1
|
Kinouani S, Da Cruz H, Langlois E, Tzourio C. Prevalence, lived experiences and user profiles in e-cigarette use: A mixed methods study among French college students. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297156. [PMID: 38335200 PMCID: PMC10857705 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about e-cigarette use in French students. Our aims were to estimate the prevalence of e-cigarette experimentation and current e-cigarette use; describe the reasons for using e-cigarettes; explore the vaping experience and identify the profiles of e-cigarette users. METHODS We used a sequential, explanatory mixed methods design in a sample of French college students. Quantitative data was collected online for a cross-sectional analysis among 1698 students. Two separate analysis based on the thematic analysis and the Grounded Theory were also performed in 20 semi-structured interviews, focusing former and current smokers also current vapers. RESULTS The prevalence of e-cigarette experimentation was 39.3% (95% CI: 35.2-44.0) and 5.1% (95% CI: 3.2-8.0) of students were current e-cigarette users. Experimentation was opportunistic while current usage was rational, requiring to acquire a personal electronic device, getting used to its technicality, appreciating its availability, discretion, and learning the practice. In this context, three distinct groups of e-cigarette users were identified, based on assumed identity, tobacco and e-cigarette use, the functions assigned to e-cigarettes, and intentions with regards to vaping in the future. CONCLUSION Despite some limitations mainly related to the participants self-selection, this research showed that while many smokers and former smokers have tried e-cigarettes in this student population, few have continued to use them continuously. Moreover, these current e-cigarette users were a heterogeneous group. Longitudinal studies are needed in young adult smokers for a better understanding of how their tobacco and e-cigarette use affect each other and change over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shérazade Kinouani
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team HEALTHY, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
- Department of General Practice, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Héléna Da Cruz
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team HEALTHY, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuel Langlois
- University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Emile Durkheim Center, UMR 5116, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christophe Tzourio
- University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team HEALTHY, UMR 1219, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson M, Al-Hamdani M. An examination of the social perceptions and vaping preferences of young electronic nicotine delivery system users. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1150368. [PMID: 37151590 PMCID: PMC10162018 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1150368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Little research has been conducted on social aspects and preferences of electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use among young ENDS users, and none have examined differences in these aspects and preferences by gender and tobacco use status. Methods A total of 558 young regular vapers (ages 16-24; vaped at least once a week for the last 3 months) from Nova Scotia were recruited to complete a demographic and vaping questionnaire. A 2 x 3 study design was used to compare participants on social aspects and vaping preferences based on gender (male or female) and tobacco use status (never, former, or current smoker). Chi-square tests were used to determine significant differences, and Bonferroni tests were used to assess over- and under-representation within significant variables. Results Current tobacco-using male vapers had a higher frequency of experiencing pressure to vape from friends and current employment as compared to females. Former and never tobacco-using male vapers had a higher frequency of parental awareness of their vaping behavior than females. Former tobacco-using female vapers had a higher frequency of being influenced to vape by others they know on social media than males. Both never and former tobacco-using females reported a higher frequency of exposure to vaping content on social media than males. Never tobacco-using female vapers preferred vape pen devices relative to males. Conclusions Important gender differences by tobacco use status exist and demonstrate differential patterns of social influence for ENDS use and their experiences within this demographic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myles Davidson
- Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Mohammed Al-Hamdani
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Science, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- *Correspondence: Mohammed Al-Hamdani
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fekom M, Aarbaoui TE, Guignard R, Andler R, Quatremère G, Ducarroz S, Nguyen-Thanh V, Melchior M. Use of Tobacco Cessation Aids and Likelihood of Smoking Cessation: a French Population-Based Study. Prev Med Rep 2022; 30:102044. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
4
|
Pisinger C, Rasmussen SKB. The Health Effects of Real-World Dual Use of Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes versus the Health Effects of Exclusive Smoking of Conventional Cigarettes: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192013687. [PMID: 36294263 PMCID: PMC9603628 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high prevalence of dual use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes has been reported across the world. METHODS A systematic search was carried out. We included original articles on any topic relevant to health, excluding mental health, in all languages. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Both reviewers independently screened and read all publications. We compared dual use with exclusive smoking of conventional cigarettes (ESCC). RESULTS Fifty-two publications (49 studies) were included. Thirteen papers/10 studies were prospective. There was great heterogeneity across studies. Many methodological weaknesses, such as inaccurate exposure measurement, lack of adjustment for former tobacco consumption, and lack of significance testing were identified. Most prospective studies found dual use to be at least as harmful as ESCC. The longest follow-up was six years. Most of the best available cross-sectional studies found dual use associated with the same and, in several studies, significantly higher risk of self-reported symptoms/disease than in ESCC. The intensity of cigarette smoking seems associated with worse health. CONCLUSION Existing studies indicate that dual use is at least as, or probably even more, harmful than ESCC. Due to the predominance of cross-sectional studies and the methodological weaknesses we judged the overall certainty of the evidence as "low certainty".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotta Pisinger
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg University Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Danish Heart Foundation, 1120 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sofie K. Bergman Rasmussen
- Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg University Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Temourian AA, Song AV, Halliday DM, Gonzalez M, Epperson AE. Why do smokers use e-cigarettes? A study on reasons among dual users. Prev Med Rep 2022; 29:101924. [PMID: 35911573 PMCID: PMC9334340 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective There is minimal research that has measured motivations behind e-cigarette use and the relationship to cigarette and e-cigarette use. The aim of this study was to (1) examine extent to which motivations to use e-cigarettes varies among dual users and (2) examine whether e-cigarette motivations are related to e-cigarette and cigarette consumption among dual users. Methods Adults residing in California were recruited through social media (n = 1762, 68.9 % males, 62.9 % White) to complete an online survey. Participants self-identified as using combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual users) and reported their motivations for using an e-cigarette device, nicotine consumption, and nicotine dependence with both combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Results A greater proportion of people reported using e-cigarettes for enjoyment purposes than other motivations (34.2 %). Motivations to use e-cigarettes to quit were positively related to monthly cigarette consumption (IRR = 1.17, 95 % CI [1.08, 1.26]). Motivations to use e-cigarettes to quit smoking were also related to smoking the first cigarette within 30 min (IRR = 1.46, 95 % CI [1.05, 2.02]) and first e-cigarette within 30 min (b = 0.28, 95 % CI [0.19, 0.37]). Conclusions Compared to those who use e-cigarettes for enjoyment, smokers who are motivated to use e-cigarettes for cessation purposes are more likely to have greater nicotine dependence, cigarette consumption, and e-cigarette consumption. Future research needs to acknowledge that not all e-cigarette users are the same; motivations and use differ and are related to both consumption and dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison A Temourian
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts, University of California, Merced, USA
| | - Anna V Song
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts, University of California, Merced, USA.,Nicotine and Cannabis Policy Center, University of California, Merced, USA
| | - Deanna M Halliday
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts, University of California, Merced, USA.,Nicotine and Cannabis Policy Center, University of California, Merced, USA
| | - Mariaelena Gonzalez
- Nicotine and Cannabis Policy Center, University of California, Merced, USA.,Department of Public Health, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts, University of California, Merced, USA
| | - Anna E Epperson
- Department of Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, & Arts, University of California, Merced, USA.,Nicotine and Cannabis Policy Center, University of California, Merced, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Understanding the role of e-cigarette use in smoking cessation based on the stages of change model. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274311. [PMID: 36084052 PMCID: PMC9462758 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We explored the role of e-cigarette use in smoking cessation based on the stages of change (SOC) model, which is a framework for describing the process of smoking cessation. Methods We used nationwide, cross-sectional data on adults (19+ years) from the seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2016–2018) and restricted the participants to 3,929 recent smokers, consisting of current smokers and recent quitters (≤2 years). A multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to reveal the relationships between e-cigarette use and cigarette quitting behaviors (e.g., current quitting status, past quit attempts, intention to quit, and duration of quitting) and all stages in smoking cessation, with adjustment for sociodemographic and smoking-related factors. Results E-cigarette use was positively related to past quit attempts, while not having quit, intention to quit, and longer duration of quitting. Based on the cessation stages, current and former e-cigarette users were significantly more likely to be in the ‘Precontemplation’ and ‘Contemplation’ stages than never users, while not to be in the ‘Preparation’ and ‘Action’ stages. Current users were particularly less likely to be in the ‘Maintenance’ stage compared to never users. Conclusion E-cigarette use was closely linked with early-stage behavior than late-stage behavior in the smoking cessation process. E-cigarettes might promote quit attempts and short-term quitting in some smokers, but the negative role of inducing smokers to continue cigarette smoking with no immediate quit-intention for future attempts is dominant in the real world.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang J, Kuo J, Su WC, Jorenby DE, Piper ME, Buu A. A new statistical model for longitudinal ecological momentary assessment data on dual use of electronic and combustible cigarettes. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2022; 48:529-537. [PMID: 35100512 PMCID: PMC10201566 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2027955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Background: Existing studies of dual use of electronic and combustible cigarettes either collected longitudinal data with long gaps in between waves or conducted ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over a short period of time. In recent years, the measurement burst design that embeds an EMA protocol in each wave assessment of a traditional longitudinal study has become more popular and yet conventional generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) have important limitations for handling data from this design.Objectives: This study proposed a new statistical method to analyze data from the measurement burst design.Methods: This new statistical method was designed to model the short-term (within-wave) as well as long-term (between-wave) changes and was validated by a simulation study. Secondary analysis was conducted to analyze data from 205 dual users (52% male) and 146 exclusive smokers (50% male) who participated in a recent study using the measurement burst design.Results: The simulation study shows that the proposed method can handle the gap between waves well and is also robust to nonlinear changes across waves. Although no short-term change in smoking was found, dual users reported a long-term reduction in cigarette use that was more rapid compared to exclusive smokers (β ˆ = - 0.0127 , p = .0167 ). Vaping more was associated with smoking less (β ˆ = - 0.0058 , p = .0054 ).Conclusion: The proposed method is highly applicable as it can be easily implemented by substance use researchers and the results can be straightforwardly interpreted. The results suggest that e-cigarette use may play a role in promoting a long-term reduction in smoking among dual users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Yang
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1200 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jacky Kuo
- Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1200 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Wei-Chung Su
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1200 Pressler St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Douglas E. Jorenby
- Center for Tobacco Research & Intervention, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711, USA
| | - Megan E. Piper
- Center for Tobacco Research & Intervention, University of Wisconsin, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711, USA
| | - Anne Buu
