1
|
Almohammed HI. A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Disability. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3283. [PMID: 38892994 PMCID: PMC11172480 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. There are observed disparities in patients with disability as compared to those without disability, which leads to poor BC screening attendance, thereby worsening disease management. Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate if there are disparities in screening rates in women with disability as compared to those without disability, as well as the different factors that pose barriers to patients with disability for enrolment in BC screening programs. Method: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed published articles between 2008 and 2023, which assessed different factors that contributed to poor attendance in BC screening programs held across different countries. Detailed study characteristics were obtained, and methodological quality assessment was performed on the individual studies included in this review. Result: A total of fifty-three articles were identified as eligible studies based on the pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. These included 7,252,913 patients diagnosed with BC (913,902 patients with disability/6,339,011 patients without disability). The results revealed there are demographic, clinical, financial, and service-related barriers that contributed to lower screening rates in disabled patients as compared to non-disabled. Patient age is the most common factor, with the highest effect observed for 80 years (vs. 30-44 years) [odds ratio (OR) = 13.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.27-23.47), p < 0.0001], followed by race/ethnicity for Hispanic (vs. non-Hispanic white) [OR = 9.5 (95%CI = 1.0-91.9), p < 0.05]. Additionally, patients with multiple disabilities had the highest rate of dropouts [OR = 27.4 (95%CI = 21.5-33.3)]. Other factors like education, income, marital status, and insurance coverage were essential barriers in screening programs. Conclusions: This study presents a holistic view of all barriers to poor BC screening attendance in disabled patients, thereby exacerbating health inequalities. A standardized approach to overcome the identified barriers and the need for a tailored guideline, especially for disability groups, is inevitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huda I Almohammed
- Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bateson D, Ussher J, Strnadová I, Loblinzk J, David M, Chang EL, Carter A, Sweeney S, Winkler L, Power R, Basckin C, Kennedy E, Jolly H. Working together with people with intellectual disability to make a difference: a protocol for a mixed-method co-production study to address inequities in cervical screening participation. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1360447. [PMID: 38846600 PMCID: PMC11155193 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1360447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers yet remains a disease of inequity for people with intellectual disability, in part due to low screening rates. The ScreenEQUAL project will use an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) model to co-produce and evaluate accessible cervical screening resources with and for this group. Methods Stage 1 will qualitatively explore facilitators and barriers to screening participation for people with intellectual disability, families and support people, healthcare providers and disability sector stakeholders (n ≈ 20 in each group). An accessible multimodal screening resource, accompanying supporting materials for families and support people, and trauma-informed healthcare provider training materials will then be co-produced through a series of workshops. Stage 2 will recruit people with intellectual disability aged 25 to 74 who are due or overdue for screening into a single-arm trial (n = 48). Trained support people will provide them with the co-produced resource in accessible workshops (intervention) and support them in completing pre-post questions to assess informed decision-making. A subset will participate in qualitative post-intervention interviews including optional body-mapping (n ≈ 20). Screening uptake in the 9-months following the intervention will be measured through data linkage. Family members and support people (n = 48) and healthcare providers (n = 433) will be recruited into single-arm sub-studies. Over a 4-month period they will, respectively, receive the accompanying supporting materials, and the trauma-informed training materials. Both groups will complete pre-post online surveys. A subset of each group (n ≈ 20) will be invited to participate in post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Outcomes and analysis Our primary outcome is a change in informed decision-making by people with intellectual disability across the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and screening intention. Secondary outcomes include: (i) uptake of screening in the 9-months following the intervention workshops, (ii) changes in health literacy, attitudes and self-efficacy of family members and support people, and (iii) changes in knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and preparedness of screening providers. Each participant group will evaluate acceptability, feasibility and usability of the resources. Discussion If found to be effective and acceptable, the co-produced cervical screening resources and training materials will be made freely available through the ScreenEQUAL website to support national, and potentially international, scale-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Bateson
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Ussher
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Iva Strnadová
- University of New South Wales, Faculty of Arts Design and Architecture, School of Education, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Disability Innovation Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Michael David
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Ee-Lin Chang
- Family Planning Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Allison Carter
- Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lauren Winkler
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rosalie Power
- Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Caroline Basckin
- University of New South Wales, Faculty of Arts Design and Architecture, School of Education, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Kennedy
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuper H, Andiwijaya FR, Rotenberg S, Yip JLY. Principles for Service Delivery: Best Practices for Cervical Screening for Women with Disabilities. Int J Womens Health 2024; 16:679-692. [PMID: 38650833 PMCID: PMC11034568 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s428144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer screening is an important public health priority, yet many marginalized groups are not reached by existing programs. The nearly 700 million women with disabilities globally face substantial barriers in accessing cervical cancer screening and have lower coverage, yet there is limited evidence on what would support enhanced uptake among this population. Methods We updated a systematic review to estimate the disparity in screening uptake for women with disabilities. We conducted a scoping review to understand key barriers and the inclusion of disability in existing screening policies and possible solutions to improve screening uptakes amongst women with disabilities. We then formulated key principles for improved service delivery for this group, targeted predominantly at clinicians. Results Our updated review identified an additional five new studies, and confirmed that women with disabilities were less likely to be screened for cervical cancer (RR=0.65, 0.50-0.84). Disability-specific barriers to accessing screening pertained to: (1) knowledge and autonomy; (2) logistics; and (3) stigma and fear. Few guidelines included specific considerations for women with disabilities. Our scoping review showed that improving access to care must focus on improving (1) autonomy, awareness, and affordability; (2) human resources; and (3) health facility accessibility. Conclusion Screening programmes and health providers must ensure women with disabilities are included in cervical cancer screening programmes and thereby help to achieve their right to health and eliminate cervical cancer as a public health issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kuper
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Fahrin Ramadan Andiwijaya
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Airlangga University/ Dr. Soetomo General Academic Teaching Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Sara Rotenberg
- International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jennifer L Y Yip
- Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahar AL, Biggs K, Hansford RL, Derksen S, Griffiths R, Enns JE, Dawe DE, Hallet J, Kristjanson M, Decker K, Cobigo V, Shooshtari S, Stirling M, Kelly C, Brownell M, Turner D, Ouellette-Kuntz H. Stage IV breast, colorectal, and lung cancer at diagnosis in adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based cross-sectional study. Cancer 2024; 130:740-749. [PMID: 37902956 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a leading cause of death among people living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). Although studies have documented lower cancer screening rates, there is limited epidemiological evidence quantifying potential diagnostic delays. This study explores the risk of metastatic cancer stage for people with IDD compared to those without IDD among breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients in Canada. METHODS Separate population-based cross-sectional studies were conducted in Ontario and Manitoba by linking routinely collected data. Breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients were included (Manitoba: 2004-2017; Ontario: 2007-2019). IDD status was identified using established administrative algorithms. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance models estimated associations between IDD status and the likelihood of being diagnosed with metastatic cancer. Adjusted relative risks were pooled between provinces using random-effects meta-analyses. Potential effect modification was considered. RESULTS The final cohorts included 115,456, 89,815, and 101,811 breast (female), colorectal, and lung cancer patients, respectively. Breast (female) and colorectal cancer patients with IDD were 1.60 and 1.44 times more likely to have metastatic cancer (stage IV) at diagnosis compared to those without IDD (relative risk [RR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.20; RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24-1.67). This increased risk was not observed in lung cancer. Significant effect modification was not observed. CONCLUSIONS People with IDD were more likely to have stage IV breast and colorectal cancer identified at diagnosis compared to those without IDD. Identifying factors and processes contributing to stage disparities such as lower screening rates and developing strategies to address diagnostic delays is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson L Mahar
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelly Biggs
- ICES, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca L Hansford
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelley Derksen
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer E Enns
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David E Dawe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- ICES, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Kristjanson
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- St. Amant Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Kathleen Decker
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- ICES, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shahin Shooshtari
- St. Amant Research Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Morgan Stirling
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Christine Kelly
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Marni Brownell
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Donna Turner
- CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz
- ICES, Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hansford R, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Bourque MA, Decker K, Derksen S, Hallet J, Dawe DE, Cobigo V, Shooshtari S, Stirling M, Kelly C, Brownell M, Turner D, Mahar AL. Investigating inequalities in cancer staging and survival for adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities and cancer: A population-based study in Manitoba, Canada. Cancer Epidemiol 2024; 88:102500. [PMID: 38035452 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a leading cause of death among adults living with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD). However, few epidemiological studies exist worldwide quantifying inequalities in cancer stage at diagnosis and survival for people with IDD relative to those without IDD. METHODS A population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted using provincial health and social administrative data in Manitoba, Canada. Adults (≥18 years) with a cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2017 were included. Lifetime IDD was identified before the cancer diagnosis using an established algorithm. Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate the association between IDD status and metastatic cancer at diagnosis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to the effect of IDD on overall survival following the cancer diagnosis. RESULTS The staging and prognosis cohorts included 62,886 (n = 473 with IDD) and 74,143 (n = 592 with IDD) cancer patients, respectively. People living with IDD were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with metastatic cancer and die following their cancer diagnosis compared to those without IDD (RR=1.20; 95 % CI 1.05-1.38; HR= 1.53; 95 % CI 1.38-1.71). Significant heterogeneity by sex was identified for cancer survival (p = 0.005). DISCUSSION People with IDD had more advanced cancer stage at diagnosis and worse survival relative to those without IDD. Identifying and developing strategies to address the factors responsible that contribute to these disparities is required for improving patient-centred cancer care for adults with IDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hansford
