Effects of intentional weight loss in patients with obesity and heart failure: a systematic review

Obesity and Weight Loss Strategies for Patients With Heart Failure

Obesity is a common comorbidity among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), with the strongest pathophysiologic link of obesity being seen for HFpEF. Lifestyle measures are the cornerstone of weight loss management, but sustainability is a challenge, and there are limited efficacy data in the heart failure (HF) population. Bariatric surgery has moderate efficacy and safety data for patients with preoperative HF or left ventricular dysfunction and has been associated with reductions in HF hospitalizations and medium-term mortality. Antiobesity medications historically carried concerns for cardiovascular adverse effects, but the safety and weight loss efficacy seen in general population trials of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide/GLP-1 agonists are highly encouraging. Although there are safety concerns regarding GLP-1 agonists in advanced HFrEF, trials of the GLP-1 agonist semaglutide for treatment of obesity have confirmed safety and efficacy in patients with HFpEF.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Mid-term clinical outcomes and cardiac function in patients receiving cardiac contractility modulation

OBJECTIVES

To describe the mid-term clinical and functional cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM) recipients in an urban population with heart failure.

BACKGROUND

CCM is a non-excitatory electrical therapy for patients with systolic heart failure with NYHA class III symptoms and ejection fraction (EF) 25-45%. How CCM affects a broad range of clinical measures, including diastolic dysfunction (DD) and weight change, is unexplored.

METHODS

We reviewed 31 consecutive patients at our center who underwent CCM implant. NYHA class, hospitalizations, ejection fraction (EF), diastolic function, and weight were compared pre- and post-CCM implant.

RESULTS

Mean age and follow-up time was 63 ± 10 years and 1.4 ± 0.8 years, respectively. Mean NYHA class improved by 0.97 functional classes (p < 0.001), and improvement occurred in 68% of patients. Mean annualized hospitalizations improved (0.8 ± 0.8 vs. 0.4 ± 1.0 hospitalizations/year, p = 0.048), and after exclusion of a single outlier, change in annualized days hospitalized also improved (total cohort 3.8 ± 4.7 vs. 3.7 ± 14.8 days/year; p = 0.96; after exclusion, 3.8 ± 4.7 vs. 1.1 ± 1.9 days/year, p < 0.001). Mean EF improved by 8% (p = 0.002), and among those with DD pre-CCM, mean DD improvement was 0.8 "grades" (p < 0.001). Mean weight change was 8.5 pounds lost, amounting to 4% of body weight (p = 0.002, p = 0.002, respectively), with 77% of patients having lost weight after CCM. Five patients (16%) experienced procedural complications; incidence skewed toward early implants.

CONCLUSION

In an observational cohort, CCM therapy resulted in improvement in NYHA class, hospitalizations, systolic and diastolic function, and weight.

Association of weight loss with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A consensus has not been reached on the association between weight loss and survival outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association of weight loss with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with HF.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched the articles indexed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to May 7, 2023. Post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials or observational studies that reported the utility of weight loss in predicting cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with HF were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies reporting on 12 articles involving 26,164 patients with HF were included. A comparison of weight loss with stable weight showed that the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 1.75 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.43-2.14). Subgroup analysis revealed that weight loss was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, irrespective of whether patients were overweight/obese (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.41-2.20) or not (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.14-3.14). The pooled adjusted HR of cardiovascular mortality was 1.64 (95% CI 1.18-2.28) for patients with weight loss compared to those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with HF. Assessing weight changes can provide prognostic information for patients with HF.

Impact of Body Mass Index on outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction: a 1,699,494-individual analysis from the United States National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Obesity's effect on outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced versus maintained ejection fraction (HFrEF and HFpEF) remains debatable. We evaluated hospital outcomes and healthcare expenditures in these patients based on their Body Mass Index (BMI).

METHODS

Using the USA National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, patients >18 years admitted with a primary diagnosis of HFrEF or HFpEF between January 1, 2004, and August 31, 2015, were studied. Patients were stratified into the following BMI categories: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese, and morbidly obese. Adjusted multivariable analyses using Poisson regression models were used to study the association between BMI and hospital outcomes and healthcare costs.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,699,494 patients were included. After full adjustment, obesity (OR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.22-2.76) and morbid obesity (OR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.22-2.70) increased the odds of in-hospital mortality compared with normal weight. When stratified per ejection fraction, underweight patients had higher odds of in-hospital mortality in HFrEF (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.06-2.01). Obese and morbidly obese patients had higher odds of in-hospital mortality in both HFrEF and HFpEF. Furthermore, obese and morbidly obese patients had a longer mean adjusted length of stay and higher health care expenses.

CONCLUSIONS

Being underweight is associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality in HFrEF patients. Obesity and morbid obesity increase the risk of in-hospital mortality and higher healthcare costs in both HFrEF and HFpEF. These findings have clinical significance for HF patients, and further research is needed to investigate the ideal weight for HF patients.

Treat Obesity to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Obesity, a multifactorial, relapsing chronic disease, serves as a gateway to a spectrum of metabolic, cardiovascular, mechanical and mental health problems. Over the last few decades, the global prevalence of obesity has surged nearly threefold, mirroring the escalating rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This parallel trajectory strongly suggests a cause-and-effect relationship between obesity and T2DM. Extensive research indicates that even modest weight gain elevates the risk of T2DM, favoring the notion of obesity being a root cause. This perspective finds robust support in numerous studies demonstrating the preventive effects of obesity management on the onset of T2DM. Beyond prevention, obesity management has been shown to enhance remission in individuals with T2DM and to decrease microvascular complications, cardiovascular risk factors, renal failure and heart failure. This evidence underpins the urgent need for global initiatives aimed at addressing obesity management as a key strategy in the prevention and management of T2DM and its complications.

