CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment

PhRMA white paper on ADME pharmacogenomics

Pharmacogenomic (PGx) research on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties of drugs has begun to have impact for both drug development and utilization. To provide a cross-industry perspective on the utility of ADME PGx, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) conducted a survey of major pharmaceutical companies on their PGx practices and applications during 2003-2005. This white paper summarizes and interprets the results of the survey, highlights the contributions and applications of PGx by industrial scientists as reflected by original research publications, and discusses changes in drug labels that improve drug utilization by inclusion of PGx information. In addition, the paper includes a brief review on the clinically relevant genetic variants of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters most relevant to the pharmaceutical industry.

The 38th David A. Karnofsky lecture: the paradoxical actions of estrogen in breast cancer--survival or death?

During the first David A. Karnofsky Award lecture entitled "Thoughts on Chemical Therapy" in 1970, Sir Alexander Haddow commented about the dramatic regressions observed with estrogen in some breast cancers in postmenopausal women, but regrettably the mechanism was unknown. He was concerned that a cancer-specific target would remain elusive, without tests to predict response to therapy. At that time, I was conducting research for my PhD on an obscure group of estrogen derivatives called nonsteroidal antiestrogens. Antiestrogens had failed to fulfill their promise as postcoital contraceptives and were unlikely to be developed further by the pharmaceutical industry. In 1972, that perspective started to change and ICI 46,474 was subsequently reinvented as the first targeted therapy for breast cancer. The scientific strategy of targeting the estrogen receptor (ER) in the tumor, treating patients with long-term adjuvant therapy, examining active metabolites, and considering chemoprevention all translated through clinical trials to clinical practice during the next 35 years. Hundreds of thousands of women now have enhanced survivorship after their diagnosis of ER-positive breast cancer. However, it was the recognition of selective ER modulation (SERM) that created a new dimension in therapeutics. Nonsteroidal antiestrogens selectively turn on or turn off estrogen target tissues throughout the body. Patient care was immediately affected by the recognition in the laboratory that tamoxifen would potentially increase the growth of endometrial cancer during long-term adjuvant therapy. At that time, a failed breast cancer drug, keoxifene, was found to maintain bone density of rats (estrogenic action) while simultaneously preventing mammary carcinogenesis (antiestrogenic action). Perhaps a SERM used to prevent osteoporosis could simultaneously prevent breast cancer? Keoxifene was renamed raloxifene and became the first SERM for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis as well as the prevention of breast cancer, but without an increase in endometrial cancer. There the story might have ended had the study of antihormone resistance not revealed a vulnerability of cancer cells that could be exploited in the clinic. The evolution of antihormone resistance over years of therapy reconfigures the survival mechanism of the breast cancer cell, so estrogen no longer is a survival signal but a death signal. Remarkably, remaining tumor tissue is again responsive to continuing antihormone therapy. This new discovery is currently being evaluated in clinical trials but it also solves the mystery mechanism of chemical therapy with estrogen noted by Haddow in the first Karnofsky lecture.

Practical clinical guidelines for assessing and managing menopausal symptoms after breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to provide practical, evidence-based guidelines for evaluating and treating common menopausal symptoms following breast cancer.

METHODS

Literature review of the causes, assessment and management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

A number of nonhormonal treatments are effective in treating hot flashes. Whether pharmacological treatment is given will depend on the severity of symptoms and on patient wishes. For severe and frequent hot flashes, the best data support the use of venlafaxine, paroxetine and gabapentin in women with breast cancer. Side-effects are relatively common with all these agents. For vaginal dryness, topical estrogen treatment is the most effective but the safety of estrogens following breast cancer is not established. There are limited data on effective treatments for sexual dysfunction during menopause.

CONCLUSION

Menopausal symptoms after breast cancer should be evaluated and managed as warranted using a systematic approach and may benefit from multidisciplinary input.

Pharmacogenomic variation of CYP2D6 and the choice of optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer: a modeling analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors improves disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. This difference could be due to differences in tamoxifen metabolism because levels of endoxifen, the active tamoxifen metabolite, vary with the number of mutant alleles, including the *4 allele, of the gene encoding cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6).

METHODS

We created a Markov model to determine whether tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor monotherapy maximized 5-year disease-free survival for patients with the wild-type CYP2D6 genotype (wt/wt). Annual risks of recurrence with aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who were not selected by CYP2D6 genotype were derived from the Breast International Group 1-98 trial. Genotype frequencies and the hazard ratio for cancer recurrence on tamoxifen among patients with the *4/*4 genotype relative to the wt/wt or wt/*4 genotypes (HR(*4/*4) = 1.86) were based on data from an analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial of adjuvant tamoxifen. We explored the impact of CYP2D6(*4) heterozygosity on disease-free survival for wt/wt patients by studying a range of effect (ie, recurrence on tamoxifen) estimates, from no effect of the single mutation (Eff(wt/*4) = 0, recurrence rate in wt/*4 patients same as that in wt/wt patients) to complete effect (Eff(wt/*4) = 1 recurrence rate in wt/*4 patients same as that in *4/*4 patients).

RESULTS

With HR(*4/*4) = 1.86 and Eff(wt/*4) = 0.5, the 5-year disease-free survival of tamoxifen-treated patients with no mutations (wt/wt) was 83.9%, that is, essentially the same as that (84.0%) for genotypically unselected patients who were treated with aromatase inhibitors. With greater HR(*4/*4) estimates, disease-free survival with tamoxifen exceed that with aromatase inhibitors in wt/wt patients, even at lower assumed Eff(wt/*4) ratios.

