Apixaban compared with warfarin to prevent thrombosis in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: a randomized trial

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: A prospective observational analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome remains uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on APS patients with VTE treated with VKAs or DOACs in a tertiary hospital from 2010 to 2023. Clinical characteristics, recurrent arterial or VTE events, and hemorrhagic complications were analyzed over a one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty APS patients were included: 31 (62%) treated with VKAs and 19 (38%) with DOACs. Thrombotic recurrences occurred in 5 VKA patients (16.1%) and 3 DOAC patients (15.8%). Major bleeding occurred in 2 VKA patients (6.45%) and none in the DOAC group. There were no significant differences in thrombotic recurrence (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.19-5.46) or major bleeding (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.14-8.52) between groups.

CONCLUSION

In APS patients with VTE, DOACs showed similar rates of recurrent thrombosis and major bleeding compared to VKAs. Future studies should therefore focus on the role of DOACs in APS patients with varying clinical and serological profiles.

2024 Guideline for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

AIM

The "2024 Guideline for the Primary Prevention of Stroke" replaces the 2014 "Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke." This updated guideline is intended to be a resource for clinicians to use to guide various prevention strategies for individuals with no history of stroke.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2014 guideline; derived from research involving human participants published in English; and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected and relevant databases was conducted between May and November 2023. Other documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association were also reviewed.

STRUCTURE

Ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes lead to significant disability but, most important, are preventable. The 2024 primary prevention of stroke guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for strategies to prevent stroke throughout the life span. These recommendations align with the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 for optimizing cardiovascular and brain health, in addition to preventing incident stroke. We also have added sex-specific recommendations for screening and prevention of stroke, which are new compared with the 2014 guideline. Many recommendations for similar risk factor prevention were updated, new topics were reviewed, and recommendations were created when supported by sufficient-quality published data.

Changes in Time in Therapeutic Range Within a Warfarin Anticoagulation Clinic Following Introduction of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Background: As direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become widely recommended as first-line anticoagulation therapy, patients who remain on warfarin are likely those unable to afford, adhere to, or utilize DOAC therapy due to the presence of a contraindication. It is currently unknown how availability of DOACs have affected populations being managed at warfarin (VKA) anticoagulation clinics. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review assessing warfarin-treated patients at an outpatient anticoagulation clinic. The primary endpoint was the 6-month time in therapeutic range (TTR) before and after DOACs were recommended as first-line therapy by clinical guidelines. Study periods were January to June 2015, before DOACs were recommended over VKA, and January to June 2022, when DOACs were often recommended over VKA. TTR, demographic changes, and the presence of contraindications to DOAC therapy in the clinic population between the two time periods were assessed. Results: No difference in 6-month TTR was observed between study periods (59% in 2015 vs 63% in 2022; P = .45). Patient demographics did not significantly vary, which may be due to the clinic retaining 45% of patients between both time periods. Contraindications to DOAC therapy were identified in 39% of the 2015 group and 49% of the 2022 group (P = .18). The most common contraindication was indication for anticoagulation. Conclusion: Availability of DOACs did not seem to significantly affect the population or management of warfarin-treated patients at an outpatient anticoagulation clinic, however, contraindications and potential challenges to use of DOAC therapy are present in many patients.

Impact of thrombophilia on venous thromboembolism management

Hypercoagulable states, also called thrombophilia, can either be congenital or acquired. Congenital thrombophilia, associated mainly with venous thrombosis, is either secondary to coagulation-inhibitor deficiencies, i.e., antithrombin, protein C and Protein S, or gain of function mutations, i.e., factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations. Despite the relative frequency of these two mutations, they have not been associated with venous thrombosis recurrence. Most prevalent thrombophilia have a limited impact and usually does not change indications for duration of antithrombotic treatment or prophylaxis compared to decisions based on clinical factors. However, rare inherited thrombophilia such as antithrombin deficiency could justify a long-term anticoagulation. The main acquired thrombophilia, the Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), is associated with both arterial and venous thrombosis. Its impact on patient management is significant: choice of the anticoagulant (DOAC vs. warfarin), duration of anticoagulation, screening of any organ involvement and systemic autoimmune disease, introduction of immunosuppressive therapy.

The Emerging Role of Long Noncoding RNAs in Sorafenib Resistance Within Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a liver cancer originating from hepatocytes, is a major health concern and among the most common malignancies worldwide. Sorafenib, approved by the U.S. F.D.A., is the primary first-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. While the preferred first-line systemic regimen for HCC is immunotherapy with Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Tremelimumab-actl + durvalumab, Sorafenib is still an alternative recommended regimen. While some patients with advanced HCC may benefit from Sorafenib treatment, most eventually develop resistance, leading to poor prognosis. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been found to play a critical role in tumorigenesis and the development of HCC, as well as other cancers. They are also key players in tumor drug resistance, though the mechanisms of lncRNAs in Sorafenib resistance in HCC remain poorly understood. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms contributing to Sorafenib resistance in HCC with their potential correlation with lncRNAs, including the roles of transporters, receptors, cell death regulation, and other influencing factors.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Quick Primer on When to Use and When to Avoid

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have transformed the landscape of antithrombotic therapy in the past two decades. However, there is uncertainty about when they should or should not be used for treatment or prevention of thromboembolic events. DOACs have largely replaced warfarin for many patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism who require anticoagulant therapy. In addition to noninferior efficacy, fewer drug-drug and food-drug interactions and improved convenience; DOACs have been shown to reduce the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. They have also received new indications compared with warfarin, such as cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with stable atherosclerotic diseases. However, there are some scenarios in which DOACs are associated with inferior efficacy or worse safety compared with standard treatment, such as warfarin. These include patients with mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and others. Although DOACs offer a streamlined and convenient option for the management of many patients with or at risk of thromboembolic events, their use should be avoided in certain high-risk scenarios. This minireview summarizes such conditions and those in which there is uncertainty for use of DOACs for particular diseases or particular patient subgroups.

