Structure, function and expression of a murine homeobox protein AREC3, a homologue of Drosophila sine oculis gene product, and implication in development

Knockdown of SIX4 inhibits pancreatic cancer cells via apoptosis induction

Sine oculis homeobox 4 (SIX4), a critical transcription factor modulating organ development, potentially participates in tumorigenesis through numerous pathways. Here, we investigated siRNA-mediated knockdown effects of SIX4 on pancreatic cancer cells and underlying molecular mechanisms. The expression of SIX4 in pancreatic cancer and adjacent tissues were investigated in clinical tissue samples and bioinformatically approved by gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. Appropriate siRNA transfected into PANC1 pancreatic cancer cells in order to SIX4 knockdown. The survival, migration, invasion, colony formation, mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis, autophagy, and cell cycle in the cancer cells were investigated after knockdown of SIX4. In addition, expression of genes involved in apoptosis and metastasis were assessed in the transfected cancer cells in mRNA and protein levels. High-throughput analysis using GEO database confirmed the overexpression of SIX4 in pancreatic cancer tissues by six independent pancreatic cancer microarrays. Knockdown of SIX4 by specific siRNA significantly decreased survival, colony formation, and mitochondrial membrane potential of the cancer cells. Further assessments demonstrated that knockdown of SIX4 increases the apoptosis and autophagy rates in the cancer cells through modifying the expression of related genes. Moreover, a significant decrease in migration and invasion rates were observed in SIX4 suppressed group. Furthermore, frequency of the cells transfected with SIX4 siRNA increased slightly in G1 and Sub-G1 phases of cell cycle. Our study suggested that siRNA-mediated knockdown of SIX4 increases the pancreatic cancer cells death and reduces the invasion and migration of the cancer cells through different molecular pathways.

Retinal determination gene networks: from biological functions to therapeutic strategies

The retinal determinant gene network (RDGN), originally discovered as a critical determinator in Drosophila eye specification, has become an important regulatory network in tumorigenesis and progression, as well as organogenesis. This network is not only associated with malignant biological behaviors of tumors, such as proliferation, and invasion, but also regulates the development of multiple mammalian organs. Three members of this conservative network have been extensively investigated, including DACH, SIX, and EYA. Dysregulated RDGN signaling is associated with the initiation and progression of tumors. In recent years, it has been found that the members of this network can be used as prognostic markers for cancer patients. Moreover, they are considered to be potential therapeutic targets for cancer. Here, we summarize the research progress of RDGN members from biological functions to signaling transduction, especially emphasizing their effects on tumors. Additionally, we discuss the roles of RDGN members in the development of organs and tissue as well as their correlations with the pathogenesis of chronic kidney disease and coronary heart disease. By summarizing the roles of RDGN members in human diseases, we hope to promote future investigations into RDGN and provide potential therapeutic strategies for patients.

Six1 and Six2 of the Sine Oculis Homeobox Subfamily are Not Functionally Interchangeable in Mouse Nephron Formation

The vertebrate Six1 and Six2 arose by gene duplication from the Drosophila sine oculis and have since diverged in their developmental expression patterns. Both genes are expressed in nephron progenitors of human fetal kidneys, and mutations in SIX1 or SIX2 cause branchio-oto-renal syndrome or renal hypodysplasia respectively. Since ∼80% of SIX1 target sites are shared by SIX2, it is speculated that SIX1 and SIX2 may be functionally interchangeable by targeting common downstream genes. In contrast, in mouse kidneys, Six1 expression in the metanephric mesenchyme lineage overlaps with Six2 only transiently, while Six2 expression is maintained in the nephron progenitors throughout development. This non-overlapping expression between Six1 and Six2 in mouse nephron progenitors promoted us to examine if Six1 can replace Six2. Surprisingly, forced expression of Six1 failed to rescue Six2-deficient kidney phenotype. We found that Six1 mediated Eya1 nuclear translocation and inhibited premature epithelialization of the progenitors but failed to rescue the proliferation defects and cell death caused by Six2-knockout. Genome-wide binding analyses showed that Six1 selectively occupied a small subset of Six2 target sites, but many Six2-bound loci crucial to the renewal and differentiation of nephron progenitors lacked Six1 occupancy. Altogether, these data indicate that Six1 cannot substitute Six2 to drive nephrogenesis in mouse kidneys, thus demonstrating that the difference in physiological roles of Six1 and Six2 in kidney development stems from both transcriptional regulations of the genes and divergent biochemical properties of the proteins.

Myogenesis control by SIX transcriptional complexes

SIX homeoproteins were first described in Drosophila, where they participate in the Pax-Six-Eya-Dach (PSED) network with eyeless, eyes absent and dachsund to drive synergistically eye development through genetic and biochemical interactions. The role of the PSED network and SIX proteins in muscle formation in vertebrates was subsequently identified. Evolutionary conserved interactions with EYA and DACH proteins underlie the activity of SIX transcriptional complexes (STC) both during embryogenesis and in adult myofibers. Six genes are expressed throughout muscle development, in embryonic and adult proliferating myogenic stem cells and in fetal and adult post-mitotic myofibers, where SIX proteins regulate the expression of various categories of genes. In vivo, SIX proteins control many steps of muscle development, acting through feedforward mechanisms: in the embryo for myogenic fate acquisition through the direct control of Myogenic Regulatory Factors; in adult myofibers for their contraction/relaxation and fatigability properties through the control of genes involved in metabolism, sarcomeric organization and calcium homeostasis. Furthermore, during development and in the adult, SIX homeoproteins participate in the genesis and the maintenance of myofibers diversity.

Mice doubly deficient in Six4 and Six5 show ventral body wall defects reproducing human omphalocele

Omphalocele is a human congenital anomaly in ventral body wall closure and may be caused by impaired formation of the primary abdominal wall (PAW) and/or defects in abdominal muscle development. Here, we report that mice doubly deficient in homeobox genes Six4 and Six5 showed the same ventral body wall closure defects as those seen in human omphalocele. SIX4 and SIX5 were localized in surface ectodermal cells and somatic mesoderm-derived mesenchymal and coelomic epithelial cells (CECs) in the PAW. Six4^-/-;Six5^-/- fetuses exhibited a large omphalocele with protrusion of both the liver and intestine, or a small omphalocele with protrusion of the intestine, with complete penetrance. The umbilical ring of Six4^-/-;Six5^-/- embryos was shifted anteriorly and its lateral size was larger than that of normal embryos at the E11.5 stage, before the onset of myoblast migration into the PAW. The proliferation rates of surface ectodermal cells in the left and right PAW and somatic mesoderm-derived cells in the right PAW were lower in Six4^-/-;Six5^-/- embryos than those of wild-type embryos at E10.5. The transition from CECs of the PAW to rounded mesothelial progenitor cells was impaired and the inner coelomic surface of the PAW was relatively smooth in Six4^-/-;Six5^-/- embryos at E11.25. Furthermore, Six4 overexpression in CECs of the PAW promoted ingression of CECs. Taken together, our results suggest that Six4 and Six5 are required for growth and morphological change of the PAW, and the impairment of these processes is linked to the abnormal positioning and expansion of the umbilical ring, which results in omphalocele.

