1
|
Brezic N, Gligorevic S, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Assessing suicide risk in chronic pain management: a narrative review across drug classes. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024. [PMID: 39126380 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2391999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pain presents a multifaceted challenge in clinical practice, necessitating a nuanced understanding of pharmacological interventions to optimize treatment outcomes. This review provides an outline of various pharmacological agents commonly used in chronic pain management and highlights their safety considerations, particularly regarding suicide risk. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the role of antidepressants, anticonvulsants, GABA receptor agonists, NMDA receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, cannabis and cannabinoids, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists in chronic pain management. It assesses their therapeutic benefits, potential for misuse, and psychiatric adverse effects, including the risk of suicide. Each pharmacological class is evaluated in terms of its efficacy, safety profile, and considerations for clinical practice. We searched peer-reviewed English literature on the topic using the MEDLINE database without time restrictions. EXPERT OPINION While pharmacological interventions offer promise in alleviating chronic pain, healthcare providers must carefully weigh their benefits against potential risks, including the risk of exacerbating psychiatric symptoms and increasing suicide risk. Individualized treatment approaches, close monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential for optimizing pain management strategies while mitigating adverse effects. Ongoing research efforts are crucial for advancing our understanding of these pharmacological interventions and refining pain management practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nebojsa Brezic
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Strahinja Gligorevic
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kenneth D Candido
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Summit AG, Chen C, Pettersson E, Boersma K, D’Onofrio BM, Lichtenstein P, Quinn PD. Preliminary Validation of a General Factor Model of Chronic Overlapping Pain Conditions. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:104502. [PMID: 38417595 PMCID: PMC11283990 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs) by definition, frequently co-occur, perhaps reflecting their shared etiologies. Their overlapping nature presents a methodological challenge, possibly masking associations between COPCs and health outcomes attributable to either general or specific processes. To address this challenge, we used population-based cohort data to evaluate the predictive validity of a bifactor model of 9 self-reported COPCs by assessing its association with incident pain-related clinical diagnoses; pain-relevant pharmacotherapy; and other health outcomes. We obtained data from a 2005 to 2006 study of Swedish adult twins linked with health data from nationwide registers through 2016 (N = 25,418). We then fit a bifactor model comprising a general COPC factor and 2 independent specific factors measuring pain-related somatic symptoms and neck and shoulder pain. Accounting for age, biological sex, and cancer, the general factor was associated with increased risk of all pain-related outcomes (eg, COPC diagnosis adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [1.62, 1.81]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.72 [1.60, 1.85]), and overdose and mortality (eg, all-cause mortality aOR, 1.25 [1.09, 1.43]). The somatic symptoms specific factor was associated with pain-relevant pharmacotherapy (eg, prescribed opioids aOR, 1.25 [1.15, 1.36]), most mental health-related outcomes (eg, depression aOR, 1.95 [1.70, 2.23]), and overdose (eg, nonfatal overdose aOR, 1.66 [1.31, 2.10]). The neck and shoulder pain-specific factor was weakly and inconsistently associated with the outcomes. Findings provide initial support for the validity and utility of a general-factor model of COPCs as a tool to strengthen understanding of co-occurrence, etiology, and consequences of chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents associations between a novel measurement model of COPCs and various health outcomes. Findings provide support for measuring pain across multiple domains rather than only measuring pain specific to one physical location in both research and clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alynna G. Summit
- Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1025 E. 7 Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| | - Cen Chen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erik Pettersson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katja Boersma
- Center for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Brian M. D’Onofrio
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 E. 10 Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405 USA
| | - Paul Lichtenstein
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrick D. Quinn
- Department of Applied Health Science, School of Public Health, Indiana University, 1025 E. 7 Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moyo P, Merlin JS, Gairola R, Girard A, Shireman TI, Trivedi AN, Marshall BDL. Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis with Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Medicare Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:2097-2105. [PMID: 38829451 PMCID: PMC11306843 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08799-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice guidelines recommend nonpharmacologic and nonopioid therapies as first-line pain treatment for acute pain. However, little is known about their utilization generally and among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) for whom opioid and other pharmacologic therapies carry greater risk of harm. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between a pre-existing OUD diagnosis and treatment of acute low back pain (aLBP). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2019 Medicare data. PARTICIPANTS Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with a new episode of aLBP. MAIN MEASURES The main independent variable was OUD diagnosis measured prior to the first LBP claim (i.e., index date). Using multivariable logistic regressions, we assessed the following outcomes measured within 30 days of the index date: (1) nonpharmacologic therapies (physical therapy and/or chiropractic care), and (2) prescription opioids. Among opioid recipients, we further assessed opioid dose and co-prescription of gabapentin. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by receipt of physical therapy, chiropractic care, opioid fills, or gabapentin fills during the 6 months before the index date. KEY RESULTS We identified 1,263,188 beneficiaries with aLBP, of whom 3.0% had OUD. Two-thirds (65.8%) did not receive pain treatments of interest at baseline. Overall, nonpharmacologic therapy receipt was less prevalent and opioid and nonopioid pharmacologic therapies were more common among beneficiaries with OUD than those without OUD. Beneficiaries with OUD had lower odds of receiving nonpharmacologic therapies (aOR = 0.62, 99%CI = 0.58-0.65) and higher odds of prescription opioid receipt (aOR = 2.24, 99%CI = 2.17-2.32). OUD also was significantly associated with increased odds of opioid doses ≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents/day (aOR = 2.43, 99%CI = 2.30-2.56) and co-prescription of gabapentin (aOR = 1.15, 99%CI = 1.09-1.22). Similar associations were observed in stratified groups though magnitudes differed. CONCLUSIONS Medicare beneficiaries with aLBP and OUD underutilized nonpharmacologic pain therapies and commonly received opioids at high doses and with gabapentin. Complementing the promulgation of practice guidelines with implementation science could improve the uptake of evidence-based nonpharmacologic therapies for aLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patience Moyo
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Jessica S Merlin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Richa Gairola
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Anthony Girard
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Theresa I Shireman
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Amal N Trivedi
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brandon D L Marshall
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leyde S, Price CJ, Colgan DD, Pike KC, Tsui JI, Merrill JO. Mental Health Distress Is Associated With Higher Pain Interference in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Stabilized on Buprenorphine or Methadone. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:423-433. [PMID: 38327009 PMCID: PMC11221630 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241227402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationships between opioid use disorder (OUD), chronic pain, and mental health distress are complex and multidirectional. The objective of this exploratory study was to examine the relationship between mental health conditions and Chronic pain severity and interference among patients stabilized on either buprenorphine or methadone. METHODS We report baseline data from a randomized trial of a mind-body intervention conducted at 5 outpatient clinics that provided either buprenorphine or methadone treatment. Validated scales were used to measure substance use, mental health distress, and pain severity and interference. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between mental health conditions and pain severity and interference. RESULTS Of 303 participants, 57% (n = 172) reported Chronic pain. A total of 88% (n = 268) were prescribed buprenorphine. Mental health conditions were common, with one-quarter of the sample screening positive for all 3 mental health conditions (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]). Compared to participants without Chronic pain, participants with Chronic pain were more likely to screen positive for moderate-severe anxiety (47% vs 31%); moderate-severe depression (54% vs 41%); and the combination of anxiety, depression, and PTSD (31% vs 18%). Among participants with Chronic pain, mental health conditions were associated with higher pain interference. Pain severity was higher among participants with mental health conditions, but only reached statistical significance for depression. Pain interference scores increased with a higher number of co-occurring mental health conditions. CONCLUSIONS Among individuals stabilized on either buprenorphine or methadone, highly symptomatic and comorbid mental health distress is common and is associated with increased pain interference. Adequate screening for, and treatment of, mental health conditions in patients with OUD and Chronic pain is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Leyde
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cynthia J. Price
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dana D. Colgan
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kenneth C. Pike
- Department of Child, Family and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Judith I. Tsui
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph O. Merrill
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Richards N, Fried M, Svirsky L, Thomas N, Zettler PJ, Howard D. Clinician Perspectives on Opioid Treatment Agreements: A Qualitative Analysis of Focus Groups. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2024; 15:214-225. [PMID: 37962913 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2274606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic pain face significant barriers in finding clinicians to manage long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). For patients on LTOT, it is increasingly common to have them sign opioid treatment agreements (OTAs). OTAs enumerate the risks of opioids, as informed consent documents would, but also the requirements that patients must meet to receive LTOT. While there has been an ongoing scholarly discussion about the practical and ethical implications of OTA use in the abstract, little is known about how clinicians use them and if OTAs themselves modify clinician prescribing practices. OBJECTIVE To determine how clinicians use OTAs and the potential impacts of OTAs on opioid prescribing. DESIGN We conducted qualitative analysis of four focus groups of clinicians from a large Midwestern academic medical center. Groups were organized according to self-identified prescribing patterns: two groups for clinicians who identified as prescribers of LTOT, and two who did not. PARTICIPANTS 17 clinicians from General Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, and Palliative Care were recruited using purposive, convenience sampling. APPROACH Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes using reflexive thematic analysis by a multidisciplinary team. KEY RESULTS Our analysis identified three main themes: (1) OTAs did not influence clinicians' decisions whether to use LTOT generally but did shape clinical decision-making for individual patients; (2) clinicians feel OTAs intensify the power they have over patients, though this was not uniformly judged as harmful; (3) there is a potential misalignment between the intended purposes of OTAs and their implementation. CONCLUSION This study reveals a complicated relationship between OTAs and access to pain management. While OTAs seem not to impact the clinicians' decisions about whether to use LTOT generally, they do sometimes influence prescribing decisions for individual patients. Clinicians shared complex views about OTAs' purposes, which shows the need for more clarity about how OTAs could be used to promote shared decision-making, joint accountability, informed consent, and patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Richards
- English, Ohio State University College of Arts and Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Martin Fried
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Larisa Svirsky
- Centre for Ethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Thomas
- CATALYST, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Patricia J Zettler
- OSU Drug Enforcement and Policy Center and the OSU Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University College of Law, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Dana Howard
- Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, Center for Bioethics and OSU College of Arts and Sciences, Philosophy, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McGrew SJ, Thai JM, Woller SJ, Smit T, Rogers AH, Vujanovic AA, Zvolensky MJ. Posttraumatic Stress and Opioid Use and Pain among Individuals with Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Self-Reported Chronic Pain: The Role of Health Literacy. Subst Use Misuse 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38914534 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2369164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain and opioid misuse are a prevalent comorbidity with deleterious health outcomes. Growing work indicates that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can increase the risk for chronic pain and opioid misuse and dependence. However, there is little understanding of social determinants of health (SDoH) that may account for interrelations of PTSD with chronic pain and opioid misuse and dependence. Health literacy is one relevant SDoH construct, reflecting the ability to gather, process, and comprehend health-related information required to engage in a healthcare setting. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to examine the indirect effect of health literacy in the association between PTSD and opioid misuse, opioid dependence, pain intensity, and pain disability. METHOD The sample included 142 adults (Mage = 35.2, SD = 9.9; 67.4% female; 70.1% White/Caucasian) with self-reported chronic pain and probable PTSD who were using opioid medication. RESULTS Results demonstrated that PTSD symptom severity had a small indirect effect on opioid misuse and opioid dependence via health literacy; no indirect effects were evident for pain intensity and disability. CONCLUSION The present investigation provides evidence that health literacy may serve as an important explanatory factor in associations between PTSD symptom severity and opioid misuse and dependence among adults with co-occurring probable PTSD and chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby J McGrew
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Jessica M Thai
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Savannah J Woller
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Tanya Smit
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew H Rogers
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anka A Vujanovic
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Zvolensky
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Maryland Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zeino M, Léguillon R, Brevet P, Gerard B, Chenailler C, Raymond J, Bibaut L, Pouplin S, Joly LM, Varin R, Barat E. An Overview of Opioid Prescription Patterns among Non-Opioid Users Following Emergency Department Admission. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1138. [PMID: 38891213 PMCID: PMC11171693 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The evolving landscape of opioid prescription practices necessitates a comprehensive understanding of emerging patterns, particularly among new opioid users discharged from emergency departments. This study delves into the intricate realm of opioid utilization by elucidating the prevalence of their prescriptions. A retrospective analysis of electronic health records was conducted, including a cohort of 71 patients who received opioid prescriptions upon discharge from emergency departments from 1 January 2022 to 30 June 2022. Demographic characteristics and prescription details were systematically examined. This study illuminates tramadol's prominence, with 84% of prescriptions and a Defined Daily Dose (DDD) morphine equivalent of 60 mg, as the primary choice as a new opioid, a finding that draws attention due to the closely aligned dosages with morphine equivalents. This discovery prompts a critical reassessment of tramadol's therapeutic role, considering its multifaceted nature encompassing serotonergic effects and heightened fall risks. This study advocates for a nuanced and vigilant approach to tramadol prescription, cognizant of its potential risks and therapeutic implications, and highlights the imperative of optimizing data quality and traceability within electronic health records to enhance patient care and facilitate future research endeavors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Zeino
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
| | - Romain Léguillon
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
- Laboratoire d’Informatique Médicale et d’Ingénierie des Connaissances en e-Santé (LIMICS), U1142, IN-9 SERM, Sorbonne Université, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Pauline Brevet
- CIC-CRB 1404, Department of Rheumatology, CHU Rouen, University Rouen Normandie, F-76000 Rouen, France;
| | - Baptiste Gerard
- Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (B.G.); (L.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Catherine Chenailler
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
| | - Johanna Raymond
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
| | - Lucas Bibaut
- Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (B.G.); (L.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Sophie Pouplin
- Department of Rheumatology, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (B.G.); (L.B.); (S.P.)
