1
|
Kenning C, Usher-Smith JA, Jamison J, Jones J, Boaz A, Little P, Mallen C, Bower P, Park S. Impact of research activity on performance of general practices: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2024:BJGPO.2024.0073. [PMID: 38649161 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2024.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is evidence that engaging in research is directly associated with better performance. If this relationship is to be strengthened, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that might underlie that relationship. AIM To explore the perspectives of staff and wider stakeholders about mechanisms by which research activity may impact on the performance of general practices. DESIGN & SETTING Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with general practice professionals and wider stakeholders in England. METHOD Individual interviews with 41 purposively sampled staff in 'research-ready' or 'research-active' general practices, and 21 other stakeholders. Interviews were independently coded by three researchers using a framework approach. RESULTS Participants described potential 'direct' and 'indirect' impacts on their work. 'Direct' impacts included improved knowledge and skills that could change practice work (for example, additional records searches for particular conditions); bringing in additional resources (for example, access to investigations or staff); and improving relationships with patients. 'Indirect' impacts included job satisfaction (for example, perception of practice as a centre of excellence and innovation, and the variety afforded by research activity reducing burnout); and staff recruitment (increasing the attractiveness of the practice as a place to work). Responders identified few negative impacts. CONCLUSION Staff and stakeholders identified a range of potential impacts of research activity on practice performance, with impacts on their working lives most salient. Negative impacts were not generally raised. Nevertheless, responders generally discussed potential impacts rather than providing specific examples of those impacts. This may reflect the type of research activity conducted in general practice, often led by external collaborators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Kenning
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - James Jamison
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Annette Boaz
- NIHR Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit, Policy Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sophie Park
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Hampstead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meneo D, Curati S, Russo PM, Martoni M, Gelfo F, Baglioni C. A Comprehensive Assessment of Bedtime Routines and Strategies to Aid Sleep Onset in College Students: A Web-Based Survey. Clocks Sleep 2024; 6:468-487. [PMID: 39311226 PMCID: PMC11417809 DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep6030031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
College students often experience sleep-wake alterations. Different factors can contribute to insomnia symptoms in this population. The present study aims at investigating pre-sleep behaviours and strategies used to aid sleep onset in young college students and their association with insomnia symptoms. A total of 548 Italian college students (mean age = 23.48 years, range = 19-30 years, 80.5% female) completed a web-based survey on pre-sleep behaviours and sleep-onset facilitators, insomnia symptoms and sleep hygiene, anxiety and depression, and coping strategies. The use of electronic devices at bedtime and as a sleep-onset facilitator was predominant. Students using specific behaviours as sleep-onset facilitators were characterised by more psychological difficulties and poorer sleep. In multivariable linear regression analysis, the frequency of using medications and melatonin, regardless of motivations, was associated with higher insomnia symptoms. The use of specific sleep-onset facilitators positively correlated with the severity of insomnia symptoms. Many students engage in behaviours that are considered sleep-interfering and that are often employed in an attempt to facilitate sleep onset without benefits. Overall, the motivational factors behind pre-sleep behaviours need to be addressed in preventive programs targeting young college students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debora Meneo
- Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Plinio, 44, 00193 Rome, Italy; (D.M.)
| | - Sara Curati
- Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Plinio, 44, 00193 Rome, Italy; (D.M.)
| | - Paolo Maria Russo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Monica Martoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Gelfo
- Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Plinio, 44, 00193 Rome, Italy; (D.M.)
- IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00179 Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Baglioni
- Department of Human Sciences, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Plinio, 44, 00193 Rome, Italy; (D.M.)
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brooks J, Ruane H, McDiarmid S, Vyas A, Issa B, Harvie M. Do people with type 2 diabetes find continuous and intermittent low-energy diets for weight loss and diabetes remission acceptable? J Hum Nutr Diet 2024; 37:995-1006. [PMID: 38798236 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Manchester Intermittent versus Daily Diet App Study (MIDDAS) tested the feasibility and potential efficacy of two remotely delivered low-energy diet (LED) programmes (800 kcal/day) to support weight loss and remission of type 2 diabetes: continuous [CLED] (8 weeks of daily LED) and intermittent [ILED] (2 days of LED/week for 28 weeks). Understanding participant experiences can help us to understand the acceptability of LED programmes to people with type 2 diabetes, informing future programme development and implementation. METHODS Twenty participants (10 CLED; 10 ILED) took part in interviews conducted at the end of the active weight loss phase (CLED week 12, ILED week 28). Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using the template analysis approach, with an a priori focus on acceptability. Four themes are presented: prospective acceptability, intervention coherence and perceived effectiveness, opportunity costs and self-efficacy. RESULTS Both remotely supported CLED and ILED interventions appeared acceptable to participants. CLED participants found the rapid initial weight loss phase comparatively easy and highly motivating but expressed more concerns around weight maintenance. ILED participants found the more gradual weight loss initially frustrating but expressed greater confidence in their longer-term adherence. The importance of continued individualised support from healthcare professionals was emphasised, and evidence of weight loss and improvement in other medical markers through monitoring via the mobile phone app was useful. CONCLUSION Different approaches to remotely delivered LEDs appear acceptable; therefore asking patients which approach may be more acceptable to them may be a useful way to offer individualised and tailored support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Brooks
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Ruane
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah McDiarmid
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Avni Vyas
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Basil Issa
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michelle Harvie
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Cancer Research, Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shepherd V, Hood K, Wood F. 'It's not making a decision, it's prompting the discussions': a qualitative study exploring stakeholders' views on the acceptability and feasibility of advance research planning (CONSULT-ADVANCE). BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:80. [PMID: 39039465 PMCID: PMC11265470 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health and care research involving people who lack capacity to consent requires an alternative decision maker to decide whether they participate or not based on their 'presumed will'. However, this is often unknown. Advance research planning (ARP) is a process for people who anticipate periods of impaired capacity to prospectively express their preferences about research participation and identify who they wish to be involved in future decisions. This may help to extend individuals' autonomy by ensuring that proxy decisions are based on their actual wishes. This qualitative study aimed to explore stakeholders' views about the acceptability and feasibility of ARP and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation in the UK. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 researchers, practitioners, and members of the public who had participated in a preceding survey. Interviews were conducted remotely between April and November 2023. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Participants were supportive of the concept of ARP, with differing amounts of support for the range of possible ARP activities depending on the context. Six main themes were identified: (1) Planting a seed - creating opportunities to initiate/engage with ARP; (2) A missing part of the puzzle - how preferences expressed through ARP could help inform decisions; (3) Finding the sweet spot - optimising the timing of ARP; (4) More than a piece of paper - finding the best mode for recording preferences; (5) Keeping the door open to future opportunities - minimising the risk of unintended consequences; and (6) Navigating with a compass - principles underpinning ARP to ensure safeguarding and help address inequalities. Participants also identified a number of implementation challenges, and proposed facilitative strategies that might overcome them which included embedding advance research planning in existing future planning processes and research-focused activities. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a routemap to implementing ARP in the UK to enable people anticipating impaired capacity to express their preferences about research, thus ensuring greater opportunities for inclusion of this under-served group, and addressing the decisional burden experienced by some family members acting as proxies. Development of interventions and guidance to support ARP is needed, with a focus on ensuring accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Fiona Wood
- PRIME Centre Wales, Cardiff, UK
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng R, Wang J, Wang Y, Zhu P, Wang L, Zhang Z, Dong F. "Let them be": Family members' perspectives on the participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research: A qualitative descriptive study. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 155:104772. [PMID: 38676991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruiting advanced cancer patients is crucial for nursing research in cancer care. However, nurse researchers often face various socio-cultural challenges, particularly in mainland China, where cultural taboos around death pose significant obstacles. An unexplored constraint in this context is the pivotal role Chinese family members play in patients' healthcare decision-making. This research gap underscores the need for a deeper understanding of Chinese family members' perspectives on the engagement of advanced cancer patients in nursing research. OBJECTIVE To explore the perceptions and concerns of family members regarding the recruitment and participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. SETTINGS Three cancer hospitals in mainland China. PARTICIPANTS A purposive sample of 18 family members, consisting of children or spouses of advanced cancer patients, was recruited as participants. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data between September 2022 and January 2023. The thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Three themes were identified: The absence of prior participation, Family members' reluctance to facilitate patient involvement, and Strategies to encourage patients' future participation. Family members were hesitant to allow their relatives with advanced cancer to engage in nursing research, primarily due to concerns about distressing patients, the use of potential sensitive language, stigma, and the risks involved in participation. To address these concerns, they emphasized the importance of gaining family approval prior to patient enrolment. They highlighted the need of family involvement on behalf of sick relatives in research, advocating for the inclusion of a wide range of patients rather than targeting specific subgroups. They also reiterated the significance of choosing the right time for participation and avoiding using sensitive terms such as 'cancer', 'dying', and 'death' when engaging with patients. Moreover, they proposed the recruitment of patients by trusted professionals, shortening the duration of research activities and simplifying research procedures. CONCLUSIONS This study provides fresh insights into the perspectives of family members concerning the recruitment and engagement of advanced cancer patients in nursing research. It emphasizes the importance of addressing their concerns and recommendations, aiding nurse researchers in developing culturally sensitive recruitment strategies and fostering the inclusive participation of advanced cancer patients in nursing research within the context of family-centered care and cultural taboos surrounding death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruishuang Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jun Wang
- Center for Human Geography and Urban Development, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanhui Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Ping Zhu
- Department of Nursing, Jiangsu Province Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of VIP Medical Services, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenling Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Fengqi Dong
- Department of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ribeiro DC, Wilkinson A, Gava V, Lamb SE, Abbott JH. Patients' perspectives on planned interventions tested in the Otago MASTER feasibility trial: an implementation-based process evaluation study. Braz J Phys Ther 2024; 28:101086. [PMID: 38936312 PMCID: PMC11260924 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients are key stakeholders of clinical research, and their perspectives are relevant for researchers when planning and conducting clinical trials. Numerous aspects of trial process can influence participants' experiences. Their experiences within a trial can impact retention rates. Poor treatment adherence may bias treatment effect estimates. One way to improve recruitment and adherence is to design trials that are aligned with patients' needs and preferences. This study reports a process evaluation of the Otago MASTER feasibility trial. OBJECTIVES Our aims were to investigate the patients' perceptions of the trial interventions through individual interviews. METHODS Twenty-five participants were recruited for the feasibility trial and were allocated to two groups: tailored or standardised exercise. Sixteen participants agreed to take part in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and all interviews were analysed thematically using an iterative approach. RESULTS Our key findings suggest participants: (1) took part in the study to access healthcare services and contribute to research; (2) valued interventions received; (3) reported certain barriers and facilitators to participate in the trial; and (4) highlighted areas for improvement when designing the full trial. CONCLUSION Participants volunteered to access healthcare and to contribute to research. Participants valued the personalised care, perceived that their engagement within the trial improved their self-management and self-efficacy behaviour, valued the time spent with clinicians, and the empathetic environment and education received. Facilitators and barriers will require careful consideration in the future as the barriers may impact reliability and validity of future trial results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Cury Ribeiro
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| | - Amanda Wilkinson
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Nursing, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Vander Gava
- Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - J Haxby Abbott
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fitzhugh C, Gibson R. Understanding perceptions about the health effects of night working and the barriers and enablers to taking part in nutritional research: A qualitative study among night workers in England. NUTR BULL 2024. [PMID: 38924319 DOI: 10.1111/nbu.12691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Working at night is associated with adverse cardiometabolic health outcomes. However, there are a lack of nutritional intervention studies conducted amongst night workers, subsequently contributing to a lack of evidence-based guidelines for night workers. The aim of The Eating on the Night Shift study was to understand how night shift workers view working at night in relation to nutritional health and wellbeing, the barriers and enablers to participate in research and what kind of guidance would be useful to them. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a convenience sample (n = 18) of night workers based in England. The interview covered experiences of working night shifts, perceptions about night work and their health, and perceptions of and likely engagement with nutritional research. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Of the final sample 13 were female (72%), 39% worked a rotating shift pattern and 78% had worked night shifts for 1 year or more. Four overarching themes were identified: (1) the consequences of night work on health and wellbeing, (2) eating at night means a less healthy diet, (3) working at night has wider knock-on effects on aspects of lifestyle and wellbeing and (4) nutritional research is perceived as important, but there are barriers to participation. Night workers are aware that working at night can negatively impact their diet as well as their health. Nutritional researchers need to engage with night workers when considering intervention design and implementation as well as in the development of any resultant evidence-based guidance to ensure its relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Fitzhugh
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rachel Gibson
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beasant L, Realpe A, Douglas S, Kenny L, Rai D, Mills N. Autistic adults' views on the design and processes within randomised controlled trials: The APRiCoT study. AUTISM : THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 28:1540-1550. [PMID: 37882480 PMCID: PMC11134970 DOI: 10.1177/13623613231202432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
