1
|
Lo SB, Ruprecht AL, Post KE, Eche-Ugwu IJ, Cooley ME, Temel JS, Greer JA. Dyspnea-Related Dimensions And Self-Efficacy: Associations With Well-Being in Advanced Lung Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:366-374.e1. [PMID: 38307373 PMCID: PMC11032235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Dyspnea is a complex, multidimensional symptom comprising sensory-perceptual, affective, and functional domains that commonly persists in patients with lung cancer and impairs mental health and quality of life (QOL). However, data are lacking on how dyspnea's dimensions or self-efficacy to manage dyspnea are associated with patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess the associations of dyspnea dimensions (dyspnea-related sensory-perceptual experience, affective distress, and functional impact) and dyspnea self-efficacy with depression, anxiety, and QOL in patients with advanced lung cancer reporting dyspnea. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline clinical trial data testing a supportive care intervention for dyspnea. Patients with advanced lung cancer reporting at least moderate dyspnea (≥2 on the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale) self-reported dyspnea and patient outcome measures. Hierarchical regressions tested the associations of the dyspnea dimensions with depressive and anxiety symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung) while adjusting for variables known to affect these outcomes. RESULTS The sensory-perceptual experience of dyspnea (effort) was associated with worse depressive symptoms (b = 0.21, P < 0.01) and QOL (b = -0.53, P = 0.01). Dyspnea self-efficacy was associated with improved depressive (b = -1.26, P < 0.01) and anxiety symptoms (b = -1.72, P < 0.01) and QOL (b = 3.66, P < 0.01). The affective and functional dimensions of dyspnea were not associated with the patient outcomes in the final models. CONCLUSIONS Dyspnea-related sensory-perceptual experience and self-efficacy were associated with mental health and QOL outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Examining the individual contributions of dyspnea's multiple dimensions provides a nuanced understanding of its patient impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen B Lo
- Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Anna L Ruprecht
- Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn E Post
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ijeoma Julie Eche-Ugwu
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph A Greer
- Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nayak MM, Mazzola E, Jaklitsch MT, Drehmer JE, Nabi-Burza E, Bueno R, Winickoff JP, Cooley ME. Effectiveness of a computer-facilitated intervention on improving provider delivery of tobacco treatment in a thoracic surgery and oncology outpatient setting: A pilot study. Tob Induc Dis 2024; 22:TID-22-66. [PMID: 38650848 PMCID: PMC11033978 DOI: 10.18332/tid/186272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective tobacco treatments are available but are often not delivered to individuals with an actual or potential diagnosis of thoracic malignancy. The specific aims of this study were to identify the prevalence of tobacco use and examine the effectiveness of the Clinical and community Effort Against Smoking and secondhand smoke Exposure (CEASE), a system-level computer-facilitated intervention, to improve provider delivery of tobacco treatment in a thoracic surgery and oncology outpatient setting. METHODS A pre-post-test design was used to assess the effectiveness of CEASE. A 3-step approach was used to integrate tobacco treatment into routine care: ask about tobacco use, assist with cessation, and refer to a quitline. An end-of-visit survey was conducted to collect prevalence of tobacco use and delivery of tobacco treatment. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 218 individuals were enrolled; 105 participants were in usual care (UC) and 113 were in the CEASE group. Of those who enrolled, 27.6% were never smokers in UC and 27.7% in CEASE, 60% were former smokers in UC and 50% in CEASE, and 12.4% were current smokers in UC and 21.4% in CEASE. Significant differences were noted in delivery of tobacco treatment with 15.4% having received tobacco treatment in UC compared to 62.5% in CEASE (p<0.004). CONCLUSIONS A computer-facilitated intervention increased provider delivery of tobacco treatment in a thoracic surgery and oncology outpatient setting. This intervention provided a low-resource approach that has the potential to be scaled and implemented more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manan M. Nayak
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| | - Michael T. Jaklitsch
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Jeremy E. Drehmer
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Emara Nabi-Burza
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Jonathan P. Winickoff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SS, Prasad A, Nayak MM, Chen H, Srisoem C, DeMarco RF, Castaldi P, Cooley ME. Predictors of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Adherence: Mixed-Methods Research With a Convergent Parallel Design. Ann Behav Med 2024; 58:275-285. [PMID: 38401531 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined the effect of baseline attitudes toward nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on its actual adherence in a smoking cessation intervention. PURPOSE This study (i) examined the predictability of baseline variables (quantitative data) on NRT adherence and (ii) explored the congruence of participants' statements about NRT products (qualitative data) during counseling sessions with their baseline attitudes. METHODS This is a mixed-methods research study using a convergent parallel design. Participants included 74 individuals in the treatment group who received behavioral counseling and combination NRT. A Poisson regression analysis was performed to identify baseline variables predicting NRT adherence. Thematic analysis was completed with a subset of participants (n = 38) who varied in NRT attitude scores and adherence. A joint display was created to integrate quantitative and qualitative data and discover convergence. RESULTS Approximately 59% of the participants (41/74) used NRT continuously for ≥5 weeks. Having negative attitudes toward NRT and depressive symptoms predicted NRT adherence even after controlling for education and anxiety symptoms. Thematic analysis revealed that NRT adherence is a learning process that consists of the following three distinctive but interrelated phases: (i) information needs, (ii) comprehensive readiness, and (iii) experiential learning. Of the 38 participants, 34 (89.5%) showed convergence between baseline attitude scores and statements about NRT made during counseling sessions. CONCLUSIONS Individuals who have negative attitudes toward NRT are less likely to use the products in a smoking cessation intervention. Counselors should assess attitudes toward NRT at baseline and address them proactively during counseling sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun S Kim
- Department of Nursing, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anyah Prasad
- Department of Gerontology, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Nursing, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chaowalit Srisoem
- Department of Nursing, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosanna F DeMarco
- Department of Nursing, Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Castaldi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yackel HD, Halpenny B, Abrahm JL, Ligibel J, Enzinger A, Lobach DF, Cooley ME. A qualitative analysis of algorithm-based decision support usability testing for symptom management across the trajectory of cancer care: one size does not fit all. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:63. [PMID: 38443870 PMCID: PMC10913367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02466-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with cancer experience symptoms that change across the disease trajectory. Due to the distress and cost associated with uncontrolled symptoms, improving symptom management is an important component of quality cancer care. Clinical decision support (CDS) is a promising strategy to integrate clinical practice guideline (CPG)-based symptom management recommendations at the point of care. METHODS The objectives of this project were to develop and evaluate the usability of two symptom management algorithms (constipation and fatigue) across the trajectory of cancer care in patients with active disease treated in comprehensive or community cancer care settings to surveillance of cancer survivors in primary care practices. A modified ADAPTE process was used to develop algorithms based on national CPGs. Usability testing involved semi-structured interviews with clinicians from varied care settings, including comprehensive and community cancer centers, and primary care. The transcripts were analyzed with MAXQDA using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis method. A cross tabs analysis was also performed to assess the prevalence of themes and subthemes by cancer care setting. RESULTS A total of 17 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were interviewed for usability testing. Three main themes emerged: (1) Algorithms as useful, (2) Symptom management differences, and (3) Different target end-users. The cross-tabs analysis demonstrated differences among care trajectories and settings that originated in the Symptom management differences theme. The sub-themes of "Differences between diseases" and "Differences between care trajectories" originated from participants working in a comprehensive cancer center, which tends to be disease-specific locations for patients on active treatment. Meanwhile, participants from primary care identified the sub-theme of "Differences in settings," indicating that symptom management strategies are care setting specific. CONCLUSIONS While CDS can help promote evidence-based symptom management, systems providing care recommendations need to be specifically developed to fit patient characteristics and clinical context. Findings suggest that one set of algorithms will not be applicable throughout the entire cancer trajectory. Unique CDS for symptom management will be needed for patients who are cancer survivors being followed in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ligibel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David F Lobach
- Elimu Informatics, 1709 Julian Court, 94530, El Cerrito, CA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-508, 02215, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shin J, Hammer M, Cooley ME, Cooper BA, Paul SM, Cartwright F, Kober KM, Conley YP, Levine JD, Miaskowski C. Common and distinct risk factors that influence more severe and distressing shortness of breath profiles in oncology outpatients. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7013. [PMID: 38400684 PMCID: PMC10891479 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shortness of breath occurs in 10%-70% of oncology patients. Very little is known about interindividual variability in its severity and distress and associated risk factors. Using latent profile analyses (LPAs), purpose was to identify subgroups of patients with distinct severity and distress profiles for shortness of breath as single symptom dimensions. In addition, a joint LPA was done using patients' severity AND distress ratings. For each of the three LPAs, differences among the shortness of breath classes in demographic, clinical, symptom, stress, and resilience characteristics were evaluated. METHODS Patients completed ratings of severity and distress from shortness of breath a total of six times over two cycles of chemotherapy. All of the other measures were completed at enrollment (i.e., prior to the second or third cycle of chemotherapy). Separate LPAs were done using ratings of severity and distress, as well as a joint analysis using severity AND distress ratings. Differences among the latent classes were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS For severity, two classes were identified (Slight to Moderate [91.6%] and Moderate to Severe [8.4%]). For distress, two classes were identified (A Little Bit to Somewhat [83.9%] and Somewhat to Quite a Bit [16.1%]). For the joint LPA, two classes were identified (Lower Severity and Distress [79.9%] and Higher Severity and Distress [20.1%]). While distinct risk factors were associated with each of the LPAs, across the three LPAs, the common risk factors associated with membership in the worse class included: a past or current history of smoking, poorer functional status, and higher comorbidity burden. In addition, these patients had a higher symptom burden and higher levels of cancer-specific stress. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians can use the information provided in this study to identify high-risk patients and develop individualized interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joosun Shin
- Dana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Bruce A. Cooper
- School of NursingUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Steven M. Paul
- School of NursingUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Kord M. Kober
- School of NursingUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yvette P. Conley
- School of NursingUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jon D. Levine
- School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- School of NursingUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
