Endogenous growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone is required for GH responses to pharmacological stimuli

Hypothalamic GHRH

Despite initial discovery in pancreatic tumors, GHRH is a 44-amino acid peptide primarily expressed in the hypothalamus. Recent RNA sequencing clarifies GHRH expression: predominantly hypothalamic in humans, with some basal ganglia presence, while extending to additional central nervous system (CNS) regions in other species. GHRH binds to its G-protein coupled receptor (GHRHR) in the arcuate (ARC), ventromedial (VMH), and periventricular (PeN) nuclei of the hypothalamus to exert its effects. Notably, the highest non-brain expression is found in somatotroph cells of the pituitary, directly targeting growth hormone (GH) production. GHRH is the primary regulator of pulsatile GH secretion, counteracted by somatostatin. While early models proposed alternating GHRH/somatostatin bursts, others implicate somatostatin as the primary regulator of GH pulse timing. These models fail to fully explain species and gender differences, particularly regarding nutritional status. The discovery of ghrelin, acting via GHS-R1a on GHRH neurons, significantly advanced understanding of GH regulation. Ghrelin interacts intricately with GHRH, modulating its expression and neuronal activity. Ghrelin also exerts GHRH-independent GH stimulation and synergizes with GHRH. The crucial role of GHRH in GH regulation is demonstrated by its key involvement in the action of other GH regulators, such as leptin, neuropeptide Y (NPY), and orexins. However, these interactions have also revealed that the physiological effects of GHRH extend far beyond its canonical role as a GH secretagogue. In this context, GHRH is thought to be a key regulator of the sleep-wake cycle and may be involved in whole-body energy homeostasis. The objective of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on GHRH and to discuss the potential pleiotropic effect of this hypothalamic neuropeptide, far beyond its classical action as regulator of the somatotroph axis.

Endothelial Unfolded Protein Response-Mediated Cytoskeletal Effects

The endothelial semipermeable monolayers ensure tissue homeostasis, are subjected to a plethora of stimuli, and their function depends on cytoskeletal integrity and remodeling. The permeability of those membranes can fluctuate to maintain organ homeostasis. In cases of severe injury, inflammation or disease, barrier hyperpermeability can cause irreparable damage of endothelium-dependent issues, and eventually death. Elucidation of the signaling regulating cytoskeletal structure and barrier integrity promotes the development of targeted pharmacotherapies towards disorders related to the impaired endothelium (e.g., acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis). Recent reports investigate the role of unfolded protein response in barrier function. Herein we review the cytoskeletal components, the unfolded protein response function; and their interrelations on health and disorder. Moreover, we emphasize on unfolded protein response modulators, since they ameliorate illness related to endothelial leak.

A GH Secretagogue Receptor Agonist (LUM-201) Elicits Greater GH Responses than Standard GH Secretagogues in Subjects of a Pediatric GH Deficiency Trial

INTRODUCTION

LUM-201 (ibutamoren, formerly MK-0677) is an orally administered GH secretagogue receptor agonist under development for treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (PGHD).

METHODS

The GH response to a single dose of LUM-201 and to other GH secretagogues used for diagnosis of PGHD were compared in 68 pediatric subjects participating in a trial for growth hormone deficiency.

RESULTS

LUM-201 elicited greater GH responses than observed in GHD diagnostic tests with arginine, glucagon, clonidine, L-dopa, and insulin-induced hypoglycemia [median and interquartile ranges 15.0 ng/mL (3.5, 49) vs. 5.5 ng/mL (1.8, 7.6) (p < 0.0001)]. The difference between responses was greatest in subjects with higher baseline IGF-I concentrations and higher GH responses to standard GH stimuli.

CONCLUSION

LUM-201 elicits greater GH responses than standard stimuli in subjects with higher peak GH in response to conventional testing and is potentially an orally administered treatment alternative to injectable rhGH in a subset of patients with adequate responses to an acute dose of LUM-201.

Diagnosing Growth Hormone Deficiency: Can a Combined Arginine and Clonidine Stimulation Test Replace 2 Separate Tests?

OBJECTIVE

Given the large number of false-positive growth hormone deficiency (GHD) diagnoses from a single growth hormone (GH) stimulation test in children, 2 different pharmacologic tests, performed on separate days or sequentially, are required. This study aimed to assess the reliability and safety of a combined arginine-clonidine stimulation test (CACST).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. During 2017-2019, 515 children aged >8 years underwent GH stimulation tests (CACST: n = 362 or clonidine stimulation test [CST]: n = 153). The main outcome measures used to compare the tests were GH response (sufficiency/deficiency) and amplitude and timing of peak GH and safety parameters.

RESULTS

Population characteristics were as follows: median age of 12.2 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10.7, 13.4), 331 boys (64%), and 282 prepubertal children (54.8%). The GHD rate was comparable with 12.7% for CACST and 14.4% for CST followed by a confirmatory test (glucagon or arginine) (P = .609). Peak GH was higher and occurred later in response to CACST compared with CST (14.6 ng/mL [IQR: 10.6, 19.4] vs 11.4 ng/mL [IQR: 7.0, 15.8], respectively, P < .001; 90 minutes [IQR: 60, 90] vs 60 minutes [IQR: 60, 90], respectively, P < .001). No serious adverse events occurred following CACST.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the reliability and safety of CACST in detecting GHD in late childhood and adolescence, suggesting that it may replace separate or sequential GH stimulation tests. By diminishing the need for the second GH stimulation test, CACST saves time, is more cost-effective, and reduces discomfort for children, caregivers, and medical staff.

[The role of glucose and insulin in the metabolic regulation of growth hormone secretion]

The exact physiological basis for the suppression of growth hormone secretion by oral glucose intake remains unknown, despite the widespread use of the oral glucose tolerance test in endocrinology. Lack of growth hormone suppression by glucose occurs in about a third of patients with acromegaly, as well as in other disorders. It is currently known that the secretion of growth hormone is affected by various factors, such as age, gender, body mass index, and the redistribution of adipose tissue. There is also evidence of the impact of overeating as well as being overweight on the secretion of growth hormone. It is known that both of these conditions are associated with hyperinsulinemia, which determines the possibility of its predominant role in suppressing the secretion of growth hormone. The purpose of this review is to discuss the accumulated data on the isolated effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on growth hormone secretion, as well as other metabolic regulators and conditions affecting its signaling. Understanding of the pathophysiological basis of these mechanisms is essential for further research of the role of glucose and insulin in the metabolic regulation of growth hormone secretion. However, the studies in animal models are complicated by interspecific differences in the response of growth hormone to glucose loading, and the only possible available model in healthy people may be the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

L-dopa is a potent stimulator of cortisol in short children

AIMS

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of oral L-dopa as a stimulatory agent for cortisol.

METHODS

In 27 short children that were evaluated for possible growth hormone deficiency (GHD), the levels of serum GH and cortisol were determined after oral L-dopa administration and after i.m. glucagon administration. We defined cortisol concentrations >18 μg/dl (496 nmol/l) as adequate response. Peak GH concentration <10 ng/ml in both tests defined GHD.

RESULTS

Twenty-five out of the 27 children (93%) studied showed a normal cortisol response, i.e. a peak serum cortisol >18 μg/dl in the L-dopa test, whereas 19 children (70%) had a normal cortisol response after stimulation with glucagon. In the children with normal cortisol response in both tests, the mean peak serum cortisol concentration was 28.7 (SD 1.59) after L-dopa and 26.65 (SD 1.26) μg/dl after glucagon administration. There was no statistically significant difference in peak serum cortisol response to L-dopa between GH-deficient and GH-sufficient children [25.90 (SD 4.9) vs. 29.87 (SD 9.9) μg/dl, respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

These results clearly suggest that L-dopa administration is a potent stimulus for cortisol secretion at least in short children.