Appetite and its Regulation: Are there Palatable Interventions for Heart Failure?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is a major driver of heart failure (HF) incidence, and aggravates its pathophysiology. We summarized key reported and ongoing randomized clinical trials of appetite regulation and/or dietary energy restriction in individuals with HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Weight loss can be achieved by structured supervised diet programs with behavioural change, medications, or surgery. The new glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists alone or in combination with other agents (e.g., glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon receptor agonists or amylin analogues) potently and sustainably reduce appetite, and, taken together with dietary advice, can produce substantial, life-changing, weight loss approaching that achieved by surgery. To date, data from the STEP-HFpEF trial show meaningful improvements in health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire). Effective weight management could relieve several drivers of HF, to complement the existing treatments for HF with both reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Further trials of weight loss interventions will provide more definitive evidence to understand their effects on clinical events in patients with HF.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Patients with Heart Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The current study aims to evaluate the effect of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) on the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with diagnosed heart failure (HF). Fourteen related articles with 217 patients were included in the final analysis. LVEF significantly improved after BMS in patients with HF with a mean difference of 7.78% (CI 95%: 3.72, 11.84, I2 = 83.75, p-value < 0.001). Also, the NYHA class significantly decreased after BMS with a mean difference of - 0.40 (CI 95%: - 0.62, - 0.19, I2: 47.03, p-value < 0.001). A total of 27 patients with obesity and HF were listed for cardiac transplantation after BMS. Of those, 20 patients successfully underwent heart transplantation after BMS.

Effects of weight loss in heart failure patients with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of weight loss (WL) on the prognosis of overweight and obese patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed the literature up to 1 February 2023 from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases for cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data from eligible studies were extracted, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3. A total of 19 studies (involving 449 882 patients) were included in the systematic review and meta-analyses. The results showed that WL did not reduce the mortality and rehospitalization rates in overweight and obese HF patients, but could improve the quality of life (P = 0.002), cardiac function (P = 0.0001), and exercise capacity (P = 0.03). The subgroup analysis showed that WL from bariatric surgery (BS) reduced the risk of death (P < 0.00001), WL from medication or exercise was not significantly associated with the risk of death (P = 0.18), and WL was associated with a higher mortality in the subgroup with unspecified WL modality or unintentional WL (P < 0.00001). In addition, it did not reduce the risk of short-term rehospitalization (P = 0.11), but reduced the rehospitalization rates over the long-term (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

WL improves the long-term rehospitalization (>3 months), quality of life, cardiac function, and exercise capacity in overweight and obese HF patients. Although overall WL is not proven effective, subgroup analysis shows that BS can reduce mortality.

Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure Revisited: Etiology as Effect Modifier

The prognostic value of overweight/obesity in heart failure (HF) may vary according to HF etiologies. We aim to determine whether body mass index has differential impacts on survival among hospitalized HF patients with varying etiologies. Consecutive hospitalized HF patients between December 2006 and December 2017 were included. Multivariable analyses, including Cox proportional hazard models and restricted cubic splines, were used to investigate the impact of body mass index on mortality by HF etiology. Among the 3,836 patients included (mean age 57.1 years, 28.4% women), 1,475 (38.5%) were identified as having ischemic etiology. Of the remaining 2,361 patients with non-ischemic etiologies, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) accounted for 45.6% (n = 1,077). The rest of the patients were uniformly classified as having non-ischemic-non-DCM HF. The unadjusted data demonstrated an adiposity-related survival paradox in HF across all etiologies. However, the paradox holds only among non-ischemic-non-DCM HF patients after multivariate adjustment, wherein overweight patients exhibit the lowest mortality compared with their normal-weight counterparts (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.91), with a nadir in mortality risk at 28.18 kg/m2. Similar survival benefits of overweight were not demonstrated in ischemic or DCM HF patients (ischemic etiology: aHR 1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.36; DCM etiology: aHR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.28). In conclusion, being overweight or obese does not confer better survival in HF patients of ischemic or DCM etiology, and the prognostic benefit of being overweight is maintained only in non-ischemic-non-DCM HF patients. Pathophysiologic interpretations are warranted, and whether patients of certain etiologies would benefit from weight reduction needs to be explored.

Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health reflects the interplay among metabolic risk factors, chronic kidney disease, and the cardiovascular system and has profound impacts on morbidity and mortality. There are multisystem consequences of poor cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health, with the most significant clinical impact being the high associated incidence of cardiovascular disease events and cardiovascular mortality. There is a high prevalence of poor cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health in the population, with a disproportionate burden seen among those with adverse social determinants of health. However, there is also a growing number of therapeutic options that favorably affect metabolic risk factors, kidney function, or both that also have cardioprotective effects. To improve cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health and related outcomes in the population, there is a critical need for (1) more clarity on the definition of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome; (2) an approach to cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic staging that promotes prevention across the life course; (3) prediction algorithms that include the exposures and outcomes most relevant to cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health; and (4) strategies for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in relation to cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health that reflect harmonization across major subspecialty guidelines and emerging scientific evidence. It is also critical to incorporate considerations of social determinants of health into care models for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and to reduce care fragmentation by facilitating approaches for patient-centered interdisciplinary care. This presidential advisory provides guidance on the definition, staging, prediction paradigms, and holistic approaches to care for patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and details a multicomponent vision for effectively and equitably enhancing cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health in the population.