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Kathleen Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Shelley Derksen
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David E Dawe
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Shahin Shooshtari
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; St Amant Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Morgan Stirling
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Christine Kelly
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marni Brownell
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Donna Turner
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Alyson L Mahar
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khan MMM, Waqar U, Munir MM, Woldesenbet S, Mavani P, Endo Y, Katayama E, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Agnese DM, Obeng-Gyasi S, Pawlik TM. Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening Rates Among Adults With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:911-919. [PMID: 37857986 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14425-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities may face barriers in accessing healthcare, including cancer screening and detection services. We sought to assess the association of intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) with breast cancer screening rates. METHODS Data from 2018 to 2020 was used to identify screening-eligible individuals from Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Adults aged 65-79 years who did not have a previous diagnosis of breast cancer were included. Multivariable regression was used to analyze the differences in breast cancer screening rates among individuals with and without IDD. RESULTS Among 9,383,349 Medicare beneficiaries, 11,265 (0.1%) individuals met the criteria for IDD. Of note, individuals with IDD were more likely to be non-Hispanic White (90.5% vs. 87.3%), have a Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≤ 2 (66.2% vs. 85.5%), and reside in a low social vulnerability index neighborhood (35.7% vs. 34.4%). IDD was associated with reduced odds of undergoing breast cancer screening (odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.80; p < 0.001). Breast cancer screening rates in individuals with IDD were further influenced by social vulnerability and belonging to a racial/ethnic minority. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with IDD may face additional barriers to breast cancer screening. The combination of IDD and social vulnerability placed patients at particularly high risk of not being screened for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Usama Waqar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Medical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Parit Mavani
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Weise J, Cvejic R, Trollor J. Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241251938. [PMID: 38708679 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241251938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with intellectual disability are less likely to participate in breast screening than people without intellectual disability. They experience a range of barriers to accessing breast screening, however, there is no consensus on strategies to overcome these barriers. Our objective was to reach consensus on the strategies required for accessible breast screening for people with intellectual disability. METHODS Fourteen experts participated in a modified on-line Delphi that used Levesque's model of health care access as the theoretical framework. At the end of each round descriptive and thematic analyses were completed. Data was then triangulated to determine if consensus was reached. RESULTS After 3 rounds, 9 strategies were modified, 24 strategies were added and consensus was reached for 52 strategies across the 5 dimensions of access. Key areas of action related to (i) decision making and consent, (ii) accessible information, (iii) engagement of peer mentors, (iv) service navigators, and (v) equipping key stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS The resulting strategies are the first to articulate how to make breast screening accessible and can be used to inform health policy and quality improvement practices.
Collapse
|
8
|
Marquis S, Lunsky Y, McGrail KM, Baumbusch J. Population-level use of gynecological health services by female youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities in British Columbia Canada. Disabil Health J 2023:101478. [PMID: 37142456 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that female youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) experience poorer gynecological care compared to female youth without disabilities. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to obtain baseline data on visits to a health care provider for a gynecological issue for females with IDD and compare that information to the experiences of female youth without IDD. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort study using population-level administrative health data from 2010 to 2019 for females aged 15-24 years, with and without IDD. RESULTS 6452 female youth with IDD and 637,627 female youth without IDD were identified in the data. Over the ten-year period, 53.77% of youth with IDD and 53.68% of youth without IDD had a visit to a physician for a gynecological issue. However, as females with IDD aged, the number of people seeing a physician for a gynecological issue decreased. In the group aged 20-24 years, 15.25% of females with IDD and 24.47% of females without IDD (p < 0.0001) had a Pap test done at any time; 25.94% of females with IDD had a visit for contraception management and 28.38% of females (p < 0.0001) without IDD had a visit for contraception management. Gynecological care also varied by type of IDD. CONCLUSIONS Females with IDD had a similar number of visits for a gynecological issue as female youth without IDD. However, the reasons for visits and the age at which visits occurred differed between youth with and without IDD. As females with IDD transition into adulthood, gynecological care must be maintained and improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Marquis
- School of Nursing University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
| | - Yona Lunsky
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, CAMH, 1025 Queen St West, Toronto, ONT, M6J 1H4, Canada.
| | - Kimberlyn M McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, The University of British Columbia, 201-2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Baumbusch
- School of Nursing University of British Columbia, T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Breau G, Thorne S, Baumbusch J, Hislop TG, Kazanjian A. Family physicians' and trainees' experiences regarding cancer screening with patients with intellectual disability: An interpretive description study. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2023; 27:250-265. [PMID: 35189749 PMCID: PMC9941798 DOI: 10.1177/17446295211044041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
People with intellectual disability receive breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening at lower rates relative to the general population, although the reasons for this disparity are largely unknown. Research, both with the general population and specific to people with intellectual disability, has revealed that a family physician's recommendation for cancer screening or continuity of primary care may increase screening rates. We interviewed family physicians and family medicine trainees regarding their experiences recommending cancer screening to patients with intellectual disability. We concluded that the decision to recommend cancer screening is complex, and includes physicians weighing their clinical judgement as to the best provision of care for patients with a patient's eligibility for screening, while continuing to respect patients' autonomy. This patient-physician interaction occurs within the larger medical environment. Further research with experienced family physicians is warranted to better understand this complex phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Breau
- Genevieve Breau, School of Human Sciences,
Faculty of Education, Health & Human Sciences, University of Greenwich,
Dreadnought Building, Room D113, Greenwich Campus, Old Royal Naval College, Park
Row, London SE10 9LS, UK. Emails:
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horsbøl TA, Michelsen SI, Lassen TH, Juel K, Bigaard J, Hoei-Hansen CE, Vejborg I, Thygesen LC. Breast Cancer Screening Among Women With Intellectual Disability in Denmark. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2248980. [PMID: 36595297 PMCID: PMC9856850 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Breast cancer-specific mortality is increased among women with intellectual disability (ID), and knowledge about participation in breast cancer screening in this group is needed. OBJECTIVE To examine participation in the Danish national breast cancer screening program among women with ID compared with women without ID. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This dynamic population-based cohort study assessed participation in the Danish national breast cancer screening program initiated in 2007, targeting women aged 50 to 69 years with a screening interval of 2 years. In all, 6357 women with ID born between 1941 and 1967 and eligible for the screening program were identified in national registers. Women entered the study between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Subsequently, 273 women were excluded due to a history of carcinoma in situ or breast cancer, and 489 due to registration errors in registers. Each woman was individually age-matched with 10 women without ID (reference group). All women were followed up until March 31, 2021, or censoring (due to death, carcinoma in situ, or breast cancer). Data were analyzed from December 1, 2021, to June 31, 2022. EXPOSURES Intellectual disability was defined as being registered with an ID diagnosis or a diagnosis most likely leading to ID or residing at an institution for persons with ID. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Participation in breast cancer screening (fully, partly, and never). RESULTS A total of 5595 women with ID and 49 423 age-matched women in the reference group were included in the analysis. Of these, 2747 women with ID (49%) and 24 723 in the reference group (50%) were 50 years of age at study entry; for those older than 50 years, the median age was 51 years (IQR, 50-58 years) in both groups. In all, 1425 women with ID (25%) were fully screened according to guidelines for the Danish breast cancer screening program compared with 30 480 women in the reference group (62%). Women with ID had nearly 5 times higher odds of never being screened compared with the reference group (odds ratio, 4.90 [95% CI, 4.60-5.22]). In all, 2498 women with ID (45%) and 6573 in the reference group (13%) were never screened. The proportion of never-screened women increased with severity of ID, from 834 of 2287 (36%) among women with mild ID to 173 of 212 (82%) among women with profound ID. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cohort study suggest that women with ID are markedly less likely to participate in breast cancer screening compared with women without ID. These findings further suggest a need for tailored guidelines and approaches for breast cancer screening in this group of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Ishøy Michelsen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tina Harmer Lassen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Knud Juel
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Janne Bigaard
- Prevention and Information, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christina Engel Hoei-Hansen
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ilse Vejborg
- Department of Breast Examinations, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lau Caspar Thygesen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Akobirshoev I, Vetter M, Iezzoni LI, Rao SR, Mitra M. Delayed Medical Care And Unmet Care Needs Due To The COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults With Disabilities In The US. Health Aff (Millwood) 2022; 41:1505-1512. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa I. Iezzoni
- Lisa I. Iezzoni, Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sowmya R. Rao