Effects of hypothalamic dopamine on growth hormone-releasing hormone-induced growth hormone secretion and thyrotropin-releasing hormone-induced prolactin secretion in goats

The aim of the present study was to clarify the effects of hypothalamic dopamine (DA) on the secretion of growth hormone (GH) in goats. The GH-releasing response to an intravenous (i.v.) injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH, 0.25 μg/kg body weight (BW)) was examined after treatments to augment central DA using carbidopa (carbi, 1 mg/kg BW) and L-dopa (1 mg/kg BW) in male and female goats under a 16-h photoperiod (16 h light, 8 h dark) condition. GHRH significantly and rapidly stimulated the release of GH after its i.v. administration to goats (P < 0.05). The carbi and L-dopa treatments completely suppressed GH-releasing responses to GHRH in both male and female goats (P < 0.05). The prolactin (PRL)-releasing response to an i.v. injection of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 1 μg/kg BW) was additionally examined in male goats in this study to confirm modifications to central DA concentrations. The treatments with carbi and L-dopa significantly reduced TRH-induced PRL release in goats (P < 0.05). These results demonstrated that hypothalamic DA was involved in the regulatory mechanisms of GH, as well as PRL secretion in goats.

Profiling of Glucose-Sensing Neurons Reveals that GHRH Neurons Are Activated by Hypoglycemia

Comprehensive transcriptional profiling of glucose-sensing neurons is challenging because of low expression levels of glucokinase (Gck) and other key proteins that transduce a glucose signal. To overcome this, we generated and validated transgenic mice with a neuronal/endocrine-specific Gck promoter driving cre expression and mated them to mice with cre-dependent expression of an EGFP-tagged ribosomal protein construct (EEF1A1-LSL.EGFPL10) that can be used to map and profile cells. We found significant Gck expression in hypothalamic and limbic regions in cells that are activated following administration of glucose or 2-deoxyglucose. Transcriptional profiling from Gck-cre/EEF1A1-LSL.EGFPL10 mice enriched known and previously unknown glucose-sensing populations including neurons expressing growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH). Electrophysiological recordings show that hypoglycemia activates GHRH neurons, suggesting a mechanistic link between hypoglycemia and growth hormone release. These studies provide a means for mapping glucose-sensitive neurons and for generating transcriptional profiles from other cell types expressing cre in a cell-specific manner.

Growth hormone in chronic renal disease

Severe growth retardation (below the third percentile for height) is seen in up to one-third children with chronic kidney disease. It is thought to be multifactorial and despite optimal medical therapy most children are unable to reach their normal height. Under-nutrition, anemia, vitamin D deficiency with secondary hyperparathyroidism, metabolic acidosis, hyperphosphatemia, renal osteodystrophy; abnormalities in the growth hormone/insulin like growth factor system and sex steroids, all have been implicated in the pathogenesis of growth failure. Therapy includes optimization of nutritional and metabolic abnormalities. Failure to achieve adequate height despite 3-6 months of optimal medical measures mandates the use of recombinant GH (rGH) therapy, which has shown to result in catch-up growth, anywhere from 2 cm to 10 cm with satisfactory liner, somatic and psychological development.

Effect of body mass index on the growth hormone response to clonidine stimulation testing in children with short stature

OBJECTIVES

An inverse relationship has been shown between body mass index (BMI) and the peak growth hormone (GH) response to stimulation in adults and in children with short stature. This relation is observed even within a normal range of BMI. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of BMI on the GH response to clonidine in a large number of children with short stature.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study on the GH response to clonidine in a single centre.

METHODS

We studied 202 children with short stature (135 M and 67 F) who underwent clonidine testing from 2007 to 2009.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients had a GH peak >10 μg/l. In univariate regression analysis, the peak GH after clonidine was negatively correlated with BMI-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS) and positively correlated with height velocity-SDS and IGF-I-SDS. Only the relationship between peak GH and BMI-SDS remained significant in children with a BMI-SDS from -2 to +2. In the multivariate stepwise regression analysis, BMI-SDS and IGF-I-SDS were the only significant variables in the entire cohort, explaining 19·5% of the variance in peak GH. When only subjects with BMI-SDS between -2·0 and +2·0 were included in the analysis (n = 173), BMI-SDS alone explained 21·4% of the variability in peak GH. The number of patients who failed the clonidine test increased with increasing BMI-SDS.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI affects the GH response to clonidine in children with short stature and should be considered when interpreting the results to the stimulation test.

Is there a role for growth hormone therapy in refractory critical illness?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Protein catabolism is common among critically ill patients, contributing to organ dysfunction, muscle weakness, prolonged mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the ICU, with adverse impact on patient prognosis and resource utilization. Neither adequate enteral nutrition nor parenteral nutrition stems this catabolism. Recombinant growth hormone supplementation in surgical trauma and burn injury patients has demonstrated nitrogen retention, increased insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, decreased length of stay and improved survival. As a result, growth hormone became widely used in the ICU, until two large randomized trials in 1999 noted increased mortality associated with infection and organ dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Small clinical trials have revisited growth hormone supplementation in prolonged critical illness, demonstrating nitrogen conservation and increased serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor-1 binding protein in patients receiving adequate nutrition support. These trials suggest growth hormone supplementation may be safe and more efficacious in a subclass of chronic critically ill patients.

SUMMARY

Prior to proposing new prospective randomized clinical trials, case reports describing anecdotal experience with growth hormone in selected chronically critically ill patients may provide insight into redefining the ICU population most likely to benefit from growth hormone supplementation. Current guidelines continue to recommend against the use of growth hormone in critical illness.

Antagonists of growth-hormone-releasing hormone: an emerging new therapy for cancer

This article reviews the potential clinical uses of antagonists of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) for tumor therapy. GHRH antagonists suppress the growth of various human cancer lines xenografted into nude mice; such tumors include breast, ovarian, endometrial and prostate cancers, lung cancers (small-cell lung carcinomas and non-small-cell lung carcinomas), renal, pancreatic, gastric and colorectal carcinomas, brain tumors (malignant gliomas), osteogenic sarcomas and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The antitumor effects of GHRH antagonists are exerted in part indirectly through the inhibition of the secretion of GH from the pituitary and the resulting reduction in the levels of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). The main effects of the GHRH antagonists are, however, exerted directly on tumors. GHRH ligand is present in various human cancers and might function as an autocrine and/or paracrine growth factor. Pituitary-type GHRH receptors and their splice variants are also found in many human cancers. The inhibitory effects of GHRH antagonists seem to be due to the blockade of action of tumoral GHRH. Antagonists of GHRH can also suppress cancer growth by blocking production of IGF-I and/or IGF-II by the tumor. Further development of GHRH antagonists that are still-more potent should lead to potential therapeutic agents for various cancers.

Growth hormone response to different consecutive stress stimuli in healthy men: is there any difference?

The contribution of growth hormone (GH), released during acute and repeated stressful situations, to the development of stress-related disorders is often neglected. We have hypothesized that the modulation of the GH response to sequential stress exposure in humans depends mainly on the nature of the stressor. To test this hypothesis, we compared GH responses to different stressful situations, namely aerobic exercise, hypoglycemia and hyperthermia, which were applied in two sequential sessions separated by 80-150 min. In addition, administration of the dopaminergic drug apomorphine was used as a pharmacological stimulus. GH responses to submaximal exercise (bicycle ergometer, increasing work loads of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 W/kg, total duration 20 min) and hyperthermia in a sauna (80 degrees C, 30 min) were prevented when preceded by the same stress stimulus. Hypoglycemia induced by insulin (0.1 IU/kg intravenously) resulted in a significant GH response also during the second of the two consecutive insulin tests, though the response was reduced. Administration of apomorphine (0.75 mg subcutaneously) or insulin prevented the increase in GH release in response to a sequential bolus of apomorphine, while hypoglycemia induced a significant elevation in GH levels even if applied after a previous treatment with apomorphine. In conclusion, the feedback inhibition of the GH response to a sequential stress stimulus depends on the stimulus used. Unlike in the case of exercise and hyperthermia, mechanisms involved in the stress response to hypoglycemia appear to overcome the usual feedback mechanisms and to re-induce the GH response when applied after another stimulus.

Factors regulating growth hormone secretion in humans

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is pulsatile in nature in all species. The periodic pattern of GH release plays an important role in transmitting the GH message in a tissue-specific manner. The question of what regulates the pulsatile GH secretion pattern is an issue of not only theoretical interest but of considerable practical importance for designing different GH therapies for a variety of human diseases. This article provides a brief introductory overview of the different regulators of GH secretion and concentrates primarily on human studies.

