Relative efficiency of the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 index scores in measuring health burden of chronic medical conditions in a population health survey in the United States

Psychometric properties of MG-ADL items and MG-ADL score: An assessment of distributional characteristics, validity and factor structure in two large datasets

BACKGROUND

The Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living scale (MG-ADL) is an 8-item outcome measure to assess symptoms and functional limitations in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. The MG-ADL score is an equally weighted level sum score that is used as primary outcome measures in clinical trials, in clinical practice, and as an end-point in health economic evaluation. This data analysis aims to obtain detailed knowledge of measurement properties of MG-ADL items and the MG-ADL score.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from a real-world prospective study (MRW) were combined with longitudinal data from the ADAPT trial. Outcome measures included were MG-ADL, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), MG 15-item Quality of Life (MG-QOL15r) and EQ-5D-5L. Patients were categorized by their Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification. The following measurement properties were assessed: distributional characteristics, inter-item correlation, convergent, known groups and construct validity and internal factor structure.

RESULTS

Correlations of items within MG-ADL dimensions were moderate, while MG-ADL correlations between comparable MG-QOL15r and QMG items were mixed. Known groups validity for the MG-ADL score was demonstrated for MGFA class. Mean MG-ADL item level scores by MGFA class demonstrated construct validity. PCA, including all four outcome measures, resulted in a nine factor solution.

DISCUSSION

Psychometric properties of individual MG-ADL items were moderate to good. This study showed that the MG-ADL adequately captures the multidimensional heterogeneous nature of MG. This is, however, accompanied by mixed psychometric performance of the MG-ADL score, which may complicate health economic modelling.

REGISTRATION

MyRealWorld-MG was registered on November 25, 2019, with registration numberNCT04176211. The ADAPT randomized clinical trial is registered atClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03669588).

Determinants of health-related quality of life in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus, failing first-line treatment in Africa

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral treatment improves health related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH). However, one third initiating first-line treatment experience virological failure and the determinants of HRQoL in this key population are unknown. Our study aims to identify determinants of among PWH failing antiretroviral treatment in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

We analysed data from a cohort of PWH having virological failure (> 1,000 copies/mL) on first-line ART in South Africa and Uganda. We measured HRQoL using the EuroQOL EQ-5D-3L and used a two-part regression model to obtain by-country analyses for South Africa and Uganda. The first part identifies risk factors that were associated with the likelihood of participants reporting perfect health (utility = 1) versus non-perfect health (utility < 1). The second part identifies risk factors that were associated with the EQ-5 L-3L utility scores for participants reporting non-perfect health. We performed sensitivity analyses to compare the results between the two-part model using tobit models and ordinary least squares regression.

RESULTS

In both countries, males were more likely to report perfect health and participants with at least one comorbidity were less likely to report perfect health. In South Africa, participants with side effects and in Uganda those with opportunistic infections were also less likely to report perfect health. In Uganda, participants with 100% ART adherence were more likely to report perfect health. In South Africa, high HIV viral load, experiencing ART side effects, and the presence of opportunistic infections were each associated with lower HRQoL, whereas participants with 100% ART adherence reported higher HRQoL. In Uganda participants with lower CD4 count had lower HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Markers of advanced disease (opportunistic infection, high viral load, low CD4), side effects, comorbidities and lack of ART adherence negatively impacted HRQoL for PWH experiencing virological failure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02787499.

Psychometric properties and comparison of four health utility approaches among myopia patients in China

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of myopia creates and earlier age of onset has created public health concerns for the long-term eye health, vision impairment and carries with it a significant economic burden. The quality of the economic evaluation is dependent on the sensitivity and validity of the approaches. Nowadays, there are many approaches to measure patients' health state utility (HSU). However, little is known regarding the performance of direct approach and indirect approach in people with myopia. This study is aimed to compare the psychometric properties of four HSU approaches among patients with myopia in mainland China, including two direct approaches (TTO and SG), the generic preference-based measures (PBM) (AQoL-7D) and the disease-specific PBM (VFQ-UI).

METHODS

A convenience sampling framework was used to recruit patients with myopia who attended a large ophthalmic hospital in Jinan, China. Spearman's rank correlations coefficient was used to assess concurrent validity. Known-group validity was analyzed by: (1) whether the patients wear corrective devices; (2) severity of myopia as low or moderate to high of the better eye; (3) duration of myopia as ≤ 10 years or > 10 years. Effect size (ES), relative efficiency (RE) statistic and the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess sensitivity. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement.

RESULTS

A valid sample size of 477 myopia patients was analyzed (median duration: 10 years). The mean HSU scores between TTO and SG were similar (0.95) and higher than AQoL-7D (0.89) and VFQ-UI (0.83). Overall, the VFQ-UI had the best performance based on the psychometric analysis. The agreement indicated that there was no pair of approaches that could be used interchangeably.

CONCLUSIONS

The VFQ-UI showed better psychometric properties than other three approaches for providing health state utility in Chinese myopia patients. Given the widespread use and its generic nature of the AQoL-7D, it could be used alongside with VFQ-UI to provide complementary health state utility from a generic and disease-specific perspective for economic evaluation. More evidence on the responsiveness of four health utility approaches in myopia patients is required.

Examining the relationship between the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) and EQ-5D-5L and comparing their psychometric properties

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS) and EQ-5D-5L and compare their psychometric properties in 4 chronic conditions in China.

METHODS

Participants were invited to complete the online survey. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the correlation between SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L; exploratory factor analysis was used to ascertain the number of unique underlying latent factors measured by SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L. Next, we assessed the psychometric properties of SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L by reporting distributions and examining their known-group validity and convergent validity.

RESULTS

In total, 500 individuals participated the online survey. Spearman's rank correlation showed that EQ-5D-5L dimensions, except for the anxiety/depression dimension, were weakly correlated with all dimensions of SWEMWBS. The two-factor solution for exploratory factor analysis found that all of SWEMWBS dimensions loaded onto one factor, four EQ-5D-5L dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities and pain/discomfort) onto another, and the EQ-5D-5L item of anxiety/depression item loaded moderately onto both factors. Patients of four disease groups had different distributions of responses for both SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L. In terms of known-group validity, both the F statistic and AUROC value of EQ-5D-5L utility scores were significantly higher than SWEMWBS scores in all four pair-wised comparisons. The Pearson correlation coefficient between EQ-5D-5L utility scores, SWEMWBS scores and EQ-VAS was 0.44 (P < 0.01) and 0.65 (P < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SWEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L measure different constructs and can be seen as complementary measures. Both measures demonstrated good convergent validity and known-group validity with EQ-5D-5L being a more sensitive measure, even for mental conditions.

Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in measuring the HRQoL burden of 4 health conditions in China

BACKGROUND

EQ-5D-3L has been used in the National Health Services Survey of China since 2008 to monitor population health. The five-level version of EQ-5D was developed, but there lacks evidence to support the use of five-level version of EQ-5D in China. This study was conducted to compare the measurement properties of both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in quantifying health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden for 4 different health conditions in China.

METHODS

Participants from China were recruited to complete the 3L and 5L questionnaire via Internet. Quota was set to recruit five groups of individuals, with one group of individuals without any health condition and one group of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), HIV/AIDS, chronic Hepatitis B (CHB), or depression, respectively. The 3L and 5L were compared in terms of response distributions, percentages of reporting 'no problems', index value distributions, known-group validity and their relative efficiency.

RESULTS

In total, 500 individuals completed the online survey, including 140 healthy individuals, 122 individuals with hepatitis B, 107 with depression, 90 individuals with GAD and 101 with HIV/AIDS. 5L also had smoother and less clustered index value distributions. Healthy group showed different response distributions to the four condition groups. The percentage of reporting 'no problems' decreased significantly in the 5L in all domains (P < 0.01), especially in the pain/discomfort dimension (relative difference: 43.10%). Relative efficiency suggested that 5L had a higher absolute discriminatory power than the 3L version between healthy participant and the other 4 condition groups, especially for the HIV/AIDS group when the 3L results was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5L version may be preferable to the 3L, as it demonstrated superior performance with respect to higher sensitivity to mild health problems, better relative efficiency and responses and index value distributions.

