1
|
Reith C, Preiss D, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Spata E, Davies K, Halls H, Harper C, Holland L, Wilson K, Roddick AJ, Cannon CP, Clarke R, Colhoun HM, Durrington PN, Goto S, Hitman GA, Hovingh GK, Jukema JW, Koenig W, Marschner I, Mihaylova B, Newman C, Probsfield JL, Ridker PM, Sabatine MS, Sattar N, Schwartz GG, Tavazzi L, Tonkin A, Trompet S, White H, Yusuf S, Armitage J, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R, Baigent C, Barnes E, Fulcher J, Herrington WG, Kirby A, O'Connell R, Amarenco P, Arashi H, Barter P, Betteridge DJ, Blazing M, Blauw GJ, Bosch J, Bowman L, Braunwald E, Bulbulia R, Byington R, Clearfield M, Cobbe S, Dahlöf B, Davis B, de Lemos J, Downs JR, Fellström B, Flather M, Ford I, Franzosi MG, Fuller J, Furberg C, Glynn R, Goldbourt U, Gordon D, Gotto, Jr A, Grimm R, Gupta A, Hawkins CM, Haynes R, Holdaas H, Hopewell J, Jardine A, Kastelein JJP, Kean S, Kearney P, Kitas G, Kjekshus J, Knatterud G, Knopp RH, Koren M, Krane V, Landray M, LaRosa J, Latini R, Lonn E, Lucci D, MacFadyen J, Macfarlane P, MacMahon S, Maggioni A, Marchioli R, Moyé L, Murphy S, Neil A, Nicolis EB, Packard C, Parish S, Pedersen TR, Peto R, Pfeffer M, Poulter N, Pressel S, Probstfield J, Rahman M, Robertson M, Sacks F, Schmieder R, Serruys P, Sever P, Shaw J, Shepherd J, Simpson L, Sleight P, Smeeth L, Tobert J, Tognoni G, Varigos J, Wanner C, Wedel H, Weis S, Welch KM, Wikstrand J, Wilhelmsen L, Wiviott S, Yamaguchi J, Young R, Zannad F. Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12:306-319. [PMID: 38554713 PMCID: PMC7615958 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00040-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses of summary data from randomised controlled trials have shown that statin therapy increases the risk of diabetes, but less is known about the size or timing of this effect, or who is at greatest risk. We aimed to address these gaps in knowledge through analysis of individual participant data from large, long-term, randomised, double-blind trials of statin therapy. METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of statin therapy that participated in the CTT Collaboration. All double-blind randomised controlled trials of statin therapy of at least 2 years' scheduled duration and with at least 1000 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. All recorded diabetes-related adverse events, treatments, and measures of glycaemia were sought from eligible trials. Meta-analyses assessed the effects of allocation to statin therapy on new-onset diabetes (defined by diabetes-related adverse events, use of new glucose-lowering medications, glucose concentrations, or HbA1c values) and on worsening glycaemia in people with diabetes (defined by complications of glucose control, increased use of glucose-lowering medication, or HbA1c increase of ≥0·5%). Standard inverse-variance-weighted meta-analyses of the effects on these outcomes were conducted according to a prespecified protocol. FINDINGS Of the trials participating in the CTT Collaboration, 19 trials compared statin versus placebo (123 940 participants, 25 701 [21%] with diabetes; median follow-up of 4·3 years), and four trials compared more versus less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 5340 [17%] with diabetes, median follow-up of 4·9 years). Compared with placebo, allocation to low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 10% proportional increase in new-onset diabetes (2420 of 39 179 participants assigned to receive a statin [1·3% per year] vs 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to receive placebo [1·2% per year]; rate ratio [RR] 1·10, 95% CI 1·04-1·16), and allocation to high-intensity statin therapy resulted in a 36% proportional increase (1221 of 9935 participants assigned to receive a statin [4·8% per year] vs 905 of 9859 participants assigned to receive placebo [3·5% per year]; 1·36, 1·25-1·48). For each trial, the rate of new-onset diabetes among participants allocated to receive placebo depended mostly on the proportion of participants who had at least one follow-up HbA1c measurement; this proportion was much higher in the high-intensity than the low-intensity or moderate-intensity trials. Consequently, the main determinant of the magnitude of the absolute excesses in the two types of trial was the extent of HbA1c measurement rather than the proportional increase in risk associated with statin therapy. In participants without baseline diabetes, mean glucose increased by 0·04 mmol/L with both low-intensity or moderate-intensity (95% CI 0·03-0·05) and high-intensity statins (0·02-0·06), and mean HbA1c increased by 0·06% (0·00-0·12) with low-intensity or moderate-intensity statins and 0·08% (0·07-0·09) with high-intensity statins. Among those with a baseline measure of glycaemia, approximately 62% of new-onset diabetes cases were among participants who were already in the top quarter of the baseline distribution. The relative effects of statin therapy on new-onset diabetes were similar among different types of participants and over time. Among participants with baseline diabetes, the RRs for worsening glycaemia