| | - Luc Marie Joly
- Emergency Medicine Department, Universitary Hospital of Rouen, University Rouen Normandy, F-76000 Rouen, France;
| | - Rémi Varin
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
| | - Eric Barat
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, France; (M.Z.); (R.L.); (C.C.); (J.R.); (R.V.)
- Department of Public Health, Normandie University UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, F-14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schepis TS, Rogers AH, Munoz L, Zvolensky MJ. Indirect effects of emotion regulation in the relationship between pain and cannabis use in adults 18-64 years. Addict Behav 2024; 153:107983. [PMID: 38367507 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.107983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals with chronic pain often receive prescription opioid medication, and they may use cannabis to treat pain as well, although the risks of cannabis-opioid co-use are significant. This study aimed to investigate whether two transdiagnostic factors, emotion regulation and distress tolerance, had significant indirect effects in the relationship between pain and cannabis use in adults with chronic pain and an opioid prescription. METHODS Participants (n = 450; mean age = 38.6 ± 11.09) were recruited using Qualtrics panel service and were 75 % female and 79 % White, non-Hispanic. Participants completed a 30-minute self-report survey capturing three-month cannabis use, the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS), and the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS). The Graded Pain Scale (GCPS) assessed pain severity/intensity and disability. Analyses used the SPSS PROCESS macro, with both single (i.e., one transdiagnostic factor) and parallel indirect effects (i.e., both the DERS and DTS) examined. RESULTS There were statistically significant indirect effects for both the DERS and DTS in the relationship between pain intensity or disability and three-month cannabis use in single factor models. In the parallel indirect effect model, only the DERS was statistically significant (intensity indirect effect coefficient = 0.0195 % confidence interval [95 %CI] = 0.0065, 0.390; disability indirect effect coefficient = 0.0147, 95 %CI = 0.0055, 0.0274). CONCLUSIONS When examining parallel indirect effects, only emotional regulation and not distress tolerance mediated the relationship between chronic pain and cannabis use among those with an opioid prescription. Clinically, interventions aimed at improving emotional regulation in individuals with chronic pain can help limit cannabis and opioid co-use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ty S Schepis
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, USA; Translational Health Research Center, Texas State University, USA; Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, USA.
| | - Andrew H Rogers
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Liliana Munoz
- Department of Psychology, Texas State University, USA
| | - Michael J Zvolensky
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA; HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Friedman JK, Taylor BC, Campbell EH, Allen K, Bangerter A, Branson M, Bronfort G, Calvert C, Cross LJS, Driscoll MA, Evans R, Ferguson JE, Haley A, Hennessy S, Meis LA, Burgess DJ. Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: Baseline results from the LAMP trial. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0293437. [PMID: 38753651 PMCID: PMC11098421 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic pain are highly prevalent comorbid conditions. Veterans dually burdened by PTSD and chronic pain experience more severe outcomes compared to either disorder alone. Few studies have enrolled enough women Veterans to test gender differences in pain outcomes [catastrophizing, intensity, interference] by the severity of PTSD symptoms. AIM Examine gender differences in the association between PTSD symptoms and pain outcomes among Veterans enrolled in a chronic pain clinical trial. METHODS Participants were 421 men and 386 women Veterans with chronic pain who provided complete data on PTSD symptoms and pain outcomes. We used hierarchical linear regression models to examine gender differences in pain outcomes by PTSD symptoms. RESULTS Adjusted multivariable models indicated that PTSD symptoms were associated with higher levels of pain catastrophizing (0.57, 95% CI [0.51, 0.63]), pain intensity (0.30, 95% CI [0.24, 0.37]), and pain interference (0.46, 95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). No evidence suggesting gender differences in this association were found in either the crude or adjusted models (all interaction p-values<0.05). CONCLUSION These findings may reflect the underlying mutual maintenance of these conditions whereby the sensation of pain could trigger PTSD symptoms, particularly if the trauma and pain are associated with the same event. Clinical implications and opportunities testing relevant treatments that may benefit both chronic pain and PTSD are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica K. Friedman
- VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System (VAGLACS), Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Brent C. Taylor
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Emily Hagel Campbell
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Kelli Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VAHCS, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ann Bangerter
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Mariah Branson
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Gert Bronfort
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Collin Calvert
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Lee J. S. Cross
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Mary A. Driscoll
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Ronni Evans
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - John E. Ferguson
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Alex Haley
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Earl E. Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Sierra Hennessy
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Laura A. Meis
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- Women’s Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Diana J. Burgess
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pinto BM, Tavares I, Pozza DH. Enhancing Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review of Mindfulness Therapies and Guided Imagery Interventions. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:686. [PMID: 38792869 PMCID: PMC11122846 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There has been an increasing interest in the use of non-pharmacological approaches for the multidimensional treatment of chronic pain. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of mindfulness-based therapies and Guided Imagery (GI) interventions in managing chronic non-cancer pain and related outcomes. Materials and Methods: Searching three electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed on Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and pilot RCTs investigating mindfulness or GI interventions in adult patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was utilized to assess the quality of the evidence, with outcomes encompassing pain intensity, opioid consumption, and non-sensorial dimensions of pain. Results: Twenty-six trials met the inclusion criteria, with most of them exhibiting a moderate to high risk of bias. A wide diversity of chronic pain types were under analysis. Amongst the mindfulness interventions, and besides the classical programs, Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) emerges as an approach that improves interoception. Six trials demonstrated that mindfulness techniques resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity, and three trials also reported significant outcomes with GI. Evidence supports a significant improvement in non-sensory dimensions of pain in ten trials using mindfulness and in two trials involving GI. Significant effects on opioid consumption were reported in four mindfulness-based trials, whereas one study involving GI found a small effect with that variable. Conclusions: This study supports the evidence of benefits of both mindfulness techniques and GI interventions in the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Regarding the various mindfulness interventions, a specific emphasis on the positive results of MORE should be highlighted. Future studies should focus on specific pain types, explore different durations of the mindfulness and GI interventions, and evaluate emotion-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Manarte Pinto
- Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (B.M.P.); (I.T.)
| | - Isaura Tavares
- Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (B.M.P.); (I.T.)
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Health and IBMC, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Daniel Humberto Pozza
- Experimental Biology Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine of Porto, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal; (B.M.P.); (I.T.)
- Institute for Research and Innovation in Health and IBMC, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim M, Park SK, Kim WM, Kim E, Kim H, Park JM, Choi SS, Choi EJ. Updated guidelines for prescribing opioids to treat patients with chronic non-cancer pain in Korea: developed by committee on hospice and palliative care of the Korean Pain Society. Korean J Pain 2024; 37:119-131. [PMID: 38557654 PMCID: PMC10985489 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.24022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
There are growing concerns regarding the safety of long-term treatment with opioids of patients with chronic non-cancer pain. In 2017, the Korean Pain Society (KPS) developed guidelines for opioid prescriptions for chronic non-cancer pain to guide physicians to prescribe opioids effectively and safely. Since then, investigations have provided updated data regarding opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain and have focused on initial dosing schedules, reassessment follow-ups, recommended dosage thresholds considering the risk-benefit ratio, dose-reducing schedules for tapering and discontinuation, adverse effects, and inadvertent problems resulting from inappropriate application of the previous guidelines. Herein, we have updated the previous KPS guidelines based on a comprehensive literature review and consensus development following discussions among experts affiliated with the Committee on Hospice and Palliative Care in the KPS. These guidelines may assist physicians in prescribing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain in adult outpatient settings, but should not to be regarded as an inflexible standard. Clinical judgements by the attending physician and patient-centered decisions should always be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minsoo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| | - Woong Mo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eunsoo Kim
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyuckgoo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jun-Mo Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Seong-Soo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Joo Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Piret EM, Milloy MJ, Voon P, Choi J, DeBeck K, Hayashi K, Kerr T. Denial of prescription pain medication among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:72. [PMID: 38549113 PMCID: PMC10979632 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00956-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use drugs experience pain at two to three times the rate of the general population and yet continue to face substantial barriers to accessing appropriate and adequate treatment for pain. In light of the overdose crisis and revised opioid prescribing guidelines, we sought to identify factors associated with being denied pain medication and longitudinally investigate denial rates among people who use drugs. METHODS We used multivariable generalized estimating equations analyses to investigate factors associated with being denied pain medication among people who use drugs reporting pain in three prospective cohort studies in Vancouver, Canada. Analyses were restricted to study periods in which participants requested a prescription for pain from a healthcare provider. Descriptive statistics detail denial rates and actions taken by participants after being denied. RESULTS Among 1168 participants who requested a prescription for pain between December 2012 and March 2020, the median age was 47 years and 63.0% were male. Among 4,179 six-month observation periods, 907 (21.7%) included a report of being denied requested pain medication. In multivariable analyses, age was negatively associated with prescription denial (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.97-0.99), while self-managing pain (AOR = 2.48, 95%CI:2.04-3.00), experiencing a non-fatal overdose (AOR = 1.51, 95%CI:1.22-1.88), engagement in opioid agonist therapy (AOR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.09-1.61), and daily use of heroin or other unregulated opioids (AOR = 1.32, 95%CI:1.05-1.66) were positively associated with being denied. Common actions taken (n = 895) after denial were accessing the unregulated drug supply (53.5%), doing nothing (30.6%), and going to a different doctor/emergency room (6.1%). The period following the introduction of new prescribing guidelines was not associated with a change in denial rates. CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of people who use drugs continue to be denied prescriptions for pain, with such denial associated with important substance use-related harms, including non-fatal overdose. Guidelines specific to the pharmaceutical management of pain among people who use drugs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyne Marie Piret
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 5804 Fairview Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - M-J Milloy
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Division of Social Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Pauline Voon
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - JinCheol Choi
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
| | - Kora DeBeck
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- School of Public Policy, Simon Fraser University, 515 West Hastings St, Vancouver, BC, V6B 5K3, Canada
| | - Kanna Hayashi
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Thomas Kerr
- British Columbia Centre On Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2A9, Canada.