SIX4 promotes metastasis via activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway in colorectal cancer

Background

Several studies report aberrant expression of sine oculis homeobox (SIX) homolog family members during cancer development and progression. SIX4 participates in organ development, such as myogenesis and neurogenesis. However, the expression and clinical implication of SIX4 in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear.

Methods

The SIX4 expression levels in colorectal patients were assessed in nine different human cancer arrays and compared using patient survival data. SIX4 expression was silenced in two cell culture lines for invasion and wound healing assessment. Finally, bioinformatics assessments ascertained the pathways impacted by SIX4.

Results

SIX4 was upregulated in The Cancer Genome Atlas CRC cohort and other gene expression omnibus (GEO) cohorts. In addition, SIX4 expression significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis and advanced Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stages. Moreover, SIX4 overexpression was related to unfavorable prognosis in CRC patients. Silencing SIX4 inhibited CRC cell metastasis by surpressing AKT phosphorylation.

Discussion

SIX4 is upregulated in CRC and can be used as a prognosis biomarker.

Genome-wide association between Six4, MyoD, and the histone demethylase Utx during myogenesis

Adult skeletal muscles can regenerate after injury, due to the presence of satellite cells, a quiescent population of myogenic progenitor cells. Once activated, satellite cells repair the muscle damage by undergoing myogenic differentiation. The myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) coordinate the process of progenitor differentiation in cooperation with other families of transcription factors (TFs). The Six1 and Six4 homeodomain TFs are expressed in developing and adult muscle and Six1 is critical for embryonic and adult myogenesis. However, the lack of a muscle developmental phenotype in Six4-null mice, which has been attributed to compensation by other Six family members, has discouraged further assessment of the role of Six4 during adult muscle regeneration. By employing genome-wide approaches to address the function of Six4 during adult skeletal myogenesis, we have identified a core set of muscle genes coordinately regulated in adult muscle precursors by Six4 and the MRF MyoD. Throughout the genome of differentiating adult myoblasts, the cooperation between Six4 and MyoD is associated with chromatin repressive mark removal by Utx, a demethylase of histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 27. Among the genes coordinately regulated by Six4 and MyoD are several genes critical for proper in vivo muscle regeneration, implicating a role of Six4 in this process. Using in vivo RNA interference of Six4, we expose an uncompensated function of this TF during muscle regeneration. Together, our results reveal a role for Six4 during adult muscle regeneration and suggest a widespread mechanism of cooperation between Six4 and MyoD.

The SIX1-EYA transcriptional complex as a therapeutic target in cancer

INTRODUCTION

The SIX homeodomain proteins and the eyes absent (EYA) family of co-activators form a bipartite transcription factor complex that promotes the proliferation and survival of progenitor cells during organogenesis and is down-regulated in most adult tissues. Abnormal over-expression of SIX1 and EYA in adult tissue is associated with the initiation and progression of diverse tumor types. Importantly, SIX1 and EYA are often co-overexpressed in tumors, and the SIX1-EYA2 interaction has been shown to be critical for metastasis in a breast cancer model. The EYA proteins also contain protein tyrosine phosphatase activity, which plays an important role in breast cancer growth and metastasis as well as directing cells to the repair pathway upon DNA damage.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a summary of the SIX1/EYA complex as it relates to development and disease and the current efforts to therapeutically target this complex.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, there have been an increasing number of studies suggesting that targeting the SIX1/EYA transcriptional complex will potently inhibit tumor progression. Although current attempts to develop inhibitors targeting this complex are still in the early stages, continued efforts toward developing better compounds may ultimately result in effective anti-cancer therapies.

Transcriptional regulation of cranial sensory placode development

Cranial sensory placodes derive from discrete patches of the head ectoderm and give rise to numerous sensory structures. During gastrulation, a specialized "neural border zone" forms around the neural plate in response to interactions between the neural and nonneural ectoderm and signals from adjacent mesodermal and/or endodermal tissues. This zone subsequently gives rise to two distinct precursor populations of the peripheral nervous system: the neural crest and the preplacodal ectoderm (PPE). The PPE is a common field from which all cranial sensory placodes arise (adenohypophyseal, olfactory, lens, trigeminal, epibranchial, otic). Members of the Six family of transcription factors are major regulators of PPE specification, in partnership with cofactor proteins such as Eya. Six gene activity also maintains tissue boundaries between the PPE, neural crest, and epidermis by repressing genes that specify the fates of those adjacent ectodermally derived domains. As the embryo acquires anterior-posterior identity, the PPE becomes transcriptionally regionalized, and it subsequently becomes subdivided into specific placodes with distinct developmental fates in response to signaling from adjacent tissues. Each placode is characterized by a unique transcriptional program that leads to the differentiation of highly specialized cells, such as neurosecretory cells, sensory receptor cells, chemosensory neurons, peripheral glia, and supporting cells. In this review, we summarize the transcriptional and signaling factors that regulate key steps of placode development, influence subsequent sensory neuron specification, and discuss what is known about mutations in some of the essential PPE genes that underlie human congenital syndromes.

Microarray identification of novel genes downstream of Six1, a critical factor in cranial placode, somite, and kidney development

BACKGROUND

Six1 plays an important role in the development of several vertebrate organs, including cranial sensory placodes, somites, and kidney. Although Six1 mutations cause one form of branchio-otic syndrome (BOS), the responsible gene in many patients has not been identified; genes that act downstream of Six1 are potential BOS candidates.

RESULTS

We sought to identify novel genes expressed during placode, somite and kidney development by comparing gene expression between control and Six1-expressing ectodermal explants. The expression patterns of 19 of the significantly up-regulated and 11 of the significantly down-regulated genes were assayed from cleavage to larval stages. A total of 28/30 genes are expressed in the otocyst, a structure that is functionally disrupted in BOS, and 26/30 genes are expressed in the nephric mesoderm, a structure that is functionally disrupted in the related branchio-otic-renal (BOR) syndrome. We also identified the chick homologues of five genes and show that they have conserved expression patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the 30 genes selected for expression analyses, all are expressed at many of the developmental times and appropriate tissues to be regulated by Six1. Many have the potential to play a role in the disruption of hearing and kidney function seen in BOS/BOR patients.

