Venous thromboembolism with JAK inhibitors and other immune-modulatory drugs: a Swedish comparative safety study among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Assessment of cardiovascular, thromboembolic and cancer risk in patients eligible for treatment with Janus Kinase inhibitors: The JAK-ERA multidisciplinary consensus

INTRODUCTION

JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have emerged as effective treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases, including gastrointestinal, dermatological, and rheumatological conditions. Despite their efficacy, concerns about their safety profile necessitate a comprehensive framework for their optimal use. This study aimed to establish an expert consensus (the JAK-ERA [Janus Kinase-inhibitors Evidence-based Risk Analysis] Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus) on the principles guiding JAKi therapy to maximize therapeutic benefits while mitigating risks.

METHODS

A Delphi method was employed, gathering opinions from experts across multiple disciplines. This iterative process involved rounds of surveys and feedbacks to synthesize diverse expert knowledge into a cohesive set of principles and consensus statements. The multidisciplinary panel included specialists in cardiology, oncology, hematology, gastroenterology, dermatology, and rheumatology.

RESULTS

A total of 6 overarching principles and 13 expert consensus statements were developed. The percentage of agreement ranged between 78 and 100 %. The principles highlight the importance of rapid intervention to prevent complications and alleviate psychological burdens. Detailed risk assessments for cardiovascular (CV), thromboembolic, and cancer risks were deemed essential. Recommendations included using validated tools for CV risk evaluation, comprehensive thromboembolic risk assessment, and routine cancer screenings based on standard protocols. Multidisciplinary collaboration was stressed to ensure precise risk management and optimal therapeutic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The consensus provides a structured approach to JAKi therapy, balancing efficacy with safety considerations. The overarching principles and expert consensus statements offer a robust framework for clinical practice, ensuring that JAKi use is tailored to individual patient profiles, thereby enhancing outcomes and minimizing risks. Ongoing validation through prospective studies and real-world data is essential to further refine these recommendations.

Expert consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: 2024 update

In light of the introduction of new Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), new indications for JAKi and recent safety considerations that have arisen since the preceding consensus statement on JAKi therapy, a multidisciplinary taskforce was assembled, encompassing patients, health care professionals, and clinicians with expertise in JAKi therapy across specialties. This taskforce, informed by two comprehensive systematic literature reviews, undertook the objective to update the previous expert consensus for using JAKi developed in 2019. The taskforce deliberated on overarching principles, indications, dosage and comedication strategies, warnings and contraindications, screening protocols, monitoring recommendations, and adverse effect profiles. The methodology was based on the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology standard operating procedures, with voting on these important elements. Furthermore, an updated research agenda was proposed. The task force did not address when a JAKi should be prescribed but rather considerations once this decision has been made. This update aimed to equip clinicians with the necessary knowledge and guidance for the efficient and safe administration of this expanding and significant class of drugs.

Role of rheumatoid arthritis registries worldwide: What have they taught us?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common rheumatic conditions, impacting quality of life on several domains. Major breakthroughs have been achieved over the past three decades in the management benefitting the patients' lives. With increasing as well as novel treatment options, clinical registries have been established and continuously evolve to portray patient characteristics, monitor disease activity of RA, effectiveness and safety of the novel compounds. The greatest insights derived from registries is our current knowledge on the risks for malignancies and infections but also extending our knowledge collected in clinical trials on comparative effectiveness, long-term drug utilisation and under-represented populations. Moreover, the possible evolution of registries involving Big Data and AI, and the increased focus on patient centredness is discussed.

Do newly approved drugs have a worse observed safety profile than once established? A study on time trends in risks of key safety outcomes with immunomodulatory drugs against rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate rates of key safety outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and in reference cohorts, presented over time since the market entry of each b/tsDMARD class and over calendar period at treatment start.

METHODS

This was a nationwide register-based cohort study conducted from 2006 to 2022. From the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register and national registers, we identified treatment initiators of b/tsDMARDs (n = 33,550 initiations), an early bionaive RA cohort (n = 16,011), and a matched general population cohort (n = 111,074). The main outcome was first of either major adverse cardiovascular event, venous thromboembolism, cancer, or serious infection. We stratified rates by time since market entry of each b/tsDMARD class at treatment start, and by calendar year of treatment start. We calculated incidence rates (IRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox regression and adjusted for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 5862 events were observed in the b/tsDMARD initiator cohort. b/tsDMARD treatments initiated >5 (vs <2) years since market entry of that class were associated with lower outcome rates (unadjusted HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81). This association was attenuated once adjusting for patient characteristics (adjusted HR = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.84-1.03). By contrast, during our study period, adjusted rates declined (adjusted HR = 0.74 and 95% CI = 0.69-0.80 for b/tsDMARDs initiated 2016-2021 vs 2006-2010), despite a constant rate in the background population.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest channelling makes the safety profile of b/tsDMARDs appear worse when new on the market. Declining incidences of typical RA comorbidities in b/tsDMARD initiators during recent years suggest that the bar defining an "acceptable" safety profile for new b/tsDMARDs for use in RA should be lower(ed).

Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-a systematic literature review informing the 2024 update of an international expert consensus statement

OBJECTIVES

This systematic literature review (SLR) on safety outcomes was performed to inform the 2024 update of the expert consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi).

METHODS

An update of the 2019 SLR was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. For safety, randomised, placebo-controlled or active-controlled trials on all JAKi investigated in IMIDs, long-term extension (LTE) studies, pooled trial data analyses, and cohort and claims studies were included.

RESULTS

We screened 13,905 records, of which 209 were finally included. Three safety trials and 13 post hoc analyses, 83 efficacy randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adequate safety reporting, 56 integrated safety analyses and LTE of RCTs, 20 additional conference abstracts on RCT data, as well as 37 real-world cohort studies were presented to the task force. Safety profiles of JAKi were overall consistent across compounds and indications, but impacts of patient profiles, treatment dosing, and other cofactors like background medications on drug safety could be observed. Furthermore, differential effects of variously selective JAKi on distinct adverse events of special interest (AESI) and laboratory outcomes were discerned.

CONCLUSION

A substantial amount of literature was published on JAKi safety since 2019. A comprehensive overview of these data supports the optimal use of JAKi in patients with IMIDs, by consideration and balance of their benefits as well as risks in every patient.

Janus kinase inhibitor treatment for inflammatory diseases: excess or no excess risk of venous thromboembolism?

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases since their introduction in 2012. The expanded indications of JAKis have raised concerns about the associated risk of thrombosis, venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), and arterial thrombosis. This literature review examines studies reporting the risk of VTEs associated with JAKis in patients with inflammatory diseases. Phase I to III trials showed no increased risk of VTEs. However, these studies were not designed to detect adverse events such as VTEs. The pharmacovigilance data indicated that the frequency of VTE reports was higher than that of other adverse events. An increased risk of VTEs was also observed in the ORAL Surveillance study, a randomized, noninferiority, postmarketing phase IV safety study comparing tofacitinib with anti-tumor necrosis factor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, limitations have to be acknowledged: pharmacovigilance data are declarative and subject to bias, VTE was a secondary outcome in the ORAL study, with noncomparable VTE risk factors between groups and increased thrombosis risks only at high doses of tofacitinib. Nevertheless, these data have led regulatory organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency to issue precautionary measures regarding the use of JAKis in inflammatory diseases. Most well-conducted real-life studies are in rheumatoid arthritis and do not confirm an excess of VTE risk associated with JAKis. Considering those conflicting results and limitations, future research should focus on specific indications and patient profiles, taking into account the complex interaction between drug treatment and underlying disease activity, to be able to draw definite conclusion about the VTE risk associated with JAKis.