Clinical Practice Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 2024 Update

Herein we present the update for the Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. It involves the participation of several experts along the country, following the GRADE system. We included aspects regarding vaccines, pregnancy and cardiovascular risk which were not presented in the previous guidelines in 2017.

Monitoring anti-factor Xa activity in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with factor Xa inhibitors

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used clinically in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) for secondary prevention after acute venous thromboembolism, although the data are limited. We evaluated the effects of DOACs-especially factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors-by measuring anti-factor Xa activity (AXA). Fifty consecutive CTEPH patients treated with rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban were enrolled. Heparin-calibrated AXA was measured at peak and trough. The median peak heparin-calibrated AXA across all 50 patients was 1.90 IU/mL and was comparable among the three FXa inhibitors. At trough, heparin-calibrated AXA was significantly higher in apixaban-treated patients (median 0.70 IU/mL) than in those given rivaroxaban (median 0.11 IU/mL) or edoxaban (median 0.11 IU/mL, p < 0.001). Peak heparin-calibrated AXA was significantly lower with reduced-dosage FXa inhibitor (edoxaban 30 mg/day) than with the reference dosage (edoxaban 60 mg/day, apixaban 10 mg/day, or rivaroxaban 15 mg/day, p = 0.01). The heparin-calibrated AXA of both rivaroxaban and apixaban was strongly significantly correlated with the plasma concentration of each drug. The cumulative rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was significantly higher in patients with peak heparin-calibrated AXA ≥ 2.09 IU/mL. Heparin-calibrated AXA could provide useful information for treating CTEPH patients with FXa inhibitors.

Hematological causes of acute ischemic stroke in younger individuals

Ischemic stroke is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The majority of affected individuals are older, with clear cardiovascular or embolic risk factors; however, up to a fifth of cases may occur in patients under the age of 50 years. In this review, we discuss some common hematological causes of ischemic stroke in this age range, with a focus on antiphospholipid syndrome, myeloproliferative neoplasms, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and sickle cell disease. We review the etiology of stroke associated with these conditions and explore important management considerations that may be unique to these settings. These include the choice of antithrombotic agents, cytoreduction in myeloproliferative neoplasms, management of thrombocytopenia in immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and treatment of sickle cell disease.

Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulation in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Time in Therapeutic Range and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome is still frequently treated with vitamin K antagonists, with a target international normalized ratio of 2-3. Time in therapeutic range of international normalized ratio of ≥ 70% is considered optimal. Time in therapeutic range among antiphospholipid syndrome patients is not well documented and the clinical consequences of poor international normalized ratio control are uncertain. This study aimed to determine the proportion of vitamin K antagonist-treated antiphospholipid syndrome patients achieving time in therapeutic range ≥ 70%, to define the features associated with poor control and to determine its association with thrombotic and bleeding events.

METHODS

This medical records review included antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonists, between 2012-2023. The proportion of patients achieving a time in therapeutic range ≥ 70% was determined, and thrombotic and bleeding events were compared between patients with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70% vs < 70%.

RESULTS

Sixty seven antiphospholipid syndrome patients were studied. It was observed that 29.9% achieved time in therapeutic range ≥ 70% and 9.1% of patients with 3 or more comorbidities achieved time in therapeutic range values ≥ 70% compared with 40% of patients with less than 3 comorbidities. Fewer recurrent arterial and overall thrombotic events occurred with time in therapeutic range ​​≥ 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with vitamin K antagonists achieve optimal anticoagulation and are at risk for recurrent thrombotic events, particularly arterial. Presence of multiple comorbidities is associated with poor international normalized ratio control. Careful monitoring of this patient population is warranted.

Ten tips to manage oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). While general treatment strategies for AF may largely be transferred to patients with mild to moderate CKD, patients with advanced CKD-particularly hemodialysis (HD) patients-with AF pose substantial therapeutical challenges to cardiologists and nephrologists. The arguably greatest dilemma is the very limited evidence on appropriate strategies for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in HD patients with AF, since the risk for both thromboembolic events without oral anticoagulation and severe bleeding events with oral anticoagulation are substantially increased in advanced CKD, compared with the general population. Thus, the benefit to risk ratio of either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants is less evident in HD than in non-CKD patients with AF. As a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, we here propose 10 tips that may help our colleagues to navigate between the risk of undertreatment-exposing CKD patients with AF to a high stroke risk-and overtreatment-exposing the very same patients to a prohibitively high bleeding risk. These tips include ideas on alternative risk stratification strategies and novel treatment approaches that are currently in clinical studies-such as factor XI inhibitors or left atrial appendage closure-and may become game-changers for HD patients with AF.