Role of endogenous ghrelin in growth hormone secretion, appetite regulation and metabolism

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid hormone that is acylated post-translation, is the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). The highest concentrations of ghrelin are found in the stomach; however ghrelin peptide is also present in hypothalamic nuclei known to be important in the control of GH and feeding behavior. Exogenous ghrelin potently stimulates pituitary GH release through a mechanism that is dependent, in part, on endogenous GH-releasing hormone. Whether endogenous ghrelin plays a role in the control of GH secretion and growth is not clear and ghrelin deficient animals appear to grow normally. In contrast, experimental animal and clinical data suggest that abnormalities in GHS-R signaling could impact growth. Ghrelin or other GHS are clinically useful for GH-testing and limited data suggest that they might be useful in the treatment of some patients with GH deficiency. Substantial data have implicated ghrelin as an important regulator of feeding behavior and energy equilibrium. Ghrelin has a potent orexigenic effect in both animals and humans and this effect is mediated through hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY) and Agouti-related peptide (AgRP). Appetite simulation coupled with other metabolic effects promotes weight gain during chronic treatment with ghrelin. These metabolic effects are in part mediated through an increase in respiratory quotient (VQ). Presence of ghrelin appears to be necessary for the development of obesity in some animal models. Whether abnormalities in ghrelin signaling are involved in human obesity is not yet known.

Cortisol hypersecretion in unipolar major depression with melancholic and psychotic features: dopaminergic, noradrenergic and thyroid correlates

Evidence supports that hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has a pivotal role in the psychobiology of severe depression. The present study aimed at assessing hypothalamic-pituitary dopaminergic, noradrenergic, and thyroid activity in unipolar depressed patients with melancholic and psychotic features and with concomitant hypercortisolemia. Hormonal responses to dexamethasone, apomorphine (a dopamine receptor agonist), clonidine (an alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonist) and 0800 and 2300 h protirelin (TRH) were measured in 18 drug-free inpatients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of severe major depressive disorder with melancholic and psychotic features showing cortisol nonsuppression following dexamethasone and 23 matched hospitalized healthy controls. Compared with controls, patients showed (1) lower adrenocorticotropin and cortisol response to apomorphine (p<0.015 and <0.004, respectively), (2) lower growth hormone response to clonidine (p=0.001), and (3) lower responses to TRH: 2300 h maximum increment in serum thyrotropin (TSH) level (p=0.006) and the difference between 2300 and 0800 h maximum increment in serum TSH values (p=0.0001). Our findings, in a subgroup of unipolar depressed inpatients with psychotic and melancholic features, are compatible with the hypothesis that chronic elevation of cortisol may lead to dopaminergic, noradrenergic and thyroid dysfunction.

Growth Hormone Responses to Low-Dose Physostigmine in Elderly vs. Young Women and Men

BACKGROUND

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is a sensitive measure of CNS cholinergic neurotransmission, and GH decreases considerably with age. Cholinesterase inhibitors, which increase acetylcholine concentrations, have been used in elderly subjects to investigate the neuroendocrine effects of aging and Alzheimer's disease. However, there have been only a few studies of a potential sex difference in GH responses to cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects, with mixed results.

OBJECTIVE

We therefore administered low-dose physostigmine (PHYSO), a cholinesterase inhibitor, to normal, non-hormone-replaced, elderly women and men, to ascertain a potential sex difference in GH response. We hypothesized: (1) elderly women and men would have similar hormone responses, because of relatively low circulating estrogen in the women, and (2) the elderly women would have significantly lower baseline GH and GH responses to cholinergic challenge than the young women we studied previously.

METHODS

Normal elderly women and men > or =65 years of age meeting stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria were studied on three test days, 4-7 days apart, by serial blood sampling for several hours for baseline GH, followed by administration of low-dose PHYSO (first and third days) or saline (second day) at 18:00 h. Frequent blood sampling was continued for several hours. Plasma GH and hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal cortical hormones were measured in each sample.

RESULTS

PHYSO administration produced no side effects in about half the elderly subjects and mild side effects in the other half, with no significant female-male differences and no significant relationship between the presence or absence of side effects and GH response. PHYSO significantly increased GH compared to saline, to a similar degree in the elderly women and men. The elderly women had a significantly greater GH response to PHYSO than did the young women, whereas GH responses were similar in the elderly and young men.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate similar GH responses to low-dose PHYSO in elderly women compared to elderly men, and a significantly greater GH response in elderly women compared to young women. A likely mechanism is increased sensitivity of central cholinergic systems that inhibit somatostatin and/or enhance GHRH release from the hypothalamus.

Histories of sexual abuse are associated with differential effects of clonidine on autonomic function in women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder

In women meeting strict criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), we examined whether clonidine, an alpha2-adrenergic receptor (AR) agonist, would have different effects on sexually abused versus non-abused PMDD women for measures of autonomic nervous system function. Twelve women meeting prospective, DSM-IV criteria for PMDD, five of whom had a history of sexual abuse, participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design study, comparing 2 months of on oral clonidine (0.3 mg/day) with 2 months on active placebo. During the luteal phase that preceded randomization and following each two-month challenge, women were tested for cardiovascular measures at rest and in response to mental stress, and for resting plasma norepinephrine (NE) concentrations as well as beta1 and beta2-AR responsivity using the isoproterenol sensitivity test. Results revealed that in comparison to placebo, clonidine significantly reduced plasma norepinephrine concentrations, increased both beta1- and beta2-AR responsivity, and reduced resting and stress heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) (p < 0.05) in all PMDD women. With clonidine, sexually abused PMDD women exhibited greater decreases in resting and stress-induced HR (p < 0.01) and stress-induced systolic BP (p < 0.05), while non-abused PMDD women exhibited greater reductions in plasma NE concentration (p = 0.07), and greater increases in beta2-AR responsivity (p < 0.05) than abused PMDD women. These results suggest PMDD women with and without a history of sexual abuse respond differently to a clonidine challenge in measures reflecting autonomic nervous system functioning, indicating that abuse may modify presynaptic alpha2-AR function in PMDD.

Joint pituitary-hypothalamic and intrahypothalamic autofeedback construct of pulsatile growth hormone secretion

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is vividly pulsatile in all mammalian species studied. In a simplified model, self-renewable GH pulsatility can be reproduced by assuming individual, reversible, time-delayed, and threshold-sensitive hypothalamic outflow of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH release-inhibiting hormone (somatostatin; SRIF). However, this basic concept fails to explicate an array of new experimental observations. Accordingly, here we formulate and implement a novel fourfold ensemble construct, wherein 1) systemic GH pulses stimulate long-latency, concentration-dependent secretion of periventricular-nuclear SRIF, thereby initially quenching and then releasing multiphasic GH volleys (recurrent every 3-3.5 h); 2) SRIF delivered to the anterior pituitary gland competitively antagonizes exocytotic release, but not synthesis, of GH during intervolley intervals; 3) arcuate-nucleus GHRH pulses drive the synthesis and accumulation of GH in saturable somatotrope stores; and 4) a purely intrahypothalamic mechanism sustains high-frequency GH pulses (intervals of 30-60 min) within a volley, assuming short-latency reciprocal coupling between GHRH and SRIF neurons (stimulatory direction) and SRIF and GHRH neurons (inhibitory direction). This two-oscillator formulation explicates (but does not prove) 1) the GHRH-sensitizing action of prior SRIF exposure; 2) a three-site (intrahypothalamic, hypothalamo-pituitary, and somatotrope GH store dependent) mechanism driving rebound-like GH secretion after SRIF withdrawal in the male; 3) an obligatory role for pituitary GH stores in representing rebound GH release in the female; 4) greater irregularity of SRIF than GH release profiles; and 5) a basis for the paradoxical GH-inhibiting action of centrally delivered GHRH.