- School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mullins MA, Reber L, Washington A, Stasenko M, Rankin A, Friese CR, Cooley ME, Hudson MF, Wallner LP. Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in community oncology practices. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19203-19214. [PMID: 37732470 PMCID: PMC10557876 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data collection in community oncology practices is critical to identify and address cancer inequities, but less than 20% of NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP)-affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data despite widespread recommendations. We evaluated multilevel barriers and facilitators for SOGI data collection at NCORP practices. METHODS We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews at seven purposefully sampled NCORP oncology practices. We interviewed one clinician (oncologist, advanced practice provider) and one clinic staff member per practice. Thematic analysis informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. RESULTS Thematic saturation occurred after interviews at six practices and was confirmed with interviews at an additional practice. Participants highlighted multilevel barriers including low levels of understanding, information technology infrastructure, and perceived low relative priority. Not understanding the role of SOGI data in oncology care contributed to cis-heteronormative culture. At the clinic level, this culture coincided with a lack of processes and policies for collecting SOGI from all patients. At the care team level, perceived irrelevance to oncology care was related to discomfort asking SOGI, fear of patient discomfort, and limited awareness of SOGI in electronic health records. Suggested solutions included: normalizing asking SOGI questions, giving patients privacy to complete SOGI, and clarifying clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS SOGI data collection barriers stemmed from perceptions that SOGI disclosure does not influence care quality. Oncology teams may benefit from training on culturally sensitive SOGI collection, education on SOGI data relevance to oncology practices, and support for implementing SOGI data collection policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A. Mullins
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public HealthUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Lisa Reber
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public HealthUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Ariel Washington
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Marina Stasenko
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Aaron Rankin
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Christopher R. Friese
- Center for Improving Patient and Population HealthUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care ServicesDana‐Farber Cancer InstituteBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Matthew F. Hudson
- Prisma Health Cancer Institute Greenville South CarolinaGreenvilleSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Lauren P. Wallner
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
- Rogel Cancer CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bai J, Pugh SL, Eldridge R, Yeager KA, Zhang Q, Lee WR, Shah AB, Dayes IS, D'Souza DP, Michalski JM, Efstathiou JA, Longo JM, Pisansky TM, Maier JM, Faria SL, Desai AB, Seaward SA, Sandler HM, Cooley ME, Bruner DW. Neighborhood Deprivation and Rurality Associated With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer in NRG Oncology RTOG 0415. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:39-49. [PMID: 36736921 PMCID: PMC10106367 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rurality and neighborhood deprivation can contribute to poor patient-reported outcomes, which have not been systematically evaluated in patients with specific cancers in national trials. Our objective was to examine the effect of rurality and neighborhood socioeconomic and environmental deprivation on patient-reported outcomes and survival in men with prostate cancer in NRG Oncology RTOG 0415. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data from men with prostate cancer in trial NRG Oncology RTOG 0415 were analyzed; 1,092 men were randomized to receive conventional radiation therapy or hypofractionated radiation therapy. Rurality was categorized as urban or rural. Neighborhood deprivation was assessed using the area deprivation index and air pollution indicators (nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers) via patient ZIP codes. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite measured cancer-specific quality of life. The Hopkins symptom checklist measured anxiety and depression. EuroQoL-5 Dimension assessed general health. RESULTS We analyzed 751 patients in trial NRG Oncology RTOG 0415. At baseline, patients from the most deprived neighborhoods had worse bowel (P = .011), worse sexual (P = .042), and worse hormonal (P = .015) scores; patients from the most deprived areas had worse self-care (P = .04) and more pain (P = .047); and patients from rural areas had worse urinary (P = .03) and sexual (P = .003) scores versus patients from urban areas. Longitudinal analyses showed that the 25% most deprived areas (P = .004) and rural areas (P = .002) were associated with worse EuroQoL-5 Dimension visual analog scale score. Patients from urban areas (hazard ratio, 1.81; P = .033) and the 75% less-deprived neighborhoods (hazard ratio, 0.68; P = .053) showed relative decrease in risk of recurrence or death (disease-free survival). CONCLUSIONS Patients with prostate cancer from the most deprived neighborhoods and rural areas had low quality of life at baseline, poor general health longitudinally, and worse disease-free survival. Interventions should screen populations from deprived neighborhoods and rural areas to improve patient access to supportive care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinbing Bai
- Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronald Eldridge
- Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine A Yeager
- Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Qi Zhang
- Department of Geography, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - W Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amit B Shah
- WellSpan York Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania
| | - Ian S Dayes
- McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David P D'Souza
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario Schulich, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - John M Longo
- Zablocki VAMC and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Jordan M Maier
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Sergio L Faria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah W Bruner
- Emory University Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cooley ME, Biedrzycki B, Brant JM, Hammer MJ, Lally RM, Tucker S, Ginex PK. Translation of Evidence-Based Interventions Into Oncology Care Settings: An Integrative Review. Cancer Nurs 2023; 46:E110-E121. [PMID: 36480276 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adoption of evidence remains slow, leading to variations in practices and quality of care. Examining evidence-based interventions implemented within oncology settings can guide knowledge translation efforts. OBJECTIVE This integrative review aimed to (1) identify topics implemented for oncology-related evidence-based practice (EBP) change; (2) describe frameworks, guidelines, and implementation strategies used to guide change; and (3) evaluate project quality. METHODS PubMed and CINAHL were searched to identify published practice change projects. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Fifty articles met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted; content analysis was conducted. The Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set guided quality assessment. RESULTS Topics included infection control/prevention (n = 18), pain/palliative care (n = 13), psychosocial assessment (n = 11), and medication adherence (n = 8). Among the projects, Plan, Do, Study, Act (n = 8) and Lean Six Sigma (n = 6) frameworks were used most. Thirty-six projects identified guidelines that directed interventions. Multiple implementation strategies were reported in all articles with planning, education, and restructuring the most common. Reach, sustainability, and ability to be replicated were identified as quality gaps across projects. CONCLUSION The EBP topics that emerged are consistent with the oncology nursing priorities, including facilitating integration of EBP into practice. The studies identified used national guidelines and implementation strategies to move evidence into practice. Heterogeneity in measurement made synthesis of findings difficult across studies, although individual studies showed improvement in patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Development of an interprofessional oncology consortium could facilitate a standardized approach to implementation of high-priority topics that target improved patient outcomes, harmonize measures, and accelerate translation of evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Author Affiliations: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Cooley and Hammer); Formerly of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Biedrzycki); Billings Clinic, Montana (Dr Brant); University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha (Dr Lally); The Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Tucker); and Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Ginex)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Allen DH, Arthur EK, Blazey M, Brassil K, Cahill JE, Cooley ME, Fadol AP, Hammer MJ, Hartranft S, Murphy B, Nolan TS, Sun V, Whisenant M, Yoder LH. A scoping review on the nurse scientist role within healthcare systems. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2023; 20:47-55. [PMID: 36617530 DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of the nurse scientist in the clinical setting is not well defined, which contributes to variability in role implementation, scope, administration, funding, and affiliation across healthcare sites. AIMS The aim of this scoping review was to identify attributes of the clinical nurse scientist role and its operationalization in the clinical setting through available evidence. METHODS A comprehensive, computerized search of the literature in PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL was conducted in early May 2020 by a medical research librarian and repeated in July 2021 and April 2022. The 5-step framework described by Arskey and O'Malley guided the review methodology. Two reviewers conducted an independent screen of all articles, followed by a full-text review of eligible articles by two independent reviewers each using a standardized data extraction template. Themes were then organized and synthesized using descriptive content analysis from the included articles. RESULTS A final sample of 55 full-text articles were included in the review. Overall, the findings suggest that the nurse scientist role in a clinical setting can be challenging to implement in complex healthcare environments. Successful models include the nurse scientist in a leadership role, alignment of research with institutional priorities, and strong support from senior leadership. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION Findings suggest that standardized guidelines are lacking to govern the implementation of the nurse scientist role in the clinical setting. To succeed, the nurse scientist role must be valued and supported by organizational leaders. Further, access to resources to build infrastructure must be provided. The magnitude and scope of individual organizational support can be tailored based on the resources of the institution; however, the foundation of having institutional leadership support is critical to role success of the clinical nurse researcher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meghan Blazey
- University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kelly Brassil
- Pack Health, A Quest Diagnostics Company, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jennifer E Cahill
- Mass General Hospital, Yvonne L. Munn Cancer for Nursing Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anecita P Fadol
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Nursing and Cardiology, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilyn J Hammer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sue Hartranft
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Nursing Research Department, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Beverly Murphy
- Duke University Medical Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Timiya S Nolan
- The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Virginia Sun
- City of Hope Division of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences and Department of Surgery, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Meagan Whisenant
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Linda H Yoder
- University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cooley ME, Castaldi PJ, Mazzola E, Blazey MU, Nayak MM, Healey MJ, Lathan CS, Borondy-Kitts A, DeMarco RF, Kim SS. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment (ESCAPE) digitalized intervention to promote lung health in high-risk individuals who smoke. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 124:107005. [PMID: 36396069 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) is an effective screening test to decrease lung cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening may be a teachable moment helping people who smoke to quit, which may result in increased benefit of screening. Innovative strategies are needed to engage high-risk individuals in learning about LDCT screening. More precise methods such as polygenic risk scores quantify genetic predisposition to tobacco use, and optimize lung health interventions. We present the ESCAPE (Enhanced Smoking Cessation Approach to Promote Empowerment) protocol. This study will test a smoking cessation intervention using personal stories and a lung cancer screening decision-aide compared to standard care (brief advice, referral to a quit line, and a lung cancer screening decision-aide), examine the relationship between a polygenic risk score and smoking abstinence, and describe perceptions about integration of genomic information into smoking cessation treatment. A randomized controlled trial followed by a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach will compare the efficacy of the interventions. Interviews will add insight into the use of genomic information and risk perceptions to tailor smoking cessation treatment. Two-hundred and fifty individuals will be recruited from primary care, community-based organizations, mailing lists and through social media. Data will be collected at baseline, 1, 3 and 6-months. The primary outcomes are 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence and stage of lung cancer screening at 6-months. The results from this study will provide information to refine the ESCAPE intervention and facilitate integration of precision health into future lung health interventions. Clinical trial registration number: NCT0469129T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Peter J Castaldi
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, CLSB 11007, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Meghan Underhill Blazey
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642, United States of America.
