1
|
Walbaum B, García-Fructuoso I, Martínez-Sáez O, Schettini F, Sánchez C, Acevedo F, Chic N, Muñoz-Carrillo J, Adamo B, Muñoz M, Partridge AH, Bellet M, Brasó-Maristany F, Prat A, Vidal M. Hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in young women: A comprehensive review. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 129:102804. [PMID: 39084152 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
The incidence of breast cancer in ≤ 40 yr-old women (YWBC) has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Although this group of patients represents less than 10 % of all newly diagnosed BC cases it encompasses a significant burden of disease. Usually underrepresented in clinical trials, YWBCs are also characterized by late diagnoses and poorly differentiated, aggressive-subtype disease, partly explaining its poor prognosis along with a high recurrence risk, and high mortality rates. On the other hand, YWBC treatment poses unique challenges such as preservation of fertility, and long-term toxicity and adverse events. Herein, we summarize the current evidence in hormone receptor-positive YWBC including specific risk factors, clinicopathologic and genomic features, and available evidence on response to chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Overall, we advocate for a more comprehensive multidisciplinary healthcare model to improve the outcomes and the quality of life of this subset of younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Walbaum
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Isabel García-Fructuoso
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Martínez-Sáez
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesco Schettini
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - César Sánchez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Francisco Acevedo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nuria Chic
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Barbara Adamo
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Montserrat Muñoz
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meritxell Bellet
- Oncology Department, Breast Cancer Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fara Brasó-Maristany
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Cancer and Blood Disorders, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Reveal Genomics, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aleix Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Cancer and Blood Disorders, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Reveal Genomics, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Hospital Quironsalud, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Vidal
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors Group, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Hospital Quironsalud, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ma L, Yang B, Wu J. Revisiting ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonists for premenopausal women with breast cancer: Who should use and the impact on survival outcomes. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 129:102770. [PMID: 38865794 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer diagnosed in premenopausal women tends to be more aggressive and the benefit of ovarian function suppression (OFS), at least in certain groups of patients, is well known. There is hesitancy in using OFS in some groups of patients who may otherwise benefit from the treatment. For instance, it is clear that in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), high-risk, early-stage breast cancer, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) should be given in the adjuvant setting; however, confusion remains whether premenopausal patients with intermediate-risk disease benefit from GnRHa, given the lack of consensus on its definition in guidelines and clinical practice. Most recent evidence on the long-term efficacy of GnRHa, with up to 20-years of follow-up, reinforced its benefits in premenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. In this comprehensive review, we reviewed the long-term efficacy in terms of improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for early-stage HR+ breast cancer and examined evidence from multiple randomized clinical studies to identify the clinicopathological characteristics that correlated with improved DFS and OS with the addition of OFS to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Other aspects of GnRHa, including its efficacy in advanced breast cancer, safety profile, evidence in ovarian function preservation, and the advantages of long-acting formulations were also discussed. By addressing the existing gaps and grey areas regarding the inclusion of OFS as a crucial treatment component for premenopausal breast cancer patients, physicians are more aware of who to administer and the potential impact on survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linxiaoxi Ma
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Benlong Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiong Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270 Dongan Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Noguchi E, Yamanaka T, Mukai H, Yamamoto N, Chung CF, Lu YS, Chang DY, Sohn J, Kim GM, Lee KH, Lee SC, Iwasa T, Iwata H, Watanabe K, Jung KH, Tanabe Y, Kang SY, Yasojima H, Aogi K, Tokunaga E, Sim SH, Yap YS, Matsumoto K, Tseng LM, Umeyama Y, Sudo K, Kojima Y, Hata T, Kuchiba A, Shibata T, Nakamura K, Fujiwara Y, Tamura K, Yonemori K. A phase 3 study (PATHWAY) of palbociclib plus tamoxifen in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:76. [PMID: 39174547 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00684-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy is approved for treating patients with hormone-receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer; however, data on palbociclib combined with tamoxifen are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. This double-blind phase 3 study included 184 women who were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Pre/perimenopausal women also received goserelin. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Median PFS was 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1-32.4) with palbociclib-tamoxifen and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.6) with placebo-tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; P = 0.002). Palbociclib-tamoxifen improved PFS in patients who were treated with first-line or second-line endocrine therapy and pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients. Though OS data are still immature (median not reached in both groups), an overall risk reduction of 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.21) with palbociclib-tamoxifen was observed at the time of PFS analysis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with palbociclib-tamoxifen was neutropenia (89.0% [none were febrile] versus 1.1% with placebo-tamoxifen). There were no deaths owing to adverse events in either group. Among patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, palbociclib-tamoxifen resulted in significantly longer PFS than tamoxifen alone. Early OS data showed a trend favoring palbociclib-tamoxifen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03423199. Study registration date: February 06, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi Noguchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yamanaka
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Naohito Yamamoto
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Chi-Feng Chung
- Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Shen Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Dwan-Ying Chang
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Joohyuk Sohn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gun Min Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Chin Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tsutomu Iwasa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kenichi Watanabe
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kyung Hae Jung
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuko Tanabe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seok Yun Kang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hiroyuki Yasojima
- Departments of Surgery and Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Aogi
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Eriko Tokunaga
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Sung Hoon Sim
- Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Sim Yap
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Koji Matsumoto
- Hyogo Cancer Center Division of Medical Oncology, Akashi, Japan
| | - Ling-Ming Tseng
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Kazuki Sudo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Kojima
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomomi Hata
- International Trial Management Section, Research Management Division, Clinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Aya Kuchiba
- Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Support Office National Cancer Center Hospital/Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Shibata
- Biostatistics Section, Clinical Research Support Office National Cancer Center Hospital/Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Nakamura
- Department of International Clinical Development, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Fujiwara
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kan Yonemori
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schettini F, Blondeaux E, Molinelli C, Bas R, Kim HJ, Di Meglio A, Bernstein Molho R, Linn SC, Pogoda K, Carrasco E, Punie K, Agostinetto E, Lopetegui-Lia N, Phillips KA, Toss A, Rousset-Jablonski C, Acheritogaray M, Ferrari A, Paluch-Shimon S, Fruscio R, Cui W, Wong SM, Vernieri C, Dieci MV, Matikas A, Rozenblit M, Villarreal-Garza C, De Marchis L, Puglisi F, Vasconcelos de Matos L, Mariño M, Teixeira L, Graffeo R, Rognone A, Chirco A, Antone N, Abdou Y, Marhold M, Božović-Spasojević I, Cortés Salgado A, Carmisciano L, Bruzzone M, Curigliano G, Prat A, Lambertini M. Characterization of HER2-low breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenetic variants: Results of a large international retrospective cohort study. Cancer 2024; 130:2746-2762. [PMID: 38752572 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) in women aged ≤40 years carrying germline pathogenetic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes is infrequent but often associated with aggressive features. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low-expressing BC has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic target but has not been characterized in this rare patient subset. METHODS Women aged ≤40 years with newly diagnosed early-stage HER2-negative BC (HER2-0 and HER2-low) and germline BRCA1/2 PVs from 78 health care centers worldwide were retrospectively included. Chi-square test and Student t-test were used to describe variable distribution between HER2-0 and HER2-low. Associations with HER2-low status were assessed with logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. Statistical significance was considered for p ≤ .05. RESULTS Of 3547 included patients, 32.3% had HER2-low BC, representing 46.3% of hormone receptor-positive and 21.3% of triple-negative (TN) tumors. HER2-low vs. HER2-0 BC were more often of grade 1/2 (p < .001), hormone receptor-positive (p < .001), and node-positive (p = .003). BRCA2 PVs were more often associated with HER2-low than BRCA1 PVs (p < .001). HER2-low versus HER2-0 showed better DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97) in the overall population and more favorable DFS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.95) and overall survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.93) in the TN subgroup. Luminal A-like tumors in HER2-low (p = .014) and TN and luminal A-like in HER2-0 (p = .019) showed the worst DFS. CONCLUSIONS In young patients with HER2-negative BC and germline BRCA1/2 PVs, HER2-low disease was less frequent than expected and more frequently linked to BRCA2 PVs and associated with luminal-like disease. HER2-low status was associated with a modestly improved prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Schettini
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors group, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- U.O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Chiara Molinelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Raphaëlle Bas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universite Paris Cité, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Antonio Di Meglio
- Cancer Survivorship Group, INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Rinat Bernstein Molho
- Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center affiliated to Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Pogoda
- Department of Breast Cancer and Reconstructive Surgery, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Estela Carrasco
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Unit, Medical oncology Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kevin Punie
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elisa Agostinetto
- Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nerea Lopetegui-Lia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Department of Surgery, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
- Unité INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Hopital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospice civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | | | - Alberta Ferrari
- Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) Unit and General Surgery 3 - Senology, Breast Cancer Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Shani Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett institute of oncology, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Robert Fruscio
- UO Gynecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, and McGill University Medical School, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Medical Oncology Department, Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
- Oncology and Hematology-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy
- Oncologia 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alexios Matikas
- Department of Oncology/Pathology, Karolinska Institute and Breast Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion - TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Laura De Marchis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology Department of Hematology, Oncology, Dermatology, Umberto 1 University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Monica Mariño
- Hospital Universitari Son Espases Palma, Palma, Spain
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Department of Senology, Université Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC-IOSI, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Rognone
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Yara Abdou
- University of North Carolina - Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Maximilian Marhold
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivana Božović-Spasojević
- Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Luca Carmisciano
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- U.O. Epidemiologia Clinica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Aleix Prat
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors group, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Cancer and Blood Disorders, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Reveal Genomics, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of Oncology (IOB)-Hospital Quirón Salud, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cortesi L, Cortesi G, Venturelli M, Marcheselli L, Toss A, Barbieri E, Tamburrano F, Musolino A, De Giorgi U, Bisagni G, Arcangeli V, Zamagni C, Cavanna L, Dominici M. Can contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy increase survival in BRCA-related breast cancer? Results from the Italian MUTina study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108603. [PMID: 39154430 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 07/21/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy, a unique Hub and Spoke model was adopted to recognize BRCA-related breast cancer (BC) patients. Characteristics and outcomes of tumors identified by this model will be presented. METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study involved patients diagnosed with BRCA-related BC identified in the Emilia-Romagna region between January 2000 and December 2013. Seven provinces collected data on patient and tumor characteristics; clinical and gene testing information were also registered. Comparisons between BRCA1 and BRCA2 BC were performed. To balance different variants to identify significant predictors of survival, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis on Cox regression was conducted. RESULTS From 2000 to 2013, 284 BRCA-related BC were registered (171 BRCA1, 110 BRCA2, and 3 BRCA1 and BRCA2). BRCA1 were diagnosed at an earlier stage compared to BRCA2 (50.1 % vs 30 %, respectively, in stage I, P = 0.0015). BRCA2 patients underwent more up-front surgery (85 % vs. 74.9 %, P = 0.049) and less chemotherapy (69.1 % vs 88.9 %, P = 0.004) than BRCA1 patients. At 11.8 years median follow-up, BRCA1 patients developed more second contralateral BC (P = 0.09), while BRCA2 had more visceral relapses (P = 0.013). No differences in overall survival (OS) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 patients (P = 0.07) were found. An advantage in OS was independently seen for patients who underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (P = 0.0001) and oophorectomy (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, adopting a homogeneous regional framework provides important information about prevention and treatment strategies of BRCA-related BC and suggests using maximal surgery to improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy.
