Meal Delivery Programs Reduce The Use Of Costly Health Care In Dually Eligible Medicare And Medicaid Beneficiaries

Signals in Health Inequity: Examining Social Needs and Costs in a Large Health System

Previous research has demonstrated that social determinants of health are drivers of medical utilization, cost, and health outcomes. In this study, we compared the mean annual total cost to deliver health services per patient by health-related social need (HRSN) status and total HRSNs using linear regression and ANOVA, respectively. Patients with ≥1 HRSN (n = 8409) yielded $1772 higher annual costs compared to patients without HRSNs (n = 34 775) (P < .0001). Compared to patients without HRSNs, delivering care to patients with 1 HRSN (n = 4222) cost $1689 (P < .0001) more and to patients with ≥2 HRSN (n = 4187) cost $1856 (P < .0001) more per year.

Impact of Medically Tailored Meals on Clinical Outcomes Among Low-Income Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and adverse social determinants of health experience barriers to healthful eating, and achieve poorer glycemic control and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of medically tailored meals (MTM) with medical nutrition therapy (MNT) on clinical outcomes among adults with DM.

DESIGN

Pilot randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

English-speaking adults with DM and hemoglobin A1c (A1c) levels > 8% insured by Maryland Medicaid plans.

INTERVENTION

The treatment group received home delivery of 12 medically tailored, frozen meals and a fresh produce bag weekly for 3 months, and individual calls with a registered dietitian monthly for 6 months in addition to usual care. The control group received usual care. Outcomes were change from baseline to 6 months in A1c (primary), body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, food insecurity, and diabetes-related quality of life, knowledge, and self-efficacy (secondary).

KEY RESULTS

We randomized 74 adults; 77% completed data collection. The mean age was 48 years, 40% were male, 77% were Black, and the mean A1c was 10.3%. Eighty-six percent of meals were delivered, and on average 4.8 nutrition visits were completed. At 6 months, both groups had similar improvements in A1c (- 0.7 vs. - 0.6%); the control group reported more favorable changes in diabetes medications. Changes in systolic blood pressure and BMI at 6 months did not differ between groups. Diabetes-related quality of life, knowledge, and self-efficacy improved modestly, but not differently by group. Food insecurity decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months in the intervention (53 to 17%) compared to control (48 to 44%; p < 0.05), which lessened but remained significant at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment and retention of an at-risk group of adults with DM was feasible. Intervention uptake was good but did not improve clinical outcomes. More comprehensive and clinically integrated interventions are likely needed to achieve significant clinical benefits.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

NCT04034511.

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Food is Medicine for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes in China

BACKGROUND

'Food is Medicine', a rapidly growing innovative intervention, has been shown to improve the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, due to the unique characteristics of Chinese dietary culture, it remains unclear whether such intervention measures can be implemented in China.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the potential barriers and facilitators to implementing 'Food is Medicine' intervention for the management of people living with T2DM in three Chinese provinces.

DESIGN

Face-to-face semi-structured individual in-depth interview and focus group discussions in Heilongjiang, Hubei and Ningxia provinces in China.

PARTICIPANT

People living with T2DM.

APPROACH

Both inductive and deductive methods were used to analyse the interview data, guided by the COM-B framework.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 97 individuals participated in the study. Participants were concerned about the prices of buying prescribed meals, if not fully subsidised by healthcare system. Other barriers included the potential challenge to adhering to prescribed meals for long periods if the variety was limited, the difficulties in delivering fresh food or meals to remote areas and the lack of knowledge of healthy diets among the people living with T2DM and their relatives. In contrast, clinicians' confidence in the effectiveness of food and meal prescription, the opportunities to collaborate with community canteens on producing prescribed foods, and the convenience of preparing food for people with T2DM were identified as the main enablers.

CONCLUSIONS

There are presently several potential barriers to future implementing 'Food is Medicine' to manage people living with T2DM. But there are also clear opportunities to develop a context-tailored 'Food is Medicine' intervention in China.

Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Primary Care Patients May Reduce Hospital Readmissions: A Quasi-Experimental Study

BACKGROUND

Health care systems are increasingly partnering with community-based organizations to address social determinants of health (SDH). We established a program that educates and connects patients with SDH needs at a primary care clinic to community services and facilitated referrals.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of addressing SDH soon after discharge on hospital readmission in a clinic population.

DESIGN

Pre/post, quasi-experimental design with longitudinal data analysis for quality improvement.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinic patients (n = 754) having at least one hospital discharge between June 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, were included. Of these, 145 patients received the intervention and 609 served as comparison.

INTERVENTIONS

A primary care liaison was employed to assess and educate recently discharged clinic patients for SDH needs and refer them for needed community services from June 1, 2020, to October 31, 2021.

MAIN MEASURES

Hospital readmissions within 30, 60, and 90 days of discharge were tracked at 6-month intervals. Covariates included patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, income, Hierarchical Condition Category risk scores, and Clinical Classification Software diagnosis groups. Data for all hospital discharges during the intervention period were used for the main analysis and data for the year before the intervention were extracted for comparison.

KEY RESULTS

Overall, patients in the intervention group were older, sicker, and more likely to have public insurance. The reductions in 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions during the intervention period were 14.39%, 13.28%, and 12.04% respectively in the intervention group, while no significant change was observed in the comparison group. The group difference in reduction over time was statistically significant for 30-day (Diff = 12.54%; p = 0.032), 60-day (Diff = 14.40%; p = 0.012), and 90-day readmissions (Diff = 14.71%; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that screening clinic patients for SDH, and educating and connecting them to community services during post-hospital care may be associated with reductions in hospital readmissions.

Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review

The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to synthesize contemporary evidence on effectiveness of community-based allied health (AH) services on acute care utilizations and views from relevant stakeholders. An a priori protocol was registered with PROSPERO [CRD42023437013]. Inclusion criteria were: (a) stand-alone interventions led by practitioners/graduates from one or more target AH professions (audiology, exercise physiology, diabetes educator, nutrition and dietetics, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, social work, and speech pathology); (b) examined acute care utilization-related outcomes with/without perceptions of relevant stakeholders; and (c) published after 2010 and in English. Eligible studies were identified from: (a) bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, PsycINFO, CINAHL complete, and the Cochrane Library) (September 19, 2023); (b) online databases (ProQuest Central and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global) and theses repository (Trove) (September 20, 2023); (c) Google and Google Scholar (October 17-18, 2023); and (d) citation searching. A modified version of McMaster Critical Appraisal Tools and McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to assess methodological quality. Data synthesis was through convergent segregated approach. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. There were 67 included papers. The integrated quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrated mixed evidence, likely influenced by the heterogeneity of the evidence base, for the effectiveness of AH services on acute care utilizations. Patients and their carers were largely positive about these services, highlighting opportunities to build on these experiences. The certainty of evidence for patient-important outcomes was however "very low", emphasizing cautious interpretation. The findings of this review shed light on the breadth and scope of AH in the community sector, and its potential impact on the acute sector. Further investment in, and ongoing research on, community-based AH can strengthen primary healthcare and relieve pressure on the acute sector.

Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial

BACKGROUND

As food insecurity and healthcare costs are linked, healthcare entities (i.e., providers, healthcare systems, insurers) are increasingly interested in identifying and providing solutions to address food insecurity among their patients. Home-delivered meals are one long-standing solution to address food insecurity among homebound older adults. However, there is limited evidence about what mode of delivery is most effective in promoting community independence, reducing healthcare utilization, and improving quality of life as well as how these outcomes may vary as a function of people's preferences for how meals are delivered to them.

