The influence of the CYP3A4*22 polymorphism on serum concentration of quetiapine in psychiatric patients

Effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on exposure and efficacy of quetiapine: A retrospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

The involvement of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the metabolism of quetiapine has been proposed, though conclusive evidence is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the impact of CYP3A5 genetic variability on quetiapine exposure in a Chinese patient population.

METHODS

Patient data were retrospectively collected from the database of the Mental Health Centre at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, covering the period from September 1, 2019, to July 1, 2023. The study included patients genotyped for CYP3A5 who were treated with quetiapine. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as serum concentrations of the drug and its metabolites, included oral administration of quetiapine, availability of information on the prescribed daily dose and concomitant medications, and the determination of steady-state blood levels at the time of sampling (after at least 3 days of continuous administration at the same dose). Exclusion criteria comprised polypharmacy with known CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, as well as patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the exposure to quetiapine and N-dealkylquetiapine, measured using dose-corrected concentrations (C/D). The secondary endpoint was the metabolism of quetiapine to N-dealkylquetiapine, assessed by the ratio of metabolite to parent drug concentrations. The third endpoint is the differences in adverse reactions, QTc intervals, and biochemical parameters among patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes.

RESULT

Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical data from 207 patients were ultimately included in the study. Of these, 20 patients had the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype, 78 had the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype, and 109 had the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. The CYP3A5*3 variant was found to significantly impact the metabolism of quetiapine. The C/D values for both quetiapine and N-dealkyl quetiapine were notably higher in individuals with the *3/*3 genotype compared to those with the *1/*1 and *1/*3 genotypes (P1 < 0.001 and P2 = 0.002, respectively). A comparison of the variability in metabolic ratios among different genotype groups revealed no significant difference (P = 0.067). However, a post hoc analysis indicated that the metabolic ratio in poor metabolizers was significantly lower than that in intermediate metabolizers (P = 0.021). The analysis of adverse reaction incidence and QTc intervals among different genotypes showed no statistically significant differences (P = 0.652, P = 0.486). However, comparison of biochemical parameters across different genotype groups revealed that alanine aminotransferase, uric acid, hemoglobin, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype compared to those with the CYP3A5*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotypes.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5*3 significantly influences the metabolism of quetiapine. Specifically, carriers of the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype exhibited higher blood levels of quetiapine, with a greater likelihood of these levels exceeding the therapeutic range. This finding underscores the need for clinicians to pay special attention to the efficacy and occurrence of adverse reactions when prescribing quetiapine to patients carrying the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype.

Ziprasidone population pharmacokinetics and co-medication effects in Chinese patients

Ziprasidone is widely used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Despite its prevalence, there is a notable lack of population pharmacokinetics (PPK) studies on ziprasidone in serum, both domestically and internationally. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the various factors influencing the PPK characteristics of Ziprasidone, thereby providing a scientific basis for personalized treatment strategies in clinical settings. This is a retrospective study. A non-linear mixed-effects modeling method was used for data analysis, with the ziprasidone PPK model established using the Phoenix NLME 8.1 software. Model evaluation employed goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and Bootstrap methods to ensure reliability and accuracy. To further validate the model's applicability, data from an additional 30 patients meeting the same inclusion criteria but not included in the final model were collected for external validation. Simulations were performed to explore the personalized dosage regimens. This retrospective analysis collected 547 drug concentration data points from 185 psychiatric disorder patients, along with related medical records. The data included detailed demographic information (such as age, gender, weight), dosing regimens, laboratory test results, and concomitant medication details. In the final model, Ka was fixed at 0.5 h-1 based on literature, and the population typical values for ziprasidone clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were 18.74 L/h and 110.24 L, respectively. Co-administration of lorazepam and valproic acid significantly influenced the clearance of ziprasidone. Moreover, the model evaluation indicated good stability and predictive accuracy. A simple to use dosage regimen table was derived based on the results of simulations. This study successfully established and validated a PPK model for ziprasidone in Chinese patients with psychiatric disorders. The model provides a scientific reference for individualized dosing of ziprasidone and holds the potential to optimize treatment strategies, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Discovering interactions in polypharmacy: Impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine

AIMS

Metamizole is quite an old drug with analgesic, antipyretic and spasmolytic properties. Recent findings have shown that it may induce several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, especially CYP3A4 and CYP2B6. The clinical relevance of these properties is uncertain. We aimed to unravel potential pharmacokinetic interactions between metamizole and the CYP3A4 substrate quetiapine.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations of quetiapine from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database were analysed. Two groups of 33 patients, either receiving quetiapine as a monotherapy (without CYP modulating comedications) or with concomitantly applied metamizole, were compared addressing a potential impact of metamizole on the metabolism of quetiapine being reflected in differences of plasma concentrations of quetiapine and dose-adjusted plasma concentrations.