The role of Six1 in the genesis of muscle cell and skeletal muscle development

The sine oculis homeobox 1 (Six1) gene encodes an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor. In the past two decades, much research has indicated that Six1 is a powerful regulator participating in skeletal muscle development. In this review, we summarized the discovery and structural characteristics of Six1 gene, and discussed the functional roles and molecular mechanisms of Six1 in myogenesis and in the formation of skeletal muscle fibers. Finally, we proposed areas of future interest for understanding Six1 gene function.

Nonhuman genetics. Genomic basis for the convergent evolution of electric organs

Little is known about the genetic basis of convergent traits that originate repeatedly over broad taxonomic scales. The myogenic electric organ has evolved six times in fishes to produce electric fields used in communication, navigation, predation, or defense. We have examined the genomic basis of the convergent anatomical and physiological origins of these organs by assembling the genome of the electric eel (Electrophorus electricus) and sequencing electric organ and skeletal muscle transcriptomes from three lineages that have independently evolved electric organs. Our results indicate that, despite millions of years of evolution and large differences in the morphology of electric organ cells, independent lineages have leveraged similar transcription factors and developmental and cellular pathways in the evolution of electric organs.

The EYA-SO/SIX complex in development and disease

Eyes absent (EYA) and Sine oculis (SO/SIX) proteins function as transcriptional activation complexes and play essential roles in organogenesis during embryonic development in regulating cell proliferation and survival and coordination of particular differentiation programs. Mutations of the Eya and So/Six genes cause profound developmental defects in organisms as diverse as flies, frogs, fish, mice, and humans. EYA proteins also possess an intrinsic phosphatase activity, which is essential for normal development. Here, we review crucial roles of EYA and SO/SIX in development and disease in mice and humans.

Six homeoproteins directly activate Myod expression in the gene regulatory networks that control early myogenesis

In mammals, several genetic pathways have been characterized that govern engagement of multipotent embryonic progenitors into the myogenic program through the control of the key myogenic regulatory gene Myod. Here we demonstrate the involvement of Six homeoproteins. We first targeted into a Pax3 allele a sequence encoding a negative form of Six4 that binds DNA but cannot interact with essential Eya co-factors. The resulting embryos present hypoplasic skeletal muscles and impaired Myod activation in the trunk in the absence of Myf5/Mrf4. At the axial level, we further show that Myod is still expressed in compound Six1/Six4:Pax3 but not in Six1/Six4:Myf5 triple mutant embryos, demonstrating that Six1/4 participates in the Pax3-Myod genetic pathway. Myod expression and head myogenesis is preserved in Six1/Six4:Myf5 triple mutant embryos, illustrating that upstream regulators of Myod in different embryonic territories are distinct. We show that Myod regulatory regions are directly controlled by Six proteins and that, in the absence of Six1 and Six4, Six2 can compensate.

The onset of skeletal muscle formation is controlled by complex gene regulatory networks. By manipulation of these genetic pathways in the mouse embryo, we have examined the interplay between genes encoding the transcriptional regulator Pax3; the major myogenic determination proteins Myf5, Mrf4, and Myod; as well as genes encoding homeodomain proteins Six1 and Six4. In the absence of Myf5 and Six1/4, Myod expression is compromised. We demonstrate that key regulatory elements of the Myod gene are directly targeted by Six factors, including Six2, which is unexpectedly upregulated in the absence of Six1 and Six4. This work therefore reveals new aspects of the gene regulatory networks that control myogenesis.

Structure-function analyses of the human SIX1-EYA2 complex reveal insights into metastasis and BOR syndrome

SIX1 interacts with EYA to form a bipartite transcription factor essential for development. Loss of function of this complex causes branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR), while re-expression of SIX1 or EYA promotes metastasis. Here we describe the 2.0 Å structure of SIX1 bound to EYA2, which suggests a novel DNA binding mechanism for SIX1 and provides a rationale for the effect of BOR syndrome mutations. The structure also reveals that SIX1 uses predominantly a single helix to interact with EYA. Substitution of a single amino acid in this helix is sufficient to disrupt the SIX1–EYA interaction, SIX1-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in mouse models. Given that SIX1 and EYA are co-overexpressed in many tumor types, our data indicate that targeting the SIX1–EYA complex may be a potent approach to inhibit tumor progression in multiple cancer types.

EYA1-SIX1 complex in neurosensory cell fate induction in the mammalian inner ear

The phosphatase-transactivator EYA1 interacts with the homeodomain protein SIX1 to form transcriptional activation complexes, which play essential roles in regulating cell proliferation, survival and induction of sensory and neuronal differentiation programs during inner ear development. Mutations of the Eya1 and Six1 genes cause profound developmental auditory defects in mice and humans. The molecular mechanisms and developmental processes controlled by the EYA1 and SIX1 complex in inner ear development and neurosensory fate induction are the focus of this review.

The Eyes Absent proteins in development and disease

The Eyes Absent (EYA) proteins, first described in the context of fly eye development, are now implicated in processes as disparate as organ development, innate immunity, DNA damage repair, photoperiodism, angiogenesis, and cancer metastasis. These functions are associated with an unusual combination of biochemical activities: tyrosine phosphatase and threonine phosphatase activities in separate domains, and transactivation potential when associated with a DNA-binding partner. EYA mutations are linked to multiorgan developmental disorders, as well as to adult diseases ranging from dilated cardiomyopathy to late-onset sensorineural hearing loss. With the growing understanding of EYA biochemical and cellular activity, biological function, and association with disease, comes the possibility that the EYA proteins are amenable to the design of targeted therapeutics. The availability of structural information, direct links to disease states, available animal models, and the fact that they utilize unconventional reaction mechanisms that could allow specificity, suggest that EYAs are well-positioned for drug discovery efforts. This review provides a summary of EYA structure, activity, and function, as they relate to development and disease, with particular emphasis on recent findings.

Regulation of Six1 expression by evolutionarily conserved enhancers in tetrapods

The Six1 homeobox gene plays critical roles in vertebrate organogenesis. Mice deficient for Six1 show severe defects in organs such as skeletal muscle, kidney, thymus, sensory organs and ganglia derived from cranial placodes, and mutations in human SIX1 cause branchio-oto-renal syndrome, an autosomal dominant developmental disorder characterized by hearing loss and branchial defects. The present study was designed to identify enhancers responsible for the dynamic expression pattern of Six1 during mouse embryogenesis. The results showed distinct enhancer activities of seven conserved non-coding sequences (CNSs) retained in tetrapod Six1 loci. The activities were detected in all cranial placodes (excluding the lens placode), dorsal root ganglia, somites, nephrogenic cord, notochord and cranial mesoderm. The major Six1-expression domains during development were covered by the sum of activities of these enhancers, together with the previously identified enhancer for the pre-placodal region and foregut endoderm. Thus, the eight CNSs identified in a series of our study represent major evolutionarily conserved enhancers responsible for the expression of Six1 in tetrapods. The results also confirmed that chick electroporation is a robust means to decipher regulatory information stored in vertebrate genomes. Mutational analysis of the most conserved placode-specific enhancer, Six1-21, indicated that the enhancer integrates a variety of inputs from Sox, Pax, Fox, Six, Wnt/Lef1 and basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Positive autoregulation of Six1 is achieved through the regulation of Six protein-binding sites. The identified Six1 enhancers provide valuable tools to understand the mechanism of Six1 regulation and to manipulate gene expression in the developing embryo, particularly in the sensory organs.

