Benefit profile of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: a nationwide multicentre registry in Japan

Efficacy of unfractionated heparin in patients with moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in sepsis. However, observational studies suggest that anticoagulants as a whole may benefit severely ill sepsis patients with coagulopathy, but the optimal targets of unfractionated heparin remain unclear. This study investigated which sepsis patients could most benefit from unfractionated heparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we identified adult sepsis patients requiring urgent hospitalization from 2006 to 2019 using a large-scale Japanese medical database. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving unfractionated heparin within 72 h of admission and those who did not. We compared in-hospital mortality, major bleeding complications, and thromboembolic events between these groups using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and treatment variables. Additionally, we assessed the association between heparin administration and in-hospital mortality across various subgroups.

RESULTS

Among 30,342 sepsis patients, 2520 received early heparin administration, and 27,822 did not. Multivariate logistic regression revealed a significant association between heparin and reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 0.735, 95 % CI: 0.596-0.903) but no significant association with major bleeding and thromboembolic risk (adjusted OR: 1.137, 1.243; 95 % CI: 0.926-1.391, 0.853-1.788, respectively). Subgroup analyses suggested significant survival benefits associated with heparin only in the sepsis patients with moderate coagulopathy and sepsis-induced coagulopathy scores of 3 or 4 (adjusted OR: 0.452, 0.625; 95 % CI: 0.265-0.751, 0.410-0.940, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early heparin administration upon admission is associated with lower in-hospital mortality, especially in moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy, and no significant increase in complications.

Practical approach to thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis: a narrative review

Thrombocytopenia frequently occurs in patients with sepsis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) may be a possible cause of thrombocytopenia owing to its high prevalence and association with poor outcomes; however, it is important to keep the presence of other diseases in mind in sepsis practice. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), which is characterized by thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and complement-mediated HUS, is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and organ damage. TMA has become widely recognized in recent years because of the development of specific treatments. Previous studies have reported a remarkably lower prevalence of TMA than DIC; however, its epidemiology is not well defined, and there may be cases in which TMA is not correctly diagnosed, resulting in poor outcomes. Therefore, it is important to differentiate DIC from TMA. Nevertheless, differentiating between DIC and TMA remains a challenge as indicated by previous reports that most patients with TMA can be diagnosed as DIC using the universal coagulation scoring system. Several algorithms to differentiate sepsis-related DIC from TMA have been suggested, contributing to improving the care of septic patients with thrombocytopenia; however, it may be difficult to apply these algorithms to patients with coexisting DIC and TMA, which has recently been reported. This review describes the disease characteristics, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment, of DIC, TMA, and other diseases with thrombocytopenia and proposes a novel practical approach flow, which is characterized by the initiation of the diagnosis of TMA in parallel with the diagnosis of DIC. This practical flow also refers to the longitudinal diagnosis and treatment flow with TMA in mind and real clinical timeframes. In conclusion, we aim to widely disseminate the results of this review that emphasize the importance of incorporating consideration of TMA in the management of septic DIC. We anticipate that this practical new approach for the diagnostic and treatment flow will lead to the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of complex cases, improve patient outcomes, and generate new epidemiological evidence regarding TMA.

A machine learning model for early and accurate prediction of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation before its progression to an overt stage

Background

Recent studies suggested an expected survival benefit associated with anticoagulant therapies for sepsis in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, anticoagulant therapies for overt DIC are no longer assumed to regulate pathologic progression as overt DIC is a late-phase coagulation disorder. Therefore, methods for early prediction of sepsis-induced DIC before its progression to an overt stage are strongly required.

Objectives

We aimed to develop a prediction model for overt DIC using machine learning.

Methods

This retrospective, observational study included adult septic patients without overt DIC. The objective variable was binary classification of whether patients developed overt DIC based on International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) overt DIC criteria. Explanatory variables were the baseline and time series data within 7 days from sepsis diagnosis. Light Gradient Boosted Machine method was used to construct the prediction model. For controls, we assessed sensitivity and specificity of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria for subsequent onset of overt DIC.

Results

Among 912 patients with sepsis, 139 patients developed overt DIC within 7 days from diagnosis of sepsis. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting onset of overt DIC within 7 days were 84.4%, 87.5%, and 0.867 in the test cohort and 95.0%, 75.9%, and 0.851 in the validation cohort, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity by the diagnostic thresholds were 54.7% and 74.9% for Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and 63.3% and 71.9% for ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional DIC scoring systems, a machine learning model might exhibit higher prediction accuracy.

Targeting extranuclear histones to alleviate acute and chronic inflammation

Extracellular histones instigate an inflammatory triad - centered on cytotoxicity, immune cell stimulation, and coagulation - ultimately shaping the dynamics and outcome of various inflammatory pathologies. Given the virtual absence of beneficial functions of histones in the extracellular space, in recent years a number of interference strategies have emerged. In this review we summarize pathogenic functions of extracellular histones and highlight current developments of therapeutic interference. Finally, we elaborate on the current status of preclinical attempts to interfere with extracellular histones in the context of a focus on sepsis and cardiovascular diseases, both of which are leading causes of mortality worldwide.

Persistent and Late-Onset Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Are Closely Related to Poor Prognosis in Patients with Sepsis

BACKGROUND

 Septic-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is heterogeneous regarding prognosis and responsiveness to anticoagulant therapy.

OBJECTIVES

 To investigate the relationship between the timing of development and recovery of DIC, its prognosis, and the difference in response to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-associated DIC patients.

METHODS

 This study was performed with a dataset from a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study (J-Septic DIC registry) in Japan between 2011 and 2013 to reveal the subgroup "high risk of death in DIC" and investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use and mortality. Patients were assigned to four groups based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-overt DIC status at days 1 and 3: non-DIC (-/-), early-recovered DIC (+/-), late-onset DIC (-/+), and persistent DIC (+/+).

RESULTS

 A total of 1,922 patients were included. In-hospital mortality in persistent and late-onset DIC patients was significantly higher than in patients with non-DIC and early-recovered DIC. This finding indicates that persistent DIC and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognosis subgroup, "high-risk" DIC. Meanwhile, patients with high-risk DIC treated with anticoagulants had significantly better outcomes than those without anticoagulants after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

 This study showed that individuals with a high risk of death, persistent DIC, and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognostic subgroup in septic DIC; however, high-risk DIC is also a subgroup that can obtain more benefits from anticoagulant therapy.

Rotational Thromboelastometry and Clot Waveform Analysis as Point-of-Care Tests for Diagnosis of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Critically Ill Children in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the test performances of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and activated partial thromboplastin time-based clot waveform analysis (aPTT-CWA) compared with the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis disseminated intravascular coagulation (ISTH-DIC) score for diagnosis of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (ODIC) in critically ill children. Prognostic indicators of DIC complications were also evaluated.

DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted. ROTEM and aPTT-CWA were assessed alongside standard parameters based on the ISTH-DIC score and natural anticoagulants. Both conventional and global hemostatic tests were repeated on days 3-5 for nonovert DIC.