Rethinking the use of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are at high risk for recurrent thrombosis, and indefinite anticoagulation is recommended. Patients with APS merit indefinite anticoagulation, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have historically been the standard treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) present an appealing alternative to VKAs. Due to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, DOACs offer advantages over VKAs, namely the lack of need for laboratory monitoring, the usage of a fixed dosage, and the absence of significant interaction with dietary components and drugs. The efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with APS have been studied in four phase II/III clinical trials (three with rivaroxaban and one with apixaban). These studies showed DOACs' inferiority compared to VKAs in preventing recurrent thrombosis. Recurrence was significantly greater in patients with arterial thrombotic events and a triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies. No differences were observed in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between both groups. Major bleeding was similar in patients treated with DOACs or VKAs. Several observational studies have reported similar results. This review aims to analyse the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for secondary prevention in patients with APS.

Characteristics and prognosis of elderly-onset antiphospholipid syndrome: An observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease mainly affecting young individuals. Testing for antiphospholipid antibodies is recommended for young patients who are suspected to have APS. Yet, it is hard to differentiate APS from other acquired thrombophilia disorders in elderly-onset APS patients. This study aim to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of elderly-onset APS.

METHODS

This is an observational cohort study. Thrombotic APS patients who underwent follow-ups between 2009 and 2022 were included. Elderly-onset APS patients (onset age ≥60 years) were compared to non-elderly-onset APS patients (onset age <60 years) and matched cases of elderly non-APS patients (age ≥60 years with thrombosis).

RESULTS

A total of 161 APS patients were included in this study, 45 (28.0%) were elderly-onset APS. Stroke (35.6% vs. 18.1%, p = .018) was more common at disease onset in elderly-onset APS patients. Compared to non-elderly-onset patients, elderly-onset APS patients were associated with a higher number of cardiovascular risk factors. Elderly-onset APS patients showed significantly lower positive rate (51.1% vs. 71.6%, p = .014) and ratios [1.24 (1.01-1.38) vs. 1.37 (1.16-1.77), p = .004] of lupus anticoagulant. Elderly-onset APS patients had a significantly higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality (p < .001) and APS-related mortality than non-elderly-onset patients (p = .002) and elderly non-APS patients (p = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly-onset APS patients have unique disease characteristics with higher 10-years cumulative all-cause mortality and APS-related mortality. Early recognition and control of comorbidities may reduce the recurrence of thrombosis and mortality in elderly-onset APS patients.

Management of Patients Receiving Anticoagulation Therapy in Dental Practice: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant drugs are a valuable tool for minimizing thrombotic risks in at-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to conduct a literature review highlighting the management of these drugs during daily clinical dental practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We limited our search to English-language papers published between 1 January 1989, and 7 March 2024, in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science that were relevant to our topic. In the search approach, the Boolean keywords "anticoagulant AND dentistry" were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-five clinical trials were included for final review from 623 articles obtained from the databases Web of Science (83), PubMed (382), and Scopus (158), eliminating duplicates and 79 off-topic items, resulting in 419 articles after removing 315 entries and confirming eligibility. Overall, these studies support the use of local hemostatic measures to manage the risk of bleeding in patients on anticoagulant therapy undergoing dental procedures and highlight the importance of greater education and collaboration among healthcare professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Research and clinical investigation have improved understanding and management of dental procedures in patients undergoing anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. Hemostatic agents, clinical protocols, risk factors, and continuous education are essential for navigating the complexities of anticoagulant therapy, ensuring optimal outcomes and enhancing patient well-being.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: From guidelines to clinical management

Thrombotic manifestations, mainly venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke, are the most common and potentially life-threatening presentations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The management of APS requires the assessment of the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) profile, of concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases and the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and bleeding. Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) remains the cornerstone of therapy for thrombotic APS. As platelets play a central role in APS, low-dose aspirin is the first option for primary thromboprophylaxis in asymptomatic aPL carriers, and also plays a role as combination therapy with VKAs in arterial thrombosis. Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be considered in certain low-risk situations, although they are not recommended in patients with arterial thrombosis or triple positive aPL. Adjuvant therapies such as hydroxychloroquine and statins may be useful in complex settings such as thrombotic recurrences or high risk of bleeding. In this article, we review the evidence and the recommendations of the guidelines for the treatment of APS, and provide a critical and practical approach of its management from our clinical perspective.

Antiphospholipid syndrome with major arterial thrombosis, presenting as pulmonary thromboembolism, cerebrovascular accident, and coronary artery disease: A case report and literature review

Antiphospholipid syndrome is an immunopathologic disorder that should be considered in all patients with recurrent and/or unexplained thromboembolic events. Antiphospholipid antibodies are diagnostic markers, and anticoagulation therapy is the therapeutic and preventive strategy. Long-term anticoagulation therapy is necessary, with careful attention to potential bleeding complications.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Pregnancy: Current Understanding and Management Strategies

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) represents a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by microvascular thrombosis and end-organ damage. Pregnancy-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (p-TMA) has emerged as a distinct clinical entity with unique diagnostic challenges. Identifying the specific form of p-TMA is critical for appropriate and timely management. This review offers a comprehensive overview of the various forms of thrombotic microangiopathies associated with pregnancy, highlighting our current understanding of their pathophysiology and the evolving landscape of diagnosis and treatment for each.