- Division of Social Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang Y, Hu S, Chen Y, Chen M, Zhang D, Liu W, Chen C, Gan Y, Luo M, Ke B. Discovery of a novel series of pyridone amides as Na V1.8 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2024; 101:129655. [PMID: 38350529 DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
The NaV1.8 channel, mainly found in the peripheral nervous system, is recognized as one of the key factors in chronic pain. The molecule VX-150 was initially promising in targeting this channel, but the phase II trials of VX-150 did not show expected pain relief results. By analyzing the interaction mode of VX-150 and NaV1.8, we developed two series with a total of 19 molecules and examined their binding affinity to NaV1.8 in vitro and analgesic effect in vivo. One compound, named 2j, stood out with notable activity against the NaV1.8 channel and showed effective pain relief in models of chronic inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain. Our research points to 2j as a strong contender for developing safer pain-relief treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfang Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Shilong Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuhao Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Meiyuan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Di Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Wencheng Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunxia Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Menglan Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Bowen Ke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Laboratory of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National-Local Joint Engineering Research Centre of Translational Medicine of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Moyo P, Merlin JS, George M, Shireman TI, Marshall BD. Association of Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis With Use of Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Care Among Chronic Low Back Pain Patients: A Group-Based Trajectory Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2024; 25:742-754. [PMID: 37820847 PMCID: PMC10922407 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Nonpharmacologic approaches are recommended as first-line treatment for chronic pain, and their importance is heightened among individuals with co-occurring opioid use disorder (OUD), in whom opioid therapies may be particularly detrimental. Our objectives were to assess the receipt and trajectories of nonpharmacologic pain treatment and determine the association of OUD diagnosis with these trajectories. This retrospective cohort study used Medicare claims data from 2016 to 2018 and applied group-based trajectory models to identify distinct patterns of physical therapy (PT) or chiropractic care treatment over the 12 months following a new episode of chronic low back pain. We used logistic regression models to estimate the association of co-occurring OUD with group membership in PT and chiropractic trajectories. Our sample comprised 607,729 beneficiaries at least 18 years of age, of whom 11.4% had a diagnosis of OUD. The 12-month prevalence of PT and chiropractic treatment receipt was 24.7% and 27.1%, respectively, and lower among Medicare beneficiaries with co-occurring OUD (PT: 14.6%; chiropractic: 6.8%). The final models identified 3 distinct trajectories each for PT (no/little use [76.6% of sample], delayed and increasing use [8.2%], and early and declining use [15.2%]); and chiropractic (no/little use [75.0% of sample], early and declining use [17.3%], and early and sustained use [7.7%]). People with OUD were more likely to belong in trajectories with little/no PT or chiropractic care as compared to other trajectories. The findings indicate that people with co-occurring chronic pain and OUD often do not receive early or any nonpharmacologic pain therapies as recommended by practice guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: PT and chiropractic care use were low overall and even lower among Medicare beneficiaries with co-occurring OUD compared with those without OUD. As updated guidelines on pain management are promulgated, targeted interventions (eg, insurance policy, provider, and patient education) are needed to ensure equitable access to guideline-recommended pain therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patience Moyo
- Brown University School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jessica S. Merlin
- Challenges in Managing and Preventing Pain Clinical Research Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Miriam George
- Brown University School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Theresa I. Shireman
- Brown University School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Brandon D.L. Marshall
- Brown University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baliki MN, Vigotsky AD, Rached G, Jabakhanji R, Huang L, Branco P, Cong O, Griffith J, Wasan AD, Schnitzer TJ, Apkarian AV. Neuropsychology of chronic back pain managed with long-term opioid use. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.07.24302408. [PMID: 38370783 PMCID: PMC10871381 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.07.24302408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Chronic pain is commonly treated with long-term opioids, but the neuropsychological outcomes associated with stable long-duration opioid use remain unclear. Here, we contrasted the psychological profiles, brain activity, and brain structure of 70 chronic back pain patients on opioids (CBP+O, average opioid exposure 6.2 years) with 70 patients managing their pain without opioids. CBP+O exhibited moderately worse psychological profiles and small differences in brain morphology. However, CBP+O had starkly different spontaneous brain activity, dominated by increased mesocorticolimbic and decreased dorsolateral-prefrontal activity, even after controlling for pain intensity and duration. These differences strongly reflected cortical opioid and serotonin receptor densities and mapped to two antagonistic resting-state circuits. The circuits' dynamics were explained by mesocorticolimbic activity and reflected negative affect. We reassessed a sub-group of CBP+O after they briefly abstained from taking opioids. Network dynamics, but not spontaneous activity, reflected exacerbated signs of withdrawal. Our results have implications for the management and tapering of opioids in chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwan N Baliki
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrew D Vigotsky
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Biomedical Engineering and Statistics & Data Science, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gaelle Rached
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rami Jabakhanji
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lejian Huang
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Paulo Branco
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Olivia Cong
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James Griffith
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Medical and Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ajay D Wasan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas J Schnitzer
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - A Vania Apkarian
- Center for Translational Pain Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mauck MC, Zhao Y, Goetzinger AM, Tungate AS, Spencer AB, Lal A, Barton CE, Beaudoin F, McLean SA. Incidence of persistent opioid use following traumatic injury. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49:79-86. [PMID: 37364919 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Major traumatic injuries are a known risk factor for persistent opioid use, but data describing the relationship between specific traumatic injuries and opioid use is lacking. METHODS We used insurance claims data from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2020 to estimate the incidence of new persistent opioid use in three hospitalized trauma populations: individuals hospitalized after burn injury (3809, 1504 of whom required tissue grafting), individuals hospitalized after motor vehicle collision (MVC; 9041), and individuals hospitalized after orthopedic injury (47, 637). New persistent opioid use was defined as receipt of ≥1 opioid prescriptions 90-180 days following injury in an individual with no opioid prescriptions during the year prior to injury. RESULTS New persistent opioid use was observed in 12% (267/2305) of individuals hospitalized after burn injury with no grafting, and 12% (176/1504) of burn injury patients requiring tissue grafting. In addition, new persistent opioid use was observed in 16% (1454/9041) of individuals hospitalized after MVC, and 20% (9455/47, 637) of individuals hospitalized after orthopedic trauma. In comparison, rates of persistent opioid use in all trauma cohorts (19%, 11, 352/60, 487) were greater than the rates of persistent opioid use in both non-traumatic major surgery (13%) and non-traumatic minor surgery (9%). CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that new persistent opioid use frequently occurs in these common hospitalized trauma populations. Improved interventions to reduce persistent pain and opioid use in patients hospitalized after these and other traumas are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew C Mauck
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ying Zhao
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amy M Goetzinger
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew S Tungate
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alex B Spencer
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Asim Lal
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chloe E Barton
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Anesthesiology, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Francesca Beaudoin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Samuel A McLean
- Institute for Trauma Recovery, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Emergency Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Finstad J, Røise O, Clausen T, Rosseland LA, Havnes IA. A qualitative longitudinal study of traumatic orthopaedic injury survivors' experiences with pain and the long-term recovery trajectory. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079161. [PMID: 38191252 PMCID: PMC10806614 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore trauma patients' experiences of the long-term recovery pathway during 18 months following hospital discharge. DESIGN Longitudinal qualitative study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Thirteen trauma patients with injuries associated with pain that had been interviewed 6 weeks after discharge from Oslo University Hospital in Norway, were followed up with an interview 18 months postdischarge. METHOD The illness trajectory framework informed the data collection, with semistructured, in-depth interviews that were analysed thematically. RESULTS Compared with the subacute phase 6 weeks postdischarge, several participants reported exacerbated mental and physical health, including increased pain during 18 months following discharge. This, andalternating periods of deteriorated health status during recovery, made the pathway unpredictable. At 18 months post-discharge, participants were coping with experiences of reduced mental and physical health and socioeconomic losses. Three main themes were identified: (1) coping with persistent pain and reduced physical function, (2) experiencing mental distress without access to mental healthcare and (3) unmet needs for follow-up care. Moreover, at 18 months postdischarge, prescribed opioids were found to be easily accessible from GPs. In addition to relieving chronic pain, motivations to use opioids were to induce sleep, reduce withdrawal symptoms and relieve mental distress. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The patients' experiences from this study establish knowledge of several challenges in the trauma population's recovery trajectories, which may imply that subacute health status is a poor predictor of long-term outcomes. Throughout recovery, the participants struggled with physical and mental health needs without being met by the healthcare system. Therefore, it is necessary to provide long-term follow-up of trauma patients' health status in the specialist health service based on individual needs. Additionally, to prevent long-term opioid use beyond the subacute phase, there is a need to systematically follow-up and reassess motivations and indications for continued use throughout the recovery pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Finstad
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Røise
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Trauma Registry, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Clausen
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Leiv Arne Rosseland
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingrid Amalia Havnes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cazzaniga S, Real G, Finazzi S, Lorini LF, Forget P, Bugada D. How to Modulate Peripheral and Central Nervous System to Treat Acute Postoperative Pain and Prevent Pain Persistence. Curr Neuropharmacol 2024; 22:23-37. [PMID: 37563811 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x21666230810103508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic postoperative pain (CPSP) is a major issue after surgery, which may impact on patient's quality of life. Traditionally, CPSP is believed to rely on maladaptive hyperalgesia and risk factors have been identified that predispose to CPSP, including acute postoperative pain. Despite new models of prediction are emerging, acute pain is still a modifiable factor that can be challenged with perioperative analgesic strategies. In this review we present the issue of CPSP, focusing on molecular mechanism underlying the development of acute and chronic hyperalgesia. Also, we focus on how perioperative strategies can impact directly or indirectly (by reducing postoperative pain intensity) on the development of CPSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Cazzaniga
- Emergency and Intensive Care Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Real
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Finazzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca F Lorini
- Emergency and Intensive Care Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Patrice Forget
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Epidemiology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
- Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Dario Bugada
- Emergency and Intensive Care Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Allen CB, Williamson TK, Norwood SM, Gupta A. Do Electrical Stimulation Devices Reduce Pain and Improve Function?-A Comparative Review. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1339-1354. [PMID: 37751060 PMCID: PMC10616008 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00554-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple forms of electrical stimulation (ES) potentially offer widely varying clinical benefits. Diminished function commonly associated with acute and chronic pain lessens productivity and increases medical costs. This review aims to compare the relative effects of various forms of ES on functional and pain outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive literature search focused on studies of commonly marketed forms of ES used for treatment of pain and improvement of function. Peer-reviewed manuscripts were categorized as "Important" (systematic review or meta-analysis, randomized controlled trial, observational cohort study) and "Minor" (retrospective case series, case report, opinion review) for each identified form of ES. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Varying forms of ES have markedly different technical parameters, applications, and indications, based on clinically meaningful impact on pain perception, function improvement, and medication reduction. Despite being around for decades, there is limited quality evidence for most forms of ES, although there are several notable exceptions for treatment of specific indications. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has well-demonstrated beneficial effects for rehabilitation of selective spinal cord injured (SCI), post-stroke, and debilitated inpatients. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has similarly shown effectiveness in rehabilitation of some stroke, SCI, and foot drop outpatients. H-Wave® device stimulation (HWDS) has moderate supportive evidence for treatment of acute and refractory chronic pain, consistently demonstrating improvements in function and pain measures across diverse populations. Interestingly, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), the most widely used form of ES, demonstrated insignificant or very low levels of pain and functional improvement. CONCLUSION Ten of 13 reviewed forms of ES have only limited quality evidence for clinically significant reduction of pain or improvement of function across different patient populations. NMES and FES have reasonably demonstrated effectiveness, albeit for specific clinical rehabilitation indications. HWDS was associated with the most clinically significant outcomes, in terms of functional improvement combined with reduction of pain and medication use. More rigorous long-term clinical trials are needed to further validate appropriate use and specific indications for most forms of ES. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian B Allen
- University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, TX, 78235, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | | | - Ashim Gupta
- Future Biologics, Lawrenceville, GA, 30043, USA.
