Safety and efficacy of satralizumab monotherapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Review of the Longitudinal Management of Autoimmune Encephalitis, Potential Biomarkers, and Novel Therapeutics

Purpose of Review

Increasing awareness and earlier diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) have led to a greater number of patients being cared for longitudinally by neurologists. Although many neurologists are now familiar with the general approach to diagnosis and acute immunosuppression, this review aims to provide neurologists with guidance related to management beyond the acute phase of disease, including long-term immunosuppression, monitoring, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and symptom management.

Recent Findings

Observational studies in AE have demonstrated that early diagnosis and treatment is associated with improved neurologic outcomes, particularly in AE with antibodies targeting neuronal cell surface/synaptic proteins. The literature regarding long-term management is evolving. In addition to traditional immunosuppressive approaches, there is emerging use of novel immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) in case series, and several randomized controlled trials are planned. Novel biomarkers of disease activity and methods to measure outcomes and response to treatment are being explored. Furthermore, it is increasingly recognized that many individuals have chronic symptoms affecting quality of life including seizures, cognitive impairment, fatigue, sleep disorders, and mood disorders, and there are emerging data supporting the use of patient centered outcome measures and multidisciplinary symptom-based care.

Summary

This review aims to summarize recent literature and offer a practical approach to long-term management of adult patients with AE through a multidisciplinary approach. We summarize current knowledge on ISTs, potential biomarkers of disease activity, outcome measures, and long-term sequelae. Further research is needed to answer questions regarding optimal IST, biomarker validity, and sequelae of disease.

Moving towards a new era for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) include a rare group of autoimmune conditions that primarily affect the central nervous system. They are characterized by inflammation and damage to the optic nerves, brain and spinal cord, leading to severe vision impairment, locomotor disability and sphynteric disturbances. In the majority of cases, NMOSD arises due to specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies targeting aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG), which is the most prevalent water-channel protein of the central nervous system. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to manage symptoms and prevent long-term disability in NMOSD patients. NMOSD were previously associated with a poor prognosis. However, recently, a number of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that biological therapies acting on key elements of NMOSD pathogenesis, such as B cells, interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway, and complement, have impressive efficacy in preventing the occurrence of clinical relapses. The approval of the initial drugs marks a revolutionary advancement in the treatment of NMOSD patients, significantly transforming therapeutic options and positively impacting their prognosis. In this review, we will provide an updated overview of the key immunopathological, clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging aspects of NMOSD. Additionally, we will critically examine the latest advancements in NMOSD treatment approaches. Lastly, we will discuss key aspects regarding optimization of treatment strategies and their monitoring.

Interleukin-6 Signaling Blockade Induces Regulatory Plasmablasts in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Interleukin-6 receptor antibodies (IL-6R Abs), including satralizumab, are increasingly used to prevent relapse for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, the detailed mechanism of action of this treatment on the lymphocyte phenotype remains unclear. This study focused on B cells in patients with NMOSD, hypothesizing that IL-6R Ab enables B cells to acquire regulatory functions by producing the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated in vitro to induce the expansion of B-cell subsets, double-negative B cells (DNs; CD19+ IgD-, CD27-) and plasmablasts (PBs; CD19+, CD27hi, CD38hi). Whole B cells, DNs, or PBs were isolated after culture with IL-6R Ab, and IL-10 expression was quantified using quantitative PCR and a cytometric bead array. RNA sequencing was performed to identify the marker of regulatory PBs induced by IL-6R Ab.

RESULTS

DNs and PBs were observed to expand in patients with NMSOD during the acute attacks. In the in vitro model, IL-6R Ab increased IL-10 expression in B cells. Notably, IL-10 expression increased in PBs but not in DNs. Using RNA sequencing, CD200 was identified as a marker of regulatory PBs among the differentially expressed upregulated genes. CD200+ PBs produced more IL-10 than CD200- PBs. Furthermore, patients with NMOSD who received satralizumab had a higher proportion of CD200+ PBs than patients during the acute attacks.

DISCUSSION

Treatment with IL-6 signaling blockade elicited a regulatory phenotype in B cells and PBs. CD200+ PBs may be a marker of treatment responsiveness in the context of NMOSD pathophysiology.

Preferences for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder treatments: A conjoint analysis with neurologists in Spain

BACKGROUND

The treatment landscape for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has changed in recent years with the approval of therapies with different efficacy, safety and administration profiles.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess neurologists' preferences for different NMOSD treatment attributes using conjoint analysis (CA).

METHODS

We conducted an online, non-interventional, cross-sectional study in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Neurology. Our CA assessed five drugs' attributes: prevention of relapse, prevention of disability accumulation, safety risk, management during pregnancy, and route and frequency of administration. Participants were presented with eight hypothetical treatment scenarios to rank based on their preferences from the most preferred to the least. An ordinary least squares method was selected to estimate weighted preferences.

RESULTS

A total of 104 neurologists were included. Mean age (standard deviation-SD) was 37.7 (10.3) years, 52.9 % were male, and median time (interquartile range) of experience managing NMOSD was 5.0 (2.9, 10.8) years. Neurologists placed the greatest importance on efficacy attributes, time to relapse (44.1 %) being the most important, followed by preventing disability accumulation (36.8 %). In contrast, route and frequency of administration (4.6 %) was the least important characteristic. Participants who prioritised efficacy attributes felt more comfortable in decision-making, had fewer past experiences of care-related regret and a lower attitude to risk taking than their counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Neurologists' treatment preferences in NMOSD were mainly driven by efficacy attributes. These results may be useful to design policy decisions and treatment guidelines for this condition.

B cell-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells as an emerging therapy in neuroimmunological diseases

BACKGROUND

Neuroimmunology research and development has been marked by substantial advances, particularly in the treatment of neuroimmunological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. With more than 20 drugs approved for multiple sclerosis alone, treatment has become more personalised. The approval of disease-modifying therapies, particularly those targeting B cells, has highlighted the role of immunotherapeutic interventions in the management of these diseases. Despite these successes, challenges remain, particularly for patients who do not respond to conventional therapies, underscoring the need for innovative approaches.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The approval of monoclonal antibodies, such as ocrelizumab and ofatumumab, which target CD20, and inebilizumab, which targets CD19, for the treatment of various neuroimmunological diseases reflects progress in the understanding and management of B-cell activity. However, the limitations of these therapies in halting disease progression or activity in patients with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders have prompted the exploration of cell-based therapies, particularly chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Initially successful in the treatment of B cell-derived malignancies, CAR T cells offer a novel therapeutic mechanism by directly targeting and eliminating B cells, potentially overcoming the shortcomings of antibody-mediated B cell depletion. WHERE NEXT?: The use of CAR T cells in autoimmune diseases and B cell-driven neuroimmunological diseases shows promise as a targeted and durable option. CAR T cells act autonomously, penetrating deep tissue and effectively depleting B cells, especially in the CNS. Although the therapeutic potential of CAR T cells is substantial, their application faces hurdles such as complex logistics and management of therapy-associated toxic effects. Ongoing and upcoming clinical trials will be crucial in determining the safety, efficacy, and applicability of CAR T cells. As research progresses, CAR T cell therapy has the potential to transform treatment for patients with neuroimmunological diseases. It could offer extended periods of remission and a new standard in the management of autoimmune and neuroimmunological disorders.

Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

INTRODUCTION

Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions.

METHODS

Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs).

RESULTS

For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.

Safety and efficacy of inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: end-of-study results from the open-label period of the N-MOmentum trial

BACKGROUND

Inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting antibody, demonstrated safety and efficacy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the randomised controlled period of the N-MOmentum trial. Here, end-of-study data, including the randomised controlled period and open-label extension period, are reported.