Health State Utility Values of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Related Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to synthesize health state utility values (HSUVs) of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its related complications published in the literature, conducting a meta-analysis of the data when possible.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and School of Health and Related Research Health Utilities Database repository. Studies focused on T2DM and its complications reporting utility values elicited using direct and indirect methods were selected. We categorized the results according to the instrument to describe health and meta-analyzed them accordingly. Data included in the analysis were pooled in a fixed-effect model by the inverse of variance mean and random-effects DerSimonian-Laird method. Two approaches on sensitivity analysis were performed: leave-one-out method and including data of HSUVs obtained by foreign population value sets.

RESULTS

We identified 70 studies for the meta-analysis from a total of 467 studies. Sufficient data to pool T2DM HSUVs from EQ-5D instrument, hypoglycemia, and stroke were obtained. HSUVs varied from 0.7 to 0.92 in direct valuations, and the pooled mean of 3-level version of EQ-5D studies was 0.772 (95% confidence interval 0.763-0.78) and of 5-level version of EQ-5D 0.815 (95% confidence interval 0.808-0.823). HSUVs of complications varied from 0.739 to 0.843, or reductions of HSUVs between -0.014 and -0.094. In general, HSUVs obtained from 3-level version of EQ-5D and Health Utility Index 3 instruments were lower than those directly elicited. A considerable amount of heterogeneity was observed. Some complications remained unable to be pooled due to scarce of original articles.

CONCLUSIONS

T2DM and its complications have a considerable impact on health-related quality of life. 5-level version of EQ-5D estimates seems comparable with direct elicited HSUVs.

Health State Utility Mapping of Rimegepant for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: Double-Blind Treatment Phase and Open Label Extension (BHV3000-305)

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study were to (1) report long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes among patients using rimegepant preventatively in BHV3000-305 (NCT03732638) open-label extension (OLE) and (2) map Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQv2) to EQ-5D-3L utility values over the double-blind treatment (DBT; 0-12 weeks) and the OLE (13-64 weeks) to assess the influence of treatment on these values.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis using data from a rimegepant study for the prevention of migraine (BHV3000-305). Adult patients with migraine took either rimegepant 75 mg or placebo every other day (EOD) during the DBT phase. All patients received rimegepant during the OLE. MSQv2 was measured at baseline, weeks 12, 24, and 64. A validated algorithm was used to map MSQv2 scores to EQ-5D utilities.

RESULTS

Baseline data were available for 347 patients treated with placebo and 348 treated with rimegepant in the DBT period, who continued to the OLE. Baseline EQ-5D utilities were similar between trial arms: 0.598 for placebo and 0.614 for rimegepant. EQ-5D improved from baseline to week 12 and utilities increased by + 0.09 for placebo and + 0.10 for rimegepant (p value = 0.011). By 24 weeks, at which point patients who were originally randomized to placebo had received rimegepant 75 mg EOD for 12 weeks, HRQoL measures (MSQv2 and EQ-5D) were similar across groups, demonstrating rapid onset of treatment effect. This HRQoL improvement was durable out to 64 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Compared to placebo, treatment with rimegepant 75 mg was associated with greater improvement in EQ-5D utilities during the 12-week DBT phase. Patients originally randomized to placebo experienced a similar improvement in EQ-5D utilities after switching to rimegepant during the OLE, demonstrating that benefits are realized within 12 weeks of active treatment. This preventive effect was durable out to 64 weeks and was associated with an additional increase in HRQoL over time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03732638.

Feasibility of perioperative remote monitoring of patient-generated health data in complex surgical oncology

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of remote perioperative telemonitoring of patient-generated physiologic health data and patient-reported outcomes in a high risk complex general and urologic oncology surgery population is evaluated.

METHODS

Complex general surgical/urologic oncology patients wore a pedometer, completed ePROs (electronic patient-reported outcome surveys) and record their vitals (weight, pulse, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and temperature) via a telehealth app platform. Feasibility (% adherence) was assessed as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with a median age 58 (32-82) years were included. The readmission rate was 33% and the incidence of ≥Grade 3a morbidity was 24%. Adherence to vital sign and ePRO measurements was 95% before surgery, 91% at discharge, and 82%, 68%, and 64% at postdischarge d2, 7, 14, and 30, respectively. There was significant worsening of mobility, self-care and usual daily activity at postdischarge d2 compared to preoperative baseline (p < 0.05). Median daily preoperative steps taken by patients with

CONCLUSIONS

Telemonitoring is feasible in a general surgical and urologic oncology setting. Future studies will ascertain optimal patient selection, duration, and extent of perioperative monitoring.

Collapse

Key Words

• patient-generated health data
• patient-reported outcomes
• telemonitoring

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Middle Aged
• Patient Discharge
• Feasibility Studies
• Surgical Oncology
• Aftercare
• Telemedicine

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Laleh G Melstrom Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Xiaoke Zhou Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
Andreas Kaiser Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Duarte, California, USA
Kevin Chan Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Urologic Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Clayton Lau Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Urologic Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Mustafa Raoof Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Susanne G Warner Department of Surgery Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Ali Zhumkhawala Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Urologic Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Bertram Yuh Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Urologic Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Gagandeep Singh Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Yuman Fong Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duarte, California, USA
Virginia Sun Department of Surgery City of Hope, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duarte, California, USA Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA

Collapse

Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L Over Time? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Responsiveness of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Nine Countries

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the responsiveness of EQ-5D-3L (3L) with EQ-5D-5L (5L) descriptive systems and value sets in two independent samples (rehabilitation and stroke patients).

METHODS

Descriptive system results were compared cross-sectionally, and descriptive responsiveness was tested by calculating changed level responses ('moves') from baseline to follow-up, proportion of improved patients, Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC), and probability of superiority (PS). Responsiveness of values based on nine country-specific value sets was assessed by standardized response mean (SRM) and standardized effect size (SES). Relative efficiency of 5L over 3L was assessed by calculating ratios of the SRM and SES statistics.

RESULTS

Descriptive comparisons confirmed earlier evidence and showed a consistent overestimation of health problems in 3L. Descriptive responsiveness improved with 5L in terms of moves per respondent, proportions of improved patients and PS, whereas PCHC showed mixed results. Better value responsiveness statistics were observed for 5L in rehabilitation patients for all value sets. In stroke patients, 3L showed better responsiveness statistics compared with 5L. Relative efficiency results were moderately to strongly better with 5L for rehabilitation, and slightly to moderately better with 3L for stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Descriptive results were the main driver of 3L-5L responsiveness differences. Responsiveness of 3L was influenced by the 'confined to bed' label and the overestimation bias of 3L, which affected all responsiveness results. This may impact quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimations, leading to over- or underestimations of QALYs gained, depending on the condition and condition severity. QALY calculations based on 5L data will result in more accurate estimates.

Feasibility of perioperative remote monitoring of patient-generated health data in complex surgical oncology

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of remote perioperative telemonitoring of patient-generated physiologic health data and patient-reported outcomes in a high risk complex general and urologic oncology surgery population is evaluated.

METHODS

Complex general surgical/urologic oncology patients wore a pedometer, completed ePROs (electronic patient-reported outcome surveys) and record their vitals (weight, pulse, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and temperature) via a telehealth app platform. Feasibility (% adherence) was assessed as the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with a median age 58 (32-82) years were included. The readmission rate was 33% and the incidence of ≥Grade 3a morbidity was 24%. Adherence to vital sign and ePRO measurements was 95% before surgery, 91% at discharge, and 82%, 68%, and 64% at postdischarge d2, 7, 14, and 30, respectively. There was significant worsening of mobility, self-care and usual daily activity at postdischarge d2 compared to preoperative baseline (p < 0.05). Median daily preoperative steps taken by patients with <Grade 3a versus ≥Grade 3a postoperative morbidity was 6062 versus 4166 (p < 0.05). Of those interviewed, 87% (13/15) viewed vital sign devices as helpful in recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemonitoring is feasible in a general surgical and urologic oncology setting. Future studies will ascertain optimal patient selection, duration, and extent of perioperative monitoring.

EQ-5D-5L measurement properties are superior to EQ-5D-3L across the continuum of health using US value sets

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the measurement properties of the US EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and -5L to -3L crosswalk value sets (3L; 5L; 5L > 3L) across the spectrum of health.

Methods

The three scoring approaches were compared in terms of range of scale, percent of worse-than-dead health states, and mean single-level transitions. Discriminative ability was compared by leveraging two cross-sectional datasets. A novel method was used to visualize and compare the responsiveness of 3L and 5L scoring approaches across EQ VAS values.