Dilemmas in the diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombosis (which may be venous, arterial, or microvascular) and/or pregnancy morbidity in association with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. Although thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity are the main clinical criteria for a diagnosis of APS in the revised Sapporo (Sydney) criteria, recently published American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for APS have significantly refined the diagnostic algorithm to include a scoring system clustered into 6 clinical domains (macrovascular venous thromboembolism, macrovascular arterial thrombosis, microvascular thrombosis, obstetric, cardiac valve, and hematologic). Diagnosis of APS is complicated by the fact that significant heterogeneity exists in patients' clinical presentation, underlying vascular risk factors, and methods of detecting antiphospholipid antibodies. Despite the autoimmune nature of APS, anticoagulation remains the main strategy for secondary prevention of thrombosis. Furthermore, optimal antithrombotic treatment in APS patients with arterial thrombosis remains controversial due to a paucity of data from randomized controlled studies. In this paper, we present 2 cases and highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges they pose and how we approach them in the light of current evidence.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a complex systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by a hypercoagulable state, leading to severe vascular thrombosis and obstetric complications. The 2023 ACR/EULAR guidelines have revolutionized the classification and understanding of APS, introducing broader diagnostic criteria that encompass previously overlooked cardiac, renal, and hematologic manifestations. Despite these advancements, diagnosing APS remains particularly challenging in seronegative patients, where traditional tests fail, yet clinical symptoms persist. Emerging non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies offer promising new diagnostic and management avenues for these patients. Managing APS involves a strategic balance of cardiovascular risk mitigation and long-term anticoagulation therapy, though the use of direct oral anticoagulants remains contentious due to varying efficacy and safety profiles. This article delves into the intricate pathogenesis of APS, explores the latest classification criteria, and evaluates cutting-edge diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies.

Rivaroxaban for stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (RISAPS): protocol for a randomized controlled, phase IIb proof-of-principle trial

Background

Optimal secondary prevention antithrombotic therapy for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain injury is undefined. The standard of care, warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists at standard or high intensity (international normalized ratio (INR) target range 2.0-3.0/3.0-4.0, respectively), has well-recognized limitations. Direct oral anticoagulants have several advantages over warfarin, and the potential role of high-dose direct oral anticoagulants vs high-intensity warfarin in this setting merits investigation.

Objectives

The Rivaroxaban for Stroke patients with APS trial (RISAPS) seeks to determine whether high-dose rivaroxaban could represent a safe and effective alternative to high-intensity warfarin in adult patients with APS and previous ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other ischemic brain manifestations.

Methods

This phase IIb prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority, open-label, proof-of-principle trial compares rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily vs warfarin, target INR range 3.0-4.0. The sample size target is 40 participants. Triple antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients are excluded. The primary efficacy outcome is the rate of change in brain white matter hyperintensity volume on magnetic resonance imaging, a surrogate marker of presumed ischemic damage, between baseline and 24 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include additional neuroradiological and clinical measures of efficacy and safety. Exploratory outcomes include high-dose rivaroxaban pharmacokinetic modeling.

Conclusion

Should RISAPS demonstrate noninferior efficacy and safety of high-dose rivaroxaban in this APS subgroup, it could justify larger prospective randomized controlled trials.

Elucidating the Neuropsychiatric Phenomena of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a 31-Year-Old Female

We present an unusual case of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a 31-year-old female patient exhibiting neuropsychiatric manifestations, followed by a subsequent thromboembolic stroke. APS is characterized by antiphospholipid antibodies leading to a prothrombotic state and an increased risk of thrombotic events. While the neurological involvement in APS typically presents with thrombotic events, antiphospholipid antibodies may also directly interact with neural tissue, causing immediate pathogenic effects that disrupt normal function. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in APS are rare but have been documented previously, including cases of psychosis and hallucinations. The timely recognition of APS in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms is crucial for appropriate management and the prevention of further complications. The reported patient displayed aggressive, bizarre, and erratic behavior upon admission to the psychiatric unit, followed by the development of right-sided facial droop and weakness. Imaging studies revealed stenosis and partial occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA), and a repeat scan showed a known left MCA territory infarct with increasing hypodensity in specific brain regions. Notably, the patient exhibited multiple purpuric ecchymoses on bilateral upper extremities, raising suspicion of a hypercoagulable state. Laboratory investigations detected elevated levels of anticardiolipin IgG and beta-2 glycoprotein 1 IgG, along with a positive antinuclear antibody. The presence of a patent foramen ovale was also confirmed through echocardiography. This case emphasizes the importance of early APS recognition in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, facilitating appropriate intervention and improved outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms connecting APS to neuropsychiatric manifestations, enabling enhanced understanding and refined management of this intricate condition.

Apixaban Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients With Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Current guidelines recommend that direct anticoagulants should not be used in prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, except for triple-positive APS and rivaroxaban use, little evidence supports such recommendation. In a real-life cohort study, we evaluated the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with APS on apixaban versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We enrolled 152 patients with APS (aged 44 years [interquartile range 36-56], 83% women), including 66 patients treated with apixaban 5 mg bid and 86 with warfarin (target international normalized ratio [INR] 2-3). During a median follow-up of 53 months, we recorded venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, along with major bleeding. We observed 4 thrombotic events (6.1%, 3 venous thromboembolism and 1 ischemic stroke) in patients on apixaban and 12 events (14%, 9 venous thromboembolism, 2 ischemic strokes and 1 myocardial infarction) in VKA patients. Patients with APS on apixaban had similar risk of recurrent thromboembolism compared with those on warfarin (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.327, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.104-1.035). Thromboembolic events occurred less commonly in statin users (8% vs. 50%, P = 0.01) and more frequently in triple-positive APS (50% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.028) and in patients with higher D-dimer at baseline ( P = 0.023); the latter difference was present in the apixaban group ( P = 0.02). Patients on apixaban had similar risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.201-1.448). In real-life patients with APS, apixaban appears to be similar to VKA for the prevention of thromboembolism and risk of bleeding, which might suggest that some patients with APS could be treated with apixaban.