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin St., Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim MM, Steffensen I, Miguel RD, Carlone J, Curtin GM. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Association between E-cigarette Use among Cigarette Smokers and Quit Attempts Made to Abstain from Cigarette Smoking. Am J Health Behav 2022; 46:358-375. [PMID: 36109859 DOI: 10.5993/ajhb.46.4.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Following AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA guidelines, in this synthesis of evidence we sought to identify and characterize any associations between e-cigarette use among cigarette smokers and cigarette smoking quit attempts. Methods: We queried 3 databases from January 1, 2007 to January 5, 2021. Search results were screened using the PICOS review method. Included studies examined e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking quit attempts across e-cigarette use statuses. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Center approach. Finally, 4 random-effects models compared e-cigarette users and non- e-cigarette-users in terms of past year and prospective (6 to 12 months) cigarette smoking quit attempts. Results: We qualitatively synthesized 17 adjusted studies for this review. Two meta-analyses showed past year quit attempts were significantly associated with current e-cigarette users and 2 prospective data analyses found no significant association. Conclusions: The results of the meta- analyses emphasize temporality in the association between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking quit attempts. Numerous methodological limitations, including inadequate definitions of e-cigarette use and non-adjustment for confounding variables, limit the confidence in conclusions that can be drawn on the causal association between e-cigarette use and cigarettes smoking quit attempts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi M Kim
- Mimi M. Kim, Senior Director, Scientific & Regulatory Affairs, RAI Services Company, Winston-Salem NC, United States;,
| | | | - Red D Miguel
- Red D. Miguel, Vice-President and Chief Technical Officer, Thera-Business, Kanata, ON, Canada
| | - Julien Carlone
- Julien Carlone, Senior Medical Researcher/Writer, Thera-Business, Kanata, ON, Canada (former employee)
| | - Geoffrey M Curtin
- Geoffrey M. Curtin, Retired employee of RAI Services Company, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gittelman M, Southworth H, Carle AC, Anzeljc S, Qian X, Wervey Arnold M, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Types of Tobacco Products Used by Caregivers of Newborns in the Primary Care Setting. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2022; 61:535-541. [PMID: 35484841 PMCID: PMC10134048 DOI: 10.1177/00099228221091030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study determined the types of tobacco products used by caregivers who presented to infant well-child visits (WCVs), tobacco product use by other household members, and caregivers' readiness to quit. The Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics conducted a 10-month quality improvement collaborative to improve providers' tobacco screening and cessation counseling practices. A sub-analysis of the initial screenings was performed to determine types of tobacco products used and caregivers' readiness to quit. Fourteen practices (60 providers) participated, and 3972 initial screens were analyzed; 320 (8.1%) caregivers and 490 (12.4%) household members used tobacco products. Most smoking caregivers and household members exclusively used cigarettes (79% and 72%, respectively). There was no difference in caregiver intention to quit by tobacco type, yet 53% of smoking caregivers were ready to quit. Providers should provide screening and cessation counseling to caregivers of infants at WCVs since many are ready to quit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Gittelman
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hayley Southworth
- Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Adam C Carle
- James M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Samantha Anzeljc
- Ohio Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Xiaokun Qian
- Ohio Colleges of Medicine, Government Resource Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Palmer AM, Price SN, Foster MG, Sanford BT, Fucito LM, Toll BA. Urgent Need for Novel Investigations of Treatments to Quit E-cigarettes: Findings from a Systematic Review. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:569-580. [PMID: 35816038 PMCID: PMC9444997 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
E-cigarette use has been increasing globally over the past decade. Many use e-cigarettes as an alternative or method to quit cigarette smoking, whereas others use these products recreationally. As technology has advanced, many individuals have reported symptoms of dependence on these products and continue to use them beyond achieving abstinence from smoking. Despite individuals reporting interest in quitting, little is known about e-cigarette cessation. This systematic review sought to identify and evaluate all human subjects literature published on the outcome of e-cigarette cessation through September 2021. Of the 79 articles identified, 56 were cross-sectional, 6 were qualitative, 5 were cohort studies, 3 were experimental, 2 were mixed methods, and 7 reported intervention or case studies of e-cigarette cessation. Results showed youth generally had high intent to quit e-cigarettes, whereas results were mixed with adult samples. Youth were motivated to quit e-cigarettes by health concerns, whereas adults were motivated to quit e-cigarettes by cost, lack of satisfaction, and psychologic factors. Adults were more likely to report past e-cigarette quit attempts, most commonly "cold turkey." Few interventions tested strategies for e-cigarette cessation, with a majority targeted for youth. Given the lack of information on e-cigarette cessation, recommendations for future studies are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda M. Palmer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston SC USA,Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sarah N. Price
- Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Madeline G. Foster
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brandon T. Sanford
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston SC USA,Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Lisa M. Fucito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Benjamin A. Toll
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston SC USA,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yun HW, Jung KJ, Jee SH, Kimm H. Overall quit in triple users of conventional cigarette, e-cigarette and heated tobacco product among healthy adults: a Korea Medical Institute health check-up study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051865. [PMID: 35851018 PMCID: PMC9297207 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While multiuse patterns of e-cigarettes (EC) or heated tobacco products (HTP) with conventional cigarettes (CC) have been reported, smoking cessation of multiusers is not well known. We aimed to analyse overall quit in triple users of CC, EC and HTP among healthy adults. METHODS A questionnaire was conducted on 89 360 adults who visited the Korea Medical Institute health check-ups in Seoul, Korea, from May 2018 to September 2019. Among 38 812 ever smokers, 9252 were ever triple users of CC, EC and HTP. Frequency and related factors of overall quit were analysed in the cross-sectional study. RESULTS The average age was 38.8±9.0 years, and 8458 (91.4%) were men. There were 5329 (57.6%) current triple users, 3547 (38.3%) single or dual product quitters and 376 (4.1%) overall quitters. Among the former triple users, the most common tobacco product use pattern was 'dual quit of EC and HTP (eg, current CC use)' both in men (21.3%) and women (26.3%). Age 60s or older (OR 8.5, 95% CI 5.2 to 13.8), women (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.5), no hyperlipidaemia and married status were significantly related to overall quit. CONCLUSION The most common pathway for 'ever triple users' of the three tobacco products was 'current triple users', and the second was 'CC users'. Single or dual product quitters could continue to smoke by EC or HTP instead of quit. Further research on overall quit will be needed to develop effective regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Won Yun