- Sowmya R. Rao, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pearson RJ, Grant C, Wijlaars L, Finch E, Bedston S, Broadhurst K, Gilbert R. Mental health service use among mothers involved in public family law proceedings: linked data cohort study in South London 2007-2019. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2022; 57:2097-2108. [PMID: 35294976 PMCID: PMC9477900 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02221-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mental health problems and substance misuse are common among the mothers of children who experience court-mandated placement into care in England, yet there is limited research characterising these health needs to inform evidence-based policy. In this descriptive study, we aimed to generate evidence about the type, severity, and timing of mental health and substance misuse needs among women involved in public family law proceedings concerning child placement into care ('care proceedings'). METHODS This is a retrospective, matched cohort study using linked family court and mental health service records for 2137 (66%) of the 3226 women involved in care proceedings between 2007 and 2019 in the South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Trust (SLaM) catchment area. We compared mental health service use and risk of dying with 17,096 female-matched controls who accessed SLaM between 2007 and 2019, aged 16-55 years, and were not involved in care proceedings. RESULTS Most women (79%) were known to SLaM before care proceedings began. Women had higher rates of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (19% vs 11% matched controls), personality disorders (21% vs 11%), and substance misuse (33% vs 12%). They were more likely to have a SLaM inpatient admission (27% vs 14%) or to be sectioned (19% vs 8%). Women had a 2.15 (95% CI 1.68-2.74) times greater hazard of dying, compared to matched controls, adjusted for age. CONCLUSION Women involved in care proceedings experience a particularly high burden of severe and complex mental health and substance misuse need. Women's increased risk of mortality following proceedings highlights that interventions responding to maternal mental health and substance misuse within family courts should offer continued, long-term support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J. Pearson
- Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
| | - Claire Grant
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Linda Wijlaars
- Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
| | - Emily Finch
- Southwark and Addictions Directorate, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8RZ UK
| | - Stuart Bedston
- Centre for Child and Family Justice Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW UK
| | - Karen Broadhurst
- Centre for Child and Family Justice Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW UK
| | - Ruth Gilbert
- Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159465. [PMID: 35954824 PMCID: PMC9368105 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%, n = 10) were deemed to have a high risk of bias, and the remainder a low risk of bias. The pooled estimates showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. In conclusion, women with disabilities face disparities in receipt of preventative cancer care. There is consequently an urgent need to evaluate and improve the inclusivity of cancer screening programs and thereby prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lunsky Y, Lai MC, Balogh R, Chung H, Durbin A, Jachyra P, Tint A, Weiss J, Lin E. Premature mortality in a population-based cohort of autistic adults in Canada. Autism Res 2022; 15:1550-1559. [PMID: 35633154 DOI: 10.1002/aur.2741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Research from different countries suggests that autistic adults are more likely to die prematurely than non-autistic adults, but these studies do not always investigate male and female individuals separately and do not consider whether this pattern is unique to autistic people or is also an issue for people with other developmental disabilities. We examined premature mortality in autistic males and females (assigned at birth) in a population-based cohort, compared to males and females with and without other developmental disabilities. Using linked administrative health and social services population data from Ontario, Canada, age-matched males and females aged 19-65 years were followed between 2010 and 2016, and causes of death were determined. Over the 6-year observation period, 330 of 42,607 persons (0.77%) in the group without developmental disabilities had died compared to 259 of 10,646 persons (2.43%) in the autism group and 419 of 10,615 persons (3.95%) in the other developmental disabilities group. Autistic males and females were more likely to die than non-autistic males (adjusted risk ratio, RR 3.13, 95%CI 2.58-3.79) and non-autistic females (adjusted RR 3.12, 95%CI 2.35-4.13) without developmental disabilities, but were less likely to die than adults with other developmental disabilities (males: adjusted RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.55-0.79; females: adjusted RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.71). Most common causes of death varied depending on a person's sex and diagnosis. Given the greater likelihood of premature mortality in adults with developmental disabilities including autism, greater attention and resources directed toward their health and social care are needed, tailored to their sex and diagnosis-informed needs. LAY SUMMARY: This study looked at how many autistic men and women died over 6 years (2010-2016), along with how they died, and compared this to adults who did not have autism living in Ontario, Canada. It found that autistic men and women were more than three times as likely to die as people of the same age who did not have a developmental disability. However, adults with other developmental disabilities besides autism were even more likely to die than autistic adults. This means that we have to pay more attention and invest in better social and health care for autistic people, along with people who have other types of developmental disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yona Lunsky
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meng-Chuan Lai
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth & Family Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Balogh
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Anna Durbin
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Jachyra
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,The Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth & Family Mental Health, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ami Tint
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Weiss
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Lin
- Azrieli Adult Neurodevelopmental Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cooper SA, Henderson A, Kinnear D, Mackay D, Fleming M, Smith GS, Hughes-McCormack LA, Rydzewska E, Dunn K, Pell JP, Melville C. Cohort profile: Scotland's record-linkage e-cohorts of people with intellectual disabilities, and autistic people (SCIDA). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057230. [PMID: 35568493 PMCID: PMC9109103 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate health, mortality and healthcare inequalities experienced by people with intellectual disabilities, and autistic people, and their determinants; an important step towards identifying and implementing solutions to reduce inequalities. This paper describes the cohorts, record-linkages and variables that will be used. PARTICIPANTS Scotland's Census, 2011 was used to identify Scotland's citizens with intellectual disabilities, and autistic citizens, and representative general population samples with neither. Using Scotland's community health index, the Census data (demography, household, employment, long-term conditions) were linked with routinely collected health, death and healthcare data: Scotland's register of deaths, Scottish morbidity data 06 (SMR06: cancer incidence, mortality, treatments), Prescribing Information System (identifying asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; angina/congestive heart failure/hypertension; peptic ulcer/reflux; constipation; diabetes; thyroid disorder; depression; bipolar disorders; anxiety/sleep; psychosis; attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; epilepsy; glaucoma), SMR01 (general/acute hospital admissions and causes, ambulatory care sensitive admissions), SMR04 (mental health admissions and causes), Scottish Care Information-Diabetes Collaboration (diabetic care quality, diabetic outcomes), national bowel screening programme and cervical screening. FINDINGS TO DATE Of the whole population, 0.5% had intellectual disabilities, and 0.6% were autistic. Linkage was successful for >92%. The resultant e-cohorts include: (1) 22 538 people with intellectual disabilities (12 837 men and 9701 women), 4509 of whom are children <16 years, (2) 27 741 autistic people (21 390 men and 6351 women), 15 387 of whom are children <16 years and (3) representative general population samples with neither condition. Very good general health was reported for only 3389 (15.0%) people with intellectual disabilities, 10 510 (38.0%) autistic people, compared with 52.4% general population. Mental health conditions were reported for 4755 (21.1%) people with intellectual disabilities, 3998 (14.4%) autistic people, compared with 4.2% general population. FUTURE PLANS Analyses will determine the extent of premature mortality, causes of death, and avoidable deaths, profile of health conditions and cancers, healthcare quality and screening and determinants of mortality and healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally-Ann Cooper
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Angela Henderson
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Deborah Kinnear
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Daniel Mackay
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Fleming
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Gillian S Smith
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Ewelina Rydzewska
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kirsty Dunn
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - J P Pell
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Craig Melville
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McConnell D, Phelan S. The devolution of eugenic practices: Sexual and reproductive health and oppression of people with intellectual disability. Soc Sci Med 2022; 298:114877. [PMID: 35276622 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Early 20th century eugenicists propagated a system of ideas, values and dispositions that constituted adults with intellectual disability as the antithesis of the paradigmatic citizen, and a biological threat to society. The eugenic schema was encoded in sex-segregated institutionalization and, in many places, forced sterilization. These eugenic practices are no longer sanctioned. However, eugenic practices did not disappear. In this paper we argue that the eugenic schema is now encoded and purveyed through a multiplicity of social arrangements and practices that deny adults with intellectual disability the respect, opportunity and means necessary to participate on a par with others in social life. Such practices include, for example, covert or coerced contraception, and discriminatory child welfare interventions leading to high rates of custody deprivation. Drawing on relational theory, we problematize normative assumptions of embodiment and citizenship, which give rise to attributions of incapacity, and argue that adults with intellectual disability need what all other adults need to make and effect choices concerning their sexuality, relationships and parenthood, i.e., recognition, opportunity and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David McConnell
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Canada.
| | - Shanon Phelan
- Faculty of Health, School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boer R, Castro FFS, Gozzo TDO. Access and accessibility to cancer screening for Brazilian women with spinal cord injury. ESCOLA ANNA NERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2021-0451en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Objective to identify and analyze the accessibility and accessibility of Brazilian women with spinal cord injury to preventive examinations for breast and cervical cancer. Method quantitative and cross-sectional study developed in a virtual platform. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, as well as association analysis between qualitative variables using Fisher's exact test. When identified the association (p<0.05), logistic regression was performed. Results a total of 120 Brazilian women with spinal cord injury, aged between 25 and 67 years participated in the study; 85.83% visited a gynecologist after the spinal cord injury, 79.17% underwent cytology and 52.50% underwent mammography. It was observed that women who used the supplementary health plan were more likely to have visited a gynecologist than those who used the public service. Those who had a partner and were older were more likely to have undergone the cytology exam. For mammography, those who were older and who used supplementary health care were more likely to have had mammography exams after the spinal cord injury. Conclusion women with spinal cord injury seek screening tests. However, they encounter difficulties related to the physical structure, equipment, transportation, health professionals, as well as socio-demographic difficulties and difficulties regarding the health service used.
