Cannabinoid Metabolites as Inhibitors of Major Hepatic CYP450 Enzymes, with Implications for Cannabis-Drug Interactions

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a potent and orally bioavailable FGFRs inhibitor for fibrotic treatment

Organ fibrosis, such as lung fibrosis and liver fibrosis, is a progressive and fatal disease. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) play an important role in the development and progression of fibrosis. Through scaffold hopping, bioisosteric replacement design, and structure-activity relationship optimization, we developed a series of highly potent FGFRs inhibitors, and the indazole-containing candidate compound A16 showed potent kinase activity comparable to that of AZD4547. In addition, A16 effectively suppressed the activation of lung fibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) induced by TGF-β1, leading to a reduction in collagen deposition. Notably, A16 exhibited potent anti-fibrotic effects through the inhibition of the FGFR pathway in vitro. Compound A16 also showed reasonable pharmacokinetic properties (F = 21.84 %) and favorable cardiac safety (hERG IC50 > 20 μM). Moreover, in models of pulmonary fibrosis, A16 ameliorated (in the prevention model) and reversed (in the treatment model) bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis, as well as mitigated inflammatory immune response in the lung. Furthermore, in the CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model, when A16 was administrated orally at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks, it effectively improved liver function, restored damaged liver structures, and reduced collagen deposition. Taken together, these results suggest that A16 could be a potential drug candidate for the treatment of organ fibrosis.

The resurgence of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists as adulterants in the Era of Cannabis legalization: Lessons from prior epidemics and clinical implications

Momentum towards legalization of medical and recreational cannabis drives a convergence between natural cannabinoids and their synthetic counterparts, creating new clinical challenges in a second wave of exposures. This review critically examines the emerging challenges posed by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) and semi-synthetic cannabinoids, emphasizing their clinical implications. SCRAs are potent full agonist activity that have been identified as adulterants in several recreational substances, including cannabis and opioids. Adulteration often leads to unpredictable clinical outcomes and exacerbates the potential for drug interactions. Drawing parallels with other drug epidemics, this paper highlights the urgent need for clinical preparedness to address the nuanced presentations of cannabinoid toxicity, stressing the importance of patient history, physical examination, and judicious use of supportive laboratory tests. This review serves as a cautionary tale and call to action for researchers and policymakers. There is a clear need for robust quality control measures, enhanced public awareness campaigns, and development of evidence-based clinical guidelines to mitigate the health risks associated with intentional and unintentional use of synthetic cannabinoids.

Therapeutic potential of cannabidiol polypharmacology in neuropsychiatric disorders

Cannabidiol (CBD), the primary non-intoxicating compound in cannabis, is currently approved for treating rare, treatment-resistant seizures. Recent preclinical research suggests that CBD's multifaceted mechanisms of action in the brain, which involve multiple molecular targets, underlie its neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, and antipsychotic effects. Clinical trials are also exploring CBD's therapeutic potential beyond its current uses. This review focuses on CBD's polypharmacological profile and discusses the latest preclinical and clinical findings regarding its efficacy in neuropsychiatric disorders. Existing evidence suggests that CBD's ability to modulate multiple signaling pathways may benefit neuropsychiatric disorders, and we propose further research areas to clarify its mechanisms, address data gaps, and refine its therapeutic indications.

Part 1: Evaluation of Pediatric Cannabis-Drug Interaction Reports

Data addressing safety concerns related to potential drug interactions between cannabis-derived products and pharmaceutical medications in the pediatric population are lacking. In this study, we retrieved case reports through a published literature search using PubMed and spontaneous reporting data using the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify potential cannabis- and cannabinoid-drug interactions in individuals younger than 18 years old. To evaluate the published case reports, we used the Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS), a 10-item questionnaire designed to discern the causal relationship between a potential drug interaction and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). FAERS reports were deduplicated and analyzed to gather information regarding patient demographics, associated drugs, nature of the ADRs, outcomes, professions of the reporters, and reporting timelines. Seven published case reports and 9142 FAERS ADRs reports were included in the final analysis. Based on the findings, caution is warranted when cannabis or cannabinoids are used in combination with prescribed medications, including methadone, everolimus, fluoxetine, and paroxetine. Cannabinoids may inhibit drug-metabolizing enzymes, including several cytochrome P450s, leading to increased drug exposure and potentially, an increased risk for ADRs.

Drug interactions in a sample of inpatients diagnosed with cannabis use disorder

The majority of patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD) regularly take medication. Cannabinoids influence metabolism of some commonly prescribed drugs. However, little is known about the characteristics and frequency of potential cannabis-drug (CDIs) and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in patients with CUD. Therefore, our study aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of drug interactions in patients with CUD during inpatient treatment on an addiction-specific ward over a six-year-period. To this aim, medication charts were analyzed and screened for potential CDIs and DDIs. Herein, the drugs.com classification for potential CDIs and UpToDate Lexicomp program for potential DDIs were utilized. The study cohort consisted of 301 patient cases, predominantly male (85.0%), with a median age of 37 years. 89.4% (269/301) of all cases involved were taking at least one drug that could potentially interact with cannabis. Levomethadone, buprenorphine and morphine were the most common drugs involved in potentially serious CDIs. In addition, 196 DDIs were identified, of which 25.5% were classified as 'avoid combination' and 74.5% as 'consider therapy modification'. Hereby, combinations of levomethadone with other psychotropic drugs most frequently accounted for potentially severe and mild DDIs. The results of our study indicate that especially patients diagnosed with CUD also receiving opioid substitution therapy are at risk for potential drug interactions. Therefore, a clinical monitoring of vigilance and respiratory function should be applied during inpatient treatment. Routine use of interaction check tools in patients diagnosed with CUD should also be considered by healthcare providers. In addition, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) should be used to increase medication safety in this patient population.

Utilization of Cannabidiol in Post-Organ-Transplant Care

Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the major phytochemical constituents of cannabis, Cannabis sativa, widely recognized for its therapeutic potential. While cannabis has been utilized for medicinal purposes since ancient times, its psychoactive and addictive properties led to its prohibition in 1937, with only the medical use being reauthorized in 1998. Unlike tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), CBD lacks psychoactive and addictive properties, yet the name that suggests its association with cannabis has significantly contributed to its public visibility. CBD exhibits diverse pharmacological properties, most notably anti-inflammatory effects. Additionally, it interacts with key drug-metabolizing enzyme families, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), which mediate phase I and phase II metabolism, respectively. By binding to these enzymes, CBD can inhibit the metabolism of co-administered drugs, which can potentially enhance their toxicity or therapeutic effects. Mild to moderate adverse events associated with CBD use have been reported. Advances in chemical formulation techniques have recently enabled strategies to minimize these effects. This review provides an overview of CBD, covering its historical background, recent clinical trials, adverse event profiles, and interactions with molecular targets such as receptors, channels, and enzymes. We particularly emphasize the mechanisms underlying its anti-inflammatory effects and interaction with drugs relevant to organ transplantation. Finally, we explore recent progress in the chemical formulation of CBD in order to enhance its bioavailability, which will enable decreasing the dose to use and increase its safety and efficacy.

Hypothesized pharmacogenomic and medication influences on tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol metabolism in a cohort of unselected oral cannabis users

BACKGROUND

Differences in cannabinoid metabolism and patient responses can arise even with equivalent doses and formulations. Genetic polymorphisms in genes responsible for cannabinoid metabolism and medications that alter CYP450 pathways responsible for metabolism of cannabinoids may account for some of this variability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on a cohort of unselected patients who had previously completed pharmacogenomic testing and reported oral cannabis use, as defined as "oral" or "by mouth" route of administration. The objective was to identify atypical variants and medications in this cohort and formulate a hypothesis on how these variables influence the metabolism of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD).

RESULTS

Oral cannabis use was confirmed in 71 patients, with an average age of 68.5 years, and primarily white women. Of the 71 patients, 10 had no atypical variants; 31 had atypical variants in CYP2C9; 37 had atypical variants in CYP2C19; 6 had atypical variants in CYP3A4; and 15 had atypical variants in CYP3A5. Of the 71 patients, 5 were taking medications that could interact with THC, and 8 were taking medications that could interact with CBD.