- National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Keum Ji Jung
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sun Ha Jee
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Heejin Kimm
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee PN, Fry JS. Investigating the effect of e-cigarette use on quitting smoking in adults aged 25 years or more using the PATH study. F1000Res 2022; 9:1099. [PMID: 35813077 PMCID: PMC9214270 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.26167.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The evidence on harms and benefits of e-cigarettes partly concerns whether their use encourages smokers to quit. We addressed this using data from the nationally representative PATH study, with detailed accounting for potential confounding variables. Methods: We considered adults aged 25+. Our original analyses, reported in version 1 of this paper, used data for Waves 1 to 3, separate analyses considering Waves 1 to 2, 2 to 3 and 1 to 3. These related baseline ever e-cigarette use (or e-product use at Wave 2) to quitting at follow-up, adjusting for confounders derived from 55 candidates. Sensitivity analyses omitted ever other product users, linked quitting to current e-cigarette use, and used values of some predictors modified using follow-up data. Additional analyses used data for Waves 1 to 4, separately considering sustained, delayed and temporary quitting during Waves 1 to 3, 2 to 4 and 1 to 4. Sensitivity analyses considered 30-day quitting, restricted attention to smokers attempting to quit, and considered ever smokeless tobacco or snus use. Results: In the original analyses, unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) of quitting smoking for ever e-cigarette use were 1.29 (95% CI 1.01-1.66), 1.52 (1.26-1.83) and 1.47 (1.19-1.82) for the Wave 1 to 2, 2 to 3, and 1 to 3 analyses. These reduced after adjustment, to 1.23 (0.94-1.61), 1.51 (1.24-1.85) and 1.39 (1.11-1.74). Quitting rates remained elevated in users in all sensitivity analyses. The additional analyses found associations of e-cigarette use with sustained, delayed and temporary quitting, associations little affected by considering 30-day quitting, and only slightly reduced restricting attention to quit attempters. Ever use of smokeless tobacco or snus also predicted increased quitting. Conclusions: As does most evidence from clinical trials, other analyses of PATH, and other epidemiological studies, our results suggest using e-cigarettes helps adult smokers to quit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter N. Lee
- P.N.Lee Statistics and Computing, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5DA, UK
| | - John S. Fry
- RoeLee Statistics Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Documento de posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) ante las estrategias de reducción del daño del tabaco. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2022. [PMID: 37497325 PMCID: PMC10369613 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2022.100175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, the appearance of electronic cigarettes and new tobacco products (heated tobacco or smokeless tobacco) has generated a growing interest in harm reduction methods that are defined as mechanisms that seek to reduce the harmful consequences of tobacco without give up the pleasant effects of it by replacing it with these new electronic devices. However, these products are addictive and not safe as they contain nicotine. Harm reduction is a false solution as it represents a commercial strategy of the tobacco industry to increase its sales, making it difficult to control smoking, since it keeps smokers from consuming tobacco and prevents them from making serious attempts to quit. In addition, these products are a gateway to adolescents in tobacco.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sun Y, Wang MP, Cheung YTD, Ho SY, Luk TT, Zhao S, Wu YS, Wong BYM, Weng X, Chen J, Zhang X, Leung LT, Chak KY, Lam TH. Changes in tobacco use at the early stage of the COVID-19
pandemic: Results of four cross-sectional surveys in Hong Kong. Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20:26. [PMID: 35342385 PMCID: PMC8895477 DOI: 10.18332/tid/145935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Changes in tobacco use since the COVID-19 outbreak differed by countries and little is known about changes in the use of specific tobacco products. METHODS We analyzed data from four cross-sectional telephone/online surveys from April to June 2020 to investigate such changes since the 1st and 2nd wave outbreaks (February to April 2020) in Hong Kong. The respondents were 1595 adults (83.2% male) who used tobacco before the COVID-19 outbreak from our previous intervention study and surveys. We investigated the changes in tobacco use, intention to quit and quit attempts during the outbreak. RESULTS About two-thirds (65.3%) of respondents reported no change in overall tobacco use, while 23.1% used less (including cessation) and 11.6% used more, resulting in a net decrease of 11.5 percentage points. A greater net decrease was observed for cigarettes (14.3% points) than heated tobacco products (HTPs, 3.3% points) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, 2.5% points). Decreased use was mainly due to the more extended stay at home (63.2%), health considerations (52.6%) and mask-wearing (47.4%), while increased use was for passing time (75.0%) and releasing stress (46.4%). Eight percent of cigarette, HTP and e-cigarette users reported a higher intention to quit since the pandemic outbreak. Nineteen percent of tobacco users (176/948) attempted to quit during the pandemic. Only 2.9% (46/1569) were abstinent at the time of the survey. CONCLUSIONS Overall tobacco use decreased after the first two waves of the COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong. A greater proportion of cigarette users decreased use than HTP and e-cigarette users. Given the different methods used in the four surveys, future studies should aim for a large and representative sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuying Sun
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Man Ping Wang
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Sai Yin Ho
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tzu Tsun Luk
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shengzhi Zhao
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Bonny Yee-Man Wong
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xue Weng
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, China
| | - Jianjiu Chen
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States
| | - Xiaoyu Zhang
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lok Tung Leung
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kin Yeung Chak
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tai Hing Lam