What are the outcomes of dietary interventions in Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To determine the efficacy of dietary interventions in Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

METHOD AND RESULTS

Keyword searches were performed in five bibliographic databases to identify randomized or controlled studies of dietary interventions conducted in HFpEF or mixed heart failure (HF) samples published in the English language. Studies were appraised for bias and synthesized into seven categories based on the similarity of the intervention or targeted population. The quality of the body of evidence was assessed via the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) framework. Twenty-five unique interventions were identified; 17 were considered for meta-analysis. Most studies were judged to be at high risk of bias. There was moderate-quality evidence that caloric restriction led to clinically meaningful improvements in blood pressure and body weight. There was moderate-quality evidence that carbohydrate restriction resulted in meaningful reductions in blood pressure. There was very low-quality evidence that protein supplementation improved blood pressure and body weight and moderate-quality evidence for clinically meaningful improvements in function.

CONCLUSIONS

While some types of dietary interventions appeared to deliver clinically meaningful change in critical outcomes; the study heterogeneity and overall quality of the evidence make it difficult to make firm recommendations. Greater transparency when reporting the nutritional composition of interventions would enhance the ability to pool studies.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019145388.

Effect of bariatric surgery on cardio-psycho-metabolic outcomes in severe obesity: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Randomized evidence comparing the cardiovascular effects of surgical and conservative weight management is lacking.

PATIENTS & METHODS

In this single-center, open-label randomized trial, obese patients with indication for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and able to perform treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were included. After a 6-12 month run-in phase of multimodal anti-obesity treatment, patients were randomized to RYGB or psychotherapy-enhanced lifestyle intervention (PELI) and co-primary endpoints were assessed 12 months later. Thereafter, PELI patients could opt for surgery and patients were reassessed 24 months after randomization. Co-primary endpoints were mean change (95 % confidence intervals) in peak VO2 (ml/min/kg body weight) in CPET and the physical functioning scale (PFS) of the Short Form health survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Of 93 patients entering the study, 60 were randomized. Among these (median age 38 years; 88 % women; mean BMI 48·2 kg/m2), 46 (RYGB: 22 and PELI: 24) were evaluated after 12 months. Total weight loss was 34·3 % after RYGB vs. 1·2 % with PELI, while peak VO2 increased by +4·3 ml/min/kg (2·7, 5·9) vs +1·1 ml/min/kg (-0·2, 2·3); p < 0·0001. Respective improvement in PFS score was +40 (30, 49) vs +10 (1, 15); p < 0·0001. 6-minute walking distance also favored the RYGB group: +44 m (17, 72) vs +6 m (-14, 26); p < 0·0001. Left ventricular mass decreased after RYGB, but not with PELI: -32 g (-46, -17) vs 0 g (-13,13); p < 0·0001. In the non-randomized follow-up, 34 patients were assessed. Favorable changes were sustained in the RYGB group and were repeated in the 15 evaluated patients that opted for surgery after PELI.

CONCLUSIONS

Among adults with severe obesity, RYGB in comparison to PELI resulted in improved cardiopulmonary capacity and quality of life. The observed effect sizes suggest that these changes are clinically relevant.

Influence of weight variation on long-term mortality of patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

In heart failure, weight loss predicts dismal prognosis. Weight variations have not been addressed in obese patients with heart failure.

AIM

To study the impact of weight variation on heart failure mortality according to body mass index strata.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with chronic heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction<50%. Only patients with ≥1 year of follow-up were included. Patients with missing data for body mass index at the index and 1-year appointments were excluded. Patients were classified into three groups according to weight variation: weight gain>5%; weight loss>5%; and weight stability. Follow-up was set from the 1-year appointment. Cox-regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic impact of weight variation.

RESULTS

We studied 589 patients: 69.8% male; mean age, 69 years. Over 1 year, 148 patients (25.1%) gained>5% weight, 97 (16.5%) lost>5% weight and the remaining 344 were weight-stable. During 49 months of median follow-up, 248 patients died. Patients who lost>5% of their weight presented a higher death risk than the others (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.19). After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio for death for low/normal-weight patients who lost>5% of their weight was 1.81 (95% confidence interval 1.02-3.21; P=0.04) compared with the others. Among the overweight, those who lost>5% of their weight had a hazard ratio of 2.34 (95% confidence interval 1.32-4.12). In the initially obese subgroup, weight loss>5% was not associated with prognosis (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.53-2.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss predicted mortality in low/normal-weight and overweight patients with heart failure. However, in obese patients, significant weight loss did not predict poorer survival. Weight loss should not be discouraged in obese patients with heart failure.

Interventions to Address Cardiovascular Risk in Obese Patients: Many Hands Make Light Work

Obesity is a growing public health epidemic worldwide and is implicated in slowing improved life expectancy and increasing cardiovascular (CV) risk; indeed, several obesity-related mechanisms drive structural, functional, humoral, and hemodynamic heart alterations. On the other hand, obesity may indirectly cause CV disease, mediated through different obesity-associated comorbidities. Diet and physical activity are key points in preventing CV disease and reducing CV risk; however, these strategies alone are not always sufficient, so other approaches, such as pharmacological treatments and bariatric surgery, must support them. Moreover, these strategies are associated with improved CV risk factors and effectively reduce the incidence of death and CV events such as myocardial infarction and stroke; consequently, an individualized care plan with a multidisciplinary approach is recommended. More precisely, this review explores several interventions (diet, physical activity, pharmacological and surgical treatments) to address CV risk in obese patients and emphasizes the importance of adherence to treatments.

