Design and Conduct Considerations for First-in-Human Trials

Phase I Study of Tivozanib Eye Drops in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of tivozanib eye drops in healthy volunteers and patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design

This multicenter group-sequential dose escalation phase I study consisted of a placebo-controlled double-masked study of healthy volunteers (cohorts 1 and 2) and an open-label study of patients with nAMD (cohort 3).

Participants

Healthy volunteers: Japanese or White men aged 20 to <50 years. Patients with nAMD with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 μm and best-corrected visual acuity score ≥23 letters in the study eye.

Methods

In the single-dose cohort of healthy men (cohort 1: steps 1-5), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (30 μL/drop, 5-minute interval; 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 w/v%) or placebo were administered in 1 eye once. In the multiple-dose cohort of healthy men (cohort 2: steps 1-6), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 w/v%) or placebo were administered 3 times daily in 1 eye for 21 days. In the multiple-dose cohort of patients with nAMD (cohort 3, steps 1-3), 1 or 2 tivozanib eye drops (0.5 and 1.0 w/v%) were administered 3 times daily in 1 affected eye for 21 days.

Main Outcome Measures

The safety outcome measures included adverse events (AEs). The pharmacokinetic outcome was serum tivozanib concentration. Among the exploratory efficacy outcomes, CST was evaluated.

Results

In total, 40, 48, and 28 participants were enrolled in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Serious AEs did not occur in cohorts 1 to 3. The most frequent AE in multiple-dose cohorts was reversible punctate keratitis: placebo arm, 8.3% (healthy men, 1/12); tivozanib arm, 47.2% (healthy men, 17/36) and 14.3% (nAMD, 4/28). Serum tivozanib exposure increased dose-dependently and was similar in healthy men and patients with nAMD. In patients with nAMD, mean CST changes from baseline to day 22 were -27.6 ± 54.88 (0.5 w/v%; 1 drop, 3 times daily), -35.6 ± 49.64 (1.0 w/v%; 1 drop, 3 times daily), and -43.7 ± 55.19 μm (1.0 w/v%; 2 drops, 3 times daily).

Conclusions

Tivozanib eye drops showed a favorable safety profile in healthy Japanese and White men and Japanese patients with nAMD.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Total Body PET/CT: A Role in Drug Development?

Nowadays, total body PET has already entered the medical centers and enabled various clinical applications due to its superior imaging capabilities, especially the high sensitivity. However, the potential of the total body PET in the clinical evaluation of radiopharmaceuticals remains underexplored. The development and regulatory processes for radiopharmaceuticals present unique challenges that total body PET could address. In the safety evaluation of radiopharmaceuticals, the internal radiation dosimetry demands images with high quality and quantitative accuracy, which can be achieved using the total body PET. The current clinical pharmacokinetic study for radiopharmaceuticals still relies on invasively sampling of blood and other body fluid, causing discomfort of participant and difficulty in implementation. With the total body PET, the radioactive concentration of the drug in various blood vessels can be assessed noninvasively, facilitating the pharmacokinetic study. The parametric analysis over the total body based on compartment models also sheds light on the pharmacokinetics of the radiopharmaceutical. A special requirement for multi-center clinical research involving PET and SPECT is the harmonization of the quantitative performance among different imaging equipment, and the discrepancy between the total body PET and short axial field of view PET scanners may add to the complexity. To date, there are several successful examples of clinical trials of innovative radiopharmaceuticals using the total body PET, involving different types of tracers ranging from small molecules, peptides, nanobodies, minibodies, and aptamers. In conclusion, total body PET has the potential to revolutionize the clinical evaluation of radiopharmaceuticals and will play a crucial role in future drug development.

Proof of Concept for High-Dose Cannabidiol Pretreatment to Antagonize Opioid Induced Persistent Apnea

Using a mouse equivalent of FDA-approved cannabidiol (CBD) dosing, we found high dose CBD affects opioid induced persistent apnea (OIPA), the principal cause of opioid related fatalities. CBD pretreatment mitigated respiratory depression from fentanyl in awake mice and significantly delayed OIPA onset in anesthetized mice, effective as the opioid antagonist naloxone. The powerful effect of CBD pretreatment on OIPA suggests a novel therapeutic strategy to reduce fatal opioid overdose incidence.

Anything is better than nothing': exploring attitudes towards novel therapies in leukodystrophy clinical trials

BACKGROUND/AIM

Leukodystrophies comprise a group of genetic white matter disorders that lead to progressive motor and cognitive impairment. Recent development of novel therapies has led to an increase in clinical trials for leukodystrophies. To enable recruitment of individuals with a leukodystrophy into clinical trials, clinical trial acceptability should be ascertained. We sought therefore, to identify the motivations for and barriers to clinical trial participation in addition to clinical trial features that may be of concern to individuals with a leukodystrophy and/or their carers.

METHODS

Adults with a leukodystrophy and parents/carers of individuals with a leukodystrophy were recruited through the Australian Leukodystrophy Registry and through online advertisements. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants views on what clinical trials involve, the perceived risks and benefits of clinical trials, their desire to participate in clinical trials and their personal experience with leukodystrophy. Thematic analysis of data was performed with co-coding of interview transcripts.

RESULTS

5 interviews were held with parents of children with leukodystrophy, 4 with parents of adults with leukodystrophy and 3 with adults diagnosed with leukodystrophy. Motivations for clinical trial enrolment include access to potentially lifesaving novel treatments and improved prognostic outcomes. Participants were concerned about adverse clinical trial outcomes, including side effects and exacerbation of illness. Despite this, majority of participants were willing to try anything in clinical trials, demonstrating a high tolerance for first in human trials and trials utilising invasive treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Interviewees communicated a strong desire to participate in interventional clinical trials involving novel therapies. To support enrolment into future leukodystrophy clinical trials we suggest the provision of transparent information regarding clinical trial treatments, consideration of alternative trial control measures, and inclusion of treating clinicians in the trial recruitment process. Clinicians play an integral role in initiating transparent conversations regarding trial risks and adverse outcomes.

Randomized, double-blind, phase 1a single-ascending dose and food effect studies assessing safety and pharmacokinetics of EC5026 in healthy volunteers

Chronic pain represents a significant unmet medical need, affecting one-fifth of the U.S. population. EC5026 is a small molecule inhibitor of the enzyme soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) which is being developed as a novel non-opioid, non-NSAID analgesic. EC5026 prolongs the action of epoxy fatty acids, endogenous analgesic lipid mediators that are rapidly metabolized by sEH. We evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of EC5026 in two phase I trials, a single-ascending dose (SAD) study and a fed-fasted study. The SAD study evaluated EC5026 doses ranging from 0.5 to 24 mg in healthy volunteers. EC5026 was well tolerated. No treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to EC5026. No apparent treatment- or dose-related trends in laboratory results, vital signs, physical examinations, or electrocardiograms were observed. A linear, near-dose-proportional increase in exposure was observed with progressive doses in the SAD study; plasma exposure was below or near the lower limit of quantification after 0.5-2 mg doses. Mean half-lives ranged from 41.8 to 59.1 h. for doses of 8-24 mg, supporting a once-daily dosing regimen. In the fed-fasted study using 8 mg EC5026 tablets, higher peak concentrations (66%) and total exposures (53%) were observed under the fed condition. Plasma concentrations declined in a monoexponential manner with mean half-lives of 59.5 h. in the fed state and 66.9 h. in the fasted state. Future clinical trials using EC5026 for the treatment of pain are justified based on the favorable outcomes from both clinical trials along with preclinical evidence of analgesic activity.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Spesolimab in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Phase I Study

INTRODUCTION

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and potentially life-threatening inflammatory skin disease. Interleukin (IL)-36 signalling may play a central role in GPP pathogenesis. Spesolimab is a humanized anti-IL-36 monoclonal antibody inhibiting the IL-36 signalling pathway. Here, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of spesolimab in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

In this Phase 1, single-dose, parallel-group, open-label study, healthy Chinese subjects aged 18-45 years received a single spesolimab dose by intravenous infusion (IV; 450 mg, 900 mg, or 1200 mg) or subcutaneous (SC) administration (300 mg or 600 mg). Primary endpoints were spesolimab exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration); secondary endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Fifty subjects received IV (n = 30) or SC (n = 20) spesolimab (n = 10 per dose group); 60.0% were male, mean ± standard deviation age was 31.5 ± 6.6 and 31.0 ± 6.5 years in the IV and SC groups, respectively. Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner in both groups. TEAEs were reported in 83.3% and 80.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups, the most common TEAE was upper respiratory tract infection (20.0% and 25.0%, respectively). One serious AE of hand fracture was reported in the 900 mg IV group that was not considered drug-related. Drug-related AEs were reported in 53.3% and 55.0% of subjects in the IV and SC groups. All laboratory-related AEs were mild and resolved.