CONCLUSIONS

Modeling suggests that among patients who are wild type for CYP2D6, 5-year disease-free survival outcomes are similar to or perhaps even superior with tamoxifen than with aromatase inhibitors. Endocrine therapy tailored to CYP2D6 genotype could be considered for women who are newly diagnosed with breast cancer, particularly those who have with concerns about either the relative toxicity or the increased cost of aromatase inhibitors.

Inflammation and CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism in advanced cancer: impact and implications for chemotherapeutic drug dosing

BACKGROUND

The inability to accurately predict treatment outcomes for cancer patients in terms of tumour response and anticancer drug toxicity is a severe limitation inherent in current approaches to chemotherapy. Many anticancer drugs are metabolically cleared by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), the predominant CYP expressed in liver. CYP3A4 expression exhibits marked interindividual variation and is repressed in acute inflammatory states.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To review the relevance of CYP3A4 variability to drug metabolism in the setting of cancer and to understand how inflammation associated with malignancy contributes to both this variability and to adverse treatment outcomes. (2) To examine the relationship between tumour-induced inflammation and repression of CYP3A4 and to explore methods of dosing of anticancer drugs in the setting of advanced cancer.

METHODS

Review of relevant literature covering both human and animal studies as well as in vitro mechanistic studies.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Interindividual variability in CYP3A4 expression is a major confounding factor for effective cancer treatment and methods to predict CYP3A4-mediated drug clearance may have clinical utility in this setting. Although acute inflammation has long been recognised to repress drug metabolism, it is now becoming apparent that cancer patients exhibiting clinical and laboratory features of an inflammatory response have reduced expression of CYP3A4 and possibly other genes relevant to anticancer drug disposition.

Association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival of breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen treatment

BACKGROUND

Human cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype may affect the efficacy of tamoxifen treatment in Caucasian women with breast cancer. The most common polymorphism of CYP2D6 in Chinese women is variant 10 (188 C to T).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tamoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHtam) were measured in the serum of 37 women with breast cancer who were receiving tamoxifen treatment. The association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival was determined in a cohort of 293 women with breast cancer who received tamoxifen (n = 152) or who did not (n = 141).

RESULTS

The serum 4OHtam concentrations were significantly lower in women with the CYP2D6 *10 homozygous variant T/T genotype than in those with the homozygous wild-type C/C genotype (P = 0.04). Among tamoxifen-treated women, women with the T/T genotype had a significantly worse disease-free survival (DFS) than those with the C/C or C/T genotype, and the T/T genotype remained an independent prognostic factor of DFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio = 4.7; 95% confidence interval = 1.1-20.0; P = 0.04). Among women who did not receive tamoxifen, there was no significant association between CYP2D6 *10 genotype and survival.

CONCLUSION

In tamoxifen-treated patients, women with the CYP2D6 *10 T/T genotype have a lower 4OHtam level in the serum and a worse clinical outcome.

Genelex Corporation

Comprehensive, personalized medication management and pharmacogenetic testing are important existing opportunities to reduce adverse medication events and improve overall healthcare outcomes. A primary barrier to the adoption of personalized pharmacology is the inadequacy of existing patient records, drug interaction tools and the ‘interpretation gap’ – the lack of physician decision support tools needed to interpret DNA test reports. GeneMedRx, an algorithm-driven, gene–drug interaction software, closes this gap. It helps physicians optimize medication regimens by correlating the genetic makeup of the patient with all the medicines they are taking. Portable personal health records created by GeneMedRx are the core product required for a much-needed comprehensive program of personalized medication management.

Pharmacogenomics of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors

In selection of therapy for women with breast cancer, the focus has been almost exclusively on the characteristics of the tumor, eg, estrogen receptor (ER) and HER-2. Until recently, essentially no attention has been paid to the host and her genetic makeup as it relates to the metabolism of different drugs. The first real clinical application of pharmacogenetics in breast cancer management relates to tamoxifen's biotransformation to active anticancer metabolites. New information has arisen on the metabolism of tamoxifen to the active metabolite, 4 hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (endoxifen). Endoxifen is a metabolite with antitumor activity and affinity for the ER that is similar to 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen, but 1 that is normally present in substantially higher concentrations. CYP2D6 plays a central role in the metabolism to endoxifen and 1 published study shows that genotypic differences in CYP2D6 and use of CYP2D6 inhibitors has an impact on outcomes of women treated with tamoxifen. The aromatase inhibitors represent a major class of drugs in the armamentarium against breast cancer. The aromatase gene has been resequenced and functional genomics have been performed on the identified nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphisms showing significant decreases in levels of activity. These findings are consistent with a hypothesis that genetic variation in the CYP19 gene might be important in the activity of aromatase inhibitors. Currently, the emphasis is on examining multiple genes (thus pharmacogenomics) in pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic pathways in women receiving aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer.

Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment

OBJECTIVE

While many breast cancer patients experience "normal" distress, there is a subset who experience clinically significant depression. We examined the current knowledge about the prevalence, impact and treatment of major depression in women with breast cancer.

METHOD

We reviewed the evidence for the prevalence of depression in women with breast cancer from the last 20 years and summarized the medical literature on the pharmacology and psychotherapy of depression in this population.

RESULTS

Despite evidence that depression significantly impacts quality of life in breast cancer patients, few studies focus on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression. Treatment studies have focused on distress and mixed depressive states, with resulting lack of replicable studies showing treatment efficacy. Potential biological and psychosocial determinants of major depression following breast cancer are discussed in a proposed model. The need for further research on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression in this population is proposed.

