1
|
Wang XJ, Huo YX, Hu WD, Yue C. The association of maternal smoking around birth with chronic respiratory diseases in adult offspring: A Mendelian randomization study. Tob Induc Dis 2024; 22:TID-22-120. [PMID: 38938749 PMCID: PMC11210268 DOI: 10.18332/tid/189394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal smoking during pregnancy disturbs fetal lung development, and induces in their offspring childhood respiratory diseases. Whether it has a continued impact on offspring adult lung health and exerts a casual effect of chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), remains uncertain. We seek to determine the causal relationships between maternal smoking around birth and offspring adult CRDs, using summary data from previously described cohorts. METHODS Mendelian randomization (MR) study was used to analyze the genome-wide associations of maternal smoking around birth and offspring adult CRDs, including respiratory insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), related respiratory insufficiency, emphysema, COPD, COPD hospital admissions, early onset of COPD, later onset of COPD, asthma, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), lung cancer (LC), small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). RESULTS After removing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with smoking by the offspring, maternal smoking around birth was associated with increased risk of offspring adult respiratory diseases (OR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.013-1.284; p=0.030), respiratory insufficiency (OR=2.413; 95% CI: 1.039-5.603; p=0.040), COPD (OR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.013-1.284; p=0.003), and asthma (OR=1.336; 95% CI: 1.161-1.538; p<0.001). Besides, maternal smoking during pregnancy was associated with a greater risk of LUSC (OR=1.229; 95% CI: 0.992-1.523; p=0.059) than the risk of IPF (OR=1.001; 95% CI: 0.999-1.003; p=0.224), LC (OR=1.203; 95% CI: 0.964-1.501; p=0.103), or SCLC (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.77-1.601; p=0.577). CONCLUSIONS In this MR analysis, maternal smoking around birth caused a strong risk factor for the offspring to develop lung problems and CRDs in adulthood. The policy related to smoking cessation for mothers during pregnancy should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Jun Wang
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun-Xia Huo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Second People’s Hospital of Lanzhou City, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Dong Hu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chaoyan Yue
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murray RL, Alexandris P, Baldwin D, Brain K, Britton J, Crosbie PAJ, Gabe R, Lewis S, Parrott S, Quaife SL, Tam HZ, Wu Q, Beeken R, Copeland H, Eckert C, Hancock N, Lindop J, McCutchan G, Marshall C, Neal RD, Rogerson S, Quinn Scoggins HD, Simmonds I, Thorley R, Callister ME. Uptake and 4-week quit rates from an opt-out co-located smoking cessation service delivered alongside community-based low-dose computed tomography screening within the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial. Eur Respir J 2024; 63:2301768. [PMID: 38636970 PMCID: PMC11024392 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01768-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 50% of those attending for low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer continue to smoke and co-delivery of smoking cessation services alongside screening may maximise clinical benefit. Here we present data from an opt-out co-located smoking cessation service delivered alongside the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST). METHODS Eligible YLST participants were offered an immediate consultation with a smoking cessation practitioner (SCP) at their screening visit with ongoing smoking cessation support over subsequent weeks. RESULTS Of 2150 eligible participants, 1905 (89%) accepted the offer of an SCP consultation during their initial visit, with 1609 (75%) receiving ongoing smoking cessation support over subsequent weeks. Uptake of ongoing support was not associated with age, ethnicity, deprivation or educational level in multivariable analyses, although men were less likely to engage (adjusted OR (ORadj) 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89). Uptake was higher in those with higher nicotine dependency, motivation to stop smoking and self-efficacy for quitting. Overall, 323 participants self-reported quitting at 4 weeks (15.0% of the eligible population); 266 were validated by exhaled carbon monoxide (12.4%). Multivariable analyses of eligible smokers suggested 4-week quitting was more likely in men (ORadj 1.43, 95% CI 1.11-1.84), those with higher motivation to quit and previous quit attempts, while those with a stronger smoking habit in terms of cigarettes per day were less likely to quit. CONCLUSIONS There was high uptake for co-located opt-out smoking cessation support across a wide range of participant demographics. Protected funding for integrated smoking cessation services should be considered to maximise programme equity and benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Panos Alexandris
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - David Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kate Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - John Britton
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip A J Crosbie
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Barts Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Lewis
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Samantha L Quaife
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Hui Zhen Tam
- Barts Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Qi Wu
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Rebecca Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Harriet Copeland
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Eckert
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Neil Hancock
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Grace McCutchan
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Richard D Neal
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Harriet D Quinn Scoggins
- PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Irene Simmonds
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Thorley
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Matthew E Callister
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pereira LFF, dos Santos RS, Bonomi DO, Franceschini J, Santoro IL, Miotto A, de Sousa TLF, Chate RC, Hochhegger B, Gomes A, Schneider A, de Araújo CA, Escuissato DL, Prado GF, Costa-Silva L, Zamboni MM, Ghefter MC, Corrêa PCRP, Torres PPTES, Mussi RK, Muglia VF, de Godoy I, Bernardo WM. Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging. J Bras Pneumol 2024; 50:e20230233. [PMID: 38536982 PMCID: PMC11095927 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Although lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common and lethal tumors, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Smoking is still responsible for more than 85% of cases. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC-related mortality by 20%, and that reduction reaches 38% when LCS by LDCT is combined with smoking cessation. In the last decade, a number of countries have adopted population-based LCS as a public health recommendation. Albeit still incipient, discussion on this topic in Brazil is becoming increasingly broad and necessary. With the aim of increasing knowledge and stimulating debate on LCS, the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, the Brazilian Thoracic Association, and the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging convened a panel of experts to prepare recommendations for LCS in Brazil. The recommendations presented here were based on a narrative review of the literature, with an emphasis on large population-based studies, systematic reviews, and the recommendations of international guidelines, and were developed after extensive discussion by the panel of experts. The following topics were reviewed: reasons for screening; general considerations about smoking; epidemiology of LC; eligibility criteria; incidental findings; granulomatous lesions; probabilistic models; minimum requirements for LDCT; volumetric acquisition; risks of screening; minimum structure and role of the multidisciplinary team; practice according to the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System; costs versus benefits of screening; and future perspectives for LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Fernando Ferreira Pereira
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Ricardo Sales dos Santos
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Daniel Oliveira Bonomi
- . Departamento de Cirurgia Torácica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Juliana Franceschini
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Fundação ProAR, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Ilka Lopes Santoro
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Medicina, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - André Miotto
- . Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Departamento de Cirurgia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitário Alcides Carneiro, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG - Campina Grande (PB) Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Caruso Chate
- . Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- . Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville (FL) USA
| | - Artur Gomes
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió, Maceió (AL) Brasil
| | - Airton Schneider
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital São Lucas, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - César Augusto de Araújo
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Departamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia - UFBA - Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Dante Luiz Escuissato
- . Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR - Curitiba (PR) Brasil
| | | | - Luciana Costa-Silva
- . Serviço de Diagnóstico por Imagem, Instituto Hermes Pardini, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Mauro Musa Zamboni
- . Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil
- . Centro Universitário Arthur Sá Earp Neto/Faculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis -UNIFASE - Petrópolis (RJ) Brasil
| | - Mario Claudio Ghefter
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | | | | | - Ricardo Kalaf Mussi
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP) Brasil
| | - Valdair Francisco Muglia
- . Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Oncologia e Hematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | - Irma de Godoy
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoffmann H, Kaaks R, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG. [Statement Paper on the Implementation of a National Organized Program in Germany for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Risk Populations Using Low-dose CT Screening Including Management of Screening Findings]. Zentralbl Chir 2024; 149:96-115. [PMID: 37816386 DOI: 10.1055/a-2178-5907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present concrete cornerstones for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hanover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Kaaks R, Hoffmann H. [Statement paper on the implementation of a national organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in risk populations using low-dose CT screening including management of screening findings]. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024; 196:134-153. [PMID: 37816377 DOI: 10.1055/a-2178-2846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on the early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present key points for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process. CITATION FORMAT: · Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG, Andreas S et al. Position paper on the implementation of a nationally organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in high-risk populations using low-dose CT screening including the management of screening findings requiring further workup. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: DOI 10.1055/a-2178-2846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Blum TG, Vogel-Claussen J, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Kaaks R, Hoffmann H. [Statement paper on the implementation of a national organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in risk populations using low-dose CT screening including management of screening findings]. Pneumologie 2024; 78:15-34. [PMID: 37816379 DOI: 10.1055/a-2175-4580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present concrete cornerstones for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Verdone JE, Marciniak ET, Deepak J. Tobacco treatment in the setting of lung cancer screening. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2024; 30:3-8. [PMID: 37933671 DOI: 10.1097/mcp.0000000000001030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Lung cancer screening by low-dose CT is an increasingly implemented preventive medicine tool. Screening for lung cancer is incomplete without addressing problematic tobacco use, the greatest modifiable risk factor in the development of lung cancer. This review describes recent work related to lung cancer screening and treatment of tobacco use in that context. RECENT FINDINGS Implementation of lung cancer screening demonstrates socioeconomic disparities in terms of adherence to screening as well as likelihood of successful tobacco dependence treatment. Active tobacco dependence is a common comorbidity for patients undergoing lung cancer screening. The optimal implementation of tobacco dependence treatment in the context of lung cancer screening is still an area of active investigation. SUMMARY Treatment of tobacco dependence at time of lung cancer screening is a major opportunity for clinicians to intervene to reduce the major modifiable risk factor for lung cancer, tobacco use. Providing comprehensive tobacco dependence treatment is most effective using combination pharmacologic and behavioral interventions. Practices providing comprehensive treatment will benefit from accurate documentation for billing and coding and supplementing with external resources such as state Quit Lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E Verdone
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lam S, Bai C, Baldwin DR, Chen Y, Connolly C, de Koning H, Heuvelmans MA, Hu P, Kazerooni EA, Lancaster HL, Langs G, McWilliams A, Osarogiagbon RU, Oudkerk M, Peters M, Robbins HA, Sahar L, Smith RA, Triphuridet N, Field J. Current and Future Perspectives on Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A Roadmap From 2023 to 2027 From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:36-51. [PMID: 37487906 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer substantially reduces mortality from lung cancer, as revealed in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. This review is based on the ninth CT screening symposium of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, which focuses on the major themes pertinent to the successful global implementation of LDCT screening and develops a strategy to further the implementation of lung cancer screening globally. These recommendations provide a 5-year roadmap to advance the implementation of LDCT screening globally, including the following: (1) establish universal screening program quality indicators; (2) establish evidence-based criteria to identify individuals who have never smoked but are at high-risk of developing lung cancer; (3) develop recommendations for incidentally detected lung nodule tracking and management protocols to complement programmatic lung cancer screening; (4) Integrate artificial intelligence and biomarkers to increase the prediction of malignancy in suspicious CT screen-detected lesions; and (5) standardize high-quality performance artificial intelligence protocols that lead to substantial reductions in costs, resource utilization and radiologist reporting time; (6) personalize CT screening intervals on the basis of an individual's lung cancer risk; (7) develop evidence to support clinical management and cost-effectiveness of other identified abnormalities on a lung cancer screening CT; (8) develop publicly accessible, easy-to-use geospatial tools to plan and monitor equitable access to screening services; and (9) establish a global shared education resource for lung cancer screening CT to ensure high-quality reading and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Lam