Results

The US 5L value set had the broadest range of scale at 1.573 (vs. 1.109 for 3L and crosswalk). The crosswalk had the smallest mean single-level transition of 0.061 (vs. 0.078 for 5L and 0.111 for 3L). The 5L value set tended to be more discriminative/greater statistical efficiency than the crosswalk (F-statistic ratio: 1.111, 95% CI 0.989–1.240) and 3L (F-statistic ratio: 1.102 95% CI 0.861–1.383) across levels of general health. The 5L was the most responsive value set between EQ VAS values of 25 and 75.

Conclusion

These results imply greater sensitivity of the 5L to health changes and potentially lower incremental cost-utility ratios compared to the 3L.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-02031-8.

This study is among the first to compare the performance of value sets for the US to help users understand health utility gains depending on the value set/scoring approach selected.

The 5L value set had improved interval-level measurement properties than the 3L and 3L > 5L value sets.

Empirical analyses, including a novel simulation method, showed that the 5L value set tended to have greater discriminative ability across the entire health continuum.

Validation and comparison of five preference-based measures among age-related macular degeneration patients: evidence from mainland China

PURPOSE

To compare the psychometric properties of five preference-based measures (PBMs) among patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in mainland China, including three health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures [the 15D, the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-7D, and EQ-5D-5L] and two capability wellbeing measures [the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) and ICECAP measure for Older people (ICECAP-O)].

METHODS

A convenience sampling framework was used to successively recruit inpatients with AMD who attended a large ophthalmic hospital in Jinan, China. Psychometric properties (known-group validity, concurrent validity, and sensitivity) were assessed. The agreements between PBMs were reported.

RESULTS

A valid sample of 210 AMD inpatients (median duration: 12 months) was analyzed. Overall, the AQoL-7D had the best performance based on the psychometric tests been conducted. Sufficient evidence was found on psychometric properties for other 2 preference-based HRQoL measures. The ICECAP-A outperformed ICECAP-O on known-group validity and concurrent validity whereas opposite results were found on sensitivity. The Bland-Altman plots indicate that there was no pair of PBMs that could be used interchangeably.

CONCLUSIONS

The AQoL-7D had shown better psychometric properties than other four PBMs based on Chinese AMD inpatients. The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated sufficient psychometric properties and given the availability of a Chinese-specific tariff and the recommendations of China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations, it may be prioritized to be used in China. Capability wellbeing instruments could also be considered given they provide information that goes beyond health. Further evidence on responsiveness and reliability for all five PBMs among AMD patients is required.

Development and Critical Evaluation of a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure Sensitive to Binaural Hearing in Adults: The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality-of-Life System

OBJECTIVES

The widely-used generic preference-based measures of health-related quality of life-the EuroQol Descriptive System (EQ-5D) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI3)-are limited in their response to technologies that improve hearing. The EQ-5D lacks construct validity for hearing, while the HUI3 is restricted by a ceiling effect and by using speech reception as the only evidence of the ability to hear. Consequently, neither measure consistently registers benefits from binaural hearing, such as those from bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation. The objectives were to test whether informants value binaural hearing, to develop a condition-specific preference-based measure sensitive to binaural hearing, to assess the psychometric properties of the new instrument, and to determine whether it meets requirements for informing judgments of cost-effectiveness: does it measure greater gains than do the generic preference-based measures, while avoiding exaggerating losses, and displaying sensitivity to side effects?

DESIGN

Three levels of function, ranging from no difficulty to great difficulty, were defined on each of three dimensions where listening is easier or more successful when hearing is binaural rather than monaural: perception of speech in spatially separated noise, localization of sounds, and effort and fatigue. Informants (N = 203) valued the 27 combinations of levels and dimensions in a time trade-off task with a 10-year time frame to provide a value of binaural-related quality of life ("binaural utility") for each combination. A questionnaire was compiled to allow respondents to report their level of function on each dimension so that a value of binaural utility could be assigned to them. The questionnaire and the age-standardized valuations constitute The York Binaural Hearing-Related Quality-of-Life System (YBHRQL). Adult users of unilateral implants (N = 8), bilateral implants (N = 11), or bimodal aiding (N = 9) undertook performance tests of spatial listening and completed the HUI3, EQ-5D, and Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaires. They completed the YBHRQL questionnaire 24 and 38 mo later.

RESULTS

Despite long intervals between measurements, the YBHRQL demonstrated desirable psychometric properties: good construct validity evidenced by significant correlations with performance measures and the SSQ index; a greater ability than the EQ-5D or HUI3 to distinguish unilateral, bimodal, and bilateral listening; and good reproducibility. The YBHRQL did not exaggerate losses of utility but was insensitive to a potential side effect of implantation (pain/discomfort). It measured a gain in utility from bilateral compared with unilateral implantation (median = 0.11, interquartile range, 0.03 to 0.16) that was greater than the gain measured by the EQ-5D (0.00, 0.00 to 0.00) but not the HUI3 (0.00, 0.00 to 0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

The YBHRQL summarizes the contribution of binaural hearing to quality of life by combining the functional status of a listener with the preferences of independent informants. It would be an efficient clinical outcome measure. In addition, if used alongside the EQ-5D or HUI3, it would provide evidence which could beneficially modulate confidence in the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Further research on its sensitivity to side effects, and on the size of the gains in utility which it measures, is needed to determine whether it could stand alone to inform resource-allocation decisions.

Impairment in Health-Related Quality of Life among Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors

INTRODUCTION

Health utility instruments are increasingly being used to measure impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after stroke. Population-based studies of HRQoL after stroke and assessment of differences by age and functional domain are needed.

METHODS

We used the Canadian Community Health Survey linked with administrative databases to determine HRQoL using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) among those with prior hospitalization or emergency department visit for stroke and compared to controls without stroke. We used multivariable linear regression to determine the difference in HUI3 between those with stroke and controls for the global index and individual attributes, with assessment for modification by age (<60, 60-74, and 75+ years) and sex, and we combined estimates across survey years using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our cohort contained 1240 stroke survivors and 123,765 controls and was weighted to be representative of the Canadian household population. Mean health utility was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58, 0.68) for those with stroke and 0.83 (95% CI 0.82, 0.84) for controls. There was significant modification by age, but not sex, with the greatest adjusted reduction in HUI3 among stroke respondents aged 60-74 years. Individual HUI3 attributes with the largest reductions in utility among stroke survivors compared to controls were mobility, cognition, emotion, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based study, the reduction in HUI3 among stroke survivors compared to controls was greatest among respondents aged 60-74, and in attributes of mobility, cognition, emotion, and pain. These results highlight the persistent impairment of HRQoL in the chronic phase of stroke and potential targets for community support.

Health-related quality of life and economic burden of prurigo nodularis

BACKGROUND

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is an understudied, pruritic inflammatory skin disease. Little is known about the effect of PN on quality of life and its associated economic burden.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of PN on quality of life and its economic implications.

METHODS

A cohort study of PN patients (n = 36) was conducted using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 questionnaire. Control data from US adults (n = 4187) were obtained from the 2002-2003 Joint Canada/United States Survey of Health. Quality-adjusted life year loss and economic costs were estimated by comparing the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores of the PN patients with those of the controls.

RESULTS

The PN patients had lower overall health performance compared to the controls, (mean ± SE, 0.52 ± 0.06 vs 0.86 ± 0.003, respectively, P < .001). In multivariable regression, PN was found to be associated with worse health performance (coefficient -0.34, 95% CI [-0.46 to -0.23]), most prominent in the pain subdomain (coefficient -0.24, 95% CI [-0.35 to -0.13]). This correlated to an average of 6.5 lifetime quality-adjusted life years lost per patient, translating to an individual lifetime economic burden of $323,292 and a societal burden of $38.8 billion.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that PN is associated with significant quality-of-life impairment, similar to the level of other chronic systemic conditions. PN is also associated with a substantial individual economic burden, emphasizing the necessity of research on effective treatment options.

Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in hypertensive patients living in rural China

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement properties of two versions of EQ-5D (i.e.EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L) in hypertensive patients in rural China.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in hypertensive patients in rural China. We compared the ceiling effects, redistribution properties, informativity, known-groups validity, and relative efficiency of the 3L and 5L and examined their agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 11,412 patients were enrolled in our study. The mean EQ-5D index score was 0.84 (SD 0.21) according to the 5L and 0.86 (SD 0.17) according to the 3L. A good agreement was observed between the 3L and 5L. The overall ceiling effect decreased from 46.4% (3L) to 29.4% (5L). The Shannon index, H' improved in all dimensions when used 5L. When used 3L, the median responses of all groups were consistent with 5L across the three dimensions of 'mobility', 'self-care', 'usual activities', while the median responses were inconsistent for the 'pain/discomfort' and 'anxiety/depression' dimensions. The 3L performed better in eight comorbidities in terms of F-statistics and six comorbidities in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). The 5L performed better both in terms of the F-statistics and AUROCs in age, education level, anti-hypertensive medication use.

CONCLUSION

Taking all comparisons into account, we recommend the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients with hypertension in rural China.

Assessment of Utility in Migraine: Mapping the Migraine-Specific Questionnaire to the EQ-5D-5L

INTRODUCTION

There are increasing demands for studies of cost-effectiveness to allocate resources for disease prevention and treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to measure quality of life in migraineurs, based on the Migraine-Specific Questionnaire (MSQ) and EQ-5D-5L, and thereafter map an algorithm to estimate health-state utility values from the MSQ in individuals with migraine.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study conducted between May and July 2018 in a tertiary headache clinic in Tehran, Iran, migraineurs diagnosed based on International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3β were enrolled and were asked to complete the MSQ questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated to measure the correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and MSQ v2.1 domains' score. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. After statistical analysis, several regression models were presented to map the results of the MSQ domains to the utility index, and the preferred model was achieved based on goodness of fit and the model's predictive performance.

RESULTS

The preferred MSQ algorithm had approximately the same prediction errors in all migraineurs, episodic and chronic migraine (root mean square error 0.24, 0.24, and 0.23, respectively). The preferred MSQ model explained a variance of 0.26 (R²) in episodic and 0.38 in chronic migraine in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The preferred MSQ mapping algorithm will be suitable in estimating health state utilities in trials of patients with migraine that contain MSQ scores but lack utility values.

Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L.

METHODS

Pre-determined key words and exclusion criteria were used to systematically search publications from 2011 to 2019. Information on study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted: specifically, EQ-5D-5L distribution (including ceiling and floor), missing values, reliability (test-retest), validity (convergent, known-groups, discriminate) and responsiveness (distribution, anchor-based). EQ-5D-5L index value means, ceiling and correlation coefficients (convergent validity) were pooled across the studies using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Of the 889 identified publications, 99 were included for review, representing 32 countries. Musculoskeletal/orthopedic problems and cancer (n = 8 each) were most often studied. Most papers found missing values (17 of 17 papers) and floor effects (43 of 48 papers) to be unproblematic. While the index was found to be reliable (9 of 9 papers), individual dimensions exhibited instability over time. Index values and dimensions demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with global health measures, other multi-attribute utility instruments, physical/functional health, pain, activities of daily living, and clinical/biological measures. The instrument was not correlated with life satisfaction and cognition/communication measures. Responsiveness was addressed by 15 studies, finding moderate effect sizes when confined to studied subgroups with improvements in health.

CONCLUSIONS

The EQ-5D-5L exhibits excellent psychometric properties across a broad range of populations, conditions and settings. Rigorous exploration of its responsiveness is needed.

Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in Six Commonly Diagnosed Cancers

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L (3L) and EQ-5D-5L (5L) in cancer patients.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of inpatients with lung, breast, colorectal, liver, gastric, or thyroid cancer were interviewed using the 3L, 5L, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaires, and a subgroup was invited to complete the 3L and 5L again. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to assess test-retest reliability, and Spearman's correlation between the EQ-5D and FACT-G was evaluated to assess convergent validity. Comparison of subgroups defined using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status and cancer stage were performed to assess known-group validity and discriminatory power using the F-statistic and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve. All analyses were also performed for each subgroup of cancer patients.

RESULTS

A total of 416 cancer patients completed the baseline questionnaire and 90 patients also completed the follow-up survey after 2 days. Ceiling effects were smaller in 5L (10.1%) than in 3L (17.8%). The test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the 5L were slightly better than those of the 3L. Both the 3L and 5L showed known-group validity; however, the 5L index showed better discriminatory power. Similar trends were found in the six types of cancers.

CONCLUSION

In general, 5L appears to have better measurement properties than 3L for measuring the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. While both the 3L and 5L are suitable, 5L should be preferable to 3L for use in cancer outcomes research.

Health-Related QOL and Economic Burden of Chronic Pruritus

Chronic pruritus (CP) has considerable implications for QOL. However, its impact on health-related QOL and economic burden is not fully characterized. We administered a cross-sectional survey on 132 patients with CP using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 instrument. Normative data from healthy adults (n = 4,187) were obtained from the Joint Canada/US Survey of Health. Quality-adjusted life-year loss and economic costs were estimated on the basis of Health Utilities Index Mark 3 scores of patients with CP versus controls. Patients with CP had lower overall health performance than the control (0.56 ± 0.03 vs. 0.86 ± 0.003, P < 0.001). In multivariable regression, CP was associated with worse overall health performance (coefficient = -0.30, 95% confidence interval = -0.33 to -0.27), most accentuated in the domains of pain (coefficient = -0.24, confidence interval = -0.28 to -0.21) and emotion (coefficient = -0.11, confidence interval = -0.13 to -0.10). The reduced Health Utilities Index Mark 3 score correlated with 5.5 average lifetime quality-adjusted life-years lost per patient. Using conservative estimates for willingness to pay, the quality-adjusted life-year loss translated to an individual lifetime economic burden of $274,921 and a societal burden of $88.8 billion. CP is associated with significant QOL impairment. The economic burden of CP highlights the necessity for further research into management options.

A comparison of the reliability and validity of SF-6D, EQ-5D and HUI3 utility measures in patients with schizophrenia and patients with depression in Singapore

There is limited evidence of a direct comparison of the psychometric performance of generic preference-based measures in patients with mental illness in an Asian patient population. The current study aimed to compare the test-retest reliability, convergent and known-group validity and magnitude of change in scores of the EuroQol Five-Dimension, Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) measures in patients with depression and patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. 500 patients were recruited from a tertiary psychiatric institution in Singapore. The Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS), 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale were also included. In the schizophrenia sample, the SF-6D was found to have higher test-retest validity, convergent validity with SQLS domain scores, known-group validity and magnitude of change in scores over 6-month follow up than other measures. In the depression sample, the HUI3 was found to have higher test-retest reliability, convergent validity with Q-LES-Q, known group validity and magnitude of change in scores than other measures. Results suggest that the SF-6D and HUI3 to be more suitable as a utility measure for patients with schizophrenia and depression in an Asian patient population.

Comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in the general population of Chengdu city in China

The EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D are the most commonly used economic evaluation instruments. Data comparing the psychometric properties of the instruments are scarce in the Chinese population. This study compared the psychometric properties of these measures in the Chinese general population in Chengdu.From October to December 2012, 2186 respondents (age ≥18) were selected from urban and rural areas of Chengdu, China, via multistage stratified cluster sampling. Correlations, scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots were used to explore the relationships between the 2 measures. Ceiling and floor effects were used to analyze the score distribution. The known-groups method was used to evaluate discriminant validity.Among 2186 respondents, 2182 completed the questionnaire, and 2178 (18-82 years old, mean 46.09 ± 17.49) met the data quality requirement. The mean scores for the EQ-5D-3LCN, EQ-5D-3LUK, and SF-6DUK were 0.95 (Std: 0.11), 0.93 (Std: 0.15), and 0.79 (Std: 0.12), respectively. The correlations between domains ranged from 0.16 to 0.51. The correlation between the EQ-5D-3LCN and SF-6DUK and between the EQ-5D-3LUK and SF-6DUK was 0.46. The scatter plots and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poor agreement between the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D. The floor and ceiling effects were respectively 0.05% and 74.60% for the EQ-5D-3L and 0.05% and 2.53% for the SF-6DUK. The EQ-5D-3LCN, EQ-5D-3LUK and SF-6D have good discriminant validity in different sociodemographic and health condition groups. The SF-6D has higher level of discriminant validity in moderately healthy groups in the EQ-5D-3L full-health population.Both the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D are valid economic evaluation instruments in the Chinese general population in Chengdu but do not seem to be interchangeable. The EQ-5D-3L has a higher ceiling effect and higher level of discriminant validity among different sociodemographic groups, and the SF-6D has a lower ceiling effect and higher level of discriminant validity in health condition groups. Users may consider the evidence in the choice of these instruments.

Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the first empirical head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-3L (3L) and EQ-5D-5L (5L) value sets for multiple countries.

METHODS

A large multinational dataset, including 3L and 5L data for eight patient groups and a student cohort, was used to compare 3L versus 5L value sets for Canada, China, England/UK (5L/3L, respectively), Japan, The Netherlands, South Korea and Spain. We used distributional analyses and two methods exploring discriminatory power: relative efficiency as assessed by the F statistic, and an area under the curve for the receiver-operating characteristics approach. Differences in outcomes were explored by separating descriptive system effects from valuation effects, and by exploring distributional location effects.

RESULTS

In terms of distributional evenness, efficiency of scale use and the face validity of the resulting distributions, 5L was superior, leading to an increase in sensitivity and precision in health status measurement. When compared with 5L, 3L systematically overestimated health problems and consequently underestimated utilities. This led to bias, i.e. over- or underestimations of discriminatory power.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that 5L provides more precise measurement at individual and group levels, both in terms of descriptive system data and utilities. The increased sensitivity and precision of 5L is likely to be generalisable to longitudinal studies, such as in intervention designs. Hence, we recommend the use of the 5L across applications, including economic evaluation, clinical and public health studies. The evaluative framework proved to be useful in assessing preference-based instruments and might be useful for future work in the development of descriptive systems or health classifications.

Wireless Monitoring Program of Patient-Centered Outcomes and Recovery Before and After Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery

Importance

A combined subjective and objective wireless monitoring program of patient-centered outcomes can be carried out in patients before and after major abdominal cancer surgery.

Objective

To conduct a proof-of-concept pilot study of a wireless, patient-centered outcomes monitoring program before and after major abdominal cancer surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this proof-of-concept pilot study, patients wore wristband pedometers and completed online patient-reported outcome surveys (symptoms and quality of life) 3 to 7 days before surgery, during hospitalization, and up to 2 weeks after discharge. Reminders via email were generated for all moderate to severe scores for symptoms and quality of life. Surgery-related data were collected via electronic medical records, and complications were calculated using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The study was carried out in the inpatient and outpatient surgical oncology unit of one National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. Eligible patients were scheduled to undergo curative resection for hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal cancers, were English speaking, and were 18 years or older. Twenty participants were enrolled over 4 months. The study dates were April 1, 2015, to July 31, 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes included adherence to wearing the pedometer, adherence to completing the surveys (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system), and satisfaction with the monitoring program.

Results

This study included a final sample of 20 patients (median age, 55.5 years [range, 22-74 years]; 15 [75%] female) with evaluable data. Pedometer adherence (88% [17 of 20] before surgery vs 83% [16 of 20] after discharge) was higher than survey adherence (65% to 75% [13 of 20 and 15 of 20] completed). The median number of daily steps at day 7 was 1689 (19% of daily steps at baseline), which correlated with the Comprehensive Complication Index, for which the median was 15 of 100 (r = -0.64, P < .05). Postdischarge overall symptom severity (2.3 of 10) and symptom interference with activities (3.5 of 10) were mild. Pain (4.4 of 10), fatigue (4.7 of 10), and appetite loss (4.0 of 10) were moderate after surgery. Quality-of-life scores were lowest at discharge (66.6 of 100) but improved at week 2 (73.9 of 100). While patient-reported outcomes returned to baseline at 2 weeks, the number of daily steps was only one-third of preoperative baseline.

Conclusions and Relevance

Wireless monitoring of combined subjective and objective patient-centered outcomes can be carried out in the surgical oncology setting. Preoperative and postoperative patient-centered outcomes have the potential of identifying high-risk populations who may need additional interventions to support postoperative functional and symptom recovery.

Validation and comparison of the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L instruments in Greece

PURPOSE

To validate and compare the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L with the EQ-5D-5L classification systems in Greece.

METHODS

Participants (n = 2279) over 40 years old, sampled from the greater area of Athens using a multistage stratified quota sampling method, completed both EQ-5D versions, while information was also collected on socio-demographics and health-related characteristics. The EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L were evaluated in terms of agreement, ceiling effects, redistribution and inconsistency, informativity, and convergent and known-groups validity.

RESULTS

The agreement between the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L was high (ICC = 0.85). Ceiling effects decreased significantly in the EQ-5D-5L in all domains (P < 0.001), with "usual activities" (-21.4 %) and "self-care" (-20.1 %) showing the highest absolute and "anxiety/depression" the highest relative reduction (-32.46 %). Inconsistency was low (5.7 %). The increase in prevalence of problems was larger than the decrease in their severity, resulting in a lower mean health utility for the EQ-5D-5L. Overall absolute and relative informativity improved by 70.5 % and 16.4 %, respectively, in the EQ-5D-5L. Both instruments exhibited good convergent and known-groups validity, with evidence of a considerably better convergent performance and discriminatory ability of the EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EQ-5D versions demonstrated good construct validity and had consistent redistribution. The EQ-5D-5L system may be preferable to the EQ-5D-3L, as it exhibited superior performance in terms of lower ceiling effects, higher absolute and relative informativity, and improved convergent and known-groups validity efficiency.

The extremity function index (EFI), a disability severity measure for neuromuscular diseases: psychometric evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To adapt and to combine the self-report Upper Extremity Functional Index and Lower Extremity Function Scale, for the assessment of disability severity in patients with a neuromuscular disease and to examine its psychometric properties in order to make it suitable for indicating disease severity in neuromuscular diseases.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional postal survey study was performed among patients diagnosed with a neuromuscular disease.

METHODS

Patients completed both adapted extremity function scales, questionnaires for psychometric evaluation, and disease-specific questions. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed, and reliability and validity were examined.

RESULTS

Response rate was 70% (n = 702). The Extremity Function Index model with a two-factor structure - for upper and lower extremities - showed an acceptable fit. The Extremity Function Index scales showed good internal consistency (alphas: 0.97-0.98). The known-groups validity test confirmed that Extremity Function Index scales discriminate between categories of "Extent of limitations" and "Quality of Life." Convergent and divergent validity tests confirmed that Extremity Function Index scales measure the physical impact of neuromuscular diseases. Relative validity tests showed that the Extremity Function Index scales performed well in discriminating between subgroups of patients with increasing "Extent of limitations" compared to concurrent measurement instruments.

CONCLUSION

The Extremity Function Index proved to be a sound and easy to apply self-report disability severity measurement instrument in neuromuscular diseases. Implications for rehabilitation The Extremity Function Index reflects the functioning of all muscles in the upper and lower extremities involved in activities of daily living. The Extremity Function Index is an easy to administer and patient-friendly disability severity measurement instrument that has the ability to evaluate differences in disability severity between relevant neuromuscular disease subgroups. The Extremity Function Index is a valid and reliable disability severity measurement instrument for neuromuscular diseases.

A Vision "Bolt-On" Item Could Increase the Discriminatory Power of the EQ-5D Index Score

BACKGROUND

Recently, a vision "bolt-on" EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) was developed and tentative utility values (i.e., a "value set") for this new descriptive system were estimated.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the discriminatory power of this bolt-on and standard utility-based EQ-5D health indices.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data on the (3-level) vision bolt-on EQ-5D were collected through face-to-face interviews with 500 and 336 individuals with and without visual impairment, respectively. To assess the discriminatory power of the vision bolt-on index relative to the standard EQ-5D index developed in the vision bolt-on valuation study, 16 pairs of mutually exclusive subgroups of individuals defined by the individuals' visual acuity and responses to the 14-item visual function questionnaire were compared pairwise. The absolute mean difference in the two index scores and the corresponding F statistic derived from the comparisons were used as measures of discriminatory power.

RESULTS

The absolute mean difference in the bolt-on index score was larger than that in the standard EQ-5D index score in 14 of the 16 comparisons. The bolt-on index score exhibited a larger F-statistic value than did the standard EQ-5D index score in all known-group comparisons, with the F-statistic ratio ranging from 0.415 to 0.770.

CONCLUSIONS

The vision bolt-on EQ-5D appears to be more discriminative than the standard EQ-5D in measurement of vision problems. Future studies should investigate the extent to which the vision bolt-on item can increase the sensitivity of the EQ-5D to vision change in interventional studies.