Neurovascular Issues in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Arterial Vasculopathy from Small to Large Vessels in a Neuroradiological Perspective

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune prothrombotic condition characterized by venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and pregnancy morbidity. Among neurological manifestations, arterial thrombosis is only one of the possible associated clinical and neuroradiological features. The aim of this review is to address from a neurovascular point of view the multifaceted range of the arterial side of APS. A modern neurovascular approach was proposed, dividing the CNS involvement on the basis of the size of affected arteries, from large to small arteries, and corresponding clinical and neuroradiological issues. Both large-vessel and small-vessel involvement in APS were detailed, highlighting the limitations of the available literature in the attempt to derive some pathomechanisms. APS is a complex disease, and its neurological involvement appears multifaceted and not yet fully characterized, within and outside the diagnostic criteria. The involvement of intracranial large and small vessels appears poorly characterized, and the overlapping with the previously proposed inflammatory manifestations is consistent.

When anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation becomes difficult: Focus on chronic kidney disease, coagulation disorders, and cancer

Anticoagulation therapy (AT) is fundamental in atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment but poses challenges in implementation, especially in AF populations with elevated thromboembolic and bleeding risks. Current guidelines emphasize the need to estimate and balance thrombosis and bleeding risks for all potential candidates of antithrombotic therapy. However, administering oral AT raises concerns in specific populations, such as those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), coagulation disorders, and cancer due to lack of robust data. These groups, excluded from large direct oral anticoagulants trials, rely on observational studies, prompting physicians to adopt individualized management strategies based on case-specific evaluations. The scarcity of evidence and specific guidelines underline the need for a tailored approach, emphasizing regular reassessment of risk factors and anticoagulation drug doses. This narrative review aims to summarize evidence and recommendations for challenging AF clinical scenarios, particularly in the long-term management of AT for patients with CKD, coagulation disorders, and cancer.

Factor Xa inhibitors vs. warfarin in patients with Hughes syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The optimal treatment regimen for patients with Hughes syndrome remains unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of warfarin vs. factor Xa inhibitors in patients with Hughes syndrome.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing 8 efficacy and safety of warfarin and factor Xa inhibitors in patients with Hughes syndrome. Recurrent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, stroke, adverse reactions, and bleeding were among 10 outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate 11 relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs.

Results

The analysis included 625 patients from four RCTs and one post-hoc analysis. Meta-analysis showed a statistically non-significant difference between factor Xa inhibitors and warfarin in the recurrent thrombosis risk (arterial or venous) [RR 2.77 (95%, CI 0.79, 9.65); P=0.11, I2=50%]. Consistent results were revealed among patients with a previous history of arterial thrombosis [RR 2.76 (95% CI 0.93, 8.16); P=0.75, I2=0%], venous thrombosis [RR 1.71 (95% CI 0.60, 4.84); P=0.31, I2=15%] and patients who were triple antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positive [RR 4.12 (95% CI 0.46, 37.10); 21 P=0.21, I2=58%]. Factor Xa inhibitors were significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke [RR 8.51 (95% CI 2.35, 13.82); P=0.47, I2=0%].

Conclusion

Factor Xa inhibitors exhibited an increased risk of stroke among patients with Hughes syndrome. In addition, although not significant, the higher RRs among patients on factor Xa inhibitors may indicate a higher risk of thrombotic events associated with factor Xa inhibitors.

Direct oral anticoagulants for treatment of venous thrombosis: illustrated review of appropriate use

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the preferred option for treatment of venous thromboembolism due to their favorable profile compared with other agents such as vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparin. However, findings from randomized controlled trials suggest efficacy and/or safety concerns with DOAC use in some clinical contexts. This illustrated review will summarize indications where DOACs have proven efficacy and safety, situations where they fall short, and situations where uncertainty remains compared with other treatments for venous thromboembolism.

Low recurrent thrombosis rates in single positive antiphospholipid syndrome regardless of type of anticoagulation

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by thrombosis and persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Triple-positive APS has the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, but no studies have focused on recurrent thrombosis in patients with single-positive TAPS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with single-positive TAPS diagnosed at Lifespan Health System, Rhode Island, to determine the rates and risk factors for recurrent thrombosis. Between January 2001 and April 2022, 128 patients were assessed who had single-positive APS (LAC = 98, aCL = 21, aβ2GPI = 9) and who had been followed for a total of 1453.8 patient-years (median follow-up 3.04 years). The initial antithrombotic regimen was warfarin in 44 %, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 34 %, enoxaparin in 2 %, and no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet therapy only in 20 %. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 16 (12.5 %) with a recurrent thrombosis rate of 3.08 per 100 patient-years. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the only variable significantly associated with recurrent thrombosis in a model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and type of positive APS test. All 16 patients with recurrent thrombosis were initially treated with warfarin, and, at the time of recurrent thrombosis, 13 patients remained on warfarin and three were off anticoagulation. In conclusion, the recurrent thrombosis rate in single-positive APS is low, and not all patients with a single-positive test may need indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this finding and establish optimal anticoagulation regimens for low-risk TAPS.