Prognostic relevance of gradual weight changes on long-term mortality in chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

While obesity has been linked to better ouctomes (the obesity paradox), cachexia is associated with higher mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). As opposed to overt cachexia, little is known about the prognostic impact of gradual, long-term weight changes in stable HFrEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included ambulatory patients with clinically stable chronic HFrEF on individually optimized treatment. Next to other clinical and functional parameters, changes in body weight over the past one (n = 733, group 1) or two (n = 636, group 2) years were recorded. Four-year mortality was analysed with respect to baseline BMI and changes in body weight or BMI using fractional polynomials. In addition, outcome was stratified by BMI categories (18.5-25 kg/m²: normal weight, >25-30 kg/m²: overweight, >30 kg/m²: obesity). An obesity paradox was present in both groups, with overweight and obese patients having the best prognosis. In both groups, a gradual weight gain of 5% was associated with the lowest mortality, whereas mortality steadily increases with increasing weight loss. Excessive weight gain >10% was also related to higher mortality. Stratification by baseline BMI categories revealed that weight loss was most detrimental in normal weight patients, whereas the prognostic impact of weight change was weaker in obese patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic HFrEF, gradual weight loss is associated with steadily increasing mortality, whereas a weight gain of 5% is related to the best prognosis. Prevention of any inappropriate weight loss might be a therapeutic goal in HFrEF patient care.

U-shaped association between body mass index and ejection fraction in intensive care unit patients with heart failure

AIMS

There are limited data about the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in patients with heart failure (HF). The study aims to assess the correlation between BMI and left ventricular EF under HF conditions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We derived the data from the Dryad Digital Repository for analysis, and the information of the original patients was obtained from the MIMIC-III database by the data uploader. We performed smooth curve and two piecewise linear regression analyses to evaluate the association between BMI and EF in HF patients. A total of 962 participants were included in this study, with age of 73.7 ± 13.5 years, and 475 participants were male (49.4%). The results of the smooth curve supported a U-shaped relationship between BMI and EF, and the inflection point was found to be a BMI of 23.3 kg/m2 in these HF patients. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that EF decreased with increasing BMI up to the inflection point (β = -0.7, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.1, P = 0.028), whereas beyond the turning point, the relationship between EF and BMI showed a positive correlation (β = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.3 P < 0.001). Importantly, ischaemic heart disease (interaction P = 0.0499) and hyperlipidaemia (interaction P = 0.0162) affected the association between BMI and EF in the lower BMI group (BMI < 23.3 kg/m2 ), although only diabetes mellitus (interaction P = 0.0255) altered the association between BMI and EF in the higher BMI group (BMI ≥ 23.3 kg/m2 ).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to higher BMI, we also found that lower BMI is related to higher EF in intensive care unit patients with HF, supporting a U-shaped association between BMI and EF.

Comprehensive Review of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is a growing global phenomenon, and its damaging effects in terms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk are becoming more apparent. NAFLD is estimated to affect around one quarter of the world population and is often comorbid with other metabolic disorders including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and metabolic syndrome. In this review, we examine the current evidence describing the many ways that NAFLD itself increases CVD risk. We also discuss the emerging and complex biochemical relationship between NAFLD and its common comorbid conditions, and how they coalesce to increase CVD risk. With NAFLD's rising prevalence and deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system, a complete understanding of the disease must be undertaken, as well as effective strategies to prevent and treat its common comorbid conditions.

Cardiovascular protection by SGLT2 inhibitors - Do anti-inflammatory mechanisms play a role?

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome and related metabolic disturbances represent a state of low-grade inflammation, which accelerates insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) progression. Among antidiabetic medications, sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors are the only agents which showed remarkable reductions in heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and major cardiovascular endpoints (MACE) as well as renal endpoints regardless of diabetes status in large randomized clinical outcome trials (RCTs). Although the exact mechanisms underlying these benefits are yet to be established, growing evidence suggests that modulating inflammation by SGLT2 inhibitors may play a key role.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In this manuscript, we summarize the current knowledge on anti-inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibitors as one of the mechanisms potentially mediating their cardiovascular (CV) benefits. We introduce the different metabolic and systemic actions mediated by these agents which could mitigate inflammation, and further present the signalling pathways potentially responsible for their proposed direct anti-inflammatory effects. We also discuss controversies surrounding some of these mechanisms.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors are promising anti-inflammatory agents by acting either indirectly via improving metabolism and reducing stress conditions or via direct modulation of inflammatory signalling pathways. These effects were achieved, to a great extent, in a glucose-independent manner which established their clinical use in HF patients with and without diabetes.

Obesity increases cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFmrEF

Background

High body mass index increases the risk of heart failure morbidity and mortality. It is unclear whether a high body mass index is associated with prognosis in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF). We retrospectively analyzed the effect of a high body mass index on the prognosis of patients with HFmrEF.

Methods

We investigated the association between body mass index and cardiovascular death (death from any cardiovascular mechanism) in 1,691 HFmrEF patients (mean age, 68 years; 35% female) in Xiangtan Central Hospital. Using Cox proportional hazards models, body mass index was assessed as a continuous and a categorical variable.

Results

Cardiovascular death occurred in 133 patients (82 males and 51 females) after 1 year of follow-up. After adjustment for established risk factors, there was a 7.5% increase in the risk of cardiovascular death for females for each increment of 1 in BMI. In contrast, changes in male body mass index were not significantly associated with cardiovascular death (P = 0.097). Obese subjects had a 1.8-fold increased risk of cardiovascular death compared with subjects with a normal body mass index. The hazard ratio for females was 2.163 (95% confidence interval: 1.150–4.066). Obesity was not significantly associated with cardiovascular death in males (P = 0.085).