METHODS

In the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 N-MOmentum trial, adults aged 18 years and older with an neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder diagnosis, Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 8·0 or less, and history of either at least one acute inflammatory attack requiring rescue therapy in the past year or two attacks requiring rescue therapy in the past 2 years, were recruited from 81 outpatient specialty clinics or hospitals in 24 countries. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (3:1), using a central interactive voice system or interactive web response system, and a permuted block randomisation scheme (block size of 4), to receive intravenous inebilizumab (300 mg) or identical placebo on days 1 and 15 of the randomised period, which lasted up to 197 days. Participants and all study staff were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint of the randomised period of the trial was time to onset of adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attack on or before day 197. Participants in the randomised controlled period who had an adjudicated attack, completed 197 days in the study, or were in the randomised controlled period when enrolment stopped, could voluntarily enter the open-label period. In the open-label period, participants either initiated inebilizumab if assigned placebo (receiving 300 mg on days 1 and 15 of the open-label period) or continued treatment if assigned inebilizumab (receiving 300 mg on day 1 and placebo on day 15, to maintain B-cell depletion and masking of the randomised controlled period). All participants subsequently received inebilizumab 300 mg every 6 months for a minimum of 2 years. The end-of-study analysis endpoints were time to adjudicated attack and annualised attack rate (assessed in all participants who received inebilizumab at any point during the randomised controlled period or open-label period [any inebilizumab population] and the aquaporin-4 [AQP4]-IgG seropositive subgroup [any inebilizumab-AQP4-IgG seropositive population]) and safety outcomes (in all participants who were exposed to inebilizumab, analysed as-treated). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02200770, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 6, 2015, and Sept 24, 2018, 467 individuals were screened, 231 were randomly assigned, and 230 received at least one dose of inebilizumab (n=174) or placebo (n=56). Between May 19, 2015, and Nov 8, 2018, 165 (95%) of 174 participants in the inebilizumab group and 51 (91%) of 56 in the placebo group entered the open-label period (mean age 42·9 years [SD 12·4], 197 [91%] of 216 were female, 19 [9%] were male, 115 [53%] were White, 45 [21%] were Asian, 19 [9%] were American Indian or Alaskan Native, and 19 [9%] were Black or African American). As of data cutoff for this end of study analysis (Dec 18, 2020; median exposure 1178 days [IQR 856-1538], total exposure of 730 person-years) 225 participants formed the any inebilizumab population, and 208 (92%) participants were AQP4-IgG seropositive. Overall, 63 adjudicated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attacks occurred in 47 (21%) of 225 treated participants (60 attacks occurred in 44 [21%] of 208 in the AQP4-IgG seropositive subgroup); 40 (63%) of 63 attacks occurred in 34 (15%) of 225 treated participants during the first year of treatment. Of individuals who had an adjudicated attack while receiving inebilizumab, 36 (77%) of 47 were subsequently attack-free at the end of 4 years. Annualised attack rates decreased year-on-year, with end-of-study adjusted annualised attack rates being similar in the any inebilizumab-AQP4-IgG seropositive subgroup (0·097 [95% CI 0·070-0·14]) and any inebilizumab populations (0·092 [0·067-0·13]). Overall, 208 (92%) of 225 participants who received any inebilizumab had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, the most frequent of which were urinary tract infection (59 [26%]), nasopharyngitis (47 [21%]), and arthralgia (39 [17%]). Infection rates did not increase over 4 years. Three (1%) of 225 participants in the any inebilizumab population died during the open-label period (one each due to a CNS event of unknown cause and pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency resulting from an neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder attack and viral pneumonia related to COVID-19), all of which were deemed to be unrelated to treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Data from the end-of-study analysis of the N-MOmentum trial showed continued and sustained clinical benefits of long-term inebilizumab treatment in individuals with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, which supports the role of inebilizumab as a CD19+ B-cell-depleting therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

FUNDING

MedImmune and Viela Bio/Horizon Therapeutics, now part of Amgen.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab with conventional immunotherapy in refractory patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study was based on patients from an MG registry study in China and conducted from February 10, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Adult refractory patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG were assigned to tocilizumab or conventional immunotherapy groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean difference of MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) change at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 corresponding to that at the baseline between the two groups. A generalized estimating equation model was used for the primary outcome analysis. Safety was assessed based on adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 34 eligible patients, 20 (mean [standard deviation] age, 53.8 [21.9] years; 12 [60.0%] female) received tocilizumab and 14 received conventional immunotherapy (45.8 [18.0] years; 8 [57.1%] female). The tocilizumab group had greater reduction in MG-ADL score at week 4 (adjusted mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -4.7 to -2.0; p < 0.001) than the conventional immunotherapy group, with significant differences sustained through week 24 (adjusted mean difference, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.4 to -2.6; p < 0.001). At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving higher levels of MG-ADL (up to 7-point reduction) and QMG (up to 11-point reduction) scores improvement was significantly greater with tocilizumab. Tocilizumab had acceptable safety profiles without severe or unexpected safety issues.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab is safe and effective in improving the MG-ADL score and reducing prednisone dose in refractory AChR-Ab+ gMG, suggesting tocilizumab has the potential to be a valuable therapeutic option for such patients.

Efgartigimod as rescue treatment in acute phase of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A Case Report

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a central nervous system demyelinating disease. Current therapy methods, however, have limited effect on acute attacks except for intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). Efgartigimod is a first-in-class novel human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc fragment approved for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis. Its capacity to rapidly decrease serum IgG levels, including pathogenic autoantibodies, positions it as a potentially effective option for managing the acute phase of NMOSD.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 59-year-old female patient with acute NMOSD, presenting with vision loss and numbness in all four limbs. Despite an initial inadequate response to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the addition of Efgartigimod to her treatment regimen led to rapid improvement, notably including a significant reduction in serum aquaporin-4 antibody titers, total IgG levels, and inflammation cytokine levels. Furthermore, no adverse events were reported during a four-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

As an adjunct to glucocorticoid therapy, Efgartigimod has proven effective and safe for this patient. However, to ascertain its potential as a novel therapeutic option for acute NMOSD, larger-scale prospective clinical trials are required.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease

For over two centuries, clinicians have been aware of various conditions affecting white matter which had come to be grouped under the umbrella term multiple sclerosis. Within the last 20 years, specific scientific advances have occurred leading to more accurate diagnosis and differentiation of several of these conditions including, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. This new understanding has been coupled with advances in disease-modifying therapies which must be accurately applied for maximum safety and efficacy.

Anti- and pro-inflammatory milieu differentially regulate differentiation and immune functions of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells

Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) were regarded for years solely for their regenerative role; however, their immune-modulatory roles have gained much attention recently, particularly in the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite extensive studies on OPCs, there are limited data elucidating the interactions between their intrinsic regenerative and immune functions, as well as their relationship with the inflamed central nervous system (CNS) environment, a key factor in MS pathology. We examined the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines, represented by interferon (IFN)-γ and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines, represented by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-10, on OPC differentiation and immune characteristics. Using primary cultures, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence stainings, we assessed differentiation capacity, phagocytic activity, major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II expression, and cytokine secretion. We observed that the anti-inflammatory milieu (IL4 and IL10) reduced both OPC differentiation and immune functions. Conversely, exposure to TNF-α led to intact differentiation, increased phagocytic activity, high levels of MHC-II expression, and cytokines secretion. Those effects were attributed to signalling via TNF-receptor-2 and counteracted the detrimental effects of IFN-γ on OPC differentiation. Our findings suggest that a pro-regenerative, permissive inflammatory environment is needed for OPCs to execute both regenerative and immune-modulatory functions.