SETTING

PICU of the Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

SUBJECTS

Infants and children who were admitted to PICU with underlying diseases predisposed to DIC, such as sepsis, malignancy, major surgery, trauma, or severe illness, were included in the study between July 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-four children were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of ODIC was 20.3%. Regarding ROTEM parameters, using EXTEM clot formation time (CFT) cutoff of greater than 102 seconds provided sensitivity and specificity of 90.9% and 80.9%, respectively, for diagnosing ODIC, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86. In the case of aPTT-CWA performance, no biphasic waveform was observed, whereas both maximum coagulation acceleration (Min2) of less than 0.35%/s 2 and maximum coagulation deceleration of less than 0.25%/s 2 demonstrated identical sensitivities of 76.9% and specificities of 79.6%. Combining two global hemostatic tests significantly improved the diagnostic performance (INTEM CFT + EXTEM CFT + Min2 AUC 0.92 [95% CI, 0.80-1.00] vs. EXTEM CFT AUC 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.96], p = 0.034). Bleeding was the most common consequence. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, Min2 of less than 0.36%/s 2 was an independent risk factor for bleeding complications, with an adjusted odds ratio of 15.08 (95% CI, 1.08-211.15, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

ROTEM and aPTT-CWA were valuable diagnostic tools in critically ill children who might require point-of-care tests. Min2 showed significant clinical implications for predicting bleeding events in this population.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin for the treatment of DIC associated with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) is commonly used in Japan to treat disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), but its efficacy compared with other anticoagulants is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this issue in DIC patients with hematological malignancies.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus for prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of rhTM in DIC patients with hematological malignancies between April 2008 and April 2023. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating recovery from DIC, hemorrhagic adverse events (AEs), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We analyzed one prospective (64 patients) and seven retrospective studies (209 patients). Use of rhTM was associated with a higher rate of recovery from DIC (OR: 2.25 [1.09-4.63] and 1.98 [1.12-3.50] in prospective and retrospective studies, respectively; same order below) and fewer hemorrhagic AEs (OR: 0.83 [0.30-2.30] and 0.21 [0.08-0.57]). rhTM did not improve OS (OR: 1.06 [0.42-2.66] and 1.72 [0.87-3.39]), although the incidence of hemorrhagic death was lower in the rhTM group (0 of 94 patients).

CONCLUSION

Use of rhTM in patients with hematological malignancy-associated DIC is strongly expected to be effective and safe.

Association Between Nonthyroidal Illness Syndrome and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Sepsis

Purpose

Both nonthyroidal illness syndrome (NTIS) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are commonly occurred in sepsis. The objective of this study is to evaluate the association between NTIS and DIC, as well as their impacts on the mortality in adults with sepsis.

Patients and methods

A total of 1219 septic patients in two Chinese academic centers from October 2012 and October 2022 were enrolled in analysis. We conduct logistic regression models to analyze the independent risk factors for DIC. Modified Poisson regression models are used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of NTIS on the 28 days mortality in septic patients with DIC. Correlation analysis between thyroid function parameters and coagulation parameters is performed with Pearson coefficient be reported.

Results

DIC is diagnosed on 388 (31.8%) of all the 1219 enrolled septic patients within 72 hours after admission. In multivariate logistic regression models, NTIS (OR 3.19; CI 2.31-4.46; p<0.001) is a statistically significant independent risk factor for DIC after adjustment for potential confounders. Twenty-eight days mortality is significantly higher in DIC patients complicated with NTIS compared with the other DIC patients (23.2% vs 14.0%, p=0.024). This result is also robust in different modified Poisson regression models (Model 1: RR 1.46; CI 1.25-1.70; p<0.001; Model 2: RR 1.35; CI 1.14-1.60; p<0.001; Model 3: RR 1.18; CI 1.02-1.37; p=0.026). Correlation analysis reveals that the thyroid function parameters of FT3, FT4 and TSH only have weak correlations with coagulation parameters of platelet count, fibrinogen, FDP, D-dimers, PT, APTT and INR in sepsis.

Conclusion

NTIS is an independent risk factor for DIC in adults with sepsis. DIC patients complicated with NTIS have significantly higher severity and higher rate of mortality.

COAGULOPATHY PARAMETERS PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOMES IN SEPSIS-INDUCED ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE TWO PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT STUDIES

ABSTRACT

Background: Although coagulopathy is often observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its clinical impact remains poorly understood. Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the coagulopathy parameters that are clinically applicable for prognostication and to determine anticoagulant indications in sepsis-induced ARDS. Method: This study enrolled patients with sepsis-derived ARDS from two nationwide multicenter, prospective observational studies. We explored coagulopathy parameters that could predict outcomes in the Focused Outcome Research on Emergency Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis, and Trauma (FORECAST) cohort, and the defined coagulopathy criteria were validated in the Sepsis Prognostication in Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Room-Intensive Care Unit (SPICE-ICU) cohort. The correlation between anticoagulant use and outcomes was also evaluated. Results: A total of 181 patients with sepsis-derived ARDS in the FORECAST study and 61 patients in the SPICE-ICU study were included. In a preliminary study, we found the set of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio ≥1.4 and platelet count ≤12 × 10 4 /μL, and thrombocytopenia and elongated prothrombin time (TEP) coagulopathy as the best coagulopathy parameters and used it for further analysis; the odds ratio (OR) of TEP coagulopathy for in-hospital mortality adjusted for confounding was 3.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-8.87; P = 0.005). In the validation cohort, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality was 32.99 (95% CI, 2.60-418.72; P = 0.002). Although patients without TEP coagulopathy showed significant improvements in oxygenation over the first 4 days, patients with TEP coagulopathy showed no significant improvement (ΔPaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, 24 ± 20 vs. 90 ± 9; P = 0.026). Furthermore, anticoagulant use was significantly correlated with mortality and oxygenation recovery in patients with TEP coagulopathy but not in patients without TEP coagulopathy. Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia and elongated prothrombin time coagulopathy is closely associated with better outcomes and responses to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-induced ARDS, and our coagulopathy criteria may be clinically useful.

Designing the Diagnostic Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and critical complication in various diseases. There are several diagnostic criteria, such as the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria, the Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (JSTH) criteria, and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) criteria. Due to the strengths and drawbacks inherent in each diagnostic criterion, it has the potential to cause confusion in clinical settings. It is possible to increase the specificity by making a complex criterion but simple and easy-to-use criteria are demanded in practice. To establish pragmatic criteria using readily available biomarkers, the ISTH focused on DIC arising from sepsis and released sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria (SIC). A similar approach will aid in constructing a practical diagnostic criterion tailored to each specific background.

Risk stratification utilizing sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, antithrombin activity, and demographic data in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a frequent complication in patients with sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Anticoagulant therapy may be appropriate for certain patients with DIC, particularly those with increased disease severity and deficiency in the physiologic anticoagulant antithrombin. We retrospectively analyzed post-marketing survey data from 1562 patients with sepsis-associated DIC and antithrombin activity of 70% or less. All the patients were treated with antithrombin concentrates. Baseline sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, DIC score, and antithrombin activity were assessed. Cox multivariate regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of variables used to assess mortality. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to classify the risk of 28-day mortality. COX multivariate regression analysis demonstrated a significant association of age, sex, baseline SOFA score, baseline antithrombin activity, and the presence of pneumonia or skin/soft tissue infection with increased mortality. The area under the curve of SOFA score or antithrombin activity for mortality was 0.700 and 0.614, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly higher in patients with SOFA score ≥ 12 and antithrombin activity < 47%. The decision tree analysis accurately classified the risk of death into high (> 40%), medium (40%-20%), and low (< 20%) categories in 86.1% of the cohort. Twenty eight-day mortality can be strongly predicted using baseline SOFA score, antithrombin activity, infection site, age, and sex as variables in the clinical decision tree for patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

Intensive care unit mortality and cost-effectiveness associated with intensivist staffing: a Japanese nationwide observational study

BACKGROUND

Japan has four types of intensive care units (ICUs) that are divided into two categories according to the management fee charged per day: ICU management fees 1 and 2 (ICU1/2) (equivalent to high-intensity staffing) and 3 and 4 (ICU3/4) (equivalent to low-intensity staffing). Although ICU1/2 charges a higher rate than ICU3/4, no cost-effectiveness analysis has been performed for ICU1/2. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of ICU1/2 compared with those of ICU3/4.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used a nationwide Japanese administrative database to identify patients admitted to ICUs between April 2020 and March 2021 and divided them into the ICU1/2 and ICU3/4 groups. The ICU mortality rates and in-hospital mortality rates were determined, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (Japanese Yen (JPY)/QALY), defined as the difference between quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and medical costs, was compared between ICU1/2 and ICU3/4. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test; an ICER of < 5 million JPY/QALY was considered cost-effective.