CONCLUSION

The results this study reveal the spectrum of hypothesized alterations in THC and CBD metabolism due to atypical genetic variants and medications. The absence of published clinical outcomes in this field renders it challenging to estimate clinical significance of these findings. Until such data become available, clinicians should remain aware of the possibility that atypical variants and medications may impact patients' responses to THC and CBD.

A cautionary tale of paradox and false positives in cannabidiol research

INTRODUCTION

Decades of research on cannabidiol (CBD) have identified thousands of purported cellular effects, and many of these have been proposed to correlate with a vast therapeutic potential. Yet despite the large volume of findings fueling broad optimism in this regard, few have translated into any demonstrable clinical benefit or even notable side effects. Therein resides the great paradox of CBD: a drug that appears to affect almost everything in vitro does not clearly do much of anything in a clinical setting.

AREAS COVERED

Comparative critical evaluation of literature searched in PubMed and Google Scholar discovers multiple instances of inconsistent and contradictory findings regarding the pharmacology and clinical effects of CBD, as well as several uncelebrated reports that suggest potential explanations for these observations. Many of those effects attributed to the ostensible pharmacologic activity of cannabidiol are almost certainly the product of false-positive experimental results and artifactual findings that are unlikely to be realized under physiologic conditions.

EXPERT OPINION

Concerns regarding the physiological relevance and translational potential of in vitro findings across the field of cannabinoid research are both far-reaching and demanding of attention in the form of appropriate experimental controls that remain almost universally absent.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Cannabidiol, Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, and Their Metabolites in Healthy Adults After Administration by Multiple Routes

The two most extensively studied cannabinoids, cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are used for myriad conditions. THC is predominantly eliminated via the cytochromes P450 (CYPs), whereas CBD is eliminated through both CYPs and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). The fractional contributions of these enzymes to cannabinoid metabolism have shown conflicting results among studies. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for CBD and THC and for drug-drug interaction studies involving CBD or THC as object drugs were developed and verified to improve estimates of these contributions. First, physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters for CBD, THC, and their metabolites (7-OH-CBD, 11-OH-THC, and 11-COOH-THC) were obtained from the literature or optimized. Second, PBPK base models were developed for CBD and THC after intravenous administration. Third, beginning with the intravenous models, absorption models were developed for CBD after oral and oromucosal spray administration and for THC after oral, inhalation, and oromucosal spray administration. The full models well-captured the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) of CBD and THC from the verification dataset. Predicted AUC and Cmax for CBD and 7-OH-CBD were within two-fold of the observed data. For THC, 11-OH-THC, and 11-COOH-THC, 100%, 100%, and 83% of the predicted AUC values were within two-fold, respectively, of the observed values; 100%, 92%, and 94% of the predicted Cmax values, respectively, were within two-fold of the observed values. The verified models could be used to help address critical public health needs, including assessing potential drug interaction risks involving CBD and THC.

Evaluation of the Drug-Drug Interaction Potential of Cannabidiol Against UGT2B7-Mediated Morphine Metabolism Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

Background: Morphine is a commonly prescribed opioid analgesic used to treat chronic pain. Morphine undergoes glucuronidation by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 to form morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide. Morphine is the gold standard for chronic pain management and has a narrow therapeutic index. Reports have shown that chronic pain patients have increasingly used other supplements to treat their chronic pain, including cannabidiol (CBD). Up to 50% of chronic pain patients report that they co-use cannabis with their prescribed opioid for pain management, including morphine. Previous work has shown that cannabidiol is a potent inhibitor of UGT2B7, including morphine-mediated metabolism. Co-use of morphine and CBD may result in unwanted drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Methods: Using available physiochemical and clinical parameters, morphine and CBD physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were developed and validated in both healthy and cirrhotic populations. Models for the two populations were then combined to predict the severity and clinical relevance of the potential DDIs during coadministration of both morphine and CBD in both healthy and hepatic-impaired virtual populations. Results: The predictive DDI model suggests that a ~5% increase in morphine exposure is to be expected in healthy populations. A similar increase in exposure of morphine is predicted in severe hepatic-impaired populations with an increase of ~10. Conclusions: While these predicted increases in morphine exposure are below the Food and Drug Administration's cutoff (1.25-fold increase), morphine has a narrow therapeutic index and a 5-10% increase in exposure may be clinically relevant. Future clinical studies are needed to fully characterize the clinical relevance of morphine-related DDIs.

Unveiling the impact of water-boiled cannabis on warfarin: A case report of atrial fibrillation patients after cannabis legalization in Thailand

Warfarin, a commonly prescribed anticoagulant, is utilized to prevent thrombotic issues and requires careful dose adjustment due to its narrow therapeutic range. As warfarin is metabolized by essential drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs), it is prone to interactions with a wide range of therapeutic agents, including herbal medicines. In June 2022, Thailand became the first country in Asia to remove cannabis plants from its narcotics control list, allowing individuals to cultivate them for personal use. Consequently, this report aimed to examine the interaction between cannabis and warfarin in Thai patients following the legalization of cannabis from 2021 to 2023. These three case reports elucidated the potential for drug interactions arising from the concurrent use of warfarin and water-boiled cannabis. This process involved placing cannabis flowers into a boiling kettle and subsequently consuming the resulting cannabis-infused water instead of regular drinking water. Our findings revealed that each atrial fibrillation patient had supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) levels ranging from 3.49 to 4.92, with no bleeding complications. Following the cessation of cannabis use, the INR levels decreased and returned to the therapeutic range for warfarin therapy. In summary, the current report indicates that water-boiled cannabis may influence the outcomes of warfarin therapy, as evidenced by the changes in INR levels.

Effect of cannabidiol and hemp extract on viability and function of hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells

Since the passage of the 2018 Agriculture Improvement Act (2018 Farm Bill), the number of products containing cannabis-derived compounds available to consumers have rapidly increased. Potential effects on liver function as a result from consumption of products containing cannabidiol (CBD), including hemp extracts, have been observed but the mechanisms for the effects are not fully understood. In this study, hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were used to evaluate potential hepatic effects of CBD and hemp extract at exposure concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 30 μM. Despite that a significant reduction in cell viability occurred only in the 30 μM group for both CBD and hemp extract, significant changes to cytochrome P450 activity, mitochondrial membrane potential, and lipid accumulation occurred within the concentration range of 0.1-3 μM for both CBD and hemp extract. Albumin and urea production, caspase 3/7 activity, and intracellular glutathione were significantly affected within the concentration range of 3-30 μM by CBD or hemp extract. These findings indicate that CBD and hemp extract can alter hepatic function and metabolism. The current study contributes data to help inform the evaluation of potential hepatotoxic effects of products containing cannabis-derived compounds.

Cannabinoid Therapy in Athletics: A Review of Current Cannabis Research to Evaluate Potential Real-World Cannabinoid Applications in Sport

The increasing legalization of Cannabis sativa plant products has sparked growing interest in their therapeutic applications. Prohibition laws established in 1937 hindered formal research on cannabis, a plant with cultural and medicinal roots dating back to 2700 BC in Chinese history. Despite regulatory hurdles, published research on cannabis has emerged; yet elite athletes remain an underrepresented population in these studies. Athletes, known for exploring diverse substances to optimize performance, are drawn to the potential benefits of cannabinoid therapy, with anecdotal reports suggesting positive effects on issues ranging from anxiety to brain injuries. This review aims to evaluate empirical published cannabis research with a specific focus on its potential applications in athletics. The changing legal landscape, especially the removal of cannabis from drug testing programs in leagues such as the National Basketball Association (NBA), and endorsements by Major League Baseball (MLB) for cannabinoid products and the National Football League (NFL) for cannabis research, reflects a shift in the acceptability of such substances in sports. However, stigma, confusion, and a lack of education persist, hindering a cohesive understanding among sports organizations, including business professionals, policymakers, coaches, and medical/training staff, in addition to athletes themselves. Adding to the confusion is the lack of consistency with cannabinoid regulations from sport to sport, within or out of competition, and with cannabis bioactive compounds. The need for this review is underscored by the evolving attitudes toward cannabinoids in professional sports and the potential therapeutic benefits or harms they may offer. By synthesizing current cannabis research, this review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the applications and implications of cannabinoid use in the realm of athletics.

