Comput Graph Stat 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/10618600.2015.1058799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
For centuries, herbs and plants have been used for medicinal purposes and as food as well. This review concerns about different types of plants that retain the immune stimulating and anti-tumor properties. Large variety of active phytochemicals such as carotenoids, flavonoids, ligands, polyphenolics, terpenoids, sulfides, lignans and plant sterols has been identified in different types of herbs. These phytochemicals have different mechanisms of action. They either stimulate the protective enzyme like glutathione transferase or prevent the cell proliferation. This review has centered on the biochemical properties of Allium sativum, Echinacea, Curcuma longa, Arctium lappa, Camellia sinensis, Panax ginseng and Flax seed. Extracts and juices of Withania somnifera, Amoora rohituka, Dysoxylum binectariferum and Vaccinium macrocarpon, respectively also used as anti-breast cancer. The volatile oils and extracts of these herbs and plants inhibit the synthesis of mevalonate that lessen the tumor growth and cholesterol synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munazza Shareef
- Institute of Pharmacy, Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, 38000 Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf
- Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, 430074 Wuhan, PR China
| | - Maliha Sarfraz
- Institute of Pharmacy, Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Agriculture, 38000 Faisalabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Current algorithms for association rule mining from transaction data are mostly deterministic and enumerative. They can be computationally intractable even for mining a dataset containing just a few hundred transaction items, if no action is taken to constrain the search space. In this paper, we develop a Gibbs-sampling-induced stochastic search procedure to randomly sample association rules from the itemset space, and perform rule mining from the reduced transaction dataset generated by the sample. Also a general rule importance measure is proposed to direct the stochastic search so that, as a result of the randomly generated association rules constituting an ergodic Markov chain, the overall most important rules in the itemset space can be uncovered from the reduced dataset with probability 1 in the limit. In the simulation study and a real genomic data example, we show how to boost association rule mining by an integrated use of the stochastic search and the Apriori algorithm.
Collapse
|
30
|
O'Brien KM, Shi M, Sandler DP, Taylor JA, Zaykin DV, Keller J, Wise AS, Weinberg CR. A family-based, genome-wide association study of young-onset breast cancer: inherited variants and maternally mediated effects. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24:1316-23. [PMID: 26883092 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Young-onset breast cancer shows certain phenotypic and etiologic differences from older-onset breast cancer and may be influenced by some distinct genetic variants. Few genetic studies of breast cancer have targeted young women and no studies have examined whether maternal variants influence disease in their adult daughters through prenatal effects. We conducted a family-based, genome-wide association study of young-onset breast cancer (age at diagnosis <50 years). A total of 602 188 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped for 1279 non-Hispanic white cases and their parents or sisters. We used likelihood-based log-linear models to test for transmission asymmetry within families and for maternally mediated genetic effects. Three autosomal SNPs (rs28373882, P=2.8 × 10(-7); rs879162, P=9.2 × 10(-7); rs12606061, P=9.1 × 10(-7)) were associated with risk of young-onset breast cancer at a false-discovery rate below 0.20. None of these loci has been previously linked with young-onset or overall breast cancer risk, and their functional roles are unknown. There was no evidence of maternally mediated, X-linked, or mitochondrial genetic effects, and no notable findings within cancer subcategories defined by menopausal status, estrogen receptor status, or by tumor invasiveness. Further investigations are needed to explore other potential genetic, epigenetic, or epistatic mechanisms and to confirm the association between these three novel loci and young-onset breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie M O'Brien
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Min Shi
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Dmitri V Zaykin
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Alison S Wise
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vukovic V, Ianuale C, Leoncini E, Pastorino R, Gualano MR, Amore R, Boccia S. Lack of association between polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 gene and risk of cancer: evidence from meta-analyses. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:83. [PMID: 26865042 PMCID: PMC4750358 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2096-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polymorphisms in the CYP1A2 genes have the potential to affect the individual capacity to convert pre-carcinogens into carcinogens. With these comprehensive meta-analyses, we aimed to provide a quantitative assessment of the association between the published genetic association studies on CYP1A2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the risk of cancer. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science and SCOPUS bibliographic online databases and databases of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). After data extraction, we calculated Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the retrieved CYP1A2 SNPs and cancer. Random effect model was used to calculate the pooled ORs. Begg and Egger tests, one-way sensitivity analysis were performed, when appropriate. We conducted stratified analyses by study design, sample size, ethnicity and tumour site. RESULTS Seventy case-control studies and one GWA study detailing on six different SNPs were included. Among the 71 included studies, 42 were population-based case-control studies, 28 hospital-based case-control studies and one genome-wide association study, including total of 47,413 cancer cases and 58,546 controls. The meta-analysis of 62 studies on rs762551, reported an OR of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.96-1.12) for overall cancer (P for heterogeneity < 0.01; I(2) = 50.4%). When stratifying for tumour site, an OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-1.01; P for heterogeneity = 0.23, I(2) = 28.5%) was reported for bladder cancer for those homozygous mutant of rs762551. An OR of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.65-0.95; P for heterogeneity = 0.09, I(2) = 58.1%) was obtained for the bladder cancer from the hospital-based studies and on Caucasians. CONCLUSIONS This large meta-analysis suggests no significant effect of the investigated CYP1A2 SNPs on cancer overall risk under various genetic models. However, when stratifying according to the tumour site, our results showed a borderline not significant OR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.70-1.01) for bladder cancer for those homozygous mutant of rs762551. Due to the limitations of our meta-analyses, the results should be interpreted with attention and need to be further confirmed by high-quality studies, for all the potential CYP1A2 SNPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Vukovic
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carolina Ianuale
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Leoncini
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Pastorino
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Gualano
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosarita Amore