LAY ABSTRACT Large randomised controlled trials are used to test healthcare treatments. Yet there are no large randomised controlled trials on effective treatments for common mental health issues affecting autistic adults. The purpose of this study was to learn what autistic adults think about randomised controlled trials in preparation for a randomised controlled trial testing a medication for anxiety. This means we wanted to know their opinions about the way randomised controlled trials are done, such as how people are chosen to be in the study and how the study is carried out. We did this by talking to 49 autistic adults individually and asking them questions. We found that most of the people we talked to were okay with the way randomised controlled trials are done. They thought it was fair and they liked that it was based on evidence. However, some autistic people might find it hard to take part in randomised controlled trials. Some people did not like the uncertainty of not knowing what treatment they would receive in a randomised controlled trial. Others felt too vulnerable and may have had bad experiences with healthcare in the past. We found that it is important to involve autistic people early on and at every stage when designing a clinical trial. Care about how clear and precise the study communication is will build trust and improve access to research. Our study indicates that it is possible to conduct large randomised controlled trials with and for autistic people. This can ultimately contribute to the improvement of healthcare outcomes for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alba Realpe
- University of Bristol, UK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UK
| | | | | | - Dheeraj Rai
- University of Bristol, UK
- Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, UK
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hong Y, Lee N, Kirkpatrick CE, Hu S, Lee S, Hinnant A. "Trust Me, I'm a Doctor." How TikTok Videos from Different Sources Influence Clinical Trial Participation. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-12. [PMID: 38699819 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2346680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
This study experiments with TikTok videos to promote clinical trial participation. More specifically, it examines how short-form video sources (doctors vs. prior volunteers for clinical trials) influence perceived source credibility, self-efficacy, and behavioral intention to participate in clinical trials. Findings from this online experiment (N = 396) showed that doctor sources led to greater behavioral intention through enhancing source credibility compared to prior volunteer sources. Alternatively, prior volunteer sources increased behavioral intention via enhanced self-efficacy for participants with low trust in doctors. These findings contribute to the understanding of how short-form video sources act as heuristic cues, leading to persuasion outcomes. Overall, we recommend featuring doctors when using video-based messages to promote clinical trial participation. Also, this study emphasizes the need for health communication practitioners to consider prior volunteers as spokespersons when targeting populations with low baseline trust in doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoorim Hong
- Strategic Communication, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| | - Namyeon Lee
- Department of Mass Communication, University of North Carolina at Pembroke
| | - Ciera E Kirkpatrick
- Advertising & Public Relations, College of Journalism & Mass Communications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
| | - Sisi Hu
- Advertising, School of Journalism and Strategic Media, University of Arkansas
| | - Sungkyoung Lee
- Strategic Communication, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| | - Amanda Hinnant
- Journalism Studies, School of Journalism, University of Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Koppner J, Lindelöf A, Iredahl F, Tevell M, Nilsson S, Thorsell A, Faresjö Å, Israelsson Larsen H. Factors affecting self-perceived mental health in the general older population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:660. [PMID: 38429704 PMCID: PMC10905926 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18199-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health problems among older people are large public health concerns but often go unrecognized and undertreated. During COVID - 19 several restrictions regarding social contacts were launched, primarily for the old. The objective of this study is to investigate which factors that had the main negative affect on mental health in the older population during the pandemic. METHOD A cross-sectional cohort study set in Swedish primary care during the pandemic years 2021-2022. The population constitutes of 70-80-years-old, N = 260. Instruments used are Geriatric depression scale 20 (GDS20); Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and Perceived stress scale 10 (PSS10). Sociodemography and risk factors are explored. Outcome measures are factors independently associated with decreased mental health. Analyses were performed for the group as a whole and with logistic regression models comparing individuals who stated they were mentally affected by the pandemic to individuals who stated they were not. RESULTS Participants who stated they were mentally affected by the COVID - 19 pandemic reported significantly higher levels of anxiety (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), and stress (p = 0.026) compared to those who stated they were not mentally affected. Explanatory regression models of up to 50% showed that following factors were prominent among individuals who reported a decline in their mental health due to the COVID - 19 pandemic (n = 24); impaired social life (OR 20.29, p < 0.001, CI 4.53-90.81), change in physical activity (OR 5.28, p = 0.01, CI 1.49-18.72), perceived family situation (OR 31.90, p = 0,007, CI 2,53-402.42), mild/moderate and high anxiety (OR 4.94, p = 0.034, CI 1.13-21.60, OR 7.96, p = 0.035, CI 1.16-54.53 respectively), and female gender (OR 6.52, p = 0.029, CI 1.22-34.92). CONCLUSION Anxiety, family situation, social life and change in physical activity were the main factors influencing the 70-80-years-old's self-perceived mental health during the COVID - 19 pandemic. Long-term effects of social restrictions on mental health in the older population need to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Koppner
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Ann Lindelöf
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Iredahl
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maxine Tevell
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Staffan Nilsson
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Annika Thorsell
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences/Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åshild Faresjö
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health/Public Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Hanna Israelsson Larsen
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of General practice, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lai B, Wadsworth D, Spring K, Jones CS, Mintz M, Malone LA, Kim Y, Wilroy J, Lee H. Validity and Reliability of a Telehealth Physical Fitness and Functional Assessment Battery for Ambulatory Youth With and Without Mobility Disabilities: Observational Measurement Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 11:e50582. [PMID: 38345838 PMCID: PMC10897795 DOI: 10.2196/50582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Youth (age 15-24 years) with and without disability are not adequately represented enough in exercise research due to a lack of time and transportation. These barriers can be overcome by including accessible web-based assessments that eliminate the need for on-site visitations. There is no simple, low-cost, and psychometrically sound compilation of measures for physical fitness and function that can be applied to youth with and without mobility disabilities. OBJECTIVE The first purpose was to determine the statistical level of agreement of 4 web-modified clinical assessments with how they are typically conducted in person at a laboratory (convergent validity). The second purpose was to determine the level of agreement between a novice and an expert rater (interrater reliability). The third purpose was to explore the feasibility of implementing the assessments via 2 metrics: safety and duration. METHODS The study enrolled 19 ambulatory youth: 9 (47%) with cerebral palsy with various mobility disabilities from a children's hospital and 10 (53%) without disabilities from a university student population. Participants performed a battery of tests via videoconferencing and in person. The test condition (teleassessment and in person) order was randomized. The battery consisted of the hand grip strength test with a dynamometer, the five times sit-to-stand test (FTST), the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) either around a standard circular track (in person) or around a smaller home-modified track (teleassessment version, home-modified 6-minute walk test [HM6MWT]). Statistical analyses included descriptive data, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS The mean time to complete the in-person assessment was 16.9 (SD 4.8) minutes and the teleassessment was 21.1 (SD 5.9) minutes. No falls, injuries, or adverse events occurred. Excellent convergent validity was shown for telemeasured hand grip strength (right ICC=0.96, left ICC=0.98, P<.001) and the TUG test (ICC=0.92, P=.01). The FTST demonstrated good agreement (ICC=0.95, 95% CI 0.79-0.98; P=.01). The HM6MWT demonstrated poor absolute agreement with the 6MWT. However, further exploratory analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the tests (r=0.83, P<.001). The interrater reliability was excellent for all tests (all ICCs>0.9, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that videoconference assessments are convenient and useful measures of fitness and function among youth with and without disabilities. This paper presents operationalized teleassessment procedures that can be replicated by health professionals to produce valid and reliable measurements. This study is a first step toward developing teleassessments that can bypass the need for on-site data collection visitations for this age group. Further research is needed to identify psychometrically sound teleassessment procedures, particularly for measures of cardiorespiratory endurance or walking ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron Lai
- Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Danielle Wadsworth
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Katherine Spring
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Division of Population and Public Health Science, Pediatric Obesity and Health Behavior Laboratory, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Chloe S Jones
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Madison Mintz
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Laurie A Malone
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Yumi Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jereme Wilroy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Holim Lee
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stoffel ST, Law JH, Kerrison R, Brewer HR, Flanagan JM, Hirst Y. Testing Behavioral Messages to Increase Recruitment to Health Research When Embedded Within Social Media Campaigns on Twitter: Web-Based Experimental Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e48538. [PMID: 38315543 PMCID: PMC10877493 DOI: 10.2196/48538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social media is rapidly becoming the primary source to disseminate invitations to the public to consider taking part in research studies. There is, however, little information on how the contents of the advertisement can be communicated to facilitate engagement and subsequently promote intentions to participate in research. OBJECTIVE This paper describes an experimental study that tested different behavioral messages for recruiting study participants for a real-life observational case-control study. METHODS We included 1060 women in a web-based experiment and randomized them to 1 of 3 experimental conditions: standard advertisement (n=360), patient endorsement advertisement (n=345), and social norms advertisement (n=355). After seeing 1 of the 3 advertisements, participants were asked to state (1) their intention to take part in the advertised case-control study, (2) the ease of understanding the message and study aims, and (3) their willingness to be redirected to the website of the case-control study after completing the survey. Individuals were further asked to suggest ways to improve the messages. Intentions were compared between groups using ordinal logistic regression, reported in percentages, adjusted odds ratio (aOR), and 95% CIs. RESULTS Those who were in the patient endorsement and social norms-based advertisement groups had significantly lower intentions to take part in the advertised study compared with those in the standard advertisement group (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97; P=.03 and aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.92; P=.009, respectively). The patient endorsement advertisement was perceived to be more difficult to understand (aOR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.87; P=.004) and to communicate the study aims less clearly (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95; P=.01). While the patient endorsement advertisement had no impact on intention to visit the main study website, the social norms advertisement decreased willingness compared with the standard advertisement group (157/355, 44.2% vs 191/360, 53.1%; aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.54-0.99; P=.02). The majority of participants (395/609, 64.8%) stated that the messages did not require changes, but some preferred clearer (75/609, 12.3%) and shorter (59/609, 9.7%) messages. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that adding normative behavioral messages to simulated tweets decreased participant intention to take part in our web-based case-control study, as this made the tweet harder to understand. This suggests that simple messages should be used for participant recruitment through Twitter (subsequently rebranded X).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro T Stoffel
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jing Hui Law
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Kerrison
- School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah R Brewer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James M Flanagan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yasemin Hirst
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Start C, McBride M, Zhu G, Shaikh S, Pierce J. Understanding facilitators of research participation among adults with self-reported chronic pain - a survey examining hypothetical research participation. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:18. [PMID: 38254022 PMCID: PMC10802039 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02128-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An inability to successfully recruit participants into clinical research has consequences that negatively affect the conduct and reliability of research studies. Understanding facilitators of research participation, namely motives for participation and preferred research outcomes, may improve recruitment and retention of clinical trials related to chronic pain. The present study explored research participation facilitators among individuals with chronic pain and their association with demographic characteristics, pain-related characteristics, and factors related to future research engagement. METHODS Individuals from Michigan who were 18 years or older and self-reported having chronic pain completed an online survey assessing motives for research participation and desired research outcomes. Analyses were conducted in three stages. First, we evaluated underlying factors of motives for participation and research outcome preferences using principal components analysis. Second, we classified individuals according to their patterns of facilitators using latent profile analysis. Finally, we evaluated differences between facilitator profiles in demographic characteristics, pain-related characteristics, and factors related to future research engagement using χ2 analyses and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. RESULTS Three components of motives for research participation were identified: social engagement/enjoyment; pain improvement/advancing science; and compensation. Three components of research outcome preferences were identified: co-occurring symptom reduction; behavior reduction modification; and pain and function improvement. Four potential patient-centered profiles utilizing these dimensions of facilitators were identified that had unique demographic characteristics, research participation willingness, and treatment interest. CONCLUSIONS Our data provide a framework of motives and research outcome preferences that may inform recruitment and retention in chronic pain research. It also gives an indication of who may respond best to active or passive recruitment strategies that appeal to a given motive or preferred outcome. This information may be useful for improving recruitment and to monitor any potential biases in participant samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Start
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Meagan McBride
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Guohao Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Sana Shaikh
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA
| | - Jennifer Pierce
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Back & Pain Center, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Burlington Building 1, Suite 310, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liang JE, Liang MY, Zhang EE, Peng YY, Chen LL, Deng JY, Lin T, Fu J, Zhang JN, Li SL, Li F, Xiao HM, Huang WM, Liu YH. Factors influencing willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and strategies for effective recruitment. Int J Ophthalmol 2024; 17:157-163. [PMID: 38239943 PMCID: PMC10754671 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.01.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore the factors influencing individuals' willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials. METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted from January to April 2021 among patients and their family members at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, in Guangzhou, China. The survey gathered data on respondents' willingness, demographic and socioeconomic profiles, as well as their reasons and concerns regarding engagement in clinical trials. RESULTS Of the 1078 residents surveyed (mean age 31.2±13.1y; 65.8% females) in Guangzhou, 749 (69.5%) expressed a willingness to participate in future ophthalmic clinical trials. Specific characteristics associated with greater willingness included a younger age, lower annual income, higher education, prior participation experience, previous ophthalmic treatment, and a better understanding of clinical trials. With the exception of age, these characteristics were significantly linked to a higher willingness. The primary barrier to participation, expressed by 64.8% of those willing and 54.4% of those unwilling, was "Uncertain efficacy". In terms of motivations, the willing group ranked "Better therapeutic benefits" (35.0%), "Professional monitoring" (34.3%), and "Trust in healthcare professionals" (33.1%) as their top three reasons, whereas the unwilling participants indicated "Full comprehension of the protocol" (46.2%) as the key facilitator. CONCLUSION This study reveals a substantial willingness to participate in ophthalmic clinical trials and demonstrates the predictive role of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Variations in motivators and concerns between willing and unwilling participants highlight the significance of tailored recruitment strategies. Importantly, the need for and trust in healthcare professionals stand out as powerful motivations, underscoring the importance of enhancing physician-patient relationships, adopting patient-centered communication approaches, and addressing individualized needs to improve accrual rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-En Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meng-Yin Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - En-En Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Ying Peng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ling-Ling Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Yu Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ting Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jun Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Ni Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Li Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fei Li