- Regenerative Orthopaedics, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, India.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coleman C, Lennon RP, Garza RH, Veasley C, Kuchera J, Edwards R, Zgierska AE. Shifting quality chronic pain treatment measures from processes to outcomes. J Opioid Manag 2023; 19:83-94. [PMID: 37879663 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Misapplication of the 2016 Centers for Disease Control (CDC) opioid prescribing guidelines has led to overem-phasis of morphineequivalent daily dose (MEDD) as a "metric of success" in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), resulting in unintentional harms to patients. This article reviews CNCP-related guidelines and patient preferences in order to identify pragmatic, patient-centered metrics to assess treatment response and safety in opioid-treated CNCP. METHODS We reviewed the clinical (CDC), research (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials), and implementability-related guidelines (GuideLine Implementability Appraisal), along with relevant patient-identified treatment goals. From these, we summarize a guideline-concordant, patient-centered, implementable set of measures to aid the clinical management of opioid-treated CNCP. RESULTS We identify metrics across three domains of care: (1) treatment response metrics, which align with the CNCP care goals (pain intensity, pain interference including function and quality of life, and global impression of change); (2) risk assessment ("safety") metrics, eg, MEDD, benzodiazepine-opioid or naloxone-opioid coprescribing, and severity of mental health disorders, which evaluate the risk-benefit profile of opioid therapy; and (3) adherence ("process") metrics, which assess clinician/patient adherence to the guideline-recommended opioid therapy monitoring practices, eg, the presence of completed treatment agreement or urine toxicology testing. All metrics should be informed by implementability principles, eg, be decidable, executable, and measurable. CONCLUSIONS This article summarizes guideline-concordant, patient-centered, implementable metrics for assessing treatment response, safety, and adherence in opioid-treated CNCP. Regardless of which specific treatment guidelines are applied, this approach could help conceptualize and standardize the collection and reporting of CNCP-relevant metrics, compare them across health systems, and optimize care and treatment outcomes in opioid-treated CNCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Coleman
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-5592
| | - Robert P Lennon
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey; Affiliate Faculty, Penn State Law, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Rose Hennessy Garza
- Joseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Jay Kuchera
- Specialized Opioid Support Services, Resolute Pain Solutions, Envision Physician Services, Port Saint Lucie, Florida
| | - Robert Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard School of Medi-cine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aleksandra E Zgierska
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Public Health Sciences, and Anes-thesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Galán S, de la Vega R, Esteve R, López-Martínez AE, Fernández Baena M, Ramírez-Maestre C. Physicians' perception about predictors of opioid abuse in patients with chronic non-cancer pain: a Delphi study. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1269018. [PMID: 37928367 PMCID: PMC10621745 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1269018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Opioids are being prescribed widely, and increasingly, for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). However, several side effects are associated with mid- and long-term opioid use and, for certain patients, with the risk of problematic opioid use. The aim of this study is to know the perception of the physicians about which variables could be associated with increased risk of patients with CNCP developing a problem of abuse or misuse of the prescribed opioid medication. Methods Twenty-nine physicians with experience in CNCP pain management and opioids prescription participated in a two-round Delphi study focused on the risk factors for opioid misuse and abuse. Results The variables that reached consensus regarding their relationship with the increased risk of suffering a problem of opioid abuse or misuse were: (1) Experiencing pain on a daily basis, (2) previous use of high-dose opioids, (3) generalized anxiety, (4) hopelessness, (5) benzodiazepine intake, (6) use of opioids for reasons other than pain, (7) family problems, family instability or family breakdown, and (8) having access to several opioid prescribers. The only variable that reached consensus regarding it not being associated to a possible risk of abuse or misuse was having mild pain intensity (0-4 on a NRS-11). Conclusions This study provides useful information that could help make decisions about the use of opioids for CNCP treatment and prevent future difficulties. Prospective studies testing the relationship of the variables that reached consensus with the risk of opioid misuse and abuse are warranted. Significance This study shows the variables of CNCP that the professional must take into account in order to avoid possible problems when prescribing opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Galán
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND), Málaga, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Prevención y Promoción de la Salud (RICAPPS), Málaga, Spain
| | - Rocío de la Vega
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND), Málaga, Spain
- Personalidad, Evaluación y tratamiento Psicológico, Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga (Spain), Málaga, Spain
| | - Rosa Esteve
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND), Málaga, Spain
- Personalidad, Evaluación y tratamiento Psicológico, Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga (Spain), Málaga, Spain
| | - Alicia E. López-Martínez
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND), Málaga, Spain
- Personalidad, Evaluación y tratamiento Psicológico, Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga (Spain), Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Ramírez-Maestre
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND), Málaga, Spain
- Personalidad, Evaluación y tratamiento Psicológico, Facultad de Psicología y Logopedia, Andalucía Tech, Universidad de Málaga (Spain), Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Friedman JK, Taylor BC, Hagel Campbell E, Allen K, Bangerter A, Branson M, Bronfort G, Calvert C, Cross L, Driscoll M, Evans R, Ferguson JE, Haley A, Hennessy S, Meis LA, Burgess DJ. Gender differences in PTSD severity and pain outcomes: baseline results from the LAMP trial. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.10.13.23296998. [PMID: 37873176 PMCID: PMC10593051 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.13.23296998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Background Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and chronic pain are highly prevalent comorbid conditions. Veterans dually burdened by PTSD and chronic pain experience more severe outcomes compared to either disorder alone. Few studies have enrolled enough women Veterans to test gender differences in pain outcomes [catastrophizing, intensity, interference] by the severity of PTSD. Aim Examine gender differences in the association between PTSD symptoms and pain outcomes among Veterans enrolled in a chronic pain clinical trial. Methods Participants were 421 men and 386 women Veterans with chronic pain who provided complete data on PTSD symptoms and pain outcomes. We used hierarchical linear regression models to examine gender differences in pain outcomes by PTSD symptoms. Results Adjusted multivariable models indicated that PTSD symptoms were associated with higher levels of pain catastrophizing (0.57, 95% CI [0.51, 0.63]), pain intensity (0.30, 95% CI [0.24, 0.37]), and pain interference (0.46, 95% CI [0.39, 0.52]). No evidence suggesting differences in this association were found in either the crude or adjusted models (all interaction p-values<0.05). Conclusion These findings may reflect the underlying mutual maintenance of these conditions whereby the sensation of pain could trigger PTSD symptoms, particularly if the trauma and pain are associated with the same event. Clinical implications and opportunities testing relevant treatments that may benefit both chronic pain and PTSD are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Friedman
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - B C Taylor
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - E Hagel Campbell
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
| | - K Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VAHCS, Durham, NC
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - A Bangerter
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
| | - M Branson
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
| | - G Bronfort
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN
| | - C Calvert
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Ljs Cross
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
| | - M Driscoll
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - R Evans
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN
| | - J E Ferguson
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| | - A Haley
- Integrative Health & Wellbeing Research Program, Bakken Center for Spirituality & Healing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN
| | - S Hennessy
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
| | - L A Meis
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
- Women's Health Sciences Division, National Center for PTSD, Boston, MA
| | - D J Burgess
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (MVAHCS), Minneapolis, MN
- University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zgierska AE, Burzinski CA, Garland EL, Barrett B, Lennon RP, Brown RL, Schiefelbein AR, Nakamura Y, Stahlman B, Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Experiences of adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34885. [PMID: 37832078 PMCID: PMC10578753 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adults with opioid-treated chronic low back pain (CLBP), an understudied area. Participants in a "parent" clinical trial of non-pharmacologic treatments for CLBP were invited to complete a one-time survey on the perceived pandemic impact across several CLBP- and opioid therapy-related domains. Participant clinical and other characteristics were derived from the parent study's data. Descriptive statistics and latent class analysis analyzed quantitative data; qualitative thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. The survey was completed by 480 respondents from June 2020 to August 2021. The majority reported a negative pandemic impact on their life (84.8%), with worsened enjoyment of life (74.6%), mental health (74.4%), pain (53.8%), pain-coping skills (49.7%), and finances (45.3%). One-fifth (19.4%) of respondents noted increased use of prescribed opioids; at the same time, decreased access to medication and overall healthcare was reported by 11.3% and 61.6% of respondents, respectively. Latent class analysis of the COVID-19 survey responses revealed 2 patterns of pandemic-related impact; those with worse pandemic-associated harms (n = 106) had an overall worse health profile compared to those with a lesser pandemic impact. The pandemic substantially affected all domains of relevant health-related outcomes as well as healthcare access, general wellbeing, and financial stability among adults with opioid-treated CLBP. A more nuanced evaluation revealed a heterogeneity of experiences, underscoring the need for both increased overall support for this population and for an individualized approach to mitigate harms induced by pandemic or similar crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra E. Zgierska
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine, Public Health Sciences, and Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Cindy A. Burzinski
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison, WI
| | - Eric L. Garland
- University of Utah, College of Social Work, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Bruce Barrett
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Madison, WI
| | - Robert P. Lennon
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, and Law School, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Roger L. Brown
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI
| | | | - Yoshio Nakamura
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Pain Research Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Barbara Stahlman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Robert N. Jamison
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA
| | - Robert R. Edwards
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine and Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kendler KS, Lönn SL, Ektor-Andersen J, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Risk factors for the development of opioid use disorder after first opioid prescription: a Swedish national study. Psychol Med 2023; 53:6223-6231. [PMID: 36415073 PMCID: PMC10520598 DOI: 10.1017/s003329172200349x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We need to better understand the frequency and predictors of opioid use disorder (OUD) after first opioid prescription (OP). METHODS We followed 1 516 392 individuals from the Swedish population born 1980-2000, from 1 July 2007, until 31 Dec 2017. We examined putative risk predictors with univariable and multivariable Cox Models and the potential causal effects of predictors by propensity score and co-sibling analyses. RESULT Of the individuals in our cohort, 24.8% (375 404) received a first OP, of whom 3034 (0.90%) developed a subsequent first OUD. The hazard ratio (HR) (± 95% CIs) for OUD after OP equaled 7.10 (6.75-7.46), with a mean time to onset of 3.41 (2.39) years. The strongest putative risk factors for development of OUD after OP were prior psychiatric and substance use disorders, criminal behavior, parental divorce/death, poor school performance, current community deprivation, divorce, and male sex. Few predictors differed across sexes. OP renewal was associated with a HR of 3.66 (3.41-3.93) for OUD. Co-sibling and propensity score analyses suggested that at least a moderate proportion of the risk factor-OUD association was likely causal. A risk score to predict OUD after OP had an AUC of 0.85, where nearly 60% of cases scoring in the top decile. CONCLUSIONS In a general population sample, an OP represents a substantial risk factor for subsequent OUD. Many of the risk factors for OUD after OP can be readily assessed at the time of potential OP, permitting clinicians to evaluate the risk of iatrogenic OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth S. Kendler
- Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sara L. Lönn
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - John Ektor-Andersen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Jan Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden and Addiction Center Malmö, Division of Psychiatry, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Kristina Sundquist