Catalog and comparison of societal preferences (utilities) for lung cancer health states: results from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study

BACKGROUND

The EQ-5D and SF-6D are 2 health-related quality-of-life indexes that provide preference-weighted measures for use in cost-effectiveness analyses.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium included the EQ-5D and SF-12v2 in their survey of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients. Utilities were calculated from patient-provided scores for each domain of the EQ-5D or the SF-6D. Utilities were calculated for categories of cancer type, stage, and treatment.

RESULTS

There were 5015 enrolled lung cancer patients with a baseline survey in CanCORS; 2396 (47.8%) completed the EQ-5D, and 2344 (46.7%) also completed the SF-12v2. The mean (standard deviation) utility from the EQ-5D was 0.78 (0.18), and from the SF-6D (derived from SF-12v2) was 0.68 (0.14). The EQ-5D demonstrated a ceiling effect, with 20% of patients reporting perfect scores, translating to a utility of 1.0. No substantial SF-6D floor effects were noted. Utilities increased with age and decreased with stage and comorbidities. Patient-reported (EQ-5D) visual analog scale scores for health status had a moderate (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001) positive correlation with utilities. A subset (n = 1474) completed follow-up EQ-5D questionnaires 11-13 months after diagnosis. Among these patients, there was a nonsignificant decrease in mean utility for stage IV and an increase in mean utility for stages I, II, and III.

CONCLUSION

This study generated a catalog of community-weighted utilities applicable to societal-perspective cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer interventions and compared utilities based on the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Potential users of these scores should be aware of the limitations and think carefully about their use in specific studies.

Health status and quality of life: results from a national survey in a community-dwelling sample of elderly people

PURPOSE

To investigate the relation between age and HRQoL indicators in a community-dwelling population aged 65 years and older.

METHODS

Data were collected within a sample stratified by age (65-69; 70-74; 75-79; 80-84; 85-89; 90 years and above) and sex and randomly selected in the population records in Switzerland. The EQ-5D was used to assess HRQoL. Analyses were conducted on the entire available sample (N = 3,073) and on the subsample with no missing data in the EQ-5D (N = 2,888), considering age, gender, education and region.

RESULTS

Results of multiple regression analyses showed different age-related patterns across the EQ-5D. The proportion of respondents reporting no problems ranged from 51 % in the 65- to 69-year age group to 20 % in the 90 years and above age group. Odds ratio (OR) for Mobility problems increased from 2.04 in the 75- to 79-year age group to 13.34 in the 90 years and above age group; OR for Usual Activities increased from 1.76 to 11.68 and from 1.55 to 2.32 for Pain/Discomfort; OR for Self-Care increased from 5.26 in the 80- to 84-year age group to 30.36 in the 90 years and above age group. Problems with Self-Care remained low, increasing from 6.22 % in the 80- to 84-year age group to 26.21 % in the oldest age group. The magnitude of the gender, region and education effects was much lower than that of age.

CONCLUSION

HRQoL is globally preserved in older adults in Switzerland, even if substantial impairment is reported in very old age affecting mainly functional health dimensions. Anxiety/Depression and Pain/Discomfort did not appear to be affected by age; high rates of difficulties were reported for Pain/Discomfort but not for Anxiety/Depression.

Quality of life, health status, and health service utilization related to a new measure of health literacy: FLIGHT/VIDAS

OBJECTIVE

Researchers have identified significant limitations in some currently used measures of health literacy. The purpose of this paper is to present data on the relation of health-related quality of life, health status, and health service utilization to performance on a new measure of health literacy in a nonpatient population.

METHODS

The new measure was administered to 475 English- and Spanish-speaking community-dwelling volunteers along with existing measures of health literacy and assessments of health-related quality of life, health status, and healthcare service utilization. Relations among measures were assessed via correlations and health status and utilization was tested across levels of health literacy using ANCOVA models.

RESULTS

The new health literacy measure is significantly related to existing measures of health literacy as well as to participants' health-related quality of life. Persons with lower levels of health literacy reported more health conditions, more frequent physical symptoms, and greater healthcare service utilization.

CONCLUSION

The new measure of health literacy is valid and shows relations to measures of conceptually related constructs such as quality of life and health behaviors.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

FLIGHT/VIDAS may be useful to researchers and clinicians interested in a computer administered and scored measure of health literacy.

Impact of urinary incontinence on healthcare resource utilization, health-related quality of life and productivity in patients with overactive bladder

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on healthcare resource utilization (HRU), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and productivity measures in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the Adelphi OAB/UI Disease Specific Programme, a multinational survey of patient- and physician-reported data, fielded between November 2010 and February 2011. The primary patient groups of interest were those with OAB, both with and without UI. Health-related quality of life and productivity measures were derived from the EuroQoL-5D, the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Measures of HRU included OAB-related surgeries, OAB-related hospitalizations, incontinence pads, anticholinergic use and physician visits. Multivariate linear regression models and literature-based minimal clinically important differences were used to assess statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in HRQoL and productivity measures between patients with OAB with UI and those without UI.

RESULTS

A total of 1 730 patients were identified, with a mean age of 60.7 years, and 77.0% of them were women, 84.2% were non-Hispanic whites, and 71% were incontinent. Bivariate analyses showed that HRU was significantly higher among patients with OAB with UI than among those without UI in all categories except for the number of OAB-related physician visits. In both bivariate and multivariate analyses, incontinent patients presented with clinically and statistically significantly lower HRQoL and productivity measures with respect to all study endpoints, except for percentage of work time missed due to their OAB/UI.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary incontinence was associated with significantly higher HRU and lower HRQoL and productivity in this population of patients with OAB from five different countries. In addition to clinical considerations, the economic and humanistic impact of UI should be taken into account when evaluating treatment options for patients with OAB.

Impact of urinary incontinence on health-related quality of life, daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity

Background

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL), productivity, and greater healthcare resource burden. The humanistic and economic burden may be more apparent in NDO patients with urinary incontinence (UI). The objective of this study was to compare the HRQoL, productivity, and health resource use (HRU) between continent and incontinent NDO patients.

Methods

A retrospective database analysis was conducted using the Adelphi Overactive Bladder (OAB)/UI Disease Specific Programme, a multi-national, cross-sectional survey reported from both patients’ and physicians’ perspectives. The population for this analysis included NDO patients with or without UI. General and disease-specific HRQoL were assessed using the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL), and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q). Productivity and daily activity impairment were measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. HRU indicators included OAB-related surgery, OAB-related hospitalizations, incontinence pad usage, switching anticholinergics used for OAB due to inadequate response or adverse effects, and OAB-related physician visits. Bivariate analyses, multivariate ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analyses and published minimal clinically important differences (MCID) were used to assess relationships between incontinent status and the aforementioned outcome measures.

Results

A total of 324 NDO patients with or without urinary incontinence were included, averaging 54 years of age (SD 16), of whom 43.8 percent were male. Bivariate analyses detected no significant relationship between incontinent status and HRU variables. Regression analyses revealed that incontinent patients had clinically and statistically lower disease-specific HRQoL and greater impairment in daily activities as compared to continent patients. On average, incontinent patients scored 10 points lower on the I-QOL total score, 9 points lower on the OAB-q HRQoL score, 15 points higher on OAB-q symptom severity, and experienced 8.2 percent higher activity impairment due to their bladder condition (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Incontinent NDO patients experience significantly lower HRQoL and activity impairment as compared to continent NDO patients.

Responsiveness of the testing morbidities index in colonoscopy

OBJECTIVES

The Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) was developed to measure the effects of any diagnostic or screening procedure on health-related quality of life (HRQOL); it includes seven domains incorporating mental and physical aspects before, during, and after testing. To add to prior work on the validity of the TMI classification, responsiveness of a summated scale version was evaluated in 71 colonoscopy patients. Further data on construct validity were also obtained.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the study when scheduling colonoscopy days to weeks beforehand. The baseline survey included the EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire with five levels in each attribute (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) and its visual analogue scale (VAS) assessment (EQ-VAS), the Short Form 12 version 2 (SF-12v2) component summary scores and six-dimensional health state short-form (derived from the short-form 12v2 health survey [SF-6D] utilities), and an original construct-specific VAS (CS-VAS) for usual HRQOL using utility scale anchors. The TMI's highest possible summated score (all best levels) served as its baseline. Survey data were generally obtained by telephone interview. A postprocedure survey was given to patients after colonoscopy and interviews conducted as soon as possible after the day of the procedure. The postprocedure survey included the SF-12v2/SF-6D, EQ-5D questionnaire instruments, TMI items, and a CS-VAS incorporating the overall HRQOL effects of colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Standardized response means showed greatest responsiveness by the TMI (-1.52) followed by the CS-VAS instruments (-0.42). The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the EQ-VAS, and the SF-12 component summaries were unresponsive, and the SF-6D was minimally responsive (-0.05). Correlation of the post-CS-VAS with the TMI was substantial (r = -0.52), suggesting TMI construct validity. Moderate to strong correlation of the baseline CS-VAS with standard indexes was observed (r = 0.54-0.81).