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Michael J Healey
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | - Christopher S Lathan
- Department of Medicine, Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States of America.
| | | | - Rosanna F DeMarco
- Department of Nursing, Robert and Donna Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.
| | - Sun S Kim
- Department of Nursing, Robert and Donna Manning College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pozzar RA, Tavormina A, Enzinger AC, Poort H, Demarsh A, Gorra M, Cooley ME, Wright AA. Opportunities to improve care for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and their caregivers. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
207 Background: Cancers of the gynecologic and gastrointestinal tracts (GYN/GI) often metastasize along the peritoneum (peritoneal carcinomatosis; PC), causing ascites and malignant obstructions of the bowel, urinary tract, and biliary tree. Patients with PC frequently require palliative surgical interventions; e.g., ostomies, gastric tubes, and catheters. To date, few researchers have described the unique needs of these patients and their caregivers. Methods: We recruited adult patients with advanced GYN/GI cancers, a recent hospitalization for PC, and a new complex care need. We invited adult caregivers of enrolled patients to participate. We abstracted patients’ clinical characteristics and outcomes from the medical record. At baseline, patients completed items related to perceived health status and advance care planning, while caregivers completed the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) and items related to their caregiving role. All participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: Sixty-five patients and 40 caregivers completed surveys. Fifty-six (86%) patients had GYN and nine (14%) had GI cancers. Most (56/65, 86%) were re-hospitalized within two months, and over a quarter (18/65, 27%) died within six months of enrollment. Twenty-four (37%) reported they were terminally ill, but only nine (14%) had spoken with a physician about the care they would want to receive if they were dying. Caregivers were primarily spouses (27/40, 70%) who provided most or all of the care for their loved one (25/40, 63%) and engaged in caregiving seven days per week (27/40, 68%). Of the four CRA subscales measuring negative caregiving experiences, mean scores were highest for impact on schedule (3.3, SD = 0.8; possible range 1-5, higher scores indicate greater burden), followed by impact on finances (2.3, SD = 1.1), impact on health (2.0, SD = 0.65), and lack of family support (1.8, SD = 0.67). Caregivers reported that they received training on a mean of 1.1 (SD = 1.3) clinical care tasks but performed a mean of 2.9 (SD = 1.7) clinical care tasks. Thirty-two (49%) patients and 9 (23%) caregivers met borderline case or case criteria for depressive symptoms, while 26 (40%) patients and 15 (38%) caregivers met borderline case or case criteria for anxiety symptoms. Conclusions: Patients with PC and their caregivers are highly burdened and distressed. Patients are at high-risk for re-hospitalization, but few have discussed their end-of-life wishes with their medical teams. Interventions that train these patients and their caregivers to perform clinical care tasks, facilitate serious illness conversations, and provide psychosocial support are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03367247.
Collapse
|
12
|
Mullins MA, Rankin A, Washington A, Stasenko M, Friese CR, Cooley ME, Hudson MF, Wallner LP. “It really does not matter to me, they can be two purple unicorns”: Barriers and facilitators to sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measurement in the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.28_suppl.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
170 Background: Despite recommendations from numerous clinical bodies (e.g., ASCO), less than 20% of NCORP-affiliated practices regularly collect SOGI data. This gap compromises the ability to identify and correct care inequities experienced by sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals. Therefore, we evaluated provider- and clinic- level barriers and facilitators to SOGI collection at NCORP practices across the US. Methods: We conducted 14 interviews across seven NCORP oncology practices via Zoom. We purposefully sampled to ensure geographic, racial, and ethnic diversity of patient populations. We interviewed one clinician (oncologist, advanced practice provider) and one clinic staff member per practice. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) informed thematic analysis that identified barriers and facilitators to SOGI data collection. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded by two coders who adjudicated any discordance. Analyses were conducted in NVivo. Results: Thematic saturation occurred after interviews at six practices, with interviews at the seventh practice confirming saturation. Participants represented five geographic regions and included three Minority Underserved practices and two rural practices. Several organizational context characteristics influenced SOGI data collection: access to knowledge, information technology infrastructure, staff processes, and perceived relative priority of SOGI for an oncology visit. All oncologists expressed a low relative priority of sexual orientation data for oncology care. Gender identity had higher priority because it influences how clinicians should address patients. At the clinic level, this low relative priority coincides with a lack of processes and policies for collecting SOGI from all patients. At the oncology care team level, perceived irrelevance to oncology care was related to discomfort in asking SOGI, fear of patient discomfort, and limited awareness of SOGI in electronic health records. Suggested solutions included: normalizing asking SOGI questions, giving patients privacy to complete SOGI, and clarifying relevance of SOGI for clinical purposes. Understanding how SOGI improves patient experiences was a facilitator for collection. Conclusions: Within this NCORP practice sample, SOGI data collection barriers included clinician-perceived low relative priority for collection, and perceptions that SOGI disclosure does not influence care quality, despite most interviewees expressing a strong desire to show respect to patients and provide high quality cancer care. Oncology teams may benefit from training on culturally sensitive SOGI collection, education on SOGI data relevance to oncology practices, and support for implementing SOGI data collection policies.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pozzar RA, Enzinger AC, Poort H, Furey A, Donovan H, Orechia M, Thompson E, Tavormina A, Fenton AT, Jaung T, Braun IM, DeMarsh A, Cooley ME, Wright AA. Developing and Field Testing BOLSTER: A Nurse-Led Care Management Intervention to Support Patients and Caregivers following Hospitalization for Gynecologic Cancer-Associated Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:1367-1375. [PMID: 35297744 PMCID: PMC9492907 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) afflicts women with advanced gynecologic cancers. Patients with PC often require ostomies, gastric tubes, or catheters to palliate symptoms, yet patients and caregivers report feeling unprepared to manage these devices. The purpose of this study was to develop and field test the Building Out Lifelines for Safety, Trust, Empowerment, and Renewal (BOLSTER) intervention to support patients and their caregivers after hospitalization for PC. Materials and Methods: We adapted components of the Standard Nursing Intervention Protocol with stakeholders and topical experts. We developed educational content; built a smartphone application to assess patients' symptoms; and assessed preliminary feasibility and acceptability in two single-arm prepilot studies. Eligible participants were English-speaking adults hospitalized for gynecologic cancer-associated PC and their caregivers. Feasibility criteria were a ≥50% consent-to-approach ratio and ≥80% outcome measure completion. The acceptability criterion was ≥70% of participants recommending BOLSTER. Results: During the first prepilot, BOLSTER was a 10-week intervention. While 7/8 (87.5%) approached patients consented, we experienced high attrition to hospice. Less than half of patients (3/7) and caregivers (3/7) completed outcome measures. For the second prepilot, BOLSTER was a four-week intervention. All (7/7) approached patients consented. Two withdrew before participating in any study activity because they were "too overwhelmed." We excluded data from one caregiver who completed baseline measures with the patient's assistance. All remaining patients (5/5) and caregivers (4/4) completed outcome measures and recommended BOLSTER. Conclusion: BOLSTER is a technology-enhanced, nurse-led intervention that is feasible and acceptable to patients with gynecologic cancer-associated PC and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A. Pozzar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea C. Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hanneke Poort
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann Furey
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heidi Donovan
- School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meghan Orechia
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Anna Tavormina
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anny T.H.R. Fenton
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tim Jaung
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ilana M. Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrea DeMarsh
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexi A. Wright
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nayak MM, Mazzola E, Jaklitsch MT, Drehmer JE, Nabi-Burza E, Bueno R, Winickoff JP, Cooley ME. Feasibility of collecting computer-facilitated patient-reported
tobacco use, interest, and preferences for smoking cessation
in an outpatient thoracic surgery and oncology setting. Tob Induc Dis 2022; 20:63. [PMID: 35854879 PMCID: PMC9251647 DOI: 10.18332/tid/150335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Effective strategies are needed to facilitate collection of tobacco use information and integrate smoking cessation treatment into the routine care of all high-risk patient populations to improve clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to establish the feasibility of collecting computer-facilitated patient-reported tobacco use, identify patient interest and preferences for smoking cessation in an outpatient thoracic surgery and oncology setting with higher prevalence of tobacco use than the general population. METHODS A brief patient-administered tobacco screening survey was handed out on an iPad in the waiting room of a thoracic surgery and oncology practice setting to sequential patients with varying diagnoses. Tobacco use, household exposure to tobacco, and interest and preferences for smoking cessation treatment were recorded. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-squared test were used for analysis. RESULTS Of the 599 surveys administered, 594 (99%) were completed. Self-reported smoking status included 36.4% (n=218) never smokers, 53.3% (n=319) former smokers, and 10.4% (n=62) current smokers. Among current smokers, 45.2% (n=28) were interested in receiving smoking cessation treatment. Preferences for treatment included: 21.4% (n=6) who wanted Quitline only, 25% (n=7) medication alone, and 53.6% (n=15) combined Quitline plus medication. Current smokers (55.7%, n=34) were more likely to live in households with tobacco exposure compared to those with former (11.4%, n=36) or never smokers (8.3%, n=18) (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Implementing a computer-facilitated system to screen for current smoking and provide smoking cessation services was feasible in the outpatient thoracic surgery and oncology setting. Almost half of the smokers indicated an interest in receipt of smoking cessation treatment. Household exposure was more frequent among current smokers, therefore routine screening for secondhand smoke exposure from other household members is an important consideration in developing smoking cessation treatment plans to mitigate health risks among vulnerable patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manan M. Nayak
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| | - Michael T. Jaklitsch
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Jeremy E. Drehmer
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Emara Nabi-Burza
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Jonathan P. Winickoff
- Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, United States
- Tobacco Research and Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cooley ME, Mazzola E, Xiong N, Hong F, Lobach DF, Braun IM, Halpenny B, Rabin MS, Johns E, Finn K, Berry D, McCorkle R, Abrahm JL. Clinical Decision Support for Symptom Management in Lung Cancer Patients: A Group RCT. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:572-580. [PMID: 34921934 PMCID: PMC9194912 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Clinical guidelines are available to enhance symptom management during cancer treatment but often are not used in the practice setting. Clinical decision support can facilitate the implementation and adherence to clinical guidelines. and improve the quality of cancer care. OBJECTIVES Clinical decision support offers an innovative approach to integrate guideline-based symptom management into oncology care. This study evaluated the effect of clinical decision support-based recommendations on clinical management of symptoms and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) among outpatients with lung cancer. METHODS Twenty providers and 179 patients were allotted in group randomization to attention control (AC) or Symptom Assessment and Management Intervention (SAMI) arms. SAMI entailed patient-report of symptoms and delivery of recommendations to manage pain, fatigue, dyspnea, depression, and anxiety; AC entailed symptom reporting prior to the visit. Outcomes were collected at baseline, two, four and six-months. Adherence to recommendations was assessed through masked chart review. HR-QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung questionnaire. Descriptive statistics with linear and logistic regression accounting for the clustering structure of the design and a modified chi-square test were used for analyses. RESULTS Median age of patients was 63 years, 58% female, 88% white, and 32% ≤high school education. Significant differences in clinical management were evident in SAMI vs. AC for all target symptoms that passed threshold. Patients in SAMI were more likely to receive sustained-release opioids for constant pain, adjuvant medications for neuropathic pain, opioids for dyspnea, stimulants for fatigue and mental health referrals for anxiety. However, there were no statistically significant differences in HR-QOL at any time point. CONCLUSION SAMI improved clinical management for all target symptoms but did not improve patient outcomes. A larger study is warranted to evaluate effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Research in Nursing and Patient Care (M.E.C, B.H.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Data Sciences (E.M., N.X., F.H.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Niya Xiong