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hui-Ming Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Wen-Min Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yu-Hong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
McCarthy C, Pericin I, Smith SM, Moriarty F, Clyne B. Recruiting general practitioners and older patients with multimorbidity to randomized trials. Fam Pract 2023; 40:810-819. [PMID: 37014975 PMCID: PMC10745264 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with multimorbidity are under-represented in experimental research. OBJECTIVE To explore the barriers and facilitators to general practitioner (GP) and older patient recruitment and retention in a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHOD This descriptive study uses qualitative and quantitative data from a cluster RCT, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a medicines optimization intervention. The SPPiRE cluster RCT enrolled 51 general practices and 404 patients aged ≥65 years and prescribed ≥15 medicines. Quantitative data were collected from all recruited practices and 32 additional practices who were enrolled, but unable to recruit sufficient participants. Qualitative data were collected from purposive samples of intervention GPs (18/26), patients (27/208), and researcher logs and analysed thematically using inductive coding. RESULTS Enrolment rates for practices and patients were 37% and 25%, respectively. Barriers to GP recruitment were lack of resources and to patient recruitment were difficulty understanding trial material and concern about medicines being taken away. GPs' primary motivation was perceived importance of the research question, whereas patients' primary motivation was trust in their GP. All general practices were retained. Thirty-five patients (8.6%) were lost to follow-up for primary outcomes, mainly because they had died and 45% did not return patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). CONCLUSION Patient retention for the primary outcome was high, as it was collected directly from patient records. Patient completion of PROM data was poor, reflecting difficulty in understanding trial material. Recruiting older patients with multimorbidity to clinical trials is possible but requires significant resource and planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN12752680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline McCarthy
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Ivana Pericin
- School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Frank Moriarty
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Godskesen T, Björk J, Juth N. Challenges regarding informed consent in recruitment to clinical research: a qualitative study of clinical research nurses' experiences. Trials 2023; 24:801. [PMID: 38082434 PMCID: PMC10712041 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07844-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical research nurses (CRNs) have first-hand experience with ethical challenges and play a crucial role in upholding ethical conduct and adherence to the principles of informed consent in clinical research. This study explores the ethical challenges encountered by CRNs in the process of obtaining informed consent for clinical research. METHODS A qualitative exploratory design. Semistructured interviews (n = 14) were conducted with diverse CRNs in Sweden. These CRNs covered a wide range of research fields, including pharmaceutical and academic studies, interventions, and observational research, spanning different trial phases, patient categories, and medical conditions. The interviews were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The analysis identified three main categories: (i) threats to voluntariness, (ii) measures to safeguard voluntariness, and (iii) questionable exclusion of certain groups. CRNs face challenges due to time constraints, rushed decisions, information overload, and excessive reliance on physicians' recommendations. Overestimating therapeutic benefits in stages of advanced illness emerged as a risk to voluntariness. CRNs outlined proactive solutions, such as allowing ample decision-making time and offering support, especially for terminally ill patients. Concerns were also voiced about excluding certain demographics, such as those with language barriers or cognitive impairments. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, upholding ethical research standards requires recognising various factors affecting patient voluntariness. Researchers and CRNs should prioritise refining the informed consent process, overcoming participation challenges, and aligning scientific rigour with personalised care. Additionally, a concerted effort is vital to meet the diverse needs of patient populations, including equitable inclusion of individuals with language barriers or cognitive limitations in clinical studies. These findings have significant implications for enhancing the ethics of clinical research and advancing person-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tove Godskesen
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
| | - Joar Björk
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden
| | - Niklas Juth
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics (CHE), LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Madurasinghe VW, Knapp P, Eldridge S, Collier D, Treweek S, Rick J, Graffy J, Parker A, Salisbury C, Torgerson D, Jolly K, Sidhu MS, Fife-Schaw C, Hull MA, Sprange K, Brettell E, Bhandari S, Montgomery A, Bower P. Can we achieve better trial recruitment by presenting patient information through multimedia? Meta-analysis of 'studies within a trial' (SWATs). BMC Med 2023; 21:425. [PMID: 37940944 PMCID: PMC10634086 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03081-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People need high-quality information to make decisions about research participation. Providing information in written format alone is conventional but may not be the most effective and acceptable approach. We developed a structure for the presentation of information using multimedia which included generic and trial-specific content. Our aim was to embed 'Studies Within A Trial' (SWATs) across multiple ongoing trials to test whether multimedia presentation of patient information led to better rates of recruitment. METHODS Five trials included a SWAT and randomised their participants to receive a multimedia presentation alongside standard information, or standard written information alone. We collected data on trial recruitment, acceptance and retention and analysed the pooled results using random effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome defined as the proportion of participants randomised following an invitation to take part. RESULTS Five SWATs provided data on the primary outcome of proportion of participants randomised. Multimedia alongside written information results in little or no difference in recruitment rates (pooled odds ratio = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17, p-value = 0.671, I2 = 0%). There was no effect on any other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Multimedia alongside written information did not improve trial recruitment rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN71952900, ISRCTN 06710391, ISRCTN 17160087, ISRCTN05926847, ISRCTN62869767.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York & the Hull York Medical School, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sandra Eldridge
- Centre for Clinical Trials and Methodology, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, 58 Turner Street, London, E1 2AB, UK
| | - David Collier
- Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3Rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Jo Rick
- National Institute of Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jonathan Graffy
- General Practitioner Arbury Road Surgery 114, Arbury Road, Cambridge, CB4 2JG, UK
| | - Adwoa Parker
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - David Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Manbinder S Sidhu
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2RT, UK
| | | | - Mark A Hull
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Kirsty Sprange
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Elizabeth Brettell
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Sunil Bhandari
- Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, and Hull York Medical School, Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - Alan Montgomery
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bevan JHJ, Theodosiou AA, Corner J, Dorey RB, Read RC, Jones CE. A Questionnaire-based Study Exploring Participant Perspectives in a Perinatal Human Challenge Trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023; 42:935-941. [PMID: 37463362 PMCID: PMC10569679 DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000004036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women have historically been excluded from most medical research, including human challenge studies. The proof-of-concept Lactamica 9 human challenge study investigated whether nasal inoculation of pregnant women with commensal bacteria leads to horizontal transmission to the neonate. Given the unique practical and ethical considerations of both human challenge studies and interventional research involving pregnant women and their newborns, we sought to investigate the motivations, concerns and experiences of these volunteers. METHODS Pre- and post-participation questionnaires were given to all participants in the Lactamica 9 study. These fully anonymized qualitative and Semi-quantitative questionnaires used forced Likert scales, word association and free-text questions. RESULTS Pre- and post-participation questionnaires were completed by 87.1% (27/31) and 62.5% (15/24) of eligible participants, respectively. Almost all pre-participation respondents agreed with altruistic motivations for participation, and most concerns were related to discomfort from study procedures, with few concerned about the theoretical risks of inoculation to themselves (5/27; 18.5%) or their baby (6/27; 22.2%). Participants most frequently associated the study intervention with the terms "bacteria," "natural," "protective" and "safe." For the post-participation questionnaire, 93.3% (14/15) found all study procedures acceptable, and qualitative feedback was almost entirely positive, with particular emphasis on the research team's flexibility, approachability and friendliness. CONCLUSIONS The successful completion of the Lactamica 9 study demonstrates that human challenge research in healthy pregnant women can be acceptable and feasible. Participants' initial concerns of potential discomfort were outweighed by predominantly altruistic motivations and perception of the intervention as "natural."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H. J. Bevan
- From the Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, School of Primary Care, Population Science and Medical Education, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasia A. Theodosiou
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - James Corner
- University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Robert B. Dorey
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Robert C. Read
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christine E. Jones
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Knapp P, Martin-Kerry J, Moe-Byrne T, Sheridan R, Coleman E, Roche J, Young B, Higgins S, Preston J, Bower P, Gamble C, Stones C. The effectiveness and acceptability of multimedia information when recruiting children and young people to trials: the TRECA meta-analysis of SWATs. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-112. [PMID: 38140894 DOI: 10.3310/htpm3841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Background The information provided to potential trial participants plays a crucial role in their decision-making. Printed participant information sheets for trials have received recurrent criticism as being too long and technical, unappealing and hard to navigate. An alternative is to provide information through multimedia (text, animations, video, audio, diagrams and photos). However, there is limited evidence on the effects of multimedia participant information on research recruitment rates, particularly in children and young people. Objectives The study objectives were as follows: 1. to develop template multimedia information resources through participatory design, for use when recruiting children and young people to trials 2. to evaluate the multimedia information resources in a series of Studies Within A Trial, to test their effects on recruitment and retention rates, and participant decision-making, by comparing the provision of multimedia information resources instead of printed participant information sheets, and comparing the provision of multimedia information resources in addition to printed participant information sheets. Design Two-phase study: 1. multimedia information resources development including qualitative study; user testing study; readability metrics; enhanced patient and public involvement 2. multimedia information resources' evaluation comprising Studies Within A Trial undertaken within host trials recruiting children and young people. Setting United Kingdom trials involving patients aged under 18. Participants Development phase: n = 120 (children and young people, parents, clinicians, trial personnel). Evaluation phase: n = 1906 (children and young people being asked to take part in trials). Interventions Multimedia information resources (comprising text, audio, 'talking heads' video, trial-specific and trial-generic animations). Printed participant information sheets. Main outcome measures Primary outcome: trial recruitment rate comparing multimedia information resource-only with printed participant information sheet-only provision. Secondary outcomes: trial recruitment rate comparing combined multimedia information resource and printed participant information sheet with printed participant information sheet-only provision; trial retention rate; quality of participant decision-making. Results for each trial were calculated and combined in a two-stage random-effects meta-analysis. Results Phase 1 generated two multimedia information resource templates: (1) for children aged 6-11 years; (2) for children aged 12-18 years and parents. In the Phase 2 Studies Within A Trial the multimedia information resources improved trial recruitment, when compared to printed information alone [odds ratio (OR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 2.28; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%]. When printed participant information sheet-only provision was compared to combined multimedia information resource and printed participant information sheet provision, there was no effect on trial recruitment (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.50; I2 = 0%). There were no differences between multimedia information resource and printed participant information sheet on trial retention or participant decision-making quality. In a study within a hypothetical trial setting, multimedia information resource-only provision produced higher ratings of 'information was easy to understand' (Z = 3.03; p = 0.003) and 'I had confidence in decision-making' (Z = 2.00; p = 0.044) than printed participant information sheet-only provision. Limitations It was not possible to include data from three Studies Within A Trial in the meta-analysis due to limited sample size, and questionnaire return rates were low, which reduced the strength of the findings. Conclusions Use of multimedia information increased the rate of recruitment to trials involving children and young people compared to standard patient information sheets. Future work There should be further evaluation of the effects of multimedia information on recruitment to trials involving children and young people. It would be valuable to assess any impacts of multimedia information resources on communication between trial recruiters, children and young people, and parents. Study registration This trial is registered as TRECA ISRCTN 73136092 and Northern Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology Research SWAT Repository (SWAT 97). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 14/21/21) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Jacqueline Martin-Kerry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- School of Allied Health Professions, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Roche
- York Trials Unit, University of York, York, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jennifer Preston
- NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catherine Stones
