Clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with STK11, KEAP1, or TP53 comutations: subgroup results from the phase III IMpower150 trial

Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials

Antiangiogenic agents, generally antibodies or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors that target the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, are currently among the few combination partners clinically proven to improve the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This benefit has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials across different cancer types, some with practice-changing results; however, numerous phase III trials have also had negative results. The rationale for using antiangiogenic drugs as partners for ICIs relies primarily on blocking the multiple immunosuppressive effects of VEGF and inducing several different vascular-modulating effects that can stimulate immunity, such as vascular normalization leading to increased intratumoural blood perfusion and flow, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic effects of endothelial cells on T cells, among others. Conversely, VEGF blockade can also cause changes that suppress antitumour immunity, such as increased tumour hypoxia, and reduced intratumoural ingress of co-administered ICIs. As a result, the net clinical benefits from antiangiogenic-ICI combinations will be determined by the balance between the opposing effects of VEGF signalling and its inhibition on the antitumour immune response. In this Perspective, we summarize the results from the currently completed phase III trials evaluating antiangiogenic agent-ICI combinations. We also discuss strategies to improve the efficacy of these combinations, focusing on aspects that include the deleterious functions of VEGF-VEGFR inhibition on antitumour immunity, vessel co-option as a driver of non-angiogenic tumour growth, clinical trial design, or the rationale for drug selection, dosing and scheduling.

Milestones in tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting

Research into the mechanisms and manifestations of solid tumor vascularization was launched more than 50 years ago with the proposition and experimental demonstrations that angiogenesis is instrumental for tumor growth and was, therefore, a promising therapeutic target. The biological knowledge and therapeutic insights forthcoming have been remarkable, punctuated by new concepts, many of which were not foreseen in the early decades. This article presents a perspective on tumor vascularization and its therapeutic targeting but does not portray a historical timeline. Rather, we highlight eight conceptual milestones, integrating initial discoveries and recent progress and posing open questions for the future.

Combined treatment for a rare malignant glomus tumor of the esophagus with pulmonary and liver metastases: a case report and review of literature

Background

Glomus tumors are typically benign soft tissue tumors that occur at the extremities; malignant and viscerally occurring cases are extremely rare.

Case presentation

We report a 49-year old male patient with a malignant esophageal glomus tumor that was complicated by lung and liver metastases. Genetic test results guided the patient's individualized treatment. Consequently, treatment with Anlotinib combined with Tislelizumab achieved significant clinical benefits.

Conclusion

Our case report demonstrates that immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with malignant esophageal glomus tumors can achieve significant efficacy and suggests the potential value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) detection in guiding personalized treatments in patients with malignant esophageal glomus tumors.

Molecular classification and biomarkers of outcome with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: analyses of the CASPIAN phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

We explored potential predictive biomarkers of immunotherapy response in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with durvalumab (D) + tremelimumab (T) + etoposide-platinum (EP), D + EP, or EP in the randomized phase 3 CASPIAN trial.

METHODS

805 treatment-naïve patients with ES-SCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive D + T + EP, D + EP, or EP. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Patients were required to provide an archived tumor tissue block (or ≥ 15 newly cut unstained slides) at screening, if these samples existed. After assessment for programmed cell death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden, residual tissue was used for additional molecular profiling including by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In 182 patients with transcriptional molecular subtyping, OS with D ± T + EP was numerically highest in the SCLC-inflamed subtype (n = 10, median 24.0 months). Patients derived benefit from immunotherapy across subtypes; thus, additional biomarkers were investigated. OS benefit with D ± T + EP versus EP was greater with high versus low CD8A expression/CD8 cell density by immunohistochemistry, but with no additional benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP. OS benefit with D + T + EP versus D + EP was associated with high expression of CD4 (median 25.9 vs. 11.4 months) and antigen-presenting and processing machinery (25.9 vs. 14.6 months) and MHC I and II (23.6 vs. 17.3 months) gene signatures, and with higher MHC I expression by immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the tumor microenvironment is important in mediating better outcomes with D ± T + EP in ES-SCLC, with canonical immune markers associated with hypothesized immunotherapy mechanisms of action defining patient subsets that respond to D ± T.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043872.

Unravelling the Triad of Lung Cancer, Drug Resistance, and Metabolic Pathways

Lung cancer, characterized by its heterogeneity, presents a significant challenge in therapeutic management, primarily due to the development of resistance to conventional drugs. This resistance is often compounded by the tumor's ability to reprogram its metabolic pathways, a survival strategy that enables cancer cells to thrive in adverse conditions. This review article explores the complex link between drug resistance and metabolic reprogramming in lung cancer, offering a detailed analysis of the molecular mechanisms and treatment strategies. It emphasizes the interplay between drug resistance and changes in metabolic pathways, crucial for developing effective lung cancer therapies. This review examines the impact of current treatments on metabolic pathways and the significance of considering metabolic factors to combat drug resistance. It highlights the different challenges and metabolic alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, underlining the need for subtype-specific treatments. Key signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, MAPK, and AMPK, have been discussed for their roles in promoting drug resistance and metabolic changes, alongside the complex regulatory networks involved. This review article evaluates emerging treatments targeting metabolism, such as metabolic inhibitors, dietary management, and combination therapies, assessing their potential and challenges. It concludes with insights into the role of precision medicine and metabolic biomarkers in crafting personalized lung cancer treatments, advocating for metabolic targeting as a promising approach to enhance treatment efficacy and overcome drug resistance. This review underscores ongoing advancements and hurdles in integrating metabolic considerations into lung cancer therapy strategies.

Creation and Validation of Patient-Derived Cancer Model Using Peritoneal and Pleural Effusion in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: An Early Experience

Background: The application of personalized cancer treatment based on genetic information and surgical samples has begun in the field of cancer medicine. However, a biopsy may be painful for patients with advanced diseases that do not qualify for surgical resection. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are cancer models in which patient samples are transplanted into immunodeficient mice. PDXs are expected to be useful for personalized medicine. The aim of this study was to establish a PDX from body fluid (PDX-BF), such as peritoneal and pleural effusion samples, to provide personalized medicine without surgery. Methods: PDXs-BF were created from patients with ovarian cancer who had positive cytology findings based on peritoneal and pleural effusion samples. PDXs were also prepared from each primary tumor. The pathological findings based on immunohistochemistry were compared between the primary tumor, PDX, and PDX-BF. Further, genomic profiles and gene expression were evaluated using DNA and RNA sequencing to compare primary tumors, PDXs, and PDX-BF. Results: Among the 15 patients, PDX-BF was established for 8 patients (5 high-grade serous carcinoma, 1 carcinosarcoma, 1 low-grade serous carcinoma, and 1 clear cell carcinoma); the success rate was 53%. Histologically, PDXs-BF have features similar to those of primary tumors and PDXs. In particular, PDXs-BF had similar gene mutations and expression patterns to primary tumors and PDXs. Conclusions: PDX-BF reproduced primary tumors in terms of pathological features and genomic profiles, including gene mutation and expression. Thus, PDX-BF may be a potential alternative to surgical resection for patients with advanced disease.

Prognostic implications of STK11 with different mutation status and its relationship with tumor-infiltrating immune cells in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Mutations in STK11 (STK11Mut) gene may present a negative impact on survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients, however, its relationship with immune related genes remains unclear. This study is to unveil whether overexpressed- and mutated-STK11 impact survival in NSCLC and to explore whether immune related genes (IRGs) are involved in STK11 mutations.

