Morbidity, mortality and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer

New Oral Anticoagulants Open New Horizons for Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased quality of life, and higher economic burden in patients with cancer. Currently, the treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is particularly challenging. For many years, low molecular weight heparin (LMWHs) has been the standard for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Recently, the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may offer an oral anticoagulant option for some patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) as a growing body of literature supports the use of NOACs in the setting of CAT. With the use of NOAC as a new option in the management of CAT, clinicians now face several choices for the individual cancer patient with VTE. We need a more in-depth understanding of the drug properties, efficacy and safety, economic analysis that allows us to choose the most appropriate treatment for each patient. In the review, we will present an overview of CAT management, discuss the available evidence, economic costs for NOACs in the treatment of CAT, and seek to provide the best range of treatments for cancer patients.

Pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: An updated and operative guide for diagnosis and management

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Appropriate risk stratification for primary and secondary VTE prevention as well as for risk of early death in acute setting is needed for an adequate treatment. Despite enormous advances have been made in the management of VTE in the last two decades, optimal medical therapy remains a major concern due to still high incidence of both symptomatic and incidental pulmonary embolism (PE), its recurrence, poor survival rate, bleeding risk and multiple drugs interactions. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) simplified the treatment of VTE as compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) due to their oral administration, fixed dose regimens and lower cost. However, their prescription requires extra caution, especially in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Lastly, data on reperfusion approaches remain confined to case series and subgroups analysis. The aim of this review is to summarize recent knowledge concerning PE in patients with malignancies, focusing on available treatments and decision making.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Venous Thromboembolism: An Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database

Data on venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are scarce and conflicting. This study investigated the risk of reporting VTEs associated with ICIs in comparison with all other anticancer drugs. The World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase), comprising >30 million individual case safety reports, was queried. All reports on patients with cancer, involving at least one anticancer drug as a suspect or interacting drug and registered from January 1, 2008, to May 31, 2021, were included. The association between ICIs and the risk of reporting VTEs was estimated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality with all other anticancer drugs as comparators. RORs were estimated as crude and adjusted RORs for age, sex, and other medications (excluding anticancer drugs) associated with risk of VTEs. Among 1,196 patients experiencing VTEs after ICI treatment, the median age was 65 years and 57.6% were men. Anti-PD-1 agents (62.5%) were the most frequently reported. ICIs were not associated with higher reporting of VTEs when compared with other anticancer drugs (crude ROR 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 0.67 and adjusted ROR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.74). No signal of disproportionate reporting was found when considering each class of ICIs. In conclusion, ICIs were not associated with higher reporting of VTEs, in comparison with all other anticancer drugs in a large-scale pharmacovigilance database. Owing to the limitations inherent to pharmacovigilance studies, prospective studies, including an adequate comparison group, are needed to assess the risk of VTEs in ICI-treated patients.

Development and validation of a nomogram to assess postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication in patients with lung cancer that seriously affects prognosis and quality of life. At present, the detection rate of patients with early-stage lung cancer is increasing, but there are few studies on the risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to establish a nomogram for predicting the probability of postoperative VTE risk in patients with stage IA NSCLC.

METHODS

The clinical data of 452 patients with stage IA NSCLC from January 2017 to January 2022 in our center were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Independent risk factors were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram was established based on the results and internally validated. The predictive power of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The nomogram prediction model included three risk factors: age, preoperative D-dimer, and intermuscular vein dilatation. The areas under the ROC curve of this predictive model were 0.832 (95% CI: 0.732-0.924) and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.668-0.930) in the training and validation sets, respectively, showing good discriminative power. In addition, the probability of postoperative VTE occurrence predicted by the nomogram was consistent with the actual occurrence probability. In the decision curve, the nomogram model had a better net clinical benefit at a threshold probability of 5%-90%.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of postoperative VTE in patients with stage IA NSCLC; this nomogram can accurately and intuitively evaluate the probability of VTE in these patients and help clinicians make decisions on prevention and treatment.

The Role of NEWS2 + Lactate + D-Dimer in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Admission and In-Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 Patients

Background

We investigated the parameters of National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) + lactate + D-dimer in predicting the intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Methods

Patients, who applied to the emergency department of a tertiary university hospital and were taken to the COVID-19 zone with suspected COVID-19 between March 2020 and June 2020, were retrospectively examined. In this study, 244 patients, who were hospitalized and had positive polymerase chain reaction test results, were included. NEWS2, lactate, and D-dimer levels of the patients were recorded. Patients were grouped by the states of in-hospital mortality and ICU admission.

Results

Of 244 patients who were included in the study, 122 (50%) were male, while their mean age was 53.76 ± 17.36 years. 28 (11.5%) patients were admitted to the ICU, while in-hospital mortality was seen in 14 (5.7%) patients. The levels of D-dimer, NEWS2, NEWS2 + lactate, NEWS2 + D-dimer, NEWS2 + lactate + D-dimer were statistically significantly higher in patients with in-hospital mortality and admitted to ICU ( p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) values of D-dimer, lactate, NEWS2, NEWS2 + lactate, NEWS2 + D-dimer, NEWS2 + lactate + D-dimer in predicting ICU admission were as 0.745 (0.658-0.832), 0.589 (0.469-0.710), 0.760 (0.675-0.845), 0.774 (0.690-0.859), 0.776 (0.692-0.860), and 0.778 (0.694-0.862), respectively; while the AUC values of these parameters in predicting in-hospital mortality were found to be as 0.768 (0.671-0.865), 0.695 (0.563-0.827), 0.735 (0.634-0.836), 0.757 (0.647-0.867), 0.752 (0.656-0.848), and 0.764 (0.655-0.873), respectively.

Conclusions

Compared to using the NEWS2 value alone, a combination of NEWS2, lactate, and D-dimer was found to be more valuable in predicting in-hospital mortality and ICU admission.

Thrombosis, cancer, and COVID-19

Cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have unusual similarities: they both result in a markedly elevated risk of thrombosis, exceptionally high D-dimer levels, and the failure of anticoagulation therapy in some cases. Cancer patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection and have a higher mortality rate. Science has uncovered much about SARS-CoV-2, and made extraordinary and unprecedented progress on the development of various treatment strategies and COVID-19 vaccines. In this review, we discuss known data on cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), SARS-CoV-2 infection, and COVID-19 vaccines and discuss considerations for managing CAT in patients with COVID-19. Cancer patients should be given priority for COVID-19 vaccination; however, they may demonstrate a weaker immune response to COVID-19 vaccines than the general population. Currently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends an additional dose and booster shot of the COVID-19 vaccine after the primary series in patients undergoing active cancer treatment for solid tumors or hematological cancers, recipients of stem cell transplant within the last 2 years, those taking immunosuppressive medications, and those undergoing active treatment with high-dose corticosteroids or other drugs that suppress the immune response. The mainstay of thrombosis treatment in patients with cancer and COVID-19 is anticoagulation therapy.

Incidence and risk factors of perioperative venous thromboembolism in patients with cervical cancer

The aim of this retrospective study was to identify the perioperative incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing surgery for cervical cancer. The retrospective medical records of consecutive patients with cervical cancer were collected at the Qianfoshan Hospital affiliated with Shandong University from July 2014 to July 2017. Basic information regarding the patients, as well as tumor and surgery-related factors were compared between the cervical cancer patients with and without VTE. In the present study, a total of 338 patients undergoing surgery for cervical cancer were included. Ten (3.0%) patients were diagnosed with preoperative VTE and 18 (5.5%) with postoperative VTE. Multivariate analyses found that high levels of D-dimer and a larger size of the cervical tumor were independent risk factors for preoperative VTE, whereas the length of surgery and use of chemotherapy were independently associated with VTE development within 30 days after surgery. In conclusion, the major findings of the present study was a significant incidence of VTE in patients with cervical cancer. We also identified the clinical characteristics which can cause cervical cancer patients to have an increased risk for VTE.