- Data Sciences (E.M., N.X., F.H.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Data Sciences (E.M., N.X., F.H.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Ilana M Braun
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (I.M.B., J.L.A.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Research in Nursing and Patient Care (M.E.C, B.H.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael S Rabin
- Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology (M.S.R.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellis Johns
- Family Medicine (E.J.), Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Kathleen Finn
- Clinical Research (K.F.), City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Donna Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics (D.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth McCorkle
- School of Nursing (R.M.), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care (I.M.B., J.L.A.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gray TF, Zanville N, Cohen B, Cooley ME, Starkweather A, Linder LA. Finding New Ground-Fostering Post-Traumatic Growth in Children and Adolescents After Parental Death From COVID-19. J Adolesc Health 2022; 70:10-11. [PMID: 34930565 PMCID: PMC8598317 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tamryn F. Gray
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Address correspondence to: Tamryn F. Gray, Ph.D., R.N., M.P.H., Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Noah Zanville
- Center for Clinical Advancement, Mission Health, HCA Healthcare North Carolina Division, Asheville, North Carolina
| | - Bevin Cohen
- Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Angela Starkweather
- The Center for Accelerating Precision Pain Self-Management (CAPPS-M), University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs, Connecticut
| | - Lauri A. Linder
- Division of Acute and Chronic Care, University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah,Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Leeper HE, Tonorezos E, Mayer D, Bakitas M, Chang S, Cooley ME, Hervey-Jumper S, Miaskowski C, Sherwood P, Tsien C, Wallgren K, Willmarth N, Arons D, Acquaye A, King AL, Penas-Prado M, Vera E, Gilbert MR, Armstrong TS. Proceedings of the Survivorship Care in Neuro-Oncology Workshop sponsored by the Comprehensive Oncology Network Evaluating Rare CNS Tumors (NCI-CONNECT). Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac029. [PMID: 35542753 PMCID: PMC9079897 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Survivorship for those living with primary CNS cancers begins at diagnosis, continues throughout a person's life, and includes caregivers. Opportunities and challenges exist to advance survivorship care for those living with primary CNS cancers that necessitate stakeholder involvement. Methods In June 2021, NCI-CONNECT convened a two-day virtual workshop about survivorship care in neuro-oncology. Two expert panels provided key recommendations and five working groups considered critical questions to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to the advancement of survivorship care and developed recommendations and action items. Results The following action items emanated from the workshop: seek endorsement of meeting report from stakeholder organizations; address barriers in access to survivorship care and provider reimbursement; advance survivorship research through NIH and private grant support; develop a survivorship tool kit for providers, people living with primary CNS cancers and their caregivers; provide accessible educational content for neuro-oncology, neurology, and oncology community providers about survivorship care in neuro-oncology; and establish core competencies for survivorship care for neuro-oncology providers to be included in training and standardized exams. Conclusions Action items aim to address access and reimbursement barriers, expand patient and provider education, develop core competencies, and support survivorship research through funding and other supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather E Leeper
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Emily Tonorezos
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Deborah Mayer
- School of Nursing and University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, UAB Center for Palliative and Supportive Care, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Susan Chang
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shawn Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- Departments of Physiological Nursing and Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Schools of Nursing and Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Paula Sherwood
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland,USA
| | - Kimberly Wallgren
- CERN Foundation, A Program of the National Brain Tumor Society, Zionsville, Indiana, USA
| | | | - David Arons
- National Brain Tumor Society, Newton, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alvina Acquaye
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Amanda L King
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Marta Penas-Prado
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Vera
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Terri S Armstrong
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones RA, Hirschey R, Campbell G, Cooley ME, Lally R, Rueter EK, Gullatte MM. Update to 2019-2022 ONS Research Agenda: Rapid Review to Promote Equity in Oncology Healthcare Access and Workforce Development. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:604-612. [PMID: 34673761 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.604-612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) tasked a rapid response research team (RRRT) to develop priorities to increase diversity, equity, and inclusivity in oncology clinical care and workforce development. METHODS An RRRT of experts in health disparities conducted a rapid review of the literature, consulted with oncology nurse leaders and disparities researchers, and reviewed priorities from funding agencies. RESULTS Significant gaps in the current oncology disparities literature were identified and used to inform priority areas for future research practice and workforce development in oncology nursing. SYNTHESIS This is the second article in a two-part series that presents findings on structural racism and health inequities in oncology nursing. In the first article, three priority areas for oncology nursing research were presented. In this article, strategies to improve diversity, equity, and inclusivity in clinical practice and the oncology workforce are described. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Recommendations are presented to inform research, clinical, administrative, and academic oncology nursing settings on increasing diversity, equity, and inclusivity and deconstructing structural racism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy A Jones
- School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jones R, Hirschey R, Campbell G, Cooley ME, Lally R, Somayaji D, Rueter EK, Gullatte MM. Update to 2019-2022 ONS Research Agenda: Rapid Review to Address Structural Racism and Health Inequities. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:589-600. [PMID: 34673760 PMCID: PMC8674842 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.589-600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) formed a team to develop a necessary expansion of the 2019-2022 ONS Research Agenda, with a focus on racism and cancer care disparities. METHODS A multimethod consensus-building approach was used to develop and refine the research priorities. A panel of oncology nurse scientists and equity scholars with expertise in health disparities conducted a rapid review of the literature, consulted with experts and oncology nurses, and reviewed priorities from funding agencies. RESULTS Critical gaps in the literature were identified and used to develop priority areas for oncology nursing research, practice, and workforce development. SYNTHESIS This is the first article in a two-part series that discusses structural racism and health inequities within oncology nursing. In this article, three priority areas for oncology nursing research are presented; in the second article, strategies to improve cancer disparities and equity and diversity in the oncology workforce are described. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH Research priorities are presented to inform future research that will provide methods and tools to increase health equity and reduce structural racism in oncology nursing practice, research, education, policy, and advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randy Jones
- Professor University of Virginia School of Nursing, Assistant Director of Community Outreach and Engagement UVA Emily Couric Cancer Center
| | - Rachel Hirschey
- Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, Associate Member, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Grace Campbell
- Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Lecturer, Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Nurse Scientist, Nursing and Patient Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Robin Lally
- Interim Associate Dean for Research, Professor, University of Nebraska College of Nursing, Member Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center
| | - Darryl Somayaji
- Assistant Professor, University at Buffalo, School of Nursing, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Mary Magee Gullatte
- Corporate Director Nursing Evidence Based Practice and Research, Emory Healthcare and Adjunct Faculty Emory Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pozzar RA, Enzinger AC, Orechia M, Thompson E, Furey A, Fenton ATHR, Poort H, Cooley ME, Donovan HAS, Braun I, Dinardo M, Demarsh A, Wright AA. Building out lifelines for safety, trust, empowerment, and renewal: Development, feasibility, and acceptability of the BOLSTER intervention for patients with gynecologic cancers and their caregivers. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
187 Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) afflicts over half of women with advanced gynecologic (GYN) cancers. Patients with PC often require ostomies, gastric tubes, or catheters to palliate their symptoms, yet patients and caregivers report feeling unprepared to manage these devices at home. Our aims were to develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention (BOLSTER) to support patients with GYN cancers and their caregivers after hospitalization for PC. Methods: We used the ADAPT-ITT approach to adapt components of the Standard Nursing Intervention Protocol for the target population. First, we assembled a team of stakeholders and topical experts to identify gaps in patient resources. Next, we developed patient- and family-centered educational materials. We augmented written materials with illustrations and produced short videos of patients and caregivers managing medical devices. We developed a protocolized manual for a baccalaureate-prepared nurse to provide care coordination, skills training, and symptom management education across several in-person or telehealth visits. We also created a smartphone application to assess patient-reported outcomes, deliver tailored educational content, and trigger clinical action between visits. Finally, we assessed the feasibility and acceptability of two iterations of BOLSTER in single-arm pilot studies of English-speaking adult patients hospitalized for PC and their caregivers. We defined feasibility as a ≥50% consent-to-approach ratio and acceptability as ≥70% of participants recommending BOLSTER. Results: Intervention characteristics during and the results of each single-arm pilot study are shown in Table. In the first single-arm pilot, 2/4 participants declined home visits, 2/4 wished BOLSTER were shorter, and 3/4 desired access to BOLSTER earlier in their disease course. For the second single-arm pilot, we expanded participant eligibility criteria, eliminated home visits, and reduced the duration of the intervention. Conclusions: BOLSTER is a technology-enhanced, nurse-led care management intervention that is feasible and acceptable to patients with GYN cancer-associated PC and their caregivers. A randomized controlled pilot study of BOLSTER represents a logical next step. Clinical trial information: NCT03367247. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ann Furey
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Azizoddin DR, Adam R, Kessler D, Wright AA, Kematick B, Sullivan C, Zhang H, Hassett MJ, Cooley ME, Ehrlich O, Enzinger AC. Leveraging mobile health technology and research methodology to optimize patient education and self-management support for advanced cancer pain. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5741-5751. [PMID: 33738594 PMCID: PMC8410657 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06146-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient education is critical for management of advanced cancer pain, yet the benefits of psychoeducational interventions have been modest. We used mobile health (mHealth) technology to better meet patients' needs. METHODS Using the Agile and mHealth Development and Evaluation Frameworks, a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, researchers, patients, and design specialists followed a four-phase iterative process to develop comprehensive, tailored, multimedia cancer pain education for a patient-facing smartphone application. The target population reviewed the content and provided feedback. RESULTS The resulting application provides comprehensive cancer pain education spanning pharmacologic and behavioral aspects of self-management. Custom graphics, animated videos, quizzes, and audio-recorded relaxations complemented written content. Computable algorithms based upon daily symptom surveys were used to deliver brief, tailored motivational messages that linked to more comprehensive teaching. Patients found the combination of pharmacologic and behavioral support to be engaging and helpful. CONCLUSION Digital technology can be used to provide cancer pain education that is engaging and tailored to individual needs. A replicable interdisciplinary and patient-centered approach to intervention development was advantageous. mHealth interventions may be a scalable approach to improve cancer pain. Frameworks that merge software and research methodology can be useful in developing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R Azizoddin
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Thorn Building, Boston, MA, 13-1303, USA.