Long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder

Background

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing, autoimmune, inflammatory astrocytopathy. Rituximab for B-cell suppression is a common treatment for NMOSD; however, large-scale randomised controlled trials are lacking.

Objective

Evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of rituximab for NMOSD.

Methods

Retrospective observational study of patients with NMOSD treated with rituximab. Annualised relapse rates (ARRs) before and during rituximab treatment were evaluated; Modified Rankin Scores (mRS) were measured as a marker of disability.

Results

In total, 37 patients were included: 27 aquaporin-4-IgG-seropositive and 10 seronegative NMOSD. The predominant rituximab dosing regimen was an initial 1000 mg, split over two 500 mg infusions, two weeks apart, followed by single 500 mg doses. Over a median follow-up of 54 months, ARR for the whole cohort was 0.136 (95% CI 0.088-0.201), significantly lower than the pretreatment ARR of 0.366 (95% CI 0.271-0.483, p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in ARR for the seropositive subgroup, but not seronegative. Significant improvement in mRS was seen post-treatment. Infections were reported in 32% of patients during follow-up; most were mild.

Conclusion

Rituximab, at doses lower than traditionally used, may be an efficacious therapy for NMOSD, with a favourable safety profile.

Time to Disability Milestones and Annualized Relapse Rates in NMOSD and MOGAD

OBJECTIVE

To investigate accumulation of disability in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in a changing treatment landscape. We aimed to identify risk factors for the development of disability milestones in relation to disease duration, number of attacks, and age.

METHODS

We analyzed data from individuals with NMOSD and MOGAD from the German Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group registry. Applying survival analyses, we estimated risk factors and computed time to disability milestones as defined by the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS).

RESULTS

We included 483 patients: 298 AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD, 52 AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD patients, and 133 patients with MOGAD. Despite comparable annualized attack rates, disability milestones occurred earlier and after less attacks in NMOSD patients than MOGAD patients (median time to EDSS 3: AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD 7.7 (95% CI 6.6-9.6) years, AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD 8.7) years, MOGAD 14.1 (95% CI 10.4-27.6) years; EDSS 4: 11.9 (95% CI 9.7-14.7), 11.6 (95% lower CI 7.6) and 20.4 (95% lower CI 14.1) years; EDSS 6: 20.1 (95% CI 16.5-32.1), 20.7 (95% lower CI 11.6), and 37.3 (95% lower CI 29.4) years; and EDSS 7: 34.2 (95% lower CI 31.1) for AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD). Higher age at onset increased the risk for all disability milestones, while risk of disability decreased over time.

INTERPRETATION

AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD, AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD, and MOGAD patients show distinctive relapse-associated disability progression, with MOGAD having a less severe disease course. Investigator-initiated research has led to increasing awareness and improved treatment strategies appearing to ameliorate disease outcomes for NMOSD and MOGAD. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:720-732.

Real-world management of patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder using satralizumab: Results from a Japanese claims database

BACKGROUND

Satralizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has been approved globally for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), based on positive results from two randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies: SAkuraSky (NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (NCT02073279). There remains an unmet need to understand the real-world management of NMOSD, especially in patients undergoing tapering of concomitant therapy. We examined real-world treatment patterns, including concomitant glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, and relapse in satralizumab-treated patients with NMOSD, using a Japanese administrative hospital claims database.

METHODS

We used retrospective data from the Medical Data Vision hospital-based administrative claims database. The index date was the date of first satralizumab prescription and the study period was set between August 2018 and March 2022. Patients were included in the overall population if they had a first prescription for satralizumab between August 2020 and March 2022, an International Classification of Disease, Version10 code of G36.0 prior to March 2022, and were observable for ≥90 days prior to the index date. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with relapse-free reduction of oral glucocorticoids to 0 mg/day at 360 days of continued satralizumab treatment. Secondary endpoints included time to relapse, number of relapses after the index date while being on continuous satralizumab treatment, annualized relapse rate before and after the index date, and concomitant medication use. Relapse and dose reduction were identified using definition specifically developed for this study.

RESULTS

Of the 131 patients included in the overall population, most were female (90.8 %), aged 18-65 years (75.6 %), and were prescribed oral glucocorticoids (93.1 %). Azathioprine (19.1 %) and tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor (18.3 %), were the most common immunosuppressants at index date. Six (4.6 %) patients had a history of biologic use (tocilizumab, 1 [0.8 %]; eculizumab, 5 [3.8 %]). Among 111 patients observable for 360 days pre-index, there were 0.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) relapses during 360 days before the index date. The median (interquartile range) duration of satralizumab exposure was 197.0 (57.0-351.0) days. Most (125/131; 95.4 %) patients were relapse-free post-index; 6 (4.6 %) patients relapsed within 90 days after the index date, of which 2 had the first relapse within 7 days after the index date. Among 21 patients with 360-day follow-up, 6 (28.6 %) patients were on 0 mg/day dose of glucocorticoid prescription without relapse 360 days post-index. Of these 6 patients, 2 had no prescription of oral glucocorticoids at the index date and remained glucocorticoid- and relapse-free 360 days after the index date.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data support the phase 3 clinical trials. Our results, over a median duration of satralizumab exposure of 197.0 days, showed that a majority (125/131, 95.4 %) of patients were relapse-free after initiating satralizumab treatment. The number of glucocorticoid-free patients without relapse increased over time under continuous satralizumab prescription. Further studies are needed to confirm if satralizumab can be used as a potential immunosuppressant- and glucocorticoid-sparing agent.

A Dual-domain Engineered Antibody for Efficient HBV Suppression and Immune Responses Restoration

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major public health concern because of the inefficiency of currently approved therapies in clearing the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Antibody-based regimens have demonstrated potency regarding virus neutralization and HBsAg clearance. However, high dosages or frequent dosing are required for virologic control. In this study, a dual-domain-engineered anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapeutic antibody 73-DY is developed that exhibits significantly improved efficacy regarding both serum and intrahepatic viral clearance. In HBV-tolerant mice, administration of a single dose of 73-DY at 2 mg kg-1 is sufficient to reduce serum HBsAg by over 3 log10 IU mL-1 and suppress HBsAg to < 100 IU mL-1 for two weeks, demonstrating a dose-lowering advantage of at least tenfold. Furthermore, 10 mg kg-1 of 73-DY sustainably suppressed serum viral levels to undetectable levels for ≈ 2 weeks. Molecular analyses indicate that the improved efficacy exhibited by 73-DY is attributable to the synergy between fragment antigen binding (Fab) and fragment crystallizable (Fc) engineering, which conferred sustained viral suppression and robust viral eradication, respectively. Long-term immunotherapy with reverse chimeric 73-DY facilitated the restoration of anti-HBV immune responses. This study provides a foundation for the development of next-generation antibody-based CHB therapies.

Structural insights into IL-6 signaling inhibition by therapeutic antibodies

Antibody inhibitors of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling pathway, such as tocilizumab and sarilumab, have been used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced cytokine storm, and severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Here, we solve the cryogenic electron microscopy structures of sarilumab and tocilizumab in complex with IL-6R to resolutions of 3.2 and 3.3 Å, respectively. These structures reveal that both tocilizumab and sarilumab bind to the D3 domain of IL-6R. The binding surfaces of the two antibodies largely overlap, but the detailed interactions are different. Functional studies of various mutants show results consistent with our structural analysis of the antibodies and IL-6R interactions. Structural comparisons with the IL-6/IL-6R/gp130 complex indicate that sarilumab and tocilizumab probably inhibit IL-6/IL-6R signaling by competing for the IL-6 binding site. In summary, this work reveals the antibody-blocking mechanism of the IL-6 signaling pathway and paves the way for future antibody discovery.

