Characterization of the discriminative stimulus properties induced by 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 agonists in rats

Experimental strategies to discover and develop the next generation of psychedelics and entactogens as medicines

Research on classical psychedelics (psilocybin, LSD and DMT) and entactogen, MDMA, has produced a renaissance in the search for more effective drugs to treat psychiatric, neurological and various peripheral disorders. Psychedelics and entactogens act though interaction with 5-HT_2A and other serotonergic receptors and/or monoamine reuptake transporters. 5-HT, which serves as a neurotransmitter and hormone, is ubiquitously distributed in the brain and peripheral organs, tissues and cells where it has vasoconstrictor, pro-inflammatory and pro-nociceptive actions. Serotonergic psychedelics and entactogens have known safety and toxicity risks. For these drugs, the risks been extensively researched and empirically assessed through human experience. However, novel drug-candidates require thorough non-clinical testing not only to predict clinical efficacy, but also to address the risks they pose during clinical development and later after approval as prescription medicines. We have defined the challenges researchers will encounter when developing novel serotonergic psychedelics and entactogens. We describe screening techniques to predict clinical efficacy and address the safety/toxicity risks emerging from our knowledge of the existing drugs: 1) An early-stage, non-clinical screening cascade to pharmacologically characterise novel drug-candidates. 2) Models to detect hallucinogenic activity. 3) Models to differentiate hallucinogens from entactogens. 4) Non-clinical preclinical lead optimisation technology (PLOT) screening to select drug-candidates. 5) Modified animal models to evaluate the abuse and dependence risks of novel psychedelics in Safety Pharmacology testing. Our intention has been to design non-clinical screening strategies that will reset the balance between benefits and harms to deliver more effective and safer novel psychedelics for clinical use. This article is part of the Special Issue on 'National Institutes of Health Psilocybin Research Speaker Series'.

Serotonin type 5A receptor antagonists inhibit D-lysergic acid diethylamide discriminatory cue in rats

PURPOSE

Like other psychedelics, D-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) affects numerous serotonin receptors, and according to the current dogma, the 5-HT_2A receptors are considered the main target for its hallucinogenic effects. LSD, however, also displays agonistic activity at the 5-HT_5A receptors, which mediate some of LSD-induced behavioural effects.

METHODS

Using male Sprague Dawley rats, we examined the effects of 5-HT_2A and 5-HT_5A receptor antagonists on LSD-induced stimulus control in the two-lever drug discrimination test using a FR10 schedule of reinforcement.

RESULTS

In animals trained to discriminate 0.08 mg/kg LSD from vehicle 15 minutes after injection, LSD produced dose-related increases in response, with an ED50 (±95% confidence limits) of 0.0384 (± 0.025-0.051) mg/kg). LSD-like responses were observed when the training dose of LSD was given 5-30 but not 90 minutes before the test. Confirming earlier reports, the 5-HT antagonist ketanserin (2 mg/kg) attenuated the LSD response in 50% of rats, and due to pretreatment with 0.2 and 2 mg/kg MDL 100907, 63% and 67% of animals, respectively, failed to select the LSD lever. We then investigated the effects of two 5-HT_5A receptor antagonists, and we found that 56% and 60% of rats pretreated with 3 and 10 mg/kg SB 699551, respectively, failed to select the LSD lever. Due to pretreatment with 0.01 mg/kg ASP 5736, 58% of rats did not select the LSD lever. This dose also reduced the response rate but not the number of rats failing to complete the test.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that antagonists of the 5-HT_5A receptor may inhibit subjective effects of LSD in rats.

Recent advances in the neuropsychopharmacology of serotonergic hallucinogens

Serotonergic hallucinogens, such as (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide, psilocybin, and mescaline, are somewhat enigmatic substances. Although these drugs are derived from multiple chemical families, they all produce remarkably similar effects in animals and humans, and they show cross-tolerance. This article reviews the evidence demonstrating the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor is the primary site of hallucinogen action. The 5-HT2A receptor is responsible for mediating the effects of hallucinogens in human subjects, as well as in animal behavioral paradigms such as drug discrimination, head twitch response, prepulse inhibition of startle, exploratory behavior, and interval timing. Many recent clinical trials have yielded important new findings regarding the psychopharmacology of these substances. Furthermore, the use of modern imaging and electrophysiological techniques is beginning to help unravel how hallucinogens work in the brain. Evidence is also emerging that hallucinogens may possess therapeutic efficacy.

A translational pharmacology approach to understanding the predictive value of abuse potential assessments

Within the drug development industry the assessment of abuse potential for novel molecules involves the generation and review of data from multiple sources, ranging from in-vitro binding and functional assays through to in-vivo nonclinical models in mammals, as well as collection of information from studies in humans. This breadth of data aligns with current expectations from regulatory agencies in both the USA and Europe. To date, there have been a limited number of reviews on the predictive value of individual models within this sequence, but there has been no systematic review on how each of these models contributes to our overall understanding of abuse potential risk. To address this, we analyzed data from 100 small molecules to compare the predictive validity for drug scheduling status of a number of models that typically contribute to the abuse potential assessment package. These models range from the assessment of in-vitro binding and functional profiles at receptors or transporters typically associated with abuse through in-vivo models including locomotor activity, drug discrimination, and self-administration in rodents. Data from subjective report assessments in humans following acute dosing of compounds were also included. The predictive value of each model was then evaluated relative to the scheduling status of each drug in the USA. In recognition of the fact that drug scheduling can be influenced by factors other than the pharmacology of the drug, we also evaluated the predictive value of each assay for the outcome of the human subjective effects assessment. This approach provides an objective and statistical assessment of the predictive value of many of the models typically applied within the pharmaceutical industry to evaluate abuse potential risk. In addition, the impact of combining information from multiple models was examined. This analysis adds to our understanding of the predictive value of each model, allows us to critically evaluate the benefits and limitations of each model, and provides a method for identifying opportunities for improving our assessment and prediction of abuse liability risk in the future.

Multiple receptors contribute to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens

Serotonergic hallucinogens produce profound changes in perception, mood, and cognition. These drugs include phenylalkylamines such as mescaline and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), and indoleamines such as (+)-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin. Despite their differences in chemical structure, the two classes of hallucinogens produce remarkably similar subjective effects in humans, and induce cross-tolerance. The phenylalkylamine hallucinogens are selective 5-HT(2) receptor agonists, whereas the indoleamines are relatively non-selective for serotonin (5-HT) receptors. There is extensive evidence, from both animal and human studies, that the characteristic effects of hallucinogens are mediated by interactions with the 5-HT(2A) receptor. Nevertheless, there is also evidence that interactions with other receptor sites contribute to the psychopharmacological and behavioral effects of the indoleamine hallucinogens. This article reviews the evidence demonstrating that the effects of indoleamine hallucinogens in a variety of animal behavioral paradigms are mediated by both 5-HT(2) and non-5-HT(2) receptors.

S(-)Propranolol as a discriminative stimulus and its comparison to the stimulus effects of cocaine in rats

RATIONALE

Racemic propranolol (PRO), a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, has been evaluated as a test agent but not as a discriminative stimulus. Its S(-) stereoisomer is thought to subserve the effects of (+/-)PRO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were trained to discriminate S(-)PRO (5 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced operant conditioning task.

RESULTS

The S(-)PRO stimulus was shown to be centrally mediated, dose-related, time dependent, and stereoselective: S(-)PRO (ED(50) = 2.2 mg/kg) was twice as potent as (+/-)PRO and approximately four times as potent as R(+)PRO. The S(-)PRO stimulus generalized fully to the beta-adrenoceptor agent pindolol, the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine, cocaine, and the serotonergic agents TFMPP and RU 24969; partial generalization occurred to (-)ephedrine and nisoxetine but not to fenfluramine or 5-OMe DMT. The S(-)PRO stimulus was blocked completely (and competitively) when prazosin, an alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist, was given in combination with the training dose of S(-)PRO. Moreover, prazosin exerted antagonism of the S(-)PRO-like effect of (+/-)PRO or R(+)PRO but produced only partial antagonism of the S(-)PRO-like effect of cocaine. In a second study, rats were trained to discriminate 8 mg/kg of cocaine from saline. The cocaine stimulus generalized to S(-)PRO, (+/-)PRO, and R(+)PRO. Prazosin partially attenuated the stimulus effect of cocaine (8 mg/kg) but completely blocked the cocaine-like effects of (+/-), S(-), and R(+)PRO.