Transcription factors involved in lens development from the preplacodal ectoderm

Lens development is a stepwise process accompanied by the sequential activation of transcription factors. Transcription factor genes can be classified into three groups according to their functions: the first group comprises preplacodal genes, which are implicated in the formation of the preplacodal ectoderm that serves as a common primordium for cranial sensory tissues, including the lens. The second group comprises lens-specification genes, which establish the lens-field within the preplacodal ectoderm. The third group comprises lens-differentiation genes, which promote lens morphogenesis after the optic vesicle makes contact with the presumptive lens ectoderm. Analyses of the regulatory interactions between these genes have provided an overview of lens development, highlighting crucial roles for positive cross-regulation in fate specification and for feed-forward regulation in the execution of terminal differentiation. This overview also sheds light upon the mechanisms of how preplacodal gene activities lead to the activation of genes involved in lens-specification.

Developmental expression patterns of candidate cofactors for vertebrate six family transcription factors

Six family transcription factors play important roles in craniofacial development. Their transcriptional activity can be modified by cofactor proteins. Two Six genes and one cofactor gene (Eya1) are involved in the human Branchio-otic (BO) and Branchio-otic-renal (BOR) syndromes. However, mutations in Six and Eya genes only account for approximately half of these patients. To discover potential new causative genes, we searched the Xenopus genome for orthologues of Drosophila cofactor proteins that interact with the fly Six-related factor, SO. We identified 33 Xenopus genes with high sequence identity to 20 of the 25 fly SO-interacting proteins. We provide the developmental expression patterns of the Xenopus orthologues for 11 of the fly genes, and demonstrate that all are expressed in developing craniofacial tissues with at least partial overlap with Six1/Six2. We speculate that these genes may function as Six-interacting partners with important roles in vertebrate craniofacial development and perhaps congenital syndromes.

Molecular characterization, expression patterns and polymorphism analysis of porcine Six1 gene

Six1 belongs to the Six gene family that includes six members in mammals (from Six1 to Six6). It has been demonstrated that Six1 homeodomain transcription factor is implicated in myogenesis. However, the molecular characteristics of Six1 in pigs have not been reported. In this study, we isolated and characterized the porcine Six1 gene full-length cDNA, genomic DNA and proximal promoter sequence. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR results confirmed that porcine Six1 was highly expressed in skeletal muscle. Real-time quantitative PCR results showed that porcine Six1 was highly expressed in embryonic stage and no significant expression differences is observed between Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. Furthermore, Six1 expression was significantly different among different developmental stages in Yorkshire pigs and the expression trend was up-regulated from 3 days to 180 days, reaching its highest expression level at 180 days. In addition, the data of Six1 expression in different muscles demonstrated that Six1 was a fast-twitch muscle high expression gene. PCR-HindII-RFLP was established to detect a C/T mutation and an A/G mutation which were present in promoter and intron, respectively. Meanwhile, their associations with economic traits were assessed in Meishan × Yorkshire F2 reference family. The statistical results revealed that the two HindII polymorphisms of porcine Six1 had significant associations with several meat quality traits (P<0.05). Taken together, these studies suggest that porcine Six1 may play an important role in skeletal muscle growth and meat quality.

A member of the six gene family promotes the specification of P cell fates in the O/P equivalence group of the leech Helobdella

The lateral ectoderm of the leech embryo arises from the o and p bandlets, two parallel columns of blast cells that collectively constitute the O/P equivalence group. Individual blast cells within this equivalence group become committed to alternative O or P developmental pathways in accordance with their respectively ventrolateral or dorsolateral position (Weisblat and Blair, 1984). We here describe a novel member of the Six gene transcription factor family, Hau-Six1/2A, which contributes to the patterning of these cell fates in the leech Helobdella sp. (Austin). During embryogenesis Hau-Six1/2A expression is restricted to the dorsolateral column of p blast cells, and thus correlates with P cell fate over most of the body's length. Experimental manipulations showed that Hau-Six1/2A expression is induced in p blast cells by the interaction with the adjoining q bandlet. In addition, misexpression of Hau-Six1/2A in the ventrolateral o blast cells by injection of an expression plasmid elicited the dorsolateral P cell fates ectopically. These data imply that Hau-Six1/2A is a component of the molecular pathway that normally distinguishes O and P cell fates within this equivalence group. Genomic analysis revealed that the Six1/2 subfamily has expanded to a total of six genes in Helobdella. The pattern of Hau-Six1/2A expression during later embryogenesis suggested that this gene may have lost ancestral function(s) and/or acquired novel roles in association with the gene duplications that produced this expansion.

Autoregulatory binding sites in the zebrafish six3a promoter region define a new recognition sequence for Six3 proteins

The homeodomain (HD) transcription factor Six3, which is a member of the Six/Sine oculis family, is essential for development of the eyes and forebrain in vertebrates. It has recently been claimed that the HDs of Six3 and other members of the Six family have a common recognition sequence, TGATAC. However, a different recognition sequence including the typical TAAT core motif, which has not yet been fully defined, has also been proposed for the Six3 HD in mice. Our study of the zebrafish orthologue six3a, which has an identical HD, shows that it binds in vitro to multiple TAAT-containing sites within its promoter region. Comparison of the different binding affinities for these sequences identifies three high-affinity sites with a common TAATGTC motif. Notably, this new recognition sequence, which is supported by our analysis of the influence of single-nucleotide substitutions on the DNA-binding affinity, is distinct from all of the DNA-binding specificities previously described in surveys of HDs. In addition, our comparison of Six3a HD binding to the novel TAATGTC motif and the common recognition sequence of Six family HDs (TGATAC) shows very similar affinities, suggesting two distinct DNA-binding modes. Transient reporter assays of the six3a promoter in zebrafish embryos also indicate that the three high-affinity sites are involved in autoregulation. In support of this, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show enrichment of Six3a binding to a six3a promoter fragment containing two clustered high-affinity sites. These findings provide strong evidence that the TAATGTC motif is an important target sequence for vertebrate Six3 proteins in vivo.