Comparative Analysis of Coagulation Activation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With TNF Inhibitors Versus JAK Inhibitors: A Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the activation of the coagulation system of RA patients and assess changes during anti-inflammatory treatment with tumor necrosis factor blockers (anti-TNF) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi).

METHODS

Biomarkers for the coagulation system, including D-dimer, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, activated partial thrombin time, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), activated factor IX, antithrombin complex, and von Willebrand factor (vWF), were longitudinally measured in 83 RA patients treated with anti-TNF and 38 RA patients with JAKi. Data were collected at baseline, after 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57 (±14) years; 76% was female. The mean DAS28-CRP was 3.6 (±1.3) for anti-TNF users and 4.1 (±1.4) for JAKi users at baseline and declined in both groups. Baseline coagulation markers levels were comparable between groups. In anti-TNF users, D-dimer and fibrinogen levels significantly declined (-0.31 mg/L, p = 0.01 and -0.71 g/L, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas TAT significantly increased after 6 months follow-up (1.46 μg/L, p = 0.03) and no effect on vWF ( p = 0.98). In JAKi users, vWF declined significantly during the 6 months follow-up (-37.41%, p < 0.001); additionally, there were reductions of D-dimer, fibrinogen, and TAT that did not reach significance (-0.17 mg/L, p = 0.59; -0.49 g/L, p = 0.12; and 0.68 μg/L, p = 0.27, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The prothrombotic tendency in active RA declined during effective treatment with both anti-TNF and JAKi. Altogether, the biomarkers used in this study suggest that an increased VTE risk in the first 6 months due to either treatment with anti-TNF or JAKi is unlikely.

A Systematic Overview of Contraindications and Special Warnings for Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Establishing a Framework to Create a "Safety Checklist"

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).

METHODS

We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i).

RESULTS

All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities.

Review article: Novel therapies in inflammatory bowel disease - An update for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Several new treatments including small molecules and biologics have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases in recent years. Clinicians and patients now have a wide variety of therapeutic options to choose from and these novel therapies provide several advantages including oral administration, lower immunogenicity, better selectivity and arguably better safety profiles. An increase in treatment options has increased the complexity of decision-making. Both patients and clinicians have had to become rapidly familiar with efficacy of new medications balanced against a range of pre-initiation requirements, dosing schedules and adverse event profiles.

AIMS

To provide a simple guide to practising clinicians on recently approved and emerging therapies and address key challenges around treatment strategies such as optimal sequencing and timing of treatment.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the published literature and major conference abstracts to identify phase III placebo-controlled and active comparator trials for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Data for recently approved therapies including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1 receptor modulators and p19 interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors have demonstrated improved patient outcomes in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Further comparative head-to-head studies have improved our understanding of when and how to optimally use newer therapies, specifically for IL-23 inhibitors. Data for emerging treatment options and novel treatment strategies such as early effective treatment, combinations of treatments and implications for sequencing are continuing to transform IBD care continually.

CONCLUSIONS

Recently approved novel therapies have expanded the range of medical options available to treat IBD. However, further data from long-term extension studies, real-world studies and head-to-head trials are warranted to better inform the long-term safety and optimal sequencing of treatments for patients living with IBD.

Herpes Zoster and Venous Thromboembolism Following Upadacitinib Treatment for Severe Atopic Dermatitis

New medications targeting the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway have been developed through emerging biologics research. However, due to documented adverse effects, including herpes zoster (HZ) and venous thromboembolism (VTE), an extensive patient workup and counseling are necessary before prescribing. We present the case of an 81-year-old patient with severe atopic dermatitis on upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, who developed HZ and VTE, requiring hospitalization. This study emphasizes the need for further research, continuous monitoring, and risk management for HZ and VTE in patients undergoing upadacitinib treatment, especially in high-risk populations.

JAK inhibitor selectivity: new opportunities, better drugs?

Cytokines function as communication tools of the immune system, serving critical functions in many biological responses and shaping the immune response. When cytokine production or their biological activity goes awry, the homeostatic balance of the immune response is altered, leading to the development of several pathologies such as autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Cytokines bind to specific receptors on cells, triggering the activation of intracellular enzymes known as Janus kinases (JAKs). The JAK family comprises four members, JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2, which are critical for intracellular cytokine signalling. Since the mid-2010s multiple JAK inhibitors have been approved for inflammatory and haematological indications. Currently, approved JAK inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy; however, improved selectivity for specific JAKs is likely to enhance safety profiles, and different strategies have been used to accomplish enhanced JAK selectivity. In this update, we discuss the background of JAK inhibitors, current approved indications and adverse effects, along with new developments in this field. We address the issue of JAK selectivity and its relevance in terms of efficacy, and describe new modalities of JAK targeting, as well as new aspects of JAK inhibitor action.

The Association Between Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, and Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Reporting Status and Signal Detection in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database

BACKGROUND

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have expanding indications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are serious adverse events associated with their use. Moreover, their analysis using the Japanese database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports has not yet been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) to evaluate the association between JAK inhibitors and DVT and PE.

METHODS

JADER reports from April 2004 to October 2023 were analyzed. A classification of reports for the period covered was performed by drug, and an imbalance analysis was performed with oral JAK inhibitors as the target drug and DVT, PE, and "embolic and thrombotic events, venous" (Standardised MedDRA Query; SMQ) as the target adverse events. Reported odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC) were calculated for signal detection.

RESULTS

Overall, 6631 JAK inhibitor-related adverse events were reported, including 60 and 41 cases of DVT and PE, respectively. The ROR and IC of the JAK inhibitors for DVT were 2.52 (1.95-3.25) and 1.27 (0.41-2.13), while those of baricitinib for DVT were 4.37 (2.83-6.73) and 1.90 (0.47-3.33), respectively. ROR signals were detected for JAK inhibitors for PE and "embolic and thrombotic events, venous (SMQ)," overall and for several JAK inhibitors but none for IC.

CONCLUSIONS

Several JAK inhibitors are under postmarketing phase vigilance, and the number of reported adverse events is low. However, when administering these drugs, care should be taken to avoid the development of thromboembolism, considering the patient's background.

Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis over a treatment duration of up to 8.3 years

OBJECTIVES

To update the long-term safety profile of filgotinib, a Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Data from seven trials were integrated (NCT01888874, NCT01894516, NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728, NCT02065700 and NCT03025308). Patients received once-daily filgotinib 100 mg or 200 mg. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs)/100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) were calculated for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Post hoc analyses assessed patients aged <65 and ≥65 years.

RESULTS

Patients (N=3691) received filgotinib for a median (maximum) of 3.8 (8.3) years (12 541 PYE). Rates of TEAEs of interest: serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolism were stable over time and comparable between doses. In the overall population, numerically lower EAIR (95% CI)/100 PYE of herpes zoster was observed for filgotinib 100 mg versus 200 mg (1.1 (0.8 to 1.5) vs 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8)). Incidence of serious infections, herpes zoster, MACE, malignancies and all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥65 versus <65 years. In patients aged ≥65 years, EAIRs (95% CI)/100 PYE for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) (0.4 (0.1 to 1.1) vs 1.4 (0.8 to 2.2)), malignancies excluding NMSC (1.0 (0.5 to 1.9) vs 2.0 (1.3 to 2.9)) and all-cause mortality (1.3 (0.7 to 2.2) vs 1.6 (1.0 to 2.5)) were numerically lower for filgotinib 100 mg versus 200 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

In the overall population, TEAEs of interest were stable over time and similar between filgotinib 100 mg and 200 mg dose groups, except for herpes zoster. A dose-dependent relationship between malignancies and all-cause mortality was suggested in patients ≥65 years old.