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Institute of Public Health- Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F.Vito 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, Dowty JG, Allman R, Apicella C, Milne RL, Tsimiklis H, Phillips KA, Giles GG, Terry MB, Southey MC, Hopper JL. Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Clinical Models and 77 Independent Risk-Associated SNPs for Women Aged Under 50 Years: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25:359-65. [PMID: 26677205 PMCID: PMC4767544 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 12/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which clinical breast cancer risk prediction models can be improved by including information on known susceptibility SNPs is not known. METHODS Using 750 cases and 405 controls from the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry who were younger than 50 years at diagnosis and recruitment, respectively, Caucasian and not BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, we derived absolute 5-year risks of breast cancer using the BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS risk prediction models and combined these with a risk score based on 77 independent risk-associated SNPs. We used logistic regression to estimate the OR per adjusted SD for log-transformed age-adjusted 5-year risks. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. We also constructed reclassification tables and calculated the net reclassification improvement. RESULTS The ORs for BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS were 1.80, 1.75, 1.67, and 1.30, respectively. When combined with the SNP-based score, the corresponding ORs were 1.96, 1.89, 1.80, and 1.52. The corresponding AUCs were 0.66, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.57 for the risk prediction models, and 0.70, 0.69, 0.66, and 0.63 when combined with the SNP-based score. CONCLUSIONS By combining a 77 SNP-based score with clinical models, the AUC for predicting breast cancer before age 50 years improved by >20%. IMPACT Our estimates of the increased performance of clinical risk prediction models from including genetic information could be used to inform targeted screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adrian Bickerstaffe
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Carmel Apicella
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Tsimiklis
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Collins IM, Bickerstaffe A, Ranaweera T, Maddumarachchi S, Keogh L, Emery J, Mann GB, Butow P, Weideman P, Steel E, Trainer A, Bressel M, Hopper JL, Cuzick J, Antoniou AC, Phillips KA. iPrevent®: a tailored, web-based, decision support tool for breast cancer risk assessment and management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 156:171-82. [PMID: 26909793 PMCID: PMC4788692 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3726-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to develop a user-centered, web-based, decision support tool for breast cancer risk assessment and personalized risk management. Using a novel model choice algorithm, iPrevent(®) selects one of two validated breast cancer risk estimation models (IBIS or BOADICEA), based on risk factor data entered by the user. Resulting risk estimates are presented in simple language and graphic formats for easy comprehension. iPrevent(®) then presents risk-adapted, evidence-based, guideline-endorsed management options. Development was an iterative process with regular feedback from multidisciplinary experts and consumers. To verify iPrevent(®), risk factor data for 127 cases derived from the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study were entered into iPrevent(®), IBIS (v7.02), and BOADICEA (v3.0). Consistency of the model chosen by iPrevent(®) (i.e., IBIS or BOADICEA) with the programmed iPrevent(®) model choice algorithm was assessed. Estimated breast cancer risks from iPrevent(®) were compared with those attained directly from the chosen risk assessment model (IBIS or BOADICEA). Risk management interventions displayed by iPrevent(®) were assessed for appropriateness. Risk estimation model choice was 100 % consistent with the programmed iPrevent(®) logic. Discrepant 10-year and residual lifetime risk estimates of >1 % were found for 1 and 4 cases, respectively, none was clinically significant (maximal variation 1.4 %). Risk management interventions suggested by iPrevent(®) were 100 % appropriate. iPrevent(®) successfully integrates the IBIS and BOADICEA risk assessment models into a decision support tool that provides evidence-based, risk-adapted risk management advice. This may help to facilitate precision breast cancer prevention discussions between women and their healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M Collins
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Greater Green Triangle Clinical School, Deakin University School of Medicine, Warrnambool, Australia
| | - Adrian Bickerstaffe
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thilina Ranaweera
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sanjaya Maddumarachchi
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - G Bruce Mann
- The Breast Service, Royal Melbourne and Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED) and The Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Prue Weideman
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emma Steel
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alison Trainer
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mathias Bressel
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St., Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ademuyiwa FO, Cyr A, Ivanovich J, Thomas MA. Managing breast cancer in younger women: challenges and solutions. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2015; 8:1-12. [PMID: 26730210 PMCID: PMC4694614 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s68848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer in young women is relatively rare compared to breast cancer occurring in older women. Younger women diagnosed with breast cancer also tend to have a more aggressive biology and consequently a poorer prognosis than older women. In addition, they face unique challenges such as diminished fertility from premature ovarian failure, extended survivorship periods and its attendant problems, and the psychosocial impact of diagnosis, while still raising families. It is therefore imperative to recognize the unique issues that younger women face, and plan management in a multidisciplinary fashion to optimize clinical outcomes. This paper discusses the challenges of breast cancer management for young women, as well as specific issues to consider in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Foluso O Ademuyiwa
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amy Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maria A Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Qian DC, Byun J, Han Y, Greene CS, Field JK, Hung RJ, Brhane Y, Mclaughlin JR, Fehringer G, Landi MT, Rosenberger A, Bickeböller H, Malhotra J, Risch A, Heinrich J, Hunter DJ, Henderson BE, Haiman CA, Schumacher FR, Eeles RA, Easton DF, Seminara D, Amos CI. Identification of shared and unique susceptibility pathways among cancers of the lung, breast, and prostate from genome-wide association studies and tissue-specific protein interactions. Hum Mol Genet 2015; 24:7406-20. [PMID: 26483192 PMCID: PMC4664175 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddv440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 10/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have indicated that strong single-gene effects are the exception, not the rule, for most diseases. We assessed the joint effects of germline genetic variations through a pathway-based approach that considers the tissue-specific contexts of GWAS findings. From GWAS meta-analyses of lung cancer (12 160 cases/16 838 controls), breast cancer (15 748 cases/18 084 controls) and prostate cancer (14 160 cases/12 724 controls) in individuals of European ancestry, we determined the tissue-specific interaction networks of proteins expressed from genes that are likely to be affected by disease-associated variants. Reactome pathways exhibiting enrichment of proteins from each network were compared across the cancers. Our results show that pathways associated with all three cancers tend to be broad cellular processes required for growth and survival. Significant examples include the nerve growth factor (P = 7.86 × 10(-33)), epidermal growth factor (P = 1.18 × 10(-31)) and fibroblast growth factor (P = 2.47 × 10(-31)) signaling pathways. However, within these shared pathways, the genes that influence risk largely differ by cancer. Pathways found to be unique for a single cancer focus on more specific cellular functions, such as interleukin signaling in lung cancer (P = 1.69 × 10(-15)), apoptosis initiation by Bad in breast cancer (P = 3.14 × 10(-9)) and cellular responses to hypoxia in prostate cancer (P = 2.14 × 10(-9)). We present the largest comparative cross-cancer pathway analysis of GWAS to date. Our approach can also be applied to the study of inherited mechanisms underlying risk across multiple diseases in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Qian
