1
|
Ambagtsheer F, Bunnik E, Pengel LHM, Reinders MEJ, Elias JJ, Lacetera N, Macis M. Public Opinions on Removing Disincentives and Introducing Incentives for Organ Donation: Proposing a European Research Agenda. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12483. [PMID: 38644936 PMCID: PMC11027084 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
The shortage of organs for transplantations is increasing in Europe as well as globally. Many initiatives to the organ shortage, such as opt-out systems for deceased donation and expanding living donation, have been insufficient to meet the rising demand for organs. In recurrent discussions on how to reduce organ shortage, financial incentives and removal of disincentives, have been proposed to stimulate living organ donation and increase the pool of available donor organs. It is important to understand not only the ethical acceptability of (dis)incentives for organ donation, but also its societal acceptance. In this review, we propose a research agenda to help guide future empirical studies on public preferences in Europe towards the removal of disincentives and introduction of incentives for organ donation. We first present a systematic literature review on public opinions concerning (financial) (dis)incentives for organ donation in European countries. Next, we describe the results of a randomized survey experiment conducted in the United States. This experiment is crucial because it suggests that societal support for incentivizing organ donation depends on the specific features and institutional design of the proposed incentive scheme. We conclude by proposing this experiment's framework as a blueprint for European research on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike Ambagtsheer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Liset H. M. Pengel
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marlies EJ Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julio J. Elias
- Department of Economics, School of Business, University of CEMA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mario Macis
- Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haywood N, Mehaffey JH, Kilbourne S, Mannem H, Weder M, Lau C, Krupnick AS, Agarwal A. Influence of broader geographic allograft sharing on outcomes and cost in smaller lung transplant centers. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163:339-345. [PMID: 33008575 PMCID: PMC7474916 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE On November 24, 2017, Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network implemented a change to lung allocation replacing donor service area with a 250 nautical mile radius around donor hospitals. We sought to evaluate the experience of a small to medium size center following implementation. METHODS Patients (47 pre and 54 post) undergoing lung transplantation were identified from institutional database from January 2016 to October 2019. Detailed chart review and analysis of institutional cost data was performed. Univariate analysis was performed to compare eras. RESULTS Similar short-term mortality and primary graft dysfunction were observed between groups. Decreased local donation (68% vs 6%; P < .001), increased travel distance (145 vs 235 miles; P = .004), travel cost ($8626 vs $14,482; P < .001), and total procurement cost ($60,852 vs $69,052; P = .001) were observed postimplementation. We also document an increase in waitlist mortality postimplementation (6.9 vs 31.6 per 100 patient-years; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Following implementation of the new allocation policy in a small to medium size center, several changes were in accordance with policy intention. However, concerning shifts emerged, including increased waitlist mortality and resource utilization. Continued close monitoring of transplant centers stratified by size and location are paramount to maintaining global availability of lung transplantation to all Americans regardless of geographic residence or socioeconomic status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Haywood
- Division of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va
| | - J Hunter Mehaffey
- Division of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va
| | - Sarah Kilbourne
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va
| | - Hannah Mannem
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va
| | - Max Weder
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va
| | - Christine Lau
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md
| | - Alexander S Krupnick
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Md
| | - Avinash Agarwal
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Va.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mrzljak A, Mikulic D, Busic M, Vukovic J, Jadrijevic S, Kocman B. Liver Transplantation in Croatia: "David Among Goliaths". Transplantation 2021; 105:1389-1391. [PMID: 34157714 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Mrzljak
- Department of Medicine, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Danko Mikulic
- Department of Surgery, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Jurica Vukovic
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Branislav Kocman
- Department of Surgery, Merkur University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fu R, Sekercioglu N, Hishida M, Coyte PC. Economic Consequences of Adult Living Kidney Donation: A Systematic Review. Value Health 2021; 24:592-601. [PMID: 33840438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Current guidelines mandate organ donation to be financially neutral such that it neither rewards nor exploits donors. This systematic review was conducted to assess the magnitude and type of costs incurred by adult living kidney donors and to identify those at risk of financial hardship. METHODS We searched English-language journal articles and working papers assessing direct and indirect costs incurred by donors on PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Research Papers in Economics, and EconLit in 2005 and thereafter. Estimates of total costs, types of costs, and characteristics of donors who incurred the financial burden were extracted. RESULTS Sixteen studies were identified involving 6158 donors. Average donor-borne costs ranged from US$900 to US$19 900 (2019 values) over the period from predonation evaluation to the end of the first postoperative year. Less than half of donors sought financial assistance and 80% had financial loss. Out-of-pocket payments for travel and health services were the most reported items where lost income accounted for the largest proportion (23.2%-83.7%) of total costs. New indirect cost items were identified to be insurance difficulty, exercise impairment, and caregiver income loss. Donors from lower-income households and those who traveled long distances reported the greatest financial hardship. CONCLUSIONS Most kidney donors are undercompensated. Our findings highlight gaps in donor compensation for predonation evaluation, long-distance donations, and lifetime insurance protection. Additional studies outside of North America are needed to gain a global prospective on how to provide for financial neutrality for kidney donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Fu
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Nigar Sekercioglu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manabu Hishida
- Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Critchley CR, Fleming J, Nicol D, Marlton P, Ellis M, Devereux L, Bruce G, Kerridge I. Identifying the nature and extent of public and donor concern about the commercialisation of biobanks for genomic research. Eur J Hum Genet 2021; 29:503-511. [PMID: 33479473 PMCID: PMC7940627 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-00746-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Various forms of private investment are considered necessary for the sustainability of biobanks, yet pose significant challenges to public trust. To manage this tension, it is vital to identify the concerns of relevant stakeholders to ensure effective and acceptable policy and practice. This research examines the aspects of commercialisation that are of most concern to the Australian public (n = 800) and patients who had donated their tissue to two large disease specific (cancer) public biobanks (n = 564). Overall, we found a commercialisation effect (higher support for public relative to private) in relation to funding, research location and access to stored biospecimens. The effect was strongest for research locations and access compared to funding. A latent class analysis revealed the pattern of concern differed, with the majority (34.1%) opposing all aspects of commercialisation, a minority supporting all (15.7%), one quarter (26.8%) opposing some (sharing and selling tissue) but not others (research locations and funding), and a group who were unsure about most aspects but opposed selling tissue (23.5%). Patient donors were found to be more accepting of and unsure about most aspects of commercialisation. Members of the (general) public who were motivated to participate in biobanking were more likely to oppose some aspects while supporting others, while those who indicated they would not donate to a biobank were more likely to oppose all aspects of commercialisation. The results suggest that approaches to policy, engagement and awareness raising need to be tailored for different publics and patient groups to increase participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine R Critchley
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Jennifer Fleming
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Dianne Nicol
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Paula Marlton
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Megan Ellis