CONCLUSION

Spesolimab exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after a single dose by IV and SC administration. Spesolimab was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04390568.

Safety and efficacy of an allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell preparation in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A Phase I/IIa randomised controlled trial

Objectives

To assess the safety and efficacy of an allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell preparation (MAG200) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis over 12 months.

Design

A single-centre, double-blind, ascending dose, randomised controlled trial. 40 participants with moderate knee osteoarthritis were randomised to receive a single intra-articular injection of MAG200 (dose cohorts:10, 20, 50, 100 ​× ​106 ​cells) or placebo. Primary objectives were safety and efficacy according to a compound responder analysis of minimal clinically important difference in pain (numerical pain rating scale [NPRS]) and function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Function in Daily Living subscale [KOOSADL]) at month 12. Secondary efficacy outcomes included changes from baseline in patient reported outcome measures and evaluation of disease-modification using quantitative MRI.

Results

Treatment was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events. MAG200 cohorts reported a greater proportion of responders than placebo and demonstrated clinical and statistically significant improvement in pain and clinically relevant improvement in all KOOS subscales. MAG200 demonstrated a reproducible treatment effect over placebo, which was clinically relevant for pain in the 10 ​× ​106 dose cohort (mean difference NPRS:-2.25[95%CI:-4.47,-0.03, p ​= ​0.0468]) and for function in the 20 ​× ​106 and 100 ​× ​106 dose cohorts (mean difference KOOSADL:10.12[95%CI:-1.51,21.76, p ​= ​0.0863] and 10.81[95%CI:-1.42,23.04, p ​= ​0.0810] respectively). A trend in disease-modification was observed with improvement in total knee cartilage volume in MAG200 10, 20, and 100 ​× ​106 dose cohorts, with progression of osteoarthritis in placebo, though this was not statistically significant. No clear dose response was observed.

Conclusion

This early-phase study provides supportive safety and efficacy evidence to progress MAG200 to later-stage trial development.

Trial registration

ACTRN12617001095358/ACTRN12621000622808.

Dosage Optimization: A Regulatory Perspective for Developing Oncology Drugs

Optimized dosages provide a secure foundation for the development of well-tolerated and effective oncology drugs. Project Optimus, an initiative within the Oncology Center of Excellence, strives to reform the dosage optimization and dosage selection paradigm in oncology. This initiative stems from the availability of targeted drugs and from the demand for more tolerable dosages from patients, caregivers, and advocates. Reforming dosage optimization for oncology drugs requires a paradigm shift from the one employed for cytotoxic chemotherapy to one that understands and considers the unique attributes of targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cellular therapy. Limited characterization of dosage during drug development may result in (1) patients not staying on a therapy long-term due to poor tolerability, (2) failure to establish positive benefit-risk in clinical trials for regulatory approval (3) withdrawal of drugs from the market (4) removal of indications of drugs from the market. Timely access to drugs is important for all patients with cancer, so it is vital to iteratively analyze all nonclinical and clinically relevant data at each stage of development and leverage quantitative approaches, innovative trial designs, and regulatory support to arrive at dosages with favorable benefit-risk. This review highlights the key challenges and opportunities to embracing this new paradigm and realizing the full potential of new oncology therapies.

Dose selection of novel anticancer drugs: exposing the gap between selected and required doses

Historically, dose selection of anticancer drugs has mainly been based on establishing the maximum tolerated dose in phase 1 clinical trials with a traditional 3 plus 3 design. In the era of targeted therapies and immune-modulating agents, this approach does not necessarily lead to selection of the most favourable dose. This strategy can introduce potentially avoidable toxicity or inconvenience for patients. Multiple changes in drug development could lead to more rational dose selection, such as use of better predictive preclinical models, adaptive and randomised trial design, evaluation of multiple dose levels in late-phase development, assessment of target activity and saturation, and early biomarker use for efficacy and safety evaluation. In this Review, we evaluate the rationale and validation of dose selection in each phase of drug development for anticancer drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration from Jan 1, 2020, to June 30, 2023, and give recommendations for dose optimisation to improve safety and patient convenience. In our evaluation, we classified 20 (65%) of the 31 recently registered anticancer agents as potential candidates for dose optimisation, which could be achieved either by reducing the dose (n=10 [32%]) or adjusting the dosage regimen (n=10 [32%]). Dose selection seemed to be adequately justified for nine (29%) of the drugs, whereas the reviewed data were inconclusive for formulating a recommendation on dose optimisation for two (6%) of the drugs.

Quality and Safety Considerations for Therapeutic Products Based on Extracellular Vesicles

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) serve as an intrinsic system for delivering functional molecules within our body, playing significant roles in diverse physiological phenomena and diseases. Both native and engineered EVs are currently the subject of extensive research as promising therapeutics and drug delivery systems, primarily due to their remarkable attributes, such as targeting capabilities, biocompatibility, and low immunogenicity and mutagenicity. Nevertheless, their clinical application is still a long way off owing to multiple limitations. In this context, the Science Board of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) of Japan has conducted a comprehensive assessment to identify the current issues related to the quality and safety of EV-based therapeutic products. Furthermore, we have presented several examples of the state-of-the-art methodologies employed in EV manufacturing, along with guidelines for critical processes, such as production, purification, characterization, quality evaluation and control, safety assessment, and clinical development and evaluation of EV-based therapeutics. These endeavors aim to facilitate the clinical application of EVs and pave the way for their transformative impact in healthcare.

Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors for Gene Therapy of the Central Nervous System: Delivery Routes and Clinical Aspects

The Central Nervous System (CNS) is vulnerable to a range of diseases, including neurodegenerative and oncological conditions, which present significant treatment challenges. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts molecule penetration, complicating the achievement of therapeutic concentrations in the CNS following systemic administration. Gene therapy using recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors emerges as a promising strategy for treating CNS diseases, demonstrated by the registration of six gene therapy products in the past six years and 87 ongoing clinical trials. This review explores the implementation of rAAV vectors in CNS disease treatment, emphasizing AAV biology and vector engineering. Various administration methods-such as intravenous, intrathecal, and intraparenchymal routes-and experimental approaches like intranasal and intramuscular administration are evaluated, discussing their advantages and limitations in different CNS contexts. Additionally, the review underscores the importance of optimizing therapeutic efficacy through the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of rAAV vectors. A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials reveals successes and challenges, including barriers to commercialization. This review provides insights into therapeutic strategies using rAAV vectors in neurological diseases and identifies areas requiring further research, particularly in optimizing rAAV PK/PD.

A phase I randomized study to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SIR2446M, a selective RIPK1 inhibitor, in healthy participants

Activation of receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), a broadly expressed serine/threonine protein kinase, by pro-inflammatory cytokines and pathogens can result in apoptosis, necroptosis, or inflammation. RIPK1 inhibition has been shown to reduce inflammation and cell damage in preclinical studies and may have therapeutic potential for degenerative and inflammatory diseases. SIR2446 is a potent and selective novel small molecule RIPK1 kinase inhibitor. This phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Australia (ACTRN12621001621808) evaluated the safety (primary objective), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single (3-600 mg) and multiple (5-400 mg for 10 days) ascending oral doses of SIR2446M (SIR2446 magnesium salt form) in healthy adults from Nov 24, 2021, until May 01, 2023. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild/moderate. The most reported TEAEs were vascular access site pain, headache, and rash morbilliform. SIR2446M plasma half-lives ranged from 11 to 19 h and there were no major deviations from dose proportionality for maximum concentration and area under the curve across doses. Renal excretion of unchanged SIR2446 was minimal. No marked accumulation was observed (mean accumulation ratio, 1.2-1.6) after multiple daily doses. A high-fat meal mildly reduced the exposure but was not considered clinically significant. SIR2446M had a rapid and sustained inhibitory effect on the activity of RIPK1, with an overall 90% target engagement at repeated doses ranging from 30 to 400 mg in peripheral blood mononuclear cells ex vivo stimulated to undergo necroptosis. The favorable safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profile of SIR2446M in healthy participants supports its further clinical development in patients with degenerative and inflammatory diseases.