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Jinyoung Byun
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Younghun Han
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Casey S Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John K Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK
| | - Rayjean J Hung
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Yonathan Brhane
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - John R Mclaughlin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
| | - Gordon Fehringer
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Maria Teresa Landi
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Albert Rosenberger
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, 37099 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Heike Bickeböller
- Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, 37099 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jyoti Malhotra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Angela Risch
- Division of Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Heinrich
- Institute of Epidemiology I, German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - David J Hunter
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Brian E Henderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Fredrick R Schumacher
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK and
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Daniela Seminara
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
LAPTM4B Gene Expression and Polymorphism as Diagnostic Markers of Breast Cancer in Egyptian Patients. J Med Biochem 2015; 34:393-401. [PMID: 28356847 PMCID: PMC4922358 DOI: 10.2478/jomb-2014-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the association between LAPTM4B gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer among Egyptian female patients. Also, measurement was done of its serum level to evaluate its significance as a diagnostic marker for breast cancer. Methods This case control study was done on 88 breast cancer patients, 40 with fibroadenoma and 80 healthy subjects. Genotyping of the LAPTM4B polymorphism was determined by PCR. Serum LAPTM4B level was measured using ELISA. Results There was a significant difference in the (*1/2+ *2/2) genotypes in breast cancer patients (59.1) compared to the control subjects (43.8%) (P=0.047; OR=1.86; 95% CI =1.01–3.43). The frequency of the allele 2* of the LAPTM4B gene was significantly higher in breast cancer patients (36.4%) than in the control (25.6%) (p=0.034; OR=1.66; 95% CI =1.04–2.65). Genotypes (*1/2+*2/2) were significantly associated with the differential classification of TNM. Serum level of LAPTM4B was significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in control and fibroadenoma and in fibroadenoma patients than in control. In breast cancer patients, serum LAPTM4B was significantly higher in stage III and in large tumor size. Serum LAPTM4B was significantly higher in the cancer patients’ genotypes (*1/2+*2/2). Conclusions Genetic polymorphism of LAPTM4B is a potential risk factor for the development of breast cancer. Serum LAPTM4B may be used as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for breast cancer.
Collapse
|
37
|
Stone J, Thompson DJ, Dos Santos Silva I, Scott C, Tamimi RM, Lindstrom S, Kraft P, Hazra A, Li J, Eriksson L, Czene K, Hall P, Jensen M, Cunningham J, Olson JE, Purrington K, Couch FJ, Brown J, Leyland J, Warren RML, Luben RN, Khaw KT, Smith P, Wareham NJ, Jud SM, Heusinger K, Beckmann MW, Douglas JA, Shah KP, Chan HP, Helvie MA, Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Woolcott C, Maskarinec G, Haiman C, Giles GG, Baglietto L, Krishnan K, Southey MC, Apicella C, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, Ursin G, Alnaes GIG, Kristensen VN, Borresen-Dale AL, Gram IT, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Simard J, Pharoah P, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Fasching PA, Pankratz VS, Hopper JL, Vachon CM. Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures. Cancer Res 2015; 75:2457-67. [PMID: 25862352 PMCID: PMC4470785 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Mammographic density measures adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) are heritable predictors of breast cancer risk, but few mammographic density-associated genetic variants have been identified. Using data for 10,727 women from two international consortia, we estimated associations between 77 common breast cancer susceptibility variants and absolute dense area, percent dense area and absolute nondense area adjusted for study, age, and BMI using mixed linear modeling. We found strong support for established associations between rs10995190 (in the region of ZNF365), rs2046210 (ESR1), and rs3817198 (LSP1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas (all P < 10(-5)). Of 41 recently discovered breast cancer susceptibility variants, associations were found between rs1432679 (EBF1), rs17817449 (MIR1972-2: FTO), rs12710696 (2p24.1), and rs3757318 (ESR1) and adjusted absolute and percent dense areas, respectively. There were associations between rs6001930 (MKL1) and both adjusted absolute dense and nondense areas, and between rs17356907 (NTN4) and adjusted absolute nondense area. Trends in all but two associations were consistent with those for breast cancer risk. Results suggested that 18% of breast cancer susceptibility variants were associated with at least one mammographic density measure. Genetic variants at multiple loci were associated with both breast cancer risk and the mammographic density measures. Further understanding of the underlying mechanisms at these loci could help identify etiologic pathways implicated in how mammographic density predicts breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Genetic Origins of Health and Disease, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Deborah J Thompson
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Dos Santos Silva
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Scott
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara Lindstrom
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditi Hazra
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jingmei Li
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Human Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Louise Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Matt Jensen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Julie Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Janet E Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Judith Brown
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Leyland
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth M L Warren
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Robert N Luben
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kay-Tee Khaw
- MRC Centre for Nutritional Epidemiology in Cancer Prevention and Survival (CNC), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paula Smith
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas J Wareham
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian M Jud
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Heusinger
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Julie A Douglas
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kaanan P Shah
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Heang-Ping Chan
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mark A Helvie
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | - Christy Woolcott
- Department of Obstetrics and Genecology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Christopher Haiman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Baglietto
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif Cedex, France. Paris-South University, Villejuif, France
| | - Kavitha Krishnan
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carmel Apicella
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia A Knight
- Prosserman Centre for Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Giske Ursin
- Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, California
| | - Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vessela N Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inger Torhild Gram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Qin Wang
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center and Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - V Shane Pankratz
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Celine M Vachon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Smyth C, Špakulová I, Cotton-Barratt O, Rafiq S, Tapper W, Upstill-Goddard R, Hopper JL, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Kapuscinski M, Fliege J, Collins A, Brodzki J, Eccles DM, MacArthur BD. Quantifying the cumulative effect of low-penetrance genetic variants on breast cancer risk. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2015; 3:182-8. [PMID: 26029704 PMCID: PMC4444159 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Revised: 11/28/2014] [Accepted: 12/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Many common diseases have a complex genetic basis in which large numbers of genetic variations combine with environmental factors to determine risk. However, quantifying such polygenic effects has been challenging. In order to address these difficulties we developed a global measure of the information content of an individual's genome relative to a reference population, which may be used to assess differences in global genome structure between cases and appropriate controls. Informally this measure, which we call relative genome information (RGI), quantifies the relative "disorder" of an individual's genome. In order to test its ability to predict disease risk we used RGI to compare single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes from two independent samples of women with early-onset breast cancer with three independent sets of controls. We found that RGI was significantly elevated in both sets of breast cancer cases in comparison with all three sets of controls, with disease risk rising sharply with RGI. Furthermore, these differences are not due to associations with common variants at a small number of disease-associated loci, but rather are due to the combined associations of thousands of markers distributed throughout the genome. Our results indicate that the information content of an individual's genome may be used to measure the risk of a complex disease, and suggest that early-onset breast cancer has a strongly polygenic component.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Smyth
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Iva Špakulová
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Cotton-Barratt
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Sajjad Rafiq
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom
| | - William Tapper
- Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom
| | - Rosanna Upstill-Goddard
- Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Miroslav Kapuscinski
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jörg Fliege
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Collins
- Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom
| | - Jacek Brodzki
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom
| | - Ben D MacArthur
- Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom ; Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YA, United Kingdom ; Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 150:71-80. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3293-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/31/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
40
|
Khan S, Greco D, Michailidou K, Milne RL, Muranen TA, Heikkinen T, Aaltonen K, Dennis J, Bolla MK, Liu J, Hall P, Irwanto A, Humphreys K, Li J, Czene K, Chang-Claude J, Hein R, Rudolph A, Seibold P, Flesch-Janys D, Fletcher O, Peto J, dos Santos Silva I, Johnson N, Gibson L, Aitken Z, Hopper JL, Tsimiklis H, Bui M, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Southey MC, Apicella C, Stone J, Waisfisz Q, Meijers-Heijboer H, Adank MA, van der Luijt RB, Meindl A, Schmutzler RK, Müller-Myhsok B, Lichtner P, Turnbull C, Rahman N, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Reed MWR, Schmidt MK, Broeks A, Veer LJVAN, Hogervorst FB, Fasching PA, Schrauder MG, Ekici AB, Beckmann MW, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Flyger H, Benitez J, Zamora PM, Perez JIA, Haiman CA, Henderson BE, Schumacher F, Le Marchand L, Pharoah PDP, Dunning AM, Shah M, Luben R, Brown J, Couch FJ, Wang X, Vachon C, Olson JE, Lambrechts D, Moisse M, Paridaens R, Christiaens MR, Guénel P, Truong T, Laurent-Puig P, Mulot C, Marme F, Burwinkel B, Schneeweiss A, Sohn C, Sawyer EJ, Tomlinson I, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Andrulis IL, Knight JA, Tchatchou S, Mulligan AM, Dörk T, Bogdanova NV, Antonenkova NN, Anton-Culver H, Darabi H, Eriksson M, Garcia-Closas M, Figueroa J, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Devilee P, Tollenaar RAEM, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ, Kristensen VN, Slager S, Toland AE, Ambrosone CB, Yannoukakos D, Lindblom A, Margolin S, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Barile M, Mariani P, Hooning MJ, Martens JWM, Collée JM, Jager A, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Durda K, Giles GG, McLean C, Brauch H, Brüning T, Ko YD, Brenner H, Dieffenbach AK, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Swerdlow A, Ashworth A, Orr N, Jones M, Simard J, Goldberg MS, Labrèche F, Dumont M, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Grip M, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen JM, Mannermaa A, Hamann U, Chenevix-Trench G, Blomqvist C, Aittomäki K, Easton DF, Nevanlinna H. MicroRNA related polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. PLoS One 2014; 9:e109973. [PMID: 25390939 PMCID: PMC4229095 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic variations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in microRNAs (miRNA) or in the miRNA binding sites may affect the miRNA dependent gene expression regulation, which has been implicated in various cancers, including breast cancer, and may alter individual susceptibility to cancer. We investigated associations between miRNA related SNPs and breast cancer risk. First we evaluated 2,196 SNPs in a case-control study combining nine genome wide association studies (GWAS). Second, we further investigated 42 SNPs with suggestive evidence for association using 41,785 cases and 41,880 controls from 41 studies included in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Combining the GWAS and BCAC data within a meta-analysis, we estimated main effects on breast cancer risk as well as risks for estrogen receptor (ER) and age defined subgroups. Five miRNA binding site SNPs associated significantly with breast cancer risk: rs1045494 (odds ratio (OR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96), rs1052532 (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.99), rs10719 (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99), rs4687554 (OR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.99, and rs3134615 (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) located in the 3' UTR of CASP8, HDDC3, DROSHA, MUSTN1, and MYCL1, respectively. DROSHA belongs to miRNA machinery genes and has a central role in initial miRNA processing. The remaining genes are involved in different molecular functions, including apoptosis and gene expression regulation. Further studies are warranted to elucidate whether the miRNA binding site SNPs are the causative variants for the observed risk effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dario Greco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taru A. Muranen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomas Heikkinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsimari Aaltonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Astrid Irwanto
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jingmei Li
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Hein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- PMV Research Group at the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Flesch-Janys
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology/Clinical Cancer Registry and Institute for Medical Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julian Peto
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel dos Santos Silva
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nichola Johnson