| | - Rosalind Adam
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Daniela Kessler
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexi A Wright
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Kematick
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clare Sullivan
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Haipeng Zhang
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham Digital Innovation Hub, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Ehrlich
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wells-Di Gregorio S, Deshields T, Flowers SR, Taylor N, Robbins MA, Johnson R, Dwyer M, Siston A, Cooley ME, Kayser K. Development of a psychosocial oncology core curriculum for multidisciplinary education and training: Initial content validation using the modified Delphi Method. Psychooncology 2021; 31:130-138. [PMID: 34523775 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite its four decade history, the multidisciplinary specialty of psychosocial oncology (PSO) has no official consensus on core content. In 2014, the American Psychosocial Oncology Society (APOS) Board charged the APOS Professional Education Committee with outlining curricular content needed for core competence. METHODS Content validation was completed using a four-phase modified Delphi Method. During Phase I, a Professional Education Committee subgroup proposed domains and items, which were rated by the APOS Fellows and Board via online survey. During Phase II, Fellows completed a second, revised survey. Phase III incorporated early career members. Developmental and diversity items were integrated into each domain. In Phase IV, a larger group of subject matter experts were surveyed, with feedback incorporated. Validation across phases involved average rating thresholds, intraclass correlations, and final percent agreement. RESULTS The Delphi Method supported 12 content domains: Cancer Basics, Psychosocial Oncology, Professional Development, Ethics, Emotional/Psychological Concerns, Sexuality and Relationship Concerns, Spiritual/Religious Concerns, Healthcare Communication and Decision Making, Social/Practical Problems, Caregiver Concerns, Cognitive Concerns, Physical Symptoms and Psychosocial Assessment/Treatment. High levels of agreement were achieved across domains (86%-100%) and items, with no significant rating differences by discipline. CONCLUSIONS This proposed core content can enhance and standardize education and training in PSO including APOS' Virtual Psychosocial Oncology Core Curriculum, focused on broadly expanding the PSO workforce, particularly in underserved areas. Next steps include development of core competencies and establishment of online training modules based on this content validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Teresa Deshields
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Stacy R Flowers
- Department of Family Medicine, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA
| | - Nicole Taylor
- Graduate School of Professional Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Mona A Robbins
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Rhonda Johnson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, USA
| | - Meagan Dwyer
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Amy Siston
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Neurosciences, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F Cantor Center Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen Kayser
- Raymond A. Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Colomer-Lahiguera S, Ribi K, Dunnack HJ, Cooley ME, Hammer MJ, Miaskowski C, Eicher M. Experiences of people affected by cancer during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative analysis of public online forums. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:4979-4985. [PMID: 33576878 PMCID: PMC7878172 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06041-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies focusing on patients with and survivors of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic highlight unique psychological and behavioral challenges. These findings were obtained in surveys using self-report questionnaires with pre-specified response options that may not capture the broad range of experiences of individuals affected by cancer, including people with cancer and informal caregivers, in this unprecedented situation. Online forums produce a large amount of valuable first-hand user-generated content that can be used to better understand their day-to-day lives. This study, based on the analysis of narratives in cancer online forums, aims to describe and categorize the experiences of people affected by cancer during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD An inductive, descriptive, thematic approach was applied to publicly available cancer forums from Germany, the USA, the UK, and Ireland posted between mid-March and mid-April 2020. RESULTS An analysis of the content of 230 main posts revealed three major themes: (1) concerns related to the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care, the risks and fears of getting infected, logistic issues, and economic impact; (2) adaptation challenges faced at the individual and societal level; and (3) the need for advice including information about COVID-19 and the (self-)management of cancer symptoms and treatment. CONCLUSION Our qualitative description of the experiences of people affected by cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak can help to improve communication, education, and the development of supportive care strategies. Furthermore, the themes and subthemes identified could potentially inform item development for future self-report questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Karin Ribi
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG), Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Christine Miaskowski
- Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim SS, Lee SA, Mejia J, Cooley ME, Demarco RF. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Storytelling Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Women Living With HIV. Ann Behav Med 2021; 54:447-454. [PMID: 31863582 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaz062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with HIV in the USA smoke at a rate nearly three times that of the general population, and Black women are disproportionately affected by HIV infection. PURPOSE This study was conducted to test the preliminary efficacy of a digital storytelling intervention for smoking cessation in U.S. women living with HIV. METHODS Participants in the treatment arm viewed a film in which women living with HIV talk about quitting smoking, and those in the control arm viewed an attention-control film in which women talk about living with HIV infection. Participants in both arms received eight weekly video-call counseling sessions focused on smoking cessation and nicotine patches or gum during the same period. Participants were followed on a monthly basis from quit day for 3 months. RESULTS Of the 53 participants randomized, four withdrew before receiving any intervention, one dropped out during the intervention, and 48 (90.6%) completed the study. No difference was found in the baseline characteristics between the two arms with the exception that the treatment arm had higher nicotine dependence scores [t(1.51) = 2.30, p = .03] than the control arm. Seven day point-prevalence abstinence rates at 3 month follow-up were not found to differ between the two arms. However, the odds of achieving 3 month prolonged abstinence were four times greater (odds ratio = 4.23, 95% confidence interval = 1.10, 16.23) in the treatment arm than the control arm when the analysis was performed with those (n = 49, 92.5%) who received any part of the allotted intervention. CONCLUSIONS A digital storytelling intervention seems to be a valuable strategy to enhance the effect of conventional tobacco dependence treatment for women living with HIV. However, the underlying mechanism of the effect of digital storytelling necessitates further investigations in a large RCT.Clinical Trials Registration No. NCT03289676.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun S Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sang A Lee
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeannette Mejia
- Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rosanna F Demarco
- Department of Nursing, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee H, Kim D, Kiang PNC, Cooley ME, Shi L, Thiem L, Kan P, Chea P, Allison J, Kim M. Awareness, knowledge, social norms, and vaccination intentions among Khmer mother-daughter pairs. Ethn Health 2021; 26:379-391. [PMID: 30141338 DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1514455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, which can be prevented by vaccination. Mothers play an important role in promoting vaccination and health education. However, Cambodian American mothers reported to have challenges to play a role as primary health educators due to lack of health knowledge and language and cultural gaps. Therefore, this study aims to understand the Cambodian American daughters' and mothers' awareness, knowledge and social norms of HPV vaccination and their health communication and vaccination decision-making. We conducted a pilot randomized clinical trial to promote HPV vaccination. In this study, we have only reported findings from baseline data examining individual, interpersonal and social determinants of HPV vaccination behavior among 19 dyads of Cambodian American mothers and daughters. Both mothers and daughters demonstrated low levels of awareness and knowledge. A significant relationship was found between the daughters' HPV vaccine decisions and their perception of their mothers' intention on HPV vaccination for them. Culturally and linguistically appropriate communication strategies such as storytelling or visual presentation approaches may be more effective than the current practice of using information-based written materials to promote HPV vaccination and health education among Cambodian Americans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haeok Lee
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deogwoon Kim
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Nien-Chu Kiang
- Asian American Studies Program, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Nursing and Patient Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ling Shi
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda Thiem
- Asian American Studies Program, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - PenhSamnang Kan
- Asian American Studies Program, School for Global Inclusion and Social Development, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phala Chea
- Support of English Language Learners & Families/McKinney-Vento Education Liaison, Lowell Public Schools, Lowell, MA, USA
| | - Jeroan Allison
- Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Minjin Kim
- Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zanville N, Cohen B, Gray TF, Phillips J, Linder L, Starkweather A, Yeager KA, Cooley ME. The Oncology Nursing Society Rapid Review and Research Priorities for Cancer Care in the Context of COVID-19. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:131-145. [PMID: 33600397 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.131-145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify research priorities addressing COVID-19 that build on the 2019-2022 Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Research Agenda, in alignment with ONS's mission to promote excellence in oncology nursing and quality cancer care. METHODS & VARIABLES Priority areas were identified using a multistep approach combining rapid review of the literature; consultation with experts/stakeholders; and review of priorities from other funding agencies, public health, and cancer-focused organizations. RESULTS The rapid research response team identified five priority areas for research related to COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Oncology nurses are well positioned to address the research priorities and cross-cutting themes identified through this review. The use of innovative methodologic approaches and attention to disparities are necessary to advance cancer care related to COVID-19.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cohen B, Cooley ME, Gray TF, Linder L, Phillips J, Starkweather A, Yeager KA, Zanville N. Nursing's seat at the research roundtable. Lancet 2020; 396:1397-1398. [PMID: 33065036 PMCID: PMC7553737 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bevin Cohen
- Center for Nursing Research and Innovation, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | | | | | - Lauri Linder
- University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Katherine A Yeager
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park ER, Perez GK, Regan S, Muzikansky A, Levy DE, Temel JS, Rigotti NA, Pirl WF, Irwin KE, Partridge AH, Cooley ME, Friedman ER, Rabin J, Ponzani C, Hyland KA, Holland S, Borderud S, Sprunck K, Kwon D, Peterson L, Miller-Sobel J, Gonzalez I, Whitlock CW, Malloy L, de León-Sanchez S, O’Brien M, Ostroff JS. Effect of Sustained Smoking Cessation Counseling and Provision of Medication vs Shorter-term Counseling and Medication Advice on Smoking Abstinence in Patients Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:1406-1418. [PMID: 33048154 PMCID: PMC8094414 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.14581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Persistent smoking may cause adverse outcomes among patients with cancer. Many cancer centers have not fully implemented evidence-based tobacco treatment into routine care. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of sustained telephone counseling and medication (intensive treatment) compared with shorter-term telephone counseling and medication advice (standard treatment) to assist patients recently diagnosed with cancer to quit smoking. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This unblinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital/Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Adults who had smoked 1 cigarette or more within 30 days, spoke English or Spanish, and had recently diagnosed breast, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynecological, head and neck, lung, lymphoma, or melanoma cancers were eligible. Enrollment occurred between November 2013 and July 2017; assessments were completed by the end of February 2018. INTERVENTIONS Participants randomized to the intensive treatment (n = 153) and the standard treatment (n = 150) received 4 weekly telephone counseling sessions and medication advice. The intensive treatment group also received 4 biweekly and 3 monthly telephone counseling sessions and choice of Food and Drug Administration-approved cessation medication (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, or varenicline). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES The primary outcome was biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were treatment utilization rates. RESULTS Among 303 patients who were randomized (mean age, 58.3 years; 170 women [56.1%]), 221 (78.1%) completed the trial. Six-month biochemically confirmed quit rates were 34.5% (n = 51 in the intensive treatment group) vs 21.5% (n = 29 in the standard treatment group) (difference, 13.0% [95% CI, 3.0%-23.3%]; odds ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.13-3.27]; P < .02). The median number of counseling sessions completed was 8 (interquartile range, 4-11) in the intensive treatment group. A total of 97 intensive treatment participants (77.0%) vs 68 standard treatment participants (59.1%) reported cessation medication use (difference, 17.9% [95% CI, 6.3%-29.5%]; odds ratio, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.32-4.04]; P = .003). The most common adverse events in the intensive treatment and standard treatment groups, respectively, were nausea (n = 13 and n = 6), rash (n = 4 and n = 1), hiccups (n = 4 and n = 1), mouth irritation (n = 4 and n = 0), difficulty sleeping (n = 3 and n = 2), and vivid dreams (n = 3 and n = 2). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among smokers recently diagnosed with cancer in 2 National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers, sustained counseling and provision of free cessation medication compared with 4-week counseling and medication advice resulted in higher 6-month biochemically confirmed quit rates. However, the generalizability of the study findings is uncertain and requires further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01871506.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse R. Park