were 1·10 (1·06-1·14) for low-intensity or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 1·24 (1·06-1·44) for high-intensity statin therapy compared with placebo. INTERPRETATION Statins cause a moderate dose-dependent increase in new diagnoses of diabetes that is consistent with a small upwards shift in glycaemia, with the majority of new diagnoses of diabetes occurring in people with baseline glycaemic markers that are close to the diagnostic threshold for diabetes. Importantly, however, any theoretical adverse effects of statins on cardiovascular risk that might arise from these small increases in glycaemia (or, indeed, from any other mechanism) are already accounted for in the overall reduction in cardiovascular risk that is seen with statin therapy in these trials. These findings should further inform clinical guidelines regarding clinical management of people taking statin therapy. FUNDING British Heart Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu R, Williams C, Zhou J, Schlackow I, Emberson J, Reith C, Keech A, Robson J, Armitage J, Gray A, Simes J, Baigent C, Mihaylova B, Armitage J, Baigent C, Barnes E, Blackwell L, Collins R, Davies K, Emberson J, Fulcher J, Halls H, Herrington WG, Holland L, Keech A, Kirby A, Mihaylova B, O'Connell R, Preiss D, Reith C, Simes J, Wilson K, Blazing M, Braunwald E, Lemos JD, Murphy S, Pedersen TR, Pfeffer M, White H, Wiviott S, Clearfield M, Downs JR, Gotto A, Weis S, Fellström B, Holdaas H, Jardine A, Pedersen TR, Gordon D, Davis B, Furberg C, Grimm R, Pressel S, Probstfield JL, Rahman M, Simpson L, Koren M, Dahlöf B, Gupta A, Poulter N, Sever P, Wedel H, Knopp RH, Cobbe S, Fellström B, Holdaas H, Jardine A, Schmieder R, Zannad F, Betteridge DJ, Colhoun HM, Durrington PN, Fuller J, Hitman GA, Neil A, Braunwald E, Davis B, Hawkins CM, Moyé L, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Kjekshus J, Wedel H, Wikstrand J, Wanner C, Krane V, Franzosi MG, Latini R, Lucci D, Maggioni A, Marchioli R, Nicolis EB, Tavazzi L, Tognoni G, Bosch J, Lonn E, Yusuf S, Armitage J, Bowman L, Collins R, Keech A, Landray M, Parish S, Peto R, Sleight P, Kastelein JJ, Pedersen TR, Glynn R, Gotto A, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, MacFadyen J, Ridker PM, Keech A, MacMahon S, Marschner I, Tonkin A, Shaw J, Simes J, White H, Serruys PW, Knatterud G, Blauw GJ, Cobbe S, Ford I, Macfarlane P, Packard C, Sattar N, Shepherd J, Trompet S, Braunwald E, Cannon CP, Murphy S, Collins R, Armitage J, Bowman L, Bulbulia R, Haynes R, Parish S, Peto R, Sleight P, Amarenco P, Welch KM, Kjekshus J, Pedersen TR, Wilhelmsen L, Barter P, Gotto A, LaRosa J, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Cobbe S, Ford I, Kean S, Macfarlane P, Packard C, Roberston M, Sattar N, Shepherd J, Young R, Arashi H, Clarke R, Flather M, Goto S, Goldbourt U, Hopewell J, Hovingh GK, Kitas G, Newman C, Sabatine MS, Schwartz GG, Smeeth L, Tobert J, Varigos J, Yamamguchi J. Long-term cardiovascular risks and the impact of statin treatment on socioeconomic inequalities: a microsimulation model. Br J Gen Pract 2024; 74:BJGP.2023.0198. [PMID: 38373851 PMCID: PMC10904120 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND UK cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and mortality have declined in recent decades but socioeconomic inequalities persist. AIM To present a new CVD model, and project health outcomes and the impact of guideline-recommended statin treatment across quintiles of socioeconomic deprivation in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING A lifetime microsimulation model was developed using 117 896 participants in 16 statin trials, 501 854 UK Biobank (UKB) participants, and quality-of-life data from national health surveys. METHOD A CVD microsimulation model was developed using risk equations for myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularisation, cancer, and vascular and non-vascular death, estimated using trial data. The authors calibrated and further developed this model in the UKB cohort, including further characteristics and a diabetes risk equation, and validated the model in UKB and Whitehall II cohorts. The model was used to predict CVD incidence, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the impact of UK guideline-recommended statin treatment across socioeconomic deprivation quintiles. RESULTS Age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular events were key CVD risk determinants. Model-predicted event rates corresponded well to observed rates across participant categories. The model projected strong gradients in remaining life expectancy, with 4-5-year (5-8 QALYs) gaps between the least and most socioeconomically deprived quintiles. Guideline-recommended statin treatment was projected to increase QALYs, with larger gains in quintiles of higher deprivation. CONCLUSION The study demonstrated the potential of guideline-recommended statin treatment to reduce socioeconomic inequalities. This CVD model is a novel resource for individualised long-term projections of health outcomes of CVD treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Runguo Wu
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Claire Williams