Venous thromboembolism in Cancer surgery: A report from the Nationwide readmissions database

Background

The present study characterized the incidence of venous thromboembolism in a contemporary cohort of surgical oncology patients and its association with index hospitalization and postdischarge outcomes.

Methods

Adults undergoing 7 major thoracic and abdominal cancer resections were identified in the 2016–2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable models stratified by operative subtype were developed to evaluate the association of venous thromboembolism with outcomes of interest.

Results

Of an estimated 436,368 patients, venous thromboembolism was identified in 9,811 (2.2%) patients during index hospitalization. Esophageal (4.1%) and gastric (4.1%) resections exhibited the highest rates of venous thromboembolism, whereas pulmonary resection (1.0%) the lowest. Following adjustment, cancer resection type demonstrated the strongest association with venous thromboembolism development among all factors analyzed (adjusted odds ratio: 3.13, 95% confidence interval: 2.60–3.78). Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism was associated with increased mortality (10.2%, 95% confidence interval: 9.4–11.1 vs 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.6–1.7) and prolonged index hospital stay (19.5 days, 95% confidence interval: 19.1–20.0 vs 7.5, 95% confidence interval: 7.4–7.5). Of patients who survived index hospitalization, venous thromboembolism occurrence was associated with increased risk of nonhome discharge (56.4%, 95% confidence interval: 54.7–58.0 vs 14.4, 95% confidence interval: 14.2–14.7) and readmission (30.0%, 95% confidence interval: 28.5–31.1 vs 16.9, 95% confidence interval: 16.7–17.1). Additionally, venous thromboembolism substantially increased index hospitalization ($40,000, 95% confidence interval: $38,000–$42,000) and readmission costs ($3,200, 95% confidence interval: $1,700–$4,700).

Conclusion

Rates of venous thromboembolism remain high in surgical oncology patients, with cancer resection type as a major predictor of venous thromboembolism incidence. Venous thromboembolism was associated with inferior clinical and financial outcomes that extended beyond discharge. These findings underscore the importance of continued vigilance and procedure-specific prophylaxis measures.

Management of cancer-associated thrombosis with thrombocytopenia: Impact of the ISTH guidance statement

Background

Optimal management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in patients with thrombocytopenia remains difficult given competing risks of recurrent thrombosis and increased bleeding. We determine the impact of the ISTH Scientific and Standardization Committee (SCC) guidance on CAT management and thrombocytopenia on platelet transfusion, bleeding, and recurrent thrombosis.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of patients with CAT and thrombocytopenia who required anticoagulation for VTE for 11 months before and after implementation of the ISTH SCC guidance. Medical records were reviewed to identify the type of VTE event, number of platelet transfusions, incidence of bleeding, and VTE recurrence within pre- and postintervention time periods.

Results

A total of 41 and 80 cases were included in the preintervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The preintervention group showed a trend toward less acute VTE events (39% vs 55%; P = .05). The postintervention period had an increased per-patient platelet transfusion (median, 2.5 vs 4; P = .05). Nonmajor bleeding was increased in the postintervention group (2% vs 16%; P = 0.03) and included all six (8%) major hemorrhages (P = .09). There was numerically less recurrent thrombosis in the postintervention group (20% vs 8%; P = .07), which was not significantly different when accounting for acuity of VTE. Management adherence was strong, at 91%, in the postintervention group.

Conclusion

The ISTH guidance on management of cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with thrombocytopenia was successfully implemented in an academic medical center. There was no significant difference in bleeding or recurrent thrombosis outcomes after adjusting for acuity of VTE.

The impact of warfarin on overall survival in cancer patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. Warfarin has largely been replaced by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the standard of care in cancer-associated VTE. The survival benefit of these anticoagulants over warfarin in the cancer population was not demonstrated in clinical trials, possibly due to insufficient sample size and limited follow-up duration. There are emerging population-based studies suggesting that warfarin may be associated with improved overall survival in cancers and may have a protective effect against certain types of cancers. Warfarin may exert its anti-neoplastic properties through both coagulation pathway -dependent and -independent mechanisms, the latter of which are mediated by inhibition of the Gas6-AXL signaling pathway. Further research should emphasize on identifying clinical and laboratory predictors of beneficial effects of warfarin. In this review article, we summarize and update the current evidence regarding the potential impact of warfarin on the overall survival of cancer patients and incidence of cancer, as well as review the potential mechanism of such effect and future perspectives.

Venous-thromboembolism and associated health care utilization in elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with lymphoma have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The authors examined the risk of VTE and subsequent health care utilization in elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

A total of 5537 DLBCL patients ≥66 years old enrolled in Medicare from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and a noncancer control group of Medicare beneficiaries (n = 5537) were identified. Cumulative incidence function to examine the risk of VTE 12 months after DLBCL diagnosis was used. Fine and Gray method was used to examine the risk factors associated with VTE risk in multivariable models. Total number of hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and Medicare spending were compared in DLBCL patients with and without VTE.

RESULTS

VTE was diagnosed in 8.3% DLBCL patients and 1.5% controls, yielding an 8.6-fold higher risk of VTE in DLBCL in adjusted analysis (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.62-11.20; P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that precancer VTE history was associated with an increased risk of developing VTE after a DLBCL diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 5.39; 95% CI, 4.39-6.63), and Asian individuals were associated with a lower risk (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-1.00). Patients newly diagnosed with VTE after lymphoma had a 1.7-fold higher rate of hospitalization and a 1.2-fold higher rate of outpatient visits compared to those without, resulting in excess Medicare spending of $22,208 in the first year after DLBCL diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients with DLBCL have an elevated risk of VTE resulting in excess health care utilization. VTE history before DLBCL was associated with increased risk of post-DLBCL VTE, and Asian individuals were associated with a lower risk of VTE.

Readmissions From Venous Thromboembolism After Complex Cancer Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality after cancer surgery. Venous thromboembolism events that are significant enough to require hospital readmission are potentially life threatening, yet data regarding the frequency of these events beyond the 30-day postoperative period remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates, outcomes, and predictive factors of readmissions owing to VTE up to 180 days after complex cancer operations, using a national data set.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study of the 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Database was performed to study adult patients readmitted with a primary VTE diagnosis. Data obtained from 197 510 visits for 126 104 patients were analyzed. This was a multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of patients who underwent a complex cancer operation (defined as cystectomy, colectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, liver/biliary resection, lung/bronchus resection, pancreatectomy, proctectomy, prostatectomy, or hysterectomy) from January 1 through September 30, 2016, for a corresponding cancer diagnosis.

EXPOSURES

Readmission with a primary diagnosis of VTE.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportion of 30-, 90-, and 180-day VTE readmissions after complex cancer surgery, factors associated with readmissions, and outcomes observed during readmission visit, including mortality, length of stay, hospital cost, and readmission to index vs nonindex hospital.

RESULTS

For the 126 104 patients included in the study, 30-, 90-, and 180-day VTE-associated readmission rates were 0.6% (767 patients), 1.1% (1331 patients), and 1.7% (1449 of 83 337 patients), respectively. A majority of patients were men (58.7%), and the mean age was 65 years (SD, 11.5 years). For the 1331 patients readmitted for VTE within 90 days, 456 initial readmissions (34.3%) were to a different hospital than the index surgery hospital, median length of stay was 5 days (IQR, 3-7 days), median cost was $8102 (IQR, $5311-$10 982), and 122 patients died (9.2%). Independent factors associated with readmission included type of operation, scores for severity and risk of mortality, age of 75 to 84 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.02-1.78), female sex (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37), nonelective index admission (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.68), higher number of comorbidities (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.60), and experiencing a major postoperative complication during the index admission (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.85-2.33).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, VTE-related readmissions after complex cancer surgery continued to increase well beyond 30 days after surgery. Quality improvement efforts to decrease the burden of VTE in postoperative patients should measure and account for these late VTE-related readmissions.

Preoperative oncologic therapy and the prolonged risk of venous thromboembolism in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most prothrombotic cancers. Among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy and surgery represent a compound risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), rendering the postoperative time a period of interest. We aimed to analyze whether preoperative oncologic therapy increases the risk for VTE after surgery and identify which characteristics associate with VTE.