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lisa Devereux
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gordana Bruce
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Javanbakht M, Mashayekhi A, Trevor M, Branagan-Harris M, Atkinson J. Cost-utility analysis of normothermic liver perfusion with the OrganOx metra compared to static cold storage in the United Kingdom. J Med Econ 2020; 23:1284-1292. [PMID: 32729749 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1804391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rising numbers of patients on the liver transplant waiting list has led to the utilization of organs from higher-risk donors that are more likely to be discarded and are prone to post-transplant complications. Storage and transportation of these livers at low temperatures can cause damage. OrganOx metra is a portable device intended to preserve and maintain the donated liver in normothermic conditions for up to 24 h prior to transplantation. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-utility of normothermic machine perfusion with OrganOx metra in liver transplantation compared to the current practice of static cold storage (SCS). METHODS A de novo decision analytic model (a decision tree along with a Markov model), based on current treatment pathways, was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes. Results from a randomized clinical trial and national standard sources were used to inform the model. Costs were estimated from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted to explore uncertainty surrounding input parameters. RESULTS Over a lifetime time horizon, liver transplantation with OrganOx metra was more costly and more effective than the current practice of static cold storage. The total costs per patient were £37,370 vs £46,711, and the total effectiveness per patient was 9.09 QALYs vs 10.27 QALYs for SCS and OrganOx metra groups, respectively. The estimated ICER was £7,876 per each QALY gained. Results from the PSA showed that use of OrganOx metra has 99% probability of being cost-effective at a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold. OrganOx metra led to the utilization of 54 additional livers with patients experiencing lower rates of early allograft dysfunction and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Use of OrganOx metra for the perfusion and transportation of livers prior to transplantation is a cost-effective strategy. KEY POINTS FOR DECISION MAKERS Introduction of OrganOx metra into NHS could increase the utilisation of donated livers with patients experiencing lower rates of early allograft dysfunction and adverse events, compared with current practice. Results of the economic analysis indicate that the OrganOx metra is highly likely to be cost-effective and result in improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Javanbakht
- Optimax Access UK Ltd, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Atefeh Mashayekhi
- Optimax Access UK Ltd, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Miranda Trevor
- School of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Michael Branagan-Harris
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| | - Jowan Atkinson
- Device Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
We study popular attitudes in Germany, Spain, the Philippines, and the United States toward three controversial markets-prostitution, surrogacy, and global kidney exchange (GKE). Of those markets, only prostitution is banned in the United States and the Philippines, and only prostitution is allowed in Germany and Spain. Unlike prostitution, majorities support legalization of surrogacy and GKE in all four countries. So, there is not a simple relation between public support for markets, or bans, and their legal and regulatory status. Because both markets and bans on markets require social support to work well, this sheds light on the prospects for effective regulation of controversial markets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin E Roth
- Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305;
| | - Stephanie W Wang
- Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stock PG, Wall A, Gardner J, Domínguez-Gil B, Chadban S, Muller E, Dittmer I, Tullius SG. Ethical Issues in the COVID Era: Doing the Right Thing Depends on Location, Resources, and Disease Burden. Transplantation 2020; 104:1316-1320. [PMID: 32569002 PMCID: PMC7340125 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G. Stock
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anji Wall
- Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - James Gardner
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Elmi Muller
- University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ian Dittmer
- Auckland District Health Board (ADHB), Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang Z, Gerull WD, Gauthier JM, Meyers BF, Kozower BD, Patterson GA, Nava RG, Hachem RR, Witt CA, Byers DE, Marklin GF, Ridolfi G, Liu J, Kreisel D, Puri V. Shipping Lungs Greater Distances Increases Costs Without Cutting Waitlist Mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110:1691-1697. [PMID: 32511997 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND On November 24, 2017, a change in lung allocation policy was initiated to replace the donor service area with a 250-nautical-mile radius circle around the donor hospital. We aim to analyze the consequences of this change, including organ acquisition cost and transplant outcomes, at the national level. METHODS Data on adult patients undergoing lung transplantation between April 27, 2017, and June 22, 2018 (30 weeks before to 30 weeks after allocation policy change) were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Patients were classified into pre-change and post-change subgroups. Six-month overall survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Organ acquisition costs were compared between the pre-change and post-change groups. RESULTS Of the 3317 adult patients removed from the waiting list during the study period (pre-change 1637 vs post-change 1680), 2734 underwent transplantation (pre-change 1371 of 1637 [83.8%] vs post-change 1363 of 1680 [81.1%]), and 382 died or became too sick to be transplanted (pre-change 168 of 1637 [10.3%] vs post-change 214 of 1680 [12.7%], P = .077). Six-month survival rates of transplanted patients were similar between the two groups. However, average organ acquisition costs increased after policy change (pre-change $50,735 ± $10,858 vs post-change $53,440 ± $10,247, P < .001) with an increase in nonlocal donors (pre-change 44.3% vs post-change 68.9%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Organ acquisition costs and resource utilization increased with the new lung allocation policy, whereas deaths on the waiting list or after transplantation did not decrease. Further optimization of the allocation policy is necessary to balance access to transplant and proper stewardship of human and financial resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhizhou Yang
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - William D Gerull
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jason M Gauthier
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Bryan F Meyers
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin D Kozower
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - G Alexander Patterson
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ruben G Nava
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Chad A Witt
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Derek E Byers
- Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | - Jingxia Liu
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel Kreisel
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Varun Puri
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Persad G. Will more organs save more lives? Cost-effectiveness and the ethics of expanding organ procurement. Bioethics 2019; 33:684-690. [PMID: 31020671 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The assumption that procuring more organs will save more lives has inspired increasingly forceful calls to increase organ procurement. This project, in contrast, directly questions the premise that more organ transplantation means more lives saved. Its argument begins with the fact that resources are limited and medical procedures have opportunity costs. Because many other lifesaving interventions are more cost-effective than transplantation and compete with transplantation for a limited budget, spending on organ transplantation consumes resources that could have been used to save a greater number of other lives. This argument has not yet been advanced in debates over expanded procurement and could buttress existing concerns about expanded procurement. To support this argument, I review existing empirical data on the cost-effectiveness of transplantation and compare them to data on interventions for other illnesses. These data should motivate utilitarians and others whose primary goal is maximizing population-wide health benefits to doubt the merits of expanding organ procurement. I then consider two major objections: one makes the case that transplant candidates have a special claim to medical resources, and the other challenges the use of cost-effectiveness to set priorities. I argue that there is no reason to conclude that transplant candidates' medical interests should receive special priority, and that giving some consideration to cost-effectiveness in priority setting requires neither sweeping changes to overall health priorities nor the adoption of any specific, controversial metric for assessing cost-effectiveness. Before searching for more organs, we should first ensure the provision of cost-effective care.