Methods

188 NSCLC patients with intact formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue available for detecting STK11 protein expression were included in the analysis. After immunohistochemical detection of STK11 protein, patients were divided into high STK11 expression group (STK11High) and low STK11 expression group (STK11Low), and then Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and COX proportional hazards model were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups of patients. In addition, the mutation data from the TCGA database was used to categorize the NSCLC population, namely STK11 Mutated (STK11Mut) and wild-type (STK11Wt) subgroups. The difference in OS between STK11Mut and STK11Wt was compared. Finally, bioinformatics analysis was used to compare the differences in IRGs expression between STK11Mut and STK11Wt populations.

Results

The median follow-up time was 51.0 months (range 3.0 - 120.0 months) for real-life cohort. At the end of follow-up, 64.36% (121/188) of patients experienced recurrence or metastasis. 64.89% (122/188) of patients ended up in cancer-related death. High expression of STK11 was a significant protective factor for NSCLC patients, both in terms of PFS [HR=0.42, 95% CI= (0.29-0.61), P<0.001] and OS [HR=0.36, 95% CI= (0.25, 0.53), P<0.001], which was consistent with the finding in TCGA cohorts [HR=0.76, 95%CI= (0.65, 0.88), P<0.001 HR=0.76, 95%CI= (0.65, 0.88), P<0.001]. In TCGA cohort, STK11 mutation was a significant risk factor for NSCLC in both lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) histology in terms of OS [HR=6.81, 95%CI= (2.16, 21.53), P<0.001; HR=1.50, 95%CI= (1.00, 2.26), P=0.051, respectively]. Furthermore, 7 IRGs, namely CALCA, BMP6, S100P, THPO, CGA, PCSK1 and MUC5AC, were found significantly overexpressed in STK11-mutated NSCLC in both LUSC and LUAD histology.

Conclusions

Low STK11 expression at protein level and presence of STK11 mutation were associated with poor prognosis in NSCLC, and mutated STK11 might probably alter the expression IRGs profiling.

Exploration of efficacy of different therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation in the first-line treatment

PURPOSE

The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response.

RESULTS

We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits.

Emerging Therapies in Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Virus (+) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) is the most frequently found oncogene in human cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For many years, KRAS was considered "undruggable" due to its structure and difficult targeting. However, the discovery of the switch II region in the KRAS-G12C-mutated protein has changed the therapeutic landscape with the design and development of novel direct KRAS-G12C inhibitors. Sotorasib and adagrasib are FDA-approved targeted agents for pre-treated patients with KRAS-G12C-mutated NSCLC. Despite promising results, the efficacy of these novel inhibitors is limited by mechanisms of resistance. Ongoing studies are evaluating combination strategies for overcoming resistance. In this review, we summarize the biology of the KRAS protein and the characteristics of KRAS mutations. We then present current and emerging therapeutic approaches for targeting KRAS mutation subtypes intending to provide individualized treatment for lung cancer harboring this challenging driver mutation.

Combining Genomic Biomarkers to Guide Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The clinical value of STK11, KEAP1, and EGFR alterations for guiding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial, as some patients with these proposed resistance biomarkers show durable ICB responses. More specific combinatorial biomarker approaches are urgently needed for this disease.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To develop a combinatorial biomarker strategy with increased specificity for ICB unresponsiveness in NSCLC, we performed a comprehensive analysis of 254 patients with NSCLC treated with ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade monotherapy, including a discovery cohort of 75 patients subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and an independent validation cohort of 169 patients subjected to tumor-normal large panel sequencing. The specificity of STK11/KEAP1/EGFR alterations for ICB unresponsiveness was assessed in the contexts of a low (<10 muts/Mb) or high (≥10 muts/Mb) tumor mutational burden (TMB).

RESULTS

In low TMB cases, STK11/KEAP1/EGFR alterations were highly specific biomarkers for ICB resistance, with 0/15 (0.0%) and 1/34 (2.9%) biomarker-positive patients showing treatment benefit in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. This contrasted with high TMB cases, where 11/13 (85%) and 15/34 (44%) patients with at least one STK11/KEAP1/EGFR alteration showed durable treatment benefit in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively. These findings were supported by analyses of progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The unexpected ICB responses in patients carrying resistance biomarkers in STK11, KEAP1, and EGFR were almost exclusively observed in patients with a high TMB. Considering these alterations in context, the TMB offered a highly specific combinatorial biomarker strategy for limiting overtreatment in NSCLC.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of tumour suppressor genes in lung cancer

Tumour suppressor genes play a cardinal role in the development of a large array of human cancers, including lung cancer, which is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Therefore, extensive studies have been committed to deciphering the underlying mechanisms of alterations of tumour suppressor genes in governing tumourigenesis, as well as resistance to cancer therapies. In spite of the encouraging clinical outcomes demonstrated by lung cancer patients on initial treatment, the subsequent unresponsiveness to first-line treatments manifested by virtually all the patients is inherently a contentious issue. In light of the aforementioned concerns, this review compiles the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of some of the tumour suppressor genes implicated in lung cancer that are either frequently mutated and/or are located on the chromosomal arms having high LOH rates (1p, 3p, 9p, 10q, 13q, and 17p). Our study identifies specific genomic loci prone to LOH, revealing a recurrent pattern in lung cancer cases. These loci, including 3p14.2 (FHIT), 9p21.3 (p16INK4a), 10q23 (PTEN), 17p13 (TP53), exhibit a higher susceptibility to LOH due to environmental factors such as exposure to DNA-damaging agents (carcinogens in cigarette smoke) and genetic factors such as chromosomal instability, genetic mutations, DNA replication errors, and genetic predisposition. Furthermore, this review summarizes the current treatment landscape and advancements for lung cancers, including the challenges and endeavours to overcome it. This review envisages inspired researchers to embark on a journey of discovery to add to the list of what was known in hopes of prompting the development of effective therapeutic strategies for lung cancer.

Development, testing and validation of a targeted NGS-panel for the detection of actionable mutations in lung cancer (NSCLC) using anchored multiplex PCR technology in a multicentric setting

Lung cancer is a paradigm for a genetically driven tumor. A variety of drugs were developed targeting specific biomarkers requiring testing for tumor genetic alterations in relevant biomarkers. Different next-generation sequencing technologies are available for library generation: 1) anchored multiplex-, 2) amplicon based- and 3) hybrid capture-based-PCR. Anchored multiplex PCR-based sequencing was investigated for routine molecular testing within the national Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer (nNGM). Four centers applied the anchored multiplex ArcherDX-Variantplex nNGMv2 panel to re-analyze samples pre-tested during routine diagnostics. Data analyses were performed by each center and compiled centrally according to study design. Pre-defined standards were utilized, and panel sensitivity was determined by dilution experiments. nNGMv2 panel sequencing was successful in 98.9% of the samples (N = 90). With default filter settings, all but two potential MET exon 14 skipping variants were identified at similar allele frequencies. Both MET variants were found with an adapted calling filter. Three additional variants (KEAP1, STK11, TP53) were called that were not identified in pre-testing analyses. Only total DNA amount but not a qPCR-based DNA quality score correlated with average coverage. Analysis was successful with a DNA input as low as 6.25 ng. Anchored multiplex PCR-based sequencing (nNGMv2) and a sophisticated user-friendly Archer-Analysis pipeline is a robust and specific technology to detect tumor genetic mutations for precision medicine of lung cancer patients.