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Chunxue Bai
- Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute and Chinese Alliance Against Cancer, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - David R Baldwin
- Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Services (NHS) Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yan Chen
- Digital Screening, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Casey Connolly
- International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, Colorado
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ping Hu
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Harriet L Lancaster
- University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Georg Langs
- Computational Imaging Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annette McWilliams
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Australia University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | | | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging and The Institute for Diagnostic Accuracy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew Peters
- Woolcock Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hilary A Robbins
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Liora Sahar
- Data Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - John Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huber RM. [Early detection of lung cancer - current status and implementation scenarios]. Pneumologie 2023; 77:1016-1026. [PMID: 38092015 DOI: 10.1055/a-1531-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis of conventionally diagnosed lung cancer patients is still rather poor. Two large, randomized trials using screening by low dose CT could demonstrate that early detection in persons with smoking as risk factor can improve this prognosis. Early detection of lung cancer can be achieved by structured screening programs using low dose CT for persons at increased risk, but in addition also by consequent management of incidental pulmonary nodules, which are seen on imaging for other reasons. Integral part of these programs should be prevention measures, especially a consequent, repeated, low-threshold offer of a service for smoking cessation. Programs for lung cancer screening for persons at increased risk are only beneficial for the screenees and cost-effective, if the various parts of the program are optimally integrated and coordinated and all necessary disciplines (especially respiratory medicine, radiology, pathology, thoracic surgery, radiotherapy) are included in a multidisciplinary manner. For Germany the certified lung cancer centres in structured cooperation with physicians in private practice (respiratory physicians, radiologists, general practitioners) would be a good option. It is essential that there is a good perception for the need of early detection of lung cancer in politics and the public and that the persons at risk are reached, contacted and motivated by various methods.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lam DCL, Liam CK, Andarini S, Park S, Tan DSW, Singh N, Jang SH, Vardhanabhuti V, Ramos AB, Nakayama T, Nhung NV, Ashizawa K, Chang YC, Tscheikuna J, Van CC, Chan WY, Lai YH, Yang PC. Lung Cancer Screening in Asia: An Expert Consensus Report. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:1303-1322. [PMID: 37390982 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence and mortality of lung cancer are highest in Asia compared with Europe and USA, with the incidence and mortality rates being 34.4 and 28.1 per 100,000 respectively in East Asia. Diagnosing lung cancer at early stages makes the disease amenable to curative treatment and reduces mortality. In some areas in Asia, limited availability of robust diagnostic tools and treatment modalities, along with variations in specific health care investment and policies, make it necessary to have a more specific approach for screening, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with lung cancer in Asia compared with the West. METHOD A group of 19 advisors across different specialties from 11 Asian countries, met on a virtual Steering Committee meeting, to discuss and recommend the most affordable and accessible lung cancer screening modalities and their implementation, for the Asian population. RESULTS Significant risk factors identified for lung cancer in smokers in Asia include age 50 to 75 years and smoking history of more than or equal to 20 pack-years. Family history is the most common risk factor for nonsmokers. Low-dose computed tomography screening is recommended once a year for patients with screening-detected abnormality and persistent exposure to risk factors. However, for high-risk heavy smokers and nonsmokers with risk factors, reassessment scans are recommended at an initial interval of 6 to 12 months with subsequent lengthening of reassessment intervals, and it should be stopped in patients more than 80 years of age or are unable or unwilling to undergo curative treatment. CONCLUSIONS Asian countries face several challenges in implementing low-dose computed tomography screening, such as economic limitations, lack of efforts for early detection, and lack of specific government programs. Various strategies are suggested to overcome these challenges in Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chi-Leung Lam
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Chong-Kin Liam
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sita Andarini
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Persahabatan Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Samina Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel S W Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Navneet Singh
- Lung Cancer Clinic, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Seung Hun Jang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Varut Vardhanabhuti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Antonio B Ramos
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Anesthesia, Lung Center of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Tomio Nakayama
- Division of Screening Assessment and Management, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Japan
| | - Nguyen Viet Nhung
- Vietnam National Lung Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, VNU Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kazuto Ashizawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yeun-Chung Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jamsak Tscheikuna
- Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Wai Yee Chan
- Imaging Department, Gleneagles Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur; Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yeur-Hur Lai
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pan-Chyr Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan & National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kotti T, Katsampouris E, Ruparel M, McEwen A, Dickson JL, Duffy SW, Waller J, Janes SM, Quaife SL. A randomised controlled trial testing acceptance of practitioner-referral versus self-referral to stop smoking services within the Lung Screen Uptake Trial. Addiction 2023; 118:2007-2013. [PMID: 37331722 PMCID: PMC10952744 DOI: 10.1111/add.16269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Optimising smoking cessation (SC) referral strategies within lung cancer screening (LCS) could significantly reduce lung cancer mortality. This study aimed to measure acceptance of referral to SC support by either practitioner-referral or self-referral among participants attending a hospital-based lung health check appointment for LCS as part of the Lung Screen Uptake Trial. DESIGN Single-blinded two-arm randomised controlled trial. SETTING England. PARTICIPANTS Six hundred forty-two individuals ages 60 to 75 years, who self-reported currently smoking or had a carbon monoxide reading over 10 ppm during the lung health check appointment. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either a contact information card for self-referral to a local stop smoking service (SSS) (self-referral, n = 360) or a SSS referral made on their behalf by the nurse or trial practitioner (practitioner-referral, n = 329). MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome was acceptance of the practitioner-referral (defined as participants giving permission for their details to be shared with the local SSS) compared with acceptance of the self-referral (defined as participants taking the physical SSS contact information card to refer themselves to the local SSS). FINDINGS Half (49.8%) accepted the practitioner-made referral to a local SSS, whereas most (88.5%) accepted the self-referral. The odds of accepting the practitioner-referral were statistically significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio = 0.10; 95% confidence interval = 0.06-0.17) than the self- referral. In analyses stratified by group, greater quit confidence, quit attempts and Black ethnicity were associated with increased acceptance within the practitioner-referral group. There were no statistically significant interactions between acceptance by referral group and any of the participants' demographic or smoking characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Among participants in hospital-based lung cancer screening in England who self-reported smoking or met a carbon monoxide cut-off, both practitioner-referral and self-referral smoking cessation strategies were highly accepted. Although self-referral was more frequently accepted, prior evidence suggests practitioner-referrals increase quit attempts, suggesting practitioner-referrals should be the first-line strategy within lung cancer screening, with self-referral offered as an alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Kotti
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Evangelos Katsampouris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Mamta Ruparel
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Andy McEwen
- National Centre for Smoking Cessation and TrainingDorchesterUnited Kingdom
| | - Jennifer L. Dickson
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Stephen W. Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Samuel M. Janes
- Lungs for Living Research Centre, UCL Respiratory, Division of MedicineUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Samantha L. Quaife
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Villalobos A, Chambers DA. Advancing the science of integrating multiple interventions by blending and bundling. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad070. [PMID: 37707597 PMCID: PMC10587993 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer prevention and control research has produced a variety of effective interventions over the years, though most are single disease focused. To meet the Cancer Moonshot goal to reduce the cancer death rate by 50% by 2047, it may be necessary to overcome the limitations of siloed interventions that do not meet people's multiple needs and limitations in system capacity to deliver the increasing number of interventions in parallel. In this article, we propose integrating multiple evidence-based interventions as a potential solution. We define 2 types of integrated interventions, blended and bundled, and provide examples to illustrate each. We then offer a schematic and outline considerations for how to assemble blended or bundled interventions including looking at the intervention need or opportunity along the cancer continuum as well as co-occurring behaviors or motivations. We also discuss delivery workflow integration considerations including social-ecological level(s), context or setting, implementer, and intended beneficiary. Finally, in assembling integrated interventions, we encourage consideration of practice-based expertise and community and/or patient input. After assembly, we share thoughts related to implementation and evaluation of blended or bundled interventions. To conclude the article, we present multiple research opportunities in this space. With swift progress on these research directions, cancer prevention and control interventionists and implementation scientists can contribute to achieving the promise of the reignited Cancer Moonshot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aubrey Villalobos
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - David A Chambers
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fu SS, Rothman AJ, Vock DM, Lindgren BR, Almirall D, Begnaud A, Melzer AC, Schertz KL, Branson M, Haynes D, Hammett P, Joseph AM. Optimizing Longitudinal Tobacco Cessation Treatment in Lung Cancer Screening: A Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2329903. [PMID: 37615989 PMCID: PMC10450571 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Nearly half of the 14.8 million US adults eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS) smoke cigarettes. The optimal smoking cessation program components for the LCS setting are unclear. Objective To assess the effect of adding a referral to prescription medication therapy management (MTM) to the tobacco longitudinal care (TLC) program among patients eligible for LCS who smoke and do not respond to early tobacco treatment and to assess the effect of decreasing the intensity of TLC among participants who do respond to early treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial included patients who currently smoked cigarettes daily and were eligible for LCS. Recruitment took place at primary care centers and LCS programs at 3 large health systems in the US and began in October 2016, and 18-month follow-up was completed April 2021. Interventions (1) TLC comprising intensive telephone coaching and combination nicotine replacement therapy for 1 year with at least monthly contact; (2) TLC with MTM, MTM offered pharmacist-referral for prescription medications; and (3) Quarterly TLC, intensity of TLC was decreased to quarterly contact. Intervention assignments were based on early response to tobacco treatment (abstinence) that was assessed either 4 weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Main outcomes and Measures Self-reported, 6-month prolonged abstinence at 18-month. Results Of 636 participants, 228 (35.9%) were female, 564 (89.4%) were White individuals, and the median (IQR) age was 64.3 (59.6-68.8) years. Four weeks or 8 weeks after treatment initiation, 510 participants (80.2%) continued to smoke (ie, early treatment nonresponders) and 126 participants (19.8%) had quit (ie, early treatment responders). The 18 month follow-up survey response rate was 83.2% (529 of 636). Across TLC groups at 18 months follow-up, the overall 6-month prolonged abstinence rate was 24.4% (129 of 529). Among the 416 early treatment nonresponders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for TLC with MTM vs TLC was 17.8% vs 16.4% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13; 95% CI, 0.67-1.89). In TLC with MTM, 98 of 254 participants (39%) completed at least 1 MTM visit. Among 113 early treatment responders, 6-month prolonged abstinence for Quarterly TLC vs TLC was 24 of 55 (43.6%) vs 34 of 58 (58.6%) (aOR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.25-1.17). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, adding referral to MTM with TLC for participants who did not respond to early treatment did not improve smoking abstinence. Stepping down to Quarterly TLC among early treatment responders is not recommended. Integrating longitudinal tobacco cessation care with LCS is feasible and associated with clinically meaningful quit rates. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02597491.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven S. Fu
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | | | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Bruce R. Lindgren
- Biostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Daniel Almirall
- Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Abbie Begnaud
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Anne C. Melzer
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | | | - Mariah Branson
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David Haynes
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Patrick Hammett
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Anne M. Joseph