METHODS

We first identified patients surgically treated for pancreatic cancer at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2017, collecting the following data: gender, age at surgery, preoperative medication, body mass index (BMI), preoperative chemo(radio)therapy, tumor size, positive node ratio, perineural and perivascular invasion, tumor grade, surgical technique, postoperative anticoagulation, adjuvant therapy, time of VTE, time of local disease recurrence, time of distant metastasis, and time of death. With a follow-up period of at least 2 years or until death, we compared a total of 93 preoperative oncologic therapy and 291 upfront surgery patients (n = 384, median age 66.5 years).

RESULTS

Preoperative oncologic therapy increased the risk for thrombosis after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.53). The VTE incidence rate remained high for up to 2 years after surgery. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 , prior anticoagulation, and disease recurrence (p < 0.05, respectively) associated with VTE. VTE is also associated with shorter overall survival (HR 3.25; 95% CI 2.36-4.44). In 71.6% (95% CI 60.5-81.1) of patients, VTE was diagnosed after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative oncologic therapy represents an independent risk factor for VTE, not only during the immediate postoperative period but up to 2 years after surgery. VTE is associated with obesity, prior anticoagulation, and disease recurrence and diminishes overall survival.

Incidence, Timing, and Outcomes of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Esophagogastric Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Abdominal surgery and chemotherapy are well-established risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer, but their specific contribution in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer is unclear. We aim to quantify the risk of VTE, identify risk factors associated with VTE, and determine the association between VTE and survival in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal or gastric cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted using linked administrative healthcare databases. We used the Ontario Cancer Registry to identify patients with esophageal or gastric cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016 who underwent surgical resection. Incidence of first VTE event was identified using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 codes. VTE incidence was calculated at clinically relevant time points 180 days before and after surgery. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with VTE with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate associations between covariates and survival. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by VTE status.

RESULTS

A total of 4894 patients had esophagectomy or gastrectomy, of which 8% (n = 383/4894) had VTE. VTE risk was 2.5% (n = 123/4894) 180 days before surgery, 2.8% (n = 138/4894) within 30 days of surgery, and 2.5% (n = 122/4894) from 31 to ≤ 180 days after surgery. Of the patients with VTE within 30 days of surgery, 34% (n = 47/138) were diagnosed after discharge from hospital. Receipt of preoperative chemotherapy was associated with VTE 180 days before surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.41, 6.11). Increased hospital length of stay (LOS) was associated with VTE 30 days after surgery (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02, 1.14, per week). Patients with VTE had inferior median OS and CSS (2.2 vs. 3.7 years; 2.3 vs. 4.4 years, respectively). In adjusted models VTE was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.13, 1.63) and CSS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.16, 1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

The highest risk of VTE is within 30 days of surgery with one third of patients diagnosed after discharge from hospital. Longer hospital LOS and receipt of preoperative chemotherapy are associated with increased risk of VTE. VTE is an independent risk factor for inferior survival in patients with esophageal or gastric cancer.

GDF-15, hs-TnT and NT proBNP for Predicting Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Ambulatory Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15), high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin T (hs-TnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in non-cancer patients. However, the performance of these biomarkers in cancer patients is unknown. Our objective was to assess performance of these biomarkers in predicting VTE in cancer patients at intermediate to high risk for VTE (Khorana Score≥2). We used 1-month plasma samples from AVERT trial patients to determine if GDF-15, NT-proBNP and hs-TnT levels are associated with VTE incidence between one- and 7-months from the start of chemotherapy. The minimal Euclidean distance of the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was used to derive optimal cut-offs for GDF-15 and NT-proBNP given there was no evidence of a commonly used cut-off. Logistic and Fine and Gray competing risk regression analysis were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR), respectively, while adjusting for age, sex, anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. We tested in two groups: all patients (n=476, Model 1) and all patients with non-primary brain cancers (n=454, Model 2). In Model 1 and 2, GDF-15 ≥2290.9pg/mL had adjusted ORs for VTE of 1.65 (95%CI: 0.89-3.08), and 2.28 (95%CI: 1.28-4.09), respectively. hs-TnT ≥14.0pg/mL was associated with higher odds of VTE in Model 1 and 2 [adjusted ORs: 2.26 (95%CI: 1.40-3.65), 2.03 (95%CI: 1.07-3.84), respectively]. For NT-proBNP, levels ≥183.5pg/mL was not associated with VTE. Similar results were observed in the Fine and Gray analysis. Our results indicate that increased GDF-15 and hs-TnT levels predicted increased VTE risk.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Cancer-associated thrombosis (including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial events) is highly consequential for patients with cancer and is associated with worsened survival. Despite substantial improvements in cancer treatment, the risk of VTE has increased in recent years; VTE rates additionally depend on the type of cancer (with pancreas, stomach and primary brain tumours having the highest risk) as well as on individual patient's and cancer treatment factors. Multiple cancer-specific mechanisms of VTE have been identified and can be classified as mechanisms in which the tumour expresses proteins that alter host systems, such as levels of platelets and leukocytes, and in which the tumour expresses procoagulant proteins released into the circulation that directly activate the coagulation cascade or platelets, such as tissue factor and podoplanin, respectively. As signs and symptoms of VTE may be non-specific, diagnosis requires clinical assessment, evaluation of pre-test probability, and objective diagnostic testing with ultrasonography or CT. Risk assessment tools have been validated to identify patients at risk of VTE. Primary prevention of VTE (thromboprophylaxis) has long been recommended in the inpatient and post-surgical settings, and is now an option in the outpatient setting for individuals with high-risk cancer. Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of therapy, with low molecular weight heparin or newer options such as direct oral anticoagulants. Personalized treatment incorporating risk of bleeding and patient preferences is essential, especially as a diagnosis of VTE is often considered by patients even more distressing than their cancer diagnosis, and can severely affect the quality of life. Future research should focus on current knowledge gaps including optimizing risk assessment tools, biomarker discovery, next-generation anticoagulant development and implementation science.

Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer

BACKGROUND

Compared with people without cancer, people with cancer who receive anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) are more likely to develop recurrent VTE.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of three types of parenteral anticoagulants (i.e. fixed-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH), and fondaparinux) for the initial treatment of VTE in people with cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in the following major databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via Ovid) and Embase (via Ovid). We also handsearched conference proceedings, checked references of included studies, and searched for ongoing studies. This update of the systematic review is based on the findings of a literature search conducted on 14 August 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the benefits and harms of LMWH, UFH, and fondaparinux in people with cancer and objectively confirmed VTE.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a standardised form, we extracted data - in duplicate - on study design, participants, interventions, outcomes of interest, and risk of bias. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, minor bleeding, postphlebitic syndrome, quality of life, and thrombocytopenia. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 11,484 identified citations, 3073 were unique citations and 15 RCTs fulfilled the eligibility criteria, none of which were identified in the latest search. These trials enrolled 1615 participants with cancer and VTE: 13 compared LMWH with UFH; one compared fondaparinux with UFH and LMWH; and one compared dalteparin with tinzaparin, two different types of low molecular weight heparin. The meta-analyses showed that LMWH may reduce mortality at three months compared to UFH (risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 1.10; risk difference (RD) 57 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 101 fewer to 17 more; low certainty evidence) and may reduce VTE recurrence slightly (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.76; RD 30 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 70 fewer to 73 more; low certainty evidence). There were no data available for bleeding outcomes, postphlebitic syndrome, quality of life, or thrombocytopenia. The study comparing fondaparinux with heparin (UFH or LMWH) found that fondaparinux may increase mortality at three months (RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.81; RD 43 more per 1000, 95% CI 24 fewer to 139 more; low certainty evidence), may result in little to no difference in recurrent VTE (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.54; RD 8 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 52 fewer to 63 more; low certainty evidence), may result in little to no difference in major bleeding (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.66; RD 12 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 40 fewer to 44 more; low certainty evidence), and probably increases minor bleeding (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.66; RD 42 more per 1000, 95% CI 10 fewer to 132 more; moderate certainty evidence). There were no data available for postphlebitic syndrome, quality of life, or thrombocytopenia. The study comparing dalteparin with tinzaparin found that dalteparin may reduce mortality slightly (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.73; RD 33 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 135 fewer to 173 more; low certainty evidence), may reduce recurrent VTE (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.16; RD 47 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 77 fewer to 98 more; low certainty evidence), may increase major bleeding slightly (RR 2.19, 95% CI 0.20 to 23.42; RD 20 more per 1000, 95% CI 14 fewer to 380 more; low certainty evidence), and may reduce minor bleeding slightly (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.21; RD 24 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 95 fewer to 164 more; low certainty evidence). There were no data available for postphlebitic syndrome, quality of life, or thrombocytopenia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is probably superior to UFH in the initial treatment of VTE in people with cancer. Additional trials focusing on patient-important outcomes will further inform the questions addressed in this review. The decision for a person with cancer to start LMWH therapy should balance the benefits and harms and consider the person's values and preferences.