- School of Design, Clothworkers' Central, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Boxall C, Renz S, Eminton Z, Nuttall J, Saji A, Cluff C, Wilcox C, Muller I, Layton AM, Soulsby I, Santer M. Factors that influence women's enrolment and ongoing participation in a partially decentralised randomised controlled dermatology trial: a qualitative interview study with participants in the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial. Trials 2023; 24:661. [PMID: 37821899 PMCID: PMC10568833 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of decentralised clinical trials (which bring trials to patients through remote processes and technology versus central on-site visits) has been thought to be a potential solution to common recruitment and retention barriers. However, there is a lack of evidence to understand the experiences, needs and preferences of the public to inform trial methodologies that appeal to different populations. We report participant experiences of SAFA, a partially decentralised randomised clinical trial, to inform the methodology used in future dermatology trials that aim to appeal to women aged 18 and over. METHODS Participants of the SAFA (Spironolactone for Adult Female Acne) trial were invited to take part in a qualitative semi-structured interview to explore their experience and perspectives of taking part in the trial. Questions focused on their experience of using decentralised methods to access and enrol in the trial (e.g. social media advertising), in addition to the decentralised trial visit and data collection methods used throughout. Interviews were conducted remotely, recorded, and transcribed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Twelve SAFA participants (all women, age range 22-36 years) were interviewed. Initially, participants were influenced to enrol by trusted online information, the feeling of validation the trial provided, and the convenience and flexibility offered by the decentralised methods and research staff made participants feel valued and enabled them to engage in the trial with minimal interference to existing commitments. SAFA participants were generally accepting of trial demands, such as the text-heavy paperwork and on-site visits for blood collection and highlighted several areas relevant for trial conduct going forwards including where decentralised methods may (and may not) be accepted and how trial accessibility and understanding could be improved. CONCLUSIONS The study has shown that decentralised methods used by responsive and approachable staff were widely accepted in the SAFA trial. Interviewees found the methods adopted in the SAFA trial helped the trial to fit with their needs and promoted a sense of feeling valued that encouraged ongoing trial engagement. Decentralised methods should be considered favourably when designing a dermatology trial as they can potentially enhance both recruitment and retention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN 12892056. Registered on October 15, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherish Boxall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Susanne Renz
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Zina Eminton
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Jacqueline Nuttall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Alan Saji
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Charlotte Cluff
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Christopher Wilcox
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ingrid Muller
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | | | - Irene Soulsby
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Genuis SK, Luth W, Weber G, Bubela T, Johnston WS. Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:222. [PMID: 37803257 PMCID: PMC10557269 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) face disability- and travel-related barriers to research participation. We investigate the usefulness and acceptability of asynchronous, online focus groups (AOFGs) for research involving people affected by ALS (patients and family caregivers) and outline lessons learned. METHODS The ALS Talk Project, consisting of seven AOFGs and 100 participants affected by ALS, provided context for this investigation. Hosted on the secure itracks Board™ platform, participants interacted in a threaded web forum structure. Moderators posted weekly discussion questions and facilitated discussion. Data pertaining to methodology, participant interaction and experience, and moderator technique were analyzed using itracks and NVivo 12 analytics (quantitative) and conventional content analysis and the constant-comparative approach (qualitative). RESULTS There was active engagement within groups, with post lengths averaging 111.48 words and a complex network of branching interactions between participants. One third of participant responses included individual reflections without further interaction. Participants affirmed their co-group members, offered practical advice, and discussed shared and differing perspectives. Moderators responded to all posts, indicating presence and probing answers. AOFGs facilitated qualitative and quantitative data-gathering and flexible response to unanticipated events. Although total participation fell below 50% after 10-12 weeks, participants valued interacting with peers in an inclusive, confidential forum. Participants used a variety of personal devices, browsers, and operating systems when interacting on the online platform. CONCLUSIONS This methodological examination of AOFGs for patient-centred investigations involving people affected by ALS demonstrates their usefulness and acceptability, and advances knowledge of online research methodologies. Lessons learned include: early identification of research goals and participant needs is critical to selecting an AOFG platform; although duration longer than 10-12 weeks may be burdensome in this population, participants were positive about AOFGs; AOFGs offer real world flexibility enabling response to research challenges and opportunities; and, AOGFs can effectively foster safe spaces for sharing personal perspectives and discussing sensitive topics. With moderators playing an important role in fostering engagement, AOFGs facilitated rich data gathering and promoted reciprocity by fostering the exchange of ideas and interaction between peers. Findings may have implications for research involving other neurologically impaired and/or medically vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelagh K Genuis
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 7-123 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Westerly Luth
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 7-123 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | | | - Tania Bubela
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall 11328 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Wendy S Johnston
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 7-123 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meskell P, Biesty LM, Dowling M, Roche K, Meehan E, Glenton C, Devane D, Shepperd S, Booth A, Cox R, Chan XHS, Houghton C. Factors that impact on recruitment to vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 9:MR000065. [PMID: 37655964 PMCID: PMC10472890 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000065.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 pandemic on 11 March 2020. Vaccine development and deployment were swiftly prioritised as a method to manage and control disease spread. The development of an effective vaccine relies on people's participation in randomised trials. Recruitment to vaccine trials is particularly challenging as it involves healthy volunteers who may have concerns around the potential risks and benefits associated with rapidly developed vaccines. OBJECTIVES To explore the factors that influence a person's decision to participate in a vaccine trial in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was June 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with an identifiable qualitative component. We included studies that explored the perspectives of adults aged 18 years or older who were invited to take part in vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We assessed the title, abstracts and full texts identified by the search. We used a sampling frame to identify data-rich studies that represented a range of diseases and geographical spread. We used QSR NVivo to manage extracted data. We assessed methodological limitations using an adapted version of the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tool for qualitative studies. We used the 'best-fit framework approach' to analyse and synthesise the evidence from our included studies. We then used the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) assessment to assess our confidence in each finding and develop implications for practice. MAIN RESULTS We included 34 studies in our review. Most studies related to HIV vaccine trials. The other studies related to Ebola virus, tuberculosis, Zika virus and COVID-19. We developed 20 key findings, under three broad themes (with seven subthemes), that described the factors that people consider when deciding whether to take part in a vaccine trial for a pandemic or epidemic disease. Our GRADE-CERQual confidence was high in nine of the key findings, moderate in 10 key findings and low in one key finding. The main reason for downgrading review findings were concerns regarding the relevance and adequacy of the underlying data. As a result of the over-representation of HIV studies, our GRADE-CERQual assessment of some findings was downgraded in terms of relevance because the views described may not reflect those of people regarding vaccine trials for other pandemic or epidemic diseases. Adequacy relates to the degree of richness and quantity of data supporting a review finding. Moderate concerns about adequacy resulted in a downgrading of some review findings. Some factors were considered to be under the control of the trial team. These included how trial information was communicated and the inclusion of people in the community to help with trial information dissemination. Aspects of trial design were also considered under control of the trial team and included convenience of participation, provision of financial incentives and access to additional support services for those taking part in the trial. Other factors influencing people's decision to take part could be personal, from family, friends or wider society. From a personal perceptive, people had concerns about vaccine side effects, vaccine efficacy and possible impact on their daily lives (carer responsibilities, work, etc.). People were also influenced by their families, and the impact participation may have on relationships. The fear of stigma from society influenced the decision to take part. Also, from a societal perspective, the level of trust in governments' involvement in research and trial may influence a person's decision. Finally, the perceived rewards, both personal and societal, were influencing factors on the decision to participate. Personal rewards included access to a vaccine, improved health and improved disease knowledge, and a return to normality in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. Potential societal rewards included helping the community and contributing to science, often motivated by the memories of family and friends who had died from the disease. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review identifies many of the factors that influence a person's decision to take part in a vaccine trial, and these reflect findings from reviews that examine trials more broadly. However, we also recognise some factors that become more important in connection with a vaccine trial in the context of a pandemic or epidemic. These factors include the potential stigma of taking part, the possible adverse effects of a vaccine, the added motivation for helping society, the role of community leaders in trial dissemination, and the level of trust placed in governments and companies developing vaccines. These specific influences need to be considered by trial teams when designing, and communicating about, vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Linda M Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Elaine Meehan
- Ageing Research Centre, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, ScHARR, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rebecca Cox
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Xin Hui S Chan
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wegge-Larsen C, Mehlsen M, Jensen AB. The motivation of breast cancer patients to participate in a national randomized control trial. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:468. [PMID: 37452876 PMCID: PMC10349774 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07930-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials are essential for development of better cancer care. Therefore, patient willingness to participate in these trials is important. The aim of this study was to assess motivation and thoughts of breast cancer patients concerning participation in a clinical trial. METHODS Twenty-one patients participated in two semi-structed interviews about participating in a clinical trial testing the efficacy of cryotherapy for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients treated with paclitaxel. The interviews took place before and after the intervention and were coded and categorized following the steps in Braun & Clarke's thematic analysis to identify motivational factors and experiential themes. RESULTS Four overarching themes were identified: (1) reasons to participate in the trial, (2) personal resources, (3) safety, and (4) experience of the randomization. The most frequent reason for participating in the trial was to support research and help others, but many also participated hoping to receive the intervention treatment. The study showed that a surplus of personal resources played an important role when the patients decided to participate in the trial. Differences were found between patients belonging to the intervention and the control group in relation to these themes. Finally, both groups experienced the extra examinations received during the trial as an additional source of safety. CONCLUSION This qualitative study found different factors influencing the experience of participating in a clinical trial, e.g., intervention-status, personal resources, and safety. This knowledge can be valuable when planning future clinical trials involving breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Wegge-Larsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - M Mehlsen
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A B Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Knapp P, Moe-Byrne T, Martin-Kerry J, Sheridan R, Roche J, Coleman E, Bower P, Higgins S, Stones C, Graffy J, Preston J, Gamble C, Young B, Perry D, Dahlmann-Noor A, Abbas M, Khandelwal P, Ludden S, Azuara-Blanco A, McConnell E, Mandall N, Lawson A, Rogers CA, Smartt HJM, Heys R, Stones SR, Taylor DH, Ainsworth S, Ainsworth J. Providing multimedia information to children and young people increases recruitment to trials: pre-planned meta-analysis of SWATs. BMC Med 2023; 21:244. [PMID: 37403173 PMCID: PMC10320935 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02936-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials are often beset by problems with poor recruitment and retention. Information to support decisions on trial participation is usually provided as printed participant information sheets (PIS), which are often long, technical, and unappealing. Multimedia information (MMI), including animations and videos, may be a valuable alternative or complement to a PIS. The Trials Engagement in Children and Adolescents (TRECA) study compared MMI to PIS to investigate the effects on participant recruitment, retention, and quality of decision-making. METHODS We undertook six SWATs (Study Within A Trial) within a series of host trials recruiting children and young people. Potential participants in the host trials were randomly allocated to receive MMI-only, PIS-only, or combined MMI + PIS. We recorded the rates of recruitment and retention (varying between 6 and 26 weeks post-randomisation) in each host trial. Potential participants approached about each host trial were asked to complete a nine-item Decision-Making Questionnaire (DMQ) to indicate their evaluation of the information and their reasons for participation/non-participation. Odds ratios were calculated and combined in a meta-analysis. RESULTS Data from 3/6 SWATs for which it was possible were combined in a meta-analysis (n = 1758). Potential participants allocated to MMI-only were more likely to be recruited to the host trial than those allocated to PIS-only (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.05, 2.28; p = 0.03). Those allocated to combined MMI + PIS compared to PIS-only were no more likely to be recruited to the host trial (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.53, 1.50; p = 0.67). Providing MMI rather than PIS did not impact on DMQ scores. Once children and young people had been recruited to host trials, their trial retention rates did not differ according to intervention allocation. CONCLUSIONS Providing MMI-only increased the trial recruitment rate compared to PIS-only but did not affect DMQ scores. Combined MMI + PIS instead of PIS had no effect on recruitment or retention. MMIs are a useful tool for trial recruitment in children and young people, and they could reduce trial recruitment periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Knapp
- Department of Health Sciences & the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Roche
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coleman
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Jenny Preston
- Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carrol Gamble
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Daniel Perry
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Mohamed Abbas
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anna Lawson
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mäder M, Timpel P, Schönfelder T, Militzer-Horstmann C, Scheibe S, Heinrich R, Häckl D. Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:369. [PMID: 37069592 PMCID: PMC10108444 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09287-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With its digital health application (DiGA)-system, Germany is considered one of Europe's pioneers in the field of evidence-based digital health. Incorporating DiGA into standard medical care must be based on evidence-based success factors; however, a comprehensive overview of the evidence required of scientific studies for their approval is lacking. OBJECTIVE The study aims to, (1) identify specific requirements defined by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (German: Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel- und Medizinprodukte; BfArM) to design adequate studies, proving a positive healthcare effect, and (2) to assess the evidence given for applications permanently listed in the DiGA directory. METHODS A multi-step approach was used: (1) identification of the evidence requirements for applications permanently listed in the DiGA directory, (2) identification of the evidence available supporting them. RESULTS All DiGA permanently listed in the DiGA directory (13 applications) are included in the formal analysis. Most DiGA addressed mental health (n = 7), and can be prescribed for one or two indications (n = 10). All permanently listed DiGA have demonstrated their positive healthcare effect through a medical benefit, and most of them provide evidence for one defined primary endpoint. All DiGA manufacturers conducted a randomized controlled trial. DISCUSSION It is striking that- although patient-relevant structural and procedural improvements show high potential for improving care, especially in terms of processes - all DiGA have provided a positive care effect via a medical benefit. Although BfArM accepts study designs with a lower level of evidence for the proof of a positive healthcare effect, all manufacturers conducted a study with a high level of evidence. CONCLUSION The results of this analysis indicate that permanently listed DiGA meet higher standards than required by the guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Mäder
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany.