Pulsatile and nocturnal growth hormone secretions in men do not require periodic declines of somatostatin

Using a continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion to create constant supraphysiological somatostatinergic tone, we have previously shown that growth hormone (GH) pulse generation in women is independent of endogenous somatostatin (SRIH) declines. Generalization of these results to men is problematic, because GH regulation is sexually dimorphic. We have therefore studied nine healthy young men (age 26 +/- 6 yr, body mass index 23.3 +/- 1.2 kg/m2) during normal saline and octreotide infusion (8.4 microg/h) that provided stable plasma octreotide levels (764.5 +/- 11.6 pg/ml). GH was measured in blood samples obtained every 10 min for 24 h. Octreotide suppressed 24-h mean GH by 52 +/- 13% (P = 0.016), GH pulse amplitude by 47 +/- 12% (P = 0.012), and trough GH by 39 +/- 12% (P = 0.030), whereas GH pulse frequency and the diurnal rhythm of GH secretion remained essentially unchanged. The response of GH to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was suppressed by 38 +/- 15% (P = 0.012), but the GH response to GH-releasing peptide-2 was unaffected. We conclude that, in men as in women, declines in hypothalamic SRIH secretion are not required for pulse generation and are not the cause of the nocturnal augmentation of GH secretion. We propose that GH pulses are driven primarily by GHRH, whereas ghrelin might be responsible for the diurnal rhythm of GH.

The influence of insulin on circulating ghrelin

Ghrelin is a novel peptide that acts on the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor in the pituitary and hypothalamus. It may function as a third physiological regulator of GH secretion, along with GH-releasing hormone and somatostatin. In addition to the action of ghrelin on the GH axis, it appears to have a role in the determination of energy homeostasis. Although feeding suppresses ghrelin production and fasting stimulates ghrelin release, the underlying mechanisms controlling this process remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses, by use of a stepped hyperinsulinemic eu- hypo- hyperglycemic glucose clamp, that either hyperinsulinemia or hypoglycemia may influence ghrelin production. Having been stable in the period before the clamp, ghrelin levels rapidly fell in response to insulin infusion during euglycemia (baseline ghrelin 207 +/- 12 vs. 169 +/- 10 fmol/ml at t = 30 min, P < 0.001). Ghrelin remained suppressed during subsequent periods of hypoglycemia (mean glucose 53 +/- 2 mg/dl) and hyperglycemia (mean glucose 163 +/- 6 mg/dl). Despite suppression of ghrelin, GH showed a significant rise during hypoglycemia (baseline 4.1 +/- 1.3 vs. 28.2 +/- 3.9 microg/l at t = 120 min, P < 0.001). Our data suggest that insulin may suppress circulating ghrelin independently of glucose, although glucose may have an additional effect. We conclude that the GH response seen during hypoglycemia is not regulated by circulating ghrelin.

IGF-I does not affect the net increase in GH release in response to arginine

Arginine stimulates growth hormone (GH) secretion, possibly by inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) inhibits GH secretion via effects at the pituitary and/or hypothalamus. We hypothesized that if the dominant action of IGF-I is to suppress GH release at the level of the pituitary, then the arginine-induced net increase in GH concentration would be unaffected by an IGF-I infusion. Eight healthy young adults (3 women, 5 men) were studied on day 2 of a 47-h fast for 12 h (35th-47th h) on four occasions. Saline (Sal) or 10 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) recombinant human IGF-I was infused intravenously for 5 h from 37 to 42 h of the 47-h fast. Arginine (Arg) (30 g iv) or Sal was infused over 30 min during the IGF-I or Sal infusion from 40 to 40.5 h of the fast. Subjects received the following combinations of treatments in random order: 1) Sal + Sal; 2) Sal + Arg; 3) IGF-I + Sal; 4) IGF-I + Arg. Peak GH concentration on the IGF-I + Arg day was ~45% of that on the Sal + Arg day. The effect of arginine on net GH release was calculated as [(Sal + Arg) - (Sal + Sal)] - [(IGF-I + Arg) - (IGF-I + Sal)]. There was no significant effect of IGF-I on net arginine-induced GH release over control conditions. These findings suggest that the negative feedback effect of IGF-I on GH secretion is primarily mediated at the pituitary level and/or at the hypothalamus through a mechanism different from the stimulatory effect of arginine.

Streptozotocin, an O-GlcNAcase inhibitor, blunts insulin and growth hormone secretion

Type 2 diabetes mellitus results from a complex interaction between nutritional excess and multiple genes. Whereas pancreatic beta-cells normally respond to glucose challenge by rapid insulin release (first phase insulin secretion), there is a loss of this acute response in virtually all of the type 2 diabetes patients with significant fasting hyperglycemia. Our previous studies demonstrated that irreversible intracellular accumulation of a glucose metabolite, protein O-linked N-acetylglucosamine modification (O-GlcNAc), is associated with pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis. In the present study, we show that streptozotocin (STZ), a non-competitive chemical blocker of O-GlcNAcase, induces an insulin secretory defect in isolated rat islet cells. In contrast, transgenic mice with down-regulated glucose to glucosamine metabolism in beta-cells exhibited an enhanced insulin secretion capacity. Interestingly, the STZ blockade of O-GlcNAcase activity is also associated with a growth hormone secretory defect and impairment of intracellular secretory vesicle trafficking. These results provide evidence for the roles of O-GlcNAc in the insulin secretion and possible involvement of O-GlcNAc in general glucose-regulated hormone secretion pathways.

Pulsatile growth hormone secretion persists in genetic growth hormone-releasing hormone resistance

Growth hormone (GH) secretion is regulated by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin, and possibly ghrelin, but uncertainty remains about the relative contributions of these hypophysiotropic factors to GH pulsatility. Patients with genetic GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) deficiency present an opportunity to examine GH secretory dynamics in the selective absence of GHRH input. We studied circadian GH profiles in four young men homozygous for a null mutation in the GHRH-R gene by use of an ultrasensitive GH assay. Residual GH secretion was pulsatile, with normal pulse frequency, but severely reduced amplitude (<1% normal) and greater than normal process disorder (as assessed by approximate entropy). Nocturnal GH secretion, both basal and pulsatile, was enhanced compared with daytime. We conclude that rhythmic GH secretion persists in an amplitude-miniaturized version in the absence of a GHRH-R signal. The nocturnal enhancement of GH secretion is likely mediated by decreased somatostatin tone. Pulsatility of residual GH secretion may be caused by oscillations in somatostatin and/or ghrelin; it may also reflect intrinsic oscillations in somatotropes.

Growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with an inactivating defect of the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor is pulsatile: evidence for a role for non-GHRH inputs into the generation of GH pulses

GH secretion is regulated by the interaction of GHRH and somatostatin and is released in 10-20 pulses in each 24-h cycle. The exact roles in pulse generation played by somatostatin, GHRH, and the recently isolated GH-releasing peptide, Ghrelin, are not fully elucidated. To investigate the GHRH-mediated GH secretion in human, we investigated pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic GH secretion in two young adults (male, 24 yr; female, 23 yr) from a Moroccan family with a novel inactivating defect of the GHRH receptor gene. Data were compared with values in age- and gender-matched controls. Plasma GH concentration were measured by a sensitive immunofluorometric assay, with a detection limit of 0.01 mU/L. All plasma GH concentrations in the female patient were measurable; in the male patient 30 of 145 samples were at or below the detection limit. GH secretion was pulsatile, with 21 and 23 secretory episodes/24 h in the male and female patients, respectively. The fraction of basal to total GH secretion was raised in both patients by 0.18 and 0.15, respectively. The total 24-h GH production rate was greatly diminished; in the male patient it was 6.9 mU/L (normal values for his age, 26--63 mU/L), and in the female patient it was 4.2 mU/L (normal values for her age, 96--390 mU/L). The nyctohemeral plasma GH rhythm was preserved (P < 0.001), with normal acrophases (0430 and 0218 h in the male and female, respectively). Approximate entropy was greatly elevated in both subjects (0.82 in the male and 1.17 in the female; upper normal values for age and gender, 0.24 and 0.59, respectively). Intravenous injection of 50 microg GHRH failed to increase the plasma GH concentration in both patients, but 100 microg GH-releasing peptide-2 elicited a definite increase (male patient, 0.13 to 1.74 mU/L; female patient, 0.29 to 0.87 mU/L). Both patients had a partial empty sella on magnetic resonance imaging scanning. In summary, the present studies in two patients with a profound loss of function mutation of the GHRH receptor favor the view that in the human the timing of GH pulses is primarily supervised by intermittent somatostatin withdrawal, and the amplitude of GH pulses is driven by GHRH. In addition, we infer that effectual GHRH input controls the GH cell mass and the orderliness of the secretory process.