| | - Giulia Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Marta Venturelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Fabio Tamburrano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy
| | - Antonino Musolino
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori," Meldola, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Bisagni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Valentina Arcangeli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori," Meldola, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Infermi, 47923 Rimini, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Medical Oncology, Hospital of Piacenza, Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Modena Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen Y, Zhang R, Yan Y, Li H, Song G. Effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian function suppression in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a retrospective single-center real-world study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 206:543-550. [PMID: 38709374 PMCID: PMC11208182 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07323-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the effectiveness of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of various gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI) in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer. Potential risk factors associated with insufficient OFS were analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer patients who had received AI with GnRHa were studied retrospectively. Patients were divided into different groups according to monthly or trimonthly GnRHa schedules they received, and the effectiveness of OFS was compared between groups. Insufficient OFS was defined as at least one instance of estradiol ≥ 30 pg/ml. Patient data was gathered from medical records for this comparison. RESULTS Of the 264 patients enrolled in this study, 117 were administered 3.6 mg of goserelin monthly (goserelin 1 M group), 63 received 3.75 mg of leuprorelin monthly (leuprorelin 1 M group) and 84 were given 11.25 mg of leuprorelin every three months (leuprorelin 3 M group). Overall, 7.20% experienced insufficient OFS. The incidence rates in the three GnRHa depot groups were 7.69%, 6.35%, and 7.14%, respectively, without a significant statistical difference (P = 0.900). Notably, younger patients exhibited a higher likelihood of insufficient OFS [OR = 0.900, 95%CI (0.824-0.982), P = 0.018]. CONCLUSION Insufficient OFS remains a concern during GnRHa and AI treatment. The effectiveness of the three GnRHa depots commonly used in China seems comparable. Younger patients face a heightened risk of insufficient OFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifei Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Ruyan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Ying Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Huiping Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Guohong Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hyams DM, Bareket-Samish A, Rocha JEB, Diaz-Botero S, Franco S, Gagliato D, Gomez HL, Korbenfeld E, Krygier G, Mattar A, De Pierro AN, Borrego MR, Villarreal C. Selecting postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer: An updated assessment and systematic review of leading commercially available gene expression assays. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:166-187. [PMID: 38932668 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Gene expression assays (GEAs) can guide treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Several large prospective randomized clinical trials, and numerous additional studies, now provide new information for selecting an appropriate GEA. This systematic review builds upon prior reviews, with a focus on five widely commercialized GEAs (Breast Cancer Index®, EndoPredict®, MammaPrint®, Oncotype DX®, and Prosigna®). The comprehensive dataset available provides a contemporary opportunity to assess each GEA's utility as a prognosticator and/or predictor of adjuvant therapy benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Hyams
- Medical Director, Desert Surgical Oncology, Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage, California, USA
| | | | - Juan Enrique Bargallo Rocha
- Breast Cancer Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología Mexico and Centro Medico ABC, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sebastian Diaz-Botero
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Cancer Center at Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sandra Franco
- Medical Director, Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre el Cáncer, CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Debora Gagliato
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, San Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henry L Gomez
- Breast Unit Director, OncoSalud, Clinica Delgado, AUNA, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Ernesto Korbenfeld
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Gabriel Krygier
- Department of Oncology, Universitary Hospital de Clínicas, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Andre Mattar
- Director of Mastology Center, Centro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher, Hospital da Mulher, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aníbal Nuñez De Pierro
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Mastology, Hospital J.A. Fernandez, Buenos Aires City, Argentina
| | - Manuel Ruiz Borrego
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Cynthia Villarreal
- Head, Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Elghazaly H, Azim HA, Rugo HS, Cameron D, Swain SM, Curigliano G, Harbeck N, Tripathy D, Arun B, Aapro M, Piccart M, Cardoso F, Gligorov J, Elghazawy H, El Saghir NS, Penault-Llorca F, Perez EA, Poortmans P, Abdelaziz H, El-Zawahry HM, Kassem L, Sabry M, Viale G, Al-Sukhun S, Gado N, Leung JWT, Ezz Elarab L, Cardoso MJ, Abdel Karim K, Foheidi M, Elmaadawy MM, Conte P, Selim ASM, Kandil A, Kamal RM, Paltuev RM, Guarneri V, Abulkhair O, Zakaria O, Golshan M, Orecchia R, ElMahdy M, Abdel-Aziz AM, Eldin NB. Tailoring neo/adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: "The advent of a personalized approach"-The Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) consensus and recommendations. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38985794 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of early breast cancer (BC) has witnessed an uprise in the use of neoadjuvant therapy and a remarkable reshaping of the systemic therapy postneoadjuvant treatment in the last few years, with the evolution of many controversial clinical situations that require consensus. METHODS During the 14th Breast-Gynecological and Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference held in Egypt in 2022, a panel of 44 BC experts from 13 countries voted on statements concerning debatable challenges in the neo/adjuvant treatment setting. The recommendations were subsequently updated based on the most recent data emerging. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop this consensus. A consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The consensus recommendations addressed different escalation and de-escalation strategies in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy for early BC. The recommendations recapitulate the available clinical evidence and expert opinion to individualize patient management and optimize therapy outcomes. Consensus was reached in 63% of the statements (52/83), and the rationale behind each statement was clarified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hesham Elghazaly
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hamdy A Azim
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh and National Health Service Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sandra M Swain
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Breast Center, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Banu Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matti Aapro
- Breast Center, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
| | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Medical Oncology Department, L'Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institute Universitaire de Cancérologie, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Hagar Elghazawy
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nagi S El Saghir
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- National Institute of Health and Medical Research Unit 1240 "Molecular Imaging and Theranostic Strategies", Department of Pathology, Clermont Auvergne University, Center Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Edith A Perez
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Network and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hany Abdelaziz
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Heba M El-Zawahry
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Loay Kassem
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Sabry
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | | | - Neven Gado
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Jessica W T Leung
- Department of Breast Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lobna Ezz Elarab
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Faculdade de Medicina, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Meteb Foheidi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Adult Medical Oncology, Princess Noorah Oncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs-Western Region, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Merit M Elmaadawy
- Diagnostic Radiology Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Pierfranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Division of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Ashraf S M Selim
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Alaa Kandil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria School of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Rasha M Kamal
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Ruslan M Paltuev
- Department of Breast Tumours of Federal State Budgetary Institution "Petrov Research Institute of Oncology", Russian Association of Oncological Mammology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Division of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Omalkhair Abulkhair
- Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Services, Alhabib Hospital, Riyad, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mehra Golshan
- Department of Surgery, Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Manal ElMahdy
- Department of Pathology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed M Abdel-Aziz
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Nermean Bahie Eldin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lammers SWM, Geurts SME, Hermans KEPE, van Hellemond IEG, Swinkels ACP, Smorenburg CH, van der Sangen MJC, Kroep JR, Honkoop AH, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Roos WK, Imholz ALT, Vriens IJH, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Ovarian function recovery in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant anastrozole treatment: updated results from the phase 3 DATA trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07411-w. [PMID: 38940981 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07411-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure (CIOFF) may experience ovarian function recovery (OFR). Earlier, we showed that OFR during treatment with anastrozole impacted the prognosis of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) patients with CIOFF. Here, we present the long-term follow-up results. METHODS Postmenopausal women with HR+ BC who were 45-57 years of age and received chemotherapy were identified from the phase 3 DATA study (NCT00301457) on the extended use of anastrozole. Eligible patients were categorised into two groups: patients with CIOFF and definitely postmenopausal patients. Patients with CIOFF were monitored for OFR. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with OFR and patients without OFR using multivariable Cox regression analyses, including OFR as a time-dependent covariate. BC-specific mortality (BCSM) was compared between groups using the Fine and Gray method. RESULTS This study included 656 patients: 395 patients with CIOFF and 261 definitely postmenopausal patients. OFR occurred in 39 (12%) of 329 patients with CIOFF who were monitored for OFR. The median follow-up time was 13.3 years. Patients with OFR experienced a deterioration in DFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-2.81), DRFS (HR = 1.51; 95% CI 0.73-3.11), OS (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 0.75-3.55), and BCSM (subdistribution HR = 1.98; 95% CI 0.84-4.63) when compared with patients without OFR. CONCLUSION In patients with CIOFF, OFR during treatment with anastrozole was associated with a deterioration in BC outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of adequate ovarian function suppression in this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senna W M Lammers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn E P E Hermans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid C P Swinkels
- Clinical Research Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith R Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Aafke H Honkoop
- Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wilfred K de Roos