Targeting KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways for immunomodulation and improving treatment outcomes in solid tumors

Historically, KRAS has been considered 'undruggable' inspite of being one of the most frequently altered oncogenic proteins in solid tumors, primarily due to the paucity of pharmacologically 'druggable' pockets within the mutant isoforms. However, pioneering developments in drug design capable of targeting the mutant KRAS isoforms especially KRASG12C-mutant cancers, have opened the doors for emergence of combination therapies comprising of a plethora of inhibitors targeting different signaling pathways. SHP2 signaling pathway, primarily known for activation of intracellular signaling pathways such as KRAS has come up as a potential target for such combination therapies as it emerged to be the signaling protein connecting KRAS and the immune signaling pathways and providing the link for understanding the overlapping regions of RAS/ERK/MAPK signaling cascade. Thus, SHP2 inhibitors having potent tumoricidal activity as well as role in immunomodulation have generated keen interest in researchers to explore its potential as combination therapy in KRAS mutant solid tumors. However, the excitement with these combination therapies need to overcome challenges thrown up by drug resistance and enhanced toxicity. In this review, we will discuss KRAS and SHP2 signaling pathways and their roles in immunomodulation and regulation of tumor microenvironment and also analyze the positive effects and drawbacks of the different combination therapies targeted at these signaling pathways along with their present and future potential to treat solid tumors.

Unveiling the role of KRAS in tumor immune microenvironment

Kirsten rats sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS), the first discovered human oncogene, has long been recognized as "undruggable". KRAS mutations frequently occur in multiple human cancers including non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), colorectal cancer(CRC) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC), functioning as a "molecule switch" determining the activation of various oncogenic signaling pathways. Except for its intrinsic pro-tumorigenic role, KRAS alteration also exhibits an unique immune signature characterized by elevated PD-L1 level and high tumor mutational burden(TMB). KRAS mutation shape an immune suppressive microenvironment by impeding effective T cells infiltration and recruiting suppressive immune cells including myeloid-derived suppressor cells(MDSCs), regulatory T cells(Tregs), cancer associated fibroblasts(CAFs). In immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) era, NSCLC patients with mutated KRAS tend to be more responsive to ICI than patients with intact KRAS. The hallmark for KRAS mutation is the existence of multiple kinds of co-mutations. Different types of co-alterations have distinct tumor microenvironment(TME) signatures and responses to ICI. TP53 co-mutation possess a "hot" TME and achieve higher response to immunotherapy while other loss of function mutation correlated with a "colder" TME and a poor outcome to ICI-based therapy. The groundbreaking discovery of KRAS G12C inhibitors significantly improved outcomes for this KRAS subtype even though efficacy was limited to NSCLC patients. KRAS G12C inhibitors also restore the suppressive TME, creating an opportunity for combinations with ICI. However, an inevitable challenge to KRAS inhibitors is drug resistance. Promising combination strategies such as combination with SHP2 is an approach deserve further exploration because of their immune modulatory effect.

Outcomes following KRASG12C inhibitor treatment in patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRASG12C inhibitors in patients with KRASG12C-mutated solid tumors.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRASG12C inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRASG12C inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRASG12C inhibitor treatment.

Transcription factor-target gene regulatory network analysis in human lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Transcription factors (TFs) play a crucial role in the occurrence and progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and targeting TFs is an important direction for treating LUAD. However, targeting a single TF often fails to achieve satisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Furthermore, the regulatory TF-target gene networks involved in the development of LUAD is complex and not yet fully understood.

Methods

In this study, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze the transcriptome profile of human LUAD tissues and matched adjacent nontumor tissues. We selected the differentially expressed TFs, performed enrichment analysis and survival curve analysis, and predicted the regulatory networks of the top differential TFs with their target genes. Finally, alternative splicing analyses were also performed.

Results

We found that TFs GRHL3, SIX1, SIX2, SPDEF, and ETV4 were upregulated, while TAL1, EPAS1, SOX17, NR4A1, and EGR3 were significantly downregulated in LUAD tissues compared to normal tissues. We propose a potential GRHL3-CDH15-Wnt-β-catenin pro-oncogenic signaling axis and a potential TAL1-ADAMTS1-vascular antioncogenic signaling axis. In addition, we found that alternative splicing of intron retention (IR), approximate IR (XIR), multi-IR (MIR), approximate MIR (XMIR), and approximate alternative exon ends (XAE) showed abnormally increased frequencies in LUAD tissues.

Conclusions

These findings revealed a novel TF-target gene regulatory axis related to tumorigenesis and provided potential therapeutic targets and mechanisms for LUAD.

Genome-Wide CRISPR Screens Identify Multiple Synthetic Lethal Targets That Enhance KRASG12C Inhibitor Efficacy

Non-small lung cancers (NSCLC) frequently (∼30%) harbor KRAS driver mutations, half of which are KRASG12C. KRAS-mutant NSCLC with comutated STK11 and/or KEAP1 is particularly refractory to conventional, targeted, and immune therapy. Development of KRASG12C inhibitors (G12Ci) provided a major therapeutic advance, but resistance still limits their efficacy. To identify genes whose deletion augments efficacy of the G12Cis adagrasib (MRTX-849) or adagrasib plus TNO155 (SHP2i), we performed genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screens on KRAS/STK11-mutant NSCLC lines. Recurrent, potentially targetable, synthetic lethal (SL) genes were identified, including serine-threonine kinases, tRNA-modifying and proteoglycan synthesis enzymes, and YAP/TAZ/TEAD pathway components. Several SL genes were confirmed by siRNA/shRNA experiments, and the YAP/TAZ/TEAD pathway was extensively validated in vitro and in mice. Mechanistic studies showed that G12Ci treatment induced gene expression of RHO paralogs and activators, increased RHOA activation, and evoked ROCK-dependent nuclear translocation of YAP. Mice and patients with acquired G12Ci- or G12Ci/SHP2i-resistant tumors showed strong overlap with SL pathways, arguing for the relevance of the screen results. These findings provide a landscape of potential targets for future combination strategies, some of which can be tested rapidly in the clinic.

SIGNIFICANCE

Identification of synthetic lethal genes with KRASG12C using genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening and credentialing of the ability of TEAD inhibition to enhance KRASG12C efficacy provides a roadmap for combination strategies. See related commentary by Johnson and Haigis, p. 4005.

The impact of oncogenic driver mutations on neoadjuvant immunotherapy outcomes in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the presence of different oncogenic driver mutations may affect the tumor microenvironment and consequently influence the clinical benefit from immunotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive NSCLC patients (stage IIA to IIIB) who underwent radical surgery after receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy at a single high-volume center between December 2019 and August 2022. Pathological response and long-term outcomes were compared based on the driver oncogene status, and RNA sequencing analysis was conducted to investigate the transcriptomic characteristics before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 167 patients included in this study, 47 had oncogenic driver mutations. KRAS driver mutations were identified in 28 patients, representing 59.6% of oncogenic driver mutations. Of these, 17 patients had a major pathological response, which was significantly higher than in the non-KRAS driver mutation group (60.7% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.049). Multivariate Cox regression analysis further revealed that the KRAS driver mutation group was an independent prognostic factor for prolonged disease-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.10, P = 0.032). The median proportion of CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in the KRAS driver mutation NSCLCs than in the non-driver mutation group (18% vs. 13%, P = 0.030). Furthermore, immune-related pathways were enriched in the KRAS driver mutation NSCLCs and activated after immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that NSCLC patients with KRAS driver mutations have a superior response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, possibly due to their higher immunogenicity. The findings highlight the importance of considering oncogenic driver mutations in selecting neoadjuvant treatment strategies for NSCLC patients.