Collapse
|
11
|
Champney TH. A Bioethos for Bodies: Respecting a Priceless Resource. Anat Sci Educ 2019; 12:432-434. [PMID: 30589510 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The value that willed body donors provide to medical education is priceless. Their precious gift helps to teach anatomy, spatial relationships between morphological structures, anatomical variation, and professionalism to medical students in a way that plastic models, podcasts, and lectures cannot. They are also an important resource for medical research and a wide variety of postgraduate training opportunities. While many body donation programs throughout the world are nonprofit organizations, there are body donation companies in the United States that sell donors for-profit. These "body brokers" have accumulated large profits from this business. It is incongruous that others would profit from such a priceless, freely donated gift. To prevent this incongruity, it is proposed that the international anatomical community develop a normative culture (a bioethos) for body donation programs. This would involve the conscious and systematic development of ethical principles for the day-to-day policies and practices of institutions that collect and use human bodies. With the development of this bioethos, a cultural shift in how donors are treated would occur and, over time, this would become the normal practice. These principles would become fundamental and foundational for the procurement and use of priceless human tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Champney
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Champney TH, Hildebrandt S, Gareth Jones D, Winkelmann A. BODIES R US: Ethical Views on the Commercialization of the Dead in Medical Education and Research. Anat Sci Educ 2019; 12:317-325. [PMID: 30240149 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
With the ongoing and expanding use of willed bodies in medical education and research, there has been a concomitant rise in the need for willed bodies and an increase in the means of supplying these bodies. A relatively recent development to enlarge this supply has been the growth of for- profit willed body companies ("body brokers") in the United States. These companies advertise for donors, cover all cremation and other fees for the donor, distribute the bodies or body parts nationally and internationally, and charge their users for access to the body or body parts. In doing so, they generate substantial profits. This review examines the historical development of willed body programs, the legal and economic aspects of willed body programs, and then provides an ethical framework for the use of willed bodies. The ethical principles described include detailed informed consent from the donors, comprehensive and transparent information about the process from the body donation organizations, and societal input on the proper and legal handling of willed bodies. Based on the ethical principles outlined, it is recommended that there be no commercialization or commodification of willed bodies, and that programs that use willed bodies should not generate profit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Champney
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
- Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Sabine Hildebrandt
- Divison of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - D Gareth Jones
- Department of Anatomy, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Andreas Winkelmann
- Institut für Anatomie, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg - Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Given the current organ shortage, a prevalent alternative to the altruism-based policy is a market-based solution: pay people for their organs. Receiving much popular and scholarly attention, a salient normative argument against neoliberal pressures is the preservation of human dignity. This article examines how advocates of both the altruistic status quo and market challengers reason and weigh the central normative concept of dignity, meant as inherent worth and/or rank. Key rhetorical strategies, including motivations and broader social visions, of the two positions are analyzed and evaluated, and the separation of morally normative understandings of dignity from market encroachment is defended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gillespie
- University of California, Los Angeles, 322 Humanities Building, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Department of Health is consulting on opt-in or opt-out for organ donation for transplantation. Merits and demerits. Cooperation between doctors and the family is essential.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
We do not always benefit from the expansion of our choice sets. This is because some options change the context in which we must make decisions in ways that render us worse off than we would have been otherwise. One promising argument against paid living kidney donation holds that having the option of selling a 'spare' kidney would impact people facing financial pressures in precisely this way. I defend this argument from two related criticisms: first, that having the option to sell one's kidney would only be harmful if one is pressured or coerced to take this specific course of action; and second, that such forms of pressure are unlikely to feature in a legal market.