RESULTS

The ICU1/2 group (n = 71,412; 60.7%) had lower ICU mortality rates (ICU 1/2: 2.6% vs. ICU 3/4: 4.3%, p < 0.001) and lower in-hospital mortality rates (ICU 1/2: 6.1% vs. ICU 3/4: 8.9%, p < 0.001) than the ICU3/4 group (n = 46,330; 39.3%). The average cost per patient of ICU1/2 and ICU3/4 was 2,249,270 ± 1,955,953 JPY and 1,682,546 ± 1,588,928 JPY, respectively, with a difference of 566,724. The ICER was 718,659 JPY/QALY, which was below the cost-effectiveness threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU1/2 is associated with lower ICU patient mortality than ICU3/4. Treatments under ICU1/2 are more cost-effective than those under ICU3/4, with an ICER of < 5 million JPY/QALY.

Impact of Different Treatments for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation on Patients with or without Biliary Drainage for Severe Biliary Tract Infection

Objective

Sepsis caused by severe acute cholangitis requires biliary drainage to decrease the intra-biliary pressure. Furthermore, several studies showed that anticoagulant treatment can improve the outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). There were reports examining the efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in patients undergoing biliary drainage with sepsis-associated DIC, and no reports compared the efficacy of DIC treatments when no drainage is performed. In this study, the influence of antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) preparations on the overall survival (OS) of patients with and without biliary drainage was analyzed.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study in a single institution involved patients with sepsis-associated DIC caused by severe biliary tract infection. In total, 71 patients treated by either AT replacement therapy or rTM preparation were assessed for inclusion. The two groups were patients with biliary drainage (n = 45) and without drainage (n = 26). To assess the clinical efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in each group, the 60-day OS was determined through estimated survival analysis.

Results

Focusing on the effects of different therapeutic agents for DIC, in the group of patients with biliary drainage, OS showed no difference between patients treated by rTM and AT. However, in patients without biliary drainage, the survival curves of patients treated with AT replacement were lower than those of patients with rTM preparation.

Conclusion

This study revealed that the OS of patients without biliary drainage differed depending on the DIC therapeutic agent for sepsis-associated DIC caused by acute cholangitis. We would recommend the use of rTM preparation over AT replacement therapy for patients who cannot undergo biliary drainage.

Role of aspirin, beta-blocker, statins, and heparin therapy in septic patients under mechanical ventilation: a narrative review

Sepsis is the main cause of death among patients admitted to intensive care units. Management of sepsis includes fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, intravenous antimicrobials, source control, mechanical ventilation, and others. New insights into the potential benefits of non-antimicrobial drugs in sepsis have evolved based on the pathophysiology of the disease and the mechanism of action of some drugs, but the findings are still controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, and heparin as adjunctive treatments in septic patients under mechanical ventilation with non-cardiovascular diseases and their effect on mortality. We searched PubMed with relevant keywords (beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, or heparin, and critically ill or sepsis) for the last 10 years and some personal collection of relevant articles, and then we assessed studies according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results show that beta-blockers, aspirin, and heparin may have promising feedback on reducing mortality. However, new well-controlled, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to confirm that, and multiple issues regarding their usage need to be addressed. On the other hand, the feedback regarding the effectiveness of statins was not as strong as that of the other drugs studied, and we suggest that further research is needed to confirm these results.

Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-3 by improving inflammation and coagulopathy

Background and aim

Sepsis is a syndromic response to infection and is associated with high mortality, thus imposing a significant global burden of disease. Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism, its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects in sepsis remain controversial. Owing to the modification of the Sepsis-3 definition and diagnostic criteria, further evaluation of the efficacy and benefit population of LMWH is required.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess whether LMWH improved the inflammation, coagulopathy, and clinical outcomes against Sepsis-3 and to identify the target patients. All patients diagnosed with sepsis at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (the largest general hospital in northwest China) from January 2016 to December 2020 were recruited and re-evaluated using Sepsis-3 criteria.

Results

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 88 pairs of patients were categorized into the treatment and control groups based on subcutaneous LMWH administration. Compared with the control group, a significantly lower 28-day mortality was observed in the LMWH group (26.1 vs. 42.0%, p = 0.026) with a comparable incidence of major bleeding events (6.8 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.773). Cox regression analysis showed that LMWH administration was the independent protective factor for septic patients (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; p = 0.006). Correspondingly, the LMWH treatment group showed a significant improvement in inflammation and coagulopathy. Further subgroup analysis showed that LMWH therapy was associated with favorable outcomes in patients younger than 60 years and diagnosed with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), ISTH overt DIC, non-septic shock, or non-diabetics and in patients included in the moderate-risk group (APACHE II score 20-35 or SOFA score 8-12).

Conclusion

Our study results showed that LMWH improves 28-day mortality by improving inflammatory response and coagulopathy in patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. The SIC and ISTH overt DIC scoring systems can better identify septic patients who are likely to benefit more from LMWH administration.

Risk factors for postoperative disseminated intravascular coagulation in surgical patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia

PURPOSE

The prognostic impact of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in surgical patients with non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is unclear. This study aimed to confirm the association between postoperative DIC and prognosis and to identify preoperative risk factors associated with postoperative DIC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 52 patients who underwent emergency surgery for NOMI between January 2012 and March 2022. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis with the log-rank test was used to compare 30-day survival and hospital survival between patients with and without postoperative DIC. In addition, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the preoperative risk factors for postoperative DIC.

RESULTS

The 30-day and hospital mortality rates were 30.8% and 36.5%, respectively, and the incidence rate of DIC was 51.9%. Compared to patients without DIC, patients with DIC showed significantly lower rates of 30-day survival (41.5% vs 96%, log-rank P < 0.001) and hospital survival (30.2% vs 86.4%, log-rank, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses showed that the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC score (OR = 2.697; 95% CI, 1.408-5.169; P = 0.003) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR = 1.511; 95% CI, 1.111-2.055; P = 0.009) were independent risk factors for postoperative DIC in surgical patients with NOMI.

CONCLUSION

The development of postoperative DIC is a significant prognostic factor for 30-day and hospital mortalities in surgical patients with NOMI. In addition, the JAAM DIC score and SOFA score have a high discriminative ability for predicting the development of postoperative DIC.