METHODS

With extensive stakeholder input, we designed and implemented a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness study in which we will enroll 2300 older adults on waiting lists at home-delivered meals programs across the country and randomize them to receive for 6 months, either (1) weekday lunchtime meals delivered by a local volunteer or driver who also provides socialization and wellness checks or (2) biweekly delivery of 10 frozen meals to participants' homes. Participant data will be combined with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) data to calculate post-randomization institutional vs. community days. Baseline and 3-month surveys will evaluate secondary outcomes (e.g., food insecurity, loneliness, quality of life) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., nutritional risk). To examine heterogeneity of treatment effects, we will test for interactions between the two types of meal delivery and participants' preferred mode of meal delivery as well as participants' living arrangements.

DISCUSSION

This research will be the first to prospectively evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the two predominant meal delivery options. The knowledge generated from this research will be of value to healthcare providers, health systems, payers, community-based organizations, older adults, and their families, because it will identify the mode of meal delivery that best meets homebound older adults' needs and promotes community independence. In addition, the experience of working closely with stakeholders in designing and conducting this trial will be useful to researchers seeking to engage with stakeholders in the development and evaluation of complex social service interventions while balancing regulatory, resource, and human subjects research considerations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov.  NCT05357261 . Registered on May 02, 2022.

Using Z Codes to Document Social Risk Factors in the Electronic Health Record: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Individual-level social risk factors have a significant impact on health. Social risks can be documented in the electronic health record using ICD-10 diagnosis codes (the "Z codes"). This study aims to summarize the literature on using Z codes to document social risks.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted using the PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for papers published before June 2024. Studies were included if they were published in English in peer-reviewed journals and reported a Z code utilization rate with data from the United States.

RESULTS

Thirty-two articles were included in the review. In studies based on patient-level data, patient counts ranged from 558 patients to 204 million, and the Z code utilization rate ranged from 0.4% to 17.6%, with a median of 1.2%. In studies that examined encounter-level data, sample sizes ranged from 19,000 to 2.1 billion encounters, and the Z code utilization rate ranged from 0.1% to 3.7%, with a median of 1.4%. The most reported Z codes were Z59 (housing and economic circumstances), Z63 (primary support group), and Z62 (upbringing). Patients with Z codes were more likely to be younger, male, non-White, seeking care in an urban teaching facility, and have higher health care costs and utilizations.

DISCUSSION

The use of Z codes to document social risks is low. However, the research interest in Z codes is growing, and a better understanding of Z code use is beneficial for developing strategies to increase social risk documentation, with the goal of improving health outcomes.

Will a Programmatic Framework Integrating Food Is Medicine Achieve Value on Investment?

Diet-related chronic diseases account for seven out of the ten leading causes of death in the USA. Food is Medicine (FIM) interventions can be effective adjuncts to standard medical care to address this cost burden. While the Food is Medicine Pyramid recommends some culinary skill development when integrating FIM into healthcare, the emphasis is on medically tailored meals and food provision. Hence, there is a practice gap to ensure patients develop the necessary skills to apply nutrition recommendations into improved food behaviors to achieve positive long-term health outcomes. This paper presents a theoretical framework for optimizing existing clinical services to provide FIM interventions, tracking associated improvements in patient outcomes, and identifying healthcare cost saving/revenue generation that can lead to a net value on investment. It describes how these interventions can and have been used in a clinical setting as adjuncts to clinical care. While there is published evidence for each modality individually, the literature lacks evidence of the value of an integrated approach. The framework therefore provides a roadmap to both identify best practices and evaluate outcomes that will inform viable financial models.

Health outcomes reported by healthcare providers and clients of a community-based medically tailored meal program

BACKGROUND

Medically tailored meal (MTM) programs provide home-delivered meals to people living with serious illness and poor nutritional status. Client outcome studies have found evidence of decreased healthcare utilization and cost savings associated with MTM program participation, and inconclusive evidence of change in health measures. The purpose of this study was to use a novel observational framework to describe the client profile and change in health outcomes using routinely collected health and program data from a community-based MTM program at MANNA (Philadelphia, PA).

METHODS

Clients reported their self-rated health and experiences of food insecurity and malnutrition. Healthcare providers reported clients' body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1C. These health outcomes, measured at program intake and 3-6 months later, were linked with administrative data for 1,959 clients who completed at least two months of MTM services in 2020, 2021, and 2022.

RESULTS

Clients exhibited substantial heterogeneity in demographics and health status at intake. Self-reported malnutrition risk decreased significantly over program duration (p < .001). Nearly one-third of clients with poor health reported improvement over time. Over 60% of clients with obesity experienced stable BMI. Clients with hypertension experienced significant improvements in systolic blood pressure (p < .001). Clients with diabetes and available data (n = 45) demonstrated significant reduction in hemoglobin A1C (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

We found evidence that participation in MANNA's MTM program was associated with favorable health outcomes for clients with serious illness and nutritional risk. Community-based organizations can maximize the completeness of their data by focusing on routinely collected internal data like validated health screeners and surveys.

The Effectiveness of Recipe4Health: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Food as Medicine is increasingly recognized as an important strategy for addressing the related challenges of food insecurity and nutrition-related chronic conditions. Food as Medicine refers to integration of food-based nutrition interventions into healthcare to prevent and treat disease. However, there is limited evidence to understand the effectiveness of Food as Medicine.

METHODS

Recipe4Health (R4H), a comprehensive Food as Medicine program, was implemented in 4 Federally Qualified Health Centers in California for patients with food insecurity and/or nutrition-related chronic conditions. Patients were referred by a healthcare provider to a "Food Farmacy" (16 weekly produce home deliveries) alone or in combination with a "Behavioral Pharmacy" (16 weekly group visits). A quasi-experimental study with pre/post surveys (4 months) and propensity score matched controls for Electronic Health Record outcomes over 12 months was conducted. Participants were 2,643 R4H patients and 2,643 controls identified from 1/2020 to 12/2022; data were analyzed from 2023 to 2024.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in produce consumption from baseline to 4 months (0.41 servings/day [0.11, 0.72], p=0.007) in the Food Farmacy in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy. Compared to controls, there were improvements in non-HDL cholesterol for the Food Farmacy alone (-17.1 mg/dL [-26.9, -7.2], p<0.001) and in combination with Behavioral Pharmacy (-17 mg/dL [-28.3, -5.8], p=0.003) at 12 months. Compared to controls, HbA1c significantly decreased in the Food Farmacy alone at 12 months (-0.37%, 95% CI [-0.65, -0.08]; p=0.01), but not the Food Farmacy with Behavioral Pharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

R4H resulted in improvements in diet and multiple clinical health outcomes, such as non-HDL cholesterol and HbA1c.

Health-Related Social Needs Screening and Referral in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to review approaches to health-related social needs (HRSN) screening and referral in pediatric primary care.

METHOD

PsycINFO, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched to include peer-reviewed studies conducted in the U.S. over the last 30 years that reported HRSN screening and/or referral outcomes in primary care up to age 18. Studies included multiple HRSN domains and a variety of study designs. Data were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

20 studies met inclusion criteria. A variety of screening targets and modalities were employed in addition to referral support methods. Positive screens among the domains reported varied depending on the screening process and sample.

DISCUSSION

This review highlights a range of patient-centered innovations for HRSN screening and referral that may be adaptable to a range of local needs and capacities. Ongoing rigorous evaluation of these models is needed.