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Tobacco Treatment and Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Giselle K. Perez
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Susan Regan
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Tobacco Treatment and Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Alona Muzikansky
- MGH Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Douglas E. Levy
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Tobacco Treatment and Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Jennifer S. Temel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Nancy A. Rigotti
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Tobacco Treatment and Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - William F. Pirl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kelly E. Irwin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ann H. Partridge
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary E. Cooley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily R. Friedman
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Julia Rabin
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Colin Ponzani
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Kelly A. Hyland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Susan Holland
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Borderud
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kim Sprunck
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Diana Kwon
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa Peterson
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jacob Miller-Sobel
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Irina Gonzalez
- Health Policy Research Center, Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - C. Will Whitlock
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Laura Malloy
- Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Suhana de León-Sanchez
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Maureen O’Brien
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Tobacco Treatment Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rosenzweig MQ, Bailey DE, Bush NJ, Coombs LA, Lehto RH, Loerzel V, Sun V, Mooney K, Cooley ME. Mentorship for Nurse Scientists: Strategies for Growth From the Oncology Nursing Society Research Mentorship Task Force. Oncol Nurs Forum 2020; 46:769-774. [PMID: 31626617 DOI: 10.1188/19.onf.769-774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM STATEMENT To describe research mentorship strategies needed to strengthen oncology nursing science and ensure that a cadre of nurse scientists are available to carry out the research mission of the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS). DESIGN Multimethod consensus-building approach by content experts of the ONS Research Mentorship Task Force and approval by the ONS Board of Directors was employed. DATA SOURCES Expert opinion, surveys, notes from an all-day research mentorship retreat, and literature review were used. ANALYSIS Content analysis was used to synthesize notes from the research mentorship retreat. FINDINGS Various strategies were identified to strengthen the pipeline of oncology nurse scientists and promote development across the career trajectory. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Mentorship is essential to advance the growth and impact of oncology nursing science and requires support throughout the career trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nancy J Bush
- School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rendle KA, Burnett-Hartman AN, Neslund-Dudas C, Greenlee RT, Honda S, Elston Lafata J, Marcus PM, Cooley ME, Vachani A, Meza R, Oshiro C, Simoff MJ, Schnall MD, Beaber EF, Doria-Rose VP, Doubeni CA, Ritzwoller DP. Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Across Diverse Healthcare Systems: A Process Model from the Lung PROSPR Consortium. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 13:129-136. [PMID: 31871221 PMCID: PMC7010351 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-19-0378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Numerous organizations, including the United States Preventive Services Task Force, recommend annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT for high risk adults who meet specific criteria. Despite recommendations and national coverage for screening eligible adults through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, LCS uptake in the United States remains low (<4%). In recognition of the need to improve and understand LCS across the population, as part of the larger Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening PRocess (PROSPR) consortium, the NCI (Bethesda, MD) funded the Lung PROSPR Research Consortium consisting of five diverse healthcare systems in Colorado, Hawaii, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Using various methods and data sources, the center aims to examine utilization and outcomes of LCS across diverse populations, and assess how variations in the implementation of LCS programs shape outcomes across the screening process. This commentary presents the PROSPR LCS process model, which outlines the interrelated steps needed to complete the screening process from risk assessment to treatment. In addition to guiding planned projects within the Lung PROSPR Research Consortium, this model provides insights on the complex steps needed to implement, evaluate, and improve LCS outcomes in community practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine A Rendle
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | | | | | | | - Stacey Honda
- Center for Health Research, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Oahu, Hawaii
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Pamela M Marcus
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Anil Vachani
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rafael Meza
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Caryn Oshiro
- Center for Health Research, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Oahu, Hawaii
| | - Michael J Simoff
- Henry Ford Health System and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - V Paul Doria-Rose
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Debra P Ritzwoller
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Knowledge of the patterns of symptom distress in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer is an important first step in developing interventions that can potentially lessen symptom distress. The purposes of this secondary analysis were to describe the changes in patterns of symptom distress over time in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer, and to examine the relationship of selected demographic and clinical characteristics to symptom distress. Complete data were available for 117 patients. The patterns of symptom distress in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer varied between treatment groups and over time. Symptom distress scores were moderate to high on entry into the study, indicating that symptom management in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients is essential and should begin early in the course of illness. Moreover, clinical interventions should be tailored to the type of treatment. Various demographic and clinical variables were weak and inconsistent predictors of symptom distress, underscoring the importance of examining the role of psychosocial factors in mediating symptom distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E. Cooley
- Smoking Cessation Research Program, Harvard Medical School/ Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas H. Short
- Mathematics Department, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, Pennsylvania
| | - Helene J. Moriarty
- Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cooley ME, Poghosyan H, Sprunck-Harrild K, Winickoff JP, Edge SB, Emmons KM. Tobacco treatment implementation within 28 commission on cancer accredited programs in the Northeast region of the USA: A pilot study. Transl Behav Med 2019. [PMID: 29528457 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer survivors are a rapidly growing population and an important target for tobacco treatment interventions. Continued smoking after the diagnosis of cancer is associated with a higher risk of cancer recurrence and mortality. Systematic tobacco cessation programs are effective. This study surveyed American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) programs in the Northeast region of the USA regarding their tobacco control programs. Seventy percent of cancer survivors are treated within CoC programs. The purpose of this study was to describe the extent of implementation of tobacco treatment and determine the organizational delivery of tobacco treatment as measured by the presence of goals to address smoking, leadership support, and integration of tobacco treatment guidelines into care delivery. Data were collected by a survey. The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire was used to collect data on implementation of tobacco treatment services. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Most programs (78.6%) had an electronic health record and of these 68% captured smoking status. Implementation of tobacco treatment was not optimal for identifying smokers, providing patients with community linkages or self-care cessation support. Implementation of decision aides for pharmacotherapy and reassessment of smoking status were the least developed areas. Moreover, the organizational delivery for tobacco treatment was less than optimal. Many cancer programs have not implemented systems to deliver optimal tobacco treatment. Efforts should be made to help cancer programs develop sustainable system-wide programs that address the urgent need to deliver tobacco treatment to all cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Stephen B Edge
- American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, Chicago, IL, USA.,Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cooley ME, Blonquist TM, Hong F, Nayak MM, Crouter SE, Hayman LL, Jaklitsch MT, Emmons KM, Bueno R. The effect of a lifestyle risk reduction intervention on lifestyle adherence and health-related quality of life in nonsmall cell lung cancer survivors: Feasibility study outcomes. Psychooncology 2019; 28:920-923. [PMID: 30673155 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Traci M Blonquist
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Data Sciences (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott E Crouter
- College of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Tennesee, Knoxville, USA
| | - Laura L Hayman
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts-, Boston, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michael T Jaklitsch
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen M Emmons
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raphael Bueno
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Somayaji D, Blok AC, Hayman LL, Colson Y, Jaklisch M, Cooley ME. Enhancing behavioral change among lung cancer survivors participating in a lifestyle risk reduction intervention: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1299-1308. [PMID: 30643990 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4631-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early detection and improved treatment have increased lung cancer survival. Lung cancer survivors have more symptom distress and lower function compared with other cancer survivors; however, few interventions are available to improve health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Lifestyle risk reduction interventions have improved HR-QOL in other cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to explore lung cancer survivor perspectives on making behavioral changes in the context of a lifestyle risk reduction intervention. METHODS Twenty-two lung cancer survivors participated in interviews after completing the Healthy Directions (HD) intervention. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered through a survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Five main themes were identified: (1) the diagnosis was a motivator for behavior change, (2) participants had to deal with disease consequences, (3) the coach provided guidance, (4) strategies for change were initiated, and (5) social support sustained behavioral changes. Other important subthemes were the coach helped interpret symptoms, which supported self-efficacy and goal setting, and survivors employed self-monitoring behaviors. Several participants found the recommended goals for physical activity were difficult and were discouraged if unable to attain the goal. Findings underscore the need for individualized prescriptions of physical activity, especially for sedentary survivors. CONCLUSIONS Lung cancer survivors described the benefits of coaching to enhance their engagement in behavioral change. Additional research is needed to validate the benefit of the HD intervention to improve HR-QOL among this vulnerable and understudied group of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl Somayaji
- University at Buffalo, 3435 Main Street, 201C, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
| | - Amanda C Blok
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Hospital, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 200 Springs Road, Building 70 (152), Bedford, MA, 01730, USA.,Graduate School of Nursing and Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 368 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA
| | - Laura L Hayman
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA, 02125-3393, USA
| | - Yolanda Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael Jaklisch
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-512, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Changes are underway at the Oncology Nursing Society to align resources so that scientists have the support needed to generate new knowledge and clinicians have access to tools needed to use evidence-based interventions that can speed the translation of research to transform cancer care.