Chimeric AQP4-based immunosorbent for highly-specific removal of AQP4-IgG from blood

Anti-aquaporin-4 autoantibodies (AQP4-IgG) are implicated in the pathogenesis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and their removal from the blood circulation is considered to be an effective method for acute treatment. An ideal extracorporeal AQP4-IgG removal system should have high specificity, which means that it can selectively remove AQP4-IgG without affecting normal immunoglobulins. However, the conventional tryptophan immobilized column lacks sufficient specificity and cannot achieve this goal. In this study, we successfully prepared a fusion protein chimeric AQP4, which consists of the complete antigenic epitopes of human AQP4 and the constant region of scaffold protein DARPin. Chimeric AQP4 was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli, and then immobilized on agarose gel as a ligand for selective capture of AQP4-IgG immunosorbent. The prepared immunosorbent had a theoretical maximum adsorption capacity of 20.48 mg/g gel estimated by Langmuir isotherm. In vitro plasma perfusion tests demonstrated that the chimeric AQP4 coupled adsorbent had remarkable adsorption performance, and could eliminate more than 85 % of AQP4-IgG under the gel-to-plasma ratio of 1:50. Moreover, it exhibited high specificity because other human plasma proteins were not adsorbed in the dynamic adsorption experiment. These results suggest that the chimeric AQP4 coupled immunosorbent can provide a new approach for specific immunoadsorption (IA) treatment of NMOSD.

Therapeutic inertia in the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Introduction and objective

Limited information is available on how neurologists make therapeutic decisions in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), especially when new treatments with different mechanisms of action, administration, and safety profile are being approved. Decision-making can be complex under this uncertainty and may lead to therapeutic inertia (TI), which refers to lack of treatment initiation or intensification when therapeutic goals are not met. The study aim was to assess neurologists' TI in NMOSD.

Methods

An online, cross-sectional study was conducted in collaboration with the Spanish Society of Neurology. Neurologists answered a survey composed of demographic characteristics, professional background, and behavioral traits. TI was defined as the lack of initiation or intensification with high-efficacy treatments when there is evidence of disease activity and was assessed through five NMOSD aquaporin-4 positive (AQP4+) simulated case scenarios. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between neurologists' characteristics and TI.

Results

A total of 78 neurologists were included (median interquartile range [IQR] age: 36.0 [29.0-46.0] years, 55.1% male, median [IQR] experience managing demyelinating conditions was 5.2 [3.0-11.1] years). The majority of participants were general neurologists (59.0%) attending a median (IQR) of 5.0 NMOSD patients (3.0-12.0) annually. Thirty participants (38.5%) were classified as having TI. Working in a low complexity hospital and giving high importance to patient's tolerability/safety when choosing a treatment were predictors of TI.

Conclusion

TI is a common phenomenon among neurologists managing NMOSD AQP4+. Identifying TI and implementing specific intervention strategies may be critical to improving therapeutic decisions and patient care.

Treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: revisiting the complement system and other aspects of pathogenesis

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) represents a rare neuroimmunological disease causing recurrent attacks and accumulation of permanent disability in affected patients. The discovery of the pathogenic IgG‑1 antibody targeting a water channel expressed in astrocytes, aquaporin 4, constitutes a milestone achievement. Subsequently, multiple pathophysiological aspects of this distinct disease entity have been investigated. Demyelinating lesions and axonal damage ensue from autoantibodies targeting an astroglial epitope. This conundrum has been addressed in the current disease model, where activation of the complement system as well as B cells and interleukin 6 (IL-6) emerged as key contributors. It is the aim of this review to address these factors in light of novel treatment compounds which reflect these pathophysiological concepts in aiming for attack prevention, thus reducing disease burden in patients with NMOSD.

Review of Satralizumab for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A New Biologic Agent Targeting the Interleukin-6 Receptor

Currently, three monoclonal antibodies (MABs) have received regulatory approval from the federal agency, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA), for the medical management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Satralizumab was the third approved therapy after MABs like eculizumab and inebilizumab for NMOSD, an uncommon but severe enfeebling autoimmune neurological disease. Satralizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, exerts its action in NMOSD by acting against cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), a foremost mediator in the pathological process of NMOSD. Two pivotal clinical trials carried out in NMOSD patients had established that satralizumab significantly decreased the rate of relapse in patients suffering from NMOSD as opposed to placebo. The trials also demonstrated that satralizumab is relatively safe. Thus, satralizumab provides an efficacious and safe treatment option for this rare, disabling central nervous system (CNS) disease. Our review aimed to elucidate the pharmacological characteristics of satralizumab and illustrate the available evidence regarding its safety and efficacy in patients with NMOSD.

Measuring the economic burden of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Colombia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic burden of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in the Colombian context.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted from a societal perspective using the prevalence-based approach. Costs were expressed in 2022 US dollars (1 USD = $3,914.46 COP). Direct medical costs were assessed from a bottom-up approach. Indirect costs included loss of productivity of the patient and their caregivers. The economic burden of NMOSD in Colombia was estimated as the sum of direct and indirect costs.

RESULTS

The direct cost of treating a patient with NMOSD was USD$ 8,149.74 per year. When projecting costs nationwide, NMOSD would cost USD$ 7.2 million per year. Of these costs, 53.5% would be attributed to relapses and 34.4% to pharmacological therapy. Indirect costs potentially attributed to NMOSD in Colombia were estimated at USD$ 1.5 million per year per cohort. Of these, 78% are attributable to loss of patient productivity, mainly due to reduced access to the labor market and premature mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The NMOSD has a representative economic burden at the patient level, with direct costs, particularly related to relapses and medicines, being the main component of total costs. These findings are useful evidence that requires attention from public policymakers in Colombia.

Updates in NMOSD and MOGAD Diagnosis and Treatment: A Tale of Two Central Nervous System Autoimmune Inflammatory Disorders

Aquaporin-4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD) and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) are antibody-associated diseases targeting astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, respectively. Their recognition as distinct entities has led to each having its own diagnostic criteria that require a combination of clinical, serologic, and MRI features. The therapeutic approach to acute attacks in AQP4+NMOSD and MOGAD is similar. There is now class 1 evidence to support attack-prevention medications for AQP4+NMOSD. MOGAD lacks proven treatments although clinical trials are now underway. In this review, we will outline similarities and differences between AQP4+NMOSD and MOGAD in terms of diagnosis and treatment.

Immune-Mediated Myelopathies

OBJECTIVE

Immune-mediated myelopathies are conditions in which the immune system attacks the spinal cord. This article describes the distinguishing characteristics of immune-mediated myelopathies and treatment strategies for patients affected by these disorders.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

New biomarkers, such as aquaporin 4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, in the blood and spinal fluid have led to the identification of antigen-specific immune-mediated myelopathies and approved therapies to prevent disease progression.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The first step in the diagnosis of an immune-mediated myelopathy is confirming that the immune system is the cause of the attack by excluding non-immune-mediated causes. The second step is to narrow the differential diagnosis based on objective biomarkers such as serology and MRI patterns. The third step is to treat the specific immune-mediated myelopathy by using evidence-based medicine.