CONCLUSIONS

PRO and cocaine exhibited cross-substitution, but their stimulus effects were antagonized differentially by prazosin. PRO (and its optical isomers) can exert a stimulus effect that is based, at least in part, on increased alpha(1)-adrenoceptor activity. PRO might be better characterized as an adrenoceptor partial agonist.

Effect of 8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin and MDMA on the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical hallucinogen DOM in rats

Co-administration of the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor agonist (+/-)8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin [(+/-)8-OH DPAT] enhances the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) in rats. In the present investigation, using Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate DOM (1.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle under a VI-15 s schedule of reinforcement, it was shown that the stimulus-enhancing actions of 8-OH DPAT are related more to its R(+)-isomer than to its S(-)-enantiomer, and that the (+/-)- and R(+)8-OH DPAT-induced effects are antagonized by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist NAN-190. (+/-)8-OH DPAT and its isomers substitute in rats trained to discriminate the designer drug N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA; methylenedioxymethamphetamine) from vehicle indicating some similarity of effect. On this basis, it was hypothesized that MDMA might be capable of enhancing the DOM stimulus. Co-administration of MDMA with low (i.e., 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) doses of DOM resulted in greater DOM-appropriate responding than engendered by administration of DOM alone. As such, the present findings are the first to demonstrate an MDMA-induced enhancing effect on the discriminative stimulus actions of a classical hallucinogen. The results also suggest that a 5-HT1A serotonin receptor mechanism might contribute to this phenomenon.

'Hybrid' benzofuran-benzopyran congeners as rigid analogs of hallucinogenic phenethylamines

Phenylalkylamines that possess conformationally rigidified furanyl moieties in place of alkoxy arene ring substituents have been shown previously to possess the highest affinities and agonist functional potencies at the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor among this chemical class. Further, affinity declines when both furanyl rings are expanded to the larger dipyranyl ring system. The present paper reports the synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of 'hybrid' benzofuranyl-benzopyranyl phenylalkylamines to probe further the sizes of the binding pockets within the serotonin 5-HT(2A) agonist binding site. Thus, 4(a-b), 5(a-b), and 6 were prepared as homologs of the parent compound, 8-bromo-1-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']difuran-4-yl)-2-aminopropane 2, and their affinity, functional potency, and intrinsic activity were assessed using cells stably expressing the rat 5-HT(2A) receptor. The behavioral pharmacology of these new analogs was also evaluated in the two-lever drug discrimination paradigm. Although all of the hybrid isomers had similar, nanomolar range receptor affinities, those with the smaller furanyl ring at the arene 2-position (4a-b) displayed a 4- to 15-fold greater functional potency than those with the larger pyranyl ring at that position (5a-b). When the furan ring of the more potent agonist 4b was aromatized to give 6, a receptor affinity similar to the parent difuranyl compound 2 was attained, along with a functional potency equivalent to 2, 4a, and 4b. In drug discrimination experiments using rats trained to discriminate LSD from saline, 4b was more than two times more potent than 5b, with the latter having a potency similar to the classic hallucinogenic amphetamine 1 (DOB).

Lack of generalisation between the GABAA receptor agonist, gaboxadol, and allosteric modulators of the benzodiazepine binding site in the rat drug discrimination procedure

INTRODUCTION

The binding sites for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and GABA(A) receptor agonists are located differently from the binding sites for benzodiazepine receptor agonists. Furthermore, the major pharmacological effects of benzodiazepine receptor agonists and the GABA(A) receptor agonist gaboxadol (4,5,6,7-tetrahydrroisoxazolo(5,4-c)pyridin-3-ol, THIP) are mediated by different GABA(A) receptor subunit compositions; that is, gaboxadol may interact primarily with extra-synaptically located alpha(4)beta(2/3)delta-containing receptors and benzodiazepines with the synaptically located alpha(1)beta(2/3)gamma(2)-containing receptors.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to address if this different receptor subtype selectivity was reflected in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-lever liquid reinforced operant discrimination procedure was conducted. Three groups of rats were trained to discriminate gaboxadol, diazepam and zolpidem 5.5, 1.5 and 0.7 mg/kg i.p., respectively, from vehicle.

RESULTS

Substitution tests showed that gaboxadol-trained animals failed to recognize diazepam (0.75-1.5 mg/kg), zolpidem (0.4-0.7 mg/kg), zopiclone (2.5 mg/kg), zaleplon (1.0-1.5 mg/kg) or indiplon (0.31 mg/kg). In contrast, all benzodiazepine receptor agonists, but not gaboxadol (4.5-5.5 mg/kg), generalised to the discriminative stimulus in diazepam- and zolpidem-trained animals.

DISCUSSION

In agreement with these data, the competitive benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil (10 mg/kg s.c.) antagonised the discriminative stimulus of zolpidem but not of gaboxadol. Interaction tests showed no synergistic interaction of concomitant administration of gaboxadol and zolpidem or diazepam.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies have shown that gaboxadol and benzodiazepines interact with different receptor populations, and the present study confirms that in vivo functional consequences of this receptor selectivity exist in the form of differential behavioural responses in rats.

Further evidence that the delayed temporal dopaminergic effects of LSD are mediated by a mechanism different than the first temporal phase of action

Activation of 5-HT(2A) receptors is thought to mediate the hallucinogenic effects of LSD. Nevertheless, in a previous report we provided evidence that a delayed temporal phase of the behavioral pharmacology of LSD is mediated by D(2)-like dopamine receptor stimulation. In this study rats were trained to discriminate LSD with either a 30 min preinjection time (LSD-30, N=12) or a 90 min preinjection time (LSD-90, N=13) from saline, using a two-lever, food-reinforced operant conditioning task. We then tested a large number of agonists and antagonists belonging to distinct pharmacological classes in these animals. As anticipated, classical hallucinogens such as psilocin and mescaline substituted only in LSD-30 rats, and not in LSD-90 rats. The dopamine receptor agonists ABT-724, aripiprazole, dihydrexidine, WAY 100635, and SKF 38393, fully or partially mimicked LSD-90, but not LSD-30. The results reported here support and extend our previous conclusion that the delayed temporal effects of LSD are mediated by activation of a dopaminergic system.

Chronic treatment with a serotonin(2) receptor (5-HT(2)R) agonist modulates the behavioral and cellular response to (+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine [(+)-MDMA]

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA; ecstasy] evokes a multifaceted subjective experience in human users which includes stimulation, feelings of well-being, mood elevation, empathy towards others as well as distortions in time, sensation and perception. Aspects of this unique psychopharmacology of MDMA are thought to be related to its potent actions to release serotonin (5-HT) and indirectly stimulate the 5-HT(2A) receptor (5-HT(2A)R). In the present studies, we examined the interrelationship between down-regulation of 5-HT(2A)R expression and the behaviorally stimulatory effects generated by acute administration of (+)-MDMA, the most potent enantiomer of (+/-)-MDMA. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were chronically treated with the preferential 5-HT(2A)R agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) which has been shown to down-regulate expression of the 5-HT(2A)R, but not the closely related 5-HT(2C)R. While chronic DOI treatment did not alter the functional sensitivity of either the 5-HT(2A)R or 5-HT(2C)R, this regimen enhanced (+)-MDMA-evoked hyperactivity. Subsequent analysis of c-Fos and 5-HT(2A)R immunoreactivity in brain sections demonstrated that DOI treatment decreased the number of (+)-MDMA-induced c-Fos immunopositive nuclei and 5-HT(2A)R immunostaining in select cortical and striatal areas. These results indicate that chronic DOI exposure results in an enhanced behavioral response to (+)-MDMA and in a pattern of neuronal activation which resembles that seen in psychostimulant sensitization. These data also suggest that expression of the 5-HT(2A)R in the NAc and PFC may play a role in the sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulating effects of (+)-MDMA and in the processes of neural regulation upon repeated psychostimulant administration.