Effectiveness of early heparin therapy on outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether early unfractionated heparin (UFH) administration provides a survival advantage for patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC). Methods: Patients hospitalized with sepsis-induced coagulopathy from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database were identified. Patients were divided into two groups, who received unfractionated heparin (UFH) subcutaneously within 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the control group, who received not. The primary endpoint was intensive care unit mortality, the secondary outcomes were 7, 14, and 28-day and hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) the marginal structural Cox model (MSCM) and E-value analysis were used to account for baseline differences, time-varying and unmeasured confounding factors. Results: A total of 3,377 patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy were enrolled in the study, of which 815 in unfractionated heparin group and 2,562 in control group. There was significant effect on primary and secondary outcomes with unfractionated heparin after propensity score matching (intensive care unit mortality, hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.92; 7-day, HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49-0.99; 14-day, HR 0.68.95% CI 0.50-0.92; 28-day, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96; hospital mortality, HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96), marginal structural Cox model manifested unfractionated heparin associated with decreased intensive care unit mortality in all populations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84), and stratification with the marginal structural Cox model indicated analysis further indicated the survival advantage only among patients with an sepsis-induced coagulopathy score of 4 (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.81). Further analysis showed that treatment with 6,250-13750 IU/day of unfractionated heparin associated with a decreased risk of intensive care unit mortality. Similar results were replicated in subgroup analysis with propensity score matching only for patients with an sepsis-induced coagulopathy score of 4 (intensive care unit mortality, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). Conclusion: This study found early unfractionated heparin therapy to patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Subgroup analysis further demonstrates heparin therapy decreased intensive care unit mortality primarily in patients only with SIC score of 4.

Endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis in sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening clinical syndrome characterized by multiorgan dysfunction caused by a dysregulated or over-reactive host response to infection. During sepsis, the coagulation cascade is triggered by activated cells of the innate immune system, such as neutrophils and monocytes, resulting in clot formation mainly in the microcirculation, a process known as immunothrombosis. Although this process aims to protect the host through inhibition of the pathogen’s dissemination and survival, endothelial dysfunction and microthrombotic complications can rapidly lead to multiple organ dysfunction. The development of treatments targeting endothelial innate immune responses and immunothrombosis could be of great significance for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with sepsis. Medications modifying cell-specific immune responses or inhibiting platelet–endothelial interaction or platelet activation have been proposed. Herein, we discuss the underlying mechanisms of organ-specific endothelial dysfunction and immunothrombosis in sepsis and its complications, while highlighting the recent advances in the development of new therapeutic approaches aiming at improving the short- or long-term prognosis in sepsis.

Heparan sulfates and heparan sulfate binding proteins in sepsis

Heparan sulfates (HSs) are the main components in the glycocalyx which covers endothelial cells and modulates vascular homeostasis through interactions with multiple Heparan sulfate binding proteins (HSBPs). During sepsis, heparanase increases and induces HS shedding. The process causes glycocalyx degradation, exacerbating inflammation and coagulation in sepsis. The circulating heparan sulfate fragments may serve as a host defense system by neutralizing dysregulated Heparan sulfate binding proteins or pro-inflammatory molecules in certain circumstances. Understanding heparan sulfates and heparan sulfate binding proteins in health and sepsis is critical to decipher the dysregulated host response in sepsis and advance drug development. In this review, we will overview the current understanding of HS in glycocalyx under septic condition and the dysfunctional heparan sulfate binding proteins as potential drug targets, particularly, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and histones. Moreover, several drug candidates based on heparan sulfates or related to heparan sulfates, such as heparanase inhibitors or heparin-binding protein (HBP), will be discussed regarding their recent advances. By applying chemical or chemoenzymatic approaches, the structure-function relationship between heparan sulfates and heparan sulfate binding proteins is recently revealed with structurally defined heparan sulfates. Such homogenous heparan sulfates may further facilitate the investigation of the role of heparan sulfates in sepsis and the development of carbohydrate-based therapy.

Sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: an international estrangement of disease concept

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired syndrome characterized by widespread intravascular activation of coagulation, which can be caused by infectious and noninfectious insults, such as trauma, postcardiac arrest syndrome, and malignant diseases. At present, diagnosis and treatment of DIC clearly differ between Japan and Western countries; in Japan, DIC has long been considered a therapeutic target, and much evidence on DIC has been published. However, there has recently been no international consensus on whether DIC should be a therapeutic target with anticoagulant therapy. This review describes the coagulofibrinolytic system abnormalities associated with sepsis and discusses related management strategies. It also explores the reasons why DIC is perceived differently in different regions. There is a major discrepancy between diagnostic and treatment options in Japan, which are based on holistic assessments of trials, as well as the results of post hoc subgroup analyses and observational studies, and those in Western countries, which are based mainly on the results of sepsis mega trials, especially randomized controlled trials. The differences might also be due to various patient factors in each region, especially racial characteristics in thrombolytic mechanisms, and differences in interpretation of evidence for candidate drugs. Hence, Japanese researchers need to distribute their high-quality clinical research data not only to Japan but also to the rest of the world.

Epidemiology of sepsis in a Japanese administrative database

Sepsis is the leading cause of death worldwide. Considering regional variations in the characteristics of patients with sepsis, a better understanding of the epidemiology in Japan will lead to further development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of sepsis. To investigate the epidemiology of sepsis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed between 2003 and January 2023. Among the 78 studies using a Japanese administrative database, we included 20 that defined patients with sepsis as those with an infection and organ dysfunction. The mortality rate in patients with sepsis has decreased since 2010, reaching 18% in 2017. However, the proportion of inpatients with sepsis is increasing. A study comparing short-course (≤7 days) and long-course (≥8 days) antibiotic administration showed lower 28-day mortality in the short-course group. Six studies on the treatment of patients with septic shock reported that low-dose corticosteroids or polymyxin B hemoperfusion reduced mortality, whereas intravenous immunoglobulins had no such effect. Four studies investigating the effects of treatment in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation demonstrated that antithrombin may reduce mortality, whereas recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin does not. A descriptive study of medical costs for patients with sepsis showed that the effective cost per survivor decreased over an 8-year period from 2010 to 2017. Sepsis has a significant impact on public health, and is attracting attention as an ongoing issue. Further research to determine more appropriate prevention methods and treatment for sepsis should be a matter of priority.

Anticoagulant therapies against sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a frequent but lethal complication in sepsis. Anticoagulant therapies, such as heparin, antithrombin, activated protein C, and recombinant human-soluble thrombomodulin, were expected to regulate the progression of coagulopathy in sepsis. Although a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the survival effects of these therapies over the past few decades, there remains no consistent evidence showing a significant survival benefit of anticoagulant therapies. Currently, anticoagulant therapies are not conducted as a standard treatment against sepsis in many countries and regions. However, most of these RCTs were performed overall in patients with sepsis but not in those with sepsis-induced DIC, who were theoretically the optimal target population of anticoagulants. Actually, multiple lines of evidence from observational studies and meta-analyses of the RCTs have suggested that anticoagulant therapies might reduce mortality only when used in septic DIC. In addition, the severity of illness is another essential factor that maximally affects the efficacy of the therapy. Therefore, to provide evidence on the true effect of anticoagulant therapies, the next RCTs must be designed to enroll only patients with sepsis-induced overt DIC and a high severity of illness. To prepare these future RCTs, a novel scientific infrastructure for accurate detection of patients who can receive maximal benefit from anticoagulant therapies also needs to be established.

Clinical applications of machine learning in the survival prediction and classification of sepsis: coagulation and heparin usage matter

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome eliciting highly heterogeneous host responses. Current prognostic evaluation methods used in clinical practice are characterized by an inadequate effectiveness in predicting sepsis mortality. Rapid identification of patients with high mortality risk is urgently needed. The phenotyping of patients will assistant invaluably in tailoring treatments.