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Patrick Timpel
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tonio Schönfelder
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences/Public Health, Dresden University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsta Militzer-Horstmann
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sandy Scheibe
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Health Sciences/Public Health, Dresden University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ria Heinrich
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dennis Häckl
- Faculty of Economics and Management Science, Leipzig University, Chair for Health Economics and Management, Leipzig, Germany
- Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research (WIG2 GmbH), Markt 8, 04109, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fylan B, Munro J, O'Hara JK, Khatoon B, Lawton R. Developing a research community within an online healthcare feedback platform. Health Expect 2023; 26:705-714. [PMID: 36661042 PMCID: PMC10010085 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Care Opinion is an online feedback platform supporting patients to author stories about their care. It is not known whether authors would be willing to be involved in improving care through research. The aims of this study were to explore the views and preferences of Care Opinion authors about joining an online research community and to pilot new research community functionality. METHODS Five hundred and nine Care Opinion authors were invited to take part in an online survey in June 2019. Survey items included questions about participants' willingness to take part in research and their preferences for supporting processes. Data were analysed descriptively. Authors were invited to consent to join a research community and were asked to participate in three pilot studies. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-three people consented to take part in the survey (32%). Participants indicated they would like to know the time commitment to the project (146, 90%), details about the organization carrying out the research (124, 76%) and safeguarding information (124, 76%). Over half indicated that they did not know how to get involved in healthcare research (87, 53%). Subsequently, 667 authors were invited to join the research community, 183 (27%) accepted, and three studies were matched to their expressed preferences for project attributes or organization type. CONCLUSION Many people who leave online feedback about their experiences of healthcare are also willing to join a research community via that platform. They have strong preferences for supporting University and NHS research. Eligibility and acceptance rates to join pilot research studies varied. Further work is needed to grow the research community, increase its diversity, and create relevant and varied opportunities to support research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Four members of the Safety In Numbers patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group advised about survey development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Fylan
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - James Munro
- Care Opinion Community Interest Company, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jane K O'Hara
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Binish Khatoon
- School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Al-Shami KM, Ahmed WS, Alzoubi KH. Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:895-903. [PMID: 37013082 PMCID: PMC10066730 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s402769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biospecimen repositories and big data generated from clinical research are critically important in advancing patient-centered healthcare. However, ethical considerations arising from reusing clinical samples and health records for subsequent research pose a hurdle for big-data health research. This study aims to assess the public's opinions in Jordan toward providing blanket consent for using biospecimens and health records in research. Participants and Methods A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-reported questionnaire was carried out in different cities in Jordan, targeting adult participants. Outcome variables included awareness of clinical research, participation in clinical research, and opinions toward providing open access to clinical samples and records for research purposes. Descriptive analysis was utilized for reporting the outcome as frequency (percentages) out of the total responses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the association between independent variables and the outcome of interest. Results A total of 1033 eligible participants completed the questionnaire. Although the majority (90%) were aware of clinical research, only 24% have ever participated in this type of research. About half (51%) agreed on providing blanket consent for the use of clinical samples, while a lower percentage (43%) agreed on providing open access to their health records. Privacy concerns and lack of trust in the researcher were cited as major barriers to providing blanket consent. Participation in clinical research and having health insurance were predictors for providing open access to clinical samples and records. Conclusion The lack of public trust in Jordan toward data privacy is evident from this study. Therefore, a governance framework is needed to raise and maintain the public's trust in big-data research that warrants the future reuse of clinical samples and records. As such, the current study provides valuable insights that will inform the design of effective consent protocols required in data-intensive health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal M Al-Shami
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
- Faculty of Biosciences, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Wesam S Ahmed
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Karem H Alzoubi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Moffat KR, Shi W, Cannon P, Sullivan F. Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: a systematic mixed studies review. Trials 2023; 24:90. [PMID: 36747260 PMCID: PMC9903494 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06865-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A common challenge for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is recruiting enough participants to be adequately powered to answer the research question. Recruitment has been set as a priority research area in trials to improve recruitment and thereby reduce wasted resources in conducted trials that fail to recruit sufficiently. METHODS We conducted a systematic mixed studies review to identify the factors associated with recruitment to RCTs in general practice. On September 8, 2020, English language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL databases for published studies. NTIS and OpenGrey were searched for grey literature, and BMC Trials was hand searched. A narrative synthesis was conducted for qualitative studies and a thematic synthesis for qualitative studies. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. These were of different study types (10 cross-sectional, 5 non-randomised studies of interventions, 2 RCTs, 10 qualitative and 10 mixed methods). The highest proportion was conducted in the UK (48%). The study quality was generally poor with 24 (65%) studies having major concerns. A complex combination of patient, practitioner or practice factors, and patient, practitioner or practice recruitment were assessed to determine the possible associations. There were more studies of patients than of practices or practitioners. CONCLUSIONS For practitioners and patients alike, a trial that is clinically relevant is critical in influencing participation. Competing demands are given as an important reason for declining participation. There are concerns about randomisation relating to its impact on shared decision-making and not knowing which treatment will be assigned. Patients make decisions about whether they are a candidate for the trial even when they objectively fulfil the eligibility criteria. General practice processes, such as difficulties arranging appointments, can hinder recruitment, and a strong pre-existing doctor-patient relationship can improve recruitment. For clinicians, the wish to contribute to the research enterprise itself is seldom an important reason for participating, though clinicians reported being motivated to participate when the research could improve their clinical practice. One of the few experimental findings was that opportunistic recruitment resulted in significantly faster recruitment compared to systematic recruitment. These factors have clear implications for trial design. Methodologically, recruitment research of practices and practitioners should have increased priority. Higher quality studies of recruitment are required to find out what actually works rather than what might work. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018100695. Registered on 03 July 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith R. Moffat
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
| | - Wen Shi
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
| | - Paul Cannon
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XCollege Librarian Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, Information Services, University of Glasgow Library, Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QE UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- Population and Behavioural Science Division, School of Medicine, Medical & Biological Sciences, North Haugh, St Andrews, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Antonio MG, Williamson A, Kameswaran V, Beals A, Ankrah E, Goulet S, Wang Y, Macias G, James-Gist J, Brown LK, Davis S, Pillai S, Buis L, Dillahunt T, Veinot TC. Targeting Patients' Cognitive Load for Telehealth Video Visits Through Student-Delivered Helping Sessions at a United States Federally Qualified Health Center: Equity-Focused, Mixed Methods Pilot Intervention Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42586. [PMID: 36525332 PMCID: PMC9897309 DOI: 10.2196/42586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The task complexity involved in connecting to telehealth video visits may disproportionately impact health care access in populations already experiencing inequities. Human intermediaries can be a strategy for addressing health care access disparities by acting as technology helpers to reduce the cognitive load demands required to learn and use patient-facing telehealth technologies. OBJECTIVE We conducted a cognitive load theory-informed pilot intervention involving warm accompaniment telehealth helping sessions with patients at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). We demonstrate how to design and report recruitment methods, reach, delivery process, and the preliminary impact of a novel equity-focused intervention. METHODS Early into the COVID-19 pandemic a telehealth helping session was offered to patients at FQHC via phone. Graduate students led the sessions on conducting a telehealth video test run or helping with patient portal log-in. They systematically recorded their recruitment efforts, intervention observations, and daily reflection notes. Following the intervention, we asked the intervention participants to participate in an interview and all patients who had telehealth visits during and 4 weeks before and after the intervention period to complete a survey. Electronic health records were reviewed to assess telehealth visit format changes. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses of the recruitment records, electronic health record data, and surveys were performed. Through integrative analysis, we developed process-related themes and recommendations for future equity-focused telehealth interventions. RESULTS Of the 239 eligible patients, 34 (14.2%) completed the intervention and 3 (1.2%) completed subsequent interviews. The intervention participants who completed the survey (n=15) had lower education and less technological experience than the nonintervention survey participants (n=113). We identified 3 helping strategies for cognitive load reduction: providing step-by-step guidance for configuring and learning, building rapport to create confidence while problem-solving, and being on the same page to counter informational distractions. Intervention participants reported increased understanding but found that learning the video visit software was more difficult than nonintervention participants. A comparison of visit experiences did not find differences in difficulty (cognitive load measure) using telehealth-related technologies, changes to visit modality, or reported technical problems during the visit. However, the intervention participants were significantly less satisfied with the video visits. CONCLUSIONS Although a limited number of people participated in the intervention, it may have reached individuals more likely to need technology assistance. We postulate that significant differences between intervention and nonintervention participants were rooted in baseline differences between the groups' education level, technology experience, and technology use frequency; however, small sample sizes limit conclusions. The barriers encountered during the intervention suggest that patients at FQHC may require both improved access to web-based technologies and human intermediary support to make telehealth video visits feasible. Future large, randomized, equity-focused studies should investigate blended strategies to facilitate video visit access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcy G Antonio
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Alicia Williamson
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | - Ashley Beals
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ankrah
- Department of Informatics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Shannon Goulet
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Yucen Wang
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Grecia Macias
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jade James-Gist
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Lindsay K Brown
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sage Davis
- Covenant Community Care, Detroit, MI, United States
| | | | - Lorraine Buis
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Tawanna Dillahunt
- School of Information and College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Tiffany C Veinot
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Information and School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ferguson MC, McNicol E, Kleykamp BA, Sandoval K, Haroutounian S, Holzer KJ, Kerns RD, Veasley C, Turk DC, Dworkin RH. Perspectives on Participation in Clinical Trials Among Individuals With Pain, Depression, and/or Anxiety: An ACTTION Scoping Review. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:24-37. [PMID: 36152760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
For individuals experiencing pain, the decision to engage in clinical trials may be influenced by a number of factors including current and past care, illness severity, physical functioning, financial stress, and caregiver support. Co-occurring depression and anxiety may add to these challenges. The aim of this scoping review was to describe perspectives about clinical trial participation, including recruitment and retention among individuals with pain and pain comorbidities, including depression and/or anxiety. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Study features, sample demographics, perspectives, barriers and/or motivations were collected and described. A total of 35 assessments were included in this scoping review with 24 focused on individuals with pain (24/35, 68.6%), 9 on individuals with depression and/or anxiety (9/35, 25.7%), and 2 on individuals with pain and co-occurring depression/anxiety (2/35, 5.7%). Barriers among participants with pain and those with depression included: research team's communication of information, fear of interventional risks, distrust (only among respondents with pain), too many procedures, fear of inadequate treatment, disease-life stressors, and embarrassment with study procedures (more commonly reported in participants with depression). Facilitators in both groups included: altruism and supportive staff, better access to care, and the ability to have outcome feedback (more commonly among individuals with depression). Individuals with pain and depression experience challenges that affect trial recruitment and retention. Engaging individuals with pain within research planning may assist in addressing these barriers and the needs of individuals affected by pain and/or depression. PERSPECTIVE: This review highlights the need to address barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials, including the need for an assessment of perspectives from underserved or marginalized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie C Ferguson
- School of Pharmacy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois.