Complex discriminative stimulus properties of (+)lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in C57Bl/6J mice

RATIONALE

The drug discrimination procedure is the most frequently used in vivo model of hallucinogen activity. Historically, most drug discrimination studies have been conducted in the rat. With the development of genetically modified mice, a powerful new tool has become available for investigating the mechanisms of drug-induced behavior. The current paper is part of an ongoing effort to determine the utility of the drug discrimination technique for evaluating hallucinogenic drugs in mice.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the training procedures and characterize the stimulus properties of (+)lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in mice.

METHODS

Using a two-lever drug discrimination procedure, C57Bl/6J mice were trained to discriminate 0.45 mg/kg LSD vs saline on a VI30 sec schedule of reinforcement, with vanilla-flavored Ensure serving as the reinforcer.

RESULTS

As in rats, acquisition was orderly, but the training dose was nearly five-fold higher for mice than rats. LSD lever selection was dose-dependent. Time-course studies revealed a rapid loss of the LSD stimulus effects. The 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonist, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine [(-)DOB] (1.0 mg/kg), substituted fully for LSD and the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (1.6 mg/kg), substituted partially for LSD. Pretreatment with the 5-HT(2A) receptor-selective antagonist, MDL 100907, or the 5-HT(1A)-selective antagonist WAY 100635, showed that each antagonist only partially blocked LSD discrimination. Substitution of 1.0 mg/kg (-)DOB for LSD was fully blocked by pretreatment with MDL 100907 but unaltered by WAY 100635 pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that in mice the stimulus effects of LSD have both a 5-HT(2A) receptor and a 5-HT(1A) receptor component.

Plants and the central nervous system

This review article draws the attention to the many species of plants possessing activity on the central nervous system (CNS). In fact, they cover the whole spectrum of central activity such as psychoanaleptic, psycholeptic and psychodysleptic effects, and several of these plants are currently used in therapeutics to treat human ailments. Among the psychoanaleptic (stimulant) plants, those utilized by human beings to reduce body weight [Ephedra spp. (Ma Huang), Paullinia spp. (guaraná), Catha edulis Forssk. (khat)] and plants used to improve general health conditions (plant adaptogens) were scrutinized. Many species of hallucinogenic (psychodysleptic) plants are used by humans throughout the world to achieve states of mind distortions; among those, a few have been used for therapeutic purposes, such as Cannabis sativa L., Tabernanthe iboga Baill. and the mixture of Psychotria viridis Ruiz and Pav. and Banisteriopsis caapi (Spruce ex Griseb.) C.V. Morton. Plants showing central psycholeptic activities, such as analgesic or anxiolytic actions (Passiflora incarnata L., Valeriana spp. and Piper methysticum G. Forst.), were also analysed.Finally, the use of crude or semipurified extracts of such plants instead of the active substances seemingly responsible for their therapeutic effect is discussed.

Discriminative stimulus properties of (+/-)-fenfluramine: the role of 5-HT2 receptor subtypes

The role of serotonin 5-HT2 receptors (5-HT2R) in the discriminative stimulus effects of fenfluramine was investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate (+/-)-fenfluramine (2 mg/kg ip) from saline using a 2-lever, water-reinforced paradigm. Drug-lever responding after fenfluramine was dose-dependent. The 5-HT(2C/1B)R agonist mCPP and the 5-HT(2C)R agonist MK 212 fully substituted, whereas the 5-HT(2A/2C)R agonist DOI partially substituted, for the training drug. The 5-HT(2B)R agonist BW 723C86 engendered saline-lever responding. The 5-HT(2C/2B)R antagonist SB 206553 completely antagonized the fenfluramine discrimination a well as the full substitutions of mCPP and MK 212 and the partial substitution of DOI. The selective 5-HT(2A)R antagonist M100907 partially suppressed the stimulus effects of fenfluramine, mCPP, and MK 212 and almost fully attenuated the partial substitution of DOI. RS 102221, a selective 5-HT(2C)R antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier, did not alter the fenfluramine cue. Results demonstrate that the discriminative stimulus effects of fenfluramine are centrally mediated by 5-HT(2C)R and to some extent by 5-HT(2A)R.

Further evidence that the discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate are mediated by 5-HT 1A/1B/2C receptors

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. Unlike other anxiolytics such as 5-HT receptor agonists, INDO may not share tolerance or dependency with the benzodiazepine anxiolytics. It has been reported that the discriminative stimulus properties of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonists, but not those of 5-HT(3/4) agonists, generalize to INDO. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to obtain further evidence on the differential involvement of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO by evaluating its interactions with antagonists of the 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(2C), and 5-HT(3/4) receptor subtypes. Rats were trained to discriminate INDO from saline in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm. For Group D(+)S(-), administration of INDO signalled that saccharin flavour was followed by LiCl, while injection of vehicle signalled safe consumption of saccharin solution. Group D(-)S(+) had the contingencies reversed. After this training, rats had generalization tests where INDO administration was preceded by different doses of the following antagonists: WAY100635 (5-HT(1A)), NAN190 (5-HT(1A)), methiothepin (5-HT(1A/1B/2C)), GR127935 (5-HT(1B/1D)), ketanserin (5-HT(2A/2C)), ritanserin (5-HT(2C/2A)), mesulergine (5-HT(2C/2A)), metergoline (5-HT(2C/2A)), SB206553 (5-HT(2B/2C)), and tropisetron (5-HT(3/4)). In Group D(+)S(-), the order of potency to block the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO was WAY100635>ketanserin>ritanserin>GR127935>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190, while in Group D(-)S(+), the order was WAY100635>GR127935>ketanserin>ritanserin>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190. Tropisetron did not produce any alteration of the discriminative control by INDO. These results suggest that the discriminative signal of INDO is mediated by 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) receptors and that blockade of any of its components produces a degradation of its discriminative effects.

Full substitution of the discriminative cue of a 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonist with the combined administration of a 5-HT(1B/2C) and a 5-HT(1A) agonist

The present study examined whether animals attend to the individual components of the cue produced by a drug that stimulates different 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor populations, using a drug discrimination task based on the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. The training drug was indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate) (INDO) that has been described as a 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) agonist able to exert discriminative control in both operant and CTA procedures. The principal objective was to examine generalization with the combined administration of agonists for the different receptor sites that may mimic the mechanism of action of the training drug. Male Wistar rats, deprived of water, were trained to discriminate INDO from saline; during the drug trials, the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-LiCl pairings, while, during the saline trials, the administration of saline preceded the saccharin-saline pairings. In generalization tests, INDO, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) agonist), 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP, a 5-HT(1B) agonist), alpha-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(2C) agonist) or 2-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(3) agonist), were administered alone or in combination. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT, TFMPP and alpha-methyl-5-HT produced dose-dependent generalization, up to 88% in the case of 8-OH-DPAT. The combined administration of the following pairs of drugs, 8-OH-DPAT+TFMPP or 8-OH-DPAT+ alpha-methyl-5-HT, at doses that produced only 15-55% generalization when administered alone, produced greater than 80% generalization to INDO. However, the single administration of 2-methyl-5-HT produced only saline-like responding and its combined administration with 8-OH-DPAT did not modify the generalization produced by the single administration of 8-OH-DPAT. These results suggest that animals attend to the individual components of the drug cue; in the case of INDO, which has three elements, each mediated by a different receptor subpopulation (5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2C) ), the separate stimulation of at least two receptor subpopulations was 'interpreted' by the subject as the presence of the training drug.

5-HT3 receptor ligands lack discriminative stimulus properties

The putative discriminative stimulus of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists ondansetron and (DL)-11-[(2-methyl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl]-4,5,6,7,10,11,12-octahydroazepinol[3,2,1-jk]-carbazol-12-one hydrochloride (DU122932), and of the 5-HT3 receptor agonists 2-methyl-5-HT and 3,4-dichlorophenylbiguanide (3,4DCPB) were investigated in a standard two-lever, food-reinforced drug-saline discrimination procedure with groups of rats (N= 10 per group). In three groups of rats after 80 sessions with training doses ranging from 0.1 to 4.0 mg/kg po, stimulus control by ondansetron, DU122932 and 2-methyl-5-HT was still absent. The same 30 animals thereafter rapidly learned to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (CDP) from vehicle. In three other groups of rats, stimulus control by CDP was first established. Then, the vehicle was gradually (from 0.1 to 2.0 mg/kg po) replaced by either ondansetron, DU122932 or 2-methyl-5-HT. Finally, the dose of CDP was gradually decreased. In all three groups, stimulus control disappeared. A seventh group was trained to discriminate 3,4DCPB (5.0 mg/kg po) from saline. When training was not successful, dose and route were changed but discrimination was not attained. It is concluded that in the rat, using the classical two lever discrimination procedure, the 5-HT3 receptor ligands ondansetron, DU122932, 2-methyl-5-HT and 3,4DCPB are incapable of producing an internal state that can act as a stimulus to control responding.

Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate, a 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C agonist: a study in rats

Indorenate (INDO), initially described as an antihypertensive agent, also has some effects on behaviour, with anxiolytic and anorectic actions being reported. The aim of the present experiment was to examine the activity of INDO at the behavioural level at various serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor sites by comparing its stimulus properties with those of other 5-HT receptor agonists and by examining its interactions with some 5-HT antagonists. Rats were trained to discriminate between 10.0 mg/kg INDO (administered intraperitoneally (90 min before the start of the session) from saline. A Fixed Ratio 10 (FR10) schedule of reinforcement was in effect in each drug condition. During generalization test sessions, the discrimination index (DI, responses to drug lever/responses to drug + saline lever) was calculated from the responses emitted before the first reinforcer of the session. DI was a function of the dose of INDO employed. Generalization to the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO was observed with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg produced 90% generalization) and the 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor agonist 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (TFMPP) (3.0 mg/kg produced up to 75% generalization). Yohimbine (5.6 mg/kg), buspirone (1.0 mg/kg), 6-chloro-2-(1-piperaziny)pyrazine (1.0 mg/kg) and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) (1.0 mg/kg) induced a DI of 70%, 50% and 48% and 55%, respectively. In generalization tests, ritanserin (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) induced saline-like responding. NAN-190 (3.0 mg/kg), a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, was able to reduce the DI of INDO to 50%. Although the 5-HT(2C/2A) receptor antagonists cinanserin (10.0 mg/kg) and metergoline (0.3 mg/kg) were able to reduce the stimulus properties of INDO to 60% and 30%, respectively, only ritanserin (1.0 mg/kg) reduced the stimulus properties of INDO to 25% with a clear dose-response relationship. The results suggest that INDO acts as an agonist at 5-HT1A receptor sites, but its activity at 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor sites also contributes to its discriminative function.

Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. It possesses anxiolytic and antihypertensive actions mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and anorectic activity mediated by 5-HT(2C/1B) receptors. This study examined whether INDO may exert discriminative control using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm, and whether differential participation of 5-HT receptor subtypes may be involved in its cue. Male Wistar rats trained to drink their daily water in a 30-min period were trained to discriminate INDO from saline. One group received the intraperitoneal administration of INDO (10.0 mg/kg) before saccharin-LiCl pairings; on alternate days, rats received saline before the saccharin-saline pairings (Group D(+)S(-)). The other group had the contingencies reversed (i.e., the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-saline pairings: Group D(-)S(+)). In two-bottle generalization tests (one bottle containing saccharin, the other plain water), the preference for saccharin was evaluated after different doses of INDO, [3H]-8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (5-HT(1A)), buspirone (5-HT(1A)), RU24969 (5-HT(1A/1B)), TFMPP (5-HT(1B/2C)), MK212 (5-HT(2C)), alpha-Me-5-HT (5-HT(2C/2A)), 2-Me-5-HT (5-HT(3)) and cisapride (5-HT(4)). The results showed that INDO, RU24969, TFMPP, alpha-Me-5-HT and MK 212 produced a dose-dependent generalization; 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone produced only partial generalization, while 2-Me-5-HT and cisapride did not produce generalization. The results indicate that INDO administration may exert discriminative control over saccharin preference mediated mainly by 5-HT(1B/2C) receptors, but with an important contribution of 5-HT(1A) receptors.

DOI-Induced activation of the cortex: dependence on 5-HT2A heteroceptors on thalamocortical glutamatergic neurons

Administration of the hallucinogenic 5-HT(2A/2C) agonist 1-[2, 5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl]-2-aminopropane (DOI) induces expression of Fos protein in the cerebral cortex. To understand the mechanisms subserving this action of DOI, we examined the consequences of pharmacological and surgical manipulations on DOI-elicited Fos expression in the somatosensory cortex of the rat. DOI dose-dependently increased cortical Fos expression. Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist MDL 100,907 completely blocked DOI-elicited Fos expression, but pretreatment with the 5-HT(2C) antagonist SB 206,553 did not modify DOI-elicited Fos expression. These data suggest that DOI acts through 5-HT(2A) receptors to increase cortical Fos expression. However, we found that DOI did not induce Fos in cortical 5-HT(2A) immunoreactive neurons but did increase expression in a band of neurons spanning superficial layer V to deep III, within the apical dendritic fields of layer V 5-HT(2A)-immunoreactive cells. This band of Fos immunoreactive neurons was in register with anterogradely labeled axons from the ventrobasal thalamus, which have previously been shown to be glutamatergic and express the 5-HT(2A) transcript. The effects of DOI were markedly reduced in animals pretreated with the AMPA/KA antagonist GYKI 52466, and lesions of the ventrobasal thalamus attenuated DOI-elicited Fos expression in the cortex. These data suggest that DOI activates 5-HT(2A) receptors on thalamocortical neurons and thereby increases glutamate release, which in turn drives Fos expression in cortical neurons through an AMPA receptor-dependent mechanism. These data cast new light on the mechanisms of action of hallucinogens.

Differential effects of 5-HT agonists and antagonists on the repeated acquisition and performance of response sequences in monkeys

As a means of characterizing the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in learning, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) agonists and antagonists with selective affinities for each receptor subtype (i.e. 8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), (-)-4-(dipropylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz-(c,d,)indole-6-carboxamide (LY228729), (+/-)-1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimeth-oxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI), 4-iodo-N-[2- [4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide hydrochloride (p-MPPI), N-[2- [4- (2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl] -N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide maleate (WAY-100635), 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyllpiperazine hydrobromide (NAN-190) and ritanserin) were administered to monkeys responding under a multiple schedule of repeated acquisition and performance. In addition, a selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist (8-OH-DPAT) was administered in combination with a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist (ritanserin) to examine any potential interactions between the two 5-HT receptor subtypes. When administered alone, 8-OH-DPAT (0.1-3.2mg/kg), LY228729 (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) and DOI (0.018-3.2 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased overall response rate in both schedule components, and generally increased the percentage of errors in the acquisition components at doses lower than those that increased the percentage of errors in the performance components. At the doses of each drug tested (i.e. 0.1 or 0.32 mg/kg), both p-MPPI and WAY-100635 antagonized the disruptive effects of 8-OH-DPAT, by shifting the dose-effect curves for overall response rate and the percentage of errors to the right. In contrast, ritanserin (0.32 or 1mg/kg) had little or no effect on the disruptions produced by 8-OH-DPAT, but it effectively antagonized the rate-decreasing and error-increasing effects produced by the 5-HT2A agonist DOI. Administration of the 5-HT1A antagonists WAY-100635 and NAN-190 alone produced dose-dependent rate-decreasing effects, but the effects on accuracy of responding in the acquisition components differed from those of the 5-HT1A agonists (8-OH-DPAT and LY228729), in that they did not produce an increase in the percentage of errors. Together, these results suggest that 5-HT is capable of disrupting learning in monkeys through actions at both the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, and that 5-HT2A receptor antagonism does not unilaterally modify the effects produced by 5-HTA1A receptor activation.