An in vitro evaluation on metabolism of mitragynine to 9-O-demethylmitragynine

Kratom (Mitragyna Speciosa Korth.) is an indigenous tree native to Southeast Asia whose leaves have been traditionally ingested as a tea and has seen its popularity increase in the United States. Although kratom and its constituents presently have no approved uses by the Food and Drug Administration, its major alkaloids (e.g., mitragynine) have psychoactive properties that may hold promise for the treatment of opioid cessation, pain management, and other indications. 9-O-demethylmitragynine is a major metabolite formed from mitragynine metabolism (36 % total metabolism) and displays similar pharmacologic activity. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 has been identified as a major enzyme involved in mitragynine metabolism; however, the in vitro metabolism parameters of 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation are not well defined and a risk of potential drug interactions exists. Using human liver S9 fractions, 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation was generally linear for enzyme concentrations of 0-0.25 mg/mL and incubation times of 5-20 min. 9-O-demethylmitragynine displayed a Km 1.37 μM and Vmax of 0.0931 nmol/min/mg protein. Known CYP inhibitors and compounds that might be concomitantly used with kratom were assessed for inhibition of 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation. Ketoconazole, a CYP3A index inhibitor, demonstrated a significant effect on 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation, further implicating CYP3A4 as a major metabolic pathway. Major cannabinoids (10 μg/mL) displayed minor inhibition of 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation, while all other compounds had minimal effects. Mixtures of physiological achievable cannabinoid concentrations also displayed minor effects on 9-O-demethylmitragynine formation, making a metabolic drug interaction unlikely; however, further in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies are necessary to fully exclude any risk.

Green rush and red warnings: Retrospective chart review of adverse events of interactions between cannabinoids and psychotropic drugs

Aim

Our objective was to systematically assess the prevalence and clinical features of adverse events related to interactions between cannabinoids and psychotropic drugs through a retrospective chart review.

Methodology

1586 adverse event reports were assessed. Cases included in the analysis showed a high probability of a causal relationships between cannabinoid-psychotropic drug interactions and adverse events. Data extracted included age, sex, psychotropic drug, cannabinoid products, other medications, and the clinical outcomes and mechanisms of these interactions.

Results

Cannabinoids were involved in 8% of adverse events associated with the concomitant use of psychotropic drugs and other preparations. We identified 20 reports in which side effects presented a causal relationship with the use of psychotropic drugs and cannabinoids. Preparations containing 18% or more tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), presented significant side effects with the following antidepressants: mianserine (restless legs syndrome, urogenital pain, ventricular tachycardia), mirtazapine (pancreatitis, hyperhidrosis, arthralgia), quetiapine (myocarditis, renal failure, bradycardia, sialorrhea), haloperidol (ventricular arrhythmia, prolonged QTc), aripiprazole (prolonged QTc), ventricular tachycardia) and cariprazine (stomach pain, hepatotoxicity), sertraline (ataxia, hyperactivity, coma, hallucinations, anxiety, agitation, tachycardia, panic attacks, disorientation, headache, dizziness, blurry vision, severe emesis, xerostomia, dry eyes), trazodone (disorientation, memory impairment, sedation), fluvoxamine (tachycardia, tachypnoea, dysarthria, auditory hallucinations). Two out of 20 reports (10%) analyzed in our study was related with the simultaneous use of cannabidiol (CBD) oil and sertraline. Concomitant use of those substances was associated with the adverse events in form of diarrhea, emesis, fever and severe fatigue.

Conclusion

Clinicians need to closely monitor adverse events resulting from the combined use of cannabinoids and psychotropic medications. The accumulation of side effects and pharmacokinetic interactions (including CYP and p-glycoprotein inhibition) between these drugs can lead to clinically significant adverse outcomes.

The impact of cannabis use proximal to sleep and cannabinoid metabolites on sleep architecture

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Cannabis is a common sleep aid; however, the effects of its use prior to sleep are poorly understood. This study aims to determine the impact of nonmedical whole plant cannabis use 3 hours prior to sleep and measured cannabis metabolites on polysomnogram measures.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of 177 healthy adults who provided detailed cannabis use history, underwent a 1-night home sleep test and had measurement of 11 plasma and urinary cannabinoids, quantified using mass spectroscopy, the morning after the home sleep test. Multivariable models were used to assess the relationship between cannabis use proximal to sleep, which was defined as use 3 hours before sleep, and individual home sleep test measurements. Correlation between metabolite concentrations and polysomnogram measures were assessed.

RESULTS

In adjusted models, cannabis use proximal to sleep was associated with increased wake after sleep onset (median 60.5 vs 45.8 minutes), rate ratio 1.59 (1.22, 2.05), and increased proportion of stage 1 sleep (median 15.2% vs 12.3%), effect estimate 0.16 (0.06, 0.25). Compared to nonusers, frequent cannabis users (> 20 days per month) also had increased wake after sleep onset and stage 1 sleep, in addition to increased rapid eye movement latency and decreased percent sleep efficiency. Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol metabolites correlated with these home sleep test measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis use proximal to sleep was associated with minimal changes in sleep architecture. Its use was not associated with measures of improved sleep including increased sleep time or efficiency and may be associated with poor quality sleep through increased wake onset and stage 1 sleep.

CITATION

Althoff MD, Kinney GL, Aloia MS, Sempio C, Klawitter J, Bowler RP. The impact of cannabis use proximal to sleep and cannabinoid metabolites on sleep architecture. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(10):1615-1625.

Cannabidiol (CBD): Confronting consumers' expectations of therapeutic benefits with pharmacological reality

In recent years, the increase in cannabidiol (CBD) sales in Europe has raised questions regarding the legal status of this product, as well as its safety of use. Consumers seem to be looking for solutions to various health issues. However, the scientific reality is much more nuanced. The European CBD market emerged in Switzerland in 2016 and subsequently expanded across the continent. This expansion has been facilitated by the establishment of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration limits for these products. However, the current market offers a diverse range of CBD products, often lacking clear information on raw materials, product concentrations and recommended dosages. Regulating these products is challenging, as the appropriate classification of CBD remains uncertain. CBD products are in high demand worldwide, with many people seeking alternative treatments for medical conditions or general health and well-being benefits. However, the use of CBD products often relies on self-medication and lacks sufficient scientific evidence. Improved communication between patients and healthcare professionals is needed to ensure informed decisions and address potential interactions with other medications. Scientific evidence on CBD is currently limited and the efficacy of CBD-containing products has only been proven in clinical trials for Epidyolex® as an add-on therapy. There is no consensus on the long-term safety, appropriate dosage, schedules or administration routes for CBD. Health claims associated with CBD are not consistent with the available scientific research, which is still in its early stages. Further clinical research is needed to establish the efficacy and safety of CBD in various medical conditions. The enthusiasm surrounding CBD-based products should be tempered by the limited scientific evidence of their efficacy, the inadequacy of patient expectations, regulatory concerns and potential drug interactions.

Cannabinoids in Integumentary Wound Care: A Systematic Review of Emerging Preclinical and Clinical Evidence

This systematic review critically evaluates preclinical and clinical data on the antibacterial and wound healing properties of cannabinoids in integument wounds. Comprehensive searches were conducted across multiple databases, including CINAHL, Cochrane library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and LILACS, encompassing records up to May 22, 2024. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven were animal studies, predominantly utilizing murine models (n = 10) and one equine model, involving 437 animals. The seven human studies ranged from case reports to randomized controlled trials, encompassing 92 participants aged six months to ninety years, with sample sizes varying from 1 to 69 patients. The studies examined the effects of various cannabinoid formulations, including combinations with other plant extracts, crude extracts, and purified and synthetic cannabis-based medications administered topically, intraperitoneally, orally, or sublingually. Four animal and three human studies reported complete wound closure. Hemp fruit oil extract, cannabidiol (CBD), and GP1a resulted in complete wound closure in twenty-three (range: 5-84) days with a healing rate of 66-86% within ten days in animal studies. One human study documented a wound healing rate of 3.3 cm2 over 30 days, while three studies on chronic, non-healing wounds reported an average healing time of 54 (21-150) days for 17 patients by oral oils with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and CBD and topical gels with THC, CBD, and terpenes. CBD and tetrahydrocannabidiol demonstrated significant potential in reducing bacterial loads in murine models. However, further high-quality research is imperative to fully elucidate the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in the treatment of bacterial skin infections and wounds. Additionally, it is crucial to delineate the impact of medicinal cannabis on the various phases of wound healing. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021255413).

Patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

There has been limited study regarding patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. To address this gap, this study assesses the determinants and prevalence of patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

METHODS

Individuals who completed cancer treatment from July 2017 to December 2019 were invited to participate in a survey regarding medical cannabis. An electronic survey was administered in English and Spanish from August to November 2021 and completed by 1592 individuals (response rate = 17.6%).

RESULTS

About one-third (33.5%) of participants reported discussing medical cannabis for cancer symptom management with a health-care provider. Controlling for other factors, individuals with malnutrition and/or cachexia had higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50 to 3.53) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without malnutrition and/or cachexia. Similarly, individuals with nausea had higher odds (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.44 to 2.61) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without nausea. A smaller percentage (15.6%) of participants reported receiving a recommendation for medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. Among individuals who reported using cannabis, a little over one-third (36.1%) reported not receiving instructions from anyone on how to use cannabis or determine how much to take.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study suggests that patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management is limited. As interest and use of medical cannabis continues to grow among cancer patients, there is a need to ensure patients have access to high quality patient-provider communication.

Cannabinoids and triple-negative breast cancer treatment

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for about 10-20% of all breast cancer cases and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Until recently, treatment options for TNBC were limited to chemotherapy. A new successful systemic treatment is immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, but new tumor-specific biomarkers are needed to improve patient outcomes. Cannabinoids show antitumor activity in most preclinical studies in TNBC models and do not appear to have adverse effects on chemotherapy. Clinical data are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety in humans. Importantly, the endocannabinoid system is linked to the immune system and immunosuppression. Therefore, cannabinoid receptors could be a potential biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy or a novel mechanism to reverse resistance to immunotherapy. In this article, we provide an overview of the currently available information on how cannabinoids may influence standard therapy in TNBC.

Potential perioperative cardiovascular outcomes in cannabis/cannabinoid users. A call for caution

Background

Cannabis is one of the most widely used psychoactive substances. Its components act through several pathways, producing a myriad of side effects, of which cardiovascular events are the most life-threatening. However, only a limited number of studies address cannabis's perioperative impact on patients during noncardiac surgery.

Methods

Studies were identified by searching the PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using relevant keyword combinations pertinent to the topic.

Results

Current evidence shows that cannabis use may cause several cardiovascular events, including abnormalities in cardiac rhythm, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular events. Additionally, cannabis interacts with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, decreasing their efficacy. Finally, the interplay of cannabis with inhalational and intravenous anesthetic agents may lead to adverse perioperative cardiovascular outcomes.

Conclusions

The use of cannabis can trigger cardiovascular events that may depend on factors such as the duration of consumption, the route of administration of the drug, and the dose consumed, which places these patients at risk of drug-drug interactions with anesthetic agents. However, large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to further elucidate gaps in the body of knowledge regarding which patient population has a greater risk of perioperative complications after cannabis consumption.

Non-linear plasma protein binding of cannabidiol

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol is highly bound to plasma proteins. Changes in its protein binding can lead to altered unbound plasma concentrations and result in alteration of pharmacological activity of cannabidiol-containing medications. This research has assessed non-linearity of cannabidiol plasma protein binding and the potential effect of tizoxanide on the binding.

METHOD

Cannabidiol protein binding was evaluated by ultrafiltration technique. Human plasma was spiked with cannabidiol stock solution to produce samples of various concentrations. For interaction study potential interactant tizoxanide was added in each sample. All samples were processed through Amicon Micropartition system and analyzed by HPLC.

RESULTS

The study has detected cannabidiol binding to borosilicate glass (9%) and polyethylene plastics (15%). In the interaction study the mean protein unbound fraction of cannabidiol was 0.05 (5%), indicating no binding interaction between cannabidiol and tizoxanide since cannabidiol unbound fraction without tizoxanide was also 5%. The cannabidiol fraction unbound was more than 2-fold greater at high concentrations compared to low concentrations.

CONCLUSION

a). At high concentrations cannabidiol plasma protein binding is non-linear. The non-linearity can affect elimination and medicinal effect of cannabidiol drugs. b). Borosilicate and polyethylene containers should be avoided in formulation, packing and administration of cannabidiol-containing medicines to guarantee correct doses. c). Cannabidiol medications can be co-administered with tizoxanide without caution.

Hepatoprotective Effect of Cannabidiol on the Progression of Experimental Hepatic Cirrhosis in Rats

Introduction: Liver cirrhosis is a condition characterized by the gradual replacement of normal liver tissue with scar tissue, ultimately leading to liver failure. This slow and progressive disease begins with a chronic inflammatory process induced by a noxious agent. In its advanced stages, the disease lacks effective therapies. Research has demonstrated the significant involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the pathogenesis of this disease. This study evaluated the hepatoprotective effect of cannabidiol (CBD) in the progression of experimental hepatic cirrhosis induced by thioacetamide (TAA) in rats. Methods: A randomized experimental design was employed using Holtzman rats. Hepatic cirrhosis was induced by intraperitoneal administration of TAA at a dose of 150 mg/kg for 6 weeks, with treatment initiated additionally. The groups were as follows: Group 1: TAA + vehicle; Group 2: TAA + CBD 2 mg/kg; Group 3: TAA + CBD 9 mg/kg; Group 4: TAA + CBD 18 mg/kg; Group 5: TAA + silymarin 50 mg/kg; and Group 6: Healthy control. Serum biochemical analysis (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin) and hepatic histopathological study were performed. The Knodell histological activity index (HAI) was determined, considering periportal necrosis, intralobular degeneration, portal inflammation, fibrosis, and focal necrosis. Results: All groups receiving TAA exhibited an elevation in AST levels; however, only those treated with CBD at doses of 2 mg/kg and 18 mg/kg did not experience significant changes compared to their baseline values (152.8 and 135.7 IU/L, respectively). Moreover, ALT levels in animals treated with CBD showed no significant variation compared to baseline. The HAI of hepatic tissue was notably lower in animals treated with CBD at doses of 9 and 18 mg/kg, scoring 3.0 and 3.25, respectively, in contrast to the TAA + vehicle group, which recorded a score of 7.00. Animals treated with CBD at 18 mg/kg showed a reduced degree of fibrosis and necrosis compared to those receiving TAA alone (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that cannabidiol exerts a hepatoprotective effect in the development of experimental hepatic cirrhosis induced in rats.

Advances and Challenges in Modeling Cannabidiol Pharmacokinetics and Hepatotoxicity

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a pharmacologically active metabolite of cannabis that is US Food and Drug Administration approved to treat seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex in children aged 1 year and older. During clinical trials, CBD caused dose-dependent hepatocellular toxicity at therapeutic doses. The risk for toxicity was increased in patients taking valproate, another hepatotoxic antiepileptic drug, through an unknown mechanism. With the growing popularity of CBD in the consumer market, an improved understanding of the safety risks associated with CBD is needed to ensure public health. This review details current efforts to describe CBD pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of hepatotoxicity using both pharmacokinetic models and in vitro models of the liver. In addition, current evidence and knowledge gaps related to intracellular mechanisms of CBD-induced hepatotoxicity are described. The authors propose future directions that combine systems-based models with markers of CBD-induced hepatotoxicity to understand how CBD pharmacokinetics may influence the adverse effect profile and risk of liver injury for those taking CBD. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review describes current pharmacokinetic modeling approaches to capture the metabolic clearance and safety profile of cannabidiol (CBD). CBD is an increasingly popular natural product and US Food and Drug Administration-approved antiepileptic drug known to cause clinically significant enzyme-mediated drug interactions and hepatotoxicity at therapeutic doses. CBD metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and putative mechanisms of CBD-induced liver injury are summarized from available preclinical data to inform future modeling efforts for understanding CBD toxicity.