Association between antipsychotics and pulmonary embolism: a pharmacovigilance analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotics (APs). However, specific data from real-world studies remain limited. This study aims to investigate the potential relationship between APs and PE.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), from the first quarter of 2018 to the first quarter of 2023, all PE cases suspected of being induced by APs were collected for disproportionality analysis, and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to evaluate associations. Mortality, life-threatening events, and hospitalizations were also analyzed for each APs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,676 cases of PE related to APs were included. APs were significantly associated with PE (ROR 2.00, 1.91-2.10), including chlorpromazine (n = 41), haloperidol (n = 164), loxapine (n = 37), olanzapine (n = 461), paliperidone (n = 161), quetiapine (n = 526), risperidone (n = 274), aripiprazole (n = 254), and clozapine (n = 234). The median onset time of PE was 29 days. Among all cases, 347 (20.7%) resulted in death, with haloperidol (53.2%) having a higher mortality rate than other APs.

CONCLUSIONS

APs may increase the risk of PE in patients with schizophrenia.

Practical guidance for managing patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis using small molecule therapies

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a severe and debilitating illness that affects the quality of life and physical health of many Canadians. Given the dynamic and progressive nature of the disease, advanced therapies are required to support its long-term management. The emergence of small molecule therapies offers novel treatment options that target mechanisms central to the immunopathology of UC. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators and Janus-activated kinase inhibitors are 2 classes of therapies that target unique pathways to attenuate inflammation and modulate the immune response characteristic of UC. This review aims to provide practical guidance on how these therapeutic options can best be used to optimize treatment management and highlight the emerging role of small molecule therapies as a treatment strategy for UC.

Adverse cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with JAK inhibitors: An analysis of postmarketing spontaneous safety reports

OBJECTIVES

The ORAL Surveillance trial, a postmarketing safety clinical trial, found an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients treated with Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. However, additional studies yielded mixed results and data on other JAK inhibitors are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) to assess reporting of adverse cardiovascular events following treatment with JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients between January 2015 and June 2023. To identify disproportionately increased reporting, an adjusted reporting odds ratio (adj.ROR) was calculated with a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We identified safety reports of 75,407 RA patients treated with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, n = 52,181; upadacitinib, n = 21,006; baricitinib, n = 2,220) and 303,278 patients treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs; TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and tocilizumab). The mean age was 61.2(±12) and 59.0(±13), respectively; 82 % and 81 % were women. Compared to bDMARDs, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased reporting of VTE [n = 1,393, adj.ROR=2.11 (1.97-2.25)], stroke [n = 973, adj.ROR=1.25 (1.16-1.34)], ischemic heart disease [IHD, n = 999, adj.ROR=1.23 (1.13-1.33)], peripheral edema [n = 2699, adj.ROR=1.22 (1.17-1.28)], and tachyarrhythmias [n = 370, adj.ROR=1.15 (1.00-1.33)]. Most of the events occurred in the first year after treatment initiation. When different JAK inhibitors were compared, VTE, stroke, and IHD were more frequently reported with upadacitinib and baricitinib than tofacitinib. When stratified by age category, all safety signals were statistically significant in patients aged≤65 years.

CONCLUSION

In this global postmarketing study, JAK inhibitors are associated with increased reporting of VTE, stroke, IHD, and tachyarrhythmias. These adverse events were reported following all JAK inhibitors that were studied, suggesting a class effect.

Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who are Insufficient Responders to Conventional Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease which can induce progressive disability if not properly treated early. Over the last 20 years, the improvement of knowledge on the pathogenesis of the disease has made available several drugs targeting key elements of the pathogenetic process, which now represent the preferred treatment option after the failure of first-line therapy with conventional drugs such as methotrexate (MTX). To this category of targeted drugs belong anti-cytokine or cell-targeted biological agents and more recently also Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis). In the absence to date of specific biomarkers to guide the therapeutic choice in the context of true precision medicine, the choice of the first targeted drug after MTX failure is guided by treatment cost (especially after the marketing of biosimilar products) and by the clinical characteristics of the patient (age, sex, comorbidities and compliance) and the disease (presence or absence of autoantibodies and systemic or extra-articular manifestations), which may influence the efficacy and safety profile of the available products. This viewpoint focuses on the decision-making process underlying the personalized approach to RA therapy and will analyse the evidence in the literature supporting the choice of individual products and in particular the differential choice between biological drugs and JAKis.

Long-term sustainability of response to upadacitinib among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biological treatments: results up to 5 years from SELECT-BEYOND

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term sustainability of response to the Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) in the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial.

METHODS

Patients on background conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were treated once daily with upadacitinib 15 mg or placebo. Patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter a long-term extension of up to 5 years. The sustainability of response was assessed based on achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP)) targets and evaluated up to week 260 in all patients receiving the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose, including those randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib 15 mg at week 12.

RESULTS

In this bDMARD-IR population, 45% (n=104/229) and 79% (n=172/219) of patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg plus background csDMARD(s) achieved CDAI remission or CDAI low disease activity (LDA) at any point during the 5-year study, respectively. Of those who achieved CDAI remission/LDA, 25%/43% maintained their initial response through 240 weeks of follow-up after first achieving response. Most patients who lost remission or LDA were able to recapture that response by the cut-off date. Similar overall results were observed for SDAI and DAS28 (CRP). No strong predictors of response were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Over three-quarters of bDMARD-IR patients achieved CDAI LDA with upadacitinib, and almost half of those maintained LDA through 240 weeks of follow-up. Remission was achieved by nearly half of all patients and maintained in approximately a quarter of those achieving remission.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02706847.

Increased risk of cardiovascular events under the treatments with Janus kinase inhibitors versus biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective longitudinal population-based study using the Japanese health insurance database

OBJECTIVES

To compare the risk of cardiovascular events among Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKIs), biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFIs) and non-TNFIs) and methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Using Japanese claims data, patients with RA were enrolled in this study if they had at least one ICD-10 code (M05 or M06), were new users of JAKIs, bDMARDs or MTX between July 2013 and July 2020 and being 18 years old or older. The incidence rate (IR), IR ratio and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR (95% CI)) of cardiovascular events including venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, acute myocardial infarction and stroke were calculated. A time-dependent Cox regression model adjusted for patient characteristics at baseline was used to calculate aHR.

RESULTS

In 53 448 cases, IRs/1000 patient-years of the overall cardiovascular events were 10.1, 6.8, 5.4, 9.1 and 11.3 under the treatments with JAKIs, bDMARDs, TNFIs, non-TNFIs and MTX, respectively. The adjusted HRs of JAKIs for overall cardiovascular events were 1.7 (1.1 to 2.5) versus TNFIs without MTX and 1.7 (1.1 to 2.7) versus TNFIs with MTX.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with RA, individuals using JAKIs had a significantly higher risk of overall cardiovascular events than TNFIs users, which was attributed to the difference in the risk between JAKIs and TNFIs versus MTX. These data should be interpreted with caution because of the limitations associated with the claims database.

Unlocking new dimensions in long-acting injectables using lipid mesophase-based beads

In this study, we explored the use of lipid mesophases (LMPs) as a biocompatible and biodegradable material for sustained drug delivery. Our hypothesis centered on leveraging the high surface-to-volume ratio of LMP-based beads to enhance strength, stability, and surface interaction compared to the LMP bulk gel. To modulate drug release, we introduced antioxidant vitamin E into the beads, influencing mesophase topologies and controlling drug diffusion coefficients. Four drugs with distinct chemical properties and intended for three different pathologies and administration routes were successfully loaded into the beads with a drug entrapment efficiency exceeding 80 %. Notably, our findings revealed sustained drug release, irrespective of the drugs' chemical properties, culminating in the development of an injectable formulation. This formulation allows direct administration into the target site, minimizing systemic exposure, and thereby mitigating adverse effects. Our approach demonstrates the potential of LMP-based beads for tailored drug delivery systems with broad applications in diverse therapeutic scenarios.