| | - Ewan McNicol
- School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bethea A Kleykamp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Karin Sandoval
- School of Pharmacy, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois
| | - Simon Haroutounian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katherine J Holzer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert D Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Christin Veasley
- Co-founder and Director, Chronic Pain Research Alliance, North Kingstown, Rhode Island
| | - Dennis C Turk
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ponjoan A, Jacques-Aviñó C, Medina-Perucha L, Romero V, Martí-Lluch R, Alves-Cabratosa L, Ramos R, Berenguera A, Garcia-Gil MDM. Axes of social inequities in COVID-19 clinical trials: A systematic review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1069357. [PMID: 36891333 PMCID: PMC9987589 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The representativeness of participants is crucial to ensure external validity of clinical trials. We focused on the randomized clinical trials which assessed COVID-19 vaccines to assess the reporting of age, sex, gender identity, race, ethnicity, obesity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status in the results (description of the participants' characteristics, loss of follow-up, stratification of efficacy and safety results). Methods We searched the following databases for randomized clinical trials published before 1st February 2022: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Excerpta Medica. We included peer-reviewed articles written in English or Spanish. Four researchers used the Rayyan platform to filter citations, first reading the title and abstract, and then accessing the full text. Articles were excluded if both reviewers agreed, or if a third reviewer decided to discard them. Results Sixty three articles were included, which assessed 20 different vaccines, mainly in phase 2 or 3. When describing the participants' characteristics, all the studies reported sex or gender, 73.0% race, ethnicity, 68.9% age groups, and 22.2% obesity. Only one article described the age of participants lost to follow-up. Efficacy results were stratified by age in 61.9%, sex or gender in 26.9%, race and/or, ethnicity in 9.5%, and obesity in 4.8% of the articles. Safety results were stratified by age in 41.0%, and by sex or gender in 7.9% of the analysis. Reporting of gender identity, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status of participants was rare. Parity was reached in 49.2% of the studies, and sex-specific outcomes were mentioned in 22.9% of the analysis, most of the latter were related to females' health. Conclusions Axes of social inequity other than age and sex were hardly reported in randomized clinical trials that assessed COVID-19 vaccines. This undermines their representativeness and external validity and sustains health inequities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ponjoan
- Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Constanza Jacques-Aviñó
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.,Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Medina-Perucha
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.,Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victor Romero
- Servicio Canario de la Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ruth Martí-Lluch
- Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Lia Alves-Cabratosa
- Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain
| | - Rafel Ramos
- Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain.,Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Anna Berenguera
- Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Nursing, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - María Del Mar Garcia-Gil
- Grup en Salut Vascular de Girona (ISV-Girona), Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAPJGol), Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Newington L, Alexander CM, Kirby P, Saggu RK, Wells M. Reflections on contributing to health research: A qualitative interview study with research participants and patient advisors. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279354. [PMID: 36534681 PMCID: PMC9762575 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to explore individuals' experiences of contributing to health research and to identify the types of impact that are perceived as important by participants or patient and public advisors. Specifically, research led by NMAHPP clinicians (Nursing, Midwifery, Allied health professions, Healthcare science, Psychology and Pharmacy). METHODS Semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with health research participants and patient or public advisors. Interviewees were recruited from five UK sites and via social media. Interview transcripts were analysed using Thematic Analysis to identify key themes and areas of disagreement. RESULTS Twenty-one interviews were completed, and four main themes were identified. The first, optimising research experiences, included personal reflections and broader recommendations to improve participant experiences. The second, connecting health research with healthcare, described research as key for the continued development of healthcare, but illustrated that communication between research teams, participants, and clinicians could be improved. The third theme explored the personal impacts of contributing to research, with interviewees recalling common positive experiences. The final theme discussed capturing research impacts. Interviewees highlighted potential priorities for different stakeholders, but emphasised that financial impacts should not be the sole factor. CONCLUSION Individuals who were involved in NMAHPP health research recalled positive experiences and reported good relationships with their research teams. They felt that their contributions were valued. Suggested strategies to optimise the research experience focused on simplifying documentation, clear signposting of the research activities involved, and feedback on the research findings. Routine sharing of relevant research data with clinicians was also recommended. Personal impacts included a deeper understanding of their health condition or health more broadly, and increased confidence interacting with healthcare and other professionals. These findings will be used to inform development of a framework to capture the impact of NMAHPP research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Newington
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Caroline M. Alexander
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pippa Kirby
- Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rhia K. Saggu
- Therapies, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Wells
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Nursing Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Neate SL, Bevens W, Jelinek PL, Gray KM, Weiland TJ, Nag N, Simpson-Yap S, Jelinek GA, Yu M, Reece JC. A multiple sclerosis lifestyle behavior online course: Qualitative analysis of participants' motivations, expectations and experiences. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1022185. [PMID: 36568793 PMCID: PMC9768550 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Modification of lifestyle-related risk factors for multiple sclerosis (MS) has been associated with improved health outcomes when compared with standard medical management alone. Based on an existing lifestyle modification program offered as a residential workshop, the MS Online Course (MSOC) was developed to translate the workshop into an online intervention. We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), to assess the feasibility concepts of accessibility, learnability and desirability through quantitative and qualitative analyzes. In the present study, we performed additional qualitative analyzes to explore participants' motivations, expectations, and experiences of the MSOC. This study aims to complement prior feasibility analyzes and inform recruitment strategies and course content redevelopment so that its effectiveness may be assessed by examining behavior change and health outcomes in a future larger RCT. Methods Participants were recruited via online advertisements and randomized to either: the standard care course, containing material sourced from public facing MS websites; or the intervention course, based on an evidence-based lifestyle modification program for people with MS. Course completers were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Within a qualitative paradigm, reflexive thematic analysis of interviews was undertaken. Results Of 31 eligible participants, 17 completed the MSOC and 14 agreed to be interviewed. Four themes were identified in this analysis: (1) "Wanting to help others" (helping through volunteering, contributing to knowledge base, spreading the word; (2) "Seeking knowledge" (confirmation of existing knowledge; obtaining new knowledge, relevant, credible information); (3) "Doing what I can to help myself" (understanding lifestyle modification, changing my lifestyle, remaining well); and (4) "Changing attitudes" (finding positivity, feeling more confident and in control). Conclusions Participants were motivated to help others through research, help themselves by improving knowledge and to find ways to better manage their MS. Expectations included obtaining credible, reliable information, to substantiate existing knowledge, and to further understand lifestyle modification. Participants' experiences included confirmation of and obtaining new knowledge, and early implementation of modified lifestyle behaviors. These insights surrounding participants' motivations, expectations and experiences will assist in recruitment strategies, course redevelopment and outcome measures for the future RCT to examine the effectiveness of the MSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra L. Neate
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,*Correspondence: Sandra L. Neate
| | - William Bevens
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Pia L. Jelinek
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kathleen M. Gray
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - T. J. Weiland
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nupur Nag
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Steve Simpson-Yap
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,MS Flagship, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - George A. Jelinek
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M. Yu
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jeanette C. Reece
- Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Segre LS, Davila RC, Carter C, Arndt S. Race/ethnicity matching boosts enrollment of black participants in clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 122:106936. [PMID: 36162741 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enrollment of a representative sample of racial or ethnic-minority participants can be challenging for researchers conducting clinical trials. One proposed solution is race/ethnicity matching (i.e., aligning the racial or ethnic identity of the trial recruiter with that of the desired participant), but in practice this idea has yielded mixed results. Nevertheless, the approach seems inherently strong, so we reevaluated this strategy in a secondary analysis. METHODS Black participant enrollment was tracked during the screening phase of two clinical trials led by the same PI and conducted in the same setting: the NICU of a midwestern academic hospital in a predominantly White locale. In the first trial, the recruiter was a White neonatal nurse practitioner from the NICU. In the second trial, the recruiter was a Black research nurse. In this evaluation of race/ethnicity matching, the number of Black women who enrolled into the screening phase of the two trials was compared. RESULTS The Black research nurse enrolled twice as many Black participants into the screening phase of a clinical trial compared to the White NICU neonatal nurse practitioner (12.24% & 6.1%, respectively). The 6.14 percentage-point difference in Black participant enrollment is significant using Fisher's exact test (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS The key finding is that the Black recruiter enrolled a significantly greater number of Black participants than the White recruiter, suggesting that race/ethnicity matching is a viable strategy for increasing racial/ethnic minority participation in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa S Segre
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, United States of America.
| | - Rebecca Chuffo Davila
- Stead Family Children's Hospital, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, United States of America
| | - Cheryl Carter
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, United States of America
| | - Stephan Arndt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Coyle J, Rogers A, Copland R, De Paoli G, MacDonald TM, Mackenzie IS. A secondary qualitative analysis of stakeholder views about participant recruitment, retention, and adherence in decentralised clinical trials (DCTs). Trials 2022; 23:614. [PMID: 35907888 PMCID: PMC9338512 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06521-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) are clinical trials where all or most trial activities occur in or near participants’ homes instead of hospitals or research sites. While more convenient for participants, DCTs may offer limited opportunities to build trust with investigators and trial teams. This qualitative analysis explored DCT stakeholder views to inform strategies for maximising participant recruitment, retention, and adherence. Methods A secondary analysis of original interview transcripts focused on participant engagement: recruitment, retention, and adherence. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of stakeholders, including trial managers and administrators, investigators, nurses, vendors, and patient representatives. Interview data were coded using a thematic approach to generate descriptive themes. Results Forty-eight stakeholders were interviewed. Three components of participant engagement in DCTs were identified: identifying and attracting potential participants, retaining participants and encouraging adherence, and involvement of patients and the public. Interviewees believed that a potential participant’s beliefs about research value and their trust in the research team strongly influenced the likelihood of taking part in a DCT. Early involvement of patients was identified as one way to gauge participant priorities. However, perceived burden was seen as a barrier to recruitment. Factors influencing retention and adherence were related to the same underlying motivators that drove recruitment: personal values, circumstances, and burden. Being part of a DCT should not conflict with the original motivations to participate. Conclusion Recruitment, retention, and adherence in DCTs are driven by factors that have previously been found to affect conventional clinical trials. Increasing patient and public involvement can address many of these factors. In contrast to conventional trials, DCTs are perceived as requiring greater emphasis on communication, and contact, to engender trust between participants and researchers despite a relative lack of in-person interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Coyle
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Amy Rogers
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
| | - Rachel Copland
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Giorgia De Paoli
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Thomas M MacDonald
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | - Isla S Mackenzie
- MEMO Research, Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moe-Byrne T, Knapp P, Perry D, Achten J, Spoors L, Appelbe D, Roche J, Martin-Kerry JM, Sheridan R, Higgins S. Does digital, multimedia information increase recruitment and retention in a children's wrist fracture treatment trial, and what do people think of it? A randomised controlled Study Within A Trial (SWAT). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057508. [PMID: 35831055 PMCID: PMC9280884 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate digital, multimedia information (MMI) for its effects on trial recruitment, retention, decisions about participation and acceptability by patients, compared with printed information. DESIGN Study Within A Trial using random cluster allocation within the Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) study. SETTING Emergency departments in 23 UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS 1409 children aged 4-16 years attending with a torus (buckle) fracture, and their parents/guardian. Children's mean age was 9.2 years, 41.0% were female, 77.4% were ethnically White and 90.0% spoke English as a first language. INTERVENTIONS Participants and their parents/guardian received trial information either via multimedia, including animated videos, talking head videos and text (revised for readability and age appropriateness when needed) on tablet computer (MMI group; n=681), or printed participant information sheet (PIS group; n=728). OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was recruitment rate to FORCE. Secondary outcomes were Decision-Making Questionnaire (nine Likert items, analysed summatively and individually), three 'free text' questions (deriving subjective evaluations) and trial retention. RESULTS MMI produced a small, not statistically significant increase in recruitment: 475 (69.8%) participants were recruited from the MMI group; 484 (66.5%) from the PIS group (OR=1.35; 95% CI 0.76 to 2.40, p=0.31). A total of 324 (23.0%) questionnaires were returned and analysed. There was no difference in total Decision-Making Questionnaire scores: adjusted mean difference 0.05 (95% CI -1.23 to 1.32, p=0.94). The MMI group was more likely to report the information 'very easy' to understand (89; 57.8% vs 67; 39.4%; Z=2.60, p=0.01) and identify information that was explained well (96; 62.3% vs 71; 41.8%). Almost all FORCE recruits were retained at the 6 weeks' timepoint and there was no difference in retention rate between the information groups: MMI (473; 99.6%); PIS (481; 99.4%). CONCLUSIONS MMI did not increase recruitment or retention in the FORCE trial, but participants rated multimedia as easier to understand and were more likely to evaluate it positively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN73136092 and ISRCTN13955395.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Knapp