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorna Gibson
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Aitken
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Tsimiklis
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Minh Bui
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel F. Schmidt
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carmel Apicella
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Quinten Waisfisz
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Muriel A. Adank
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob B. van der Luijt
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Division of Molecular Gyneco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Peter Lichtner
- Institute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Nazneen Rahman
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - David J. Hunter
- Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Angela Cox
- CRUK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Simon S. Cross
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Malcolm W. R. Reed
- CRUK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frans B. Hogervorst
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Cancer Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Michael G. Schrauder
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Cancer Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B. Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Cancer Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Børge G. Nordestgaard
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sune F. Nielsen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Genetics Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Valencia, Spain
| | - Pilar M. Zamora
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose I. A. Perez
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Especialidades, Hospital Monte Naranco, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Brian E. Henderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Fredrick Schumacher
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America
| | - Paul D. P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mitul Shah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Luben
- Clinical Gerontology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Brown
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Celine Vachon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Janet E. Olson
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Center (VRC), VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthieu Moisse
- Vesalius Research Center (VRC), VIB, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Paridaens
- Oncology Department, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pascal Guénel
- Inserm (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), U1018, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer, Villejuif, France
- University Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Inserm (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), U1018, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer, Villejuif, France
- University Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Claire Mulot
- Université Paris Sorbonne Cité, UMR-S775 Inserm, Paris, France
| | - Frederick Marme
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elinor J. Sawyer
- Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J. Kerin
- Clinical Science Institute, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nicola Miller
- Clinical Science Institute, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia A. Knight
- Prosserman Centre for Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandrine Tchatchou
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Hatef Darabi
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Montserrat Garcia-Closas
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Louise Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics & Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Caroline Seynaeve
- Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Molecular Biology (EpiGen), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Susan Slager
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | | | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, IRRP, National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Aghia Paraskevi Attikis, Athens, Greece
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology - Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Barile
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Mariani
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, Milan, Italy
- Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John W. M. Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Durda
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catriona McLean
- Anatomical Pathology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Brüning
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany
| | - The GENICA Network
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute for Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aida Karina Dieffenbach
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anthony Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology and Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Orr
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Jones
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques Simard
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center and Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark S. Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Labrèche
- Départements de Santé Environnementale et Santé au Travail et de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Martine Dumont
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec Research Center and Laval University, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, NordLab Oulu/Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, NordLab Oulu/Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Mervi Grip
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Vesa Kataja
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oncology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Veli-Matti Kosma
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jaana M. Hartikainen
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cunha AD, Michelin MA, Murta EFC. Pattern response of dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment and breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5:495-502. [PMID: 25114862 PMCID: PMC4127618 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant neoplasm and the cause of death by cancer among women worldwide. Its development, including malignancy grade and patient prognosis, is influenced by various mutations that occur in the tumor cell and by the immune system’s status, which has a direct influence on the tumor microenvironment and, consequently, on interactions with non-tumor cells involved in the immunological response. Among the immune response cells, dendritic cells (DCs) play a key role in the induction and maintenance of anti-tumor responses owing to their unique abilities for antigen cross-presentation and promotion of the activation of specific lymphocytes that target neoplasic cells. However, the tumor microenvironment can polarize DCs, transforming them into immunosuppressive regulatory DCs, a tolerogenic phenotype which limits the activity of effector T cells and supports tumor growth and progression. Various factors and signaling pathways have been implicated in the immunosuppressive functioning of DCs in cancer, and researchers are working on resolving processes that can circumvent tumor escape and developing viable therapeutic interventions to prevent or reverse the expression of immunosuppressive DCs in the tumor microenvironment. A better understanding of the pattern of DC response in patients with BC is fundamental to the development of specific therapeutic approaches to enable DCs to function properly. Various studies examining DCs immunotherapy have demonstrated its great potential for inducing immune responses to specific antigens and thereby reversing immunosuppression and related to clinical response in patients with BC. DC-based immunotherapy research has led to immense scientific advances, both in our understanding of the anti-tumor immune response and for the treatment of these patients.