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, GROW, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Coussy F, Robert M, Villanueva C, Dalenc F, Rowinski E, Wassermann J. [Adherence to endocrine therapy: A major issue in breast cancer management]. Bull Cancer 2024:S0007-4551(24)00195-4. [PMID: 38897911 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Endocrine therapy plays a crucial role in the treatment of women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, non-adherence remains a frequent issue known to negatively impact survival. Based on a comprehensive literature review, this article explores the terminologies employed to describe adherence and methods used for its assessment, the adherence data reported with adjuvant endocrine therapy with targeted therapies, the determinants of adherence or non-adherence, and finally, tested solutions to address it. The results show that a better understanding of the causes of non-adherence would help to better identify patients at risk, and to develop personalized intervention programs capable of improving adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy. In light of the literature, interventions are likely to require a multimodal approach and integration into our future healthcare pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Coussy
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Curie, Paris et Saint-Cloud, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - Marie Robert
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest - René Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain, France
| | | | - Florence Dalenc
- Département d'oncologie médicale, IUCT, Oncopole Claudius-Regard, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, Toulouse, France
| | - Elise Rowinski
- Département d'oncologie médicale, centre Léon-Bérard, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, Lyon, France
| | - Johanna Wassermann
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, IUC, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chavez-MacGregor M, Miao J, Pusztai L, Goetz MP, Rastogi P, Ganz PA, Mamounas EP, Paik S, Bandos H, Razaq W, O'Dea A, Kaklamani V, Silber ALM, Flaum LE, Andreopoulou E, Wendt AG, Carney JF, Sharma P, Gralow JR, Lew DL, Barlow WE, Hortobagyi GN. Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Endocrine Therapy ± 1 Year of Everolimus in Patients With High-Risk, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302344. [PMID: 38833643 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-serine threonine kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway abnormalities contribute to endocrine resistance. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, improved progression-free survival in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) when combined with endocrine therapy (ET). In this phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy of everolimus + ET as adjuvant therapy in high-risk, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC after adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to physician's choice ET and 1 year of everolimus (10 mg orally once daily) or placebo stratified by risk group. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) evaluated by a stratified log-rank test with the hazard ratio (HR) estimated by Cox regression. Subset analyses included preplanned evaluation by risk group and exploratory analyses by menopausal status and age. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety. Everolimus did not improve IDFS/OS when added to ET in patients with early-stage high-risk, hormone receptor-positive BC. RESULTS One thousand and nine hundred thirty-nine patients were randomly assigned with 1,792 eligible for analysis. Overall, no benefit of everolimus was seen for IDFS (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14]) or OS (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.26]). The assumption of proportional hazards was not met suggesting significant variability in the HR over time since the start of treatment. In an unplanned subgroup analysis among postmenopausal patients (N = 1,221), no difference in IDFS (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86 to 1.36]) or OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.89 to 1.60]) was seen. In premenopausal patients (N = 571), everolimus improved both IDFS (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.94]) and OS (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.86]). Treatment completion rates were lower in the everolimus arm compared with placebo (48% v 73%) with higher grade 3 and 4 adverse events (35% v 7%). CONCLUSION One year of adjuvant everolimus + ET did not improve overall outcomes. Subset analysis suggests mTOR inhibition as a possible target for patients who remain premenopausal after chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Matthew P Goetz
- Alliance, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN
| | - Priya Rastogi
- NRG Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- NRG Oncology, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Hanna Bandos
- NRG Oncology, NRG Oncology SDMC, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Anne O'Dea
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS
| | | | | | | | | | - Albert G Wendt
- Dignity Health Cancer Center at Saint Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Julie R Gralow
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Alexandria, VA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nardin S, Ruelle T, Giannubilo I, Del Mastro L. Adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: New approaches of endocrine therapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2024; 110:162-167. [PMID: 38112006 DOI: 10.1177/03008916231216830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and luminal breast cancer is the predominant subtype, characterized by the presence of estrogen receptors and/or progesterone receptors in tumor cells. Adjuvant endocrine therapy is the pivotal approach in the management of luminal early breast cancer. Hence, new therapeutic approaches have been studied during the last few years, especially in patients with high risk of recurrence.Here we provide a summary of the most recent clinical trials evaluating adjuvant treatment in hormone-receptors-positive early breast cancer. First, the main cornerstone is related to the role of extended endocrine treatment, which has been widely investigated to access a benefit in disease-free survival and overall survival (only the GIM4 trial has positive feedback about survival) and to tailor the treatment according to patient compliance. The results highlighted an advantage in extending the use of endocrine treatment for at least seven full years, considering aromatase inhibitors as principal drugs. Second, the shift of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) from advanced to early setting reported positive outcomes, with favorable results from MonarchE and NATALEE trials, using Abemaciclib and Ribociclib respectively, even if non-negligible toxicities have been reported. Last, the use of PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2 mutated patients has been evaluated in the OlympiA trial (Olaparib), observing a comparable benefit between hormone-receptors-positive and triple-negative early breast cancer.However, more data are still required to better select patients that could benefit more from CDK4/6i considering side effects too, and sequential treatments are still not codified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Nardin
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Irene Giannubilo
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sukumar JS, Sardesai S, Ni A, Williams N, Johnson K, Quiroga D, Ramaswamy B, Wesolowski R, Cherian M, Stover DG, Gatti‐Mays M, Pariser A, Sudheendra P, George MA, Lustberg M. Real-world treatment patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ovarian suppression in premenopausal HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7317. [PMID: 38895891 PMCID: PMC11185945 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) premenopausal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Moreover, the benefit and clinical indications of ovarian suppression (OS) is poorly elucidated. We described real-world patterns surrounding choice of ET and clinicopathologic features which predicted treatment with OS in a contemporary cohort of premenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ BC. METHODS This retrospective analysis included premenopausal patients with nonmetastatic HR+/HER2+ BC from the CancerLinQ Discovery database from January 2010 to May 2020. Women were less than 50 years and received chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and ET. They were categorized into 1 of 4 groups based on type of ET prescribed at initiation: aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS, OS, tamoxifen + OS, or tamoxifen. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between clinicopathologic features and OS use. RESULTS Out of 360,540 patients with BC, 937 were included. The majority (n = 818, 87%) were prescribed tamoxifen, whereas 4 (0.4%), 50 (5.3%), and 65 (6.9%) received OS, tamoxifen + OS and AI + OS, respectively. No clinicopathologic features predicted OS use apart from age; patients <35 years were more likely to receive OS compared with those ≥35 years (odds ratio 2.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This is the first real-world study evaluating ET treatment patterns in HR+/HER2+ premenopausal BC. OS use was uncommon and the majority received tamoxifen as the preferred ET regardless of most clinicopathologic risk factors. Additional research is needed to optimize ET decisions in young women with this distinct BC subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine S. Sukumar
- Department of Breast Medical OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Sagar Sardesai
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Andy Ni
- The Ohio State University, College of Public HealthColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Nicole Williams
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Kai Johnson
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Dionisia Quiroga
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Bhuvana Ramaswamy
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Robert Wesolowski
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Mathew Cherian
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Margaret Gatti‐Mays
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Ashley Pariser
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Preeti Sudheendra
- Division of Medical OncologyThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Mridula A. George
- Division of Medical OncologyRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyNew BrunswickNew JerseyUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Olmen JP, Jacobs CF, Bartels SAL, Loo CE, Sanders J, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, Drukker CA, van Duijnhoven FH, Kok M. Radiological, pathological and surgical outcomes after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with a clinical high risk and a low-risk 70-gene signature. Breast 2024; 75:103726. [PMID: 38599047 PMCID: PMC11017070 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the response to and surgical benefits of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in ER+/HER2-breast cancer patients who are clinically high risk, but genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint). METHODS Patients with ER+/HER2-invasive breast cancer with a clinical high risk according to MINDACT, who had a genomic low risk according to the 70-gene signature and were treated with NET between 2015 and 2023 in our center, were retrospectively analyzed. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess radiological response using MRI or ultrasound. Surgical specimens were evaluated to assess pathological response. Two breast cancer surgeons independently scored the eligibility of breast conserving therapy (BCS) pre- and post- NET. RESULTS Of 72 included patients, 23 were premenopausal (100% started with tamoxifen of which 4 also received OFS) and 49 were postmenopausal (98% started with an aromatase inhibitor). Overall, 8 (11%) showed radiological complete response. Only 1 (1.4%) patient had a pathological complete response (RCB-0) and 68 (94.4%) had a pathological partial response (RCB-1 or RCB-2). Among the 26 patients initially considered for mastectomy, 14 (53.8%) underwent successful BCS. In all 20 clinical node-positive patients, a marked axillary lymph node was removed to assess response. Four out of 20 (20%) patients had a pathological complete response of the axilla. CONCLUSION The study showed that a subgroup of patients with a clinical high risk and a genomic low risk ER+/HER2-breast cancer benefits from NET resulting in BCS instead of a mastectomy. Additionally, NET may enable de-escalation in axillary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefien P van Olmen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chaja F Jacobs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne A L Bartels
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline A Drukker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Corti C, Batra-Sharma H, Kelsten M, Shatsky RA, Garrido-Castro AC, Gradishar WJ. Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e432442. [PMID: 39013124 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_432442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Therapeutic advances in breast cancer have significantly improved outcomes in recent decades. In the early setting, there has been a gradual shift from adjuvant-only to neoadjuvant strategies, with a growing focus on customizing post-neoadjuvant treatments through escalation and de-escalation based on pathologic response. At the same time, the transition from a pre-genomic to a post-genomic era, utilizing specific assays in the adjuvant setting and targeted sequencing in the advanced stage, has deepened our understanding of disease biology and aided in identifying molecular markers associated with treatment benefit. Finally, the introduction of new drug classes such as antibody-drug conjugates, and the incorporation in the (neo)adjuvant setting of therapies previously investigated in the advanced stage, like immunotherapy and CDK4-6 inhibitors, poses new challenges in treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Corti