Conventional and new antidepressant drugs in the elderly

Depression in the elderly is nowadays a predominant health care problem, mainly due to the progressive aging of the population. It results from psychosocial stress, polypathology, as well as some biochemical changes which occur in the aged brain and can lead to cognitive impairments, increased symptoms from medical illness, higher utilization of health care services and increased rates of suicide and nonsuicide mortality. Therefore, it is very important to make an early diagnosis and a suitable pharmacological treatment, not only for resolving the acute episode, but also for preventing relapse and enhancing the quality of life. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and in pharmacodynamics have to be kept into account before prescribing an antidepressant therapy in an old patient. In this paper some of the most important and tolerated drugs in the elderly are reviewed. Tricyclic antidepressants have to be used carefully for their important side effects. Nortriptyline, amytriptiline, clomipramine and desipramine as well, seem to be the best tolerated tricyclics in old people. Second generation antidepressants are preferred for the elderly and those patients with heart disease as they have milder side effects and are less toxic in overdose and include the so called atypicals, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin noradrenalene reuptake inhibitors and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors are useful drugs in resistant forms of depression in which the above mentioned drugs have no efficacy; the last generation drugs (reversible MAO inhibitors), such as meclobemide, seem to be very successful. Mood stabilizing drugs are widely used for preventing recurrences of depression and for preventing and treating bipolar illness. They include lithium, which is sometimes used especially to prevent recurrence of depression, even if its use is limited in old patients for its side effects, the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and valproic acid. Putative last generation mood stabilizing drugs include the dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blockers and the anticonvulsants phenytoin, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate, which have unique mechanisms of action and also merit further systematic study. Psychotherapy is often used as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy, while electroconvulsant therapy is used only in the elderly patients with severe depression, high risk of suicide or drug resistant forms.

5-HT(3) receptor antagonists and anxiety; a preclinical and clinical review

The present paper reviews the evidence for anxiolytic activity of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in animal models of anxiety and in clinical trials in humans. Compared to the established anxiolytics (benzodiazepine receptor agonists and, to a lesser extent, 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists) 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists display a different anxiolytic profile. They are anxiolytic in a limited number of animal anxiety models. If active, they often are very potent and display bell-shaped dose response curves, whereas the ratio between therapeutic activity and side effects appears remarkably large. 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists remain active after chronic dosing and no indications for tolerance, dependence or rebound effects were found, which seems to make these drugs an attractive alternative to the benzodiazepines. However, the large body of animal data indicating a complete lack of psychotropic activity of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists weakens the prediction of anxiolytic activity in these drugs. Human data are also controversial; some investigators have reported positive effects in anxiety disorders (panic disorder, GAD), others did not. It can be concluded that 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists do not represent a breakthrough in the treatment of various anxiety disorders, as initially suggested.

Effects of diazepam, citalopram, methadone and naloxone on PCP-induced stereotyped behaviour and social isolation in the rat social interaction test

Phencyclidine (PCP) can induce a model psychosis in humans that mimics the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the social interaction test PCP induces stereotyped behaviour and social isolation in rats, and these behaviours can be inhibited by antipsychotic drugs. In order to further evaluate the predictive validity of this model of schizophrenia the anxiolytic diazepam (0.02-17.5 micromol/kg; 0.005-5.0 mg/kg), the antidepressant citalopram (0.62-19.8 micromol/kg; 0.3-4.0 mg/kg), the opioid agonist methadone (0.36-5.8 micromol/kg; 0.13-2.0 mg/kg) and the opioid antagonist naloxone (0.34-22.0 micromol/kg; 0.13-8.0 mg/kg) were tested as examples of drugs without antipsychotic activity. The experiments demonstrated that these compounds did not specifically inhibit the behavioural effects of PCP. So far only antipsychotic drugs have been able to specifically inhibit the PCP-induced behaviours.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist BAY x 3702 in the rat

The aminomethylchroman derivative BAY x 3702 (R-(-)-2-¿4-[(chroman-2-ylmethyl)-amino]-butyl¿-1,1-dioxo-benzo[d] isothiazolone HCl) has recently been characterized as a relatively selective, high affinity 5-HT1A receptor agonist with neuroprotective, anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in animal models. It was the aim of the present study to further confirm its receptor binding profile in an in vivo assay. Rats were trained to discriminate BAY x 3702 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle in a standard two-lever fixed ratio 10 food-reinforced procedure. All rats learned the discrimination, the median number of sessions to reach criterion being 38 (range: 22-58 sessions). Generalization tests with BAY x 3702 showed dose-dependent and complete generalization after different routes of administration; the ED50 values being: 0.030, 0.007 and 0.36 mg/kg, after i.p., i.v. and p.o. administration, respectively. Assessment of the duration of action after administration of 0.1 mg/kg BAY x 3702, i.p., resulted in a T1/2 of 65 min. Dose-dependent and complete generalization was also obtained with the 5-HT1A receptor agonists 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin, ED50 in mg/kg, i.p.: 0.086), flesinoxan (0.30), SR 57746A ((4-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-N-(2-(naphth-2-yl)ethyl)-1,2,3,6-tet rahydropyridine HCl, 1.0), the (+)-enantiomer of BAY x 3702 (1.3) and ipsapirone (1.8); the ED50 values being closely correlated with their respective affinities for the 5-HT1A receptor. Pretreatment with the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 ((N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide trihydrochloride) dose-dependently and completely blocked the discriminative effects of 0.1 mg/kg BAY x 3702 (ID50: 0.013 mg/kg, i.p.). WAY-100635, prazosin, idazoxan, raclopride, paroxetine, (-)-BAY k 8644 (methyl-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3-nitro-4-(2-trifluoro-methyl-phenyl)-p yridine-5-carboxylate), ethanol, and the putative neuroprotectants MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydroxy-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cyclohepten-5,10-imin e), CNS 1102 (N-(1-naphthyl)-N'-(3-ethylphenyl)-N'-methyl-guanidine), CGS 19755 (cis-4-(phosphonomethyl) piperidine-2-carboxylic acid) and nimodipine did not induce more than 20% generalization. It is concluded that the BAY x 3702 cue is mediated by its agonistic activity at 5-HT1A receptors.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors potentiate 8-OH-DPAT-induced stimulus control in the pigeon

The effects of two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine and citalopram, and a nonselective monoamine reuptake inhibitor, imipramine, were characterized in pigeons that had been trained to discriminate 0.64 mg/kg of 8-hydroxy-(2-di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, from saline. Neither fluoxetine, citalopram, nor imipramine generalized to the 8-OH-DPAT-induced stimulus cue. However, when administered in addition to 8-OH-DPAT, both fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) and citalopram (10 mg/kg) lowered the ED50 for generalization of 8-OH-DPAT from 0.16 mg/kg (8-OH-DPAT by itself) to 0.05 mg/kg (fluoxetine + 8-OH-DPAT) and 0.06 mg/kg (citalopram + 8-OH-DPAT). Under similar conditions, imipramine (1 mg/kg) had no effect on the generalization curve for 8-OH-DPAT. The data support the hypothesis that activation of the 5-HT1A receptor may be relevant to the mechanism of action of serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

The putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonist DU125530 blocks the discriminative stimulus of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan in pigeons

Twelve homing pigeons were trained to discriminate the 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan (0.25 mg/kg p.o.) from its vehicle in a fixed ratio (FR) 30 two-key operant drug discrimination procedure. Tests for generalization and antagonism showed that compounds with agonistic action at the 5-HT1A receptor, such as 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin), buspirone and ipsapirone all substituted for the flesinoxan cue. Compounds with mixed agonistic action at the 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor fully (eltoprazine) or partially (RU24969 (5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl-1H-indole)) substituted for flesinoxan. TFMPP (1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine) and mCPP (1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine), both acting at the 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor, did not substitute for flesinoxan, neither did the selective 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. The results of the antagonism tests showed that the 5-HT1A receptor antagonists NAN-190 (1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine), WAY 100635 ((N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclo-he xane-carboxamide) and the newly developed DU125530 (2-[4-[4-(7-chloro-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-5-yl)-1-piperazinyl ]butyl]-1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide) fully (more than 80%) blocked the flesinoxan cue without having substantial effects when given alone. WAY100135 (N-tert-butyl-3-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl)-2-phenylpropanamide ), (+/-)-pindolol and (S)-UH-301 ((S)-5-fluoro-8-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)-tetralin) all partially antagonized the flesinoxan cue. However, both WAY100135 as well as (+/-)-pindolol also partially substituted for flesinoxan in generalization tests. NAN190, (S)-UH-301, WAY100635 and DU125530 were without any activity in the generalization test at the doses tested. The putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonist S15535 (4-benzodioxan-5-yl) 1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine) was identified as a full agonist in the present procedure. Taken together these results suggest that the flesinoxan cue in pigeons is mediated by the 5-HT1A receptor and that DU125530 acts as a full antagonist on the 5-HT1A receptor.