Diagnosis and Management of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cerebral venous thrombosis accounts for 0.5% to 3% of all strokes. The most vulnerable populations include young individuals, women of reproductive age, and patients with a prothrombotic state. The clinical presentation of cerebral venous thrombosis is diverse (eg, headaches, seizures), requiring a high level of clinical suspicion. Its diagnosis is based primarily on magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance venography or computed tomography/computed tomographic venography. The clinical course of cerebral venous thrombosis may be difficult to predict. Death or dependence occurs in 10% to 15% of patients despite intensive medical treatment. This scientific statement provides an update of the 2011 American Heart Association scientific statement for the diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis. Our focus is on advances in the diagnosis and management decisions of patients with suspected cerebral venous thrombosis. We discuss evidence for the use of anticoagulation and endovascular therapies and considerations for craniectomy. We also provide an algorithm to optimize the management of patients with cerebral venous thrombosis and those with progressive neurological deterioration or thrombus propagation despite maximal medical therapy.

Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism for the general physician

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Vintage Victory: Warfarin Versus Apixaban in the Antiphospholipid Arena

This case report explores the efficacy of warfarin compared to apixaban in managing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), an autoimmune disorder characterized by recurrent thrombosis. We emphasize the constraints of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as apixaban in APS management. This case discusses a 41-year-old female patient with APS who did not respond to apixaban therapy. The report details her transition to warfarin, resulting in symptom resolution and no further complications, thus alluding to warfarin's effectiveness in APS management over apixaban. The case contributes to the ongoing debate on the suitability of modern DOACs in APS treatment.

Anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant therapy in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: old drugs and new treatment targets

In this review, we discuss the current evidence on classic and newer oral anticoagulant therapy, older drugs such as HCQ and statins, and new potential treatment targets in APS. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the cornerstone treatment for thrombotic events in APS. In patients fulfilling criteria for definite APS presenting with a first venous thrombosis, treatment with VKAs with a target international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0 is recommended. In patients with arterial thrombosis, treatment with VKA with target INR 2.0-3.0 or 3.0-4.0 is recommended by recent guidelines, considering the individual's bleeding and thrombosis recurrence risk. A combination of VKAs and low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/daily) may also be considered. According to available evidence direct oral anticoagulants should be avoided in patients with arterial thrombosis and/or those with triple aPL positivity. Adjunctive treatment with HCQ and/or statins can be considered, especially in anticoagulation treatment-refractory APS. Potential targeted treatments in APS include B-cell targeting, complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, IFN targeting, adenosine receptors agonists, CD38 targeting or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. The safety and efficacy of these treatment targets needs to be examined in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

For most patients, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for venous thromboembolism treatment. However, randomized controlled trials suggest that DOACs may not be as efficacious or as safe as the current standard of care in conditions such as mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic heart disease. DOACs do not provide a net benefit in conditions such as embolic stroke of undetermined source. Their efficacy is uncertain for conditions such as left ventricular thrombus, catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and for patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thrombosis who have end-stage renal disease. This paper provides an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials on DOACs, detailing when they have demonstrated efficacy and safety, when DOACs should not be the standard of care, where their safety and efficacy are uncertain, and areas requiring further research.

Ischaemic stroke in a patient with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) despite non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy

Primary stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is primarily with non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) therapy. However, 20-36% of ischaemic strokes seem to occur in patients with atrial fibrillation while already on anticoagulation. We present a case of an ischaemic stroke in an elderly female in her 70s with medical history significant for hypertension and NVAF. She had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 and was on apixaban for thromboprophylaxis. She presented with neurological deficits consistent with a left middle cerebral artery stroke, confirmed via head imaging; the most likely stroke aetiology was determined to be cardioembolic in the setting of NVAF. She was treated with continuation of her apixaban at the same dosage She displayed improved function, although with residual expressive aphasia at her 2-month neurology follow-up. Cardioembolic ischaemic stroke in NVAF despite current NOAC therapy does not have current management guidelines.

Choice and Duration of Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent medical condition with high morbidity, mortality, and associated costs. Anticoagulation remains the main treatment for VTE, though the decision on when, how, and for how long to administer anticoagulants is increasingly complex. This review highlights the different phases of VTE management, with special circumstances for consideration such as antiphospholipid syndrome, coronary artery disease, cancer-associated thrombus, COVID-19, and future anticoagulation options. Anticoagulation management will continue to be a complex decision, applying evidence-based medicine to individual patients with the hope of maximizing effectiveness while minimizing risks.

How to diagnose and manage antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoimmune antibodies directed toward phospholipids or phospholipid-protein complexes, particularly those containing β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI). Persistently positive aPL accompanied by arterial or venous thrombosis, or recurrent pregnancy loss, constitutes the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Several types of aPL with different specificities have been defined and may be detected in the clinical lab, including lupus anticoagulants (detected using clotting assays) and anticardiolipin, anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin/phosphatidylserine antibodies (detected by ELISA); each of the last 3 aPL may be either IgG, IgM, or IgA, though IgA antibodies are not included in criteria for APS. Due to the relative rarity of APS and the heterogeneity of aPL, thrombosis risk stratification is challenging, and randomized clinical trials for thrombosis treatment and prevention have been limited. This lack of high-quality data has made the clinical management of APS difficult, and existing guidelines are few and could not possibly cover many of the scenarios encountered in managing patients with APS. In this review, we present 3 patients with aPL and/or APS who highlight treatment dilemmas, and we discuss background information that may help guide clinical judgment in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with these enigmatic antibodies.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Arterial Thrombosis and Thromboembolism in COVID-19: An American College of Chest Physicians Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

Evidence increasingly shows that the risk of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 is associated with a hypercoagulable state. Several organizations have released guidelines for the management of COVID-19-related coagulopathy and prevention of VTE. However, an urgent need exists for practical guidance on the management of arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism in this setting.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the current available evidence informing the prevention and management of arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A group of approved panelists developed key clinical questions by using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) format that address urgent clinical questions regarding prevention and management of arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19. Using MEDLINE via PubMed, a literature search was conducted and references were screened for inclusion. Data from included studies were summarized and reviewed by the panel. Consensus for the direction and strength of recommendations was achieved using a modified Delphi survey.