Pronounced benefits of JAK inhibition with baricitinib in COVID-19 pneumonia in obese but not lean subjects

OBJECTIVE

Obesity and age are strongly linked to severe COVID-19 pneumonia where immunomodulatory agents including Janus kinase inhibitors have shown benefits but the efficacy of such therapy in viral pneumonia is not well understood. We evaluated the impact of obesity and age on survival following baricitinib therapy for severe COVID-19.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the COV-BARRIER multicentre double-blind randomised study of baricitinib versus placebo (PBO) with an assessment of 28-day mortality was performed. All-cause mortality by day 28 was evaluated in a Cox regression analysis (adjusted to age) in three different groups according to body mass index (BMI) (<25 kg/m2, 25-30 kg/m2 and >30 kg/m2) and age <65 years and ≥65 years.

RESULTS

In the high BMI group (>25 kg/m2), baricitinib therapy showed a significant survival advantage compared with PBO (incidence rate ratio (IRR) for mortality by day 28 0.53 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.87)) and 0.66 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94) for the respective <65 years and ≥65 years, respectively. The 28-day all-cause-mortality rates for BMI over 30 were 5.62% for baricitinib and 9.22% for PBO (HR=0.6, p<0.05). For BMI under 25 kg/m2, irrespective of age, baricitinib therapy conferred no survival advantage (IRR of 1.89 (95% CI 0.49 to 7.28) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.99) for <65 years and ≥65 years, respectively) ((mortality 6.6% baricitinib vs 8.1 in PBO), p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of baricitinib in COVID-19 pneumonia is linked to obesity suggesting that immunomodulatory therapy benefit is associated with obesity-associated inflammation.

Increased Risk for Pulmonary Embolism among Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis-Results from a Large Database Analysis

Background: Axial spondyloarthropathy(AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the axial skeleton, often characterized by sacroiliitis. While pulmonary embolism (PE), a potentially lethal condition, has been linked to several autoimmune diseases, limited data exist regarding PE risk among patients with AS. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Healthcare Services (CHS) database, including 5825 patients with AS and 28,356 matched controls. Follow-up began at the date of first AS diagnosis for patients and at the matched patient's diagnosis date for controls and continued until PE diagnosis, death, or study end date. Results: Prevalence of PE before AS diagnosis in patients compared to controls was 0.4% vs. 0.2% (p < 0.01). The incidence rate of PE was 11.6 per 10,000 person-years for patients with AS and 6.8 per 10,000 person-years for controls. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for PE in patients with AS was 1.70 (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated excess risk for PE in patients with AS regardless of gender and age, with variations among AS treatment categories. Discussion: Our findings highlight a significant association between AS and PE, indicating an increased risk in patients with AS independent of age and sex and suggests a subclinical level of inflammation. Preliminary results suggest a protective role of immunosuppressing drugs. Further research into the impact of treatment strategies should be conducted and could inform clinical management and reduce the life-threatening risk of PE in Patients with AS.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a rheumatic disorder that may be responsible for relevant articular impairment. The recently licensed Janus Kinase (JaK) inhibitors represent a new opportunity to improve PsA treatment. This review deals with the clinical usefulness of the selective JaK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) in patients with PsA.

COVERED AREAS

Two phase-III studies are available: SELECT-PsA 1, performed in patients with an inadequate response to non-biological therapies, and SELECT-PsA 2, conducted in biologic-experienced patients. Long-term extension results and post-hoc analysis data of these two trials are also available.

EXPERT OPINION

The results provided by the trials indicate that UPA may be used to treat all of the clinical manifestations of PsA. Venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, and malignancy, the most feared adverse events associated with JaK inhibitor use, were not increased in the trial populations, yet long-term observational studies are needed to make sure that UPA is safe in this respect.

Differences in Management and Outcomes of Older and Younger Adults with Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Older adults with ulcerative colitis [UC] have greater morbidity than younger adults. The goal of this study was to investigate differences in the management and outcomes of older and younger patients hospitalised with severe UC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalised for acute severe ulcerative colitis requiring intravenous steroids. We compared outcomes of adults aged ≥65 years with outcomes of younger patients. Primary study outcomes included frequency and timing of medical and surgical rescue therapy during the hospitalisation, postoperative complications, frailty, and mortality outcomes up to 1 year following the hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 63 older adults [≥65 years] and 137 younger adults [14-64 years]. Despite similar disease severity at hospitalisation, older adults were half as likely to receive medical rescue therapy (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.91). This difference was more striking among the frailest older adults. Older patients were similarly likely to undergo surgery but were more likely to undergo urgent or emergent procedures [50%] compared with younger patients [13%] [p <0.004]. The fraction of older adults at high risk for frailty increased from 33% pre-hospitalisation to 42% post-hospitalisation. Nearly one-third [27.8%] of older adults died within 1 year of hospitalisation, with half the deaths among older adults being attributable to UC or complications of UC.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with younger patients, older adults had lower frequency use of medical rescue therapy, higher rates of emergency surgery, and increased mortality within 1 year. Further research is needed to optimise care pathways in this population.

Risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular event endpoints with tofacitinib versus TNF inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase 3b/4 randomised safety study

OBJECTIVES

Compare the risk of extended major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event (MACE) composite outcomes and component events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance.

METHODS

Patients with RA aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 additional CV risk factor received tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg two times per day or TNFi. MACE (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke or CV death (MACE-3)) was extended by sequential addition of CV events (hospitalisation for unstable angina (MACE-4), coronary revascularisation (MACE-5), transient ischaemic attack (MACE-6), peripheral vascular disease (MACE-7)), heart failure (HF) hospitalisation (MACE-8) and venous thromboembolism (VTE; (MACE-8 plus VTE)). HRs (tofacitinib vs TNFi) were evaluated for MACE and individual components.

RESULTS

HRs for MACE-4 to MACE-8 with combined and individual tofacitinib doses versus TNFi were similar. Risk of MACE-8 plus VTE appeared similar with tofacitinib 5 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.12 (0.82 to 1.52)), but higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi (HR 1.38 (1.02 to 1.85)). Risk of MI was higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi, but difference in risk of other individual CV events was not suggested. Across extended MACE definitions, risk appeared higher with tofacitinib versus TNFi in those with atherosclerotic CV disease or age ≥65 years.

CONCLUSION

In ORAL Surveillance, risk of composite CV endpoints combining all ischaemic CV events and HF did not appear different with tofacitinib versus TNFi. The totality of CV risk was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg two times per day versus TNFi, driven by an increase in VTE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02092467.

Case report: Cerebral sinus vein thrombosis in VEXAS syndrome

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, and somatic) syndrome is a newly described hemato-inflammatory acquired monogenic entity that presents in adulthood. One of the main features of VEXAS syndrome is a high venous thromboembolism (VTE) burden, with approximately 30-40% experiencing lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and a lower incidence of pulmonary embolism at approximately 10%. To date, VEXAS syndrome has not been associated with rarer forms of VTE such as cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (CSVT) and Budd-Chiari syndrome, which are well-recognized vascular manifestations in Behcet's disease, another autoinflammatory vasculitic disease. Herein, we describe a case of acute severe extensive and fatal CSVT in a patient with VEXAS syndrome. The event occurred during a period of apparently quiescent inflammatory status, while the patient was receiving tocilizumab and a low dose of glucocorticoids. Despite treatment with anticoagulation, high-dose glucocorticoids, endovascular thrombectomy, and intracranial pressure-lowering agents, the patient suffered severe neurologic damage and ultimately succumbed to the condition 3 weeks after the onset of CSVT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of CVST in a patient with VEXAS syndrome.