RESULTS

Patients comedicated with metamizole showed >50% lower plasma concentrations of quetiapine (median 45.2 ng/mL, Q1 = 15.5; Q3 = 90.5 vs. 92.0 ng/mL, Q1 = 52.3; Q3 = 203.8, P = .003). The dose-adjusted plasma concentrations were 69% lower in the comedication group (P = .001). Subgroup analyses did not suggest a dose dependency of the metamizole effect or an influence of quetiapine formulation (immediate vs. extended release). Finally, the comedication group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of patients whose quetiapine concentrations were below the therapeutic reference range (78.8% in the metamizole group vs. 54.4% in the control group, P = .037) indicating therapeutically insufficient drug concentrations.

CONCLUSION

The combination of metamizole and quetiapine leads to significantly lower drug concentrations of quetiapine, probably via an induction of CYP3A4. Clinicians must consider the risk of adverse drug reactions, especially treatment failure under quetiapine when adding metamizole.

CYP3A4 inhibitors may influence the quantification of [123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT scans

PURPOSE

[123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT is an imaging tool to support the diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes characterized by nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration. After intravenous injection, [123I]I-FP-CIT is metabolized for a small part by the enzyme CYP3A4, leading to the formation of [123I]I-nor-β-CIT. [123I]I-nor-β-CIT passes the blood-brain barrier and has a very high affinity for the serotonin transporter (SERT). The SERT is expressed in the striatum and cortical areas. So, at least theoretical, the use of frequently used CYP3A4 inhibitors (like amiodarone) may influence the specific to non-specific striatal [123I]I-FP-CIT ratio. Here we tested this novel hypothesis.

METHODS

Using a retrospective design, we determined the specific to non-specific striatal [123I]I-FP-CIT ratio (using BRASS software) in 6 subjects that were using an CYP3A4 inhibitor and 18 matched controls. Only subjects were included with a normal rated [123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT scan, and all participants were scanned on the same brain-dedicated SPECT system.

RESULTS

The specific to non-specific (assessed in the occipital cortex) striatal [123I]I-FP-CIT binding ratio was significantly higher in CYP3A4 users than in the control group (3.52 ± 0.33 vs. 2.90 ± 0.78, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data suggest that the use of CYP3A4 inhibitors may influence striatal [123I]I-FP-CIT binding ratios. This information, when reproduced in larger studies, may be relevant for studies in which quantification of [123I]I-FP-CIT SPECT imaging is used for diagnostic or research purposes.

The impact of CYP3A5*3 on oral quetiapine: A population pharmacokinetic model in Chinese bipolar disorder patients

BACKGROUND

There is great interindividual difference in the plasma concentration of quetiapine, and optimizing quetiapine therapy to achieve a balance between efficacy and safety is still a challenge. In our study, a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model considering genetic information was developed with the expectation of comprehensively explaining this observation in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Patients who were dispensed quetiapine and underwent the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) were included. The genotypes of CYP3A5*3, CYP2D6*10, and ABCB1 C3435T/G2677T were analyzed. Finally, a multivariable linear regression model was applied to describe the PPK of quetiapine considering the covariates weight, height and genotype information.

RESULTS

A total of 175 TDM points from 107 patients were adopted for PPK model development. Resultantly, the CL/F of quetiapine in CYP3A5 expressers was 81.1 CL/h, whereas it was 43.6 CL/h in CYP3A5 nonexpressers. The interindividual variability in CL/F was 47.7 %. However, neither the ABCB1 nor CYP2D6 genotype was significantly associated with the predictor of quetiapine clearance in our study.

LIMITATIONS

Only trough concentrations were collected, and the span between different points was relatively wide, impeding the application of the typical nonlinear compartment model for PPK analysis. In addition, this was a single-center study which limited the sample of wild-type CYP3A5 carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently established PPK model of quetiapine considering the contribution of the CYP3A5 genotype could efficiently predict the population and individual pharmacokinetic parameters of Chinese bipolar disorder patients, which could better guide the personalized therapy with quetiapine, thus to achieve the best clinical response.

Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 and antipsychotics

The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate pharmacogenetics implementation in clinical practice by developing evidence-based guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. A guideline describing the gene-drug interaction between the genes CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 and antipsychotics is presented here. The DPWG identified gene-drug interactions that require therapy adjustments when respective genotype is known for CYP2D6 with aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone and zuclopenthixol, and for CYP3A4 with quetiapine. Evidence-based dose recommendations were obtained based on a systematic review of published literature. Reduction of the normal dose is recommended for aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, haloperidol, pimozide, risperidone and zuclopenthixol for CYP2D6-predicted PMs, and for pimozide and zuclopenthixol also for CYP2D6 IMs. For CYP2D6 UMs, a dose increase or an alternative drug is recommended for haloperidol and an alternative drug or titration of the dose for risperidone. In addition, in case of no or limited clinical effect, a dose increase is recommended for zuclopenthixol for CYP2D6 UMs. Even though evidence is limited, the DPWG recommends choosing an alternative drug to treat symptoms of depression or a dose reduction for other indications for quetiapine and CYP3A4 PMs. No therapy adjustments are recommended for the other CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 predicted phenotypes. In addition, no action is required for the gene-drug combinations CYP2D6 and clozapine, flupentixol, olanzapine or quetiapine and also not for CYP1A2 and clozapine or olanzapine. For identified gene-drug interactions requiring therapy adjustments, genotyping of CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 prior to treatment should not be considered for all patients, but on an individual patient basis only.

Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Atypical Antipsychotics

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), also known as atypical antipsychotics, are a newer class of antipsychotic drugs used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and related psychiatric conditions. The plasma concentration of antipsychotic drugs is a valid measure of the drug at its primary target structure in the brain, and therefore determines the efficacy and safety of these drugs. However, despite the well-known high variability in pharmacokinetics of these substances, psychiatric medication is usually administered in uniform dosage schedules. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), as the specific method that can help personalised medicine in dose adjustment according to the characteristics of the individual patient, minimizing the risk of toxicity, monitoring adherence, and increasing cost-effectiveness in the treatment, thus seems to be an elegant tool to solve this problem. Non-response to therapeutic doses, uncertain adherence to medication, suboptimal tolerability, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical indications for TDM of SGAs. This review aims to summarize an overview of the current knowledge and evidence of the possibilities to tailor the dosage of selected SGAs using TDM, including the necessary pharmacokinetic parameters for personalised pharmacotherapy.

Impact of age, sex and cytochrome P450 genotype on quetiapine and N-desalkylquetiapine serum concentrations: A study based on real-world data from 8118 patients

AIMS

To investigate the effect of aging, sex and cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotypes on the exposure of quetiapine (QUE) and the pharmacologically active metabolite N-desalkylquetiapine (NDQ).

METHODS

Patients with serum concentrations of QUE and NDQ were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. The outcome measures were concentration:dose (C:D) ratios of QUE and NDQ, and NDQ:QUE metabolic ratio. Linear mixed model analyses were used to evaluate the effects of age, sex and, subsequently, CYP2D6/3A genotypes.

RESULTS

The average age of the included population (n = 8118 patients) was 44 years (13.5% ≥65 years). The C:D ratio of QUE and NDQ gradually increased in patients aged >50 years compared to those aged 18-30 years, with 28 and 29% increase, respectively, for patients aged >70 years (P < .001). Compared to males, females had 15% lower QUE C:D ratio and 10% higher C:D ratio of NDQ (both P < .001). The NDQ:QUE metabolic ratio was 30% higher in females than in males (P < .001). For females ≥65 years, the NDQ C:D ratio was 36% higher compared to males <65 years (P < .001). A significantly higher NDQ C:D ratio was observed for CYP2D6 intermediate (+7%, P = .012) and poor (+17%, P = .001) compared to normal metabolizers. No effects of CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*1 allele variants were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study shows an increase of the QUE and NDQ exposures during aging. Old age, female sex and CYP2D6 allele variants encoding reduced activity are factors associated with high NDQ exposure. Therefore, females ≥65 years carrying CYP2D6 allele variants encoding reduced activity have the highest risk of dose-dependent side effects of NDQ during QUE treatment.

Effects of CYP3A4*22 polymorphism on trough concentration of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Tacrolimus (Tac) is a widely used immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplantation. Cytochrome P450 (CYP), especially CYP3A4 enzymes are responsible for the metabolism of drugs. However, the correlation between plasma Tac concentration and CYP3A4*22 gene variants is controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between CYP3A4*22 polymorphism and the dose-adjusted trough concentration (C0/D) of Tac in adult kidney transplant patients. Methods: We conducted a literature review for qualifying studies using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases until July 2023. For the continuous variables (C0/D and daily dose), mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between the CYP3A4 * 22 and Tac pharmacokinetics. We performed an additional analysis on the relationship of CYP3A5*3 with Tac PKs and analyzed the effects of CYP3A4*22 in CYP3A5 non-expressers. Results: Overall, eight eligible studies with 2,683 renal transplant recipients were included in this meta-analysis. The CYP3A4*22 allele was significantly associated with a higher C0/D (MD 0.57 ng/mL/mg (95% CI: 0.28 to 0.86; p = 0.0001) and lower mean daily dose requirement (MD -2.02 mg/day, 95% CI: -2.55 to -1.50; p < 0.00001). An additional meta-analysis demonstrated that carrying the CYP3A5*3 polymorphism greatly impacted Tac blood concentration. From the result with CYP3A5 non-expressers, CYP3A4*22 showed significant effects on the Tac C0/D and dose requirement even after adjusting the effect of CYP3A5*3. Conclusion: Patients with CYP3A4*22 allele showed significantly higher plasma C0/D of Tac and required lower daily dose to achieve the therapeutic trough level after kidney transplantation. These findings of our meta-analysis may provide further evidence for the effects of genetic polymorphism in CYP3A4 on the PKs of Tac, which will improve individualized treatment in a clinical setting.