RESULTS

The review and analysis of the literature based on 11 PICO questions resulted in 11 recommendations. Overall, a low quality of evidence specific to the population with COVID-19 was found. Consequently, many of the recommendations were based on indirect evidence and prior guidelines in similar populations without COVID-19.

INTERPRETATION

The existing evidence and panel consensus do not suggest a major departure from the management of arterial thrombosis according to recommendations predating the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on the optimal strategies for prevention and management of arterial thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 are sparse. More high-quality evidence is needed to inform management strategies in these patients.

Embolic myocardial infarction with cardiac arrest as an initial manifestation of non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis, characterised by sterile vegetations, is commonly caused by systemic lupus erythematosus and is known to be complicated with embolic cerebrovascular disease. Embolic myocardial infarction with non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis is extremely rare. We report a case of ventricular fibrillation arrest from presumed coronary embolisation in non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis. While there are no standardised guidelines on the management of embolic myocardial infarction in endocarditis, it requires a multidisciplinary approach unique for every encountered clinical scenario.

Factor XI inhibitors for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: A new therapeutic approach on the horizon?

Anticoagulant drugs that are currently used to prevent and/or treat thrombosis have some limitations that hinder their ability to meet specific clinical requirements. While these drugs effectively reduce the rates of thrombotic events, they simultaneously increase the risk of bleeding. Moreover, their risk-to-benefit balance is problematic in some patients, such as those with severe chronic kidney disease or those at high bleeding risk. A novel anticoagulation method, FXI inhibition has emerged as a promising alternative. It demonstrates a strong rationale for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and the potential fulfillment of unmet clinical needs in the cardiovascular field. A number of FXI inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical investigation. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of early results of research on FXI inhibitors in the cardiovascular setting, offering valuable insights into their potential role in shaping the future of anticoagulation.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Unprovoked (or provoked by mild risk factors) venous thromboembolism (VTE) in young patients, VTE in uncommon sites, or cases of unexplained VTE recurrence may be positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and thus may be diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The evaluation of aPL is standardized using immunological tests for anticardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I. The determination of functional antibodies (lupus anticoagulant) is less standardized, especially in patients on anticoagulant treatment. Patients positive for all the three tests are at high risk of recurrence, which, in turn, might lead to chronic obstruction of pulmonary vessels (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension). Randomized clinical trials have shown that triple-positive patients should be treated with vitamin K antagonists maintaining an international normalized ratio between 2 and 3. Whether patients with VTE and incomplete aPL profile can be treated with direct oral anticoagulants should be further investigated.

Current and Emerging Endovascular and Neurocritical Care Management Strategies in Large-Core Ischemic Stroke

The volume of infarcted tissue in patients with ischemic stroke is consistently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Initial studies of endovascular thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion excluded patients with established large-core infarcts, even when large volumes of salvageable brain tissue were present, due to the high risk of hemorrhagic transformation and reperfusion injury. However, recent retrospective and prospective studies have shown improved outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy, and several clinical trials were recently published to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular management of patients presenting with large-core infarcts. With or without thrombectomy, patients with large-core infarcts remain at high risk of in-hospital complications such as hemorrhagic transformation, malignant cerebral edema, seizures, and others. Expert neurocritical care management is necessary to optimize blood pressure control, mitigate secondary brain injury, manage cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure, and implement various neuroprotective measures. Herein, we present an overview of the current and emerging evidence pertaining to endovascular treatment for large-core infarcts, recent advances in neurocritical care strategies, and their impact on optimizing patient outcomes.

Embolic Phenomena of Libman-Sacks Endocarditis and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) are at high risk of developing arterial or venous thromboembolism and a state of systemic hypercoagulability. Libman-Sacks endocarditis (LSE) is a type of non-bacterial endocarditis usually seen in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. These vegetations dislodge easily and can cause profound neurological and systemic complications in the form of emboli. We describe one such case of a young woman with known SLE who presented with an acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke and was found to have APS with extensive mitral valve vegetation, indicating Libman-Sacks endocarditis on echocardiography. Recognizing the increasing frequency of both APS and LSE in patients with SLE and screening patients, especially the younger population with SLE, for APS is vital. Furthermore, in those patients presenting with embolic events, echocardiography plays a key role as it can help expedite the diagnosis of LSE. Our case report also reiterates that warfarin, when compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), is superior in decreasing future embolic events.

Therapy with direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of thromboembolic events in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterised by venous thrombosis (VT) or arterial thrombosis (AT) and/or pregnancy morbidity and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) hold several advantages to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for prevention of thrombosis and we wish to evaluate DOACs compared with VKAs in secondary prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with APS.

METHODS

We conducted searches of the published literature using relevant data sources (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL), and of trial registers for unpublished data and ongoing trials. We included randomised trials examining individuals >18 years with APS classified according to the criteria valid when the trial was carried out. Randomised controlled trials had to examine any DOAC agent compared with any comparable drug. We tabulated all occurrences of events from all eligible randomised trials. Due to few events, ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using the Peto method.