Under the dual effect of inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis, CTD-ILD patients possess a greater susceptibility to VTE

As an autoimmune disease, the persistent systemic inflammatory response associated with connective tissue disease (CTD) is involved in the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, clinical data showed that the risk of VTE in patients differed between subtypes of CTD, suggesting that different subtypes may have independent mechanisms to promote the development of VTE, but the specific mechanism lacks sufficient research at present. The development of pulmonary fibrosis also contributes to the development of VTE, and therefore, patients with CTD-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) may be at higher risk of VTE than patients with CTD alone or patients with ILD alone. In addition, the activation of the coagulation cascade response will drive further progression of the patient's pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis, which will continue to increase the patient's risk of VTE and adversely affect prognosis. Currently, the treatment for CTD-ILD is mainly immunosuppressive and antirheumatic therapy, such as the use of glucocorticoids and janus kinase-inhibitors (JAKis), but, paradoxically, these drugs are also involved in the formation of patients' coagulation tendency, making the clinical treatment of CTD-ILD patients with a higher risk of developing VTE challenging. In this article, we review the potential risk factors and related mechanisms for the development of VTE in CTD-ILD patients to provide a reference for clinical treatment and prevention.

Combination therapy of high-dose intravenous anakinra and baricitinib in patients with critical COVID-19: Promising results from retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination treatment of high-dose intravenous anakinra and baricitinib in patients with critically ill COVID-19.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary center with diagnosis of COVID-19 patients.Study population consisted of patients with positive polymerase chain reaction and computer tomography findings compatible with COVID-19 as well as critical illness.

RESULTS

Data of 15 patients in combination group and 43 patients in control group were evaluated and included into the study. Overall mortality was 46.7 % (n = 7) in combination arm and 69.8 % (n = 30) in control group although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). Similarly, need of intubation was also lower in combination arm (46.7 %) compared to control group (69.8 %), it was not significantly different (p = 0.1). ICU admission was significantly lower in combination (46.7 %, n = 7) arm than control group (76.7 %, n = 33) (p = 0.03, Odds ratio [OR]:4.7). Development of severe infection (20 %, n = 3 vs 25 %, n = 9/36), pulmonary embolism (6.7 %, n = 1 vs 0), myocardial infarction (6.7 %, n = 1 vs 2.6 %, n = 1/38) and pneumothorax (13.3 %, n = 2 vs 2.6 %, n = 1/38) were not different between two groups (p = 0.7, p = 0.3, p = 0.5 and p = 0.2). In multivariable analysis only cHIS score was associated with high mortality (p = 0.018, OR:2.8, [95 % confidence interval: 1.2-6.6]). In survival analysis, mortality rate was significantly lower in combination arm than control group (Log-Rank:p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of high-dose anakinra and baricitinib may be an adequate treatment option in patients with COVID-19 who had critical disease and has acceptable safety profile.

Current status of immunological therapies for rheumatoid arthritis with a focus on antigen-specific therapeutic vaccines

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recognized as an autoimmune joint disease driven by T cell responses to self (or modified self or microbial mimic) antigens that trigger and aggravate the inflammatory condition. Newer treatments of RA employ monoclonal antibodies or recombinant receptors against cytokines or immune cell receptors as well as small-molecule Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to systemically ablate the cytokine or cellular responses that fuel inflammation. Unlike these treatments, a therapeutic vaccine, such as CEL-4000, helps balance adaptive immune homeostasis by promoting antigen-specific regulatory rather than inflammatory responses, and hence modulates the immunopathological course of RA. In this review, we discuss the current and proposed therapeutic products for RA, with an emphasis on antigen-specific therapeutic vaccine approaches to the treatment of the disease. As an example, we describe published results of the beneficial effects of CEL-4000 vaccine on animal models of RA. We also make a recommendation for the design of appropriate clinical studies for these newest therapeutic approaches, using the CEL-4000 vaccine as an example. Unlike vaccines that create or boost a new immune response, the clinical success of an immunomodulatory therapeutic vaccine for RA lies in its ability to redirect autoreactive pro-inflammatory memory T cells towards rebalancing the "runaway" immune/inflammatory responses that characterize the disease. Human trials of such a therapy will require alternative approaches in clinical trial design and implementation for determining safety, toxicity, and efficacy. These approaches include adaptive design (such as the Bayesian optimal design (BOIN), currently employed in oncological clinical studies), and the use of disease-related biomarkers as indicators of treatment success.

Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Venous Thromboembolism with JAK Inhibitors versus TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) between tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We researched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov until December of 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The outcomes studied were MACE (stroke, heart attack, myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) and VTE (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism). We pooled data using random effects model. Risk for the reported outcomes was expressed as odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidential interval (CI). We performed a subgroup analysis based on study design.

Results

We identified 23 studies, 20 of which compared the odds for MACE and 14 the odds for VTE between JAK and TNF inhibitors in RA patients. Ten studies were RCTs and the rest were observational. Regarding MACE risk we pooled data from a total of 215,278 patients (52,243 were treated with JAK inhibitors, while the rest 163,035 were under TNF inhibitors). Compared with TNF inhibitors, the OR for JAK inhibitors in regards with MACE risk was 0.87 (0.64-1.17, p<0.01). Regarding VTE, a total of 176,951 patients were analysed (41,375 JAK inhibitors users and 135,576 TNF inhibitors users). The OR for VTE for JAK inhibitors compared with TNF inhibitors was 1.28 (0.89-1.84, p<0.01).

Conclusion

According to our results, there is no statistically significant difference for MACE or VTE in RA patients who receive either JAK or TNF inhibitors.

Atopic dermatitis (eczema) guidelines: 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters GRADE- and Institute of Medicine-based recommendations

BACKGROUND

Guidance addressing atopic dermatitis (AD) management, last issued in 2012 by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force, requires updating as a result of new treatments and improved guideline and evidence synthesis methodology.

OBJECTIVE

To produce evidence-based guidelines that support patients, clinicians, and other decision-makers in the optimal treatment of AD.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary guideline panel consisting of patients and caregivers, AD experts (dermatology and allergy/immunology), primary care practitioners (family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine), and allied health professionals (psychology, pharmacy, nursing) convened, prioritized equity, diversity, and inclusiveness, and implemented management strategies to minimize influence of conflicts of interest. The Evidence in Allergy Group supported guideline development by performing systematic evidence reviews, facilitating guideline processes, and holding focus groups with patient and family partners. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach informed rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations. Evidence-to-decision frameworks, subjected to public comment, translated evidence to recommendations using trustworthy guideline principles.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 25 recommendations to gain and maintain control of AD for patients with mild, moderate, and severe AD. The eAppendix provides practical information and implementation considerations in 1-2 page patient-friendly handouts.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based recommendations address optimal use of (1) topical treatments (barrier moisturization devices, corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, PDE4 inhibitors [crisaborole], topical JAK inhibitors, occlusive [wet wrap] therapy, adjunctive antimicrobials, application frequency, maintenance therapy), (2) dilute bleach baths, (3) dietary avoidance/elimination, (4) allergen immunotherapy, and (5) systemic treatments (biologics/monoclonal antibodies, small molecule immunosuppressants [cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, JAK inhibitors], and systemic corticosteroids) and UV phototherapy (light therapy).