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Foley KL, Dressler EV, Weaver KE, Sutfin EL, Miller DP, Bellinger C, Kittel C, Stone RJ, Petty WJ, Land SR, Spangler JG, Lesser GJ, Chiles C. The Optimizing Lung Screening Trial (WF-20817CD): Multicenter Randomized Effectiveness Implementation Trial to Increase Tobacco Use Cessation for Individuals Undergoing Lung Screening. Chest 2023; 164:531-543. [PMID: 36931460 PMCID: PMC10410244 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One-half of all people who undergo lung cancer screening (LCS) currently use tobacco. However, few published studies have explored how to implement effective tobacco use treatment optimally during the LCS encounter. RESEARCH QUESTION Was the Optimizing Lung Screening intervention (OaSiS) effective at reducing tobacco use among patients undergoing LCS in community-based radiology facilities? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS The OaSiS study (National Cancer Institute [NCI] Protocol No.: WF-20817CD) is an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type II cluster randomized trial of radiology facilities conducted in partnership with the Wake Forest National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program research base. We randomly assigned 26 radiology facilities in 20 states to the intervention or usual care group. Staff at intervention facilities implemented a variety of strategies targeting the clinic and care team. Eligible patient participants were aged 55 to 77 years undergoing LCS and currently using tobacco. Of 1,094 who completed a baseline survey (523 intervention group, 471 control group) immediately before the LCS appointment, 956 completed the 6-month follow-up (86% retention rate). Fifty-four percent of those who reported not using tobacco at 6 months completed biochemical verification via mailed cotinine assay. Generalized estimating equation marginal models were used in an intention-to-treat analysis to predict 7-day tobacco use abstinence. RESULTS The average self-reported abstinence among participants varied considerably across facilities (0%-27%). Despite a significant increase in average cessation rate over time (0% at baseline to approximately 13% at 6 months; P < .0001), tobacco use did not differ by trial group at 14 days (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.46-1.99; P = .90), 3 months (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.69-1.99; P = .56), or 6 months (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.65-1.43; P = .87). INTERPRETATION The OaSiS trial participants showed a significant reduction in tobacco use over time, but no difference by trial arm was found. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03291587; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie L Foley
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Erin L Sutfin
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - David P Miller
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Christina Bellinger
- Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Carol Kittel
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Rebecca J Stone
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - W Jeffrey Petty
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Stephanie R Land
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - John G Spangler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Caroline Chiles
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lang AE. Patients Who Present With Tobacco Use: More Than a Teachable Moment-A Treatable One. Chest 2023; 164:292-293. [PMID: 37558325 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Edward Lang
- Department of Primary Care, McDonald Army Health Center, Fort Eustis, VA; Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mascalchi M, Picozzi G, Puliti D, Diciotti S, Deliperi A, Romei C, Falaschi F, Pistelli F, Grazzini M, Vannucchi L, Bisanzi S, Zappa M, Gorini G, Carozzi FM, Carrozzi L, Paci E. Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: What We Have Learned in Two Decades of ITALUNG and What Is Yet to Be Addressed. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2197. [PMID: 37443590 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13132197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The ITALUNG trial started in 2004 and compared lung cancer (LC) and other-causes mortality in 55-69 years-aged smokers and ex-smokers who were randomized to four annual chest low-dose CT (LDCT) or usual care. ITALUNG showed a lower LC and cardiovascular mortality in the screened subjects after 13 years of follow-up, especially in women, and produced many ancillary studies. They included recruitment results of a population-based mimicking approach, development of software for computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and lung nodules volumetry, LDCT assessment of pulmonary emphysema and coronary artery calcifications (CAC) and their relevance to long-term mortality, results of a smoking-cessation intervention, assessment of the radiations dose associated with screening LDCT, and the results of biomarkers assays. Moreover, ITALUNG data indicated that screen-detected LCs are mostly already present at baseline LDCT, can present as lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces, and can be multiple. However, several issues of LC screening are still unaddressed. They include the annual vs. biennial pace of LDCT, choice between opportunistic or population-based recruitment. and between uni or multi-centre screening, implementation of CAD-assisted reading, containment of false positive and negative LDCT results, incorporation of emphysema. and CAC quantification in models of personalized LC and mortality risk, validation of ultra-LDCT acquisitions, optimization of the smoking-cessation intervention. and prospective validation of the biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Mascalchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Picozzi
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Donella Puliti
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Diciotti
- Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy
| | - Annalisa Deliperi
- Radiodiagnostic Unit 2, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cisanello University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Romei
- Radiodiagnostic Unit 2, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cisanello University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Falaschi
- Radiodiagnostic Unit 2, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cisanello University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Pistelli
- Pulmonary Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Michela Grazzini
- Division of Pneumonology, San Jacopo Hospital Pistoia, 51100 Pistoia, Italy
| | - Letizia Vannucchi
- Division of Radiology, San Jacopo Hospital Pistoia, 51100 Pistoia, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bisanzi
- Regional Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Zappa
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gorini
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Maria Carozzi
- Regional Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Carrozzi
- Pulmonary Unit, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Eugenio Paci
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50100 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Huang S, Tang O, Zheng X, Li H, Wu Y, Yang L. Effectiveness of smoking cessation on the high-risk population of lung cancer with early screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials until January 2022. Arch Public Health 2023; 81:101. [PMID: 37268972 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01111-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer has always been the malignant tumor with the highest incidence rate. Smoking is the most important risk factor for lung cancer. Although potential positive effects of smoking cessation interventions on the high-risk population of lung cancer have been observed, evidence of its definitive effect remains uncertain. This study aimed to summarize the evidence related to the effects and safety of smoking cessation interventions for the high-risk population of lung cancer. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted through the following seven databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Science Direct. Screening and assessment for risk of bias were conducted by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed for the 7-day-point prevalence of smoking abstinence and continuous smoking abstinence using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS Meta-analysis results show that in the 7-day-point prevalence of smoking abstinence (by patient-reported outcome): individualized intervention was significantly higher than that of the standard care [RR = 1.46, 95%CI = (1.04,2.06), P < 0.05]. Moreover, the smoking cessation interventions were significantly elevated than that of standard care [RR = 1.58, 95%CI = (1.12, 2.23), P < 0.05] within 1-6 month follow-up time. In line with the findings in cigarette smoking, the continuous smoking abstinence of E-cigarettes (biochemical verified): E-cigarettes were significantly higher than that of the standard care [RR = 1.51, 95%CI = (1.03, 2.21), P < 0.05], and within 1-6 month follow-up time, the smoking cessation interventions were significantly greater than that of standard care [RR = 1.51, 95%CI = (1.03, 2.21), P < 0.05]. Publication bias was detected possibly. CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review show that smoking cessation intervention is effective for long-term lung cancer high-risk smokers who participate in early screening, of which E-cigarettes are the best, followed by individual smoking cessation. TRIAL REGISTRATION A review protocol was developed and registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42019147151. Registered 23 June 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simin Huang
- School of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine-Fuzhou, Fuzhou, China
| | - Oufeng Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University-Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Xutong Zheng
- School of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine-Fuzhou, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hui Li
- School of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine-Fuzhou, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yuxin Wu
- Ji'an College-Ji'an, Ji'an, China
| | - Liu Yang
- School of Nursing, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine-Fuzhou, Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stone E, Myers R. Advances in lung cancer: a ground-breaking decade. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2023; 11:407-409. [PMID: 37147028 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(23)00133-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Stone
- Department of Thoracic Medicine and Lung Transplantation, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
| | - Renelle Myers
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pasello G, Scattolin D, Bonanno L, Caumo F, Dell'Amore A, Scagliori E, Tinè M, Calabrese F, Benati G, Sepulcri M, Baiocchi C, Milella M, Rea F, Guarneri V. Secondary prevention and treatment innovation of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Impact on diagnostic-therapeutic pathway from a multidisciplinary perspective. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 116:102544. [PMID: 36940657 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, mostly because the lack of a screening program so far. Although smoking cessation has a central role in LC primary prevention, several trials on LC screening through low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a high risk population showed a significant reduction of LC related mortality. Most trials showed heterogeneity in terms of selection criteria, comparator arm, detection nodule method, timing and intervals of screening and duration of the follow-up. LC screening programs currently active in Europe as well as around the world will lead to a higher number of early-stage Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) at the diagnosis. Innovative drugs have been recently transposed from the metastatic to the perioperative setting, leading to improvements in terms of resection rates and pathological responses after induction chemoimmunotherapy, and disease free survival with targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The present review summarizes available evidence about LC screening, highlighting potential pitfalls and benefits and underlining the impact on the diagnostic therapeutic pathway of NSCLC from a multidisciplinary perspective. Future perspectives in terms of circulating biomarkers under evaluation for patients' risk stratification as well as a focus on recent clinical trials results and ongoing studies in the perioperative setting will be also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Pasello
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
| | - Daniela Scattolin
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Bonanno
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesca Caumo
- Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Amore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Elena Scagliori
- Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Mariaenrica Tinè
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Fiorella Calabrese
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaetano Benati
- Azienda Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria (AULSS 9) Scaligera, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Cristina Baiocchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, San Bortolo Hospital, Azienda Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria (AULSS 8) Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, University of Verona - School of Medicine, Verona University Hospital Trust, Italy
| | - Federico Rea
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Thomas NA, Ward R, Tanner NT, Rojewski AM, Toll B, Gebregziabher M, Silvestri GA. Factors Associated With Smoking Cessation Attempts in Lung Cancer Screening: A Secondary Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest 2023; 163:433-443. [PMID: 36162480 PMCID: PMC10103689 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.08.2239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality resulting from lung cancer screening (LCS) with an additive reduction from smoking abstinence. However, successful smoking cessation within LCS is variable. RESEARCH QUESTION What patient and treatment factors are associated with attempts to quit smoking among those screened for lung cancer? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In a secondary analysis of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network arm of the NLST, patient demographics, patient smoking behaviors, and tobacco treatment variables were stratified by patient smoking status. The Cox proportional hazards ratio was used to evaluate each variable's effect on attempting to quit smoking. RESULTS Seven thousand three hundred sixty-nine patients were smoking actively at enrollment in the NLST. Of the patients who reported they were smoking, 73.4% did not receive any pharmacologic tobacco treatment. More patients who attempted to quit received pharmacologic tobacco treatment than those who continued to smoke: (nicotine replacement therapy [NRT], 18.0% vs 12.4% [P < .01]; bupropion, 7.9% vs 6.9% [P = .02]; both NRT and bupropion, 5.6% vs 3.9% [P < .01]). Stable users were more likely to be women (47.8% vs 43.8%; P < .01), to be African American (8.2% vs 6.3%; P = .007), to be unmarried (43.2% vs 36.9% [P < .01]), and to have less than a college education (47.7% vs 42.3%; P < .01). Patients with high dependence who received dual therapy with bupropion and NRT showed the highest likelihood of quit attempt (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.75-2.44). INTERPRETATION In this analysis, only one-quarter of patients who underwent LCS and who smoked were treated with pharmacologic therapy, which is associated with increased likelihood of attempting to quit. Certain characteristics are associated with difficulty with attempting to quit smoking. Those with high nicotine dependence benefitted most from dual pharmacologic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina A Thomas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, CU Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.