Collapse
|
36
|
Poghosyan H, Moen EL, Kim D, Manjourides J, Cooley ME. Social and Structural Determinants of Smoking Status and Quit Attempts Among Adults Living in 12 US States, 2015. Am J Health Promot 2018; 33:498-506. [PMID: 30071738 DOI: 10.1177/0890117118792827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the relationships among intermediary determinants, structural determinants, and adult smoking status and quit attempts. DESIGN Secondary data analysis of cross-sectional data. SETTING Data come from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), Social Context module. A national, representative sample from 12 US states (Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Utah). PARTICIPANTS A total of 64 053 noninstitutionalized US adults aged ≥18 years. MEASURES Smoking status and quit attempts were outcome variables. Individual-level structural determinants (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, and employment status) and intermediary determinants (housing insecurity, food insecurity, health insurance, binge drinking, and general health mental health) from BRFSS. ANALYSIS Weighted multivariate, multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Current smoking was greater among men, respondents aged between 35 to 64 and 55 to 64, adults who reported food insecurity, housing insecurity, frequent mental distress, binge drinking, and who were unemployed. Current smokers had higher odds of making quit attempts in the past 12 months if they were non-Hispanic Black, graduated college, and reported food and housing insecurity. CONCLUSION Multifaceted smoking cessation interventions that address food and housing needs also incorporate screening for potential comorbidities such as mental distress and/or hazardous alcohol use and may be needed to enhance smoking cessation rates among racially diverse adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermine Poghosyan
- 1 Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erika L Moen
- 2 The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Colleague, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Daniel Kim
- 3 Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Justin Manjourides
- 3 Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cooley ME, Abrahm JL, Berry DL, Rabin MS, Braun IM, Paladino J, Nayak MM, Lobach DF. Algorithm-based decision support for symptom self-management among adults with Cancer: results of usability testing. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:31. [PMID: 29843767 PMCID: PMC5975425 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0608-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is essential that cancer patients understand anticipated symptoms, how to self-manage these symptoms, and when to call their clinicians. However, patients are often ill-prepared to manage symptoms at home. Clinical decision support (CDS) is a potentially innovative way to provide information to patients where and when they need it. The purpose of this project was to design and evaluate a simulated model of an algorithm-based CDS program for self-management of cancer symptoms. METHODS This study consisted of three phases; development of computable algorithms for self-management of cancer symptoms using a modified ADAPTE process, evaluation of a simulated model of the CDS program, and identification of design objectives and lessons learned from the evaluation of patient-centered CDS. In phase 1, algorithms for pain, constipation and nausea/vomiting were developed by an expert panel. In phase 2, we conducted usability testing of a simulated symptom assessment and management intervention for self-care (SAMI-Self-Care) CDS program involving focus groups, interviews and surveys with cancer patients, their caregivers and clinicians. The Acceptability E-scale measured acceptability of the program. In phase 3, we developed design objectives and identified barriers to uptake of patient-centered CDS based on the data gathered from stakeholders. RESULTS In phase 1, algorithms were reviewed and approved through a consensus meeting and majority vote. In phase 2, 24 patients & caregivers and 13 clinicians participated in the formative evaluation. Iterative changes were made in a simulated SAMI-Self-Care CDS program. Acceptability scores were high among patients, caregivers and clinicians. In phase 3, we formulated CDS design objectives, which included: 1) ensure patient safety, 2) communicate clinical concepts effectively, 3) promote communication with clinicians, 4) support patient activation, and 5) facilitate navigation and use. We identified patient barriers and clinician concerns to using CDS for symptom self-management, which were consistent with the chronic care model, a theoretical framework used to enhance patient-clinician communication and patient self-management. CONCLUSION Patient safety and tool navigation were critical features of CDS for patient self-management. Insights gleaned from this study may be used to inform the development of CDS resources for symptom self-management in patients with other chronic conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Donna L Berry
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center and the Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW-512, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael S Rabin
- Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Ilana M Braun
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Joanna Paladino
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Manan M Nayak
- The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - David F Lobach
- Klesis Healthcare and Department of Family Medicine, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 2100 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Park ER, Perez GK, Regan S, Muzikanksy A, Rigotti N, Levy DE, Temel JS, Cooley ME, Partridge AH, Pirl WF, Irwin K, Friedman ER, Borderud S, Hyland K, Rabin J, Sprunck K, Kwon D, Ostroff JS. Integrating tobacco treatment into cancer care: A first snapshot of RCT findings. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.6505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - William F. Pirl
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL
| | | | | | | | - Kelly Hyland
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - Diana Kwon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lee H, Kim M, Cooley ME, Kiang PNC, Kim D, Tang S, Shi L, Thiem L, Kan P, Peou S, Touch C, Chea P, Allison J. Using narrative intervention for HPV vaccine behavior change among Khmer mothers and daughters: A pilot RCT to examine feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness. Appl Nurs Res 2018; 40:51-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2017.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
40
|
Berry DL, Nayak MM, Abrahm JL, Braun I, Rabin MS, Cooley ME. Clinician perspectives on symptom and quality of life experiences of patients during cancer therapies: Implications for eHealth. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1113-1119. [PMID: 28497471 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Revised: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore clinician experiences with cancer symptom and quality of life (SQL) management from diagnosis throughout therapy in the ambulatory setting, plus identify preferences for a future SQL decision support system. METHODS Eligible clinicians worked in ambulatory cancer care with responsibility for direct patient care. Focus groups were conducted to discuss symptom management throughout the treatment experience and features desired in a future decision support system. Each group was audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and entered into NVivo 9 for analysis. Open and axial coding was completed, grouping common concepts into nodes; large constructs among the nodes were identified and main messages were synthesized. RESULTS A total of 118 clinicians were contacted by email resulting in a final sample of 51 attending 1 of 9 focus groups. Clinicians described a standard face-to-face approach to assessment of SQL, before and throughout therapy. Preparing patients for expected symptoms and approaches to management included paper-based patient education materials and referrals. Communicating with patients between visits was covered in detail, notably use of telephone and email. Future system features desired by the clinicians included an electronic, Web-based system with real-time, trended data, reasonable alerts, and tailored information for patients. CONCLUSIONS Cancer care specialists reported strategies to assess and manage cancer SQL in ambulatory care including patient-reported outcome measures, contact communication modes, face-to-face interviews, and paper-based patient education materials. Future system features desired by clinicians included an electronic, Web-based system with real-time, trended data, reasonable alerts, and tailored information for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ilana Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cooley ME, Nayak MM, Abrahm JL, Braun IM, Rabin MS, Brzozowski J, Lathan C, Berry DL. Patient and caregiver perspectives on decision support for symptom and quality of life management during cancer treatment: Implications for eHealth. Psychooncology 2017; 26:1105-1112. [PMID: 28430396 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2016] [Revised: 03/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adequate symptom and quality-of-life (SQL) management is a priority during cancer treatment. eHealth is a timely way to enhance patient-engagement, facilitate communication, and improve health outcomes. The objectives of this study were to describe patient and caregivers' perspectives for providing, processing, and managing SQL data to enhance communication and identify desired components for decision support. METHODS Data were collected from 64 participants through questionnaires and focus groups. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. Open and axial coding was completed, grouping commonalities and large constructs into nodes to identify and synthesize themes. RESULTS Face-to-face meetings with clinicians were the prime time to communicate, and patients strove to understand treatment options and the effect on SQL by bringing caregivers to their visits, taking notes, tracking symptoms, and creating portable health records. Patients/caregivers struggled to self-manage their symptoms and were uncertain when to contact clinicians when experiencing uncontrolled symptoms. Most participants identified eHealth solutions for decision support. However, 38% of participants (n = 24) rarely used computers and identified non-eHealth options for decision support. Core components for both eHealth and non-eHealth systems were access to (1) cancer information, (2) medical records, (3) peer support, and (4) improved support and understanding on when to contact clinicians. CONCLUSIONS Patients were faced with an overwhelming amount of information and relied on their caregivers to help navigate the complexities of cancer care and self-manage SQL. Health technologies can provide informational support; however, decision support needs to span multiple venues to avoid increasing disparities caused by a digital divide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jane Brzozowski
- Independent Clinical Informatics Consultant, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Blok AC, Blonquist TM, Nayak MM, Somayaji D, Crouter SE, Hayman LL, Colson YL, Bueno R, Emmons KM, Cooley ME. Feasibility and acceptability of "healthy directions" a lifestyle intervention for adults with lung cancer. Psychooncology 2017; 27:250-257. [PMID: 28426922 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this feasibility study of an adapted lifestyle intervention for adults with lung cancer were to (1) determine rates of enrollment, attrition, and completion of 5 nurse-patient contacts; (2) examine demographic characteristics of those more likely to enroll into the program; (3) determine acceptability of the intervention; and (4) identify patient preferences for the format of supplemental educational intervention materials. METHODS This study used a single-arm, pretest and posttest design. Feasibility was defined as ≥20% enrollment and a completion rate of 70% for 5 nurse-patient contact sessions. Acceptability was defined as 80% of patients recommending the program to others. Data was collected through electronic data bases and phone interviews. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for analyses. RESULTS Of 147 eligible patients, 42 (28.6%) enrolled and of these, 32 (76.2%) started the intervention and 27 (N = 27/32; 84.4%; 95% CI, 67.2%-94.7%) completed the intervention. Patients who were younger were more likely to enroll in the study (P = .04) whereas there were no significant differences by gender (P = .35). Twenty-three of the 24 (95.8%) participants' contacted posttest recommended the intervention for others. Nearly equal numbers of participants chose the website (n = 16, 50%) vs print (n = 14, 44%). CONCLUSION The intervention was feasible and acceptable in patients with lung cancer. Recruitment rates were higher and completion rates were similar as compared to previous home-based lifestyle interventions for patients with other types of cancer. Strategies to enhance recruitment of older adults are important for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda C Blok