Selective JAK-Inhibitors in Spondyloarthritis

As our research interest and knowledge increases in the field of Spondyloarthritis, new aspects also emerge as regards to their therapeutic approach. JAK inhibitors (JAKi) are a relatively new treatment option, aiming molecules in the JAK-STAT pathway, which has a leading role in the pathophysiology of both Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis. JAKi exhibit different selectivity towards the four different members of the JAK family (namely JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2), possibly reflecting different efficacy and safety profile. Although knowledge is more consolidated for rheumatoid arthritis in which JAKi are being used for more than 10 years, data are still accumulating for PsA/SpA. In this review we aim to present and assess current knowledge about the efficacy of JAKi (with a focus on selective JAKi) in the treatment of patients with SpA and evaluate their safety profile as some concerns may arise around this therapeutic option.

Long-term safety of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying drugs in rheumatology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The landscape for treatment of rheumatic diseases is ever evolving, with several new drugs recently approved across diseases and more in the pipeline. This timely review aims to highlight the latest literature on long-term safety profiles of salient established and emerging biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

RECENT FINDINGS

The risk of infection remains elevated with the use of most b and tsDMARDs, with specifically risk of hepatitis B reactivation with rituximab and zoster infection with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). The results of the ORAL surveillance trial led to new black box warnings for JAKi and evoked critical risk-benefit discussions surrounding JAKi and DMARDs overall.

SUMMARY

Such well conducted trials are needed to gather long term comparative safety data of DMARDs. In the interim, real world observational studies also have a role to play in our understanding of long-term drug safety, provided that detailed attention is paid to minimize biases inherent in observational studies.

Periplogenin inhibits pathologic synovial proliferation and infiltration in rheumatoid arthritis by regulating the JAK2/3-STAT3 pathway

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that affects joints, causing inflammation, synovitis, and erosion of cartilage and bone. Periplogenin is an active ingredient in the anti-rheumatic and anti-inflammatory herb, cortex periplocae. We conducted a study using a CIA model and an in vitro model of fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) induced by Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) stimulation. We evaluated cell activity, proliferation, and migration using the CCK8 test, EDU kit, and transwell assays, as well as network pharmacokinetic analysis of periplogenin targets and RA-related effects. Furthermore, we measured inflammatory factors and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) expression using ELISA and qRT-PCR assays. We also evaluated joint destruction using HE and Safranin O-Fast Green Staining and examined the changes in the JAK2/3-STAT3 pathway using western blot. The results indicated that periplogenin can effectively inhibit the secretion of inflammatory factors, suppress the JAK2/3-STAT3 pathway, and impede the proliferation and migration of RA FLS. Thus, periplogenin alleviated the Synovial inflammatory infiltration of RA.

Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a real-life evidence from BioSTAR nationwide registry

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have increased morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities. The association of CV diseases (CVD) and traditional CV risk factors has been debated, depending on patient and RA characteristics. This study aimed to find the prevalence of CVD and CV risk factors in patients with RA. A multi-center cross-sectional study was performed on RA patients using the BioSTAR (Biological and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Registry) in September 2022. Socio-demographic, clinical, and follow-up data were collected. Myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disorders, congestive heart failure, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack were regarded as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). CVD was defined as the presence of at least one clinical situation of MACE. Group 1 and Group 2 included patients with and without CVD. Prevalence rates of CVD and traditional CV risk factors were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the differences in the clinical characteristics between patients with and without CVD. An analysis of 724 patients with a mean age of 55.1 ± 12.8 years diagnosed with RA was conducted. There was a female preponderance (79.6%). The prevalence rate of CVD was 4.6% (n = 33). The frequencies of the diseases in the MACE category were ischemic heart disease in 27, congestive heart failure in five, peripheral vascular disorders in three, and cerebrovascular events in three patients. The patients with CVD (Group 1) were significantly male, older, and had higher BMI (p = 0.027, p < 0.001, and p = 0.041). Obesity (33.4%) and hypertension (27.2%) were the two CV risk factors most frequently. Male sex (HR = 7.818, 95% CI 3.030-20.173, p < 0.001) and hypertension (HR = 4.570, 95% CI 1.567-13.328, p = 0.005) were the independent risk factors for CVD. The prevalence of CVD in RA patients was 4.6%. Some common risk factors for CVD in the general population, including male sex, older age, and hypertension, were evident in RA patients. Male sex and hypertension were the independent risk factors for developing CVD in patients with RA.

Are JAKis more effective among elderly patients with RA, smokers and those with higher cardiovascular risk? A comparative effectiveness study of b/tsDMARDs in Sweden

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the relative effectiveness of janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis differ by the presence or absence of risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) disease, age, sex and smoking.

METHODS

Through Swedish registers, we identified 13 493 individuals with 3166 JAKi, 5575 non-TNFi and 11 286 TNFi treatment initiations 2016-2022. All lines of therapy were included, with the majority in second line or higher. Treatment response was defined as the proportion reaching European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) good response and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission, respectively, within 6 months. Crude percentage point differences in these proportions (JAKis, and non-TNFis, vs TNFis) overall and by risk factors were observed, and adjusted for confounders using linear regression models. Predicted probabilities of response and remission were estimated from adjusted Poisson models, and presented across CV risk and age.

RESULTS

Overall, adjusted percentage point differences indicated higher response (+5.0%, 95% CI 2.2% to 7.9%) and remission (+5.8%, 95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%) with JAKis versus TNFis. The adjusted percentage point differences for response in those above 65, at elevated CV risk, and smokers were +5.9% (95% CI 2.7% to 9.0%), +8.3% (95% CI 5.3% to 11.4%) and +6.0% (95% CI 3.3% to 8.7%), respectively. The corresponding estimates for remission were +8.0% (95% CI 5.3% to 10.8%), +5.6% (95% CI 3.0% to 8.2%) and +7.6% (95% CI 5.5% to 9.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

As used in clinical practice, response and remission at 6 months with JAKis are higher than with TNFi. Among patients with risk factors of concern, effectiveness is similar or numerically further increased. For individualised benefit-to-risk ratios to guide treatment choice, safety and effectiveness in specific patient segments should be considered.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, systemic, autoimmune inflammatory disease that mainly affects the joints and periarticular soft tissues. In this Seminar, we provide an overview of the main aspects of rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology and advances in the understanding of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis will be reviewed. We will discuss the clinical manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis, classification criteria, and the value of imaging in the diagnosis of the disease. The advent of new medications and the accumulated scientific evidence demand continuous updating regarding the diagnosis and management, including therapy, of rheumatoid arthritis. An increasing number of patients are now able to reach disease remission. This major improvement in the outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been determined by a combination of different factors (eg, early diagnosis, window of opportunity, treat-to-target strategy, advent of targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and combination therapy). We will discuss the updated recommendations of the two most influential societies for rheumatology worldwide (ie, the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Furthermore, controversies (ie, the role of glucocorticoids in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and safety profile of Janus kinase inhibitors) and outstanding research questions, including precision medicine approach, prevention, and cure of rheumatoid arthritis will be highlighted.

Crucial safety issues on Janus kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis might be associated with the lack of LDL-cholesterol management: a reasoned literature analysis

This point of view explores the safety concerns of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-Is), used in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other rheumatologic conditions. Increasing evidence shows that JAK-Is may elevate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially pulmonary embolism. This fact has prompted the European Medicines Agency to advise cautious use of these drugs in patients over 65, smokers, and those at risk of cardiovascular issues or cancer. The paper analyses the evidence on the association between VTE risk and RA and whether different JAK-Is pose different risks. It also probes the link between VTE, lipids, and JAK inhibition, noting that JAK-Is can alter HDL and LDL levels. On the other hand, some evidence indicates that tighter LDL-cholesterol control could mitigate VTE risk, particularly pulmonary embolism. Moreover, data from trials show little attention to treating this main cardiovascular and VTE risk factor in rheumatological patients. Although the lipid paradox theory emphasizes the U-shaped relationship between LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk in patients with RA, uncontrolled levels of clinically relevant LDL cholesterol remain closely linked to cardiovascular and VTE risk. In conclusion, high-potency statins could help to manage the increased cardiovascular and VTE risk concomitant to JAK-Is treatment in rheumatologic patients without depriving them of the best therapeutic choice and, in addition, reducing the inherent risk associated with the disease.