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden and Addiction Center Malmö, Division of Psychiatry, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang W, Lu X, Li Q, Chen D, Zeng W. The Relationship between Blood Lead Level and Chronic Pain in US Adults: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Ther 2023; 12:1195-1208. [PMID: 37391620 PMCID: PMC10444925 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00535-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lead toxicity has been a major public health problem worldwide, yet no study has investigated the association between lead exposure and chronic pain. METHODS We used data from three cycles of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with chronic pain status. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to investigate the association between chronic pain and blood lead level (BLL). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore which confounding factor modified the association between chronic pain and BLL. RESULTS A total of 13,485 participants were included in our final analysis, out of which 1950 (14.46%) had chronic pain. In the fully adjusted model, a 1 μg/dL increase of BLL was associated with 3% higher risk of chronic pain. The highest BLL quartile (BLL > 2.40 μg/dL) was associated with a 32% increase in the risk of chronic pain compared with the lowest BLL quartile (BLL < 0.90 μg/dL). In the subgroup analyses, hypertension (P for interaction = 0.018) and arthritis (P for interaction = 0.004) status modified the association between BLL and chronic pain. Higher quartiles of BLL were associated with a higher risk of chronic pain only in individuals with hypertension or arthritis but not those without these conditions. CONCLUSION A higher BLL was associated with a higher risk of chronic pain. Further research is warranted to investigate whether a causal relationship exists between the two, as well as potential underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanyu Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoyun Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Dongtai Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Weian Zeng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 510060, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gaddy MD, Baum B, Kiesow B, Coombs NC, Beamon ER, Mullowney Y, Williams GC, Brant JM. The Use of Holographic Memory Resolution® to Improve the Physical and Biopsychosocial Symptoms of Chronic Pain: A Feasibility, Mixed Methods Study. PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE 2023; 6:4-11. [PMID: 38510483 PMCID: PMC10948938 DOI: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20230028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Holographic Memory Resolution® (HMR®), a mind-based therapy, has been used for decades as a nonpharmacologic intervention for trauma imprinting to alleviate depression, anxiety, pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). No clinical studies were found examining the use of HMR®. This study examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of administering HMR® to individuals experiencing chronic pain and related biopsychosocial symptoms. Methods A feasibility, mixed-methods study was conducted between October 2021 and July 2022 and included four HMR® sessions over 1-12 weeks. A convenience sample was comprised of 60 adults suffering from chronic physical or emotional pain of 4+ (0-10 scale) over 6+ months at two clinics in the U.S. Baseline and subsequent surveys after sessions 2, 3, and 4 assessed symptom response. Symptoms were longitudinally measured via self-report of depression, anxiety, somatic symptom burden, PTSD, and vitality. Results 73% completed all four sessions, demonstrating feasibility. Ages ranged from 19 to 80 years, 85% were female, and 87% were Caucasian. 52% reported high risk for toxic stress. Four symptoms decreased significantly: depression (p = 0.05), anxiety (p = 0.03), symptom burden (p < 0.01) and PTSD symptoms (p = 0.01); vitality improved. Conclusions HMR® may be a feasible intervention to address chronic pain and accompanying biopsychosocial symptoms; a randomized controlled trial is the next step to measure efficacy. Unlike other mind-based therapies, HMR® participants use their own internal language for identification and resolution of the pain. The trauma imprinting can then be gently addressed, and the memory-based components of pain resolved or reduced, which empowers participants to improve their well-being. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05001399.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yvonne Mullowney
- Collaborative Science & InnovationBillings ClinicBillingsMontanaUSA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ramdin C, Azer A, Ghafoor N, Attaalla K, Ghbrial M, Nelson L. Prevalence and services for the treatment of chronic pain at residential substance treatment centers. J Addict Dis 2023:1-6. [PMID: 37665562 DOI: 10.1080/10550887.2023.2251856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Studies suggest that a large proportion of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) also have underlying chronic pain. There is limited data on prevalence of chronic pain treatment as a component of residential substance use treatment. This initiative sought to investigate the prevalence and type of chronic pain services offered at these residential programs.Methods: This study was a retrospective review of information obtained from residential substance use treatment facility websites contained in SAMHSA's treatment navigator. Nine hundred-fifty out of 2952 websites were randomly selected for analysis. The primary outcome was prevalence of facilities that had chronic pain programs. Services offered were specified as available. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data.Results: Nine-hundred nine websites (95.7%, [94,97]) were accessible. Twenty-six facilities (2.9%,[1.9,4.2]) had a chronic pain program and of these 22 (84.6%, [64.3,95.0]) specified services offered. Common services included physical therapy (6, 27.3%), massage (12, 54.6%), and acupuncture (10, 45.5%). Of the remaining sites, 630 (69.3%, [66.2,72.3]) specified services offered, including yoga (122, 19.4%) and exercise (199, 31.6%).Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that despite most facilities offering adjunctive services, few had chronic pain programs. This suggests that there is a possible need for better updating of facility websites or possibly an area for improvement in residential substance use treatment settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Ramdin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Amanda Azer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Naila Ghafoor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Kyrillos Attaalla
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Mina Ghbrial
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Lewis Nelson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Richards CJ, Friedman D, Pinsky H, Gootkind E, Lee H, Yonker L, Georgiopoulos AM. Alcohol and opiate misuse in adults with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2023; 58:2535-2542. [PMID: 37294071 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International consensus statements on depression and anxiety in adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis (awCF) recommend assessment for comorbid substance misuse. However, at CF centers, the frequency and impact of substance misuse have not been well characterized, and best practices for prevention, identification, and evidence-based treatment have not been routinely implemented. METHODS Medical records of 148 awCF over 3 years were reviewed to determine the prevalence of substance misuse (alcohol or opiates) and its relationship with clinical variables and healthcare utilization. Independent sample t test for continuous outcomes and χ2 test for binary outcomes were used to compare groups with and without substance misuse. RESULTS Substance misuse was documented in 28 (19%) awCF, equally distributed between alcohol (n = 13) and opiates (n = 15). Adults with substance misuse were more likely to be male. The prevalence of diagnosed anxiety and depression did not differ significantly between groups, but those with substance misuse had more severe anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Item [GAD-7]: 10.0 ± 6.1 vs. 3.3 ± 4.4; p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9: 10.4 ± 6.5 vs. 4.0 ± 4.8; p < 0.001). Adults with substance misuse had higher annual rates of missed outpatient CF visits, more frequent "sick" visits, more frequent and longer hospitalizations, and a higher mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS In awCF, substance misuse is common and associated with adverse indicators of emotional and physical health, including via proxy of service utilization, suggesting that systematic approaches to addressing substance misuse in CF clinics should be considered. Prospective, longitudinal study is warranted to elucidate the complex relationships between depression, anxiety, substance misuse, and health outcomes in individuals with CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Richards
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah Friedman
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hanna Pinsky
- Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth Gootkind
- Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hang Lee
- MGH Center for Biostatistics, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lael Yonker
- Pediatric Pulmonary, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anna M Georgiopoulos
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Winiker AK, Heidari O, Pollock S, Sodder S, Tobin K. Barriers to Assessing and Treating Trauma in Primary Care and Opportunities for Improvement: Perspectives from Prescribers of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:1651-1659. [PMID: 37495397 PMCID: PMC10758239 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2238301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Background: Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) is a best practice for treating individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), and primary care-based MOUD management can reduce treatment barriers among OUD patients. Individuals with OUD experience disproportionately high rates of trauma and violence, highlighting the importance of addressing trauma, mental health, and substance use concurrently. However, clear guidelines for trauma-informed treatment in a primary care setting remain poorly established. Methods: A qualitative approach was engaged to explore primary care providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to assessing and treating trauma among MOUD patients. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted in 2021 with Baltimore-based MOUD prescribers, including primary care physicians and nurse practitioners. Interview questions assessed experiences with identifying and treating trauma among MOUD patients, including challenges and opportunities. Results: Providers reported extensive histories of trauma experienced by MOUD patients. Barriers to addressing trauma include a lack of standardized protocols/procedures for identifying trauma, insufficient training/time to assess and treat trauma, and the limited availability of external mental health providers and specialty services. Opportunities included building strong, mutually respectful patient-provider relationships, providing individualized, person-centered care, and establishing connections to coordinated multidisciplinary treatment networks. Conclusions: MOUD treatment within primary care is an important way to increase OUD treatment access, but clearer standards are needed for the treatment of trauma within this patient population. These findings demonstrate opportunities to improve standards and systems such that primary care providers are better equipped to assess and treat the complex histories of trauma experienced by individuals with OUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail K. Winiker
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Omeid Heidari
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sarah Pollock
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Shereen Sodder
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Karin Tobin
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Loh J, Buxton J, Kaida A, Voon P, Grant C, Milloy MJ. Estimating the prevalence and correlates of pain among people living with HIV who use unregulated drugs in a Canadian setting. J Opioid Manag 2023; 19:225-237. [PMID: 37145925 PMCID: PMC10811581 DOI: 10.5055/jom.2023.0778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Although prevalent among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) and people who use unregulated drugs (PWUD), pain and its possible links to substance use patterns and engagement in HIV treatment remains poorly characterized. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and correlates of pain among a cohort of PLWH who use un-regulated drugs. Between December 2011 and November 2018, 709 participants were recruited, and data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects (GLMM). At baseline, 374 (53 percent) individuals reported moderate-to-extreme pain in the previous 6 months. In a multivariable model, pain was significantly associated with nonmedical prescrip-tion-opioid use (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.63, 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.05), nonfatal overdose (AOR = 1.46, 95 percent CI: 1.11-1.93), self-managing pain (AOR = 2.25, 95 percent CI: 1.94-2.61), requesting pain medication in the previous 6 months (AOR = 2.01, 95 percent CI: 1.69-2.38), and ever being diagnosed with a mental illness (AOR = 1.47, 95 percent CI: 1.11-1.94). Establishing accessible pain management interventions that address the complex intersection of pain, drug use, and HIV-infection has potential to improve quality of life outcomes among this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Loh
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jane Buxton
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Angela Kaida
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Pauline Voon
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Cameron Grant
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M-J Milloy
- British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pasqualini I, Rullán PJ, Deren M, Krebs VE, Molloy RM, Nystrom LM, Piuzzi NS. Team Approach: Use of Opioids in Orthopaedic Practice. JBJS Rev 2023; 11:01874474-202303000-00008. [PMID: 36972360 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.22.00209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
» The opioid epidemic represents a serious health burden on patients across the United States. » This epidemic is particularly pertinent to the field of orthopaedics because it is one of the fields providing the highest volume of opioid prescriptions. » The use of opioids before orthopaedic surgery has been associated with decreased patient-reported outcomes, increased surgery-related complications, and chronic opioid use. » Several patient-level factors, such as preoperative opioid consumption and musculoskeletal and mental health conditions, contribute to the prolonged use of opioids after surgery, and various screening tools for identifying high-risk drug use patterns are available. » The identification of these high-risk patients should be followed by strategies aimed at mitigating opioid misuse, including patient education, opioid use optimization, and a collaborative approach between health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Pasqualini
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meriwether KV, Griego JL, Jansen SM, Abudushalamu F, Petersen TR, Dunivan GC, Komesu YM, Page-Reeves J. Beliefs and Narratives Associated with the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:216-229. [PMID: 36509397 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Female patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) face complicated healthcare journeys, but narrative perspectives on CPP treatment are lacking. DESIGN We collected data in English and Spanish from discussion groups and individual interviews with stakeholders around female CPP. SETTING A tertiary care center for gynecologic care. PATIENTS Patients with CPP who self-identified as women/female, community healthcare workers, and providers who care for women with CPP. INTERVENTIONS We conducted discussion groups with all 3 types of stakeholders and individual interviews with female patients who have CPP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Patient participants completed condition specific validated questionnaires. De-identified transcripts were coded with NVivo software. We contrasted patient characteristics and codes between patients with CPP who did and did not report opioid use in the last 90 days. The mean pain score of patient participants was 6/10 ± 2/10, and 14 of 47 (28%) reported recent opioid use, without significant differences between patients with and without recent opioid use. Thematic saturation was achieved. Five main themes emerged: the debilitating nature of CPP, emotional impacts of CPP, challenges in CPP healthcare interactions, treatment for CPP, and the value of not feeling alone. Common threads voiced by stakeholders included difficulty discussing chronic pain with others, a sense of inertia in treatment, interest in alternative and less invasive treatments before more involved treatments, and the need for individualized, stepwise, integrated treatment plans. Participants agreed that opioids should be used when other treatments fail, but women recently using opioids voiced fewer concerns about addiction and positive experiences with opioid efficacy. CONCLUSIONS These findings among female patients with CPP and also among community healthcare workers and providers advocate for a move toward patient-centered care, particularly the acknowledgment that every woman experiences pain in a singular way. Furthermore, stakeholders voice a deep need for development of individualized treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate V Meriwether
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Meriwether, Ms. Griego, and Dr. Komesu).