CYP3A genetic variation and taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and candidate gene study

Background: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) is an important cause of premature treatment cessation and dose-limitation in cancer therapy. It also reduces quality of life and survivorship in affected patients. Genetic polymorphisms in the CYP3A family have been investigated but the findings have been inconsistent and contradictory. Methods: A systematic review identified 12 pharmacogenetic studies investigating genetic variation in CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3 and TIPN. In our candidate gene study, 288 eligible participants (211 taxane participants receiving docetaxel or paclitaxel, and 77 control participants receiving oxaliplatin) were successfully genotyped for CYP3A4*22 and CYP3A5*3. Genotyping data was transformed into a combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotype: Poor metabolisers, intermediate metabolisers and extensive metabolisers. Individual genotypes and combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotypes were assessed in relation to neurotoxicity, including by meta-analysis where possible. Results: In the systematic review, no significant association was found between CYP3A5*3 and TIPN in seven studies, with one study reporting a protective association. For CYP3A4*22, one study has reported an association with TIPN, while four other studies failed to show an association. Evaluation of our patient cohort showed that paclitaxel was found to be more neurotoxic than docetaxel (p < 0.001). Diabetes was also significantly associated with the development of TIPN. The candidate gene analysis showed no significant association between either SNP (CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22) and the development of TIPN overall, or severe TIPN. Meta-analysis showed no association between these two variants and TIPN. Transformed into combined CYP3A metaboliser phenotypes, 30 taxane recipients were poor metabolisers, 159 were intermediate metabolisers, and 22 were extensive metabolisers. No significant association was observed between metaboliser status and case-control status. Summary: We have shown that the risk of peripheral neuropathy during taxane chemotherapy is greater in patients who have diabetes. CYP3A genotype or phenotype was not identified as a risk factor in either the candidate gene analysis or the systematic review/meta-analysis, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a minor contribution, which would require a larger sample size.

The pharmacogenetics of the new-generation antipsychotics - A scoping review focused on patients with severe psychiatric disorders

Exploring the possible correlations between gene variations and the clinical effects of the new-generation antipsychotics is considered essential in the framework of personalized medicine. It is expected that pharmacogenetic data will be useful for increasing the treatment efficacy, tolerability, therapeutic adherence, functional recovery, and quality of life in patients with severe psychiatric disorders (SPD). This scoping review investigated the available evidence about the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics of five new-generation antipsychotics, i.e., cariprazine, brexpiprazole, aripiprazole, lumateperone, and pimavanserin. Based on the analysis of 25 primary and secondary sources and the review of these agents' summaries of product characteristics, aripiprazole benefits from the most relevant data about the impact of gene variability on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with significant consequences on this antipsychotic's efficacy and tolerability. The determination of the CYP2D6 metabolizer status is important when administering aripiprazole, either as monotherapy or associated with other pharmacological agents. Allelic variability in genes encoding dopamine D2, D3, and serotonin, 5HT2A, 5HT2C receptors, COMT, BDNF, and dopamine transporter DAT1 was also associated with different adverse events or variations in the clinical efficacy of aripiprazole. Brexpiprazole also benefits from specific recommendations regarding the CYP2D6 metabolizer status and the risks of associating this antipsychotic with strong/moderate CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommendations about cariprazine refer to possible pharmacokinetic interactions with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. Pharmacogenetic data about cariprazine is sparse, and relevant information regarding gene-drug interactions for lumateperone and pimavanserin is yet lacking. In conclusion, more studies are needed to detect the influence of gene variations on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of new-generation antipsychotics. This type of research could increase the ability of clinicians to predict favorable responses to specific antipsychotics and to improve the tolerability of the treatment regimen in patients with SPD.

Antipsychotic drug-aripiprazole against schizophrenia, its therapeutic and metabolic effects associated with gene polymorphisms

Second-generation antipsychotics are widely used for the treatment of schizophrenia. Aripiprazole (ARI) is classified as a third-generation antipsychotic drug with a high affinity for dopamine and serotonin receptors. It is considered a dopamine-system stabilizer without severe side effects. In some patients the response to ARI treatment is inadequate and they require an effective augmentation strategy. It has been found that the response to the drug and the risk of adverse metabolic effects can be related to gene polymorphisms. A reduced dose is recommended for CYP2D6 poor metabolizers; moreover, it is postulated that other polymorphisms including CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1, DRD2, and 5-HTRs genes influence the therapeutic effect of ARI. ARI can increase the levels of prolactin, C-peptide, insulin, and/or cholesterol possibly due to specific genetic variants. It seems that a pharmacogenetic approach can help predict drug response and improve the clinical management of patients with schizophrenia.