| | - Ralph Ward
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Nichole T Tanner
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Alana M Rojewski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Benjamin Toll
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Mulugeta Gebregziabher
- Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Gerard A Silvestri
- Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Su Z, Li X, Wu H, Meng Z, Li Y, Pan H, Liang H, Wang Y, Zhao FH, Qiao Y, Zhou Q, Fan YG. The impact of low-dose CT on smoking behavior among non-smokers, former-smokers, and smokers: A population-based screening cohort in rural China. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4667-4678. [PMID: 35894767 PMCID: PMC9972152 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening may provide a "teachable moment" for the smoking cessation and relapse prevention. However, the impact of lung cancer screening on smoking initiation in non-smokers has not been reported. METHODS A baseline smoking behavior survey was conducted in 2000 participants who were screened by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from 2014 to 2018. All participants were re-surveyed on their smoking behavior in 2019. Of these, 312 participants were excluded, leaving 1688 participants in the final analysis. The smoking initiation rate in baseline non-smokers, the relapse rate in baseline former smokers, and the abstinence rate in baseline current smokers were calculated, respectively. The associations between screening results, demographic characteristics, and smoking behavior change were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS From 2014 to 2019, smoking prevalence significantly decreased from 52.6% to 49.1%. The prevalence of smoking initiation, relapse, and abstinence in baseline non-smokers, former, and current smokers was 16.8%, 22.9%, and 23.7%, respectively. The risk of smoking initiation in baseline non-smokers was significantly higher in those with negative screening result (adjusted OR = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.27-6.94). Compared to smokers who only received baseline screening, the chance of smoking abstinence in baseline current smokers was reduced by over 80% in those who attended 5 rounds of screening (adjusted OR = 0.15, 95% CI:0.08-0.27). No significant associations were found between smoking relapse and prior screening frequency, with at least one positive screening result. Age, gender, occupational exposure, income, and smoking pack years were also associated with smoking behavior changes. CONCLUSIONS The overall decreased smoking prevalence indicated an overwhelming effect of "teachable moment" on "license to smoke." A tailored smoking cessation strategy should be integrated into lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Su
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuebing Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Heng Wu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhaowei Meng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Yang Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongli Pan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Hao Liang
- Sichuan Lung Cancer Institute, Sichuan Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan University, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Fang-Hui Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Youlin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,Center of Global Health, School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qinghua Zhou
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.,Sichuan Lung Cancer Institute, Sichuan Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan University, China
| | - Ya-Guang Fan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fathi JT. Integration of Tobacco Dependence Treatment in Lung Cancer Screening and Other Ambulatory Care Settings. Respir Med 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24914-3_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
23
|
Wang P, Chapron J, Bennani S, Revel MP, Wislez M. [Lung cancer screening: Update, news and perspectives]. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:42-54. [PMID: 36496261 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in France and worldwide (20 % of cancer deaths). This mortality is partly linked to an overrepresentation of metastatic stages at diagnosis (approximately 55 % of lung cancers at diagnosis). Low-dose chest CT in a target population to detect early forms accessible to radical treatment has been evaluated through multiple randomized trials (NLST, NELSON, MILD, DANTE…). These trials demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer specific mortality. The current problem is to integrate a CT screening policy CT at a national level, which should be both efficient and cost-effective, while presenting the least harms for the eligible population. Finally, it is necessary to optimize the participation of the eligible population and particularly in the most deprived areas and ensure the proper implementation of smoking cessation measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Wang
- AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Cité, unité d'oncologie thoracique, service de pneumologie, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jeanne Chapron
- AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Cité, unité d'oncologie thoracique, service de pneumologie, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Souhail Bennani
- AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, service de radiologie, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Revel
- AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, service de radiologie, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Marie Wislez
- AP-HP, hôpital Cochin, université Paris Cité, unité d'oncologie thoracique, service de pneumologie, 75014 Paris, France; Université de Paris, centre de recherche des cordeliers, sorbonne université, Inserm, Team Inflammation, Complement, and Cancer, 75006 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Behar Harpaz S, Weber MF, Wade S, Ngo PJ, Vaneckova P, Sarich PEA, Cressman S, Tammemagi MC, Fong K, Marshall H, McWilliams A, Zalcberg JR, Caruana M, Canfell K. Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening for Australia, capturing differences in the health economic impact of NELSON and NLST outcomes. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:91-101. [PMID: 36323879 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02026-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A national, lung cancer screening programme is under consideration in Australia, and we assessed cost-effectiveness using updated data and assumptions. METHODS We estimated the cost-effectiveness of lung screening by applying screening parameters and outcomes from either the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) or the NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker Screenings ONderzoek (NELSON) to Australian data on lung cancer risk, mortality, health-system costs, and smoking trends using a deterministic, multi-cohort model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for a lifetime horizon. RESULTS The ICER for lung screening compared to usual care in the NELSON-based scenario was AU$39,250 (95% CI $18,150-108,300) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY); lower than the NLST-based estimate (ICER = $76,300, 95% CI $41,750-236,500). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, lung screening was cost-effective in 15%/60% of NELSON-like simulations, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $30,000/$50,000 per QALY, respectively, compared to 0.5%/6.7% for the NLST. ICERs were most sensitive to assumptions regarding the screening-related lung cancer mortality benefit and duration of benefit over time. The cost of screening had a larger impact on ICERs than the cost of treatment, even after quadrupling the 2006-2016 healthcare costs of stage IV lung cancer. DISCUSSION Lung screening could be cost-effective in Australia, contingent on translating trial-like lung cancer mortality benefits to the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Behar Harpaz
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Marianne F Weber
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Wade
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Preston J Ngo
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pavla Vaneckova
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter E A Sarich
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sonya Cressman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Martin C Tammemagi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada
| | - Kwun Fong
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.,University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre at The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia
| | - Henry Marshall
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.,University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre at The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia
| | | | - John R Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, the University of Sydney, A joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cooley ME, Castaldi PJ, Mazzola E, Blazey MU, Nayak MM, Healey MJ, Lathan CS, Borondy-Kitts A, DeMarco RF, Kim SS. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment (ESCAPE) digitalized intervention to promote lung health in high-risk individuals who smoke. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 124:107005. [PMID: 36396069 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an effective screening test to decrease lung cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening may be a teachable moment helping people who smoke to quit, which may result in increased benefit of screening. Innovative strategies are needed to engage high-risk individuals in learning about LDCT screening. More precise methods such as polygenic risk scores quantify genetic predisposition to tobacco use, and optimize lung health interventions. We present the ESCAPE (Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment) protocol. This study will test a smoking cessation intervention using personal stories and a lung cancer screening decision-aide compared to standard care (brief advice, referral to a quit line, and a lung cancer screening decision-aide), examine the relationship between a polygenic risk score and smoking abstinence, and describe perceptions about integration of genomic information into smoking cessation treatment. A randomized controlled trial followed by a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach will compare the efficacy of the interventions. Interviews will add insight into the use of genomic information and risk perceptions to tailor smoking cessation treatment. Two-hundred and fifty individuals will be recruited from primary care, community-based organizations, mailing lists and through social media. Data will be collected at baseline, 1, 3 and 6-months. The primary outcomes are 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence and stage of lung cancer screening at 6-months. The results from this study will provide information to refine the ESCAPE intervention and facilitate integration of precision health into future lung health interventions. Clinical trial registration number: NCT0469129T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Peter J Castaldi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, CLSB 11007, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Meghan Underhill Blazey
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Michael J Healey
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Christopher S Lathan
- Department of Medicine, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | | | - Rosanna F DeMarco
- Department of Nursing, Robert and Donna Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.