Synchronous mucinous metaplasia and neoplasia of the female genital tract with both pulmonary metastases and STK11/KRAS gene mutations: a case report

Multiple morphological changes in two or more sites of concurrent multifocal mucinous lesions in the female genital tract are indicative of SMMN-FGT, which is unrelated to high-risk HPV infection. MUC6 and HIK-1083 showed positive characteristic immunohistochemistry. Seldom is the condition described. Here we describe an SMMN-FGT patient who also had lung metastases and STK11/KRAS gene mutations. Based on the current researches, we hypothesize that SMMN-FGT is closely associated with the development of cervical gastric adenocarcinoma.

Immunoediting of KEAP1-NRF2 mutant tumours is required to circumvent NRF2-mediated immune surveillance

In human cancer, activating mutations in the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway are frequently observed, and positively selected for, as they confer the cytoprotective functions of the transcription factor NRF2 on the cancer cells. This results in the development of aggressive tumours which are resistant to treatment with chemotherapeutic compounds. Recent clinical developments have also revealed that NRF2-activated cancers are similarly resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs. As the mechanism of action of these immune modulating therapies is tangential to the classical cytoprotective function of NRF2, it is unclear how aberrant NRF2 activity could impact the anti-cancer functionality of the immune system. In this context, we found that in human cancer, NRF2-activated cells are highly immunoedited, which allows the cancer cells to escape immune surveillance and develop into malignant tumours. This immunoediting takes the form of reduced antigen presentation by the MHC-I complex, coupled with reduced expression of activating ligands for NK cells. Together, these modifications to the immunogenicity of NRF2-activated cancers inhibit immune effector cell infiltration and engagement, and contribute to the formation of the immunologically cold tumour microenvironment which is a characteristic feature of NRF2-activated cancers.

Histo-Molecular Factors of Response to Combined Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers

BACKGROUND

Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) is the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the impact of routinely available histo-molecular biomarkers on its efficacy has not yet been fully assessed.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical activity of CIT according to oncogenic drivers, STK11 and TP53 mutations, and MET overexpression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving CIT for advanced NSCLC with available comprehensive molecular profile were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), adjusted on main confounding factors, and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate.

RESULTS

Among the 195 patients included between September 2018 and October 2021, 88 (41%) had a KRAS mutation, 16 (8.2%) an EGFR mutation or an ALK, ROS1, or RET rearrangement, 11 (5.6%) a BRAF mutation, 6 (3.1%) a MET exon 14 mutation or MET amplification, and 5 (2.6%) a HER2 mutation. Seventy-seven patients (39.5%) had none of these alterations. The median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI 5.3-7.3). Per subgroup, the median PFS was 7.1 months (5.4-8.9) for KRAS, 5.5 months (2.5-15.3) for EGFR/ALK/ROS1/RET, 12.9 months (2.6-not reached [NR]) for BRAF, 1.5 months (0.6-NR) for MET, 3.9 months (2.6-NR) for HER2, and 5.6 months (4.7-7.8) for patients without any oncogenic alteration. No difference in PFS was observed between the KRAS, BRAF, EGFR/ALK/ROS1/RET, and no-driver subgroups. STK11 mutations were associated with poor PFS (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.01-2.51]) whereas TP53 mutations had no impact. MET overexpression was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.35-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the efficacy of combining pembrolizumab with pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy differs according to the histo-molecular biomarkers, which may help to identify patients liable to benefit from CIT.

Tackling the immunotherapy conundrum: advances and challenges for operable non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents the majority of lung cancer cases, and its standard treatment is primarily surgery. Nonetheless, this type of cancer exhibits an important rate of tumor recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated significant survival benefits in many cancers, especially in early-stage NSCLC. This review considers the latest CheckMate816, IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials that led to US FDA approvals. The new wave of resectable NSCLC trial results are also summarized. Finally, the latest challenges for these treatment modalities, such as the choice between neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, the accurate identification of biomarkers and the presence of driver mutations such as EGFR, are discussed.

Optimal Therapeutic Strategy for PD-L1 Negative Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Decision-Making Guide Based on Clinicopathological and Molecular Features

OPINION STATEMENT

Strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), which can enhance antitumor immune responses, have revolutionized the lung cancer therapeutic landscape. The ICI mechanism of action involves the blockade of regulatory cell surface molecules using antibodies against the Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4 (CTLA-4) (ipilimumab, tremelimumab); the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1; nivolumab, pembrolizumab); or the PD ligand-1 (PD-L1; atezolizumab, durvalumab). Notably, anti-PD-1 demonstrated long-term survival benefits, durable objective responses, and a manageable safety profile in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 and platinum chemotherapy achieved better survival outcomes than chemotherapy alone, which was observed irrespective of PD-L1 expression on cancer cells. Although promising results have been reported from large clinical trials, especially for patients with high PD-L1 expression, the optimal treatment approach for patients with PD-L1-negative NSCLC has yet to be defined. We propose a guide for clinicians in the therapeutic decision-making process based on the latest data available about treatments, prognostic factors, predictive biomarkers, and real-world evidence in PD-L1-negative NSCLC patients.

Evaluating distinct KRAS subtypes as potential biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Despite the acknowledged predictive value of KRAS in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responses, the heterogeneous behavior of its mutations in this sphere remains largely unexplored. As of now, no studies have definitively categorized KRAS subtype variations as independent prognostic indicators for ICI responses in lung cancer patients.

Methods

We analyzed a cohort of 103 patients, all harboring different KRAS mutation subtypes, and complemented this data with information from TCGA and GEO databases. Our research focused on delineating the relationships between KRAS mutation subtypes and factors like immunotherapy markers and immune cell composition, in addition to examining survival rates, drug sensitivity, and PD-L1 responses corresponding to distinct KRAS subtypes.

Results

We found that the G12V and G12D subtypes demonstrated elevated expressions of immunotherapy markers, implying a potentially enhanced benefit from immunotherapy. Significant variations were identified in the distribution of naive B cells, activated CD4+ memory T cells, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) across different KRAS mutant subtypes. A notable difference was observed in the Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) levels across the four KRAS subtypes, with the G12D subtype displaying the lowest TMB level. Furthermore, G12C subtype showcased the worst prognosis in terms of progression-free intervals (PFI), in stark contrast to the more favorable outcomes associated with the G12A subtype.

Conclusion

Our study reveals that KRAS mutations exhibit considerable variability in predicting outcomes for LUAD patients undergoing ICI treatment. Thus, the evaluation of KRAS as a biomarker for ICIs necessitates recognizing the potential diversity inherent in KRAS mutations.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for RET fusion non-small cell lung cancer: hopes and challenges

Immune ch eckpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a milestone in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, NSCLC with known oncogenic drivers has been overlooked in most studies evaluating anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1. Rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene (RET) gene fusion was identified in 1-2% of NSCLC patients. More recently, two selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, demonstrated higher efficacy and good tolerability. In contrast, the activity of ICIs in RET fusion NSCLC has not been well characterized. Here, we analyzed the clinical data of ICIs and discussed the suitable time to introduce ICIs in RET fusion NSCLC. Finally, we put forward future strategies to adequately maximize the efficacy of ICIs treatment in patients with RET fusion NSCLC in the upcoming era of combination immunotherapies.