Collapse
|
17
|
Gürses İA, Coşkun O, Öztürk A. Current status of cadaver sources in Turkey and a wake-up call for Turkish anatomists. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 11:155-165. [PMID: 28657659 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Persisting difficulties in body procurement in Turkey led to the acquisition of donated, unclaimed, autopsied, and imported bodies regulated under current legislature. Yet, no study had investigated the extent of the on-going cadaver problem. This study was aimed to outline cadaver sources in anatomy departments and their effectiveness by means of an online survey. Additionally, official websites of each department were investigated regarding any information on body donation. Unclaimed cadavers (84.8%) were the major source for anatomy departments, followed by donated (50%) and imported cadavers (39.1%). Foundation-based medical faculties were more likely to import cadavers (P = 0.008). There was a moderate increase (rs = 0.567; P = 0.018) in donation registrations to our department after 2000. The departments in cities with significantly higher City-Based Gross Domestic Product measures (US$9,900 vs. US$16,772, P = 0.041), frequencies for mid- or high-school graduates (30.4% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.041), and frequencies for under- or post-graduates (13.1% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.24) had managed to use donated cadavers. Anatomy departments' major reasons for using unclaimed cadavers were education (45.9%), unclaimed cadavers being the only source (24.3%), and receiving inadequate donations (21.6%). Nine out of seventy-four departments (12.2%) provided information regarding body donation on their websites. Body procurement remains as a serious problem in Turkey and it is apparent that current legislature does not provide a sufficient cadaver inflow. Similarly, anatomy departments' effectiveness in public awareness of body donation and support in the National Body Donation Campaign seems questionable. Anat Sci Educ 11: 155-165. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Anatomists
- Anatomy/education
- Awareness
- Cadaver
- Dissection
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate/economics
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration
- Faculty, Medical
- Female
- Human Body
- Humans
- Legislation, Medical
- Schools, Medical/economics
- Schools, Medical/organization & administration
- Surveys and Questionnaires
- Time Factors
- Tissue and Organ Procurement/economics
- Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence
- Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods
- Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data
- Turkey
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- İlke Ali Gürses
- Department of Anatomy, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Osman Coşkun
- Department of Anatomy, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adnan Öztürk
- Department of Anatomy, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hanson CS, Ralph AF, Manera KE, Gill JS, Kanellis J, Wong G, Craig JC, Chapman JR, Tong A. The Lived Experience of "Being Evaluated" for Organ Donation: Focus Groups with Living Kidney Donors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2017; 12:1852-1861. [PMID: 28993303 PMCID: PMC5672970 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03550417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Comprehensive evaluations are required to safeguard voluntarism and minimize harm to living kidney donors. This process is lengthy, invasive, and emotionally challenging, with up to one fifth of potential donors opting out. We aimed to describe donors' experiences of the evaluation process. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We conducted 14 focus groups involving 123 kidney donors who completed donation from three transplant centers (Australia and Canada). Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified six themes reflecting donors' experiences of evaluation. The themes that related to perseverance included emotional investment (prioritizing the recipient's health, desperation for a normal life, protecting eligibility, shame of disappointing others, and overcoming opposition), undeterred by low risks (medical confidence and protection, worthwhile gamble, inherent invincibility, and normalizing risks), and mental preparation (avoiding regret, resolving decisional ambivalence, and managing expectations of recovery). The challenges included underlying fears for health (processing alarming information, unsettling uncertainty, and preoperative panic), system shortfalls (self-advocacy in driving the process, stressful urgency, inconsistent framing of safety, unnerving bodily scrutiny, questioning risk information, and draining finances); and lifestyle interference (living in limbo, onerous lifestyle disruption, and valuing flexibility). CONCLUSIONS Previous donors described an emotional investment in donating and determination to protect their eligibility, despite having concerns for their health, financial and lifestyle disruption, and opposition from their family or community. Our findings suggest the need to prepare donors for surgery and recovery, minimize anxiety and lifestyle burdens, ensure that donors feel comfortable expressing their fears and concerns, reduce unnecessary delays, and make explicit the responsibilities of donors in their assessment process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla S. Hanson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angelique F. Ralph
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karine E. Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John S. Gill
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John Kanellis
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health and Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; and
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy R. Chapman
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martínez Otero JM. [The Hypertrophy of Autonomy in the Bioethical Debate]. Cuad Bioet 2017; 28:329-340. [PMID: 28964000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In the current bioethical debate personal autonomy is frequently used as an argument to justify the legalization of new options for the subject. This is the case, for instance, of the controversies around surrogated motherhood, organ free market, euthanasia or egg freezing in order to postpone motherhood. This paper aims to show how legalizing certain options can be harmful to people, and would justify and perpetuate situations of domination of some human beings over others. In this regard, the importance of recognizing the unavailability of certain goods and human rights is underlined.
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Altınörs N, Haberal M. Transplant Ethics. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2016; 14:32-36. [PMID: 27805507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to review and discuss the great variety of ethical issues related to organ donation, organ procurement, transplant activities, and new ethical problems created as a result of technologic and scientific developments. MATERIALS AND METHODS An extensive literature survey was made, and expert opinions were obtained. RESULTS The gap between demand and supply of organs for transplant has yielded to organ trafficking, organ tourism, and commercialism. This problem seems to be the most important issue, and naturally there are ethical dilemmas related to it. A wide number of ideas have been expressed on the subject, and different solutions have been proposed. CONCLUSION The struggle against organ trafficking and commercialism should include legislation, efforts to increase deceased-donor donations, and international cooperation. China's policy to procure organs from prisoners sentenced to death is unethical, and the international community should exert more pressure on the Chinese government to cease this practice. Each particular ethical dilemma should be taken separately and managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Altınörs
- From the Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Başkent University , Ankara, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The shortage of cadaveric organs and increased success of living donor transplantation support the use of living organ donors. Clinical social workers have the opportunity to explore a variety of donor-specific issues when performing psychosocial evaluations of living donors, including motivation, psychological stability, and personal and family consequences of donation, as well as the direct and indirect financial consequences faced by living donors. Although most donor-related medical costs are covered, other associated expenses are not reimbursable and may put donors at risk for financial hardship. Out-of-pocket expenses also serve as a disincentive to donate for some volunteers. During the evaluation process, healthcare professionals should openly discuss how surgery, recovery, and any potential complications might impact prospective donors' financial situation. Donors can then decide whether they are able to realistically handle the costs of donation. We present the financial dilemmas experienced by many living donors and highlight efforts that have been made to deal with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Jacobs
- Fairview University Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Research into the fears and concerns families have about donation and other issues at the time of the donation discussion substantiates that many fears and concerns act as impediments to consent. Twenty fears and concerns voiced by families at the time of the donation discussion have been identified. Specific strategies have been developed to deal with 19 of those concerns. Using gentle probing questions and targeted strategies, trained requestors may successfully address many fears and concerns, thus increasing the likelihood of the family consenting to donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Verble