Food is Medicine Interventions and Climate Change

Food is Medicine (FiM), also known as Food as Medicine, integrates food and nutrition interventions into health care delivery with the primary goal to improve population health and address diet-related health conditions. To date, there has been little focus on the relation between FiM and climate change despite FiM's involvement with 2 key drivers of climate change: health care delivery and food systems. FiM may be able to advance lifestyle medicine and population health objectives, as well as mitigate some of the health care and food-related drivers of climate change, by focusing on 4 key areas: (1) Increasing the absolute number and proportion of patients who follow plant-based diets; (2) reducing food waste; (3) reducing unnecessary health care utilization; and (4) lowering transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions related to food procurement. Measuring the ecological impact of FiM alongside clinical, utilization, and financial measures will require a different analytical approach than that used traditionally in health care. Ultimately, thoughtful, data-driven, and urgent interventions that span the food and health care sectors are needed to sustainably support not only FiM, but human, environmental, and planetary health as well.

Medicare advantage initiative to improve social determinants of health

This editorial comments on the article by Richards et al.

Socioeconomic factors associated with uptake and satisfaction with a post-hospitalization meals benefit in Medicare Advantage

BACKGROUND

Kaiser Permanente Southern California began offering a 4-week supplemental benefit of home-delivered meals to Medicare Advantage members after discharge from a hospitalization for heart failure and other medical conditions in 2021. The purpose of this study is to explore the associations between socioeconomic disadvantage and food insecurity with patient uptake of and satisfaction with the meals.

METHODS

Data for this cross-sectional study were drawn from survey and electronic medical record data for members referred for the meals benefit (n = 6169) and linked to a hospitalization encounter (n = 2254) between January and December 2021. Uptake was assessed using vendor records; measures of socioeconomic status included the neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) and prior receipt of medical financial assistance (MFA) from the health system. Patients were invited to complete an email or phone survey about their satisfaction with the meals and food insecurity. Multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to examine the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and food insecurity with meals uptake and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Sixty-two percent of patients referred for the benefit accepted the meals (mean age: 79 ± 9, 59% people of color). While there was no significant relationship between NDI and meals uptake (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07, p = 0.77), patients who received prior MFA were more likely to accept the meals (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.16, p < 0.01). Sixty-nine percent of patients who completed the survey (23% response rate) reported that meals were very or extremely helpful. Patients with food insecurity (29% of survey respondents) were more likely to report that the meals were helpful for their recovery compared to food secure patients (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.09-1.35, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The home-delivered meals appeared to be particularly utilized by and helpful to patients with greater financial strain and/or food insecurity, suggesting that supplemental benefits could be more targeted toward addressing unmet needs of vulnerable adults.

Association of Patient-Reported Social Needs with Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Federally Qualified Health Center Patients

BACKGROUND

Health care systems are increasingly screening for unmet social needs. The association between patient-reported social needs and health care utilization is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between patient-reported social needs, measured by the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE), and inpatient and emergency department (ED) utilization.

DESIGN

This cohort study analyzed merged 2017-2019 electronic health record (EHR) data across multiple health systems.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in central North Carolina who completed PRAPARE as part of a primary care visit with behavioral health services.

MAIN MEASURES

The count of up to 12 unmet social needs, aggregated as 0, 1, 2, or 3 + . Outcomes include the probability of an ED visit and hospitalization 12 months after PRAPARE assessment, modeled by logistic regressions controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, comorbidity burden, being uninsured, and prior utilization in the past 12 months.

KEY RESULTS

The study population consisted of 1924 adults (38.7% male, 50.1% Black, 36.3% Hispanic, 55.9% unemployed, 68.2% of patients reported 1 + needs). Those with more needs were younger, more likely to be unemployed, and experienced greater comorbidity burden. 35.3% of patients had ED visit(s) and 36.3% had hospitalization(s) 1 year after PRAPARE assessment. In adjusted analysis, having 3 + needs was associated with a percentage point increase in the predicted probability of hospitalization (average marginal effect 0.06, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) compared with having 0 needs. Similarly, having 2 needs (0.07, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) or 3 + needs (0.06, SE 0.03, p < 0.05) was associated with increased probability of ED visits compared to 0 needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported social needs were common and associated with health care utilization patterns. Future research should identify interventions to address unmet social needs to improve health and avoid potentially preventable escalating medical intervention.

Rationale and design of the KP ENRICH trial: A food is medicine intervention in low-income high-risk adults with diabetes within Kaiser Permanente

BACKGROUND

Food insecurity is associated with poor glycemic control and increased risk for diabetes-related complications. The clinical benefit of addressing these challenges through a medically supportive grocery prescription (GRx) program in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains unclear. We report the aims and design of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month GRx intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among low-income adults with T2D.

METHODS

The Kaiser Permanente Evaluating Nutritional Interventions in Food-Insecure High-Risk Adults (KP ENRICH) Study is a pragmatic randomized trial enrolling 1100 participants within Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Southern California, two integrated health care delivery systems serving >9 million members. Medicaid-insured adults with T2D and baseline HbA1c ≥7.5% will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either GRx, delivered as $100 per month for select items from among a curated list of healthful food groups in an online grocery ordering and home-delivery platform along with biweekly digital nutrition educational materials, or control, consisting of free membership and deliveries from the online grocery platform but without curated food groups or purchasing dollars. The primary outcome is 6-month change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes include 12-month change in HbA1c, and 6- and 12-month change in medical resource utilization, food security, nutrition security, dietary habits, diabetes-related quality of life, and dietary self-efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this large randomized clinical trial of GRx will help inform future policy and health system-based initiatives to improve food and nutrition security, disease management, and health equity among patients with T2D.

U.S. food policy to address diet-related chronic disease

Poor diet is the leading cause of mortality in the U.S. due to the direct relationship with diet-related chronic diseases, disproportionally affects underserved communities, and exacerbates health disparities. Evidence-based policy solutions are greatly needed to foster an equitable and climate-smart food system that improves health, nutrition and reduces chronic disease healthcare costs. To directly address epidemic levels of U.S. diet-related chronic diseases and nutritional health disparities, we conducted a policy analysis, prioritized policy options and implementation strategies, and issued final recommendations for bipartisan consideration in the 2023-24 Farm Bill Reauthorization. Actional recommendations include: sugar-sweetened beverage taxation, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) fruit and vegetable subsidy expansion, replacement of ultra-processed foods (UPF) with sustainable, diverse, climate-smart agriculture and food purchasing options, and implementing "food is medicine."

Addressing Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Implementation and Impact on Health Care Utilization, Costs, and Integration of Care

In recent years, health care policy makers have focused increasingly on addressing social drivers of health as a strategy for improving health and health equity. Impacts of social, economic, and environmental conditions on health are well established. However, less is known about the implementation and impact of approaches used by health care providers and payers to address social drivers of health in clinical settings. This article reviews current efforts by US health care organizations and public payers such as Medicaid and Medicare to address social drivers of health at the individual and community levels. We summarize the limited available evidence regarding intervention impacts on health care utilization, costs, and integration of care and identify key lessons learned from current implementation efforts.

Participant Insights From a Family-based Meal Kit Delivery Intervention

OBJECTIVE

To explore the lived experiences of prediabetic participants in an in-home, family-based meal kit delivery intervention for 12 weeks. Delivered foods followed a plant-dominant pattern, including small meat portions, to encourage long-term adoption of this pattern.

METHODS

Qualitative in-depth individual interviews (n = 21) were undertaken online with 7 pilot participants, at 3-time points (preintervention, during intervention, and postintervention). Three online focus groups were also undertaken postintervention with 12 participants.