Intersession reliability of center of pressure measurement during bipedal standing with different foot placement angles

INTRODUCTION

The foot placement is a determinant of the base of support and influences standing balance. The reliability of postural stability tests with different foot placement angles is unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To determine and compare the intra- and inter-day reliability of the center of pressure-based postural stability while standing with different foot placement angles.

METHOD

Twenty-five healthy adults (16 females and 9 males; age: 29 ± 6 years) completed 70 s trials of eyes open and eyes closed stability tests with 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° angles between the feet while standing on a forceplate in three sessions: two sessions were in the same day, and the third session was one-week apart. The repeatability of measurements was tested using analysis of variance, interclass correlation, and standard error of measurements.

RESULT

Throughout the three study sessions, there was no difference in postural stability while participants stood with different foot placement angles. The interclass correlation scores ranged from 0.71 to 0.96, the standard error of measurements ranged from 2.1% to 12.9%, and no significant systematic changes (p < 0.05) occurred between the testing sessions for any foot placements. Standing with a 45° angle between the feet with closed eyes showed higher reliability values than other conditions. The intra-day reliability scores were greater than inter-day reliability.

DISCUSSION

The relative reliability of postural stability could be impacted by foot placement angles, which might alter ankle mobility and base of support dimensions. The advantages of larger foot placement angles on improving the relative reliability of postural stability could be better demonstrated in healthy people under challenging conditions such as standing with closed eyes.

CONCLUSION

Standing with foot placement angles between 0° and 45° are reliable and a quantitative assessment of the center of pressure could be used to monitor the changes in postural stability between sessions.

The estimation and translation uncertainties in applying NOAEL to clinical dose escalation

The systemic exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) estimated from animals is an important criterion commonly applied to guard the safety of participants in clinical trials of investigational drugs. However, the discrepancy in toxicity profile between species is widely recognized. The objective of the work reported here was to assess, via simulation, the level of uncertainty in the NOAEL estimated from an animal species and the effectiveness of applying its associated exposure value to minimizing the toxicity risk to human. Simulations were conducted for dose escalation of an investigational new chemical entity with hypothetical exposure-response models for the dose-limiting toxicity under a variety of conditions, in terms of between-species relative sensitivity to the toxicity and the between-subject variability in the key parameters determining the sensitivity and pharmacokinetics. Results show a high uncertainty in the NOAEL estimation. Notably, even when the animal species and humans are assumed to have the same sensitivity, which may not be realistic, limiting clinical dose to the exposure at the NOAEL that has been identified in the animals carries a high risk of either causing toxicity or under-dosing, hence undermining the therapeutic potential of the drug candidate. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the mechanism of the toxicity profile and its cross-species translatability, as well as the importance of understanding the dose requirement for achieving adequate pharmacology.

Eugenol as a potential adjuvant therapy for gingival squamous cell carcinoma

Adoption of plant-derived compounds for the management of oral cancer is encouraged by the scientific community due to emerging chemoresistance and conventional treatments adverse effects. Considering that very few studies investigated eugenol clinical relevance for gingival carcinoma, we ought to explore its selectivity and performance according to aggressiveness level. For this purpose, non-oncogenic human oral epithelial cells (GMSM-K) were used together with the Tongue (SCC-9) and Gingival (Ca9-22) squamous cell carcinoma lines to assess key tumorigenesis processes. Overall, eugenol inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation while inducing cytotoxicity in cancer cells as compared to normal counterparts. The recorded effect was greater in gingival carcinoma and appears to be mediated through apoptosis induction and promotion of p21/p27/cyclin D1 modulation and subsequent Ca9-22 cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase, in a p53-independent manner. At these levels, distinct genetic profiles were uncovered for both cell lines by QPCR array. Moreover, it seems that our active component limited Ca9-22 and SCC-9 cell migration respectively through MMP1/3 downregulation and stimulation of inactive MMPs complex formation. Finally, Ca9-22 behaviour appears to be mainly modulated by the P38/STAT5/NFkB pathways. In summary, we can disclose that eugenol is cancer selective and that its mediated anti-cancer mechanisms vary according to the cell line with gingival squamous cell carcinoma being more sensitive to this phytotherapy agent.

Bayesian framework for multi-source data integration-Application to human extrapolation from preclinical studies

In preclinical investigations, for example, in in vitro, in vivo, and in silico studies, the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicological characteristics of a drug are evaluated before advancing to first-in-man trial. Usually, each study is analyzed independently and the human dose range does not leverage the knowledge gained from all studies. Taking into account all preclinical data through inferential procedures can be particularly interesting in obtaining a more precise and reliable starting dose and dose range. Our objective is to propose a Bayesian framework for multi-source data integration, customizable, and tailored to the specific research question. We focused on preclinical results extrapolated to humans, which allowed us to predict the quantities of interest (e.g. maximum tolerated dose, etc.) in humans. We build an approach, divided into four steps, based on a sequential parameter estimation for each study, extrapolation to human, commensurability checking between posterior distributions and final information merging to increase the precision of estimation. The new framework is evaluated via an extensive simulation study, based on a real-life example in oncology. Our approach allows us to better use all the information compared to a standard framework, reducing uncertainty in the predictions and potentially leading to a more efficient dose selection.

Application of 3D printing in early phase development of pharmaceutical solid dosage forms

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) is an emerging technology, offering the possibility for the development of dose-customized, effective, and safe solid oral dosage forms (SODFs). Although 3DP has great potential, it does come with certain limitations, and the traditional drug manufacturing platforms remain the industry standard. The consensus appears to be that 3DP technology is expected to benefit personalized medicine the most, but that it is unlikely to replace conventional manufacturing for mass production. The 3DP method, on the other hand, could prove well-suited for producing small batches as an adaptive manufacturing technique for enabling adaptive clinical trial design for early clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advancements in 3DP technologies for SODFs and to focus on the applications for SODFs in the early clinical development stages, including a discussion of current regulatory challenges and quality controls.

Dose Prediction and Pharmacokinetic Simulation of XZP-5610, a Small Molecule for NASH Therapy, Using Allometric Scaling and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models

The objectives of this study were to support dose selection of a novel FXR agonist XZP-5610 in first-in-human (FIH) trials and to predict its liver concentrations in Chinese healthy adults. Key parameters for extrapolation were measured using in vitro and in vivo models. Allometric scaling methods were employed to predict human pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters and doses for FIH clinical trials. To simulate the PK profiles, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed using animal data and subsequently validated with clinical data. The PBPK model was employed to simulate XZP-5610 concentrations in the human liver across different dose groups. XZP-5610 exhibited high permeability, poor solubility, and extensive binding to plasma proteins. After a single intravenous or oral administration of XZP-5610, the PK parameters obtained from rats and beagle dogs were used to extrapolate human parameters, resulting in a clearance of 138 mL/min and an apparent volume of distribution of 41.8 L. The predicted maximum recommended starting dose (MRSD), minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were 0.15, 2, and 3 mg, respectively. The PK profiles and parameters of XZP-5610, predicted using the PBPK model, demonstrated good consistency with the clinical data. By using allometric scaling and PBPK models, the doses, PK profile, and especially the liver concentrations were successfully predicted in the FIH study.

US FDA's Dose Optimization Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments of Oncology Approvals and the Impact on Product Labels from 2010 to 2022: An Emerging Landscape from Traditional to Novel Therapies

BACKGROUND

Dose optimization is a focal point of many US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals. We sought to understand the impact of the FDA's Postmarketing Commitments/Postmarketing Requirements (PMCs/PMRs) on dose optimization and prescriber labeling for oncology drugs.

METHODS

Publicly available information was aggregated for all FDA oncology drug approvals between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022. Study completion dates were compared to product labeling before and after PMC/PMR fulfillment dates to evaluate labeling changes associated with dose-related PMCs/PMRs. Data were analyzed individually (2010-2015 and 2016-2022) due to differences in available information.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2015, 14 of 42 (33.3%) new molecular entities (NMEs) had dose-related PMCs/PMRs, with 6 of 14 (42.9%) resulting in a relevant label change. From 2016 to 2022, of the 314 new or supplemental applications approved, 21 had dose-related PMCs/PMRs (6.7%), which trended upward over time; 71.4% of dose-related PMCs/PMRs were NMEs. Kinase inhibitors (KIs) and antibody/peptide drug conjugates (ADCs/PDCs) were the most affected drug classes. Ten of the 21 approvals with dose-related PMCs/PMRs fulfilled their dosing PMCs/PMRs, and 3 of the 10 (30%) had relevant label changes.