Drug-Cannabinoid Interactions in Selected Therapeutics for Symptoms Associated with Epilepsy, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Cancer, Multiple Sclerosis, and Pain

Clinical practice entails a translation of research that assists in the use of scientific data and therapeutic evidence for the benefit of the patient. This review critically summarizes the potential impact of cannabinoids in conjunction with other drugs when associated with treatments for epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder, cancer, multiple sclerosis, and chronic pain. In these associations, potential drug interactions may occur and alter the predicted clinical results. Therefore, the potential for drug interactions must always be assessed to avoid therapeutic failures and/or increased side effects. Some effects may be additive, synergistic, or antagonistic, but changes in absorption, distribution, metabolism, particularly through cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes (e.g., CYP2C9 and CYP3A4), and excretion may also occur. For example, the combination of cannabis-derived compounds and the antifungal drug ketoconazole, a CYP3A4 inhibitor, increases the plasma concentration of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). In contrast, rifampicin, a CYP3A4 inducer, stands out for reducing plasma THC levels by approximately 20-40% and 50% to 60% for CBD. Other CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers are likely to have a similar effect on plasma concentrations if co-administered. Pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsant medications have also been reported, as have pharmacodynamic interactions between cannabinoids and medications with sympathomimetic effects (e.g., tachycardia, hypertension), central nervous system depressants (e.g., drowsiness, ataxia), and anticholinergics (e.g., tachycardia and somnolence). Although further studies are still pending, there is currently clinical evidence supporting drug interactions with cannabinoids, requiring doctors to evaluate the risk of drug combinations with cannabinoids and vice versa. The tables provided here were designed to facilitate the identification of biorelevant interactions that may compromise therapeutic efficacy and toxicity.

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs and direct oral anticoagulants for primary and secondary stroke prevention

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the guideline-recommended therapy for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism. Since approximately 10% of patients using antiepileptic drugs (AED) also receive DOAC, aim of this review is to summarize data about drug-drug interactions (DDI) of DOAC with AED by using data from PubMed until December 2023.

AREAS COVERED

Of 49 AED, only 16 have been investigated regarding DDI with DOAC by case reports or observational studies. No increased risk for stroke was reported only for topiramate, zonisamide, pregabalin, and gabapentin, whereas for the remaining 12 AED conflicting results regarding the risk for stroke and bleeding were found. Further 16 AED have the potential for pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic DDI, but no data regarding DOAC are available. For the remaining 17 AED it is unknown if they have DDI with DOAC.

EXPERT OPINION

Knowledge about pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic DDI of AED and DOAC is limited and frequently restricted to in vitro and in vivo findings. Since no data about DDI with DOAC are available for 67% of AED and an increasing number of patients have a combined medication of DOAC and AED, there is an urgent need for research on this topic.

Cannabidiol and pharmacokinetics drug-drug interactions: Pharmacological toolbox

Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the most important components of the Cannabis sativa plant with delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). CBD is used both for medical and recreational purposes. It can be of pharmaceutical grade (Epidyolex®), and also self-service purchased in pharmacy, CBD shops and on the internet (non-pharmaceutical). CBD is almost as widespread as it is poorly understood from a pharmacological point of view and particularly in terms of drug interactions. Drug-drug interactions could lead to clinical complications, and we here gather data currently available on pharmacokinetics (PK) drug-drug interactions with CBD through a narrative review. This review shows that several PK drug-drug interactions exist with different class of medications and aims to help clinicians to better know about CBD for their practice as this product is increasingly used.

Cannabis use in liver transplant candidates and recipients

The increasing legality and acceptance of cannabis sale and consumption across the United States has led to a measurable increase in cannabis use nationwide, including in liver transplant (LT) candidates and recipients. With over 75% of liver transplant recipients transplanted in states with legalized use of medicinal and/or recreational cannabis, liver transplant clinicians must have expertise in the assessment of cannabis use given its potential impact on clinical care. In this review, the authors provide an understanding of nomenclature and tools to assess cannabis use, highlight essential components to guide clinical policy development and implementation, and discuss the potential impacts of cannabis use on patients' transplant course.

Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide clinicians, adults with cancer, caregivers, researchers, and oncology institutions on the medical use of cannabis and cannabinoids, including synthetic cannabinoids and herbal cannabis derivatives; single, purified cannabinoids; combinations of cannabis ingredients; and full-spectrum cannabis.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of cannabis and cannabinoids when used by adults with cancer. Outcomes of interest included antineoplastic effects, cancer treatment toxicity, symptoms, and quality of life. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to January 27, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

The evidence base consisted of 13 systematic reviews and five additional primary studies (four RCTs and one cohort study). The certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low or very low.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Cannabis and/or cannabinoid access and use by adults with cancer has outpaced the science supporting their clinical use. This guideline provides strategies for open, nonjudgmental communication between clinicians and adults with cancer about the use of cannabis and/or cannabinoids. Clinicians should recommend against using cannabis or cannabinoids as a cancer-directed treatment unless within the context of a clinical trial. Cannabis and/or cannabinoids may improve refractory, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting when added to guideline-concordant antiemetic regimens. Whether cannabis and/or cannabinoids can improve other supportive care outcomes remains uncertain. This guideline also highlights the critical need for more cannabis and/or cannabinoid research.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

CBD and THC in Special Populations: Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions

Cannabinoid use has surged in the past decade, with a growing interest in expanding cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) applications into special populations. Consequently, the increased use of CBD and THC raises the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Nevertheless, DDIs for cannabinoids, especially in special populations, remain inadequately investigated. While some clinical trials have explored DDIs between therapeutic drugs like antiepileptic drugs and CBD/THC, more potential interactions remain to be examined. This review summarizes the published studies on CBD and THC-drug interactions, outlines the mechanisms involved, discusses the physiological considerations in pharmacokinetics (PK) and DDI studies in special populations (including pregnant and lactating women, pediatrics, older adults, patients with hepatic or renal impairments, and others), and presents modeling approaches that can describe the DDIs associated with CBD and THC in special populations. The PK of CBD and THC in special populations remain poorly characterized, with limited studies investigating DDIs involving CBD/THC in these populations. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate potential DDIs between CBD/THC and medications that are commonly used in special populations. Modeling approaches can aid in understanding these interactions.

Effect of CYP2D6, 2C19, and 3A4 Phenoconversion in Drug-Related Deaths

Molecular autopsy is a very important tool in forensic toxicology. However, many determinants, such as co-medication and physiological parameters, should be considered for optimal results. These determinants could cause phenoconversion (PC), a discrepancy between the real metabolic profile after phenoconversion and the phenotype determined by the genotype. This study's objective was to assess the PC of drug-metabolizing enzymes, namely CYP2D6, 2C19, and 3A4, in 45 post-mortem cases where medications that are substrates, inducers, or inhibitors of these enzymes were detected. It also intended to evaluate how PC affected the drug's metabolic ratio (MR) in four cases. Blood samples from 45 cases of drug-related deaths were analyzed to detect and determine drug and metabolite concentrations. Moreover, all the samples underwent genotyping utilizing the HaloPlex Target Enrichment System for CYP2D6, 2C19, and 3A4. The results of the present study revealed a statistically significant rate of PC for the three investigated enzymes, with a higher frequency of poor metabolizers after PC. A compatibility was seen between the results of the genomic evaluation after PC and the observed MRs of venlafaxine, citalopram, and fentanyl. This leads us to focus on the determinants causing PC that may be mainly induced by drug interactions. This complex phenomenon can have a significant impact on the analysis, interpretation of genotypes, and accurate conclusions in forensic toxicology. Nevertheless, more research with more cases in the future is needed to confirm these results.

Cannabinoid-Induced Inhibition of Morphine Glucuronidation and the Potential for In Vivo Drug-Drug Interactions

Opioids are commonly prescribed for the treatment of chronic pain. Approximately 50% of adults who are prescribed opioids for pain co-use cannabis with their opioid treatment. Morphine is primarily metabolized by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7 to an inactive metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and an active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). Previous studies have shown that major cannabis constituents including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) inhibit major UGT enzymes. To examine whether cannabinoids or their major metabolites inhibit morphine glucuronidation by UGT2B7, in vitro assays and mechanistic static modeling were performed with these cannabinoids and their major metabolites including 11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC), 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-COOH-THC), 7-hydroxy-cannabidiol (7-OH-CBD), and 7-carboxy-cannabidiol (7-COOH-CBD). In vitro assays with rUGT-overexpressing microsomes and human liver microsomes showed that THC and CBD and their metabolites inhibited UGT2B7-mediated morphine metabolism, with CBD and THC exhibiting the most potent Ki,u values (0.16 µM and 0.37 µM, respectively). Only 7-COOH-CBD exhibited no inhibitory activity against UGT2B7-mediated morphine metabolism. Static mechanistic modeling predicted an in vivo drug-drug interaction between morphine and THC after inhaled cannabis, and between THC, CBD, and 7-OH-CBD after oral consumption of cannabis. These data suggest that the co-use of these agents may lead to adverse drug events in humans.