| | - Jamie L Griego
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Meriwether, Ms. Griego, and Dr. Komesu)
| | | | | | - Tim R Petersen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Petersen)
| | - Gena C Dunivan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama (Dr. Dunivan)
| | - Yuko M Komesu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Meriwether, Ms. Griego, and Dr. Komesu)
| | - Janet Page-Reeves
- and University of New Mexico Office of Community Health, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Dr. Page-Reeves)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Coloma-Carmona A, Carballo JL. Assessing Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain Patients: Further Validation of the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) Using Item Response Theory. Int J Ment Health Addict 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-023-01029-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractDue the limitations of the previous validations, the purpose of this study was to further validate the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index (POMI) in a larger sample of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients and to examine differential item functioning (DIF) across sex. Participants (n=225 CNCP patients under long-term opioid therapy) completed patient characteristics, self-reported POMI and DSM-5 prescription opioid use disorder measurements. Reliability and factor structure were assessed using both item response theory and classical test theory. ROC curve analysis was used to establish the optimum cut-off score for detecting the presence of DSM-5 prescription opioid-use disorder. Concurrent validity was also tested. The POMI showed a unidimensional factor structure and acceptable internal consistency (ωcat =0.62). DIF analysis showed that males and females respond similarly to each item of the POMI, supporting unbiased measurement of the latent trait across both groups. A cut-off point of 2 is suggested in order to maximize the accuracy of the instrument as a first-screening tool for opioid misuse (AUC=0.78; p<0.001; CI 95%: 0.72–0.85). Concurrent validity of the POMI was high with DSM-5 moderate to severe opioid-use disorder criteria (OR=7.824, p<0.001). These results indicate that the POMI is a valid and clinically feasible screening instrument for detecting CNCP patients who misuse opioid medications. The short length of the scale could meet the needs of clinical practice as it allows clinicians to precisely identify and monitor prescription opioid misuse in both male and female patients.
Collapse
|
34
|
Edwards RR, Schreiber KL, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Baron R, Freeman R, Jensen TS, Latremoliere A, Markman JD, Rice ASC, Rowbotham M, Staud R, Tate S, Woolf CJ, Andrews NA, Carr DB, Colloca L, Cosma-Roman D, Cowan P, Diatchenko L, Farrar J, Gewandter JS, Gilron I, Kerns RD, Marchand S, Niebler G, Patel KV, Simon LS, Tockarshewsky T, Vanhove GF, Vardeh D, Walco GA, Wasan AD, Wesselmann U. Optimizing and Accelerating the Development of Precision Pain Treatments for Chronic Pain: IMMPACT Review and Recommendations. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:204-225. [PMID: 36198371 PMCID: PMC10868532 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Large variability in the individual response to even the most-efficacious pain treatments is observed clinically, which has led to calls for a more personalized, tailored approach to treating patients with pain (ie, "precision pain medicine"). Precision pain medicine, currently an aspirational goal, would consist of empirically based algorithms that determine the optimal treatments, or treatment combinations, for specific patients (ie, targeting the right treatment, in the right dose, to the right patient, at the right time). Answering this question of "what works for whom" will certainly improve the clinical care of patients with pain. It may also support the success of novel drug development in pain, making it easier to identify novel treatments that work for certain patients and more accurately identify the magnitude of the treatment effect for those subgroups. Significant preliminary work has been done in this area, and analgesic trials are beginning to utilize precision pain medicine approaches such as stratified allocation on the basis of prespecified patient phenotypes using assessment methodologies such as quantitative sensory testing. Current major challenges within the field include: 1) identifying optimal measurement approaches to assessing patient characteristics that are most robustly and consistently predictive of inter-patient variation in specific analgesic treatment outcomes, 2) designing clinical trials that can identify treatment-by-phenotype interactions, and 3) selecting the most promising therapeutics to be tested in this way. This review surveys the current state of precision pain medicine, with a focus on drug treatments (which have been most-studied in a precision pain medicine context). It further presents a set of evidence-based recommendations for accelerating the application of precision pain methods in chronic pain research. PERSPECTIVE: Given the considerable variability in treatment outcomes for chronic pain, progress in precision pain treatment is critical for the field. An array of phenotypes and mechanisms contribute to chronic pain; this review summarizes current knowledge regarding which treatments are most effective for patients with specific biopsychosocial characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dennis C Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ralf Baron
- Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, House D, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Roy Freeman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nick A Andrews
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, California
| | - Luda Diatchenko
- Department of Anesthesia and Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, California
| | - John Farrar
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Robert D Kerns
- Yale University, Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Psychology, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | - Kushang V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | - Gary A Walco
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ajay D Wasan
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ursula Wesselmann
- Department of Anesthesiology/Division of Pain Medicine, Neurology and Psychology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ljungvall H, Lind AL, Zetterberg H, Wagner S, Ekselius L, Karlsten R, Heilig M, Åsenlöf P. U-PAIN cohort study among patients with chronic pain in specialised pain care: a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062265. [PMID: 36517106 PMCID: PMC9756188 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine acceptability of study participation and feasibility of (1) recruitment, (2) data collection and (3) outcome measures for the prospective U-PAIN cohort. DESIGN Internal feasibility study of a prospective cohort. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING 64 patients, >18 years, with chronic pain at a multidisciplinary pain centre at a university hospital in Sweden. OUTCOME MEASURES Acceptability of study participation was measured with a study-specific 10-item Likert scale. A score <3 was considered feasible, for the two items that assessed respondent burden a higher score indicated lesser participant burden and a score >3 was feasible. Recruitment was assessed by participation rates at baseline and retention at the 1-year follow-up, with threshold values for feasibility at 75% and 80%, respectively. Data collection and outcome measures were examined by completions rates of study procedures (90% was considered feasible), sample scores, internal consistency (α>0.70 was considered feasible), and agreement between self-reported data and data retrieved from medical records on opioid use (ICC or κ>0.60 was considered feasible). RESULTS Acceptability for study procedures was feasible, but participation rates were low: 25%. The retention rate at 1-year follow-up was 81% for those included in the feasibility study, that is, filling out computerised patient-reported outcome measures, and 65% for those using paper and pencil format. The completion rates for the different data collection methods ranged from 83% to 95%. Agreement between self-reported opioid use and prescribed dose and between opioid use disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), and clinical International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) diagnoses for opioid dependence were almost perfect (κ=0.91 and κ=0.90, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This feasibility study has helped to explore and improve methods for recruitment, data collection and use of outcome measures for the U-PAIN cohort. Low participation rate and high refusal rate at baseline is a challenge that needs to be further addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Ljungvall
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anne-Li Lind
- Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hedvig Zetterberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sofia Wagner
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lisa Ekselius
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rolf Karlsten
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Markus Heilig
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linkopings universitet, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Åsenlöf
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Carlile N, Fuller TE, Benneyan JC, Bargal B, Hunt L, Singer S, Schiff GD. Lessons Learned in Implementing a Chronic Opioid Therapy Management System. J Patient Saf 2022; 18:e1142-e1149. [PMID: 35617623 PMCID: PMC9691784 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Opioid misuse has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality in the United States, and safer opioid use represents an important challenge in the primary care setting. This article describes a research collaborative of health service researchers, systems engineers, and clinicians seeking to improve processes for safer chronic opioid therapy management in an academic primary care center. We present implementation results and lessons learned along with an intervention toolkit that others may consider using within their organization. METHODS Using iterative improvement lifecycles and systems engineering principles, we developed a risk-based workflow model for patients on chronic opioids. Two key safe opioid use process metrics-percent of patients with recent opioid treatment agreements and urine drug tests-were identified, and processes to improve these measures were designed, tested, and implemented. Focus groups were conducted after the conclusion of implementation, with barriers and lessons learned identified via thematic analysis. RESULTS Initial surveys revealed a lack of knowledge regarding resources available to patients and prescribers in the primary care clinic. In addition, 18 clinicians (69%) reported largely "inheriting" (rather than initiating) their chronic opioid therapy patients. We tracked 68 patients over a 4-year period. Although process measures improved, full adherence was not achieved for the entire population. Barriers included team structure, the evolving opioid environment, and surveillance challenges, along with disruptions resulting from the 2019 novel coronavirus. CONCLUSIONS Safe primary care opioid prescribing requires ongoing monitoring and management in a complex environment. The application of a risk-based approach is possible but requires adaptability and redundancies to be reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Theresa E Fuller
- Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James C Benneyan
- Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Basma Bargal
- Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Characterizing OPRM1 DNA methylation in prescription opioid users with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain Rep 2022; 7:e1046. [PMID: 36447952 PMCID: PMC9699511 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Many patients with chronic pain use prescription opioids. Epigenetic modification of the μ-opioid receptor 1 (OPRM1) gene, which codes for the target protein of opioids, may influence vulnerability to opioid abuse and response to opioid pharmacotherapy, potentially affecting pain outcomes. Objective Our objective was to investigate associations of clinical and sociodemographic factors with OPRM1 DNA methylation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain on long-term prescription opioids. Methods Sociodemographic variables, survey data (Rapid Estimate of Adult Health Literacy in Medicine-Short Form, Functional Comorbidity Index [FCI], PROMIS 43v2.1 Profile, Opioid Risk Tool, and PROMIS Prescription Pain Medication Misuse), and saliva samples were collected. The genomic DNA extracted from saliva samples were bisulfite converted, amplified by polymerase chain reaction, and processed for OPRM1-targeted DNA methylation analysis on a Pyrosequencing instrument (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA). General linear models were used to examine the relationships between the predictors and OPRM1 DNA methylation. Results Data from 112 patients were analyzed. The best-fitted multivariable model indicated, compared with their counterparts, patients with > eighth grade reading level, degenerative disk disease, substance abuse comorbidity, and opioid use < 1 year (compared with >5 years), had average methylation levels that were 7.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95%, 14.4%), 11.7% (95% CI 2.7%, 21.1%), 21.7% (95% CI 10.7%, 32.5%), and 16.1% (95% CI 3.3%, 28.8%) higher than the reference groups, respectively. Methylation levels were 2.2% (95% CI 0.64%, 3.7%) lower for every 1 unit increase in FCI and greater by 0.45% (95% CI 0.08%, 0.82%) for every fatigue T score unit increase. Conclusions OPRM1 methylation levels varied by several patient factors. Further studies are warranted to replicate these findings and determine potential clinical utility.