- Verble, Worth & Verble, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The idea of paying donors in order to make more human bodily material available for therapy, assisted reproduction, and biomedical research is notoriously controversial. However, while national and international donation policies largely oppose financial incentives they do not treat all parts of the body equally: incentives are allowed in connection to the provision of some parts but not others. Taking off from this observation, I discuss whether body parts differ as regards the ethical legitimacy of incentives and, if so, why. I distinguish two approaches to this issue. On a "principled" approach, some but not all body parts are inherently special in a way that proscribes payment. On a "pragmatic" approach, the appropriateness of payment in relation to a specific part must be determined through an overall assessment of e.g. the implications of payment for the health and welfare of providers, recipients, and third parties, and the quality of providers' consent. I argue that the first approach raises deep and potentially divisive questions about the good life, whereas the second approach invokes currently unsupported empirical assumptions and requires difficult balancing between different values and the interests of different people. This does not mean that any attempt to distinguish between body parts in regard to the appropriateness of payment necessarily fails. However, I conclude, any plausible such attempt should either articulate and defend a specific view of the good life, or gather relevant empirical evidence and apply defensible principles for weighing goods and interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Malmqvist
- Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Numerous payment methodologies, contract types, and income reimbursement methods exist in the highly complex environment of transplantation. A fundamental understanding of the transplant environment and the various compensation schemes involved with transplant revenue management is necessary to stay viable in such a complicated system. Knowledge of resources such as Medicare, commercial insurance, Medicaid, and self-pay individuals will allow a program to fully optimize allowable revenue streams. This multiple payer mix can be challenging, with payment arrangements ranging from a single global case rate that must cover all transplant-related services to individual payment arrangements for each stage of the transplantation process. Transplant programs must track each agreement to ensure optimal payment, and must therefore become proficient with central fiscal operations such as Medicare cost reporting and managed care contract negotiations. Outlier protection and risk pool strategies can also be used to remain competitive and profitable. A transplant program must have a thorough understanding of all available payment schemes and reimbursement optimizing strategies to facilitate the realization of a strong financial outlook.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barry Marshall
- Methodist University Hospital Transplant Institute, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Bipin Adhikari
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; Nepal Community Health and Development Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Ping
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Nianzeng Xing
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Financial incentives may spur donation. Nephrol News Issues 2016; 30:24. [PMID: 27382862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
|
29
|
Abstract
Referring to Kant's arguments addressing the moral relationship between our bodies and ourselves is quite common in contemporary debate about organ selling, although he does not provide us with any specific arguments related to this debate. It is widely argued that the most promising way to show the moral impermissibility of organ selling is to mount an argument on Kantian grounds. This paper asks whether it is possible to argue coherently against organ selling in a Kantian framework. It will be shown that by mounting the argument on Kantian grounds no compelling argument can be given against sale of organs, either because the arguments apply to donation of organs, too, or the arguments are not convincing for other independent reasons. In the first section, it will be argued that donation and selling are not distinguishable in a Kantian framework, since the concern about commodification of the body and its parts shall be raised by both actions. In the second section, some contemporary accounts inspired by Kant will be presented and discussed separately. It will be argued that the reasons for promoting organ donation while arguing against selling clash with each other in an unconvincing way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zümrüt Alpinar-Şencan
- Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
One of the more polarizing policies proposed to alleviate the organ shortage is financial payment of donors in return for organs. A priori and empirical investigation concludes that such systems are ethically inadequate. A new methodological approach towards policy formation and implementation is proposed which places ethical concerns at its core. From a hypothetical secular origin, the optimal ethical policy structure concerning organ donation is derived. However, when applied universally, it does not yield ideal results for every culture and society due to region-specific variation. Since religion holds significant influence in the organ donation debate, three religions-Catholicism, Islam, and Shinto-were examined in order to illustrate this variation. Although secular ethical concerns should rest at the core of policy construction, certain region-specific contexts require cultural and religious competence and necessitate the adjustment of the optimal template policy accordingly to yield the best moral and practical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Jackson Smith
- Tulane University School of Medicine, 1470 Annunciation Street, Apartment #3203, New Orleans, LA, 70130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Held PJ, McCormick F, Ojo A, Roberts JP. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Government Compensation of Kidney Donors. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:877-85. [PMID: 26474298 PMCID: PMC5057320 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
From 5000 to 10 000 kidney patients die prematurely in the United States each year, and about 100 000 more suffer the debilitating effects of dialysis, because of a shortage of transplant kidneys. To reduce this shortage, many advocate having the government compensate kidney donors. This paper presents a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of such a change. It considers not only the substantial savings to society because kidney recipients would no longer need expensive dialysis treatments--$1.45 million per kidney recipient--but also estimates the monetary value of the longer and healthier lives that kidney recipients enjoy--about $1.3 million per recipient. These numbers dwarf the proposed $45 000-per-kidney compensation that might be needed to end the kidney shortage and eliminate the kidney transplant waiting list. From the viewpoint of society, the net benefit from saving thousands of lives each year and reducing the suffering of 100 000 more receiving dialysis would be about $46 billion per year, with the benefits exceeding the costs by a factor of 3. In addition, it would save taxpayers about $12 billion each year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Held
- Department of Nephrology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - F McCormick
- U.S. Economic and Financial Research, Bank of America, San Francisco, CA (retired)
| | - A Ojo
- Department of Nephrology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - J P Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco Transplant Service, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kitpoka P, Chanthet S, Chongkolwatana V, Chuansumrit A, Kunakorn M. Comparison of Double RBC Collection by Blood Cell Separators. J Med Assoc Thai 2016; 99:88-96. [PMID: 27455830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The problem of red blood cell (RBC) shortage occurs because of the expanding demand for blood utilization and the dfficulties in donor recruitment and retention. Resources can be maximized by using current technology to collect two units of RBC from the same donor during a single collection session. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance, collection efficiency (CE), production cost, and donor satisfactions of two commercially available blood cell separators (BCS) for double dose red cell (DDRC) collection. Donor safety, clinical effectiveness, and patient safety were studied. MATERIAL AND METHOD Thirty-one repeated male donors from the blood bank, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University were recruited for DDRC collection by two BCSs, the Alyx™, Fresenius Kabi, NC, USA, and the MCS®+, Haemonetics Corporation, Scotland. The donation intervals were at least 16 weeks. The target RBC volume was 360 mL (180 mL x 2 units). Pre- and post-donation hematologic parameters were monitored and quality tests for DDRC were performed. Donor reactions (DR) were observed and donor satisfaction questionnaires were collected after donations. Eighty-six units of RBC were transfused to 33 patients. Transfusion reactions (TR) were observed, and hematocrit (Hct) increments were determined pre-transfusion and 24 hours post-transfusion. RESULTS The Alyx™ was faster for collecting and filtrating RBC (p<0.001) and had better CE (p<0.001). All DDRC from both BCSs met all the quality standards, required by both the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), which were hemoglobin (Hb) >42.5 g, Hct 50 to 70% and the residual white blood cells (WBC) <5x10(6). The Alyx™ processed less whole blood (WB) volume but provided DDRC with higher RBC yield, Hb content, and RBC volume than that of MCS® + (p<0. 001). However; the MCS®+ had one advantage over the Alyx™ whereby the DDRC collected by the MCS®+ were washed to reduce the risk of plasma associated TR. No serious DR from either BCS was observed. All donors had Hb >10 g/dL and Hct >30% after collection, as required by AABB. Serum ferritin reduction and iron depletion found in DDRC donors were not different from WB donors. All donors were satisfied with the DDRC collection process and would like to donate again. There was no evidence of acute or delayed TR in the patients. Hct increased significantly in 69.70% of the patients. CONCLUSION DDRC collection can be performed safely and efficiently from both BCS. The quality of DDRC from both BCSs met the AABB and FDA standards. Donor safety, transfusion safety, and effectiveness were observed. Even though the production cost of DDRC was slightly higher than that of whole blood derived filtered RBC, DDRC was better in terms of quality, risk reduction for infectious agents, and RBC alloimmunization. Production of DDRC can also be helpful supplying special RBC such as group O, Rh D negative, and phenotyped RBC.