Cannabinoid-Induced Stereoselective Inhibition of R-S-Oxazepam Glucuronidation: Cannabinoid-Oxazepam Drug Interactions

Benzodiazepines (BZDs) such as oxazepam are commonly prescribed depressant drugs known for their anxiolytic, hypnotic, muscle relaxant, and anticonvulsant effects and are frequently used in conjunction with other illicit drugs including cannabis. Oxazepam is metabolized in an enantiomeric-specific manner by glucuronidation, with S-oxazepam metabolized primarily by UGT2B15 and R-oxazepam glucuronidation mediated by both UGT 1A9 and 2B7. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the potential inhibitory effects of major cannabinoids, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and major THC metabolites, 11-hydroxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-COOH-THC), on the UGT-mediated metabolism of R- and S-oxazepam. The cannabinoids and metabolites were screened as inhibitors of R- and S-oxazepam glucuronidation in microsomes isolated from HEK293 cells overexpressing individual UGT enzymes (rUGTs). The IC50 values were determined in human liver microsomes (HLM), human kidney microsomes (HKM), and rUGTs and utilized to estimate the nonspecific, binding-corrected Ki (Ki,u) values and predict the area under the concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR). The estimated Ki,u values observed in HLM for S- and R-oxazepam glucuronidation by CBD, 11-OH-THC, and THC were in the micromolar range (0.82 to 3.7 µM), with the Ki,u values observed for R-oxazepam glucuronidation approximately 2- to 5-fold lower as compared to those observed for S-oxazepam glucuronidation. The mechanistic static modeling predicted a potential clinically significant interaction between oral THC and CBD with oxazepam, with the AUCR values ranging from 1.25 to 3.45. These data suggest a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction when major cannabinoids like CBD or THC and oxazepam are concurrently administered.

Effects of cannabidiol and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on cytochrome P450 enzymes: a systematic review

Due to legal, political, and cultural changes, the use of cannabis has rapidly increased in recent years. Research has demonstrated that the cannabinoids cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) inhibit and induce cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect of CBD and THC on the activity of CYP450 enzymes and the implications for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with psychotropic agents that are CYP substrates. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) and PsychINFO. Search terms included 'cannabidiol', 'tetrahydrocannabinol', and 'cytochrome P450'. A total of seven studies evaluating the interaction of THC and CBD with CYP450 enzymes and psychotropic drugs were included. Both preclinical and clinical studies were included. Results from the included studies indicate that both CBD and THC inhibit several CYP450 enzymes including, but not limited to, CYP1A2, CYP3C19, and CYP2B6. While there are a few known CYP450 enzymes that are induced by THC and CBD, the induction of CYP450 enzymes is an understudied area of research and lacks clinical data. The inhibitory effects observed by CBD and THC on CYP450 enzymes vary in magnitude and may decrease the metabolism of psychotropic agents, cause changes in plasma levels of psychotropic medications, and increase adverse effects. Our findings clearly present interactions between THC and CBD and several CYP450 enzymes, providing clinicians evidence of a high risk of DDIs for patients who consume both cannabis and psychotropic medication. However, more clinical research is necessary before results are applied to clinical settings.

Syntheses of Cannabinoid Metabolites: Ajulemic Acid and HU-210

Cannabinoid metabolites have been reported to be more potent than their parent compounds. Among them, ajulemic acid (AJA) is a side-chain analog of Δ9-THC-11-oic acid, which would be a good template structure for the discovery of more potent analogues. Herein, we optimized the key allylic oxidation step to introduce the C-11 hydroxy group with a high yield. A series of compounds was prepared with this condition applied including HU-210, 11-nor-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-carboxylic acid and Δ9-THC-carboxylic acid.

In vitro Effect of Cannabidiol on Red Blood Cells: Implication in Long-Lasting Pathology Treatment

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol (CBD) is the principal non-hallucinogenic compound of Cannabis plants with high clinical interest because CBD has been described as having anti-inflammatory, analgesic and anticonvulsant properties. CBD is considered a multitarget compound as it can interact with a wide range of targets, explaining their multiplicity of effects. Some clinical studies have indicated certain side effects of CBD, including somnolence, anemia and diarrhea, while the elevation of transaminases is considered as an exclusion criterion from the trial. Since the red blood cells (RBCs) are a source of transaminase, we assayed in vitro effect on RBCs stability.

METHODS

We performed in vitro experiments with RBCs obtained from human peripheral blood with normal hematological parameters exposed to CBD in the range of therapeutic uses. We evaluated RBCs morphological changes, membrane fragility and hemoglobin release as a reflection of hemolysis.

RESULTS

CBD induced an increase in the hemoglobin release (3.27 μg/106 RBC), without altered RBC osmotic fragility. When RBCs suspensions were incubated with CBD the initial number of elements (RBCs + vesicles) was increased up to 65% after 20 min and returned to basal level after 40 min of incubation. In the first 20 min, the accounts of elements were enriched in the smaller vesicles that disappeared after the remaining 20 minutes.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that CBD affects the indemnity of erythrocytes in vitro, inducing the formation of hemolytic vesicles that can provide the basis for the development of anemia, transaminase elevation and underlying tissular iron overload in patients chronically treated with CBD.

Cannabidiol and cannabidiolic acid: Preliminary in vitro evaluation of metabolism and drug-drug interactions involving canine cytochrome P-450, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase, and P-glycoprotein

Phytocannabinoid-rich hemp extracts containing cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) are increasingly being used to treat various disorders in dogs. The objectives of this study were to obtain preliminary information regarding the in vitro metabolism of these compounds and their capacity to inhibit canine cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated drug metabolism and canine P-glycoprotein-mediated transport. Pure CBD and CBDA, and hemp extracts enriched for CBD and for CBDA were evaluated. Substrate depletion assays using pooled dog liver microsomes showed CYP cofactor-dependent depletion of CBD (but not CBDA) and UDP-glucuronosytransferase cofactor-dependent depletion of CBDA (but not CBD) indicating major roles for CYP and UDP-glucuronosytransferase in the metabolism of these phytocannabinoids, respectively. Further studies using recombinant canine CYPs demonstrated substantial CBD depletion by the major hepatic P450 enzymes CYP1A2 and CYP2C21. These results were confirmed by showing increased CBD depletion by liver microsomes from dogs treated with a known CYP1A2 inducer (β-naphthoflavone) and with a known CYP2C21 inducer (phenobarbital). Cannabinoid-drug inhibition experiments showed inhibition (IC50  = 4.6-8.1 μM) of tramadol metabolism via CYP2B11-mediated N-demethylation (CBD and CBDA) and CYP2D15-mediated O-demethylation (CBDA only) by dog liver microsomes. CBD and CBDA did not inhibit CYP3A12-mediated midazolam 1'-hydroxylation (IC50  > 10 μM). CBD and CBDA were not substrates or competitive inhibitors of canine P-glycoprotein. Results for cannabinoid-enriched hemp extracts were identical to those for pure cannabinoids. These in vitro studies indicate the potential for cannabinoid-drug interactions involving certain CYPs (but not P-glycoprotein). Confirmatory in vivo studies are warranted.

Tolerability of long-term cannabidiol supplementation to healthy adult dogs

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol (CBD) has therapeutic potential in companion animals. Shorter-term studies have determined that CBD is well tolerated in dogs with mild adverse effects and an increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. There is need to assess CBD's long-term tolerability.