CONCLUSION

The TMI appears responsive and exhibits further evidence of construct validity.

Comparison of three societally derived health-state classification values among older African Americans with depressive symptoms

PURPOSE

To compare societal values across three health-state classification systems in older African Americans with depression and to describe the association of these instruments to depression severity.

METHODS

We summarized baseline values for EQ-5D (US weights) and HUI2/3 (Canadian weights) and their subscales for 118 older African American participants enrolled in a randomized depression treatment trial and calculated correlations between the different instruments. We evaluated ceiling and floor effects for each instrument by comparing the proportion at the highest and lowest possible score for each tool. Also, utility scores were assessed by level of depression severity (mild, moderate, moderate severe, severe) scores as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

RESULTS

Mean utility values were 0.58 (SD = 0.21) for EQ-5D, 0.52 (SD = 0.21) for HUI2, and 0.36 (SD = 0.31) for HUI3. For the EQ-5D, 72 % of participants reported having some problems on the anxiety/depression domain. On the emotion domain for the HUI2, 23 % reported the highest level of impairment compared to only 3 % on the HUI3. No participant scored at the floor for the EQ-5D, HUI2, or HUI3 index; one participant scored at the ceiling value on the HUI3 index. Correlations ranged from 0.63 to 0.82 (all of which were significant at an alpha level of 0.05). In general, utility scores trended inversely with depression level.

CONCLUSION

Small differences in the three preference-weighted health-state classification systems were evident for this sample of older African Americans with depressive symptoms, with HUI scores lower than EQ-5D. For this sample, utility scores were lower (i.e., poorer) than the general United States population with depression on each utility measure.

Screening tool for late-effect pediatric neuro-oncological clinics: a treatment-oriented questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Many survivors of pediatric brain tumors (SPBTs) suffer from long-term late effects (LEs). Our aim was to create a practical screening tool for detecting LEs in this population. Such a screening tool will improve our ability to identify those patients who may benefit from treatment in LE clinics while focusing on individual relevant issues.

PROCEDURE

We developed the Treatment-Oriented Screening Questionnaire (TOSQ); a self-reported, risk-based questionnaire that addresses all LEs SPBTs can potentially suffer. As a basis for the TOSQ design we used the Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines published by the Children's Oncology Group. Output includes individual recommendations for further treatment. We prospectively assessed whether the TOSQ can accurately detect treatment targets in SPBTs by comparing patient and caregiver questionnaire scores with physician evaluations. Data are presented from 41 SPBTs.

RESULTS

The TOSQ is a precise screening tool for identifying LEs in SPBTs based on the significant correlation (P < 0.05) that was found between parental scores and physician evaluations. Statistical testing proved that parents are a good source of information about child's health status, and that TOSQ accurately reflects the correlation between patient difficulties and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The TOSQ is the first described screening tool for identification of LEs designed specifically for SPBTs. It is simple to use and provides a valid, comprehensive and economic assessment followed by targeted treatment plan for each patient. By repeatedly using the TOSQ over the years, we can improve our ability to detect and give focused treatment to those who require assistance.

Using the bootstrap to establish statistical significance for relative validity comparisons among patient-reported outcome measures

Background

Relative validity (RV), a ratio of ANOVA F-statistics, is often used to compare the validity of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. We used the bootstrap to establish the statistical significance of the RV and to identify key factors affecting its significance.

Methods

Based on responses from 453 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to 16 CKD-specific and generic PRO measures, RVs were computed to determine how well each measure discriminated across clinically-defined groups of patients compared to the most discriminating (reference) measure. Statistical significance of RV was quantified by the 95% bootstrap confidence interval. Simulations examined the effects of sample size, denominator F-statistic, correlation between comparator and reference measures, and number of bootstrap replicates.

Results

The statistical significance of the RV increased as the magnitude of denominator F-statistic increased or as the correlation between comparator and reference measures increased. A denominator F-statistic of 57 conveyed sufficient power (80%) to detect an RV of 0.6 for two measures correlated at r = 0.7. Larger denominator F-statistics or higher correlations provided greater power. Larger sample size with a fixed denominator F-statistic or more bootstrap replicates (beyond 500) had minimal impact.

Conclusions

The bootstrap is valuable for establishing the statistical significance of RV estimates. A reasonably large denominator F-statistic (F > 57) is required for adequate power when using the RV to compare the validity of measures with small or moderate correlations (r < 0.7). Substantially greater power can be achieved when comparing measures of a very high correlation (r > 0.9).

Patient and societal value functions for the testing morbidities index

BACKGROUND

We developed preference-based and summated scale scoring for the Testing Morbidities Index (TMI) classification, which addresses short-term effects on quality of life from diagnostic testing before, during, and after testing procedures.

METHODS

The two TMI preference functions use multiattribute value techniques; one is patient-based and the other has a societal perspective, informed by 206 breast biopsy patients and 466 (societal) subjects. Because of a lack of standard short-term methods for this application, we used the visual analog scale (VAS). Waiting tradeoff (WTO) tolls provided an additional option for linear transformation of the TMI. We randomized participants to 1 of 3 surveys: The first derived weights for generic testing morbidity attributes and levels of severity with the VAS; a second developed VAS values and WTO tolls for linear transformation of the TMI to a "dead-healthy" scale; the third addressed initial validation in a specific test (breast biopsy). The initial validation included 188 patients and 425 community subjects. Direct VAS and WTO values were compared with the TMI. Alternative TMI scoring as a nonpreference summated scale was included, given evidence of construct and content validity.

RESULTS

The patient model can use an additive function, whereas the societal model is multiplicative. Direct VAS and the VAS-scaled TMI were correlated across modeling groups (r = 0.45-0.62). Agreement was comparable to the value function validation of the Health Utilities Index 2. Mean absolute difference (MAD) calculations showed a range of 0.07-0.10 in patients and 0.11-0.17 in subjects. MAD for direct WTO tolls compared with the WTO-scaled TMI varied closely around 1 quality-adjusted life day.

CONCLUSIONS

The TMI shows initial promise in measuring short-term testing-related health states.

Comparison of direct-measured and derived short form six dimensions (SF-6D) health preference values among chronic hepatitis B patients

PURPOSE

The short form six dimensions (SF-6D) are derived from the SF-36 Health Survey with the intention that item data of the latter are often converted to a preference value, which was subsequently used in economic evaluations of interventions. The aim was to compare the equivalence and sensitivity of health preference values derived from the SF-36/SF-12 Health Surveys to that measured directly by the SF-6D for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the SF-6D and SF-36 data from a baseline sample of 589 patients with CHB infection with different stages of liver diseases. Degree of agreement (equivalence) between direct-measured and derived SF-6D values was determined using spearman correlation and intra-class correlation. Sensitivity and discriminative power of different SF-6D values were compared by standardized effect size and relative efficiency (RE) statistics.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the direct-measured or derived SF-6D preference values were found between CHB groups. Degree of agreement between SF-6D values was satisfactory. Direct-measured SF-6D was the most efficient, followed by SF-12-derived and the SF-36-derived was the least, based on the standardized effect size and the RE statistics. Sensitivity and discriminative power of direct-measured SF-6D were superior to derived SF-6D among people with different CHB health states.

CONCLUSIONS

Although direct-measured and derived SF-6D preference values had satisfactory sensitivity in discriminating between CHB groups, direct-measured SF-6D is the most sensitive and preferable method of obtaining health preference.

Preference-based SF-6D scores derived from the SF-36 and SF-12 have different discriminative power in a population health survey

OBJECTIVE

To compare the discriminative power of the SF-6D index scores derived from the SF-36 (SF-6D36) and SF-12 (SF-6D12) in the general population.