RESULTS

Postintervention, most participants reported positive changes in eating patterns and mindset changes enabling future healthier eating. The deliveries inspired enthusiasm for tastier cooking and family involvement. Although participants indicated they felt well-being improvements, they often became focused on the outcome of their physical test results (eg, weight), leading to some disappointment and feelings of failure.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Participant engagement with the intervention was high, but other underlying emotions, outside diet behavior, can affect long-term adoption outcomes. This has implications for designing future interventions.

"Food Is Medicine" Strategies for Nutrition Security and Cardiometabolic Health Equity: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

"Food Is Medicine" (FIM) represents a spectrum of food-based interventions integrated into health care for patients with specific health conditions and often social needs. Programs include medically tailored meals, groceries, and produce prescriptions, with varying levels of nutrition and culinary education. Supportive advances include expanded care pathways and payment models, e-screening for food and nutrition security, and curricular and accreditation requirements for medical nutrition education. Evidence supports positive effects of FIM on food insecurity, diet quality, glucose control, hypertension, body weight, disease self-management, self-perceived physical and mental health, and cost-effectiveness or cost savings. However, most studies to date are quasiexperimental or pre/post interventions; larger randomized trials are ongoing. New national and local programs and policies are rapidly accelerating FIM within health care. Remaining research gaps require rigorous, iterative evaluation. Successful incorporation of FIM into health care will require multiparty partnerships to assess, optimize, and scale these promising treatments to advance health and health equity.

Effect of an Intensive Food-as-Medicine Program on Health and Health Care Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Food-as-medicine programs are becoming increasingly common, and rigorous evidence is needed regarding their effects on health.

Objective

To test whether an intensive food-as-medicine program for patients with diabetes and food insecurity improves glycemic control and affects health care use.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This stratified randomized clinical trial using a wait list design was conducted from April 19, 2019, to September 16, 2022, with patients followed up for 1 year. Patients were randomly assigned to either participate in the program immediately (treatment group) or 6 months later (control group). The trial took place at 2 sites, 1 rural and 1 urban, of a large, integrated health system in the mid-Atlantic region of the US. Eligibility required a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 8% or higher, food insecurity, and residence within the service area of the participating clinics.

Intervention

The comprehensive program provided healthy groceries for 10 meals per week for an entire household, plus dietitian consultations, nurse evaluations, health coaching, and diabetes education. The program duration was typically 1 year.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was HbA1c level at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included other biometric measures, health care use, and self-reported diet and healthy behaviors, at both 6 months and 12 months.

Results

Of 3712 patients assessed for eligibility, 3168 were contacted, 1064 were deemed eligible, 500 consented to participate and were randomized, and 465 (mean [SD] age, 54.6 [11.8] years; 255 [54.8%] female) completed the study. Of those patients, 349 (mean [SD] age, 55.4 [11.2] years; 187 [53.6%] female) had laboratory test results at 6 months after enrollment. Both the treatment (n = 170) and control (n = 179) groups experienced a substantial decline in HbA1c levels at 6 months, resulting in a nonsignificant, between-group adjusted mean difference in HbA1c levels of -0.10 (95% CI, -0.46 to 0.25; P = .57). Access to the program increased preventive health care, including more mean (SD) dietitian visits (2.7 [1.8] vs 0.6 [1.3] visits in the treatment and control groups, respectively), patients with active prescription drug orders for metformin (134 [58.26] vs 119 [50.64]) and glucagon-like peptide 1 medications (114 [49.56] vs 83 [35.32]), and participants reporting an improved diet from 1 year earlier (153 of 164 [93.3%] vs 132 of 171 [77.2%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, an intensive food-as-medicine program increased engagement with preventive health care but did not improve glycemic control compared with usual care among adult participants. Programs targeted to individuals with elevated biomarkers require a control group to demonstrate effectiveness to account for improvements that occur without the intervention. Additional research is needed to design food-as-medicine programs that improve health.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03718832.

Narrative review: food as medicine across the pediatric age continuum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poor diet and food insecurity contribute to the dramatic rise in diet-related chronic disease and increasing cost of healthcare. The Food as Medicine (FAM) framework describes food-based interventions designed to prevent, manage, and treat diet-related diseases. However, FAM interventions have not been widely implemented or evaluated in pediatric populations, so critical questions remain about their optimal delivery and design, efficacy, and funding opportunities. We have reviewed the recent literature and offer insights into potential funding and implementation strategies for pediatric healthcare providers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from adult and population-level interventions provide evidence that FAM interventions positively impact diet quality, food security, health outcomes, and healthcare utilization and cost in adults and households with children. Evidence from recent pediatric-based FAM interventions and population data from recent changes to federal nutrition programs support the use of food-based interventions to improve child diet quality, food insecurity, and potentially impact long-term health and healthcare utilization and cost.

SUMMARY

Applying the entire spectrum of evidence-based FAM interventions in pediatric settings from prenatal to adolescent stages will offer the greatest opportunity to ensure all children have access to enough healthful food so they can achieve their highest potential in life.

Formative assessment of community health center Food is Medicine programs during COVID-19 in Northern California

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted implementa­tion of Food is Medicine (FIM) programs and imposed food security and healthcare-related hard­ships. Understanding access to and experiences with FIM programs during crises and among diverse populations can help build resilience of programs to future shocks. This formative, mixed-methods study aimed to (1) assess potential barriers and facilitators to access to health services during the COVID-19 pandemic, with emphasis on Food is Medicine (FIM) programs; and (2) understand the effects of the pandemic on healthcare access, food security, and related coping strategies among Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) clients. From December 2021 to September 2022, 19 inter­views (10 in English, 9 in Spanish) were conducted with clients in Yolo County, CA, with close-ended and open-ended questions about their experiences for a pre-pandemic period (before March 2020) and a pandemic period (last 12 months). Qualita­tive analysis was conducted in NVivo and using the Framework Method. Major themes identified for Objective 1 were: (1) perceived benefits of FIM programs, including increased knowledge and skills and increased access to produce; (2) barriers to program participation, including client time con­straints and limited program awareness; and (3) sat­isfaction with FQHC services. Themes identified for Objective 2 were: (1) changes in healthcare access, such as increased difficulty with access and healthcare cost, and the use of telehealth; (2) changes in food security, including economic barri­ers to purchasing quality food and the decreased quantity of food; and (3) use of federal and com­munity resources to cope with difficulties. Our results suggest potential avenues to strengthen Food is Medicine programs, and highlight the role of FQHC programs, community resources, and social networks as coping strategies for food insecurity and decreased access to care.

A Clinical-Community Partnership to Address Food Insecurity and Reduce Emergency Department Utilization Among Medicaid-Insured Patients in North Carolina

CONTEXT

Socioeconomic risk factors have the greatest impact on overall health trajectory. Patients with Medicaid insurance are more likely to experience food insecurity, in addition to poor health and increased health care utilization. Targeted food and produce prescription programs can reduce food insecurity, but sustainable implementation is challenging and evidence demonstrating the impact on clinical utilization outcomes is lacking.

PROGRAM

In 2021, a cross-sector collaboration between Mecklenburg County Public Health, Reinvestment Partners, and Atrium Health initiated a food prescription program in urban North Carolina. A low-cost mass text message campaign was used to identify and enroll Medicaid-insured patients with a history of emergency department (ED) utilization.

METHODS

A nonrandomized before/after evaluation design was used with a 12-month data collection window (6 months before/after program enrollment) for 711 patients enrolled between June 2021 and 2022. Changes in the odds of nonadmission ED utilization were modeled using logistic regression, adjusting for race/ethnicity, gender, age, comorbidity, and dose, along with interaction by comorbidity.