CONCLUSION

Most dose-related PMRs/PMCs were issued for NMEs. Of these, KIs and ADCs/PDCs were highly represented, reflecting their novelty and greater uncertainty around their safety profile. PMC/PMR issuance broadly increased over time. With the implementation of the FDA's Project Optimus in 2021, it remains to be seen whether fewer dose-related PMCs/PMRs emerge in future due to enhanced dose optimization in the premarketing setting.

A phase I trial of SON-1010, a tumor-targeted, interleukin-12-linked, albumin-binding cytokine, shows favorable pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety in healthy volunteers

Background

The benefits of recombinant interleukin-12 (rIL-12) as a multifunctional cytokine and potential immunotherapy for cancer have been sought for decades based on its efficacy in multiple mouse models. Unexpected toxicity in the first phase 2 study required careful attention to revised dosing strategies. Despite some signs of efficacy since then, most rIL-12 clinical trials have encountered hurdles such as short terminal elimination half-life (T½), limited tumor microenvironment targeting, and substantial systemic toxicity. We developed a strategy to extend the rIL-12 T½ that depends on binding albumin in vivo to target tumor tissue, using single-chain rIL-12 linked to a fully human albumin binding (FHAB) domain (SON-1010). After initiating a dose-escalation trial in patients with cancer (SB101), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) phase 1 trial in healthy volunteers (SB102) was conducted.

Methods

SB102 (NCT05408572) focused on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) endpoints. SON-1010 at 50-300 ng/kg or placebo administered subcutaneously on day 1 was studied at a ratio of 6:2, starting with two sentinels; participants were followed through day 29. Safety was reviewed after day 22, before enrolling the next cohort. A non-compartmental analysis of PK was performed and correlations with the PD results were explored, along with a comparison of the SON-1010 PK profile in SB101.

Results

Participants receiving SON-1010 at 100 ng/kg or higher tolerated the injection but generally experienced more treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) than those receiving the lowest dose. All TEAEs were transient and no other dose relationship was noted. As expected with rIL-12, initial decreases in neutrophils and lymphocytes returned to baseline by days 9-11. PK analysis showed two-compartment elimination in SB102 with mean T½ of 104 h, compared with one-compartment elimination in SB101, which correlated with prolonged but controlled and dose-related increases in interferon-gamma (IFNγ). There was no evidence of cytokine release syndrome based on minimal participant symptoms and responses observed with other cytokines.

Conclusion

SON-1010, a novel presentation for rIL-12, was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers up to 300 ng/kg. Its extended half-life leads to a prolonged but controlled IFNγ response, which may be important for tumor control in patients.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05408572, identifier NCT05408572.

Effect of Cimetidine on Metformin Pharmacokinetics and Endogenous Metabolite Levels in Rats

Tubular secretion is a primary mechanism along with glomerular filtration for renal elimination of drugs and toxicants into urine. Organic cation transporters (OCTs) and multidrug and toxic extrusion (MATE) transporters facilitate the active secretion of cationic substrates, including drugs such as metformin and endogenous cations. We hypothesized that administration of cimetidine, an Oct/Mate inhibitor, will result in increased plasma levels and decreased renal clearance of metformin and endogenous Oct/Mate substrates in rats. A paired rat pharmacokinetic study was carried out in which metformin (5 mg/kg, intravenous) was administered as an exogenous substrate of Oct/Mate transporters to six Sprague-Dawley rats with and without cimetidine (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneal). When co-administered with cimetidine, metformin area under the curve increased significantly by 3.2-fold, and its renal clearance reduced significantly by 73%. Untargeted metabolomics was performed to investigate the effect of cimetidine on endogenous metabolome in the blood and urine samples. Over 8,000 features (metabolites) were detected in the blood, which were shortlisted using optimized criteria, i.e., a significant increase (P value < 0.05) in metabolite peak intensity in the cimetidine-treated group, reproducible retention time, and quality of chromatogram peak. The metabolite hits were classified into three groups that can potentially distinguish inhibition of i) extra-renal uptake transport or catabolism, ii) renal Octs, and iii) renal efflux transporters or metabolite formation. The metabolomics approach identified novel putative endogenous substrates of cationic transporters that could be tested as potential biomarkers to predict Oct/Mate transporter mediated drug-drug interactions in the preclinical stages. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Endogenous substrates of renal transporters in animal models could be used as potential biomarkers to predict renal drug-drug interactions in early drug development. Here we demonstrated that cimetidine, an inhibitor of organic cation transporters (Oct/Mate), could alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin and endogenous cationic substrates in rats. Several putative endogenous metabolites of Oct/Mate transporters were identified using metabolomics approach, which could be tested as potential transporter biomarkers to predict renal drug-drug interaction of Oct/Mate substrates.

A review of clinical trials registered in India from 2008 to 2022 to describe the first-in-human trials

Aim

This analysis was conducted to review the number, and describe the characteristics of first-in-human (FIH) Phase 1 clinical trials registered in India from 2008 to 2022.

Materials and Methods

The data were extracted from the Clinical Trials Registry - India database for all FIH Phase 1 clinical trials registered between 2008 and 2022. Early-phase trials that were not FIH trials (e.g., pharmacokinetic studies and drug-drug interaction studies) were excluded from the study.

Results

A total of 1891 trials were retrieved and 220 were included in the analysis. Most of the investigational products were drugs (55%) followed by vaccines (38.2%). The most common therapeutic class of drugs was cancer chemotherapy (19.8%), followed by antimicrobial chemotherapy and endocrinology (18.2% each). The most common vaccine was the influenza vaccine (21.4%), followed by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (15.5%). The pharmaceutical industry was the predominant sponsor for most (91%) of the Phase 1 trials. Of the top five sites where most of the Phase 1 trials were conducted, three were private nonacademic centers (cumulatively 31%) and two were tertiary care medical colleges (cumulatively 9%).

Conclusion

Phase 1 clinical trials seem to be conducted in India predominantly with industry sponsorship. There is a need to have an alternate ecosystem to take forward molecules that do not receive adequate attention from the industry and molecules that are of national health priority other than areas such as chemotherapy, antimicrobials, and endocrinology. The Indian Council of Medical Research is setting up Phase 1 clinical trial capacity for molecules that predominantly may arise from nonindustry channels.

Pooled analysis of routine safety parameters observed in healthy participants at baseline and following placebo administration in early phase clinical studies

Phase I trials inform on the initial safety profile of a new molecule and impact whether further development is pursued or not. Understanding the effect of non-pharmacological factors on the variability of routine safety parameters could improve decision making in these early clinical trials, helping to separate signals related to the new molecule from background "noise." To understand the impact of non-pharmacological factors on routine safety parameters, we evaluated pooled safety data from over 1000 healthy participants treated with placebo in phase I trials between 2009 and 2018. The phase I participants were predominantly men, less than or equal to 50 years, White, and non-Hispanic; and approximately an equal proportion had body mass index in the normal and overweight/obese range. Following administration of placebo, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory parameters remained near predose baseline values. Large changes from baseline were observed for many safety parameters, but these occurred in a relatively small number of participants. At least one adverse event (AE) occurred in 49.7% of participants receiving placebo in single ascending dose (SAD) studies and in 72.4% of participants receiving placebo in multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies, with headache being the most commonly reported AE (18.7% in SAD and 28.3% in MAD studies). Overall, these analyses are consistent with non-pharmacological factors having a small impact on routine safety parameters in a phase I trial. The provided supplemental data may be used to contextualize the magnitude and frequency of abnormal safety values and AEs observed in phase I trials.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SHR7280, a Non-peptide GnRH Antagonist in Premenopausal Women with Endometriosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study

BACKGROUND

Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists are promising agents in the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Here we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of SHR7280, an oral non-peptide GnRH antagonist in premenopausal women with endometriosis.