Effects of ketanserin on the discrimination of electrical stimulation of the dorsal raphé nucleus in rats

The electrical stimulation of the dorsal raphé nucleus was used as a training cue in a discrimination paradigm. Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate between electrical stimulation (ES; 200 microA) of the dorsal raphé nucleus (DRN) and non-stimulation. This was accomplished by associating ES with intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of lithium chloride (LiCl), following the session with electrical stimulation. This made the drinking of saccharin during ES aversive by conditioned taste aversion. Following training, rats decreased saccharin consumption in ES sessions. This discrimination was learned within three pairings of the ES with LiCl. Lowering the ES current to 50-100 microA resulted in levels of saccharin consumption similar to non-stimulation levels, whereas 150 microA showed a response intermediate between the stimulation response at 200 microA and non-stimulation. The discrimination of ES of the DRN (200 microA) was not affected by prior administration of the 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin (1 or 2 mg/kg, i.p.), suggesting that activation of 5-HT2 receptors is not the primary discriminative cue generated by ES. However, the 5-HT2A/2C agonist DOI (0.25-0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), substituted for ES of the DRN, i.e. animals reduced saccharin consumption following DOI administration. This substitution of DOI for ES was antagonized by the administration of ketanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p.). These results suggest that ES of the DRN has properties that are similar to the activation of 5-HT2A/2C receptors by DOI. However, other stimuli such as activation of other 5-HT receptors are also involved, given that the discriminative cues of ES are not blocked by the 5-HT2A/2C antagonist ketanserin.

Assessment of relative efficacies of 5-HT1A receptor ligands by means of in vivo animal models

We have evaluated the effects of ligands with varying efficacies at beta-adrenoceptors and 5-HT1A receptors in three in vivo models reflecting pre- and/or postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor activation. Forepaw treading in rats is mediated by postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamin)tetralin)-induced discriminative stimulus is predominantly mediated by postsynaptic, but presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors might also be involved, and footshock-induced ultrasonic vocalization involves predominantly presynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. In vitro receptor binding studies demonstrated high beta-adrenoceptor and 5-HT1A receptor affinity of (-)-penbutolol, high beta-adrenoceptor and 60 times lower 5-HT1A receptor affinity of (+)-penbutolol, high beta-adrenoceptor affinity and about 100 times lower 5-HT1A receptor affinity of pindolol and (-)-tertatolol, only affinity for beta-adrenoceptors of metoprolol and ICI 118,551 (erythro-D,L-1-(7-methylindan-4-yloxy)-3-isopropylamine-b utan-2-ol, and only affinity for 5-HT1A receptors of WAY 100.635 ((N-[2-[4- (2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclo-hexane-carboxamide). (-)-Penbutolol, (-)-tertatolol, pindolol and WAY 100.635 antagonized 5-MeODMT-induced (5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine) forepaw treading in rats, and (+)-penbutolol, ICI 118,551 and metoprolol were inactive. (-)-Penbutolol, WAY 100.635 and (-)-tertatolol antagonized 8-OH-DPAT-induced discriminative stimulus in rats, pindolol and metoprolol showed a mixed antagonistic and agonistic profile. Pindolol antagonized footshock-induced ultrasonic vocalization in rats, tertatolol inhibited maximum 36% and WAY 100.635, (-)-penbutolol, (+)-penbutolol, metroprolol and ICI 118,551 were inactive. (-)-Penbutolol and WAY 100.635 reversed 8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of ultrasonic vocalization completely, (-)-tertatolol reversed maximum 52% and (+)-penbutolol and pindolol were inactive. It is concluded, that efficacies at 5-HT1A receptors can be estimated by applying a battery of in vivo test models that involve post- and presynaptic receptors to a variable degree. The in vivo ranking order of efficacy at 5-HT1A receptors was: WAY 100.635 = (-)-penbutolol < (-)-tertatolol < pindolol.

The antiaggressive potency of (-)-penbutolol involves both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors and beta-adrenoceptors

The relative importance of 5-HT1A and beta-adrenergic activities in the antiaggressive effects of (-)-penbutolol was studied in male mice. (-)-Penbutolol had high affinity for 5-HT1A receptors and beta-adrenoceptors, and antagonized the 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT)-induced 5-HT syndrome and the 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamin)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT)-induced discriminatory stimulus in rats. (-)-Penbutolol abolished aggressive behaviour (ED50 = 56 mumol/kg), and reversed the antiaggressive effects of 8-OH-DPAT and 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP) (ED50 = 8.1 and 2.1 mumol/kg, respectively). (N-[2-[4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY 100635) reversed the antiaggressive effects of 8-OH-DPAT (ED50 = 0.012 mumol/kg), but did not affect the antiaggressive effects of TFMPP. The antiaggressive effect of a submaximal dose of 8-OH-DPAT was markedly potentiated by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists without 5-HT1A receptor affinity, whereas (-)-penbutolol was effective at only one dose (4.5 mumol/kg). In conclusion, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonistic potency of (-)-penbutolol in aggressive mice is attenuated by beta-adrenoceptor-induced facilitation of serotonergic neurotransmission.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the 5HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT: attenuation by mu but not by kappa opioids

The ability of mu and kappa opioids to alter the discriminative-stimulus and rate-decreasing effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT was examined in rats trained to discriminate either a low (0.1 mg/kg) or a high (0.3 mg/kg) dose of 8-OH-DPAT from water using a two-lever food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. The mu opioids, morphine and fentanyl, and the kappa opioids, U50,488 and bremazocine, failed to substitute for the 8-OH-DPAT stimulus, even when tested up to doses that substantially reduced rates of responding. During antagonism tests, selected doses of the mu opioids, morphine and fentanyl, administered at various pretreatment times, attenuated the stimulus effects of both training doses of 8-OH-DPAT. Moreover, morphine (135-min pretreat) and fentanyl (15-min pretreat) produced rightward shifts in the 8-OH-DPAT dose-effect curve that were partially surmountable and naltrexone-reversible. In contrast to the effects of the mu opioids, the kappa opioids, U50,488 and bremazocine, failed to alter the stimulus effects of the training dose of 8-OH-DPAT, regardless of dose or pretreatment time. The rate-decreasing effects of 8-OH-DPAT were not altered substantially by either the mu or kappa opioids examined. The present study demonstrates that the stimulus effects, but not the rate-decreasing effects, of 5-HT1A receptor agonists can be modulated by mu opioids, whereas neither of these effects are changed by kappa opioids.

Complex stimulus properties of LSD: a drug discrimination study with alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists and antagonists

The influence of several alpha 2-adrenergic agents on the discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) was studied in rats trained to discriminate 0.08 mg/kg (186 nmol/kg) of LSD from saline in a two-lever operant paradigm. Only yohimbine fully mimicked LSD with an ED50 of 2.05 mg/kg (5.24 mumol/kg). Yohimbine's 5-HT1A agonist properties may be responsible for this substitution. Other alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists, idazoxan with an agonist/antagonist profile at 5-HT1A receptors and RS 26026-197, a highly selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, failed to produce substitution. Clonidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, did not substitute for LSD but the response rate was dose-dependently reduced. None of the alpha 2-adrenergic agents used for pretreatment before LSD inhibited the response to the LSD training dose. Coadministration of clonidine with LSD produced a leftward shift of the dose-response relationship of LSD without a significant change in the slope of the dose-response line. Simultaneous administration of alpha 2-adrenergic agents with LSD shifted the dose-response curve to the left only when the adrenergic agent also possessed at least moderate affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor. In addition, radioligand competition experiments were performed that showed LSD to have relatively high affinity (Ki = 37 nM) for [3H]clonidine-labeled sites in rat cortex with lower affinity for [3H]yohimbine labeled sites. While previous studies have suggested that the nature of the LSD cue may be essentially expressed by 5-HT2 receptor activation, the present data show that this cue can be modulated by effects of LSD at 5-HT1A and at other monoamine neurotransmitter receptors.