RESULTS

A majority of the sample was non-Hispanic Black (61%; n = 436), female (90%; n = 643), with "none to mild" chronic disease comorbidity (81%; n = 573). The unadjusted and adjusted odds of nonadmission ED utilization significantly reduced between time periods, along with significant interaction by comorbidity. Among the subsamples, patients with "none to mild" comorbidity showed 34% reduction in odds of nonadmission ED utilization (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.86).

DISCUSSION

Food prescription programming targeting Medicaid-insured patients may reduce ED utilization, particularly among those without severe comorbidity. Retrospective data collection and sample homogeneity reduced the quality of evidence, but results offer a pragmatic example that can be replicated for further study. Additional research is needed to strengthen the body of evidence and support cross-sector investment in food and produce prescription programming.

Food as medicine: a quasi-randomized control trial of two healthy food interventions for chronic disease management among ambulatory patients at an urban academic center

BACKGROUND

Globally, poor nutrition is a driver of many chronic diseases and is responsible for more deaths than any other risk factor. Accordingly, there is growing interest in the direct provision of healthy foods to patients to tackle diet-linked chronic diseases and mortality.

AIM

To assess the effect of two healthy food interventions in conjunction with nutrition counseling and education on select chronic disease markers, food insecurity, diet quality, depression, and on self-efficacy for healthy eating, healthy weight, and chronic disease management.

METHODS

This parallel-arm quasi-randomized control trial will be conducted between January 2022 and December 2023. Seventy adult patients recruited from a single academic medical center will be randomly assigned to receive either: i) daily ready-made frozen healthy meals or ii) a weekly produce box and recipes for 15 weeks. Participants will, additionally, take part in one individual nutrition therapy session and watch videos on healthy eating, weight loss, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Data on weight, height, glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and diabetes and blood pressure medications will be collected in-person at the baseline visit and at 16 weeks from baseline and via medical chart review at six months and 12 months from enrollment. The primary outcome of the study is weight loss at 16 weeks from baseline. Pre- and post-intervention survey data will be analyzed for changes in food insecurity, diet quality, depression, as well as self-efficacy for health eating, healthy weight, and chronic disease management. Through retrospective chart review, patients who received standard of care will be matched to intervention group participants as controls based on body mass index, type 2 diabetes, and/or hypertension.

FINDINGS

By elucidating the healthy food intervention with better health outcomes, this study aims to offer evidence that can guide providers in their recommendations for healthy eating options to patients.

Home-Delivered Meals and Nursing Home Placement Among People With Self-Reported Dementia: A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial

Importance

Home-delivered meals promote food security and independence among homebound older adults. However, it is unclear which of the 2 predominant modes of meal delivery, daily-delivered vs mailed (or drop-shipped) frozen meals, promotes community living for homebound older adults with dementia.

Objective

To assess the risk of nursing home admission within 6 months between homebound individuals receiving daily-delivered vs drop-shipped frozen meals.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This pilot, multisite, 2-arm, pragmatic clinical trial included older adults with self-reported dementia on waiting lists for meals at 3 Meals on Wheels (MOW) programs in Texas and Florida between April 7 and October 8, 2021, to assess time to nursing home placement.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to receive either meals delivered by an MOW driver or frozen meals that were mailed to participants' homes every 2 weeks. Participants received their assigned intervention for up to 6 months.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary study outcome was days from randomization to a Minimum Data Set nursing home admission assessment within 6 months. Feasibility of conducting this type of study was examined by tracking enrollment, examining baseline characteristics, monitoring participants' intervention fidelity, measuring the proportion of participants linked with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data, and analyzing the primary study outcome.

Results

Among 325 eligible participants who were randomized, 243 enrolled in the study (mean [SD] age, 81 [8.0] years; 152 (62.6%) were female): 128 to the daily-delivered meals group and 115 to the drop-shipped frozen meals group; 119 participants (49.0%) lived alone. Among the total participants enrolled, 227 (93.4%) were linked deterministically to their CMS data; probabilistic methods were used to link the remaining 16 participants (6.6%). At 6 months from randomization, 160 participants (65.8%) were still receiving meals, and 25 (10.1%; 95% CI, 6.3%-14.0%) were admitted to a nursing home. After adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, age, program, and living arrangement and the use of death as a censoring event, the adjusted log hazard ratio of nursing home placement between daily-delivered and drop-shipped frozen meals was -0.67 (95% CI, -1.52 to 0.19).

Conclusions and Relevance

This pilot randomized clinical trial demonstrated the feasibility of enrolling participants with self-reported dementia on waiting lists at MOW programs, linking their data, and evaluating outcomes. While this pilot study was not powered to detect meaningful, statistically significant differences in nursing home placement, its feasibility and initial results warrant exploration in a follow-on, adequately powered trial.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04850781.

Food insecurity and delayed or forgone health care among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States, 2019-2021

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing food insecurity crisis in the United States, limited evidence exists about the effects of food insecurity on the unmet health care needs of peripartum (pregnant and postpartum) women. The aim of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and delayed or forgone health care among peripartum women in the United States from 2019 to 2021.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2019, 2020, and 2021 National Health Interview Surveys. Food security status was defined by type (high/marginal, low, and very low). Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, were conducted to estimate the overall and specific delayed or forgone health care (yes or no) between the different categories of food security.

RESULTS

Of the 1525 peripartum women (weighted, N = 5,580,186), 11% of peripartum women in the United States experienced suboptimal food security in the 12 mo between 2019 and 2021, with 5% experiencing low and 5% experiencing very low food security. This included 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-8%) who reported delaying filling a medical prescription, 6% (95% CI, 5-8%) who required counseling or therapy from a mental health professional but did not receive it, 6% (5-8%) who delayed counseling or therapy from a mental health professional, 8% (95% CI, 6-10%) who needed medical care but did not receive it, and 9% (95% CI, 7-10%) who delayed medical care. Peripartum women with low and very food security were more likely to delay or forego health care due to cost concerns than food-secure peripartum women. In the multivariable analyses adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors, women with low and very low food security had higher risk for delayed or forgone health care than those with marginal or high food security.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a positive association between food insecurity and cost-related unmet health care needs among peripartum women. Future empirical studies are needed to assess the effects of peripartum health care interventions targeting food insecurity on reducing health care access disparities associated with costs and improving peripartum health outcomes.

"Because There's Experts That Do That": Lessons Learned by Health Care Organizations When Partnering with Community Organizations

BACKGROUND

Health care organizations' partnerships with community-based organizations (CBOs) are increasingly viewed as key to improving patients' social needs (e.g., food, housing, and economic insecurity). Despite this reliance on CBOs, little research explores the relationships that health care organizations develop with CBOs.

OBJECTIVE

Understand how health care organizations interact with CBOs to implement social care.

DESIGN

Thirty-three semi-structured telephone interviews collected April-July 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Administrators at 29 diverse health care organizations with active programming related to improving patients' social needs. Organizations ranged from multi-state systems to single-site practices and differed in structure, size, ownership, and geography.

MEASURES

Structure and goals of health care organizations' relationship with CBOs.

RESULTS

Most health care organizations (26 out of 29) relied on CBOs to improve their patients' social needs. Health care organization's goals for social care activities drove their relationships with CBOs. First, one-way referrals to CBOs did not require formal relationships or frequent interactions with CBOs. Second, when health care organizations contracted with CBOs to deliver discrete services, leadership-level relationships were required to launch programs while staff-to-staff interactions were used to maintain programs. Third, some health care organizations engaged in community-level activities with multiple CBOs which required more expansive, ongoing leadership-level partnerships. Administrators highlighted 4 recommendations for collaborating with CBOs: (1) engage early; (2) establish shared purpose for the collaboration; (3) determine who is best suited to lead activities; and (4) avoid making assumptions about partner organizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care organizations tailored the intensity of their relationships with CBOs based on their goals. Administrators viewed informal relationships with limited interactions between organizations sufficient for many activities. Our study offers key insights into how and when health care organizations may want to develop partnerships with CBOs.