Safety profile of upadacitinib in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: integrated post hoc analysis of the SELECT phase III rheumatoid arthritis clinical programme

OBJECTIVE

Increased risk of serious adverse events (AEs) was reported for tofacitinib relative to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged ≥50 years enriched for cardiovascular (CV) risk (ORAL Surveillance). We assessed post hoc the potential risk of upadacitinib in a similar RA population.

METHODS

Pooled safety data from six phase III trials were evaluated post hoc for AEs in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg once a day (with or without conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs), adalimumab 40 mg every other week with concomitant methotrexate (MTX), or MTX monotherapy in the overall trial population and in a subset of patients with higher CV risk (aged ≥50 years, ≥1 CV risk factor). Higher-risk patients from a head-to-head study of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab (SELECT-COMPARE) were assessed in parallel. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent AEs were summarised based on exposure to upadacitinib or comparators.

RESULTS

A total of 3209 patients received upadacitinib 15 mg, 579 received adalimumab and 314 received MTX monotherapy; ~54% of the patients were included in the overall and SELECT-COMPARE higher-risk populations. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were more frequent in the higher-risk cohorts versus the overall population but were generally similar across treatment groups. Rates of serious infections in higher-risk populations and herpes zoster (HZ) and NMSC in all populations were higher with upadacitinib 15 mg than comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased risk of MACE, malignancy (excluding NMSC) and VTE was observed in higher-risk populations with RA, yet risk was comparable between upadacitinib-treated and adalimumab-treated patients. Higher rates of NMSC and HZ were observed with upadacitinib versus comparators across all populations, and increased rates of serious infections were detected in upadacitinib-treated patients at higher CV risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT02706873, NCT02675426, NCT02629159, NCT02706951, NCT02706847 and NCT03086343.

Recommendations for assessing the risk of cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism before the initiation of targeted therapies for chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders have increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with the general population. Moreover, recent data have raised concerns around a possible increased risk of major CV events (MACE) and VTE in patients treated with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). In October 2022, the PRAC has recommended measures to minimize the risk of serious side effects, including CV conditions and VTE, associated with all approved in chronic inflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an adequate and feasible strategy to evaluate, at the individual level, the risk of CVD and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary steering committee comprised 11 members including rheumatologists, a cardiologist, a hematologist expert in thrombophilia and fellows. Systematic literature searches were performed and evidence was categorized according to standard guidelines. The evidence was discussed and summarized by the experts in the course of a consensus finding and voting process.

RESULTS

Three overarching principles were defined. First, there is a higher risk of MACE and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases compared with the general population. Second, the rheumatologist has a central role in the evaluation of the risk of CVD and VTE in patient with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Third, the risk of MACE and VTE should be regularly assessed in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, particularly before initiating targeted therapies. Eleven recommendations were defined to prevent potentially life-threatening complications of CVD and VTE in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, providing practical assessment of CVD and VTE before considering the prescription of targeted therapies, and especially JAKi.

CONCLUSION

These practical recommendations based on expert opinion and scientific evidence provide consensus for the prevention and the assessment of CVD and VTE.

The Emerging Safety Profile of JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatic Diseases

Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) medications are small-molecule drugs that affect intracellular signal transduction. They are highly effective oral medications that have been approved for the treatment of various rheumatic diseases, with rheumatoid arthritis being a key example of an autoimmune rheumatic disease. JAKi are oral-route medications that are alternatives to injectable biologic therapies, launched in the late 1990s. While most safety concerns with JAKi are similar to the biologics, there are many differences. New data on comparative safety of JAKi versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were recently published that led to new black box warnings by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about cardiovascular and cancer risks and a label change for JAKi. This review summarizes the current published data with regards to the safety of JAKi, focused on rheumatic diseases. Specifically, any risk differences between agents or across different indications are discussed, as well as the risk factors for these adverse outcomes.

The impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life use of Janus kinases inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: the Expanded Risk Score in RA as a tool to quantify the risk of cardiovascular events

Objective

To evaluate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the impact of EMA recommendations on the real-life prescription of JAK inhibitors (JAKis) and the use of the Expanded Risk Score in RA (ERS-RA) to quantify the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-life RA patients treated with JAKis. Patients were classified as ineligible for JAKis if they fulfilled EMA criteria (>65 years-old, history of malignancy, or increased risk of venous thromboembolic events [VTE] or MACE including smoking). Risk of MACE was defined according to ORAL Surveillance trial inclusion criteria (ORALSURV) or by using the ERS-RA.

Results

Of 194 patients enrolled, 57.9% were classified as ineligible according to EMA definition (ORALSURV criteria). The most frequent reason for ineligibility was increased MACE risk (70.2%), followed by age>65 (34.2%), smoking (30.7%), and increased risk of VTE (20.2%) or malignancy (7%). The use of the ERS-RA reduced the rate of patients carrying an increased CV risk to 18.6% (p<0.001 versus ORALSURV), leading to 46.4% overall ineligible patients. Over a drug-exposure of 337 patient/years, we observed 2 VTE, one MACE (non-fatal stroke), and one solid malignancy (all in the group of patients classified as ineligible according to both the definitions).

Conclusions

Rigorous application of EMA indications in clinical practice could result in the exclusion of a large proportion of RA patients from treatment with JAKis. A proper quantification of the risk for MACE by dedicated tools as ERS-RA is advocated to better tailor the management of RA.

Cardiovascular safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a progressively utilized therapeutic approach for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the complete determination of their cardiovascular safety remains inconclusive. Hence, the primary objective of this network meta-analysis is to meticulously assess and juxtapose the cardiovascular risks linked to distinct JAK inhibitors employed in RA patients. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were meticulously conducted, encompassing a collection of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on investigating the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Extensive exploration was performed across multiple electronic databases, incorporating studies published until March 2023. To be included in this analysis, the RCTs were required to involve adult participants diagnosed with RA who received treatment with JAK inhibitors. To ensure accuracy, two authors independently undertook the selection of eligible RCTs and meticulously extracted aggregate data. In order to examine the outcomes of MACE and all-cause mortality, a frequentist graph theoretical approach within network meta-analyses was employed, utilizing random-effects models. Third study has been registered on PROSPERO under the reference CRD42022384611. Findings: A specific selection encompassing a total of 14 meticulously chosen randomized controlled trials was undertaken, wherein 13,524 patients were assigned randomly to distinct treatment interventions. The analysis revealed no notable disparity in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the interventions and the placebo group. However, in comparison to adalimumab, the employment of JAK inhibitors exhibited an association with higher rates of all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.81]. This observed increase in risk primarily stemmed from the usage of tofacitinib (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.12-3.23). None of the other JAK inhibitors exhibited a statistically significant variance in all-cause mortality when compared to adalimumab. Interpretation: Our study suggests that JAK inhibitors may not increase the risk of MACE in RA patients but may be associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to adalimumab, primarily due to tofacitinib use. Rheumatologists should carefully consider the cardiovascular risks when prescribing JAK inhibitors, particularly tofacitinib, for RA patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=384611, CRD42022384611.