Isolation-induced aggression in mice: effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitors and involvement of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors

The inhibitory potencies of selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) uptake inhibitors on isolation-induced aggressive behaviour in male mice were studied. Furthermore, the role of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in the mediation of aggressive behaviour was studied. The selective 5-HT uptake inhibitors, sertraline, floxetine, femoxetine and fluvoxamine, showed weak antiaggressive effects, and citalopram and paroxetine were ineffective. This rank of potencies corresponded with neither uptake inhibitory potencies in vitro nor potentiation of 1-5-hydroxytryptophan (1,5-HTP)-induced motor effects in vivo, as citalopram and paroxetine were among the most potent compounds in these tests. A subeffective dose of 1,5-HTP (110 mumol/kg = 25 mg/kg, s.c.) potentiated the antiaggressive effect of citalopram and paroxetine more than 110 and 1600 times, respectively. The effects of sertraline, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine and femoxetine were only potentiated 3, 36, 4 and 16 times, respectively. The 5-HT releasing compound fenfluramine inhibited the aggressive behaviour dose dependently, and depletion of 5-HT by treatment with p-chloro-phenylalanine methyl ester attenuated this effect significantly. p-Chloro-phenylalanine methyl ester was ineffective itself, but potentiated the antiaggressive effect of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamin)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). The beta-adrenoceptor/5-HT1A receptor antagonist, (-)-penbutolol, reversed the antiaggressive effects of 8-OHDPAT. In conclusion, selective 5-HT uptake inhibitors act in different ways on isolation-induced aggressive behaviour, and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors are involved in mediating the aggressive behaviour.

Involvement of 5-HT2C receptors in mediating the discriminative stimulus properties of m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP)

Rats were trained to discriminate the 5-HT receptor agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP; 1 mg/kg) from saline using a two-lever, water-reinforced drug discrimination task. The antidepressant trazodone (1-8 mg/kg), the 5-HT1B/2C receptor agonists 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP; 0.25-1 mg/kg) and MK 212 (0.125-1 mg/kg), and the mixed 5-HT1A/B receptor agonist RU 24969 (0.25-2 mg/kg) substituted fully for mCPP. The 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI; 0.25-1 mg/kg) and d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 0.02-0.08 mg/kg) and the 5-HT releaser fenfluramine (0.5-2 mg/kg) also mimicked mCPP. Agonists selective for the 5-HT1A or 5-HT3 receptor or the 5-HT reuptake site produced saline-lever responding. The ergoline derivative mesulergine (0.5-4 mg/kg) produced a partial agonist/antagonist profile. The 5-HT1/2 receptor antagonist metergoline (0.125-1 mg/kg) completely blocked the mCPP cue whereas the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonists ketanserin and LY 53857 as well as all other 5-HT receptor antagonists failed to block the mCPP cue. The dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and haloperidol were also ineffective mCPP antagonists. Following pretreatment with the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor p-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA; 100 mg/kg/day) for 3 consecutive days, the discriminability of low doses of mCPP increased, whereas the effects of fenfluramine decreased. The present results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of mCPP in rats are mediated primarily by postsynaptic 5-HT2C receptors.

Drug discrimination and receptor binding studies of N-isopropyl lysergamide derivatives

Isopropyl (IPLA), N-methyl-N-isopropyl (MIPLA), N-ethyl-N-isopropyl (EIPLA), and N,N-diisopropyl (DIPLA) lysergamides were evaluated for lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)-like activity. In rats trained to discriminate 0.08 mg/kg LSD tartrate from saline, each of the subject compounds completely substituted, with an ED50 two to three times larger than that of LSD except for DIPLA, which had an ED50 about eightfold greater. Similarly, all the compounds displaced [125I](R)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane ([125I]DOI) from rat cortical homogenates and displaced [3H]8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin ([3H]8-OH-DPAT) from rat hippocampal homogenates with KI values similar to those of LSD, again with the exception of DIPLA, which had about nine- and fourfold lower affinities, respectively. Interestingly, all the compounds had four- to fivefold lower affinities than LSD in displacing [3H]ketanserin from 5-HT2 binding sites. Molecular modeling studies found that all the compounds had low energy conformations similar to LSD. No correlation between the activity of the compounds and the preferred conformation of the amide substituents was apparent. In summary, N-alkyl-N-isopropyl analogs of LSD retain LSD-like activity in drug discrimination and 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 agonist binding assays only until the N-alkyl substitution is as large as ethyl; LSD-like activity dramatically drops when the second alkyl substituent is N-isopropyl.

Anxiolytic and antidepressant mechanisms of 5-HT1A drugs in the pigeon: contributions from behavioral studies

The discovery that compounds acting through 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor subtypes can produce anxiolytic and/or antidepressant therapeutic effects in humans has resulted in considerable interest in the role of the 5-HT receptor system in both anxiety and depressive disorders. Because many of the clinically efficacious 5-HT1A anxiolytic drugs are either ineffective or produce inconsistent results in traditional or standard types of preclinical punishment or conflict procedures with rodents and other nonhuman mammals, there is considerable need for alternative behavioral assays sensitive to and selective for these compounds. In contrast to data with nonhuman mammals, 5-HT1A drugs are quite effective in pigeons studied under a punishment procedure. This paper reviews the use of the pigeon conflict procedure as a method for the detection and analysis of potential anxiolytic drugs acting through 5-HT1A receptors. Additionally, recent studies, also with the pigeon, have indicated that, in contrast to the rat, it is possible to establish an antidepressant such as imipramine as a discriminative stimulus, and then to use this procedure to evaluate the neuropharmacological bases for the behavioral and, presumably, therapeutic actions of these drugs. Using the drug discrimination procedure, it has been possible to examine a number of selective compounds that substitute for imipramine, thereby clarifying specific substrates for the antidepressant activity of this and related drugs. The pigeon promises to be a useful species in the pharmacological analyses of novel anxiolytic drugs and provides new approaches to the analysis and understanding of traditional as well as the more recently introduced antidepressant drugs.

Time- and dose-dependent effects of the serotonergic agent quipazine on regional cerebral metabolism in rats

The time course and the relation to dose of regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose (rCMRglc) were measured in awake male adult Fischer-344 rats after administration of quipazine, a serotonin 5-HT2-3 receptor agonist. rCMRglc was determined, using the quantitative autoradiographic [14C]deoxyglucose technique, in 92 brain regions at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after quipazine 20 mg/kg i.p. and at 60 min after quipazine 5 mg/kg i.p. Peak metabolic effects were observed 60 min after quipazine 20 mg/kg i.p. when rCMRglc was significantly elevated in 27 (29%) brain regions (mean rise 17%). Quipazine increased rCMRglc in brain regions with high densities of 5-HT3 receptors (area postrema, olfactory tubercle, amygdala), in dopaminergic nuclei (substantia nigra pars compacta and pars reticulata) and terminal fields of their projections (zona incerta, subthalamic nucleus, preoptic magnocellular area, nucleus of facial nerve). The topographic distribution and direction of rCMRglc changes induced by quipazine are different from those produced by the 5-HT2 agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane and, consistent with the pharmacological and binding properties of quipazine, suggest a preferential activation of 5-HT3 receptors.

The role of serotonergic mechanisms in inhibition of isolation-induced aggression in male mice

The role of serotonergic (5-HT) receptor subtypes in mediation of aggressive behaviour in isolated male mice has been studied. Increase of attack latency was used as a simple measure of antiaggressive behaviour. 5-HT1A agonists (BAY R 1531, 8-OHDPAT, flesinoxan, gepirone, 5MeO DMT, buspirone, ipsapirone, BMY 14802) completely inhibit the aggressive behaviour irrespective of their intrinsic activities. Also the putative antagonists spiroxatrine and NAN 190 as well as the non-selective 5-HT1 agonists RU 24969, TFMPP, mCPP and eltoprazine have an antiaggressive effect. The mixed 5-HT1A and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (-)-alprenolol and pindolol are ineffective and do not inhibit the effect of 8-OHDPAT. Neither does the non-selective 5-HT antagonist metergoline. The antiaggressive effect correlates with 5-HT1A receptor affinity in vitro and with generalization to the 8-OHDPAT-induced discriminative stimulus. The selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor citalopram does not inhibit aggressive behaviour. The 5-HT2 agonist DOI has an antiaggressive effect only at high doses, whereas the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin and the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron are ineffective. Prazosin (alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist), clonidine (alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist), clenbuterol (beta-adrenoceptor agonist), ketanserin (5-HT2 receptor and alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist), clozapine and (-)-octoclothepin (dopamine (DA), 5-HT2 receptor and alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist) all show an antiaggressive effect. SCH 23390 (DA D1 receptor antagonist) and emonapride (DA D2 receptor antagonist) are ineffective. In conclusion, 5-HT1A receptors are involved in mediation of isolation-induced aggressive behaviour in mice. The involvement of other 5-HT receptor subtypes needs further clarification. The adrenergic system may also be involved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Discriminative stimulus effects of 8-OH-DPAT in pigeons: antagonism studies with the putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists BMY 7378 and NAN-190