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Shaw RM, Bell LJ. 'Because you can't live on love': living kidney donors' perspectives on compensation and payment for organ donation. Health Expect 2015; 18:3201-12. [PMID: 25418552 PMCID: PMC5810734 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Living kidney donation accounts for approximately half of all kidney transplantation in many countries and is central to health policy focused on increasing organ supply. However, little examination of the economic consequences of living kidney donation has been undertaken from the perspective of donors themselves. This article documents living kidney donors' views regarding recompense and payment for organ donation, based on their experience. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five living kidney donors from New Zealand participated in this study. METHODS This qualitative study, based on thematic analysis, uses semi-structured in-depth interviews to examine the experiences of living kidney donors. Themes were organized around altruism and the 'gift', perceptions of shared corporeality and identity, and donor support. RESULTS Most participants agreed the donation process was costly in terms of time and money. Many incurred personal costs, and some experienced financial hardship. All the participants viewed financial hardship as a barrier to organ donation and favoured recompense for direct and indirect costs. Most did not support payment for organs, and none supported commercialization. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The findings show that framing organ donation as a 'gift' can stymie discussion about reciprocity, remuneration and exchange, making talk about financial recompense difficult. Financial well-being, nonetheless, has implications for the ability to care for self and others post-operatively. We conclude that the economic consequences for living kidney donors in jurisdictions where recompense for direct and indirect costs is insufficient are unfair. Review of financial assistance for live organ donors is therefore recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda M. Shaw
- School of Social & Cultural StudiesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Lara J.M. Bell
- School of Social & Cultural StudiesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Olofsson JI, Friberg B, Lundin K. [Introduce a uniform compensation for egg and sperm donors]. Lakartidningen 2015; 112:DR3A. [PMID: 26661269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
|
36
|
Silva VSE, Moura LC, Leite RF, de Oliveira PC, Schirmer J, Roza BDA. Intra-hospital organ and tissue donation coordination project: cost-effectiveness and social benefits. Rev Saude Publica 2015; 49:S0034-89102015000100260. [PMID: 26487290 PMCID: PMC4603262 DOI: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2015049005770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the viability of a professional specialist in intra-hospital committees of organ and tissue donation for transplantation.METHODS Epidemiological, retrospective and cross-sectional study (2003-2011 and 2008-2012), which was performed using organ donation for transplants data in the state of Sao Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. Nine hospitals were evaluated (hospitals 1 to 9). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the differences in the number of brain death referrals and actual donors (dependent variables) after the professional specialist started work (independent variable) at the intra-hospital committee of organ and tissue donation for transplantation. To evaluate the hospital invoicing, the hourly wage of the doctor and registered nurse, according to the legislation of the Consolidation of Labor Laws, were calculated, as were the investment return and the time elapsed to do so.RESULTS Following the nursing specialist commencement on the committee, brain death referrals and the number of actual donors increased at hospital 2 (4.17 and 1.52, respectively). At hospital 7, the number of actual donors also increased from 0.005 to 1.54. In addition, after the nurse started working, hospital revenues increased by 190.0% (ranging 40.0% to 1.955%). The monthly cost for the nurse working 20 hours was US$397.97 while the doctor would cost US$3,526.67. The return on investment was 275% over the short term (0.36 years).CONCLUSIONS This paper showed that including a professional specialist in intra-hospital committees for organ and tissue donation for transplantation proved to be cost-effective. Further economic research in the area could contribute to the efficient public policy implementation of this organ and tissue harvesting model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Silva e Silva
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Escola Paulista de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Luciana Carvalho Moura
- Instituto Israelita de Responsabilidade Social. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Renata Fabiana Leite
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Escola Paulista de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Priscilla Caroliny de Oliveira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Escola Paulista de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Janine Schirmer
- Departamento de Enfermagem na Saúde da Mulher. Escola Paulista de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Bartira De’ Aguiar Roza
- Departamento de Enfermagem Clínica e Cirúrgica. Escola Paulista de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wu JA, Ngo TC, Rothman C, Breyer BN, Eisenberg ML. Selling blood and gametes during tough economic times: insights from Google search. Can J Urol 2015; 22:7973-7977. [PMID: 26432967 PMCID: PMC4933504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To use Google Insights search volume and publicly available economic indicators to test the hypothesis that sperm, egg, and blood donations increase during economic downturns and to demonstrate the feasibility of using Google search volume data to predict national trends in actual sperm, egg, and blood donations rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cross-correlation statistical analysis comparing Google search data for terms relating to blood, egg, and sperm donations with various economic indicators including the S&P 500 closing values, gross domestic product (GDP), the U.S. Index of Leading Indicators (U.S. Leading Index), gross savings rate, mortgage interest rates, unemployment rate, and consumer price index (CPI) from 2004-2011. A secondary analysis determined the Pearson correlation coefficient between Google search data with actual sperm, egg, and blood donation volume in the U.S. as measured by California Cryobank, the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System, and the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey, respectively. Significance of cross-correlation and Pearson correlation analysis as indicated by p value. RESULTS There were several highly significant cross-correlation relationships between search volume and various economic indicators. Correlation between Google search volume for the term 'sperm donation,' 'egg donation,' and 'blood donation' with actual number of sperm, egg and blood donations in the United States demonstrated Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.2 (p > 0.10), -0.1 (p > 0.10), and 0.07 (p > 0.10), respectively. Temporal analysis showed an improved correlation coefficient of 0.9 (p < 0.05) for blood donation when shifted 12 months later relative to Google search volume. CONCLUSION Google search volume data for search terms relating to sperm, egg, and blood donation increase during economic downturns. This finding suggests gamete and bodily fluid donations are influenced by market forces like other commodities. Google search may be useful for predicting blood donation trends but is more limited in predicting actual semen and oocyte donation patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Wu