Collapse
|
18
|
Boer R, Castro FFS, Gozzo TDO. Acesso e acessibilidade ao rastreamento de câncer em mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular. ESCOLA ANNA NERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2021-0451pt] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Resumo Objetivo identificar e analisar a acessibilidade e o acesso de mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular para a realização de exames preventivos do câncer de mama e colo de útero. Método estudo quantitativo e transversal desenvolvido em plataforma virtual. Realizadas análises estatísticas descritivas e de associação entre as variáveis qualitativas por meio do teste exato de Fisher. Quando identificada a associação (p<0,05), foi realizada a regressão logística. Resultados participaram 120 mulheres brasileiras com lesão medular com idades entre 25 e 67 anos; 85,83% foram ao ginecologista após a lesão medular, 79,17% realizaram a citologia e 52,50%, a mamografia. Observou-se que as mulheres que utilizavam a saúde suplementar apresentaram maior probabilidade de terem ido ao ginecologista do que as usuárias do serviço público. Aquelas com companheiro e as de maior idade apresentaram maior probabilidade de terem realizado o exame de citologia. Para a mamografia, aquelas de maior idade e que utilizavam a saúde suplementar apresentaram maiores chances de terem realizado o exame de mamografia após a lesão medular. Conclusão mulheres com lesão medular buscam a realização de exames de rastreamento. Entretanto, encontram dificuldades relacionadas à estrutura física, aos equipamentos, transporte, profissionais da saúde, assim como dificuldades sociodemográficas e quanto ao serviço de saúde utilizado.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chan DNS, Law BMH, Au DWH, So WKW, Fan N. A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators influencing the cancer screening behaviour among people with intellectual disabilities. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 76:102084. [PMID: 34920342 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.102084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) may require assistance in accessing healthcare services, including cancer screening. A better understanding of the factors affecting cancer screening utilisation among these individuals is needed for the development of strategies to promote screening uptake in them. This review aimed to explore the facilitators of and barriers to cancer screening utilisation among people with ID. A literature search was conducted using five databases, and an additional snowball search yielded 16 studies for inclusion in the review. Overall, the methodological quality of these studies was good (43-100%). In this review, we noted barriers to screening among individuals with ID, including perceptions of fear, distress, and embarrassment; unpreparedness for screening; negative interactions with healthcare professionals; a lack of knowledge about cancer screening; mobility issues; a high severity of ID; and a lack of ability to provide consent and communicate verbally. Facilitators to screening among these individuals were also identified, including living in a supervised setting, prior use of other healthcare services, being educated about screening via social media, having carers accompany them to screening appointments, and having dual insurance coverage or a higher income. Our review highlights the current needs of individuals with ID undergoing cancer screening. Strategies should be developed to address these needs, such as the provision of training to healthcare professionals on how to conduct screening for people with ID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothy N S Chan
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Bernard M H Law
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Doreen W H Au
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Winnie K W So
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Ning Fan
- Yan Chai Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ní Shé É, McDonald FEJ, Mimmo L, Ross XS, Newman B, Patterson P, Harrison R. What Are the Psycho-Social and Information Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults Cancer Care Consumers with Intellectual Disability? A Systematic Review of Evidence with Recommendations for Future Research and Practice. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:1118. [PMID: 34943314 PMCID: PMC8699987 DOI: 10.3390/children8121118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
People with intellectual disability have unmet health needs and experience health inequalities. There is limited literature regarding cancer care for children, adolescents, and young adults (AYA) with intellectual disability despite rising cancer incidence rates in this population. This systematic review aimed to identify the psycho-social and information support needs of AYA cancer care consumers with intellectual disability to generate recommendations for future research and cancer care service delivery enhancement. We searched eight databases yielding 798 articles. Following abstract and full-text review, we identified 12 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Our three themes related to communication and accessible information; supports and system navigation, cancer service provider training, and reasonable adjustments. There was a lack of user-friendly, accessible information about cancer and screening programs available. Both paid and family carers are critical in accessing cancer supports, services, and screening programs for AYA with intellectual disability. Ongoing training should be provided to healthcare professionals regarding the importance of care screening for AYAs with intellectual disability. This review recommends that AYA with intellectual disability and their family carers be involved in developing tailored cancer services. This should focus on enabling inclusive screening programs, accessible consent, and challenging the enduring paternalism of support services via training and appropriate communication tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éidín Ní Shé
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2190, Australia; (B.N.); (R.H.)
| | - Fiona E. J. McDonald
- Canteen Australia, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia; (F.E.J.M.); (X.S.R.); (P.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Laurel Mimmo
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
- Clinical Governance Unit, The Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | | | - Bronwyn Newman
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2190, Australia; (B.N.); (R.H.)
| | - Pandora Patterson
- Canteen Australia, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia; (F.E.J.M.); (X.S.R.); (P.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Reema Harrison
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2190, Australia; (B.N.); (R.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Matin BK, Ballan M, Darabi F, Karyani AK, Soofi M, Soltani S. Sexual health concerns in women with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review in qualitative studies. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1965. [PMID: 34717594 PMCID: PMC8556840 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12027-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies indicate that women with intellectual disabilities (ID) face various personal and socio-environmental barriers in their sexual lives. This study aimed to identify the concerns and sexual health needs experienced by women with ID. METHOD A systematic review of relevant qualitative articles was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science Scopus and PsycINFO databases from June 2018 to August 2018. We designed our search strategy according to two main foci: (1) sexuality; and (2) women with ID. In the study, searches were limited to articles published from January 2000 to December 2017. In this review, studies on women ages 16 and over were included. RESULTS Within the four databases, the search found 274 unique articles. After three steps of screening (title, abstract and full text), 22 studies were included in the final review. The articles mentioned difficulties with lack of sexual experience, negative experiences with sexuality, negative attitudes towards sexuality by nondisabled individuals, limited cognitive capacities to understand sexual identity, difficulty with finding the right partner, lack of access to sexual health information, lack of school-based sexuality education, violence and sexual abuse, lack of support from families and caregivers about sexuality, fear of sexual acts and unwanted pregnancy, shyness in expressing sexual desires, and limited knowledge of sexual behaviors. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that women with ID need to be provided with school-based sexuality education tailored to the level of understanding needed to attain the requisite knowledge to form relationships, understand sexual and romantic relationships, and practice safe sex when they choose this option. Families along with education and healthcare systems should provide opportunities for women with ID to talk about their sexual needs and make their own choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behzad Karami Matin
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Michelle Ballan
- School of Social Welfare, Stony Brook University, New York, USA
| | - Fatemeh Darabi
- Department of Public Health, Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
| | - Ali Kazemi Karyani
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Moslem Soofi
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Shahin Soltani
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stirling M, Anderson A, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Hallet J, Shooshtari S, Kelly C, Dawe DE, Kristjanson M, Decker K, Mahar AL. A scoping review documenting cancer outcomes and inequities for adults living with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 54:102011. [PMID: 34517198 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Emerging evidence suggests adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) may be at risk of inequities in cancer experiences and outcomes. Individuals with IDD may experience multiple barriers that could worsen outcomes and experience. These barriers may be connected to features of IDD or the healthcare system overall. Future research and program planning to support adults with IDD and cancer must be informed by evidence that acknowledges potential disparities, underlying determinants, and knowledge deficits. OBJECTIVE We conducted a scoping review to systematically map the evidence describing and comparing cancer-related outcomes along the cancer continuum from risk to mortality for adults with IDD. We identified specific factors observed to influence those outcomes. METHODS We followed the expanded Arksey & O'Malley framework for conducting the scoping review. We searched for literature in PubMed and Embase databases. We abstracted cancer-related data, IDD-related data, and data related to physical and social determinants of health. RESULTS Of the 2796 studies retrieved, 38 were included for review. Most studies focused on screening outcomes and experiences. Studies reported that adults with IDD experienced inequities at various points along the cancer continuum. Numerous social and physical determinants of health influenced the experiences and outcomes of adults with IDD. CONCLUSION This scoping review identified significant gaps in the literature. Of note was the focus on cancer screening and lack of attention to larger systems of oppression that may influence poor cancer experiences and outcomes for adults with IDD. There is strong need to improve both quality and quantity of research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Stirling
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Alexandrea Anderson
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shahin Shooshtari
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Christine Kelly
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - David E Dawe
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Mark Kristjanson
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Kathleen Decker
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Alyson L Mahar
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Amir N, Mitra M, Leung K, Moore Simas TA. Complications following hysterectomy in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Disabil Health J 2021; 15:101213. [PMID: 34531173 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exist on complications following hysterectomy among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). OBJECTIVE The objective was to assess the frequencies of postoperative complications in women with IDD following hysterectomy. METHODS The National Inpatient Sample from 2014 to 2017 was queried using codes from the International Classification of Disease 9th and 10th revisions to identify women over 15 years of age with a diagnosis of an IDD undergoing hysterectomy. Comparisons were made to women without IDD undergoing the same procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine between group differences in the frequency of clinical post-surgical complications while adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS Of eligible women undergoing hysterectomy, 1,370 were identified as having IDD and 624,700 did not. Compared to controls, women with IDD were significantly younger (45 vs. 50 years, p < 0.001). Women with IDD were also more likely to have had governmental health insurance (83% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), an open hysterectomy approach (78% vs. 69%, p = 0.002), and longer hospital stays (4 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, women with IDD had greater odds of postoperative urinary complications (OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.18-11.83) and complications related to decubitus ulcer formation (OR 8.97, 95% CI 2.10-38.36). CONCLUSIONS Women with IDD have increased odds having urinary and decubitus ulcer complications following hysterectomy, compared to women without IDD. These results inform surgical decision-making and anticipatory guidance for these women and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nili Amir
- UConn Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 263 Farmington Avenue Farmington, CT 06030, USA; University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Monika Mitra