[The relationship of cytochrome P450 isoforms with the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic and antidepressant therapy]

Cytochrome P450 (CYP450) is the leading enzyme in the biotransformation of most psychotropic drugs. CYP450 gene polymorphisms determine a patient's endophenotype with respect to the activity of enzymes of the family and affect the metabolism of prescribed antipsychotics and antidepressants. Categorizing patients by endophenotype during genotyping is likely to help simplify the selection of therapy in clinical practice. Co-prescribing drugs that may be inhibitors or inducers of CYP450 isoforms, in turn, may lead to adverse reactions or no effect of therapy. The article presents a compilation of known pharmacogenetic recommendations regarding the four major endophenotypes of metabolizers.

CYP2C8*3 and *4 define CYP2C8 phenotype: An approach with the substrate cinitapride

Cinitapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug, prescribed for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, and as an adjuvant therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of relevant variants in CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 and other pharmacogenes, along with demographic characteristics, on cinitapride pharmacokinetics and safety; and to evaluate the impact of CYP2C8 alleles on the enzyme's function. Twenty-five healthy volunteers participating in a bioequivalence clinical trial consented to participate in the study. Participants were genotyped for 56 variants in 19 genes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (e.g., CYP2C8 or CYP3A4) or transporters (e.g., SLC or ABC), among others. CYP2C8*3 carriers showed a reduction in AUC of 42% and Cmax of 35% compared to *1/*1 subjects (p = 0.003 and p = 0.011, respectively). *4 allele carriers showed a 45% increase in AUC and 63% in Cmax compared to *1/*1 subjects, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CYP2C8*3 and *4 alleles may be used to infer the following pharmacogenetic phenotypes: ultrarapid (UM) (*3/*3), rapid (RM) (*1/*3), normal (NM) (*1/*1), intermediate (IM) (*1/*4), and poor (PM) metabolizers (*4/*4). In this study, we properly characterized RMs, NMs, and IMs; however, additional studies are required to properly characterize UMs and PMs. These findings should be relevant with respect to cinitapride, but also to numerous CYP2C8 substrates such as imatinib, loperamide, montelukast, ibuprofen, paclitaxel, pioglitazone, repaglinide, or rosiglitazone.

Tools for optimising pharmacotherapy in psychiatry (therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests): focus on antidepressants

Objectives: More than 40 drugs are available to treat affective disorders. Individual selection of the optimal drug and dose is required to attain the highest possible efficacy and acceptable tolerability for every patient.Methods: This review, which includes more than 500 articles selected by 30 experts, combines relevant knowledge on studies investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of 33 antidepressant drugs and of 4 drugs approved for augmentation in cases of insufficient response to antidepressant monotherapy. Such studies typically measure drug concentrations in blood (i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring) and genotype relevant genetic polymorphisms of enzymes, transporters or receptors involved in drug metabolism or mechanism of action. Imaging studies, primarily positron emission tomography that relates drug concentrations in blood and radioligand binding, are considered to quantify target structure occupancy by the antidepressant drugs in vivo. Results: Evidence is given that in vivo imaging, therapeutic drug monitoring and genotyping and/or phenotyping of drug metabolising enzymes should be an integral part in the development of any new antidepressant drug.Conclusions: To guide antidepressant drug therapy in everyday practice, there are multiple indications such as uncertain adherence, polypharmacy, nonresponse and/or adverse reactions under therapeutically recommended doses, where therapeutic drug monitoring and cytochrome P450 genotyping and/or phenotyping should be applied as valid tools of precision medicine.

Variants in COMT, CYP3A5, CYP2B6, and ABCG2 Alter Quetiapine Pharmacokinetics

Quetiapine is an atypical antipsychotic widely used for the treatment of schizophrenia and the depressive episodes of bipolar disorder. The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of variants in relevant pharmacogenes in the pharmacokinetics of quetiapine and to exploratorily evaluate adverse drug reaction (ADR) incidence based on genetic polymorphism. Specifically, 49 healthy volunteers enrolled in two bioequivalence clinical trials were included in this study. In addition, 80 variants in 19 relevant pharmacogenes were genotyped, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes, catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT), other enzymes (e.g., UGT1A1 or UGT1A4), and transporters (e.g., SLCO1B1, ABCB1, or ABCG2). The COMT rs13306278 T allele was significantly related to quetiapine-increased exposure. We demonstrated the existence of quetiapine derivatives with a catechol-like structure (7,8-dihydroxi-quetiapine and 7,8-dihydroxi-N-desalkyl-quetiapine), which would be COMT metabolites and would explain quetiapine accumulation through CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 negative feedback. Moreover, CYP3A5 and CYP2B6 phenotypes were related to quetiapine exposure variability, which confirms (for CYP3A5) and suggests (for CYP2B6) that these enzymes play an important role in quetiapine’s metabolism. Finally, the ABCG2 rs2231142 T allele was related to quetiapine accumulation. Further studies are required to confirm the clinical relevance of our findings.