METHODS

In the Phase 1 part of the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending, Phase 1/2 trial, premenopausal women with endometriosis were randomized (4:1) to receive SHR7280 or placebo treatment for 21 consecutive days. The treatment dose started from 200 mg QD, and then increased to 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients received assigned treatment, 24 with SHR7280 and 6 with placebo. SHR7280 was well tolerated. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 19 (79.2%, 19/24) patients in the SHR7280 group and 5 (83.3%, 5/6) patients in the placebo group. Most AEs were mild and no severe AEs occurred. SHR7280 showed a rapid absorption, with a time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of 1.0 h, 1.0 h, and 0.8 h for the 200 mg QD, 300 mg QD, and 200 mg BID regimens, respectively. Plasma concentration of SHR7280 was dose dependent. The mean half-life (t1/2) at steady state was 6.9 h, 7.4 h, and 2.8 h, respectively, and little or no accumulation was observed. Pharmacodynamic analysis showed that SHR7280 could effectively suppress estradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrations and prevent progesterone increase in a dose-dependent manner. SHR7280 at doses of 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID could suppress estradiol levels within the desired therapeutic window of 20-50 pg/mL throughout the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

SHR7280 showed favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the doses of 200 mg QD, 300 mg QD, and 200 mg BID. The results of this study provide evidence to support the further development of SHR7280 as a GnRH antagonist for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain in the subsequent Phase 2 trial.

TRIAL REGISTRY

Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04417972. Trial registration date: 5 June 2020.

Systematic review of first-in-human and early phase clinical trials for surgically implantable biological mitral valve substitutes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review was the creation of uniform protocols to carry out and disclose First-In-Human and preliminary clinical trials of biological mitral valve replacement. The need for consistent methodology in these early trials was highlighted by the observation of significant variability in the methods and protocols used across different research.

METHODS

An extensive search through six major databases was carried out to retrieve First-In-Human (FIH) clinical studies evaluating surgically implanted bio-prostheses in the mitral position.

RESULTS

Following the PRISMA guideline, a systematic search identified 2082 published articles until March 2023. After removing duplicates (189), 1862 citations were screened, resulting in 22 eligible studies with 3332 patients for analysis. The mitral valve prostheses in these studies ranged from 21 to 37 mm, with the 29 mm size being most prevalent. Patient numbers varied, with the FIH subgroup including 31 patients and the older subgroup including 163 patients. Average study durations differed: the older subgroup lasted 4.57 years, the FIH subgroup 2.85 years, and the early phase studies spanned 8.05 years on average.

CONCLUSION

FIH clinical report is essential to assess the significance of clinical data required for a "de novo" surgical implant. In addition, understanding the performance of the device, and recognizing the difficulties associated with the innovation constitute important lessons. These insights could be beneficial for the development of bioprosthetic heart valves and formulating a protocol for an FIH clinical trial.

Utilizing PK and PD Biomarkers to Guide the First-in-Human Starting Dose Selection of MTBT1466A: A Novel Humanized Monoclonal Anti-TGFβ3 Antibody for the Treatment of Fibrotic Diseases

MTBT1466A is a high-affinity TGFβ3-specific humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody with reduced Fc effector function, currently under investigation in clinical trials as a potential anti-fibrotic therapy. Here, we characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of MTBT1466A in mice and monkeys and predicted the PK/PD of MTBT1466A in humans to guide the selection of the first-in-human (FIH) starting dose. MTBT1466A demonstrated a typical IgG1-like biphasic PK profile in monkeys, and the predicted human clearance of 2.69 mL/day/kg and t1/2 of 20.4 days are consistent with those expected for a human IgG1 antibody. In a mouse model of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, changes in expression of TGFβ3-related genes, serpine1, fibronectin-1, and collagen 1A1 were used as PD biomarkers to determine the minimum pharmacologically active dose of 1 mg/kg. Unlike in the fibrosis mouse model, evidence of target engagement in healthy monkeys was only observed at higher doses. Using a PKPD-guided approach, the recommended FIH dose of 50 mg, IV, provided exposures that were shown to be safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers. MTBT1466A PK in healthy volunteers was predicted reasonably well using a PK model with allometric scaling of PK parameters from monkey data. Taken together, this work provides insights into the PK/PD behavior of MTBT1466A in preclinical species, and supports the translatability of the preclinical data into the clinic.

Using the TI.VA algorithm to titrate the depth of general anaesthesia: a first-in-humans study

Background

The dose of anaesthetic and opioid drugs must be continuously adjusted after the induction of general anaesthesia to maintain an adequate depth of anaesthesia. The TI.VA algorithm is a multiple-input/multiple-output algorithm designed to optimise the balance between anaesthetic and opioid concentrations during general anaesthesia. It applies vector analysis to a two-dimensional matrix to quantify any inadequacy of the depth of anaesthesia at any given moment and determine any drug dose adjustments required to achieve an adequate depth of anaesthesia. This study aimed to capture preliminary data on the performance and safety of the TI.VA algorithm during total i.v. anaesthesia in patients.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled nine patients with breast cancer scheduled to undergo surgery. General anaesthesia was induced under manual control using propofol and remifentanil. Anaesthesia was guided using the TI.VA algorithm from skin incision until surgical resection was completed. The quality of anaesthesia was assessed through an analysis of performance errors. A bispectral index global score (GSBIS) <50 was considered an acceptable target for algorithm performance.

Results

All nine procedures were completed without any adverse events and none of the patients recalled any intraoperative event. Overall, we analysed 3417 monitoring points corresponding to 285 min of surgery. All patients presented a GSBIS below the cut-off value of 50.

Conclusions

The TI.VA algorithm provides adequate control of clinical anaesthesia. A more sophisticated prototype needs to be developed before the trial is expanded to include larger patient populations.

Clinical trial registration

NCT05199883.

Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) in patients with chronic cervical spinal cord injury in the USA: a first-in-human and randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes neural disconnection and persistent neurological deficits, so axon sprouting and plasticity might promote recovery. Soluble Nogo-Receptor-Fc decoy (AXER-204) blocks inhibitors of axon growth and promotes recovery of motor function after SCI in animals. This first-in-human and randomised trial sought to determine primarily the safety and pharmacokinetics of AXER-204 in individuals with chronic SCI, and secondarily its effect on recovery.

METHODS

We conducted a two-part study in adults (aged 18-65 years) with chronic (>1 year) cervical traumatic SCI at six rehabilitation centres in the USA. In part 1, AXER-204 was delivered open label as single intrathecal doses of 3 mg, 30 mg, 90 mg, or 200 mg, with primary outcomes of safety and pharmacokinetics. Part 2 was a randomised, parallel, double-blind comparison of six intrathecal doses of 200 mg AXER-204 over 104 days versus placebo. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) by investigators using a central electronic system, stratified in blocks of four by American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and receipt of AXER-204 in part 1. All investigators and patients were masked to treatment allocation until at least day 169. The part 2 primary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics, with a key secondary objective to assess change in International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS) at day 169 for all enrolled participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03989440, and is completed.

FINDINGS

We treated 24 participants in part 1 (six per dose; 18 men, six women), and 27 participants in part 2 (13 placebo, 14 AXER-204; 23 men, four women), between June 20, 2019, and June 21, 2022. There were no deaths and no discontinuations from the study due to an adverse event in part 1 and 2. In part 2, treatment-related adverse events were of similar incidence in AXER-204 and placebo groups (ten [71%] vs nine [69%]). Headache was the most common treatment-related adverse event (five [21%] in part 1, 11 [41%] in part 2). In part 1, AXER-204 reached mean maximal CSF concentration 1 day after dosing with 200 mg of 412 000 ng/mL (SD 129 000), exceeding those concentrations that were efficacious in animal studies. In part 2, mean changes from baseline to day 169 in ISNCSCI UEMS were 1·5 (SD 3·3) for AXER-204 and 0·9 (2·3) for placebo (mean difference 0·54, 95% CI -1·48 to 2·55; p=0·59).

INTERPRETATION

This study delivers the first, to our knowledge, clinical trial of a rationally designed pharmacological treatment intended to promote neural repair in chronic SCI. AXER-204 appeared safe and reached target CSF concentrations; exploratory biomarker results were consistent with target engagement and synaptic stabilisation. Post-hoc subgroup analyses suggest that future trials could investigate efficacy in patients with moderately severe SCI without prior AXER-204 exposure.

FUNDING

Wings for Life Foundation, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, and ReNetX Bio.