- The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management Brandeis University, 415 South Street Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Leung
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Tiffany A Moore Simas
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA; UMass Memorial Health Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Memorial Campus, 119 Belmont Street, Jaquith Building Floor 2, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Walji LT, Murchie P, Lip G, Speirs V, Iversen L. Exploring the influence of rural residence on uptake of organized cancer screening - A systematic review of international literature. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 74:101995. [PMID: 34416545 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Lower screening uptake could impact cancer survival in rural areas. This systematic review sought studies comparing rural/urban uptake of colorectal, cervical and breast cancer screening in high income countries. Relevant studies (n = 50) were identified systematically by searching Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL. Narrative synthesis found that screening uptake for all three cancers was generally lower in rural areas. In meta-analysis, colorectal cancer screening uptake (OR 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.50-0.87, I2 = 85 %) was significantly lower for rural dwellers than their urban counterparts. The meta-analysis found no relationship between uptake of breast cancer screening and rural versus urban residency (OR 0.93, 95 % CI = 0.80-1.09, I2 = 86 %). However, it is important to note the limitation of the significant statistical heterogeneity found which demonstrates the lack of consistency between the few studies eligible for inclusion in the meta-analyses. Cancer screening uptake is apparently lower for rural dwellers which may contribute to poorer survival. National screening programmes should consider geography in planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren T Walji
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Peter Murchie
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Gerald Lip
- North East Scotland Breast Screening Programme, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Valerie Speirs
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lisa Iversen
- Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Walsh S, O'Mahony M, Hegarty J, Farrell D, Taggart L, Kelly L, Sahm L, Corrigan M, Caples M, Martin AM, Tabirca S, Corrigan MA, Lehane E. Defining breast cancer awareness and identifying barriers to breast cancer awareness for women with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES : JOID 2021; 26:1744629521999548. [PMID: 33769130 DOI: 10.1177/1744629521999548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Incidence rates for developing breast cancer are similar for women regardless of intellectual ability. However, women with an intellectual disability present with advanced breast cancers, which often have a poor prognosis. METHOD A structured narrative review of the literature was performed to explore the concepts of breast awareness and breast cancer awareness and subsequently, identify barriers to breast cancer awareness encountered by women with an intellectual disability. RESULTS A total of 22 studies involving people with varying levels of intellectual disability informed this review. The barriers to breast cancer awareness encountered by women with an intellectual disability include: lack of their understanding, the role of the carer and literacy issues. CONCLUSION Identifying the barriers to breast cancer awareness for women with an intellectual disability will help to facilitate breast cancer awareness which has the potential to result in better long-term outcomes through an early diagnosis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Louise Kelly
- Cork Breast Research Centre-Cork University Hospital, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark A Corrigan
- Cork Breast Research Centre-Cork University Hospital, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Coronado GD, Nielson CM, Keast EM, Petrik AF, Suls JM. The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control 2021; 32:555-565. [PMID: 33687606 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01408-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients' chronic disease burden can influence the likelihood that providers will recommend cancer screening and that patients will participate in it. Using data from the STOP CRC pragmatic study, we examined associations between chronic disease burden and colorectal cancer screening recommendation and use. METHODS Participating STOP CRC clinics (n = 26) received either usual care or training to implement a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program. Selected clinic patients (n = 60,187 patients) were aged 50-74 and overdue for colorectal cancer screening. We used logistic regression to examine the associations between FIT recommendations and completion and patients' chronic disease burden, calculated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System. RESULTS For each index, FIT recommendation odds were 8-9% higher among individuals with minimal chronic disease burden and 13-23% lower among individuals with high chronic disease burden (inverted U-shaped association). Among adults who were ordered a FIT, FIT completion odds were 20% lower for individuals with any, versus no, chronic condition and diminished with increasing disease burden (inverse linear association). CONCLUSIONS Analysis showed an inverted U-shaped association between patients' chronic disease burden and providers' recommendation of a FIT and an inverse linear association between patients' chronic disease burden and FIT completion. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01742065.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Carrie M Nielson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Erin M Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Jerry M Suls
- Center for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, New York, NY, 10022, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fuzzell LN, Perkins RB, Christy SM, Lake PW, Vadaparampil ST. Cervical cancer screening in the United States: Challenges and potential solutions for underscreened groups. Prev Med 2021; 144:106400. [PMID: 33388330 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States are generally high, yet certain groups demonstrate disparities in screening and surveillance. Individuals at greatest risk for cervical cancer are often from marginalized or underserved groups who do not participate in regular screening for a variety of reasons. Using the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR) Trans-Organ Conceptual Model, including concepts of individual-, provider-, facility-, system-, or policy-level factors, we provide a commentary to highlight reasons for low screening participation among subgroups in the U.S. These include racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents, sexual and gender minorities, those with limited English proficiency, those with particular religious beliefs, and various health conditions. We describe barriers and offer potential solutions for each group. In addition, we discuss cross-cutting barriers to screening including difficulty interacting with the healthcare system (limited knowledge and health literacy, lack of provider recommendation/contact), financial (cost, lack of insurance), and logistical barriers (e.g., lack of usual source of care, competing demands, scheduling issues). Solutions to address these barriers are needed to improve screening rates across all underscreened groups. Changes at state and national policy levels are needed to address health insurance coverage. Mobile screening, ensuring that interpreters are available for all visits, and targeted in reach at non-gynecological visits can further overcome barriers. Employing community outreach workers can increase community demand for screening, and patient navigators can improve adherence to both screening and follow-up diagnostic evaluation. HPV self-sampling can address multiple barriers to cervical cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay N Fuzzell
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Boston University School of Medicine, 85 E. Concord St., Boston, MA 02118, United States of America
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Paige W Lake
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America
| | - Susan T Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr. Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America; University of South Florida, College of Medicine, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL 33612, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Smith AJB, Applebaum J, Tanner EJ, Capone GT. Gynecologic Care in Women With Down Syndrome: Findings From a National Registry. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136:518-523. [PMID: 32769650 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate receipt of recommended gynecologic care, including cancer screening and menstrual care, among women with Down syndrome in the United States. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women participating in DS-Connect, the National Institute of Health's registry of women with Down syndrome. Using 2013-2019 survey data, we estimated the proportion of women receiving recommended age-appropriate well-woman care (Pap tests, mammogram, breast examination, pelvic examination) and compared receipt of gynecologic care to receipt of other preventive health care. We also estimated proportion receiving care for menstrual regulation. RESULTS Of 70 participants with Down syndrome, 23% (95% CI 13-33) of women received all recommended gynecologic components of a well-woman examination. Forty-four percent (95% CI 32-56) of women aged 18 years and older reported ever having a gynecologic examination, and 26% (95% CI 15-37) reported ever having a Pap test. Of women aged 40 years or older, 50% (95% CI 22-78) had had a mammogram. Fifty-two percent (95% CI 41-65) had tried medication for menstrual regulation, and 89% (95% CI 81-96) received all recommended components of nongynecologic routine health care. CONCLUSION Women with Down syndrome received gynecologic care, including cancer screening, at lower-than-recommended rates and at substantially lower rates than other forms of health care. Efforts to improve gynecologic care in this vulnerable population are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna J B Smith
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; and the Down Syndrome Clinic and Research Center, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cuypers M, Tobi H, Huijsmans CAA, van Gerwen L, Ten Hove M, van Weel C, Kiemeney LALM, Naaldenberg J, Leusink GL. Disparities in cancer-related healthcare among people with intellectual disabilities: A population-based cohort study with health insurance claims data. Cancer Med 2020; 9:6888-6895. [PMID: 32710528 PMCID: PMC7520346 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Concerns have been raised about the accessibility and quality of cancer‐related care for people with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, there is limited insight into cancer incidence and the utilization of cancer care at the ID population level to inform targeted cancer control strategies. Therefore, we aimed to examine differences in the utilization of cancer‐related care between people with and without ID, identified through diagnostic codes on health insurance claims. Methods In a population‐based cohort study, Dutch individuals of all ages who received residential care through the Chronic Care Act due to an ID (n = 65 183) and an age and sex‐matched sample of persons without ID (1:2 ratio), who were cancer‐free at enrollment in 2013 were followed through 2015. Incidence rates (IRs) of newly started cancer care and IR ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs were used to compare groups. Separate analyses were performed per cancer type. Results Individuals with ID received less cancer‐related care than individuals without (IRR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.62‐0.66). Differences increased with age and were larger for females than for males. Utilization of care for cancers within the national screening program (female breast, cervical, and colon cancer) was lower for people with ID compared to people without ID. Conclusion Cancer may be underdiagnosed and/or undertreated in people with ID, or cancer is truly less prevalent in this population. In particular, the differences detected between males and females with ID, and the potential underutilization of national screening programs, require urgent follow‐up investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Cuypers
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Tobi
- Biometris, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Chris van Weel
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Honorary Professor of Primary Health Care Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Lambertus A L M Kiemeney
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jenneken Naaldenberg
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geraline L Leusink
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zha N, Alabousi M, Patel BK, Patlas MN. Beyond Universal Health Care: Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening Participation in Canada. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 16:570-579. [PMID: 30947889 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite well-established preventive screening guidelines for breast cancer, screening rates do not meet targets in both the United States and Canada. Although access to preventive care is an important factor toward participation, breast cancer screening rates in Canada vary despite a universal health care system. The objective of this study is to understand features within the Canadian population that potentiate screening disparities through a systematic review of the literature. METHODS A search of MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify relevant studies published from 2005 onward. Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text screening. Inclusion criteria were defined as studies reporting on disparities in image-based screening for breast cancer. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-four studies were retrieved, from which 29 studies were selected on the basis of the predetermined inclusion criteria. Population groups identified at risk for low image-based screening participation included those of low socioeconomic status, individuals with comorbidities, new immigrants and refugees, those in remote geographic locations, individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, and ethnocultural minorities. Barriers to image-based screening can be improved by targeting measures specific to these at-risk groups at the individual, organization, and policy levels. CONCLUSIONS Multiple at-risk population groups exist for preventive cancer screening within a universal health care system. By understanding specific characteristics within these vulnerable populations, effective intervention strategies can be established to improve breast cancer preventive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanxi Zha