CONCLUSION

Major depression is a frequent but underrecognized and undertreated condition among breast cancer patients, which causes amplification of physical symptoms, increased functional impairment and poor treatment adherence. More research on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression in this population is needed.

Clinical Relevance of CYP2D6 Genetics for Tamoxifen Response in Breast Cancer

Tamoxifen is a standard endocrine therapy for the prevention and treatment of steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen requires enzymatic activation by CYP 450 enzymes for the formation of clinically relevant metabolites, 4-OH-tamoxifen and endoxifen, which both have a greater affinity to the estrogen receptor and ability to inhibit cell proliferation when compared to the parent drug. CYP2D6 is the key enzyme in this biotransformation, and recent mechanistic, pharmacologic, and clinical pharmacogenetic evidence suggests that genetic variants and drug interaction by CYP2D6 inhibitors influence plasma concentrations of active tamoxifen metabolites and outcome of patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. Particularly, non-functional (poor metabolizer) and severely impaired (intermediate metabolizer) CYP2D6 variants are associated with higher recurrence rates. Accordingly, CYP2D6 genotyping prior to treatment for prediction of metabolizer status and outcome may open new avenues for the individualization of endocrine treatment choice and benefit. Moreover, strong CYP2D6 inhibitors such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine should be avoided as co-medication.

Advances in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women

Hormone receptor-positive cancers are the most common tumor subtype among postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Despite substantial improvements in disease-free survival and overall survival with tamoxifen and chemotherapy, recurrences still occur, and may ultimately lead to death from breast cancer. Importantly, disease recurrence includes both early and late events, with over half of all recurrences detected more than 5 years from initial breast cancer diagnosis. In recent years, a number of large, randomized trials have evaluated the role of the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. These studies have tested one of three approaches: (1) an upfront AI, (2) a sequential approach after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, and (3) extended endocrine therapy beyond 5 years. Results of these studies have challenged the previous standard of a 5-year course of tamoxifen alone. While the AIs have become a standard component of treatment for most postmenopausal women, many questions remain as to how best tailor endocrine treatment to individual patients. In addition, despite the gains achieved with the AIs, many recurrences are not prevented, and novel strategies are urgently needed, particularly for those women at high risk of recurrence. In this article, we review the efficacy and toxicity data from the available trials of endocrine therapy in the postmenopausal setting. We outline controversies in choosing the optimal endocrine approach, and we discuss selected ongoing studies. Finally, we highlight future research directions, such as the need to understand host and tumor heterogeneity.

Genotype-guided adjuvant endocrine therapy: new tricks from an old drug?

Evaluation of: Schroth W, Antoniadou L, Fritz P et al. Breast cancer treatment outcome with adjuvant tamoxifen relative to patient Cyp2D6 and Cyp2c19 genotypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 5187-5193 (2007). Tamoxifen is one of the most commonly used treatments for breast cancer but is not effective in all patients. We review the study by Schroth and colleagues, evaluating the correlation between genotype for CYP2D6 and other enzymes involved in tamoxifen metabolism and breast cancer outcome. This study demonstrates that patients treated with tamoxifen with intermediate and poor metabolism genotypes have a higher risk of relapse, independent of other prognostic factors. Patients who were not treated with tamoxifen had no differences in outcomes based on CYP2D6 status. This study adds to the growing body of literature suggesting that genetic differences in patients can determine the effectiveness of tamoxifen and highlights the need for studies evaluating how genotype can best guide selection of endocrine therapy for breast cancer.

Safely promoting breast-conserving surgery and preventing early relapses with an aromatase inhibitor

Neoadjuvant therapy improves patient outcomes substantially by increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery. Following primary surgery, women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer remain at risk for loco-regional and systemic recurrence. The most common relapse event, distant metastases, is associated with the poorest outcomes. As a neoadjuvant therapy, anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane have been investigated in phase 3 studies and have shown efficacy in this setting. All three aromatase inhibitors (AIs) significantly improved the rate of breast-conserving surgery. As initial adjuvant therapy, the third-generation AIs anastrozole and letrozole more effectively reduce recurrence risk compared with tamoxifen following surgery, especially in the first 2 years, when the risk is greatest. Tamoxifen, once the standard initial therapy, is associated with improved disease-free survival but may be more effective at reducing loco-regional recurrence than distant metastases. Initial adjuvant letrozole therapy has also shown a pronounced reduction in the risk of distant metastases early on in the course of therapy. If AIs are not used upfront, sequential use of exemestane or anastrozole following tamoxifen provides greater protection against relapse than continuing on tamoxifen. Side effects associated with estrogen deprivation of AIs are less serious than those of tamoxifen and are easily managed. Various molecular markers are under study as surrogates to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy, which may in turn predict responsiveness to adjuvant therapy. Surgeons treating breast cancer patients and prescribing endocrine therapy should be aware of all treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal therapy, and inform their patients of the benefits and the potential side effects. Early and long-term-risk reduction with AI treatment should be discussed with patients, as should the management of common AI-associated adverse events.

Integrating pharmacogenomics into oncology clinical practice

Oncology pharmacogenomics has seen a great deal of progress in the past 10 years. The release of the Human Genome Project data and the availability of fast, affordable genotyping platforms has allowed the field to expand and has provided invaluable data for pharmacogenomics research. The introduction of US FDA-approved targeted therapy (trastuzumab), package insert changes (irinotecan and tamoxifen) and the initiation of a genotype-guided clinical trial for cancer therapy (TYMS TSER in rectal cancer), along with panels of DNA and expression markers (Roche AmpliChip(®) and Oncotype Dx™ panel) are paving the way towards the integration of pharmacogenomics into clinical practice.