Development of consensus-driven SPIRIT and CONSORT extensions for early phase dose-finding trials: the DEFINE study

BACKGROUND

Early phase dose-finding (EPDF) trials are crucial for the development of a new intervention and influence whether it should be investigated in further trials. Guidance exists for clinical trial protocols and completed trial reports in the SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines, respectively. However, both guidelines and their extensions do not adequately address the characteristics of EPDF trials. Building on the SPIRIT and CONSORT checklists, the DEFINE study aims to develop international consensus-driven guidelines for EPDF trial protocols (SPIRIT-DEFINE) and reports (CONSORT-DEFINE).

METHODS

The initial generation of candidate items was informed by reviewing published EPDF trial reports. The early draft items were refined further through a review of the published and grey literature, analysis of real-world examples, citation and reference searches, and expert recommendations, followed by a two-round modified Delphi process. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) was pursued concurrently with the quantitative and thematic analysis of Delphi participants' feedback.

RESULTS

The Delphi survey included 79 new or modified SPIRIT-DEFINE (n = 36) and CONSORT-DEFINE (n = 43) extension candidate items. In Round One, 206 interdisciplinary stakeholders from 24 countries voted and 151 stakeholders voted in Round Two. Following Round One feedback, one item for CONSORT-DEFINE was added in Round Two. Of the 80 items, 60 met the threshold for inclusion (≥ 70% of respondents voted critical: 26 SPIRIT-DEFINE, 34 CONSORT-DEFINE), with the remaining 20 items to be further discussed at the consensus meeting. The parallel PPIE work resulted in the development of an EPDF lay summary toolkit consisting of a template with guidance notes and an exemplar.

CONCLUSIONS

By detailing the development journey of the DEFINE study and the decisions undertaken, we envision that this will enhance understanding and help researchers in the development of future guidelines. The SPIRIT-DEFINE and CONSORT-DEFINE guidelines will allow investigators to effectively address essential items that should be present in EPDF trial protocols and reports, thereby promoting transparency, comprehensiveness, and reproducibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

SPIRIT-DEFINE and CONSORT-DEFINE are registered with the EQUATOR Network ( https://www.equator-network.org/ ).

Opportunities for Systems Biology and Quantitative Systems Pharmacology to Address Knowledge Gaps for Drug Development in Pregnancy

Pregnant women are still viewed as therapeutic orphans to the extent that they are avoided as participants in mainstream clinical trials and not considered a priority for targeted drug research despite the fact that many clinical conditions exist during pregnancy for which pharmacotherapy is warranted. Part of the challenge is the uncertain risk potential that pregnant women represent in the absence of timely and costly toxicology and developmental pharmacology studies, which only partly mitigate such risks. Even when clinical trials are conducted in pregnant women, they are often underpowered and absent biomarkers and exclude evaluation across multiple stages of pregnancy where relevant development risk could have been assessed. Quantitative systems pharmacology model development has been proposed as one solution to fill knowledge gaps, make earlier and perhaps more informed risk assessment, and design more informative trials with better recommendations for biomarker and end point selection including design and sample size optimality. Funding for translational research in pregnancy is limited but will fill some of these gaps, especially when joined with ongoing clinical trials in pregnancy that also fill certain knowledge gaps, especially biomarker and end point evaluation across pregnancy states linked to clinical outcomes. Opportunities exist for further advances in quantitative systems pharmacology model development with the inclusion of real-world data sources and complimentary artificial intelligence/machine learning approaches. The successful coordination of the approach reliant on these new data sources will require commitments to share data and a diverse multidisciplinary group that seeks to develop open science models that benefit the entire research community, ensuring that such models can be used with high fidelity. New data opportunities and computational resources are highlighted in an effort to project how these efforts can move forward.

Simultaneous evaluation of treatment efficacy and toxicity for bispecific T-cell engager therapeutics in a humanized mouse model

Immuno-oncology (IO)-based therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors, bi-specific antibodies, and CAR-T-cell therapies have shown significant success in the treatment of several cancer indications. However, these therapies can result in the development of severe adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Currently, there is a paucity of in vivo models that can evaluate dose-response relationships for both tumor control and CRS-related safety issues. We tested an in vivo PBMC humanized mouse model to assess both treatment efficacy against specific tumors and the concurrent cytokine release profiles for individual human donors after treatment with a CD19xCD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE). Using this model, we evaluated tumor burden, T-cell activation, and cytokine release in response to bispecific T-cell-engaging antibody in humanized mice generated with different PBMC donors. The results show that PBMC engrafted NOD-scid Il2rgnull mice lacking expression of mouse MHC class I and II (NSG-MHC-DKO mice) and implanted with a tumor xenograft predict both efficacy for tumor control by CD19xCD3 BiTE and stimulated cytokine release. Moreover, our findings indicate that this PBMC-engrafted model captures variability among donors for tumor control and cytokine release following treatment. Tumor control and cytokine release were reproducible for the same PBMC donor in separate experiments. The PBMC humanized mouse model described here is a sensitive and reproducible platform that identifies specific patient/cancer/therapy combinations for treatment efficacy and development of complications.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the novel basal insulin Fc (insulin efsitora alfa), an insulin fusion protein in development for once-weekly dosing for the treatment of patients with diabetes

AIM

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of basal insulin Fc (BIF; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant together with human IgG2 Fc domain, following single and multiple once-weekly BIF administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The single ascending dose, 15-day study assessed four BIF doses (5-35 mg) in healthy participants and people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In the 6-week multiple ascending dose study, people with T2D, previously treated with basal insulin, received insulin glargine daily or a one-time loading dose of BIF followed by 5 weeks of once-weekly dosing (1-10 mg). Safety, tolerability and PK and glucose PD were examined.

RESULTS

Mean ages of people with T2D (N = 57) and healthy participants (N = 16) in the single-dose study were 58.4 and 35.8 years, respectively; mean body mass index values were 29.5 and 26.1 kg/m² . BIF had a PK half-life of approximately 17 days, which led to a sustained, dose-dependent decrease in fasting blood glucose for 5 days or longer. No severe hypoglycaemia was observed. The 6-week ascending dose study included 33 people with T2D aged 40-69 years. BIF showed a low peak-to-trough ratio of 1.14 after the last dose at week 6 (steady state). Over 6 weeks, BIF seven-point glucose profiles remained constant and were similar to insulin glargine. Rates and duration of BIF hypoglycaemic events were similar to insulin glargine.

CONCLUSIONS

BIF was well tolerated and the PK/PD profile enabled once-weekly dosing with minimal variation in exposure in a treatment interval of 1 week. The findings suggest BIF is suitable for further development as a weekly basal insulin in people with diabetes.

Approaches for estimating the clinical starting dose of new dosage forms: An example of a long-acting injectable formulation of finasteride

In our previous study, a long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of finasteride was prepared as a new dosage form of PROPECIA®, and in vivo pharmacokinetics (PKs)-pharmacodynamics (PDs) was evaluated in beagle dogs. The resulting PK-PD profiles of the formulation showed pharmacological effects and achievability for monthly delivery. In this study, a first-in-human (FIH) dose of the LAI formulation loaded with finasteride was predicted. The three approaches were used for estimating a FIH dose of the LAI formulation: (1) No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL)-based approach; (2) Pharmacokinetically-guided approach; (3) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based approach. The advantage, assumptions, limitations, and estimated FIH dose from each approach was discussed and compared since there is no consensus on the best approach. For the prediction of clinical exposures and estimation of FIH doses, the clinical PK-PD parameters were allometrically scaled from the nonclinical data, extracted from reported clinical studies, or fixed from published literature. The starting dose range of the LAI formulation (as finasteride) was estimated to be 16.80-81.06 mg from the three approaches, and the PK/PD model-based approach suggests the most optimal starting dose (16.80 mg) of the LAI formulation. The approaches for estimating starting doses presented in the study could be used as a basis for an Investigational New Drug (IND) application of new dosage forms.