Conclusion

An increased body mass index is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death in patients with HFmrEF; however, this risk was mainly associated with female patients with HFmrEF and less with male patients with HFmrEF.

Fluid and Salt Balance and the Role of Nutrition in Heart Failure

The main challenges in heart failure (HF) treatment are to manage patients with refractory acute decompensated HF and to stabilize the clinical status of a patient with chronic heart failure. Beyond the use of medications targeted in the inhibition of the neurohormonal system, the balance of salt and fluid plays an important role in the maintenance of clinical compensation in respect of renal function. In the case of heart failure, a debate of opinion exists on salt restriction. Restricted dietary sodium might lead to worse outcomes in heart failure patients due to the activation of the neurohormonal system and malnutrition. On the contrary, positive sodium balance is the primary driver of water retention and, ultimately, volume overload in acute HF. Some recent studies reported associations of decreased salt consumption with higher readmission rates and increased mortality. Thus, the usefulness of salt restriction in heart failure management remains debated. The use of individualized nutritional support, compared with standard hospital food, was effective in reducing these risks, particularly in the group of patients at high nutritional risk.

Cardio-psycho-metabolic outcomes of bariatric surgery: design and baseline of the WAS trial

Obesity is a rapidly emerging health problem and an established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Bariatric surgery profoundly reduces body weight and mitigates sequelae of obesity. The open, randomized controlled Würzburg Adipositas Studie (WAS) trial compares the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs psychotherapy-supported lifestyle modification in morbidly obese patients. The co-primary endpoint addresses 1-year changes in cardiovascular function (peak VO2 during cardiopulmonary exercise testing) and the quality of life (QoL) (Short-Form-36 physical functioning scale). Prior to randomization, all included patients underwent a multimodal anti-obesity treatment for 6-12 months. Thereafter, the patients were randomized and followed through month 12 to collect the primary endpoints. Afterwards, patients in the lifestyle group could opt for surgery, and final visit was scheduled for all patients 24 months after randomization. Sample size calculation suggested to enroll 90 patients in order to arrive at minimally 22 patients per group evaluable for the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives were to quantify changes in body weight, left ventricular hypertrophy, systolic and diastolic function (by echocardiography and cardiac MRI), functional brain MRI, psychometric scales, and endothelial and metabolic function. WAS enrolled 93 patients (72 women, median age 38 years, BMI 47.5 kg/m2) exhibiting a relevantly compromised exercise capacity (median peakVO2 18.3 mL/min/kg) and the QoL (median physical functioning scale 50). WAS is the first randomized controlled trial focusing on the effects of RYGB on cardiovascular function beyond hypertension. In addition, it will provide a wealth of high-quality data on the cerebral, psychiatric, hepatic, and metabolic function in obese patients after RYGB.

Management of Obesity in Cardiovascular Practice: JACC Focus Seminar

Obesity contributes to reduced life expectancy because of its link with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Yet, targeting this poorly diagnosed, ill-defined, and underaddressed modifiable risk factor remains a challenge. In this review, we emphasize that the tendency among health care professionals to amalgam all forms of obesity altogether as a single entity may contribute to such difficulties and discrepancies. Obesity is a heterogeneous condition both in terms of causes and health consequences. Attention should be given to 2 prevalent subgroups of individuals: 1) patients who are overweight or moderately obese with excess visceral adipose tissue; and 2) patients with severe obesity, the latter group having distinct additional health issues related to their large body fat mass. The challenge of tackling high-cardiovascular-risk forms of obesity through a combination of personalized clinical approaches and population-based solutions is compounded by the current obesogenic environment and economy.

Efficacy of dapagliflozin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to body mass index

Aims

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), there is an ‘obesity paradox’, where survival is better in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) and weight loss is associated with worse outcomes. We examined the effect of a sodium–glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor according to baseline BMI in the Dapagliflozin And Prevention of Adverse‐outcomes in Heart Failure trial (DAPA‐HF).

Methods and results

Body mass index was examined using standard categories, i.e. underweight (<18.5 kg/m²); normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²); overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m²); obesity class I (30.0–34.9 kg/m²); obesity class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m²); and obesity class III (≥40 kg/m²). The primary outcome in DAPA‐HF was the composite of worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Overall, 1348 patients (28.4%) were under/normal‐weight, 1722 (36.3%) overweight, 1013 (21.4%) obesity class I and 659 (13.9%) obesity class II/III. The unadjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for the primary outcome with obesity class 1, the lowest risk group, as reference was: under/normal‐weight 1.41 (1.16–1.71), overweight 1.18 (0.97–1.42), obesity class II/III 1.37 (1.10–1.72). Patients with class I obesity were also at lowest risk of death. The effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome and other outcomes did not vary by baseline BMI, e.g. hazard ratio for primary outcome: under/normal‐weight 0.74 (0.58–0.94), overweight 0.81 (0.65–1.02), obesity class I 0.68 (0.50–0.92), obesity class II/III 0.71 (0.51–1.00) (P‐value for interaction = 0.79). The mean decrease in weight at 8 months with dapagliflozin was 0.9 (0.7–1.1) kg (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

We confirmed an ‘obesity survival paradox’ in HFrEF. We showed that dapagliflozin was beneficial across the wide range of BMI studied.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03036124.