Collapse
|
42
|
The incidence of PALB2 c.3113G>A in women with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer attending familial cancer centres in Australia. Fam Cancer 2014; 12:587-95. [PMID: 23471749 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9620-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The familial aggregation of breast cancer has been well-described with approximately 25% of breast cancers attributable to inherited mutations in currently known breast cancer susceptibility genes. PALB2 c.3113G>A (p.Trp1038*) is a protein-truncating mutation which has been associated with high estimated risk of breast cancer in Australian women (91%; 95% CI = 44-100) to age 70 years. This study screened for PALB2 c.3113G>A in germline DNA representing 871 unrelated individuals from "high-risk" breast and/or ovarian cancer families evaluated in the setting of a Familial Cancer Centre in Australia. The PALB2 c.3113G>A mutation was identified in eight of 871 probands (0.92%) from these families. Median age of diagnosis was 42 years. Five of these eight women had contra-lateral breast cancers. Available data suggests that PALB2 c.3113G>A is a rare mutation with estimated breast cancer risks similar in magnitude to that associated with BRCA2 mutations. Although the proportion of high-risk women carrying this PALB2 mutation is low, research efforts should continue in order to effect its translation into clinical genetic testing practice.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ahsan H, Halpern J, Kibriya MG, Pierce BL, Tong L, Gamazon E, McGuire V, Felberg A, Shi J, Jasmine F, Roy S, Brutus R, Argos M, Melkonian S, Chang-Claude J, Andrulis I, Hopper JL, John EM, Malone K, Ursin G, Gammon MD, Thomas DC, Seminara D, Casey G, Knight JA, Southey MC, Giles GG, Santella RM, Lee E, Conti D, Duggan D, Gallinger S, Haile R, Jenkins M, Lindor NM, Newcomb P, Michailidou K, Apicella C, Park DJ, Peto J, Fletcher O, Silva IDS, Lathrop M, Hunter DJ, Chanock SJ, Meindl A, Schmutzler RK, Müller-Myhsok B, Lochmann M, Beckmann L, Hein R, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Bui QM, Stone J, Flesch-Janys D, Dahmen N, Nevanlinna H, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Hall P, Czene K, Irwanto A, Liu J, Rahman N, Turnbull C, Dunning AM, Pharoah P, Waisfisz Q, Meijers-Heijboer H, Uitterlinden AG, Rivadeneira F, Nicolae D, Easton DF, Cox NJ, Whittemore AS. A genome-wide association study of early-onset breast cancer identifies PFKM as a novel breast cancer gene and supports a common genetic spectrum for breast cancer at any age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23:658-69. [PMID: 24493630 PMCID: PMC3990360 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) causes substantial loss of life and productivity, creating a major burden among women worldwide. We analyzed 1,265,548 Hapmap3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) among a discovery set of 3,523 EOBC incident cases and 2,702 population control women ages ≤ 51 years. The SNPs with smallest P values were examined in a replication set of 3,470 EOBC cases and 5,475 control women. We also tested EOBC association with 19,684 genes by annotating each gene with putative functional SNPs, and then combining their P values to obtain a gene-based P value. We examined the gene with smallest P value for replication in 1,145 breast cancer cases and 1,142 control women. The combined discovery and replication sets identified 72 new SNPs associated with EOBC (P < 4 × 10(-8)) located in six genomic regions previously reported to contain SNPs associated largely with later-onset breast cancer (LOBC). SNP rs2229882 and 10 other SNPs on chromosome 5q11.2 remained associated (P < 6 × 10(-4)) after adjustment for the strongest published SNPs in the region. Thirty-two of the 82 currently known LOBC SNPs were associated with EOBC (P < 0.05). Low power is likely responsible for the remaining 50 unassociated known LOBC SNPs. The gene-based analysis identified an association between breast cancer and the phosphofructokinase-muscle (PFKM) gene on chromosome 12q13.11 that met the genome-wide gene-based threshold of 2.5 × 10(-6). In conclusion, EOBC and LOBC seem to have similar genetic etiologies; the 5q11.2 region may contain multiple distinct breast cancer loci; and the PFKM gene region is worthy of further investigation. These findings should enhance our understanding of the etiology of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Habibul Ahsan
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, IL
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Jerry Halpern
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
| | - Muhammad G Kibriya
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Brandon L Pierce
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Lin Tong
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Eric Gamazon
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
| | - Anna Felberg
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
| | - Jianxin Shi
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, MD
| | - Farzana Jasmine
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Shantanu Roy
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Rachelle Brutus
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Maria Argos
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Stephanie Melkonian
- Center for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Departments of Health Studies, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Irene Andrulis
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto Ontario
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Esther M. John
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA and Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Kathi Malone
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Marilie D Gammon
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Duncan C Thomas
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA
| | - Daniela Seminara
- Epidemiology and Genetics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, MD
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA
| | - Julia A Knight
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto Ontario
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Regina M Santella
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
| | - Eunjung Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA
| | - David Conti
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA
| | - David Duggan
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Steve Gallinger
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Haile
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, CA
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Polly Newcomb
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carmel Apicella
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel J Park
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julian Peto
- Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Isabel dos Santos Silva
- Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mark Lathrop
- Centre National de Genotypage, Evry, France
- Fondation Jean Dausset – CEPH, Paris, France
| | - David J Hunter
- Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division for Gynaecological Tumor-Genetics, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Molecular Gynaeco-Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Magdalena Lochmann
- Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division for Gynaecological Tumor-Genetics, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Lars Beckmann
- Foundation for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care IQWIG, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rebecca Hein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- PMV Research Group at the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Quang Minh Bui
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dieter Flesch-Janys
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology/Clinical Cancer Registry, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute for Medical Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Dahmen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Per Hall
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17177, Sweden
| | - Astrid Irwanto
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Nazneen Rahman
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Quinten Waisfisz
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, section Oncogenetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, section Oncogenetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre G. Uitterlinden
- Department of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dan Nicolae
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nancy J Cox
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, IL
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, IL
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, IL