Food Is Medicine: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association

Unhealthy diets are a major impediment to achieving a healthier population in the United States. Although there is a relatively clear sense of what constitutes a healthy diet, most of the US population does not eat healthy food at rates consistent with the recommended clinical guidelines. An abundance of barriers, including food and nutrition insecurity, how food is marketed and advertised, access to and affordability of healthy foods, and behavioral challenges such as a focus on immediate versus delayed gratification, stand in the way of healthier dietary patterns for many Americans. Food Is Medicine may be defined as the provision of healthy food resources to prevent, manage, or treat specific clinical conditions in coordination with the health care sector. Although the field has promise, relatively few studies have been conducted with designs that provide strong evidence of associations between Food Is Medicine interventions and health outcomes or health costs. Much work needs to be done to create a stronger body of evidence that convincingly demonstrates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different types of Food Is Medicine interventions. An estimated 90% of the $4.3 trillion annual cost of health care in the United States is spent on medical care for chronic disease. For many of these diseases, diet is a major risk factor, so even modest improvements in diet could have a significant impact. This presidential advisory offers an overview of the state of the field of Food Is Medicine and a road map for a new research initiative that strategically approaches the outstanding questions in the field while prioritizing a human-centered design approach to achieve high rates of patient engagement and sustained behavior change. This will ideally happen in the context of broader efforts to use a health equity-centered approach to enhance the ways in which our food system and related policies support improvements in health.

Learning in real world practice: Identifying implementation strategies to integrate health-related social needs screening within a large health system

Introduction

Health systems have many incentives to screen patients for health-related social needs (HRSNs) due to growing evidence that social determinants of health impact outcomes and a new regulatory context that requires health equity measures. This study describes the experience of one large urban health system in scaling HRSN screening by implementing improvement strategies over five years, from 2018 to 2023.

Methods

In 2018, the health system adapted a 10-item HRSN screening tool from a widely used, validated instrument. Implementation strategies aimed to foster screening were retrospectively reviewed and categorized according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Statistical process control methods were utilized to determine whether implementation strategies contributed to improvements in HRSN screening activities.

Results

There were 280,757 HRSN screens administered across 311 clinical teams in the health system between April 2018 and March 2023. Implementation strategies linked to increased screening included integrating screening within an online patient portal (ERIC strategy: involve patients/consumers and family members), expansion to discrete clinical teams (ERIC strategy: change service sites), providing data feedback loops (ERIC strategy: facilitate relay of clinical data to providers), and deploying Community Health Workers to address HRSNs (ERIC strategy: create new clinical teams).

Conclusion

Implementation strategies designed to promote efficiency, foster universal screening, link patients to resources, and provide clinical teams with an easy-to-integrate tool appear to have the greatest impact on HRSN screening uptake. Sustained increases in screening demonstrate the cumulative effects of implementation strategies and the health system's commitment toward universal screening.

Community-based organizations' perspectives on piloting health and social care integration in North Carolina

BACKGROUND

Community-based organizations (CBOs) are key players in health and social care integration initiatives, yet little is known about CBO perspectives and experiences in these pilot programs. Understanding CBO perspectives is vital to identifying best practices for successful medical and social care integration.

METHODS

From February 2021 to March 2021, we conducted surveys with 12 CBOs that participated in the North Carolina COVID-19 Social Support Program, a pre-pilot for North Carolina's Medicaid Sect. 1115 demonstration waiver program that addresses social drivers of health.

RESULTS

CBO participants preferred communication strategies that involved direct communication and felt clear communication was vital to the program's success. Participants expressed varied experiences regarding their ability to handle a changing volume of referrals. Participants identified their organizations' strengths as: strong organizational operations, past experiences with and understanding of the community, and coordination across organizations. Participants identified challenges as: difficulty communicating with clients, coping with capacity demands for scaling services, and lack of clear processes from external organizations. Almost all CBO participants expressed enthusiasm for participating in similar social care transformation programs in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

CBO participants in our study had broadly positive experiences in the pilot program and almost all would participate in a similar program in the future. Participants provided perspectives that can inform health and social care integration initiatives, including strengths and challenges in such programs. To build and sustain health and social care integration programs, it is important to: (1) support CBOs through regular, direct communication that builds trust and power-sharing between CBO and health care entities; (2) leverage CBO community expertise; and (3) pursue an individualized assessment of CBO capacity and identify CBO capacity-building strategies that ensure program success and sustainability.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical health outcomes and health-related social needs among Medicaid-Medicare dual-eligible beneficiaries.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Dual eligibles during COVID-19.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive scoping review including observational studies, clinical trials, and original empirical research studies of PubMed and CINAHL. We generated a list of terms related to programs that both serve dual eligibles and address our desired outcomes. With the assistance of a medical librarian, we identified relevant abstracts published during COVID-19 meeting our inclusion criteria. We performed full-text reviews of relevant abstracts and selected the final studies. We extracted the study population, design, and major findings, then conducted thematic analysis.

RESULTS

1100 articles were identified, with 439 deemed relevant. On full text-review, 15 articles met inclusion criteria representing more than 86 million Medicare beneficiaries. No studies were specific only to dual eligibles. Topic areas included in this review include COVID-19 case counts (2 articles), mortality (8 articles), hospitalizations (7 articles), food insecurity (1 article), self-reported mental health (1 article), and social connectedness (2 articles). Dual eligibles had disparate COVID-19-related outcomes from Medicare-only enrollees in 12 of 15 studies. Studies show higher mortality for dual eligibles overall, but this was not true for dual eligibles in nursing homes and assisted living communities. Dual eligibles were more likely to experience food insecurity. More favorably, dual eligibles reported greater social connectedness.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Dual eligibles had different outcomes from Medicare-only recipients in multiple health outcomes and health-related social needs during COVID-19, but studies are limited, particularly in terms of health-related social needs. Future work focusing on outcomes only among dual-eligible beneficiaries, integrated care programs, and fiscal alignment between Medicare and Medicaid plans may help stakeholders address health needs specific to dual eligibles.

"I Felt Like I Had Something I Could Do About It": Pediatric Clinician Experiences With a Food Insecurity-Focused Produce Prescription Program

Efforts to address food insecurity (FI) in pediatric clinics have increased over the last decade, particularly after a groundbreaking 2015 American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement supporting universal routine screening and intervening. Produce prescription programs are a novel strategy addressing FI. Limited data exist on effectiveness and feasibility in pediatric clinical settings. This study explored clinician experiences after enrolling patients who completed a produce prescription program in an urban primary-care clinic in Washington, DC. One year after program completion, the experiences of 11 clinicians were explored through qualitative interviews and coded using thematic content analysis. Identified themes explored changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Clinicians expressed that the program offered a tangible resource to address FI, building trust and strengthening their sense of self-efficacy in addressing families' concerns. Incorporation of a produce prescription intervention to address FI was feasible and well accepted by pediatric primary-care clinicians.