Review: Influence of the CYP450 Genetic Variation on the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders

Second-generation antipsychotic metabolism is mainly carried out by the CYP450 superfamily, which is highly polymorphic. Therefore, knowing the influence of the different known CYP450 polymorphisms on antipsychotic plasmatic levels and, consequently, the biological effect could contribute to a deeper knowledge of interindividual antipsychotic treatment variability, prompting possible solutions. Considering this, this state of the art review aimed to summarize the current knowledge about the influence of the diverse characterized phenotypes on the metabolism of the most used second-generation antipsychotics. Forty studies describing different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the genes CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 and their influence on pharmacokinetics of olanzapine, clozapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, and quetiapine. Most of the authors concluded that although significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters between the different phenotypes could be observed, more thorough studies describing pharmacokinetic interactions and environmental conditions, among other variables, are needed to fully comprehend these pharmacogenetic interactions.

Genetic Variations Associated with Long-Term Treatment Response in Bipolar Depression

Several pharmacogenetic-based decision support tools for psychoactive medication selection are available. However, the scientific evidence of the gene-drug pairs analyzed is mainly based on pharmacogenetic studies in patients with major depression or schizophrenia, and their clinical utility is mostly assessed in major depression. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of individual genes, with pharmacogenetic relevance in other psychiatric conditions, in the response to treatment in bipolar depression. Seventy-six patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder and an index major depressive episode were included in an observational retrospective study. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and all patients were genotyped using a commercial multigene pharmacogenomic-based tool (Neuropharmagen^®, AB-Biotics S.A., Barcelona, Spain). Multiple linear regression was used to identify pharmacogenetic and clinical predictors of efficacy and tolerability of medications. The pharmacogenetic variables response to serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (ABCB1) and reduced metabolism of quetiapine (CYP3A4) predicted patient response to these medications, respectively. ABCB1 was also linked to the tolerability of SNRIs. An mTOR-related multigenic predictor was also associated with a lower number of adverse effects when including switch and autolytical ideation. Our results suggest that the predictors identified could be useful to guide the pharmacological treatment in bipolar disorder. Additional clinical studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

CYP3A4∗22 Genotyping in Clinical Practice: Ready for Implementation?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is the most important drug metabolizing enzyme in the liver, responsible for the oxidative metabolism of ∼50% of clinically prescribed drugs. Therefore, genetic variation in CYP3A4 could potentially affect the pharmacokinetics, toxicity and clinical outcome of drug treatment. Thus far, pharmacogenetics for CYP3A4 has not received much attention. However, the recent discovery of the intron 6 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs35599367C > T, encoding the CYP3A4^∗22 allele, led to several studies into the pharmacogenetic effect of CYP3A4^∗22 on different drugs. This allele has a relatively minor allele frequency of 3-5% and an effect on CYP3A4 enzymatic activity. Thus far, no review summarizing the data published on several drugs is available yet. This article therefore addresses the current knowledge on CYP3A4^∗22. This information may help in deciding if, and for which drugs, CYP3A4^∗22 genotype-based dosing could be helpful in improving drug therapy. CYP3A4^∗22 was shown to significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of several drugs, with currently being most thoroughly investigated tacrolimus, cyclosporine, and statins. Additional studies, focusing on toxicity and clinical outcome, are warranted to demonstrate clinical utility of CYP3A4^∗22 genotype-based dosing.

Inhibitory Effects of Antipsychotics on the Contractile Response to Acetylcholine in Rat Urinary Bladder Smooth Muscles

The clinical applications of antipsychotics for symptoms unrelated to schizophrenia, such as behavioral and psychological symptoms, in patients with Alzheimer's disease, and the likelihood of doctors prescribing antipsychotics for elderly people are increasing. In elderly people, drug-induced and aging-associated urinary disorders are likely to occur. The most significant factor causing drug-induced urinary disorders is a decrease in urinary bladder smooth muscle (UBSM) contraction induced by the anticholinergic action of therapeutics. However, the anticholinergic action-associated inhibitory effects of antipsychotics on UBSM contraction have not been sufficiently assessed. In this study, we examined 26 clinically available antipsychotics to determine the extent to which they inhibit acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contraction in rat UBSM to predict the drugs that should not be used by elderly people to avoid urinary disorders. Of the 26 antipsychotics, six (chlorpromazine, levomepromazine (phenothiazines), zotepine (a thiepine), olanzapine, quetiapine, clozapine (multi-acting receptor targeted antipsychotics (MARTAs))) competitively inhibited ACh-induced contractions at concentrations corresponding to clinically significant doses. Further, 11 antipsychotics (perphenazine, fluphenazine, prochlorperazine (phenothiazines), haloperidol, bromperidol, timiperone, spiperone (butyrophenones), pimozide (a diphenylbutylpiperidine), perospirone, blonanserin (serotonin-dopamine antagonists; SDAs), and asenapine (a MARTA)) significantly suppressed ACh-induced contraction; however, suppression occurred at concentrations substantially exceeding clinically achievable blood levels. The remaining nine antipsychotics (pipamperone (a butyrophenone), sulpiride, sultopride, tiapride, nemonapride (benzamides), risperidone, paliperidone (SDAs), aripiprazole, and brexpiprazole (dopamine partial agonists)) did not inhibit ACh-induced contractions at concentrations up to 10-5 M. These findings suggest that chlorpromazine, levomepromazine, zotepine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and clozapine should be avoided by elderly people with urinary disorders.