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ahmadinejad N, Movahedinia S, Movahedinia S, Shahriari M. Association of mammographic density with pathologic findings. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL 2013; 15:e16698. [PMID: 24693404 PMCID: PMC3955519 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.16698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2013] [Revised: 06/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/27/2013] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and is the first cause of death due to cancer among women. Mammography is the best screening method and mammographic density, which determines the percentage of fibro glandular tissue of breast, is one of the strongest risk factors of breast cancer. Because benign and malignant lesions may present as dense lesions in mammography so it is necessary to take a core biopsy of any suspicious lesions to evaluate pathologic findings. Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the association between mammographic density and histopathological findings in Iranian population. Moreover, we assessed the correlation between mammographic density and protein expression profile. We indeed, determined the accuracy and positive predictive value and negative predictive value of mammographic reports in our center. Patients and Method This study is a cross-sectional study carried out among 131 eligible women who had referred to imaging center for mammographic examination and had been advised to take biopsy of breast tissue. All participants of the study had filled out the informed consent. Pathologic review was performed blinded to the density status. Patients were divided into low density breast tissue group (ACR density group 1-2) and high density breast tissue group (ACR 3, 4) and data was compared between these two groups. Statistical analysis performed using SPSS for windows, version 11.5. We used chi-square, t-test, and logistic regression test for analysis and Odds Ratio calculated where indicated. Results In patients with high breast densities, malignant cases (61.2%) were significantly more in comparison to patients with low breast densities (37.3%) (P= 0.007, OR=2.66 95% CI=1.29-5.49). After adjusting for age, density was associated with malignancy in age groups <46 years (P=0.007), and 46-60 years (P=0.024) but not in age group >60yrs (P=0.559). Adjusting for menopausal status, density showed association with malignancy in both pre-menopause (P=0.041) and menopause (P=0.010) patients. Using logistic regression test, only age and density showed independent association with risk of breast cancer. No association was found between density and protein profile expression. Mammographic method has a false negative percent of 10.3% for negative BI-RADS group and a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 69.6% for positive BI-RADS group. PPVs for BI-RADS 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 were 16%, 87.5%, 84.6%, and 91.5% respectively. NPVs for BI-RADS 1, 2 and 3 were 66.7%, 95.8% and 90.0% respectively. Conclusions In this study we found that increasing in mammographic density is associated with an increase in malignant pathology reports. Expression of ER, PR and HER-2 receptors didn't show association with density. Our mammographic reports had a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 55.6%, which shows that our mammography is an acceptable method for screening breast cancer in this center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasrin Ahmadinejad
- Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Samaneh Movahedinia
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Sajjadeh Movahedinia
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
- Corresponding Author: Sajjadeh Movahedinia, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2166581577, E-mail:
| | - Mona Shahriari
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, IR Iran
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nguyen TL, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Dite GS, Stone J, Apicella C, Bui M, Macinnis RJ, Odefrey F, Cawson JN, Treloar SA, Southey MC, Giles GG, Hopper JL. Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:2395-403. [PMID: 24130221 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammographic density, the area of the mammographic image that appears white or bright, predicts breast cancer risk. We estimated the proportions of variance explained by questionnaire-measured breast cancer risk factors and by unmeasured residual familial factors. METHODS For 544 MZ and 339 DZ twin pairs and 1,558 non-twin sisters from 1,564 families, mammographic density was measured using the computer-assisted method Cumulus. We estimated associations using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression and studied familial aspects using a multivariate normal model. RESULTS The proportions of variance explained by age, body mass index (BMI), and other risk factors, respectively, were 4%, 1%, and 4% for dense area; 7%, 14%, and 4% for percent dense area; and 7%, 40%, and 1% for nondense area. Associations with dense area and percent dense area were in opposite directions than for nondense area. After adjusting for measured factors, the correlations of dense area with percent dense area and nondense area were 0.84 and -0.46, respectively. The MZ, DZ, and sister pair correlations were 0.59, 0.28, and 0.29 for dense area; 0.57, 0.30, and 0.28 for percent dense area; and 0.56, 0.27, and 0.28 for nondense area (SE = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Under the classic twin model, 50% to 60% (SE = 5%) of the variance of mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk are due to undiscovered genetic factors, and the remainder to as yet unknown individual-specific, nongenetic factors. IMPACT Much remains to be learnt about the genetic and environmental determinants of mammographic density.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuong L Nguyen
- Authors' Affiliations: Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne; Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton; Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville; Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy; and The University of Queensland, Centre for Military and Veterans' Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Joshi NN, Bhat S, Hake S, Kale M, Kannan S. Opposing effects of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms on the risk for breast cancer in western Indian women: a pilot study. Int J Immunogenet 2013; 41:242-9. [PMID: 24164868 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Revised: 08/16/2013] [Accepted: 09/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
In an earlier study, the genotypes associated with higher level of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) were found to reduce the risk for breast cancer in western Indian women. This observation implied that gene polymorphisms affecting the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines may influence the risk for breast cancer in this population. Hence, we performed genotyping for three more functional single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) responsible for variations in the levels of cytokines associated with inflammation. To that effect, polymorphisms in genes coding for IL-4 (IL-4 C-590T; rs2243250), IFN-γ (IFN-G A + 874T; rs2430561) and MCP-1 (MCP-1 A-2578G; rs1024611) were examined in premenopausal, healthy women (N = 239) and patients with breast cancer (N = 182) from western India. In carriers of the IL-4*590T allele, a reduced risk for the disease (dominant model; OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-0.98) was seen similar to that seen in TGF-B1*10C carriers. An opposite trend was observed with respect to the alleles associated with higher expression of MCP-1 or IFN-γ. In individuals positive for three or more alleles associated with higher levels of either pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines, an additive effect on the modulation of risk for the disease was evident (for TGF-B1 & IL-4, OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.87; for IFN-G & MCP-1, OR = 2.29, 95% CI 0.95-5.51). In the context of contrasting observations in other populations, these results indicate a significant contribution of anti-inflammatory genotypes in the modulation of risk for breast cancer in western Indian women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N N Joshi
- Cancer Research Institute, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prospective validation of the breast cancer risk prediction model BOADICEA and a batch-mode version BOADICEACentre. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:1296-301. [PMID: 23942072 PMCID: PMC3778274 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2013] [Revised: 06/11/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) is a risk prediction algorithm that can be used to compute estimates of age-specific risk of breast cancer. It is uncertain whether BOADICEA performs adequately for populations outside the United Kingdom. Methods: Using a batch mode version of BOADICEA that we developed (BOADICEACentre), we calculated the cumulative 10-year invasive breast cancer risk for 4176 Australian women of European ancestry unaffected at baseline from 1601 case and control families in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Based on 115 incident breast cancers, we investigated calibration, discrimination (using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves) and accuracy at the individual level. Results: The ratio of expected to observed number of breast cancers was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.10). The E/O ratios by subgroups of the participant's relationship to the index case and by the reported number of affected relatives ranged between 0.83 and 0.98 and all 95% CIs included 1.00. The area under the ROC curve was 0.70 (95% CI 0.66–0.75) and there was no evidence of systematic under- or over-dispersion (P=0.2). Conclusion: BOADICEA is well calibrated for Australian women, and had good discrimination and accuracy at the individual level.