Advances in the long-term treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune neuroinflammatory disorder with a prevalence of 1-5/100,000 globally, characterized by attacks of the central nervous system including but not limited to optic neuritis, transverse myelitis and brainstem lesions, including area postrema lesions. These autoimmune attacks can lead to irreversible damage if left untreated, therefore strategies have been developed to prevent relapses. Initial off-label treatments have achieved variable levels of success in relapse prevention, but improved relapse prevention and quality of life remain a goal in the field. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of NMOSD over the last 10 years has led to newer, more specific approaches in treatment, culminating in the first FDA approved treatments in the disease. In this review, we will discuss the seminal trials of PREVENT or Eculizumab in the treatment of aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG positive NMOSD, N-Momentum or Inebilizumab in the study of NMOSD (both AQP4-IgG positive and negative) and SAkura Sky and SAkuraStar which studied satralizumab in AQP4-IgG seropositive and seronegative NMOSD patients. We will also discuss the extension trials of each of these medications and what lead to their approval in AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD patients. We will then examine treatments in the pipeline for adult and pediatric NMOSD patients and conclude with discussions on treatment considerations in pregnant patients and how to approach treatment of NMOSD patients during COVID.

Intruders or protectors - the multifaceted role of B cells in CNS disorders

B lymphocytes are immune cells studied predominantly in the context of peripheral humoral immune responses against pathogens. Evidence has been accumulating in recent years on the diversity of immunomodulatory functions that B cells undertake, with particular relevance for pathologies of the central nervous system (CNS). This review summarizes current knowledge on B cell populations, localization, infiltration mechanisms, and function in the CNS and associated tissues. Acute and chronic neurodegenerative pathologies are examined in order to explore the complex, and sometimes conflicting, effects that B cells can have in each context, with implications for disease progression and treatment outcomes. Additional factors such as aging modulate the proportions and function of B cell subpopulations over time and are also discussed in the context of neuroinflammatory response and disease susceptibility. A better understanding of the multifactorial role of B cell populations in the CNS may ultimately lead to innovative therapeutic strategies for a variety of neurological conditions.

Relapses and Serious Infections in Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Treated with Rituximab: A Swedish Single-Center Study

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare immune-mediated relapsing-remitting disease of the central nervous system. The usage of rituximab, as relapse-preventive therapy, in NMOSD is common. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study to assess the risk of relapses and severe infectious events (SIEs) in rituximab-treated NMOSD patients. This study included 24 aquaporin-4 IgG+ (AQP4+), 8 myelin-oligodendrocyte-protein IgG+ (MOG+), and 10 double-seronegative NMOSD patients. Relapses were observed in 50% of all patients during a mean treatment time of 4.0 (range: 0.5-8.25) years. The incidence risk ratio (IRR) of relapse was three times higher in MOG+ compared to AQP4+ patients (IRR: 3.0, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.2-7.7). SIEs occurred in 40% of all patients during follow-up. AQP4+ patients conferred an increased risk of SIEs compared to MOG+ patients (IRR; 5.3, 95% CI; 1.2-24.3). Incomplete CD19+ B-lymphocyte suppression was not correlated with relapse risk (hazard ratio; 1.9, 95% CI; 0.7-5.2), and there was no correlation between IgG-levels and SIE risk (odds ratio; 2.0, 95% CI; 0.8-4.8). In conclusion, considerable risks of both relapses and SIEs were observed in NMOSD patients exposed to rituximab, which underlines the need for close clinical vigilance of disease activity and infections during treatment.

Evidence-based management of optic neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optic neuritis can result from several distinct causes, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), when not idiopathic. This review discusses evidence-based treatment approaches contingent upon each specific cause of optic neuritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence highlights the need for prompt plasmapheresis as adjunct to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with NMOSD-associated optic neuritis. Recent advances have included a proliferation of novel disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for long-term management of NMOSD and an understanding of how existing therapeutic options can be leveraged to optimally treat MOGAD.

SUMMARY

In acute idiopathic or MS-associated optic neuritis, IVMP hastens visual recovery, though it does not substantially affect final visual outcomes. IVMP and adjunctive plasmapheresis are beneficial in the treatment of NMOSD-associated optic neuritis, with a shorter time-to-treatment associated with a higher likelihood of recovery. The natural history of untreated MOGAD-associated optic neuritis is unclear but treatment with IVMP is near-universal given phenotypic similarities with NMOSD. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is warranted in patients with NMOSD as well as in patients with MOGAD with poor visual recovery or recurrent attacks.

Monoclonal antibody therapies for aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease

Monoclonal antibody therapies mark the new era of targeted treatment for relapse prevention in aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD). For over a decade, rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting agent, had been the most effectiveness treatment for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor, was also observed to be effective. In 2019, several randomized, placebo-controlled trials were completed that demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of eculizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor), inebilizumab (anti-CD19 B-cell-depleting agent), and satralizumab (anti-interleukin-6 receptor), leading to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of specific treatments for AQP4-IgG+NMOSD for the first time. Most recently, ravulizumab (anti-C5 complement inhibitor) was also shown to be highly efficacious in an open-label, external-controlled trial. Although only some patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) warrant immunotherapy, there is currently no FDA-approved treatment for relapse prevention in MOGAD. Observational studies showed that tocilizumab was associated with a decrease in relapses, whereas rituximab seemed to have less robust effectiveness in MOGAD compared to AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. Herein, we review the evidence on the efficacy and safety of each monoclonal antibody therapy used in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD and MOGAD, including special considerations in children and women of childbearing potential.

Monoclonal antibodies in neuro-ophthalmology

Neuro-ophthalmologic diseases include a broad range of disorders affecting the afferent and efferent visual pathways. Recently, monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have emerged as a promising targeted approach in the management of several of these complex conditions. Here, we describe the mechanism-specific applications and advancements in neuro-ophthalmologic mAb therapies. The application of mAbs in neuro-ophthalmologic diseases highlights our increasing understanding of disease-specific mechanisms in autoimmune conditions such as neuromyelitis optica, thyroid eye disease, and myasthenia gravis. Due to the specificity of mAb therapies, applications in neuro-ophthalmologic diseases have yielded exceptional clinical outcomes, including both reduced rate of relapse and progression to disability, visual function preservation, and quality of life improvement. These advancements have not only expanded the range of treatable neuro-ophthalmologic diseases but also reduced adverse events and increased the response rate to treatment. Further research into neuro-ophthalmologic disease mechanisms will provide accurate and specific targeting of important disease mediators through applications of future mAbs. As our understanding of these diseases and the relevant therapeutic targets evolve, we will continue to build on our understanding of how mAbs interfere with disease pathogenesis, and how these changes improve clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients.

Mitoxantrone in NMO Spectrum Disorder in a Large Multicenter Cohort in French Caribbean

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preventing relapses in neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a primary goal. New effective molecules are often expensive and not readily available in regions with fragile health systems. Assessing the efficacy and safety of less costly therapeutic alternatives is necessary. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone (MiTX) in NMOSD.

METHODS

This is an observational, multicenter, open study of 86 NMOSD-treated patients with prospective follow-up over 30 years. The first endpoint was the first relapse at the 96-week follow-up. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the median delay to relapse, the annualized relapse rate (ARR), and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) at 96 weeks of follow-up and to assess risk factors of relapse and the occurrence of severe adverse effects.

RESULTS

At 96-week follow-up, 71% of our patients were relapse-free, and it was 87% when patients were treated with MiTX from the first attack. The ARR dropped from 0.85 (±0.55) to 0.32 (±0.63) (p < 0.001) and EDSS from 4.9 (±2.4) to 4.2 (±2.6) (p < 0.001). AQP4-IgG seropositivity (hazard ratio [HR] 12.3, 95% CI 1.64-91.6, p = 0.015), a delay between the first attack and MiTX ≥24 months (HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.23-6.17, p = 0.014), and a pretreatment ARR ≥1 (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.05-5.39, p = 0.037) were predictors of relapse. During the entire follow-up, severe secondary adverse events occurred in 3 patients (3.5%).

DISCUSSION

MiTX is an effective and safe treatment for most of our patients, drastically less expensive than new molecules, and could be allowed in NMOSD Afro-descendant patients in geographical areas where access to care is difficult.