Can tailored home-delivered meal services alleviate self-rated frailty of the low-income older adults in Korea?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine whether the tailored home-delivered meal (HDM) services included nutrition counseling impacts alleviating self-rated frailty among low-income older adults in Korea.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Pre- and post-test were implemented on May 27 and on November 25 in 2019 during 3 weeks, respectively, before and after the 6 months intervention program. Participants completed a questionnaire measuring frailty, malnutrition, food security, depression, and underlying diseases. Initially, 136 older adults were selected as participants for this study, they were recipients of a free meal program from 2 senior welfare centers in Seoul, the final sample size of those who completed the intervention program was 117 (female 70.9%, male 29.1%). Statistical analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS package program, paired t-test and χ2 test to validate the test.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in the score of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) before and after receiving the tailored HDM services (pre-test 9.46, post-test 2.8, P < 0.01). The differences in the score of TFI by 3 risk groups at the pre-test decreased as a result of receiving these services.

CONCLUSIONS

The tailored HDM services alleviated the self-rated frailty of low-income older adults with limited mobility in a community setting. Based on the positive outcomes this study could be applied to developing social services for aging in place.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of medically tailored meals compared to usual care among individuals with type 2 diabetes in Australia

BACKGROUND

'Food is medicine' strategies aim to integrate food-based nutrition interventions into healthcare systems and are of growing interest to healthcare providers and policy makers. 'Medically Tailored Meals' (MTM) is one such intervention, which involves the 'prescription' by healthcare providers of subsidized, pre-prepared meals for individuals to prevent or manage chronic conditions, combined with nutrition education.

OBJECTIVE

This study will test the efficacy of an MTM program in Australia among participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hyperglycemia, who experience difficulties accessing and eating nutritious food.

METHODS

This study will be a two-arm parallel trial (goal n = 212) with individuals randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a MTM intervention group or a control group (106 per arm). Over 26 weeks, the intervention group will be prescribed 20 MTM per fortnight and up to 3 sessions with an accredited dietitian. Controls will continue with their usual care. The primary outcome is glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %) and secondary outcomes include differences in blood pressure, blood lipids and weight, all measured at 26 weeks. Process and economic data will be analyzed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Recruitment commenced in the first quarter of 2023, with analyses and results anticipated to be available by March 2025.

DISCUSSION

Few randomized controlled trials have assessed the impact of MTM on clinical outcomes. This Australian-first trial will generate robust data to inform the case for sustained, large-scale implementation of MTM to improve the management of T2D among vulnerable populations.

ANZCTR

ACTRN12622000852752.

PROTOCOL VERSION

Version 1.1, July 2023.

A Collaborative Pilot to Support Patients With Diabetes Through Tailored Food Box Home Delivery

We conducted a randomized, controlled prospective pilot study to determine feasibility and impact of food bank and health system collaboration to home-delivered food to adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus experiencing food insecurity. Treatment group received biweekly, ethnically tailored, home-delivered food for 24 weeks. Analysis included intervention feasibility and impact on healthcare utilization, HbA1c, and other health-related measures. Intervention was feasible and successful with high levels of participant satisfaction. At baseline, participants with highest HbA1c reported poorer health, lower medication adherence and self-care, and higher diabetes distress and medicine for food tradeoffs. At 24 weeks, treatment group reported improved food security and health status. There were no differences in HbA1c or healthcare utilization measures between the two groups. It is feasible for a community food bank and nearby hospital to successfully collaborate and provide supplemental food staples to food insecure adults with type 2 diabetes and improve food insecurity and health status. Public policy efforts should utilize and expand this strategy with the goal of improving health and reducing health disparities. Future work could include more comprehensive food support focused on those with poorest glycemic control, and expanded, coordinated interventions directed at other social determinants of health. Future programming and policies should be cocreated with community input to ensure greatest success.

Food Access Support Technology (FAST): a Centralized City-Wide Platform for Rapid Response to Food Insecurity

BACKGROUND

Food access for patients remains a critical need for health systems to address given varying resource availability and inefficient coordination among health and food services.

AIM

Develop and evaluate the Food Access Support Technology (FAST), a centralized digital platform for food access that pairs health systems with food and delivery community-based organizations (CBOs).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Two health systems, 12 food partners, and 2 delivery partners in Philadelphia, PA.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

Using FAST, referrers can post requests for food delivery on recipients' behalf, which are reviewed and claimed by eligible CBOs that can prepare food boxes for delivery to people's homes.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Between March 2021 and July 2022, FAST received 364 requests, representing 207 food insecure households in 51 postal codes. The platform facilitated the completion of 258 (70.9%) requests, with a median completion time of 5 (IQR 0-7) days and a median of only 1.5 days (IQR 0-5) for requests marked "urgent." Qualitative interviews with FAST end-users endorsed the usability of the FAST platform and its effectiveness in facilitating resource-sharing between partners.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that centralized platforms can address household food insecurity by (1) streamlining partnerships between health systems and CBOs for food delivery and (2) facilitating the real-time coordination of resources among CBOs.

Perceptions of North Carolina's Medicaid Transformation: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

In 2021, North Carolina switched 1.6 million beneficiaries from a fee-for-service Medicaid model to a managed care system. The state prepared beneficiaries with logistical planning and a communications plan. However, the rollout occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, creating significant challenges. Little is known about how Medicaid Transformation impacted the experience of Medicaid enrollees.

METHODS

We conducted four focus groups (N = 22) with Medicaid beneficiaries from January to March 2022 to gain insight into their experience with Medicaid Transformation. A convenience sample was recruited. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and verified. A codebook was developed using inductive and deductive codes. Two study team members independently coded the transcripts; discrepancies were resolved among the research team. Themes were derived by their prevalence and salience within the data.

RESULTS

We identified four major themes: 1) Participants expressed confusion about the signup process; 2) Participants had a limited understanding of their new plans; 3) Participants expressed difficulty accessing services through their plans; and 4) Participants primarily noted negative changes to their care. These findings suggest that Medicaid enrollees felt unsupported during the enrollment process and had difficulty accessing assistance to gain a better understanding of their plans and new services.

LIMITATIONS

Participants were recruited from a single institution in the Southeastern United States; results may not be transferable to other institutions. Participants were likely not representative of all Medicaid Transformation beneficiaries; only English-speaking participants were included.

CONCLUSION

As the transition process continues, the North Carolina Medicaid program can benefit from integrating recommendations identified by member input to guide strategies for addressing whole-person care.

Association of a Medicare Advantage Posthospitalization Home Meal Delivery Benefit With Rehospitalization and Death

Importance

The 2018 Chronic Care Act allowed Medicare Advantage plans to have greater flexibility in offering supplemental benefits, such as meals and services, to address unmet needs of beneficiaries with certain chronic conditions. Based on earlier studies of community-based nutritional support, such programs may result in reduced use.

Objective

To evaluate the association of a 4-week posthospitalization home-delivered meals benefit with 30-day all-cause rehospitalization and mortality in patients admitted for heart failure (HF) and other acute medical conditions (non-HF).

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, patients who received meals (the meals group) were compared with 2 controls: (1) no meals in the 2019 historical cohort who would have been eligible for the benefit (the no meals-2019 group) and (2) no meals in the 2021 and 2022 concurrent cohort who were referred but did not receive the meals due to unsuccessful contacts and active declines (the no meals-2021/2022 group). This study took place in a large integrated health care system in southern California among Medicare Advantage members with a hospitalization for HF or other acute medical conditions at 15 Kaiser Permanente hospitals discharged to home.

Exposure

The exposure was receipt of at least 1 and up to 4 shipments of home-delivered meals (total of 56 to 84 meals) after hospital discharge.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were 30-day all-cause composite rehospitalization and death.