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | | | - Max Kelsten
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - William J Gradishar
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Park KH, Loibl S, Sohn J, Park YH, Jiang Z, Tadjoedin H, Nag S, Saji S, Md Yusof M, Villegas EMB, Lim EH, Lu YS, Ithimakin S, Tseng LM, Dejthevaporn T, Chen TWW, Lee SC, Galvez C, Malwinder S, Kogawa T, Bajpai J, Brahma B, Wang S, Curigliano G, Yoshino T, Kim SB, Pentheroudakis G, Im SA, Andre F, Ahn JB, Harbeck N. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102974. [PMID: 38796284 PMCID: PMC11145753 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with early breast cancer were updated and published online in 2023, and adapted, according to previously established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with early breast cancer. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with breast cancer representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and KSMO. The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different Asian regions represented by the 10 oncological societies. The latter are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with early breast cancer across the different regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices, molecular profiling, as well as the age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different regions of Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Park
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Goethe University Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J Sohn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Y H Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Z Jiang
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Bejing, China
| | - H Tadjoedin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Dharmais Hospital, National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - S Nag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sahyadri Speciality Hospitals, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - S Saji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - M Md Yusof
- Cancer Centre at PHKL, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - E M B Villegas
- Cebu Cancer Institute, Perpertual Succour Hospital, Cebu Doctors' University Hospital, Cho-ing Hua Hospital, Cebu City, Philippines
| | - E H Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y-S Lu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S Ithimakin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - L-M Tseng
- Department of Surgery, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, and School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - T Dejthevaporn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - T W-W Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital and Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - S C Lee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore (NCIS), Singapore, Singapore
| | - C Galvez
- St. Luke's Medical Center Global City, Taguig City, Philippines
| | - S Malwinder
- Cancer Centre at PHKL, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - T Kogawa
- Advanced Medical Development, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - B Brahma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Hospital, National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - S Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - S-B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - S-A Im
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - F Andre
- Breast Cancer Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J B Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fenix-Caballero S, Sanchez-Vegas A, Alegre Del-Rey EJ, Epstein D, Garcia-Mochon L, Olry de Labry Lima A. Economic assessment of abemaciclib for the adjuvant treatment of luminal HER2- breast cancer from the perspective of the Spanish health system. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-024-01681-3. [PMID: 38647974 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01681-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Abemaciclib is an oral inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6). Data from the clinical trial monarchE (2023) showed improved survival from invasive disease. The aim of the present article was to conduct an economic assessment of adjuvant treatment with abemaciclib in women with luminal, HER2- and node-positive breast cancer. METHODS A Markov model was constructed with four mutually exclusive health states (disease-free, local recurrence, distal recurrence and death). Analyses were based on the clinical trial monarchE which compared an intervention group (abemaciclib + hormone therapy [HT]) with HT alone. The effectiveness measure used was quality-adjusted life years (QALY), with unit costs and utilities being obtained from existing literature. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was used to compare the two treatment strategies. RESULTS Total costs were €98,765 and €17,935 for the abemaciclib plus HT group and the HT alone group, respectively. The health outcome was 10.076QALY for the intervention group and 9.495QALY for the control group, with the ICUR being€139,173/QALY. CONCLUSION Despite the significant gains of abemaciclib as adjuvant treatment in terms of progression-free survival, this treatment is not cost-effective for the Spanish National Health System at published prices. It may be cost-effective with an appropriate discount on the official price.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Fenix-Caballero
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Puerto Real, Puerto Real, Spain
- Programa de doctorado en farmacia, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Adrián Sanchez-Vegas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme, Seville, Spain
| | | | - David Epstein
- Department of Applied Economics, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Leticia Garcia-Mochon
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Olry de Labry Lima
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs. Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
- Centro Andaluz de Información del Medicamento: CADIME, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP). Campus Universitario de Cartuja, Cuesta del Observatorio no. 4, 18010, Granada, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Woolpert KM, Schmidt JA, Ahern TP, Hjorth CF, Farkas DK, Ejlertsen B, Collin LJ, Lash TL, Cronin-Fenton DP. Clinical factors associated with patterns of endocrine therapy adherence in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:59. [PMID: 38589932 PMCID: PMC11003111 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01819-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer are recommended at least five years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but adherence to this treatment is often suboptimal. We investigated longitudinal trends in adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among premenopausal breast cancer patients and identified clinical characteristics, including baseline comorbidities and non-cancer chronic medication use, associated with AET adherence. METHODS We included stage I-III premenopausal breast cancer patients diagnosed during 2002-2011 and registered in the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database who initiated AET. We used group-based trajectory modeling to describe AET adherence patterns. We also linked patients to Danish population-based registries and fit multinomial logistic models to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) associating clinical characteristics with AET adherence patterns. RESULTS We identified three adherence patterns among 4,353 women-high adherers (57%), slow decliners (36%), and rapid decliners (6.9%). Women with stage I disease (vs. stage II; OR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.5, 2.5), without chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy; OR: 4.3, 95% CI 3.0, 6.1), with prevalent comorbid disease (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 1 vs. 0; OR: 1.6, 95% CI 1.1, 2.3), and with a history of chronic non-cancer medication use (vs. none; OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.0, 1.8) were more likely to be rapid decliners compared with high adherers. CONCLUSIONS Women with stage I cancer, no chemotherapy, higher comorbidity burden, and history of chronic non-cancer medication use were less likely to adhere to AET. Taking steps to promote adherence in these groups of women may reduce their risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten M Woolpert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Julie A Schmidt
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas P Ahern
- Department of Surgery, The Robert Larner, M.D. College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Cathrine F Hjorth
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Dóra K Farkas
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- On behalf of the Danish Breast Cancer Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lindsay J Collin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Timothy L Lash
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wang J, Li B, Luo M, Huang J, Zhang K, Zheng S, Zhang S, Zhou J. Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: molecular features and clinical significance. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024; 9:83. [PMID: 38570490 PMCID: PMC10991592 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents pre-invasive breast carcinoma. In untreated cases, 25-60% DCIS progress to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). The challenge lies in distinguishing between non-progressive and progressive DCIS, often resulting in over- or under-treatment in many cases. With increasing screen-detected DCIS in these years, the nature of DCIS has aroused worldwide attention. A deeper understanding of the biological nature of DCIS and the molecular journey of the DCIS-IDC transition is crucial for more effective clinical management. Here, we reviewed the key signaling pathways in breast cancer that may contribute to DCIS initiation and progression. We also explored the molecular features of DCIS and IDC, shedding light on the progression of DCIS through both inherent changes within tumor cells and alterations in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, valuable research tools utilized in studying DCIS including preclinical models and newer advanced technologies such as single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics and artificial intelligence, have been systematically summarized. Further, we thoroughly discussed the clinical advancements in DCIS and IDC, including prognostic biomarkers and clinical managements, with the aim of facilitating more personalized treatment strategies in the future. Research on DCIS has already yielded significant insights into breast carcinogenesis and will continue to pave the way for practical clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Baizhou Li
- Department of Pathology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| | - Meng Luo
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Plastic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia Huang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China
| | - Suzhan Zhang
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Jiaojiao Zhou
- The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Department of Breast Surgery and Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Hangzhou, China.
- Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Đokić S, Gazić B, Grčar Kuzmanov B, Blazina J, Miceska S, Čugura T, Grašič Kuhar C, Jeruc J. Clinical and Analytical Validation of Two Methods for Ki-67 Scoring in Formalin Fixed and Paraffin Embedded Tissue Sections of Early Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1405. [PMID: 38611083 PMCID: PMC11011015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Proliferation determined by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry has been proposed as a useful prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. However, the clinical validity of Ki-67 is questionable. In this study, Ki-67 was retrospectively evaluated by three pathologists using two methods: a visual assessment of the entire slide and a quantitative assessment of the tumour margin in 411 early-stage breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 26.8 years. We found excellent agreement between the three pathologists for both methods. The risk of recurrence for Ki-67 was time-dependent, as the high proliferation group (Ki-67 ≥ 30%) had a higher risk of recurrence initially, but after 4.5 years the risk was higher in the low proliferation group. In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients, the intermediate Ki-67 group initially followed the high Ki-67 group, but eventually followed the low Ki-67 group. ER-positive pN0-1 patients with intermediate Ki-67 treated with endocrine therapy alone had a similar outcome to patients treated with chemotherapy. A cut-off value of 20% appeared to be most appropriate for distinguishing between the high and low Ki-67 groups. To summarize, a simple visual whole slide Ki-67 assessment turned out to be a reliable method for clinical decision-making in early breast cancer patients. We confirmed Ki-67 as an important prognostic and predictive biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snežana Đokić
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (S.Đ.); (B.G.)
- Faculty of Medicine Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Barbara Gazić
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (S.Đ.); (B.G.)
| | - Biljana Grčar Kuzmanov
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (S.Đ.); (B.G.)
| | - Jerca Blazina
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; (S.Đ.); (B.G.)