Generation of growth hormone pulsatility in women: evidence against somatostatin withdrawal as pulse initiator

To test whether endogenous hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIH) fluctuations are playing a role in the generation of growth hormone (GH) pulses, continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion (16 microg/h) was used to create constant supraphysiological somatostatinergic tone. Six healthy postmenopausal women (age 67 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 24.7 +/- 1.2 kg/m(2)) were studied during normal saline and octreotide infusion providing stable plasma octreotide levels of 2,567 +/- 37 pg/ml. Blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 24 h, and plasma GH was measured with a sensitive chemiluminometric assay. Octreotide infusion suppressed 24-h mean GH by 84 +/- 3% (P = 0.00026), GH pulse amplitude by 90 +/- 3% (P = 0.00031), and trough GH by 54 +/- 5% (P = 0.0012), whereas GH pulse frequency remained unchanged. The response of GH to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was not suppressed, and the GH response to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) was unaffected. We conclude that, in women, periodic declines in hypothalamic SRIH secretion are not the driving force of endogenous GH pulses, which are most likely due to episodic release of GHRH and/or the endogenous GHRP-like ligand.

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.

Multihormonal responses to clonidine in patients with affective and psychotic symptoms

The neuroendocrine responses to the alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine (CLO) (0.35 mg if body weight <65 kg or 0.375 mg if body weight> or =65 kg, PO) were studied in a large group of subjects: 134 drug-free inpatients--with either DSM-IV schizophrenia (SCZ, n=31), schizoaffective disorder (SAD, n=16), or major depressive episode (MDE, n=87) - and 22 hospitalized controls (HCs). Comparison with a previous placebo test performed in a subgroup of 92 subjects (46 MDEs, 20 SCZs, 8 SADs, and 18 HCs) showed that CLO induced a significant increase of growth hormone, prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) levels but no significant change in adrenocorticotropin and cortisol release. According to diagnostic categories, we found significantly lower GH stimulation in MDEs and in SADs compared to HCs or to SCZs. In addition, we found significantly lower CLO induced PRL and TSH stimulations in paranoid SCZ patients compared to controls and disorganized SCZ patients. Taken together, these results suggest a hyposensitivity of noradrenergic alpha(2)-receptors in patients with affective symptoms.

Serotonergic and noradrenergic function in depression: clinical correlates

The present study was conducted in order to investigate the relationships between central noradrenergic (NA) and serotonergic (5-HT) function and clinical characteristics of a major depressive episode according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. We measured growth hormone response (ΔGH) to clonidine (CLO) (an α2 NA agonist), as an index of central NA function, and prolactin response (APRL) to d-fenfluramine (d-FEN) (a specific 5-HT releaser/uptake inhibitor), as an index of central 5-HT function, in 53 medication-free depressed inpatients. On the basis of their CLO and d-FEN test responses, patients were classified into 4 groups. Group 1 (blunted ΔPRL_d-FEN alone [11 %]) was characterized by a recent violent suicide attempt, a high degree of medical damage, and mild anxiety. Group 2 (blunted ΔGH_CLO alone [32%]) was characterized by an absence of a history of suicide attempt and by severe anxiety. Group 3 (combination of blunted ΔGH_CLO and APRL_d-FEN [18%]) was characterized by a history of suicide attempts, total duration of the illness of over W years, age over 40 years, and more than 3 previous hospitalizations. Group 4 (no abnormality [39%]) had no specific clinical profile. These results suggest that, in depression, specific psychopathological features may be linked to 5-HT and/or NA dysfunction. However, our results also suggest that NA and/or 5-HT dysfunction are less likely to be the primary cause of mood disorders but are more indicative of failure of compensatory mechanisms involved in affective homeostatic processes.

Serotonergic and noradrenergic function in depression: clinical correlates

The present study was conducted in order to investigate the relationships between central noradrenergic (NA) and serotonergic (5-HT) function and clinical characteristics of a major depressive episode according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. We measured growth hormone response (ΔGH) to clonidine (CLO) (an α2 NA agonist), as an index of central NA function, and prolactin response (APRL) to d-fenfluramine (d-FEN) (a specific 5-HT releaser/uptake inhibitor), as an index of central 5-HT function, in 53 medication-free depressed inpatients. On the basis of their CLO and d-FEN test responses, patients were classified into 4 groups. Group 1 (blunted ΔPRL(d-FEN) alone [11 %]) was characterized by a recent violent suicide attempt, a high degree of medical damage, and mild anxiety. Group 2 (blunted ΔGH(CLO) alone [32%]) was characterized by an absence of a history of suicide attempt and by severe anxiety. Group 3 (combination of blunted ΔGH(CLO) and APRL(d-FEN) [18%]) was characterized by a history of suicide attempts, total duration of the illness of over W years, age over 40 years, and more than 3 previous hospitalizations. Group 4 (no abnormality [39%]) had no specific clinical profile. These results suggest that, in depression, specific psychopathological features may be linked to 5-HT and/or NA dysfunction. However, our results also suggest that NA and/or 5-HT dysfunction are less likely to be the primary cause of mood disorders but are more indicative of failure of compensatory mechanisms involved in affective homeostatic processes.

Growth hormone therapy for hypopituitary adults: time for re-appraisal

The advent of the production of large quantities of recombinant growth hormone (GH) has made it possible to have sufficient material to assess its efficacy in adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Although some studies have shown that patients who are severely deficient benefit from GH therapy, the spectrum of GHD is broad, and the degree of deficiency at times is very difficult to define. In some cases, benefit is not easily quantified, and some studies have claimed benefits that, although statistically significant, are either not clinically important or are so marginal as to be questionable in terms of cost, difficulty of administration and potential risks. The purpose here is to identify the current problems in the diagnosis of GHD, to discuss the rationale for GH therapy and to assess the potential effects of GHD as well as the benefits of GH therapy in GHD adults. We will include a commentary as to which effects appear more robust than others and which are likely to result in the greatest patient benefit. Finally, some attention will be paid to long-term safety issues that should be monitored to ensure that this medication is safe even for the patients with the greatest need.

Growth hormone responses during strenuous exercise: the role of GH-releasing hormone and GH-releasing peptide-2

PURPOSE AND METHODS

This study was designed to investigate the role of two effective releasers of growth hormone (GH): GHRH and GHRP-2 during exercise (EX). Eight healthy male subjects (ages: 22 +/- 1.2 (mean +/- SD) yr, BMI: 22.5 +/- 2.2 kg x m(-2)) were exposed to maximally stimulating dose of 100 microg GHRH iv, and 200 microg GHRP-2 iv, during incremental EX on a cycle ergometer to exhaustion. GH responses after EX alone were compared with the responses after the combined administration of the same EX plus GHRH, EX plus GHRP-2, and EX plus GHRH plus GHRP-2. Blood samples were obtained in the fasted state at intervals for 2 h postexercise and the area under the GH response curve (AUC) was calculated by trapezoidal integration.

RESULTS

Significant differences (P < 0.003) were observed between the AUCs after administration of EX alone (mean +/- SEM): 2,324 +/- 312 microg x L(-1) 120 min, after EX plus GHRH: 6,952 +/- 1,083, after EX plus GHRP-2: 14,674 +/- 2,210, and after the combination EX plus GHRH plus GHRP-2: 17,673 +/- 1,670. However, AUCs after each combination did not differ significantly from those after arithmetical addition of each separate stimulus, indicating that the mechanisms of the respective stimuli do not interact. Linear regression analysis on mean GH responses between 20 and 30 min after the start of EX showed that EX alone and GHRH alone explain about 59% (adj. R2) of the GH response to the combination EX plus GHRH. The ratio of the respective regression coefficients (GHRH vs EX) was about 2:1 (instead of 1:1), indicating that EX seems to potentiate the activity of GHRH. GHRH alone and EX alone also explained about 74% of the response to the combination EX plus GHRP-2. In the latter response, a synergistic action of GHRP-2 on GHRH could be observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate that under strenuous EX conditions, endogenous GHRH activity causes a further increase of GH release. A GHRP-2 mediated mechanism in the central neuroendocrine regulation acts as a "booster," possibly by stimulating the effects of GHRH and/or an unknown hypothalamic factor, as well as by stimulating the pituitary GH release directly.