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Junwen Zhou
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Iryna Schlackow
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Emberson
- Nuffield Department of Population Health and Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christina Reith
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anthony Keech
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - John Robson
- Clinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jane Armitage
- Nuffield Department of Population Health and Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Simes
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Colin Baigent
- Nuffield Department of Population Health and Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Borislava Mihaylova
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London; associate professor and senior health economist, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sammons E, Hopewell JC, Chen F, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Valdes-Marquez E, Dayanandan R, Knott C, Murphy K, Wincott E, Baxter A, Goodenough R, Lay M, Hill M, Macdonnell S, Fabbri G, Lucci D, Fajardo-Moser M, Brenner S, Hao D, Zhang H, Liu J, Wuhan B, Mosegaard S, Herrington W, Wanner C, Angermann C, Ertl G, Maggioni A, Barter P, Mihaylova B, Mitchel Y, Blaustein R, Goto S, Tobert J, DeLucca P, Chen Y, Chen Z, Gray A, Haynes R, Armitage J, Baigent C, Wiviott S, Cannon C, Braunwald E, Collins R, Bowman L, Landray M. Long-term safety and efficacy of anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:1416-1424. [PMID: 34910136 PMCID: PMC8986460 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS REVEAL was the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate that adding cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor therapy to intensive statin therapy reduced the risk of major coronary events. We now report results from extended follow-up beyond the scheduled study treatment period. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 30 449 adults with prior atherosclerotic vascular disease were randomly allocated to anacetrapib 100 mg daily or matching placebo, in addition to open-label atorvastatin therapy. After stopping the randomly allocated treatment, 26 129 survivors entered a post-trial follow-up period, blind to their original treatment allocation. The primary outcome was first post-randomization major coronary event (i.e. coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) during the in-trial and post-trial treatment periods, with analysis by intention-to-treat. Allocation to anacetrapib conferred a 9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3-15%; P = 0.004] proportional reduction in the incidence of major coronary events during the study treatment period (median 4.1 years). During extended follow-up (median 2.2 years), there was a further 20% (95% CI 10-29%; P < 0.001) reduction. Overall, there was a 12% (95% CI 7-17%, P < 0.001) proportional reduction in major coronary events during the overall follow-up period (median 6.3 years), corresponding to a 1.8% (95% CI 1.0-2.6%) absolute reduction. There were no significant effects on non-vascular mortality, site-specific cancer, or other serious adverse events. Morbidity follow-up was obtained for 25 784 (99%) participants. CONCLUSION The beneficial effects of anacetrapib on major coronary events increased with longer follow-up, and no adverse effects emerged on non-vascular mortality or morbidity. These findings illustrate the importance of sufficiently long treatment and follow-up duration in randomized trials of lipid-modifying agents to assess their full benefits and potential harms. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 48678192; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01252953; EudraCT No. 2010-023467-18.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Sammons
- REVEAL Central Coordinating Office, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Armitage J, Baigent C, Barnes E, Betteridge DJ, Blackwell L, Blazing M, Bowman L, Braunwald E, Byington R, Cannon C, Clearfield M, Colhoun H, Collins R, Dahlöf B, Davies K, Davis B, de Lemos J, Downs JR, Durrington P, Emberson J, Fellström B, Flather M, Ford I, Franzosi MG, Fulcher J, Fuller J, Furberg C, Gordon D, Goto S, Gotto A, Halls H, Harper C, Hawkins CM, Herrington W, Hitman G, Holdaas H, Holland L, Jardine A, Jukema JW, Kastelein J, Kean S, Keech A, Kirby A, Kjekshus J, Knatterud (deceased) G, Knopp (deceased) R, Koenig W, Koren M, Krane V, Landray MJ, LaRosa J, Lonn E, MacFarlane P, MacMahon S, Maggioni A, Marchioli R, Marschner I, Mihaylova B, Moyé L, Murphy S, Nakamura H, Neil A, Newman C, O'Connell R, Packard C, Parish S, Pedersen T, Peto R, Pfeffer M, Poulter N, Preiss D, Reith C, Ridker P, Robertson M, Sacks F, Sattar N, Schmieder R, Serruys P, Sever P, Shaw J, Shear C, Simes J, Sleight P, Spata E, Tavazzi L, Tobert J, Tognoni G, Tonkin A, Trompet S, Varigos J, Wanner C, Wedel H, White H, Wikstrand J, Wilhelmsen L, Wilson K, Young R, Yusuf S, Zannad F. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2019; 393:407-415. [PMID: 30712900 PMCID: PMC6429627 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31942-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 428] [Impact Index Per Article: 85.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2017] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statin therapy has been shown to reduce major vascular events and vascular mortality in a wide range of individuals, but there is uncertainty about its efficacy and safety among older people. We undertook a meta-analysis of data from all large statin trials to compare the effects of statin therapy at different ages. METHODS In this meta-analysis, randomised trials of statin therapy were eligible if they aimed to recruit at least 1000 participants with a scheduled treatment duration of at least 2 years. We analysed individual participant data from 22 trials (n=134 537) and detailed summary data from one trial (n=12 705) of statin therapy versus control, plus individual participant data from five trials of more intensive versus less intensive statin therapy (n=39 612). We subdivided participants into six age groups (55 years or younger, 56-60 years, 61-65 years, 66-70 years, 71-75 years, and older than 75 years). We estimated effects on major vascular events (ie, major coronary events, strokes, and coronary revascularisations), cause-specific mortality, and cancer incidence as the rate ratio (RR) per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol. We compared proportional risk reductions in different age subgroups by use of standard χ2 tests for heterogeneity when there were two groups, or trend when there were more than two groups. FINDINGS 14 483 (8%) of 186 854 participants in the 28 trials were older than 75 years at randomisation, and the median follow-up duration was 4·9 years. Overall, statin therapy or a more intensive statin regimen produced a 21% (RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·77-0·81) proportional reduction in major vascular events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol. We observed a significant reduction in major vascular events in all age groups. Although proportional reductions in major vascular events diminished slightly with age, this trend was not statistically significant (ptrend=0·06). Overall, statin or more intensive therapy yielded a 24% (RR 0·76, 95% CI 0·73-0·79) proportional reduction in major coronary events per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, and with increasing age, we observed a trend towards smaller proportional risk reductions in major coronary events (ptrend=0·009). We observed a 25% (RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·73-0·78) proportional reduction in the risk of coronary revascularisation procedures with statin therapy or a more intensive statin regimen per 1·0 mmol/L lower LDL cholesterol, which did not differ significantly across age groups (ptrend=0·6). Similarly, the proportional reductions in stroke of any type (RR 0·84, 95% CI 0·80-0·89) did not differ significantly across age groups (ptrend=0·7). After exclusion of four trials which enrolled only patients with heart failure or undergoing renal dialysis (among whom statin therapy has not been shown to be effective), the trend to smaller proportional risk reductions with increasing age persisted for major coronary events (ptrend=0·01), and remained non-significant for major vascular events (ptrend=0·3). The proportional reduction in major vascular events was similar, irrespective of age, among patients with pre-existing vascular disease (ptrend=0·2), but appeared smaller among older than among younger individuals not known to have vascular disease (ptrend=0·05). We found a 12% (RR 0·88, 95% CI 0·85-0·91) proportional reduction in vascular mortality per 1·0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol, with a trend towards smaller proportional reductions with older age (ptrend=0·004), but this trend did not persist after exclusion of the heart failure or dialysis trials (ptrend=0·2). Statin therapy had no effect at any age on non-vascular mortality, cancer death, or cancer incidence. INTERPRETATION Statin therapy produces significant reductions in major vascular events irrespective of age, but there is less direct evidence of benefit among patients older than 75 years who do not already have evidence of occlusive vascular disease. This limitation is now being addressed by further trials. FUNDING Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, UK Medical Research Council, and British Heart Foundation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, Emberson J, Wheeler DC, Tomson C, Wanner C, Krane V, Cass A, Craig J, Neal B, Jiang L, Hooi LS, Levin A, Agodoa L, Gaziano M, Kasiske B, Walker R, Massy ZA, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Krairittichai U, Ophascharoensuk V, Fellström B, Holdaas H, Tesar V, Wiecek A, Grobbee D, de Zeeuw D, Grönhagen-Riska C, Dasgupta T, Lewis D, Herrington W, Mafham M, Majoni W, Wallendszus K, Grimm R, Pedersen T, Tobert J, Armitage J, Baxter A, Bray C, Chen Y, Chen Z, Hill M, Knott C, Parish S, Simpson D, Sleight P, Young A, Collins R. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377:2181-92. [PMID: 21663949 PMCID: PMC3145073 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1649] [Impact Index Per Article: 126.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lowering LDL cholesterol with statin regimens reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and the need for coronary revascularisation in people without kidney disease, but its effects in people with moderate-to-severe kidney disease are uncertain. The SHARP trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe in such patients. METHODS This randomised double-blind trial included 9270 patients with chronic kidney disease (3023 on dialysis and 6247 not) with no known history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. Patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily versus matching placebo. The key prespecified outcome was first major atherosclerotic event (non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-haemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularisation procedure). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00125593, and ISRCTN54137607. FINDINGS 4650 patients were assigned to receive simvastatin plus ezetimibe and 4620 to placebo. Allocation to simvastatin plus ezetimibe yielded an average LDL cholesterol difference of 0·85 mmol/L (SE 0·02; with about two-thirds compliance) during a median follow-up of 4·9 years and produced a 17% proportional reduction in major atherosclerotic events (526 [11·3%] simvastatin plus ezetimibe vs 619 [13·4%] placebo; rate ratio [RR] 0·83, 95% CI 0·74-0·94; log-rank p=0·0021). Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4·6%] vs 230 [5·0%]; RR 0·92, 95% CI 0·76-1·11; p=0·37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2·8%] vs 174 [3·8%]; RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6·1%] vs 352 [7·6%]; RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·68-0·93; p=0·0036). After weighting for subgroup-specific reductions in LDL cholesterol, there was no good evidence that the proportional effects on major atherosclerotic events differed from the summary rate ratio in any subgroup examined, and, in particular, they were similar in patients on dialysis and those who were not. The excess risk of myopathy was only two per 10,000 patients per year of treatment with this combination (9 [0·2%] vs 5 [0·1%]). There was no evidence of excess risks of hepatitis (21 [0·5%] vs 18 [0·4%]), gallstones (106 [2·3%] vs 106 [2·3%]), or cancer (438 [9·4%] vs 439 [9·5%], p=0·89) and there was no significant excess of death from any non-vascular cause (668 [14·4%] vs 612 [13·2%], p=0·13). INTERPRETATION Reduction of LDL cholesterol with simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily safely reduced the incidence of major atherosclerotic events in a wide range of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. FUNDING Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; British Heart Foundation; UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Baigent
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin J Landray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christina Reith
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jonathan Emberson
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Christoph Wanner
- Department of Medicine 1, Division of Nephrology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Vera Krane
- Department of Medicine 1, Division of Nephrology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Alan Cass
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruce Neal
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lixin Jiang
- China Oxford Centre for International Health Research, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, China
| | - Lai Seong Hooi
- Department of Medicine and Haemodialysis Unit, Sultanah Aminah Hospital, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
| | - Adeera Levin
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Agodoa
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mike Gaziano
- Harvard Medical School, VA Boston, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Robert Walker
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Otago, New Zealand
| | - Ziad A Massy
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Division of Nephrology, Amiens University Hospital, and INSERM ERI-12, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | | | - Udom Krairittichai
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vuddidhej Ophascharoensuk
- Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Hallvard Holdaas
- Renal Section, Department of Organ Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vladimir Tesar
- Department of Nephrology, First School of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrzej Wiecek
- Department of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Diederick Grobbee
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Dick de Zeeuw
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - David Lewis
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - William Herrington
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marion Mafham