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura L Hayman
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.,University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Karen M Emmons
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lobach DF, Johns EB, Halpenny B, Saunders TA, Brzozowski J, Del Fiol G, Berry DL, Braun IM, Finn K, Wolfe J, Abrahm JL, Cooley ME. Increasing Complexity in Rule-Based Clinical Decision Support: The Symptom Assessment and Management Intervention. JMIR Med Inform 2016; 4:e36. [PMID: 27826132 PMCID: PMC5120240 DOI: 10.2196/medinform.5728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of uncontrolled symptoms is an important component of quality cancer care. Clinical guidelines are available for optimal symptom management, but are not often integrated into the front lines of care. The use of clinical decision support (CDS) at the point-of-care is an innovative way to incorporate guideline-based symptom management into routine cancer care. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a rule-based CDS system to enable management of multiple symptoms in lung cancer patients at the point-of-care. METHODS This study was conducted in three phases involving a formative evaluation, a system evaluation, and a contextual evaluation of clinical use. In Phase 1, we conducted iterative usability testing of user interface prototypes with patients and health care providers (HCPs) in two thoracic oncology clinics. In Phase 2, we programmed complex algorithms derived from clinical practice guidelines into a rules engine that used Web services to communicate with the end-user application. Unit testing of algorithms was conducted using a stack-traversal tree-spanning methodology to identify all possible permutations of pathways through each algorithm, to validate accuracy. In Phase 3, we evaluated clinical use of the system among patients and HCPs in the two clinics via observations, structured interviews, and questionnaires. RESULTS In Phase 1, 13 patients and 5 HCPs engaged in two rounds of formative testing, and suggested improvements leading to revisions until overall usability scores met a priori benchmarks. In Phase 2, symptom management algorithms contained between 29 and 1425 decision nodes, resulting in 19 to 3194 unique pathways per algorithm. Unit testing required 240 person-hours, and integration testing required 40 person-hours. In Phase 3, both patients and HCPs found the system usable and acceptable, and offered suggestions for improvements. CONCLUSIONS A rule-based CDS system for complex symptom management was systematically developed and tested. The complexity of the algorithms required extensive development and innovative testing. The Web service-based approach allowed remote access to CDS knowledge, and could enable scaling and sharing of this knowledge to accelerate availability, and reduce duplication of effort. Patients and HCPs found the system to be usable and useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David F Lobach
- School of Medicine, Department of Community & Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.,Klesis Healthcare, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Ellis B Johns
- Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA, United States.,Medengineers Informatics, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Toni-Ann Saunders
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jane Brzozowski
- Independent Clinical Informatics Consultant, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Donna L Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ilana M Braun
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen Finn
- City of Hope, Clinical Trials Office, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Joanne Wolfe
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To discuss multiple co-occurring cancer symptoms, review symptom assessment instruments, identify innovative methods to integrate symptom assessment and management in the clinical setting, and examine barriers and facilitators for implementation of symptom assessment and use of clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES Peer-reviewed articles, guidelines, systematic reviews, and web-based resources. CONCLUSION Despite the availability of brief, reliable, and valid instruments, symptom assessment has not been integrated as a routine aspect of clinical care. New technologies and changes in health policy provide an optimal environment to integrate electronic symptom assessment and management into cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Oncology nurses play a key role in early identification and management of distressing symptoms.
Collapse
|
45
|
Poghosyan H, Darwish SA, Kim SS, Cooley ME. The association between social support and smoking status in cancer survivors with frequent and infrequent mental distress: results from 10 US states, 2010. J Cancer Surviv 2016; 10:1078-1088. [PMID: 27236586 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-016-0551-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined the association between social support and smoking status among adult cancer survivors, with special emphasis on mental health differences using data from 10 US states. METHODS Cross-sectional data from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Cancer Survivorship module on 8055 cancer survivors were analyzed. Sample weights were applied for the generalization of results to 2.6 million cancer survivors. RESULTS In 2010, 15.6 % (418,700) were current, 38.4 % (1.03 million) former, and 46.0 % (1.2 million) never smokers. About 18.0 % of cancer survivors reported receiving the lowest level of social support and 12.1 % reported experiencing frequent mental distress in the past 30 days. Participants' mean age at the time of the first cancer diagnosis was 51.0 (standard error (SE) = 0.33) and mean time since their diagnosis was 11.3 years (SE = 0.18). Compared to those with infrequent mental distress, cancer survivors with frequent mental distress were diagnosed at a younger age (45.0 vs. 51.8), more likely to be current smokers (36.8 vs. 12.7 %), and less likely to always receive social support they needed (33.4 vs. 56.3 %). Cancer survivors who received higher levels of social support were less likely to be current smokers than those who received the lowest level of social support they needed. Among cancer survivors who reported frequent mental distress, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to be current smokers than non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS Rates of current smokers were lower among cancer survivors who received social support and reported infrequent mental distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Psychosocial screening may help health care professional identify smokers with frequent mental distress who require more intensive smoking cessation interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermine Poghosyan
- School of Nursing; Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Sabreen A Darwish
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
| | - Sun S Kim
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify components of efficacious interventions for multiple health behavior change (MHBC) in adult cancer survivors or adults at high risk for cancer. METHODS A systematic review of MHBC interventions was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. RESULTS Ten studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies changed at least 2 health behaviors. Diet, exercise, and smoking cessation were consistently changed with in-person interventions. Longer duration interventions using phone or mail contact had a positive association with changing diet and exercise. CONCLUSIONS MHBC interventions positively influenced behavior change in adults with cancer and those at high risk for cancer. Future studies should focus on increasing dissemination and implementation of efficacious interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda C Green
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Laura L Hayman
- College of Nursing & Health Sciences, and Associate Vice-Provost for Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center, Research in Nursing and Patient Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cooley ME, Poghosyan H, Sarna L. Lung Cancer. Psychooncology 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/med/9780199363315.003.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
48
|
Cooley ME, Blonquist TM, Catalano PJ, Lobach DF, Halpenny B, McCorkle R, Johns EB, Braun IM, Rabin MS, Mataoui FZ, Finn K, Berry DL, Abrahm JL. Feasibility of using algorithm-based clinical decision support for symptom assessment and management in lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2015; 49:13-26. [PMID: 24880002 PMCID: PMC4621015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2013] [Revised: 04/25/2014] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Distressing symptoms interfere with the quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Algorithm-based clinical decision support (CDS) to improve evidence-based management of isolated symptoms seems promising, but no reports yet address multiple symptoms. OBJECTIVES This study examined the feasibility of CDS for a Symptom Assessment and Management Intervention targeting common symptoms in patients with lung cancer (SAMI-L) in ambulatory oncology. The study objectives were to evaluate completion and delivery rates of the SAMI-L report and clinician adherence to the algorithm-based recommendations. METHODS Patients completed a web-based symptom assessment and SAMI-L created tailored recommendations for symptom management. Completion of assessments and delivery of reports were recorded. Medical record review assessed clinician adherence to recommendations. Feasibility was defined as 75% or higher report completion and delivery rates and 80% or higher clinician adherence to recommendations. Descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations were used for data analyses. RESULTS Symptom assessment completion was 84% (95% CI=81-87%). Delivery of completed reports was 90% (95% CI=86-93%). Depression (36%), pain (30%), and fatigue (18%) occurred most frequently, followed by anxiety (11%) and dyspnea (6%). On average, overall recommendation adherence was 57% (95% CI=52-62%) and was not dependent on the number of recommendations (P=0.45). Adherence was higher for anxiety (66%; 95% CI=55-77%), depression (64%; 95% CI=56-71%), pain (62%; 95% CI=52-72%), and dyspnea (51%; 95% CI=38-64%) than for fatigue (38%; 95% CI=28-47%). CONCLUSION The CDS systems, such as SAMI-L, have the potential to fill a gap in promoting evidence-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Cooley
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ellis B Johns
- Virginia Commonwealth University Shenandoah Valley, Front Royal, Virginia, USA
| | - Ilana M Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Donna L Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Janet L Abrahm
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Reid Ponte P, Hayman LL, Berry DL, Cooley ME. A new model for postdoctoral training: the Nursing Postdoctoral Program in Cancer and Health Disparities. Nurs Outlook 2014; 63:189-203. [PMID: 25771193 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Revised: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 11/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The University of Massachusetts Boston and Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center joined forces in 2009 to create a Postdoctoral Nursing Research Fellowship in Cancer and Health Disparities. In combining the resources of a large university and a research-intensive service institution, the postdoctoral program provides a new model for preparing nurse scientists to conduct independent research that advances nursing knowledge and interdisciplinary understanding of complex health issues. The multifaceted program consists of educational programming, research training, and career planning components. Additionally, each fellow is assigned a nurse scientist mentor and interdisciplinary co-mentor. The mentors support the fellows with scholarly activities and research training and help the fellows craft individualized career plans, including proposals for postfellowship career development research. In this article, the postdoctoral program leaders describe the program structure, strategies used to recruit minority and nonminority candidates, and data describing program outcomes and share lessons learned and recommendations for organizations that may be interested in establishing similar postdoctoral fellowships at their institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Reid Ponte
- Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Nursing and Patient Care Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | | | - Donna L Berry
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mary E Cooley
- University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA; Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Quinn BL, Sheldon LK, Cooley ME. Pediatric Pain Assessment by Drawn Faces Scales: A Review. Pain Manag Nurs 2014; 15:909-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2013] [Revised: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|