- School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kavousi M, Pisinger C, Barthelemy JC, De Smedt D, Koskinas K, Marques-Vidal P, Panagiotakos D, Prescott EB, Tiberi M, Vassiliou VS, Løchen ML. Electronic cigarettes and health with special focus on cardiovascular effects: position paper of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021; 28:1552-1566. [PMID: 32726563 DOI: 10.1177/2047487320941993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco use is the single largest preventable risk factor for premature death of non-communicable diseases and the second leading cause of cardiovascular disease. In response to the harmful effects of tobacco smoking, the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has emerged and gained significant popularity over the past 15 years. E-cigarettes are promoted as safe alternatives for traditional tobacco smoking and are often suggested as a way to reduce or quit smoking. However, evidence suggests they are not harmless. DISCUSSION The rapid evolution of the e-cigarette market has outpaced the legislator's regulatory capacity, leading to mixed regulations. The increasing use of e-cigarettes in adolescents and young individuals is of concern. While the long-term direct cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes remain largely unknown, the existing evidence suggests that the e-cigarette should not be regarded as a cardiovascular safe product. The contribution of e-cigarette use to reducing conventional cigarette use and smoking cessation is complex, and the impact of e-cigarette use on long-term cessation lacks sufficient evidence. CONCLUSION This position paper describes the evidence regarding the prevalence of e-cigarette smoking, uptake of e-cigarettes in the young, related legislations, cardiovascular effects of e-cigarettes and the impact of e-cigarettes on smoking cessation. Knowledge gaps in the field are also highlighted. The recommendations from the population science and public health section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Kavousi
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotta Pisinger
- Centre for Clinical Research and Prevention, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Delphine De Smedt
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maja-Lisa Løchen
- Department of Community Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pierce JP, Chen R, Kealey S, Leas EC, White MM, Stone MD, McMenamin SB, Trinidad DR, Strong DR, Benmarhnia T, Messer K. Incidence of Cigarette Smoking Relapse Among Individuals Who Switched to e-Cigarettes or Other Tobacco Products. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2128810. [PMID: 34665239 PMCID: PMC8527352 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although e-cigarettes are not approved as a cessation device, many who smoke believe that e-cigarettes will help them quit cigarette smoking successfully. OBJECTIVE To assess whether people who recently quit smoking and who had switched to e-cigarettes or another tobacco product were less likely to relapse to cigarette smoking compared with those who remained tobacco free. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study analyzed a nationally representative sample of US households that participated in 4 waves of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (conducted 2013 through 2017), combining 2 independent cohorts each with 3 annual surveys. Eligible participants were individuals who smoked at baseline, had recently quit at the first follow-up, and completed the second follow-up survey. EXPOSURES Use of e-cigarettes or alternate tobacco products at follow-up 1 after recently quitting smoking. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Weighted percentage of participants with over 12 months abstinence by follow-up 2. RESULTS Of a total of 13 604 participants who smoked cigarettes at baseline, 9.4% (95% CI, 8.7%-10.0%) recently had quit smoking (mean age, 41.9; 95% CI, 39.7-46.6 years; 641 [43.2%] women) Of these, 22.8% (95% CI, 19.7%-26.0%) had switched to e-cigarettes, with 17.6% (95% CI, 14.8%-20.5%) using them daily. A total of 37.1% (95% CI, 33.7%-40.4%) used a noncigarette tobacco product and 62.9% (95% CI, 59.6%-66.3%) were tobacco free. Rates of switching to e-cigarettes were highest for those who were in the top tertile of tobacco dependence (31.3%; 95% CI, 25.0%-37.7%), were non-Hispanic White (26.4%; 95% CI, 22.3%-30.4%), and had higher incomes (annual income ≥$35 000, 27.5%; 95% CI, 22.5%-32.4% vs <$35 000, 19.3%; 95% CI, 16.3%-22.3%). At follow-up 2, unadjusted relapse rates were similar among those who switched to different tobacco products (for any tobacco product: successfully quit, 41.5%; 95% CI, 36.2%-46.9%; relapsed with significant requit, 17.0%; 95% CI, 12.4%-21.6%; currently smoking, 36.2%; 95% CI, 30.9%-41.4%). Controlled for potential confounders, switching to any tobacco product was associated with higher relapse rate than being tobacco free (adjusted risk difference, 8.5%; 95% CI, 0.3%-16.6%). Estimates for those who switched to e-cigarettes, whether daily or not, were not significant. While individuals who switched from cigarettes to e-cigarettes were more likely to relapse, they appeared more likely to requit and be abstinent for 3 months at follow-up 2 (17.0%; 95% CI, 12.4%-21.6% vs 10.4%; 95% CI, 8.0%-12.9%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This large US nationally representative study does not support the hypothesis that switching to e-cigarettes will prevent relapse to cigarette smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Pierce
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Ruifeng Chen
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Sheila Kealey
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Eric C. Leas
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Martha M. White
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Matthew D. Stone
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Sara B. McMenamin
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Dennis R. Trinidad
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - David R. Strong
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Tarik Benmarhnia
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Karen Messer
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zakiyah N, Purwadi FV, Insani WN, Abdulah R, Puspitasari IM, Barliana MI, Lesmana R, Amaliya A, Suwantika AA. Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Alternative Tobacco and Nicotine Products for Smoking Reduction and Cessation: A Systematic Review. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:1955-1975. [PMID: 34326646 PMCID: PMC8315778 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s319727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alternative tobacco and nicotine products such as electronic cigarettes (EC), smokeless tobacco, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) are currently being assessed as options in tobacco harm reduction due to their potential role in smoking reduction and smoking cessation. OBJECTIVE To provide the current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of various alternative tobacco and nicotine products for smoking reduction and cessation. METHODS A systematic review using databases from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library was conducted up to December 2020 to identify eligible experimental and observational studies assessing the use of alternative tobacco and nicotine products on smoking reduction and smoking cessation and the safety of these products. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and ROBINS-I tools were used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Results were described through a narrative synthesis of the evidence. RESULTS From 1955 retrieved references, 44 studies (31 randomized controlled trials/RCTs and 13 prospective cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Twenty-nine studies were assessing EC, one study evaluated heat-not-burn (HNB) product, five studies were focused on snus, and nine studies assessed NRT in the form of nicotine patch, gum, etc. The overall results suggested that alternative tobacco and nicotine products in the form of EC, snus, and NRT can moderately reduce daily cigarette consumption and has potential to assist smoking cessation attempts, with fewer adverse events. CONCLUSION The findings suggested that alternative tobacco and nicotine products have a potential role in assisting smoking reduction and cessation, highlighting their role in the tobacco harm reduction approach. Further studies should focus on investigating long-term outcomes, safety, and effectiveness of alternative tobacco and nicotine products to better inform smoking reduction/cessation policy. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020205830.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neily Zakiyah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Febby V Purwadi