METHODS

Data from the National Health Measurement Study were used. The F statistic was used to compare the relative efficiency of the SF-6D36 and SF-6D12, as well as the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 index scores, in discriminating between respondents with and without 1 of the 11 chronic medical conditions. The efficiency of the multiattribute health classification systems of the study instruments was measured using the Shannon index (H'). The relative efficiency of the SF-6D36 and SF-6D12 was also compared in respondents who were on the ceilings of the EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 scales.

RESULTS

The SF-6D36 score was systematically lower than the SF-6D12 score at the group level (range, 0.022-0.036). The SF-6D36 exhibited higher discriminative power in 8 and 5 conditions than the SF-6D12 and all other index scores, respectively. The SF-6D36 had higher H' values than the SF-6D12 in the dimensions of physical functioning (1.73 vs. 0.78), mental health (1.70 vs. 1.39), and bodily pain (2.16 vs. 1.56) as well as than all other instruments in similar health dimensions. In respondents reporting full health on the EQ-5D, HUI2, or HUI3, the SF-6D36 better discriminated between those with and without medical conditions than the SF-6D12.

CONCLUSIONS

The SF-6D derived from the SF-36 is more discriminative than that derived from the SF-12 and is therefore preferred for use in population health surveys where a preference-based health index is needed.

EQ-5D™-derived utility values for different levels of migraine severity from a UK sample of migraineurs

BACKGROUND

To estimate utility values for different levels of migraine pain severity from a United Kingdom (UK) sample of migraineurs.

METHODS

One hundred and six migraineurs completed the EQ-5D to evaluate their health status for mild, moderate and severe levels of migraine pain severity for a recent migraine attack, and for current health defined as health status within seven days post-migraine attack. Statistical tests were used to evaluate differences in mean utility scores by migraine severity.

RESULTS

Utility scores for each health state were significantly different from 1.0 (no problems on any EQ-5D dimension) (p < 0.0001) and one another (p < 0.0001). The lowest mean utility, - 0.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.27 - -0.13), was for severe migraine pain. The smallest difference in mean utility was between mild and moderate migraine pain (0.13) and the largest difference in mean utility was between current health (without migraine) and severe migraine pain (1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that all levels of migraine pain are associated with significantly reduced utility values. As severity worsened, utility decreased and severe migraine pain was considered a health state worse than death. Results can be used in cost-utility models examining the relative economic value of therapeutic strategies for migraine in the UK.

QALY weights for diabetic retinopathy--a comparison of health state valuations with HUI-3, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and TTO

OBJECTIVE

To estimate quality-adjusted life-year weights for patients with diabetic retinopathy by using various methods and to investigate the empirical validity of the different measures.

METHODS

The study population comprised 152 patients with diabetes in Östergötland County, Sweden. Participants were interviewed by telephone by using the time trade-off (TTO) method and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) (direct valuations) as well as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the health utilities index mark 3 (HUI-3) (indirect valuations). The quality-adjusted life-year weights were adjusted for potential confounders by using analysis of covariance. The empirical validity of the measures was examined by testing their ability to detect hypothetical differences between severity levels of diabetic retinopathy and by investigating the correlation between the measures and the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25).

RESULTS

All measures detected significant differences in scores between patient groups classified according to visual impairment in the better eye (analysis of covariance, P < 0.05), but only HUI-3 and EQ-VAS detected significant differences between patient groups classified according to visual impairment or pathological progression in the worse eye. HUI-3 recorded a difference of 0.43 in values between normal vision and blindness in the better eye, which was more than twice the differences captured by the other measures (0.15-0.20). In addition, HUI-3 showed the highest correlation with NEI VFQ-25 (r = 0.54; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In cost-utility analyses, the choice of quality-adjusted life-year measure may affect whether an intervention is considered cost-effective. Furthermore, if decisions are to be based on values from the general public, HUI-3 can be recommended for cost-utility analyses of interventions directed at diabetic retinopathy.

Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III

OBJECTIVES

Expressing the outcomes of treatment in quality-adjusted life years is increasingly important as a tool to aid decision makers concerning the allocation of scarce resources within the health care sector. A quality-adjusted life year is a measure of life expectancy that is weighted by health-related quality of life. These weights are referred to as utility scores and are usually measured by multiattribute utility measures. Several studies found that different utility measures provide different estimates of the same person's level of utility. The aim of this study was to investigate which of two widely used utility measures, the EQ-5D and the HUI mark III, is preferred in a tinnitus population.

METHODS

Baseline and follow-up data on EQ-5D and HUI mark III of 429 patients of a randomized controlled clinical trial, investigating cost-effectiveness of usual care versus specialized care of tinnitus, were included. Agreement, discriminative power, and responsiveness of the health state description and the utility scores were examined.

RESULTS

Corresponding dimensions of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III showed large correlations; although ceiling effects were more frequently observed in the EQ-5D. Mean utility scores for EQ-5D (0.77; SD 0.22) and HUI mark III (0.64; SD 0.28) were significantly different (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, p < 0.001), and agreement was low to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.53). Both health state description and utility scores of both measures discriminated between different severity groups. These groups were based on baseline scores of the Tinnitus Questionnaire. The HUI mark III had a higher ability than the EQ-5D to detect improved patients from randomly selected pairs of improved and unimproved patients.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that different utility measures lead to different health state descriptions and utility scores among tinnitus patients. However, both measures are capable of discriminating between clinically different groups. The HUI mark III is more responsive than the EQ-5D, and therefore preferred in a tinnitus population.

A value set for the EQ-5D based on experienced health states: development and testing for the German population

BACKGROUND

Decision makers responsible for allocation of healthcare resources may require that health states are valued by the population for whom they are making decisions. To achieve this, health-state descriptions can be combined with a value set that reflects the valuations of the target population. In the decision-utility approach, such a value set is at least partly based on wants and expectations regarding given health states. This may reflect aspects different from the health state experienced and valued by a respondent.

OBJECTIVES

To derive a value set that is completely based on experienced health states, emphasising the patient's perspective, and test its predictive performance in comparison with established approaches.

METHODS

Problem descriptions and rating scale valuations of the EQ-5D were drawn from two representative German population surveys in 2006 and 2007. Two models based on given health states but differing in valuation method (1a, b) were analysed, along with three models based on experienced health states: (2) ordinary least squares regression; (3) scale-transformed regression; and (4) a generalized linear model with binomial error distribution and constraint parameter estimation. The models were compared with respect to issues in specification, and accuracy in predicting the actual valuations of experienced health states in a new data set, using correlation, mean error and ranking measures for the latter. In addition, the impact of standardizing experience-based index models for age and sex of the subjects was investigated.

RESULTS

Models 1 (a, b), 2 and 3 partly led to plausible and comparable parameter estimates, but also led to problems of insignificance and inconsistencies in some of the estimates. Model 4 achieved consistency and featured partly equivalent and partly better predictive accuracy. Using this model, mean valuations of health states were much better predicted by the experience-based approach than by the decision-utility approach, especially for health states that frequently (>10) occurred in the population sample. Standardizing the experience-based index models for age and sex further improved predictive accuracy and strengthened the position of model 4.

CONCLUSIONS

A value set for the EQ-5D can be plausibly estimated from experience-based valuations. The approach offers an alternative to decision makers who prefer experience-based valuation over decision utilities in the measurement of health outcome. Although usefulness in population samples was shown, use in a clinical context will first require indication-specific tests. Current limitations include use in a general population only, and a restricted range of health states covered.

[IQWiG's methods for the cost-benefit assessment : Comparison with an international reference scenario]

Standardization of international health economic guidelines has been repeatedly requested. In this context, an international reference case was proposed, which constitutes an agreed approach for the key elements of health economic evaluation including study perspective, comparators, source of effectiveness data, role of modeling, main (economic) outcome, source of utilities, characterizing uncertainty. It is, however, questionable whether such a reference scenario can reasonably be applied across all health care systems. Our analysis pursues the question to which degree the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care's (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen, IQWiG) "General methods for evaluating the relation between cost and benefit" comply with the key elements of the reference case. In case of divergences, they will be described and discussed in light of the German social legislation and in consideration of current scientific evidence. In conclusion, the analysis revealed that IQWiG complied with the reference case in almost all aspects. Differences were found only with respect to the choice of main (economic) outcome and the source of utilities. These differences seem justified and well explained in the context of the German social legislation as well as in view of the weaknesses of the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) concept.