Nutrition in chronic heart failure patients: a systematic review

Nutrition is the primary source of energy production for myocardial contractility and to maintaining cardiac efficiency. Although many studies provided evidence of the benefits of nutritional intervention in chronic heart failure patients (CHF), these effects are not still completely understood. We searched in PubMed and Embase articles related to the following keywords: "chronic heart failure" with "diet," "nutrition," "insulin resistance," and "caloric restriction." Of the 975 retrieved articles, 20 have been selected. The primary endpoint was the left ventricular (LV) function and the secondary mortality rate in HF patients. Some studies showed that the Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) had a beneficial effect on cardiac function, while others did not find any positive impact. Nutritional supplements and hypercaloric intake had positive effects on underweight HF patients, while hypocaloric diet was beneficial in obese HF patients improving glucose control and cardiac function. The effect of MedDiet in HF patients showed conflicting results. Changes in the dietary pattern can reduce the evolution of HF, considering not only the quality of food but also the caloric intake. The discriminant factor to prescribe a diet regime in HF patients is represented by body mass index (BMI). A well-balanced caloric diet represents an effective therapy in overweight HF patients to reduce the mortality rate. Long-term studies evaluating cause-effect of energy and macronutrients intake on cardiac function in HF patients are necessary.

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor therapy: mechanisms of action in heart failure

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at a higher risk of developing heart failure compared with the healthy population. In recent landmark clinical trials, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor therapies improve blood glucose control and also reduce cardiovascular events and heart failure hospitalisations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Intriguingly, such clinical benefits have also been seen in patients with heart failure in the absence of type 2 diabetes although the underlying mechanisms are not clearly understood. Potential pathways include improved glycaemic control, diuresis, weight reduction and reduction in blood pressure, but none fully explain the observed improvements in clinical outcomes. More recently, novel mechanisms have been proposed to explain these benefits that include improved cardiomyocyte calcium handling, enhanced myocardial energetics, induced autophagy and reduced epicardial fat. We provide an up-to-date review of cardiac-specific SGLT2 inhibitor-mediated mechanisms and highlight studies currently underway investigating some of the proposed mechanisms of action in cardiovascular health and disease.

Proteomic and Structural Manifestations of Cardiomyopathy in Rat Models of Obesity and Weight Loss

Obesity cardiomyopathy increases the risk of heart failure and death. Obesity is curable, leading to the restoration of the heart phenotype, but it is not clear if there are any after-effects of obesity present after weight loss. We characterize the proteomic landscape of obesity cardiomyopathy with an evaluation of whether the cardiac phenotype is still shaped after weight loss. Cardiomyopathy was validated by cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, oversized myocytes, and mTOR upregulation in a rat model of cafeteria diet-induced developmental obesity. By global proteomic techniques (LC-MS/MS) a plethora of molecular changes was observed in the heart and circulation of obese animals, suggesting abnormal utilization of metabolic substrates. This was confirmed by increased levels of cardiac ACSL-1, a key enzyme for fatty acid degradation and decreased GLUT-1, a glucose transporter in obese rats. Calorie restriction and weight loss led to the normalization of the heart's size, but fibrosis was still excessive. The proteomic compositions of cardiac tissue and plasma were different after weight loss as compared to control. In addition to morphological consequences, obesity cardiomyopathy involves many proteomic changes. Weight loss provides for a partial repair of the heart's architecture, but the trace of fibrotic deposition and proteomic alterations may occur.

Does Weight Loss Improve Clinical Outcomes in Overweight and Obese Patients with Heart Failure?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity increases the risk of new onset heart failure (HF), and particularly HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Despite the observations of favorable clinical outcomes in HF patients with obesity in general, sometimes referred to as the "obesity paradox," it is important to recognize that severe obesity is associated with worse clinical outcomes. This review summarizes the effects of obesity treatment on cardiovascular health and HF clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment for obesity utilizes a variety of modalities to achieve purposeful weight loss including lifestyle intervention, medications, and bariatric surgery. There are a cluster of benefits of obesity treatment in terms of clinical outcomes in HF. The mechanisms of these benefits include both weight loss-dependent and weight loss-independent mechanisms. Obesity treatment is safe and associated with favorable clinical outcomes across the spectrum of the HF population. The potential benefits are facilitated through multiple mechanisms.

Surgical obesity treatment and the risk of heart failure

AIMS

Obesity is associated with increased risk for heart failure. We analysed data from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study, a prospective matched cohort study, to investigate whether bariatric surgery reduces this risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From the total SOS population (n = 4047), we identified 4033 obese individuals with no history of heart failure at baseline, of whom 2003 underwent bariatric surgery (surgery group) and 2030 received usual care (control group). First-time principal diagnoses of heart failure were identified by crosschecking the SOS database with the Swedish National Patient Register and the Swedish Cause of Death Register using diagnosis codes. During a median follow-up of 22 years, first-time heart failure occurred in 188 of the participants treated with surgery and in 266 of those receiving usual care. The risk of developing heart failure was lower in the surgery group than in the control group [sub-hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.79; P < 0.001]. After pooling data from the two study groups, the quartile of subjects with the largest weight loss after 1 year (mean -41 kg) displayed the greatest risk reduction (sub-hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.70; P < 0.001). This association remained statistically significant after adjustment for surgical intervention and potential baseline confounders (sub-hazard ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.97; P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Compared with usual care, bariatric surgery was associated with reduced risk of heart failure among persons being treated for obesity. The risk of heart failure appeared to decline in parallel with a greater degree of weight loss.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01479452.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Heart Failure