The relative roles of continuous growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH(1-29)NH2) and intermittent somatostatin(1-14)(SS) in growth hormone (GH) pulse generation: studies in normal and post cranial irradiated individuals

OBJECTIVES

Pulsatile GH release in humans is thought to involve the coordinated interaction of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS). Disordered GH secretion is seen in most patients following high dose (> 30 Gy) cranial irradiation in childhood and could result from dysregulation of these hypothalamic hormones or reflect direct pituitary damage. We have used a peptide 'clamp' to assess the relative roles of continuous GHRH and intermittent SS in GH pulse generation in healthy volunteers and short-and long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS

12 adult male long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 17.0 years (15.2-19. 7); 12.2 years (5.8-14.0) postradiotherapy, > 30Gy whole brain irradiation) with 9 matched control volunteers and 6 short-term survivors of childhood brain tumours (median age 6.4 years (5.9-7. 7); 2.5 years (1.7-3.6) post radiotherapy, > 30Gy whole brain irradiation) with 6 matched controls (studies of spontaneous GH release alone).

MEASUREMENTS

Serum GH concentrations in 24 h spontaneous GH profiles and during three 'clamp' studies: continuous GHRH(1-29)NH2 (60 ng/kg/minutes, subcutaneous infusion, 24 h); intermittent SS(1-14) withdrawal (20microg/m2/hour, intravenous infusion, 3 h on/1 h off, 2-3 cycles over 8-12 h); intermittent SS and continuous GHRH combined (2-3 cycles over 8-12 h). Data were analysed by spectral analysis, 'peak' and 'trough' determination and serial array averaging.

RESULTS

In normal adults, discrete pulsatility was seen in all profiles of spontaneous GH secretion. Continuous GHRH amplified peak GH concentrations (median basal peak 21.1 mU/l vs. GHRH 62.0 mU/l, P = 0.008) whilst pulse timing remained unaffected. Rebound GH release following SS withdrawal alone was variable. Combining continuous GHRH with intermittent SS produced regular GH responses upon SS withdrawal (20.3 mU/l; range 2. 3-105.4). Heterogeneous patterns of spontaneous GH release were seen in the irradiated subjects. Spontaneous peak GH release was reduced in the children following irradiation (Irradiation 14.9 mU/l vs. Control 25.1 mU/l, P = 0.007). Peak GH concentrations were significantly amplified by GHRH in half of them. Adult long-term survivors had lower spontaneous GH concentrations and continuous GHRH amplified GH release in most subjects (Spontaneous 4.2 mU/l vs. GHRH 6.5 mU/l, P = 0.008) but peak concentrations remained far less than those of controls. Combining intermittent SS with continuous GHRH regularized GH release in many patients but the GH responses remained attenuated (4.6 mU/l; 2.5-17.5).

CONCLUSION

GH pulsatility can be generated in normal volunteers by the combination of continuous GHRH and intermittent SS and provides indirect evidence for a role for GHRH in GH synthesis and replenishment of stored GH pools at times of high SS tone. Patterns of GH release in short-and long-term survivors of childhood brain tumours are heterogeneous suggesting that combined hypothalamic deficiencies of GHRH and SS occur following high dose radiotherapy. The attenuated GH release seen in long-term survivors compared to controls suggests that GH secretory dysfunction does not simply reflect reduced GHRH and SS secretion, and that trophic effects or pituitary damage may be important with time.

Insulin hypoglycemia and growth hormone secretion in sheep: a paradox revisited

Although insulin-induced hypoglycemia is a potent stimulus for growth hormone (GH) secretion in humans, hypoglycemia was reported to suppress GH in sheep. We investigated whether GH suppression in sheep during insulin hypoglycemia resulted from the dose of insulin administered or the fed state of the animal. Saline or insulin (0.05, 0.2, 1.0, or 5.0 U/kg) intravenous boluses were administered to eight fasted ewes in a crossover experiment. In another experiment, four sheep were fed 2 h before intravenous administrations of either 0.2 or 5 U/kg of insulin. All doses of insulin resulted in comparable hypoglycemia, although the duration of hypoglycemia increased directly with insulin dose. Hypoglycemia in fasted animals stimulated GH secretion. The GH rise above baseline was inversely related to the insulin dose, and the insulin doses of 1 and 5 U/kg resulted in late suppression of GH below baseline concentrations. Insulin administration to fed animals caused an identical degree of hypoglycemia but no increase in GH. Insulin-hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion in sheep in a manner similar to humans, and the response is dependent on both fed state and insulin dose.

Growth hormone pulsatility in acromegaly following radiotherapy

Radiotherapy continues to have an important role in the treatment of acromegaly and is particularly effective at halting tumour growth, causing tumour shrinkage and reducing growth hormone (GH) concentrations in the long term. The major disadvantages of radiotherapy include the slow reduction in GH levels and damage to the other hypothalamic-pituitary axes. The 24 hour GH profile in active acromegaly compared with normals, characteristically shows an increased frequency of GH pulses, increased disorderliness (approximate entropy) of GH release, increased mean GH valley nadir, increased non-pulsatile fraction of GH and either similar or increased GH pulse amplitude. Complete surgical excision of a GH secreting adenoma may reverse these abnormalities and reduce circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations to normal. However, very few data are available regarding the effects of radiotherapy on GH pulsatility in patients with acromegaly. Radiotherapy rarely leads to normalisation of the pattern of spontaneous GH release and may therefore be associated with an elevated IGF-1 even when 24 hour GH concentrations are comparable to healthy controls. The impact of such a biochemical state on morbidity and mortality in acromegaly is unknown. The continuing effects of radiotherapy may potentially transform an individual from a state of GH excess, to a state of GH deficiency, with as yet undetermined effects. In addition, radiotherapy leads to significant hypothalamic dysfunction, with the possible loss of endogenous somatostatin (SMS) production. This may potentially alter somatostatin (SMS) receptor expression on somatotroph adenomas and alter their responsiveness to subsequent SMS analogue therapy.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated through a complex neuroendocrine control system, especially by the functional interplay of two hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS), exerting stimulatory and inhibitory influences, respectively, on the somatotrope. The two hypothalamic neurohormones are subject to modulation by a host of neurotransmitters, especially the noradrenergic and cholinergic ones and other hypothalamic neuropeptides, and are the final mediators of metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune influences for the secretion of GH. Since the identification of the GHRH peptide, recombinant DNA procedures have been used to characterize the corresponding cDNA and to clone GHRH receptor isoforms in rodent and human pituitaries. Parallel to research into the effects of SS and its analogs on endocrine and exocrine secretions, investigations into their mechanism of action have led to the discovery of five separate SS receptor genes encoding a family of G protein-coupled SS receptors, which are widely expressed in the pituitary, brain, and the periphery, and to the synthesis of analogs with subtype specificity. Better understanding of the function of GHRH, SS, and their receptors and, hence, of neural regulation of GH secretion in health and disease has been achieved with the discovery of a new class of fairly specific, orally active, small peptides and their congeners, the GH-releasing peptides, acting on specific, ubiquitous seven-transmembrane domain receptors, whose natural ligands are not yet known.

Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human

During the last decade, the GH axis has become the compelling focus of remarkably active and broad-ranging basic and clinical research. Molecular and genetic models, the discovery of human GHRH and its receptor, the cloning of the GHRP receptor, and the clinical availability of recombinant GH and IGF-I have allowed surprisingly rapid advances in our knowledge of the neuroregulation of the GH-IGF-I axis in many pathophysiological contexts. The complexity of the GHRH/somatostatin-GH-IGF-I axis thus commends itself to more formalized modeling (154, 155), since the multivalent feedback-control activities are difficult to assimilate fully on an intuitive scale. Understanding the dynamic neuroendocrine mechanisms that direct the pulsatile secretion of this fundamental growth-promoting and metabolic hormone remains a critical goal, the realization of which is challenged by the exponentially accumulating matrix of experimental and clinical data in this arena. To the above end, we review here the pathophysiology of the GHRH somatostatin-GH-IGF-I feedback axis consisting of corresponding key neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic effectors, and their cloned receptors and signaling pathways. We propose that this system is best viewed as a multivalent feedback network that is exquisitely sensitive to an array of neuroregulators and environmental stressors and genetic restraints. Feedback and feedforward mechanisms acting within the intact somatotropic axis mediate homeostatic control throughout the human lifetime and are disrupted in disease. Novel effectors of the GH axis, such as GHRPs, also offer promise as investigative probes and possible therapeutic agents. Further understanding of the mechanisms of GH neuroregulation will likely allow development of progressively more specific molecular and clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions in which GH secretion is regulated abnormally. Thus, we predict that unexpected and enriching insights in the domain of the neuroendocrine pathophysiology of the GH axis are likely be achieved in the succeeding decades of basic and clinical research.