| | - Sun S Kim
- Department of Nursing, Robert and Donna Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Quinn-Scoggins HD, Murray RL, Quaife SL, Smith P, Brain KE, Callister MEJ, Baldwin DR, Britton J, Crosbie PAJ, Thorley R, McCutchan GM. Co-development of an evidence-based personalised smoking cessation intervention for use in a lung cancer screening context. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:478. [PMID: 36522781 PMCID: PMC9756588 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02263-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimising smoking cessation services within a low radiation-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening programme has the potential to improve cost-effectiveness and overall efficacy of the programme. However, evidence on the optimal design and integration of cessation services is limited. We co-developed a personalised cessation and relapse prevention intervention incorporating medical imaging collected during lung cancer screening. The intervention is designed to initiate and support quit attempts among smokers attending screening as part of the Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking study (YESS: ISRCTN63825779). Patients and public were involved in the development of an intervention designed to meet the needs of the target population. METHODS An iterative co-development approach was used. Eight members of the public with a history of smoking completed an online survey to inform the visual presentation of risk information in subsequent focus groups for acceptability testing. Three focus groups (n = 13) were conducted in deprived areas of Yorkshire and South Wales with members of the public who were current smokers or recent quitters (within the last year). Exemplar images of the heart and lungs acquired by LDCT, absolute and relative lung cancer risk, and lung age were shown. Data were analysed thematically, and discussed in stakeholder workshops. Draft versions of the intervention were developed, underpinned by the Extended Parallel Processing Model to increase self-efficacy and response-efficacy. The intervention was further refined in a second stakeholder workshop with a patient panel. RESULTS Individual LDCT scan images of the lungs and heart, in conjunction with artistic impressions to facilitate interpretation, were considered by public participants to be most impactful in prompting cessation. Public participants thought it important to have a trained practitioner guiding them through the intervention and emphasising the short-term benefits of quitting. Presentation of absolute and relative risk of lung cancer and lung age were considered highly demotivating due to reinforcement of fatalistic beliefs. CONCLUSION An acceptable personalised intervention booklet utilising LDCT scan images has been developed for delivery by a trained smoking cessation practitioner. Our findings highlight the benefit of co-development during intervention development and the need for further evaluation of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet D Quinn-Scoggins
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - Rachael L Murray
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Samantha L Quaife
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Pamela Smith
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Kate E Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Matthew E J Callister
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David R Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Britton
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip A J Crosbie
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Thorley
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Grace M McCutchan
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhai T, Diergaarde B, Wilson DO, Kang H, Sood A, Bayliss SH, Yuan JM, Picchi MA, Lan Q, Belinsky SA, Siegfried JM, Cook LS, Leng S. Early natural menopause is associated with poor lung health and increased mortality among female smokers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:885.e1-885.e12. [PMID: 35934119 PMCID: PMC9729368 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early natural menopause has been regarded as a biomarker of reproductive and somatic aging. Cigarette smoking is the most harmful factor for lung health and also an established risk factor for early menopause. Understanding the effect of early menopause on health outcomes in middle-aged and older female smokers is important to develop preventive strategies. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the associations of early menopause with multiple lung health and aging biomarkers, lung cancer risk, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in postmenopausal women who were moderate or heavy smokers. STUDY DESIGN This study was conducted on postmenopausal women with natural (n=1038) or surgical (n=628) menopause from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study. The Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study is a community-based research cohort of current and former smokers, screened with low-dose computed tomography and followed up for lung cancer. Early menopause was defined as occurring before 45 years of age. The analyses were stratified by menopause types because of the different biological and medical causes of natural and surgical menopause. Statistical methods included linear model, generalized linear model, linear mixed-effects model, and time-to-event analysis. RESULTS The average age of the 1666 female smokers was 59.4±6.7 years, with 1519 (91.2%) of the population as non-Hispanic Whites and 1064 (63.9%) of the population as current smokers at baseline. Overall, 646 (39%) women reported early menopause, including 198 (19.1%) women with natural menopause and 448 (71.3%) women with surgical menopause (P<.001). Demographic variables did not differ between early and nonearly menopause groups, regardless of menopause type. Significant associations were identified between early natural menopause and higher risk of wheezing (odds ratio, 1.65; P<.01), chronic bronchitis (odds ratio, 1.73; P<.01), and radiographic emphysema (odds ratio, 1.70; P<.001) and lower baseline lung spirometry in an obstructive pattern (-104.8 mL/s for forced expiratory volume in the first second with P<.01, -78.6 mL for forced vital capacity with P=.04, and -2.1% for forced expiratory volume in the first second-to-forced vital capacity ratio with P=.01). In addition, early natural menopause was associated with a more rapid decline of forced expiratory volume in the first second-to-forced vital capacity ratio (-0.16% per year; P=.01) and incident airway obstruction (odds ratio, 2.02; P=.04). Furthermore, women early natural menopause had a 40% increased risk of death (P=.023), which was mainly driven by respiratory diseases (hazard ratio, 2.32; P<.001). Mediation analyses further identified that more than 33.3% of the magnitude of the associations between early natural menopause and all-cause and respiratory mortality were explained by baseline forced expiratory volume in the first second. Additional analyses in women with natural menopause identified that the associations between continuous smoking and subsequent lung cancer risk and cancer mortality were moderated by early menopause status, and females with early natural menopause who continued smoking had the worst outcomes (hazard ratio, >4.6; P<.001). This study did not find associations reported above in female smokers with surgical menopause. CONCLUSION Early natural menopause was found to be a risk factor for malignant and nonmalignant lung diseases and mortality in middle-aged and older female smokers. These findings have strong public health relevance as preventive strategies, including smoking cessation and chest computed tomography screening, should target this population (ie, female smokers with early natural menopause) to improve their postmenopausal health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Zhai
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Brenda Diergaarde
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - David O Wilson
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Huining Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Akshay Sood
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Samuel H Bayliss
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Maria A Picchi
- Lung Cancer Program, Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Qing Lan
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD
| | - Steven A Belinsky
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Lung Cancer Program, Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Jill M Siegfried
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz, Arora, CO
| | - Shuguang Leng
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM; Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM; Lung Cancer Program, Lovelace Biomedical Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Marshall HM, Vemula M, Hay K, McCaul E, Passmore L, Yang IA, Bowman RV, Fong KM. Active screening for lung cancer increases smoking abstinence in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 19:374-384. [DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Henry M. Marshall
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Mounavi Vemula
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Karen Hay
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute HerstonQueenslandAustralia
| | - Elizabeth McCaul
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Linda Passmore
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Ian A. Yang
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Rayleen V. Bowman
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| | - Kwun M. Fong
- University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Thoracic MedicineThe Prince Charles Hospital ChermsideQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer deaths by early detection. The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends lung cancer screening with LDCT in adults of age 50 years to 80 years who have at least a 20 pack-year smoking history and are currently smoking or have quit within the past 15 years. The implementation of a lung-cancer-screening program is complex. High-quality screening requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The aim of a screening program is to find balance between mortality reduction and avoiding potential harms related to false-positive findings, overdiagnosis, invasive procedures, and radiation exposure. Components and processes of a high-quality lung-cancer-screening program include the identification of eligible individuals, shared decision-making, performing and reporting LDCT results, management of screen-detected lung nodules and non-nodule findings, smoking cessation, ensuring adherence, data collection, and quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Humberto K Choi
- Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue Mail Code A90, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | - Peter J Mazzone
- Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue Mail Code A90, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Begnaud A, Fu SS, Lindgren B, Melzer A, Rothman AJ, Schertz K, Vock DM, Joseph AM. Latent constructs identified in older individuals who smoke cigarettes and are eligible for lung cancer screening: Factor analysis of baseline data from the PLUTO smoking cessation trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 29:100977. [PMID: 36052176 PMCID: PMC9424922 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lung cancer screening (LCS) combined with smoking cessation intervention is currently recommended for older individuals with a history of heavy smoking. Tailoring tobacco treatment for this patient population of older, people who smoke (PWS) may improve cessation rates while efficiently using limited smoking cessation resources. Although some older people who smoke will need more intensive treatment to achieve sustained abstinence, others may be successful with less intensive treatment. A framework to identify them a priori would be helpful to distribute smoking cessation resources accordingly. Methods Baseline demographic, smoking, and health data are reported from a randomized clinical trial of longitudinal smoking cessation interventions delivered in the setting of LCS. Candidate variables were factor analyzed to identify latent factors, or constructs, to identify subgroups of older participants among the heterogenous population of older people who smoke. Results We identified three factor-derived constructs: self-reported health status, heaviness of smoking, and nicotine dependence. Nicotine dependence was moderately correlated with both of the other two factors. Conclusions This factor analysis of baseline participant characteristics identified a set of latent constructs – based on a few practical clinical variables -- that can be used to classify the heterogenous population of older people who smoke to identify. We propose this framework to identify subgroups of people who smoke who might successfully quit with less intense treatment at the time of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven S Fu
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, USA
| | - Bruce Lindgren
- Masonic Cancer Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, USA
| | - Anne Melzer
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, USA
| | | | | | - David M Vock
- University of Minnesota School of Public Health, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
[Low-dose Spiral Computed Tomography in Lung Cancer Screening]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2022; 25:678-683. [PMID: 36172733 PMCID: PMC9549430 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2022.101.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the highest morbidity and mortality in the world. The low early diagnosis rate and poor prognosis of patients have caused serious social burden. Regular screening of high-risk population by low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) can significantly improve the early diagnosis rate of lung cancer and bring new opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. In recent years, LDCT lung cancer screening programs have been carried out in many countries around the world and achieved good results, but there are still some controversies in the selection of screening subjects, screening frequency, cost effectiveness and other aspects. In this paper, the key factors of LDCT lung cancer screening, screening effect, pulmonary nodule management and artificial intelligence contribution to the development of LDCT will be reviewed, and the application progress of LDCT in lung cancer screening will be discussed.