Antibodies to neural cell surface and synaptic proteins in paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes

Among patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS), emphasis has historically been placed on neural antibodies against intracellular proteins that have a strong association with malignancy. Because of the intracellular location of their antigenic targets, these antibodies are typically considered to be non-pathogenic surrogate markers of immune cell-mediated neural injury. Unfortunately, patients with these antibodies often have suboptimal response to immunotherapy and poor prognosis. Over the last two decades, however, dramatic advancements have been made in the discovery and clinical characterization of neural antibodies against extracellular targets. These antibodies are generally considered to be pathogenic, given their potential to directly alter antigen structure or function, and patients with these antibodies often respond favorably to prompt immunotherapy. These antibodies also associate with tumors and may thus occur as PNS, albeit more variably than neural antibodies against intracellular targets. The updated 2021 PNS diagnostic criteria, which classifies antibodies as high-risk, intermediate-risk, or lower-risk for an associated cancer, better clarifies how neural antibodies against extracellular targets relate to PNS. Using this recently created framework, the clinical presentations, ancillary test findings, oncologic associations, and treatment responses of syndromes associated with these antibodies are discussed.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) - revised recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). Part II: Attack therapy and long-term management

This manuscript presents practical recommendations for managing acute attacks and implementing preventive immunotherapies for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a rare autoimmune disease that causes severe inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS), primarily affecting the optic nerves, spinal cord, and brainstem. The pillars of NMOSD therapy are attack treatment and attack prevention to minimize the accrual of neurological disability. Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G antibodies (AQP4-IgG) are a diagnostic marker of the disease and play a significant role in its pathogenicity. Recent advances in understanding NMOSD have led to the development of new therapies and the completion of randomized controlled trials. Four preventive immunotherapies have now been approved for AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD in many regions of the world: eculizumab, ravulizumab - most recently-, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These new drugs may potentially substitute rituximab and classical immunosuppressive therapies, which were as yet the mainstay of treatment for both, AQP4-IgG-positive and -negative NMOSD. Here, the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) provides an overview of the current state of knowledge on NMOSD treatments and offers statements and practical recommendations on the therapy management and use of all available immunotherapies for this disease. Unmet needs and AQP4-IgG-negative NMOSD are also discussed. The recommendations were developed using a Delphi-based consensus method among the core author group and at expert discussions at NEMOS meetings.

Long-term Effects of IL-6 Receptor Blockade Therapy on Regulatory Lymphocytes and Neutrophils in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a disabling autoimmune neurologic disease. Anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) therapy prevents relapses in patients with anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive NMOSD; however, it remains unclear how cellular immune components are altered by anti-IL-6R therapy. In this study, we examined the long-term effects of the anti-IL-6R monoclonal antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) on immune cell profiles in patients with NMOSD.

METHODS

Monthly IV injections of TCZ (8 mg/kg) were administered as an add-on therapy to 19 anti-AQP4-IgG-positive patients, who had been refractory to corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. Peripheral blood was collected before infusion of TCZ for flow cytometry analysis of lymphocyte subsets. Seven patients provided whole blood samples for gene expression profiles.

RESULTS

Patients with NMOSD had reduced numbers of lymphocyte subsets with regulatory functions, including transitional B cells, CD56high NK cells, and CD45RA-FoxP3high regulatory T cells. However, after initiating TCZ therapy, the numbers increased to normal levels within 1 year. Gene expression analysis revealed that neutrophil granule-related genes, predominated by those related to azurophil granules, were significantly upregulated in patients with NMOSD. Such alterations suggestive of accelerated myeloid turnover were not observed 1 year after TCZ therapy, and the effects of TCZ on some neutrophil genes were observed as early as 5 days after starting TCZ. In vitro analysis demonstrated that naïve T-cell division was impaired in the enrolled patients, which was fully recovered after 18 months of therapy.

DISCUSSION

In patients with active NMOSD not treated with molecular targeting drugs, we observed reduction or deficiency in lymphocytes with regulatory potentials and activation of neutrophils. However, introduction of anti-IL-6R therapy accompanied by tapering concomitant drugs corrected such abnormalities, which might contribute to persistent relapse prevention. The recovery in the naïve T-cell division after starting TCZ may underlie the relatively low risk of infection in patients under anti-IL-6R therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000005889 (July 8, 2011) and UMIN000007866 (May 1, 2012) (umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm). The first participant was enrolled on November 2, 2011.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder safely and successfully treated with satralizumab during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a case report

Background

Satralizumab, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes interleukin-6 receptors, is known to reduce the relapse rate in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), but its safety during pregnancy has not been established. We present the case of an NMOSD patient who safely completed pregnancy, parturition, and breastfeeding under satralizumab treatment. Importantly, satralizumab transfer to umbilical cord blood, infant serum, or breast milk was not observed.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old Japanese female developed anti-aquaporin 4 antibody-positive NMOSD with left optic neuritis. Despite responding to steroid and azathioprine therapy, she experienced moon face and weight gain and desired the prompt reduction of the steroid dosage. She also wanted to conceive a child with a safe and preferably early pregnancy and parturition. Because pregnancy and parturition after the onset of NMOSD elevate the risk of relapse and miscarriage, treatment with satralizumab was initiated with the patient's consent. She experienced normal parturition and continued with satralizumab, steroid, and azathioprine treatments while breastfeeding without experiencing any relapses. Concentrations of satralizumab in the umbilical cord blood, infant serum, and breast milk were below the detection sensitivity.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that satralizumab may be safe and effective for the perinatal management of NMOSD, especially when there are concerns about continuing pregnancy and the risk of relapse after parturition.

A comprehensive review of the advances in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare relapsing neuroinflammatory autoimmune astrocytopathy, with a predilection for the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most cases are characterised by aquaporin-4-antibody positivity and have a relapsing disease course, which is associated with accrual of disability. Although the prognosis in NMOSD has improved markedly over the past few years owing to advances in diagnosis and therapeutics, it remains a severe disease. In this article, we review the evolution of our understanding of NMOSD, its pathogenesis, clinical features, disease course, treatment options and associated symptoms. We also address the gaps in knowledge and areas for future research focus.

Reshaping neuroimmunology: diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine

Precision medicine has revolutionized the field of neuroimmunology, with innovative approaches that characterize diseases based on their biology, deeper understanding of the factors leading to heterogeneity within the same disease, development of targeted therapies, and strategies to tailor therapies to each patient. This review explores the impact of precision medicine on various neuroimmunological conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), optic neuritis, autoimmune encephalitis, and immune-mediated neuropathies. We discuss advances in disease subtyping, recognition of novel entities, promising biomarkers, and the development of more selective monoclonal antibodies and cutting-edge synthetic cell-based immunotherapies in neuroimmunological disorders. In addition, we analyze the challenges related to affordability and equity in the implementation of these emerging technologies, especially in situations with limited resources.

Utilization of FDA approved treatments for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in clinical practice: A survey study of academic neuroimmunologists

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune condition for which three treatments have been approved since 2019: eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. We conducted a survey of U.S. academic neuroimmunologists to assess adoption of these therapies and barriers to use. Thirty-three neuroimmunologists from 18 states completed the survey. Nearly all (88 %) reported using the novel NMOSD treatments (NNTs). They uncommonly switched clinically stable patients to NNTs (69 % switched none, 22 % switched 1-25 % of their patients). For newly diagnosed patients, NNT initiation rates varied. Following relapse, respondents were dichotomized, either switching 75-100 % of patients (60 %) or 0-25 % (40 %). Insurance and cost-related barriers were common.