- Health Sciences and the Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Louise Spoors
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Jenny Roche
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Czwikla J, Herzberg A, Kapp S, Kloep S, Rothgang H, Nitschke I, Haffner C, Hoffmann F. Generalizability and reach of a randomized controlled trial to improve oral health among home care recipients: comparing participants and nonparticipants at baseline and during follow-up. Trials 2022; 23:560. [PMID: 35804423 PMCID: PMC9264743 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06470-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The generalizability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a low response can be limited by systematic differences between participants and nonparticipants. This participation bias, however, is rarely investigated because data on nonparticipants is usually not available. The purpose of this article is to compare all participants and nonparticipants of a RCT to improve oral health among home care recipients at baseline and during follow-up using claims data. Methods Seven German statutory health and long-term care insurance funds invited 9656 home care recipients to participate in the RCT MundPflege. Claims data for all participants (n = 527, 5.5% response) and nonparticipants (n = 9129) were analyzed. Associations between trial participation and sex, age, care dependency, number of Elixhauser diseases, and dementia, as well as nursing, medical, and dental care utilization at baseline, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Associations between trial participation and the probability of (a) moving into a nursing home, (b) being hospitalized, and (c) death during 1 year of follow-up were examined via Cox proportional hazards regressions, controlling for baseline variables. Results At baseline, trial participation was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio 1.29 [95% confidence interval 1.08–1.54]), high (vs. low 1.46 [1.15–1.86]) care dependency, receiving occasional in-kind benefits to relieve caring relatives (1.45 [1.15–1.84]), having a referral by a general practitioner to a medical specialist (1.62 [1.21–2.18]), and dental care utilization (2.02 [1.67–2.45]). It was negatively associated with being 75–84 (vs. < 60 0.67 [0.50–0.90]) and 85 + (0.50 [0.37–0.69]) years old. For morbidity, hospitalizations, and formal, respite, short-term, and day or night care, no associations were found. During follow-up, participants were less likely to move into a nursing home than nonparticipants (hazard ratio 0.50 [0.32–0.79]). For hospitalizations and mortality, no associations were found. Conclusions For half of the comparisons, differences between participants and nonparticipants were observed. The RCT’s generalizability is limited, but to a smaller extent than one would expect because of the low response. Routine data provide a valuable source for investigating potential differences between trial participants and nonparticipants, which might be used by future RCTs to evaluate the generalizability of their findings. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00013517. Retrospectively registered on June 11, 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06470-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Czwikla
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany. .,Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany. .,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Alexandra Herzberg
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Sonja Kapp
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Stephan Kloep
- High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Linzer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heinz Rothgang
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ina Nitschke
- Division of Gerodontology, Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Science, University Medical Center, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Clinic of General, Special Care and Geriatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstraße 11, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cornelius Haffner
- Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Städtisches Klinikum Harlaching München, Sanatoriumsplatz 2, 81545, Munich, Germany
| | - Falk Hoffmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Al-Shami KM, Ahmed WS, Alzoubi KH. Motivators and barriers towards clinical research participation: A population-based survey from an Arab MENA country. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0270300. [PMID: 35749422 PMCID: PMC9231817 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Jordan was the first Arab country to enact clinical research regulations. The country has a well-flourished pharmaceutical industry that leans heavily on clinical research (CR) for drug development and post-marketing surveillance. In this cross-sectional study, we sought to assess the public's awareness and attitude towards CR as well as their perceived motivators and barriers to CR participation. A population-based, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to the general public in Jordan. Among the 1061 participants in this survey, 74% reported being aware of CR. The majority (70%) agreed to the role of CR in health promotion. Online information and healthcare staff were the two main sources of CR information for the participants. About 25% of the participants received prior invitations to participate in CR with 21% agreeing to participate. However, most participants of the current study (63%) were willing to participate in future CR. Contributing to science, benefiting others, and promoting one's own health were the top motivating factors for participating in CR; while time constraints, fear of research procedure, and lack of interest were the most cited reasons for rejecting participation. Filling out questionnaire surveys, donating blood samples, and participating in physical examinations were the main CR contributions of the participants. Nearly 31% of the participants believed that CR is conducted in a responsible and ethical manner, while 57% did not have an opinion regarding the same matter. In addition, 49% and 44% were neutral with regards to the degree of harm and confidentiality posed by CR. While only 27% disagreed that CR exposes participants to some form of harm, 48% either strongly agreed (15%) or agreed (33%) that it maintains high level of confidentiality for participants. The current study provides insight into the public's perception of CR in Jordan as well as its motivating factors and perceived barriers towards participating in CR. We envisage to utilize this insight as an aid in the design of vigilant future awareness campaigns and recruitment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal M. Al-Shami
- Division of Tumor Metabolism and Microenvironment, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Drug Discovery and Development, Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America
| | - Wesam S. Ahmed
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Karem H. Alzoubi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Skvarc D, Evans S, Cheah S, Cranney M, German B, Orr R, Emerson C, Olive L, Beswick L, Massuger W, Raven L, Mikocka-Walus A. Can an online expressive writing program support people with inflammatory bowel disease? A feasibility randomised controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2022; 48:101616. [PMID: 35716442 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We explored feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online writing intervention (WriteforIBD) against an active control condition for distress in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A feasibility RCT was conducted in 19 adults (89.5% female, aged 20-69 years) with IBD and mild-moderate distress. Participants allocated to the WriteForIBD group completed a 4-day 30-min writing program adapted for IBD. The active control group wrote about trivial topics provided by researchers. Feasibility was established based on the recruitment and retention while acceptability based on completion rates and a numeric rating scale. All participants completed measures of mental health and disease activity before and after the intervention (one week) and at follow-up three months after the study commencement. RESULTS The retention rate in the study was high (100% WriteForIBD; 82% control). All participants attended every session. 84.2% of participants were satisfied with the intervention. All participants reported a significant improvement in IBD-Control immediately after the intervention; F (2, 33.7) = 7.641, p = .002. A significant interaction of group*time for resilience was noted, R2 = 0.19, p < .001, with the active control group reporting a significant decline in resilience from the first follow-up to three months while no significant change in resilience for the WriteForIBD group was recorded. CONCLUSIONS Online expressive writing is potentially feasible and highly acceptable to people with IBD who report distress. Future large-scale trials should explore the intervention that is adapted from this feasibility study. REGISTRATION ID: ACTRN12620000448943p.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Skvarc
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Subhadra Evans
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suiyin Cheah
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Bonnie German
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rebecca Orr
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; iMPACT, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Lisa Olive
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; iMPACT, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Lauren Beswick
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Leanne Raven
- Crohn's & Colitis Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bradley CB, Tapia AL, DiGuiseppi CG, Kepner MW, Kloetzer JM, Schieve LA, Wiggins LD, Windham GC, Daniels JL. Reasons for participation in a child development study: Are cases with developmental diagnoses different from controls? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2022; 36:435-445. [PMID: 35107836 PMCID: PMC9169212 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current knowledge about parental reasons for allowing child participation in research comes mainly from clinical trials. Fewer data exist on parents' motivations to enrol children in observational studies. OBJECTIVES Describe reasons parents of preschoolers gave for participating in the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a US multi-site study of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental delays or disorders (DD), and explore reasons given by child diagnostic and behavioural characteristics at enrolment. METHODS We included families of children, age 2-5 years, participating in SEED (n = 5696) during 2007-2016. We assigned children to groups based on characteristics at enrolment: previously diagnosed ASD; suspected ASD; non-ASD DD; and population controls (POP). During a study interview, we asked parents their reasons for participating. Two coders independently coded responses and resolved discrepancies via consensus. We fit binary mixed-effects models to evaluate associations of each reason with group and demographics, using POP as reference. RESULTS Participants gave 1-5 reasons for participation (mean = 1.7, SD = 0.7). Altruism (48.3%), ASD research interest (47.4%) and perceived personal benefit (26.9%) were most common. Two novel reasons were knowing someone outside the household with the study conditions (peripheral relationship; 14.1%) and desire to contribute to a specified result (1.4%). Odds of reporting interest in ASD research were higher among diagnosed ASD participants (odds ratio [OR] 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.49-3.35). Perceived personal benefit had higher odds among diagnosed (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.61-2.29) or suspected ASD (OR 3.67, 95% CI 2.99-4.50) and non-ASD DD (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.50-2.16) participants. Peripheral relationship with ASD/DD had lower odds among all case groups. CONCLUSIONS We identified meaningful differences between groups in parent-reported reasons for participation. Differences demonstrate an opportunity for future studies to tailor recruitment materials and increase the perceived benefit for specific prospective participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chyrise B. Bradley
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amanda L. Tapia
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carolyn G. DiGuiseppi
- Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marti W. Kepner
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joy M. Kloetzer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura A. Schieve
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lisa D. Wiggins
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gayle C. Windham
- California Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Richmond, California, USA
| | - Julie L. Daniels
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
The psychosocial responses of patients in cancer clinical trials: are they a barrier to participation? JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
This paper aims to discuss the psychosocial concomitants with involvement in oncology clinical trials, focusing on barriers that can impact upon participation. It will conclude with some recommendations for strategies to address potential psychosocial barriers with the aim of increasing trial participation rates.
Materials and methods:
A literature search was carried out using CINAHL, PubMed and EMCare databases with the following keywords for filtering: psychological distress, clinical trials, participation and oncology. The final selection of papers that met the inclusion criteria for this review was manually subjected to Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for relevance.
Results:
Thirteen papers were included in the review. The dominant theme within the literature is psychosocial obstacles to oncology clinical trial participation. Five key barriers were identified: anxiety and fear; ethnicity and social background; tensions between scientific objectives and personal motivations to participation; tensions between personal benefits versus altruism; carer perspectives.
Conclusions:
The key barriers discussed led to the identification of a set of strategies to help mediate conflicting tensions and motivations of trial enrolment with a view to increasing participation rates. Further prospective research garnering primary data investigating both the psychological and psychosocial factors influencing cancer clinical trial participation for patients needs to be undertaken.
Collapse
|
42
|
Allison K, Patel D, Kaur R. Assessing Multiple Factors Affecting Minority Participation in Clinical Trials: Development of the Clinical Trials Participation Barriers Survey. Cureus 2022; 14:e24424. [PMID: 35637812 PMCID: PMC9127181 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to analyze factors that influence individuals' decisions to participate in clinical trials focusing on racial and ethnic disparities that exist in clinical trials. These factors are then used to develop a survey that may be used in a clinical setting to further understand specific factors affecting participation. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was carried out for publications from 2010 to 2021 using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. After reviewing the data, the predominant factors that were encountered in the search were then commented upon and reviewed to create an evidence-based questionnaire. Using the comprehensive search, factors that affect clinical trial participation were identified. These factors were then used to create a comprehensive, evidence-based questionnaire to be implemented in a clinical setting to conduct and analyze the factors impacting participation in clinical trials. Understanding the factors that primarily impact an individual's decisions to participate or not participate in a clinical trial allow researchers to implement changes to decrease the hesitancy regarding participation.