METHODS

Machine learning and deep learning technology are used to characterize the patients' phenotype and determine the sepsis severity. The database used in this study is MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV ('Medical information Mart for intensive care') which is a large, public, and freely available database. The K-means clustering is used to classify the sepsis phenotype. Convolutional neural network (CNN) was used to predict the 28-day survival rate based on 35 blood test variables of the sepsis patients, whereas a double coefficient quadratic multivariate fitting function (DCQMFF) is utilized to predict the 28-day survival rate with only 11 features of sepsis patients.

RESULTS

The patients were grouped into four clusters with a clear survival nomogram. The first cluster (C_1) was characterized by low white blood cell count, low neutrophil, and the highest lymphocyte proportion. C_2 obtained the lowest Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the highest survival rate. C_3 was characterized by significantly prolonged PTT, high SIC, and a higher proportion of patients using heparin than the patients in other clusters. The early mortality rate of patients in C_3 was high but with a better long-term survival rate than that in C_4. C_4 contained septic coagulation patients with the worst prognosis, characterized by slightly prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT), significantly prolonged prothrombin time (PT), and high septic coagulation disease score (SIC). The survival rate prediction accuracy of CNN and DCQMFF models reached 92% and 82%, respectively. The models were tested on an external dataset (MIMIC-IV) and achieved good performance. A DCQMFF-based application platform was established for fast prediction of the 28-day survival rate.

CONCLUSION

CNN and DCQMFF accurately predicted the sepsis patients' survival, while K-means successfully identified the phenotype groups. The distinct phenotypes associated with survival, and significant features correlated with mortality were identified. The findings suggest that sepsis patients with abnormal coagulation had poor outcomes, abnormal coagulation increase mortality during sepsis. The anticoagulation effects of appropriate heparin sodium treatment may improve extensive micro thrombosis-caused organ failure.

Age-related differences in the survival benefit of the administration of antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination in sepsis

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is one of the major organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis. This retrospective secondary analysis comprised data from a prospective multicenter study to investigate the age-related differences in the survival benefit of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis according to the DIC diagnostic criteria. Adult patients with severe sepsis based on the Sepsis-2 criteria were enrolled and divided into the following groups: (1) anticoagulant group (patients who received anticoagulant therapy) and (2) non-anticoagulant group (patients who did not receive anticoagulant therapy). Patients in the former group were administered antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination. The increases in the risk of hospital mortality were suppressed in the high-DIC-score patients aged 60-70 years receiving anticoagulant therapy. No favorable association of anti-coagulant therapy with hospital mortality was observed in patients aged 50 years and 80 years. Furthermore, anticoagulant therapy in the lower-DIC-score range increased the risk of hospital mortality in patients aged 50-60 years. In conclusion, anticoagulant therapy was associated with decreased hospital mortality according to a higher DIC score in septic patients aged 60-70 years. Anticoagulant therapy, however, was not associated with a better outcome in relatively younger and older patients with sepsis.

Web-based application for predicting the potential target phenotype for recombinant human thrombomodulin therapy in patients with sepsis: analysis of three multicentre registries

A recent randomised controlled trial failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) on sepsis. However, there is still controversy in the effects of rhTM for sepsis due to the heterogeneity of the study population. We previously identified patients with a distinct phenotype that could be a potential target of rhTM therapy (rhTM target phenotype). However, for application in the clinical setting, a simple tool for determining this target is necessary. Thus, using three multicentre sepsis registries, we aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting presence of the target phenotype that we previously identified for targeted rhTM therapy. The predictors were platelet count, PT-INR, fibrinogen, fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, and D-dimer. We also implemented the model as a web-based application. Two of the three registries were used for model development (n = 3694), and the remaining registry was used for validation (n = 1184). Approximately 8-9% of patients had the rhTM target phenotype in each cohort. In the validation, the C statistic of the developed model for predicting the rhTM target phenotype was 0.996 (95% CI 0.993-0.998), with a sensitivity of 0.991 and a specificity of 0.967. Among patients who were predicted to have the potential target phenotype (predicted target patients) in the validation cohort (n = 142), rhTM use was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted risk difference, - 31.3% [- 53.5 to - 9.1%]). The developed model was able to accurately predict the rhTM target phenotype. The model, which is available as a web-based application, could profoundly benefit clinicians and researchers investigating the heterogeneity in the treatment effects of rhTM and its mechanisms.

Phenotype-oriented anticoagulant therapy for sepsis: still a work in progress

Coagulation disorders ranging from subtle changes in coagulation parameters to fatal disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are common in septic patients. Coagulation activation is considered to be one of the most important factors contributing to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in sepsis. Anticoagulant therapy is, therefore, necessary to prevent MODS, but eligibility criteria remain controversial. Sepsis is a highly heterogeneous syndrome, which could explain the negative results of clinical studies on the treatment of sepsis. Recently, sepsis has been subdivided into several phenotypes with different therapeutic outcomes. At present, septic patients with dysfunctional coagulation expressed as increased D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDPs) are considered to be candidates for anticoagulant therapy. In this review, we aimed to describe the features of different septic phenotypes. We also discuss factors that contribute to controversies in this area, and challenges in defining which septic phenotypes are good candidates for anticoagulant therapy.

The Necessity of Individualized Treatment for Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation by Infected Organ

Objective

Several studies have shown that anticoagulation can improve survival outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A guideline from Japan in 2020 suggested two therapeutic agents for sepsis-associated DIC treatment: antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) preparation. In 2021, our preliminary study proposed that different organs of septic infection might lead to distinct treatment outcomes following different therapies against DIC. In this study, we created a subanalysis on the influence of AT replacement therapy and rTM preparations on overall survival (OS) by comparing two causative organs: biliary and respiratory tract infections.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study in a single institution involved patients with sepsis-associated DIC treated by either AT or rTM who were categorized based on sources of infection. The two groups defined for this study were biliary (n = 62) and respiratory tract infection (n = 84). To assess the clinical efficacy of AT and rTM, 30-day OS was examined using a stepwise variable selection for a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The analysis of factors influencing OS by each group showed that rTM preparation remained a significant factor in the biliary tract infection group (HR 0.306, 95% CI 0.133–0.706). In the respiratory tract infection group, the score of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (HR 1.109, 95% CI 1.051–1.170), polymyxin B hemoperfusion (HR 0.390, 95% CI 0.161–0.944), and AT replacement therapy (HR 0.510, 95% CI 0.261–0.997) were established as significant factors.

Conclusion

This study revealed that the OS of patients with biliary tract and respiratory tract infections differed depending on the DIC therapeutic agent. Based on these results, we could suggest that it is necessary to develop individualized treatment strategies for septic infections, taking into consideration the differences in the infected organs.

A Suggested Link Between Antithrombin Dose and Rate of Recovery from Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients with Severe Organ Failure

Introduction

The efficacy of antithrombin (AT) supplementation against septic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) may depend on various pre-existing factors, particularly the AT dose and multiple organ dysfunction severity. This study aimed to identify the impactful factors for early DIC recovery.

Methods

Patients’ clinical records, including AT therapy and septic DIC data, were retrospectively extracted from January 2015 to December 2020. The patients were divided into those with early DIC recovery (n = 34) and those without (n = 37). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined significant independent factors. Time-to-event analysis confirmed how these factors affected the DIC recovery time.