Pharmacogenomics of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters in chemotherapy

There is wide variability in the response of individuals to standard doses of drug therapy. This is an important problem in clinical practice, where it can lead to therapeutic failures or adverse drug events. Polymorphisms in genes coding for metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters can affect drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenomics aims to identify individuals predisposed to high risk of toxicity and low response from standard doses of anticancer drugs. This chapter focuses on the clinical significance of polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters in influencing efficacy and toxicity of anticancer therapy. The most important examples to demonstrate the influence of pharmacogenomics on anticancer therapy are thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT), UGT (uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase) 1A1*28, and DPD (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) *2A, respectively, for 6-mercaptopurine, irinotecan, and 5-fluorouracil therapy. However, in most other anticancer therapies no clear association has been found for polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters and pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Evaluation of different regimens and tumor types showed that polymorphisms can have different, sometimes even contradictory, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in different tumors in response to different drugs. The clinical application of pharmacogenomics in cancer treatment therefore requires more detailed information regarding the different polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters. A greater understanding of complexities in pharmacogenomics is needed before individualized therapy can be applied on a routine basis.

Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators and Antihormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer

Selective estrogen-receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) are synthetic nonsteroidal compounds that switch on and switch off target sites throughout the body. Tamoxifen, the pioneering SERM, blocks estrogen action by binding to the ER in breast cancers. Tamoxifen has been used ubiquitously in clinical practice during the last 30 years for the treatment of breast cancer and is currently available to reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Raloxifene maintains bone density (estrogen-like effect) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, but at the same time reduces the incidence of breast cancer in both high- and low-risk (osteoporotic) postmenopausal women. Unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene does not increase the incidence of endometrial cancer. Clearly, the simple ER model of estrogen action can no longer be used to explain SERM action at different sites around the body. Instead, a new model has evolved on the basis of the discovery of protein partners that modulate estrogen action at distinct target sites. Coactivators are the principal players that assemble a complex of functional proteins around the ligand ER complex to initiate transcription of a target gene at its promoter site. A promiscuous SERM ER complex creates a stimulatory signal in growth factor receptor–rich breast or endometrial cancer cells. These events cause drug-resistant, SERM-stimulated growth. The sometimes surprising pharmacology of SERMs has resulted in a growing interest in the development of new selective medicines for other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. This will allow the precise treatment of diseases that was previously considered impossible.

Breast cancer treatment outcome with adjuvant tamoxifen relative to patient CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes

PURPOSE

The clinical outcome of tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients may be influenced by the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes that catalyze the formation of antiestrogenic metabolites endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen. We investigated the predictive value of genetic variants of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and three other cytochrome P450 enzymes for tamoxifen treatment outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DNA from 206 patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and from 280 patients not receiving tamoxifen therapy (71 months median follow-up) was isolated from archival material and was genotyped for 16 polymorphisms of CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP3A5 by matrix-assisted, laser desorption/ionization, time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and by copy number quantification. Risk and survival estimates were calculated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen-treated patients carrying the CYP2D6 alleles *4, *5, *10, *41-all associated with impaired formation of antiestrogenic metabolites-had significantly more recurrences of breast cancer, shorter relapse-free periods (hazard ratio [HR], 2.24; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.33; P = .02), and worse event-free survival rates (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.25; P = .02) compared with carriers of functional alleles. Patients with the CYP2C19 high enzyme activity promoter variant *17 had a more favorable clinical outcome (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.92; P = .03) than carriers of *1, *2, and *3 alleles.

CONCLUSION

Because genetically determined, impaired tamoxifen metabolism results in worse treatment outcomes, genotyping for CYP2D6 alleles *4, *5, *10, and *41 can identify patients who will have little benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. In addition to functional CYP2D6 alleles, the CYP2C19 *17 variant identifies patients likely to benefit from tamoxifen.

New insights into the metabolism of tamoxifen and its role in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

The metabolism of tamoxifen is being redefined in the light of several important pharmacological observations. Recent studies have identified 4-hydroxy N-desmethyltamoxifen (endoxifen) as an important metabolite of tamoxifen necessary for antitumor actions. The metabolite is formed through the enzymatic product of CYP2D6 which also interacts with specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to prevent the hot flashes observed in up to 45% of patients taking tamoxifen. Additionally, the finding that enzyme variants of CYP2D6 do not promote the metabolism of tamoxifen to endoxifen means that significant numbers of women might not receive optimal benefit from tamoxifen treatment. Clearly these are particularly important issues not only for breast cancer treatment but also for selecting premenopausal women, at high risk for breast cancer, as candidates for chemoprevention using tamoxifen.

Effects of CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes including SULT1A1 gene copy number on tamoxifen metabolism

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen is hydroxylated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 to the potent metabolites 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHtam) and 4-hydroxy-N-demethyltamoxifen (4OHNDtam), which are both conjugated by sulphotransferase (SULT)1A1. Clinical studies indicate that CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes are predictors for treatment response to tamoxifen. Therefore, we examined the relationship between CYP2D6 genotype, SULT1A1 genotype, SULT1A1 copy number and the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The serum levels of tamoxifen and metabolites of 151 breast cancer patients were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms and SULT1A1 copy number were determined by long PCR, PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism, DNA sequencing and fluorescence-based PCR.