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Johnson RA, Wendler D. Challenging the Sanctity of Donorism: Patient Tissue Providers as Payment-Worthy Contributors. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2015; 25:291-333. [PMID: 26412739 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2015.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Many research projects rely on human biological materials and some of these projects generate revenue. Recently, it has been argued that investigators have a moral claim to share in the revenue generated by these projects, whereas persons who provide the biological material have no such claim (Truog, Kesselheim, and Joffe 2012). In this paper, we critically analyze this view and offer a positive proposal for why tissue providers have a moral claim to benefit. Focusing on payment as a form of benefit, we argue that research is a joint project and propose a contribution principle for paying participants in those joint projects. We distinguish between contributions that shape a project's revenue generating properties, grounding a claim to payment, and contributions that fail to ground such a claim. We conclude, contrary to existing arguments and practices, that some tissue providers have a moral claim to payment beyond compensation for risk and burden. This conclusion suggests that investigators, institutions, and sponsors should reconsider the fairness of their current practices.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kukla R. Editorial Note. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2015; 25:vii-ix. [PMID: 26412742 DOI: 10.1353/ken.2015.0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
|
40
|
Abstract
In The Gift Relationship, Richard Titmuss argued that the practice of altruistic blood donation fosters social solidarity while markets in blood erode it. This paper considers the implications of this line of argument for the organ market debate. I defend Titmuss' arguments against a number of criticisms and respond to claims that Titmuss' work is not relevant to the context of live donor organ transplantation. I conclude that Titmuss' arguments are more resilient than many advocates of organ markets suggest, and more relevant to the debate than is commonly appreciated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian J Koplin
- Centre for Human Bioethics, School of Philosophical, Historical and International Studies, Monash University, Menzies Building, 20 Chancellors Walk, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bruzzone P. Ethical problems in ex vivo or cadaver organ transplantation: should the donation be paid? Ann Ital Chir 2015; 86:187-191. [PMID: 25856067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Financial incentives for organ donation (from living or cadaveric donors) have been considered ethically acceptable by some bioethicists, and recently, according to the media, by Prof. Gary Becker, Nobel Laureate for Economy. However, the only countries to have approved a law allowing financial incentives for organ donation are Iran in 1988 and, in some way and much later, Singapore and Saudi Arabia. In Europe financial incentives for donors are prohibited, except maybe in Austria. In Germany, it is forbidden to purchase organs not only in the home country, but all over the world. The author was involved, as peer reviewer of a major international Transplant journal, in the evaluation of some papers concerning paid kidney living donors in Iran, and therefore made an extensive literature search on this topic and more generally on paid kidney living donation all over the world. The situation in Italy will also be reported and analysed.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The Australian Federal Government has announced a two-year trial scheme to compensate living organ donors. The compensation will be the equivalent of six weeks paid leave at the rate of the national minimum wage. In this article I analyse the ethics of compensating living organ donors taking the Australian scheme as a reference point. Considering the long waiting lists for organ transplantations and the related costs on the healthcare system of treating patients waiting for an organ, the 1.3 million AUD the Australian Government has committed might represent a very worthwhile investment. I argue that a scheme like the Australian one is sufficiently well designed to avoid all the ethical problems traditionally associated with attaching a monetary value to the human body or to parts of it, namely commodification, inducement, exploitation, and equality issues. Therefore, I suggest that the Australian scheme, if cost-effective, should represent a model for other countries to follow. Nonetheless, although I endorse this scheme, I will also argue that this kind of scheme raises issues of justice in regard to the distribution of organs. Thus, I propose that other policies would be needed to supplement the scheme in order to guarantee not only a higher number of organs available, but also a fair distribution.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Acts of helping others are often based on mixed motivations. Based on this claim, it has been argued that the use of a financial reward to incentivize organ donation is compatible with promoting altruism in organ donation. In its report Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics uses this argument to justify its suggestion to pilot a funeral payment scheme to incentivize people to register for deceased organ donation in the UK. In this article, I cast a sceptical eye on the above Nuffield report's argument that its proposed funeral payment scheme would prompt deceased organ donations that remain altruistic (as defined by and valued the report). Specifically, I illustrate how this scheme may prompt various forms of mixed motivations which would not satisfy the report's definition of altruism. Insofar as the scheme produces an expectation of the reward, it stands diametrical to promoting an 'altruistic perspective'. My minimal goal in this article is to argue that altruism is not motivationally compatible with reward as an incentive for donation. My broader goal is to argue that if a financial reward is used to incentivize organ donation, then we should recognize that the donation system is no longer aiming to promote altruism. Rewarded donation would not be altruistic but it may be ethical given a persistent organ shortage situation.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
In Canada, there are currently no guidelines at either the federal or provincial level regarding the provision of kidney transplantation services to foreign nationals (FN). Renal transplant centres have, in the past, agreed to put refugee claimants and other FNs on the renal transplant waiting list, in part, because these patients (refugee claimants) had health insurance through the Interim Federal Health Programme to cover the costs of medication and hospital care. However, severe cuts recently made to this programme have forced clinicians to question whether they should continue with transplants for FNs, for financial and ethical reasons. This paper first examines different national policies (eg, in Canada, USA, France and the UK) to map the diversity of approaches regarding transplantation for FNs, and then works through different considerations commonly used to support or oppose the provision of organs to these patients: (1) the organ shortage; (2) the free-rider problem; (3) the risk of becoming a transplant destination; (4) the impact on organ donation rates; (5) physicians' duties; (6) economic concerns; (7) vulnerability. Using a Canadian case as a focus, and generalising through a review of various national policies, we analyse the arguments for and against transplantation for FNs with a view to bringing clarity to what is a sensitive political and clinical management issue. Our aim is to help transplant centres, clinicians and ethicists reflect on the merits of possible options, and the rationales behind them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Chantal Fortin
- Nephrology and Transplantation Division, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (CHUM), Canada Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Bryn Williams-Jones
- Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bruzzone P. Independent organ donor facilities: The future of organ donation? Ann Ital Chir 2014; 85:616-617. [PMID: 25919797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Since 2001 independent Organ Donor Facilities(OFOs) have been proposed within Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs) with the aim of reducing organ procurement costs 1, cold ischemia time of donor organs and the flight-related risk 2 for donor surgeons, perfusionists and coordinators. An independent OFO has been established in 2001 in St. Louis 3, half away between the 2 Transplant Centers (TCs) (Washington University School of Medicine and St. Louis University) and now includes a two-bed intensive care facility, a complete laboratory, a cardiac catheterization facility, a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner and an operating room. All brain-dead (BD) patients within OPO (Mid-America Transplant Services), after family's informed consent, are transferred, if necessary by an OPO owned and operated airplane, to this facility, where undergo multiorgan harvesting. By doing so the organ acquisition charges (OACs) apparently decreased, as well as delay in recovery, which can affect organ viability and move families to withdraw consent; also risks and tiring of transplant surgeons were reduced. This independent OFO successfully procured in 2001 not only livers, but also pancreas, kidneys, hearts and lungs 4-6. Cold ischemia time was reduced and there was no Primary Non Function (PNF) of harvested organs, but only kidney delayed graft function (DGF). In the past, heart donors were moved to the recipient's hospital. With the development of multiorgan harvesting, usually donor surgeons are sent by the TCs in order to evaluate liver, pancreas, heart and lungs, while the only local surgeons is the "nephrectomist", that in local hospital is not a transplant surgeon. To move a donor, although hemodinamically stable, is always a risk. Finally, the decrease of OAC must balance the extra expenses to create and operate independent OFOs. In all the papers published by the members of this OFO, the control group of the retrospective analysis consisted of less selected BD donors, requiring more vasosuppressor support, which can be a study bias. It has been proposed that OPOs should organize "recovery teams" for multiple TCs but most transplant surgeons, in case of marginal donors, would like to inspect the organ prior to starting recipient surgery or would send their own team to harvest organs. According to literature, there are no other independent OFOs in US, probably because there is no need for them, and increasing their numbers would not increase organ donation rate. Considering Europe, we do not have information about the existence of independent OFOs: this may be a consequence of logistical organization and minor distances, as well as the higher concentration of TCs. However, the acceptance of such a procedure from donors' families may be less enthusiastic in Europe than in USA, particularly from minorities. In Italy would not be acceptable that the maintenance of BD donors and more generally the operation of independent OFO would rely on non-physicians, to save costs. Finally it is not clear from the reviewed papers who pay for transportation of the donor's body from the independent OFO back to home, but donor's family should not be charged for these expenses. At least 5 donors were lost during transportation, confirming that moving of BD donors remains a risky procedure. The potential economical and organizative benefits of independent OFOs could be counterweighted by the perceived (by relatives and public opinion) commodification/ reification of BD patients. Anyway, the authors of these papers should be congratulated for their innovative proposal. However, a prospective randomized trial would be needed to draw more definitive conclusions on the real benefits of independent OFOs.
Collapse
|
46
|
Holwell E, Keehn J, Leu CS, Sauer MV, Klitzman R. Egg donation brokers: an analysis of agency versus in vitro fertilization clinic websites. J Reprod Med 2014; 59:534-541. [PMID: 25552124 PMCID: PMC4639393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare websites of agencies that broker the services of women who provide human eggs for in vitro fertilization versus clinics that recruit egg providers. STUDY DESIGN We examined 207 websites, of which 128 were egg provider agency 40%) or clinic (60%) websites that recruited providers online. We compared them regarding several variables related to adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines. RESULTS According to their respective websites, agencies were more likely than clinics to mention ASRM guidelines, be located in the West/Pacific, indicate compensation, offer a fee range, set their minimum > $5,000, specify preferable traits, cap provider age at 31, require an education minimum, allow both parties to meet, discuss short-term risks, and not acknowledge a possible cancer risk. Only 25.5% of agencies and 19.5% of clinics mention psychological/emotional risks, and 11.8% and 5.2%, respectively, mention risk to future fertility. CONCLUSION This research, the first to systematically compare several key aspects of egg provider agencies versus clinics, suggests it significant differences in adherence to guidelines, raising several concerns and suggesting needs for consideration of improved monitoring and regulation by ASRM or others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Holwell
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wahab MA, Hamed H, Salah T, Elsarraf W, Elshobary M, Sultan AM, Shehta A, Fathy O, Ezzat H, Yassen A, Elmorshedi M, Elsaadany M, Shiha U. Problem of living liver donation in the absence of deceased liver transplantation program: Mansoura experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:13607-13614. [PMID: 25309092 PMCID: PMC4188913 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2014] [Revised: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We report our experience with potential donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is the first report from an area where there is no legalized deceased donation program. This is a single center retrospective analysis of potential living donors (n = 1004) between May 2004 and December 2012. This report focuses on the analysis of causes, duration, cost, and various implications of donor exclusion (n = 792). Most of the transplant candidates (82.3%) had an experience with more than one excluded donor (median = 3). Some recipients travelled abroad for a deceased donor transplant (n = 12) and some died before finding a suitable donor (n = 14). The evaluation of an excluded donor is a time-consuming process (median = 3 d, range 1 d to 47 d). It is also a costly process with a median cost of approximately 70 USD (range 35 USD to 885 USD). From these results, living donor exclusion has negative implications on the patients and transplant program with ethical dilemmas and an economic impact. Many strategies are adopted by other centers to expand the donor pool; however, they are not all applicable in our locality. We conclude that an active legalized deceased donor transplantation program is necessary to overcome the shortage of available liver grafts in Egypt.
Collapse
|
48
|
Rule interpretation impacts offsite organ recovery. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:1712. [PMID: 25180325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
|
49
|
Abstract
It has been suggested that human organs should be bought and sold on a regulated market as any other material property belongingto an individual. This would have the advantage of both addressing the grave shortage of organs available for transplantation and respecting the freedom of individuals to choose to do whatever they want with their body parts. The old arguments against such a market in human organs are, therefore, being brought back into question. The article examines the different arguments both in favour and against the sale of human organs. It concludes that the body and any of its elements is a full expression of the whole person. As such, they cannot have a price if the individual is to retain his or her full inherent dignity and if society is to retain and protect this very important concept.
Collapse
|
50
|
Giancaspro M. Reproductive tissue and contract. J Bioeth Inq 2014; 11:131-134. [PMID: 24744178 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-014-9516-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Giancaspro
- Law School, University of Adelaide, North Tce, Adelaide, 5005, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|