HYPOTHESIS

Determine the long-term tolerability of CBD administered PO to healthy dogs for 36 weeks at dosages of 5 and 10 mg/kg body weight (BW)/day. Our hypothesis was that CBD would be well tolerated by dogs.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy adult beagle dogs were randomly assigned to 3 groups of 6 each that received 0, 5, or 10 mg/kg BW/day CBD PO. Dogs were adapted to their housing for 3 weeks and received treatment for 36 weeks once daily with food. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded daily. Blood biochemistry profiles were monitored every 4 weeks. Data were analyzed as repeated measures over time using a mixed model, with significance at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The 0 and 5 mg/kg treatment groups had similar fecal scores, and the 10 mg/kg treatment group had higher frequency of soft feces. No other significant AEs were noted. An increase (P < .0001) in ALP activity occurred in groups that received CBD. Remaining blood variables were within reference range.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Chronic administration of CBD in healthy dogs at 5 mg/kg was better tolerated than 10 mg/kg, and both dosages caused an increase in ALP activity. Although our data does not indicate hepatic damage, it is recommended to monitor liver function in dogs receiving CBD chronically.

Safety and risks of CBD oils purchased online: unveiling uncertain quality and vague health claims

Introduction: The unmet need for highly effective, naturally derived products with minimal side effects results in the over-popularity of ever-newer medicinal plants. In the middle of 2010, products containing cannabidiol (CBD), one of the special metabolites of Cannabis sativa, started to gain popularity. For consumers and healthcare providers alike, the legal context surrounding the marketing of CBD products is not entirely clear, and the safety of using some products is in doubt. Companies in the online medicinal product market profit from the confusion around CBD oils. Methods: In our study, we employed a complex method known as risk-based safety mapping of the online pharmaceutical market, which included health claim content analysis of online stores, test purchases, and labeling and quantitative analysis of the CBD content. Results: There were discovered 16 online retailers selling an average of 2-7 goods and CBD oils with a concentration of 3%-5% (30-50 mg/mL) CBD. The majority (n/N = 10/16, 62.5%) displayed potential health-related benefits indirectly on their website, and in the case of one web shop (n/N = 1/16, 6.3%), we detected COVID-19-related use. Altogether, 30 types of purported "indications" were collected. A total of 12 CBD oil products were test-purchased from online retailers in December 2020. Upon evaluating the packaging and product information, we noticed that three products (n/N = 3/12, 25%) lacked instructions on use, hence increasing the risk of inappropriate application and dosing. The cannabidiol content was quantified using UHPLC. The measured CBD concentrations of the products ranged from 19.58 mg/mL to 54.09 mg/mL (mean 35.51 mg/mL, median 30.63 mg/mL, and SD ± 12.57 mg/mL). One (8.33%) product was underlabeled, five (41.67%) were over-labeled, and only every second product (50%) was appropriately labeled based on the quantitative assessment of CBD concentration. Discussion: Further research and quality control are necessary to establish the regulatory context of the usage and classification of CBD and other cannabinoids in nonmedicinal products (e.g., food supplements), as authorities and policymakers worldwide struggle with the uncertainties surrounding CBD products.

Analytical toxicology of the semi-synthetic cannabinoid hexahydrocannabinol studied in human samples, pooled human liver S9 fraction, rat samples and drug products using HPLC-HRMS-MS

Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) is an emerging semi-synthetic cannabinoid, which is obtained from cyclization of cannabidiol and subsequent hydrogenation. As a potentially legal alternative of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC), it is increasingly seized in the USA and Europe. The aims of this study were to investigate the metabolism of HHC in pooled human liver S9 fraction (pHLS9), rat and human samples. Additionally, a locally obtained low-THC cannabis product was investigated, which was advertised with an elevated concentration of HHC. Overall, HHC formed an 11-hydroxy (HO) metabolite, as well as a carboxy metabolite. While only the parent compound was detected in rat urine and feces, the hydroxy metabolite was additionally detected in pHLS9 and human plasma. The carboxy metabolite was only detectable in human plasma. The metabolism corresponded well to that of ∆9-THC, although glucuronidation and the formation of an 8-HO metabolite were not observed. Detectability of HHC and its carboxy metabolite in rat urine was investigated using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, but neither the parent compound nor the metabolite were detectable. The investigated low-THC cannabis product appeared to be an actual cannabis product since, in addition to HHC, cannabinol, cannabidiol and ∆9-THC were detected after qualitative analysis. Estimation of its content revealed not only 30.6% of HHC but also 4% of ∆9-THC.

Drug Interactions of Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol in Cannabinoid Drugs

BACKGROUND

Cannabinoid drugs containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or its structural analogues, as monotherapeutic agents or as extracts or botanical preparations with or without cannabidiol (CBD) are often prescribed to multimorbid patients who are taking multiple drugs. This raises the question of the risk of drug interactions.

METHODS

This review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of interactions with cannabinoid drugs and their potential effects is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search.

RESULTS

As THC and CBD are largely metabolized in the liver, their bioavailability after oral or oral-mucosal administration is low (6-8% and 11-13%, respectively). The plasma concentrations of THC and its active metabolite 11-OH-THC can be increased by strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (verapamil, clarithromycin) and decreased by strong CYP3A4 inductors (rifampicin, carbamazepine). The clinical significance of these effects is unclear because of the variable plasma level and therapeutic spectrum of THC. The metabolism of CBD is less dependent on cytochrome P450 enzymes than that of THC. THC and CBD inhibit CYP2C and CYP3A4; the corresponding clinically relevant drug interactions probably are likely to arise only with THC doses above 30 mg/day and CBD doses above 300 mg/day.

CONCLUSION

Potential drug interactions with THC and CBD are probably of little importance at low or moderate doses. Strong CYP inhibitors or inductors can intensify or weaken their effect. Slowly ramping up the dose of oral cannabinoid drugs can lessen their pharmacodynamic interactions, which can generally be well controlled. Administration by inhalation can worsen the interactions.

Cannabidiol's impact on drug-metabolization

IMPORTANCE

Products containing cannabidiol(CBD) are easily accessible. CBD is reported to inhibit the drug-metabolizing proteins(DMP) Cytochrome P450(CYP)3A4/5, CYP2C9, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP1A2, CYP2C19, carboxylesterase 1(CES1), uridine 5'diphospho-glucoronosyltransferase(UGT)1A9, UGT2B7, P-glycoprotein(P-gp) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein(BCRP). The relevance of CBD-drug interactions is largely unknown. Aim of the study was to identify drugs, potentially interacting with orally ingested CBD, to assess whether CBD-drug interactions have been reported, and if substrates of DMP are frequently prescribed drugs.

OBSERVATIONS

Identified were 403 drugs as substrates of DMP. CBD-drug interactions were reported for 53/403 substrates in humans (n = 25), in vivo (n = 13) or in vitro (n = 15). In 31/53 substrates, CBD induced an increase, in 1/53 a decrease, in 4/53 no change in the substrate level. For 5/53 substrates, the results were controversial, and in 12/53 no substrate levels were reported. Among the 30 most frequently prescribed drugs in Germany were 67% substrates of DMP and among the 50 most frequently prescribed drugs in the USA 68%.

RELEVANCE AND CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need for pharmacologic studies on CBD-drug interactions. Patients should be educated on the potential risk and awareness should be increased among physicians. Regulatory authorities should become aware of the problem and start an initiative on an international level to increase the safety of CBD.

Pharmacokinetics of Two Nanoemulsion Formulations of Δ8-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Rats

The use of Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC) has increased in recent years. Given that the oral absorption of cannabinoids in oil formulations is typically slow and variable, nanoemulsions may be an improved delivery vehicle. Therefore, we characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) in Sprague-Dawley rats following the administration of three different oral formulations containing 10 mg/kg Δ8-THC: a translucent liquid nanoemulsion, a reconstituted powder nanoemulsion, and a medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil solution for comparison. Δ8-THC was also administered intravenously at 0.6 mg/kg. Plasma samples were quantified for Δ8-THC and two metabolites, 11-hydroxy-Δ8-THC (11-OH-Δ8-THC) and 11-carboxy-Δ8-THC (COOH-Δ8-THC). Non-compartmental PK parameters were calculated, and a PK model was developed based on pooled data. Despite a smaller median droplet size of the translucent liquid nanoemulsion (26.9 nm) compared to the reconstituted powder nanoemulsion (168 nm), the PK was similar for both. The median Tmax values of Δ8-THC for the nanoemulsions (0.667 and 1 h) were significantly shorter than the median Tmax of Δ8-THC in MCT oil (6 h). This resulted in an approximately 4-fold higher Δ8-THC exposure over the first 4 h for the nanoemulsions relative to the MCT oil solution. The active 11-OH-Δ8-THC metabolite followed a similar pattern to Δ8-THC. The non-compartmental bioavailability estimates of Δ8-THC for the nanoemulsions (11-16.5%) were lower than for the MCT oil solution (>21.5%). However, a model-based analysis indicated similar bioavailability for all three oral formulations. These results demonstrate favorable absorption properties of both nanoemulsions, despite the difference in droplet sizes, compared to an MCT oil formulation.