The effect of short-term cortisol changes on growth hormone responses to the pyridostigmine-growth-hormone-releasing-hormone test in healthy adults and patients with suspected growth hormone deficiency

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The interaction between cortisol and growth hormone (GH)-levels may significantly influence GH-responses to a stimulation test. In order to systematically analyse the interaction in a paired design, it is necessary to use a test, which has been proven safe and reliable such as the pyridostigmine-growth-hormone-releasing-hormone (PD-GHRH) test. Three groups of subjects with a different GH-secretory capacity were included.

STUDY A

Eight healthy adults were tested seven times, once with placebo throughout the examination and six times with the PD-GHRH test following no glucocorticoid pretreatment, pretreatment with hydrocortisone (HC) (30 mg/day and 80 mg/day for 1 and 3 days) or pretreatment with 15 mg prednisolone for 1 day. HC (80 mg/day for 1 day) in combination with PD significantly stimulated GH-levels compared to PD alone, 18.9 mU/l +/- 6.1 vs 3.0 mU/l +/- 0.8 (P < 0.05). However, peak GH-responses to PD in combination with GHRH were reduced during HC (80 mg/day for 1 day) compared to no glucocorticoid pretreatment in all healthy adults. Conventional HC therapy (30 mg/day for 1 and 3 days) did not significantly affect peak GH-responses.

STUDY B

16 patients with suspected GH-deficiency (GHD) (seven with known ACTH-deficiency and nine with an intact pituitary-adrenal axis) were tested five times with the PD-GHRH test following no pretreatment or pretreatment with HC (30 mg/day and 80 mg/day for 1 and 3 days). Peak GH-responses were not significantly affected by conventional HC therapy (30 mg/day for 1 and 3 days). However, peak GH-responses to PD in combination with GHRH were reduced during HC (80 mg/day for 1 day) compared to no glucocorticoid pretreatment in all patients. Short-term hypocortisolism did not significantly affect peak GH-responses.

CONCLUSION

The GH-responses to a PD-GHRH test were reduced in all individuals during acute stress-appropriate cortisol levels and the percentage reduction in GH-levels was independent of the GH-secretory capacity. Clinically, we found that peak GH-responses were not significantly affected by a short break in conventional HC therapy nor by conventional HC therapy itself. However, our results also demonstrated that a GH-stimulation test should not be performed on patients, suffering from acute stress.

Recovery of growth hormone release from suppression by exogenous insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I): evidence for a suppressive action of free rather than bound IGF-I

To determine the time course of recovery of GH release from insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) suppression, 11 healthy adults (18-29 yr) received, in randomized order, 4-h i.v. infusions of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I; 3 microg/kg-h) or saline (control) from 25.5-29.5 h of a 47.5-h fast. Serum GH was maximally suppressed within 2 h and remained suppressed for 2 h after the rhIGF-I infusion; during this 4-h period, GH concentrations were approximately 25% of control day levels [median (interquartile range), 1.2 (0.4-4.0) vs. 4.8 (2.8-7.9) microg/L; P < 0.05]. A rebound increase in GH concentrations occurred 5-7 h after the end of rhIGF-I infusion [7.6 (4.6 -11.7) vs. 4.3 (2.5-6.0) microg/L; P < 0.05]. Thereafter, serum GH concentrations were similar on both days. Total IGF-I concentrations peaked at the end of the rhIGF-I infusion (432 +/- 43 vs. 263 +/- 44 microg/L; P < 0.0001) and remained elevated 18 h after the rhIGF-I infusion (360 +/- 36 vs. 202 +/- 23 microg/L; P = 0.001). Free IGF-I concentrations were approximately 140% above control day values at the end of the infusion (2.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 0.88 +/- 0.3 microg/L; P = 0.001), but declined to baseline within 2 h after the infusion. The close temporal association between the resolution of GH suppression and the fall of free IGF-I concentrations, and the lack of any association with total IGF-I concentrations suggest that unbound (free), not protein-bound, IGF-I is the major IGF-I component responsible for this suppression. The rebound increase in GH concentrations after the end of rhIGF-I infusion is consistent with cessation of an inhibitory effect of free IGF-I on GH release.

Regulatory mechanisms of growth hormone secretion are sexually dimorphic

Sexually dimorphic growth hormone (GH) secretory pattern is important in the determination of gender-specific patterns of growth and metabolism in rats. Whether GH secretion in humans is also sexually dimorphic and the neuroendocrine mechanisms governing this potential difference are not fully established. We have compared pulsatile GH secretion profiles in young men and women in the baseline state and during a continuous intravenous infusion of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I). During the baseline study, men had large nocturnal GH pulses and relatively small pulses during the rest of the day. In contrast, women had more continuous GH secretion and more frequent GH pulses that were of more uniform size. The infusion of rhIGF-I (10 microg/kg/h) potently suppressed both spontaneous and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH secretion in men. In women, however, rhIGF-I had less effect on pulsatile GH secretion and did not suppress the GH response to GHRH. These data demonstrate the existence of sexual dimorphism in the regulatory mechanisms involved in GH secretion in humans. The persistence of GH responses to GHRH in women suggests that negative feedback by IGF-I might be expressed, in part, through suppression of hypothalamic GHRH.

Albumin enhances sleep in the young rat

Rats 4 to 7 days after weaning received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of vehicle (baseline day), and either serum (2 mL of lyophilized rabbit serum), 140 mg of rat albumin, or hyperosmotic NaCl (experimental day). Injections were given 1 h before light onset. Sleep-wake activity and cortical brain temperature were recorded during the subsequent 12-h light period. The intensity of non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREMS) was characterized by the power density values of the electroencephalogram slow-wave activity. The sera and albumin preparations enhanced both NREMS and slow-wave activity for 5 to 6 h starting during Hour 2 after light onset. Rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) tended to decrease. Modest (0.6 degrees C maximum deviation) biphasic changes were observed in cortical brain temperature with initial decreases for 3 h followed by rises between Hours 3 and 9 of the light period. There were no differences in the sleep responses to albumin between male and female rats. Albumin also enhanced NREMS in young rats on a protein-rich diet. A significant negative correlation was found between the NREMS promoting activity of albumin injections and the body weight of the rats. NaCl solution with the same osmolarity as that of the albumin solution failed to alter sleep. I.p. albumin injection elicited significant increases in the concentrations of cholecystokinin-like immunoreactivity in the plasma. Sleep-promoting materials (hormones) in the albumin fraction, the calorigenic or nutritional value of proteins, the release of somnogenic cytokines by albumin, or endogenous humoral mechanisms stimulated by proteins (e.g., cholecystokinin or the somatotropic axis) might mediate the enhanced sleep after albumin.