Application of a Pharmacogenetics-Based Precision Medicine Model (5SPM) to Psychotic Patients That Presented Poor Response to Neuroleptic Therapy

Antipsychotics are the keystone of the treatment of severe and prolonged mental disorders. However, there are many risks associated with these drugs and not all patients undergo full therapeutic profit from them. The application of the 5 Step Precision Medicine model(5SPM), based on the analysis of the pharmacogenetic profile of each patient, could be a helpful tool to solve many of the problematics traditionally associated with the neuroleptic treatment. In order to solve this question, a cohort of psychotic patients that showed poor clinical evolution was analyzed. After evaluating the relationship between the prescribed treatment and pharmacogenetic profile of each patient, a great number of pharmacological interactions and pharmacogenetical conflicts were found. After reconsidering the treatment of the conflictive cases, patients showed a substantial reduction on mean daily doses and polytherapy cases, which may cause less risk of adverse effects, greater adherence, and a reduction on economic costs.

How Can Drug Metabolism and Transporter Genetics Inform Psychotropic Prescribing?

Many genetic variants in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters have been shown to be relevant for treating psychiatric disorders. Associations are strong enough to feature on drug labels and for prescribing guidelines based on such data. A range of commercial tests are available; however, there is variability in included genetic variants, methodology, and interpretation. We herein provide relevant background for understanding clinical associations with specific variants, other factors that are relevant to consider when interpreting such data (such as age, gender, drug-drug interactions), and summarize the data relevant to clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in psychiatry and the available prescribing guidelines. We also highlight areas for future research focus in this field.

Influence of CYP3A polymorphisms on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients

Tacrolimus is characterized by a highly variable pharmacokinetics (PK) and a small therapeutic window. It is metabolized specifically by the CYP3A isoenzymes. This study aimed to determine, in kidney transplant patients, the influence of different genotypic clusters involving these SNPs CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*22, and CYP3A5*3 on Tacrolimus bioavailability during the first (PTP1) and the second (PTP2) posttransplant phase (PT). We included kidney transplant patients who received Tacrolimus and underwent drug monitoring by C0 monitoring. CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 genotyping were performed using PCR-RFLP. We classified the patients into four groups: Slow, Intermediate, rapid, and ultra-rapid metabolizers. We included 80 patients. The Tacrolimus dose-normalized C0 (C0/D ratio) was significantly decreased in intermediate, rapid, and ultra-rapid comparing with slow metabolisers. During PTP1 only CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*22 polymorphisms correlate significantly with C0/D ratio. Regardless of the PT phase and during the late one, only the CYP3A4 polymorphisms correlate significantly with the C0/D ratio. We identified that these SNPs are all associated independently with Tacrolimus exposure in different PT phases. Moreover, we are the first to define a genotypic cluster including the three CYP3A SNPs.

Effectiveness of a Pharmacogenetic Tool at Improving Treatment Efficacy in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Three Clinical Studies

Several pharmacogenetic tests to support drug selection in psychiatric patients have recently become available. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the clinical utility of a commercial pharmacogenetic-based tool for psychiatry (Neuropharmagen^®) in the treatment management of depressive patients. Random-effects meta-analysis of clinical studies that had examined the effect of this tool on the improvement of depressive patients was performed. Effects were summarized as standardized differences between treatment groups. A total of 450 eligible subjects from three clinical studies were examined. The random effects model estimated a statistically significant effect size for the pharmacogenetic-guided prescription (d = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.11-0.56, p-value = 0.004), which corresponded to approximately a 1.8-fold increase in the odds of clinical response for pharmacogenetic-guided vs. unguided drug selection. After exclusion of patients with mild depression, the pooled estimated effect size increased to 0.42 (95% CI = 0.19-0.65, p-value = 0.004, n = 287), corresponding to an OR = 2.14 (95% CI = 1.40-3.27). These results support the clinical utility of this pharmacogenetic-based tool in the improvement of health outcomes in patients with depression, especially those with moderate-severe depression. Additional pragmatic RCTs are warranted to consolidate these findings in other patient populations.

Advancing psychiatric pharmacogenomics using drug development paradigms

Drugs used to treat psychiatric disorders, even when taken as directed, fail to provide adequate relief for a sizeable proportion of patients. Despite our advancements in understanding human genetics and development of high-throughput tools to probe variation, pharmacogenomics has yielded marginal ability to predict drug response for psychiatric disorders. Here, I review the current pharmacogenomics paradigm, identifying opportunities to incorporate drug development strategies designed to increase the probability of delivering a successful molecule to the clinic. This includes using in-depth pharmacokinetic profiles, clear measures of target engagement and target-specific pharmacodynamic responses orthogonal to clinical response. The complex pharmacological profiles psychiatric drugs require re-examination of simplified clinical response-oriented pharmacogenetic hypotheses, in favor of a more complete patient profile.