Immune-checkpoint inhibition for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer - opportunities and challenges

Therapeutic strategies harnessing the immune system to eliminate tumour cells have been successfully used for several cancer types, including in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In these patients, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can provide durable responses and improve overall survival either as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy or other immunotherapeutic agents. However, the implementation of ICIs in early stage NSCLC has been hampered by the continuous struggle to develop robust end points to assess their efficacy in this setting, especially those enabling a fast and reproducible evaluation of the clinical activity of neoadjuvant strategies. Several trials are testing ICIs, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in early stage NSCLC as an adjuvant, neoadjuvant or perioperative approach. As a novelty, most trials in the neoadjuvant setting have adopted pathological response as a primary end point. ICIs have been approved for use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings on the basis of event-free survival and disease-free survival benefit, respectively; however, the correlation of these end points with overall survival remains unclear in these settings. Unresolved challenges for the optimal use of ICIs with curative intent include concerns about their applicability in daily clinical practice and about improving patient selection based on predictive biomarkers or assessment of pathological response and minimal residual disease. In this Review, we discuss the rationale, available strategies and current trial landscape for the implementation of ICIs in patients with resectable NSCLC, and we further elaborate on future approaches to optimize their clinical benefit.

Beyond the Horizon: A Cutting-Edge Review of the Latest Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a revolutionary paradigm in oncology, offering a potent arsenal against various malignancies by harnessing the body's own immunological prowess. In a whirlwind of advancement, an abundance of new ICIs have come to light, rendering it a Herculean task for physicians to remain au courant with the rapidly evolving landscape. This comprehensive review meticulously explores the crescendo of clinical investigations and FDA approvals that have come to light during 2022 and 2023, showcasing the metamorphic impact of ICIs in cancer therapeutics. Delving into the pith of pivotal Phase 3 trials across diverse cancer types - including lung, renal, melanoma, and more - the review illuminates the significant strides made in enhancing patient outcomes, alongside the unveiling of novel ICIs that have garnered attention in the oncological community. The analysis extends to the notable presentations at the esteemed ESMO and ASCO conventions, providing a panoramic view of the contemporary advancements in ICI technology. Furthermore, the review underscores the imperative of continuous exploration in overcoming the extant challenges, such as the quest for reliable predictive biomarkers and the optimization of combinatorial strategies to surmount resistance and augment therapeutic efficacy. Through a holistic lens, this article elucidates the monumental impact of ICIs, marking a significant epoch in the odyssey towards rendering cancer a conquerable adversary.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression and the efficacy of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is expressed in approximately 70% of lung adenocarcinomas and is one of the most reliable makers to distinguish primary lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic disease. TTF-1-negative status is a poor prognostic factor, and TTF-1-negative lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. However, the relationship between TTF-1 expression and the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy is still unclear.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 129 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) treated with ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021. The expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and TTF-1 was also determined in cases for which no previous data were available. We then evaluated the association between TTF-1 expression status and treatment efficacy.

Results

Of the 129 cases, 33 were TTF-1-negative and 96 were positive. In the ICI monotherapy group (N=70), progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between TTF-1-positive and negative patients (median 3.6 vs. 3.8 months, P=0.27); however, in patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a trend for worse PFS was observed in TTF-1-negative cases compared with those that were TTF-1-positive (median 3.8 vs. 4.5 months, P=0.088). Moreover, long-term efficacy of ICI monotherapy (>2 years) was not observed in the TTF-1-negative group. TTF-1-negative patients tended to have worse overall survival (OS) than TTF-1-positive patients (median 15.6 vs. 19.5 months, P=0.13). In the ICI plus chemotherapy group (N=59), TTF-1-negative patients tended to have better PFS and similar OS compared with TTF-1-positive patients (median 9.9 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.14; median 32.3 vs. 18.9 months, P=0.78). Long-term efficacy was generally observed in TTF-1-negative patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ABCP) (median PFS 22.5 months, median OS not reached).

Conclusions

ICI monotherapy is generally less efficacious in TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC patients, and clinicians should consider ICI plus chemotherapy in these cases. Our study suggests that ABCP is an optimal regimen for TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC.

To be, or not to be: the dilemma of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer harboring various driver mutations

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is one of primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cncer. For advanced lung cancer, traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy become difficult to solve the dilemma of further progress. In recent years, with the clinical application of immunotherapy, the therapeutic strategy of lung cancer has changed dramatically. At present, immunotherapy has shown conspicuous efficacy in NSCLC patients with high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB). The discovery of driver mutations brings delightful hope for targeted cancer therapy. However, it remains controversial whether immunotherapy can be used in NSCLC patients with these specific driver mutations.

METHOD

This article summarized the latest research progresses of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. We paid close attention to the relevance of various driver mutations and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and summarized the predictive effects of several driver mutations and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The mutations of KRAS, KRAS+TP53, EPHA (especially EPHA5), ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, NOTCH, BRAF and LRP1B+FAT3 have potential to be used as biomarkers to predict the positive effectiveness of immunotherapy. ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1 mutations in LUAD patients get more positive effect in immunotherapy. While the mutations of EGFR, KEAP1, STKII/LKB1+KRAS, EML4-ALK, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, PBRM1, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1, ERBB2, PIK3CA and RET often indicate poor benefit from immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Many gene mutations have been shown to be associated with immunotherapy efficacy. Gene mutations should be combined with PD-L1, TMB, etc. to predict the effect of immunotherapy.

FSP1: a key regulator of ferroptosis

Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) is one of the main regulatory molecules of ferroptosis. FSP1 functions through the FSP1-coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10)-NAD(P)H axis and the vitamin K redox cycle. FSP1 is regulated by upstream factors, including transcription factors and noncoding RNA (ncRNA), and is subject to epigenetic modifications, which affect the progress of FSP1-related diseases. FSP1 is closely associated with the poor prognosis of malignant tumors and plays an important role in disease treatment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of FSP1 in ferroptosis regulation by summarizing regulatory pathways, possible mechanisms involving FSP1, and the relationship between FSP1 and disease prognosis and treatment.

Metabolic barriers in non-small cell lung cancer with LKB1 and/or KEAP1 mutations for immunotherapeutic strategies

Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely considered the standard initial treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when there are no targetable driver oncogenic alternations. NSCLC tumors that have two alterations in tumor suppressor genes, such as liver kinase B1 (LKB1) and/or Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), have been found to exhibit reduced responsiveness to these therapeutic strategies, as revealed by multiomics analyses identifying immunosuppressed phenotypes. Recent advancements in various biological approaches have gradually unveiled the molecular mechanisms underlying intrinsic reprogrammed metabolism in tumor cells, which contribute to the evasion of immune responses by the tumor. Notably, metabolic alterations in glycolysis and glutaminolysis have a significant impact on tumor aggressiveness and the remodeling of the tumor microenvironment. Since glucose and glutamine are essential for the proliferation and activation of effector T cells, heightened consumption of these nutrients by tumor cells results in immunosuppression and resistance to ICI therapies. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the clinical efficacies of current therapeutic strategies against NSCLC harboring LKB1 and/or KEAP1 mutations, along with the metabolic alterations in glycolysis and glutaminolysis observed in these cancer cells. Furthermore, ongoing trials targeting these metabolic alterations are discussed as potential approaches to overcome the extremely poor prognosis associated with this type of cancer.