.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bonney A, Malouf R, Marchal C, Manners D, Fong KM, Marshall HM, Irving LB, Manser R. Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 8:CD013829. [PMID: 35921047 PMCID: PMC9347663 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013829.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death in the world, however lung cancer screening has not been implemented in most countries at a population level. A previous Cochrane Review found limited evidence for the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with chest radiography (CXR) or sputum cytology in reducing lung cancer-related mortality, however there has been increasing evidence supporting screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether screening for lung cancer using LDCT of the chest reduces lung cancer-related mortality and to evaluate the possible harms of LDCT screening. SEARCH METHODS We performed the search in collaboration with the Information Specialist of the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group and included the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group Trial Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, the Cochrane Library, current issue), MEDLINE (accessed via PubMed) and Embase in our search. We also searched the clinical trial registries to identify unpublished and ongoing trials. We did not impose any restriction on language of publication. The search was performed up to 31 July 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of lung cancer screening using LDCT and reporting mortality or harm outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors were involved in independently assessing trials for eligibility, extraction of trial data and characteristics, and assessing risk of bias of the included trials using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. Primary outcomes were lung cancer-related mortality and harms of screening. We performed a meta-analysis, where appropriate, for all outcomes using a random-effects model. We only included trials in the analysis of mortality outcomes if they had at least 5 years of follow-up. We reported risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and used the I2 statistic to investigate heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We included 11 trials in this review with a total of 94,445 participants. Trials were conducted in Europe and the USA in people aged 40 years or older, with most trials having an entry requirement of ≥ 20 pack-year smoking history (e.g. 1 pack of cigarettes/day for 20 years or 2 packs/day for 10 years etc.). One trial included male participants only. Eight trials were phase three RCTs, with two feasibility RCTs and one pilot RCT. Seven of the included trials had no screening as a comparison, and four trials had CXR screening as a comparator. Screening frequency included annual, biennial and incrementing intervals. The duration of screening ranged from 1 year to 10 years. Mortality follow-up was from 5 years to approximately 12 years. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias across all domains. The certainty of evidence was moderate to low across different outcomes, as assessed by GRADE. In the meta-analysis of trials assessing lung cancer-related mortality, we included eight trials (91,122 participants), and there was a reduction in mortality of 21% with LDCT screening compared to control groups of no screening or CXR screening (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.87; 8 trials, 91,122 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were probably no differences in subgroups for analyses by control type, sex, geographical region, and nodule management algorithm. Females appeared to have a larger lung cancer-related mortality benefit compared to males with LDCT screening. There was also a reduction in all-cause mortality (including lung cancer-related) of 5% (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.99; 8 trials, 91,107 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Invasive tests occurred more frequently in the LDCT group (RR 2.60, 95% CI 2.41 to 2.80; 3 trials, 60,003 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, analysis of 60-day postoperative mortality was not significant between groups (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.94; 2 trials, 409 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). False-positive results and recall rates were higher with LDCT screening compared to screening with CXR, however there was low-certainty evidence in the meta-analyses due to heterogeneity and risk of bias concerns. Estimated overdiagnosis with LDCT screening was 18%, however the 95% CI was 0 to 36% (risk difference (RD) 0.18, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.36; 5 trials, 28,656 participants; low-certainty evidence). Four trials compared different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using various measures. Anxiety was pooled from three trials, with participants in LDCT screening reporting lower anxiety scores than in the control group (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.43, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.27; 3 trials, 8153 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient data to comment on the impact of LDCT screening on smoking behaviour. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence supports a reduction in lung cancer-related mortality with the use of LDCT for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations (those over the age of 40 with a significant smoking exposure). However, there are limited data on harms and further trials are required to determine participant selection and optimal frequency and duration of screening, with potential for significant overdiagnosis of lung cancer. Trials are ongoing for lung cancer screening in non-smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha Bonney
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Reem Malouf
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - David Manners
- Respiratory Medicine, Midland St John of God Public and Private Hospital, Midland, Australia
| | - Kwun M Fong
- Thoracic Medicine Program, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- UQ Thoracic Research Centre, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Henry M Marshall
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Louis B Irving
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Renée Manser
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Spears CA, Mhende J, Hawkins C, Do VV, Hayat MJ, Eriksen MP, Hedeker D, Abroms LC, Wetter DW. Mindfulness-Based Smoking Cessation Delivered Through Telehealth and Text Messaging for Low-Income Smokers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e35688. [PMID: 35916707 PMCID: PMC9379793 DOI: 10.2196/35688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Adults with low income and members of certain racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to quit, and therefore, they experience profound tobacco-related health disparities. Mindfulness training can increase the rates of smoking cessation and lapse recovery, and telehealth and SMS text messaging have the potential to provide more accessible treatment. OBJECTIVE This study aims to test the efficacy of delivering mindfulness-based smoking cessation treatment through text messaging (iQuit Mindfully) and telehealth (group videoconferencing), both as stand-alone interventions and in combination. In addition, it aims to examine the underlying mechanisms of mindfulness treatment. METHODS In this 2×2 randomized controlled trial, participants are randomized into 1 of 4 groups based on assignment to iQuit Mindfully text messages (yes or no) and mindfulness videoconference groups (yes or no). The primary outcomes are biochemically verified smoking abstinence at 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the start of treatment. Secondary outcomes include the frequency of home mindfulness practice and self-reported levels of mindfulness, emotions, craving, withdrawal, dependence, self-efficacy, and social support. RESULTS Recruitment, treatment, and assessment began in spring and summer 2021, and data collection is expected to continue through spring 2024. CONCLUSIONS This project aims to improve smoking cessation outcomes for low-income, racially and ethnically diverse smokers through mindfulness-based telehealth group counseling and text messaging support. We also aim to advance the scientific study of the mechanisms of action of mindfulness treatment, which could inform the development of more efficacious and efficient treatments to reduce tobacco disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04965181; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04965181. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/35688.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire A Spears
- Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Josephine Mhende
- Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - China Hawkins
- Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Vuong Van Do
- Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew J Hayat
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Michael P Eriksen
- Department of Health Policy & Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Donald Hedeker
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Lorien C Abroms
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Maurice NM, Tanner NT. Lung cancer screening at the VA: Past, present and future. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:S0093-7754(22)00041-0. [PMID: 35831214 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is responsible for more deaths annually in the United States than breast, prostate and colon cancers combined. Lung cancer screening with annual low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk patients through early detection. The incidence of lung cancer is higher in the veteran population compared to the general population due, in part, to the prevalence of tobacco use. Early detection of lung cancer is therefore an important goal of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the largest integrated health care system in the United States. The following will review previous and current initiatives undertaken by the VHA to implement and expand access to lung cancer screening and will highlight target areas of interest to improve uptake and quality of lung cancer screening. Through these initiatives and programs, the VHA aims to provide high quality and equitable access to lung cancer screening for all Veterans that incorporates research that will improve outcomes and potentially inform and optimize the practice of Lung cancer screening across the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M Maurice
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, U.S.A.; Atlanta Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Decatur, GA.
| | - Nichole T Tanner
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Charleston, SC, U.S.A.; Medical University of South Carolina, Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Charleston, SC, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Heiden BT, Engelhardt KE, Cao C, Meyers BF, Puri V, Cao Y, Kozower BD. Association between lung cancer screening and smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102194. [PMID: 35688050 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adults with high-risk smoking histories benefit from annual lung cancer screening. It is unclear if there is an association between lung cancer screening and smoking cessation among U.S. adults who receive screening. METHODS We performed this population-based cross-sectional study using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2017-2020). We defined individuals eligible for lung cancer screening as adults 55-80 years old with ≥ 30 pack-year smoking history who were currently smoking or quit within the last 15 years. We assessed the association between lung cancer screening and current smoking status. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2020, 12,382 participants met screening criteria. Current smoking was reported by 5685 (45.9 %) participants, of whom 40.4 % (2298) reported a cessation attempt in the prior year. Lung cancer screening was reported by only 2022 (16.3 %) eligible participants. Lung cancer screening was associated with lower likelihood of currently smoking (odds ratio [OR] 0.705, 95 % CI 0.626-0.793) compared to individuals who did not receive screening. Screening was also associated with higher likelihood of reporting a cessation attempt in the prior year (OR 1.562, 95 % CI 1.345-1.815) compared to individuals who did not receive screening. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of lung cancer screening was associated with lower smoking rates and more frequent cessation attempts among U.S. adults. Better implementation of lung cancer screening programs is critical and may profoundly increase smoking cessation in this population at risk of developing lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan T Heiden
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States; Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
| | - Kathryn E Engelhardt
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Chao Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Bryan F Meyers
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Varun Puri
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Yin Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Benjamin D Kozower
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States; Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kertes J, Neumark Y, Grunhaus L, Stein-Reisner O. Factors impeding psychiatrists from promoting smoking cessation among people with serious mental illness – A mixed methods study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2022.2079349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Kertes
- Dept Health Evaluation & Research, Maccabi HealthCare Services, Israel
| | - Yehuda Neumark
- Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University, Israel
| | - Leon Grunhaus
- School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem; founder and owner of Mind Clinic, the center for advanced psychiatric treatments in Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bold KW, Cannon S, Ford BB, Neveu S, Sather P, Toll BA, Fucito LM. Examining Tobacco Treatment Perceptions and Barriers among Black versus Non-Black Adults Attending Lung Cancer Screening. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:327-333. [PMID: 35063942 PMCID: PMC9064926 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening for patients at high risk based on age and smoking history. Understanding the characteristics of patients attending lung cancer screening, including potential barriers to quitting smoking, may inform ways to engage these high-risk patients in tobacco treatment and address health disparities. Patients attending lung cancer screening who currently smoke cigarettes completed a survey at Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven (N = 74) and the Medical University of South Carolina (N = 73) at the time of their appointment. The survey assessed demographics, smoking history, and perceptions and concerns about quitting smoking. Patients were 55 to 76 years old (mean = 63.3, SD = 5.3), N = 64 (43.5%) female, and N = 31 (21.1%) non-Hispanic Black. Patients smoked 16.3 cigarettes per day on average (SD = 9.2) and rated interest in quitting smoking in the next month as moderate (mean = 5.6, SD = 3.1, measured from 0 = "very definitely no" to 10 = "very definitely yes"). The most frequently endorsed concerns about quitting smoking were missing smoking (70.7%), worry about having strong urges to smoke (63.9%), and concerns about withdrawal symptoms (59.9%). In comparison with other races/ethnicities, Black patients were less likely to report concerns about withdrawal symptoms and more likely to report smoking less now and perceiving no need to quit. Findings identified specific barriers for tobacco treatment and differences by race/ethnicity among patients attending lung cancer screening, including concerns about withdrawal symptoms and perceived need to quit. Identifying ways to promote tobacco treatment is important for reducing morbidity and mortality among this high-risk population. PREVENTION RELEVANCE The current study examines patient characteristics and tobacco treatment perceptions and barriers among patients attending lung cancer screening who continue to smoke cigarettes that may help inform ways to increase treatment engagement and address tobacco-related health disparities to reduce morbidity and mortality from smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krysten W Bold
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sydney Cannon
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Bennie B Ford
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan Neveu
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Polly Sather
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Benjamin A Toll
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Lisa M Fucito
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heffner JL, Coggeshall S, Wheat CL, Krebs P, Feemster LC, Klein DE, Nici L, Johnson H, Zeliadt SB. Receipt of Tobacco Treatment and One-Year Smoking Cessation Rates Following Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1704-1712. [PMID: 34282533 PMCID: PMC9130430 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07011-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of effective smoking cessation interventions in lung cancer screening has been identified as a high-priority research gap, but knowledge of current practices to guide process improvement is limited due to the slow uptake of screening and dearth of data to assess cessation-related practices and outcomes under real-world conditions. OBJECTIVE To evaluate cessation treatment receipt and 1-year post-screening cessation outcomes within the largest integrated healthcare system in the USA-the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design Observational study using administrative data from electronic medical records (EMR). Patients Currently smoking Veterans who received a first lung cancer screening test using low-dose CT (LDCT) between January 2014 and June 2018. Main Outcomes Tobacco treatment received within the window of 30 days before and 30 days after LDCT; 1-year quit rates based on EMR Smoking Health Factors data 6-18 months after LDCT. Key Results Of the 47,609 current smokers screened (95.3% male), 8702 (18.3%) received pharmacotherapy and/or behavioral treatment for smoking cessation; 531 (1.1%) received both. Of those receiving pharmacotherapy, only one in four received one of the most effective medications: varenicline (12.1%) or combination nicotine replacement therapy (14.3%). Overall, 5400 Veterans quit smoking-a rate of 11.3% (missing=smoking) or 13.5% (complete case analysis). Treatment receipt and cessation were associated with numerous sociodemographic, clinical, and screening-related factors. CONCLUSIONS One-year quit rates for Veterans receiving lung cancer screening in VHA are similar to those reported in LDCT clinical trials and cohort studies (i.e., 10-17%). Only 1% of Veterans received the recommended combination of pharmacotherapy and counseling, and the most effective pharmacotherapies were not the most commonly received ones. The value of screening within VHA could be improved by addressing these treatment gaps, as well as the observed disparities in treatment receipt or cessation by race, rurality, and psychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimee L Heffner
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Scott Coggeshall
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Chelle L Wheat
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Paul Krebs
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Laura C Feemster
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Linda Nici
- Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Hannah Johnson
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Steven B Zeliadt
- VA HSR&D Center of Innovation (COIN) for Veteran Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Smoking Cessation by Phone Counselling in a Lung Cancer Screening Program: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. Can Respir J 2022; 2022:5446751. [PMID: 35495872 PMCID: PMC9050320 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5446751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Smoking cessation integration within lung cancer screening programs is challenging. Currently, phone counselling is available across Canada for individuals referred by healthcare workers and by self-referral. We compared quit rates after phone counselling interventions between participants who self-refer, those referred by healthcare workers, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of participants referred to provincial smoking cessation quit line in contemporaneous cohorts: self-referred participants, healthcare worker referred, and those referred by a lung cancer screening program if they were still actively smoking at the time of first contact. Baseline, covariates (sociodemographic information, smoking history, and history of mental health disorder) and quit intentions (stage of change, readiness for change, previous use of quit programs, and previous quit attempts) were compared among the three cohorts. Our primary outcome was defined as self-reported 30-day abstinence rates at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify whether group assignment was associated with higher quit rates. Results Participants referred by a lung cancer screening program had low quit rates (12%, 95% CI: 5–19) at six months despite the use of phone counselling. Compared to patients who were self-referred to the smoking cessation phone helpline, individuals referred by a lung cancer screening program were much less likely to quit (adjusted OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17–0.8), whereas those referred by healthcare workers were twice as likely to quit (adjusted OR 2.16 (1.3–3.58)) even after adjustment for differences in smoking intensity and quit intentions. Conclusions Phone counselling alone has very limited benefit in a lung cancer screening program. Participants differ significantly from those who are otherwise referred by healthcare workers. This study underlines the importance of a dedicated and personalized tobacco treatment program within every lung cancer screening program. The program should incorporate best practices and encourage treatment regardless of readiness to quit.