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 0.3 mg/kg of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) from saline. RU 24969 (5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole), at doses of 5.6-10 mg/kg, and eltoprazine (5.6 mg/kg), both mixed 5-HT1A/B agonists, substituted completely for 8-OH-DPAT, whereas 3.0-10 mg/kg of the 5-HT1B/C agonist TFMPP (1-(m-trifluromethylphenyl)piperazine) and 0.1-3.0 of the 5-HT3 antagonist MDL 72222 (3-tropanyl-3,5-dichlorobenzoate) yielded only saline-appropriate responses. Substitution for 8-OH-DPAT by eltoprazine and RU 24969, which does not occur in rats, provides in vivo support for the suggestion that the absence of a 5-HT1B receptor in the pigeon allows more complete expression of 5-HT1A-mediated effects. BMY 7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl)]8-azaspirol-[4.5]- decane-7,9-dione) attenuated the 8-OH-DPAT stimulus at doses from 1.0 to 10 mg/kg but, when administered alone, also resulted in approximately 40% 8-OH-DPAT-appropriate responding at the highest dose. NAN-190 (1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalamido)butyl)-piperazine (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent and complete antagonism of the 8-OH-DPAT-discriminative stimulus; administered alone NAN-190 resulted only in saline-key responding. NAN-190 also reversed the rate-decreasing effects of higher doses of 8-OH-DPAT. The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist (+/-)-pindolol (5.6-17 mg/kg) antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of lower 8-OH-DPAT doses but was unable to block the effects of higher doses of 8-OH-DPAT. Prazosin (1.0-10 mg/kg), which like NAN-190, is an alpha 1-antagonist, neither substituted for nor blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of 8-OH-DPAT. These results suggest that NAN-190 is an effective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist in this procedure with pigeons, with no indication of agonist actions, whereas BMY 7378 and pindolol are best characterized as partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists.

Behavioral pharmacology of antagonists at 5-HT2/5-HT1C receptors

The possible implication of 5-HT2 receptors in CNS disorders such as schizophrenia, anxiety and depression suggests that 5-HT2 antagonists may be useful in the treatment of these disorders. The present review examines behavioral procedures used to characterize 5-HT2 antagonist properties of compounds and behavioral models of clinical activity in which 5-HT2 antagonists have been reported to be active. The pharmacological profile of 5-HT2 receptors in part resembles that of 5-HT1C receptors. Responses that have been proposed to involve the activation of 5-HT1C receptors are examined for their usefulness to detect 5-HT1C antagonist properties of compounds; these responses would help to differentiate 5-HT2 from 5-HT1C antagonist activity.

Discriminative stimulus properties of 8-OH-DPAT: relationship to affinity for 5HT1A receptors

Previous studies have shown that discriminative stimulus control established with the 5HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT, generalizes to other 5HT1A agonists and partial agonists but also to the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine. On the basis of these results it has been proposed that the 8-OH-DPAT cue may be produced by activity at more than one receptor. In the present study rats were trained to discriminate a dose of 8-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg/kg, SC) from saline. Substitution tests showed dose-dependent generalisation with the 5HT1A compounds, buspirone, ipsapirone, MDL 72832 and MDL 73005EF, the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine and idazoxan, and BMY 14802, which is usually described as a sigma ligand. The buspirone metabolite 1-pyrimidinyl piperazine (1-PP) which possesses mainly alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist properties produced only partial generalisation which was not dose related. Receptor binding studies showed that all the compounds which substituted for 8-OH-DPAT displaced [3H]-8-OH-DPAT binding to rat hippocampal membranes. Furthermore, there were statistically significant positive correlations between drug affinity for 5HT1A sites and their ED50 values for both substitution for 8-OH-DPAT and potency to decrease response rates. These results are consistent with the view that the 8-OH-DPAT cue, like the ability of the compounds tested to decrease rates of responding, is largely mediated by activity at 5HT1A receptors.

Effect of serotonin depletion by p-chlorophenylalanine upon discriminative behaviours

1. Para-chlorophenylalanine (p-CPA), a competitive inhibitor of the serotonin (5-HT) synthesis enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase, was administered to rats at a dosage (100 mg/kg daily for 3 days) that depletes 5-HT. 2. Different groups of these rats were previously trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimuli produced by amphetamine, cathinone, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE), fenfluramine or yohimbine, and the effect of p-CPA pretreatment upon their discriminative performance was compared with the effect of saline (control) pretreatment. 3. p-CPA was shown to have no effect upon the dopaminergically-mediated stimuli produced by the stimulants amphetamine and cathinone or upon yohimbine performance. 4. p-CPA significantly decreased discriminative performance with the serotonergic releasing drugs MDMA, MDE and fenfluramine. This decrease in discriminative performance returned to pre-p-CPA (criterion) levels at a time (9-12 days) when 5-HT has been reported to replete to normal brain concentrations. 5. It is concluded that p-CPA pretreatment lowers brain 5-HT and, in turn, significantly decreases the ability of rats to discriminate centrally active drugs whose interoceptive cueing stimuli are mediated by 5-HT neurons.

Mixed agonist/antagonist properties of NAN-190 at 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and in vivo brain microdialysis studies

1-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine, NAN-190, is a novel compound with putative 5-HT1A antagonist properties. In the present study, the effects of NAN-190 were examined with regard to functional pre- and post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptor-mediated events, using in vivo brain microdialysis and behavioural techniques. Our findings provide evidence that NAN-190 acts as a mixed agonist/antagonist at central 5-HT1A receptors. Thus, NAN-190 blocked (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced behaviour in reserpinized rats, indicating antagonist properties at postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. However, the compound was also able to decrease the release of 5-HT in vivo, tentatively due to an agonist action at somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors. These data extend previous information on the pharmacological profile of NAN-190 and further emphasizes the difference between pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors in brain.

Drug discrimination models in anxiety and depression

Drug discrimination is a technique for investigating the stimulus properties of centrally active drugs. Although many studies have employed animals to investigate the stimulus properties of substances used clinically for the treatment of anxiety and depression, it would be a mistake to consider the internal discriminative stimuli as being related specifically to the anxiolytic or antidepressant properties of these drugs. Rather drug cues are better considered as relating to the pharmacological action of classes of compounds. Thus, benzodiazepine cues generalize to other compounds acting at benzodiazepine receptors, but not to substances (anxiolytic or otherwise) acting at 5-HT1A receptors. Similarly, antidepressants with different pharmacological properties, for example the tricyclic imipramine, or the phenylaminoketone buproprion produce distinct, unrelated discriminative stimuli. For this reason, the limits of drug discrimination techniques for investigating novel anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs should be clearly recognized. Attempts to identify an anxiogenic discriminative stimulus using pentylenetetrazole have also been misguided. In this technique it has proven difficult to separate unequivocally the pharmacological proconvulsant effects of the drug from the psychological construct anxiety. Nevertheless, drug discrimination remains a valuable technique for investigating pharmacological interactions in animals and man.

Facilitation of 8-OHDPAT-induced forepaw treading of rats by the 5-HT2 agonist DOI

The potency of the serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OHDPAT), to induce forepaw treading was increased 20-fold after co-treatment with the 5-HT2 agonist, 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI). DOI induced head twitches which were inhibited by 8-OHDPAT. The putative 5-HT1B agonist, 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP), had a weak effect on the responses to DOI or 8-OHDPAT. The forepaw treading induced by 8-OHDPAT plus DOI was inhibited by high doses of (-)-alprenolol, ketanserin or ritanserin, but was not influenced by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, ICI 118.551, or the 5-HT3 antagonist, ICS 205-930. A non-effective dose of (-)-alprenolol increased the inhibitory effect of ketanserin and ritanserin. These results indicate a complex and different interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the expression of two behavioural responses mediated by 5-HT.