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Widya N Insani
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rizky Abdulah
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Irma M Puspitasari
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Melisa I Barliana
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Department of Biological Pharmacy, Biotechnology Pharmacy Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Ronny Lesmana
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Division of Physiology, Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Division of Biological Activity, Central Laboratory, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Amaliya Amaliya
- Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| | - Auliya A Suwantika
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The Association Between Risk Behaviors and Vaping Among Youth in New Mexico. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2021; 27:S164-S167. [PMID: 33785690 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Electronic-cigarette use, or vaping, among youth has increased substantially in recent years. Tobacco smoking shows a strong association with other risk behaviors, but the association between vaping and other risk behaviors has rarely been explored. We examine the relationship between youth vaping and substance use, risky driving behaviors, and lack of bicycle helmet use. PROGRAM Data from the 2015 and 2017 New Mexico Youth Risk and Resiliency Survey were analyzed to evaluate the association between the use of e-cigarettes and other youth risk behaviors. Study participants were high school students, grades 9 to 12. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). EVALUATION A majority of students reported ever using e-cigarettes (54%). In 2015, e-cigarette users were more likely than nonusers to be Hispanic (65% vs 54%, P ≤ .001) and 16 years of age or older (58% vs 42%, P = .018). We found strong, statistically significant associations between e-cigarette use and not wearing a bicycle helmet (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.95-3.51), texting while driving (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.79-2.66), driving after drinking (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.61-5.40), current marijuana use (OR = 6.38, 95% CI: 4.65-8.76), current painkiller use (OR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.63-3.77), and current heroin use (OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.06-0.33). Driving after drinking was not significantly associated with e-cigarette use in 2017. DISCUSSION E-cigarette use is associated with multiple other risk behaviors among youth. Further research should focus on environmental and policy efforts to reduce access to e-cigarettes by youth as well as interventions that address the underlying causes of the constellation of risk behaviors.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang RJ, Bhadriraju S, Glantz SA. E-Cigarette Use and Adult Cigarette Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Public Health 2020; 111:230-246. [PMID: 33351653 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2020.305999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. To determine the association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation.Methods. We searched PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and EMBASE and computed the association of e-cigarette use with quitting cigarettes using random effects meta-analyses.Results. We identified 64 papers (55 observational studies and 9 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]). In observational studies of all adult smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 0.947; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.772, 1.160) and smokers motivated to quit smoking (OR = 0.851; 95% CI = 0.684, 1.057), e-cigarette consumer product use was not associated with quitting. Daily e-cigarette use was associated with more quitting (OR = 1.529; 95% CI = 1.158, 2.019) and less-than-daily use was associated with less quitting (OR = 0.514; 95% CI = 0.402, 0.665). The RCTs that compared quitting among smokers who were provided e-cigarettes to smokers with conventional therapy found e-cigarette use was associated with more quitting (relative risk = 1.555; 95% CI = 1.173, 2.061).Conclusions. As consumer products, in observational studies, e-cigarettes were not associated with increased smoking cessation in the adult population. In RCTs, provision of free e-cigarettes as a therapeutic intervention was associated with increased smoking cessation.Public Health Implications. E-cigarettes should not be approved as consumer products but may warrant consideration as a prescription therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Wang
- Richard J. Wang and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju were initially postdoctoral fellows in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Richard J. Wang subsequently joined the faculty as an assistant professor of medicine, and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju joined the pulmonary medicine staff at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Redwood City, CA. Stanton A. Glantz was professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California San Francisco
| | - Sudhamayi Bhadriraju
- Richard J. Wang and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju were initially postdoctoral fellows in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Richard J. Wang subsequently joined the faculty as an assistant professor of medicine, and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju joined the pulmonary medicine staff at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Redwood City, CA. Stanton A. Glantz was professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California San Francisco
| | - Stanton A Glantz