Collapse
|
40
|
Su Z, Jia XH, Zhao FH, Zhou QH, Fan YG, Qiao YL. Effect of Time Since Smoking Cessation on Lung Cancer Incidence: An Occupational Cohort With 27 Follow-Up Years. Front Oncol 2022; 12:817045. [PMID: 35299746 PMCID: PMC8921458 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This special cohort reveals the effect of smoking cessation in occupational miners exposed to radon and arsenic. Methods A total of 9,134 tin miners with at least 10 years of underground radon and arsenic exposure were enrolled beginning in 1992 and followed for up to 27 years. Detailed smoking information was collected at baseline, and information on smoking status was consecutively collected from 1992 to 1996. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to explore the relationship between time since smoking cessation and lung cancer. Results A total of 1,324 lung cancer cases occurred in this cohort over 167,776 person-years of follow-up. Among populations exposed to radon and arsenic, miners after quitting smoking for 10 years or more had almost halved their lung cancer risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.79], compared with current smokers. Among miners after quitting smoking for 5 years or more, lung cancer incidence approximately halved (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.30-0.92) for squamous cell lung carcinoma, while it showed no significant decline for adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.34-1.85). Conclusion Smoking cessation for 10 years or more halved lung cancer incidence among miners exposed to radon and arsenic, and the benefit was more pronounced among squamous cell lung carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Su
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Hua Jia
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.,The State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Fang-Hui Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qing-Hua Zhou
- Sichuan Lung Cancer Institute, Sichuan Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ya-Guang Fan
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Center for Global Health, School of Population Medicine and Public Health Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bellinger C, Foley KL, Dressler EV, Kittel C, Miller DP, Weaver KE, Sutfin EL, Petty WJ, Spangler J, Stone R, Anderson DM, Kehn H, Steenstra C, Panikkar R, Chiles C. Organizational Characteristics and Smoking Cessation Support in Community-Based Lung Cancer Screening Programs. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:529-533. [PMID: 35247325 PMCID: PMC8983582 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Bellinger
- Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
| | - Kristie Long Foley
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Carol Kittel
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - David P Miller
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Erin L Sutfin
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - W Jeffrey Petty
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - John Spangler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Rebecca Stone
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Heather Kehn
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium
| | | | - Rajiv Panikkar
- Geisinger Cancer Institute National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program
| | | | - Caroline Chiles
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Koller M, Musoro JZ, Tomaszewski K, Coens C, King MT, Sprangers MA, Groenvold M, Cocks K, Velikova G, Flechtner HH, Bottomley A. Minimally important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with lung cancer or malignant pleural mesothelioma – Interpretation guidance derived from two randomized EORTC trials. Lung Cancer 2022; 167:65-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
43
|
Williams RM, Cordon M, Eyestone E, Smith L, Luta G, McKee BJ, Regis SM, Abrams DB, Niaura RS, Stanton CA, Parikh V, Taylor KL. Improved motivation and readiness to quit shortly after lung cancer screening: Evidence for a teachable moment. Cancer 2022; 128:1976-1986. [PMID: 35143041 PMCID: PMC9038674 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients at high risk for lung cancer, screening using low-dose computed tomography (lung cancer screening [LCS]) is recommended. The purpose of this study was to examine whether screening may serve as a teachable moment for smoking-related outcomes. METHODS In a smoking-cessation trial, participants (N = 843) completed 2 phone interviews before randomization: before LCS (T0) and after LCS (T1). By using logistic and linear regression, the authors examined teachable moment variables (perceived risk, lung cancer worry) and outcomes (readiness, motivation, and cigarettes per day [CPD]). RESULTS Participants were a mean ± SD age of 63.7 ± 5.9 years, had 47.8 ± 7.1 pack-years of smoking, 35.2% had a high school diploma or General Educational Development (high school equivalency) degree or less, and 42.3% were undergoing their first scan. Between T0 and T1, 25.7% of participants increased readiness to quit, 9.6% decreased readiness, and 64.7% reported no change (P < .001). Motivation to quit increased (P < .05) and CPD decreased between assessments (P < .001), but only 1.3% self-reported quitting. Compared with individuals who reported no lung cancer worry/little worry, extreme worry was associated with readiness to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and with higher motivation (b = 0.83; P < .001) at T1. Individuals undergoing a baseline (vs annual) scan were more ready to quit in the next 30 days (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5). CONCLUSIONS During the brief window between registering for LCS and receiving the results, the authors observed that very few participants quit smoking, but a significant proportion improved on readiness and motivation to quit, particularly among individuals who were undergoing their first scan and those who were extremely worried about lung cancer. These results indicate that providing evidence-based tobacco treatment can build upon this teachable moment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi M Williams
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Marisa Cordon
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Ellie Eyestone
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Laney Smith
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Brady J McKee
- Division of Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Shawn M Regis
- Division of Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - David B Abrams
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York
| | - Raymond S Niaura
- New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Vicky Parikh
- Department of Population Health, MedStar Shah Medical Group, Hollywood, Maryland
| | - Kathryn L Taylor
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Buttery SC, Williams P, Mweseli R, Philip KEJ, Sadaka A, Bartlett EJ, Devaraj A, Kemp S, Addis J, Derbyshire J, Chen M, Morris K, Laverty A, Hopkinson NS. Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial. BMJ Open Respir Res 2022; 9:9/1/e001030. [PMID: 35121633 PMCID: PMC8819808 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Lung cancer screening programmes offer an opportunity to address tobacco dependence in current smokers. The effectiveness of different approaches to smoking cessation in this context has not yet been established. We investigated if immediate smoking cessation support, including pharmacotherapy, offered as part of a lung cancer screening programme, increases quit rates compared to usual care (Very Brief Advice to quit and signposting to smoking cessation services). Materials and methods We conducted a single-blind randomised controlled trial of current smokers aged 55–75 years attending a Targeted Lung Health Check. On randomly allocated days smokers received either (1) immediate support from a trained smoking cessation counsellor with appropriate pharmacotherapy or (2) usual care. The primary outcome was self-reported quit rate at 3 months. We performed thematic analysis of participant interview responses. Results Of 412 people attending between January and March 2020, 115 (27.9%) were current smokers; 46% female, mean (SD) 62.4 (5.3) years. Follow-up data were available for 84 smokers. At 3 months, quit rates in the intervention group were higher 14/48 (29.2%) vs 4/36 (11%) (χ2 3.98, p=0.04). Participant interviews revealed four smoking-cessation related themes: (1) stress and anxiety, (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, (3) CT scans influencing desire to quit and (4) individual beliefs about stopping smoking. Conclusion The provision of immediate smoking cessation support is associated with a substantial increase in quit rates at 3 months. Further research is needed to investigate longer-term outcomes and to refine future service delivery. Trial registration number ISRCTN12455871.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara C Buttery
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Parris Williams
- Imperial College London, London, UK .,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,NHLI Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Mweseli
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Keir Elmslie James Philip
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,NHLI Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Ahmed Sadaka
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | - Anand Devaraj
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samual Kemp
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jamie Addis
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Anthony Laverty
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Nicholas S Hopkinson
- Imperial College London, London, UK.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,NHLI Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kohn R, Vachani A, Small D, Stephens-Shields AJ, Sheu D, Madden VL, Bayes BA, Chowdhury M, Friday S, Kim J, Gould MK, Ismail MH, Creekmur B, Facktor MA, Collins C, Blessing KK, Neslund-Dudas CM, Simoff MJ, Alleman ER, Epstein LH, Horst MA, Scott ME, Volpp KG, Halpern SD, Hart JL. Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19:303-314. [PMID: 34384042 PMCID: PMC8867367 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202104-499sd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Smoking burdens are greatest among underserved patients. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces mortality among individuals at risk for smoking-associated lung cancer. Although LCS programs must offer smoking cessation support, the interventions that best promote cessation among underserved patients in this setting are unknown. This stakeholder-engaged, pragmatic randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of four interventions promoting smoking cessation among underserved patients referred for LCS. By using an additive study design, all four arms provide standard "ask-advise-refer" care. Arm 2 adds free or subsidized pharmacologic cessation aids, arm 3 adds financial incentives up to $600 for cessation, and arm 4 adds a mobile device-delivered episodic future thinking tool to promote attention to long-term health goals. We hypothesize that smoking abstinence rates will be higher with the addition of each intervention when compared with arm 1. We will enroll 3,200 adults with LCS orders at four U.S. health systems. Eligible patients include those who smoke at least one cigarette daily and self-identify as a member of an underserved group (i.e., is Black or Latinx, is a rural resident, completed a high school education or less, and/or has a household income <200% of the federal poverty line). The primary outcome is biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence sustained through 6 months. Secondary outcomes include abstinence sustained through 12 months, other smoking-related clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. This pragmatic randomized clinical trial will identify the most effective smoking cessation strategies that LCS programs can implement to reduce smoking burdens affecting underserved populations. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04798664). Date of registration: March 12, 2021. Date of trial launch: May 17, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Kohn
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
| | | | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jannie Kim
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
| | - Michael K. Gould
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | | | - Beth Creekmur
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, California
| | | | | | - Kristina K. Blessing
- Investigator Initiated Research Operations, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Michael J. Simoff
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, and
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Leonard H. Epstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael A. Horst
- Lancaster General Health Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael E. Scott
- The Center for Black Health and Equity, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott D. Halpern
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joanna L. Hart