Factor Xa inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism; A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies

INTRODUCTION

We compared the safety and efficacy of Xa-inhibitors to LMWH for treatment of venous thromboembolism in mixed and gastrointestinal cancer cohorts (CA-VTE).

METHODS

A systematic search identified RCTs and non-randomized studies (NRS) comparing Xa-inhibitors to LMWH for treating CA-VTE. Relative risks were computed. Certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Xa-inhibitors reduced the risk of recurrent VTE (RR0.64;0.49-0.84) and NRS (RR0.74;0.60-0.92;Moderate-Low Certainty). There was no significant difference in recurrent PE in RCTs (RR0.72;0.50-1.02) and NRS (1.43;0.65-3.12;Low-Very Low Certainty). Xa-inhibitors increased the risk of overall bleeding events in RCTs (RR1.45;1.05-2.01) and NRS (RR1.72;1.42-2.08;Moderate-Low Certainty), and the risk of major bleeding events in NRS (RR1.56;1.17-2.07), but not in RCTs (RR1.33;0.94-1.89; Low-Very Low Certainty). Similar results were detected in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Xa-inhibitors may reduce the risk of recurrent VTE, but not recurrent PE compared to LMWH. A higher overall bleeding risk, and a questionably higher major bleeding risk was found with Xa-inhibitor use.

Efficacy of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism among subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A post- hoc analysis of the AVERT trial

BACKGROUND

Apixaban has been shown to significantly decrease the rate of VTE among intermediate-to-high risk patients starting chemotherapy compared to placebo. This investigation sought to determine the impact of apixaban among different subgroups of patients with cancer.

METHODS

This is a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial which compared apixaban to placebo for the primary prevention of VTE in ambulatory patients initiating chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different baseline characteristics. The primary efficacy outcome was objectively documented major VTE. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model to compare the treatment effect accounting for clustering at study center level.

RESULTS

During the study period, major VTE events occurred in 4.2% and 10.2% of the apixaban and placebo groups, respectively (HR 0.41; 95%CI, 0.26-0.65). Characteristics associated with decreased risk of major VTE among patients on apixaban included: male sex (HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12-0.48); weight > 90Kg (HR 0.18, 95%CI, 0.06-0.52); no prior history of VTE (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.26-0.64); solid cancers (HR 0.30; 95%CI, 0.19-0.47); metastatic disease (HR 0.45; 95%CI, 0.26-0.78); and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy (HR 0.18, 95%CI 0.10-0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

In the AVERT trial, while apixaban thromboprophylaxis reduced the risk of major VTE in most patients, patients with weight > 90 kg, solid cancers, or concurrent antiplatelet therapy experienced the greatest benefits.

Concurrence of Gastric Cancer and Incidental Pulmonary Embolism May Be a Prognostic Factor for Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients with Incidental Pulmonary Embolism

Objective

Cancer is well known as the most important risk factor for the emergence of pulmonary embolism (PE). The incidence of incidental PE (IPE) has increased with widely use of multi-detector-row computed tomography (CT) technology. Simultaneously, more new cancer patients diagnosed concomitantly with IPE are found. No study has examined the presentation and prognosis of incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE) in gastric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to analyse prognostic factors in patients with advanced gastric cancer complicated with IPE.

Patients and Methods

Ninety patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed with IPE were enrolled. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test if non-normally distributed. The Chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test where appropriate) was used to compare categorical variables. The Kaplan–Meier method and the Log rank test were used for survival analysis. Independent prognostic factors for survival were determined using a Cox proportional hazards model. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Nineteen patients were diagnosed with IPE concomitantly with gastric cancer. Concurrence of gastric cancer and IPE, lack of anticoagulation therapy, and location of IPE were associated with survival. After adjusting for age and sex, the concurrence of gastric cancer and IPE, lack of anticoagulation, and central IPE independently influenced the survival of advanced gastric cancer patients with IPE. Subgroup analysis of patients with peripheral pulmonary embolisms confirmed that anticoagulant therapy provided a survival benefit.

Conclusion

Concurrence of gastric cancer and IPE may be a prognostic factor for advanced gastric cancer patients with IPE.

The Application of the ThroLy Risk Assessment Model to Predict Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background

Patients with aggressive lymphomas are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). ThroLy is a risk assessment model (RAM) derived to predict the occurrence of VTE in various types of lymphomas. In this study, we assess the clinical application of ThroLy RAM in a unified group of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Methods

Hospital databases were searched for patients with DLBCL and radiologically-confirmed VTE. Items in the ThroLy RAM, including prior VTE, reduced mobility, obesity, extranodal disease, mediastinal involvement, neutropenia and hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 524 patients, median age 49 (range: 18-90) years were included. Patients had high disease burden; 57.3% with stage III/IV and 34.0% with bulky disease. All were treated on unified guidelines; 63 (12.0%) had primary refractory disease. Venous thromboembolic events were reported in 71 (13.5%) patients. Among 121 patients with high (> 3) ThroLy score, 22.3% developed VTE compared to 8.4% and 12.4% in those with low and intermediate risk scores, respectively (P = .014). Simplifying the ThroLy model into two risk groups; high-risk (score ≥ 3) and low risk (score < 3) can still segregate patients; VTE developed in 44 (17.2%) high-risk patients (n = 256) compared to 27 (10.1%) in the low-risk group (n = 268), P = .038. Neutropenia, a component of the ThroLy, was encountered in only 14 (2.7%) patients.

Conclusions

ThroLy RAM can identify patients with DLBCL at high risk for VTE. Model can be modified by dividing patients into two, rather than three risk groups, and further simplified by omitting neutropenia.

Risk assessment of thromboembolic events in hospitalized cancer patients

Hospitalized cancer patients are at increased risk for Thromboembolic Events (TEs). As untailored thromboprophylaxis is associated with hemorrhagic complications, the definition of a risk-assessment model (RAM) in this population is needed. INDICATE was a prospective observational study enrolling hospitalized cancer patients, with the primary objective of assessing the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for TEs during hospitalization and within 45 days from discharge of low-grade Khorana Score (KS = 0). Secondary objectives were to assess KS Positive Predictive Value (PPV), the impact of TEs on survival and the development of a new RAM. Assuming 7% of TEs in KS = 0 patients as unsatisfactory percentage and 3% of as satisfactory, 149 patients were needed to detect the favorable NPV with one-sided α = 0.10 and power = 0.80. Stepwise logistic regression was adopted to identify variables included in a new RAM. Among 535 enrolled patients, 153 (28.6%) had a KS = 0. The primary study objective was met: 29 (5.4%) TEs were diagnosed, with 7 (4.6%) cases in the KS = 0 group (NPV = 95.4%, 95% CI 90.8-98.1%; one-sided p = 0.084). However, the PPV was low (5.7%, 95% CI 1.9-12.8%); a new RAM based on albumin (OR 0.34, p = 0.003), log(LDH) (OR 1.89, p = 0.023) and presence of vascular compression (OR 5.32, p < 0.001) was developed and internally validated. Also, TEs were associated with poorer OS (median, 5.7 vs 24.8 months, p < 0.001). INDICATE showed that the KS has a good NPV but poor PPV for TEs in hospitalized cancer patients. A new RAM was developed, and deserves further assessment in external cohorts.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Tissue Factor and Extracellular Vesicles: Activation of Coagulation and Impact on Survival in Cancer

Simple Summary

The tissue factor (TF)-factor VIIa complex is the major physiological initiator of blood coagulation. Tumors express TF and release TF-positive extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the circulation, and this is associated with the activation of coagulation. Circulating levels of EVTF activity may be a useful biomarker to identify patients at risk for thrombosis. Tumor TF and TF-positive EVs are also associated with reduced survival.