- Richard J. Wang and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju were initially postdoctoral fellows in the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco; Richard J. Wang subsequently joined the faculty as an assistant professor of medicine, and Sudhamayi Bhadriraju joined the pulmonary medicine staff at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Redwood City, CA. Stanton A. Glantz was professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen R, Pierce JP, Leas EC, White MM, Kealey S, Strong DR, Trinidad DR, Benmarhnia T, Messer K. Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Aid Long-Term Smoking Cessation in the United States: Prospective Evidence From the PATH Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol 2020; 189:1529-1537. [PMID: 32715314 PMCID: PMC7705599 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwaa161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are the preferred smoking-cessation aid in the United States; however, there is little evidence regarding long-term effectiveness among those who use them. We used the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study to compare long-term abstinence between matched US smokers who tried to quit with and without use of e-cigarettes as a cessation aid. We identified a nationally representative cohort of 2,535 adult US smokers in 2014-2015 (baseline assessment), who, in 2015-2016 (exposure assessment), reported a past-year attempt to quit and the cessation aids used, and reported smoking status in 2016-2017 (outcome assessment; self-reported ≥12 months continuous abstinence). We used propensity-score methods to match each e-cigarette user with similar nonusers. Among US smokers who used e-cigarettes to help quit, 12.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9.1%, 16.7%) successfully attained long-term abstinence. However, there was no difference compared with matched non-e-cigarette users (cigarette abstinence difference: 2%; 95% CI: -3%, 7%). Furthermore, fewer e-cigarette users were abstinent from nicotine products in the long term (nicotine abstinence difference: -4%; 95% CI: -7%, -1%); approximately two-thirds of e-cigarette users who successfully quit smoking continued to use e-cigarettes. These results suggest e-cigarettes may not be an effective cessation aid for adult smokers and, instead, may contribute to continuing nicotine dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Karen Messer
- Correspondence to Dr. Karen Messer, University of California, San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, Room 3037, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla CA 92093-0901 (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Relationship of E-Cigarette Use to Tobacco Use Outcomes Among Young Adults Who Smoke and Use Alcohol. J Addict Med 2020; 15:421-424. [PMID: 33229934 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES E-cigarette use is increasing among young adults in the U.S. However, longitudinal research studies examining associations between e-cigarette use and combustible cigarette use among young adults are limited. This study assessed the relationship of e-cigarette use to smoking reduction and cessation among young adults. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled social media-based smoking cessation trial comprising adults ages 18 to 25 who smoked cigarettes and engaged in heavy episodic drinking (N = 179). Over 12 months, participants reported past month e-cigarette use with nicotine or tetrahydrocannabinol, cigarette quantity in the past week, quit attempts, and cessation strategies including nicotine e-cigarettes. Longitudinal regression models estimated associations between e-cigarette use, smoking reduction, and 7-day abstinence. RESULTS Past-month nicotine e-cigarette use prevalence ranged from 53.1% at baseline to 50.3% at 12 months. Over 70% of participants who reported past month nicotine e-cigarette use also smoked cigarettes (ie, dual use). Neither past month nicotine nor tetrahydrocannabinol e-cigarette use was associated with smoking reduction or cessation. However, use of nicotine e-cigarettes as a cessation strategy among participants attempting to quit (N = 137) was positively associated with abstinence (adjusted odds ratio = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.20-5.09) and ≥50% reduction in cigarettes per week from baseline (aOR = 2.36,95% CI = 1.08-5.18), relative to other strategies. CONCLUSIONS Nicotine e-cigarettes were significantly associated with improved tobacco use outcomes when used as a cessation strategy, but not when used apart from trying to quit smoking. Dual use may not be an effective path to achieve smoking cessation.
Collapse
|
22
|
Pierce JP, Benmarhnia T, Chen R, White M, Abrams DB, Ambrose BK, Blanco C, Borek N, Choi K, Coleman B, Compton WM, Cummings KM, Delnevo CD, Elton-Marshall T, Goniewicz ML, Gravely S, Fong GT, Hatsukami D, Henrie J, Kasza KA, Kealey S, Kimmel HL, Limpert J, Niaura RS, Ramôa C, Sharma E, Silveira ML, Stanton CA, Steinberg MB, Taylor E, Bansal-Travers M, Trinidad DR, Gardner LD, Hyland A, Soneji S, Messer K. Role of e-cigarettes and pharmacotherapy during attempts to quit cigarette smoking: The PATH Study 2013-16. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0237938. [PMID: 32877429 PMCID: PMC7467279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More smokers report using e-cigarettes to help them quit than FDA-approved pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVE To assess the association of e-cigarettes with future abstinence from cigarette and tobacco use. DESIGN Cohort study of US sample, with annual follow-up. PARTICIPANTS US adult (ages 18+) daily cigarette smokers identified at Wave 1 (W1; 2013-14) of the PATH Study, who reported a quit attempt before W2 and completed W3 (n = 2443). EXPOSURES Use of e-cigarettes, pharmacotherapy (including nicotine replacement therapy), or no product for last quit attempt (LQA), and current daily e-cigarette use at W2. ANALYSIS Propensity score matching (PSM) of groups using different methods to quit. OUTCOME MEASURES 12+ months abstinence at W3 from cigarettes and from all tobacco (including e-cigarettes). 30+ days abstinence at W3 was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Among daily smokers with an LQA, 23.5% used e-cigarettes, 19.3% used pharmacotherapy only (including NRT) and 57.2% used no product. Cigarette abstinence for 12+ months at W3 was ~10% in each group. Half of the cigarette abstainers in the e-cigarette group were using e-cigarettes at W3. Different methods to help quitting had statistically comparable 12+ month cigarette abstinence at W3 (e-cigarettes vs no product: Risk Difference (RD) = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.06; e-cigarettes vs pharmacotherapy: RD = 0.02, 95% CI:-0.04 to 0.09). Likewise, daily e-cigarette users at W2 did not show a cessation benefit over comparable no-e-cigarette users and this finding was robust to sensitivity analyses. Abstinence for 30+ days at W3 was also similar across products. LIMITATIONS The frequency of e-cigarette use during the LQA was not assessed, nor was it possible to assess continuous abstinence from the LQA. CONCLUSION Among US daily smokers who quit cigarettes in 2014-15, use of e-cigarettes in that attempt compared to approved cessation aids or no products showed similar abstinence rates 1-2 years later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P. Pierce
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Tarik Benmarhnia
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Ruifeng Chen
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Martha White
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - David B. Abrams
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Bridget K. Ambrose
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Carlos Blanco
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Nicolette Borek
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Kelvin Choi
- National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Blair Coleman
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Wilson M. Compton
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - K. Michael Cummings
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Cristine D. Delnevo
- Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Tara Elton-Marshall
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maciej L. Goniewicz
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Shannon Gravely
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geoffrey T. Fong