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Karl Wallendszus
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Grimm
- Berman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Terje Pedersen
- University of Oslo and Centre of Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Jane Armitage
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex Baxter
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Bray
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Yiping Chen
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Zhengming Chen
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Hill
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carol Knott
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Parish
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Simpson
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Sleight
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Alan Young
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rory Collins
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Armitage J, Bowman L, Collins R, Parish S, Tobert J. Effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily on muscle and liver adverse effects in a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial in 20,536 high-risk people. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2009; 9:6. [PMID: 19442259 PMCID: PMC2676245 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6904-9-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2008] [Accepted: 03/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simvastatin reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity but, as with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, can cause significant muscle toxicity and has been associated with elevations of liver transaminases. METHODS Muscle and liver adverse effects of simvastatin 40 mg daily were evaluated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial involving 20,536 UK patients with vascular disease or diabetes (in which a substantial reduction of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity has previously been demonstrated). RESULTS The excess incidence of myopathy in the simvastatin group was < 0.1% over the 5 years of the trial, and there were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the incidence of serious hepatobiliary disease. CONCLUSION Among the many different types of high-risk patient studied (including women, older individuals and those with low cholesterol levels), there was a very low incidence (< 0.1%) of myopathy during 5 years treatment with simvastatin 40 mg daily. The risk of hepatitis, if any, was undetectable even in this very large long-term trial. Routine monitoring of liver function tests during treatment with simvastatin 40 mg is not useful.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaudiani L, Lewin A, Meneghini L, Perevozskaya I, Tobert J, Plotkin D, Mitchel Y, Shah S. 1084-169 Efficacy and safety of ezetimibe coadministered with simvastatin versus simvastatin alone in thiazolidinedione-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(04)92028-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
8
|
MacMahon M, Kirkpatrick C, Cummings CE, Clayton A, Robinson PJ, Tomiak RH, Liu M, Kush D, Tobert J. A pilot study with simvastatin and folic acid/vitamin B12 in preparation for the Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH). Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2000; 10:195-203. [PMID: 11079257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM This study was conducted in preparation for the Study Evaluating Additional Reduction in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH). SEARCH is a 12,000 patient 2X2 factorial study in post-myocardial infarction patients that will compare simvastatin 20 mg with simvastatin 80 mg to evaluate whether greater LDL-C reductions with simvastatin provide greater coronary event reductions. SEARCH will also test the hypothesis that lowering plasma homocysteine with folic acid and vitamin B12 will reduce coronary events. This pilot study was performed to determine whether any clinically meaningful interaction between simvastatin and folic acid/vitamin B12 exists. METHODS AND RESULTS Following a 2-week diet/placebo run-in period, 141 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia were randomised to one of three treatments for 6 weeks: 80 mg/day simvastatin and 2 mg folic acid/0.8 mg vitamin B12 daily (combination group); or 80 mg/day simvastatin and placebo vitamins (simvastatin alone group); or 2 mg folic acid/0.8 mg vitamin B12 daily and placebo simvastatin (vitamins alone group). The combination group and simvastatin alone group experienced similar serum lipid changes with reductions in LDL-cholesterol of 55.2% and 51.5% respectively. The combination group and vitamins alone group experienced similar homocysteine lowering with reductions in homocysteine of 25.3% and 23.1% respectively. All therapies were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS There was no detectable antagonistic effect when simvastatin and folic acid/vitamin B12 were administered concomitantly.