With worsening epidemiological trends for both the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF) worldwide, it is critical to implement optimal prevention and treatment strategies for patients with these comorbidities, either alone or concomitantly. Several guidelines and consensus statements have recommended glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors as add-ons to lifestyle interventions with or without metformin in those at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. However, these recommendations are either silent about HF or fail to differentiate between the prevention of HF in those at risk versus the treatment of individuals with manifest HF. Furthermore, these documents do not differentiate among those with different HF phenotypes. This distinction, even though important, may not be critical for sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors in view of the consistent data for benefit for both atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease– and HF-related outcomes that have emerged from the regulatory-mandated cardiovascular outcome trials for all sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and the recent DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction)demonstrating the benefit of dapagliflozin on HF-related outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with or without T2DM. However, the distinction may be crucial for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other antihyperglycemic agents. Indeed, in several of the new statements, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are suggested treatment not only for patients with T2DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but also in those with manifest HF, despite a lack of evidence for the latter recommendation. Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may be appropriate to use in patients at risk for HF, mechanistic insights and observations from randomized trials suggest no clear benefit on HF-related outcomes and even uncertainty regarding the safety in those with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Conversely, theoretical rationales suggest that these agents may benefit patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Considering that millions of patients with T2DM have HF, these concerns have public health implications that necessitate the thoughtful use of these therapies. Achieving this aim will require dedicated trials with these drugs in both patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction with T2DM to assess their efficacy, safety, and risk-benefit profile.

Weight loss for patients with obesity and heart failure

Collapse

Clinical significance of nutritional status in patients with chronic heart failure-a systematic review

Chronic heart failure (CHF) and nutritional disorders are recognized as major challenges for contemporary medicine. This study aims to estimate the role of nutritional disorders as risk factors for CHF development and prognostic factors for CHF patients and the outcome of nutritional intervention in CHF. Full-text English articles published between January 2013 and February 2019 available in the PubMed and Scopus databases were considered. Seventy-five prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional studies as well as meta-analyses on patients with CHF, reporting correlation of their nutritional status with the risk and prognosis of CHF and the outcome of nutritional interventions in CHF were all included. Higher BMI increases the risk of CHF by 15-70%, especially when associated with severe, long-lasting and abdominal obesity. Overweight and obesity are associated with the reduction of mortality in CHF by 24-59% and 15-65%, respectively, and do not affect the outcome of invasive CHF treatment. Malnutrition increases the risk of mortality (by 2- to 10-fold) and the risk of hospitalization (by 1.2- to 1.7-fold). Favorable outcome of nutritional support in CHF patients was reported in a few studies. Nutritional disorders are prevalent in patients with CHF and play a significant role in the incidence, course, and prognosis of the disease. The existence of an "obesity paradox" in patients with CHF was confirmed. Further studies on the effect of nutritional support and body weight reduction in patients with CHF are necessary.

Obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a paradox or something else?

Obesity represents one of the most common comorbidities in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Studies have shown that obesity is not only a comorbidity, but it could also be an important risk factor for HFpEF development. The mechanisms that connect obesity and HFpEF vary from obesity-induced hemodynamic changes to important biohumoral systems such as adipocitokines, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems, natriuretic peptide, and oxidative stress. Studies agree about the negative influence of morbid obesity on cardiac remodeling and HFpEF development. However, there is still no agreement regarding the relationship between body mass index, as the most commonly used parameter of obesity, and HFpEF incidence or outcome in patients who already have HFpEF. The relationship varies from the linear to the U-shaped and, therefore, the "obesity paradox," which refers to the reduced risk in mildly overweight subjects in comparison with normal and underweight individuals, deserves more attention not only in the research but also in the clinical approach to these patients. In the absence of a satisfactory pharmacological approach, which would improve the outcome of this large group of patients, alternative methods such as weight loss and physical activity seem to provide encouraging results. This review article provides a clinical overview of the available data about the mechanisms that connect obesity and HFpEF, the most relevant studies on this topic, clinical relevance of the obesity paradox, and the therapeutic approach including weight loss and physical activity in obese patients with HFpEF.

Exercise Intolerance in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Exercise intolerance is the cardinal symptom of heart failure (HF) and is of crucial relevance, because it is associated with a poor quality of life and increased mortality. While impaired cardiac reserve is considered to be central in HF, reduced exercise and functional capacity are the result of key patient characteristics and multisystem dysfunction, including aging, impaired pulmonary reserve, as well as peripheral and respiratory skeletal muscle dysfunction. We herein review the different modalities to quantify exercise intolerance, the pathophysiology of HF, and comorbid conditions as they lead to reductions in exercise and functional capacity, highlighting the fact that distinct causes may coexist and variably contribute to exercise intolerance in patients with HF.

The obesity paradox for outcomes in atrial fibrillation: Evidence from an exposure-effect analysis of prospective studies

The impact of obesity on the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. We conducted an exposure-effect meta-analysis of prospective studies to clarify the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes in patients with AF. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched through May 1, 2019. Summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using random-effects models. Nonlinear associations were explored using restricted cubic spline models. Twenty publications involving 161,922 individuals were included. Categorical variable analysis showed that underweight was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 2.6), cardiovascular death (RR: 2.91), major bleeding (RR: 1.57), stroke or systemic embolism (RR: 1.62), and a composite endpoint (RR: 2.23). In exposure-effect analysis, the risk per 5 BMI increase was reduced for adverse outcomes (RR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.92 for all-cause death; RR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95 for cardiovascular death; RR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95 for stroke or systemic embolism; and RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92 for a composite endpoint). There was a significant "U"-shaped exposure-effect relationship with all-cause death, and the nadir of the curve was observed at a BMI of approximately 28. Our results showed that underweight is associated with a worse prognosis, but that overweight and obesity are associated with improved adverse outcomes in patients with AF.