RESULTS

The levels of 4OHtam, 4OHNDtam and N-demethyltamoxifen were associated with CYP2D6 predicted enzymatic activity (P < 0.05). The SULT1A1 genotype or copy number did not influence the levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites. However, the ratios of N-demethyltamoxifen/tamoxifen and N-dedimethyltamoxifen/N-demethyltamoxifen were related to SULT1A1 genotype.

CONCLUSION

CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes may partly explain the wide inter-individual variations in the serum levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites. We propose that therapeutic drug monitoring should be included in studies linking CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes to clinical outcome.

Influence of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms on drug therapies: pharmacogenetic, pharmacoepigenetic and clinical aspects

The polymorphic nature of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes affects individual drug response and adverse reactions to a great extent. This variation includes copy number variants (CNV), missense mutations, insertions and deletions, and mutations affecting gene expression and activity of mainly CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, which have been extensively studied and well characterized. CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 expression varies significantly, and the cause has been suggested to be mainly of genetic origin but the exact molecular basis remains unknown. We present a review of the major polymorphic CYP alleles and conclude that this variability is of greatest importance for treatment with several antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiulcer drugs, anti-HIV drugs, anticoagulants, antidiabetics and the anticancer drug tamoxifen. We also present tables illustrating the relative importance of specific common CYP alleles for the extent of enzyme functionality. The field of pharmacoepigenetics has just opened, and we present recent examples wherein gene methylation influences the expression of CYP. In addition microRNA (miRNA) regulation of P450 has been described. Furthermore, this review updates the field with respect to regulatory initiatives and experience of predictive pharmacogenetic investigations in the clinics. It is concluded that the pharmacogenetic knowledge regarding CYP polymorphism now developed to a stage where it can be implemented in drug development and in clinical routine for specific drug treatments, thereby improving the drug response and reducing costs for drug treatment.

A decade of letrozole: FACE

Third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs), letrozole and anastrozole, are superior to tamoxifen as initial therapy for early breast cancer but have not been directly compared in a head-to-head adjuvant trial. Cumulative evidence suggests that AIs are not equivalent in terms of potency of estrogen suppression and that there may be differences in clinical efficacy. Thus, with no data from head-to-head comparisons of the AIs as adjuvant therapy yet available, the question of whether there are efficacy differences between the AIs remains. To help answer this question, the Femara versus Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation (FACE) is a phase IIIb open-label, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test whether letrozole or anastrozole has superior efficacy as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)- and lymph node-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients (target accrual, N=4,000) are randomized to receive either letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg daily for up to 5 years. The primary objective is to compare disease-free survival at 5 years. Secondary end points include safety, overall survival, time to distant metastases, and time to contralateral breast cancer. The FACE trial will determine whether or not letrozole offers a greater clinical benefit to postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer at increased risk of early recurrence compared with anastrozole.

Metabolism of antidepressant and neuroleptic drugs by cytochrome p450s: clinical and interethnic aspects

Early after the introduction of the classical tricyclic antidepressants and neuroleptics, it was shown that the plasma concentrations of these drugs varied between patients given the same dose. This variation is to a major extent due to the variation in the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (cf. review by Bertilsson et al.1) During recent year(s), the different CYP enzymes catalyzing the metabolism of these drugs have been identified and the clinical relevance has also been identified. This brief review highlights the clinical importance and ethnic differences in the metabolism of these drugs.

Tamoxifen pharmacogenomics: the role of CYP2D6 as a predictor of drug response

Tamoxifen continues to be a standard endocrine therapy for the prevention and treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen can be considered a classic "pro-drug," requiring metabolic activation to elicit pharmacological activity. CYP2D6 is the rate-limiting enzyme catalyzing the conversion of tamoxifen into metabolites with significantly greater affinity for the ER and greater ability to inhibit cell proliferation. Both genetic and environmental (drug-induced) factors that alter CYP2D6 enzyme activity directly affect the concentrations of the active tamoxifen metabolites and the outcomes of patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen. The a priori knowledge of the pharmacogenetic variation known to abrogate CYP2D6 enzyme activity may provide a means by which the hormonal therapy of breast cancer can be individualized.

Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy

In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) to suppress estrogen is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with tamoxifen therapy. Women receiving such endocrine therapy may experience treatment-related side effects that negatively affect health-related quality of life (QoL) and adherence to therapy. In published clinical trials and in clinical practice, adverse events (AEs) constitute the main reason for nonadherence to endocrine treatment. Serious AEs are sometimes resolved by switching to a different agent, whereas other side effects can often be managed to allow patients to remain on therapy without sacrificing QoL. Across all adjuvant endocrine trials, regardless of the treatment received, vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes are the most common side effects. Other frequently reported side effects, such as vaginal discharge, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and arthralgia, vary in prevalence between tamoxifen and AIs. Here we provide an overview of reported AEs of adjuvant endocrine therapy, focusing on those that are amenable to pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic management without treatment discontinuation. Also highlighted are specific management strategies that may improve patient QoL and thereby optimize adherence to therapy, which in turn might improve patient outcomes.