Results

A total of 4032 adults with admission to the hospital for HF (mean [SD] age, 79 [9] years; 1951 [48%] White; 2001 [50%] female) and 7944 with non-HF admissions (mean [SD] age, 78 [8] years; 3890 [49%] White; 4149 [52%] female) were included in the analyses. Unadjusted rates of 30-day death and rehospitalization for the meals, no meals-2019, and no meals-2021/2022 cohorts were as follows: HF: 23.3%, 30.1%, and 38.5%; non-HF: 16.5%, 22.4%, and 32.9%, respectively. For HF, exposure to meals was significantly associated with lower odds of 30-day death and rehospitalization compared with the no meals-2021/2022 cohort (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.71; P < .001) but was not significant compared with the no meals-2019 cohort (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.04; P = .12). For non-HF, exposure to meals was associated with significantly lower odds of 30-day death and rehospitalization when compared with the no meals-2019 (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79; P < .001) and the no meals-2021/2022 (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.37-0.62; P < .001) cohorts.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, exposure to posthospitalization home-delivered meals was associated with lower 30-day rehospitalization and mortality; randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Healthcare-based interventions to address food insecurity during pregnancy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study was a systematic review aimed to assess published literature regarding healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy and their effects on patient-reported, pregnancy, or nutritional outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in February 2022 (subsequently updated in August 2022) using Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus using terms related to food insecurity interventions during pregnancy.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies examining healthcare-based interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy with patient-reported outcomes (eg, program satisfaction), adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, preterm birth), or nutritional outcomes (eg, dietary intake) were included. Studies using data before 1995, conducted outside the United States, or focused solely on dietary content or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program as the intervention of interest were excluded.

METHODS

Of note, 3 authors screened the abstracts and full articles for inclusion. The final cohort included 5 studies. Moreover, 3 authors independently extracted data from each article and assessed the study quality using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations and the risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Study Quality Assessment tools.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 studies describing the interventions addressing food insecurity during pregnancy were included. Study designs included prospective cohort (n=1) and retrospective cohort (n=4) studies. There was heterogeneity in the type of intervention, with 3 using food vouchers, 1 focusing on a group prenatal service with nutrition and food management education, and 1 using a food connection program. Most studies (4 [80%]) shared patient-reported outcomes (eg, food security levels and program utilization rates), with 2 studies examining pregnancy-related outcomes (ie, glucose level, blood pressure, and preterm birth) and 2 studies examining nutritional outcomes. The interventions were associated with improved levels of food insecurity, reduced odds of preterm birth, and improved blood pressure trends; the findings demonstrated a 56% to 81% program utilization rate. All studies exhibited moderate to low study quality, with fair to good internal validity.

CONCLUSION

Although data on healthcare-based interventions targeted at food insecurity during pregnancy are limited, the few studies identified suggest that such interventions may affect pregnancy outcomes. A better understanding of the local scope and context of food insecurity and community-based organizations' efforts not captured by the literature in this area can help inform the development of interventions targeting food access during pregnancy.

The Social Determinants of Health and Their Impact on Dermatologic Health, Part 2: Taking Action to Address the Social Determinants of Health

The social determinants of health (SDoH) impact health and lead to health disparities in a variety of complex and intersecting ways. They are the nonmedical factors that must be addressed to improve health outcomes and achieve greater health equity. The SDoH contribute to dermatologic health disparities and decreasing these disparities requires multilevel action. Part 2 of this 2-part review offers a framework that dermatologists can use to help address the SDoH both at the point of care and in the health care system at large.

Delivering Food Resources and Kitchen Skills (FoRKS) to Adults with Food Insecurity and Hypertension: A Pilot Study

Food insecurity affects nearly 50 million Americans and is linked to cardiovascular disease risk factors and health disparities. The purpose of this single-arm pilot study was to determine the feasibility of a 16-week dietitian-led lifestyle intervention to concurrently address food access, nutrition literacy, cooking skills, and hypertension among safety-net primary care adult patients. The Food Resources and Kitchen Skills (FoRKS) intervention provided nutrition education and support for hypertension self-management, group kitchen skills and cooking classes from a health center teaching kitchen, medically tailored home-delivered meals and meal kits, and a kitchen toolkit. Feasibility and process measures included class attendance rates and satisfaction and social support and self-efficacy toward healthy food behaviors. Outcome measures included food security, blood pressure, diet quality, and weight. Participants (n = 13) were on average {mean (SD)} aged 58.9 ± 4.5 years, 10 were female, and 12 were Black or African American. Attendance averaged 19 of 22 (87.1%) classes and satisfaction was rated as high. Food self-efficacy and food security improved, and blood pressure and weight declined. FoRKS is a promising intervention that warrants further evaluation for its potential to reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors among adults with food insecurity and hypertension.

The Effect of Food is Medicine Interventions on Diabetes-related Health Outcomes Among Low-income and Food-insecure Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aim to review the current evidence of Food is Medicine interventions on diabetes outcomes among low-income or food-insecure individuals.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched from January 1, 2000 to October 26, 2021 for full-text articles written in English. The studies included experimental studies of any duration and design which addressed the effect of Food is Medicine interventions on fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels among low-income or food-insecure populations with prediabetes or diabetes of any age group. Only direction of effect of interventions on F&V intake were ascertained due to high variability in outcome measurement. A1C results were pooled using generic inverse variance with a fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and quantified by I².

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. Five of the 8 studies reported a significant increase in F&V intake. Seven of the 14 studies reported a significant decrease in A1C levels. A meta-analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials (n=843) resulted in clinically meaningful reductions in A1C compared with control (mean difference, -0.47%; 95% confidence interval, -0.66 to -0.29, I²=88%, p<0.0001). Half (n=8) of the studies have a high risk of bias due to missing data, detection bias, and confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Food is Medicine interventions are effective in increasing F&V intake and reducing A1C levels of the target population. More randomized controlled studies are needed to validate the results.

Interactive association of chronic illness and food insecurity with emergency department utilization among school-age children in the United States: A cross-sectional study

Background and Aims

Food insecurity combined with chronic disease conditions is a risk factor for Emergency Department (ED) utilization, an indicator of poor quality of care. However, such an association is not certain among school-age children with chronic conditions. Therefore, we aim to determine the association of food insecurity, chronic conditions, and ED utilization among school-age children in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed the data from the 2017 Medical expenditure panel survey (MEPS) among children aged 6-17 years (N = 5518). MEPS data was released electronically by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). We identified four groups of school-age children based on the presence of food security and chronic conditions: 1) with food insecurity and chronic conditions; 2) no food insecurity and chronic conditions; 3) with food insecurity and no chronic conditions; and 4) no food insecurity and no chronic conditions. We compared ED utilization among these four groups using incidence rate ratios (IRR) after adjusting children's age, sex, race and ethnicity, household income, insurance coverage, obesity, and geographic region using count data model, specifically multivariable Poison regression. We used SAS 9.4 and STATA 14.2 for all the data analyses.

Results

There were unweighted 5518 school-age children who represented weighted 50,479,419 school-age children in the final analysis. Overall, 6.0% had food insecurity with chronic conditions. These children had higher ED utilization (19.7%) than the other three groups (13.3%, 8.8%, and 7.2%, p < 0.001). The adjusted IRR of ED utilization among school-age children with food insecurity and chronic conditions was 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.20-3.01, p = 0.007) compared with those with food security and chronic conditions.

Conclusion

One in 16 school-age children has both food insecurity and chronic conditions. Food insecurity was positively associated with frequent ED visits in the presence of chronic conditions. Therefore, addressing food insecurity may reduce the risk of ED visits.