Collapse
|
48
|
Haanpää M, Pylkäs K, Moilanen JS, Winqvist R. Evaluation of the need for routine clinical testing of PALB2 c.1592delT mutation in BRCA negative Northern Finnish breast cancer families. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2013; 14:82. [PMID: 23941127 PMCID: PMC3751431 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-14-82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes among high-risk breast cancer patients has become a routine practice among clinical geneticists. Unfortunately, however, the genetic background of a majority of the cases coming to the clinics remains currently unexplained, making genetic counseling rather challenging. In recent years it has become evident world-wide that also women carrying a heterozygous germline mutation in PALB2 are at significantly increased risk of getting breast cancer. We have previously studied the clinical as well as biological impact of the PALB2 c.1592delT founder mutation occurring in about 1% of Finnish breast cancer patients unselected for their family history of disease, and our results demonstrated a 40% increased breast cancer risk by age 70 for female mutation carriers. Thus, this relatively common mutation in PALB2 is associated with a high risk of developing breast cancer. The aim of the current study was to analyze whether female index individuals of breast cancer families who had tested negative for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 as part of genetic counseling services should be offered mutation testing for PALB2 c.1592delT. Methods The study cohort consisted of altogether 223 individuals who had contacted the Department of Clinical Genetics at the Oulu University Hospital in Finland between the years 1997 and 2011 for counseling on hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer risk. 101 of them met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 persons were now deceased, but 6 of them had participated in one of our previous studies on PALB2. Seventy (77%) of the remaining 91 persons responded positively to our study invitation. Chart review of updated pedigree data led to the exclusion of 14 further individuals not meeting the selection criteria. Result Of the 56 alive affected female individuals screened for PALB2 c.1592delT, altogether two (3.6%) tested positive for this mutation. In addition, of the previously tested but now deceased 6 persons eligible for the current study, one more mutation carrier was observed. Therefore, overall 4.8% (3/62) of the tested individuals belonging to the Northern Finnish 1997–2011 study cohort turned out to be carriers of the PALB2 c.1592delT allele. Conclusions Given the potential benefits versus harms of this testing, the result of our study suggest that PALB2 c.1592delT should be a routine part of the genetic counseling protocol for Finnish high-risk breast cancer cases tested negative for mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Haanpää
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biocenter Oulu, Institute of Diagnostics, University of Oulu, P,O, Box 5000, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cook LS, Nelson HE, Stidley CA, Dong Y, Round PJ, Amankwah EK, Magliocco AM, Friedenreich CM. Endometrial cancer and a family history of cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:334-9. [PMID: 23632205 PMCID: PMC4052607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2012] [Revised: 04/04/2013] [Accepted: 04/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lynch Syndrome (LS), an inherited genetic syndrome, predisposes to cancers such as colorectal and endometrial. However, the risk for endometrial cancer (EC) in women not affected by LS, but with a family history of cancer, is currently unknown. We examined the association between a family history of cancer and the risk for EC in non-LS patients. METHODS This population-based case-control study included 519 EC cases and 1015 age-matched controls and took place in Alberta, Canada between 2002 and 2006. Information about risk factors, including family history of cancer in first and second degree relatives, was ascertained via in-person interviews. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status of tumor tissue was assessed to determine involvement of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. RESULTS A first or second degree family history of uterine cancer was modestly associated with the risk for overall EC [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9, 1.9], and the risks were similar for MSI+cancer (OR=1.5, 95%CI=0.7, 3.3) and MSI- cancer (OR=1.3, 95%CI=0.8, 2.4). Although consistent, these associations were modest and not significant. In contrast, the risk for MSI+cancer was elevated with a reported family history of colorectal cancer (OR=1.4, 95%CI=1.0, 2.2), but not for MSI- cancer. CONCLUSIONS A family history of uterine cancer may be modestly associated with EC risk in non-LS patients regardless of MSI status, suggesting that risk was not related to inherited defects in the MMR gene pathway. These results provide preliminary support for an EC-specific genetic syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda S Cook
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, NM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, MSC 10 5550, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tumour morphology predicts PALB2 germline mutation status. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:154-63. [PMID: 23787919 PMCID: PMC3708559 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2013] [Revised: 05/03/2013] [Accepted: 05/21/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Population-based studies of breast cancer have estimated that at least some PALB2 mutations are associated with high breast cancer risk. For women carrying PALB2 mutations, knowing their carrier status could be useful in directing them towards effective cancer risk management and therapeutic strategies. We sought to determine whether morphological features of breast tumours can predict PALB2 germline mutation status. Methods: Systematic pathology review was conducted on breast tumours from 28 female carriers of PALB2 mutations (non-carriers of other known high-risk mutations, recruited through various resources with varying ascertainment) and on breast tumours from a population-based sample of 828 Australian women diagnosed before the age of 60 years (which included 40 BRCA1 and 18 BRCA2 mutation carriers). Tumour morphological features of the 28 PALB2 mutation carriers were compared with those of 770 women without high-risk mutations. Results: Tumours arising in PALB2 mutation carriers were associated with minimal sclerosis (odds ratio (OR)=19.7; 95% confidence interval (CI)=6.0–64.6; P=5 × 10−7). Minimal sclerosis was also a feature that distinguished PALB2 mutation carriers from BRCA1 (P=0.05) and BRCA2 (P=0.04) mutation carriers. Conclusion: This study identified minimal sclerosis to be a predictor of germline PALB2 mutation status. Morphological review can therefore facilitate the identification of women most likely to carry mutations in PALB2.
Collapse
|