- Division of Emergency/Trauma Radiology, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Mostafa Alabousi
- Division of Emergency/Trauma Radiology, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michael N Patlas
- Division of Emergency/Trauma Radiology, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bulova P. Capsule Commentary on Alagoz et al., Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening for Women with Down Syndrome. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:2581. [PMID: 31456162 PMCID: PMC6848282 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05295-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bulova
- General Internal Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Balogh R, Leonard H, Bourke J, Brameld K, Downs J, Hansen M, Glasson E, Lin E, Lloyd M, Lunsky Y, O'Donnell M, Shooshtari S, Wong K, Krahn G. Data Linkage: Canadian and Australian Perspectives on a Valuable Methodology for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2019; 57:439-462. [PMID: 31568733 DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-57.5.439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Data linkage holds great promise for generating new information about people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) as a population, yet few centers have developed the infrastructure to utilize this methodology. Two examples, from Canada and Australia, describe their efforts in building data linkage capabilities, and how linked databases can be used to identify persons with IDD and used for population-based research. The value of data linkage is illustrated through new estimates of prevalence of IDD; health service utilization patterns; associations with sociodemographic characteristics, and with physical and mental health conditions (e.g., chronic diseases, injury, fertility, and depression); and findings on equity in medical treatments. Examples are provided of findings used for governmental policy and program planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Balogh
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Helen Leonard
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Jenny Bourke
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Kate Brameld
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Jenny Downs
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Michele Hansen
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Emma Glasson
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Elizabeth Lin
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Meghann Lloyd
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Yona Lunsky
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Melissa O'Donnell
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Shahin Shooshtari
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Kingsley Wong
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| | - Gloria Krahn
- Robert Balogh, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Helen Leonard and Jenny Bourke, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Kate Brameld, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia; Jenny Downs, Michele Hansen, and Emma Glasson, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Elizabeth Lin, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Meghann Lloyd, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada; Yona Lunsky, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Melissa O'Donnell, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; Shahin Shooshtari, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Kingsley Wong, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth; and Gloria Krahn, Oregon State University, Corvallis
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
O'Neill J, Newall F, Antolovich G, Lima S, Danchin MH. Adolescent immunisation in young people with disabilities in Australia. Med J Aust 2019; 211:199-200.e1. [PMID: 31342525 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny O'Neill
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.,Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | - Giuliana Antolovich
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Sally Lima
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC.,Bendigo Health, Bendigo, VIC
| | - Margie H Danchin
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bates C, Triantafyllopoulou P. Exploring the impact of mental capacity on breast screening for women with intellectual disabilities. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2019; 27:880-888. [PMID: 30565767 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the impact of mental capacity in relation to breast screening for women with intellectual disabilities in the UK. Participation in breast screening is considerably lower for women with intellectual disabilities compared to the general population. Barriers to screening include poor mobility and behavioural difficulties. There is currently no research which primarily explores the relationship between mental capacity and breast screening for this group of individuals. This paper presents the results of a cross-sectional survey of 131 women with intellectual disabilities supported by eight Social Care Providers within England and Wales. The data were collected between January 2017 and July 2017. The current research explores the decision-making process surrounding breast screening, considering the impact of associated risk factors during this process. Participants completed a specifically created survey addressing the aforementioned issues. The results indicated that women who lacked capacity, were less likely to engage in breast screening. It was also demonstrated that the process outlined in the Mental Capacity Act (MCA; 2005) was not always followed; women were not routinely assessed if there were doubts regarding their decision-making ability around breast screening and best interest meetings (BIM) were not always held if the person lacked capacity. In order to be able to generalise the current findings, further research is needed to gain a broader understanding of how professionals make decisions around breast screening for women with intellectual disabilities in case the individuals are unable to decide this independently.
Collapse
|
35
|
Plourde N, Brown HK, Vigod S, Cobigo V. The Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Preventive Cancer Screening in Women With Intellectual Disability. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2018; 123:499-513. [PMID: 30421970 DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-123.6.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Women with intellectual disability have low screening rates for breast and cervical cancer. This population-based cohort study examined the association between the level of primary care continuity and breast and cervical cancer screening rates in women with intellectual disability. Data were obtained from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. Neither high (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.88-1.29) nor moderate (aOR = 1.11; 95% CI: 0.91-1.36) continuity of care were associated with mammography screening. Women were less likely to receive a Pap test with high (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64-0.77) and moderate (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89) versus low continuity of care. Improving continuity of care may not be sufficient for increasing preventive screening rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Plourde
- Natasha Plourde, University of Ottawa, Canada; Hilary K. Brown, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Simone Vigod, Women's College Hospital, Canada; and Virginie Cobigo, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hilary K Brown
- Natasha Plourde, University of Ottawa, Canada; Hilary K. Brown, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Simone Vigod, Women's College Hospital, Canada; and Virginie Cobigo, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Simone Vigod
- Natasha Plourde, University of Ottawa, Canada; Hilary K. Brown, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Simone Vigod, Women's College Hospital, Canada; and Virginie Cobigo, University of Ottawa, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- Natasha Plourde, University of Ottawa, Canada; Hilary K. Brown, University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada; Simone Vigod, Women's College Hospital, Canada; and Virginie Cobigo, University of Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
GOALS We aimed to assess use of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) as per United States Preventive Task Force guidelines among people with mobility disability using a nationally representative data set. BACKGROUND Individuals with mobility disability have decreased access to health care services, but the impact of mobility disability on CRCS has not been investigated. STUDY Data from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey were used to estimate sociodemographic characteristics of adults with mobility disability, prevalence of CRCS, and odds of CRCS given mobility disability among Americans aged 50 to 75. RESULTS In total, 56.8% of the entire sample (n=81,953,585) were up-to-date with CRCS. Mobility disability was not associated with CRCS status on univariable analysis but was significantly associated after adjustment for covariates including age and comorbidities, with an inverse relationship between the degree of mobility disability and odds of CRCS. Odds ratio for CRCS given progressively severe disability were 0.78 (0.66 to 0.93), 0.71 (0.53 to 0.94), 0.65 (0.31 to 1.19). CONCLUSIONS The present study indicates reduced CRCS among people with mobility disability and highlights the need for CRCS to be especially targeted toward this group. Future research should identify the specific systemic, social, and/or physical barriers to CRCS for this subgroup so that they can be addressed.
Collapse
|
37
|
Ouellette-Kuntz H, Smith G, Fulford C, Cobigo V. Are we making a difference in primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities? Rev Panam Salud Publica 2018; 42:e154. [PMID: 31093182 PMCID: PMC6385804 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2018.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the impact of the dissemination of guidelines to physicians and of a population-level health communication intervention on the percentage of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) receiving preventive care through primary care. METHODS Noninstitutionalized adults with IDD in the province of Ontario, Canada, aged 40 to 64 years were matched to Ontarians without such disabilities each fiscal year (FY) from 2003 to 2016. Health administrative data were used to create a composite measure of receipt of recommended preventive primary care. Age-adjusted rates were used to assess trends, and average two-year rate ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS The number of adults with IDD identified ranged from 20 030 in FY 2003 to 28 080 in FY 2016. The percentage of adults with IDD receiving recommended preventive primary care ranged from 43.4% in 2003 to 55.7% in 2015. Men with IDD had a 53.7% increase across the 13 years, while women with IDD only had a 30.9% increase. When evaluating the impact of the interventions, men with IDD were 4% more likely (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) to receive recommended primary care in FY 2015 and FY 2016 as compared to FY 2009 and FY 2010; in contrast, women with IDD were 5% less likely (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). A comparable drop was observed among women without IDD. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 45% of adults with IDD in Ontario still do not receive recommended preventive care through primary care. Long-term impacts of the interventions introduced in the province may still occur over time, so ongoing monitoring is warranted. Special attention should be given to the preventive care needs of women with IDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Glenys Smith
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Casey Fulford
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Review of gynecologic and reproductive care for women with developmental disabilities. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2018; 28:350-8. [PMID: 27379438 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Care for women with developmental disabilities requires special consideration for unique needs related to their cognitive and physical abilities. These women and their caregivers require more support and guidance during reproductive health care. We review the literature and provide expert opinion surrounding gynecological issues for women with developmental disabilities to support healthcare providers better understand and care for this population. RECENT FINDINGS Women with developmental disabilities are more vulnerable to abuse and experience poorer gynecological healthcare outcomes. Many women with developmental disabilities are fertile and participate in sexual activity without adequate knowledge. They are at higher risk of pregnancy and birth complications. They are less likely to receive appropriate preventive screening. SUMMARY The review highlights important issues and practice suggestions related to the reproductive health care of women with developmental disabilities. Topics include clinic visits, menstruation, sexuality, sexual abuse, sexual health education, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, labor and delivery, and cancer screening/prevention. We emphasize the need for an individualized, comprehensive approach for these patients and review perceived and actual barriers to care. More education is needed on the aforementioned topics for women with developmental disabilities, their caregivers, and their providers.