Mutational landscape of cancer-driver genes across human cancers

The genetic mutations that contribute to the transformation of healthy cells into cancerous cells have been the subject of extensive research. The molecular aberrations that lead to cancer development are often characterised by gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations in a variety of oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes. In this study, we investigate the genomic sequences of 20,331 primary tumours representing 41 distinct human cancer types to identify and catalogue the driver mutations present in 727 known cancer genes. Our findings reveal significant variations in the frequency of cancer gene mutations across different cancer types and highlight the frequent involvement of tumour suppressor genes (94%), oncogenes (93%), transcription factors (72%), kinases (64%), cell surface receptors (63%), and phosphatases (22%), in cancer. Additionally, our analysis reveals that cancer gene mutations are predominantly co-occurring rather than exclusive in all types of cancer. Notably, we discover that patients with tumours displaying different combinations of gene mutation patterns tend to exhibit variable survival outcomes. These findings provide new insights into the genetic landscape of cancer and bring us closer to a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving the development of various forms of cancer.

An advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma patient harboring a BRAFV600E mutation responds to dabrafenib and trametinib: a case report and literature review

Background

The pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of NSCLC with rapid progression and poor prognosis, and is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Most PSC cases have potential targetable genomic alterations. Approximately 7% of PSC patients have BRAF mutations, and the efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAFV600E mutated PSC is unclear.

Case presentation

Our report describes a patient with mutated BRAFV600E PSC who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy early but quickly relapsed. Both chemotherapy and immunotherapy were ineffective for him, combined dabrafenib and trametinib produced a 6-month progression-free survival, and a partial response was observed in the tumor response evaluation. As a result of financial pressure, he stopped taking the targeted drugs, and his disease rapidly progressed.

Conclusion

Dabrafenib combined with trametinib provides partial remission in patients with advanced PSC with BRAFV600E mutations, and large-scale NGS panels could offer more options for PSC treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors promising role in cancer therapy: clinical evidence and immune-related adverse events

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to noteworthy progressions in the management of diverse cancer types, as evidenced by the pioneering "ipilimumab" medication authorized by US FDA in 2011. Importantly, ICIs agents have demonstrated encouraging potential in bringing about transformation across diverse forms of cancer by selectively targeting the immune checkpoint pathways that are exploited by cancerous cells for dodging the immune system, culminating in progressive and favorable health outcomes for patients. The primary mechanism of action (MOA) of ICIs involves blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints. There are three approved categories including Programmed Death (PD-1) inhibitors (cemiplimab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab), Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (Ipilimumab), and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL-1) (Avelumab). Although ICIs promisingly increase therapeutic response and cancer survival rates, using ICIs has demonstrated some limitations including autoimmune reactions and toxicities, requiring close monitoring. The present review endeavors to explicate the underlying principles of the MOA and pharmacokinetics of the approved ICIs in the realm of cancer induction, including an appraisal of their level of practice-based evidence.

Comutations and KRASG12C Inhibitor Efficacy in Advanced NSCLC

Molecular modifiers of KRASG12C inhibitor (KRASG12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinicogenomic analysis of 424 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we identified and validated coalterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, comutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ∼50% of those with early disease progression (progression-free survival ≤3 months) with KRASG12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent coalterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRASG12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRASG12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this work, we identify co-occurring genomic alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as independent determinants of poor clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and we propose a framework for patient stratification and treatment personalization based on the comutational status of individual tumors. See related commentary by Heng et al., p. 1513. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1501.

Molecular markers of metastatic disease in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prior studies characterized the association of molecular alterations with treatment-specific outcomes in KRAS-mutant (KRASMUT) lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Less is known about the prognostic role of molecular alterations and their associations with metastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed clinicogenomic data from 1817 patients with KRASMUT LUAD sequenced at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Patients with metastatic (M1) and nonmetastatic (M0) disease were compared. Transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were investigated to characterize the biology of differential associations with clinical outcomes. Organ-specific metastasis was associated with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

KEAP1 (DFCI: OR = 2.3, q = 0.04; MSKCC: OR = 2.2, q = 0.00027) and SMARCA4 mutations (DFCI: OR = 2.5, q = 0.06; MSKCC: OR = 2.6, q = 0.0021) were enriched in M1 versus M0 tumors. On integrative modeling, NRF2 activation was the genomic feature most associated with OS. KEAP1 mutations were enriched in M1 versus M0 tumors independent of STK11 status (KEAP1MUT/STK11WT: DFCI OR = 3.0, P = 0.0064; MSKCC OR = 2.0, P = 0.041; KEAP1MUT/STK11MUT: DFCI OR = 2.3, P = 0.0063; MSKCC OR = 2.5, P = 3.6 × 10-05); STK11 mutations without KEAP1 loss were not associated with stage (KEAP1WT/STK11MUT: DFCI OR = 0.97, P = 1.0; MSKCC OR = 1.2, P = 0.33) or outcome. KEAP1/KRAS-mutated tumors with and without STK11 mutations exhibited high functional STK11 loss. The negative effects of KEAP1 were compounded in the presence of bone (HR = 2.3, P = 4.4 × 10-14) and negated in the presence of lymph node metastasis (HR = 1.0, P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Mutations in KEAP1 and SMARCA4, but not STK11, were associated with metastatic disease and poor OS. Functional STK11 loss, however, may contribute to poor outcomes in KEAP1MUT tumors. Integrating molecular data with clinical and metastatic-site annotations can more accurately risk stratify patients.

Long-Term Outcomes and Molecular Correlates of Sotorasib Efficacy in Patients With Pretreated KRAS G12C-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: 2-Year Analysis of CodeBreaK 100

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In the longest follow-up, to our knowledge, for a KRASG12C inhibitor, we assessed the long-term efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of sotorasib in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the CodeBreaK 100 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03600883). This multicenter, single-group, open-label phase I/phase II trial enrolled 174 patients with KRAS G12C-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after progression on prior therapies. Patients (N = 174) received sotorasib 960 mg once daily with the primary end points for phase I of safety and tolerability and for phase II of objective response rate (ORR). Sotorasib produced an ORR of 41%, median duration of response of 12.3 months, progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.3 months, overall survival (OS) of 12.5 months, and 2-year OS rate of 33%. Long-term clinical benefit (PFS ≥ 12 months) was observed in 40 (23%) patients across PD-L1 expression levels, in a proportion of patients with somatic STK11 and/or KEAP1 alterations, and was associated with lower baseline circulating tumor DNA levels. Sotorasib was well tolerated, with few late-onset treatment-related toxicities, none of which led to treatment discontinuation. These results demonstrate the long-term benefit of sotorasib, including in subgroups with poor prognosis.