Collapse
|
38
|
Peyré A, Cauchie A, Daveluy A. Étude prospective évaluant la prévalence des douleurs chroniques chez des patients hospitalisés en service d’addictologie : de l’importance du repérage à la pluridisciplinarité des soins. Therapie 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
39
|
Blair A, Siddiqi A. Social determinants of ethno-racial inequalities in substance use: a decomposition of national survey data. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2022; 57:2013-2022. [PMID: 35482051 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02281-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Similar to the US, mortality due to suicide and the use of opioids, alcohol, and other substances (so-called "Deaths of Despair"), is rising in Canada and has been disproportionately observed among Whites compared to other racial and ethnic groups. This study aimed to assess the determinants of the ethno-racial differences in the use of substances that underlie these deaths. METHODS Using nationally representative data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (2003, 2015-2016, 2018 cycles), a decomposition analysis was performed to estimate the contribution of psychosocial determinants, including age, sex, marital status, immigration, education, income, rurality, and affective health on inequalities between White and non-White populations in illicit substance, opioid, and problematic alcohol use and combined use (≥ 2) of substances. RESULTS Overall, White respondents reported higher levels (by 5% to 10%) of substance use than non-White peers. Over 30% of the ethno-racial inequalities in illicit substance, problematic alcohol, and polysubstance use are explained by the protective role of immigration among those who are not White, whose low levels of substance use lower the prevalence in the non-White population overall. Among those born in Canada, no ethno-racial differences in substance use were observed. CONCLUSION Social determinants, particularly immigrant status, explain a substantial proportion of ethno-racial inequalities in substance use in Canada. The jump in substance use between racialized populations who immigrated to Canada and those Canadian-born highlights the importance of exploring within-group variability in deaths of despair risk and considering how intersecting forces including systemic racism shape substance use patterns across generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Blair
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
| | - Arjumand Siddiqi
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.,Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bedene A, Dahan A, Rosendaal FR, van Dorp ELA. Opioid epidemic: lessons learned and updated recommendations for misuse involving prescription versus non-prescription opioids. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:1081-1094. [PMID: 36068971 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2114898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the past decades, the opioid crisis has heavily impacted parts of the US society and has been followed by an increase in the use of opioids worldwide. It is of paramount importance that we explore the origins of the US opioid epidemic to develop best practices to tackle the rising tide of opioid overdoses. AREAS COVERED In this expert review, we discuss opioid (over)prescription, change in perception of pain, and false advertisement of opioid safety as the leading causes of the US opioid epidemic. Then, we review the evidence about opioid dependence and addiction potential and provide current knowledge about predictors of aberrant opioid-related behavior. Lastly, we discuss different approaches that were considered or undertaken to combat the rising tide of opioid-related deaths by regulatory bodies, pharmaceutical companies, and health-care professionals. For this expert review, we considered published articles relevant to the topic under investigation that we retrieved from Medline or Google scholar electronic database. EXPERT OPINION The opioid epidemic is a dynamic process with many underlying mechanisms. Therefore, no single approach may be best suited to combat it. In our opinion, the best way forward is to employ multiple strategies to tackle different underlying mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajda Bedene
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frits R Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline L A van Dorp
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nielsen S, Tse WC, Larance B. Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD011117. [PMID: 36063082 PMCID: PMC9443668 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011117.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are ongoing concerns regarding pharmaceutical opioid-related harms, including overdose and dependence, with an associated increase in treatment demand. People dependent on pharmaceutical opioids appear to differ in important ways from people who use heroin, yet most opioid agonist treatment research has been conducted in people who use heroin. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of maintenance opioid agonist pharmacotherapy for the treatment of pharmaceutical opioid dependence. SEARCH METHODS We updated our searches of the following databases to January 2022: the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, four other databases, and two trial registers. We checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs with adults and adolescents examining maintenance opioid agonist treatments that made the following two comparisons. 1. Full opioid agonists (methadone, morphine, oxycodone, levo-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM), or codeine) versus different full opioid agonists or partial opioid agonists (buprenorphine) for maintenance treatment. 2. Full or partial opioid agonist maintenance versus non-opioid agonist treatments (detoxification, opioid antagonist, or psychological treatment without opioid agonist treatment). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. MAIN RESULTS We identified eight RCTs that met inclusion criteria (709 participants). We found four studies that compared methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment, and four studies that compared buprenorphine maintenance to either buprenorphine taper (in addition to psychological treatment) or a non-opioid maintenance treatment comparison. We found low-certainty evidence from three studies of a difference between methadone and buprenorphine in favour of methadone on self-reported opioid use at end of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28 to 0.86; 165 participants), and low-certainty evidence from four studies finding a difference in favour of methadone for retention in treatment (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43; 379 participants). We found low-certainty evidence from three studies showing no difference between methadone and buprenorphine on substance use measured with urine drug screens at end of treatment (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.17; 206 participants), and moderate-certainty evidence from one study of no difference in days of self-reported opioid use (mean difference 1.41 days, 95% CI 3.37 lower to 0.55 days higher; 129 participants). There was low-certainty evidence from three studies of no difference between methadone and buprenorphine on adverse events (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.93; 206 participants). We found low-certainty evidence from four studies favouring maintenance buprenorphine treatment over non-opioid treatments in terms of fewer opioid positive urine drug tests at end of treatment (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.84; 270 participants), and very low-certainty evidence from four studies finding no difference on self-reported opioid use in the past 30 days at end of treatment (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.01; 276 participants). There was low-certainty evidence from three studies of no difference in the number of days of unsanctioned opioid use (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.19, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.09; 205 participants). There was moderate-certainty evidence from four studies favouring buprenorphine maintenance over non-opioid treatments on retention in treatment (RR 3.02, 95% CI 1.73 to 5.27; 333 participants). There was moderate-certainty evidence from three studies of no difference in adverse effects between buprenorphine maintenance and non-opioid treatments (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.48; 252 participants). The main weaknesses in the quality of the data was the use of open-label study designs, and difference in follow-up rates between treatment arms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low- to moderate-certainty evidence supporting the use of maintenance agonist pharmacotherapy for pharmaceutical opioid dependence. Methadone or buprenorphine did not differ on some outcomes, although on the outcomes of retention and self-reported substance use some results favoured methadone. Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine appears more effective than non-opioid treatments. Due to the overall very low- to moderate-certainty evidence and small sample sizes, there is the possibility that the further research may change these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Australia
| | - Wai Chung Tse
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Monash University, Frankston, Australia
- School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Briony Larance
- School of Psychology, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Murphy L, Leblanc K, Badr S, Ching E, Mao L, Steenhof N, Hamandi B, Rubin B, Seto A, Furlan AD. Opioid Utilization and Management in the Setting of Stewardship During Inpatient Rehab Care. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2022; 14:161-170. [PMID: 36118374 PMCID: PMC9477087 DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s360832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Opioid utilization and management in an inpatient rehabilitation setting have not been widely described, despite the unique opportunities that exist in this setting to support opioid stewardship across transitions in care. We aimed to characterize opioid utilization and management by interprofessional teams across a large, inpatient rehabilitation setting after incorporation of opioid stewardship principles by pharmacists as part of their daily practice. Patients and methods This was a retrospective chart review at Toronto Rehab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Patients with admission orders for any opioid from November 2017 to February 2018 were included. Complex continuing care and palliative care patients were excluded. Descriptive statistics were primarily used to describe the data as well as univariate linear regression to compare associations with milligram morphine equivalent (MME) reduction. Results A total of 448 patients were included. A reduction in total daily MME was seen in 49% (n=219) of the patients during their inpatient stay, with 73% (n=159) of these patients having a reduction of ≥50%. Sixty-nine percent (n=311) of the patients received an opioid prescription at discharge, with most scheduled (90%, n=98) with a supply of less than 30 days. Rehabilitation length of stay was correlated with a MME decrease during rehab (p<0.01), suggesting that longer lengths of stay contributed to a greater reduction in MME. Patients with chronic opioid use prior to acute care admission (p=0.01), and those who started extended-release opioids during acute care (p=0.02) were significantly less likely to discontinue opioids during rehab stay. Conclusion Opioid utilization and management in the setting of opioid stewardship across inpatient rehab and transitions of care were characterized. Opportunities exist for further quality improvement initiatives within inpatient rehabilitation and acute care settings to identify and support patients with complex pain management needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Murphy
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Correspondence: Laura Murphy, Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, 550 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada, Tel +1 416-597-3422 x 3657, Fax +1 416-260-2658, Email
| | - Kori Leblanc
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Souzi Badr
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emily Ching
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lynda Mao
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Naomi Steenhof
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bassem Hamandi
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bonita Rubin
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ada Seto
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea D Furlan
- KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kennedy N, Nelson S, Jerome RN, Edwards TL, Stroud M, Wilkins CH, Harris PA. Recruitment and retention for chronic pain clinical trials: a narrative review. Pain Rep 2022; 7:e1007. [PMID: 38304397 PMCID: PMC10833632 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Opioid misuse is at a crisis level. In response to this epidemic, the National Institutes of Health has funded $945 million in research through the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Pain Management Initiative, including funding to the Vanderbilt Recruitment Innovation Center (RIC) to strategize methods to catalyze participant recruitment. The RIC, recognizing the challenges presented to clinical researchers in recruiting individuals experiencing pain, conducted a review of evidence in the literature on successful participant recruitment methods for chronic pain trials, in preparation for supporting the HEAL Pain trials. Study design as it affects recruitment was reviewed, with issues such as sufficient sample size, impact of placebo, pain symptom instability, and cohort characterization being identified as problems. Potential solutions found in the literature include targeted electronic health record phenotyping, use of alternative study designs, and greater clinician education and involvement. For retention, the literature reports successful strategies that include maintaining a supportive staff, allowing virtual study visits, and providing treatment flexibility within the trial. Community input on study design to identify potential obstacles to recruitment and retention was found to help investigators avoid pitfalls and enhance trust, especially when recruiting underrepresented minority populations. Our report concludes with a description of generalizable resources the RIC has developed or adapted to enhance recruitment and retention in the HEAL Pain studies. These resources include, among others, a Recruitment and Retention Plan Template, a Competing Trials Tool, and MyCap, a mobile research application that interfaces with Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Kennedy
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sarah Nelson
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rebecca N. Jerome
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Terri L. Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mary Stroud
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Consuelo H. Wilkins
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA
- Office of Health Equity, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Paul A. Harris
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