SERMs for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

Tamoxifen and raloxifene are both selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). The medicines can block estrogen mediated breast cancer growth and development but will also maintain bone density in postmenopausal women and lower circulating cholesterol. Tamoxifen has remained the antihormonal therapy of choice for the treatment of ER positive breast cancer for the last 30 years. However, although adjuvant tamoxifen produces profound increases in disease-free and overall survival in patients with ER positive breast cancer, concerns about drug resistance, blood clots and endometrial cancer have resulted in a change to the use of aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of postmenopausal women. Nevertheless, tamoxifen remains the antihormonal treatment of choice for premenopausal women with ER positive breast cancer and for risk reduction in premenopausal women who are at high risk for developing breast cancer. The risk of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic disorders during tamoxifen therapy is not elevated in premenopausal women. It is important to note that aromatase inhibitors or raloxifene should not be used in premenopausal women. Raloxifene is used to prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and, unlike tamoxifen, does not increase the risk of endometrial cancer. However, raloxifene does reduce breast cancer risk by 50-70% in both low risk and high risk postmenopausal women. Comparisons of raloxifene with tamoxifen show equal efficacy as a chemopreventive for breast cancer but there is a reduction in thromboembolic disorders, fewer endometrial cancers, hysterectomies, cataracts and cataract surgeries in women taking raloxifene. Overall, SERMs continue to fulfill their promise as appropriate medicines that target specific populations for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer, part 2: therapeutic considerations

New approaches to breast cancer treatment have enhanced clinical outcomes and patient care. These approaches include advances in breast irradiation and hormonal and systemic adjuvant therapies. In addition to the identification of new drug targets and targeted therapeutics (eg, trastuzumab), there is renewed re-emphasis in the development of biomarkers for the prediction of response to therapy. One example is the pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen metabolism and the individualization of hormonal therapy. The current treatment of breast cancer continues to evolve rapidly, with new scientific and clinical achievements constantly changing the standard of care and leading to substantial reductions in breast cancer mortality. The goal of this article is to provide clinicians who care for women with breast cancer a multidisciplinary, state-of-the art approach to the treatment of these patients.

CYP2D6 polymorphisms and the impact on tamoxifen therapy

The cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is an enzyme known to metabolize a variety of xenobiotics and drugs. Inter-individual variation in the metabolic capacity of this enzyme has been extensively studied and associations with genotype have been established. Genetic polymorphisms have been grouped as nonfunctional, reduced function, functional, and multiplication alleles phenotypically. Individuals carrying these alleles are presumed to correspond to poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultrarapid metabolizers (UM), respectively. Tamoxifen has been shown to be metabolized by CYP2D6 to the more potent metabolite endoxifen. Poor metabolizers (PM) of tamoxifen have lower levels of endoxifen and poorer clinical outcomes as compared to extensive metabolizers (EM). Here, we will provide an overview of the history and application of CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics, and will discuss the clinical implications of recent developments relating to the involvement of CYP2D6 in tamoxifen treatment.

Estrogen receptor genotypes, menopausal status, and the lipid effects of tamoxifen

Tamoxifen induces important changes in serum lipid profiles in some women; however, little information is available to predict which women will experience improved lipid profiles during tamoxifen therapy. As part of a multicenter prospective observational trial in 176 breast cancer patients, we tested the hypothesis that tamoxifen-induced lipid changes were associated with genetic variants in candidate target genes (CYP2D6, ESR1, and ESR2). Tamoxifen lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.0001) by 23.5 mg/dl (13.5-33.5 mg/dl) and increased triglycerides (P=0.006). In postmenopausal women, the ESR1-XbaI and ESR2-02 genotypes were associated with tamoxifen-induced changes in total cholesterol (P=0.03; GG vs GA/AA) and triglycerides (P=0.01; gene-dose effect), respectively. In premenopausal women, the ESR1-XbaI genotypes were associated with tamoxifen-induced changes in triglycerides (P=0.002; gene-dose effect) and high-density lipoprotein (P=0.004; gene-dose effect). Our results suggest that estrogen receptor genotyping may be useful in predicting which women would benefit more from tamoxifen.

Polymorphism of the DNA repair enzyme XRCC1 is associated with treatment prediction in anthracycline and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy of patients with primary invasive breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

Outcome and survival in anthracycline-based and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy of invasive breast cancer are unpredictable. Insights into treatment prediction are expected from studies searching for an association between genetic polymorphisms and treatment outcome effects. A common feature of treatment with chemoreagents is therapeutically induced DNA damage. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis of a relationship between event-free survival and genotype distributions of seven polymorphic DNA repair enzymes and four cell cycle regulators.

BASIC METHODS

This case-case comparison included 180 patients with primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1986 and 2000 and subjected to adjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline/cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil). Ninety-two patients were reported without recurrence and 88 were reported with recurrences or dead. Median clinical follow-up was 61.7 months. Constitutional DNA isolated from archived tissues was genotyped at 19 loci by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses included adjusted risk estimates, Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox proportional hazard model, and permutation testing.

MAIN RESULTS

Carriers of the XRCC1_1196_AA genotype had a reduced risk for recurrence/death (odds ratio adjusted 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.61), which was observed in survival analyses of all patients (P=0.003) and patients treated with chemotherapy but not radiotherapy (P=0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed XRCC1 as a potential treatment predictor (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.89). The result was stable upon permutation testing. No other significant associations were observed.

CONCLUSION

The DNA repair enzyme XRCC1 is a potential treatment predictor for the outcome and survival of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy of invasive breast cancer.