Delving into Molecular Pathways: Analyzing the Mechanisms of Action of Monoclonal Antibodies Integrated in IMGT/mAb-DB for Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a rare autoimmune disease presenting with auto-antibodies that affect the neuromuscular junction. In addition to symptomatic treatment options, novel therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system®, extends the characterization of therapeutic antibodies with a systematic description of their mechanisms of action (MOA) and makes them available through its database for mAbs and fusion proteins, IMGT/mAb-DB.

METHODS

Using available literature data combined with amino acid sequence analyses from mAbs managed in IMGT/2Dstructure-DB, the IMGT® protein database, biocuration allowed us to define in a standardized way descriptions of MOAs of mAbs that target molecules towards MG treatment.

RESULTS

New therapeutic targets include FcRn and molecules such as CD38, CD40, CD19, MS4A1, and interleukin-6 receptor. A standardized graphical representation of the MOAs of selected mAbs was created and integrated within IMGT/mAb-DB. The main mechanisms involved in these mAbs are either blocking or neutralizing. Therapies directed to B cell depletion and plasma cells have a blocking MOA with an immunosuppressant effect along with Fc-effector function (MS4A1, CD38) or FcγRIIb engager effect (CD19). Monoclonal antibodies targeting the complement also have a blocking MOA with a complement inhibitor effect, and treatments targeting T cells have a blocking MOA with an immunosuppressant effect (CD40) and Fc-effector function (IL6R). On the other hand, FcRn antagonists present a neutralizing MOA with an FcRn inhibitor effect.

CONCLUSION

The MOA of each new mAb needs to be considered in association with the immunopathogenesis of each of the subtypes of MG in order to integrate the new mAbs as a viable and safe option in the therapy decision process. In IMGT/mAb-DB, mAbs for MG are characterized by their sequence, domains, and chains, and their MOA is described.

Efficacy and safety of inebilizumab in Asian participants with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Subgroup analyses of the N-MOmentum study

BACKGROUND

Inebilizumab, an anti-CD19 B cell-depleting antibody, reduced the risk of a neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attack, disability worsening, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, and disease-related hospitalizations in participants with NMOSD in the N-MOmentum study (NCT02200770). However, the efficacy and safety outcomes of inebilizumab specific to an Asian population were not fully reported. Therefore, subgroup analyses of the N-MOmentum study were conducted post hoc to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inebilizumab in Asian participants with NMOSD.

METHODS

The N-MOmentum study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial with an open-label extension period (OLP). In the subgroup analyses, data from Asian participants from the N-MOmentum study were compared with those of non-Asian participants. Eligible participants were randomly allocated (3:1) to receive 300 mg intravenous (IV) inebilizumab or placebo on Days 1 and 15. Participants who had an NMOSD attack or completed the randomized controlled period (RCP) could enter the OLP, where they received inebilizumab for ≥2 years. All participants who entered the OLP received inebilizumab 300 mg IV every 6 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 230 participants received treatment (174 received inebilizumab and 56 received placebo), of whom 47 were Asian (39 received inebilizumab and 8 received placebo). Baseline characteristics were similar between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups, except for disease duration, annualized relapse rate prior to randomization in this study, and previous maintenance therapy. In the Asian subgroup, the risk of NMOSD attacks was reduced with inebilizumab versus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.202) and the attack-free rate at 28 weeks was 82.1% with inebilizumab versus 37.5% with placebo, in the 6-month RCP. NMOSD attack rates were comparable between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. In the Asian subgroup, the rates of Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening from baseline, active MRI lesions, and disease-related hospitalizations tended to be lower in the inebilizumab group than in the placebo group; similar results were shown in the non-Asian subgroup. For long-term efficacy and safety (RCP and OLP), the annualized adjudicated NMOSD attack rate in Asian participants treated with inebilizumab was reduced (0.096) compared with that at baseline (1.04), with a mean follow-up period of inebilizumab treatment of 3.38 years, which was consistent with the results in the non-Asian subgroup. The risk of NMOSD attack decreased with prolonged duration of treatment in both the inebilizumab/inebilizumab and placebo/inebilizumab groups in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between the Asian and non-Asian subgroups. In the Asian and non-Asian subgroups, 15.2% and 35.2% of participants, respectively, had at least one serious TEAE and/or Grade ≥3 TEAE during long-term therapy. No deaths occurred in the Asian subgroup whereas three deaths occurred in the non-Asian subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Inebilizumab reduced the risk of an NMOSD attack, progression of disability, MRI lesion activity, and disease-related hospitalizations in Asian participants with NMOSD. The efficacy of inebilizumab in reducing NMOSD attacks continued without any unexpected safety signals or concerns during long-term use in Asian participants.

A Quality Assessment of Aquaporin-4 & Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Testing

BACKGROUND

Accurate anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibody assays are needed to effectively diagnose neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody-associated disease. A proportion of patients at our centre have been tested for anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG autoantibodies locally, followed by an outsourced test as part of real-world practice. Outsourced testing is costly and of unproven utility. We conducted a quality improvement project to determine the value of outsourced testing for anti-AQP4 and anti-MOG autoantibodies.

METHODS

All patients seen by Calgary neurological services who underwent cell-based testing for anti-AQP4 and/or anti-MOG autoantibodies at both MitogenDx (Calgary, AB) and Mayo Clinic Laboratories (Rochester, MN, USA) between 2016 and 2020 were identified from a provincial database. The interlaboratory concordance was calculated by pairing within-subject results collected no more than 365 days apart. Retrospective chart review was done for subjects with discordant results to determine features associated with discordance and use of outsourced testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven anti-AQP4 and 46 anti-MOG test pairs from January 2016 to July 2020 were analyzed. Concordant tests pairs comprised 54/57 (94.7%, 95%CI 88.9-100.0%) anti-AQP4 and 41/46 (89.1%, 95%CI 80.1-98.1%) anti-MOG results. Discordant anti-AQP4 pairs included two local weak positives (negative when outsourced) and one local negative (positive when outsourced). Discordant anti-MOG pairs were all due to local weak positives (negative when outsourced).

CONCLUSION

Interlaboratory discordant results for cell-based testing of anti-AQP4 autoantibodies were rare. Local anti-MOG weak positive results were associated with discordance, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation based on the clinical context. Our findings may reduce redundant outsourced testing.

Interleukin-6 in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Janus-Faced Player in Damage and Repair

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common and often devastating illness, with wide-ranging public health implications. In addition to the primary injury, victims of TBI are at risk for secondary neurological injury by numerous mechanisms. Current treatments are limited and do not target the profound immune response associated with injury. This immune response reflects a convergence of peripheral and central nervous system-resident immune cells whose interaction is mediated in part by a disruption in the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The diverse family of cytokines helps to govern this communication and among these, Interleukin (IL)-6 is a notable player in the immune response to acute neurological injury. It is also a well-established pharmacological target in a variety of other disease contexts. In TBI, elevated IL-6 levels are associated with worse outcomes, but the role of IL-6 in response to injury is double-edged. IL-6 promotes neurogenesis and wound healing in animal models of TBI, but it may also contribute to disruptions in the BBB and the progression of cerebral edema. Here, we review IL-6 biology in the context of TBI, with an eye to clarifying its controversial role and understanding its potential as a target for modulating the immune response in this disease.

Severe disease reactivation in seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders patients after stopping eculizumab treatment

INTRODUCTION

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoimmune, inflammatory disease of the central nervous system affecting the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most NMOSD patients have autoantibodies against the astrocyte water channel protein aquaporin-4 (AQP4). Eculizumab treatment is used effectively and safely in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. Our study evaluated the prognosis and outcomes of all clinical trial (PREVENT) patients from Turkey who received eculizumab treatment for AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.