A JAK Inhibitor for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Baricitinib Experience

Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate for treating adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provides improvements in clinical signs, symptoms and patient-reported outcomes. Currently, baricitinib is approved for treating RA in more than 75 countries. In several pivotal Phase II and III RA trials (RA-BALANCE, RA-BEGIN, RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, RA-BEACON, RA-BEYOND), up to seven years of baricitinib treatment was well tolerated and provided rapid and sustained efficacy, which was confirmed in real-world settings. Safety signals for another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, have emerged, as observed in the post-marketing Phase IIIb/IV trial Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance; safety signals were subsequently highlighted in a retrospective study of baricitinib and consequently new recommendations and warnings and precautions for all JAK inhibitors have been issued. Ongoing studies to further characterise and clarify the benefit:risk of JAK inhibitors include registries and controlled trials. This capstone review summarises clinical and real-world data outlining the benefit:risk profile of baricitinib, confirming that the improved disease activity and physical function of patients with RA treated with this JAK inhibitor observed in clinical trials is translated into effectiveness in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations.

JAK inhibitors and black box warnings: what is the future for JAK inhibitors?

INTRODUCTION

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have dramatically improved the treatment of various autoimmune and myeloproliferative disorders. Recently, concern has arisen regarding their safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide a comprehensive summary of the major current and emerging JAKi and their indications, address recent studies on comparative safety, and provide insight into their future and use. We emphasize that the application of the research findings on a case-by-case basis should consider a patient's age, comorbidities, disease for which JAKi is being considered, disease activity, the JAKi target(s), alternate treatment options available for the patient, and the planned duration of JAKi.

EXPERT OPINION

Rheumatologists are used to prescribing therapies in which a risk-to-benefit assessment is required as well as to screening and monitoring the safety of medications. Thus, rheumatologists are already practiced in applying specific criteria to effectively screen and monitor patients who are candidates for JAKi therapy. Ongoing research will help to clarify any mechanisms underlying differential safety signals between JAK and other therapies, what the balance between risk and efficacy is, who the susceptible subpopulations are, and whether safety signals are shared between different JAKis and across indications.

Australian recommendations on perioperative use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in people with inflammatory arthritis undergoing elective surgery

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are effective treatments for inflammatory arthritis but carry an increased risk of infection. For patients undergoing surgery, there is a need to consider the trade-off between a theoretical increased risk of infection with continuation of DMARDs perioperatively versus an increased risk of disease flare if they are temporarily withheld. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to develop recommendations for perioperative use of DMARDs for people with inflammatory arthritis undergoing elective surgery. The recommendations form part of the National Health and Medical Research Council-endorsed Australian Living Guideline for the Pharmacological Management of Inflammatory Arthritis. Conditional recommendations were made against routinely discontinuing conventional synthetic and biologic (b) DMARDs in the perioperative period but to consider temporary discontinuation of bDMARDs in individuals with a high risk of infection or where the impact of infection would be severe. A conditional recommendation was made in favour of temporary discontinuation of targeted synthetic DMARDs in the perioperative period.

Janus kinase inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for tyrosine kinase 2 inhibition

Aberrant activation of the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), conferring immune-mediated properties in target tissues. Multiple cytokines activate different combinations of JAKs and STATs to alter the cell fate of target tissue and induce end-organ damage. Thus, the simultaneous blockade of several different cytokines by small molecules acting downstream intracellular signalling has gained traction. JAK inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of several rheumatic diseases, yet hitherto not for SLE. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors including tofacitinib, baricitinib, and deucravacitinib have shown merit as treatments for SLE. Tofacitinib, a JAK1/3 inhibitor, reduced cholesterol levels, improved vascular function, and decreased the type I interferon signature in SLE patients. Baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated significant improvements in lupus rashes and arthritis in a phase 2 and a phase 3 randomised controlled trial, but the results were not replicated in another phase 3 trial. Deucravacitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, yielded greater response rates than placebo in a phase 2 trial of SLE and will be investigated in larger phase 3 trials. TYK2 is activated in response to cytokines actively involved in lupus pathogenesis; this review highlights the potential of targeting TYK2 as a promising therapy for SLE.

Clinical experience and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in giant cell arteritis: a retrospective case series from Sweden

The Janus kinase (JAK)-STAT signaling pathway is relevant in both Takayasu and giant cell arteritis (GCA), and the use of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in arthritis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease is nowadays common. Some evidence of the clinical efficacy of JAKi in GCA exists and a phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) of upadacitinib is currently recruiting. In 2017, we started using barcitinib in a GCA patient with inadequate response to corticosteroids, and later on, we treated other 14 GCA patients with baricitinib/tofacitinib during intense follow-up. The retrospective data of these 15 individuals are here summarized. GCA was diagnosed based on the ACR criteria and/or imaging techniques combined with increased C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) followed by a good initial response to corticosteroids. JAKi was initiated based on inflammatory activity, with increased CRP, presumably dependent on GCA with clinical symptoms, despite unsatisfying high doses of prednisolone. The mean age at JAKi initiation was 70.1 years and the mean exposure to JAKi was 19 months. From initiation, significant reductions in CRP were seen already at 3 (p = 0.02) and 6 (p = 0.02) months. A slower decrease was observed regarding ESR at 3 (p = 0.12) and 6 (p = 0.02) months. Furthermore, the daily prednisolone doses were reduced at 3 (p = 0.02) and 6 (p = 0.004) months. No GCA relapses were observed. Two patients were affected by serious infections, but JAKi therapy was retained or reintroduced after recovery. We present encouraging observational data on JAKi in GCA in one of the hitherto largest case series with long-term follow-up. Our clinical experiences will complement the results from the awaited RCT.

Baricitinib Safety for Events of Special Interest in Populations at Risk: Analysis from Randomised Trial Data Across Rheumatologic and Dermatologic Indications

INTRODUCTION

Baricitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), atopic dermatitis (AD), and alopecia areata (AA). Further characterisation of adverse events of special interest (AESI) for JAK inhibitors in at-risk populations will improve benefit-risk assessment for individual patients and diseases.

METHODS

Data were pooled from clinical trials and long-term extensions in moderate-to-severe active RA, moderate-to-severe AD, and severe AA. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), malignancy, venous thromboembolism (VTE), serious infection, and mortality were calculated for patients with low risk (younger than 65 years with no specified risk factors), and patients at risk (≥ 1 of: aged 65 years or older, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, current smoking, HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, poor mobility on EQ-5D, or history of malignancy).

RESULTS

Datasets included baricitinib exposure up to 9.3 years with 14,744 person-years of exposure (PYE) (RA), 3.9 years with 4628 PYE (AD), and 3.1 years with 1868 PYE (AA). In patients with low risk (RA: 31%, AD: 48%, AA: 49%), IRs for MACE (0.05, 0.04, 0), malignancies (0.20, 0.13, 0), VTE (0.09, 0.04, 0), serious infection (1.73, 1.18, 0.6), and mortality (0.04, 0, 0) in the RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively, were low. In patients at risk (RA: 69%, AD: 52%, AA: 51%), IRs were for MACE (0.70, 0.25, 0.10), malignancies (1.23, 0.45, 0.31), VTE (0.66, 0.12, 0.10), serious infection (2.95, 2.30, 1.05), and mortality (0.78, 0.16, 0) for RA, AD, and AA datasets, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Populations with low risk have low incidence of the examined JAK inhibitor-related AESI. In the dermatologic indications, incidence is also low for patients at risk. Considering individual disease burden, risk factors, and response to treatment is relevant to make informed decisions for individual patients treated with baricitinib.