The non-conserved C-terminal segments of Sine Oculis Homeobox (SIX) proteins confer functional specificity

The Sine Oculis Homeobox (SIX) proteins play critical roles in organogenesis and are defined by the presence of two evolutionarily conserved functional motifs: a homeobox DNA binding domain and the SIX protein-protein interaction domain. Members of this transcription factor family can be divided into three subgroups: Six1/2, Six4/5, and Six3/6. This partitioning is based mainly on protein sequence similarity and genomic architecture, and not on specificities of DNA binding or binding partners. In fact, it is well demonstrated that members of the different subgroups can bind to and activate common transcriptional targets as well as form biochemical complexes with communal binding partners. Here we report that the C-terminal segment, which is not conserved across different SIX subfamilies, may serve to functionally distinguish individual SIX proteins. In particular, we have dissected the C-terminal region of Optix, the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian Six3/6, and identified three regions that distinguish Optix from Sine Oculis, the fly homolog of Six1/2. Two of these regions have been preserved in all Six3/6 family members while the third section is present only within Optix proteins in the Drosophilids. The activities of these regions are required, in unison, for Optix function. We suggest that biochemical/functional differences between members of large protein families as well as proteins encoded by duplicate genes can, in part, be attributed to the activities of nonconserved segments. Finally, we demonstrate that a subset of vertebrate SIX proteins has retained the ability to function during normal fly eye development but have lost the ability to induce the formation of ectopic eyes.

Activation of Six1 target genes is required for sensory placode formation

In vertebrates, cranial placodes form crucial parts of the sensory nervous system in the head. All cranial placodes arise from a common territory, the preplacodal region, and are identified by the expression of Six1/4 and Eya1/2 genes, which control different aspects of sensory development in invertebrates as well as vertebrates. While So and Eya can induce ectopic eyes in Drosophila, the ability of their vertebrate homologues to induce placodes in non-placodal ectoderm has not been explored. Here we show that Six1 and Eya2 are involved in ectodermal patterning and cooperate to induce preplacodal gene expression, while repressing neural plate and neural crest fates. However, they are not sufficient to induce ectopic sensory placodes in future epidermis. Activation of Six1 target genes is required for expression of preplacodal genes, for normal placode morphology and for placode-specific Pax protein expression. These findings suggest that unlike in the fly where the Pax6 homologue Eyeless acts upstream of Six and Eya, the regulatory relationships between these genes are reversed in early vertebrate placode development.

Biochemical and functional characterization of six SIX1 Branchio-oto-renal syndrome mutations

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome (BOR) is an autosomal dominant developmental disorder characterized by hearing loss, branchial arch defects, and renal anomalies. Recently, eight mutations in the SIX1 homeobox gene were discovered in BOR patients. To characterize the effect of SIX1 BOR mutations on the EYA-SIX1-DNA complex, we expressed and purified six of the eight mutants in Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that only the most N-terminal mutation in SIX1 (V17E) completely abolishes SIX1-EYA complex formation, whereas all of the other mutants are able to form a stable complex with EYA. We further show that only the V17E mutant fails to localize EYA to the nucleus and cannot be stabilized by EYA in the cell. The remaining five SIX1 mutants are instead all deficient in DNA binding. In contrast, V17E alone has a DNA binding affinity similar to that of wild type SIX1 in complex with the EYA co-factor. Finally, we show that all SIX1 BOR mutants are defective in transcriptional activation using luciferase reporter assays. Taken together, our experiments demonstrate that the SIX1 BOR mutations contribute to the pathology of the disease through at least two different mechanisms that involve: 1) abolishing the formation of the SIX1-EYA complex or 2) diminishing the ability of SIX1 to bind DNA. Furthermore, our data demonstrate for the first time that EYA: 1) requires the N-terminal region of the SIX1 Six domain for its interaction, 2) increases the level of the SIX1 protein within the cell, and 3) increases the DNA binding affinity of SIX1.

The sine oculis homeobox (SIX) family of transcription factors as regulators of development and disease

The sine oculis homeobox (SIX) protein family is a group of evolutionarily conserved transcription factors that are found in diverse organisms that range from flatworms to humans. These factors are expressed within, and play pivotal developmental roles in, cell populations that give rise to the head, retina, ear, nose, brain, kidney, muscle and gonads. Mutations within the fly and mammalian versions of these genes have adverse consequences on the development of these organs/tissues. Several SIX proteins have been shown to directly influence the cell cycle and are present at elevated levels during tumorigenesis and within several cancers. This review aims to highlight aspects of (1) the evolutionary history of the SIX family; (2) the structural differences and similarities amongst the different SIX proteins; (3) the role that these genes play in retinal development; and (4) the influence that these proteins have on cell proliferation and growth.

The six family of homeobox genes in development and cancer

The homeobox gene superfamily encodes transcription factors that act as master regulators of development through their ability to activate or repress a diverse range of downstream target genes. Numerous families exist within the homeobox gene superfamily, and are classified on the basis of conservation of their homeodomains as well as additional motifs that contribute to DNA binding and to interactions with other proteins. Members of one such family, the Six family, form a transcriptional complex with Eya and Dach proteins, and together these proteins make up part of the retinal determination network first identified in Drosophila. This network is highly conserved in both invertebrate and vertebrate species, where it influences the development of numerous organs in addition to the eye, primarily through regulation of cell proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion. Mutations in Six, Eya, and Dach genes have been identified in a variety of human genetic disorders, demonstrating their critical role in human development. In addition, aberrant expression of Six, Eya, and Dach occurs in numerous human tumors, and Six1, in particular, plays a causal role both in tumor initiation and in metastasis. Emerging evidence for the importance of Six family members and their cofactors in numerous human tumors suggests that targeting of this complex may be a novel and powerful means to inhibit both tumor growth and progression.

The eyes absent family of phosphotyrosine phosphatases: properties and roles in developmental regulation of transcription

Integration of multiple signaling pathways at the level of their transcriptional effectors provides an important strategy for fine-tuning gene expression and ensuring a proper program of development. Posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, play important roles in modulating transcription factor activity. The discovery that the transcription factor Eyes absent (Eya) possesses protein phosphatase activity provides an interesting new paradigm. Eya may regulate the phosphorylation state of either itself or its transcriptional cofactors, thereby directly affecting transcriptional output. The identification of a growing number of transcription factors with enzymic activity suggests that such dual-function proteins exert greater control of signaling events than previously imagined. Given the conservation of both its phosphatase and transcription factor activity across mammalian species, Eya provides an excellent model for studying how a single protein integrates these two functions under the influence of multiple signaling pathways to promote development.