Bayesian network enables interpretable and state-of-the-art prediction of immunotherapy responses in cancer patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, have revolutionized cancer treatment and brought tremendous benefits to patients who otherwise would have had a limited prognosis. Nonetheless, only a small fraction of patients respond to immunotherapy, and the costs and side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors cannot be ignored. With the advent of machine and deep learning, clinical and genetic data have been used to stratify patient responses to immunotherapy. Unfortunately, these approaches have typically been "black-box" methods that are unable to explain their predictions, thereby hindering their responsible clinical application. Herein, we developed a "white-box" Bayesian network model that achieves accurate and interpretable predictions of immunotherapy responses against nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This tree-augmented naïve Bayes (TAN) model accurately predicted durable clinical benefits and distinguished two clinically significant subgroups with distinct prognoses. Furthermore, our state-of-the-art white-box TAN approach achieved greater accuracy than previous methods. We hope that our model will guide clinicians in selecting NSCLC patients who truly require immunotherapy and expect our approach to be easily applied to other types of cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 platform NEOSTAR trial

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab (Ipi+Nivo) and nivolumab + chemotherapy (Nivo+CT) induce greater pathologic response rates than CT alone in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of adding ipilimumab to neoadjuvant Nivo+CT is unknown. Here we report the results and correlates of two arms of the phase 2 platform NEOSTAR trial testing neoadjuvant Nivo+CT and Ipi+Nivo+CT with major pathologic response (MPR) as the primary endpoint. MPR rates were 32.1% (7/22, 80% confidence interval (CI) 18.7-43.1%) in the Nivo+CT arm and 50% (11/22, 80% CI 34.6-61.1%) in the Ipi+Nivo+CT arm; the primary endpoint was met in both arms. In patients without known tumor EGFR/ALK alterations, MPR rates were 41.2% (7/17) and 62.5% (10/16) in the Nivo+CT and Ipi+Nivo+CT groups, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in either arm. Single-cell sequencing and multi-platform immune profiling (exploratory endpoints) underscored immune cell populations and phenotypes, including effector memory CD8+ T, B and myeloid cells and markers of tertiary lymphoid structures, that were preferentially increased in the Ipi+Nivo+CT cohort. Baseline fecal microbiota in patients with MPR were enriched with beneficial taxa, such as Akkermansia, and displayed reduced abundance of pro-inflammatory and pathogenic microbes. Neoadjuvant Ipi+Nivo+CT enhances pathologic responses and warrants further study in operable NSCLC. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03158129 .).

At the crossroads of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted subsets of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a paradigm of precision medicine, with the discovery of numerous disease subtypes defined by specific oncogenic driver mutations leading to the development of a range of molecularly targeted therapies. Over the past decade, rapid progress has also been made in the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially antagonistic antibodies targeting the PD-L1-PD-1 axis, for the treatment of NSCLC. Although many of the major oncogenic drivers of NSCLC are associated with intrinsic resistance to ICIs, patients with certain oncogene-driven subtypes of the disease that are highly responsive to specific targeted therapies might also derive benefit from immunotherapy. However, the development of effective immunotherapy approaches for oncogene-addicted NSCLC has been challenged by a lack of predictive biomarkers for patient selection and limited knowledge of how ICIs and oncogene-directed targeted therapies should be combined. Therefore, whether ICIs alone or with chemotherapy or even in combination with molecularly targeted agents would offer comparable benefit in the context of selected oncogenic driver alterations to that observed in the general unselected NSCLC population remains an open question. In this Review, we discuss the effects of oncogenic driver mutations on the efficacy of ICIs and the immune tumour microenvironment as well as the potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited to overcome the challenges of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Narrative review: blood and tumor biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer without an oncogenic driver

Background and Objective

For patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without an oncogenic driver, systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy have significantly improved the outcomes. However, the majority of patients do not have a durable response, and there is a need for additional predictive biomarkers. The objective of this narrative review is to describe potential biomarkers for immunotherapy.

Methods

Narrative overview of the literature synthesizing the findings of literature reporting retrospective, prospective, and subset analyses of studies investigating potential predictive biomarkers for ICI.

Key Content and Findings

Tumor expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is the only clinically available biomarker for patients receiving ICI-based therapy. However, PD-L1 has significant limitations and studies have investigated the predictive value of higher PD-L1 expression levels. There has been interest in tumor mutation burden (TMB) based on the premise that a higher TMB would be associated with a more neoantigens, which would increase the likelihood of an immune response. The studies to date have not revealed a consistent association with TMB level and survival benefit. Kelch-like ECH Associated Protein 1 (KEAP1) and serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutations have been associated with worse outcomes with ICI but these mutations appear to be associated with a worse prognosis, and not predictive for ICI. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL's) are the mechanism of immune response, and there is interest in further investigating the presence, type and distribution of TIL's to predict immune benefit. Circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA) levels, at baseline and on treatment samples, are being investigated to assess response to therapy and long-term benefit of ICI.

Conclusions

None of the current biomarkers in development are validated for use in routine clinical care. Given the complexity of NSCLC biology and immune response to ICI most likely a composite biomarker using multiple biomarkers will need to be develop.

Adjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A new milestone

Currently, chemotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery has been shown to improve 5-year survival rates by only 4-5%. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, there is a growing interest in the role of immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC. Here, we summarize the rationale for adjuvant immunotherapy, including the postoperative immunosuppressive environment and immunological effects of platinum chemotherapy. Many ongoing clinical trials and the related progress in adjuvant immunotherapy in early-stage resectable NSCLC are discussed. Furthermore, we highlight several unresolved challenges, including markers predictive of treatment benefit, the efficacy of treatment for some oncogene-addicted tumors, the optimal combination therapy, the duration of adjuvant immunotherapy, and optimal selection between neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy. Early findings in some clinical trials are promising, and updated overall survival results will be useful for validating the current role of adjuvant immunotherapy, particularly in the context of perioperative strategy.

Genomic and immunogenomic analysis of three prognostic signature genes in LUAD

BACKGROUND

Searching for immunotherapy-related markers is an important research content to screen for target populations suitable for immunotherapy. Prognosis-related genes in early stage lung cancer may also affect the tumor immune microenvironment, which in turn affects immunotherapy.

RESULTS

We analyzed the differential genes affecting lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy through the Cancer Treatment Response gene signature DataBase (CTR-DB), and set a threshold to obtain a total of 176 differential genes between response and non-response to immunotherapy. Functional enrichment analysis found that these differential genes were mainly involved in immune regulation-related pathways. The early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) prognostic model was constructed through the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database, and three target genes (MMP12, NFE2, HOXC8) were screened to calculate the risk score of early-stage LUAD. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the model had good prognostic value, and the validation set (GSE50081, GSE11969 and GSE42127) from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) analysis indicated that the model had good stability, and the risk score was correlated with immune infiltrations to varying degrees. Multi-type survival analysis and immune infiltration analysis revealed that the transcriptome, methylation and the copy number variation (CNV) levels of the three genes were correlated with patient prognosis and some tumor microenvironment (TME) components. Drug sensitivity analysis found that the three genes may affect some anti-tumor drugs. The mRNA expression of immune checkpoint-related genes showed significant differences between the high and low group of the three genes, and there may be a mutual regulatory network between immune checkpoint-related genes and target genes. Tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) analysis found that three genes were associated with immunotherapy response and maybe the potential predictors to immunotherapy, consistent with the CTR-DB database analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of data mining, this study suggests that MMP12, NFE2, and HOXC8 may be involved in tumor immune regulation and affect immunotherapy. They are expected to become markers of immunotherapy and are worthy of further experimental research.