| | - Simona Miceska
- Faculty of Medicine Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
- Department of Cytopathology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tanja Čugura
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Cvetka Grašič Kuhar
- Faculty of Medicine Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jera Jeruc
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Umashankar S, Li M, Blevins K, Kim MO, Majure M, Park J, Huppert LA, Melisko M, Rugo HS, Esserman L, Chien AJ. Characterizing attitudes related to future child-bearing in young women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:509-520. [PMID: 38194132 PMCID: PMC10959837 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07206-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study characterizes attitudes and decision-making around the desire for future children in young women newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and assesses how clinical factors and perceived risk may impact these attitudes. METHODS This is a prospective study in women < 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 1-3 breast cancer. Patients completed a REDCap survey on fertility and family-building in the setting of hypothetical risk scenarios. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were collected through surveys and medical record. RESULTS Of 140 study patients [median age = 41.4 (range 23-45)], 71 (50.7%) were interested in having children. Women interested in future childbearing were younger than those who were not interested (mean = 35.2 [SD = 5.2] vs 40.9 years [3.90], respectively, p < 0.001), and more likely to be childless (81% vs 31%, p < 0.001). 54 women (77.1% of patients interested in future children) underwent/planned to undergo oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before chemotherapy. Interest in future childbearing decreased with increasing hypothetical recurrence risk, however 17% of patients wanted to have children despite a 75-100% hypothetical recurrence risk. 24.3% of patients wanted to conceive < 2 years from diagnosis, and 35% of patients with hormone receptor positive tumors were not willing to complete 5 years of hormone therapy. CONCLUSION Many young women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer prioritize childbearing. Interest in having a biologic child was not associated with standard prognostic risk factors. Interest decreased with increasing hypothetical recurrence risk, though some patients remained committed to future childbearing despite near certain hypothetical risk. Individual risk assessment should be included in family-planning discussions throughout the continuum of care as it can influence decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saumya Umashankar
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Moming Li
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Kaylee Blevins
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Mi-Ok Kim
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Melanie Majure
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - John Park
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Laura A Huppert
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Michelle Melisko
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - Laura Esserman
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA
| | - A Jo Chien
- Helen Diller Family Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Blondeaux E, Xie W, Carmisciano L, Mura S, Sanna V, De Laurentiis M, Caputo R, Turletti A, Durando A, De Placido S, De Angelis C, Bisagni G, Gasparini E, Rimanti A, Puglisi F, Mansutti M, Landucci E, Fabi A, Arecco L, Perachino M, Bruzzone M, Boni L, Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Regan MM. Intermediate clinical endpoints in early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of individual patient data from the Gruppo Italiano Mammella and Mammella Intergruppo trials. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102501. [PMID: 38685923 PMCID: PMC11056413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) are frequently used as primary endpoint in randomised trials (RCTs). We aim to assess whether changes in different ICEs can be used to predict changes in overall survival (OS) in adjuvant breast cancer trials. Methods Individual patient level data from adjuvant phase III RCTs conducted by the Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) and Mammella Intergruppo (MIG) study groups were used. ICEs were computed according to STEEP criteria. Using a two-stage meta-analytic model, we assessed the surrogacy of each ICE at both the outcome (i.e., OS and ICE are correlated irrespective of treatment) and trial (i.e., treatment effects on ICE and treatment effect on OS are correlated) levels. The following ICEs were considered as potential surrogate endpoints of OS: disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS). The estimates of the degree of correlation were obtained by copula models and weighted linear regression. Kendall's τ and R2 ≥ 0.70 were considered as indicators of a clinically relevant surrogacy. Findings Among the 12,397 patients enrolled from November 1992 to July 2012 in six RCTs, median age at enrolment was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 49-65). After a median follow-up of 10.3 years (IQR 6.4-14.5), 2131 (17.2%) OS events were observed, with 1390 (65.2%) attributed to breast cancer. At the outcome-level, Kendall's τ ranged from 0.69 for BCFI to 0.84 for DRFS. For DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, BCFI, and IBCFS endpoints, over 95% of the 8-year OS variability was attributable to the variation of the 5-year ICE. At the trial-level, treatment effects for the different ICEs and OS were strongly correlated, with the highest correlation for RFS and DRFS and the lowest for BCFI. Interpretation Our results provide evidence supporting the use of DFS, DDFS, DRFS, RFS, RFI, DRFI, and IBCFS as primary endpoint in breast cancer adjuvant trials. Funding This analysis was supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research ("Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro", AIRC; IG 2017/20760) and by Italian Ministry of Health-5 × 1000 funds (years 2021-2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Blondeaux
- U.O. Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Wanling Xie
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Luca Carmisciano
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Mura
- Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Oncologia Medica, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Valeria Sanna
- Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Oncologia Medica, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Michelino De Laurentiis
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumouri, Fondazione Pascale IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Roberta Caputo
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumouri, Fondazione Pascale IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Anna Turletti
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale Martini ASL Città di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Antonio Durando
- Breast Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Ospedale S. Anna, Torino, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Bisagni
- Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elisa Gasparini
- Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anita Rimanti
- ASST Mantova, Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma, Mantova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Mauro Mansutti
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Fabi
- Precision Medicine Breast Unit, Scientific Directorate, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- U.O. Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Boni
- U.O. Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Molinelli C, Jacobs F, Nader-Marta G, Borea R, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Fregatti P, Villarreal-Garza C, Bajpai J, Kim HJ, Puglisi S, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause and Late Effects. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:523-542. [PMID: 38478329 PMCID: PMC10997548 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Around 90% of breast tumours are diagnosed in the early stage, with approximately 70% being hormone receptor-positive. The cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is endocrine therapy, tailored according to disease stage, biological characteristics of the tumour, patient's comorbidities, preferences and age. In premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression is a key component of the adjuvant endocrine treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen. Moreover, it can be used during chemotherapy as a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in all breast cancer subtypes. In the metastatic setting, ovarian function suppression should be used in all premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to achieve a post-menopausal status. Despite its efficacy, ovarian function suppression may lead to several side effects that can have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life if not properly managed (e.g. hot flashes, depression, cognitive impairment, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, weight gain). A deep knowledge of the side effects of ovarian function suppression is necessary for clinicians. A correct counselling in this regard and proactive management should be considered a fundamental part of survivorship care to improve treatment adherence and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Molinelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Flavia Jacobs
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guilherme Nader-Marta
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), 90, Rue Meylemeersch, 1070, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roberto Borea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O. Senologia Chirurgica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion - TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Ernest Borges Rd, Parel East, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), 90, Rue Meylemeersch, 1070, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rastogi P, O'Shaughnessy J, Martin M, Boyle F, Cortes J, Rugo HS, Goetz MP, Hamilton EP, Huang CS, Senkus E, Tryakin A, Cicin I, Testa L, Neven P, Huober J, Shao Z, Wei R, André V, Munoz M, San Antonio B, Shahir A, Harbeck N, Johnston S. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:987-993. [PMID: 38194616 PMCID: PMC10950161 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) that persisted beyond the 2-year treatment period in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Here, we report 5-year efficacy results from a prespecified overall survival (OS) interim analysis. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 54 months, the benefit of abemaciclib was sustained with hazard ratios of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.599 to 0.772) for IDFS and 0.675 (95% CI, 0.588 to 0.774) for DRFS. This persistence of abemaciclib benefit translated to continuous separation of the curves with a deepening in 5-year absolute improvement in IDFS and DRFS rates of 7.6% and 6.7%, respectively, compared with rates of 6% and 5.3% at 4 years and 4.8% and 4.1% at 3 years. With fewer deaths in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared with the ET-alone arm (208 v 234), statistical significance was not reached for OS. No new safety signals were observed. In conclusion, abemaciclib plus ET continued to reduce the risk of developing invasive and distant disease recurrence beyond the completion of treatment. The increasing absolute improvement at 5 years is consistent with a carryover effect and further supports the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Rastogi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frances Boyle
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- USCF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Laura Testa
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Conforti F, Pala L, De Pas T, Zattarin E, Catania C, Cocorocchio E, Rossi G, Laszlo D, Colleoni M, Zambelli A, Hortobagyi GN, Cortes J, Piccart MJ, Dowsett M, Gelber RD, Viale G. Fine-Tuning Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Expert Consensus on Open Issues for Future Research. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1093-1103. [PMID: 37906083 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
After decades of research, improving the efficacy of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for early-stage breast cancer becomes increasingly difficult. Beyond technological breakthroughs and the availability of new classes of drugs, further improvement of adjuvant ET will require applying a rigorous research approach in poorly investigated areas. We critically discuss some key principles that should inform future research to improve ET efficacy, including identifying specific subgroups of patients who can benefit from escalating or de-escalating approaches, optimizing available and new treatment strategies for different clinical contexts, and dissecting the direct and indirect biological effects of therapeutic interventions. Four main issues regarding adjuvant ET were identified as relevant areas, where a better application of such principles can provide positive results in the near future: (i) tailoring the optimal duration of adjuvant ET, (ii) optimizing ovarian function suppression for premenopausal women, (iii) dissecting the biological effects of estrogen receptor manipulation, and (iv) refining the selection of patients to candidate for treatments escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Conforti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Laura Pala
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Tommaso De Pas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Emma Zattarin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Chiara Catania
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Emilia Cocorocchio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giovanna Rossi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Daniele Laszlo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Marco Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain
- Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - Martine J Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mitch Dowsett
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard D Gelber
- Department of Data Science, Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Basmadjian RB, Lupichuk S, Xu Y, Quan ML, Cheung WY, Brenner DR. Adjuvant Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e242082. [PMID: 38477918 PMCID: PMC10938175 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Few oncology studies have assessed the effectiveness of adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) in observational settings for premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Target trial emulation is increasingly used for estimating treatment outcomes in observational cohorts. Objectives To describe hormone therapy and OFS treatment patterns (aim 1), examine the association between adding OFS to tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) and survival (aim 2), and examine the association between duration of hormone treatment (TAM or AI) plus OFS (H-OFS) and survival (aim 3). Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study included all premenopausal, early-stage breast cancer diagnoses between 2010 and 2020 in Alberta, Canada. Target trial emulation was conducted. Eligibility criteria were directly modeled after the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) and Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT). Participants were followed up for a maximum of 5 years. Data were analyzed from July 2022 through March 2023. Exposures For aim 2, exposures were receiving the following baseline treatments for 2 years: AI + OFS (AI-OFS), TAM + OFS (T-OFS), and TAM alone. For aim 3, exposures were a 2-year or greater and a less than 2-year duration of H-OFS. Main Outcomes and Measures Recurrence-free survival was the primary outcome of interest. Marginal structural Cox models with inverse probability treatment and censoring weights were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for baseline and time-varying confounding variables. Results Among 3434 female patients with premenopausal, early-stage breast cancer diagnoses (median [IQR] age, 45 [40-48] years), 2647 individuals satisfied SOFT and TEXT eligibility criteria. There were 2260 patients who initiated TAM, 232 patients who initiated T-OFS, and 155 patients who initiated AI-OFS; 192 patients received H-OFS for 2 or more years, and 195 patients received H-OFS for less than 2 years. The 5-year recurrence risks were not significantly lower in AI-OFS vs TAM (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.38-1.33) or T-OFS vs TAM (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.50-1.45) groups. Patients receiving H-OFS for 2 or more years had significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival compared with those receiving H-OFS for less than 2 years (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90). Conclusions and Relevance This study found no significant reductions in recurrence risk for AI-OFS and T-OFS compared with TAM alone. H-OFS duration for at least 2 years was associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B. Basmadjian
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sasha Lupichuk
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yuan Xu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - May Lynn Quan
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Winson Y. Cheung
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Darren R. Brenner