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome

Branchio-oto-renal syndrome, a phenotype consisting of hearing loss, auricular malformations, branchial arch remnants, and renal anomalies is now recognized as one of the more common forms of autosomal dominant syndromic hearing impairment. Three loci known to be associated with the BOR phenotype have been identified and two genes that act in a regulatory network have been cloned, EYA1 and SIX1. EYA1 and SIX1 are homologous to genes involved in Drosophila eye development, eyes absent gene (eya), and sine oculis (so), respectively. EYA1, a transcriptional co-activator has a conserved, 271-amino acid, C-terminal known as the Eya Domain (ED). SIX1 has two highly conserved domains; a homeodomain (HD) and a specific Six-domain (SD) whose products function as transcription factors with specific DNA-binding activity that are crucial for protein-protein interaction. To determine the molecular basis for the organ defects that occur in BOR syndrome, many studies have focused on the effects of mutations to EYA and effects of mutations of the EYA-SIX regulatory system. However, over 60% of BOR syndrome patients do not have known mutations in EYA1 and relatively little is known about mutations to SIX1. Further evaluation of SIX1 and its related target genes may provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of BOR syndrome and offer greater clues to the disease mechanisms.

Sine oculis, a member of the SIX family of transcription factors, directs eye formation

The initiation of eye formation in all seeing animals is controlled by a group of selector genes that together forms the retinal determination cascade. In Drosophila, mice and humans, loss-of-function mutations lead to defects in eye and/or head development. While ectopic expression of these genes is sufficient to direct non-retinal tissues towards an eye fate, the ability of each gene to initiate eye formation is neither unlimited nor equal. A particularly enigmatic observation has been that one member of the cascade, sine oculis (so), which is a member of the SIX family of homeobox transcription factors, is unable to initiate eye development in non-retinal tissues. It is in contrast to every other retinal determination gene including optix, another Six family member, which can induce eye formation when expressed on its own. Here we demonstrate that, in contrast to published reports, expression of so on its own is sufficient to induce eye development within non-retinal tissues. We have extended results from prior reports on binding partner selectivity and DNA binding sites by conducting a structure/function analysis of the SO and OPTIX proteins. Here we demonstrate that the SIX domains and C-terminal portions of the SO and OPTIX proteins are required for functional specificity of SIX class transcription factors while the homeodomain of these proteins are interchangeable. Taken together, these results shed new light on the role that so plays in eye specification.

Partner specificity is essential for proper function of the SIX-type homeodomain proteins Sine oculis and Optix during fly eye development

The development of the Drosophila visual system utilizes two members of the highly conserved Six-Homeobox family of transcription factor, Sine oculis and Optix. Although in vitro studies have detected differences in DNA-binding and interactions with some co-factors, questions remain as to what extent the activity for these two transcriptional regulators is redundant or specific in vivo. In this work, we show that the SoD mutation within the Six domain does not abolish DNA-protein interactions, but alters co-factor binding specificity to resemble that of Optix. A mutation in the same region of Optix alters its activity in vivo. We propose that the dominant mutant phenotype is primarily due to an alteration in binding properties of the Sine oculis protein and that distinct partner interactions is one important mechanism in determining significant functional differences between these highly conserved factors during eye development.

Characterisation of the transcription factor, SIX5, using a new panel of monoclonal antibodies

SIX5 is a member of the human SIX family of transcription factors, many of which are involved in eye development. However, SIX5 transcripts are known to be present at very low levels in cells and no study has yet convincingly demonstrated detection of endogenous SIX5 protein by Western blotting or immunolocalisation. We have produced a new panel of 18 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that recognise at least four different epitopes in order to identify authentic human SIX5 protein in cells and tissues. Phage-displayed peptide libraries were used to identify individual amino-acids important for antibody binding within each epitope. Endogenous SIX5 migrated in SDS-PAGE with an apparent M(r) of 100 kDa and was present at similar levels in all foetal tissues and cell lines tested. In HeLa cells, it was located in the nucleoplasm with a granular distribution. An mRNA for a shorter splicing isoform of SIX5, with an altered carboxy-terminus, has been described, but further mAbs specific for this isoform did not detect any endogenous protein. We conclude that the full-length isoform is the major functional protein in vivo while the putative shorter protein is undetectable and may not be expressed at all.

Induction and specification of the vertebrate ectodermal placodes: precursors of the cranial sensory organs

The sensory organs of the vertebrate head derive from two embryological structures, the neural crest and the ectodermal placodes. Although quite a lot is known about the secreted and transcription factors that regulate neural crest development, until recently little was known about the molecular pathways that regulate placode development. Herein we review recent findings on the induction and specification of the pre-placodal ectoderm, and the transcription factors that are involved in regulating placode fate and initial differentiation.

Expression analysis of SIX3 and SIX6 in human tissues reveals differences in expression and a novel correlation between the expression of SIX3 and the genes encoding isocitrate dehyhrogenase and cadherin 18

SIX3 and SIX6 are transcription factors expressed during early stages of eye development. Limited expression data for SIX3 and SIX6 are available in the literature but, to date, there are no reports of the relative levels of expression of these genes throughout the human body and in adult tissues in particular. In this paper, we report extensive real-time quantitative PCR analyses of SIX3 and SIX6 expression in many different tissues of the adult human body, including ocular tissues, and a comparison of expression data with that of many other genes to identify similarity in expression. Using this powerful technique, we have detected a novel statistical correlation between the spatial distribution and the quantitative expression of SIX3 and 5 other transcripts including IDH1, the gene encoding the NADP(+)-dependent enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase, and cadherin 18, type 2 (CDH14). Our data demonstrate that this novel technique can be used to generate hypotheses by comparison of gene expression profiles to identify possible interactions between genes or gene products.

Slc12a2 is a direct target of two closely related homeobox proteins, Six1 and Six4

Six genes are homologs of Drosophila sine oculis and encode transcription factors that are characterized by a conserved Six domain and homeodomain. Of the six family members (Six1-Six6) in mice, Six1 and Six4 show similar expression patterns during embryogenesis. Six1-/- mice show defective formation of various organs such as inner ear, nose, skeletal muscle, kidney and thymus, whereas Six4-/- mice show little anomaly in organogenesis. To understand the molecular basis for the differential function of Six1 and Six4 in vivo, we screened target genes of Six1 and Six4 and found that Six1 and Six4 differentially regulated a set of target genes. Gel-retardation assays indicated that the promoter region of one of the targets, sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter 1 (Slc12a2), contains multiple Six1-binding sites and one common binding site of Six1 and Six4, suggesting that the DNA-binding specificity of Six1 is distinct from that of Six4. This underlies the differential regulation of common target genes by Six1 and Six4. Furthermore, in situ hybridization demonstrated that the expression of Slc12a2 was reduced in the developing dorsal root ganglia of Six1-/-/Six4-/- mice, suggesting that Six1 and Six4 regulate Slc12a2 in vivo.