Experimental Medicine Approaches in Early-Phase CNS Drug Development

Traditionally, Phase 1 clinical trials were largely conducted in healthy normal volunteers and focused on collection of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data. However, in the CNS therapeutic area, with more drugs failing in later phase development, Phase 1 trials have undergone an evolution that includes incorporation of novel approaches involving novel study designs, inclusion of biomarkers, and early inclusion of patients to improve the pharmacologic understanding of novel CNS-active compounds early in clinical development with the hope of improving success in later phase pivotal trials. In this chapter, the authors will discuss the changing landscape of Phase 1 clinical trials in CNS, including novel trial methodology, inclusion of pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and experimental medicine approaches to inform early decision-making in clinical development.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SHR7280, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in healthy premenopausal women

Background: Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists is a powerful strategy to suppress gonadotropin activity in women with sex hormone-dependent disorders. Herein, we provide the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles of SHR7280, an oral non-peptide GnRH antagonist in healthy premenopausal women. Methods: In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending, phase 1 trial, healthy premenopausal women were randomized to receive SHR7280 or placebo orally. Four doses of SHR7280 (200, 300, 400, and 500 mg BID) were planned. Safety, PK, and PD parameters were evaluated. Results: SHR7280 presented tolerable toxicity and most adverse events were mild in severity. SHR7280 showed rapid onset of action (median T_max ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 h for each dose), and plasma exposure was dose-dependent. PD results showed that SHR7280 300 mg BID and above suppressed estrogen concentration within the estradiol (E₂) treatment window for endometriosis (20-50 pg/ml), inhibited the emergence of the peak of luteinizing hormone (LH) and the concentration of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and maintained the concentration of progesterone (P) in an anovulatory state (2 nmol/L). Conclusion: SHR7280 showed favorable safety, PK, and PD profiles in the dose range of 200-500 mg BID in healthy premenopausal women. This study supports the continued clinical development of SHR7280 as a GnRH antagonist for sex hormone-dependent disorders in women. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04554043, Identifier NCT04554043.

A Holistic Review of the Preclinical Landscape for Long-Acting Anti-infective Drugs Using HIV as a Paradigm

Lack of predictive preclinical models is a key contributor to the steep attrition rate in drug development. Successful clinical translation may be higher for new chemical entities or existing approved drugs reformulated for long-acting (LA) administration if preclinical studies designed to identify any new uncertainties are predictive of human exposure and response. In this review, we present an overview of standard preclinical assessments deployed for LA formulations and delivery systems, using human immunodeficiency virus LA therapeutics preclinical development as a paradigm. Key progress in the preclinical development of novel LA antiretrovirals formulations and delivery systems are summarized, including bispecific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody and small molecule technologies for codelivery of multiple drugs with disparate solubility properties. There are new opportunities to take advantage of recent developments in tissue engineering and 3-dimensional in vitro modeling to advance preclinical modeling of anti-infective activity, developmental and reproductive toxicity assessment, and to apply quantitative modeling and simulation strategies. These developments are likely to drive the progression of more LA anti-infective drugs and multipurpose technologies into clinical development in the coming years.

A phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled study of molnupiravir in healthy Japanese to support special approval in Japan to treat COVID-19

Molnupiravir (MK-4482) is an oral prodrug of the antiviral ribonucleoside analog, N-hydroxycytidine (NHC), which has activity against RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We conducted a phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of molnupiravir in healthy Japanese adult participants. A sample size larger than typically used in pharmacokinetic studies was implemented to collect additional safety data in the Japanese population to support special approval for emergency use in Japan. Single doses of molnupiravir up to 1600 mg and multiple doses of 400 and 800 mg administered every 12 h (q12h) for 5.5 days were generally well-tolerated. NHC appeared rapidly in plasma and reached maximum concentration (C_max ), with a median time to C_max (T_max ) between 1.00 and 2.00 h. Area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity (AUC_0-inf ), area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to 12 h (AUC_0-12 ), and C_max of plasma NHC increased approximately dose proportionally. With q12h dosing, the geometric mean (GM) accumulation ratios for NHC AUC_0-12 and C_max were ~1 for 400 and 800 mg. Pharmacokinetics of NHC triphosphate (NHC-TP), the active metabolite of NHC was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and also demonstrated roughly dose proportional pharmacokinetics. The GM accumulation ratios for NHC-TP AUC_0-12 and C_max were ~2.5 for 400 and 800 mg. Following administration with food, only a modest reduction (24%) in plasma NHC C_max with comparable AUC_0-inf was seen, supporting administration without regard to food.

Trends of Phase I Clinical Trials in the Latest Ten Years across Five European Countries

BACKGROUND

Phase 1 clinical trials represent a critical phase of drug development because new candidate therapeutic agents are tested for the first time on humans. Therefore, international guidelines and local laws have been released to mitigate and control possible risks for human health in agreement with the declaration of Helsinki and the international Good Clinical Practice principles. Despite numerous scientific works characterizing the registered clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, the main features and trends of registered phase 1 clinical trials in Europe have not been investigated. This study is aimed at assessing the features and the temporal trend of distribution of phase 1 clinical studies, carried out in the five largest European countries over a ten-year period (2012-2021), and to evaluate the impact of the Italian regulatory framework on the activation of such studies.

METHODS

The main data and characteristics of phase 1 clinical studies registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database for France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom have been investigated and subsequently compared. The above-mentioned countries were selected based on similarities in terms of demographic and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) data available on official government websites. (3) Results: A total number of 6878 phase 1 clinical trials were registered for the five selected countries in the ClinicalTrials.gov database during the ten years analyzed; the studies were predominantly randomized (39.33%) and for-profit (76.64%). The most represented area of investigations was oncology (52.15%), followed by hematology (24.99%) and immunology (12.04%). The variability observed between the analyzed countries showed that the UK, Germany and France presented the highest reduction in the number of phase 1 clinical trials, while for Spain and Italy, a stable/increased trend was observed, although with a lower number of trials registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov database. (4) Conclusions: Italy displayed the lowest number of registered phase 1 clinical trials, even though it showed a stable trend over the years. In this regard, the Italian regulatory framework must urgently be adapted to that of other European countries (Spain has been the first country to implement the new Regulation (EU) No 536/2014) and streamline the process of clinical trial application to increase the attractiveness of the country. Moreover, nonprofit phase 1 clinical trials (which represent 19.81% of the total number of phase 1 clinical trials registered in Italy vs. 80.19% of profit phase 1 clinical studies) should be promoted and supported by the institutions, even from a financial point of view, to allow independent researchers to develop new therapeutic drugs.

Phase 1/1b Studies of UCB0599, an Oral Inhibitor of α-Synuclein Misfolding, Including a Randomized Study in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Parkinson's disease (PD) and its progression are thought to be caused and driven by misfolding of α-synuclein (ASYN). UCB0599 is an oral, small-molecule inhibitor of ASYN misfolding, aimed at slowing disease progression.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple doses of UCB0599.

METHODS

Safety/tolerability and PK of single and multiple doses of UCB0599 and its metabolites were investigated in two phase 1 studies in healthy participants (HPs), where food effect and possible interaction with itraconazole (ITZ) were assessed (UP0030 [randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, crossover study, N = 65] and UP0078 [open-label study, N = 22]). Safety/tolerability and multi-dose PK of UCB0599 were subsequently investigated in a phase 1b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of participants with PD (UP0077 [NCT04875962], N = 31).

RESULTS

Across all studies, UCB0599 displayed rapid absorption with linear, time-independent PK properties; PK of multiple doses of UCB0599 were predictable from single-dose exposures. No notable food-effect was observed; co-administration with ITZ affected UCB0599 disposition (maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve increased ~1.3- and ~2 to 3-fold, respectively) however, this did not impact the safety profile. Hypersensitivity reactions were reported in UP0030 (n = 2) and UP0077 (n = 2). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43% (UCB0599), and 30% (placebo) of participants with PD were predominantly mild-to-moderate in intensity and were not dose related.

CONCLUSIONS

Seventy-three HPs and 21 participants with PD received UCB0599 doses; an acceptable safety/tolerability profile and predictable PK support continued development of UCB0599 for the slowing of PD progression. A phase 2 study in early-stage PD is underway (NCT04658186). © 2022 UCB Pharma. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

How to conduct well-designed clinical research

Clinicians and healthcare decision-makers conduct their clinical practice based on the results of clinical trials. However, some health problems remain unresolved; in such cases, further research is required. To ensure reliable research results, it is important to understand the study design and conduct well-designed clinical trials. Many study designs can be chosen within the two broad categories of observational and interventional. Clinical studies have a variety of designs, including case series, case-control, cross-sectional, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Well-designed clinical studies can clarify important differences between treatment options and provide data on long-term drug efficacy and safety. Interpreting the results of clinical trials can be difficult because weaknesses in research design, data collection methods, analytic methods, and reporting can compromise their value and usefulness. However, although randomized controlled trials are limited owing to ethical and practical issues, they are optimal for investigating the effects of therapy and establishing causality. Here we present an overview of different clinical research designs and review their advantages and limitations.