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jacene H, Dietsche E, Specht J. The Current and Future Roles of Precision Oncology in Advanced Breast Cancer. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:349-356. [PMID: 38302151 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a common but heterogeneous disease characterized by several biologic features, including tumor grade, hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, and gene expression assays. These biologic and genomic features drive treatment decisions. In the advanced disease setting, inter- and intrapatient tumor heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as a challenge for optimizing treatment. Recent evidence and the recent approval of novel radiopharmaceuticals have increased recognition and acceptance of the potential of molecular imaging as a biomarker to impact and guide management decisions for advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Jacene
- Imaging/Radiology, Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
| | - Eric Dietsche
- Department of Radiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Jennifer Specht
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Divisions of Hematology and Oncology and of Clinical Research, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cantini L, Trapani D, Guidi L, Boscolo Bielo L, Scafetta R, Koziej M, Vidal L, Saini KS, Curigliano G. Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 123:102669. [PMID: 38141462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Guidi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Scafetta
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of medical oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Baclig NV, McCann KE. Updates in the treatment of HR+HER2- breast cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2024; 36:57-63. [PMID: 38170552 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death. BC research, diagnostics, drug development, and expansion of therapies for novel indications advances so rapidly that BC treatment standards change month-by-month. Herein we discuss notable advancements in the past year for hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2-) BC. RECENT FINDINGS Radiolabeled estradiol imaging and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have changed our approach to metastatic BC (mBC) detection. Amongst an abundance of therapy options, treatment de-escalation to avoid toxicities is a priority. Promising results with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the curative setting have been demonstrated even as we await final data for use in the metastatic setting. Several novel endocrine therapies are expected to gain FDA-approval in the near future. Antibody-drug conjugates have expanded from other mBC types to HR+HER2- mBC. The PROMISE trial helped define disease recurrence outcomes for premenopausal women seeking pregnancy. SUMMARY The diagnostic and treatment landscape for HR+HER2- BC continues to rapidly evolve on multiple fronts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita V Baclig
- David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
McCann KE, Goldfarb SB, Traina TA, Regan MM, Vidula N, Kaklamani V. Selection of appropriate biomarkers to monitor effectiveness of ovarian function suppression in pre-menopausal patients with ER+ breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:8. [PMID: 38242892 PMCID: PMC10798954 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00614-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has been widely adopted to provide reversible ovarian function suppression for pre-menopausal breast cancer patients who are also receiving aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen therapy based on results of 25 randomized trials representing almost 15,000 women demonstrating a survival benefit with this approach. Past clinical trials designed to establish the efficacy of GnRH agonists have monitored testosterone in the prostate cancer setting and estradiol in the breast cancer setting. We explore the merits of various biomarkers including estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) and their utility for informing GnRH agonist treatment decisions in breast cancer. Estradiol remains our biomarker of choice in ensuring adequate ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonist therapy among pre-menopausal women with breast cancer. We recommend future trials to continue to focus on estradiol levels as the primary endpoint, as they have in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E McCann
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Shari B Goldfarb
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tiffany A Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Meredith M Regan
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute / Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Virginia Kaklamani
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio / MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Thomas NS, Scalzo RL, Wellberg EA. Diabetes mellitus in breast cancer survivors: metabolic effects of endocrine therapy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2024; 20:16-26. [PMID: 37783846 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-023-00899-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common invasive malignancy in the world, with millions of survivors living today. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is also a globally prevalent disease that is a widely studied risk factor for breast cancer. Most breast tumours express the oestrogen receptor and are treated with systemic therapies designed to disrupt oestrogen-dependent signalling. Since the advent of targeted endocrine therapy six decades ago, the mortality from breast cancer has steadily declined; however, during the past decade, an elevated risk of T2DM after breast cancer treatment has been reported, particularly for those who received endocrine therapy. In this Review, we highlight key events in the history of endocrine therapies, beginning with the development of tamoxifen. We also summarize the sequence of reported adverse metabolic effects, which include dyslipidaemia, hepatic steatosis and impaired glucose tolerance. We discuss the limitations of determining a causal role for breast cancer treatments in T2DM development from epidemiological data and describe informative preclinical studies that suggest complex mechanisms through which endocrine therapy might drive T2DM risk and progression. We also reinforce the life-saving benefits of endocrine therapy and highlight the need for better predictive biomarkers of T2DM risk and preventive strategies for the growing population of breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha S Thomas
- Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Harold Hamm Diabetes Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Rebecca L Scalzo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Wellberg
- Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
- Harold Hamm Diabetes Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wadasadawala T, Joshi S, Rath S, Popat P, Sahay A, Gulia S, Bhargava P, Krishnamurthy R, Hoysal D, Shah J, Engineer M, Bajpai J, Kothari B, Pathak R, Jaiswal D, Desai S, Shet T, Patil A, Pai T, Haria P, Katdare A, Chauhan S, Siddique S, Vanmali V, Hawaldar R, Gupta S, Sarin R, Badwe R. Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Breast cancer. Indian J Cancer 2024; 61:S52-S79. [PMID: 38424682 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_55_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The incidence of breast cancer is increasing rapidly in urban India due to the changing lifestyle and exposure to risk factors. Diagnosis at an advanced stage and in younger women are the most concerning issues of breast cancer in India. Lack of awareness and social taboos related to cancer diagnosis make women feel hesitant to seek timely medical advice. As almost half of women develop breast cancer at an age younger than 50 years, breast cancer diagnosis poses a huge financial burden on the household and impacts the entire family. Moreover, inaccessibility, unaffordability, and high out-of-pocket expenditure make this situation grimmer. Women find it difficult to get quality cancer care closer to their homes and end up traveling long distances for seeking treatment. Significant differences in the cancer epidemiology compared to the west make the adoption of western breast cancer management guidelines challenging for Indian women. In this article, we intend to provide a comprehensive review of the management of breast cancer from diagnosis to treatment for both early and advanced stages from the perspective of low-middle-income countries. Starting with a brief introduction to epidemiology and guidelines for diagnostic modalities (imaging and pathology), treatment has been discussed for early breast cancer (EBC), locally advanced, and MBC. In-depth information on loco-regional and systemic therapy has been provided focusing on standard treatment protocols as well as scenarios where treatment can be de-escalated or escalated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabassum Wadasadawala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shalaka Joshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sushmita Rath
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Palak Popat
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ayushi Sahay
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Seema Gulia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prabhat Bhargava
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Revathy Krishnamurthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Dileep Hoysal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jessicka Shah
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Mitchelle Engineer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Bhavika Kothari
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rima Pathak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Dushyant Jaiswal
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sangeeta Desai
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Tanuja Shet
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Asawari Patil
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Trupti Pai
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Purvi Haria
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Aparna Katdare
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sonal Chauhan
- Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Shabina Siddique
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vaibhav Vanmali
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rohini Hawaldar
- Department of Clinical Research Secretariat, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajiv Sarin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajendra Badwe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jackisch C, Argyriadis A. Endocrine Therapy: From Ovarian Ablation to Individualized Therapy and Signal Inhibition. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:440-447. [PMID: 38125923 PMCID: PMC10730102 DOI: 10.1159/000534154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background At the end of the 19th century, Sir George Thomas Beatson first discovered the positive influence of a bilateral oophorectomy on the development of breast cancer lesions in women with advanced disease. Since then, endocrine therapy has been a key component of the treatment of both early (EBC) and advanced-stage (MBC) hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Summary This review discusses the evolution of this therapeutic approach from the introduction of high-dose estrogen therapy leading to the development of several antiestrogen therapies. Recently, the new generation of drugs includes selective estrogen receptor modulators, orally administered selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), as well as more unique agents such as complete estrogen receptor antagonists, proteolysis targeting chimeric, and selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists. These drugs are under evaluation in various levels of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) being evaluated in both early and metastatic settings. As of today, the options in EBC are ranging from short-term neoadjuvant endocrine therapy to monitor the responsiveness of Ki-67 to combined endocrine therapy in MBC, introducing the combination of endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibition as well as PARP inhibition in patients with luminal breast cancer presenting with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The results of global RCTs are settled in global and local guidelines to optimize the individual therapy of our patients with luminal EBC. Key Messages Endocrine intervention in hormone-sensitive breast cancer remains one of the most important options in all settings of early and metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Athanasios Argyriadis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Srikanthan A, Awan AA, McGee S, Rushton M. Young Women with Breast Cancer: The Current Role of Precision Oncology. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1620. [PMID: 38003935 PMCID: PMC10672565 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Young adults aged 40 years and younger with breast cancer represent less than 5% of all breast cancer cases, yet it is the leading cause of death among young women with cancer worldwide. Breast cancer that develops at a young age is more aggressive and has biological features that carry an increased risk of relapse and death. Young adults are more likely to have a genetic predisposition and key biomarkers, including endocrine receptors, the HER2 receptor, and proliferation biomarkers, that appear different compared to older adults. Despite being more aggressive, management strategies are largely the same irrespective of age. Given the higher rates of genetic predisposition, fast access to genetic counselling and testing is a necessity. In this review, the biological differences in young adult breast cancer and the current role precision medicine holds in the treatment of young adults with breast cancer are explored. Given the relatively high risk of relapse, developing novel genomic tools to refine the treatment options beyond the current standard is critical. Existing predictive genomic tests require careful interpretation with consideration of the patient's clinical and pathological features in the young patient cohort. Careful evaluation is also required when considering extended endocrine therapy options. Improved characterization of mutations occurring in tumors using next-generation sequencing could identify important driver mutations that arise in young women. Applying the advances of precision medicine equitably to patients in resource-rich and low- and middle-income countries will be critical to impacting the survival of young adults with breast cancer worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amirrtha Srikanthan
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.A.A.); (S.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Arif Ali Awan
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.A.A.); (S.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Sharon McGee
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.A.A.); (S.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| | - Moira Rushton
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.A.A.); (S.M.); (M.R.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schäffler H, Mergel F, Pfister K, Lukac S, Fink A, Veselinovic K, Rack B, Fink V, Leinert E, Dimpfl M, Englisch A, Tegeler CM, Seller A, Grischke EM, Hahn M, Volmer LL, Engler T, Frevert ML, Taran FA, Janni W, Brucker SY, Hartkopf AD, Dannehl D. The Clinical Relevance of the NATALEE Study: Application of the NATALEE Criteria to a Real-World Cohort from Two Large German Breast Cancer Centers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16366. [PMID: 38003555 PMCID: PMC10671738 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The NATALEE study showed a significant benefit in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) at intermediate and high risk of recurrence who were treated with the CDK4/6 inhibitor Ribociclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET). This retrospective study aims to apply the NATALEE inclusion criteria to a representative real-world cohort to estimate the proportion of HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients eligible for adjuvant Ribociclib therapy. Patients who underwent full surgical treatment for eBC between January 2018 and December 2020 at two large German university breast cancer centers (University of Ulm, University of Tuebingen) were included. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the patient population eligible for Ribociclib treatment based on the NATALEE study's inclusion criteria. Out of 2384 enrolled patients, 1738 had HR+/HER2- eBC, of whom 43% (747/1738) met the NATALEE inclusion criteria. Of note, these patients were older, received less chemotherapy and presented with less advanced tumor stages compared to the NATALEE study cohort. Additionally, compared to the NATALEE study cohort, fewer patients had lymph node involvement (72.4% vs. 88.7%). Our analysis suggests that approximately 43% of all HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients will qualify for Ribociclib treatment. Given the numerous treatment options for patients with HR+/HER2- eBC, as well as the differences between the NATALEE cohort and patients in the real-world clinical setting, future analyses will be needed to determine which patients would benefit most from adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henning Schäffler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Franziska Mergel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Kerstin Pfister
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Stephan Lukac
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Angelina Fink
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Kristina Veselinovic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Visnja Fink
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Moritz Dimpfl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Mannheim, 68135 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Alexander Englisch
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Christian Martin Tegeler
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Anna Seller
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Léa Louise Volmer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Tobias Engler
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Marie Louise Frevert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (M.L.F.)