Abstract

Tissue factor (TF) is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions as a receptor for FVII/FVIIa and initiates the extrinsic coagulation pathway. Tumors and cancer cells express TF that can be released in the form of TF positive (TF+) extracellular vesicles (EVs). In this review, we summarize the studies of tumor TF and TF + EVs, and their association with activation of coagulation and survival in cancer patients. We also summarize the role of tumor-derived TF + EVs in venous thrombosis in mouse models. Levels of tumor TF and TF + EVs are associated with venous thromboembolism in pancreatic cancer patients. In addition, levels of EVTF activity are associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation in cancer patients. Furthermore, tumor-derived TF + EVs enhance venous thrombosis in mice. Tumor TF and TF + EVs are also associated with worse survival in cancer patients, particularly in pancreatic cancer patients. These studies indicate that EVTF activity could be used as a biomarker to identify pancreatic cancer patients at risk for venous thrombosis and cancer patients at risk for disseminated intravascular coagulation. EVTF activity may also be a useful prognostic biomarker in cancer patients.

Awareness, knowledge, and attitude toward venous thromboembolism among Aseer Population, Saudi Arabia

Objectives:

Calls to carry efforts to increase awareness about venous thromboembolism (VTE) as a preventable major healthcare problem with serious consequences has been upraised. This study was planned to get an overview of the awareness, knowledge, and attitude toward VTE among Aseer population, Saudi Arabia and the need for an education plan.

Materials and Methods:

Questionnaire composed of 35 questions based cross-sectional study was conducted online via Google documents to public in Aseer that included both genders aged more than 18 years who agreed to be involved in the study, to assess knowledge and attitude toward VTE. The collected data were presented as numbers, percentages, and were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.

Results:

The results of the data showed that awareness knowledge and attitude toward VTE were lacking and unsatisfactory.

Conclusion:

Diligence to spread knowledge and awareness of VTE among public in Aseer is required. Further surveys involving other populations are warranted.

Clinical Practice for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Oncological Surgeries

Objective To determine the proportion of patients receiving venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after oncological surgeries as per the hospital standards and its comparison with the international guidelines. Methodology In the month of September 2019, all patients after elective oncological surgeries were reviewed for VTE prophylaxis administration and education. Results were shared with the department of surgery and Hospital Quality and Patient Safety Department. Education was provided to the relevant staff and hospital policy for VTE prophylaxis was revised followed by a loop audit which was done in October 2020. The primary endpoint was to compare the proportion of patients receiving prophylaxis as per the hospital guidelines. Results Total 425 patients were included in this audit (209 in September 2019 and 216 in October 2020). Compliance with mechanical prophylaxis increased from 84.7 % to 98.6% and pharmacological prophylaxis improved from 39.7% (n=83) to 73.1% (n=158). Adherence to local protocols enhanced significantly from 1.9% (n=4) to 56.4% (n=122). The main cause of non-compliance was lack of risk assessment for VTE. Conclusion VTE prophylaxis can be improved by setting protocols in accordance with the international guidelines and local protocols. This can prevent significant morbidity and mortality in surgical patients as well as hospital costs.

Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients with cancer and is greatest in those with cancers of the pancreas, stomach, brain, lung and ovary, late stage disease and in those undergoing treatment including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or surgery. VTE in patients with cancer is associated with a variety of adverse consequences including an increased risk of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and early mortality. A VTE risk score for ambulatory patients receiving cancer chemotherapy has been extensively validated and has been used to select high risk patients for thromboprophylaxis trials. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of these trials have confirmed that LMWHs can significantly reduce the risk of VTE in patients with cancer. While the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the general population, previous guideline panels discouraged their use due to a lack of cancer-specific data. Recently RCTs for the treatment of established VTE in patients with cancer have demonstrated that the risk of recurrent VTE is lower while the risk of bleeding greater with DOACs compared to LMWH. Two thromboprophylaxis trials comparing low dose DOACs to placebo in high risk patients receiving cancer therapy have recently reported similar rates of VTE occurrence at 6 months in the control arms. A meta-analysis of the pooled results from these trials in higher risk ambulatory patients receiving cancer therapy confirmed a significant reduction in overall VTE incidence as well as pre-planned secondary outcomes on treatment. Several clinical practice guidelines addressing VTE in patients with malignant disease have been updated including those from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The addition of DOACs as an option for the management of VTE in patients with cancer is the latest major change to previous guidelines issued by these organizations. The updated recommendations from these guidelines are summarized in this review.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer and Impact on Survival

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), identify risk factors for VTE, and assess the effect of VTE on treatment trajectory and overall survival.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer treated with NACT between 2013 to 2016 in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was incidence of VTE during NACT. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for VTE and overall survival. Data related to patient demographics, cancer treatment, and incidence of VTE were collected. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were included in this study. Average age at diagnosis was 63.8 years. The incidence of VTE during NACT was 13.3%. Patients with VTE were less likely to undergo interval debulking surgery (58.3%) than patients without VTE (78.6%). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated a decrease in overall survival in patients who had VTE during NACT (15.0 mo; 95% CI 14.5-16.5) compared with patients who did not (26.8 mo; 95% CI 22.8-30.9) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified albumin <35 g/L, BMI >30 kg/m², and non-serous histology as risk factors for VTE.

CONCLUSION

The risk of VTE in this cohort was 13.3%, which was associated with decreased overall survival. These findings suggest that thromboprophylaxis may have a role in this patient population.

A Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Thromboembolism in Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Purpose: The aims of this study were to develop and validate a novel nomogram to predict thromboembolism (TE) in gastric cancer (GC) patients receiving chemotherapy and to test its predictive ability.

Methods: This retrospective study included 544 GC patients who received chemotherapy as the initial treatment at two medical centers. Among the 544 GC patients who received chemotherapy, 275 and 137 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2014 to March 2019 were enrolled in the training cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. A total of 132 patients in the Beilun branch of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2015 to August 2019 were enrolled in external validation cohorts. The nomogram was based on parameters determined by univariate and multivariate logistic analyses. The prediction performance of the nomogram was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The applicability of the nomogram was internally and independently validated.

Results: The predictors included the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG), presence of an active cancer (AC), central venous catheter (CVC), and D-dimer levels. These risk factors are shown on the nomogram and verified. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination and fine calibration with an AUROC of 0.875 (0.832 in internal validation and 0.807 in independent validation). The DCA revealed that the nomogram had a high clinical application value.

Conclusions: We propose the nomogram for predicting TE in patients with GC receiving chemotherapy, which can help in making timely personalized clinical decisions for different risk populations.

Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Asia: A Systematic Review

The epidemiology of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in Asia is less well-studied and differs from that in the western countries. Here, we systematically examine population based and hospital-based studies reported between 1995 and 2020 to understand the epidemiology of CAT in Asia. From population-based studies, the estimated incidence of VTE in cancer patients was 1.85–9.88 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence of CAT in Asia is significantly higher than non-cancer associated VTE in the general population and cancer is perhaps the most important risk factor for VTE. Hospital-based studies were heterogeneous in study designs and reveal a wide range of prevalence of VTE among cancer patients at 0.5–44.6% while the cancer prevalence rates among VTE patients ranged from 6.1 to 65.5%. The cancer sites most associated with VTE and risk factors were similar between Asian and Western studies. CAT has a major impact on the survival of patients with cancer in Asia, but thromboprophylaxis is not commonly practiced and validated risk assessment tools are lacking. This study highlights the urgent need for large multinational epidemiological studies in Asia to establish the true burden of CAT and to guide appropriate prevention strategies.