Identification of functional sine oculis motifs in the autoregulatory element of its own gene, in the eyeless enhancer and in the signalling gene hedgehog

In Drosophila, the sine oculis (so) gene is important for the development of the entire visual system, including Bolwig's organ, compound eyes and ocelli. Together with twin of eyeless, eyeless, eyes absent and dachshund, so belongs to a network of genes that by complex interactions initiate eye development. Although much is known about the genetic interactions of the genes belonging to this retinal determination network, only a few such regulatory interactions have been analysed down to the level of DNA-protein interactions. Previous work in our laboratory identified an eye/ocellus specific enhancer of the sine oculis gene that is directly regulated by eyeless and twin of eyeless. We further characterized this regulatory element and identified a minimal enhancer fragment of so that sets up an autoregulatory feedback loop crucial for proper ocelli development. By systematic analysis of the DNA-binding specificity of so we identified the most important nucleotides for this interaction. Using the emerging consensus sequence for SO-DNA binding we performed a genome-wide search and have thereby been able to identify eyeless as well as the signalling gene hedgehog as putative targets of so. Our results strengthen the general assumption that feedback loops among the genes of the retinal determination network are crucial for proper development of eyes and ocelli.

The transcription factor Six2 activates expression of the Gdnf gene as well as its own promoter

The development of the metanephric kidney proceeds through reciprocal interactions between the metanephric mesenchyme and the ureteric bud. One important molecule mediating this interaction is the glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor Gdnf, which is secreted by the mesenchymal cells. Regulation of Gdnf expression is largely unknown. We show here that a member of the Six family of homeobox containing transcription factors, namely Six2 activates Gdnf expression. We have identified two Six2 binding sites in the Gdnf promoter that show similarity to the consensus DNA binding sequences of other homeobox proteins and harbor short palindromic sequences. Furthermore, we have characterized the Six2 protein and show that Six2 possesses a transcriptional activation domain in the C-terminus and nuclear localization determinants in the Six domain. In order to identify factors which activate expression of Six2, particularly in the metanephric mesenchyme during early kidney development we have cloned and characterized a 930 bp fragment of the murine Six2 promoter. Transgenic mice harboring a construct in which the LacZ gene is driven by the Six2 promoter fragment revealed LacZ expression at multiple sites which overlap with endogenous Six2 expression. Surprisingly, Six2 bound and activated this 930 bp fragment. The architecture of the binding sites in the Six2 promoter, but not the binding sequence itself, is very similar to the one in the Gdnf promoter. The identification of two target genes and our biochemical characterization suggest a critical role for Six2 in kidney development.

Quantitative proteomic identification of six4 as the trex-binding factor in the muscle creatine kinase enhancer

Transcriptional regulatory element X (Trex) is a positive control site within the Muscle creatine kinase (MCK) enhancer. Cell culture and transgenic studies indicate that the Trex site is important for MCK expression in skeletal and cardiac muscle. After selectively enriching for the Trex-binding factor (TrexBF) using magnetic beads coupled to oligonucleotides containing either wild-type or mutant Trex sites, quantitative proteomics was used to identify TrexBF as Six4, a homeodomain transcription factor of the Six/sine oculis family, from a background of approximately 900 copurifying proteins. Using gel shift assays and Six-specific antisera, we demonstrated that Six4 is TrexBF in mouse skeletal myocytes and embryonic day 10 chick skeletal and cardiac muscle, while Six5 is the major TrexBF in adult mouse heart. In cotransfection studies, Six4 transactivates the MCK enhancer as well as muscle-specific regulatory regions of Aldolase A and Cardiac troponin C via Trex/MEF3 sites. Our results are consistent with Six4 being a key regulator of muscle gene expression in adult skeletal muscle and in developing striated muscle. The Trex/MEF3 composite sequence ([C/A]ACC[C/T]GA) allowed us to identify novel putative Six-binding sites in six other muscle genes. Our proteomics strategy will be useful for identifying transcription factors from complex mixtures using only defined DNA fragments for purification.

Six1controls patterning of the mouse otic vesicle

Six1 is a member of the Six family homeobox genes, which function as components of the Pax-Six-Eya-Dach gene network to control organ development. Six1 is expressed in otic vesicles, nasal epithelia,branchial arches/pouches, nephrogenic cords, somites and a limited set of ganglia. In this study, we established Six1-deficient mice and found that development of the inner ear, nose, thymus, kidney and skeletal muscle was severely affected. Six1-deficient embryos were devoid of inner ear structures, including cochlea and vestibule, while their endolymphatic sac was enlarged. The inner ear anomaly began at around E10.5 and Six1was expressed in the ventral region of the otic vesicle in the wild-type embryos at this stage. In the otic vesicle of Six1-deficient embryos,expressions of Otx1, Otx2, Lfng and Fgf3,which were expressed ventrally in the wild-type otic vesicles, were abolished,while the expression domains of Dlx5, Hmx3, Dach1and Dach2, which were expressed dorsally in the wild-type otic vesicles, expanded ventrally. Our results indicate that Six1functions as a key regulator of otic vesicle patterning at early embryogenesis and controls the expression domains of downstream otic genes responsible for respective inner ear structures. In addition, cell proliferation was reduced and apoptotic cell death was enhanced in the ventral region of the otic vesicle, suggesting the involvement of Six1 in cell proliferation and survival. In spite of the similarity of otic phenotypes of Six1- and Shh-deficient mice, expressions of Six1 and Shhwere mutually independent.

Functional dissection of eyes absent reveals new modes of regulation within the retinal determination gene network

The retinal determination (RD) gene network encodes a group of transcription factors and cofactors necessary for eye development. Transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of RD family members is achieved through interactions within the network and with extracellular signaling pathways, including epidermal growth factor receptor/RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), transforming growth factor beta/DPP, Wingless, Hedgehog, and Notch. Here we present the results of structure-function analyses that reveal novel aspects of Eyes absent (EYA) function and regulation. We find that the conserved C-terminal EYA domain negatively regulates EYA transactivation potential, and that GROUCHO-SINE OCULIS (SO) interactions provide another mechanism for negative regulation of EYA-SO target genes. We have mapped the transactivation potential of EYA to an internal proline-, serine-, and threonine-rich region that includes the EYA domain 2 (ED2) and two MAPK phosphorylation consensus sites and demonstrate that activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway potentiates transcriptional output of EYA and the EYA-SO complex in certain contexts. Drosophila S2 cell two-hybrid assays were used to describe a novel homotypic interaction that is mediated by EYA's N terminus. Our data suggest that EYA requires homo- and heterotypic interactions and RAS/MAPK signaling responsiveness to ensure context-appropriate RD gene network activity.