| | - Florin Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; (M.L.F.)
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
| | - Sara Yvonne Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Ulm, 89075 Ulm, Germany; (F.M.); (A.F.); (E.L.); (W.J.)
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| | - Dominik Dannehl
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; (A.E.); (C.M.T.); (A.S.); (E.-M.G.); (M.H.); (L.L.V.); (T.E.); (A.D.H.); (D.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Gnant M, Loibl S, Cameron D, Regan MM, Denkert C, Poortmans P, Weber WP, Thürlimann B. Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: The St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:970-986. [PMID: 37683978 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The 18th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference held in March 2023, in Vienna, Austria, assessed significant new findings for local and systemic therapies for early breast cancer with a focus on the evaluation of multimodal treatment options. The emergence of more effective, innovative agents in both the preoperative (primary or neoadjuvant) and post-operative (adjuvant) settings has underscored the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment decision making, particularly when selecting systemic therapy for an individual patient. The importance of multidisciplinary discussions regarding the clinical benefits of interventions was explicitly emphasized by the consensus panel as an integral part of developing an optimal treatment plan with the 'right' degree of intensity and duration. The panelists focused on controversies surrounding the management of common ductal/no special type and lobular breast cancer histology, which account for the vast majority of breast tumors. The expert opinion of the panelists was based on interpretations of available data, as well as current practices in their professional environments, personal and socioeconomic factors affecting patients, and cognizant of varying reimbursement and accessibility constraints around the world. The panelists strongly advocated patient participation in well-designed clinical studies whenever feasible. With these considerations in mind, the St Gallen Consensus Conference aims to offer guidance to clinicians regarding appropriate treatments for early-stage breast cancer and assist in balancing the realistic trade-offs between treatment benefit and toxicity, enabling patients and clinicians to make well-informed choices through a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - H J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Loibl
- Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - D Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M M Regan
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - W P Weber
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Thürlimann
- SwissBreastCare, Bethanienspital, Zürich, Switzerland; SONK Foundation, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cucciniello L, Garufi G, Di Rienzo R, Martinelli C, Pavone G, Giuliano M, Arpino G, Montemurro F, Del Mastro L, De Laurentiis M, Puglisi F. Estrogen deprivation effects of endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: Incidence, management and outcome. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 120:102624. [PMID: 37751658 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Endocrine therapy is one of the standard adjuvant treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality in patients with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer. Despite its proven efficacy, ET side effects, which persist over time even if low grade, may deteriorate quality of life. During follow-up visits, emphasis is generally placed on the risk of disease recurrence, while the topic of ET side effects is commonly neglected and discussed only briefly. This could lead to poor adherence to therapy and early treatment discontinuation, resulting in worse survival outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available evidence on the incidence and reporting of ET-related side effects (including vasomotor symptoms, musculoskeletal disorders and genitourinary syndrome of menopause, as well as fatigue, psychological and ocular disorders, dysmetabolic effects and loss of bone density) and of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies available to mitigate symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Cucciniello
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Garufi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Rossana Di Rienzo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Martinelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giuliana Pavone
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Rodolico - San Marco", Catania, Italy
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Grazia Arpino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| | | | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gligorov J, Benderra MA, Barthere X, de Forceville L, Antoine EC, Cottu PH, Delaloge S, Pierga JY, Belkacemi Y, Houvenaegel G, Pujol P, Rivera S, Spielmann M, Penault-Llorca F, Namer M. Recommandations francophones pour la pratique clinique concernant la prise en charge des cancers du sein de Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:10S1-10S43. [PMID: 38061827 DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(23)00473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
With more than 60,000 new cases of breast cancer in mainland France in 2023 and 8% of all cancer deaths, breast cancer is the leading cancer in women in terms of incidence and mortality. While the number of new cases has almost doubled in 30 years, the percentage of patients at all stages alive at 5 years (87%) and 10 years (76%) testifies to the major progress made in terms of screening, characterisation and treatment. However, this progress, rapid as it is, needs to be evaluated and integrated into an overall strategy, taking into account the characteristics of the disease (stage and biology), as well as those of the patients being treated. These are the objectives of the St Paul-de-Vence recommendations for clinical practice. We report here the summary of the votes, discussions and conclusions of the Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023 RPCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Gligorov
- Institut universitaire de cancérologie AP-HP Sorbonne université, Paris, France.
| | | | - Xavier Barthere
- Institut universitaire de cancérologie AP-HP Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Betz M, Massard V, Gilson P, Witz A, Dardare J, Harlé A, Merlin JL. ESR1 Gene Mutations and Liquid Biopsy in ER-Positive Breast Cancers: A Small Step Forward, a Giant Leap for Personalization of Endocrine Therapy? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5169. [PMID: 37958343 PMCID: PMC10649433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2- ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaux Betz
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Vincent Massard
- Département d’Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France;
| | - Pauline Gilson
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Andréa Witz
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julie Dardare
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Alexandre Harlé
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Louis Merlin
- Département de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, CNRS UMR 7039 CRAN, Université de Lorraine, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wang X, Xia C, Wang Y, Qi Y, Qi X, Zhao J, Ye S, Lei Z, Yue J, Huang H, Liu N, Chen W, Yuan P. Landscape of young breast cancer under 35 years in China over the past decades: a multicentre retrospective cohort study (YBCC-Catts study). EClinicalMedicine 2023; 64:102243. [PMID: 37936654 PMCID: PMC10626170 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The proportion of young breast cancer patients in China is significantly higher than in Western countries, and the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical problems faced by patients in China are different from those in Western countries too, so there is an urgent need to conduct some studies for young breast cancer patients in Asia. Methods This study consisted of two breast cancer cohorts in China. The population-based cohort involved breast cancer cases diagnosed in 2000-2017 via cancer registration system, and we describe the epidemiological characteristics of the young breast cancer in China. The hospital-based cohort, patients eligible for enrollment were breast cancer in young women (≤35 years old) from eight centres in different regions of China, diagnosed and treated for the first time in six time periods (i.e., 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015). Patient demographic characteristics and clinical features were compared among the six time periods using a trend test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and the log-rank test was performed to compare OS and DFS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out using Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Findings In the population-based cohort, age-specific incidence and age-standardised percentages of breast cancer cases younger than 35 years were increased. The proportion of breast cancer under the age of 35 is increasing more rapidly in rural areas than in urban areas. In the hospital-based cohort, a total of 1308 young breast cancer patients (≤35 years old) were collected. Proportion of patients treated with adjuvant taxane or anthracycline combined with taxane is gradually increasing over the six time periods, and the proportion of patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery is gradually increasing too. Meanwhile, the patients treated with combined ovarian function suppression (OFS) endocrine therapy gradually increased, and the duration of endocrine therapy gradually longer. There is an increasing trend in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate for the total population in the six time periods between 2000 and 2015, but no significant difference in overall survival (OS) rate was observed. Early staging and longer duration of endocrine therapy were factors associated with a favorable prognosis. Interpretation The incidence of younger breast cancers under 35 years of age has gradually increased and the pattern of patient care has changed significantly over time, which may contribute to the improved prognosis of younger breast cancer patients. Funding Beijing Medical Award Foundation (YXJL-2020-0941-0763), Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of China (LC2021L04), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Clinical Translational and Medical Research Fund (2022-I2M-C&T-A-014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Wang
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Changfa Xia
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Yixin Qi
- Breast Center, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China
| | - Xiaowei Qi
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiuda Zhao
- Breast Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China
| | - Songqing Ye
- Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian, China
| | - Zixuan Lei
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Yue
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hairong Huang
- General Surgery Department, Liangxiang Hospital in Fangshan District, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Liu
- Oncology Department, Dalian Second People's Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Wanqing Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Yuan
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
D'Onofrio R, Omarini C, Toss A, Sperduti I, Piacentini F, Barbolini M, Cortesi L, Barbieri E, Pettorelli E, Chiavelli C, Dominici M, Moscetti L. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Risk Stratification in a Real-World Setting. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:712-720.e3. [PMID: 37507257 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian function suppression (OFS) and hormone therapy (HT) represent an adjuvant option in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer (HR+EBC). The SOFT-TEXT trials showed improved outcomes upon receiving aromatase inhibitors (AIs)/OFS. METHODS In order to estimate the magnitude of absolute improvements, we conducted a retrospective study applying composite risk (CR) to 237 premenopausal HR+EBC patients. RESULTS Overall, 119 of these received tamoxifen (T)/OFS and 118 received AIs/OFS. The median age was 45 years (ys). After a median follow up of 65 months, recurrence was 6.7% in T patients and 10.2% in AI ones. CR (cutoff: 2.67) and ET duration (five-year cutoff) was found to have a significant impact on DFS. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) at 5 ys amounted to 82.9% for a CR>2.67 and 95% with CR=2.67 (p 0.0046). Five-year IDFS was 98.3% in patients who had completed 5-year HT compared to 54.6% of those who had stopped before 5 years (P < .0001). Excluding patients who had discontinued therapy due to disease relapse, IDFS difference at 5 years remained statistically significant (p=0.03) between the two groups, with an iDFS rate of 86.5% at 5 years in the second group. Adverse events of different grades were reported in 116 and 112 patients in the T/OFS group and the AIs/OFS, respectively. Early discontinuation due to toxicity was 3.8%. Seven patients (19.4%) discontinued therapy due to pregnancy desire (6 in the T group, 1 in the AI one); of these, one patient relapsed. CONCLUSION In a real-world setting, treatment options for premenopausal patients who are candidates for HT and OFS should take risk status into account. Therefore, every effort should be made to maintain patient adherence to treatment in order to manage toxicities and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella D'Onofrio