The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with midline catheters compared with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Both midline catheters (MCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can cause venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the prevalence associated with each is controversial.

Objective

To compare the risk of VTE between MCs and PICCs with a systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Methods

The Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library and ProQuest were searched from inception to January 2020. All studies comparing the risk of VTE between MCs and PICCs were included. Selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Downs and Black checklist. Two authors independently assessed the literature and extracted the data. Any different opinion was resolved through third‐party consensus. Meta‐analyses were conducted to generate estimates of VTE risk in patients with MCs versus PICCs, and publication bias was evaluated with RevMan 5.3.

Results

A total of 86 studies were identified. Twelve studies were recruited, involving 40,871 patients. The prevalence of VTE with MCs and PICCs was 3.97% (310/7806) and 2.29% (758/33065), respectively. Meta‐analysis showed that the prevalence of VTE with MCs was higher than that with PICCs (RR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.33–1.76, p < .00001). Subgroup analyses by age showed that the prevalence of VTE with MCs was higher than that with PICCs in the adult group (RR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.38–2.22, p < .00001), and higher than that with PICCs in the other subgroups (RR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.19–1.69, p = .0001). Subgroup analyses by nation showed that the prevalence of VTE with MCs was higher than that with PICCs (RR=1.50, 95% CI: 1.30–1.73, p < .00001) in US subgroup and higher than that with PICCs (RR=2.87, 95% CI: 1.24–6.65, p = .01) in the other nations. The sensitivity analysis shows that the results from this meta‐analysis are robust and all studies have no significant publication bias.

Conclusions

This study provides the first systematic assessment of the risk of VTE between MCs and PICCs. MCs are associated with a higher risk of VTE than PICCs in all patients and adults. The findings of this study have several important implications for future practice. However, the risk of VTE between MCs and PICCs in children is unclear.

Current status of treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Patients with cancer are prone to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) that is the second leading cause of mortality among them. Cancer patients with VTE may encounter higher rates of VTE recurrence and bleeding complications than patients without cancer. Treatment of established VTE is often complex in patients with cancer. Treatment of cancer-associated VTE basically comprises initial treatment, long-term treatment, treatment within 6 months, treatment beyond 6 months, treatment of recurrent VTE, and treatment in special situations. Decision of antithrombotic therapy, selection of anticoagulants, duration of anticoagulation, decision of adjuvant therapy, and adjustment of regimen in special situations are the major problems in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Therapeutic anticoagulation is the key of the key in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. In addition to the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that has been fully demonstrated, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly showing its advantages along with the accompanying concern in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The latest ASCO, ITAC and NCCN guidelines agree with each other on most aspects with respect to the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, whereas differ on a few issues. Encompassing recent randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and meta-analyses, as well as the comparison of the latest authoritative guidelines including the NCCN, ASCO, and ITAC guidelines in this field, the objective of this review is to present current overview and recommendations for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer: Rationale and implementation of a pharmacist-led VTE risk assessment program in an ambulatory cancer centre

Objectives

The objectives of this paper were to identify and compare clinical prediction models used to assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory patients with cancer, as well as review the rationale and implementation of a pharmacist-led VTE screening program using the Khorana Risk Score model in an ambulatory oncology centre in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.

Data Sources

PubMed was used to identify clinical practice guidelines and review articles discussing risk prediction models used to assess VTE risk in ambulatory patients with cancer.

Data Summary

Three commonly used VTE risk prediction models in ambulatory patients with cancer: the Khorana Risk Score, Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS) and Protecht Score, were identified via literature review. After considering guideline recommendations, site-specific factors (i.e. laboratory costs, time pharmacists spent calculating VTE risk) and evidence from the CASSINI and AVERT trials, a novel pharmacist-led VTE risk assessment program using the Khorana Risk Score was developed during a fourth-year PharmD clinical rotation at the Algoma District Cancer Program (ADCP) [ambulatory cancer care centre]. ADCP patients with a Khorana Risk Score of ≥2 were referred to the hematologist for a full VTE workup. Considering limitations, inclusion and exclusion criteria of the CASSINI and AVERT trials, the hematologist and pharmacy team decided on appropriate initiation of thromboprophylaxis with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC).

Conclusions

The Khorana Risk Score was the chosen model used for the pharmacist-led VTE risk assessment program due to its user-friendly scoring algorithm, evidence from validation studies and clinical trials, as well as ease of integration into pharmacy workflow. More research is needed to determine if pharmacist-led VTE risk assessment programs will impact patient outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality, secondary to cancer-associated thrombosis.

A nomogram model to predict the venous thromboembolism risk after surgery in patients with gynecological tumors

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common post-surgical complication of gynecological malignant tumors that has serious implications on the prognosis and quality-of-life of patients. However, there exists only a few recognized specific evaluation models for the occurrence of VTE after gynecological malignant tumor surgery. We aimed to establish a nomogram model that could predict the probability of post-surgical VTE in patients with gynecological malignancies.

METHODS

We collected the clinical information of 673 patients who underwent surgery for gynecological malignant tumor in our hospital between January 2014 and May 2020. To reduce bias from confounding factors between groups, a 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed; meanwhile, univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to analyze the risk factors of VTE after surgeries. A nomogram prediction model was accordingly established and internally validated.

RESULTS

The predictors contained in the nomogram model included age, D-dimer value, body mass index (BMI), and surgical approach. The C-index of the model was 0.721 (95% confidence interval: 0.644-0.797), with good discrimination and calibration effect. The internally verified C-index value was 0.916. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the nomogram model was clinically useful when the incidence of thrombosis in patients was 10-75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the risk factors of VTE after surgery for gynecological malignant tumor, a high-performance nomogram model was established and then validated to provide individual risk assessment and guide treatment decisions.

Incidence and Risk of Various Types of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To describe the temporal association and identify risk factors between cancer diagnosis and various types of arterial thromboembolism (ATE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We inquired an aggregated electronic health record database (Explorys, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York) and identified patients with cancer from January 1999 to October 2019, with various types of ATE, including myocardial infarction, acute ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, acute mesenteric ischemia, acute renal infarction, and retinal artery occlusion. We investigated the temporal relationship between cancer diagnosis and ATE events by examining the incidence ratio (IR) of ATE before and after diagnosis of cancer.

RESULTS

We identified 305,384 patients with cancer and ATE. The 30-day interval IR of total ATE was elevated shortly before and after cancer diagnosis, which was consistent among different ATE and cancer types. The incidence was highest within a 330-day window (90 days before and 240 days after cancer diagnosis), and IR peaked at 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6 to 14.2) in the first 30 days following diagnosis of cancer. Compared with patients with cancer who never developed ATE, patients with ATE had more cardiovascular risk factors at baseline. Patients with brain cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic cancer had the highest risk of developing ATE, whereas ATE type was anatomically associated with cancer type.

CONCLUSION

In this observational study of an aggregated US patient population, those with newly diagnosed cancer had increased risk of ATE events. This risk was most elevated in a 330-day window around cancer diagnosis and was consistent across different types of ATE and cancer.

High discrepancy in thrombotic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genomic alterations

Background

Acute complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are common in patients with advanced severe lung cancers. However, current VTE risk scores cannot adequately identify high-risk patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study proposed to elucidated the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) in patients with different oncogenic aberrations and the impact of these aberrations on the efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A systemic review was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the incidence of TE in different molecular subtypes of NSCLC. Data from patients diagnosed of advanced NSCLC who harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) rearrangements since 2016 to 2019 were also retrospectively collected. A meta-analysis with random-effects model, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed. The principal summary measure was incidence of thrombotic events in NSCLC patients. And the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was compared between the two subgroups.