Elimination of antiestrogenic effects of active tamoxifen metabolites by glucuronidation

1-[4-(2-Dimethylaminoethoxy)-phenyl]-1,2-diphenylbut-1-(Z)-ene (tamoxifen, TAM) is a nonsteroidal antiestrogen that has been commonly used for the prevention and treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. TAM is extensively metabolized into several primary active metabolites including 4-hydroxy-TAM (4-OH-TAM) and endoxifen. Glucuronidation is the major phase II metabolic pathway important in their excretion. Whereas high antiestrogenic activity has been reported for both 4-OH-TAM and endoxifen, studies examining the effect of glucuronide conjugation of these metabolites have not previously been performed. In the present study, the antiestrogenic activities of glucuronidated TAM metabolites were determined by examining their effect on the induction of the estrogen-responsive progesterone receptor (PGR) gene. 17beta-Estradiol (E(2))-mediated PGR gene expression in MCF-7 cells was determined by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for each TAM metabolite isomer. E(2) (1 x 10(-10) M) induction of PGR mRNA was 6-fold after a 12-h incubation; only unconjugated TAM metabolites inhibited this effect. A virtually identical dose-dependent inhibition of E(2)-induced PGR gene expression was found for both the trans- and cis-isomers of 4-OH-TAM and endoxifen, with maximal inhibition attained at 1 x 10(-6) M of TAM metabolite. The glucuronide conjugates of all 4-OH-TAM and endoxifen isomers exhibited no effect on E(2)-mediated induction of PGR expression at all concentrations of TAM metabolite examined in this study. These data indicate that isomers of both 4-OH-TAM and endoxifen exhibit roughly equipotent antiestrogenic effects on E(2)-induced gene expression and that glucuronide conjugates of the same metabolites effectively negate this activity. This result may have important implications in terms of both whole-body and target tissue-specific glucuronidation pathways and individual responses to TAM therapy and cancer prevention.

Insights into the role of heritable genetic variation in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs

Pharmacogenetics in oncology will ideally allow oncologists to individualise therapy based on a genetic test result. Severe toxicity and clinically significant underdosing may be avoided, whereas predicted non-responders can be offered alternative therapy. This manuscript gives an overview of heritable variants in the genes of nine enzymes or pathways that have been studied most extensively in anticancer chemotherapy. Even though many pharmacogenetic association studies have been published, there is a need for more research. In particular, there is a need for replication of data and development of predictive models. Prospective trials are required to establish clinical value and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing in oncology.

The ethics of CYP2D6 testing for patients considering tamoxifen

The CYP2D6 gene is responsible for the majority of tamoxifen metabolism. Recent compelling, yet limited data have determined that postmenopausal women who carry a functional polymorphism in the CYP2D6 gene have a worse clinical outcome than women who have a wild-type genotype. In this commentary we discuss the level of evidence needed to change clinical practice and whether CYP2D6 genotyping is appropriate for all women considering tamoxifen as part of their adjuvant therapy.

Tamoxifen, soy, and lifestyle factors in Asian American women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Soy foods have been a staple in Asia for centuries but the consumption of this food in the West is recent. Intake of soy among women at high risk for or with breast cancer has become a public health concern because genistein, a major component of soy, has weak estrogenic effects on breast epithelium, and has been found to negate the benefit of tamoxifen in some animal and in vitro studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in Asian Americans with breast cancer who were tamoxifen users (n = 380) to investigate the association between soy intake and circulating levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites (N-desmethyl tamoxifen [N-DMT], 4-hydroxytamoxifen [4-OHT], and 4-hydroxy-N-desmethyl-tamoxifen [endoxifen]).

RESULTS

Serum levels of tamoxifen or its metabolites were unrelated to self-reported intake of soy or serum levels of isoflavones. Blood levels of tamoxifen were 81% higher in postmenopausal women age 65 or older compared with premenopausal women age 45 or younger (P = .005); similar patterns of results were observed for the tamoxifen metabolites. Levels of N-DMT were 27% (P = .03) lower among women in the highest tertile of body mass index (BMI, > 24.4 kg/m2) compared with those in the lowest category (BMI 21.5). Women who used hypertensive medications had higher levels of tamoxifen (P = .02) and N-DMT (P = .04) compared with nonusers.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that soy intake adversely affected levels of tamoxifen or its metabolites. However, age, menopausal status, BMI, and use of hypertensive medications significantly influenced circulating levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites in this population.

Genetic variants of CYP3A5, CYP2D6, SULT1A1, UGT2B15 and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer

Introduction

Tamoxifen therapy reduces the risk of recurrence and prolongs the survival of oestrogen-receptor-positive patients with breast cancer. Even if most patients benefit from tamoxifen, many breast tumours either fail to respond or become resistant. Because tamoxifen is extensively metabolised by polymorphic enzymes, one proposed mechanism underlying the resistance is altered metabolism. In the present study we investigated the prognostic and/or predictive value of functional polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 3A5 CYP3A5 (*3), CYP2D6 (*4), sulphotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1; *2) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B15 (UGT2B15; *2) in tamoxifen-treated patients with breast cancer.

Methods

In all, 677 tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal patients with breast cancer, of whom 238 were randomised to either 2 or 5 years of tamoxifen, were genotyped by using PCR with restriction fragment length polymorphism or PCR with denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results

The prognostic evaluation performed in the total population revealed a significantly better disease-free survival in patients homozygous for CYP2D6*4. For CYP3A5, SULT1A1 and UGT2B15 no prognostic significance was observed. In the randomised group we found that for CYP3A5, homozygous carriers of the *3 allele tended to have an increased risk of recurrence when treated for 2 years with tamoxifen, although this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68 to 11.99, P = 0.15). In the group randomised to 5 years' tamoxifen the survival pattern shifted towards a significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) among CYP3A5*3-homozygous patients (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.55, P = 0.002). No reliable differences could be seen between treatment duration and the genotypes of CYP2D6, SULT1A1 or UGT2B15. The significantly improved RFS with prolonged tamoxifen treatment in CYP3A5*3 homozygotes was also seen in a multivariate Cox model (HR = 0.13, CI = 0.02 to 0.86, P = 0.03), whereas no differences could be seen for CYP2D6, SULT1A1 and UGT2B15.