Results

The AT dose per patient body weight (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.879 [1.031-8.042], P = 0.044) and pre-existing organ dysfunction severity (0.333 [0.120-0.920], P = 0.034) were significant independent factors affecting early DIC recovery. A higher AT dose significantly shortened the DIC recovery time among patients with severe organ dysfunction (P < 0.01), but not among non-severe patients (P = 0.855).

Conclusion

The therapeutic efficacy of AT treatment for septic DIC might depend on the severity of pre-existing organ failure and the AT dose per patient body weight.

Major coagulation disorders and parameters in COVID-19 patients

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with a high prevalence rate, has rapidly infected millions of people around the world. Since viral infections can disrupt the coagulation and homeostasis cascades, various inflammatory and coagulation problems occur due to COVID-19 infection, similar to coronavirus epidemics in 2003 and 2004. According to multiple previous studies, in the present research, we reviewed the most commonly reported problems of COVID-19 patients, such as venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, disseminated intravascular coagulation, etc. and investigated the causes in these patients. Coagulation and inflammatory markers, such as platelets and fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, d-dimer, prothrombin time, etc., were also discussed, and the treatment options were briefly reviewed. In addition to coagulation treatments, regular examination of coagulation parameters and thrombotic complications can be helpful in the timely treatment of patients. Therefore, it is helpful to review the coagulation problems in COVID-19 patients. Although all mentioned problems and markers are important in COVID-19, some of them are more valuable in terms of diagnosis and prognosis.

Favorable Outcomes of Anticoagulation With Unfractioned Heparin in Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Analysis of MIMIC-III Database

Backgrounds: Anticoagulation in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unfractioned heparin (UFH) could improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).

Methods: Septic patients with SIC were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Cox-proportional hazards model, logistic regression model and linear regression were used to assess the associations between UFH administration and 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, occurrence of bleeding complications and length of stay, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match the imbalance between patients in the UFH group and the control group. Patients were further stratified according to SIC score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II).

Results: A total of 1,820 septic patients with SIC were included in the data analysis. After PSM, 652 pairs of patients were matched between the patients in the UFH group and the control group. UFH was significantly associated with reduced 28-day mortality (HR, 0.323, 95% CI, 0.258–0.406; p < 0.001) and hospital mortality (HR, 0.380, 95% CI, 0.307–0.472; p < 0.001) without increasing the risks of intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.480, 95% CI, 0.955–2.294; p = 0.080) or gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 1.094, 95% CI, 0.503–2.382; p = 0.820). For subgroup analysis, it didn't change the favorable results of UFH on mortality and UFH didn't increase the risk of hemorrhage in patients with severe disease.

Conclusions: The analysis of MIMIC-III database indicated that anticoagulant therapy with UFH may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with SIC.

Dielectric Blood Coagulometry for the Early Detection of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of dielectric blood coagulometry for early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective observational study.

SETTING

Patients with sepsis or septic shock at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine between September 2019 and September 2020.

PATIENTS

The patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis based on the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine: 1) no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 2) late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group: not diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1 but diagnosed within 48 hours after admission, and 3) disseminated intravascular coagulation group: diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1. The study evaluated 80 patients (no disseminated intravascular coagulation, 31 [38.8%]; late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation, 34 (42.5%); disseminated intravascular coagulation, 15 [18.8%]).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared the clinical severity scores and mortality of the groups and assessed the correlation between the dielectric blood coagulometry-derived coagulation marker, thrombin levels, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score using Spearman rank correlation. The mortality rate was 0% (0/31) in the no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 35.3% (12/34) in the late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group, and 33.3% (5/15) in the disseminated intravascular coagulation group. Although the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score on day 1 did not reflect disseminated intravascular coagulation in approximately 70% of patients who developed disseminated intravascular coagulation by day 2, dielectric clot strength measured by dielectric blood coagulometry on day 1 strongly correlated with disseminated intravascular coagulation development by day 2 (Spearman ρ = 0.824; p < 0.05) and with thrombin level on day 1 (Spearman ρ = 0.844; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dielectric blood coagulometry can be used to detect early-phase disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis and is strongly correlated with thrombin levels. Larger studies are needed to verify our results for developing clinical applications.

Antithrombotic Therapy Improves ICU Mortality of Septic Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of antithrombotic drugs for treating sepsis is controversial. Here, we explore the association between antithrombotic therapy and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality for septic patients with peripheral vascular disease.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study uses data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to examine mortality among different groups. Cox regression and marginal structural Cox models (MSCMs) were used to adjust for confounding factors. Main Results. The final cohort from the MIMIC-III database included 776 patients, of which 701 survived and 75 perished. The anticoagulant (AC) group and the antiplatelet-anticoagulation (AC-AP) group survived better than the group without antithrombotic treatment (non-AT). The AC and AC-AP groups showed a 0.363-fold and 0.373-fold risk of ICU mortality, respectively, compared with the non-AT group when controlling for age, gender, CRRT, alcohol, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, renal failure, liver disease, INR, PT, PPT, and SpO2. Antiplatelet therapy did not reduce ICU mortality. The same trends were apparent from the MSCM. In addition, the AC-AP group exhibited a lower risk of bleeding complications.

CONCLUSION

Although the antithrombotic group (AC and AC-AP groups) demonstrated a higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score than the group without antithrombotic treatment (non-AT group), the risk of ICU mortality was lower without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. Our study further suggested that anticoagulation therapy may benefit the prognosis of septic patients with peripheral vascular disease.

Signaling pathways and intervention therapies in sepsis

Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host systemic inflammatory and immune response to infection. Over decades, advanced understanding of host-microorganism interaction has gradually unmasked the genuine nature of sepsis, guiding toward new definition and novel therapeutic approaches. Diverse clinical manifestations and outcomes among infectious patients have suggested the heterogeneity of immunopathology, while systemic inflammatory responses and deteriorating organ function observed in critically ill patients imply the extensively hyperactivated cascades by the host defense system. From focusing on microorganism pathogenicity, research interests have turned toward the molecular basis of host responses. Though progress has been made regarding recognition and management of clinical sepsis, incidence and mortality rate remain high. Furthermore, clinical trials of therapeutics have failed to obtain promising results. As far as we know, there was no systematic review addressing sepsis-related molecular signaling pathways and intervention therapy in literature. Increasing studies have succeeded to confirm novel functions of involved signaling pathways and comment on efficacy of intervention therapies amid sepsis. However, few of these studies attempt to elucidate the underlining mechanism in progression of sepsis, while other failed to integrate preliminary findings and describe in a broader view. This review focuses on the important signaling pathways, potential molecular mechanism, and pathway-associated therapy in sepsis. Host-derived molecules interacting with activated cells possess pivotal role for sepsis pathogenesis by dynamic regulation of signaling pathways. Cross-talk and functions of these molecules are also discussed in detail. Lastly, potential novel therapeutic strategies precisely targeting on signaling pathways and molecules are mentioned.

Clinical Treatment of Perioperative Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Patients Who Underwent Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

It is unclear how effective recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) treatment is in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) during the perioperative period of gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. The current study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes of rTM for perioperative DIC.