RESULTS

5 randomised trials comprising 624 patients met the predefined eligibility criteria. The primary outcome measure was new thrombotic events, a composite endpoint of any VT or AT, during the VKA-controlled phase of treatment. According to the I2 inconsistency index, there was evidence of statistical heterogeneity across the studies (I2=60%). Across trials, 29 and 10 thrombotic events were observed in 305 and 319 patients with APS treated with DOAC and VKA, respectively, corresponding to a combined Peto OR of 3.01 (95% CI 1.56 to 5.78, p=0.001). There was a significantly increased risk of AT while treated with DOACs compared with VKA (OR 5.5 (2.5, 12.1) p<0.0001), but no difference in the risk of VT (p=0.87). We found no significant difference in risk of bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs were associated with a significant increase in the risk of a new thrombotic event, especially AT, favouring standard prophylaxis with warfarin.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019126720.

Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Unmet Needs and Review of the Literature

Patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require long-term anticoagulation due to the high-thrombotic recurrence risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been traditionally considered the standard of care in thrombotic APS. Nevertheless, the risk of recurrence persists with VKA. There are publications considering different intensities of anticoagulation with VKA; however, the standard-intensity anticoagulation (international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0) is the most recommended. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the role of antiplatelet treatment in thrombotic APS. Nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as an alternative to VKA for many indications. There are, however, discrepancies regarding the management with NOACs in thrombotic APS. In this review, we update the different clinical trials with NOACs in venous, arterial, and microvascular thrombosis and suggest how these patients should be managed in agreement with the expert panels. Although scarce data are published regarding the current role of NOACs in thrombotic APS, the clinical trials failed to demonstrate noninferiority of NOACs compared with VKA, especially in patients with triple antiphospholipid antibodies positivity and/or arterial thrombosis. Single or double antiphospholipid positivity should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. In addition, we focus on different areas of uncertainty that still remain in thrombotic APS and NOACs. To summarize, emerging clinical trials are needed to provide robust data on the management of thrombotic APS.

Survey on antiphospholipid syndrome diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment in patients with ischemic stroke, other brain ischemic injury, or arterial thromboembolism in other sites: communication from ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-associated acute ischemic stroke (AIS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or other brain ischemic injury is poorly defined.

OBJECTIVES

The survey goal was to capture variations in diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment of APS-associated ischemic stroke and related disorders to inform guidance and clinical trials to define optimal management.

METHODS

Professional colleagues, including key opinion leaders, were invited to complete a REDCap survey questionnaire initiated by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies. The survey data were tallied using simple descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

There was generally good agreement on several aspects, including which patients to test for antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), use of a lifelong vitamin K antagonist for AIS or recurrent TIA, and formal cognitive assessment for suspected cognitive impairment. There was less agreement on other aspects, including aPL testing for brain ischemic injury other than AIS/TIA or if an alternative cause for AIS or TIA exists; choice of aPL tests, their timing, and age cutoff; the aPL phenotype to trigger antithrombotic treatment; management for patent foramen ovale; antithrombotic treatment for first TIA or white matter hyperintensities; head magnetic resonance imaging specifications; and low-molecular-weight heparin dosing/anti-Xa monitoring in pregnancy. The survey highlighted that approximately 25% practice at dedicated APS clinics and <50% have a multidisciplinary team structure for patients with APS.

CONCLUSION

Much of the variation in practice reflects the lack of evidence-based recommendations. The survey results should inform the development of a more uniform multidisciplinary consensus approach to diagnosis and antithrombotic treatment.

Return emergency department visits for recurrent pulmonary embolism symptoms in children and adolescents

Rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) in children have steadily increased over the past 2 decades. Patient outcomes after hospital discharge are poorly understood, and many patients experience recurrent or persistent chest pain or dyspnea, prompting a return to care. This retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PE at a large children's hospital over a 9.5-year period was performed to evaluate rates of return to the emergency department (ED) for PE-related symptoms, and to determine the utility of repeat computed tomography angiography (CTA) in this population. Ninety-six patients were diagnosed with PE during the study period. Forty-two percent of patients (n = 40) returned to the ED for PE-related symptoms and a total of 74 repeat CTAs were performed. Among those who had return visits, the mean number of return visits was 3 and the mean number of repeat CTAs was 1.8. The median time to return to the ED was 34 days. Logistic regression analysis identified increased age and female sex as risk factors for return ED visits. Eight percent of the cohort experienced PE recurrence. Recurrent PE was observed only in those with persistent or new thrombotic risk factors and was uncommon in those who remained on appropriate anticoagulation. Future work should focus on the development of a risk stratification system to identify patients at low risk of recurrence in order to minimize repeat CTA imaging.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Thrombotic and Vascular Complications

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare, autoimmune thrombophilia defined by vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, in the setting of documented persistent antiphospholipid antibodies including the lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, or anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies can be completely asymptomatic, or they can lead to clinical manifestations as severe as catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, which involves widespread coagulopathy over a very short period of time. The degree of risk associated with antiphospholipid syndrome depends on the characteristics of the antiphospholipid antibody profile and on the presence of additional thrombotic risk factors. The current standard treatment for unprovoked thrombosis is long-term warfarin. Treatment to prevent recurrent obstetric complications is low-dose aspirin and prophylactic heparin in pregnant patients. The use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome is still being debated. Their use is generally contraindicated, especially in high-risk patients, such as those with all 3 antiphospholipid antibodies present, but they may potentially be of some use in some low-risk patients.