- Department of Psychology and School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, MaRS Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dorothy Hatsukami
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - James Henrie
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Karin A. Kasza
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Sheila Kealey
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Heather L. Kimmel
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jean Limpert
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Raymond S. Niaura
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Carolina Ramôa
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Eva Sharma
- Westat, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Marushka L. Silveira
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
- Kelly Government Solutions, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Michael B. Steinberg
- Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Ethel Taylor
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Maansi Bansal-Travers
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
| | - Dennis R. Trinidad
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Lisa D. Gardner
- Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Andrew Hyland
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America
- Westat, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Samir Soneji
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Karen Messer
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Weaver SR, Heath JW, Ashley DL, Huang J, Pechacek TF, Eriksen MP. What are the reasons that smokers reject ENDS? A national probability survey of U.S. Adult smokers, 2017-2018. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 211:107855. [PMID: 32057533 PMCID: PMC7200297 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective was to examine the reasons smokers have discontinued or chosen not to use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). METHODS Data were obtained from a national probability sample of 1843 US adult current smokers who were not current ENDS users pooled from the 2017 and 2018 annual, cross-sectional Tobacco Products and Risk Perceptions Surveys. Participants reported their ENDS use, reasons for discontinuing or not initiating ENDS use, quit smoking intentions, perceptions, and use intentions. Weighted proportions and logistic regression models were estimated. RESULTS Twenty-three percent of smokers were former ENDS users who reported prior "regular use", and 7.5% were former ENDS users who reported regular use. Three most cited reasons for discontinuing ENDS were: ENDS "didn't feel like smoking" (23%), "only ever tried them to see what they were like" (20%), and "didn't help me deal with cravings for smoking" (14%). Reasons for discontinuing ENDS were associated with the regularity of former ENDS use and ENDS type. Nearly 40% of current smokers had not tried ENDS with the most commonly cited reasons being not wanting to substitute one addiction for another (60%), concerns about their safety (53%), skepticism that ENDS could help them quit smoking (52%), and cost (43%). Reasons were associated with smoking quit intentions, harm perceptions, and age. CONCLUSION Whereas smokers who had formerly used ENDS cited inadequate craving reduction or incomparability to smoking for their discontinuation, the larger segment of smokers who have never used ENDS cited "safety," "effectiveness," and "costs" as reasons for non-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott R Weaver
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - J Wesley Heath
- Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David L Ashley
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jidong Huang
- Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Terry F Pechacek
- Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael P Eriksen
- Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gaiha SM, Halpern-Felsher B. Public Health Considerations for Adolescent Initiation of Electronic Cigarettes. Pediatrics 2020; 145:S175-S180. [PMID: 32358208 PMCID: PMC7301615 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-2056e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescent use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has increased dramatically, with younger and nicotine-naive adolescents starting to use these devices and use them more frequently than combustible cigarettes. In emerging evidence, it is shown that e-cigarettes are not effective in helping adult smokers quit and that youth using e-cigarettes are at risk for becoming nicotine dependent and continuing to use as adults. Important gaps in our knowledge remain regarding the long-term health impact of e-cigarettes, effective strategies to prevent and reduce adolescent e-cigarette use, and the impact of provider screening and counseling to address this new method of nicotine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Piper ME, Baker TB, Benowitz NL, Jorenby DE. Changes in Use Patterns Over 1 Year Among Smokers and Dual Users of Combustible and Electronic Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2020; 22:672-680. [PMID: 31058284 PMCID: PMC7457322 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntz065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual use of combustible and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is a growing use pattern; more than half of e-cigarette users are dual users. However, little is known regarding the course of dual use; for example, the likelihood of discontinuation of either combustible or e-cigarettes or both. METHODS Adult daily smokers and dual users (daily smokers who also vaped at least once per week) who did not intend to quit use of either product in the next 30 days participated in a longitudinal, observational study (N = 322, 51.2% women, 62.7% white, mean age = 42.27 [SD = 14.05]). At baseline, participants completed demographics and smoking and vaping history assessments. They also reported daily cigarette and e-cigarette use via timeline follow-back assessment and provided a breath sample for carbon monoxide assay at 4-month intervals for 1 year. RESULTS Of those who completed the year 1 follow-up, 1.9% baseline smokers and 8.0% dual users achieved biochemically confirmed seven-day point-prevalence abstinence from combustible cigarettes (χ2 = 4.57, p = .03). Of initial dual users, by 1 year 43.9% were smoking only, 48.8% continued dual use, 5.9% were vaping only, and 1.4% abstained from both products. Among baseline smokers, 92.3% continued as exclusive smokers. Baseline dual users who continued e-cigarette use were more likely to be white and report higher baseline e-cigarette dependence. CONCLUSIONS In this community sample, the majority of dual users transitioned to exclusive smoking. A higher percentage of dual users quit smoking than smokers, but attrition and baseline differences between the groups compromise strong conclusions. Sustained e-cigarette use was related to baseline e-cigarette dependence. IMPLICATIONS This research suggests that dual use of combustible and e-cigarettes is not a sustained pattern for the majority of dual users, but it is more likely to be a continued pattern if the user is more dependent on e-cigarettes. There was evidence that dual users were more likely to quit smoking than exclusive smokers, but this may be due to factors other than their dual use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Piper
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| | - Neal L Benowitz
- Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Douglas E Jorenby
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention of Wisconsin, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|