METHODS

We enrolled 100 consecutive patients diagnosed with perioperative DIC after gastrointestinal surgery, and hepato-biliary-pancreatic including emergency procedures, between January 2012 and May 2021. Patients received routine rTM treatment immediately after DIC diagnosis. Then, the DIC, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were calculated and used for evaluation. The outcomes of rTM treatment and the predictors of survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The causative diseases of DIC were as follows: perforated peritonitis, n = 38; intestinal ischemia, n = 23; intra-abdominal abscess, n = 13; anastomotic leakage, n = 7; pneumonia, n = 7; cholangitis, n = 4; and others, n = 6. The 30-day mortality rate was 18.0%. There were significant differences in the platelet count (13.78 vs 10.41, P = .032) and the SOFA score (5.22 vs 9.89, P<.0001) at the start of DIC treatment between the survivor and non-survivor groups (day 0). The survivor group had a significantly lower DIC score (3.13 vs 4.93, P = .0006) and SOFA score (4.94 vs 12.14, P < .0001) and a higher platelet count (13.50 vs 4.34, P < .0001) than the non-survivor group on day 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive and systemic treatment is fundamentally essential for DIC, in which rTM may play an important role in the treatment of perioperative DIC.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

[Treatment of sepsis-induced coagulopathy : Results of a Germany-wide survey in intensive care units]

BACKGROUND

In the context of sepsis and septic shock, coagulopathy often occurs due to the close relationship between coagulation and inflammation. Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is the most severe and potentially fatal form. Anticoagulants used in prophylactic or therapeutic doses are discussed to potentially exert beneficial effects in patients with sepsis and/or SIC; however, due to the lack of evidence recent guidelines are limited to recommendations for drug prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), while treatment of SIC has not been addressed.

METHODS

In order to determine the status quo of VTE prophylaxis as well as treatment of SIC in German intensive care units (ICU), we conducted a Germany-wide online survey among heads of ICUs from October 2019 to May 2020. In April 2020, the survey was supplemented by an additional block of questions on VTE prophylaxis and SIC treatment in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

RESULTS

A total of 67 senior doctors took part in the survey. The majority (n = 50; 74.6%) of the responses were from ICU under the direction of an anesthesiologist and/or a department of anesthesiology. Most of the participants worked either at a university hospital (n = 31; 47.8%) or an academic teaching hospital (n = 27; 40.3%). The survey results show a pronounced heterogeneity in clinical practice with respect to the prophylaxis of VTE as well as SIC treatment. In an exemplary case of pneumogenic sepsis, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) were by far the most frequently mentioned group of medications (n = 51; 76.1% of the responding ITS). In the majority of cases (n = 43; 64.2%), anti-FXa activity is not monitored with the use of LMWH in prophylaxis doses. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was listed as a strategy for VTE prophylaxis in 37.3% of the responses (n = 25). In an exemplary case of abdominal sepsis 54.5% of the participants (n = 36; multiple answers possible) stated the use of UFH or LMWH and UFH with dosage controlled by PTT is used on two participating ICUs. The anti-FXa activity under prophylactic anticoagulation with LMWH is monitored in 7 participating clinics (10.6%) in abdominal sepsis. Systematic screening for sepsis-associated coagulation disorders does not take place in most hospitals and patterns in the use of anticoagulants show significant variability between ICUs. In the case of COVID-19 patients, it is particularly noticeable that in three quarters of the participating ICUs the practice of drug-based VTE prophylaxis and SIC treatment does not differ from that of non-COVID-19 patients.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of answers collected in the survey suggests that a systematic approach to this topic via clinical trials is urgently needed to underline individualized patient care with the necessary evidence.

Age Is Associated With the Efficacy of Anticoagulant Therapies Against Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) commonly complicates sepsis and considerably worsens mortality. Recent studies suggested that anticoagulant therapies improved mortality only in specific sepsis populations, and key pathologies for selecting optimal targets needed to be identified. Anticoagulant activities were naturally altered with aging. This study aimed to evaluate age-related differences in efficacy of anticoagulant therapies in sepsis. This post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter cohort study was conducted in 42 intensive care units in Japan. Adult patients with septic DIC were divided into anticoagulant and control groups. Age-related changes in predicted mortality in both groups were compared using a logistic regression model including 2-way interaction terms. Patients were also stratified into 3 subsets based on age, and propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine survival effect of anticoagulants in each subset. We included 1432 patients with septic DIC; 867 patients received anticoagulants and 565 received none. Age-related change in predicted mortality was significantly different between groups (P for interaction = 0.013), and the gap between groups was broad in the younger population. Similarly, in Cox regression analyses, anticoagulant therapies were associated with significantly lower mortality in the subsets of age ≤ 60 and 60-79 (hazard ratios = 0.461, 0.617, P = 0.007, 0.005, respectively), whereas there was no difference in survival between the groups in the subsets of age ≥ 80. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapies for septic DIC might be associated with patient age.

Heparin beyond anti-coagulation

Heparin has served as a mainstream anticoagulant for over eight decades. Clinically heparin-derived compounds significantly contribute to prevention and treatment of thrombotic events complicated in numerous medical conditions such as venous thromboembolism, coronary artery disease and extracorporeal circulation processes. Moreover in recent years, various off-labeled efficacious potentials of heparin beyond anti-coagulation are dramatically emerging, and increasingly investigated in clinical studies. Herein this article presents a comprehensive update on the expanded applications of heparin agents, covering the pregnant clinic, respiratory inflammation, renal disease, sepsis, pancreatitis, among others. It aims to maximize the beneficial profile of a pharmaceutical product through medical re-purposing development, exemplified by heparin, to address the unmet clinical needs of severe illness including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Platelets parameters in septic shock: clinical usefulness and prognostic value

: Septic shock is a common cause of admission in the ICUs. Despite tremendous improvement in the management modalities, mortality remains high. Early diagnosis and prompt resuscitation are required to improve prognosis. Therefore, identifying a biomarker that could reveal the sepsis at its earlier stage is of paramount importance. In this regards, platelet parameters, such as mean platelet volume, immature platelet fraction and platelet-derived microparticles have been investigated as possible sepsis biomarkers. In fact, haemostasis disturbances are one of the hallmark of septic shock where platelets play a pivotal role in orchestrating the inflammatory response of the host. Moreover, these parameters could have a prognostic value as the severity of the multiorgan dysfunction is correlated with the inflammatory reaction.

Standard and derived rotational thromboelastometry parameters for prediction of disseminated intravascular coagulation in septic patients

: Waiting for lab tests results for the calculation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scores leads to unwanted delays in diagnosis. The use of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for this purpose would allow for a more rapid DIC diagnosis at the bedside. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of standard ROTEM parameters and calculated parameters from the ROTEM velocity curve to predict DIC. The retrospective observational study included 97 septic patients. Japanese Association for Acute Medicine score was used for DIC diagnosis and whole-blood ROTEM was performed at study inclusion. Univariate analysis revealed delayed coagulation initiation and propagation and reduced clot firmness and maximum elasticity in DIC patients compared with patients without DIC. To adjust for confounders, multivariable logistic regression models were created and fibrinogen levels, prothrombin time and ROTEM parameters such as maximum clot firmness, maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and total thrombus formation [area under the curve (AUC)] were identified as significant predictors of DIC. According to receiver operating characteristics analysis, MCE and total thrombus formation (AUC) were the most useful ROTEM parameters for DIC prediction. MCE less than 158 (73% sensitive, 80% specific) and AUC less than 6175 mm × 100 (73% sensitive, 76% specific) predicted DIC in septic patients. Both standard and derived ROTEM parameters are useful for rapid DIC prediction in septic patients, allowing the timely identification of patients with higher mortality risk which might benefit from additional therapies. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical relevance of these findings.