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Díaz-Álvarez J, Roiz P, Gorospe L, Ayala A, Pérez-Pinto S, Martínez-Sanz J, Sánchez-Conde M, Casado JL, Pérez-Elías MJ, Moreno A, Ron R, Vivancos MJ, Vizcarra P, Moreno S, Serrano-Villar S. Implementation of a lung cancer screening initiative in HIV-infected subjects. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260069. [PMID: 34890391 PMCID: PMC8664191 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In this pilot program of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for the screening of lung cancer (LC) in a targeted population of people with HIV (PWH), its prevalence was 3.6%; the number needed to screen in order to detect one case of lung cancer was 28, clearly outweighing the risks associated with lung cancer screening. While data from additional cohorts with longitudinal measurements are needed, PWH are a target population for lung cancer screening with LDCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Díaz-Álvarez
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Roiz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Gorospe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Ávila, Ávila, Spain
| | - Ana Ayala
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Ávila, Ávila, Spain
| | - Sergio Pérez-Pinto
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Martínez-Sanz
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matilde Sánchez-Conde
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - José L. Casado
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - María J. Pérez-Elías
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Moreno
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ron
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - María J. Vivancos
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Vizcarra
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Moreno
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Serrano-Villar
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Luo SJ, Choi E, Aredo JV, Wilkens LR, Tammemägi MC, Le Marchand L, Cheng I, Wakelee HA, Han SS. Smoking Cessation After Lung Cancer Diagnosis and the Risk of Second Primary Lung Cancer: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab076. [PMID: 34611582 PMCID: PMC8487318 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Smoking cessation reduces lung cancer mortality. However, little is known about whether diagnosis of lung cancer impacts changes in smoking behaviors. Furthermore, the effects of smoking cessation on the risk of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) have not been established yet. This study aims to examine smoking behavior changes after initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) diagnosis and estimate the effect of smoking cessation on SPLC risk following IPLC diagnosis. Methods The study cohort consisted of 986 participants in the Multiethnic Cohort Study who were free of lung cancer and active smokers at baseline (1993-1996), provided 10-year follow-up smoking data (2003-2008), and were diagnosed with IPLC in 1993-2017. The primary outcome was a change in smoking status from “current” at baseline to “former” at 10-year follow-up (ie, smoking cessation), analyzed using logistic regression. The second outcome was SPLC incidence after smoking cessation, estimated using cause-specific Cox regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Among 986 current smokers at baseline, 51.1% reported smoking cessation at 10-year follow-up. The smoking cessation rate was statistically significantly higher (80.6%) for those diagnosed with IPLC between baseline and 10-year follow-up vs those without IPLC diagnosis (45.4%) during the 10-year period (adjusted odds ratio = 5.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.38 to 7.98; P < .001). Incidence of SPLC was statistically significantly lower among the 504 participants who reported smoking cessation at follow-up compared with those without smoking cessation (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.67; P = .003). Conclusion Lung cancer diagnosis has a statistically significant impact on smoking cessation. Quitting smoking after IPLC diagnosis may reduce the risk of developing a subsequent malignancy in the lungs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia J Luo
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Eunji Choi
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Martin C Tammemägi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Loïc Le Marchand
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Iona Cheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Heather A Wakelee
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Summer S Han
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lam S, Tammemagi M. Contemporary issues in the implementation of lung cancer screening. Eur Respir Rev 2021; 30:30/161/200288. [PMID: 34289983 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0288-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography can reduce death from lung cancer by 20-24% in high-risk smokers. National lung cancer screening programmes have been implemented in the USA and Korea and are being implemented in Europe, Canada and other countries. Lung cancer screening is a process, not a test. It requires an organised programmatic approach to replicate the lung cancer mortality reduction and safety of pivotal clinical trials. Cost-effectiveness of a screening programme is strongly influenced by screening sensitivity and specificity, age to stop screening, integration of smoking cessation intervention for current smokers, screening uptake, nodule management and treatment costs. Appropriate management of screen-detected lung nodules has significant implications for healthcare resource utilisation and minimising harm from radiation exposure related to imaging studies, invasive procedures and clinically significant distress. This review focuses on selected contemporary issues in the path to implement a cost-effective lung cancer screening at the population level. The future impact of emerging technologies such as deep learning and biomarkers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Lam
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Martin Tammemagi
- Dept of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rankin NM, McWilliams A, Marshall HM. Lung cancer screening implementation: Complexities and priorities. Respirology 2021; 25 Suppl 2:5-23. [PMID: 33200529 DOI: 10.1111/resp.13963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death worldwide. The benefits of lung cancer screening to reduce mortality and detect early-stage disease are no longer in any doubt based on the results of two landmark trials using LDCT. Lung cancer screening has been implemented in the US and South Korea and is under consideration by other communities. Successful translation of demonstrated research outcomes into the routine clinical setting requires careful implementation and co-ordinated input from multiple stakeholders. Implementation aspects may be specific to different healthcare settings. Important knowledge gaps remain, which must be addressed in order to optimize screening benefits and minimize screening harms. Lung cancer screening differs from all other cancer screening programmes as lung cancer risk is driven by smoking, a highly stigmatized behaviour. Stigma, along with other factors, can impact smokers' engagement with screening, meaning that smokers are generally 'hard to reach'. This review considers critical points along the patient journey. The first steps include selecting a risk threshold at which to screen, successfully engaging the target population and maximizing screening uptake. We review barriers to smoker engagement in lung and other cancer screening programmes. Recruitment strategies used in trials and real-world (clinical) programmes and associated screening uptake are reviewed. To aid cross-study comparisons, we propose a standardized nomenclature for recording and calculating recruitment outcomes. Once participants have engaged with the screening programme, we discuss programme components that are critical to maximize net benefit. A whole-of-programme approach is required including a standardized and multidisciplinary approach to pulmonary nodule management, incorporating probabilistic nodule risk assessment and longitudinal volumetric analysis, to reduce unnecessary downstream investigations and surgery; the integration of smoking cessation; and identification and intervention for other tobacco related diseases, such as coronary artery calcification and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. National support, integrated with tobacco control programmes, and with appropriate funding, accreditation, data collection, quality assurance and reporting mechanisms will enhance lung cancer screening programme success and reduce the risks associated with opportunistic, ad hoc screening. Finally, implementation research must play a greater role in informing policy change about targeted LDCT screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole M Rankin
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Annette McWilliams
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.,Thoracic Tumour Collaborative of Western Australia, Western Australia Cancer and Palliative Care Network, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Henry M Marshall
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,The University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lewis JA, Spalluto LB, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Aguayo SM, Morales P, Avila R, Audet CM, Prusaczyk B, Lindsell CJ, Callaway-Lane C, Dittus RS, Vogus TJ, Massion PP, Limper HM, Kripalani S, Moghanaki D, Roumie CL. Protocol to evaluate an enterprise-wide initiative to increase access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration. Clin Imaging 2021; 73:151-161. [PMID: 33422974 PMCID: PMC8479827 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 11/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Veterans Affairs Partnership to increase Access to Lung Screening (VA-PALS) is an enterprise-wide initiative to implement lung cancer screening programs at VA medical centers (VAMCs). VA-PALS will be using implementation strategies that include program navigators to coordinate screening activities, trainings for navigators and radiologists, an open-source software management system, tools to standardize low-dose computed tomography image quality, and access to a support network. VAMCs can utilize strategies according to their local needs. In this protocol, we describe the planned program evaluation for the initial 10 VAMCs participating in VA-PALS. MATERIALS AND METHODS The implementation of programs will be evaluated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to ensure broad contextual guidance. Program evaluation measures have been developed using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework. Adaptations of screening processes will be assessed using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence Based Interventions. Measures collected will reflect the inner settings, estimate and describe the population reached, adoption by providers, implementation of the programs, report clinical outcomes and maintenance of programs. Analyses will include descriptive statistics and regression to evaluate predictors and assess implementation over time. DISCUSSION This theory-based protocol will evaluate the implementation of lung cancer screening programs across the Veterans Health Administration using scientific frameworks. The findings will inform plans to expand the VA-PALS initiative beyond the original sites and can guide implementation of lung cancer screening programs more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Lewis
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, United States of America; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America; Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
| | - Lucy B Spalluto
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, United States of America; Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Claudia I Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, United States of America; Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | - David F Yankelevitz
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, New York, United States of America; Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | - Samuel M Aguayo
- Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, AZ, United States of America
| | | | - Rick Avila
- Paraxial LLC, Halfmoon, NY, United States of America
| | - Carolyn M Audet
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Beth Prusaczyk
- Division of General Medical Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Christopher J Lindsell
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Carol Callaway-Lane
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, United States of America; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Medicine Service, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Robert S Dittus
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Timothy J Vogus
- Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Pierre P Massion
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Medicine Service, Nashville, TN, United States of America; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Heather M Limper
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Sunil Kripalani
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Radiation Oncology, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Christianne L Roumie
- VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|