Results

A total of 5,767 cases from 20 studies were included in the analysis of the incidence of thrombosis in patients with different oncogenic alterations. The pooled analysis showed a higher risk of thrombosis in ROS1-fusion types (41%, 95% CI: 35-47%) and ALK-fusion types (30%, 95% CI: 24-37%) than in EGFR-mutation (12%, 95% CI: 8-17%), KRAS-mutation (25%, 95% CI: 13-50%), and wild-type (14%, 95% CI: 10-20%) cases. A high prevalence of thrombosis (ALK: 24.4%; ROS1: 32.6%) was observed in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) cohort of 224 patients with ALK or ROS1 fusion. Furthermore, patients with embolism had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after TKI therapy than those without embolism, both in the ALK+ cohort (5.6 vs. 12.9 months, P<0.0001) and in the ROS1+ cohort (9.6 vs. 17.6 months, P=0.0481).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients with ALK/ROS1 rearrangements are more likely to develop thrombosis than patients with other oncogenic alterations. Thrombosis may also be associated with an inferior response and PFS after TKI therapy.

American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer. Patients with cancer and VTE are at a markedly increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The guideline development process was supported by updated or new systematic evidence reviews. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

Recommendations address mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer, those undergoing a surgical procedure, and ambulatory patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. The recommendations also address the use of anticoagulation for the initial, short-term, and long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include not using thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients receiving cancer chemotherapy at low risk of VTE and to use low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for initial treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Conditional recommendations include using thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer, LMWH or fondaparinux for surgical patients with cancer, LMWH or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy at high risk of VTE and LMWH or DOAC for initial treatment of VTE, DOAC for the short-term treatment of VTE, and LMWH or DOAC for the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

Discordant reporting of VTE in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of thromboprophylaxis versus chemotherapeutic trials

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequency of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pancreatic cancer, it is inconsistently reported as an adverse event in clinical trials. We hypothesized that reported rates of VTE in pancreatic cancer clinical trials are influenced by the objectives of the trial, with higher rates reported in thromboprophylaxis compared with chemotherapeutic trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (RCT) in pancreatic cancer to quantify differences in reported rates of VTE in thromboprophylaxis and chemotherapeutic trials.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible thromboprophylaxis RCTs were required to report rates of thrombosis in non-anticoagulant pancreatic cancer cohorts. Eligible chemotherapy studies were RCTs evaluating chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic cancer and reported thrombosis as adverse events. Pooled event rates of VTE and arterial thrombosis were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The pooled VTE rate in 13 chemotherapy studies (5694 patients) was 5.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-9.0%) compared with 16.5% (95% CI, 11.7%-23.3%; P < .001) in 9 thromboprophylaxis studies (631 patients). The pooled symptomatic VTE rate from chemotherapy studies was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.5%-8.3%), which was significantly lower than the pooled rate from thromboprophylaxis studies of 10.5% (95% CI, 7.3%-14.9%; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

The VTE incidence reported in chemotherapy RCTs in pancreatic cancer is significantly lower than reported in thromboprophylaxis studies. This finding highlights the underrecognition of VTE in chemotherapeutic trials and emphasizes the need to standardize approaches towards monitoring and reporting of VTE in clinical trials.

Effects of aging on gene expression in blood of captive Tibetan macaques ( Macaca thibetana) and comparisons with expression in humans

Changes in gene expression occur as animals, including primates, age. Macaques have long been used as a model species for primate evolution and biomedical studies. Here, to study gene expression in Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana, TMs) and its differences to humans, we applied RNA-Seq to obtain the blood transcriptomes of 24 TMs. In total, 2 523 age-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. Several pathways and processes that regulate aging, including the FoxO signaling pathway, autophagy, and platelet activation, were significantly enriched in the up-regulated DEGs. Two significantly age-related modules were identified by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The TMs and humans shared 279 common DEGs, including 111 up-regulated and 141 down-regulated genes with advancing age in the same expression direction. However, 27 age-related DEGs presented the opposite expression direction in TMs as that in humans. For example, INPPL1, with inhibitory effects on the B cell receptor signaling pathway, was up-regulated in humans but down-regulated in TMs. In general, our study suggests that aging is a critical factor affecting gene expression in the captive TM population. The similarities and differences in gene expression patterns between TMs and humans could provide new insights into primate evolution and benefit TM model development.

The prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic value of venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients has been widely investigated, but our knowledge on the role of VTE in OC patients receiving chemotherapy is limited. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic value of chemotherapy-associated VTE in OC.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched from inception to October 14, 2020. The primary outcome was the prevalence of VTE in OC patients receiving chemotherapy. The risk factors and prognostic value of VTE were the secondary outcomes. The pooled prevalence of VTE was estimated using the generic inverse-variance method. The statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with Cochran's Q test and I² statistic. Funnel plot, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to assess the potential publication bias in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of eleven observational studies with 4759 OC patients were included. The pooled prevalence of VTE was 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12) in OC patients receiving chemotherapy. The results of subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were basically consistent with the overall pooled estimate. Multiple significant risk factors associated with VTE were also identified including advanced age, D-dimer > 0.5 mg/mL, and tumor diameter > 10 cm. Only two included studies reported the prognostic value of VTE in OC patients receiving chemotherapy, but with inconsistent results. Funnel plot showed that there existed potential publication bias, which was further verified by statistical test, but the results of the trim-and-fill method showed the pooled estimate kept stable after adding two "missing" studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This current study revealed that the pooled prevalence of chemotherapy-related VTE in OC was approximately 9% in OC patients. Risk factors for chemotherapy-related VTE were also identified which may contribute to targeting potentially preventative measures for VTE in OC.

Cost of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Lung Cancer: Costecat Study

Background: Patients with lung cancer (LC) are at significantly higher risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), which may lead to increased use of health resources and the cost of the disease management. The main aim of the study was to determine the cost of the management of VTE events in patients with LC treated with Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) in Spain. Methods: Costecat was an observational, ambispective pharmacoeconomic study. Patients with LC, with a first episode of VTE (symptomatic or incidental) in treatment with LMWH, were recruited from six third-level hospitals and followed up for six months. Sociodemographic, clinical and resource use variables of VTE-related implications and its treatment were collected. Direct healthcare costs and direct non-healthcare costs were recorded. Data collection was documented in an electronic case report. Costs (€2018) were estimated from the healthcare perspective. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical program R 3.4.3 version (30 November 2017). Results: Forty-seven patients were included. Mean age was 65.4 years, 66.0% were male. The percentage of patients with LC who had metastatic disease was 78.7%. Twenty-three patients (48.9%) needed hospital admissions due to thromboembolic episode. Total average cost of patients with cancer associated VTE (CAT) was €10,969.6 per patient/semester. The hospitalizations represent 65.8% of total costs (7207.3 € SD 13,996.9 €), followed by LMWH therapy which represents 18.6% (2033.8 € SD:630.5 €). Conclusions: Venous thromboembolism episodes induce an economic impact on patients and healthcare systems. Direct healthcare costs are the major burden of the total cost, in which hospitalizations are the main drivers of cost.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Healthcare costs of patients with cancer stratified by Khorana score risk levels

AIMS

Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which entails a high economic burden. The risk of cancer-associated VTE can be assessed using the Khorana score (KS), a validated VTE risk prediction algorithm. This study compared healthcare costs associated with different KS in a population of patients newly diagnosed with cancer.

METHODS

The Optum Clinformatics DataMart database (01/01/2012-09/30/2017) was used to select adult patients with ≥1 hospitalization or ≥2 outpatient claims with a cancer diagnosis (index date) initiated on systemic therapy or radiation therapy. Patients were classified in mutually exclusive cohorts based on KS (i.e. KS = 0, 1, 2 or ≥3). The observation period spanned from index to the earliest among the end of data availability, death, end of insurance coverage, or 12 months.