METHOD

Clinical and demographic data of all patients enrolled in the PREVENT and OLE clinical trial in Turkey were analyzed during the study period and after the study ended. Clinical follow-up results were recorded in detail in patients who had to discontinue eculizumab treatment.

RESULTS

The study included 10 patients who participated in PREVENT and OLE. Seven patients completed the studies, three patients did not continue the study and were switched to other treatments. Only one of the seven patients was able to continue treatment after eculizumab was approved in AQP4-IgG+NMOSD. The other six patients could not continue treatment due to reimbursement conditions. Four of the six patients who could not continue eculizumab treatment experienced early relapse (within the first three months after stopping the drug). All of these patients had high disease activity before eculizumab and had never relapsed under eculizumab treatment over the long term.

CONCLUSION

Eculizumab was used effectively and safely in Turkish AQP4-IgG+NMOSD patients with high disease activity. Disease reactivation and relapse may occur after discontinuation of eculizumab treatment in patients with a long-term stable course. In these cases, close monitoring for disease reactivation is recommended.

Satralizumab as an add-on treatment in refractory pediatric AQP4-antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a case report

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Relapse and incomplete recovery from relapse are common in NMOSD. Most patients with NMOSD have IgG to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG). New biological agents for AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD, such as satralizumab, have become available for maintenance therapy. Satralizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody. To date, few studies have evaluated satralizumab as an add-on treatment in pediatric NMOSD patients. Here, we report an 11-year-old girl with NMOSD who frequently relapsed under long-term treatment, including oral prednisone, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and maintenance intravenous immunoglobulin treatment even with B-cell depletion. For the poor treatment response and to improve the efficacy of relapse prevention further, the patient received satralizumab treatment as an add-on therapy to MMF plus oral prednisone, with a dose of 120 mg administered subcutaneously at weeks 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 weeks after that. After initiating satralizumab, the patient remained relapse-free for 14 months at the last follow-up. Satralizumab might be effective and safe as an add-on treatment in refractory pediatric AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD under B-cell depletion.

Double-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Most patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) test positive for aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG). Those who are negative are termed double-negative (DN) NMOSD and may constitute a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. DN NMOSD is a syndrome rather than a single disease, ranging from a (postinfectious) monophasic illness to a more chronic syndrome that can be indistinguishable from AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD or develop into other mimics such as multiple sclerosis. Thus, underlying disease mechanisms are likely to be heterogeneous. This topical review aims to (1) reappraise antibody-negative NMOSD definition as it has changed over time with the development of the AQP4 and MOG-IgG assays; (2) outline clinical characteristics and the pathophysiological nature of this rare entity by contrasting its differences and similarities with antibody-positive NMOSD; (3) summarize laboratory characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging findings of DN NMOSD; and (4) discuss the current treatment for DN NMOSD.

An update on optic neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of subacute optic neuropathy in young adults. Although most cases of optic neuritis (ON) are classified as typical, meaning idiopathic or associated with multiple sclerosis, there is a growing understanding of atypical forms of optic neuritis such as antibody mediated aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and the recently described entity, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Differentiating typical ON from atypical ON is important because they have different prognoses and treatments. Findings of atypical ON, including severe vision loss with poor recovery with steroids or steroid dependence, prominent optic disc edema, bilateral vision loss, and childhood or late adult onset, should prompt serologic testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG. Although the traditional division of typical and atypical ON can be helpful, it should be noted that there can be severe presentations of otherwise typical ON and mild presentations of atypical ON that blur these traditional lines. Rare causes of autoimmune optic neuropathies, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and collapsin response-mediator protein 5 (CRMP5) autoimmunity also should be considered in patients with bilateral painless optic neuropathy associated with optic disc edema, especially if there are other accompanying suggestive neurologic symptoms/signs. Typical ON usually recovers well without treatment, though recovery may be expedited by steroids. Atypical ON is usually treated with intravenous steroids, and some forms, such as NMOSD, often require plasma exchange for acute attacks and long-term immunosuppressive therapy to prevent relapses. Since treatment is tailored to the cause of the ON, elucidating the etiology of the ON is of the utmost importance.

Interleukin 6: at the interface of human health and disease

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine executing a diverse number of functions, ranging from its effects on acute phase reactant pathways, B and T lymphocytes, blood brain barrier permeability, synovial inflammation, hematopoiesis, and embryonic development. This cytokine empowers the transition between innate and adaptive immune responses and helps recruit macrophages and lymphocytes to the sites of injury or infection. Given that IL-6 is involved both in the immune homeostasis and pathogenesis of several autoimmune diseases, research into therapeutic modulation of IL-6 axis resulted in the approval of a number of effective treatments for several autoimmune disorders like neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis (GCA), and cytokine release syndrome, associated with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. This review discusses downstream inflammatory pathways of IL-6 expression and therapeutic applications of IL-6 blockade, currently investigated for the treatment of several other autoimmune conditions such as autoimmune encephalitis, autoimmune epilepsy, as well as myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated demyelination (MOGAD). This review further highlights the need for clinical trials to evaluate IL-6 blockade in disorders such neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus (SLE), sarcoidosis and Behcet's.

A Clinical Approach to Existing and Emerging Therapeutics in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but highly disabling disease of the central nervous system. Unlike multiple sclerosis, disability in NMOSD occurs secondary to relapses that, not uncommonly, lead to blindness, paralysis, and death. Recently, newer, targeted immunotherapies have been trialed and are now in the treatment arsenal. We have endeavoured to evaluate the current state of NMOSD therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review provides a pragmatic evaluation of recent clinical trials and post-marketing data for rituximab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, eculizumab, and ravalizumab, contrasted to older agents. We also review contemporary issues such as treatment in the context of SARS-CoV2 infection and pregnancy. There has been a dramatic shift in NMOSD morbidity and mortality with earlier and improved disease recognition, diagnostic accuracy, and the advent of more effective, targeted therapies. Choosing a maintenance therapy remains nuanced depending on patient factors and accessibility. With over 100 putative agents in trials, disease-free survival is now a realistic goal for NMOSD patients.

Rituximab at lower dose for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a multicenter, open-label, self-controlled, prospective follow-up study

Objective

To address a novel lower-dose rituximab (RTX) therapy strategy based on our clinical experience and assess its efficacy and safety in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

Methods

A multicenter, open-label, self-controlled, prospective follow-up study. Totally, 108 NMOSD patients were enrolled and a lower-dose RTX strategy was applied including 100 mg weekly for 3 weeks and then reinfusions every 6 months. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score and length of spinal cord lesions were included to evaluate the efficacy. Side effects were recorded to assess the safety profile.

Results

Of 108 patients, 80 (74.1%) initiated low-dose RTX therapy immediately after acute attack treatment and 33 (30.6%) initiated it after the first attack. During a median treatment period of 35.5 (22.0-48.8) months, significant decreases were observed in median ARR (1.1 [0.8-2.0] versus 0 [0-0.2], p < 0.001), EDSS score (3.5 [2.5-4.0] versus 2.0 [1.0-3.0], p < 0.001) and spinal cord lesion segments (5.0 [4.0-8.0] versus 3.0 [1.0-6.0], p < 0.001). The cumulative risk of relapses significantly decreased during the post- versus pre-RTX period (HR 0.238, 95%CI 0.160-0.356, p < 0.001) and on early therapy initiated within 24 months after disease onset versus delayed therapy (HR 0.506, 95%CI 0.258-0.994, p = 0.041). No serious side effects were recorded and all the subjects did not discontinue treatment due to RTX-related side effects.

Conclusion

Our research provided evidence supporting the lower-dose RTX strategy in treating NMOSD and reopened the issues of optimal dosage and therapy initiation timing.