Conclusion

The metabolism of tamoxifen is complex and the mechanisms responsible for the resistance are unlikely to be explained by a single polymorphism; instead it is a combination of several mechanisms. However, the present data suggest that genetic variation in CYP3A5 may predict response to tamoxifen therapy.

Venlafaxine is superior to clonidine as treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer patients—a double-blind, randomized study

BACKGROUND

Classical hormone replacement therapy for hot flashes is contraindicated in breast cancer especially in endocrine responsive disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a double-blind, randomized phase III study, breast cancer patients suffering from hot flashes at least twice a day, who were not taking any medication against hypertension and depression received either clonidine 0.075 mg twice a day or venlafaxine 37.5 mg twice a day for 4 weeks. The primary end point was defined as the frequency of hot flashes after 4 weeks of treatment. A self-reported 1-week hot flash and other symptom questionnaire were kept before the start of treatment until the end of treatment course.

RESULTS

From April 2002 to October 2004, 80 patients were recruited of whom 64 were assessable for efficacy analyses. Thirty-three received clonidine and 31 venlafaxine, nine patients stopped early because of side-effects and seven withdrew consent. At the end of treatment week 4, the median hot flash frequency dropped by 7.6 hot flashes per day for patients receiving venlafaxine and 4.85 hot flashes per day for those receiving clonidine (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Venlafaxine is significantly more effective in reducing the frequency of hot flashes in breast cancer patients than clonidine.

Non-hormonal treatments for menopausal symptoms

Increasing numbers of women are requesting non-hormonal treatments for menopausal symptoms. Estrogen-containing HRT is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms in healthy women but is contraindicated for some women and avoided by many others. This review will assess the evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of non-hormonal treatments for menopausal symptoms. Relatively few high quality studies have addressed this issue, almost all have only addressed the treatment of hot flushes and there are few long-term data.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials of venlafaxine for hot flashes after breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although venlafaxine reduces self-reported hot flashes, no data have established the drug's impact on physiologically documented hot flashes. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials examined the efficacy of two doses of venlafaxine in relation to physiological and self-reported hot flashes and other outcomes, including negative affect, fatigue, sleep, and quality of life.

METHODS

SAMPLE

57 breast cancer survivors in the low-dose study; 20 in the high-dose study.

SETTING

university cancer clinics in the Southeast and Midwest.

INTERVENTION

37.5 mg of venlafaxine (low-dose study) or 75 mg of venlafaxine (high-dose study).

MEASURES

hot flash frequency (physiological monitor, diary, and event marker), hot flash severity (diary), hot flash bother (diary), and questionnaires for hot flash impact on daily life, negative affect, fatigue, sleep, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Subjective but not physiological hot flash measures showed placebo effects. Venlafaxine resulted in modest decreases in hot flashes, but only hot flash interference improved differentially at the higher dose. The timing of venlafaxine's effects on hot flashes varied by dose. Only women with a > or =50% decrease in physiological hot flashes experienced significant improvement in fatigue, sleep quality, and quality of life. Although side effects were mild, most patients discontinued venlafaxine long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

Although venlafaxine resulted in modest and acute reductions in hot flashes with few side effects, it may not be tolerable to some patients long-term. At least 50% relief in physiological hot flashes may be needed for patients to demonstrate improvement in other outcomes, including decreased fatigue, improved sleep, and improved quality of life.

Modifiable Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Recurrence: What Can We Tell Survivors?

The potential for recurrence causes considerable distress for breast cancer survivors. Major information sources for survivors and providers offer few clear recommendations for postdiagnosis lifestyle change related to recurrence. To design interventions to improve long-term survivors' care and quality of life, we must know what survivors are doing to prevent recurrence in the absence of solid evidence, whether survivors' perceptions and behaviors correspond to hypothesized modifiable risk factors for recurrence, and whether survivors are adopting behaviors that could otherwise be harmful to their health. Our review first addresses the general lack of consensus on the impact of specific lifestyle factors on breast cancer recurrence and the resulting equivocal lifestyle recommendations for survivors. Second, we describe inadequacies of the studies of survivors' lifestyle changes related to recurrence. Because much of the existing knowledge about modifiable risk factors for recurrence comes from studies of survivors whose participation and behavior change were potentially influenced by their concern about recurrence, we need large, population-based observational studies of randomly selected breast cancer survivors, adequately representing the target population. Critical are data on lifestyle change from prediagnosis to postdiagnosis and changes over time after diagnosis, extensive data on conventional and nonconventional treatments, and the temporal relationship between behaviors and treatments, and inclusion of the full complement of potential lifestyle risk factors for recurrence. Understanding in detail the current status of survivors' perceptions and behaviors related to modifiable risk factors for recurrence can provide considerable practical information to inform future interventions and communication strategies for breast cancer survivors.

The pharmacogenetics research network: from SNP discovery to clinical drug response

The NIH Pharmacogenetics Research Network (PGRN) is a collaborative group of investigators with a wide range of research interests, but all attempting to correlate drug response with genetic variation. Several research groups concentrate on drugs used to treat specific medical disorders (asthma, depression, cardiovascular disease, addiction of nicotine, and cancer), whereas others are focused on specific groups of proteins that interact with drugs (membrane transporters and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes). The diverse scientific information is stored and annotated in a publicly accessible knowledge base, the Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Knowledge base (PharmGKB). This report highlights selected achievements and scientific approaches as well as hypotheses about future directions of each of the groups within the PGRN. Seven major topics are included: informatics (PharmGKB), cardiovascular, pulmonary, addiction, cancer, transport, and metabolism.