RESULTS

In total 6,194 patients (KS = 0: 2,488; KS = 1: 2,125; KS = 2: 1,074; KS ≥ 3: 507) were included. On average, patients were aged 68 years, 48-52% were female, and the Quan-Charlson comorbidity index ranged between 1.1 and 1.4. Over the observation period, all-cause total healthcare costs per patient per month (PPPM) were $8,826 (KS = 0), $11,598 (KS = 1), $14,028 (KS = 2), and $16,211 (KS ≥ 3). Using the KS = 0 cohort as a reference, adjusted PPPM costs were $2,506, $4,775, and $6,452 higher in the KS = 1, KS = 2, and KS ≥ 3 cohorts, respectively. Hospitalization and outpatient costs were the main drivers of these differences. Similar results were found for VTE-related costs, which represented 4-11% of the total all-cause cost difference between KS cohorts.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounders; results may not be generalized to patients with other insurance plans or those who received treatments other than systemic therapy or radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis found that cancer patients at higher risk of VTE (based on KS) incurred significantly greater all-cause and VTE-related healthcare costs compared with cancer patients at lower risk of VTE.

Nurse staffing practices and adverse events in acute care hospitals: The research protocol of a multisite patient-level longitudinal study

Aims

We describe an innovative research protocol to: (a) examine patient‐level longitudinal associations between nurse staffing practices and the risk of adverse events in acute care hospitals and; (b) determine possible thresholds for safe nurse staffing.

Design

A dynamic cohort of adult medical, surgical and intensive care unit patients admitted to 16 hospitals in Quebec (Canada) between January 2015–December 2019.

Methods

Patients in the cohort will be followed from admission until 30‐day postdischarge to assess exposure to selected nurse staffing practices in relation to the subsequent occurrence of adverse events. Five staffing practices will be measured for each shift of an hospitalization episode, using electronic payroll data, with the following time‐varying indicators: (a) nursing worked hours per patient; (b) skill mix; (c) overtime use; (d) education mix and; and (e) experience. Four high‐impact adverse events, presumably associated with nurse staffing practices, will be measured from electronic health record data retrieved at the participating sites: (a) failure‐to‐rescue; (b) in‐hospital falls; (c) hospital‐acquired pneumonia and; and (d) venous thromboembolism. To examine the associations between the selected nurse staffing exposures and the risk of each adverse event, separate multivariable Cox proportional hazards frailty regression models will be fitted, while adjusting for patient, nursing unit and hospital characteristics, and for clustering. To assess for possible staffing thresholds, flexible non‐linear spline functions will be fitted. Funding for the study began in October 2019 and research ethics/institutional approval was granted in February 2020.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first multisite patient‐level longitudinal investigation of the associations between common nurse staffing practices and the risk of adverse events. It is hoped that our results will assist hospital managers in making the most effective use of the scarce nursing resources and in identifying staffing practices that minimize the occurrence of adverse events.

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with ovarian cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with ovarian malignancy. There is no meta-analysis available on this topic so far. The aim of our study was to quantitatively synthesize the data from studies with respect to the incidence and risk factors for postoperative VTE among cases with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for papers containing the key words "venous thromboembolism", "postoperative", "postoperation", "ovarian neoplasm", "ovary neoplasm", "ovarian cancer", "ovary cancer", and "cancer of ovary". Studies selection, data extraction, quality assessment of eligible studies were performed independently by our different reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine postoperative VTE incidence and risk factors in women with EOC. Sensitivity analysis were used to verify the robustness of the results of meta-analyses if necessary.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence for postoperative symptomatic VTE was 3% (95% CI, 0.03-0.04) and for postoperative symptomatic as well as asymptomatic VTE was 8% (95% CI, 0.07-0.09). The presence of history of VTE (OR, 2.37), advanced-stages (OR, 2.35), high complexity of surgery (OR, 2.20), clear cell carcinoma of ovary (OR, 2.53) and residual disease>1 cm (OR, 2.57) significantly increase the likelihood of having postoperative VTE. Other risk factors for postoperative VTE in EOC patients were BMI>30 (OR, 1.58), per 10-years increase in age (OR, 1.22), ASA score>2 (OR, 1.45), ascites (OR, 2.07), the diameter of residual disease is between 0 cm to 1 cm (OR, 2.06) and smoking history (OR, 1.54).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that VTE, especially subclinical VTE, is a prevalent complication in postoperative patients with EOC. History of VTE, advanced FIGO stages, high complexity of surgery, obesity, older age, ascites, higher ASA score, smoking history and suboptimal debulking are associated with this increased incidence of postoperative VTE among patients with EOC. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020209662.

End-of-Life Care Provided for Cancer Patients: A Metasynthesis Study

In the health care setting, and especially in cancer patients nearing the end of life, administrators, medical staff, patients, and families face challenges of a social, legal, religious, and cultural nature in the process of care. The present study aimed to perform a metasynthesis of qualitative studies conducted on providing end-of-life care for cancer patients. The present metasynthesis was conducted using Sandelowski and Barroso's method. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases, from the inception to date, and a total of 21 articles were identified as eligible for inclusion in the study. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) criteria were used for assessing the articles, and data were analyzed by the subject review. Six themes were extracted for end-of-life care including psychological support, palliative support, educational-counseling support, spiritual support, preferential support, and supportive interactions, each comprising a number of categories. The most frequently mentioned categories were high-value care (67%) and adaptive acceptance (57%). The findings of this metasynthesis support the view that nurses are moral agents who are deeply invested in the moral integrity of end-of-life care involving assisted death. The present study showed that providing high-value care and facilitating adaptive acceptance are important constituents of a holistic strategy for providing end-of-life care to cancer patients.

Progress in the study of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increased medical costs in tumor patients. In the current review, we summarize the progress made in the study of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

By searching cancer-associated venous thromboembolism-related literature on PubMed, the epidemiology, pathological mechanisms, risk factors, risk prediction models, and prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism were reviewed.

RESULTS

The pathophysiological mechanisms of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism are multifactorial. Various blood cell counts (such as platelets and white blood cells) and biomarkers (such as D-dimer and sP-selectin) were considered predictors of thrombosis in cancer patients and were incorporated into the venous thromboembolism risk stratification models. Thromboprophylaxis is currently recommended for all hospitalized cancer patients. In addition, outpatient thromboprophylaxis can be used for selected high-risk patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin was the preferred treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but some issues arose in the long-term treatment. In this case, direct oral anticoagulants were a treatment option for tumor patients. The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant in treating cancer patients is not inferior to low-molecular-weight heparin, but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Therefore, there were concerns regarding their safety.

CONCLUSION

Since thrombocytopenia, thrombosis recurrence, and bleeding are common in tumor patients, the selection of anticoagulants in this circumstance is a considerable challenge for clinicians.

Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in endometrial cancer

Background

Venous thromboembolism (vte) in malignancy is associated with poor outcomes. We conducted a retrospective review of vte in patients with endometrial cancer to characterize the vte incidence, identify factors that contribute to vte risk, and compare survival outcomes in patients with and without vte.

Methods

A retrospective chart review identified 422 eligible patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer (1 January 2014 to 31 July 2016). The primary outcome was vte. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors for vte; significant risk factors were included in a multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates are reported, and log rank tests were used to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves. Risk-adjusted estimates for overall survival based on vte were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The incidence of vte was 6.16% overall and 0.7% within 60 days postoperatively. Non-endometrioid histology, stages 3 and 4 disease, laparotomy, and age (p < 0.1) were identified as factors associated with vte and were included in a multivariate analysis. The overall death rate in patients with vte was 42% (9% without vte): hazard ratio, 5.63; 95% confidence interval, 2.86 to 11.08; p < 0.0001. Adjusting for age, stage of disease, and histology, risk of death remained significant for patients with a vte: hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 4.42; p = 0.0271.

Conclusions

A method to identify patients with endometrial cancer who are at high risk for vte is important, given the implications of vte for patient outcomes and the frequency of endometrial cancer diagnoses. Factors identified in our study might assist in the recognition of such patients.