Ghrelin protects against obesity-induced myocardial injury by regulating the lncRNA H19/miR-29a/IGF-1 signalling axis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with the impairment of cardiac fitness and consequent ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Ghrelin has been largely documented to be cardioprotective against ischaemia/reperfusion injury. However, the role of ghrelin in obesity-induced myocardial injury is largely unknown. This study sought to determine the cardiac effect of ghrelin against obesity-induced injury and the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

The effect of ghrelin was evaluated in a mouse model of obesity and a palmitic acid (PA)-treated cardiomyocyte cell line with or without ghrelin transfection. Gene and protein expression levels were determined by real-time PCR and western blot, respectively. Cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry analysis.

RESULTS

In the present study, we found that both a high-fat diet (HFD) and PA treatment caused myocardial injury by increasing apoptosis and the expression of inflammatory cytokines. Overexpression of ghrelin reversed the effects induced by HFD or PA treatment. Knockdown of lncRNA H19 or overexpression of miR-29a abrogated the cardioprotective effects of ghrelin against apoptosis and inflammation. We also found that IGF-1 was a target gene of miR-29a and that H19 regulated IGF-1 expression via miR-29a. Overexpression of IGF-1 partially reversed the apoptosis and inflammation promoting effects of miR-29a.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that ghrelin protected against obesity-induced myocardial injury by regulating the H19/miR-29a/IGF-1 signalling axis, providing further evidence for the clinical application of ghrelin.

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The most common causes of chronic liver disease in the developed world-nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-are the hepatic manifestations of an insulin-resistant state that is linked to visceral adiposity and systemic inflammation. NAFLD and NASH lead to an expansion of epicardial adipose tissue and the release of proinflammatory adipocytokines that cause microcirculatory dysfunction and fibrosis of the adjoining myocardium, resulting in atrial fibrillation as well as heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Inflammatory changes in the left atrium lead to electroanatomical remodeling; thus, NAFLD and NASH markedly increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Simultaneously, patients with NAFLD or NASH commonly show diastolic dysfunction or latent HFpEF. Interventions include 1) weight loss by caloric restriction, bariatric surgery, or intensive exercise, and 2) drugs that ameliorate fat-mediated inflammation in both the liver and heart (eg, statins, metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and pioglitazone). Patients with NAFLD or NASH commonly have an inflammation-related atrial and ventricular myopathy, which may contribute to symptoms and long-term outcomes.

Physiological monitoring in the complex multi-morbid heart failure patient - Introduction

Repeated physiological monitoring of comorbidities in heart failure (HF) is pivotal. This document introduces the main challenges related to physiological monitoring in the complex multimorbid HF patient, arising during an ESC consensus meeting on this topic.

Do most patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes, and atrial fibrillation, also have undiagnosed heart failure? A critical conceptual framework for understanding mechanisms and improving diagnosis and treatment

Obesity and diabetes can lead to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), potentially because they both cause expansion and inflammation of epicardial adipose tissue and thus lead to microvascular dysfunction and fibrosis of the underlying left ventricle. The same process also causes an atrial myopathy, which is clinically evident as atrial fibrillation (AF); thus, AF may be the first manifestation of HFpEF. Many patients with apparently isolated AF have latent HFpEF or subsequently develop HFpEF. Most patients with obesity or diabetes who have AF and exercise intolerance have increased left atrial pressures at rest or during exercise, even in the absence of diagnosed HFpEF. Among patients with AF, those who also have latent HFpEF have increased risk for systemic thromboembolism and death. The identification of HFpEF in patients with obesity or diabetes alters the risk-to-benefit relationship of commonly prescribed treatments. Bariatric surgery and statins can ameliorate AF and reduce the risk for HFpEF. Conversely, antihyperglycaemic drugs that promote adipogenesis or cause sodium retention (insulin and thiazolidinediones) may increase the risk for heart failure in patients with an underlying ventricular myopathy. Patients with obesity and diabetes who undergo catheter ablation for AF are at increased risk for AF recurrence and for post-ablation increases in pulmonary venous pressures and worsening heart failure, especially if HFpEF coexists. Therefore, AF may be the earliest indicator of HFpEF in patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes, and recognition of HFpEF alters the management of these patients.

Impact of Nutrition on Cardiovascular Function

The metabolic sources of energy for myocardial contractility include mainly free fatty acids (FFA) for 95%, and in lesser amounts for 5% from glucose and minimal contributions from other substrates such lactate, ketones, and amino acids. However, myocardial efficiency is influenced by metabolic condition, overload, and ischemia. During cardiac stress, cardiomyocytes increase glucose oxidation and reduce FFA oxidation. In patients with ischemic coronary disease and heart failure, the low oxygen availability limits myocardial reliance on FFA and glucose utilization must increase. Although glucose uptake is fundamental to cardiomyocyte function, an excessive intracellular glucose level is detrimental. Insulin plays a fundamental role in maintaining myocardial efficiency and in reducing glycemia and inflammation; this is particularly evident in obese and type-2 diabetic patients. An excess of F availability increase fat deposition within cardiomyocytes and reduces glucose oxidation. In patients with high body mass index, a restricted diet or starvation have positive effects on cardiac metabolism and function while, in patients with low body mass index, restrictive diets, or starvation have a deleterious effect. Thus, weight loss in obese patients has positive impacts on ventricular mass and function, whereas, in underweight heart failure patients, such weight reduction adds to the risk of heart damage, predisposing to cachexia. Nutrition plays an essential role in the evolution of cardiovascular disease and should be taken into account. An energy-restricted diet improves myocardial efficiency but can represent a potential risk of heart damage, particularly in patients affected by cardiovascular disease. Micronutrient integration has a marginal effect on cardiovascular efficiency.