Collapse
|
39
|
Parish SL, Son E, Powell RM, Igdalsky L. Reproductive Cancer Treatment Hospitalizations of U.S. Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2018; 56:1-12. [PMID: 29389260 DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
There is a dearth of existing research on the treatment of reproductive cancers among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This study analyzed the 2010 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample and compared the prevalence of reproductive cancer treatment hospitalization discharges among women with and without IDD. Discharges linked to women with IDD had higher incidences of cancer of the uterus and lower prevalence of cancer of the cervix. Moreover, discharges linked to women with IDD indicated these women were younger, had longer hospital stays, and were more likely to have public insurance coverage. Therefore, further research and targeted interventions to increase cancer prevention and screening are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L Parish
- Susan L. Parish, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University; Esther Son, Department of Social Work, College of Staten Island, City University of New York; Robyn M. Powell, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University; and Leah Igdalsky, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University
| | - Esther Son
- Susan L. Parish, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University; Esther Son, Department of Social Work, College of Staten Island, City University of New York; Robyn M. Powell, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University; and Leah Igdalsky, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University
| | - Robyn M Powell
- Susan L. Parish, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University; Esther Son, Department of Social Work, College of Staten Island, City University of New York; Robyn M. Powell, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University; and Leah Igdalsky, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University
| | - Leah Igdalsky
- Susan L. Parish, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University; Esther Son, Department of Social Work, College of Staten Island, City University of New York; Robyn M. Powell, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University; and Leah Igdalsky, Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dressler PB, Nguyen TK, Moody EJ, Friedman SL, Pickler L. Use of Transition Resources by Primary Care Providers for Youth With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2018; 56:56-68. [PMID: 29389256 DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-56.1.56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) often experience difficulties with successful transition from pediatric to adult healthcare. A consultative Transition Clinic for youth with IDD was piloted as a quality improvement project, and assessed the engagement of primary care providers (PCPs) for transition planning after patients were seen in clinic. Although many PCPs found the clinic and resources useful, individual and systemic barriers often prohibited them from participating in transition planning for this patient population. These findings highlight systemic barriers that need to be addressed to ensure successful transition, as well as the need for a specialized Transition Clinic with involvement of specialists with expertise in IDD, such as Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, to assist throughout transition process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Dressler
- Paul B. Dressler, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Teresa K. Nguyen, University of Colorado School of Public Health; Eric J. Moody, Sandra L. Friedman, and Laura Pickler, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Teresa K Nguyen
- Paul B. Dressler, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Teresa K. Nguyen, University of Colorado School of Public Health; Eric J. Moody, Sandra L. Friedman, and Laura Pickler, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Eric J Moody
- Paul B. Dressler, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Teresa K. Nguyen, University of Colorado School of Public Health; Eric J. Moody, Sandra L. Friedman, and Laura Pickler, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Sandra L Friedman
- Paul B. Dressler, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Teresa K. Nguyen, University of Colorado School of Public Health; Eric J. Moody, Sandra L. Friedman, and Laura Pickler, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | - Laura Pickler
- Paul B. Dressler, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Teresa K. Nguyen, University of Colorado School of Public Health; Eric J. Moody, Sandra L. Friedman, and Laura Pickler, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ng N, Flygare Wallén E, Ahlström G. Mortality patterns and risk among older men and women with intellectual disability: a Swedish national retrospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:269. [PMID: 29166873 PMCID: PMC5700486 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0665-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sweden has closed all institutions and imposed legislation to ensure service and support for individuals with intellectual disability (ID). Understanding mortality among older individuals with ID is essential to inform development of health promotion and disease control strategies. We investigated patterns and risk of mortality among older adults with ID in Sweden. Methods This retrospective cohort study compared older adults aged 55 years and older with ID with a control population. Participants were followed during 2002–2015 or death, and censored if they moved out of Sweden. Individuals with ID were identified from two national registers: one covering all specialist health-care visits (out-patient visits and hospitalisation) and the other covering people accessing social/support services. Individuals with ID (n = 15,289) were matched with a control population by sex, birth year, and year of first hospitalisation/out-patient visit/access to LSS services. Cause-of-death data were recorded using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision. Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to assess if overall and cause-specific mortality rate among individuals with ID was higher than in the Swedish population. Results The overall mortality rate among individuals with ID was 2483 per 100,000 people compared with 810 in the control population. Among those who died, more individuals with ID were younger than 75 years and unmarried. Leading causes of death among individuals with ID were circulatory diseases (34%), respiratory diseases (17%) and neoplasms (15%). Leading causes of death in a sub-sample with Down syndrome (DS) were respiratory diseases (37%), circulatory diseases (26%) and mental/behavioural disorders (11%). Epilepsy and pneumonitis were more common among individuals with ID than controls. Alzheimer’s disease was common in the control population and individuals with DS, but not among those with ID when DS was excluded. Individuals with ID had a higher overall mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0–4.3) and respiratory disease death risk (HR 12.5, 95% CI 10.9–14.2) than controls. Conclusion Older adults with ID in Sweden carry a higher mortality risk compared with the general population, mainly attributable to respiratory, nervous and circulatory diseases. Care for this group, particularly during the terminal stage of illness, needs to be tailored based on understanding of their main health problem. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-017-0665-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nawi Ng
- Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.,Centre for Demographic and Ageing Research, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Eva Flygare Wallén
- Karolinska Institutet (KI), Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Alfred Nobels allé 23, D2, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Gerd Ahlström
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tint A, Weiss JA. A qualitative study of the service experiences of women with autism spectrum disorder. AUTISM : THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2017; 22:928-937. [DOI: 10.1177/1362361317702561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
It is recognized that the experiences of women with autism spectrum disorder are often underrepresented in the literature. In this study, 20 women with autism spectrum disorder participated in five focus groups with discussions centered on their service use, unmet service needs, and barriers to care. Overall, women emphasized high unmet service needs, particularly with respect to mental health concerns, residential supports, and vocational and employment services. Participants also perceived many service providers as disregarding or misunderstanding women’s service needs. Findings of the current exploratory study are discussed in relation to areas of future research required to ensure effective care for this understudied population.