Randomized single oral dose phase 1 study of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Iminosugar UV-4 Hydrochloride (UV-4B) in healthy subjects

Background

UV-4 (N-(9’-methoxynonyl)-1-deoxynojirimycin, also called MON-DNJ) is an iminosugar small-molecule oral drug candidate with in vitro antiviral activity against diverse viruses including dengue, influenza, and filoviruses and demonstrated in vivo efficacy against both dengue and influenza viruses. The antiviral mechanism of action of UV-4 is through inhibition of the host endoplasmic reticulum-resident α-glucosidase 1 and α-glucosidase 2 enzymes. This inhibition prevents proper glycan processing and folding of virus glycoproteins, thereby impacting virus assembly, secretion, and the fitness of nascent virions.

Methodology/Principal findings

Here we report a first-in-human, single ascending dose Phase 1a study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of UV-4 hydrochloride (UV-4B) in healthy subjects (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02061358). Sixty-four subjects received single oral doses of UV-4 as the hydrochloride salt equivalent to 3, 10, 30, 90, 180, 360, 720, or 1000 mg of UV-4 (6 subjects per cohort), or placebo (2 subjects per cohort). Single doses of UV-4 hydrochloride were well tolerated with no serious adverse events or dose-dependent increases in adverse events observed. Clinical laboratory results, vital signs, and physical examination data did not reveal any safety signals. Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed; the maximum tolerated dose of UV-4 hydrochloride in humans has not yet been determined (>1000 mg). UV-4 was rapidly absorbed and distributed after dosing with the oral solution formulation used in this study. Median time to reach maximum plasma concentration ranged from 0.5–1 hour and appeared to be independent of dose. Exposure increased approximately in proportion with dose over the 333-fold dose range. UV-4 was quantifiable in pooled urine over the entire collection interval for all doses.

Conclusions/Significance

UV-4 is a host-targeted broad-spectrum antiviral drug candidate. At doses in humans up to 1000 mg there were no serious adverse events reported and no subjects were withdrawn from the study due to treatment-emergent adverse events. These data suggest that therapeutically relevant drug levels of UV-4 can be safely administered to humans and support further clinical development of UV-4 hydrochloride or other candidate antivirals in the iminosugar class.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02061358 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02061358.

Improving Development of Drug Treatments for Pregnant Women and the Fetus

The exclusion of pregnant populations, women of reproductive age, and the fetus from clinical trials of therapeutics is a major global public health issue. It is also a problem of inequity in medicines development, as pregnancy is a protected characteristic. The current regulatory requirements for drugs in pregnancy are being analyzed by a number of agencies worldwide. There has been considerable investment in developing expertise in pregnancy clinical trials (for the pregnant person and the fetus) such as the Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Centers funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Progress has also been made in how to define and grade clinical trial safety in pregnant women, the fetus, and neonate. Innovative methods to model human pregnancy physiology and pharmacology using computer simulations are also gaining interest. Novel ways to assess fetal well-being and placental function using magnetic resonance imaging, computerized cardiotocography, serum circulating fetoplacental proteins, and mRNA may permit better assessment of the safety and efficacy of interventions in the mother and fetus. The core outcomes in women’s and newborn health initiative is facilitating the consistent reporting of data from pregnancy trials. Electronic medical records integrated with pharmacy services should improve the strength of pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacovigilance studies. Incentives such as investigational plans and orphan disease designation have been taken up for obstetric, fetal, and neonatal diseases. This review describes the progress that is being made to better understand the extent of the problem and to develop applicable solutions.

Essential oil nebulization in mild COVID-19(EONCO): Early phase exploratory clinical trial

Background

Medications studied for therapeutic benefits in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have produced inconclusive efficacy results except for steroids.

Objective

A prospective randomized open-label, parallel-arm Phase I/II clinical trial was planned to compare essential oil (EO) blend versus placebo nebulization in mild COVID-19.

Methods

A Phase I safety evaluation was carried out in a single ascending and multiple ascending dose study designs. We assessed Phase II therapeutic efficacy on COVID-19 and general respiratory symptoms on days 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 on the predesigned case record form. Viremia was evaluated on day 0, day 5, and day 10.

Results

Dose-limiting toxicities were not reached with the doses, frequencies, and duration studied, thus confirming the formulation's preliminary safety. General respiratory symptoms (p < 0.001), anosmia (p < 0.05), and dysgeusia (p < 0.001) benefited significantly with the use of EO blend nebulization compared to placebo. Symptomatic COVID-19 participants with mild disease did not show treatment benefits in terms of symptomatic relief (p = 1.0) and viremia clearance (p = 0.74) compared to the placebo. EO blend was found to be associated with the reduced evolution of symptoms in previously asymptomatic reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive study participants (p = 0.034).

Conclusion

EO nebulization appears to be a safer add-on symptomatic relief approach for mild COVID-19. However, the direct antiviral action of the EO blend needs to be assessed with different concentrations of combinations of individual phytochemicals in the EO blend.

Review of the Chinese Landscape in Phase I Clinical Trials for Noncancer Innovative Drugs Over 2015 to 2020

In recent years, the research and development (R&D) of innovative drugs in China has been dramatically accelerated. And the early clinical study is crucial for drug R&D. However, little is known involving the change of phase I trials for noncancer drugs. We retrieved the data of phase I clinical trials for noncancer innovative drugs on the Registration and Information Disclosure Platform for Drug Clinical Studies on the Center for Drug Evaluation. The number of clinical trials proliferating in recent years and the average annual growth rates of chemical and biological drugs were 55.5% and 42.1%, respectively. Most trials were distributed in Beijing, Shanghai, and other developed coastal cities. Moreover, the clinical trials of innovative drugs in China were focused on the digestive and endocrine systems, whereas the pediatric and orphan drugs were scarce. Based on the data assessment, this work provided comprehensive analysis and suggestions about Chinese drug R&D. Significant advancement has been made in mainland China with the implementation of available policies and the emergence of advanced technologies. Though shortcomings, including uneven geographic distribution and lack of pediatric and orphan drugs, still exist, we believe progress will continue to be made in mainland China.

Early Feasibility Assessment: A Method for Accurately Predicting Biotherapeutic Dosing to Inform Early Drug Discovery Decisions

The application of model-informed drug discovery and development (MID3) approaches in the early stages of drug discovery can help determine feasibility of drugging a target, prioritize between targets, or define optimal drug properties for a target product profile (TPP). However, applying MID3 in early discovery can be challenging due to the lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data at this stage. Early Feasibility Assessment (EFA) is the application of mechanistic PKPD models, built from first principles, and parameterized by data that is readily available early in drug discovery to make effective dose predictions. This manuscript demonstrates the ability of EFA to make accurate predictions of clinical effective doses for nine approved biotherapeutics and outlines the potential of extending this approach to novel therapeutics to impact early drug discovery decisions.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and target engagement of novel RIPK1 inhibitor SAR443060 (DNL747) for neurodegenerative disorders: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I/Ib studies in healthy subjects and patients

RIPK1 is a master regulator of inflammatory signaling and cell death and increased RIPK1 activity is observed in human diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). RIPK1 inhibition has been shown to protect against cell death in a range of preclinical cellular and animal models of diseases. SAR443060 (previously DNL747) is a selective, orally bioavailable, central nervous system (CNS)–penetrant, small‐molecule, reversible inhibitor of RIPK1. In three early‐stage clinical trials in healthy subjects and patients with AD or ALS (NCT03757325 and NCT03757351), SAR443060 distributed into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after oral administration and demonstrated robust peripheral target engagement as measured by a reduction in phosphorylation of RIPK1 at serine 166 (pRIPK1) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to baseline. RIPK1 inhibition was generally safe and well‐tolerated in healthy volunteers and patients with AD or ALS. Taken together, the distribution into the CSF after oral administration, the peripheral proof‐of‐mechanism, and the safety profile of RIPK1 inhibition to date, suggest that therapeutic modulation of RIPK1 in the CNS is possible, conferring potential therapeutic promise for AD and ALS, as well as other neurodegenerative conditions. However, SAR443060 development was discontinued due to long‐term nonclinical toxicology findings, although these nonclinical toxicology signals were not observed in the short duration dosing in any of the three early‐stage clinical trials. The dose‐limiting toxicities observed for SAR443060 preclinically have not been reported for other RIPK1‐inhibitors, suggesting that these toxicities are compound‐specific (related to SAR443060) rather than RIPK1 pathway‐specific.