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Claudia Omarini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Gruppo Oncologico Italiano per la Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Isabella Sperduti
- Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Piacentini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Gruppo Oncologico Italiano per la Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma, Italy
| | - Monica Barbolini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elena Barbieri
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisa Pettorelli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Chiara Chiavelli
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy; Gruppo Oncologico Italiano per la Ricerca Clinica (GOIRC), Parma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ergun Y, Dogan M, Ucar G, Karacin P, Karacin C. Efficacy of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1901-1909. [PMID: 37701962 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2258791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and standard endocrine therapy (ET) in the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) has yielded conflicting results. We performed a pooled analysis of the adjuvant efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors by including data from the NATALEE trial, the most recent trial on this topic. METHODS We searched major databases and congress proceedings until 7 June 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET combination versus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage BC. RESULTS Four RCTs involving a total of 17,749 patients were included. According to the pooled analysis of these four studies, significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was observed with the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard ET (HzR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). IDFS benefit was irrespective from menopausal status, Ki-67 index, tumor grade, and previous chemotherapy. CDK4/6 inhibitors plus ET had a significant improvement in iDFS in stage 3 whereas there was a trend toward better iDFS in stage 2 (HzR for stage 3: 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.78; HzR for stage 2: 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.01). CONCLUSIONS Addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to standard ET in the adjuvant treatment of HR-positive/HER2-negative early-stage BC improves iDFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yakup Ergun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Batman World Hospital, Batman, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Dogan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokhan Ucar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pınar Karacin
- Department of Gynecology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cengiz Karacin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nabieva N, Altmann F, Apel K, Baerens DT, Beha M, Belau A, Busch S, Guth D, Heinrich G, Kreiss-Sender J, Markmann S, Olbermann A, Oskay-Özcelik G, Schuback B, Steinfeld-Birg D, Quiering C, Kiss F, Kreuzeder J, Nuti P, Schilling J. The Endocrine Treatment Landscape for Patients with HR+ HER2- Early-stage Breast Cancer in Germany Before the Introduction of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy - A Real-World Analysis. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1127-1137. [PMID: 37942358 PMCID: PMC10629492 DOI: 10.1055/a-2100-0643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction While premenopausal patients with HR+ HER2- early breast cancer are treated with tamoxifen +/- ovarian suppression with a GnRH analog or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) + GnRH, the majority of postmenopausal women receive an AI due to its higher efficacy compared to tamoxifen. As the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors into the treatment of early-stage breast cancer with a higher risk of recurrence will probably result in a shift in the endocrine treatment landscape, the question is what treatment did potential candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitors in Germany receive before CDK4/6 inhibitors were available. Patients and Methods As part of a retrospective multicenter analysis, anonymized data were collected of patients with HR+ HER2- early-stage breast cancer who received endocrine therapy in the period between 10/2021 and 03/2022. Potential candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment were classified into different risk cohorts using the inclusion criteria of the NATALEE and monarchE trials. Results The data of 238 patients from 29 different centers were analyzed. While 20.6% of patients met the monarchE criteria, the subgroup which met the NATALEE inclusion criteria consisted of 46.2% of patients. 53.8% of patients did not meet the inclusion criteria for either the NATALEE or the monarchE trial. More than half of the patients did not receive chemotherapy. 28.6% of patients in the whole cohort were premenopausal. 67.6% of premenopausal women received neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy. 61.8% of premenopausal patients received tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy, 19.1% received an AI + GnRH and 10.3% were treated with tamoxifen + GnRH. Conclusion Despite the high percentage of premenopausal patients who received aggressive treatment in the form of chemotherapy, only one third of premenopausal patients received GnRH in addition to their standard endocrine therapy. Studies carried out at a later point in time and registry studies will be necessary to see how the endocrine therapy landscape in Germany has changed following the introduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Falk Altmann
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus Apel
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk-Toralf Baerens
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Michaela Beha
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Antje Belau
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffi Busch
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Dagmar Guth
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Heinrich
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Janine Kreiss-Sender
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Markmann
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Olbermann
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Gülten Oskay-Özcelik
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Beatrix Schuback
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Dieter Steinfeld-Birg
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Nuti
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
- HERACLIN Institut für Datenmanagement im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Schilling
- Berufsverband Niedergelassener und ambulant tätiger Gynäkologischer Onkologen in Deutschland e.V., Neuenhagen bei Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
González-Hurtado D, Rivero S, Samamé Pérez-Vargas JC, Petracci FE. Hormone Receptor-Positive / HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer High-Risk Population: An Algorithm for Optimization Systemic Adjuvant Treatment Based on 2022 Updates. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2023; 17:11782234231192780. [PMID: 37637230 PMCID: PMC10450458 DOI: 10.1177/11782234231192780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Prognostic and predictive factors for early and late distant distance recurrence risk in estrogen-receptor positive and HER2-receptor negative early breast cancer are well known, but not all these variables work equally for the prediction. The following are the most widely accepted variables for categorizing risk levels: clinic-pathologic features (tumor size, lymph node involvement, histological grade, age, menopausal status, Ki-67 expression, estrogen, and progesterone expression), primary systemic treatment response (pathologic response and/or Ki-67 downstaging), and gene expression signatures stratification. Treatment guidelines from cancer societies and collaborative groups, online predict-tools, real-world data and experts' opinion recommends different adjuvant strategies (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, ovarian suppression, olaparib, or abemaciclib) depending on the low (< 10%), intermediate (10%-20%) or high-risk of distance recurrence at least in the first 5 years. Multiple randomized prospective trials were updated in 2022, that evidence allow us to perform a stratification of risk in pre- and postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive and HER2-receptor negative early breast cancer based on a combination of clinic-pathologic features and genomic assays and guide the adjuvant systemic treatment recommendation for those with high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sergio Rivero
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Wuerstlein R, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:289-305. [PMID: 37900552 PMCID: PMC10601667 DOI: 10.1159/000531578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) & Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf/Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Davezac M, Meneur C, Buscato M, Zahreddine R, Arnal JF, Dalenc F, Lenfant F, Fontaine C. The beneficial effects of tamoxifen on arteries: a key player for cardiovascular health of breast cancer patient. Biochem Pharmacol 2023:115677. [PMID: 37419371 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2023.115677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Over the past few decades, advances in cancer detection and treatment have significantly improved survival rate of breast cancer patients. However, due to the cardiovascular toxicity of cancer treatments (chemotherapy, anti-HER2 antibodies and radiotherapy), cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have become an increasingly important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality in breast cancer survivors. Endocrine therapies are prescribed to reduce the risk of recurrence and specific death in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) early breast cancer patients, but their impact on CVD is a matter of debate. Whereas aromatase inhibitors and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs inhibit estrogen synthesis, tamoxifen acts as a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), opposing estrogen action in the breast but mimicking their actions in other tissues, including arteries. This review aims to summarize the main clinical and experimental studies reporting the effects of tamoxifen on CVD. In addition, we will discuss how recent findings on the mechanisms of action of these therapies may contribute to a better understanding and anticipation of CVD risk in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgane Davezac
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Cecile Meneur
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France; PhysioStim, 10 rue Henri Regnault, 81100, Castres, France
| | - Melissa Buscato
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Rana Zahreddine
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France; CREFRE-Anexplo, Service de Microchirurgie Experimentale, UMS006, INSERM, Université de Toulouse, UT3, ENVT, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-François Arnal
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Françoise Lenfant
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Coralie Fontaine
- I2MC, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1297, University of Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Witzel I, Thomssen C, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Kolberg HC, Harbeck N, Stickeler E, Bartsch R, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Würstlein R, Krug D, Taran FA, Lüftner D. Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 1 - Early Stage Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:653-663. [PMID: 37916183 PMCID: PMC10617391 DOI: 10.1055/a-2074-0551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
With abemaciclib (monarchE study) and olaparib (OlympiA study) gaining approval in the adjuvant treatment setting, a significant change in the standard of care for patients with early stage breast cancer has been established for some time now. Accordingly, some diverse developments are slowly being transferred from the metastatic to the adjuvant treatment setting. Recently, there have also been positive reports of the NATALEE study. Other clinical studies are currently investigating substances that are already established in the metastatic setting. These include, for example, the DESTINY Breast05 study with trastuzumab deruxtecan and the SASCIA study with sacituzumab govitecan. In this review paper, we summarize and place in context the latest developments over the past months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg,
Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Kempten, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, München, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinkum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|