Collapse
|
43
|
Cooper SA, Hughes-McCormack L, Greenlaw N, McConnachie A, Allan L, Baltzer M, McArthur L, Henderson A, Melville C, McSkimming P, Morrison J. Management and prevalence of long-term conditions in primary health care for adults with intellectual disabilities compared with the general population: A population-based cohort study. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2017; 31 Suppl 1:68-81. [PMID: 28730746 DOI: 10.1111/jar.12386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, general practitioners/family physicians receive pay for performance on management of long-term conditions, according to best-practice indicators. METHOD Management of long-term conditions was compared between 721 adults with intellectual disabilities and the general population (n = 764,672). Prevalence of long-term conditions was determined, and associated factors were investigated via logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Adults with intellectual disabilities received significantly poorer management of all long-term conditions on 38/57 (66.7%) indicators. Achievement was high (75.1%-100%) for only 19.6% of adults with intellectual disabilities, compared with 76.8% of the general population. Adults with intellectual disabilities had higher rates of epilepsy, psychosis, hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes and heart failure. There were no clear associations with neighbourhood deprivation. CONCLUSIONS Adults with intellectual disabilities receive poorer care, despite conditions being more prevalent. The imperative now is to find practical, implementable means of supporting the challenges that general practices face in delivering equitable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally-Ann Cooper
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Laura Hughes-McCormack
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Greenlaw
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Linda Allan
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Marion Baltzer
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Laura McArthur
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Angela Henderson
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Craig Melville
- Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paula McSkimming
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jill Morrison
- General Practice and Primary Care research group, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Roll AE. Health promotion for people with intellectual disabilities - A concept analysis. Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 32:422-429. [DOI: 10.1111/scs.12448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E. Roll
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing; Madison WI USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Trétarre B, Bourgarel S, Stoebner-Delbarre A, Jacot W, Bessaoud F, Satge D. Breast cancer and screening in persons with an intellectual disability living in institutions in France. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2017; 61:266-278. [PMID: 27624823 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to describe, among a population of women with intellectual disabilities (ID) living in institutions in France, the characteristics in whom breast cancer (BC) was diagnosed and of those who participated in BC screening. METHODS Study was performed in 2009 among a random, representative sample of women with ID living in institutions in France. Participants answered a questionnaire either directly by themselves, or with the help of an intermediary. RESULTS In total, 978 women with ID aged over 18 years were included, and 14 were diagnosed with BC. The incidence observed in this sample of women with ID is similar to that of the general population (standardised incidence ratio, SIR 0.857, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42-1.53). Average age at diagnosis was 47.8 years, and the risk of developing BC before the age of 50 was 2.03% (0.4-3.66). This risk was not significantly different from that of the general population (2.4%, 1.0-3.78). Obesity was almost twice as frequent in women who had BC as compared to those without BC (43% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.0196). Among the 310 women aged >50 years and eligible for the national BC screening programme, 238 (77%) had already had at least one mammogram, and 199 had had it within the previous 2 years. Adherence to the screening programme was 64.2% (199/310) in the participating institutions. This rate was slightly higher than the national average of 62% for the same period. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study show that BC is equally as frequent among women with ID living in institutions as in the general population, and occurs at around the same age. Obesity was significantly more frequent among women in whom BC was diagnosed in our study. Participation in BC screening is slightly higher among women with ID living in institutions than among the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Trétarre
- Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 298 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - S Bourgarel
- Centre régional d'études, d'actions et d'information sur le handicap (CREAI) PACA et Corse, Marseille, France
| | - A Stoebner-Delbarre
- Institut regional du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Supportive Care, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | - W Jacot
- Institut regional du Cancer de Montpellier, Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier, Languedoc-Roussillon, France
| | - F Bessaoud
- Registre des tumeurs de l'Hérault, 298 rue des Apothicaires, Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - D Satge
- Oncodefi, Montpellier, France, and Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique de Montpellier (IURC), Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Lung Cancer in People with Intellectual Disabilities: Current State of Knowledge. LUNG CANCER INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6787648. [PMID: 27752368 PMCID: PMC5056278 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6787648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 06/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
As the life expectancy of people with intellectual disability (ID) has progressed, they have become similarly at risk of cancer as individuals of the general population. Epidemiological studies indicate a reduced incidence and mortality from lung cancer in the total population of persons with ID. However, the pattern is heterogeneous and the risk is strongly correlated with the impairment level; persons with mild intellectual impairment have higher cancer risk, and this subgroup also has the highest tobacco consumption (the major risk factor for lung cancer) compared to individuals with more severe impairment. Clinical presentation of lung cancer in persons with ID is often atypical, with symptoms frequently hidden by the mental state and communication impairments. Treatment can be impeded by incomplete understanding and lack of cooperation on the part of the patient; nevertheless, general principles for treating lung cancer must be applied to persons with ID. Early diagnosis and implementation of an adapted treatment plan may result in lung cancer outcomes similar to those of individuals in the general population. Physicians facing the difficult task of treating lung cancer in persons with ID are called to carry out their mission of care in a responsible, free, and creative way.
Collapse
|
47
|
Tuffrey-Wijne I, Wicki M, Heslop P, McCarron M, Todd S, Oliver D, de Veer A, Ahlström G, Schäper S, Hynes G, O'Farrell J, Adler J, Riese F, Curfs L. Developing research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe: a consultation process using nominal group technique. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:36. [PMID: 27009550 PMCID: PMC4806426 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0108-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Empirical knowledge around palliative care provision and needs of people with intellectual disabilities is extremely limited, as is the availability of research resources, including expertise and funding. This paper describes a consultation process that sought to develop an agenda for research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe. Methods A two-day workshop was convened, attended by 16 academics and clinicians in the field of palliative care and intellectual disability from six European countries. The first day consisted of round-table presentations and discussions about the current state of the art, research challenges and knowledge gaps. The second day was focused on developing consensus research priorities with 12 of the workshop participants using nominal group technique, a structured method which involved generating a list of research priorities and ranking them in order of importance. Results A total of 40 research priorities were proposed and collapsed into eleven research themes. The four most important research themes were: investigating issues around end of life decision making; mapping the scale and scope of the issue; investigating the quality of palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities, including the challenges in achieving best practice; and developing outcome measures and instruments for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities. Conclusions The proposal of four major priority areas and a range of minor themes for future research in intellectual disability, death, dying and palliative care will help researchers to focus limited resources and research expertise on areas where it is most needed and support the building of collaborations. The next steps are to cross-validate these research priorities with people with intellectual disabilities, carers, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders across Europe; to validate them with local and national policy makers to determine how they could best be incorporated in policy and programmes; and to translate them into actual research studies by setting up European collaborations for specific studies that require such collaboration, develop research proposals and attract research funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Tuffrey-Wijne
- Kingston University & St George's University of London, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
| | - M Wicki
- Internationale Hochschule für Heilpädagogik Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - P Heslop
- Norah Fry Research Centre, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - M McCarron
- Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S Todd
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Cardiff, Newport, UK
| | - D Oliver
- Tizard Centre, University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - A de Veer
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - S Schäper
- Department Muenster, Catholic University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany
| | - G Hynes
- Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J O'Farrell
- Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Adler
- University of Applied Sciences of Special Needs Education, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - F Riese
- Division of Psychiatry Research and Psychogeriatric Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - L Curfs
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Governor Kremers Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Brown HK, Plourde N, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Vigod S, Cobigo V. Brief report: cervical cancer screening in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities who have had a pregnancy. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH : JIDR 2016; 60:22-27. [PMID: 26359630 DOI: 10.1111/jir.12225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have lower cervical cancer screening rates than women without IDD. Key barriers to screening uptake include physician or caregiver assumptions that screening is unnecessary because women with IDD are not sexually active. Our objective was to compare cervical cancer screening rates in women with and without IDD who had had a pregnancy. METHOD We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked Ontario (Canada) health and social services administrative data. We identified 20- to 64-year-old women with (N = 5033) and without (N = 527 437) IDD who had had a pregnancy. We examined the occurrence of cervical cancer screening between April 1, 2007 and March 31, 2010. We compared screening rates in women with and without IDD using logistic regression, controlling for age, region of residence, neighbourhood income quintile and morbidity level. RESULTS Women with IDD who had had a pregnancy were more likely than those without IDD to be young, to live in the lowest neighbourhood income quintile, to live in rural areas and to have high or very high morbidity. Even after controlling for these factors, women with IDD were less likely than women without IDD to be screened (67.7% vs. 77.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.65). CONCLUSIONS Even among women who have had a pregnancy and are therefore known to have been sexually active, women with IDD face significant disparities in cervical cancer screening. Strategies to promote equitable uptake of cervical cancer screening for women with IDD need to be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H K Brown
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - N Plourde
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Ouellette-Kuntz
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Vigod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - V Cobigo
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Feldman MA, Owen F, Andrews AE, Tahir M, Barber R, Griffiths D. Randomized Control Trial of the 3Rs Health Knowledge Training Program for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2015; 29:278-88. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Maurice A. Feldman
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Frances Owen
- Department of Child and Youth Studies; Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Amy E. Andrews
- 3Rs Community-University Research Alliance; Community LivingWelland-Pelham; Welland ON Canada
| | - Munazza Tahir
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Rachel Barber
- Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| | - Dorothy Griffiths
- Department of Child and Youth Studies; Centre for Applied Disability Studies; Brock University; St. Catharines ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ouellette-Kuntz H, Coo H, Cobigo V, Wilton AS. Uptake of colorectal cancer screening among Ontarians with intellectual and developmental disabilities. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0118023. [PMID: 25689849 PMCID: PMC4331499 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 12/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Under-screening for cancer may contribute to a greater disease burden in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) as their life expectancy increases. In 2008, the province of Ontario launched Canada’s first population-based colorectal cancer screening program. Our objectives were to compare the proportions of Ontarians with and without IDD who have undergone colorectal cancer screening and to examine factors associated with screening uptake among Ontarians with IDD. Records for Ontario residents 50–64 years of age were linked across various administrative health and social services datasets to identify individuals with IDD and to select a random sample of the age-equivalent Ontario population without IDD as a comparison group. Logistic regression models were fit to examine the odds of screening uptake among individuals with IDD while controlling for age, sex, urban or rural residence, neighbourhood income quintile, expected use of health care resources, and being enrolled with or seeing a physician in a patient enrolment model (any of several primary care practice models designed to improve patient access and quality of care in Ontario), and to examine the association between these variables and colorectal cancer screening in the IDD population. The odds of having had a fecal occult blood test in the previous two years and being up-to-date with colorectal tests were 32% and 46% lower, respectively, for Ontarians with IDD compared to those without IDD. Being older, female, having a greater expected use of health care resources, and being enrolled with or seeing a physician in a primary care patient enrolment model were all significantly associated with higher odds of having been screened for colorectal cancer in the IDD population. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions aimed at making colorectal cancer screening more equitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Ongwanada Resource Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Helen Coo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Virginie Cobigo
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew S. Wilton
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|