Thymus, kidney and craniofacial abnormalities in Six 1 deficient mice

Six genes are widely expressed during vertebrate embryogenesis, suggesting that they are implicated in diverse differentiation processes. To determine the functions of the Six1 gene, we constructed Six1-deficient mice by replacing its first exon by the beta-galactosidase gene. We have previously shown that mice lacking Six1 die at birth due to thoracic skeletal defects and severe muscle hypoplasia affecting most of the body muscles. Here, we report that Six1(-/-) neonates also lack a kidney and thymus, as well as displaying a strong disorganisation of craniofacial structures, namely the inner ear, the nasal cavity, the craniofacial skeleton, and the lacrimal and parotid glands. These organ defects can be correlated with Six1 expression in the embryonic primordium structures as revealed by X-Gal staining at different stages of embryogenesis. Thus, the fetal abnormalities of Six1(-/-) mice appear to result from the absence of the Six 1 homeoprotein during early stages of organogenesis. Interestingly, these Six1 defects are very similar to phenotypes caused by mutations of Eya 1, which are responsible for the BOR syndrome in humans. Close comparison of Six1 and Eya 1 deficient mice strongly suggests a functional link between these two factors. Pax gene mutations also lead to comparable phenotypes, suggesting that a regulatory network including the Pax, Six and Eya genes is required for several types of organogenesis in mammals.

Six and Eya expression during human somitogenesis and MyoD gene family activation

This report describes the characterisation of the expression profile of several myogenic determination genes during human embryogenesis. The data were obtained from axial structures and limb buds of human embryos aged between 3 and 8 weeks of development. Using in situ hybridisation to detect Pax3 and MyoD gene family mRNAs, and immunochemistry to follow Six and Eya protein accumulation, we have been able to establish the chronology of accumulation of these gene products. As in mouse, the first transcripts detected in myotomes of 3 week-old embryos are Pax3 and Myf5, followed by the expression of myogenin. MyoD appears to be activated well after Myf5, myogenin and MRF4 in the early myotome, whereas, in limb bud muscles, the presence of all four of these mRNAs is concomitant from 6 weeks. Six1, Six4 and Six5 homeoproteins are detected later than Myf5 activation. These Six homeoproteins are first observed in the cytoplasm of myogenin expressing cells. At later stages of development, Six1 and Six5, but not Six4, are translocated into the nuclei of myogenic cells, concomitantly with MyHCemb expression. Eya1 and Eya2 proteins, potential Six cofactors, were also detected in myogenin positive cells, but their accumulation was delayed and was mainly cytoplasmic. These results preclude that early activation of Myf5, myogenin and MRF4 is under the control of Six and Eya proteins, while Six and Eya proteins would be involved in later steps of myogenic differentiation.

Altered myogenesis in Six1-deficient mice

Six homeoproteins are expressed in several tissues, including muscle, during vertebrate embryogenesis, suggesting that they may be involved in diverse differentiation processes. To determine the functions of the Six1 gene during myogenesis, we constructed Six1-deficient mice by replacing its first exon with the lacZ gene. Mice lacking Six1 die at birth because of severe rib malformations and show extensive muscle hypoplasia affecting most of the body muscles in particular certain hypaxial muscles. Six1(-/-) embryos have impaired primary myogenesis, characterized, at E13.5, by a severe reduction and disorganisation of primary myofibers in most body muscles. While Myf5, MyoD and myogenin are correctly expressed in the somitic compartment in early Six1(-/-) embryos, by E11.5 MyoD and myogenin gene activation is reduced and delayed in limb buds. However, this is not the consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to migrate into the limb buds or of an abnormal apoptosis of myoblasts lacking Six1. It appears therefore that Six1 plays a specific role in hypaxial muscle differentiation, distinct from those of other hypaxial determinants such as Pax3, cMet, Lbx1 or Mox2.

Six3 and Six6 activity is modulated by members of the groucho family

Six3 and Six6 are two genes required for the specification and proliferation of the eye field in vertebrate embryos, suggesting that they might be the functional counterparts of the Drosophila gene sine oculis (so). Phylogenetic and functional analysis have however challenged this idea, raising the possibility that the molecular network in which Six3 and Six6 act may be different from that described for SO. To address this, we have performed yeast two-hybrid screens, using either Six3 or Six6 as a bait. In this paper, we report the results of the latter screen that led to the identification of TLE1 (a transcriptional repressor of the groucho family) and AES (a potential dominant negative form of TLE proteins) as cofactors for both SIX6 and SIX3. Biochemical and mutational analysis shows that the Six domain of both SIX3 and SIX6 strongly interact with the QD domain of TLE1 and AES, but that SIX3 also interacts with TLE proteins via the WDR domain. Tle1 and Aes are expressed in the developing eye of medaka fish (Oryzias latipes) embryos, overlapping with the distribution of both Six3 and Six6. Gain-of-function studies in medaka show a clear synergistic activity between SIX3/SIX6 and TLE1, which, on its own, can expand the eye field. Conversely, AES alone decreases the eye size and abrogates the phenotypic consequences of SIX3/6 over-expression. These data indicate that both Tle1 and Aes participate in the molecular network that control eye development and are consistent with the view that both Six3 and Six6 act in combination with either Tle1 and/or Aes.

Planarian Gtsix3, a member of the Six/so gene family, is expressed in brain branches but not in eye cells

Six/sine oculis (Six/so) class genes, with representatives in vertebrates and invertebrates, include members with key developmental roles in the anterior part of the central nervous system (CNS) and eye. Having characterized the role of the first planarian gene of the Six/so family in eye development, we attempted to identify novel genes of this family related to the platyhelminth eye genetic network. We isolated a new Six/so gene in the planarian Girardia tigrina, Gtsix-3, which belongs to the Six3/6 class. Whole mount in situ hybridization revealed Gtsix3 expression in a stripe surrounding the cephalic ganglia in adults. This spatial pattern corresponds to the cephalic branches, the nerve cells that connect the CNS with the marginal sensory organs located continuously at the edge of the head. During head regeneration, Gtsix-3 shows delayed activation compared to other head genes, with an initial two spot pattern that later evolves to a continuous lateral expression in the new regenerated cephalic ganglia with a final reduction to the adult pattern. However, Gtsix-3 is not activated in tail regeneration and no eye expression is observed at any regenerative stage. These findings provide a new marker for the developing anterior nervous system and evidence the complexity of planarian brain.