Cannabis as a Source of Approved Drugs: A New Look at an Old Problem

Cannabis plants have been used in medicine since ancient times. They are well known for their anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anti-cancer, anti-oxidative, anti-microbial, anti-viral, and anti-fungal activities. A growing body of evidence indicates that targeting the endocannabinoid system and various other receptors with cannabinoid compounds holds great promise for addressing multiple medical conditions. There are two distinct avenues in the development of cannabinoid-based drugs. The first involves creating treatments directly based on the components of the cannabis plant. The second involves a singular molecule strategy, in which specific phytocannabinoids or newly discovered cannabinoids with therapeutic promise are pinpointed and synthesized for future pharmaceutical development and validation. Although the therapeutic potential of cannabis is enormous, few cannabis-related approved drugs exist, and this avenue warrants further investigation. With this in mind, we review here the medicinal properties of cannabis, its phytochemicals, approved drugs of natural and synthetic origin, pitfalls on the way to the widespread clinical use of cannabis, and additional applications of cannabis-related products.

Weed, sex and influenza

The study by Miladet al. presents data addressing how inhalation of cannabis smoke affects influenza infections in mice, and uncovers responses that are different in male and female mice https://bit.ly/46qpTis.

Cannabidiol for the Treatment of Pediatric Epilepsy

Pediatric epilepsy is a debilitating disease cluster that is much less researched than adult epilepsy. With approximately 30% of patients with pediatric epilepsy experiencing refractory seizures, novel treatment modalities are sometimes necessary to provide benefit. The use of marijuana, and more specifically cannabidiol, in people with seizures is much more broadly researched in adults compared with pediatric patients, although several recent review articles have been published. This article seeks to provide a pathophysiological basis for cannabidiol in epilepsy, discuss commercially available products and nonpharmaceutical marijuana, and review recent evidence in pediatric epilepsy. [Pediatr Ann. 2023;52(10):e369-e372.].

Evaluation of Cytochrome P450-Mediated Cannabinoid-Drug Interactions in Healthy Adult Participants

Understanding cannabis-drug interactions is critical given regulatory changes that have increased access to and use of cannabis. Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the most abundant phytocannabinoids, are in vitro reversible and time-dependent (CBD only) inhibitors of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Cannabis extracts were used to evaluate quantitatively potential pharmacokinetic cannabinoid-drug interactions in 18 healthy adults. Participant received, in a randomized cross-over manner (separated by ≥ 1 week), a brownie containing (i) no cannabis extract (ethanol/placebo), (ii) CBD-dominant cannabis extract (640 mg CBD + 20 mg Δ9-THC), or (iii) Δ9-THC-dominant cannabis extract (20 mg Δ9-THC and no CBD). After 30 minutes, participants consumed a cytochrome P450 (CYP) drug cocktail consisting of caffeine (CYP1A2), losartan (CYP2C9), omeprazole (CYP2C19), dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), and midazolam (CYP3A). Plasma and urine samples were collected (0-24 hours). The CBD + Δ9-THC brownie inhibited CYP2C19 > CYP2C9 > CYP3A > CYP1A2 (but not CYP2D6) activity, as evidenced by an increase in the geometric mean ratio of probe drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) relative to placebo (AUCGMR ) of omeprazole, losartan, midazolam, and caffeine by 207%, 77%, 56%, and 39%, respectively. In contrast, the Δ9-THC brownie did not inhibit any of the CYPs. The CBD + Δ9-THC brownie increased Δ9-THC AUCGMR by 161%, consistent with CBD inhibiting CYP2C9-mediated oral Δ9-THC clearance. Except for caffeine, these interactions were well-predicted by our physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model (within 26% of observed interactions). Results can be used to help guide dose adjustment of drugs co-consumed with cannabis products and the dose of CBD in cannabis products to reduce interaction risk with Δ9-THC.

Herbal concoction Unveiled: A computational analysis of phytochemicals' pharmacokinetic and toxicological profiles using novel approach methodologies (NAMs)

Herbal medications have an extensive history of use in treating various diseases, attributed to their perceived efficacy and safety. Traditional medicine practitioners and contemporary healthcare providers have shown particular interest in herbal syrups, especially for respiratory illnesses associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, the current understanding of the pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of phytochemicals in these herbal mixtures is limited. This study presents a comprehensive computational analysis utilizing novel approach methodologies (NAMs) to investigate the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profiles of phytochemicals in herbal syrup, leveraging in-silico techniques and prediction tools such as PubChem, SwissADME, and Molsoft's database. Although molecular dynamics, docking, and broader system-wide analyses were not considered, future studies hold potential for further investigation in these areas. By combining drug-likeness with molecular simulation, researchers identify diverse phytochemicals suitable for complex medication development examining their pharmacokinetic-toxicological profiles in phytopharmaceutical syrup. The study focuses on herbal solutions for respiratory infections, with the goal of adding to the pool of all-natural treatments for such ailments. This research has the potential to revolutionize environmental and alternative medicine by leveraging in-silico models and innovative analytical techniques to identify novel phytochemicals with enhanced therapeutic benefits and explore network-based and systems biology approaches for a deeper understanding of their interactions with biological systems. Overall, our study offers valuable insights into the computational analysis of the pharmacokinetic and toxicological profiles of herbal concoction. This paves the way for advancements in environmental and alternative medicine. However, we acknowledge the need for future studies to address the aforementioned topics that were not adequately covered in this research.

Cannabidiol-drug interaction in cancer patients: A retrospective study in a real-life setting

Cannabidiol (CBD) consumption in cancer patients is growing and there is a need to investigate how to detect cannabidiol-drug interactions (CDIs). However, CDIs and the clinical relevance between CBD, anticancer treatment, supportive care and conventional drugs is poorly studied especially in real-life settings. In 1 oncology day-hospital, a cross-sectional study in 363 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy revealed 20 patients (5.5%) who consumed CBD. In this study we aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical relevance of CDIs among these 20 patients. CDI detection used the Food and Drug Administration Drugs.com database and clinical relevance was assessed accordingly. Ninety CDIs with 34 medicines were detected (4.6 CDI/patient). The main clinical risks were central nervous system depression and hepatoxicity. The main CDIs were assessed as moderate and anticancer treatment do not seem to add to the risk. CBD discontinuation appears to be the most consistent management. Future studies should explore the clinical relevance of drug interactions with CBD in cancer patients.

Differences in Plasma Cannabidiol Concentrations in Women and Men: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study

The potential therapeutic benefits of cannabidiol (CBD) require further study. Here, we report a triple-blind (participant, investigator, and outcome assessor) placebo-controlled crossover study in which 62 hypertensive volunteers were randomly assigned to receive the recently developed DehydraTECH2.0 CBD formulation or a placebo. This is the first study to have been conducted using the DehydraTECH2.0 CBD formulation over a 12-week study duration. The new formulation's long-term effects on CBD concentrations in plasma and urine, as well as its metabolites 7-hydroxy-CBD and 7-carboxy-CBD, were analyzed. The results of the plasma concentration ratio for CBD/7-OH-CBD in the third timepoint (after 5 weeks of use) were significantly higher than in the second timepoint (after 2.5 weeks of use; p = 0.043). In the same timepoints in the urine, a significantly higher concentration of 7-COOH-CBD was observed p < 0.001. Differences in CBD concentration were found between men and women. Plasma levels of CBD were still detectable 50 days after the last consumption of the CBD preparations. Significantly higher plasma CBD concentrations occurred in females compared to males, which was potentially related to greater adipose tissue. More research is needed to optimize CBD doses to consider the differential therapeutic benefits in men and women.