Age-related variations in the neuroendocrine control, more than impaired receptor sensitivity, cause the reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs in human aging

The mechanisms underlying the reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs in aging are still unclear. Aim of our study was to verify in man whether age-related impairment of the neurohormonal control of GH secretion and/or receptor alterations are involved in the reduced GH response to GHRPs in aging. To this goal, in 16 normal elderly subjects (E, 66-81 yr) and 12 young controls (Y, 24-28 yr) we studied the effects of 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 micrograms/kg i.v. Hexarelin (HEX), a synthetic hexapeptide, or GHRH, as well as the interaction among HEX (2.0 micrograms/kg), GHRH (2.0 micrograms/kg) and arginine (ARG, 0.5 gr/kg) on GH secretion. In Y the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (1.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg; AUC0;v-120 +/- SEM: 1728.4 +/- 406.4 vs. 2265.9 +/- 298.4 vs. 2934.3 +/- 482.2 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2.0 micrograms/kg) and GHRH (649.6 +/- 111.4 vs. 792.2 +/- 117.6 vs. 1402.6 +/- 363.0 micrograms/L/h) showed a progressive increase. Two micrograms/kg HEX and 1 microgram/kg GHRH were the maximal effective doses. Similarly, in E the GH response to increasing doses of HEX (336.7 +/- 50.0 vs. 742.8 +/- 157.9 vs. 1205.1 +/- 178.1 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05 for 1.0 vs. 2 micrograms/kg, p < 0.001 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg and p < 0.03 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg) and GHRH (183.8 +/- 27.3 vs. 260.9 +/- 17.3 vs. 356.1 +/- 46.3 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.005 for 1.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg and p < 0.05 for 2.0 vs. 3.0 micrograms/kg) showed a progressive increase. In E the GH response to 3 micrograms/kg HEX or GHRH were clearly higher than those to 2 micrograms/kg. However, at each dose the GH responses to HEX or GHRH in E were lower (p < 0.05) than those in Y. In Y the GH response to HEX + GHRH was synergistical (4259.2 +/- 308.0 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05). ARG strikingly potentiated the GHRH-induced GH rise (2640.8 +/- 273.6 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) but not the HEX-induced one (2371.7 +/- 387.2 micrograms/L/h) as well as the synergistical effect of HEX and GHRH (4009.1 +/- 360.8 micrograms/L/h). In E the GH response to HEX and GHRH was still synergistical (1947.7 +/- 306.0 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05) but these responses were lower than those in young (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in E ARG restored the GH response to GHRH (1858.9 +/- 172.8 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) and even those to HEX (2069.5 +/- 528.7 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.01) and HEX + GHRH (4406.0 +/- 1079.2 micrograms/L/h, p < 0.05). Our present results indicate that the impairment of GHRP and GHRH receptor activity may have a role in the reduction of the somatotrope responsiveness in aging. However, the age-related reduction in the GH-releasing activity of GHRPs seems mainly dependent on age-related variations in the neural control, i.e. concomitant GHRH hypoactivity and somatostatinergic hyperactivity.

Variability in growth hormone stimulation tests

The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adulthood has become increasingly important because of the approved indication for growth hormone (GH) substitution therapy in such patients. While GH stimulation tests are superior to single measurements of other growth factors or spontaneous GH secretion in the diagnosis in adults, the reproducibility and specificity of GH stimulatory tests are often described to be low. This is also the case with the insulin tolerance test. Many external factors, such as fasting, physical activity, heat exposure and sleep, are known to influence GH secretion. The stimulatory or inhibitory effect of these factors on GH secretion might, therefore, influence the GH provocative test and contribute to the variability in response. Age and body composition are also known to influence GH secretion, and these factors must be considered when evaluating GH test responses. However, age-related cut-off levels for GHD have not been defined. Obesity is still a complicating factor in the diagnosis of GHD, even though some GH tests have been able to distinguish between obesity and true GHD. Based on these complicating factors, the parameters of GH stimulatory tests are recommended to be defined and standardized to optimize reproducibility and specificity. Furthermore, such tests should be performed only in patients with firm evidence of pituitary disease.

Plasma GH responses to GHRH, arginine, L-dopa, pyridostigmine, sequential administrations of GHRH and combined administration of PD and GHRH in Turner's syndrome

To investigate GH secretory capacities in patients with Turner's syndrome, GHRH, arginine, L-dopa and pyridostigmine (PD) were administered singly and GHRH was administered sequentially for 3 days. In addition, plasma GH and TSH responses to GHRH and TRH after pretreatment with PD were analyzed to investigate whether the hypothalamic cholinergic somatostatinergic system functioned normally. The maximal GH responses to GHRH, L-dopa and PD were significantly smaller in Turner's syndrome (no.=14) than in normal short children (NSC, no.=14). However, there was no difference in plasma GH responses to arginine between the two groups. In ten patients with Turner's syndrome, the plasma GH response to GHRH did not improve even after the sequential 3-day administrations. Although plasma GH and TSH responses to GHRH and TRH were significantly enhanced by the pretreatment of PD in NSC (no.=12), these responses were not enhanced in Turner's syndrome. Plasma GH response to GHRH in Turner's syndrome with normal body fat was still significantly lower than in NSC. It is therefore concluded that somatotroph sensitivity to GHRH is decreased in Turner's syndrome and that this may be due to the primary defects of the somatotrophs rather than to the increased body fat. In addition, the network of cholinergic-somatostatinergic systems seemed to be impaired in these patients, while the activity of hypothalamic somatostatin neurons was thought to be maintained.

Pharmacological testing for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency

Evaluation of growth hormone (GH) secretion using pharmacological GH stimulation tests (GHSTs) remains current practice, although the reliability of GHSTs has been questioned and many pitfalls have been pointed out. We have analysed all the 6,373 GHSTs which led to the initiation of GH therapy in 3,233 children treated in France from 1973 to 1989. Eleven different pharmacological tests were used, and 62 out of the 66 theoretical pairs of tests were used at least once. The most frequent combination of tests was used in 12.7% of patients. Reliability of GH peak measured by comparing the results of two tests in the same patient was poor, as measured by intraclass correlation coefficients (all under 0.8). Multivariate analysis identified several parameters positively or negatively associated with peak plasma GH. We believe that several of these factors (i.e. weight standard deviation score (SDS), genetic target height SDS and nature of the agent) identify biases in the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD). In addition, we re-evaluated GH secretion in 208 young adults formerly treated with GH for childhood onset GHD. Peak plasma was superior or equal to 10 ng/ml in 81% of patients with former idiopathic GHD. We conclude that the current use of GHSTs as well as the criteria for idiopathic childhood GHD should be questioned.

L-arginine and insulin-tolerance tests in the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency: influence of confounding factors

OBJECTIVE

In the attempt to define a GH stimulation test with high specificity and reproductibility, few studies have addressed the influence of potential interfering external factors on the test result. We therefore tested the influence of physical activity (admission to hospital on test morning) and mild heat exposure on the GH response to L-arginine stimulation test (Arg) and insulin-tolerance test (ITT).

DESIGN

One Arg stimulation test and one ITT were performed in all subjects during standard conditions (overnight hospital stay, 10 hours fasting). In addition, each subject was randomized to undergo either two additional Arg tests, or two ITTs, performed under two different conditions: admission to hospital on the morning of the test and during standard conditions except for heat exposure before testing. The four tests were performed in random order.

PATIENTS

Twenty-two patients (six women, 16 men) (mean age +/- SEM, 38.3 +/- 5.3 years and 36.1 +/- 2.7 years, respectively) presenting with pituitary disease and a group of healthy age and gender-matched normal subjects (six women, 13 men) (age 38.3 +/- 4.8 years and 35.7 +/- 2.4 years, respectively) participated.

MEASUREMENTS

During the GH-stimulation tests serum GH, cortisol, blood glucose, and plasma glucagon were measured and compared in the three different test conditions.

RESULTS

During standard conditions, peak GH response was higher in the ITT compared to the Arg test in the control group (23.4 +/- 3.6 mU/l vs 11.6 +/- 2.0 mU/l, P = 0.004), and the specificity of the ITT was higher (18/19 versus 13/19, P = 0.047). Minor heat exposure before the ITT (temperature rise 0.24 +/- 0.05 degrees C, range 0.0-0.5 degrees C) did not change the GH response in the healthy adults whereas admission to hospital on the morning of the test reduced the GH response significantly (P < 0.05). The lowest blood glucose did not change in the three situations and did not correlate with peak GH during the ITT. In the patients there were no significant differences between the GH response during different conditions. Plasma glucagon did not significantly differ between the different test conditions in the control group (P = 0.88), but there was a significant decrease in the glucagon response to the test performed after hospital admission on the test morning in the patients (P < 0.025). Serum cortisol response in the control group did not differ in the three situations.

CONCLUSIONS

Since provocative GH responses are influenced by external factors, conditions should be standardized to optimize the reproductibility and specificity of the tests. Furthermore the higher specificity of the insulin-tolerance test as compared to the arginine stimulation test was confirmed.