Collapse
|
43
|
Finucane E, O'Brien A, Treweek S, Newell J, Das K, Chapman S, Wicks P, Galvin S, Healy P, Biesty L, Gillies K, Noel-Storr A, Gardner H, O'Reilly MF, Devane D. The People's Trial: supporting the public's understanding of randomised trials. Trials 2022; 23:205. [PMID: 35264220 PMCID: PMC8905031 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acceptance of and public participation in clinical trials. The People’s Trial aims to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims by actively involving them in all aspects of trial design. This was done by involving the public in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial. Methods Using a reflexive approach, we describe the processes of development, conduct, and dissemination of The People’s Trial. Results Over 3000 members of the public, from 72 countries, participated in The People’s Trial. Through a series of online surveys, the public designed a trial called The Reading Trial. They chose the question the trial would try to answer and decided the components of the trial question. In December 2019, 991 participants were recruited to a trial to answer the question identified and prioritised by the public, i.e. ‘Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison with not reading a book in bed?’ We report the processes of The People’s Trial in seven phases, paralleling the steps of a randomised trial, i.e. question identification and prioritisation, recruitment, randomisation, trial conduct, data analysis, and sharing of findings. We describe the decisions we made, the processes we used, the challenges we encountered, and the lessons we learned. Conclusion The People’s Trial involved the public successfully in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial demonstrating the potential for such initiatives to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Finucane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. .,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland. .,Evidence Synthesis Ireland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Ann O'Brien
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - John Newell
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kishor Das
- School of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sarah Chapman
- Cochrane UK, hosted by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and funded by the National Institute for Health Research, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Wicks
- Wicks Digital Health, Lichfield, England, UK
| | - Sandra Galvin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Patricia Healy
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Linda Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Anna Noel-Storr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Mary Frances O'Reilly
- Formerly - Nursing and Midwifery Planning and Development Unit, West Mid-West, Merlin Park University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Health Research Board-Trials Methodology Research Network, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Evidence Synthesis Ireland, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,Cochrane Ireland, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schreiber S, Irving PM, Sharara AI, Martín-Arranz MD, Hébuterne X, Penchev P, Danese S, Anthopoulos P, Akhundova-Unadkat G, Baert F. Review article: randomised controlled trials in inflammatory bowel disease-common challenges and potential solutions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:658-669. [PMID: 35132657 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recruitment rates for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis clinical trials continue to decrease annually. The inability to reach recruitment targets and complete trials has serious implications for stakeholders in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) community. Action is required to ensure patients with an unmet medical need have access to new therapies to improve the management of their IBD. AIMS Identify challenges contributing to recruitment decline in IBD clinical trials and propose potential solutions. METHODS PubMed and Google were used to identify literature, regulatory guidelines and conference proceedings related to IBD clinical trials and related concepts. Data on IBD clinical trials conducted between 1989 and 2020 were extracted from the Trialtrove database. RESULTS Key aspects that may improve recruitment rates were identified. An increasingly patient-centric approach should be taken to study design including improvements to the readability of key trial documentation and inclusion of patient representatives in trial planning. Placebo is unappealing to patients; approaches including platform trials should be explored to minimise placebo exposure. Non-invasive imaging, biomarkers and novel digital endpoints should continue to be examined to reduce the burden on patients. Reducing the administrative burden associated with trials via the use of electronic signatures, for example, may benefit study sites and investigators. Changes implemented to IBD trials during the COVID-19 pandemic provided examples of how trial conduct can be rapidly and constructively adapted. CONCLUSIONS To improve recruitment in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis trials, the IBD community should address a broad range of issues related to clinical trial conduct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Schreiber
- Department Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Christian-Alrechts-Unversity, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Ala I Sharara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - María Dolores Martín-Arranz
- Department of Gastroenterology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Institute for Health Research, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xavier Hébuterne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, CHU of Nice and University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Plamen Penchev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Filip Baert
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jimenez-Rodriguez RM, Martín-Gutiérrez G, Jiménez-Jorge S, Rosso-Fernández CM, Tallón-Aguilar L, Roca-Oporto C, Padillo J, Luckey A, Cano A, López-Ruiz J, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Bonnín-Pascual J, Boix-Palop L, Montejo JM, Torre-Cisneros J, Cisneros JM. Factors associated with recruitment success in the phase 2a study of aztreonam-avibactam development programme: a descriptive qualitative analysis among sites in Spain. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051187. [PMID: 35115349 PMCID: PMC8814749 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Successful clinical trials are subject to recruitment. Recently, the REJUVENATE trial, a prospective phase 2a open-label, single-arm interventional clinical trial conducted within the Innovative Medicines Initiative-supported Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe-Carbapenem Resistance project, was published, with 85% of the recruitment performed in Spain. We analysed the recruitment success in this trial by establishing a model of recruitment practice. METHODS A descriptive qualitative study was performed from May 2016 to October 2017 at 10 participating Spanish centres. Data were extracted from: (1) feasibility questionnaires to assess the centre's potential for patient enrolment; (2) delegation of responsibility records; (3) pre-screening records including an anonymised list of potentially eligible and (4) screening and enrolment records. A descriptive analysis of the features was performed by the participating centre. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine factors of recruitment success. RESULTS The highest recruitment rate was observed in Hospitals 3 and 6 (58.8 and 47.0 patients per month, respectively). All the study teams were multidisciplinary with a median of 15 members (range: 7-22). Only Hospitals 3, 5 and 6 had dedicated nursing staff appointed exclusively to this study. Moreover, in those three hospitals and in Hospital 9, the study coordinator performed exclusive functions as a research planner, and did not assume these functions for the other hospitals. The univariate analysis showed a significant association between recruitment success and months of recruitment (p=0.024), number of staff (p<0.001), higher number of pharmacists (p=0.005), infectious disease specialists (p<0.001), the presence of microbiologist in the research team (p=0.018) and specifically dedicated nursing staff (p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS The existence of broad multidisciplinary teams with staff dedicated exclusively to the study as well as the implementation of a well-designed local patient assessment strategy were the essential optimisation factors for recruitment success in Spain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02655419; EudraCT 2015-002726-39; analysis of pre-screened patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Silvia Jiménez-Jorge
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Clara M Rosso-Fernández
- Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Luis Tallón-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Cristina Roca-Oporto
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Javier Padillo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Alison Luckey
- Global Antibiotic R&D Partnership (GARDP), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Angela Cano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain
| | - José López-Ruiz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Jaime Bonnín-Pascual
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Lucía Boix-Palop
- Department of Infectious Diseases, MutuaTerrassa Group, Terrassa, Spain
| | - José Miguel Montejo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | | - José Miguel Cisneros
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kron J, Syed A, Iden T, Gwathmey K, Polly K, Randolph J, Brar V, Nana-Sinkam P, Ellenbogen K, Syed H. Tackling Health Care Disparities: How to Build a Sarcoidosis Center. SARCOIDOSIS, VASCULITIS, AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF WASOG 2022; 39:e2022024. [PMID: 36791030 PMCID: PMC9766846 DOI: 10.36141/svdld.v39i3.13423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ system inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that disproportionately affects women and black patients in the United States. In addition, woman and minority patients have worse outcomes. In 2015, sarcoidosis physicians in cardiology, pulmonary medicine and rheumatology joined forces to create a multidisciplinary sarcoidosis at Virginia Commonwealth University. In 2019, the clinic was recognized as a World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) Center of Excellence. We identify four pillars of a patient-centered sarcoidosis clinic: clinical care, research, teaching, and community outreach. We detail how each of these facets plays a critical role in improving the health of individual patients, creating a strong infrastructure to improve the future of sarcoidosis treatment, and developing community-based resources that can empower patients. Most importantly, we highlight how a multidisciplinary clinic can help identify and combat healthcare disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana Kron
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Aamer Syed
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Thomas Iden
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly Gwathmey
- Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly Polly
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jessica Randolph
- Department of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Vikram Brar
- Department of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Patrick Nana-Sinkam
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kenneth Ellenbogen
- Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Huzaefah Syed
- Division of Rheumatology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Addressing Challenges in Recruiting Diverse Populations for Research: Practical Experience From a P20 Center. Nurs Res 2022; 71:218-226. [PMID: 35067645 PMCID: PMC9038626 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving the recruitment and retention of underrepresented groups in all research areas is essential for health equity. However, achieving and retaining diverse samples is challenging. Barriers to recruitment and retention of diverse participants include socioeconomic and cultural factors and practical challenges (e.g., time and travel commitments). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this article is to describe the successful recruitment and retention strategies used by two related studies within a P20 center funded by the National Institute of Nursing Research focused on precision health research in diverse populations with multiple chronic conditions, including metabolic syndrome. METHODS To address the complexity, biodiversity, and effect of metabolic syndrome and multiple chronic conditions, we developed culturally appropriate, multipronged recruitment and retention strategies for a pilot intervention study and a longitudinal observational pilot study within our P20 center. The following are the underlying principles that guided the recruitment and retention strategies: (a) flexibility, (b) active listening and bidirectional conversations, and (c) innovative problem solving. RESULTS The intervention study (Pilot 1) enrolled 49 participants. The longitudinal observational study (Pilot 2) enrolled 45 participants. Women and racial/ethnic minorities were significantly represented in both. In Pilot 1, most of the participants completed the intervention and all phases of data collection. In Pilot 2, most participants completed all phases of data collection and chose to provide biorepository specimens. DISCUSSION We developed a recruitment and retention plan building on standard strategies for a general medical population. Our real-world experiences informed the adaption of these strategies to facilitate the participation of individuals who often do not participate in research-specifically, women and racial/ethnic populations. Our experience across two pilot studies suggests that recruiting diverse populations should build flexibility in the research plan at the outset.
Collapse
|
48
|
Gabel M, Bollinger RM, Coble DW, Grill JD, Edwards DF, Lingler JH, Chin E, Stark SL. Retaining Participants in Longitudinal Studies of Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 87:945-955. [PMID: 35404282 PMCID: PMC9673904 DOI: 10.3233/jad-215710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retention of study participants is essential to advancing Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and developing therapeutic interventions. However, recent multi-year AD studies have lost 10% to 54% of participants. OBJECTIVE We surveyed a random sample of 443 participants (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]≤1) at four Alzheimer Disease Research Centers to elucidate perceived facilitators and barriers to continued participation in longitudinal AD research. METHODS Reasons for participation were characterized with factor analysis. Effects of perceived fulfillment of one's own goals and complaints on attendance and likelihood of dropout were estimated with logistic regression models. Open-ended responses suggesting study improvements were analyzed with a Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model. RESULTS Factor analyses revealed two categories, personal benefit and altruism, as drivers of continued participation. Participants with cognitive impairment (CDR > 0) emphasized personal benefits more than societal benefits. Participants with higher trust in medical researchers were more likely to emphasize broader social benefits. A minority endorsed any complaints. Higher perceived fulfillment of one's own goals and fewer complaints were related to higher attendance and lower likelihood of dropout. Facilitators included access to medical center support and/or future treatment, learning about AD and memory concerns, and enjoying time with staff. Participants' suggestions emphasized more feedback about individual test results and AD research. CONCLUSION The results confirmed previously identified facilitators and barriers. Two new areas, improved communication about individual test results and greater feedback about AD research, emerged as the primary factors to improve participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Gabel
- Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Dean W. Coble
- School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joshua D. Grill
- Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, Departments of Psychiatry & Human Behavior and Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Dorothy F. Edwards
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
- Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jennifer H. Lingler
- School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Erin Chin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Susan L. Stark
- Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
- School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mohini P, Palaganas M, Elia Y, Motran L, Sochett E, Curtis J, Scholey JW, McArthur L, Mahmud FH. Exploring the Motivational Drivers of Young Adults with Diabetes for Participation in Kidney Research. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221138236. [PMID: 36388087 PMCID: PMC9663656 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221138236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding motivational drivers and barriers to patient participation in diabetes research are important to ensure research is relevant and valuable. Young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) completed a 31-question qualitative survey evaluating participant experience, understanding, and motivators and barriers to research involvement. A total of 35 participants, 19–28 years of age, 60% female, completed the survey. Motivating factors included personal benefit, relationship with the study team, curiosity, financial compensation, altruism, and nostalgia. Older participants (>22 years) reported higher levels of trust in the study team (p = 0.02) and their relationship with the study team positively influenced their decision to participate (p = 0.03). Financial compensation was a strong motivator for participants with higher education (p = 0.02). Age, sex, education level, and trust in the study team influenced participants’ understanding. Barriers included logistics and lack of familial support. Important motivational drivers and barriers to participation in research by young adults with T1D must be considered to increase research engagement and facilitate the discovery of new knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Mohini
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - M Palaganas
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Elia
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - L Motran
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - E Sochett
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Curtis
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - JW Scholey
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - L McArthur
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - FH Mahmud
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zannad F, Chauhan C, Gee PO, Hartshorne-Evans N, Hernandez AF, Mann MK, Martinez R, Mehran R. Patient partnership in cardiovascular clinical trials. Eur Heart J 2021; 43:1432-1437. [PMID: 34897413 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients are ultimately the end-users of medical therapies and need to be actively integrated as contributors and decision-makers in the process of product development throughout product lifecycles. This is increasingly being recognized by patients, investigators, regulators, payers, sponsors, and medical journals. However, cardiovascular research remains behind other fields in terms of the extent of patient involvement and awareness of clinical trials in cardiovascular research. True patient partnerships in cardiovascular therapeutic development may permit more rapid recognition of unmet needs, ensure alignment of product development priorities with patient priorities, improve efficiency of trials (e.g. recruitment), and ensure outcomes of value to patients are being measured in trials (e.g. quality of life). This paper reviews ongoing initiatives and remaining opportunities to accomplish contributive patient involvement in cardiovascular clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faiez Zannad
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm Clinical Investigation Center, Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux, University Hospital of Nancy, Nancy 54500, France
| | | | | | | | - Adrian F Hernandez
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|