Efficacy of prospective pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial

BACKGROUND

A 12-week, double-blind, parallel, multi-center randomized controlled trial in 316 adult patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for drug therapy guidance.

METHODS

Patients with a CGI-S ≥ 4 and requiring antidepressant medication de novo or changes in their medication regime were recruited at 18 Spanish public hospitals, genotyped with a commercial PGx panel (Neuropharmagen®), and randomized to PGx-guided treatment (n = 155) or treatment as usual (TAU, control group, n = 161), using a computer-generated random list that locked or unlocked psychiatrist access to the results of the PGx panel depending on group allocation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained response (Patient Global Impression of Improvement, PGI-I ≤ 2) within the 12-week follow-up. Patients and interviewers collecting the PGI-I ratings were blinded to group allocation. Between-group differences were evaluated using χ2-test or t-test, as per data type.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty patients were available for analysis at the end of the 12-week follow-up (PGx n = 136, TAU n = 144). A difference in sustained response within the study period (primary outcome) was not observed (38.5% vs 34.4%, p = 0.4735; OR = 1.19 [95%CI 0.74-1.92]), but the PGx-guided treatment group had a higher responder rate compared to TAU at 12 weeks (47.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0476; OR = 1.62 [95%CI 1.00-2.61]), and this difference increased after removing subjects in the PGx-guided group when clinicians explicitly reported not to follow the test recommendations (51.3% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0135; OR = 1.86 [95%CI 1.13-3.05]). Effects were more consistent in patients with 1-3 failed drug trials. In subjects reporting side effects burden at baseline, odds of achieving a better tolerability (Frequency, Intensity and Burden of Side Effects Rating Burden subscore ≤2) were higher in the PGx-guided group than in controls at 6 weeks and maintained at 12 weeks (68.5% vs 51.4%, p = 0.0260; OR = 2.06 [95%CI 1.09-3.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

PGx-guided treatment resulted in significant improvement of MDD patient's response at 12 weeks, dependent on the number of previously failed medication trials, but not on sustained response during the study period. Burden of side effects was also significantly reduced.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

European Clinical Trials Database 2013-002228-18 , registration date September 16, 2013; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02529462 , retrospectively registered: August 19, 2015.

The Influence of the CYP3A4*22 Polymorphism and CYP2D6 Polymorphisms on Serum Concentrations of Aripiprazole, Haloperidol, Pimozide, and Risperidone in Psychiatric Patients

INTRODUCTION

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is involved in the metabolism of greater than 50% of the prescribed drugs. Recently, the CYP3A4*22 allele was reported to be associated with lower CYP3A4 expression and activity. Quetiapine, an antipsychotic metabolized by only CYP3A4, displayed higher serum levels in CYP3A4*22 carriers. Aripiprazole, haloperidol, pimozide, and risperidone are antipsychotics that are metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2D6. We investigated to which degree the CYP3A4*22 single-nucleotide polymorphism affects serum concentrations of patients receiving these drugs and compared this with the influence of CYP2D6 polymorphisms.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirty-four adult patients were included in this study, of whom 130 used aripiprazole, 312 used haloperidol, 86 used pimozide, and 396 used risperidone. Serum levels of the drug and, if available, their active metabolites were collected as well as information on dose. Patients were genotyped for CYP3A4*22 using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Genotyping for CYP2D6 was done with allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

No differences were found in serum (dose-corrected) concentrations of the antipsychotics between CYP3A4*22 wild-type and carrier groups. In contrast, CYP2D6 genotype did affect dose-corrected concentrations of the antipsychotics: for example, median dose-corrected concentrations were 56%, 86%, and 400% higher in predicted poor metabolizers versus extensive metabolizers for aripiprazole (P = 0.004), haloperidol (P > 0.001), and risperidone (P < 0.001), respectively, although a multiple regression analysis showed that only 4% to 17% of the variation in these concentrations could be explained by CYP2D6 status.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterozygous presence of CYP3A4*22 does not increase serum levels of antipsychotics metabolized by both CYP3A4 and CYP2D6, whereas CYP2D6 polymorphisms do affect serum levels to a limited extent.

Functional gene variants of CYP3A4

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is involved in the metabolism of more drugs in clinical use than any other foreign compound-metabolizing enzyme in humans. Recently, increasing evidence has been found showing that variants in the CYP3A4 gene have functional significance and--in rare cases--lead to loss of activity, implying tremendous consequences for patients. This review article highlights the functional consequences of all CYP3A4 variants recognized by the Human Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Allele Nomenclature Database.