Collapse
|
9
|
MacMahon M, Kirkpatrick C, Cummings C, Clayton A, Robinson P, Tomiak R, Liu M, Kush D, Tobert J. Effect of simvastatin on plasma C-reactive protein and fibrinogen: A randomised controlled trial. Atherosclerosis 2000. [DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)80178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
10
|
MacMahon M, Kirkpatrick C, Cummings C, Clayton A, Tomiak R, Liu M, Kush D, Tobert J. Study evaluating additional reduction in cholesterol and homocysteine (SEARCH) pilot study with simvastatin and folic acid/vitamin B12. Atherosclerosis 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)80570-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
11
|
Gottesman I, Tobert J, Vandlen R, Gerich J. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a somatostatin analogue (L-363,586) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Life Sci 1986; 38:2211-9. [PMID: 2872569 DOI: 10.1016/0024-3205(86)90573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
To assess the pharmacologic properties and possible use in the treatment of diabetes mellitus of a recently developed analogue somatostatin (L-363,586), the analogue (2, 5, 10 or 40 micrograms/hr), somatostatin (200 micrograms/hr), or placebo were infused intravenously for 5 hours in 6 insulin-dependent diabetic subjects who were given a standard meal containing xylose. The metabolic clearance rate of the analogue (approximately 300 ml/min) was 1/6 that previously reported for somatostatin (approximately 2000 ml/min) and its half-life was approximately 20 times as great as that reported for somatostatin (45 vs 2 min). At a dose of 10 micrograms/hr, the analogue produced suppression of plasma glucagon, growth hormone, glucose, xylose and triglyceride responses to meal ingestion which were comparable to those observed when somatostatin was infused at a rate of 200 micrograms/hr. We conclude that L-363,586 is a long-acting and potent analogue of somatostatin, which has the potential for use as an adjunct to insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
|
12
|
Parker TS, McNamara DJ, Brown CD, Kolb R, Ahrens EH, Alberts AW, Tobert J, Chen J, De Schepper PJ. Plasma mevalonate as a measure of cholesterol synthesis in man. J Clin Invest 1984; 74:795-804. [PMID: 6565710 PMCID: PMC425233 DOI: 10.1172/jci111495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Measurement of mevalonic acid (MVA) concentrations in plasma or 24-h urine samples is shown to be useful in studies of the regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and cholesterol synthesis. Plasma MVA concentrations, measured either at 7-9 a.m. after an overnight fast, or throughout the 24-h cycle, were compared with cholesterol synthesis rates that were measured by the sterol balance method: plasma MVA concentrations were directly related to the rate of whole body cholesterol synthesis (r = 0.972; p less than 0.001; n = 18) over a tenfold range of cholesterol synthesis rates. Moreover, hourly examination of MVA concentrations throughout the day demonstrated that interventions such as fasting or cholesterol feeding cause suppression of the postmidnight diurnal rise in plasma MVA concentrations, with little change in the base-line of the rhythm. Thus, the daily rise and fall of plasma MVA appears to reflect changes in tissues and organs, such as the liver and intestine, that are known to be most sensitive to regulation by fasting or by dietary cholesterol. The hypothesis that short-term regulation of HMG-CoA reductase in tissues is quickly reflected by corresponding variations in plasma MVA was tested by using a specific inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, mevinolin, to block MVA synthesis. Mevinolin caused a dose-dependent lowering of plasma MVA after a single dose; and in patients who received the drug twice a day for 4 wk, it decreased 24-h urinary MVA output. Significant lowering of plasma cholesterol was achieved through administration of mevinolin at doses that only moderately limit MVA production.
Collapse
|