Therapeutic strategies in patients with coagulopathy and disseminated intravascular coagulation: awareness of the phase-dependent characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has long been understood as a condition where both thrombotic and hemostatic abnormalities coexist. DIC is a difficult complication for clinicians to manage as it is due to multiple underlying complications of pathophysiologic abnormalities in diverse disease states. Ongoing research continues to define the meaning of DIC, evaluate therapeutic options, and how it presents with the complex paradigm of systemic activation of coagulation. In this review we introduce the current topis regarding this tough situation.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Online search of published medical literature through MEDLINE and Web of Sience using the term "disseminated intravascular coagulation", "coagulopathy", "coagulation disorder", "hemostasis", "fibrinolysis", "thrombus" and "anticoagulants".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Articles were chosen for inclusion based on their relevance to disseminated intravascular coagulation, coagulopathy, hemostasis and thrombosis in sepsis, COVID-19, trauma, and obstetrics. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.

CONCLUSIONS

DIC is recognized as a pathologically triggered and dysregulated systemic activation of coagulation in response to various noxious stimuli. DIC's phenotype and clinical manifestations can vary from prothrombotic to hemorrhagic, depending on the underlying diseases. However, the fundamental mechanisms of systemic and vascular endothelial dysfunction can be explained as different phases of the acute response, with an initial prothrombotic phase that can commonly change to hemostatic insufficiency. Thrombin is the key initiator of the pathophysiologic process along with endothelial injury and initially fibrinolysis activation followed by fibrinolysis suppression. There is no established approach for managing DIC beyond initially treating the underlying disease and replacement therapy for the management of coagulopathy. Targeting anticoagulation therapy with antithrombin concentrates and recombinant thrombomodulin for the prevention of microthrombus formation, and antifibrinolytic therapy using tranexamic acid for the coagulopathy after massive bleeding, continue to be studied as therapeutic options.

The Role of Histones and Heparin in Sepsis: A Review

Septic shock with multiple organ failure is a devastating situation in clinical settings. Through the past decades, much progress has been made in the management of sepsis and its underlying pathogenesis, but a highly effective therapeutic has not been developed. Recently, macromolecules such as histones have been targeted in the treatment of sepsis. Histones primarily function as chromosomal organizers to pack DNA and regulate its transcription through epigenetic mechanisms. However, a growing body of research has shown that histone family members can also exert cellular toxicity once they relocate from the nucleus into the extracellular space. Heparin, a commonly used anti-coagulant, has been shown to possess life-saving capabilities for septic patients, but the potential interplay between heparin and extracellular histones has not been investigated. In this review, we summarize the pathogenic roles of extracellular histones and the therapeutic roles of heparin in the development and management of sepsis and septic shock.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Evaluation of Anticoagulation Practice With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Objective

To investigate the anticoagulation practice in patients presenting with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) during sepsis and septic shock with one-year follow-up since discharge and to evaluate factors associated with the development of NOAF.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using chart review in patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock. 

Results

There was a total of 1132 patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock over a one-year period. Thirty-two patients were found to have NOAF in the setting of sepsis. Of this, eight (25%) patients were anticoagulated with warfarin and 14 (44%) patients were not anticoagulated during discharge. At one-year follow-up post-discharge, nine (29%) patients continued on warfarin and 16 (52%) patients remained not anticoagulated.

Conclusion

We found that the majority of patients who developed NOAF did not get anticoagulated at the time of discharge. A similar trend followed after one year of follow-up. Since proper treatment guidelines are not in place, these patients are at high risk for recurrent atrial fibrillation, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and death. 

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy Is Associated with the Outcome of Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression and Catabolism Syndrome

Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome (PIICS) often occur after critical care. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is expected to be associated independently with PIICS development. We retrospectively analyzed 5397 patients admitted to the Hitachi General Hospital emergency and critical care center during four years. We classified PIICS as C-reactive protein > 3.0 mg/dL or albumin < 3.0 g/dL or lymphocyte count < 800/μL on day 14. Prolonged hospital stay (>14 days) without PIICS and early recovery (discharged alive within 14 days) were assigned as non-PIICS. Early death (death within 14 days) was identified. We analyzed the association between the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt DIC and PIICS outcomes. Results revealed 488 PIICS, 416 early death and 4493 non-PIICS cases. Analyses showed DIC as associated significantly with mortality, the Barthel index at discharge and PIICS development. Multivariate regression analysis and a generalized structural equation model identified DIC on admission as an independent risk factor for PIICS in surviving patients.

Recombinant thrombomodulin protects against LPS-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome via preservation of pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx

Background and Purpose

Disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx is causally related to microvascular endothelial dysfunction, a characteristic of sepsis‐induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recombinant human thrombomodulin (rhTM) attenuates vascular endothelial injuries, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here, we investigated the structural basis and molecular mechanisms of rhTM effects on vascular endothelial injury in a model of sepsis.

Experimental Approach

LPS (20 mg·kg⁻¹) was intraperitoneally injected into 10‐week‐old male C57BL6 mice, and saline or rhTM was intraperitoneally injected 3 and 24 h after LPS injection. Using serum and/or lung tissue, histological, ultrastructural, and microarray analyses were performed.

Key Results

Survival rate of rhTM‐treated mice was significantly higher than that of control mice 48 h after LPS injection. Serum concentrations of IL‐6 and high‐mobility group box 1 were lower in the rhTM‐treated group than in the control. Injury to the endothelial glycocalyx in pulmonary capillaries was attenuated by rhTM treatment. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed up‐regulation of gene sets corresponding to cell proliferation/differentiation and anti‐inflammation, such as the TGF‐β pathway, and negative regulation of IL‐6, upon rhTM treatment. Gene expression of heparan sulfate 6‐O‐sulfotransferase 1 and endothelial cell‐specific molecule 1 (components of the endothelial glycocalyx) was significantly preserved by rhTM treatment, and their protein expression levels were maintained in endothelial cells.

Conclusion and Implications

Our findings show that rhTM treatment affected inflammation, cell proliferation/differentiation, and glycocalyx synthesis in serum and lung tissue, subsequently attenuating ARDS caused by endothelial injury.

Sepsis With Preexisting Heart Failure: Management of Confounding Clinical Features

Preexisting heart failure (HF) in patients with sepsis is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Core sepsis management includes aggressive volume resuscitation followed by vasopressors (and potentially inotropes) if fluid is inadequate to restore perfusion; however, large fluid boluses and vasoactive agents are concerning amid the cardiac dysfunction of HF. This review summarizes evidence regarding the influence of HF on sepsis clinical outcomes, pathophysiologic concerns, resuscitation targets, hemodynamic interventions, and adjunct management (ie, antiarrhythmics, positive pressure ventilatory support, and renal replacement therapy) in patients with sepsis and preexisting HF. Patients with sepsis and preexisting HF receive less fluid during resuscitation; however, evidence suggests traditional fluid resuscitation targets do not increase the risk of adverse events in HF patients with sepsis and likely improve outcomes. Norepinephrine remains the most well-supported vasopressor for patients with sepsis with preexisting HF, while dopamine may induce more cardiac adverse events. Dobutamine should be used cautiously given its generally detrimental effects but may have an application when combined with norepinephrine in patients with low cardiac output. Management of chronic HF medications warrants careful consideration for continuation or discontinuation upon development of sepsis, and β-blockers may be appropriate to continue in the absence of acute hemodynamic decompensation. Optimal management of atrial fibrillation may include β-blockers after acute hemodynamic stabilization as they have also shown independent benefits in sepsis. Positive pressure ventilatory support and renal replacement must be carefully monitored for effects on cardiac function when HF is present.