KRAS Mutations in Solid Tumors: Characteristics, Current Therapeutic Strategy, and Potential Treatment Exploration

Kristen rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene is one of the most common mutated oncogenes in solid tumors. Yet, KRAS inhibitors did not follow suit with the development of targeted therapy, for the structure of KRAS has been considered as being implausible to target for decades. Chemotherapy was the initial recommended therapy for KRAS-mutant cancer patients, which was then replaced by or combined with immunotherapy. KRAS G12C inhibitors became the most recent breakthrough in targeted therapy, with Sotorasib being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on its significant efficacy in multiple clinical studies. However, the subtypes of the KRAS mutations are complex, and the development of inhibitors targeting non-G12C subtypes is still at a relatively early stage. In addition, the monotherapy of KRAS inhibitors has accumulated possible resistance, acquiring the exploration of combination therapies or next-generation KRAS inhibitors. Thus, other non-target, conventional therapies have also been considered as being promising. Here in this review, we went through the characteristics of KRAS mutations in cancer patients, and the prognostic effect that it poses on different therapies and advanced therapeutic strategy, as well as cutting-edge research on the mechanisms of drug resistance, tumor development, and the immune microenvironment.

Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Other Cancers

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver-gene mutations is a combination of an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody and chemotherapy, or an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody and an anti-CTLA-4 antibody with or without chemotherapy. Although there were fewer cases of disease progression in the early stages of combination treatment than with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies alone, only approximately half of the patients had a long-term response. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Recent reports of such mechanisms include reduced cancer-cell immunogenicity, loss of major histocompatibility complex, dysfunctional tumor-intrinsic interferon-γ signaling, and oncogenic signaling leading to immunoediting. Among these, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is a notable potential mechanism of immune escape and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we will summarize findings on these resistance mechanisms in NSCLC and other cancers, focusing on Wnt/β-catenin signaling. First, we will review the molecular biology of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, then discuss how it can induce immunoediting and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We will also describe other various mechanisms of immune-checkpoint-inhibitor resistance. Finally, we will propose therapeutic approaches to overcome these mechanisms.

Predictors of survival to immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive poor benefit from immunotherapy (IO). For some of them, adding chemotherapy (CT) can improve the outcomes, but the reliability of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as the only biomarker to distinguish these patients is unsatisfactory. We sought to detect clinicopathological and molecular predictive factors of survival that might be added to PD-L1 expression in the selection of patients who should receive IO alone or chemoimmunotherapy (CIT).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled clinical trials investigating IO, alone or with CT, vs CT alone in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients. Meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed to investigate IO alone vs CT, CIT vs CT, and IO alone vs CIT.

RESULTS

A total of 14 367 patients with advanced NSCLC across 25 randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Squamous histology, male sex, current and former smoker status, PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlated with improved survival with IO alone compared with CT. Conversely, female sex, no smoking history, negative PD-L1 expression, and low TMB correlated with unsatisfactory outcomes with IO alone vs CT but not with CIT vs CT. CIT improved survival vs IO alone in female patients, never smokers, those having a PD-L1 expression of 1% or more (but not with a PD-L1 of  ≥ 50%) or a low TMB and in patients with central nervous system metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest some clinicopathological and molecular features that, added to PD-L1 expression, could help in the selection of the most appropriate first-line IO-based treatment for advanced NSCLC patients.

The Role of Chemotherapy Plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Oncogenic-Driven NSCLC: A University of California Lung Cancer Consortium Retrospective Study

Introduction

There is a paucity of data on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus doublet chemotherapy (C) in patients with advanced lung cancer whose tumor harbors an actionable mutation. We sought to provide insight into the role of this combination in relation to chemotherapy alone in this patient population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study at the five University of California National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and significant adverse events. Adverse events in patients who received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) post-ICI were also captured.

Results

A total of 246 patients were identified, 170 treated with C plus ICI and 76 treated with C alone. Driver alterations included EGFR (54.9%), KRAS (32.9%), ALK (5.3%), HER2/ERBB2 (2.9%), ROS1 (1.2%), MET (1.2%), RET (0.8%), and BRAF non-V600 (0.8%). The overall PFS and OS hazard ratios were not significant at 1.12 (95% confidence interval 0.83-1.51; p = 0.472) and 0.86 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-1.24, p = 0.429), respectively. No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed in the mutational subgroups. Grade 3 or greater adverse events were lower in the C plus ICI group. The multivariate analysis for PFS and OS revealed a performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) score of 2, and previous TKI treatment was associated with poorer outcomes with C plus ICI.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that patients with oncogenic-driven NSCLC, primarily those with EGFR-driven tumors, treated with a TKI should not subsequently receive C plus ICI. Analysis from prospective clinical trials will provide additional information on the role of ICIs in this group of patients.

A single center analysis of first-line treatment in advanced KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer: real-world practice

Purpose

For the first-line treatment of KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, immunotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy are the main treatment method. Here, we investigated the clinical efficacy and prognosis those two regimens as first-line treatment in real-world practice.

Methods

KRAS mutant NSCLC patients received chemotherapy or immunotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2014 to March 2022 were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, treatment scheme, clinical curative effect and follow-up data of enrolled patients were collected for analysis.

Results

Fifty patients received immunotherapy and 115 patients received chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients who received immunotherapy (HR = 0.350, 95%CI 0.156–0.781, P = 0.010), or pemetrexed-based regimen (HR = 0.486, 95%CI 0.255–0.928, P = 0.029), or antiangiogenic therapy (HR = 0.355, 95%CI 0.159–0.790, P = 0.011) were at a low risk of disease progression. And patients received antiangiogenic therapy had lower risk of death than those not (HR = 0.333, 95%CI 0.120–0.926, P = 0.035). Subgroup analysis revealed the immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone had lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.377, 95%CI 0.166–0.856, P = 0.020) in PD-L1 expression ≥1% subgroup. And in non-G12C KRAS subgroup, but not in G12C KRAS subgroup, patients who received antiangiogenic therapy had lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.254, 95%CI 0.098–0.656, P = 0.005) and death than those not (HR = 0.197, 95%CI 0.056–0.692, P = 0.011). In terms of different chemotherapy regimen, platinum-paclitaxel combined with antiangiogenic therapy achieved the highest ORR and DCR (P < 0.05), while the platinum-pemetrexed combined with antiangiogenic therapy had the longest PFS and OS (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

For the first-line treatment of KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, immunotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy, and pemetrexed-based regimen could obtain more benefits. Subgroup analysis revealed the benefits of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy were applicable in PD-L1 expression≥1% subgroup, and antiangiogenic therapy could benefit non-G12C KRAS subgroup, but not G12C KRAS subgroup. In terms of different chemotherapy regimen, platinum-pemetrexed combined with antiangiogenic therapy may be the preferred chemotherapy regimen.

Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Combination Prolonged Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NSCLC with High PD-L1 Expression and Low Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable driver mutations. However, studies comparing ICIs monotherapy with combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy in programmed death-ligand 1 high expressors remain limited. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the treatment efficacy of the therapies by studying 47 patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC who received ICI monotherapy (n = 28) or combination therapy either with chemotherapy or radiotherapy (n = 19). Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. It was observed that patients who received combination therapy had a better PFS than monotherapy, but no such significant benefit was observed in OS. The difference in PFS was higher in the subgroup of patients with low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) than in the high-NLR patient subgroup. This study suggests that pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy could provide a significant benefit in PFS, especially in patients with treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC with low NLR. Furthermore, our study also demonstrates the potential use of NLR as a biomarker for prediction of treatment outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving combination therapy.