John WS, Mannelli P, Hoyle RH, Greenblatt L, Wu LT. Association of chronic non-cancer pain status and buprenorphine treatment retention among individuals with opioid use disorder: Results from electronic health record data. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2022; 3:100048. [PMID: 36845986 PMCID: PMC9948869 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is common among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), its impact on buprenorphine treatment retention is unclear. The goal of this study was to use electronic health record (EHR) data to examine the association of CNCP status and 6-month buprenorphine retention among patients with OUD. METHODS We analyzed EHR data of patients with OUD who received buprenorphine treatment in an academic healthcare system between 2010 and 2020 (N = 676). We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate risk of buprenorphine treatment discontinuation (≥90 days between subsequent prescriptions). We used Poisson regression to estimate the association of CNCP and the number of buprenorphine prescriptions over 6 months. RESULTS Compared to those without CNCP, a higher proportion of patients with CNCP were of older age and had comorbid diagnoses for psychiatric and substance use disorders. There were no differences in the probability of buprenorphine treatment continuation over 6 months by CNCP status (p = 0.15). In the adjusted cox regression model, the presence of CNCP was not associated with time to buprenorphine treatment discontinuation (HR = 0.90, p = 0.28). CNCP status was associated with a higher number of prescriptions over 6 months (IRR = 1.20, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the presence of CNCP alone cannot be reliably associated with buprenorphine retention in patients with OUD. Nonetheless, providers should be aware of the association between CNCP and greater psychiatric comorbidity among patients with OUD when developing treatment plans. Research on the influence of additional characteristics of CNCP on treatment retention is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S. John
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Social and Community Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Paolo Mannelli
- Department of Pyschiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Adult Psychiatry and Psychology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Rick H. Hoyle
- Department of Pyschiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Adult Psychiatry and Psychology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Lawrence Greenblatt
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Li-Tzy Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Social and Community Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke Institue for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Center for Child and Family Policy, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hanning SM, Hua C, Baroutian S, Burrell R, Taylor M, Wright LJ, Svirskis D. Quantification and composition of pharmaceutical waste in New Zealand. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT 2022; 24:1603-1611. [PMID: 35570848 PMCID: PMC9085561 DOI: 10.1007/s10163-022-01410-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to quantify the amount of pharmaceutical waste produced in New Zealand, and determine the composition of pharmaceutical waste from community pharmacies in Auckland, New Zealand. Pharmaceutical waste collected in New Zealand is increasing, peaking at 542 tonne in 2019. Pharmaceutical waste collected from hospitals and pharmacies in Auckland increased by more than fourfold from 2016 to 2020. An audit of the types of pharmaceutical waste collected from community pharmacies revealed that the most common classes of drugs identified in this waste stream belonged to the nervous system, cardiovascular system and alimentary tract, and metabolism. Following examination of the contents of 12 pharmaceutical waste bins, 475 different pharmaceutical products were identified, highlighting the breadth of drugs in this waste stream. A range of dosage forms and hence materials were identified, which could present challenges for future waste treatment approaches. Hazardous drugs were identified including cytotoxic compounds, which should go into a separate waste stream for incineration. There is a need for similar data to be collected from multiple sites to fully appreciate the magnitude and composition of pharmaceutical waste. This will allow for the suitability of current practices for managing this hazardous waste stream to be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M. Hanning
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Changji Hua
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Saeid Baroutian
- Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rob Burrell
- Department of Anaesthesia, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau Health, Private Bag 93311, Otahuhu, Auckland, 1640 New Zealand
| | - Matthew Taylor
- Department of Anaesthesia, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau Health, Private Bag 93311, Otahuhu, Auckland, 1640 New Zealand
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - L. James Wright
- School of Chemical Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Darren Svirskis
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Moyo P, Schmidt C, Lee Y, Joshi R, Mukhdomi T, Trivedi A, Shireman TI. Receipt of Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Care by Adults Diagnosed with Chronic Pain: Analysis of the 2016-2018 Rhode Island All Payer Claims Database. RHODE ISLAND MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013) 2022; 105:51-56. [PMID: 35476739 PMCID: PMC9186019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine trends and factors associated with physical therapy (PT) and chiropractic care use among Rhode Islanders with private or publicly-funded health insurance who were diagnosed with chronic pain from 2016-2018. METHODS We measured monthly PT and chiropractic care use from the RI All Payer Claims Database, and conducted logistic regression to identify factors associated with utilization. RESULTS There were 284,942 unique adults with chronic pain representing over one-quarter of insured persons in the state. Chiropractic care use remained unchanged but was more prevalent (7.2%) than PT whose use increased minimally from 4.0% (2016) to 4.5% (2018). Traditional Medicare or Medicaid enrollment was associated with lower odds of receiving PT and chiropractic care than in private plans. CONCLUSIONS PT and chiropractic care use varied across payers; however, there were little to no changes in their use over time despite clinical guidelines that encourage non-pharmacologic options to manage chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patience Moyo
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Catherine Schmidt
- Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital Institute of Health Professions School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston, MA
| | - Yoojin Lee
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Richa Joshi
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Taif Mukhdomi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Amal Trivedi
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Theresa I Shireman
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Parisi A, Hanley AW, Garland EL. Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement reduces opioid craving, pain, and negative affect among chronic pain patients on long-term opioid therapy: An analysis of within- and between-person state effects. Behav Res Ther 2022; 152:104066. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
48
|
Noh Y, Heo KN, Yu YM, Lee JY, Ah YM. Trends in potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing and associated risk factors among Korean noncancer patients prescribed non-injectable opioid analgesics. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2022; 13:20420986221091001. [PMID: 35509350 PMCID: PMC9058459 DOI: 10.1177/20420986221091001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to investigate trends in the prevalence of potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing (PIOP) and identify potential risk factors among Korean noncancer patients. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of annual national patient sample data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA-NPS) for the period 2012-2018. Noncancer patients who were prescribed non-injectable opioid analgesics (NIOAs) at least once were included. The proportion of patients with at least one PIOP in terms of concurrent use of benzodiazepines or gabapentinoids, substance use disorder, treatment duration, and dosage was evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors associated with PIOP. Results Of the 9,772,503 noncancer patients, 1,583,444 (16.2%) were prescribed NIOAs at least once. Among them, 15.7% were exposed to PIOP, and the prevalence was much higher (31.6%) in the elderly group (age: ⩾65 years). The prevalence of PIOP increased 1.1-fold over 7 years (14.8-16.8%) among the total NIOA users and was more pronounced in non-tramadol NIOA users (a 1.5-fold increase, from 13.2% to 19.4%). Multivariable logistic regression indicated that older age, beneficiaries of medical aid or national meritorious service, exposure to polypharmacy, psychological disorder, chronic pain indication, and concomitant sedative use were independently associated with higher odds of PIOP. Discussion and Conclusion We found that the prevalence of PIOP was 15.7% among Korean noncancer patients, and it increased over the 7-year study period. This increasing trend is alarming because it was more drastic with non-tramadol NIOAs compared with that with tramadol. Several patient-level risk factors associated with PIOP would be useful in targeted management strategies for the safe use of opioids. Plain Language Summary Potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing and related risk factors among noncancer patients prescribed non-injectable opioids in Korea In Korea, the prevalence of non-injectable opioid analgesic (NIOA) use in noncancer patients steadily increased from 15.3% in 2012 to 17.1% in 2018.Also, the prevalence of potentially inappropriate opioid prescribing (PIOP) increased from 14.8% in 2012 to 16.8% in 2018.The following factors were associated with a markedly increased risk of PIOP: age, beneficiaries of medical aid or national meritorious service, polypharmacy, psychological disorder, chronic pain, and concomitant medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoojin Noh
- Pharmacy School, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kyu-Nam Heo
- Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Mi Yu
- Department of Pharmacy and Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Yonsei University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju-Yeun Lee
- Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Mi Ah
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Strategies aimed at preventing long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:238. [PMID: 35277150 PMCID: PMC8917706 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Long-term opioid use, which may have significant individual and societal impacts, has been documented in up to 20% of patients after trauma or orthopaedic surgery. The objectives of this scoping review were to systematically map the research on strategies aiming to prevent chronic opioid use in these populations and to identify knowledge gaps in this area.
Methods
This scoping review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. We searched seven databases and websites of relevant organizations. Selected studies and guidelines were published between January 2008 and September 2021. Preventive strategies were categorized as: system-based, pharmacological, educational, multimodal, and others. We summarized findings using measures of central tendency and frequency along with p-values. We also reported the level of evidence and the strength of recommendations presented in clinical guidelines.
Results
A total of 391 studies met the inclusion criteria after initial screening from which 66 studies and 20 guidelines were selected. Studies mainly focused on orthopaedic surgery (62,1%), trauma (30.3%) and spine surgery (7.6%). Among system-based strategies, hospital-based individualized opioid tapering protocols, and regulation initiatives limiting the prescription of opioids were associated with statistically significant decreases in morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) at 1 to 3 months following trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Among pharmacological strategies, only the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and beta blockers led to a significant reduction in MEDs up to 12 months after orthopaedic surgery. Most studies on educational strategies, multimodal strategies and psychological strategies were associated with significant reductions in MEDs beyond 1 month. The majority of recommendations from clinical practice guidelines were of low level of evidence.
Conclusions
This scoping review advances knowledge on existing strategies to prevent long-term opioid use in trauma and orthopaedic surgery patients. We observed that system-based, educational, multimodal and psychological strategies are the most promising. Future research should focus on determining which strategies should be implemented particularly in trauma patients at high risk for long-term use, testing those that can promote a judicious prescription of opioids while preventing an illicit use, and evaluating their effects on relevant patient-reported and social outcomes.
Collapse
|
50
|
Diagnostic and Predictive Capacity of the Spanish Versions of the Opioid Risk Tool and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised: A Preliminary Investigation in a Sample of People with Noncancer Chronic Pain. Pain Ther 2022; 11:493-510. [PMID: 35128624 PMCID: PMC9098780 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00356-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Accurate assessment of the risk of opioid abuse and misuse in people with noncancer chronic pain is crucial for their prevention. This study aimed to provide preliminary evidence of the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R). METHODS We used the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) as criterion measure to assess the capacity of each tool to identify patients misusing opioids at the time of the assessment. Eighteen months later, we used the COMM and the Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) to assess their predictive capacity. In total, 147 people with noncancer chronic pain participated in the diagnostic study, and 42 in the predictive study. RESULTS Receiver operating curve analysis showed that the SOAPP-R had an excellent capacity to identify participants who were misusing opioids at the time of assessment (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.827). The diagnostic capacity of the ORT was close to acceptable (AUC = 0.649-0.669), whereas its predictive capacity was poor (AUC = 0.522-0.554). The predictive capacity of the SOAPP-R was close to acceptable regarding misuse (AUC = 0.672) and poor regarding abuse (AUC = 0.423). CONCLUSION In the setting of Spanish-speaking communities, clinicians should be cautious when using these instruments to make decisions on opioid administration. Further research is needed on the diagnostic and predictive capacity of the Spanish versions of both instruments.
Collapse
|